The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutA 00-09Full Precision : No Last bill Last charge 11/10/00 Last payment / / Amount $0.00 Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 10/30/00 Diana / P 0.50 29.50 #33012 Processing 59.00 TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 0.50 TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS TOTAL NEW CHARGES PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 11/02/00 Deposit - Receipt 418909 (300.00) 03/12/01 Refund/Claim Form to Auditor 270.50 TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS NEW BALANCE TOTAL NEW BALANCE $29.50 $0.00 $29.50 ($29.50) $0.00 (� EDate 03/12/01 Development Services Depart3leint D E C V , Time 11:08 am Applicant Billing Worksheet Page 1 MAR 12 2001 A 00-09 * John & Sharon Byrne 3336 Keefer Road Chico, CA 95973 BUTTE COUNTY COMMISSION In reference to A 00-09 AIRPORT LAND USE Rounding None Full Precision : No Last bill Last charge 11/10/00 Last payment / / Amount $0.00 Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT TOTAL 10/30/00 Diana / P 0.50 29.50 #33012 Processing 59.00 TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES 0.50 TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS TOTAL NEW CHARGES PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 11/02/00 Deposit - Receipt 418909 (300.00) 03/12/01 Refund/Claim Form to Auditor 270.50 TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS NEW BALANCE TOTAL NEW BALANCE $29.50 $0.00 $29.50 ($29.50) $0.00 • COUNTY OF BUTTE - Oroville, California GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT: John & Sharon Byrne ADDRESS: 3336 Keefer Road CITY & STATE: Chico, CA 95973 DATE OF CLAIM: February 5, 2001 IMPORTANT.• SUBMIT CLAIM TO DFPARTMFMT rnnnc no ccctir�cc, SEE INSTRUCTIONS DATE " VI V fILV Cfv7CJIL/C DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY AMOUNT 2-5-01 Refund of Unused Fees for File No. A 00-09 $270. 50 TOTAL $270. 50 I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this claim is true and correct as stated. H - Dated this S — day of�� '—' `� 20r I, at 04r, -L,,-4--L -' ,Calif. gr6, a e of Claimant .. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above ave been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation [ I or Specific Board Approval [ ] (Check one) for the same. �+ r Dated this 7 day of C . 20 �E_L , at Calif. De artment Head or Authorized Der)uiy De t. Code .Ex . Code PAYABLE FROM FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - AUDITOR'S USE ONLY DEPT. & SUB. PROJ. SUB. OBJ. CLAIM NO. INV. NO. INV. DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. • . ��.. � _...- ffa ito county •- V LAND 'OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY ray.. c DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE ' • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 www.buttecounty.net February 5, 2001 John & Sharon Byrne 3336 Keefer Road Chico, CA 95973 RE: ALUC File No. A 00-09 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Byrne: The total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application is $29.50. Please sign, date, and return the enclosed claim form to this office. Once we receive the claim form, we will then process your refund in the amount of $270.50. Deposit on 11-2-00, Receipt No: 18909 $300.00 Mapping $ 29.50 Total $ 29.50 Refund Due $270.50 Should you have any questions, please contact Brian Larsen at 538-7601 Monday through Friday, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m: Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services TAP:jb Enclosure February 5, 2001 John & Sharon Byrne 3336 Keefer Road Chico, CA 95.973 RE: ALUC File No. A 00-09 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Byrne: The total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application is $29.50. Please sign, date, and return the enclosed claim form to this office. Once we receive the claim form, we will then process your refund in the amount of $270.50. - Deposit on 11-2-00, Receipt No. 18909 $300.00 Mapping $ 29.50 Total $ 