Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutALUCR, January 27, 2003 Mary Ellen Miller 1159 - 16th Street Oroville, CA 95965 L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)'538-7785 CERTIFIED MAIL Re: Use Permit UP 03-03, AP 030-200-094, Ms. Miller: Enclosed is your validated Use Permit No. UP 03-03 to allow Use Permit to convert an existing temporary mobile home (ADM 01-06) into a permanent second dwelling,. located on the west side of Sixteenth Street, approximately 300 feet south of Biggs Avenue, at 1159 16th Street, Oroville. Identified as APN 030-200'-094. County Supervisor District 4. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Roni Thornton Office Assistant H Enc. 4 , cc: Land Development Division'(g) Building Division (y) Environmental Health (p) Department of Forestry (gld) `ALae /� USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION JAN 2 7. 2003 DATE: (Certified Mail Rec.) .UP 03-03 PERMIT NO. r 030-200-094 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: "Mary Ellen Miller is hereby granted a Use Permit to convert a temporary mobile home into a permanent second dwelling on APN 030-200-094 at 1159 16`h Street, in Oroville. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit constitutes cause' for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Sec. 24-45.65. 2: Unless otherwise provided for in a special condition to this Use Permit, all conditions must be completed- prior to or concurrently with the establishment of the granted use. The use granted by this permit must be established within two years of the date of approval. 3. Minor changes may be approved administratively -by the Directors of Development Services, Environmental Health, or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant, or their respective designee. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division.that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 4. If any use for which a Use Permit has been granted'is not established within two years of the receipt of the Permit by the Permittee, the Permit shall become null and void and reapplication pursuant to Section 24-45 (of the Zoning Code) shall be required to establish the use previously granted under the expired Permit unless, 30 days prior to the expiration date, a request for a one. year extension is submitted to the Planning Commission together with sufficient evidence that the time limits for processing development permits under federal or state regulations require time limits which exceed one year. Upon application, and for good cause by the Permittee, at a public hearing pursuant to Section 24-45.25 above, .the Planning Commission may extend any time limitation previously made a part of any condition to a Use Permit. J 5. The terms and conditions of this Permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. 6. Neither the applicant, nor any agent nor representative of the applicant shall intentionally omit or misrepresent any material fact in connection with the application. Any alleged material misrepresentation shall constitute grounds for the Director of Development Services to commence a revocation hearing, and, if proven to exist, shall constitute sufficient grounds to revoke a Permit. - Conditions of Approval: Planning Division: 1. Development fees for the proposed residential conversion shall be paid prior to the issuance of the Use Permit. The fees shall be those in effect at time of application and shall include, but not be limited to, School Fees, Park and Recreation District fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, Permit and Plan Check Fees,, and Fire Protection Fees. 2. The Facility may not encroach into, under, over, above, or upon any public street in the unincorporated area of the County in the absence of a valid encroachment permit from the County. 3. All outstanding application processing fees shall be paid prior to issuance of the Minor Use Permit. 4. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. California Department of Forestry 5. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with. Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously thereafter. 6. Provide an all weather access of at least 10 foot wide and with a vertical clearance of 15 feet that will accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus to all structures. County Counsel 7. If this entire matter or any finding, action or condition of this matter is appealed to the Board of Supervisors, the applicant or any other developer/operator other than the applicant agrees to indemnify the County of Butte from liability or loss related to "the approval of this project and agrees to sign an indemnification agreement in a form approved by County Counsel before the Board's appeal hearing: 2 �%- 3 I hereby declare under penalty of perjury I have readtheforegoing conditions, they are in fact the conditions which were imposed upon the granting of this use permit, and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. Dated: A plicant NOTE: Issuance of this Use Permit does not waive requirements of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before' starting construction, nor does it waive any other ` requirements. Butte Co my Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division . Building Division Environmental Health Department Butte County Fire_ Department/CDF Assessor Airport Land Use Commission VI11 C USE PERMIT VARIANCE MINOR U.P. ADM.PERMIT PLANNING COMMISS. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OCT 3 0 2002 I] Ed Palmeri City of Chico Planning Division P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927-3420 Re: ALUC consistency, Thoman TSM Dear Ed, ALUC staff has reviewed the above referenced project for consistency with the.2000 Airport Land Use Consistency Plan (ALUCP). Until the City has brought their General Plan into conformity with the 2000 ALUCP, all projects must be reviewed for consistency with the provisions of the Plan. The proposed project is a Major Land Use Action as defined in the ALUCP and must be reviewed by the ALUC. The fee for the review is currently $300.00: An application is attached. The proposed project is located in a Compatibility Zone `132" — Extended Approach Departure Zone. Compatible residential development in this zone is one dwelling unit per five acres. The compatible densities are based on gross calculations.. The proposed land.division exceeds the compatible density and would normally be .incompatible with airport operations. However, the ALUCP has provisions for infill development. Greater infill density is allowed when a property is 10 acres or less in size and is bounded on 65% of its perimeter by similar or more intense development. The actual density allowed is calculated by determining the average density• of all parcels within 300 feet of the subject property: In this instance, the average surrounding density is approximately 4 dwelling units per acre. Assuming the newly created parcels are developed with single family residences, the resulting density of the project will be 2.6 dwelling units per acre, less than the surrounding average density. This proposed density is therefore consistent with surrounding development and can be considered as infill for the. purposed of airport compatibility: If there are any questions regarding this determination please contact me or M.A. Meleka at 538-7601. Sincerely, Craig Sanders Senior Planner .. , ' -.... u tt e our T' I -LAND .• �. - OF NATURAL 'WE'ALTH AND BEAUTY AIRPORT, LAND USE COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 July 30, 2001 Ed Palmeri City of Chico Planning Division P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927-3420 Re: ALUC consistency, Thoman TSM Dear Ed, ALUC staff has reviewed the above referenced project for consistency with the.2000 Airport Land Use Consistency Plan (ALUCP). Until the City has brought their General Plan into conformity with the 2000 ALUCP, all projects must be reviewed for consistency with the provisions of the Plan. The proposed project is a Major Land Use Action as defined in the ALUCP and must be reviewed by the ALUC. The fee for the review is currently $300.00: An application is attached. The proposed project is located in a Compatibility Zone `132" — Extended Approach Departure Zone. Compatible residential development in this zone is one dwelling unit per five acres. The compatible densities are based on gross calculations.. The proposed land.division exceeds the compatible density and would normally be .incompatible with airport operations. However, the ALUCP has provisions for infill development. Greater infill density is allowed when a property is 10 acres or less in size and is bounded on 65% of its perimeter by similar or more intense development. The actual density allowed is calculated by determining the average density• of all parcels within 300 feet of the subject property: In this instance, the average surrounding density is approximately 4 dwelling units per acre. Assuming the newly created parcels are developed with single family residences, the resulting density of the project will be 2.6 dwelling units per acre, less than the surrounding average density. This proposed density is therefore consistent with surrounding development and can be considered as infill for the. purposed of airport compatibility: If there are any questions regarding this determination please contact me or M.A. Meleka at 538-7601. Sincerely, Craig Sanders Senior Planner 12/12/2001 WED 08:23 FAX 530 895 4726 CITY OF CHICO-BUILDING r, I CITY.xCM CO dolt Transmittal Cover Sheet City of Chico Box 3420, Chico, California, 95927® Date: 12/12/1 Time: 8:06 am To: Maleka Butte Co. Planning Fax: 538-7785... From: Patrick Murphy, Senior Phone: (530) 895=4752 Planner Fax: '(530) 895-4726 E-mail: pjmurphy@ci:chico.ca.us RE: Initial Study/ALUC Discussion for Sterling University Housing - GPA/Prezone 01.03 Number of pages including cover sheet: 9 2- Message Maleka- attached is a revised page 21 for the Initial Study For the Sterling University Housing proposal off State Highway 32/Nord Avenue. The Initial Study was sent to the County Planning Department in mid-November. Since the time the Initial Study was prepared, staff has discovered that portions of the subject site are located within ALUC compatibility -zones C and D for the Ranchaero Airport. The revised page, therefore, provides an analysis of the project's consistency with applicable ALUC policies. If you need any additional information, please feel free to contact me at 895-4752. Thank you. p ECE[WE DEC 12 tool BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION 0001/002 f 12/2001 WED 08:23 FAX 530 895 4726 CITY OF CHICO-BUILDING IZ 002 f 00: City of Chico Initial Study Project - General Plan Amendment 01-03/Prezone 01-01/Annexation (Sterling University Housing) Page 21 e. To further reduce interior noise levels of future apartment buildings, the area of bedroom windows facing the tracks should be minimized if possible, with clothes closets being a preferable wall use. MONITORING 1.1: Prior to issuance of building permits, the Community Development Department shall verify that the building plans include measures to attenuate interior noise to an acceptable level. Prior to issuance of: any certificates of occupancy, the Community Development Department shall verify that the required berm and barrier have been installed. With the incorporation of the above mitigation measures in future design of apartment buildings on the subject parcels, noise impacts from the adjacent railroad tracks and vehicles along SHR-32/Nord Avenue will be reduced to a less than significant level. 1.4. Locating medium-high density residential housing on the subject parcels would not result in a significant increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity. Residential uses would likely result in a reduction of on- site noise compared to the uses that could develop under the existing ML prezoning designation. Because there are no sensitive noise receptors in the immediate vicinity of the project site, future noise generated from on-site would be less than signlflcant. MITIGATION: None required. I.S. Although temporary and single noise events will be created during the construction phase, these impacts are considered to be less than significant because they are short-term, and project contractors will be required to comply with the existing noise regulations which limit the hours of construction and noise levels. As a result. temporary .construction noise associated with future development on the project site would be less than significant. 1.6 do T. The project area is not located in proximity to any public or private air strip and isf+ef however. portions MITIGATION: None required. Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than J. Open Space/Recreation: Will the project or its Significant Mitigation Significant No related activities: Impact Incorporated Impact Imp_ act 1. Affect lands preserved under *an open space X contract or easement? 2. Affect an existing or potential community recreation X area? REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CITY ASST. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIR. CITY CHIEF OF POLICE CITY FIRE CHIEF CITY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY ASST. DIR. PUBLIC WORKS CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL CITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR CITY URBAN FORESTER CITY WPCP SUPERVISOR CITY SENIOR DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER SENIOR PLANNER (CURRENT) PRINCIPAL PLANNER PARK DIST &VSJM;AN DISTRICT ANNING DIRECTOR COUNTY ENV. HEALTH DEPT. (CHICO COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DIST COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMM. COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIST. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD UTILITY COMPANIES (PAC BELL; PG&E; CAL WATER) NORTHEAST INFO CENTER CAL TRANS AIRPORT DIRECTOR Other PROJECT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Name/Address:, Rezone 01-05 (Cavaness) 2280 Ceanothus Avenue Assessor's Parcel No. 048-660-002 Project Description: A request to rezone a 0.28 acre parcel from R1 Low Density. Residential to R2 Medium Density Residential. (See attached for complete project description.) Attached is the preliminary data regarding a project which as been submitted to the City of Chico for a discretionary action (Use Permit, Rezone, Subdivision, etc.). An assessment of the potential impacts of the project is being made. Please review and submit comments within ten working days. ■ This item will be on the Planning Commission agenda of TBD ❑ This item will be on the Zoning Administrator agenda of COMMENTS: Thank You Project Planner: Claudia Sigona n SACLAUDIA\GPA-Rezones\Rezone 01-05inf.doc Staff Report Rezone 01-05 (Cavaness) Prepared By: Claudia Sigona, Senior Planner CITYoFCHICO General Information INC. 1872 Applicant: Gerald Cavaness, 4405 Walnut Street, Oakland, CA 94619 Property Owner: Same as above. Purpose: To rezone the subject 0.28'site from R1 Low Density Residential to R2 Medium Density Residential to facilitate construction of a duplex in the rear. Location: . 2280 Ceanothus Avenue Assessor's Parcel No.: 048-660-002 Parcel Size: 0.28 acre (12,375 square feet) Existing Zoning: R1 Low Density Residential Existing Land Use: Single-family Residence General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (Borders Medium Density Residential) Surrounding Land Uses: N Single Family Residential; PV High School S Multi -family Residential E Single-family Residential W Non -conforming Commercial Cabinet Shop; Vacant R1 Environmental Review: Exempt pursuant to CEQA section 15061(b)(3) - General rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. n SACLAUDIA\GPA-Rezones\Rezone 01-05inf.doc L' Project Description r This is a request to rezone a 0.28 acre parcel located at 2280 Ceanothus Avenue, from R1 Low Density Residential (2.01 to 6 units per acre) to R2. Medium Density Residential (4.01 to 14 units per acre) to facilitate future development of the site with a duplex in the rear. The parcel is identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 048-660-002. The subject site is designated Low Density Residential, but the adjacent area to the south is designated Medium Density Residential and includes multiple units on a single parcel as well as multi -family residential (apartments). Other surrounding uses include single family residential to the north and east, and a nonconforming commercial use (a cabinet shop) to the west. Pleasant' Valley High School is located to the north beyond a row of planned development single family homes. The subject site is. presently, developed with a single-family residence on the front of the parcel. At 12;375 square feet, the subject parcel is may be subdivided into two lots under both the existing R1 district and the proposed R2 district. The subject parcel is located within _Compatibility Zone C of the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. r e � r v r r y. ya • i i 1 i - r t.„ a'c'7f�rtnE1'^� TSRU[ r j � 'e -..., ,v? 1"„v- ';L �'�r�, �. �.r xF si- 4 ...��c T3#..r �4+st � .rk `>'✓;� tr' 'r r 4 ,4'� S' ,✓ 4 y � � _ ..-w` S.P � r � ,�. �, r5'� ��..-+wi��rr r,�rt' �'E�'. E'• i T ,�w.�. p �� � T 4"�'r �,` ��Tsr:.�s ,.i � � ft,�''T'ao' < p 't ry.iJY ifs r Y .rr � -"t 6 aa��a�itix 3 �f } r..'�}7 �. '� �� � „$..tF�st�.utr. � 3�t. .r�r•�+ i� .l� r- �i-.� Iagl its ry P • xksxo-' � AMf L y a435R r ! 1 5 7 r r S..F �:�.f_:ir' -✓- �." � � �ra-y< x r .{t'r:. r.Fi .,� i x.Ft ^tM 't 7 y �-.t`'u'" � e •�'- x xY �,� r -" `a. s � � iX 1V 't. a�'t'3r�..-7•;�+ t t. sif i­.77M 't§{htt"�i�, i � ' 4 .�_.,x'j7iP � ci' c } . _ s>�Y.•... tf t'T' � .n j s ,a � fi � 4 �� - e _ .Y$ r7 P�� / �. *�,� � HCl • >°'rL {�."_>'�'�'"t`����. GVJ�. 4 2001 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: Date: October 1, 2001 F�d.E �yy • 6 c®� ■ CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR ❑ CHICO AREA REC..A ARK DIST ■ CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ❑ CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ■ CITY ASST. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 0 COUNTY PLANNING'DIRECTOR ■ CITY CHIEF OF POLICE ❑ COUNTY ENV. HEALTH DEPT. (CHICO ■ CITY FIRE CHIEF ❑ COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DIST ■ CITY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ■ COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMM. ❑ CITY ASST. DIR. PUBLIC WORKS ❑ COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIST. ■ CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL o DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME ❑ CITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR ❑ WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ❑ CITY URBAN FORESTER o UTILITY COMPANIES ❑ CITY WPCP SUPERVISOR (PAC BELL; PG&E; CAL WATER) ■ CITY SENIOR DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER ❑ NORTHEAST INFO CENTER ❑ CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ❑ CAL TRANS ■ SENIOR PLANNER (CURRENT) ❑ AIRPORT DIRECTOR ■ PRINCIPAL PLANNER O Other PROJECT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Name/Address: Use Permit •01-49 (SsCyril) -2956 Cohasset Road Assessor's Parcel No. 048-230-032 Project Description: Request to allow the conversion of an existing residence to a chapel, Sunday school room, office and storage areas. The proposed chapel is 300 square feet. The church is located in ALUC Compatibility Zone B2. Attached is the preliminary data regarding a project which as been submitted to the City of Chico for a discretionary action (Use Permit, Rezone, Subdivision, etc.). An assessment of the potential impacts of the project is being made. Please review and submit comments within ten working days. ❑ This item will be on the Planning Commission agenda of — ❑ This item will be on the Zoning Administrator agenda of October 29, 2001. COMMENTS: Thank You Project Planner: Ed Palmeri Staff Report Use Permit 01-49 (SsCyril) Prepared By: Ed Palmeri, Associate Planner cirYofcHico General Information INC. 1872 Applicant: Timothy Jacobs c/o SsCyril & Methodius Orthodox Church, 564 East Avenue, Chico, CA 95926 Property Owner: Ronald M. and Virginia D. Rome, 564 East Avenue, Chico, CA 95926 _ Purpose: To allow the conversion of an existing residential home to a church and Sunday school, office.and storage areas. Location: 2956 Cohasset Road Assessor's Parcel No.: 048-230-032. Parcel Size: 0.67 acres Existing Zoning: OR Office Residential Existing Land Use: Single Family Residential General Plan Designation: Office Surrounding Land Uses: N Single Family Residential S Single Family Residential E. Single Family Residential IN Single Family Residential, Environmental Review: Categorical exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act, Section. 145303 New Construction or Conversion or of Small Structures. Project Description: UP 01-49 (SsCyril) 2956 Cohasset Road The applicant is requesting approval of a use permit to allow the conversion of a single family residence into a church. The property is located at 2956-Cohasset Road in an OR Office Residential zoning district and, is designated Office on the General Plan, Diagram. The site is 0.67 acres and is surrounded by single family residential uses. The OR district, pursuant to Section 19.44.020 Table 4-6 ALLOWED USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS of the Land Use and Development Regulations allows a church use with approval of a use permit. The site is developed with a 1600 ± square foot single family residential dwelling, setback approximately 50 feet from Cohasset Road, with twelve unimproved parking spaces fronting Cohasset Road. The applicant intends to convert approximately 300 square feet into chapel area. The remainder of the structure will be used for Sunday school and fellowship, office, storage, and bathroom facilities. At this time there are ten members in the church. The project site, is identified in the Butte County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan s • as being in Compatibility zone B2 Airport Extended Approach Departure.Zone. Zone B2 allows for uses with a density up to 50 persons per acre. The church will be limited to a maximum of 33 persons on the site at,any single time. The single family home has been previously used as an office. Ancillary structures on the site include ' a 400± square foot mobile. home located on the northerly property line that is used for storage and a 120 ± square foot tool shed. The site is entirely fenced with a combination of wooden and construction wire fencing. Landscaping includes a variety'of shrubs and flowering plants. There is a large sycamore tree located to the rear of the site. The applicant has indicated that none of the existing landscaping or trees will be removed. SAEP\UP\2001\0149CYRIL\PR0JECT DESC.wpd I;v S NTIER CR \ DIABLOAV& m DRAKE WY A KOVAK CT o M / O < D m cnm -4 Sub'VVt Site RUSHMORE AVE v TURNBRIDGE rl O c qP� CHANCERY LN BG 9� LUPIN AVE 3 r S N_ _ o 200 0 200 Feet, Use Permit 01-49 (SsCyri I) LOCATION MAP s 2956 Cohasset Road Wit- ��r�L f p✓ie�bes)lf� \r e-e,) Ce -tri b� , � S.IIQ BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES .PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Gertrude A. Hon, UP 02-06 DATE: October 4, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen.Betts The Planning. Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to . 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit to allow a dog kennel for the boarding of up to 20 dogs. Waste from the doggs will be disposed of in an on-site septic system. The dogs will be boarded in pens inside an -existing 4.000 square foot agricultural building, with fenced `outside exercise area. on property zoned A-20 kAgdcultural, 20-acreamcelsl located on the south side of Camas Court and the west side of E: 1 az nade, at 4061 Camas Court, Chico., identified as APN 006-680-004. Supervisorial District No. 4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION , _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON February 14. 2002. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN October 182001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: �9E bl r /5.' 4n/ � , (086 - too ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER (FOR OFFICE USE) NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) TELEPHONE ,�wlver RET—PE T (530) OA -5- 7099 LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any ) GENERAL INFORMATION RE UIRED Q OWNER'S NAME APPLICATION REQUESTED [3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TELEPHONE FF [3 MINOR USE PERMIT (.301 % �)Q ADDRESS: CITY, STATE 6i: ZIP CODE , --2oetl LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ZONE PLAN EXISTING LAND USESITE SIZE (m Square Fedor Acres) '� _GENERAL C_nu O!-c�a� �cu-c�no%J �-4 Ae FS DUSTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PR POSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) F7- N /A (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER Mr`PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC M-fROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED [3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDMSION MAP ❑ REZONE O �SE PERMIT I --]TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP [3 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP [3 MINOR USE PERMIT RFE3 E3 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION C3 VARIANCE OCT I ��` i LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION [3MINOR VARIANCE COUNTY [3CERTIFICATE OF MERGER BUTTE 13ADMINISTRATIVE PLANNING DIVISION ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT p OTHER >'= PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) %< f_ - Al — 20 /<ISLVNEL C4P19CITV,G,(%N 7FD OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I A.%t PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION A.W CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE MORwfATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: �� ��/ �l J SIGNATURE: —moo i/ _ r �- ��, , AGENT AUTHORIZATION' To Butte County, Department of Development Services; �T- Print Name of Agint and Phone Number Mai}ing Address . is hereby authorized to process this applicatio for: zf� on my property, idcntificd as Buttc County Asscssor Parccl Numb= 020— / 7?— This Z This Authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of Axhiu%A/Enginee r and Phone Number . Mailing Address Print Name Signature Current fee for this application is $ as of Make check payable to `Butte County Treasurer". Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Taken by Date Received: / Total Amount Received: 10'7.? Receipt No. PlanninE.H. f q f Land Dev. I f O Fire Dept. y 3 ��P Number(s) gal Description /Owners Authorization f%oning Requirements oject Description 1<opies of Plot Plan (2 p ECE�dC 0� • .BUTTE COUNTY COUNTY OF'BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed 0 I O I e / General Information: Name and address of owner, and/or 2. Address of project: 'IV &/ Assessor's Parcel Number:, 1266- (o 66-00N 3. Na .Tb address, and telephone number of person �o be contacted concerning this 4. List and descnbe any other ieliated permits and other public ap� �ov,a�ls required for this project, including th required by city, regional, state�and federal agencies: /I�GNNEL Z -e -4L! 5A- lA/�.� 5. Existing general plan designation: 6. Edsting zoning districtWZ-7TT/P.,' 7. How is land currently used? 1,1- /4e/-> L� 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): A�WNeo Project Description: 9. Site size: �� /Z,P.��CR/I(/EL S'1T� G3VL(,/ �9a (Acres/S. FeE 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes VINO 12. Proposed development schedule 13. Associated projects 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sale area and loading. facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 18. If institutional, Indicate. the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loadinc facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19.. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state thi! and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach a! Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checker yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 2 YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in .scenic views or vistas from existing residential ✓ areas or public lands or roads. 