29.50 Refund Due $270.50 Should you have any questions, please contact Brian Larsen at 538-7601 Monday through Friday, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services TAP:jb Enclosure Count LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH. AND BEAUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397. TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net John & Sharon Byrne 3336 Keefer Road Chico, CA 95.973 RE: ALUC File No. A 00-09 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Byrne: The total cost for the processing of the above -referenced application is $29.50. Please sign, date, and return the enclosed claim form to this office. Once we receive the claim form, we will then process your refund in the amount of $270.50. - Deposit on 11-2-00, Receipt No. 18909 $300.00 Mapping $ 29.50 Total $ 29.50 Refund Due $270.50 Should you have any questions, please contact Brian Larsen at 538-7601 Monday through Friday, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services TAP:jb Enclosure COUNTY OF BUTTE Oroville, California GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT: John & Sharon Byrne ADDRESS: 3336 Keefer Road CITY & STATE: Chico, CA 95973 DATE OF CLAIM: February 5, 2001 IMPORTANT SEE INSTRUCTIONS SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GnnnS nR SFRVICFS CYVRFI/FFzSFgnF= DATE DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY AMOUNT 2-5-01 Refund of Unused Fees for File No. A 00-09 $270. 50 TOTAL $270. 50 I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the. services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this claim is true and correct as stated. Dated this day of 20 _ , at Calif. Signature of Claimant I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above have been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation [ ] or Specific Board Approval [ ] (Check one) for the same. Dated this day of 20 _ , at Calif. Department Head or Authorized Deputy Dept. Code Ex . Code PAYABLE FROM FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - AUDITOR'S USE ONLY DEPT. & SUB. PROJ. SUB. OBJ. CLAIM NO. INV. NO. INV. DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. Application Summary Checklist E!TApplication Photocopy of deposit check received in ' M Utes//Staff Report documenting Commission findings 0 Agenda//Hearing Notice (if published) CLOSED FILES: EI�Billed out 0 Received Check dSent them Refund or 0 Check box if County-initiated—"Exempt from fees" K:\Planning\ALUC\BILLINGS\Application Summary Checklist.doc I� 1 P►-yj UPM p �- Dar 0 All BUTTE -COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION ,Minutes of November 15, 2000 2. ALUC File No. A00-09 Consistency Finding for John and Sharon Byrne — Tentative Subdivision Map APN 007-260-081 & 082: Mr. Sanders presented the staff report. He stated that this item is a consistency review of an application to divide 11.1 acres into 11 parcels of (1+ acres each) for single family dwellings. The property is located at the southwest corner of Eaton Road and Godman Avenue, Chico, south of the Chico Municipal Airport. Staff recommendation was that ALUC find the project consistent with the 1978 Chico Municipal Airport CLUP as amended on October 21, 1998, and December 29, 1999. Chair Rosene opened the hearing to the public. . Mr. Fred Gerst asked whether this project, in compliance with the proposed CLUP, would fulfill the open space criteria set forth. Mr. Sanders responded affirmatively, stating that 10% would equal roughly one acre. Chair Rosene then closed the hearing. It" was moved by Commissioner Harp, seconded by Commissioner Wallrich, and unanimously carried to find ALUC File No. A00-09 Consistency Finding for John and Sharon Byrne — Tentative Subdivision Map (APN .007-260=081 & 082),' -consistent it with the 1978 Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport;- as _ amended on October 21, 1998, and December 29, 1999. Theproject—was"app"roved with the followirig= The proposed development could be considered as infill creating 11 parcels of one acre in size. This would: a. Reduce the overall number of dwellings; b. Be more consistent with surrounding parcel sizes; C. Not significantly impair the operations at the Chico Municipal Airport; and d. Not subject any people to unreasonable noise or safety risks Associated with aircraft operations. 