22. Change in.pattem or character of general .area of project ` _ ✓ .23. Significant amounts of,solid waste or litter. _ .i✓ 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ _✓ 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or groundwater quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns., _ _✓ 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. — — 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. _ 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services ✓ (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). _ 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity; oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of.the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements famished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this Initial evaluation to the best of, my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature for K:\FORMS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 3 Ini�-11UI PARKING AND ACCESS ROAD I au�7E C? NiY IM There There is enough space for 6 cars to be parked along the front .of the building. The area is hard pan dirt with a small amount of gravel embedded in it. During the construction of the building there was a problem with heavy trucks sinking in the mud so rock was brought in to firm it up. I have also laid a 3 -inch layer of gravel over the area to prevent dust and mud. The exercise pens are covered with gravel also which eliminates dust and mud. The road to the building is Butte County owned and maintained. It is in very good shape and able to handle the traffic. I anticipate no more than"an average of 15 vehicles per day coming to the facility, which includes a night person and myself. Many of my potential clients are retired and the normal workweek does not affect when they leave on trips, so they leave on days of the week other than Friday the normal drop off day for boarding. This will help to even, out the average number of vehicles coming and going. The building is located towards the front of the parcel so the tenants at the end of the road will not notice the added flow (see enclosed diagram page 9). The road doubles back along the Esplanade and then makes a 90 -degree turn to the right into the orchard. This prohibits people from any excessive speeding when approaching the building. ORCHARD SPRAYING The farmer who works the orchard lives on the other side of the adjacent orchard. He is living in a home he built two years ago surrounded by yet another orchard that he owns. I plan on maintaining a good relationship with him since we will have to work together for the good of my business and also his. He has informed me that he plans on staying in this home and retiring there. I talked to him about the effects to the dogs of the spraying that he does, and he informed me that his dog, who is almost 10 years old, walks behind him as he sprays and has never suffered any ill results. He has told me though, that he would inform me when he was going to spray so that I would have the option of putting the dogs inside of the building. He also informed me that because the orchard is located so close to Shasta Elementary School the sprays that he uses are less invasive then those he uses in the other orchards. He has also told me that he will be spraying in the evening when the dogs will be inside of the building. He does not spray directly around the building because it discolors the building and the owner of the property has asked him not to do it. I intend on informing all of my potential clients of the spraying and what I have been told about any repercussions. DOG CARE/WASTE Dogs that are to be boarded will be housed in 6'x6' chain link kennels. The walnut trees that surround the building shade the ,outside pens. I have also installed freestanding awnings to protect the dogs if it rains and they are outdoors. Someone will be on the premises 24 hours a day for the dog's safety and to allow the dogs to spend as little time in kennels as possible during the night hours. I will be here every day except Sunday when I will be hiring someone to work. I will hire two people to work the night shifts. All dogs will be taken out before sleeping to defecate and urinate. Early the next morning they will be taken out again for the same reason. Should an animal have an l6)• accident the solid waste will be picked up and dumped in the proposed addition to. the septic system, and a clean replacement carpet put in kennel. House pets are usually housebroken and do not like to mess in their environment given the choice. That is why they will be taken out in the late evening to avoid accidents, just as they would be at home. After a client has ended their stay carpet will be cleaned with a machine that I have on the premises. Carpets are cut to fit, in each 61x6' kennel and are backed with rubber. The machine pulls all of the moisture and soil from the carpet into a holding tank on the machine and when it is full it will be dumped into the utility sink in the main kennel room That sink is connected to the septic system. Carpets will be cleaned with an all in one kennel disinfectant, fungicide, cleaner and deodorizer. It is effective against parvovirus, Canine Distemper, Pseudorabies and Newcastle's. The carpet will be rolled up and removed and the floor underneath will be treated the same way. DOG WASTE/OUTSIDE Waste will be picked up throughout the day on an as needed basis. It would cause more clean up if waste was allowed to stay on the ground too long since playing animals might step in it, so it will be picked up at least three or four times during the day. The septic system will be emptied per environmental health requirements. If a dog soils a concrete area the waste is picked up immediately and deposited in a holding can to be deposited onto the proposed septic pad. All dog waste picked, up outside the building will be dumped into the pad described on page 10 and washed into the septic tank NOISE FROM BARKING DOGS There will be occasions when there will be barking dogs. The time they will be the noisiest is when someone drives into the driveway to pick up or deliver a dog. This is not usually the case when someone is driving by. Since some dog's natural instinct is to protect the place they are they bark to notify me that someone is coming. This is not the case with all dogs only .certain breeds. I will always go outside and greet the newcomer, which will probably reassure them that I am aware of the new arrival and in most cases this will stop them. If a dog- is consistently barking for not good reason I will be using training techniques to correct the behavior. I am successful in most cases. If all else fails a barking dog will be put inside of the building, in a kennel, until it calms down. Barking dogs that come here on a regular basis will be subject to behavior modification training until the problem can be corrected. If they are barking here they will also do it at home where it might become an issue with neighbors. As a last resort I have collars that correct this problem and with the owners permission will use them. I don't want to listen to a barking dog anymore than my neighbors do. ALL DOGS will spend the night inside of the building. The outside walls are 12 inches thick, fully insulated and have drywall on them. The inside walls are all 7 inches thick, fully insulated and have drywall on them. Any barking that occurs in the evening hours will be confined to the inside of the building. Dogs usually sleep at night just like people and don't bark unless there are noises outside. Since the building is located away from the street and surrounding buildings are mostly commercial there is no activity at night. The fact that there will be.someone on the site in the evening hours will help to alleviate (7) any distress a dog might experience. When dogs are outside playing during the day they will be occasionally bark during play. The surrounding orchards will muffle'this barking and it is a different barking' than that of a dog that is anxious or alerting you to something. Since someone is outside with the dogs the biggest majority of the time, throwing balls or supervising their play, the barking will be limited. IN CONCLUSION I have tried to anticipate any problems that can arise from housing dog's overnight. I have been researching this endeavor for two years looking for the right site and also contacting other businesses of this kind. I.have risked everything I own, and am already giving all of my time and attention to making sure that his business is a. success and that it run according to any laws or restrictions that might be imposed. I have polled potential clients and found that there is a need for this type of operation. No other kennel in this area offers the benefits I plan on giving such as: I . A kennel with less driving distance. 2. A safe and clean place for dogs to be where a kennel stay won't overly stress them- 3. hem3. Located away from dense residential areas. 4. Peace of mind for those dog owners who wouldn't normally kennel their pets. 5. The daycare may prevent some pet owners from- ,surrendering animals they can't supervise during the day when at work. I have compiled a list of future clients who are anticipating my getting a use permit with the idea that they will be .using .my facility. They are extremely interested in the way I plan to run my business, the location, and the kennel setup. I have worked with the local animal shelter, Butte Humane since moving to this area as a volunteer and also in breed rescue. They have also expressed to me the need for a facility of this kind. I also am very willing to help pet. owners when they are experiencing behavioral problems that if uncorrected might mean giving up their animal. I know that my business would be a welcome addition to the business community of Chico.. Thank your for your consideration. Green Line Subject Parcel 006-680-004 Green Line bards A-20 rchards '' `_:'` j Trailer Park OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 19903. 4, Rt72dll�+'r acl.? udc 140,Al DATE RECEIPT NO. TOTAL' RECEIVED .PUBLIC WORKS LAFCO PLANNING . PUBLIC SALES ENV. HEALTH FIRE NOE/NOD F/G FEE OTHER APPLICANT " RECEIVED F FROM , OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 19903. VERIZON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONTOR CONSISTENCY FINDINGS North East Chico — 65 Heritage Lane, Chico, CA Submitted :To: Butte County Airport Land Use Commission . 17 County Center Drive ..Oroville, CA 95961 Submitted By: Michelle Hightower Kukulica & Associates 1729 Rutan Drive Livermore, CA 94550 (925) 699-1420 September 20, 2001 APPLICATION CONTENTS A. Application Form B. Existing Conditions and Proposed Land Use Descriptions C. Letter of Authorization • D. Site Area Map E. Parcel Map F. Photo Simulations G. Site Plan and Elevations H. Filing Fees ttKa<p 7C WR d 001,91 US Date of Application September 19, 2001 Property Owner John Et Al Cravey/Bidwell Self -Storage Phone Number (562) 693-9825 Mailing Address 65 Heritage Lane Chico, CA 95926 Agent (if any) Michelle D. Hightower/Kukulica & Associates Phone Number (925) 699.1420 Mailing Address 1729 Rutan Drive Livermore, CA 94550 �cirate `scV g4hatio i" , .hr a etstte osth ._, Street Address 65 Heritage Lane, Chico, CA 95926 Assessor's Parcel No. 007.270-022 Parcel Size 1.14 Acres Subdivision Name N/A Zoning Lot Number CC Classification Community Commercial ,r - A K Existing Land Use Self -Storage facility and a telecommunications facility which consists of a 100' monopole and associated equipment. (describe) See Attached. Proposed Land Use A telecommunications facility which involves an 18' extension (approx.) to the existing 100' monopole. (describe) See Attached. For Residential Uses Number of Parcels or Units on Site (including secondary units) For Other Land Uses Hours of Use 24 -Hour Unmanned Facility Number of Maximum Number People on Site... Method of Calculation Height Data Height above Ground of Tallest Object (including antennas & trees) Approx.118'ft. Highest Elevation (above sea level) of Any Object or Terrain on Site ft. Flight HazardsDoes the project involve any characteristics which could create ❑ Yes ■ No Electrical interference, confusing lights, glare, smoke, or othe Electrical or visual hazards to aircraft flight? Does the project have the potential for attracting birds? ❑ Yes ■ No If yes to either, describe MW d� ON Date Received Type of project Agency Name ❑ General Plan Amendment ❑ Zoning Amendment or Variance Staff Contact ❑ Subdivision Approval Phone Number ❑ Use Permit Agency's Project No. ❑ Public Facility ❑ Other Signature6%jJ1J�, Date n (Applicant or Agent APPLICATION ATTACHMENTS A. Existing Site and Proposed Land Use Descriptions Existing Site Conditions The site is located in a commercial district within the city's Community Commercial zone. The property is immediately adjacent to Highway 99 near the Cohasset Road exit. The surrounding uses include commercial retail plazas, small office buildings, fast-food restaurants and gas stations. The existing property is occupied by Bidwell Self -Storage, a self -storage facility comprised of three=two story buildings. The monopole is located in the rear yard, approximately 30 feet from the freeway right-of-way and is surrounded by tall trees and shrubs. The pole is owned and managed by AT&T Wireless Services.. Three additional wireless carriers are presently located on the structure, including AT&T Wireless, Nextel SMR and Ubiquitel. Proposed Land Use Description The project involves the installation and operation of a telecommunications facility for Verizon Wireless at 65 Heritage.Lane, Bidwell Self -Storage in Chico. The proposed facility is a co -location effort on an existing monopole that is 100 feet in height, and presently accommodates three additional wireless carriers. The monopole will be extended by approximately 18 feet to include three -six feet, flush mounted panel antennas for Verizon. The pole extension and antennas will be painted and textured to match the existing facilities. The associated equipment necessary to transmit the signals will be installed inside two nearby storage units. The project is designed to be visually unobtrusive and will blend in'with the environment. Background Verizon Wireless is the largest wireless communications provider in the U.S. with more than 28 million wireless voice and data customers. The company offers innovative, competitively priced voice and data products and services of the highest quality along with quality customer service. Verizon's commitment to provide quality service directly correlates with the need to expand the infrastructure that supports the wireless network. As the number of American households and businesses that use wireless devices continues to increase, the need to build additional cellular sites to complete the network and provide consumers with continuous coverage, network clarity and performance becomes even more essential. Creative and effective cellular site placement is key to Verizon, and individual site locations are selected based on a number of considerations related to topography, proximity to high traffic corridors, and other technical"features. Verizon's goal is to co - locate it's facilities whenever possible to avoid the construction of new monopoles and towers. The facility at Heritage Lane will provide continuous coverage to Highway 99 and the surrounding area. Verizon Wireless Page 3 NE Chico Site Application Site Naate .NEMena PTOpMy ash%gn TBtt;r rhtm j"A utter of Authorization The tnada slgaad is flee owiw of em real propwW qe) do aUd Wow, and hereby suthocizes, comseft wad atm with iCcrimlka A Associams mid'V alzas Vruvieas as Mow L Ex". Oww conm a Sud agrsas that ICub- itm and Amadatee and Varizort Witelae4 its employees, agm end lndepandent among ora ("AWhw=ed Pages") may ee w mpon the PmpaW to Malt sad perm sante or ali attic fopawkig a dvitiea Cftmhted Acdvi W-): Swvays, powdulical soil badap wd. aabaia, Phase I accvirwmeami botmday sways, radio pt's t ad such Aee teats and mopeadow cf the hop" which Varizan WWeP may deem necessary or aft&& Ver= Was 0s agras to be resporeible for =7 and aA cgoet$ reh ad to the Pamitod Acdvidm paaLtdmg WWUGdm as and operetia and removal of wplpmmt ca the PrgmM. a ` Mae. Owner cancers end egress bast the Au6wited pu tilos may mWoe sad Me appliaat an as owner's bdmwto sack log z% am gad fsdasl gevernmoAd sordes vkm Sppvaval Mica& Asrcciata mord Va um Waeiess mmy coaeoider necsu=y or gavateo W'gVrmvalt far zoning vakaves, rezoia1 9 buildbsg permits mad arigt 4 Howavar, if recp�- 'by the Au&wizod Pot ie s, Owner agrees to asserts such aster sad the har doaameais as mw be required by the govatmnattal eusity In quesda n to evidence Ownces causew to the sctkn -%tkh is pgposed to be Ulm. It is un&ntood by bade Kaiotlim and Anamsta( Verizon Warless and thvr lLvAm d that t b aoatsait by Owner/ LwAlad does not coaAibAc a o vaouoaby Owtix/l.andlard to lease or odierwiae convey rigbta to flte Praoonm to Kakuliea and Assoo a W venUtan Wireless, and that such aaave}yintm or lease ow be seeamphshed or faranbmd by separate written armament. Vaelon 1 f0XU to B lwaad M '` C1W01 MY!!W Caemlentla Oaae Kf K4mo Verizon Wireless Proposed Co -location Site - NE Chico a ti ate Ig y o asse _-_,_ aV : i ianzanita' ,' epi_ 991 - ; "9 ` RIYE3 ?,A e-tate Highway 99'1st Ave Exit � �'•:� ate,. � "'xrS. • _y e. VR ;y .1 - _ i -ire •~ `.ss'��•-' xit ti ti �yy oChicoE _SR SR -32 Exit. - 1(•: ''.� 101' i Y�-i'i�`1a Li • a' ` ti, ° �`i.�"� ' >�C\,` ' •''. � ✓-''� ?},-1�'�a ��! �,.,\. j �`� `r � Cyt, 0 mi 02 0.4 Streets98 Copyright m 1988-1997, Microsoft Corporation and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. Please visit our web site at http Imaps.expedia.com.. Page 1 ;J =aton Rd N ? J� C ! . F. �. . _ �. min `J .(mss > ,� - y _ ,..:.- • Sar Ramcn Or o e 375 _-_- i ast Ave ,State Ci Highway 99 East Ave Exit T - — -r La 65Henhage'Lanr�' ?a?r �as:>• ini i Chtco, CA 95926 -- / i• Calla 0a Or `St `fl'-fivva -99� h t Rd Exit a ti ate Ig y o asse _-_,_ aV : i ianzanita' ,' epi_ 991 - ; "9 ` RIYE3 ?,A e-tate Highway 99'1st Ave Exit � �'•:� ate,. � "'xrS. • _y e. VR ;y .1 - _ i -ire •~ `.ss'��•-' xit ti ti �yy oChicoE _SR SR -32 Exit. - 1(•: ''.� 101' i Y�-i'i�`1a Li • a' ` ti, ° �`i.�"� ' >�C\,` ' •''. � ✓-''� ?},-1�'�a ��! �,.,\. j �`� `r � Cyt, 0 mi 02 0.4 Streets98 Copyright m 1988-1997, Microsoft Corporation and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. Please visit our web site at http Imaps.expedia.com.. Page 1 - N o wNZWffA a AVE �. aid 1 NtR is IR i W � � A N � N� I IV C PIPIr.'alwalm.e�c. MIlia al - n' lit xis MAI- Yi e7 I J, 9 .f 1-e NORT"701VAROS REDOING.Ymm Go &,Ma W, CCA-99/CA--?e no CA,- pl. TURN • rw TO LEFT ONTO C4-149 TURN j9UGNWpAy,,nCAyHT TO CONASSET EXIT TOWARDS Sm::&r6iCE wo 8,-, S. TAKE THE RD. FOR - HERITAGE LANE AVWM N LM� ONTO COPASSET DRIVING DIRECTIONS k veri on NORTHEAST, CHICO CO -LOCATE. - 65 HERITAGE 'LANE CHICO, XTHE PR� 6=-C=%Tg 9&'�TTDN AND OP9'lTION OF ICATIONS NETWO&Bl:m EL Tmn"� = mommr MONOPOLE. THE =&,LnW rlg"- AN EXISTING Is 21 212 INSIDE OF STORAGE PROJECT . DESCRIPTI APPLICANT/LESSEE VERZZM WIRELESS 25-1PARKS FDLMORE 0 SDM, CA 9 0 ZONING CA 95630 925-099-14 PROPERTY INFORMATION ARFA OF CONSTRUCTION: 2ar SOr OCCUPANCY 7M. 9 CONSTRUCTION TYPE v CURRENT room*. cmnmtmk ZONT- APPLI-TION j. XX APJL- WY -270-02 WADICAP REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY IS ~NNED AND NOT -FOR ACCESS HUMN CAPPEO UIT PROJECT SUMMARY CA 95926 -- .111:lnp WiMED AND DWALLED IN TME 's' is mc CO TO TONOTHIIN com �221-f 32* =% Of 7- NUI -K EIFi:IRIC CODE 1099 OT AM Im Lock an CODE L4 9. Crrf IL UM==-ZODE.�M IL CODE WP*-Iel-IM 1; LDT/= ORDYWAM CODE 0 ODE COMPLIANCE PNO TRNA 7C - IAA N CC I r C .- IP A L D ES1E6 N PROFESSIONAL2 05 ' sc"ENa =esR0 7 1AN:MIA - 1 PHONFFX- (918) 348-2ilS pLp� .SUITE 205 CIVIL ENGINEER-) =ENTEL.own Ct7- PHONE. FAX - (916) 348-2010 ELEcTRICALENGINEER: 9RC",uE R,SUITE 205 Cr___.__ DHE:(015348-2600 FAx- (918) 348-72510 SURVEYOR: OAVrOIEVA Ise ,%rD ASSOCICES LVC PmNE:- ir rAX- (M) 780-33M N NOTES �EESQ FDO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS coVERITY CONDITIONS ON a Sn'E -6 , T IN No OF ANCIES . ' B MSPONMU - FOR SUM E BEFORE P-CEEDlNC -M THE OM OR NY D PROJECT TEAM GENERAL CONTRACTOR N veri,ln IZON WIRELESS 255 PARKSHORE DRIVE - Om, CALIFORNIA 95630 f-KWL(;.l INFORMATION: NORTHEAST CHICO CO—LOCATE 65 HERITAGE LANE CHICO, CA 95926 BUTTE COUNTY CURRENT ISSUE DATE: 8/10/ 0p /10/0,1 p SSUED FOR: ZONING By; LWISSUEFOR 100% FINAL 07 =SUED FjO&Rj WX REVIEW LANSPREPARED By.=========== LE R %JSCIENUI-L 8 F R 470i ! OSEVILLE ROAD 5 SUM #205 M NORTH HIGHLANDS, CA 95660 8_2600 TEL -916-348-2600 FAX:. 916_3 8_ 1 0 AX:, 916-348-2610 r---- VT:CHK.:!---ApV.:== R.CUNNINGFMM J. PFAFF G. K TITLE SHEET !EETNUMBER: �REVISION:= T-1171- 171 MODEL` Dam DELT TYPE UMPER BOROM�HUMPER . _ANit?IIM ANIE:NNA _. '• SECTOR CENTER AIIMNH MARE/ LENCTHI SIZE CODE . , CO. . EMS 9; Q-. -- ` - � _ EAS . veri on VERIZON WIRELESS 255:PARKSHORE DRIVE , FOLSOM, CALIFORNIA 95630 PROJECT INFORMATION: NORTHEAST CHICO CO -LOCATE 65 HERITAGE LANE CHICO, CA 95926 BUTTE COUNTY URRENT ISSUE DATE: 8/10/01 ISSUED FOR: ZONING EV--'--DATE:----DESCRIPTION:BY: ISSUED FOR Q7 8/10/01 100% FINAL A 07/2501 90% REVIEW ' -PLANS PREPARED BY: T. "� T EIOUNTING 9RACIQT SULTANT: - • t- - _ - - FRBB--t3-89DWy ON is SECTOR N/A _ N - - YFLDW/ _ - N/A .. .. N/A ! .. B' 1XAB ._ N/A .. /A RED: C _ - R S _ N/A LINA N/A N/ B. . ' THIS -LIST' BASIC COMPONENTS ONLY=DIft18Iy[-CONIRACiWSHILL BE _ - - + SHE TDB Y[RDYDC ALL WWRINFMS AND OIWMaM MUM 70 ODIPLEI TIE 110M( DfPIC1FD: .. � . � - - N�� N/A N/A TRfU1 N/A N/A // B. T N/A .. MATERIAL UST .. _ - 1 FR99-,319MI2 s ,_,/S _ ' C , ' T DOWN- TT10MOUNTING BRACXET RAWN BY: CHK.: APV.: A.B.wo-p ANCHOR BOLT D.F. DOAGlAS FIR ' QFlS. PROUD N7YAT C77RCTRT - . . DIA: DIAMETER DIRRRIpRp PSA. POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH - AOG A TOM CABLE. COVER ASSN DIAL. DIAGONAL GPS LCLU-LW) GLUE WUIMTED BEW P.T. - PRESSURE TREATED , 9' e N/A M/A N/A S R.CUNNINGHAM J. PFAFF G. KRALIK CENSURE: . ADD'l ADDITIONAL DINE- DIMENSION. � GIMBAL POSITIONING S^NSTEM PWR � POWEA (CABINET) T N/A AFF. ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR DWG, DRAWING(S), NOR. HEADER CITY. - ilr-Er 218 N/A - , AF.C. ABOVE FINISHED GRADE DWL DOVhl(S) - _ ALAG.L ABOVE GROUND LEVEL . EA, MCR HANGER REF. REFERENCE • N/A R B - T. ALUMINUM NT. ISOLHEIN/A Mai N/A N/A RED/RFD B' T N/A . ALT. ALTERNATE. EL EfVATION . RQNf. RQNFpRCEMpR((INp) EIEC. MXCTRICAI Imo' ' COT'PF7t GROUND BUS RE07). REQUIRED ANT. ANTENNA ElEV. ELEVATOR IN -0 INCH(ES) RGS. RIGID "IVAN = SIEEFl ARCH. ARCHMCf(UR/ �• EN. EDGE N �ALEIc TUBDIG INT. INTERIOR SCK SCHEDULE NSA N/A NSA - AWO AMERICAN WIRE GAIOE ENG. ENCINEFit S SHF SPECIFT . BURNING EO EQUAL AIL LF LIINEABORFEET L (FOOT) SOP SQUARE GTTOTR(s) _ RxBt N/A N/A GRn/ca11 a• s N/A EW, EACH WAY L LONG(nuol ML) SS STAINLESS STEEL F BEAM K ►LIS. MASONRY • STD. STANDARD EIS UCTURAL1-1 / EMSBEW EXP. EXPANSION " MAX. MAXIMUM FRBB-13-984112 F Q 715' /�' �N T T DONN-TILT tlOUMING [IRA00:Tj• M.B. . MACHINE BOLT 1 'TEMP TEMPORARY MLG-PBB-1BBiLIY B R N TINNED APER OQf IDR pp►NR(( HECK MECHA NICAI - ` a BAF BOTTOM OF FOOTING MIRE FAS. FINISUFIOWRON) MFR MANUFACTURER - -N�A _ B' [T 7%C8 N/A N/A 6+ HEEf TITLE: . B/U BACKUP MIK MINIMUM THK 7HICSllT.K TOEN(�N1�L ) •p p/A CAB. CABINET CABINQ F.C. FINISH GRADE - MISC MISCELLANEOUS T/ TDP OF 117-� �• .. . DARY CANT. cv+rl ED nRF,"(m) MIL METAL - .. .MATERIAL LIST, C.I.P. CASs IN p (N) NEW -TYP. TYPICAL EDN. FOUNDATION OF U/C UNDER GMMUNDERWRITERS 'NSA R .v TXC1 N/A. N/A B+ T N/A ANTENNA L CABLE. aR COLING FOAL FACE OF MASONRY NT-& NOT TO SCALE #) NUMBER U -L UNDERWRITERS LAgpRATORY . COL COLUMN FAAI. FACE OF MASONRY D.C., ON CENTER U.NA UNLESS NOTED ORHERM45E SCHEDULE, & FOS. FACE OF WALL V.LF. VERIFY IN FIEU) ' CONK CONC. CONCRETE F.O.W. FACE OF MALL OPNG• OPEMNG PROPOSED W W1DE(W701H) � N/A n CONST- CL2RCONN=ONON� FS =NQ SURFACE PIC PRECAST W7TN1 NI N/A M/A R1R7 N/A " Il/A CRNORANCE/ B+? Il/A ABBREVIATIONS . CONT CONTINUOUS •) FOOTINNQ .ECS P[RSDIIfl p WODO - - _ PENNY (IWLS) G. GAUGE P . PLYWOOD SERVIR 1WF.EP. WEATHERPROOF CPS 11'-3 'N/A TO A . DBL DOUBLE GB7NE'1 . CPS N/A.N/A - ` �" 1/1 CRAY N/A N/A RYSANIENIN[IYOINEAS HEET NUMBER-- REVISION• . DEPT. DEPARf1RpRT CR CROWiH ((CABINET) pRC PRIMARYRADIO CABINE7 - . CL QALVANn D) PSF. POUNDS PER SOLIARE FOOT PLATE ' . CONTRACTOR TO FIELD' VERIFY CABLE LOWS PRIOR TO ORDERING, FABRICATION; OR INSTALLATION OF CABLES. - ABBREVIATIONS - . _121 ANTENNA & CABLE SCHEDULE . T2 17422-0017 &C ��E7P l7 S 75'34'31 " E J3 12.01' N eJ rn : ' lLT MEC NERI7A 24 I - e tb.sJ -. tam •,�.• _ / 4 _ 142 N 5'1B' lir M � _ . d s.os• ��CRI?0/y . LEASE / / d A .4 SE o h N/ ARC / / •4. I?.pJ• a ry 4/VD P EA7IM Ve'rz anvire/ess Regional Office 255 Porkshore Drive Folsom, CA 95630 Office: (916) 761-4801 ii;R1 ICAriON IS i7VNS1'IM IML ACCOMPANYING CCO ANYING ARE THE D(CLUSNE PRpPERTY OF"CE VE117ON WIRELESS AND THEIR USE AND PUBLIG770N SHALL BE RESTRICTEp TO THE 0 RICIN4L SITE FOR WHTCM THEY ARE PRFPARQ REUSE, REPRODUCTION OR PUBU &7 BY M' METHOD, IN WHOLE OR IN PART. IS PROHIBETE EXCEPT BY WRITTEN PERMISSION TROM VERIZON WIRMS TITLE TS 'DffSE PLANS AND/OR SPECtFIGTIONS SFUVIL REIMIN WTTHPREJIIDI EC AN OSyAL R Wim , SWILL CONSRTUiE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICRONS. a Q 190 CebY way, Suite 150 Roseville California 956!0 . Phone: 916.7803300 O DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC. d REVISION . 4 N0. DESCRIPTION BY DATE . ,.Q. COND HERS v - �. • d Q © teex RCG 08 10 01 Q1 PRELIMINARY. LCG 07/16/01 \ I Q d d SITE NAME: 99 °6" 5' STEEL a. NORTHEASi �. s �z�O V,ERALL' SITE PLAN MON L�• a a • CHICO and depleted en thb map el aftvoted ►, as City of aloe, Cormhy of Bane, state d W b amateeH m ldforrs - - ' - - - .. The laid depktaa 50 40 30 2010 0 -1 � .• . - - - ENLARGED SITE PLAN- d •4 SITE ADDRESS Ii k Belg o Portion of the ILB. Reed Rouen !.sated h Randle Mil r I ornty cdyomb n aro h ehlw nner- �^9 "lee° Pa'lkdsly deanWeA on thb mop b gfonled h 045432• Eat 139.99 feet !o e +eulherty Ian of _ point w b the beghrrhy o1P n23t00 loot! n,,�dm db b Uwe 11°''y me NoM 65TJ4'S8' Went 146 1 -ft' thence d tine 07/26/01 .. _ SITE NAME NORTHEAST CHIC ... _ ` : 6 5 HERITAGE LA -N E " fdb.e Ingd themalsodk.esterlyoerrr ofPeru! 3. M tlWyygh a tentrd argln el 5'•era lar °n9 ere o/ *44 Teel b ice True Poitof B �'°'Souin e9D341• e9tahq fa the Dnreh desmDed -c yeasfrom T"0- NORTHEAST OiICO SITE NUMBER: - 1J11.61 C H I C O CA 95926 m of p stithe -BkW d the Reevder of ue Leu l 0° toh Pard+lep Bsyhnhg end .volt a ny South a9orM' Nkat day the southerly Nu d "del Pe 48 of Y y el Bueodiomta an DesvnDs 7.. JD.Oo foot tl,ae leorWg "old the South 0056'111• Eat 77.32 feet thence South 1f' L 1 el page 72. 3,w Ig7.S8then=worth ,175.29• Em! d0°9 ice most 5"5"2.2 tat uena Sodh 6J3Y17' E"1 JD67 f °Ct to"n"e NMIt e"del Po ts J.o do tao18768tatthodbbnee that the WZM IetLllle d!1 394yD.7Ir.'61e WVpal1ar�I� d 1N21Y19.76'. the WI6U d N344Y21.16 arw the N1M7 latp3de.d SITE ADDRESS: 65 HERITAGE LANE1)the,opo i) 1N" b nethbock bit then131 Fant o .. of 1200 feet thence South 147529• o instance of 24202 Tal . to ° pont w the rrartnerly rlgDl of Way tyro th°^C°North arm 147529• Eat 56127 f6 Wert 21.J5 fret to the Pats d Bey}nIn� 12TSMISOi.ae aogre b WPoen 56 fed ' �'b Site ek GU r1 d 2038 had A & b amsar to '4/- ted vel'pp6y. The em49 fntslopak !m a fbtichae °°1/ Dti(h1 d 98 CHICO, CA 9$926 BUTTE COUNTY Pacaen.al-,a MvrnoBen oyer...arlyR fi0A p'nR ' 0t' atli p0 b sack -w d-c.r e b d nmd r ep. 3,w arelN .rrrarsnrenu Iwsre du.k,o e,e rrd •,^�•. tib p,ae,yfy mara"r�rb Wen" 5".t Ib tRR '�°�' SUMP HERE7.60 �,) eying elao o Of U-& I the nprthvly rightpOohTt w ice wtherty line el sold Porcel 3: Norm North 3555hi�'T yNn rl/ dmg the Wo1 0l US o Highway of 100.06 teat Nets , ub b dhatN Tan law fiend !ed pts an avdl Ilor®dal cwth do ere In tune dew Nay, Amino 0 1 d 1921 ad' d 1675 feet. and m °4r's+ed iI dmgyM aialfe and sh!»I{1L - QMD27 ad N4U&1) OWNER'S NAME: JOHN CRAVEY AND DOROTHY'CFIAPIN OWNER'S ADDRESS: p4rfanr.d A V.W flow No Aa.aiaap Inc 2I th4 leeteua kWglprrs ane .rre0en "ra.n h..on .-" dw#Ad nem d of my t U 91 b richt el Deyhnhg. �• rlyhl of Way or US NI¢n°y 99E o distw= el 14212 fie! b� f14Z h the Sty of ak4 County d Itutta Stela el b California.ao0lonib, wH b desaBed m fefloWc The arl� della! ( ) w i tel" d to Nxb An"'sI VWwd QAvn d t9® Vc b �%'� 65 HERITAGE LANE, CHICO, CA 95926 - (�- �nw °oto �i° -bV ftvstw Aeby Pe°n"d"p �+m° M66SS7 Rehr. T/Imdn �celfyoUae �S `C� GOOOA/GGpL ' 0ivefrO"' oD mhvdr oar, > d w floe hereoRs, dwwt" therein end tndeuMs. ahidr may D° preHuced a y opaale end s"a"ve Domes* togeau elU ice end umy t° aha d9L Deneda A tel wear. fat Leoie Areq belny o parllen oT Pored 3 m eta.n w tad arieh Pared Yap w 17e h the elft.. of foe Bunn Cawty Records h Boal 48 of PoreB M e d a m Particularly desubed ap po9e 72. Dd°y - ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S): 007-270-022 sport c.Ainefe y.y omaacy r��AD•) .rr., Hof° b page aeeafa ane a.o"a"i (Dn. + 23.x7 Urd- OV-i.�4 b �`0� °fib �'ft �mrbCtee to t pq O 4r� �O a N p O d I the onlay to add Taw d any krd Q level!, top fed fln l N era bele. the larNece of sold land Tor tae Oap"e of development s rene.d d e0 led area or ihseuMs or preducBle inecharn mhedr m fo6pe, C-mrrmich d ° 9 paint en the soutlwly Bu d add Parcel , - NET AREA OF UNDERLYING PARCEL(S): 1.143 ACRES -eecve r mop Odrrp pr"par"q Ilrsdaa f/ros � De na�"1itietbe or 7DU 014 `'n'"° °" "1e P1°P'rly "01'"0'° an INe 3,-P -.- CALL BtFg9t K Z . L.S. 4545 tl k M ""anent far reed old Public utE7y porpesa desvBad m fdh m ong J hem shkA the sorrlhmslerly senna of aero Pared ] bens SorAh 55'55' 17 East S3a2o feet thence flea ioN Pdnt et Canmerranenl North J915'38' Emt 13A77 fed to Ue southe"t add pry carnes d Swot'. IMl 212, pain! Deet' the souaaaterly con's and Toro Pehl •. ROBERT GOODMUNDSON, NET AREA OF PROJECT AREA t6tt SQUARE FEET 4) Ara• +cebee dbie. nr9e pa.tdsf M 0Wd frau ane Armd.te, Inc b cur . line "os�� w° : no b w nmr-oun4 n4 eda Berea rwtwe, -w E)(P, 9-30-02 of the noihmsleAr nems d at certain Porod Map° 4Bce eT ice Raaordd a/ the County o� Bce'irila S.�°d h `B o! CoAf'en{o, "O' �� a`ACQ h of Beginning of ice hemhaftn demaBeH doearisn dralkn dwr9 the Peknds o1 cold Lyme Arep ice ta0o.hy enc CA P.L.S. 84545, EXPIRES 09 99/30/02 -DATE GROUND ELEVATION: - 203'3 AT LEASE AREA Aced -ba Inc = e,5" g , °A-4 of an of6°s er oa'k tram 't0As1°d. +03rd ane Solea or/okor 'hard �1r r°'°I°" d °-' °vr`p' 3,r ,roP 4 w,ubnne as •91E, OF CA1) of w p"Qyml,s 7. 197], a d °°ye 72 "'� pehl b an ice .erlany tine °' Ceherset '�wa1: 6100 feet of ti"t"he etdiw 2019193, and rnnhg Nance Sauce 1475'29• 1. North 75"x•11• Wet 12.03 feet to the LATITUDE & LONGITUDE SITE TEMPORARY 6ENCHMARK: TOP CONCR . ETE MONOPOLE FOOTING. tr 3,v gpo9y ,.mgr�ne playact W"talong, odd dDlama of 3ao0 Tat thence North 753431• Wet - WNce, of 250 trotot 1.. "111 fay dog of a 3,..a b ice r1ghL IM twgvd b Wnkh beat' "un."h I Worth 1 North 7531'44• Wed so „ a'' a°"'" d Unit as thin= ELEVATION: 2D3.37' NAVD 68 GENERAL NOTES DRAWN BY: RCG South 1475'29• Wat !hence Hang lD ice rl9hl Amhg o rad' -n at SO.ar fad through o central Wyle of 10317'16' an ac to It o/ 9 ch fat t° o point of reveWe carat than= deny o cure to ice lek the b-"` Wath 6217'15• Wast 4. Nora 1475'16• Ethel 0372 het to o pots w the 5. south 7534•{4• East 4 72 rel o ice int an tt °0�Y the d s0'H Unit 210: thence Wee °f !Toil 212 Ourrcc EAST AVENUE BASIS OF ELEVATIONS: GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS). (SEE NOTE 2) - CHECKED BY: RCG . o end h ning a rocas of SBSOD f"! III o osntrd 171JS oft then, an arc dbtance of 13&67 fat' thane North 7531'31• West o eist°nc" oT feet 3,w= an 1475'29' anc- -1 rIn°re�'thor I 475'16' 1an fat b edd T" PohlatBeginning. c centehhg 161 +9ude fat, a ONTROL PONT ISSUED DATE: 07-16-01 Earl a dblonee of 33.00 fat then= Sao* 753 x of a East a d (cal• Thence Neth 14'2510- UID' Fast a dMwce of 31].ar Tat them south tT' Earl a dbtonce of 3&w r"l to ice point RFO 9( PILLSBURY RD BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE NORTH LINE OF HERITAGE LANE O TND. Yg1UYENT PROJECT NO: SCIN0000-0063 eT Bnylrwha L R A ne"erdghe eosanelt end (/ O NORTH 75'34'31"+ WEST PER BOOK 117 MAPS PAGE 3. . ANT . SHEET TI1LE: k�"""bO1dTMa"PB right Of y Rand mer, end and along the r derhg de"sEad pored PROJECT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION �' IR - EXIMVAULT _ trrnmpaE '°fig lI the twdwfM intersection of East Avvrue end cahoot! Roo$ thence South r Earl Ted: yen= Soule a • 70wha With as oculi end d9Ny rmenanb neasory, to r*s the pr**L • y,Qy�q y SITE DATA - . II - TELD VAULT . . Ugwy POLE the b Wal 40.00 fat thence South W46.16• Earl I'd t° the 0 c9mir g d o 7160 foot t adJ °are to the right thence dwg Jr. as at rria through ..molts 99 `OR SITE SURVEY ly angle of 1JY2'ar w sc length of 349.10 led: thence Soulh L Wal 2J36a fent 'hence South 2714'40• W. 151.65 /set Ihenu South 1175'IO• 131 teal to tine southaosferly corns , B - NA)FR VAULT ® YAMtQE .1 that eeAah porrd h Hua recorded September 1, Bak 169$ pay" Bfla9 and 90, c(ci Rscordr Uunce Hag U° southany end .alerly oeY f.7Droll- Savhga end law perpet North 711532- Nash j0'\ `A ASPHALT atv . SPOT ELEVAt10N 22273 feet thence North B ,• . > SLOPE SHFFT NUMBER: REV. jf . —�r .f �r� L e ;j 1 IML LOCATION FOR (E) BUILDING VERIFON'S EQUIPMENT (P) GPS ANTENNA -------_--- (E) BUILDING ,A (P) APPLETON RECEPTACLE 1a Ir---------------------------=--=----� -- (P) GPS ANTENNA ---_— �(E) BUILDING #B (E)BUILDING #C II ------------------- : r— ---= — (E) CABLE ENTRY/PORT ---------71 r------ -------- j m I I (E) TREE 1 I HEET TITLE (P(2) BARD 5 TON Moos �HA�cset ACKe ELEVATIONS , HEET NUMBER REVISION• EAST ELEVATION (LOOKING WEST) „CA6. 1 SOUTH ELEVATION (LOOKING NORTH) bC�LE 2 17422-0017 BUTTE COUNTY n,� DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICE A7 4 PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Point BTA 79 LLC (Alvin Souder), MUP 02-06 DATE: August 7, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: 5 The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. ' Thank you in advance for your time andefforts. This is an application for Minor Userm Peit for mounting antennas at a height of 70' RAD center on an existing 120 feet tower and connecting the antennas to telecommunications equipment mounted to the wall -within Suite 8 of the existing adjacent building on property zoned located 3415 Silverbell Road, Suite 8. Chico, CA 95926, identified as APN 007-390- 001. Supervisorial District No. . THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON September 26. , 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN August 21, 2001. If no comments orcommunications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT. SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION PPLICANT: Agent information to beprovided is on other side: APPLICAINT'S NAME ( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Point BTA 79 LLC (Contact: Mr, Alvin 007=390-001 ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP'CODE: FILE NUMBER: - (FOR OFFICE USE) 715 Broadway St. M" ii &a CA 90401 = d� NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT ( If any j TELEPHONE Silverb 11 Road Site #368A (310) 451-4.430 LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any)* 3415 Silverbell RnR4C 26 't.. r. :Yz' �'• . GENERAL WO RMATION REQUIRED - -et. ..:".:,.��: -.�::.•,�..<.:•- e:7 .'... ; i ..:ms s_ OWNER'S NAME :;-.,F..a;.:.._:..:<•`,.�x.otr.&':.rr'•�<:,::w�_.�' c.�i: fS'< TELEPHONE :< 4 John P.-Rehklau e (5-30 ) 891 _ ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: ...... Y 15260 Willow Drive, Los Gatos,.CA .•95032 ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Aces ) EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) Space 8 is approx 1500'Sq ft VIA / (Check One) NN/q ' (Check One) 4O OA IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED G PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE:ON WELL WATER i AP .•> a � I CA 'I'I .�_ - N 0 RE >�.. QUESTED ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT : ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ REZONE D O TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ USE PERMIT WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP t tirDc MINOR USE PERMIT AUG 3 '1 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ MINOR VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY ❑ PLACERTIFICATE OF MERGER NNING DIVISION ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PE ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 0, -OTHER :mac ; •. Y >� Yf . PRO JECrDESCI2IPTTON ':>�::r:.z;=;�~:, r�:r.:;.ri��..::,s• - �M7:-....:;�•;�-:;;' —_ FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division', describe the number and size of parcels_) a -L -at a height of 70' RAD r-pn*tt-r-nTi 4; an ex'istin 120 feet tower and connnectin the antennas 'to telecoinmunica.t. s equipment mounted to the wall'within Suite 8 of the existing ad"acerit-buil �ing This is a collocation Of multi le users. I OWNER P• 1 li'l - ON - vY• I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, FURTHER I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affid 't with this application.) DATE: 17--Ovo Ol SIGNATURE: JXY / AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address ' is hereby authorized to process this application for on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number This authorization allows; representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including documents) relating to record -title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Print Name Signature Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of Architect/Fngineer and Pbone Number Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY e olol Print Name Signature Verify: Date Received: 41dol. Total Amount Received: AP Numb6r(s) Legal Description Owners Authorization ming Requirements' -�_ Pro'ect Descriptiony Copies of plot plan Taken by Receipt No. E.H. LD Plan FD Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final. action. Current fee for this application is' $ -as of Make check payable to `Butte County Treasurer". j�EC FIVE AUG 3 X01 COUNTY OF BUTTE � l ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM gl1TTE COUNTY P! �114!Nrj r"/ISiON (To be Completed By Project Applicant) _General Information".". Date Filed 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or oroiect soonsnr: Point BTA 79 T T r 715 Broadway Stream Suite 320, Santa Monies-n� CA 90401 2. Address of project: 341 Si 1 verb 1 1 Road hi ? CA 95926 Assessor's Parcel Number: 007-39-001 3. Name, address, and telephone number of persnn to he contacted concerning this pro*ect: Ringo Gula.ti 224 Vernon Straat Roseville, CA 95678 4. List and describe any other related permits .and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: FCC License 5. Existing general plan designation: 6. Existing zoning district: C2 7. How is land currently used? P..x, s t, nQ Tower on C2 7on d Pa r 1 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Col 1 o a an t .ias on P x i t; „ tow r mount eau_ipment cahinPtc 1,�.a, �,.,,, i _._ , -3 g Project Description: 9. Site size: 180 Sq ft Feet) (Acres/Sq. 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes X No — 12. Proposed development schedule- Bui 1dinQ Fermi t will be filed 09 1 5 01 and _nil 1 Pd 1 1 -1 5-01 13. Associated projects NIA 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development None Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, iticlude the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commeFcial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 1 . facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Minor use = Dermit to allow for collocation of an existing Tower. antennas on Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? yes Discuss below (attach additional sheets as necessary): all items checked YES NO 20. Change in existing ,features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. _ 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change indust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. = X 25. Change in bay; lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. X 26. Substantial. change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. _ 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts).. 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural.gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _ IM ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 2 Environmental Setting (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use -'of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information. onn-plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one - family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.),.and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attache photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. . Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts', statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. , Date Sig t, AzK:IFORMSISUBMITTALIENV-INFO . 0 Butte County. Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING -DIVISION . FttE TO: ALUC COPY FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Point BTA 79 LLC (Mr. Alvin Souder), MUP 02-07 DATE: August 7, 2001. CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received,a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is.needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to install 6 ganel antennas on an existing monopole tower at a height of 98 feet and to connect the antennas to Telecommunications equinmeni within an existing building. The antennas will be used for digital cellular communications systems. on property zoned C-1 (Light Commercial) located within a 1.9 acre parcel northeast of and adjacent to State Route 32 (Nord Avenue) approximately' 1/4 mile northwest of Sacramento. Avenue. Chico., identified as APN 043-200-005. Supervisorial District No. 2. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON September 26, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY; ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN August 22, 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 'BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION ,PPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME (If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required)ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Pni,t- PTA 70 TTr ti- . U Ai' I C A 1 ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FMENUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) 715 Broadway Street. Suite 320, Santa Monica, CA 9001 a NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT( If any) TELEPHONE NE Site No. 364 A, Nord Avenue (�fQ) 45174430 LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any 1298 Nord Avenue, Chico CA 95926 GENERAL INFORMATION REOUIRED 9W�� OWNER'S NAME GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TELEPHONE Kenneth'KArasinski & Ellen'Karasibski .(530) 894-3.564 ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & 21P CODE: 1300 N d Avenue. Chin CA 95973 AUKG ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE VARIANCE SITE SIM (in Square Feet orAcres ) C1 CnMMPrr-iA1 MINOR VARIANCE 144 Sq ft EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) N/A 144 0' Lease area (Check One) (Check One) C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC . 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED 0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 0 REZONE USE PERMIT D E C EOV E RE W( MINOR USE PERMIT AUKG 3 molE 2001 13 VARIANCE C3 MINOR VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY C3 ADMINISTRATIVE PE 9L PLANNING DIVISION ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 13 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION 'CERTIFICATE OF MERGER 13 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN 0 OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sbeets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) This project calls for mounting antennas at an existing 140 feet monopole the heip-ht of 9R feet. The related eguiment.will be placed adiacent-to. the tower motintpd on a p1gwnod hai--kbnqrd And--9*'xl6' iect is a collocation. ^FSOWNER CERTIFICATION1. I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF TEE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affid * With this application.) '4 DATE: SIGNATURE: wit, AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, De�rtrment of Development Services;. Print Name of Agent and Phone is hereby authorized to process this app . ation on my property, identified as Butte County ; This authorization allows representation for all documents necessary for said processing, but interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print njafne) Print Name Signature Architect and/oXEneer: Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number Parcel Number -ations, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all luding documents) relating to record title Print Name Signature Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: AMOK � • — Date Received: % Total Amount Received: Number(s) �- gal Description ers Authorization iig Requirements Project Descriptionj:� Copies of plot plan Taken by :5, Receipt No. N E.H. -i d- LD Plan `s FD Payment.of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit.(Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ as of 0 Make check payable to `Butte County Treasurer". ECEodd AUG 3 2001 COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM BUTTE COUNTY (To be Completed By Project Applicant) PLANNING DIVISION Date Filed _General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor: Point BTA 79 T.. . 715 Broadway Street,`. Suite 320, Santa Monica, CA 90401 2. Address of project: 1 299 Nord A TPmiP Chir cA 99996 Assessor's Parcel Number: 043-200-005' ' 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: 'Ping-0-Gulati 224 Vernon Street, Roseville. CA 95678 (�91 Q f;1 F,-1 9AA 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: FCC T ir•Pnse 5. Existing general plan designation: 6. Existing zoning district: r 1 7. How is land currently used? C.nMMPrci a 1 _ F.xi s t i ng_ monopol P on a C1 zoned parcel 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Col 1 o an - nnas and moLnt related equipment Icabinets to a Dl.ywood backboard on a 9'x16 concrete pad. Collocation'on an existing tower. Project Description: 9. Site size: 144 So f t (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes __S No — 12. Proposed development schedule Rui 1 di ng_nPrmi t will be filed 09-15-01 and building permit will he P111 1 Pc -i 11-15-01 13. Associated projects N/a 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development None Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city 'or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading N/A ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division 0 1 M ❑ Butte County Department of Development.Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 2 facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Mi rimer use = Permit- to allow for collocation of antennas on an existing monopole. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. X 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _ 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _ X 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ X 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. _ X 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. _ g 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. X 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. X 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). _ X 30. Substantially increase -fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). _ X 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of,projects. _ g M ❑ Butte County Department of Development.Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one - family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements fumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are.true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature for K:IFORMSISUBMITTALIENV-INFO 0 Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division 0 3 ALUC August 1, 2001 Local Agencies and Departments: �r3�rry9uMio'b ! .LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH A D�j� U T Y . PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 D E E.0 0V E AUG 6 2001 BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION Subject: Pre -application Review, APN: 047-250-141, for Stephen J. Schuster, Sierra Moon Subdivision The Butte County Department of Development Service, Planning Division has received a request for apre- application conference regarding a Tentative Subdivision Map proposing 126 residential parcels to be located on a, 300 acre parcel. The property is currently zoned SR-1/PD (Suburban Residential, 1 -acre parcels, Planned Development) and OS/PD (Open Space, Planned Development) and is designated Agricultural Residential by the General Plan. On-site sewage disposal is proposed by way of community system. Water supply is proposed by individual domestic wells. The property is located west of and adjacent to Hicks Lane, approximately one-half mile south of Keefer Lane, in the North Chico area. The project is located within the North Chico Specific Plan Area, and is subject to an approved Development Agreement, a copy of which is attached for review with the application materials. The project is also located within the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the Chico Municipal Airport. The purpose of the meeting is to inform the applicant of local or state requirements that may apply to their project. This allows the applicant to incorporate those requirements into the design of the project when the actual application is made. The pre-applicatiop conference will be held in the Department of Development Services' conference room located at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, on August 24, 2001 at 10:00 am. If your department has concerns or comments regarding the proposal, please have someone attend or submit written comments to this department prior to the meeting date. Comments may be sent to the above address or faxed to (530)538-7785 attention Dan Breedon, prior to the meeting date. Ifyou have any questions please contact me at (530)538-7629. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. S' sere Daniel C. Breedon Senior Planner - Enclosures cc: Butte County Public Works, Land Development Division Butte County Environmental Health, Chico Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) Butte County Air Quality Management District Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board California Department of Transportation Ted Crawford, California Department of Forestry '. City of Chico Planning Department Chico Area Parks & Recreation District (CARD) Henri Lomelli,. California Department. of Fish & Game County Counsel DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: A.eent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applican is different f in owne an affidavit is required ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: r Z 9.3 4 -/7 - ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) q5:2:8 - NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT ( If any) TELEPHONE LOCATION QFPPV OJECT M cross streets and Address, if any A, C - GENERAL INFORMATION REOUIRED OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE L 19d WC ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: ZONE GFNERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Acres) 4(� C-5 ramgns e— EXISTING STR.; in SquareRL WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) (Check One) 31 (Check One) 0 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC C3 C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED 0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP REZONED 13 REZONEECEOVE 1:3 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP C3 USE PERMIT C3 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP 0 MINOR USE PERMIT 31 2001 0 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION 0 VARIANCE C3 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION C3 MINOR VARIANCE I BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION 1:3 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER C3 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT 0 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN 1:3 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 0 OTHER -- PR 01F= DESCRIMO N FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) t, -C4` k-- sc I �Cjc 1/1"s j'6'-1 —4 Joe, OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be apthocized, execute an affidavit of authorization and Aude the 4fidaAvit with tWs appliguioyj) DATE: / SIGNATURE: COMPLETE THIS INFORMATION III �� N M INI' u i� �' IIII"III II RECORDING REQUESTED BY: 1 998-0t�551 32 Clerk of the Board. of Supervisors Recorded_ i REC FEE . N WIZEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Off Coluan! RO ords I CONFORM .09 Bu Cleric of the Board CAMI= J. SRl8)88 I� 25 County Center Drive Recorder I 0mvilley CA 95%5. Mys 82s34PM 23-Dec-1998 I PPiO.e l of 35 Document ride(s): Development Agreement by and between Butte Coudy and Douglas N. Gunn, Trustee 5 i Of the Robert and Ann Stephens - p -- Charitble Remainder Unitcust, It AL M THIS PAGE ADDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACE FOR RECORDING INFORMATION ' (AMfio®al recording fee applies) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN BUTTE COUNTY AND DOUGLAS N. GUNN, TRUSTEE OF THE ROBERT AND ANN STEPHENS CHARITABLE REMAINDER UNITRUST, ET AL. This Development Agreement' is entered into this 1 st day of December, 1998, by and between BUTTE COUNTY,, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter "County," and DOUGLAS N. GUNN, Trustee of the Robert and Ann Stephens Charitable Remainder Unitrust, hereinafter collectively "Landowner," pursuant to the authority of Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the Government Code of. California.- Recitals alifornia Recitals A. Authorization. To strengthen the public planning process, .encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California adopted Section 65864, ct. ., of the Government Code (the "Development Agreement Statute"), which authorizes the County and an applicant for a development project to enter into a development agreement, establishing certain development rights in the Property which is the subject of the development project application. B. Prop V. The subject of this Agreement is the development of an approximately 230 acre portion of that certain parcel of land, identified as APN.047-250-141 consisting of a total of approximately 300 acres, located in the unincorporated area of Butte County within the North Chico Specific Plan area (the "NCSP") as described in Exhibit "A-1" and shown on Exhibit "A-2" (hereinafter the "Property"), attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Landowner represents that all persons holdinglegal or equitable interests in the Property shall be bound by the Agreement. C. Hong. On August. 27, 1998, the County Planning Commission, designated by Butte County Resolution No. 84-160 as the planning agency for purposes of development agreement review pursuant to Government Code Section 65867, in a duly noticed and conducted public hearing, considered this Agreement, and recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve this Agreement. D. Environmental Documents. On December 1; 1998, the Board of Supervisors, in Resolution 98-172, adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Entitlements which tiered off of the NCSP Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Mitigation measures were included in the . Mitigated Negative Declaration and are incorporated, pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA" ), in the terms and conditions of this Agreement, as reflected by -the findings concurrently adopted by the Board of Supervisors with this Agreement. E. Entitlements. The Board of Supervisors has approved the following land use entitlements for the.Property, which entitlements are the subject of this Agreement: (1) Amendment to the NorthChico Specific Plan, as adopted by Resolution No. 98-172, for 229:2f acres; (2) The Rezoning of the Property from SR -1 and.SR-1/OS acres to Planned Development SR-1/PD on 126.1± acres which generates the ability to develop up to 126 units (single-family home lots) and from OS to OS/PD on 103. if acres which generates the ability to develop up to 34 additional units for a total of 160 units, pursuant to Ordinance No. 3462, dated December 1, 1998; and _ (3) This Development Agreement, as adopted by Ordinance No. 3463, dated December 1, 1998. The approvals. described in.paragraphs E (1) through (3), inclusive, together with all County rules, ordinances, regulations and policies applicable thereto adopted and in effect _as of the effective date of this Agreement, are referred to herein as the "Entitlements." Page 2 F. General and Soecific Plans. Development of the Property in accordance with the Entitlements and. this Agreement is consistent with and will provide orderly growth and development of the area in accordance with the policies set forth in the General Plan and NCSP and the County finds and declares that this Agreement is consistent with the General Plan of Butte County and with the North Chico Specific Plan. For purposes of the protection granted by this Agreement, except as otherwise provided herein, the applicable law shall be as set forth in the Entitlements as of the date hereof. G. Substantial_ Costs to Landowner.. Landowner has incurred and will incur substantial costs'in order to comply with conditions of approval of the Entitlements and to assure development of the Property in accordance with the Entitlements and the terms of this Agreement. H. Services and Facilities to be Provided. Development of the Property will result in a need for certain municipal services and facilities, some of which will be provided by County to such development through, the implementation of the`NCSP and some of which will be provided by Landowner -subject to the performance of Landowner's obligations hereunder. - Landowner agrees to contribute to the costs of certain public facilities and services as required herein to mitigate impacts on the community of the development of the Property, and County agrees to implement the NCSP to assure that Landowner may proceed with and complete development of the Property in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. If County specifies that Landowner provide contributions of land or money, other than the dedication. of the drainage easement right-of-way. depicted in Exhibit `B", for public improvements which 'exceed requirements to mitigate impacts arising as a result of development entitlements on the Property, County shall reimburse Landowner in the manner specified' in Section 4.3 of this Agreement. I. Development Agreement Resolution. County and Landowner have fulfilled all requirements set forth in the Development Agreement Resolution of the County of Butte, Resolution No. 84-160, adopted by the Board of Supervisors on October 2, 1984, as amended. a Page 3 I. AGREEMENT SECTION 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS... 1.1 Incorporation of Recitals. The Preamble, the Recitals and all defined terms set forth in both are hereby incorporated into this Agreement as if set forth herein iii full. 1.2 Pro cdy Description and Binding Covenants. The Property comprises those portions of that property identified as APN 047-250-141 and described in Exhibits "A-1" and "A- 2". It is intended and determined that the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute covenants which shall run with the Property and the benefits and burdens hereof shall bind and inure to all successors in interest to and assigns of the parties hereto.. Accordingly, all references herein to "Landowner" shall mean and refer to DOUGLAS N.- GUNN, Trustee of the Robert and Ann Stephens Charitable Remainder Unitrust, and each and every subsequent purchaser or transferee of the Property or any portion thereof from Landowner. 1.3 Term. 1.3.1 Commencement; E=i on. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the effective date of the. Adopting. Ordinance approving this Agreement. This Agreement shall extend for a period of fifteen (15) years thereafter, unless said term is terminated, modified or extended by circumstances set forth. in this Agreement or by mutual consent of the parties hereto. Following the expiration of the term, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further force and effect; :provided, however, said termination of the Agreement shall not affect any right or duty nor the ability to construct any improvements, facilities, buildings 'or the like partially or completely constructed emanating from County.entitlements on the Property approved prior to, concurrently with, or subsequent to the expiration of this Agreement. At the date of recordation of part or all of Final SubdivisionMap(s), this Agreement shall terminate as'to those maps or parts of maps so recorded, unless specified otherwise in Subdivision Agreements or other agreements between Landowner and County regarding the timing, payment, security or other arrangements for site development or improvement installation or related matters. County shall cause arty written notice of termination approved pursuant to this subsection to be recorded against the applicable parcel, at Landowner's expense, with the County Recorder. 