2. The Draft CLUP currently being considered would allow, as infill Development, the proposed lot configuration and density. B. Approval of the project without implementation of the requirements below would necessitate the adoption of Overriding Findings by a 2/3 vote of the governing body. Overriding Findings by the governing body can only be made based on substantiated facts and must be supported by new, substantial, factual evidence introduced into the public record that the proposed action is consistent with the. State Aeronautics Act as stated in Section 2167.0. Overriding Findings cannot be adopted as matters of opinion,, heresay, or on the unsubstantiated fears and desires of the governing body. 1. A condition shall be required as part of the subdivision, map stating that prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the property owner shall sign an avigation easement granting to the City of Chico the right of continued use of the Chico Municipal Airport in the airspace above the proposed parcels and acknowledging any and all existing or potential airport operational impacts. 0 Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes. of Meeting of November 15, 2000 8 Page 2 ■ 0. AGENDA ITEM - F.2. TO: Honorable'Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: ALUC Staff DATE: November 8, 2000 ITEM: ALUC File No. A00-09 Consistency Finding for John and Sharon Byrne - Tentative Subdivision Map, APN 007-260-081 and 082 • A consistency review of an application to divide 11.1 acres into 11 parcels of (1+ acres each) for single family dwellings. The property is located at the southwest corner of Eaton Road and Godman Avenue, Chico, south of the Chico Municipal Airport. FOR: Airport Land Use Commission Meeting of November 15, 2000 SUMMARY: Staff recommends ALUC find the project consistent with the 1978 Chico Municipal Airport CL UP as amended on October 21, 1998, and December 29, 1999. ANALYSIS: The site is located approximately 1 mile south of the Chico Municipal Airport at the southwest corner of Eaton Road and Godman Avenue. It is in the unincorporated area and is under the County jurisdiction. The current General Plan land use designation is Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoning is Suburban Residential (SR). The property can potentially be developed at 6 dwelling units per acre if community sewerage service is available. Without sewerage, the density is restricted to 1 dwelling unit per acre because of the Chico Area Nitrate Action Plan. According to the 1999 Chico Airport Land Use Plan amendment, Safety Zone Map "6-1," the property is located at the farthest point from the runway at the very edge of zone 6. The east third of the project site is in Safety Zone 6 - Traffic Pattern Zone and the westerly two-thirds is in a Safety Zone 7 - Airport Area of Influence (refer to Exhibit D). The allowed density and development limitations for both Safety Zones are listed below: • MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE DENSITY• 1978 Chico Municipal Airport CLUP as amended on December 29,1999 No. Safety Zone People per Dwelling Units per Acre Acre/Criteria 6 Traffic Pattern Zone 100 / CDHIL 1 2.5 acres EKM 7 Airport Area of Influence No limit . / CDHL 4 1* EKM *The minimum parcel size is 8,000 square feet. 0Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission 0 According to the above table, residential development in zones 6 and 7 is subject to a number of conditions and criteria as follows: Criterion."E": Residential development shall not occur in a noise level greater than 55 dB CNEL-. Criterion "K": Density bonuses are prohibited. Criterion "M": - Second dwelling units are prohibited. The proposed project will develop at a density of approximately one dwelling unit per acre. This density is consistent for the portion of the project in Safety Zone 7, but is inconsistent for the easterly portion f the project area which is within Safety Zone 6. The easterly portion of the project site is also within an over -flight protection zone `B" which permits multiple family dwellings but no new single family structures. The proposed project is, therefore, inconsistent with the over -flight protection zone provisions. This project is a good example of the difficulties that could arise when a relatively small parcel is split by two different compatibility zones, particularly in and urban area. The surrounding parcels are primarily one-half acre in size. The 1999 Airport Environs Plan dictates that approximately 4.5 acres of this 11 -acre parcel cannot be developed to a density greater than one dwelling unit per 2.5 acres while the remaining 6.5 acres of the site can be developed at 4 dwelling units per acre, a 10- fold difference. Staff views this as an infill project. As such, the proposed layout appears to be a good compromise. Retaining two 2.5 -acre parcels in this location is not critical to -the safety or continuing operation of the Chico Municipal Airport. The proposed parcels sizes will be more consistent with the surrounding lots than having a group of 8,000 square foot lots and a couple of 2.5 acre parcels. Consistency with the draft 2000 CLUP: New Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUPs) have been prepared for.all public use airports in the county. They are currently in draft form and have not yet been adopted. However, a series of public hearings have taken place on the plans and amendments made to address local concerns. Though not final, the CLUPs are close to being adopted. For this reason, an analysis of the project consistency with the proposed CLUP, is warranted. The Draft CLUP shows this parcel in Compatibility Zone "C-2." The property immediately north of this site is in a C-1 compatibility zone and includes the 83 -acre parcel owned by Greg Webb. The "C-2" zone has a density recommendation of 4 dwelling units per acre or more. As proposed, the project does not meet the minimum. density requirement. However, this property appears to be eligible for consideration under the infill policies contained in the plan. For residential development, if a parcel is between 10 and 20 acres, the infill density can not be greater than double the density allowed by the primary compatibility criteria. For the "C-2" zone, this means that infill development cannot be greater than 8 dwelling units per acre. In this case, the proposed development is less than 8 dwelling units per acre and meets the infill policy. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 2 The project site is not in an area that has significant safety or noise issues. The primary issue in compatibility zone "C" is annoyance from aircraft overflight. From a noise perspective, The C-2 zone calls for higher residential densities so that the resultant ambient noise levels will be higher than the background noise from aircraft over -flight. However, this particular site already has small lot subdivision surrounding it on three sides and is adjacent to Eaton Road. Eaton is planned to be a 4 -lane arterial in the future. Once this road is widened, traffic noise will fa'r'surpass aircraft noise for this area. The ambient noise for the proposed parcels will be higher than that of a 1 -acre lot subdivision in amore rural residential environment such as the North Chico Specific Plan. Airspace Protection and Safety: The topography of the site is generally level. The site elevation is approximately 178 feet above sea level. The project site is located under the horizontal surface which has an elevation of 388 feet above sea level. With approximately 210 feet between the ground and horizontal surface, there shouldn't be an airspace conflict for single family residences. The execution of an avigation easement is recommended to protect future airport operations. The 1978 CLUP for the Chico Municipal Airport, as