1.3.2 Termination Upon Mutual A¢re t: This Agreement may be terminated upon the written mutual agreement of the parties. Page 4 1.4 Arnend_rnent of Agreement. This Agreement may be amended from time to time by mutual consent of County and Landowner., in accordance with the provisions of the Development Agreement Statute. The parties. acknowledge that under the County Zoning Code and applicable rules, -regulations and policies of the County, the Director of Development Services has the discretion to approve minor modifications to approved land use entitlements without the requirement for as public hearing or approval by the Board of Supervisors. Accordingly, the approval of any minor modifications to the Entitlements consistent with this Agreement shall not constitute nor require an amendment to this Agreement to be effective. .1.5 Recordation. The County shall cause this Agreement, any amendment hereto and any termination thereof to be recorded, at Landowners expense, with the County Recorder within ten (10) days of this Agreement, amendment or termination becoming effective. SECTION 2: DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY 2.1 Permitted Use The permitted uses of the Property, the maximum density and intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, and location of public improvements, and other terms and conditions of development applicable to the Property shall be those set forth in the Entitlements and in this Agreement. 2.2 Vested Entitlements. Subject to the provisions and conditions of this Agreement, County agrees that County is granting, and grants herewith, the Entitlements set forth in Recitals E., above. Landownees vested right to proceed with the development of.the Property shall be subject to subsequent approvals, including without limitation,. environmental review as required by CEQA, tentative subdivision maps, final subdivision maps, grading permits, building permits, final inspections, etc., provided that any conditions, terms, restrictions and requirements -for such subsequent approvals shall be consistent with the Entitlements set forth in Recitals E., above. As specified in Government Code Section 65866, this Agreement shall not prevent County from applying new rules, regulations'or policies which do not'conflict with existing rules regulations or policies applicable to the property or prevent the, County from approving, conditionally approving or denying any subsequent development project applications on the basis of existing or new rules, regulations, and policies. Page 5 i 2.3 F=xstinR Improvements. It is recognized that the property is developed with an existing single family residence that is located with the OS/PD zone. The existing dwelling will be allowed to remain as a pre-existing non -conforming use and shall be counted as one of, the 34 Density Transfer Units (DTUs) described in Section 3.4. As such, the net number of DTUs shall be'33 unless the existing residence is removed in which case the total 34 DTUs may be transferred. Any reference to 34 DTUs in this document shall take into account the preceding limitation. 11 2.4 Rules. Regulations and Official Policies. 2.4.1 Inconsistency. To the extent any future rules, ordinances, regulations. or policies applicable to development of the Property are inconsistent with the Entitlements as provided in this Agreement, the terms of the Entitlements and this Agreement shall prevail, unless the parties mutually agree to alter this Agreement. 2.4.2 Application of Changes. This section shall. not preclude the application to development of the Property, of changes in County laws, regulations, plans or policies, the terms of which are specifically mandated and. required by changes in State or Federal laws or regulations. In the event State or Federal laws or regulations'enacted after this Agreement has been executed, or action of any governmental jurisdiction, prevent, delay or preclude compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement, or require changes in plans, maps or permits approved by County, the parties agree that the provisions of this Agreement shall be modified, extended or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such State and Federal laws or regulations or the regulations of other governmental jurisdictions. Each party agrees to extend to the other its prompt, good faith and reasonable cooperation in so modifying this Agreement or approved plans. 2.4.3 Authority of Countv. This section shall not be construed to limit the authority or obligation of County to hold necessary public hearings, or to limit discretion of County or any�of its officers or.officials with regard to rules, regulations, ordinances, laws and entitlements of use which require the exercise of discretion by County or any of its officers or officials, provided that subsequent discretionary actions shall be consistent with the uses and the density and intensity of development as provided by the Entitlements and this Agreement, in effect as of the effective date of this Agreement. Page 6 SECTION 3: LANDOWNER OBLIGATIONS 3.1 Drainage Easement Dedication. Landowner shall dedicate and County shall accept an easement substantially as depicted on Exhibit "B", for construction and maintenance of drainage improvements to consist of a connector canal between Keefer'Slough and Mud Creek and necessary intake and outfall structures as may be proposed by the Arany Corps of Engineers. Transfer of the easement and recordation. will occur simultaneously with Development Agreement execution and recordation. Landowner shall only be obligated to pay Landowners proportionate share for design, construction, and maintenance of the drainage facilities if such share is lawfully imposed through fees or assessments adopted by or on behalf of a County Service Area or Assessment District or other similar entity to design, construct, or maintain said facilities for the general area The parties agree that a new deeded easement shall be substituted. if recommendations from the Army Corps of Engineers change the location or dimensions of the previously deeded easement. 3.2 Drainage Mitigation,_ Landowner shall create, or link the connector canal to, topographic features or facilities which will serve as detention basin(s) or equivalent means to mitigate stormwater runoff from the Property during peak. storm events to a level that is at least ten percent (10%) below pre -development runoff conditions. 3.3 Ai=rt Protection Measures. Landowner will comply with the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) conditions, both required and recommended, from ALUC's August 20, 1998 consistency findings transmittal as set forth in Sections 3 and 4, in attached Exhibit "C", as amended by the Board of Supervisors on December 1, 1998, in order to minimize noise and safety concerns regarding the Chico Municipal Airport (CMA) when exercising the Entitlements agreed to in this document and described in Section 3.4 immediately below. Said conditions are as follows: 1. The minimum lot size for any parcel shall not be less than 8,125 square feet if served by individual wells and on-site sewage disposal systems, or 6,500 square feet if -public sewage disposal service is provided. 2. Residential development shall be restricted to those portions of the 126 acre SR- I/PD area that are located outside of the projected 55 dB CNEL contour as Page 7 0 depicted on ExhibitIII-I within the 1995 Chico Municipal Airport FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility and Environs Plan. 3. Residential densities within the Inner Turning Zone shall be restricted to the densities recommended within the 1993 Airport land. Use Planning Handbook (nor more than one dwelling. unit per two acres) to protect the safety of aircraft and persons on the ground. Residential densities within the Traffic Pattern Zone shall not exceed 6 units per acre. 4. Residential dwelling units shall bedesigned and constructed to achieve an interior noise leverof no more than 45 dB. 5. .The property owner shall sign an avigation easement granting the right of continued use of the Chico Municipal Airport in the airspace above the subject parcel and acknowledging any and all existing or potential airport operational impacts. 6. The project proponents and the County shall devise enhanced airport operations disclosure measures which include deed .notices, ,public notices, inclusion of information in the, Department 'of Real Estate Public Report, and signage along the entrances to the project. 7. All land use shall be restricted from creating large concentrations of people that would result in the gathering of more than 60 persons per acre within the Inner Turning Zone or 150 persons per acre within the Traffic Pattern Zone at any one time. 8. Land uses shall be prohibited that create bright lights, smoke, particulate emissions, or allow for the storage of hazardous, flammable or explosive materials above ground. 9. All project lighting shall be directed within the project site and shielded to prevent adverse impacts on adjacent properties and aircraft flight. activities. 1 . Page 8 10. Section 3.3 of the Development Agreement shall be modified to reference those conditions required and recommended in Sections 3. A and 4. "A through H" in the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission's August 19, 1998 Findings relative to the Draft Development. Agreement. 11. Section 3.4 of the Development Agreement shall be revised to reflect the applicants' commitments to the Board of Supervisors and the ALUC regarding the Airport Land Use Commission's review of the tentative subdivision map to create the 34 Density Transfer Units (DTUs) within the 126 acre portion of the property or other property located within the North Chico Specific Plan Area _ The Development Agreement shall stipulate that the tentative subdivision map to create 34 DTUs within the 126 acre portion of the subject property is to be reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission for consistency with the Updated CLUE for the Chico Municipal Airport when adopted or the existing Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan, if the CLUP update has not been completed within 30 months from the date that the Development Agreement is executed. If the proposal to create the 34 DTUs within the 126 acre portion of the property is found by the ALUC to be inconsistent with the applicable Airport Land Use Plan, the property owner/applicant may request that the Board of Supervisors adopt Overriding Findings to approve the project. However, if, a finding of inconsistency is made by the ALUC to create the 34 DTUs within the 126 acre portion of the subject property, the property owner/applicant may submit a subsequent tentative subdivision map. to create the 34 DTUs within another .property that is located within the North Chico Specific Plan Area. The tentative subdivision map for such a transfer must also be reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission for consistency with the applicable Airport Land Use Plan. The property owner/applicant may. request that the Board of Supervisors adopt Overriding Findings to approve the transfer of the units to another property if that proposal is also found to be inconsistent by the ALUC. 3.4 Subdivision Man Processing., Landowner anticipates submitting two or more subdivision maps for up to 160 units on the Property.. Landowner may submit and County shall promptly process the first subdivision map for up to 126 units in the SR-l/PD zone. This Page 9 • subdivision map shall only need to be processed by County's Development Review Committee, unless appealed to the Board of Supervisors. Landowner may submit and County shall promptly review a second subdivision map for up to 34 additional density transfer units (DTUs) to be built in the SR-1/PD zone or elsewhere within the.NCSP pursuant to Section 4.1 of this Agreement, a$er adoption of a Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) Update for the CMA by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). As to any DTU, Landowner and County agree that the subdivision map shall be brought before the ALUC for a determination of whether significant airport compatibility issues exist or whether they have otherwise been satisfactorily mitigated by subdivision design criteria. If the ALUC determines that the subdivision map is consistent with noise and safety criteria in the CLUP Update which are _ consistent with California Public Utilities .Code Section 21670, the subdivision map shall be processed in accordance with the Entitlements. If the proposal is found by ALUC to be inconsistent with the applicable Airport Land Use Plan, the property owner/applicant may request that the Board of Supervisors adopt overriding findings to approve the project or they may submit a subsequent tentative subdivision map to create the 34 DTUs on another property within the North Chico Specific Plan, pursuant to Section 4.1 of this Agreement. The tentative subdivision map for such a transfer must also be reviewed by the ALUC for consistency with the applicable . Airport Land Use Plan. The property owner/applicant may request that the Board of Supervisors adopt overriding findings to approve the transfer of the units to another property if that proposal is also found to be inconsistent by the ALUC. If a CLUP Update has not been adopted within 30 months of the effective date of this Agreement, the subdivision map for the DTUs shall be processed and CMA compatibility determined pursuant to the CLUP or its equivalent which was in existence as of the effective date of this Agreement. Landowner agrees not to request extensions of approved subdivision maps beyond the 15 year term of this Agreement. At the time of recordation of final subdivision maps, Landowner and County agree to enter into mutually acceptable Subdivision Agreements regarding timing and security arrangements for .the installation of site improvements. 3.5 ' Ret tion of Creek Corridor Oren Sp Landowners will reserve in open space a 50 -foot corridor on the Property from the outer edge of the north side of Mud Creek and plant native trees and shrubs to create wildlife habitat and improve aesthetics as specified in subdivision map conditions. Landowner shall reserve a 50 -foot open space corridor from the top of bank along both sides of Keefer Slough on the Property and plant native trees and shrubs along this drainage as specified in subdivision map conditions for the same purposes. Open space preserved on-site will be credited towards PD Ordinance open space requirements. Page 10 3.6 Dedication of Public Trail Easement. Upon recordation by Landowner of a final subdivision map for the first 126 units on'the Property, Landowner will dedicate to the Chico Area Recreation District ("CARD"), or other entity acceptable to County, an easement for a public bicycle/hiking/pedestrian trail along Mud. Creek and Keefer Slough. Landowner will construct trail improvements and be reimbursed by County or CARD, as applicable, pursuant to this Agreement and the NCSP for the cost of improvements. At the time that Landowner records a final subdivision map for the DTUs, Landowner, will enter intoa, conseryation easement with a public agency or non-profit organization to retain the approximately 103.1 acres adjacent to the airport as permanent open space, or if no such entity will accept such open space, then to the County. 3.7 North Chico Specific Plan Policies. Landowner agrees to comply with the design requirements and development standards specified in the NCSP as amended by this Development Agreement. 3.8 Develo m n Connection and Mitigation Fees. Except as otherwise provided herein, any and all required payments of development, connection or mitigation fees by Landowner shall be made in the amount specified by then applicable County ordinances, either in effect as of the date of this Agreement, subject to adjustment or subsequent adoption in accordance with Section 3.10. 3.8.1 School_ Fee A r inns. So long as Landowner is paying to School District the state authorized fees then adopted and in force taking into consideration NCSP School Policies 1-4 on page 6=15 of the NCSP, County shall not refrain from approving any subdivision maps or other such entitlements for the Property or from issuing any building permits for development thereof consistent with.the Entitlements on the basis of adverse impacts of this development on school facilities. 3.8.2 Countywide Facilities Fees. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 2.4 of this Agreement, Landowner will be given a credit against any county -wide, NCSP or CSA 87 impact mitigation fees for the reasonable value of land, drainage facilities or other improvements which Landowner dedicates or elects to install at Landowner's own expense. 3.9Processing Feet and Charges. Landowner shall pay those processing, inspection and plan check fees and charges required by County under then current regulations for Page 11 processing applications and requests for permits, approvals and other actions, and monitoring compliance with any permits issued or approvals granted or the performance of any conditions with respect thereto or any performance required of Landowner hereunder. 3.10 Public Financing Limited to Specific Funding Mechanisms and Fees.' Except as expressly provided herein, Landowner's sole and only obligation with respect to the participation of the Property in any funding mechanisms to' support the construction of any public facilities and improvements or the provision of public services in relation to development of the . Property shall be to pay existing County fees related to the construction and provision of public facilities authorized by ordinance to be collected by County as of the effective date of this. _ Agreement, as such fees maybe adjusted from time to time in accordance with applicable law, or such other fees'asmay be duly adopted in the future by County,from time to time to implement the NCSP or in accordance with applicable law. Provided, however, Landowner's obligation to pay future County fees is limited to those fees adopted on a county -wide basis or which apply uniformly to all properties within the NCSP which are similarly situated, whether by geographic location, drainage sheds or other distinguishing circumstances. 3.11 - Negative Declaration Mitigation Measures. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, when Landowner elects to develop the Property, Landowner shall be bound by, and ,shall perform, all mitigation measures identified in the NCSP EIR and the Mitigated Negative Declaration related to this development which are adopted by the County and required pursuant to CEQA as identified in the mitigation monitoring plan as a responsibility of . Landowner. 3.12 No Additional Dedications or Easements. Landowner shall not be obligated to dedicate any right of way or grant any public utility. easements as a condition of development of the Property except as may be required to obtain subsequent approvals as set forth in section 2.2 of this document. Page 12 SECTION 4: COUNTY OBLIGATIONS 4.1 Specific Plan Amendment and Rezone. As provided in the Recitals and Section 2.2, County agrees that Landowner has a fully vested Specific Plan Amendment and Rezone to Suburban Residential One Acre -Planned Development (SR-1/PD) on 126.1± acres and a fully vested Specific Plan Amendment and Rezone to Open Space -Planned Development (OS/PD) on the 103.1± acres depicted in Exhibit "D". County agrees that Landowner has a fully vested right and entitlement to build up to 160 units in residential subdivisions on the Property, subject to the provisions of Sections 2.2 and 3.4. County and Landowner agree the 34 units credited as Density Transfer Units (DTUs) will not be built on the OS area These DTUs will be transferred either to the SR-l/PD area and all units built on that portion of the Property if allowed pursuant to Section 3.4, or transferred to other property within the NCSP subject to subsequent approvals specified in Section 2.2 and any rezone or specific plan amendment needed to make the DTU's consistent with the NCSP. Open space preserved on-site will be credited towards the open space requirements for both the SR-1/PD and OS/PD zones except for that portion contained within the drainage easement dedication described in Section 3.1 and also excepting the 103.1 acres of land designated OS/PD which will not be credited towards the open space requirement for the SR- 1/PD zone. County also agrees that Landowner has a vested right, but no obligation, to use open space areas anywhere on the Property for ancillary facilities which County hereby acknowledges are open space compatible, including trails, community sewage and water treatment or disposal systems, wetland/habitat mitigation and enhancement, road access to Hicks Lane, utilities, active and passive recreation, drainage facilities and all other open space retaining uses. 4.2 Counly Cooperation. County shall cooperate with Landowner and use its best good faith efforts in processing and approving all tentative subdivision maps, final subdivision maps, building permits, grading permits, final inspections and any other land use applications for permits or approvals (collectively, "Subsequent Applications") which may be required by County consistent with the Entitlements and this Agreement. County agrees to expedite review, grant and implementation of any Subsequent Applications consistent with the Entitlements and this Agreement and to impose conditions and/or adopt mitigation measures only to the extent they are consistent with and implement the Entitlements and this Agreement. The processing and approval of Subsequent Applications which are consistent with the Entitlements shall not require an amendment to this Agreement. County further finds that the NCSP EIR and the Mitigated Negative Declaration adequately address the significant impacts of development of the Property Page 13 in accordance with�the Entitlements and this Agreement and agrees that, to the extent lawfully allowed, the processing of Subsequent Applications shall tier off of and rely upon the NCSP EIR and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Property. Upon approval of any Subsequent Application, County agrees that such subsequent entitlements or approvals shall automatically be vested according to the terms of this Agreement as if such entitlements and approvals were specifically identified in this Agreement and that the expiration date for any tentative subdivision map approved for the Property shall extend for the term of this Agreement. 4.3 Reimbursement by Countv. If Landowner installs, at its cost, the drainage improvements described in Section 3.1 or any other improvements which provide public benefits above and beyond the service or mitigation needs of the Property, County shall compensate Landowner or its successors, in a manner consistent with County Code and policy, for the amount of public benefit provided which exceeds service or mitigation requirements for the Property specified in the Entitlements and this Agreement. Such compensation shall be made from assessments, developer fees, state and federal cost share or grant programs or any other source available to County. Compensation may be made in cash, by fee reduction, by density bonus or any other form agreeable to the Landowner and County. Landowner and County agree that County shall not be obligated to reimburse Landowner for that limited portion of improvements designed exclusively to mitigate stormwater runoff to a level that is at least ten percent (10%) below pre -development runoff conditions described in Section 3.2, unless County shall receive Federal, State, local or private funding from sources which' provide funds eligible to reimburse Landowner. Landowner shall join County in any application prepared by County for Federal, State, local or private funding which may be identified by Landowner or County to finance improvements and reimburse Landowner. Landowner and County shall each use its best efforts to cooperate to obtain approval of and to equitably share such funding. County and Landowner agree that the pursuit or approval of such application shall not result..in any adverse economic or financial impact upon Landowner or the Property.. 4.4 Maps and Permits. Provided that Landowner is not in default under this Agreement, except as provided in Section 3.4, County shall not cease to process or approve tentative or final subdivision maps or issue building permits or certificates of occupancy for development of the Property that are consistent with the Entitlements. applicable law relating to the vesting provisions of development agreements, Landowner and Page 14 County intend that, except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement . shall vest the Entitlements against subsequent County plans, actions, resolutions, and ordinances that directly or indirectly limit the Entitlements. 4.6 Essence of Aareement. The foregoing Sections 2, 3 and 4 are of the essence of this Agreement. SECTION 5: DEFAULT, REMEDIES, TERNIINATION 5.1 General Provisions. Subject to extensions of time by mutual consent in writing, failure or unreasonable delay by either party to perform any term or provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event of alleged default or breach of any term or condition of this Agreement, the party alleging such default or breach shall give the other party not less than thirty (30) days notice in writing specifying the nature of the alleged default and the manner in which said default may be satisfactorily cured. During any such thirty -day period, the party charged shall not be considered in default for purposes of termination or institution of legal proceedings. After notice and expiration of the thirty -day period, the other party to this Agreement at its option may institute legal proceedings pursuant to this Agreement or give notice of intent to terminate the Agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 65868 and regulations of County implementing said Government Code Section. Following notice of intent to terminate, the matter shall be scheduled for consideration and review by the Board of Supervisors within thirty (30) calendar days in the manner set forth in Government Code Sections 65865, 65867 and 65868 and County regulations implementing such Sections. Following consideration of the evidence presented in said review before the Board of Supervisors, either party alleging the default by the other party may give written notice of termination of this Agreement to the other party. Evidence of default may also arise in the course of a regularly scheduled periodic review of this Agreement pursuant to Government Code Section 65865.1. If either party determines that the other party is in default following the completion of the normally scheduled periodic review, said party may give written notice of default of this Agreement as set forth in this section, specifying in said notice the alleged nature of the default, and potential actions to cure said default and shall specify a reasonable period of time in which such default is to be cured. If the Page 15 alleged default is not cured within thirty (30) days or within such longer period specified in the notice, or if the defaulting party waives its right to cure such alleged default, the other party may terminate this Agreement. 5.2 AnnualRevi As required by Government Code Section 65865.1, County shall,- at hall,at least every twelve (12) months during the term of this Agreement, review the extent of good faith substantial compliance by Landowner with the terms of this Agreement. Such periodic review shall be limited in scope to compliance with the terms of this Agreement pursuant to Section 65865.1 of the Government Code and the monitoring of mitigation in accordance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California. Notice of such annual review shall include a finding regarding compliance with this Agreement. 'A finding by County of good faith compliance by Landowner with the terms of the Agreement shall_ be conclusive with respect to the performance of Landowner during the period preceding the review. Upon not less than thirty (30) days written notice by the Director of Development Services of .County, Landowner shall provide such information as may be reasonably requested and deemed to be required in order to ascertain compliance with this Agreement. In the same manner prescribed in Section 10, the County shall deposit in the mail to Landowner a copy of all staff reports and related exhibits concerning contract performance and, to the extent practical, at least ten (10) calendar days prior to any such periodic review. Landowner shall be permitted an opportunity to be heard orally or in writing regarding its performance under this Agreement before the Board of Supervisors or if the matter is referred to the Planning Commission before said Commission. If County takes no action within thirty (30) days following the hearing, Landowner shall be deemed to have complied in good faith with the provisions of the Agreement. 5.3 Enforced Delay_ Extension of Times of Performance. In addition to specific provisions of this Agreement, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default where delays or default are due to war, insurrection, strikes, walkouts, riots, floods, drought, earthquakes, fires, casualties, acts of God, governmental restrictions imposed or mandated by other governmental entities, enactment of conflicting state of federal laws or regulations, new or supplementary environmental regulation, litigation, or similar bases for excused performance. If written notice of such delay is given to County within thirty (30) days Page 16 of the commencement of such delay, an extension of time for such cause shall be granted in writing for the period of the enforced delay, or longer as may be mutually agreed upon. 5.4 Lagal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy any default, to enforce any covenant or agreement herein, or to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation. The remedies of County for any default of this Agreement by Landowner shall include but not be limited to termination of this Agreement and the vesting of the Entitlements hereunder and cessation of approving requests for development of the Property. All legal. actions shall be initiated in the Superior Court of the County of Butte, State of California, unless required by law to be initiated in the Federal District Court in the Eastern District of California. 5.5 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated following any event of default of Landowner or for any other reason, such termination shall not affect the validity of any building or improvement within the Property which is completed as of the date of termination, provided that such building or improvement has been constructed pursuant to a building permit issued by the County. Furthermore, no termination of this Agreement shall prevent Landowner from completing and occupying any building or other improvement authorized pursuant to a valid building permit previously issued by .the County that is under construction at the time of termination, provided that any such building or improvement is completed in accordance with said building permit in effect at the time of such termination. 5.6 Applicable Law and Attorneys' Fees. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Should any legal action be brought by either party for breach of this Agreement or to enforce any provisions herein, the prevailing party to such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs and such other costs as may be fixed by the Court. SECTION 6: HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT Landowner and its successors -in -interest and assigns, hereby agrees to, and shall defend and hold County, its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents, and employees harmless from any liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury, or bodily injury including death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise from the operations of Landowner, or of Landowner's contractors, subcontractors, agents, or Page 17 employees under this Agreement, whether such operations be by Landowner, or by any of Landowner's contractors or subcontractors, or by any one or more persons directly or indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for, Landowner or Landowner's contractors or subcontractors, unless such damage or claim arises from the gross negligence or willful; misconduct of County. The foregoing indemnity obligation of Landowner shall not apply to any liability for damage or claims for damage with respect to any damage to or use of any public improvements after the completion and acceptance thereof by County. In addition to the foregoing indemnity obligation, Landowner agrees to and shall defend,'indemnify and hold County, its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees harmless from any suits or actions at law or in equity arising out of the execution, adoption or implementation of this Agreement, exclusive of any such actions brought by Landowner, its successors -in -interests or assigns. SECTION 7: PROJECT AS A PRIVATE UNDERTAIENG It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the subject project is a private development. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this Agreement. SECTION 8: COOPERATION IN THE EVENT OF LEGAL CHALLENGE In the event of any legal action instituted by a third party or other governmental entity or official challenging the validity of any provision of this Agreement, the parties hereby agree to cooperate in defending said action. SECTION 9: GENERAL 9.1 Enforceability. The County agrees that unless this Agreement is amended or canceled pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement and the Adopting Ordinance, this Agreement shall be enforceable by any party hereto notwithstanding any change hereafter in any applicable general plan, specific plan, airport land use plan --except as specified in Section 3.4, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance or building regulation adopted by County, or by initiative, which changes, alters or amends the rules, regulations and policies applicable to the development of the Property at the time of approval of this Agreement, as provided by this Agreement and, as specified in Section 2.4.1 and by Government Code Section 65866. Page 18 9.2 Counjy Find. The County hereby finds and determines that execution of this Agreement is in the best interest of the public health, safety and general welfare and is consistent with the General Plan and North Chico Specific Plan. 9.3 Third Party_ Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered, into for the sole protection and benefit of the Landowner and the County and their successors and assigns. No other person shall have any right of action based upon any provision in this Agreement. 9.4 Severabil. Except as set forth herein, if any term,'covenant or condition of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement and all Entitlements. to which it refers, or the application of such tens, covenant or condition to Entitlements, persons, entities or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby and each term, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law:, provided, however, if any provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid or unenforceable and the effect thereof is to deprive a party hereto of an essential benefit of its bargain hereunder, then such party so deprived shall have the option to terminate this entire Agreement from and after such determination. 9.5 Construction. This Agreement shall be subject to and construed in accordance and harmony with all Butte County Codes, as they may be amended, provided that such amendments do not affect or conflict with the rights granted to the parties by this Agreement consistent with the requirements of this Agreement and Government Code Section 65866. 9.6 Other Necessary Acts. Each party shall execute and deliver to the other all such other further instruments and documents as may be reasonably necessary to carry out this Agreement in order to provide and secure to the other party the full and complete enjoyment of its rights and privileges hereunder. 9.7 Estoppel Certificate. Either party may, at any time, and from time to time, deliver written notice to the other party requesting such party to certify in writing that, to the knowledge of the certifying party, (1) this Agreement is in full force and effect and a binding obligation of the parties, (ii) this Agreement has not been amended or modified either orally or in writing, or if so amended, identifying the amendments, and (iii) the requesting party is not in default in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, or if in default, to describe therein the Page 19 y nature- of such default. The party receiving. a request hereunder shall -execute and return such certificate within thirty (30) days following the receipt thereof. County acknowledges that a certificate hereunder may be relied upon by transferees and mortgagees of Landowner. SECTION 10: NOTICES All notices required by this Agreement, the enabling legislation, or the procedure adopted pursuant to Government Code Section 65865, shall be in writing and delivered in person. or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid. Notice required to be given to the County shall be addressed as follows: Director Development Services' 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 Notice required to be given to the Landowner shall be addressed as follows: Douglas N. Gunn' Gunn Accountants 250 West Crest Street, Suite E Escondido, California 920254715 Either party may change the address stated herein by giving notice in writing to the other party, and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address.. H. ASSIGNMENT Landowner shall have the full right upon written notice to and consent by County, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, to assign this Agreement as to the Property, or any portion thereof, in connection with any sale, transfer or conveyance thereof, and upon. the express written assignment by Landowner and'assumption by the assignee of such assignment in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and the conveyyance of Landowner's interest in the Property related thereto, Landowner shall be released from any further liability or obligation hereunder related to Page 20 the portion of the Property so conveyed 'and tfie assignee shall be deemed to be the "Landowner," with all rights and obligations related thereto, with respect to such conveyed property. M. FORM OF AGREEMENT, EXHIBITS This Agreement is executed in two duplicate originals, each of which is deemed to be an original. This Agreement consists of 22 pages and 6 exhibits, which constitute the entire understanding and agreement of the parties. Approved this'lst day of December, 1998, by the Board of Supervisors of Butte County. COUNTY: LANDOWNER: BUTTE COUNTY, a political subdivisio of the State of Californ' r - By: By: Fred C. Davis, Chairman ` DO GLAS N. GUNN, Trustee of the Board of Supervisors Robert and Ann Stephens Charitable Remainder Unitrust ATTEST: Jrc 1 Cl rk Board of Supervisors By: APPROYED AS TO F us Minasian, County Counsel By: Page 21 I BUTTE COUNTY �r DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ... PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE:. Request for Comments. on a Development Application: Josh Woolf and/or Amy McNeill, MUP 02-05 DATE: July 26, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen hackney The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as.well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your. agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below., If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit for a large family dayc re on property zoned R-1 (Residential, 1-acreamcew located 460 Mojave Court.. off of Silverbell, in the north Chico area, identified as APN 007-340-021. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON Member 12, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN August 10, 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional'pages if necessary): By: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES i - BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: AP PLICANT'S ,N -AME ( If applicant is (iffe ent from owner an affidavit/is required) ASSESSOR'S PAIR/CEL NUMBER: v�S� 1v00/� Q�Va 0 OSP ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) 4''o o "O a r� COL 44 Ii co /-Z4 s-- A') - NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT �(IfIff any) �ui lq�j/I►� 8/OC�S' TELEPHONE ('S30 LOCATION OF PROJECT (Maj r cross streOet's and [A ss, ss, jf an ) '��� ��a �` .s1AJoc osS S'�d dnerde✓a�i�. -s.S �l..r� _.l�.tGOi zs� � S'.•/riPX / ed GENERAL INFORMATION REOUIRED OWNER'S NAME -&LEPHONE �✓ ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: 7-3 ZONE GENERAL PLAN R EXISTING LAND USE Cs Uta Ww eue-avP-9y- SITE SIZE ( in Square Feet or Acres ) Ace ��x • �9 s A reLL EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) 1/4f/ir 4 PROPOSED STRUCIU10 rn Square Feet) //?V/ S . �f — fr iss/ v9 . (Check One) O PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE S (Check One) PROPERT&R PROPOSED TO B N PUBLIC WA PROPER IS R PROPOSED TO Bfi6N SEV15> PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER _ ...... < APPI.TCATION RF01 TFSTFI) O GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT C3 REZONE n E (C E 0 U ji O USE PERMIT tL�� Ih�JJ l'! lL�� MINOR USE PERMIT ' , , t ,! . ? C 2001 D VARIANCE i 0 MINOR VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY C3 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIL PLANNING DIVISION 0 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 0 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP l TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION 13 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN O OTHER . , ..... ... .:... ... <..:....:.. - PRnTR(-T 1)FCC'RiPTinN FULL DESCRIPTION OF PRQPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE AB VE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMA ION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) w n DATE: SIGNATUP;7MAUM AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Print Name of Agent and Phone NNum Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for A� on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number This authorization allows representation for all. applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to.record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Vi.WPrint Name ii Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify:, Date Received: Q97- 310 AP �umber(s) Owners Authorization -� Project Description Taken by 4fA Receipt No. J 1703 E.H. Total Amount Received: � Y-�` !Legal Description Zoning Requirements 2=0— Copies of plot plan LD Plante FD Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". }_ BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: SiteCom for Metro PCS - Lisa Burke, MUP 02-03 DATE: July 27, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. . Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to place nine 5 -square foot panel antennas at the 110 foot level on an existing 120 foot tall lattice tower. EquipImentcabinets will be placed inside an existing building on property zoned C-2 (General Commercial) located On the west side of Silverbell Road, approximately 500 feet south of East Eaton Road, at 3415 Silverbell Road, Chico, identified as APN 007-390-001. Supervisorial District No. a. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON September 14 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN August 10, 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION "JrL1L;AN'1'* Agent mformation to be vrovi&A is on other side: APPLICAqr S NANP ( If applicant is different from owner an ar idavit is required ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ADDRESS:',�I77, fTATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) q35 '-w"" St- 1c, a03 0-0 CA qS F1 tmo 0,a -03 NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) TELEPHONE <;+C-(--z.'(-01M2> (,q I&) a Q --I a 5 41 LCCA77ON OF PROJEJ ( Major cross streets aAd Address, if L GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OW OWNER'S NER'S NAMEP APPL An RE UESTE IC ON Q D TELEPHONE I � -elk utt- M (-Ix%-) ADDRESS: I JL '� C STATE & ZIP CODE: gzt� ZONE GENERAL PLAN C- G LAND MS GLAND USE SIDS Q, Square Feet oA.) 'd Ac- -300 EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) 0 PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) No n e MINOR USE PERMIT - BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION (Check One) 0 NIAERED VARIANCE N/A (ChwkOne) PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER PRO= DF—SMI]MON FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division , describe the number and size of parcels,.1— .0 1 ' I - I I - v LA, 11 - ZA �11 It I L4 Mej L". PW. fLo %WyXj M4 OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and ind the affidavit with thisapplication.) DATE:SIGNATURE: APPL An RE UESTE IC ON Q D 0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT M TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP C1 REZONE EC E I V E 13 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP E3 USE PERMITD 0 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP MINOR USE PERMIT W 0 Jug 2 0 JUL BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION E3 VARIANCE LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION 0 MINOR VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF MERGER C3 ADMINISTRATIVE PERNEFF- PLANNING DIVISION MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN C3 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 10 OTHER PRO= DF—SMI]MON FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division , describe the number and size of parcels,.1— .0 1 ' I - I I - v LA, 11 - ZA �11 It I L4 Mej L". PW. fLo %WyXj M4 OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and ind the affidavit with thisapplication.) DATE:SIGNATURE: AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Print Name Signature Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of ArchitecdF.ngineer and Pbone Number Print Name signature t � ; r.f� �� i• rl t; .: j f 0 S ;ili,��; Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: f 4 10 l Total Amount Received: 4 H7. O O AP Number(s) NZA Legal Description Owners Authorization Zoning Requirements Project -Description t�Q Z Copies of plot plan Taken by ibA- Receipt No. %aLfaqa E.H. R-2. O LD Plan3 Sa oo FD. Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon ficial action. Current fee for this application is $ as of Make check payable to `Butte County Treasurer". ECEUME JUL 2 0 24N COUNTY. 3 DIVISION IOt: COUNTY OF BUTTE MENTAL INFORMATION FORM Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed h I 1716 1 1. N e andddre sof owner, and/or developer, and/o pro'ect sponsor: (Yt2 , PS d 2. Address of project: 1 -1&-1'73 Assessor's Parcel Number: 0 9 — - - 3. Name, address, aVele one mb r of er n to b� con cted concemin this project:, -11.rTj�, r14 p Jto cd!a 12 313 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public aDDrOvqls required for this p oject, including those required by city, regional, state and. federal agencies: 5. Existing general plan designation: 6. Existing zoning district: -2 7. How is land currently used? 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Project Description: 9. Site size:_ Ac- P tr ce-l' L •2 Q S -c. Ar—eq — 3 O (Acres/Sq. 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact: Total: 'e:lr- 11. Plans attached Yes -L/No 12. Proposed development schedule AW ceiW ( 4 13. Associated projects N Ik- 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development IM Q Attach description of. project containing the following Information: 15. If residential, include the nun�jjber of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household si;e expected.. VkLA, 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. h 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading 0 Butte County Department of Development.Services O Planning Division 0 1 facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.` Vt A 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicat9 clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit �yx 10.. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features.of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads..'., 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _ 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. _ 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the / vicinity. ✓ 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. _ 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such toxic as substances, flammable or explosives. _ 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel, consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). _ 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _ _/ v O Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O 2 • Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as .it exists before the project,, including information on topography, soil stability; plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and. any cultural, historical, . or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one - family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification P I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to'the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature/pr 4L K:\FORMS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO L' ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT METRO PCS SITE - SAC -C21-083 APN# 007-390-001 Project Description In order to provide personal communications services.to the County of Butte and surrounding area, Metro PCS, respectfully requests approval of its application for a Minor Use Permit to construct and operate a personal communication service (PCS), system facility at the property known as 3415 Silverbell Road, Chico, California. The facility will be comprised of nine (9) antennas mounted at 110 feet on an existing 120' monopole. A concrete pad with up to 7 equipment cabinets plus power and telco will' be located �nSidc a.•— e equipment cabinets' are each a t 1W L7t,R �• approximately 30".x 40" x 72" high. U Backeround Metro PCS, Inc. is a privately held'telecommunications service provider that has been authorized by the Federal Communications Commission to provide Personal Communication Services (PCS) in the Butte County area. The Company plans to implement an innovative and affordable pricing structure to capitalize on wireless customers' sensitivity to price. The Company believes that a substantial market opportunity exists to essentially eliminate the pricing gap between existing heavy usage cellular airtime and wire line telephone rates. Relative to current wireless service packages, Metro PCS expects to offer service packages that include large blocks of minutes consisting of anytime airtime at significantly lower effective prices per minute. Justification Statement Metro PCS is requesting a Minor Use Permit to add antennas to an unmanned telecommunications facility . located at 3415 Silverbell Road. The entitlement is requested.in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the zoning code regarding wireless communication facilities. The proposed antenna panels will be co -located on an existing tower; will be attached below ,the topmost existing antenna array; and will blend in visually to the tower. System Benefits Metro PCS's telecommunications facility will provide Personal Communication Services to the residents of the Butte area. This service will be offered to local police, fire, and public safety entities as well as to the local businesses and the general public. The proposed site located at 3415 Silverbell Road in the County of Butte is part of a network that will cover Northern California. Metro PCS's goal is to provide service to the Butte County area in the fall of 2001. Environmental Impacts The Metro PCS communication facilitywill result in no significant impacts to the environment or the area in which it is located. The unmanned facility (visited on an average of twice per month for routine maintenance purposes) will not be lit, nor emit noise or glare and will not interfere with television or radio reception. The subject site will be such that the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed facility will be compatible with and will not adversely affect the livability or appropriate development of adjacent parcels and the surrounding area., Therefore, the proposed site will have no adverse impact upon the existing land use. p EC E 0 W E JUL 202001 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION Power Density A power density study has been prepared for this site and it includes the existing antennas and the proposed antennas. The study shows that the proposed facility will operate at 12% of the Federal Safety Standard. Metro PCS will use one channel for the Butte County area initially. They are capable of eleven -channels but these will not be used until usage increases to a level necessitating the use of additional channels. Lats and Lonas The lats and longs for this site are as follows: Latitude North 394626.44" Longitude West 12 ?52'17.52'9 Nad 83 Alternative Site Selection Metro PCS is initially building our there network by collocating antennas on existing structures whenever possible. By collocating.on this monopole it prevents Metro PCS from having to construct a new monopole/tower. . BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC /o : VaisY a C, FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Pleasant Valley B DATE: July 2, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Steph The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described bi C l� a v E JUL 2 2001 ;h, UP 01-22 j BUTTE COUNTY AIt�PORT LAND USF rna, sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit to allow an expansion of an existing church, to include: enlargement of the ch arch building, a private elementary and high school, day care facility, gymnasium, three lighted ball fields, two basketball courts - park, caretaker's home, 306an rking spaces, _ on property zonedSSR- Q (Suburban -Residential, Public, Quasi -Public) located Highway 99 and Garner Lane 13539 Garnar Lane, Chico, identified as APN APM 007-420-060 & 062. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON October 25, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN July 16, 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made`that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: 7 County Center Drive'- Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 �O BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVIC PLANNING DMSION TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Spe.ctrasite Communications, Inc Agent Richard Connor Riley & Associates ATTN: Ivan M. Tjoe JOB# MUP 01-21 DATE: June 29, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine =the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of itssubmittal it'should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frarne given, or if additional information is needed, please ca11538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Minor Use Permit to replace an existing 89.5 foot tall lattice tower with a 114 foot tall monopole. The new monopole will allow for futire colocation opportunities. on property - zoned C-2 (General Commercial) located on the east side of Esplanade, approx. 1,000 ft. south of the intersection of Highway 99 to Esplanade, at 3902 E-,planade. Chico, identified as APN 006-400-056. Supervisorial District No. a. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON September 26, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN July 12,2001• If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): t' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION WFLIUANT: Agent mfotmation to be provided is on other side: IAPPLICANT'S NAME (If applicant is di1%rent from owner an affidavit is required) Spectrasite ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: C6mmunicati6ns 'Inc. ---b" their ­a int Richard -Connor Riley & Assoc tes 006-400-056 ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMB : (FOR OFFICE USE) 7600 S. Count Line Road, Burr Ridge, IL 60521 CA -0713 � -4 k NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) I TELEPHOAE (925 ) 901-1001 LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any ) HiRhway 99 & Esplanade S�? !'• RT. ... GENERAL .�.... INFORMATION REOUIItED OWNER'S NAME This will include a collocation and a compound expansion. Please See Project Summary TELEPHONE David & Nell Stephens (916 ) 894-2921 ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: 4192 Stone Valley Court Chico CA 95973 ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Acte.,) 13,817 C-2 Telecommunications Facility square feet EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) 89.5' Lattice Tower 114' Monopole Structure (Check One) (Check one) O PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED O PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER O PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER z. APPLICATION L CATION RE - UESTED 0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 REZONE 0 USE PERMIT M MINOR USE PERMIT 0 VARIANCE 0 MINOR VARIANCE 0 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT 0 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT O TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 0 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP O WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP 0 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION O LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION 0 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER 0 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN 0 OTHER i Y.•' PROJECT DESCRIPTION `<;� .'�<:�-: wf•.: .Y FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. U this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) Existing 89.5' lattice tower to be removed and replaced with 114' monopole structure. This will include a collocation and a compound expansion. Please See Project Summary JUN 22 2001 _ . OWNER CERTIFICATION -'K I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHO AGENT OF THE OW FURTHER I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND)7R THAT � OF TIS ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and ude the davit with OF THE JWb 1bED PROP TY. f, AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, DeparanenL of Development Services; SpectraSite Communications Inc., by their agent Richard Connor Riley .& Assoc. Pont Name olwgeat aqd P6otse NYm6er Ivan Tjoe 925-901-1001 , MAaWa Addmu is hereby authorized to process this.'applicstiori for' Corxaiunicetions-`...Inc: on n]y property, identific-d as liuge County Asse"or purcel Number 006-400-056 This authorization allows mprewAtstion for all applications, hearings, appeals: eta. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, bat not -including docament(s) relating to record tide interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print nand N Z � ! ,e SAW. � QHS Siyaoee Architect and/or Engineer: PnW Nam of AsditeaWag mw ass Ph=9 Nueb W ldarigg Addrm FOR OFFICE USE ONLY pilot NNW . WAV )VO—JI'La ski Verify: Date Received L• 2 2 O Total.Amount Received: N q Z- o O V , AP Number(s) Legal Description Owners Authorization Zoning Requirements — Project �''TipdOD � Copies of plot. plan Taken by Receipt No. I % I E.H. cQ 0o LD -- plan.. 06 IM Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is S as of Make check payable to `Satte County Treasuresm. COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL, INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed 6,199101 _General Information: 1.1 Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/9r projec sgonfsor: Snect-rasite CommL*iications, Inc., by their agent Richard Connor Riley s oc ates 2. Address of project: 3902 Esplanade,Chico, CA 95973 Assessor's Parcel Number:_ 006-400-056 - 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Ivan Tj oe , Ri_ha d C.rinnor Riley & Associates LLC 925-901-1001 760 S ('rnmty Line Road, B i_ 'r��Ridgg, IL. 60521 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing general plan designation: 6. Existing zoning district:C-2 'General rnmmt-rrial 7. How is land currently used? Telecommunications Facility 8. Proposed yse of site (Project for which this form is filed): - . - it _ _ _1_ 1. _ PLANNING DIVISION Project Description: 9. Site size: 3.8i7 (Aeres/Sq Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: bl/A Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes _x- No 12. Proposed development schedule I'U ovl e- 13. Associated pro'ects JZ c nn od a� 2 ► S�t�v►vOJcf a�'-�-cc- s c� �n�.r,��- t 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development Wen A -- Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type; estimated, employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function,, estimated. employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading 0 Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division 0 . . 