amended on October 21, 1998, contains diagrams which depict the locations of potential aircraft -related accidents for the facility based on general accident scatter information presented in the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook (refer to Exhibit D - CIC -17). The highest concentration of both departure- and arrival -related aircraft accidents takes place within the Runway Protection Zone and Approach Surface. Due to the project site's location at the edge of the airport area of influence, off to the side and approximately 6,000 feet away from the southerly end of runway 31 R, the risk of aircraft -related accidents is not considered significant for the residential density proposed in the CLUP. Environmental Documentation: No environmental documentation has been prepared for this project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission find ALUC File No., A00-09 (John and Sharon Byrne Tentative Subdivision Map) consistent with the 1978 Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the Chico Municipal Airport, as amended on October 21, 1998, and December 29, 1999. Exhibits: A: Findings B: List of References C: Tentative Subdivision Map D: Project Location illustrated on Chico Municipal Airport -Airport Environs Plan Map and 1999 CLUP Density Criteria • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission t 3 • EXHIBIT A BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION . CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR: ALUC File No. A00-09: John and Sharon Byrne Tentative Subdivision Mapes APN 048-020-061 (ptn.) and 100 (ptn ) The Airport Land Use Commission has prepared the following findings based on data contained in the 1978 Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the Chico Municipal Airport, as amended on October 21, 1998, and December 29, 1999, the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, and the Butte County Airport Facilities Manual. These data are based on the findings of a number of studies, documents, and reports generated by individuals, firms, and agencies recognized as having expertise in the field of Airport Land Use Planning and land use compatibility (refer to Exhibit B, List of References). ' The following findings have been prepared at the direction of the ALUC and are .for the consideration of the Lead Agency (County of Butte) when making a decision on the project. SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS A. No environmental documentation was submitted ' at the time of project review. SECTION 2: CONSISTENCY FINDINGS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT A. Although the project is not completely consistent with the 1978 Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) for the Chico Municipal Airport, as amended on October 21, 1998, and December 29, 1999, the project can be found consistent with the operations of the Chico Municipal Airport based on the following findings: 1. The current CLUP would permit 27 dwelling units. Twenty six units would be allowed on the 6.5 acres of the site located in Safety Zone 7 and 1 dwelling unit on the 4.5 acres located in the Traffic Pattern Zone. The surrounding parcel sizes are predominately less than 1 acre in size. The proposed development could be considered as ill creating 11 parcels of one acre in size. This would: a. Reduce the overall number of dwellings; b. Be more consistent with surrounding parcel sizes; C. Not significantly impair the operations at the Chico Municipal Airport; and • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 4 d. Not subject any people to unreasonable noise or safety risks associated with aircraft operations. 