1 0 Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O 2 facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the appiication is required. If, permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES - NO '20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons: or substantial alteration of ground contours. X 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. _ X .22. Change in patten or character of.general-area of project. _ _X__ 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. - X 24. Change in dust, ash, in smoke,.fumes or odors vicinity. _ I X 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing 'drainage pattens. _ 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. _ X 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 or more.. X percent 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. _ X 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). ^ X 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). i _ X 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _ 0 Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O 2 Environmental Setting: •(Aftch brief description) 32 Describe the project site as ti exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and anlmals,•and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or,Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, Including information on pians and animals and any cultural.. historical, or scenic aspect. lmdcats the type of land use (residential, commercial. etc.). intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses. shops, departmentstores, etc•), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. . Certification 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and In the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this IrM evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Sign tore r co -2-1- y N K:\F0RMS\SUBMITrAL\ENV4NF0 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Di cion G 3 Environmental Setting Attachment 32. THE SITE A. Character of the Site The parcel is used by Port -A -Storage and is primarily commercial, although there is a single residential unit for an on-site attendant. The Parcel is largely unimproved because portable storage containers, instead of buildings, are used at the facility. B. Access Access is obtained by checking in at the attendant's office located at the front gate. Although the attendant is only on duty during normal business hours, there is anon -site attendant residence. Vehicles travel to the site by crossing the Parcel along a very wide path (at least 50' wide) that bisects the storage containers. The entire Parcel is covered with rock to facilitate vehicular. travel. C. Ground Space The Site's current ground space will not likely accommodate additional co - location carriers. There is, however, sufficient space on the Parcel to expand the site into the Parcel's interior. 33. ADJACENT AREA' A. Character of the Locale A relatively high use two-lane highway (Highway 99) runs north and south approximately 500' feet to the east of the Parcel. A tractor and heavy equipment facility is located on the adjacent parcel to the north. A mobile home dealer is located to the southeast (along Highway 99). The adjacent parcel to the south is used in a residential manner, and a golf course is located on the next parcel to the south. A church is located to the east of the Site on the opposite side of Highway 99, and agricultural land is located to the west. B. Residential Use The adjacent parcel to the south is entirely residential. in use. The Site, however, abuts the property line of this residentially used parcel at a point. approximately 300' from the dwelling unit. NOTE: there were adults and children riding all terrain vehicles in the rear yard within the tower's fall zone. C. Church with Outdoor Children's Play Area There is a church on the eastern (opposite) side of Highway 99 approximately 600'-900' from the Site: The tower is clearly visible. from the church. In addition, there is an outdoor children's play area behind the church, which lies primarily out of the line -of -sight of the tower's antennas. D. Mobile Home Dealer, "McDonald's Travel N Fun' is. located near the Site and the top of the tower is visible from its driveway/entry. In addition, RV's parked behind the dealership may lie within the fall zone. E. Flight Path . . There is a flight path in the vicinity. The parcel owner granted anAviation Easement to the City of Chico in 1997. F. Setbacks The Site is located at the'southeast;corner of the Parcel. Two sided of the Site abut two adjacent parcels. There is, therefore, insufficient setback space to allow for a "fall zone.".' The areas of the adjacent parcels that appear to lie within the fall zone, are primarily undeveloped (raw), land. G. NEAREST WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE There is a lattice tower located' approximately one mile to the south on the eastern (opposite) side of Highway -99 at 3415 Silverbell Road. This co - location tower appears to be approximately 90' tall.: It is located 'in a' commercial office/industrial park on a street (Silverbell Road) that becomes entirely residential. There does not appear, to be sufficient space on this tower to accommodate additional carriers. COUNTY OF BUTTE COMMUNICATION'FACILITY PROJECT SUNIMARY Petitioner SpectraSite Communications, Inc., (SpectraSite) a North Carolina corporation, is one of the leading providers of outsourced an site and network services to the wireless communications and broadcast industries in the.United States, Canada and Europe. SpectraSite's business includes the ownership and leasing of antennae sites on towers, managing rooftops and in -building telecommunications access on commercial real estate, network planning and deployment, and construction of towers and. related wireless facilities. SpectraSite owns or manages more than 15,000 sites, in 98 of the. top 100 markets in the United States. SpectraSife's customers are leading wireless communications providers and broadcasters, including Nextel, Sprint PCS, AT&T Wireless, Ameritech, VoiceStream Communications, Tritel Communications, Teligent, Winstar, Cox Broadcasting, Clear Channel Communications and Paxson Communications. Collocation Collocation is the sharing of a single wireless communications antenna site by multiple operators. SpectraSite's business goal is to build and maintain sites in strategic locations throughout the country. Each site will accommodate numerous carriers, thereby minimizing the proliferation of towers in your community. The wireless industry is enjoying explosive growth, both domestically and internationally. Industry sources anticipate that the number of antenna sites. in the United States will grow from the current level of 22,000 to more than 100,000 sites by 2005. The recent FCC spectrum licensing to many new carriers has created an increasingly competitive wireless marketplace. With the inventory of existing towers that SpectraSite owns, the company intends to allow, co -location by wireless carriers throughout the county... Without collocation, the number of telecommunications towers could increase 600 percent or more. Build -To -Suit Build -to -Suit is a partnership between a.wireless communications company and SpectraSite. The wireless company selects a site for its network and SpectraSite will fund, build, maintain and manage the tower. SpectraSite's Build -to -Suit strategies provide wireless companies opportunities to reduce network development costs while enjoying favorable lease rates. SpectraSite provides all aspects of site maintenance and management services for the communication sites. Once the towers are constructed, SpectraSite markets space on the existing tower to wireless companies throughout the country. In addition, SpectraSite monitors tower lighting, security and site access and is responsible for all routine maintenance functions. p ECEUE JUN 2 2 2001 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OLK9211\projsum.doc Property Description The existing tower is located at 3902 Esplanade in the Town of Chico. The subject parcel is owned by David & Nell Stephens. The existing 89.5' lattice tower is located within the General Commercial (C-2) Zoning District and currently supports antennae of 3 wireless carriers. SpectraSite currently leases a 74' x 66' parcel in the Southwest portion of the property and will require additional lease space. Access is via US Highway 99E off of Esplanade. Nature of Request/Zoning Analysis SpectraSite is requesting a Minor Use Permit and any other permits necessary to allow the removal of the existing 89.5' lattice tower to replace it with a 114' monopole tower, expansion of the compound and construction of an additional accompanying electronic equipment shelter. Pursuant to the County of Butte Zoning Ordinance, at Section 24-262, "Wireless Communications Facilities," Paragraph"F", "Development Criteria for Wireless Communications Facilities",- Subsection "3", Colocations on existing approved Facilities", allows the following: Additional Facilities attached below the topmost existing Facility array, either on the same pole or tower, or a replacement pole or tower at the same height may be permitted subject to a Minor Use Permit or a Use Permit and shall -be subject to the following criteria. In addition per discussion with Senior Planner, Stephen Betts, the process we are applying for will require a Minor Use Permit.. Therefore; SpectraSite's proposed telecommunications facility will require a Minor Use Permit. Further, all setbacks will be complied with and no streets, rights-of-way or easements will be encroached upon. Components and Operations Each communication facility consists of a tower or other support structure and various wireless installations, including base station equipment. Once the rebuild of the existing antenna tower is complete and the telephone switching equipment is fine-tuned, visitation to the site by service personnel for routine maintenance will occur an average of once a month. The site is entirely self -monitored and connects directly to a central office where sophisticated computers alert personnel to any equipment malfunction or breach of security. Because the antenna tower will be unstaffed, there will be no regular hours of operation and no impact to existing traffic patterns. No water or sewer services will be required. Ingress and egress will be provided along with parking for service personnel who arrive infrequently to.service the site. C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OLK9211\projsum.doc Statement Regarding Nuisances . No nuisances will be generated by the proposed facility. The only facilities necessary for this site are telephone and electric facilities which will be provided if curnently inadequate. The facility will be unstaffed, will have no impact on traffic and will involve no loading or unloading of supplies. Further, no materials will be handled, stored; discharged or discarded. The only .noise generated by the operation of a wireless communications facility will be that from standard heating and cooling units. The proposed facility. will not injure the public health, safety, morals or general welfare.. Compliance with Federal Regulations SpectraSite will comply with all FCC rules governing construction requirements, technical standards, interference protection, power and height limitations, and radio frequency standards.. In addition, the company will comply with all. FAA rules on site location and operation. .3 10 AT&T AT&T -WIRELESS SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, L.L.C. I VICINITY MAP . DRIVING DIRECTIONS aCH O sp ectra.Slte SYCAMORE CREEK SITE ADDRESS 3902 ES P LAN•AD E CHICO,CA• 9:5973 THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF ANTENNAS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT CABINETS FOR AT&T PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES (PCS) WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK. A TOTAL OF TWELVE ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON ANEW MONOPOLE AND EQUIPMENT CABINETS ARE PROPOSED AT THIS SITE. PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT/LESSEE SPECTRASITE COMMUNICATIONS.INC. 100 REGENCY FOREST DRIVE, SUITE 400 CARY. NC. 27511 ZONING CONSULTANT: IVAN TJOE PHONE: (925) 901-1001 SITE ACQUISITION CONSULTANT' PROPERTY INFORMATION OWNER: SIFPHE?IS. DAVID L & NELL ADDRESS 3907 ESPUWADA CHICO. CA 95973 CONTACT: DAVID L STEPHEN PHONE: (530) 894-2921 AREA OF CONsTRUCT0k 4500 SF' PRESENT OCCUPANCY TYPE: TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY PROPOSED OCCUPANCY TYPE: TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY. CURRENT ZONING: C-2 ZONING APPLICATION f APA: 006-400-056 HAI AP REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY N UNMANNED AND NOT FDR HUMAN HABITATION. PROJECT SUMMARY ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SWILL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNDIG AUTHORRIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS 11 TO BE CONSTRUED TO POW WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLUNING CODES.(INCL TITRE 24 & 25) 1. CALIFORNIA ADMIMSTRRIVE CODE 5. ANSI/EU-222—F LIFE SAFETY CODE NFPA-101 6. UNIFORM PLUMBING.CODE 2. UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 7. NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE 3. BUILDING OFFICIALS AND CODE . B. LOCAL BUILDING CODE ADMINISTRATORS (BOCA) 9. CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES 4. UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE CODE COMPLIANCE CONSULTING INC. ADDRESS: 4740 NOROHGATE SACRAMM, GA 95634 CONTACT: ON SLOOTEN PHONE:(916 641-7570 ENGINE : NAME: ALLEN ADDRESS: 4700 NORDIGATE BLVD. SUITE 160 SOWEN O CA.95834 CONTACT: ADEN MAI90T/MARK NANNEY PHONE (916) 920-7900 . FAX: (916) 920-2343 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Y ' ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: UTILITY CONSULTANT: TOWER ENGINEER- PROJECT-TEAM NGINEER:PROJECTTEAM CA-0173:- o Under ground Serrce Alert 0 S.W — Ou/ari CALL: TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG , z. DESCRIPTION SFTE PLAN & ENLARGE SITE PLAN-, EOUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN JIM FoRmF�rwKF�l\VmFaIra% • u1�+r��INt•= �i SHEET INDEX ISSUED ,. PERMIT DATE. 0 DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PIANS AND EOSTONC DDAENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE CIVIL ENGMEERS W WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCES BEFORE PROCEMIHC WITH THE WORK OR DE RE70NML FOR SAME GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES AT&T AT&T WDt8849 SERV -CM OF CALPORNIA. LLC nn woWos rr ora woo GWM^ a oao ECT INFORMATION: SYCAMORE -CREEK CA -0173 3902—ESPLANADE CHICO,CA-95973 BUTTE,OO �1RRENT ISSUE DATE I 03/16/01 ZONING .:SATE UED FOR:= A 03/16/01 REVIEW PREPARED MERICOM C 0 R P 0 R A T I 0 N aeo n.uv.�f.f. �n mm csaen Rtdr la s�ufw. u.ra.�us�w. h ft{l149MD10 T! WAAT fs fU Ic[ fflAATlff RICHARD CONNOR RILEY & ASSOCIATES L.L.C. ATTY. IVAN M. TJOE 2420 CAM RAMON}1ATE 360 SAN RAMON, CA 94583 TELEPHONE: (925) 901-1001 ZDRAWN BY: ^HK.:=APV.: BMM MAN AM 4 SpectraSite 100 REGENCY FOREST DRIVE. SURE 400 CARY. NC 27511 ME SHEET - A T_ 1 CA -0713 �Y_ aawuo+ .r I X GID PN x 6' HIGH CHAIN—ENCE 4.11b� S88'36'31 "W 50. ' GIP � BOO o a 4 O p CA INET Gp� ♦�`dp\�G coao u')F4F 0 co w C p ii ?I p DNF Q V 0 H wo Q 03 O PG& BOX sr XC! �q 0 EMGRAVEL Illp C O � Q i 12' WIDE 4 - GAT GAT 1O + GH TELEPHONE VAULT CONC. �► °gOSTF ELECTRICAL CABINETS . . .. 50.00' 3 8 S88ID36 3 f W 75.00 �o �Ir�aV. ,1� TOWER HEIGHT: 76.43 FEET AGL ',a J•. TOP OF ANTENNA NO. 1: 69.85 FEET AGL F� BOTTOM OF ANTENNA NO. 1: 65.45 FEET AGL TOP OF ANTENNA NO. 2: 58.57 FEET AGL BOTTOM OF ANTENNA NO. 2: 53.51 FEET AGL BASE OF TOWER HEIGHT: 176.61 FEET AMSL ENLARGED SITE PLAN NI DR 001 YY W TUIm16M, II F CALL M NO 13 OOO®AAs SDR LDT 14 N DIDPH W DMT au fm YA► ONIIREEL 9101NIAN VPI SiAnL004. FRO N TK 01410 OF IK WDWN R00a� 01 SUTD OOINTI dEPONA W UNIM 1. IML N MOI K CIF MAPL AT PAN= 12. PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT OMAN AUL PT4OOTTY DRMTt N AR =01TY Or SUTX STAIN Cr CANPWIA MOr PAAIIOAAILY N FISIONO A PODW O LOT O N INON OR IMTCEETAN MN ORRID 'NIOATIANN VRI t1OMIW jai*. FSO N IK wn IF TK mccam of NRR WLNRT. Al IF 1. MARL N SCOL 1S OF PAM ►AI; Mr ►ARDOSART 0113121111111) CONDO AT M NSNQT WINNER W IAD LOT 14 MD POUF WD® SY A 3/4 NON Pr01 SM A PLASM RUO SDINPO'ME WW_ N NNOM GIM 1N1AT COMM WI DIADO'PARED MAI. •A SOAOM► MIR MMWADW OF A PORgO O LOO • 12 S TNM MOLNDIN IO SMR IR OWI' FSO N TK OMR[ Gr1t = v NRI[ OOMr6 CMPONA. CH IAMII IL /SN, N NOM N v MAPL PAS IS IOW LIMN WWIW SAIM NLN I= MOD TK NN" MAR Or MID LOT Sa UOQ /01100 O IW IASL sass FMR. MOO IK IATrRr Ng1Wf miLAR OI IAD c /L W THE 1111,11[ POINT 0f pINN< aAD PONT MID NOLO M 01 W TK 1100111 Dmf PAAGB4 INDOW DOTrINFo ALSO SAID IIDOLY INS 0100 WS30 GTL 0000 FMR% IIOW DUST NN1lAI. OF NW FEET MOO MI COMM CHAN UN FOND mm NOMI OrLTlY UP. WW FEET HOICK IIOIDI W -3N• KSS bW FEET W I[ PWT a SOOMn EXISTING LEASE AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCALE 1 1D ALL IMT awm RAL P10OTY SIWR M THE WISNTY or Num SIAlt or C%ItiaNA MOR PAIIMLLARY COOM As FOLAM! A PaalON Cf MIT U AS SIIDWN W WHIT CORAM MA► OND60 'MM AN YO ILlM1m1 MLI'. FAO N IK ONS or IK N D IM[R a• SUTIt COURT. CNIOMA W SAWN 1, tM6 N NW 18 Cr MAPS, PAGE /L MISS ►ARTWMLY DESIGN Al FWOQ mR0100 AT IK ISIRIIQ► CODA Cr SAD MIT 13. SAID FONT MAIDID M A >/t Mal P C WIN A PLASM PWD RAIIOIME O1163- N SIDf•I W THAT t>QDIN IIA/ DIDDO'PAM M M►•. •A NIADNT LAR: MIN IWm1 Cr A PGRN100 O LOIS 1,2a A 1S CF B MOaRAN Yrt SIR IR OW FAO N IK MW O TIS: RSOIRII CF SUM COMMIT CMPDINA ON MARDI K It. N SOOT N Of IMA►L MK 4; DOD[ NWIN N1r4r LOT. 02M F� Z. TK IISM UR O SAD LOT 14 I DIM SQUAW 003— MR. 237.0 /QT, MOO TK MlTOIY Lea Cr SAD IDT 14 TD IR TNR PWf W SLOAML SAD PWT MSD OO M IORIrAST CODON O IK IS711011 oOalWm MAGI% IOQ WIFU IRIO ALON SAD CAtNItY UPR. 01100 GO— W DOL AnW FEET% DISKS NON 402971• I= 7600 FEET ALM N OSONO CIMN LAN FDR` IOQ MINA W2320 SOL MM FEET MICE MORIN WWW [AST, MM FEET 10 INS PWf Or OMR PROPOSED LEASE AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSID W rs NCS IIAMDOR nr A POIIOI O MOT 13 N MM CM INET MIfAN MAP OFILO 'MAIOIw 1401 f1f101M01 N61'. nO N III WT S IM IlaODOI v S{RR WART M N �L OIL M SOOT O O MAPS,FADS M MlR MRADi/I�Y OOROOIO AT TK MORINOT MOVIES CP SAID LOT 14 SAID PONT MMS S MY A VW 11110111 PR WIl A PLASM PWD 3171RO TRt 1NO N 10011111 ON IMT OM MF MAI 01111111) 9•AMEL MA►•. 'A NIAOART WR IPOCNWION CF A ►aIIOW Or Lam "I It v rt MOMTAM wo sR 006 ar no N /c WM W IM IF NRt CONTIG TUAPOMA W MAMCM IS, 1M1. M SCOL N OF NAM PAS D UDIQ MOD 1K tOlfxr ISR Q GIM Mm IS /MIN -WO• GSL t76d7 PEET 10 A POD O mOMO Of TS 01)"ClAR a• A M FOOT Q ACOv tNDOIT WSW t%TDO S POLI PER OmtMI OI MOI M of OSMOSIS, CDIDI ISR AID ILO DITDOW O LDOSOS AND r1OR1131 WO[ M MtDOff NTNRMO IK O10LY I= Cr LOT 1A IDIS RATED SAID 19711DILY LAR IF LOT 17 MON --- MST. NOS FEEL DOTS IIDtN tl1rN• SASM MSQ PEEL INDW MOM 770054 IASL mIB PUT 10 IK POR W 1101 AT 1K = WAS ARA IK S FOOT OIDOW S ! MM WEE��A • IOWM NO DW01 WOR IK DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT S U.DM,t NILM9W .r GID +`Aso 2 $ITE NAME: NORD HWY DAIS W SURVEY: 3/21/01 . PDUIo PPE JIM F ' wir►rro s ns r I SURVEYED BY OR UNDER ME DIRECTION OF: DIRK C. SLOOTEN, LS 5342 • SITE ADDRESS: 3902 ESPLANADE. CHICO, CA �L4W � FDR: CPS DATA; IARI ff AIR= Mor ►a Pa to MAPS is OWNER'S ADDRESS: r lie LATITUDE: 39'47'267CM LONGITUDE: 1219FO.2rti r~ lop w LATITUDE: 3T47*27.12'W LONGITUDE: 121.5sai I NET AREA OF UNDERLYING PARCEL(S) rAvaFDKZWT NET AREA OF PRO.ECT AREA 4.200 SF R ft n MxoPO= Prrr LEM ' LATITUDE LONGITUDE LDX AWA BASIS OF BEARING: RHE BEARING SOUTH 8976'40' WEST AS SHOYM AS THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 13 PER 82 PU B wAS TAKEN AS THE PP 1IAS ARA BASS OF BEARING FOR THIS SURVEY BM a BENCH MARK >��N� TIE PROPERTY 6 ZOER C -L GD AA CMVICA 'F' • GONG. CONCRETE SETBACKS FBI ZWIC SS' F &CL j ESIAtLONL '^G sG^ - \� n Sc DM ELECTRICAL METER HEIGHT 0 BAA 0 SAM 1 Saaor Sfrfr4O'V FEDERAL ROOD ZONE INFORMATION: ZONE K "x ' ! -^r _ P C IRON PPE FlDiE SSS MDVJRBD SRls — — — — I ,.Y I i OVERALL SITE PLAN +`Aso 2 $ITE NAME: NORD HWY DAIS W SURVEY: 3/21/01 ' SITE NUMBER: F 0021 SURVEYED BY OR UNDER ME DIRECTION OF: DIRK C. SLOOTEN, LS 5342 • SITE ADDRESS: 3902 ESPLANADE. CHICO, CA �L4W � LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CPS DATA; OWNER'S NAME: STEPHENS FAMILY TRUST OWNER'S ADDRESS: NAOS3 LATITUDE: 39'47'267CM LONGITUDE: 1219FO.2rti ....., UOR MULCY WRf _ NAD27 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 006-400-056 LATITUDE: 3T47*27.12'W LONGITUDE: 121.5sai I NET AREA OF UNDERLYING PARCEL(S) GPS EQUIPMENT USED: MAGELLAN PROMARK t '+•'-- NET AREA OF PRO.ECT AREA 4.200 SF BOUNDARY SHOWN IS BASED ON RECORDED INFORMATION aw THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY •' .i":Y BENCHMARK USGS-STAMPED WORD 1939 SQUARE CONCRETE POST. ELY.. 178.42 FEET w EE D: CHICO _r .; Y CHICO LATITUDE LONGITUDE BASIS OF BEARING: RHE BEARING SOUTH 8976'40' WEST AS SHOYM AS THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 13 PER 82 PU B wAS TAKEN AS THE 3Sp ulla „ y 00-0-0- FENCE tr . BASS OF BEARING FOR THIS SURVEY BM a BENCH MARK >��N� TIE PROPERTY 6 ZOER C -L GD AA CMVICA 'F' • GONG. CONCRETE SETBACKS FBI ZWIC SS' F &CL j ESIAtLONL '^G sG^ - n Sc DM ELECTRICAL METER HEIGHT 0 BAA 0 SAM 1 CH CROWD HAND HOLE FEDERAL ROOD ZONE INFORMATION: ZONE K "x ' ! -^r _ P C IRON PPE COIANTY PAD! 000. 060DX-=W P.O.B. PONT OF BEGINNING DATE'4-20-2000 P.O.C. PONT BE COMMENCEMENT r INS IS M C MIT THAT ALL DATA DEPICTED W IHS 51OIEY P.Q.T. PONT OF TUM MAIOI NOTE: ARE rT1N TIE FAA X HWW AL AND 1E IM& ACOIIACY ""` •�•h�, 1� �« FP C'Q2 Pala POLL �•- 'i IOERAIIDES, AS SET RRIN BY r"E FAA r LEGEND SITE DATA VICINITY. MAP 9 MCOM OWM= swowelq a Mew CtICO 3002 BPLAWA CIICO CA 95M ISSUE DAZE JUNE 13. 2001 SITE SURVEY PREPARED s%AIYnID . INWmuD a ®IIS o F67750 wD on e�4 aDOra OF. 12-31�-W L7: /6147 Or IN 1 DRAYS BY:•SAP%. II( 045 UTE SURVEY GENOM DrOIYATI 11 ET NUMBER: �xwtg0w- 1 V5" AT&T . AT&T YY7U•3 W =%IMC OP CJUBORM& LL rm Nlcopm MAI ang woo IUWww a 83M I MECT INFORMATION: • I SYCAMORE-CREEK 2 CA-0173 3902-ESPLANADE CHICOAA-95973 BUTTE•CO PROPOSED 6•-0' HIGH I URRENT ISSUE OATS S88'36'31YE CHAIN LINK FENCE I 7s.00' 03/16/01 _.—.—.—.—.—� ED FOR EXISTING 6'-0' HIGH I . I CHAIN LINK FENCE ZONING I — —58836'31 b1 50.00 o EV.:�ATE:�SSUED FOR:= A 3/16/01 REVIEW MAN N89.16'40'E 822.99' t I $ PROPOSED AT&T EXISTING BUILDING I I w 12' X 28' LEASE I EQUIPMENT NET c AREAEXISTING i o CONCRETE N^ PAD Ern 0 . PARENT PARCEL '� .* - PROPOSED 110'-0' i o4 LOT 13 PER 16 MAPS 12 0 `" MONOPOLE i 1052 29'30 E 60 08• a EM i Oto N8619.44�E 113-43' ro I A9`4% S73 09'S4'E 436.26' rn m ' •� c t"y) ENLARGED SITE PLAN m . ,Qd. CD P o ',/� PROPOSED ALGON I ELECTRIC �� GH PANEL GH'PEDESTAL 2 X 3 PG&E CABLE TRAY TO BE REMOVE Box —J1. — ANTENNAS ENNAS IF EXISTING EXISTING TOWER TO REMOVE i LAMS PREPARED BY: a TES NE VAULT 0. 12'-0* GATE I $ 4!`,o PP II c . Ci ' I I❑ I W o G" I M E R I C O M 594.00' SBS' 16'40'W I I ELECTRICAL CABINETS C O R P O R A T I O N F n .. I I ."°a-m _ I••' — - — •••,-- I H �r.e m..�l.�a�f01 mino® f4NLA .�Gf,nf UW.-CAI7W id fl m9 Td 9B.tA7m VW 588 36'31 W 75.00' _ _•— �� —.—• — — 50•-0' ?- flUmma I¢ fN.tlO.nff ONSULTANT: 75•-0' _ RICHARD CONNOR RILEY & ASSOCIATES L.L.C. ATTY. IVAN M.TJOE 2420 CAMINO RAMON.SURE 380 SAN PAM. CA 94583 TELEPHONE. (925) 901-1001 PAWN BY:AHK :=APV.: BMM MAN AM r CENSURE fN ;: SITE PLAN ® 1 ENLARGED SITE-.PLAN �„�• 1 -1 ® D 2 44� - }�. SpecLL BENCH MARK: 7. ALL EOSTHO ununES. FACunm CONDITIONS. Alm TER DDEHSIONS SHOWN 10. TIE BLILDNG DEPART1E11►.6SINO 111E GUIDING PE7W S ALL BE NOTIFIED ON PLANS WAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS. THE ARCWTECt AT LFIL4f TWO WORIOMO GTS PRIOR ro THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK OR AS •17. THE GLIDES WITHIN THE FENCED-IN AM ARE To BE ACHIEVED er COMPACTING CLEAN FILL ro A OENSIIY OF 901 OF STANDARD PROCTOR COVERING THE AREA CLE I HDL V6011ME 1' F IAP AT FOR W® SUPPRESSION. TH THEN aSite AND OWNER ASSUME IO RESPaWeam WHATSOEVER As ro THE �� snPULATED By THE 000[,.EIFDRcENENY oFFICML HAVING ammo cnoN. "W+', SEAMS �EVM I ASK• OF s s• CRUSHm STONE-NO FLIES. 100 REGENCY FOREST DRIVE, SUITE 400 ELEVATION. ACCURACY OF TE NFORW1TION SHOWN ON THE PLUS OR THE MANNER OF THEIR =i:; ?-.., ROMAL OR AMISTMENT CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OETERMNI NG 11. GRADING OF ME SITE WORK AREA 6 ro BE SMOOTH AND CONnMIOUS IN 0= LOCATION OF ALL OWING UTILITIES Aim FACILITIES PIRDR ro START ac - SLOPE AND IS ro FEAilWR DRO EJ0.51DIG GRADES AT THE GRAD9NG UtITi * : , 10. CONTRACTOR SWILL CLEAN ENTIRE SITE•AFTER C06IRUCnGN SIKH TNT NO GARY, NC 27511 EET 1. ELEYATHONS ARE USG.S. GTUHL 2 SURVEY Y60RMOM SHOWN 6 OBTAINED FROM A SURVEY PREPARED BY CONTRACTOR SNALL ALSO OBTAIN FROM EACH URJTY COMPANY DETAILED INFORMATION RELATIVE ro WORIGm SCHEDULES AND MEM006 OF 4dxl, r-.N•: 12 ALL TEMPORARY ONCAYAIDNS FOR TE owALLATON OF FoIIDATONS. UTILITIES. PAPERS. 1RASK WEEDS. Ba1191 OR ANY OTTER DEPOSITS WILL REMAIN. ALL MATERIALS COLLECTm DURWO ClFAN1O OPERATIONS WIALL BE DISPOSED of OFF-SITE BY TE CEIIEINL GONTWICIOR, SITE PLAN SLDOTEN CONSULTANT or- REMOVING OR AOJUS'TWO EDSTING URITIS ETC., SHALL BE PROPFALY. LAD BACK OR BRACED'114 ACCORDANCE WTM CORRECT NNIO NORTNGNLTE. SACRAMENTO. G 930.34 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADWN6TRAl10N (OSIN) REOUREWNIS. PARE»NOT i TIE ARCHTEENZATILTIEER OW CROUPS ELBE NEFNG. LmurEs YDIS HORIZONTALLY O AND L CONTRACTOR PRIOR T VERIFY ALL CONSTRUCTION. ANY ORD PRIOR ro SUIT OF 15. STRUCTURAL. FILLS SUPPOt<TWNG PAVEMENTS SIMLL BE COMPACTED ro 1001 OF P�CIDR 19. ALL TOTEMS AND SHRUBS WIWCN N DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE DOW043 NM SHALL 8E PROTECTED Br THE GENERAL � AND AND REPaESEINDLnL�Es ai THE DILNEJL MUST G NOTIFIED AT LEAST Two THE AT FULL, GYs PRIOR ro commea wa OF Co18TRUCION AT (916) 920-7800 MEDIATELY REP TO As ro THE NTEAaETAT10N OF PLANS STIDLLD BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED ro AS TO HE PLANS THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER FOR RESOLUTION AD 9aTRUCIIOK AND NO FURTHER WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED UNTIL THE DISCREPANCY 6 CHECKED AND MAXIYUY STANDARD OILY OFI/SfT1'. x'•H'.� 14. NEW GRADES NOT N BLIIpNG AND DRIVEWAY NPROVE EMT AREA TO BE ACHIEVED 2o. ORNEMAY COMSTRUCIOK G ADINO Alp ORANAC'E WORNC SHWL CONFOW TO GV.9ORIM DEPARTMENT OF TG#fwo"ATOM VmDMD ENLARGED SITE PLAN 1. 00 NOT C=VATE Oa DISTURB BMW THE PROPERTY LINES OR LEASE LDNES. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.. OOiRECTED BY THE ARGITEDT. FAILURE TOSECURE SUCH INSTRUCTION MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL 11030E WORIED AT HIS/HER OWN MESK BY FILLING WITH MPROIIED CLEAN FILL AND COMPACTED M 951 OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY- '. , . SPECIFICATION FOR 710E ROAD AND . OR LATEST ANO ALL APPLICABLE PROVE COl1NT'1 ORDINANICES CORESUAL- S 00 NOT SCALE BUIDNC 050606 FROM ORAWNG'4. AND COMM CONTRACTOR SHALL GEL LOCAL DIGGER NOT LIE Hoa UTILITY LOCA7MM 48 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. I& ALL FILL DOLL BE PLACED N UNIFORM LITS TE LIFTS TICANESS SHOULD NOT CAN 13E COMPACTED TIROUGH01lT ITS ENTIRE OEPT11 TMEou EDITION, OR LOCAL � � EEL' NUMBER=====-REVISION L ANY OP. AID/pa FEED TRE EOOLRIIERED 0U1LRO C0N61RUCIDN SWLLL BE 9. ALL NEW AID 0090NO UnUTY STRUCTURES ON SITE AND N AREAS ro BE IXrTT►� � EPROPERLr s-`moi 21. ALL SITE WOIIC 9ALL BE CAREFULLY COORDINATED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR WITH LOCAL uRJIY COMIPANy. TEl.EP1DNE COMPNN. AMD AMI' DYER urMY RETURNED ro ILS OIIGOAL COIDIILON PWOR ro COMPLETION OF WORK. S= LEGIONAM TYPE OF ANY UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES OR I PROVDmfls SMALL DISTURBED BF CONSTRUCTION SKALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINISH EIENAl10NB PRIOR TOF9AL INSPECTION OF WORK.Ill. ANY FENS PLACED ONPOSING SLOPEST10T ARE STEEPER 71-M10 HDII2o m COMPANIES HAVING A4asGCnoN OVER TIS LOCATION- /, BE ACCURATELY NOTED AND PLACED ON AS-CG STINX ED ORAWOM BY GENEAL CONTRACTOR TOARUIIELY/ENGVEE R AT COMPLETION Of PRQECf. To VERTICAL SCALL G PROPERLY BENCHED Aro THE DOSTNG SLOPE AS DIRECTED BY A 6&TiSHMKALL E ' H A� AND ISSUED _ 3 CONSTRUCTION NOTES`" Y SHEET CA-0713 ,s PROPOSED AT&T MOUNTING FORI PROPOSED AT&T MOUNTING FOR F ALGON PANEL ANTENNAS - ALGON PANEL ANTENNAS LIGHTNING ROD \ PROPOSED NEXTEL PROPOSED NEXTEL MOUNTING FOR MOUNTING FOR OMNI ANTENNAS OMNI ANTENNAS TOP OF LIGHTNING ROD 114'-0' \LAING UGFRMING ROD EXISTING LIGHTNING R00 AT&T ANTENNAS s RAD CENTER AGL 110 -0 TOP OF THE LIGHTNING R00 ANTENNAS EXISTING fl n ANTENNAS nEXISTING _ fl s9 ANTENNASI I . Top OF THE NG Ah ANTENNA TOWER M ANTENNAS CENTER L x �- � >< 7F - U FOR FOR MOUNTING BRACKET1 ly 86'-0 — AIRTOUCH ANTENNAS RAD AGL eo-o- X X UBIOUREL ANTENNAS RAD ACL EXISTING AT&T I / \ I EXISTING AT&T ARRAY ANTENNAS ARRAY ANTENNAS ly 70'-0* PROPOSED AIRTOUCH MOUNTING FOR I n PANEL ANTENNAS PROPOSED UBIOUTTEL MOUNTING FOR PANEL ANTENNAS EXISTING I \ / I EXISTINGMER TOWER TO PROPOSED MONOPOLE ANTEN BE REMOVE I ^ I ANfTEN BE R MOVE 110'-0' EXISTING 101 20' \ / EXISTING 10'X 20' \ / NEXTEL SHELTER L— _ NEXTEL SHELTER L — — EXISTING CHAINLINK \I EXISTING CNUNUNK \I FENCE / I FENCE I \ / I EXISTING USIOUTTEL CABINET CABINET UBIDUn`EI z �I GROUND LEVEL 0--o- SOUTH ELEVATION 1 NORTH ELEVATION LIGHTNING ROD TOP OF LIGHTNING ROD 114'-0'' AT&T ANTENNAS RAD CENTER AGL ob 110'-0' TOP OF THE LIGHTNING ROD 06 TOP OF THE EXISTING ANTENNA TOWER • t� 89•-1. �f NEXTEL ANTENNAS ANTENNAS CENTER : FOR MOUNTING BRACKET 06 86'-0- AIRTOUCH ANTENNAS RAD AGL 80'-0- UBIOUITEL ANTENNAS RAD AGL Ilk 70'-0' PROPOSED AIRTOUCH MOUNTING FOR PANEL ANTENNAS PROPOSED UBIOUTIEI MOUNTING FOR PANEL ANTENNAS I - PROPOSED MONOPOLE 110'-0- NIAT&T AT&T WME.ESS SERVICES OF CALVMMA. LLC rm PFAVW w= oat woo CMW^ a swo PROJECT INFORMATION: SYCAMORE -CREEK CA -0173 3902 -ESPLANADE CHICO,CA-95973 BUTTE,CA 1 03/16/01 ZONING :REV.:=lDATE= S.SUED FOR: PREPARED MERICOM CORP.O RATIO N 9�e.es9�omv ��m 3®uqu9sw 7mF�uFew. T! 9LL970.7m T& 9�9AX7M F- 91G92MZ43 F¢ 99wa7M RICHARD CONNOR RILEY & ASSOCIATES L.L.C. ATTY. IVAN M. TJOE 2420 CAMINO RAMON SUITE 380 SAN RAMON. CA 94583 M.EPHONE: (925) 901-1001 BMM I MAN 1 AM SpectraSite 100 REGENCY FOREST DRIVE, SUITE 400 CARY, NC 27511 EET TRI c GROUND LEVEL 0'-0' ELEVATION EET NUMBER•=REVTSION = � A 2- A c—ir 2 SHEET CA -0713 AT&T - 1 ATRT WOtIIFSS 90tVICES OF GIBnRMA. LLC 1 sm 0.06 amalft a O n I ROJECT INFORMATION: ' SYCAMORE -CREEK I I CA -0173 PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH I 3902 -ESPLANADE • CHAIN LINK FENCE I CHICO,G-95973 S8936'31"W 75.00' 1 I BUTTE,CO LL RRENT ISSUE DAX . I EXISTING HIGH ! INK CHAIN LINK FENCE I i 03/16/01 • �--_--------�__ PROPOSED AT&T I 12' X 28' LEASE I N S8g36'311M 50.00' I EQUIPMENT EXISTING BUILDING I u CABINET I c 1 u N SSUED FOR: ZONING AREA I F------------ o i 1 1 rn i EV.:�ATE��LIED FOR: - EXISTING a 03/1ejo1 REVIEW MAN CONC. PAD I c 32'-10'EM o to PRO POSFr o MONOPOLE ELECTRIC GH ONCRETE PEDESTAL -I 2 X 3 PANEL - CABLE TRAY TO BE REMOVE PROPOSED ALGON - PG&E BOX EXISTING TOWER ANTENNAS L, TO BE REMOVE c` IXI$TING TELEPHONE VAULT • 0 12-0' GATE ' p i8 v EM W jO 54 T c GH ." N LANs PREPARED BY: b cn , j `r1 ELECTRICAL CABINETS j i p M E R I.0 O M Sg836'31b1 75.00' 50'-0 C O R PO R A T 1 0 N " - I 75'-0' - .mwer..e/aa..�w I r) r. rla 1mmam9a .®sa a n9)9 .Lbwa 9m9 Ti 9169At999 T t 999.MM t¢ 916910m.1 f¢ 9N.f1M11999 ONSULTANT: RICHARD SSOCATESRRIC. UNUSED se" -3 EQUIPMENT AREA PLAN �, o® 1 o® ATTY. IVAN M. TJOE PROPOSED 110' MONOPOLE2420 CAMMO RAYON,SUTIE 380 %c_10 P� 001 TELEPHONE (925) 901-1001 yJja 28'-0- RAWN BY: CHK.____APV:_ BMM MAN AM 1 CENSURE SECTOR 1 • AZIMUTH o PROPOSED AT&T 12'-0- X 28'-0- SHELTER - . SpectraSite 100 REGENCY FOREST DRIVE, SUITE 400 PROPOSED ALLGON ANTENNAS (4) I, CARP, NC 27511 ON EACH SECTOR (3 WITH 1 SPARE) TITI IF HEFT ti ti F EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN o H �J HEET NUMBER: REVISION A-3 A SHEET C-0173 ANTENNA LAYOUT 4 EQUIPMENT LAYOUT 1�r.r 1 2 COMMUNITY. DEVELOPMENT -DEPARTMENT PLANNING - 411 Main Street CITYorCHICO P.O. Box 3420 uaC.i872 Chico. CA 95927 (530) 895-4851 FAX (530) 895-4726 ATSS 459-4851 a 61X71 D �4 June 25, 2001 RE: Tentative Vesting Subdivision - S 01-04'Foothill Park East Unit 4 Subdivision Account No.: 863-510/70917=4710 Enclosed is a tentative map of the subject* subdivision. Please review this map and forward to the City of Chico your recommendations regarding facilities, easements, etc. under your organization's jurisdiction. Return one (1) copy of the tentative map within fifteen (15) days to: \ Jay Hanson , City of Chico Planning Division P.O. Box 3420 ' Chico CA 95927-3420 This will allow the City to incorporate your recommendations into the final map or improvement. plans for the subdivision. If you. have any questions or. wish to discuss the map in further detail, please call me at (530) 895-4858, at your convenience. Sincerely, Jay Hanson Associate Planner cc:... SUbd File TF (2 weeks) S:\Jh\JH\SUBDVNS\Co=entLtr.NPD ' r ^ p E C E 0 W E JUN 2 6 2001 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION eA Made From Recycled Paper rCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT' DEPARTMENT PLANNING 411 Main Street CITYo►CHICO P.O. Box 3420 D INC. 1872 - . .Chico. CA 95927. -- ' (530) 895-4851 JUN 2 5 2��� FAX (530) 895-4726 ATSS 459-4851 June 20,2001 BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION RE: Tentative Parcel Map S 01-1 (Bowman) Subdivision Account No.: 863-530/70847-4710 Enclosed is a tentative parcel map for the above referenced subdivision. Please review this map and forward to the City of. Chico your recommendations regarding facilities, easements, permit requirements,- comments and/or recommendations under your organization's jurisdiction: Please return your comments and/or one (1) annotated copy of the tentative map within fifteen (15) days to: City of Chico Community Development Department, Planning Division Ed Palmeri P. O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927-3420 Response to this map application will allow the City to incorporate your recommendations into the environmental analysis, conditions of approval for the tentative map, final map and/or improvement plans for the subdivision. Please include your name, agency and telephone number with all responses. If you have any general questions related to the project or process or wish to discuss the map in further detail, please call me at (530) 895-4795, at your convenience. If you have specific questions related to engineering, please contact Fritz McKinley, Assistant Director of Public Works, at (530) 895-4875. Sincerely, Ed Palmeri Senior Planner Enclosure(s) cc: CDD ADPW w/map Subdivision File T/F (2 weeks) &\Palmeffarcel Maps\2001\0101BOWMAN\DISTRIBUTION LETTER.wpd FE N .2 2 M01 UTTE COUNTY ANNING DIVISION g�� Made From Recycled Paper PROJECT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Name/Address: UP 01-30 1072 Marauder Street Assessor's Parcel No. 047-560-055 Project Description: Use permit to allow a church and associated uses including a pavilion/conference center for a maximum of 600 people to operate.in an existing building located Within an ML Light Manufacturing district pursuant to Section 19.48.050. Attached is the preliminary data regarding a project which as been submitted to the City of Chico for a discretionary action (Use Permit, Rezone, Subdivision, etc.). An assessment of the potential impacts of the project is being made. Please review and submit comments within ten working days. ■ This item will be on a future Airport Commission agenda. ❑ This item will be on the Zoning Administrator agenda of COMMENTS: Thank You Project Planner: Jay Hanson ^+; cc 4 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: Date: J JUN 1 �! ■ CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR ❑ CHIC AF?EA REC. AND PAR DIS ■ CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ❑ CHIC U ,_ba5lirDISTRIC ■ CITY ASST. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ❑ COU N ■ CITY CHIEF OF POLICE ❑ COUNTY ENV. HEALTH DEPT. (CHICO ■ CITY FIRE CHIEF ❑ COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DIST ■ CITY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ■ COUNTY-AIRPORT'LAND'US OCE OCE MM; ■ CITY ASST. DIR. PUBLIC. WORKS ❑ COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIST. ■ CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL ❑ DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME ❑ CITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR ❑ WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ❑ CITY URBAN FORESTER ❑ UTILITY COMPANIES ❑ CITY WPCP SUPERVISOR (PAC BELL; PG&E; CAL WATER) ■ CITY SENIOR DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER ❑ NORTHEAST INFO CENTER ❑ CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ❑ CAL TRANS ■ SENIOR PLANNER (CURRENT) ■ AIRPORT DIRECTOR- ■ PRINCIPAL PLANNER PROJECT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Name/Address: UP 01-30 1072 Marauder Street Assessor's Parcel No. 047-560-055 Project Description: Use permit to allow a church and associated uses including a pavilion/conference center for a maximum of 600 people to operate.in an existing building located Within an ML Light Manufacturing district pursuant to Section 19.48.050. Attached is the preliminary data regarding a project which as been submitted to the City of Chico for a discretionary action (Use Permit, Rezone, Subdivision, etc.). An assessment of the potential impacts of the project is being made. Please review and submit comments within ten working days. ■ This item will be on a future Airport Commission agenda. ❑ This item will be on the Zoning Administrator agenda of COMMENTS: Thank You Project Planner: Jay Hanson 0 Staff Report UP 01-30 (Abundant Life Center) ROW Prepared By: Jay Hanson,- Associate Planner CITYOFCHICo General Information INC. 1872 Applicant: Abundant Life Center c/o Peter Chapman, 30 Philadelphia Drive,. Suite D, Chico CA 95973 Property Owner. A.L. Silver, Trustee, 1450 Channing Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301 Purpose: To allow a church and associated uses including a. pavilion/conference center with a maximum of 600 people to operate in;an existing building, located within an ML Light Manufacturing -district pursuant to Section 19.48.050 Location., 1072 Marauder Street Assessor's Parcel No:. 047-56.0-055 Parcel Size: Building =.20,000 sf/ Parcel = 2.87 ac. Existing Zoning: 'ML Light Manufacturing Existing Land Use: Vacant building - General Plan Designation: Manufacturing and Warehousing Surrounding Land Uses: N Manufacturing ,(Koret) S Manufacturing/Light Industrial E Cohasset Road/Vacant property zoned MP Manufacturing Industrial Park W Manufacturing/Light Industrial Environmental Review: Not yet determined S AJh\info.up01-30.wpd PTN. SECTION 34 T23N RIE M.D.B.&M. r 31 ¢9+� n 72 _ 73 Butte County Assess'or's Map . lei ' Book 47, Page 56 42 ' ec 1 JJ(�l C�/�% 1 va. NOTE Theo parcels are for assessment purposes any and may not constitute kgol parcels • `� I�. � DB CREATED ON 5-22-2000 J 1 q ` � I � REVISED BY OB REVISED ON 6-27-2000 (5 AU) 39 - __------------ -- ` '1(Yr E}FECTKE '01-02 ROIL 6 432 AC ( .. p,Ted TAe Butle Coon Assessor's Office . 55 > 18 ;. 2.87'Ac c r -00 I3 S 0? 290.00 ( r 2.45 AC 2.57 IS 2 Z 1210 I `�� 15195 ; ; ltd 33,0O Act O 17.53 AC 4)Bpp MARAUDER 07z 1070 0 0 �_ X10 r�QAC* zo (12.53 AC*) �. \ (lll �11ncM a i 74 (8t3) N O+ 12 16 2D .f 70 r 43 o Ln ect = �% 45 N J O 1 0 .16 AC O r 1.81 ACI 1 4.b3Ac > n 0 1.7 1. AC 26 27 19 d$ 49 r r 4•us 1.70 O - r AC 1.70 ' 3 4 75 � r �° Q � 1i J 84 t3 85 i4 -_-- - - _ AC 5.10 AC j _ f 1 335- 1 ra 2.84 AC 2.16 AC* N 7+0--- ! r'�O?4 f 11.09 AC � r Z, lily 1d r( 1 21 _ 6 r �y"I r �P 58 �•� 267.00 N .66AC 1.6,3Ac ro 25 24 0 I�i { 3.06 AC W 68 76 1.14 1.72 r6 ST ' n t 79 s0 + 1 n000 1 W Y a N 5.61 AC r 1 22 1 65 Y 78 00 82 _7 i r U 77 g 0- g = U naw i i r 62 63 - s O 2.05 AC � IS U 5 Z w Ac 1.m .C- . 64 2.00 AC 94-z7 Z.13Ac , a:6 W �g 4.42 AC* IR59 DD m 57 1�1 94.00. SS CHICO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Mill � ��z ABUNDANT 166 Eaton Road . Suite F. Phone (530) 8q1-7500 June 12, 2001 The Planning Division Community Development Department 411 -Main Street Chico, CA, 95927 Dear Sir or Madam: .-CENTER Chico, CA 959.73-0201 Fax. (530) 891-7539 am asking you to.consider our.proposal that I believe would benefit our community and our city. Our.'desire is to be able to provide a facility for our church that would be able to house 500.— 600 people at a weekend service. Our major needs are 20,000 sq. ft.,, parking, easy, access, less.expensive rent, and limited noise restrictions. We also would like to look at the possibility of using our facility as a function room for the surrounding businesses, other churches and.schools. We have already been approached by 2' businesses about using our facility for seminars and the. like, if it were approved. We have looked all the city and found that thereis not much available as far as buildings or.parking go, within the current zoning regulations. Also, as we are a non-profit organization with limited funds, the cost of commercial property this size is prohibitive and scarce. I met with our mayor, Dan Herbert, and he suggested the airport location or the area around Otterson Drive. After checking out both these areas, we found the area around Otterson Drive had limited space, parking and access. The airport area on the other hand had excellent access and much more parking. 1 believe if we were allowed to use our building as a. function room, it would be a great asset to our city with it's vicinity to the airport, parking available and limited noise restrictions. Within our congregation, we have several chefs and caterers, florists and business people experienced and interested in providing such a service. EXrerience............................... . Healing from the past Success for today Hope for the future COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING CITY�oFCHICO 411 Main Street irC. 1s7z P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 (530) 895-4851 FAX (530) 895-4726 ATSS 459-4851 June 6, 2001 RE: Floral Commons Tentative Subdivision Map S 01-1 Subdivision Account No.: 863-530/70837-4710 Enclosed is a tentative subdivision map for the above referenced subdivision. Please review this map and ` D1 forward' to the City of Chico your recommendations regarding facilities, easements, permit requirements, comments and/or recommendations under your organization's jurisdiction. �1 Please return your comments and/or one (1') annotated copy of the tentative map withinifteen (15) da s t City of Chico. Community Development Department, Planning Division Ed Palmeri P. O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927-3420 Response to this map application will allow. the City to incorporate your recommendations into the environmental analysis, conditions of approval for the tentative map, final map and/or improvement plans for the subdivision. Please include your, name, agency and telephone number with all responses. If you have any general questions related to the project or process or wish to discuss the map in further detail, please call me at (530) 895-4795, at your convenience. If you have specific questions related to engineering, please contact. Development Engineering at (530) 895-4983. Sincerely, Ed Palmeri Senior Planner Enclosure(s) cc: CDD SDE Varga.w/map ADPW w/map Subdivision File T/F (2 weeks) S:\Palmen-xSutxfvisions\0101 FLORALCOMMONSTISTRIBUTION LETTER.wpd 82001 D mJUN I BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION (aOL Mede From Recycled Paper BUTTE COUNTY ECEO E DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVIC PLANNING DIVISION MAY 2 2 2001 TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division 81JTTE COUNTY RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Fir t ' ee ent cAt& t T ND USE COMMISSION ATTN: Pastor Kenneth Bledsoe, UP 01-20 -D(S& DATE: May 22, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts�ZIPA A . cam,,; M5 The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of thais comment sheet is to:.... 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, -please call 538-7601.. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit to allow a day care center for up to 41 children The center will use an existing 1,968 square foot building, on property zoned A -R (Agdcultural-Residential) located on the northwest comer of Tenth Street and Thermalito Avenue at 1619 Tenth Street, Thermalito. , identified as APN 031-253-044. Supervisorial District No. 4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON September 13, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN June , 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville; California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION AYYLIC:AN-1: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( If ap licant is different from owner an affi vit is r u' ed) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL -NUMBER: t� ed ac, ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: ' (FOR OFFICE USE) NAME OF P OPOS P JECT ( any TELEPHONE �-(' �,. r� ln� ��� erase ��r� p� �r c >'.5—��/—� qQ LOCATION OF PROJECT( Major cross streets and Jkddress, if any ) 7'h d— .o '�' ` F ' r° ` ... 3. GENERAL INFORMATION REOUIRED OWN S NAME ` TELEPHONE _ - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ( ) S 1�9?-T DRESS: TTY, STATE dt ZIP CODE: TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 26(� ONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE USE PERMIT SITE IZE (in Square Feet or Acres) (� ❑ JA `�" — EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) 1?6 8 56?• F -r. NO A9:)p/Ti0A,6 -f - ST2vcru2�3 / (Check One) C� PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED (Check One) I"PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER PROJECT DESCRIPTION `. FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and ` APPLICATION REQUESTED ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT e ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑REZONE 0 r (� O n D l� l� js v C3TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP W/ USE PERMIT ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT ��Y 9, 0 ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION C3MINOR VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PE PLANNING DIVISION ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION `. FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) rr iJ Vit- utrr )•' a !dj" e t r N - r ll — 4,, OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the davit with this application.) DATE: 7 - /5-- 0/ SIGNATURE: COUNTY OF BUTTE. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION (To be Completed By Project Applica Date Filed _General Information: 1. 2. 3. 4 Name and pddress of owner, .40 FASr'od. A20WArA Address of project: — Assessor's Parcel Number: Name, address, and telephor 0 List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals re wired for this project, includi those required by.city, regional, state and federal agencies*ro e 5. Existing genera Ian designation: 6. Existing zoning district: - 7. How is land currently used? 0- h aneh 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Project Description: 9. Site size:—.2 61 Sao ` _5Q. FT 0, (o 9 A c�_ (Acres/Sq. ( q. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: rY Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes X No 12. Proposed development schedule 13. Associated projects _ NcV1/6 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development Opt/F eM- SE57 Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate. type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading O Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division ❑ 1 D BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 2 facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this indic . and to clearly w Lv th�e application is reqqu��ired..If per its have already been issued please attach as Exhibit _(JS'6 �1ZIWI% .SPU CA7/� TO E741Aeio _ -Are the following items applicable to the project or its. effects? discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial - alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 22. Change in pattern, or character of general area of project. _ 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _ 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in;vicinity. 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. .26. Substantial change in existing.noise ervg*ager-levels in the vicinity. — 27. Site on filled land or on slopr:s of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. — — 29.. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. inuding special districts). 2 (fv�►�t�r Cbtv,Qct — 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. D BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 2 Environme.ntal Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project. site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use.of the structure's... Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe e the surrounding properties, including.information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. . Indicate.the type of land, use (residential, commercial" etc.), intensity. of land use (one- family,'apartment .houses, shoos, department stores, - etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.).. Attach photdgraphs'of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photo's will be accepted. Certification I hereby -certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and informatioh': required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date SignatUre for. K:\F0RMS\SUBM1TTAL\ENV-INFO D E C E 0 W E 9 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION 0 Butte County Department -of Development Services C3 Planning Division 0 3 MEMORANDUM,. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: Local Agencies and,Departments From: Dan Breedon, Senior Planne Subject: John Byrne Tentative Subdivision Map (TSM 01-03) Date: May 3, 2001 The applicant has amended"th s tentative map. The previous tentative map proposed 10, 1-acre parcels. The revised Parcel Map proposes .4.(+/-) acre parcels and a 5.35 acre remainder. Please provide revised comments as they apply to this revision prior to May 17, 2001. Thank you for your attention to this matter. cc: Environmental Health, Chico . Public Works, Land Development Division ALUC City of Chico Qa. �s-rrn STARK GEORGE T. KAMMERER i MAR01- �a LAW OFFICES ES7.4BLISCEP 1896 _ 3130 RIVER PLAZA Dawe SUITE 450 ZACRAMENTO. CA 95833.3883 TEL: ;916) 925.6620 FAX (916) 925-11 '17 Butte County Board of Supervisors County of Butte 3 County Center Drive Oroville, CA March 27, 2001 E.CE0ME 27 W BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION ' Via Facsimile and Hand Delivery (530) 538-7120 (Board) (530) 538-7785 (Planning) (530) 538-6891 (Counsel) Re: Reasons To Approve Pheasant Landing Unit III Subdivision and to Overrule Butte County Airport Land Use Commission Findings (Stephen Schuster Application GP A/RZ 00-05; TSM 00-03; APL 01-06) Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors: On behalf of our client, Stephen Schuster of Schuster Homes, we respectfully request your approval of the above application (the project) based upon the following substantial evidence in the record which we believe j ustifies Board approval of this project and the Board's 4/5 vote to overrule the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) finding of inconsistency of the project with the Chico. Municipal Airport (CMA), for the following reasons: Land Use 1. The project is surrounded by existing and approved. SR -1 (one acre per home) residential development which is built or being built at equal or greater density to the project, making this project truly an "infill" project even though it does not meet the ALUC criteria for such. 2. The project is proposed for development at an average density per acre of about 1.3 acres per residence which is well below the North Chico Specific Plan (NCSP) SR -1 zoning minimum size lot per residence of one -acre, by subdividing 43.83 acres into 3.0 one -ace lots. 3.. The 5 -acre park was moved from the north end of the site where it was tentatively proposed to be located under the. NCSP, to a better location along the southern boundary of the site bordering Keefer Slough where the park will serve the multiple purposes of creek corridor wildlife habitat and recreational trail expansion, flood plain protection, improved waste disposal, and could provide an emergency landing area before aircraft reach the subdivision. Butte County Board of Supervisors March 27, 2001 Page 2 This relocation is supported by the Chico Area Recreation & Park District (CARD) for these same reasons. Airport Land Use Consistency On September 20, 2000, the Butte County ALUC reviewed the project for consistency with the CMA under ALUC's Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update, adopted December 29, 1999 (1999 CLUP). The 1999 CLUP recommended a minimum 2.5 -acre parcels per residence, despite the fact that the Butte County Board of Supervisors had previously approved 1 -acre minimum parcel sizes for this site under the NCSP. The Schuster project has been designed to be consistent with the NCSP 1 acre parcel sizes approved by the Board. For the following reasons,. the project will provide for the orderly development of the CMA and the area surrounding this. airport so as to promote the overall goals and objectives of the California Airport Noise Standards and to prevent the creation of new noise and safety problems, as well as protect public health, safety, and welfare by insuring the orderly expansion of the CMA by the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around that airport, as required by California's Public Utilities Code 21670, et seq. (PUC): 1. Conditions of approval can be adopted to ensure airport compatibility and consistency. 2. The project is located further away from the CMA than the Stephens residential development project (Stephens) which was approved in 1998 by the. Board of Supervisors pursuant to findings and overruling considerations thereafter upheld by the Butte County Superior Court as legal and valid acts by the Board. The Schuster project is located just one-quarter mile immediately west of Stephens. Because of this, most of the Board's findings supporting approval of the Stephens project are relevant to Board approval of Schuster, and are attached and incorporated by reference into this letter for. the Board's consideration. (Attached.) 3. Safety and Over Flight: Approximately 70% of the project lies within the CalTrans `Traffic Pattern Zone' (TPZ). The remaining approximate 30% lies entirely within ALUC's self -devised Over Flight Protection Zone `B". (Attached.) According to the 1993 CalTrans Handbook at page 9-16, the discussion of "Acceptable Forms of Development" concerning the TPZ concludes that "the potential for aircraft accidents is relatively low and the need for land use restrictions is minimal' ... Typical residential subdivision densities of 4 to 6 dwelling units per acre are acceptable from a safety perspective ... Even higher densities may be reasonable, especially if development is clustered to provide open space ..." Thus, ALUC's limit of one. dwelling unit per 2.5 acres far exceeds CalTrans expert Butte County Board of Supervisors March 27, 2001 Page 3 recommendations and is unnecessary. The project's 1 -acre per dwelling density falls well within CalTrans allowable levels of 4 to 6 dwellings per acre. The Over Flight Protection Zone `B" wholly -created by ALUC which purports to prohibit new single family dwellings is not one of the six zones recognized by CalTrans as necessary to protect airport operations within the meaning of the PUC. Furthermore, the project proponent proposes to relocate and expand a 5 -acre park site from the north end (TPZ) of the site to the south end (Zone "B") of the site where it will provide a permanent, nearly 7 -acre area of open space where no single family dwellings will be built, which furthers the goals and objectives of the PUC. In fact, at this location, the park could provide for greater public safety protection by providing an emergency landing areabefore aircraft fly over the subdivision, in the event it is needed.. Therefore, the project does not create safety problems or result in public exposure to excessive safety or over flight hazards. 4. Noise: The 1999 CLUP "Future CNEL Noise Contours" exhibit (attached) shows the entire project site lies well outside of the 55 dB CNEL line. According to CalTrans, exposure to outdoor noise of 55 dB CNTEL or less, which is comparable to background music or a dishwasher running in the next room, i" considered "quiet" and fully compatible with single family dwellings. (CalTrans Handbook, Chapter 6.) Even single -event noise such as aircraft engine testing is determined to result in less than a 2% chance of sleep disturbance at this location at night time by CalTrans. Therefore, the project does not create noise problems or result in public exposure to excessive noise hazards. 5. Airspace Protection: The CalTrans Handbook recommends that "airspace obstructions" such as tall buildings and other land use characteristics which pose "other potential hazards to flight by attracting birds or creating visual or electronic interference with air navigation" be avoided by development in proximity to airports. (CalTrans Handbook, Chapter 3.) The Schuster project proposes single family residential dwellings and related land uses which, by their nature, and by existing design standards; are generally limited to heights below 35 feet and are otherwise designed so as not to pose a potential airspace obstruction, nor attract birds, nor create visual or electronic interference to air navigation. Therefore, the project does not create a threat to airspace protection. Butte County Board of Supervisors March 27, 2001 Page 4 Conclusion Based upon all of the substantial factual evidence submitted into the record during the course of public hearings upon the Schuster application prior to .and including Board of Supervisors hearings, we ask that the Board..of Supervisors (1) approve the Schuster project by a 4/5's vote, (2) overrule the ALUC inconsistency determination, and (3) make findings in fulfillment of the requirements of Public Utilities Code Section 21670, et seq.; that approval of this.project provides for the orderly development of the Chico Municipal Airport and the area surrounding the airport so as to promote. the overall goals and objectives of the California Airport Noise Standards adopted pursuant to the PUC, and that the project.prevents the creation of new noise and safety problems. Furthermore, we ask that the Board acknowledge that approval of the Schuster project adequately protects the'public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of the Chico Municipal Airport for the, reasons described in this letter, in staff reports, and in all other submittals and exhibits 'Which explain how the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards around the Chico Municipal Airport are minimized and which demonstrate that adequate over flight and airspace protection have been taken into` consideration. Thank you very much for your consideration of this very important request to approve Mr. Schuster's Pheasant Landing project by the 4/5's vote of the Board which is required by state law. Very truly yours, HEFNER, STARK & MAROIS, LLP By (1. Geor ammerer GTK/dan Enclosures cc:, Department of Development Services Office of the County Counsel Schuster Homes K4Schuster HomesWorth Chico Subdivision (6096.0001)& hoard of supervisors supportwpd ...... ..: .............. 