2. The Draft CLUP currently being considered would allow, as infill development, the proposed lot configuration and density. B. Approval of the project without implementation of the requirements below would necessitate the adoption of Overriding Findings by a 2/3 vote of the governing body. Overriding Findings by the governing body can only be made based on substantiated facts and must be supported by new, substantial, factual evidence introduced into the public record that the proposed action is consistent with the State Aeronautics Act as . stated in Section .21670. Overriding Findings cannot be adopted as matters of opinion, heresay, or on the unsubstantiated fears and desires ofthe governing body. 1. A condition shall be required as part of the subdivision map stating that prior to the issuance of a Building Permits, the property owner shall sign an avigation easement granting to the City of Chico the right of continued use of the Chico Municipal Airport in the airspace above the proposed parcels and acknowledging any and all existing or potential airport operational impacts. El *Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 5 EXHIBIT B- List of References Data supporting the ALUC's findings have been generated from studies and reports prepared by recognized professionals and agencies with expertise in Airport Land Use Planning and land use compatibility. These include, but are not limited to: R. Dixon Speas Associates - Prepared Butte County Airport Facilities Plan and Map of FAR Part 77 Surfaces for the Chico Municipal Airport. Caltrans Division of Aeronautics - 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. Hodges and Shutt -Prepared accident scatter data presented in Chapter 8 of the 1993 Airport Land . Use Planning Handbook. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies (1993) - Prepared accident scatter data presented in Figure 9E on page 9-13 of the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission 0 6 Tim 02 ..447.1-0 0449.66 V,� r FLOW t X141:. + + aab.U�' g4� 07 0-0.0 0-0.0 �-rO - _ _ _ \ 4930.• _ >*+s9t7- - ZA 4'9.63-��T%46. 49.63 ,49.66 449.20 181 b' 449'k�-.- O E 323 316' \ 449. _ - - \ - - - \ - - - - _ - . .._ . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. ... _ - ♦ 9 +450-31 SPOT ELEVATION \ 4 52 \ \ \ \ + 448.73 K \ +\ \ \ � ♦` � 20' PROPOSED PS.E. 55' SEPTIC TANK SETBAG• 4 .001 449.71 - ' 449.9 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT + 449.02 50' SEPTI \ � "CC "\ C TANK �� TBK � O ' \ . 50' PROPOSED EASEMENT \ sp \ \ LOT '1 � +S v. ,rl, EXISTING TREE .. \\ \\ \\ LOT 1. IDI+ ACRES +1-49.24 +448.92► 44 IDI+ ACRES p i _9. LOT 8 \\ \\.4,50\(-,\,4 \ \ +450.57 =G00 ��= =r • 7TE5T HOE a TEST: E _9' �S,__5 y� �o �\ 41-9.67 O EXI5nN5 HELL \ •) - I1.01+ A%\R05 \\ 450�0.78 449.09 9 +449.46 � � \ • TEST HOLE (SOIL PROFILE) L3A:L= _r \ \\ F-XISTI146 MOBILE HOME . .6 \ NEST HOLE TO BE REMOVED _ \1150.67 \ R50 \R.O 4 .3 _ 450. 1 + +450.31 \\ ^�- R40 151- \ ♦ 18' 1b�' ♦ +449.51 EXISTING SEPTIC6 \ \ + 449.11- /s \449.24 TO BE', (\ \ \ ABANDONED 449.56 +41-9.1-2 30' 0.3 \ \ 1� \ (�J WELL \ 1... \. +�i50.88 TEST HOLE . -:449.6 2 R20' R36' \. ; 5 TEST HO'E IDIt AGRE9 + 4 WELL SETBACK - \ PZ0 �- PROPOSE'D .. LOT 6 =E 1-56 t;S� BLE PROPOSED (TYPICAL) \ :(O1- ♦l HYD IDI+ AC.RJ:6 a� HYD 60' R.O56au USABLE S= �. �4'01 \ '� R.20'� .W. ,��gg0.13 " .TREE +451. \ SCALE I" FRZBWO, `Lol Tp e. 36' TREE +45() /R20 O 10" TREE / Xy S� oL�•\. \ 0 \ TEST HOE49.52 D '. + 449.69 , '1 \ HOLE* LOT $ CO\ \ PRO.�GT \ LOT 4 l 45TEST 2 ` ��- / bI bDii5o SF LOCATION -7 9 V. IDIt AGREE ' ro / Tt) .E E3� USABL: SF \ O 0• + 449.28 \ S \ `50' SEPTIC TANK SETBACK (E) WELL p`P � � 50' SEPTIC TANK SETBACK / O moo, \ - - - - - - _ - as 50' SEPi1G TANK SETBACK _ \ EXISTING' SEPTI - - - - - 60' RO1M. O 45 7 EAST EATv" AOAD \ ABTANDONED \ - �I/ v� �, TEST HOE 448.86\ 45.76 \ EXISTING \ - _ _ _ / I + / $ \ HOME TMOBILE O BE-�451.19GL R0 51.0 / �. `�\ ��- / 451.8 / \ + 449.49 + 448.86 2B,\\ aid '6 •r / , 4 > - ` \/gq,\1. X - 4 50.41 \\ \\\\\ 4 ''� b►/ ' - - \i �! iEf - - 'TEST HOLE / \ LAT 10 .._ 45 �p�'( 453.24 - \ ABLE SF O•. / 1.01+ AGRE'3 '� - O \ , 4,43 32' 1REe� \ 20' EXISTING _ - - ` / / 10551 U5ABLE 5FI - 4gZ28 - - WEl-1- 0.59 I \ \ INA6E EASEMENT v I WELL 451.81 \DO I 1.67 I \ T6 SUiDAD DITCH 7 < \ 451.86 O 1 1453.81 . 350.50E \ / 1 �:•: I\ +:.451\50 fo \1\ \ I E�CI5TIN6 EXISTING 4.18.84 / \1 / HOUSE•... .�' SEPTIC \ / GENERAL NOTES VICINITY MAP � Q�► \ \I / \,.<i 449.51 \\ / / +/ O \ l y., \ 449.84 OWNBZ, JOHN 1 SHARON BYRNE (Fa WELL I i 454.27, 42' TREE \ 5595 KEEFER ROAD % 49.83 \ (0 ) GA 95913 \ EXIST ,s \ O (590)510-OR2 �• TYPE 8' A 1-. / ♦ 451.5 POND - - _ - _ - \' (E) WELLS O _ ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER, 001 -X60 -061 29' It�ROVED ROADWAY 6" CL Z A" BABE ' ♦ t a5i.56 45� • - - i fj Orn - 260 - 062 corn TED TO as% `pj - - EyT N. FASTING L.OT r ' / �� ZONING- SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL RELA VE COWACTION \ J1 449.8 \ \450.8@ ''., HOUSE NOT INCLUDED IN. \ GENERAL PLAN, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL s' -o• SLOPE 2. I VNXSS SPEGFI® \ ILL SLOPES SMALL BE :iiJBDIVIStON FTi¢AGK WALKED IAI / K^TeR SUPPLY- CALIPORNIA WATER SERVICE C01- SLOPE 2% SLOPE 2% / ~- -_ • \ 449.22 SE►VAfaE DISPOSAL. SEPTIC TANKS TERRAIN, FLAT (EJ WELLS FLOOD ZONE ■ x EARTI6YORK SMALL GONPORM TO CHAPTER 600 9 WTieE SHAG Town RATIONS e L 19LL \ii I I 49.96 O O FLOOD PANEL «o6007c054oc,, FLOOD DATE Ob - TOP 03 I RELEETATIVE BI{gLL BE cor•PACTeD TO .#.♦\ 1\ TO THE CUL-DE SAG EN&Tk ON TENTATIVE VE 5UBD I V I I 87i RB.ATVE coT-pAcnoN ,!4 / 1 5 ON Mf \ REOUIREMENT AND A DEFERRED ROAD IMPROVEMENT ASREEIENr LOT 8 AND A PORTION OF LOT 7 MTAIIATWN Or KAY DALES OR OTHER LAOSION - - \449.98 / /.- - \ \ IF NEEDED ON EATON ROAD. . CONTROL /4ABUREB MAY OE M06OU ED R DIReGT$7 \ \ •, ., OF SECTIONS Q AND 10, DY TiC Dt�T. of PlBL lc WORKS OR EN61►er<R V (E) WELL T. 22 N., R. I W., M.D.B. d M. / 22' IN MAP PREPARED BY, .JOHN BYRNE BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PROPOSED ROADWAY SECTION (RS -3-B, LOCAL ACCESS ROAD) 59' BACK k 9.94 APPLICANT RECEIPT 1890 9 RECEIVED FROM ISSUED BV 1 �El ,I Date of Application Property Owner' Phone Number S 7'C)' - Mailing Address Agent (if any) - Phone Number Mailing Address Street Address �` - �S O'. DCS'//U �• C /2C L L� (�OT•t.� 6� L�iQT/ �� p( C1'��>/liiltJi4yE.) ' f Assessor's Parcel No: 00-7`200 OkI �l 08"L'' parcel Size, -7-4 C, Subdivision Name ; Zoning , r Lot Number ' Classification Existing Land_ Use ��.�' . /Z ��J� �C� S _'� •,y�72se /��-/�>-�iti��iL��—S _ (describe) _ 64 .1 T -• � �. • '+: Vit. +. ., � • ~r�,� ` , .. I ........................................... ....................................................... ............................................ B .. . ........ ...... " WW. Proposed Land'Use Date Received Type of project Agency Na ' me ' (describe) El Zoning Amendment or Variance Staff Co'ntact a, Subdivision Approval For R'e'sidential Uses Number"'of Parcels or Units on'Site (includin9 'secondary units) '/0 Phone Number `7 Or— -Use Permit For Other Land Uses" Hours of Use Number of Maximum Number + e -0, Public Facility ''People Other on Site.-.. Method of Calculation Height Data Height abov6 Ground of Tallek Object (including antennas,& trees) . Signature• ' Date' Highest Elevation (above sea,level) Of Any*Objpct or Terrain on Site ft..... % Y� Flight Hazards Does thepro ject O'�e any characteristics which -could create' 0 Yes EZKO Electrical inter co interference, sing lights, glaire, smoke, or other 'Electrical or vistial-hazaids flight? Does the project have the potential for attracting birds? E]'Yes: l"Zo If yes to either describe ........................................... ....................................................... ............................................ B .. . ........ ...... " WW. ....... ................. ................ .. ......................... ...................... ......... . ....... ............................ ............... ... ...... : ........ ....... ................. ..... .... ................... .............................. ................. ............................... .................. ................ ................. ................ Date Received Type of project Agency Na ' me P. General Plan'-Ame'ndment El Zoning Amendment or Variance Staff Co'ntact a, Subdivision Approval Phone Number `7 Or— -Use Permit Agency s Project No'. -0, Public Facility Other Signature• ' Date' (Xp'pf1cant'or'Ag6 % Y