1. Alternative orange and white paint starting at 30 feet above the ground. 2. Strobe lighting at the top of the top of the tower and shielded from striking the ground, for a mile. Towers with Guy Wires: 1. Starting at 30 feet above the ground: a... Blinking lights along length of tower and guy wires at 20 foot intervals. b. Three feet in diamtere orange safety markers 'attached at 20 foot intervals on tower and guy wires. . I., Public -and Quasi -Public: Prohibited Uses:, Churches, nursing care facilities, hospitals, colleges and universities, elementary and secondary'schools, child care facilities and similar aggregations of persons. J. 50% Open Space. K. Density Bonus Prohibited. L. No bulk petroleum products (except airport related), flammable or explosives or chemical - storage above ground: -M.- Second dwelling units are prohibited. All zones in areas of influence. 1. Permitted Uses: A. All projects covered by a vested map or development agreement. B. Any uses covered by a valid building permit. C. All uses meeting the airport CLUP standards at time permits are issued.. General Statements. 1. All ministerial and residential uses shall be referred to ALUC and findings shall be -made that there wi11 be no impacts to airport operations. I. Avigation Easements shall be signed by property owners for affuses located within the planning boundaries of each public or special use airport. 5 1%,9 CLUP DENSITY CRITERIA Adopted by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission December 29, 1999 • AZAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE DENSITY • No.' Safety Zone People per Acre Dwelling Units per Acre 1 Runway Protection Zone 10 GH' 0 - 2 Inner SafetyZone 10 ADHIJL 0 EKM - 3 Inner Turning Zone 10 ADHn 1 EKM 10 4 Outer Safety Zone 25 CDFHIL 1 EKM 5 5 Sideline Safety Zone 25 CDFHIL 0 - 6 Traffic Pattern. Zone 100. CDEM 1 unit EKM 2.5 ac. minimum parcel size 7 Area of Influence No Limit BCDHI 4 EKM 1 A. 20% Coverage Per Acre (Buildings and Structures). B. Uses compatible only if they do not result in a large concentration of people. A large . ` concentration of people is defined as a gathering, of individuals in an area that would r result in an average density of greater than 25 persons per.acre per hour during an 24- hour period ending at midnight, not to exceed 50 persons per acre at any time. C. Caretaker residences are a compatible use within all CNEL ranges, provided that they are ancillary to the primary use of a property intended for the purpose of property protection or maintenance, and subject to the condition that all residential units be designed to limit intruding noise such that interior noise levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, with windows closed, in any habitable room. D. Measures to achieve an interior noise level of 45 CNEL must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of buildings where the public is received, office areas, and other areas where people work or congregate. E. Residential development shall not .occur in a noise level greater than 55 CNEL. F. Use compatible only if it does not result in a concentration of persons greater than 25 persons per acre at any time or the storage of flammable or explosive material above ground. G. No buildings, structures, above ground transmission lines, or storage of flammable or explosive material above ground, and no uses resulting in a gathering of more than 10 I at any time. H. Communication Towers (Excluding airport related facilities): 1. Prohibited in all safety zones except Zone 8. Free Standing Towers: E�lHIBIT A % City'of of Chico General Plan Designations - RR Rural Residential VLDR Very Low Density Residential LDR Low Density Residential UQ MDR Medium Density Residential ot I� MHDR Medium High Density Residential an HDR High Density Residential D Downtown CC Comurdly Commercial MUNC Mixed Use Neighborhood Cote CS Commercial Services VS Visitor Services OFF Office M&W Manufacturing and Warehousing EM PF&S Public Facilities and Services IP Industrial Park P Park ED CG Creekside Greenway OSA/RM Open Space for Agriculture/ Recourse Management ()SFC./S Open Space for Environmental Conservation/Safety 'EXHIBIT 8 MKI irport Environs Plan (C.L.U.P.) Chico Municipal Adopted by A.L.U.C. December 1999 I Runway Protection 2 Inner Safety Zone 3 Inner Turning Zone 4 Outer Safety Zone 5 Sideline Safety Zone 6 Traffic Safety Zone 7 Airport Influence Zone 7 'Overflight Protection Zones - "A", "A 1 ", and "B" (criteria same as 1998 amendment) 2000 0 .2000 4000 -Feet M Vol 'RY VIM7ffil N If3 skis Existing Land Use = Agricultural Agricultural Processing Auto Repair Sales or Services Commercial Recreation Eating or Drinking Financial Heavy Industrial Hotels and Motels Light Industrial Mobile -Home Parks Multi -Family Residential Offices Parks Preserve Public RV Parks and Campground ® Retail Sales and Services Semi -Public r8 Single Family l Single Family Residential O Vacant Warehousing and Distribution EXHIBIT r "\ty':w- Airport Environs Plan (C.L.U.P.) - Chico Municipal Airport Adopted by A.L.U.C. December 1999 Future CNEL Noise Contours CNEL 65 CNEL 60 L..._ ..,._._ CNEL 55 Overflight Protection Zones: "A" "Al", and "B" (criteria same as 1998 amendment) 2000 0 2000 4000 Feet "\ty':w- BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA REPORT - DECEMBER 1, 1998 Applicant: Robert and Ann Stephens File #: SPA97-01 Request: An amendment to the North Chico Specific Plan -adding a PD - Planned Development combining zone, a rezone of 83± acres from SR-1/OS to SR -1 and a rezone applying the PD combining zone to' approximately 230 acres zoned SR -1 and OS. Consideration of overriding findings for ALUC consistency findings. G.P.: Agricultural Residential Zoning: SR-1/OS (Suburban Residential 1 acre/Open Space), S -R, and OS (Open Space) APN: 047-250-141 Location: On the west side of _Hicks Lane immediately adjacent to the Chico Municipal Airport, approximately between Keefer Slough and Mud Creek Parcel Size: A 230 acre portion of a 300 acre parcel: Related Projects: Development Agreement 99-01 SUMMARY: The Butte County Planning Commission's recommendation for this project is still a denial recommendation. If the Board of Supervisors chooses to approve the amendment to the North Chico Specific Plan (NCSP), the Commission recommends the use of a Development Agreement to ensure certain conditions are met. Additionally, the Board must make findings to override.the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission's determination that the project is not consistent with the recently amended Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan. Due to the requirement of overriding findings, the Board must approve this project by a 2/3 majority . DISCUSSION: On October 21,1998 the Butte County ALUC approved an amendment to the 1978 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan (CMAEP).. The amendments became effective immediately upon adoption. These changes to the airport plan affect the Stephens property and therefore this requested amendment to.the. North Chico Specific Plan (NCSP). The amendments to the CMAEP included the adoption of Overflight Protection Zones "A" and "B Zone "A" prohibits the. establishment of all new residential dwellings and zone "B" prohibits all new single family dwellings but allows multi -family structures. After adoption the amended plan, the County has 180 days to either bring their general plan and any specific plans into conformity with the airport plan or make overriding findings. The procedure for an override is spelled out in detail in the Cal Trans Division of Aeronautics Airport Land Use - Plan ni ng sePlanning Handbook. Enclosed as attachment "A" are the pertinent override sections. Based upon the amendment to the airport plan, the Board referred this project.back to ALUC for consistency findings: ALUC heard the project on November 18,. 1.998 and found that it was inconsistent with the amended plan. Specifically, ALUC found that the recently adopted overflight ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report a K.Wuster HorraWorth Chico Subdivision (6096M01)*enda report (bos).wpd 1 . 3/6x012.24 PM zones A & B prohibit new single family residences in order to minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards in area that are subject to the most intense overflight activity. This includes flight activity from several different types of heavy aircraft. Noise exposure to the site comes from general aviation activities but the site is also subject to excessive noise levels during CDF response to campaign fires and during military aircraft operations. Additionally, Aero Union routinely does engine run -ups during the nighttime hours of the summer months when the aircraft are most heavily used. The findings also state that Stephens project site is located in an area that has an elevated likelihood of being impacted by both arrival and departure aircraft accidents. The full findings and supporting data is enclosed as attachment B. BOARD OPTIONS: In making a decision on the is project, the Board should consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission, which was to deny this project. The Commission's recommendation was based upon -two main points; that an increase in residential dwellings in this area represents a potential conflict with the Chico Municipal Airport, and; that the development potential of the Stephens property was not adversely affected by the NCSP, even though 103 acres was designated open space. It should also be noted that, in addition to previous correspondence from a variety of interests favoring denial of the project, the County has received additional letters from local residents, the City of Chico, and Aero Union Corporation strongly opposing residential development for this site. If a motion for denial is made no specific findings are required as this is a legislative act. If the Board chooses to make a motion for approval, required findings and overriding findings must be made and recommended findings area provided as stated below: Approval Motion: Section 1: , Environmental Findings. A. An Environmental Impact Report has been adopted and certified for the North Chico Specific Plan (NCSP) which identified significant environmental impacts and provided mitigation measures to address those impacts. The EIR also identified significant unavoidable impacts for which no mitigation was available; traffic and circulation, air quality impacts and land use impacts. However it was found that the NCSP had significant benefits and overriding findings were adopted as fully discussed in Resolution 95-47. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act for the Stephens proposed amendment to the North Chico Specific Plan and rezone. No new potentially significant environmental effects were identified that were not identified and mitigated as part of the Stephens Negative Declaration or Final EIR (FEIR) for the North Chico Specific Plan or overridden at the time of adoption of the NCSP. Impacts that were previously identified as significant unavoidable impacts have not changed or been exacerbated because the Stephens project does not exceed any of the development assumptions and thresholds evaluated in the NCSP as witnessed below: 1. The NCSP EIR identified an increase of approximately 63,000 daily trips based upon the development of 3,093 new dwelling units and approximately 267 acres of new industrial development. As adopted, the plan reduced the number of dwellings to approximately 2,803 and the number of developable acres of industrial land to 247 acres. With the adoption of this amendment, the ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ KASchuster HomesWorth Moo Subdivision (6096-M )lagenda report (bos).wpd 2 3!8!01224 PM residential buildout of the Plan will be 2,896 dwelling units, well within the number contemplated: by the certified FEIR;. 2. The impacts to air quality were based upon the creation of 3,093 new dwelling units and approximately 267 acres of new industrial development. As adopted, the plan provided for approximately 2,803 new dwelling units and estimates the number of developable acres of industrial, land to be 247 acres. With the adoption of this amendment, the residential buildout of the Plan will be 2,896 dwelling units, well within the number contemplated by the certified FEIR; and 3. The loss of open space was identified as a significant unavoidable impact of the NCSP. The retained open space within the NCSP was intended to help maintain the rural atmosphere that.currently exists, and was a component of an overall environmental strategy to mitigate development within the NCSP area as detailed on pages 6-13 through 6-16, 7-5, 8-3, 13-7, and 15-3 of the NCSP draft EIR and FEIR. The 103 acres identified on the Stephens' property as open space by the NCSP, will be *retained for that purpose and will not be reduced in size. B.- An Initial Study was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed Development Agreement and no potentially significant environmental effects were identified; and C. The Board of Supervisors has independently reviewed, analyzed and considered both proposed Negative Declarations prior to making its decision on the amendment to the NCSP and rezone and the Development Agreement, and said Negative Declarations reflect the independent judgement of the County of Butte; Section 2: General Plan Consistency Findings. A. The proposed amendment to the North Chico Specific Plan and associated rezoning is consistent with the policies, including the text and map, of the Butte County General Plan as discussed below: 1. The Butte County General Plan Land Use Element designates the 230 acres north of Mud Creek as Agricultural Residential. The maximum development potential allowed by this designation is 1 dwelling unit per acre. The net result of the proposed amendment to the NCSP is the development of up to 160 dwelling units within the boundary of the 230 acres for an average density that is consistent with the General Plan Land use designation. Specific policies in support of the proposed amendment include: C.1.e. Encourage urban expansion toward the least productive soils. The site contains marginal agricultural soils capable 'of supporting only grazing or limited agricultural uses. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ KASchustm HomesWorth Chico Subdivision (6090-MI)vapenda report (bos).wpd 3 M1 224. PM D.1.b. Provide a diversity -of housing sites varying in size, density and location. The PD combining zone will provide the ability to offer more housing choices in the NCSP. D.2.a. Correlate residential densities to soil, slope and other natural site characteristics. The site has few limiting characteristics. Sewage disposal and drainage are. two areas that could potentially limit development. However, the 103 acres of open space acreage is available to overcome these limitations. D.2.c. Relate residential densities to intensity and compatibility of adjacent uses. -The resulting residential development will not be as dense as adjacent residential uses in the Village core and will provide a suitable transition to the 1 acre parcels to the north and west. D.2.d. Balance residential densities with traffic-carrving capacities of existina and Proposed circulation plans. The proposed circulation plan and improvements proposed by the NCSP will accommodate the additional traffic generated by this project because the improvements were based upon a greater number of dwelling units than ultimately approved by the NCSP, including the proposed amendment. G.5.b.. Prevent development and site clearance other than river bank protection of marshes and significant riparian habitats. The Development Agreement provides for riparian protection and enhancement through the use of creek side setbacks and vegetation plantings. H.3.a. Limit development in areas with significant drainage and flooding problems until adequate drainage or flood control facilities are provided. - The incorporation of drainage conditions to reduce peak project site runoff to 10% below pre -development conditions will serve to reduce downstream flooding. 'An easement along the westerly property boundary will also be deeded.to the County in orderto provide forfuture drainage improvements that will allow the transfer of flood waters from Keefer Slough to Mud Creek. This is a critical component in solving downstream flooding problems on Keefer Slough. 10.0 Provide for a safe and convenient bicycle transportation system which is integrated with other transportation modes. Pedestrian trails and bicycle paths are integrated as part of the NCSP and are also required as part of the Development Agreement. Section 3: Airport Consistency Findings.. 1978.Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan A. In public meetings on November 11 and 19, 1997, the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) considered the consistency of the proposed amendment to the NCSP and rezone..with regard to noise and safety issues near the Chico Municipal - ■ Butte County Department of Development Services. Agenda Report ■ K:1Schuster Ho' naWorth Chioo SubtMion (60%-0001)lapenda repot (bos).wpd 4 3WI 2:24 PM Airport, located adjacent to the project site. ALUC found that increased residential development proposed to occur within NCSP-designated open space was inconsistent with the existing Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan. The detailed findings are contained in a report from the ALUC dated December 9, 1997; and. B. In a public hearing held on December 11, 1997, the Planning Commission recommended that the applicants revise their project to preclude the placement of any residential units within the existing open space lands, addressing one of ALUC's concerns; and C.. In a letter dated February 6, 1998 the Stephens' attorney responded to the ALUC findings and provided information intended to support a finding that the project was consistent with the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan. The letter also contends that all of the environmental and project consistency findings made by ALUC were either unsupported by substantial evidence in the record and/or were contrary to law and thus invalid and that approval of the project does not require overriding findings, adopted by a 2/3 majority vote; and D. In a letter dated April 28, 1998, the Stephens' attorney further responded to the ALUC finding by demonstrating that approval of the project should not require overriding findings adopted by a 2/3 majority vote, because the amendment to the Specific Plan and the rezone remain completely consistent with all .relevant findings and the statement of 'overriding considerations previously adopted by the Board of Supervisors on March 28, 1995, when it approved the NCSP and at that time adopted Overriding Findings Regarding the Airport Land Use Commission finding of inconsistency for the NCSP; and E. In a public hearing held on February 12, 1998, the Planning Commission reviewed a project that was revised . in accordance with the Planning Commission's recommendations made at the December 12,1997 meeting, to propose development of up to 160 dwelling units without building upon any land within the NCSP open space designation; and F. Prior to the Board of Supervisors hearing on June 23; 1998, the applicants again revised their project to address the balance of ALUC's concerns related to the future expansion of the Chico Municipal Airport, and agreeing to limit development of the site to no more than 126 dwelling units. until a new Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) was prepared. Upon adoption of the new CLUP, up to 34 additional dwelling units out of .the -total maximum of 160 dwellings could be applied for subject to a finding of consistency with the new CLUP. At the June 23 hearing, the Board of Supervisors recommended that a Development Agreement be used to clarify and vest both the applicants' and the County's rights and obligations for development of the property under the revised amendment to the NCSP and the rezone;.and G. At a public hearing held on August 19, 1998, the ALUC reviewed the Development Agreement proposed for the project and found the project as proposed on that date to be both consistent with the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan as well as compatible with the viable, responsible operation of the Chico Municipal Airport. A . finding of Development Agreement consistency amounts to a consistency finding for • Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report a KASchuster Hw w%Nor Chive Subdivision (6096.0001)tapnda report (bos).wpd 5 3WI 2:24 PM the entire Stephens project because the Development Agreement controls all aspects of development under the amendment to the NCSP and the rezone for the project site including, the number and density of dwelling units, precise approval of development and open space areas, and timing of the construction of the dwelling units and public improvements. The ALUC consistency finding was based upon one (1) required condition, eight'(8) recommended conditions and two (2) recommended changes to the Development 'Agreement, the details of which are contained in ALUC's consistency finding report dated August 20,1998, all of which conditions and changes have been incorporated into and made a part of the Development Agreement and therefore also apply to the amendment to the NCSP and the rezone; and H. At a public hearing held on August 27, 1998, the Planning Commission reviewed the Development Agreement and proposed further recommended changes to the document, none of which limited the effectiveness of ALUC's conditions or the consistency finding. Planning staff and the Planning Commission recommended that the Board of Supervisors enter into the Development Agreement if the amendment to the NCSP and the rezone are approved; and Based upon the several significant limitations upon the amendment to the NCSP and the rezone which are made binding upon the applicants under the Development Agreement that was found to be consistent with the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan as well as compatible with the viable, responsible operation of the Chico Municipal Airport, the Board of Supervisors may approve the Development Agreement, amendment to the Specific Plan and rezone by a simple majority vote in compliance with Public Utilities Code Sections 21670, 21676, et seq.; and J.. Because these same numerous modifications to the project overall have brought the entire project into compliance with the March 28, 1995 Overriding Findings Regarding the Airport Land Use Commission, adopted by the Board of Supervisors by a 2/3 majority vote when it approved the NCSP, the requirements of Public Utilities Code Sections 21670, 21676, et seq., have already been legally satisfied. Therefore, the Stephens' Development Agreement, amendment to the NCSP and rezone provide for the orderly development, expansion, and long-term viability of the Chico Municipal. Airport and orderly development of the area surrounding the airport in the same manner.as the NCSP such that the Board of Supervisors hereby makes the following same findings as were made for the NCSP, that: 1. Residential land uses, at densities greater than one (1) unit per acre, are not allowed within 3,700 feet'from the centerline of the main runway, as shown on the Alternative Land Use Map in the FEIR, thus limiting the potential.for complaints of incompatibility with airport uses; 2. Open space has been planned for the area westerly of the Clear Zone, northerly of Mud Creek, as shown on the Alternative Land Use Plan in the FEIR, further reducing the potential for complaints of incompatibility with airport uses; 3. One acre minimum parcel sizes are planned for the area north and west of Mud Creek, as shown on the Alternative. Land Use Plan in the FEIR, which is ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ K'Schusfm Hormftrth Chico Subclhtion (609"001)%apenda report (bos).wpd 6 3!81012:24 PM consistent with the currently -adopted Airport Land Use Plan for the Airport and the Airport Land Use Handbook,, pages 3-13, 9-19 through 9-25; 4. Airport expansion through the year 201,0 is accommodated by excluding new development within the 55dB CNEL projected for the year 2010.as projected by the. Noise Exposure Map for the Alternative Land Use Plan in Chapter 5 of the FEIR; 5. The Specific Plan 'provides for airport protection measures as part of the Development Regulations in Chapter 7 of the Specific Plan, pages 7-6 and 7-7. K. As with the NCSP, the Stephens' Development Agreement, amendment to the NCSP and rezone also protects the public .health, safety, and welfare by minimizing exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas adjacent to the Chico Municipal Airport as follows: 1. Avigation easements are required, as indicated on page 7-6 of the NCSP text, . for. all residential development within the Plan area; 2. The NCSP provides for airport protection measures as part of the Development Regulation in Chapter 7 of the Specific Plan, pages 7-6 and 7-7; 3. The Accident Sites for Runways of 6,000 Feet or More, Figure 8F, taken from the 1994 Airport Land Use Handbook and superimposed with the Alternative Land Use. Map for the NCSP, together with testimony pertaining thereto at the Board of Supervisor public hearing on January 10,. 1995, by the County's consultant, Steve Honeycutt; indicates that the accident probability is highest within the boundaries of the Chico Municipal Airport Clear Zones. and very low in the vicinity of the Village Core, which vicinity includes the Stephens property; 4. The Comparison of Flight Tracks and School Sites, together with the testimony 'pertaining thereto.at the Board of Supervisors public hearing on January 10, 1995; by the County's consultant, Steve Honeycutt, indicates that aircraft on flight tracks at Chico Municipal Airport are at a sufficient flight distance and' altitude so as to I not expose the high density residential and the elementary school sites to excessive noise or safety hazards. These aircraft flight tracks are also at a sufficient flight distance and altitude so as to not to expose.the Stephens property'to excessive noise or safety hazards; L. Furthermore still, because the ' applicants incorporated into the Development Agreement, amendment to the NCSP and the rezone, the one required condition that, the minimum lot size for any parcel is not less than 8,125 square feet if served by individual wells and on-site sewage disposal systems, or 6,500 square feet if public sewage disposal service is provided; the effect of ALUC's consistency finding is that the entire project is consistent with the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan and that the project is compatible with the viable, responsible operation of the Chico Municipal Airport. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ K. dwster HomesWorth Chloo Subftsion (W96-0001)%agenda report (bos).4d 7 31&01 2:24 PM M. To further improve land use compatibility and provide for'the orderly development of the Chico Municipal Airport and the area surrounding this airport so as to promote the overall goals and objectives of California Airport Noise Standards and to prevent the creation of new noise and safety problems, as well as to protect public health, safety, and welfare by insuring the orderly expansion of the Chico Municipal Airport and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around that airport, the Development Agreement, - amendment to the NCSP and the rezone also adopt and incorporate the following ten (10) recommended conditions and recommended changes contained in the August 20, 1998 ALUC consistency finding, requiring that: 1. Residential development shall be restricted to those portions of the 126 acre SR-1/PD area that are located outside of the projected 55 dB CNEL contour a depicted on Drawing (CIC -3) within the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan. 2. Residential densities within the Inner Turning Zone shall be restricted to the densities recommended within the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook (nor more than one dwelling unit per two acres) to protect the safety of aircraft and persons on the ground. Residential densities within the Traffic Pattern Zone shall not exceed 6 units per acre._ 3. Residential dwelling units shall be designed and constructed to achieve an . interior noise level of no more than 45 dB. 4. The property owner shall sign an avigation easement granting the right of continued use of the Chico Municipal Airport in the airspace above the subject parcel and acknowledging 'any and all existing or potential airport operational impacts. 5. The project proponents and the County shall devise enhanced airport operations disclosure measures which include deed notices, public notices, inclusion of information in the Department of Real Estate Public Report, and signage along the entrances to the project. 6. All land use shall be restricted from creating large concentrations of people that would result in the gathering of more than 25 persons per acre at any one time. 7. Land uses shall be,prohibited .that create bright lights, smoke, particulate emissions, : or allow for the storage of. hazardous, flammable or explosive materials above ground. 8. All project lighting shall be directed within the project site and shielded to prevent adverse impacts on adjacent properties and aircraft flight activities. 9. Section 3.3 of the Development Agreement shall be modified to reference those conditions required and recommended in Sections 3. A and 4. "A through W in the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission's August 19, 1998 Findings relative to the Draft Development Agreement. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ KASihustelHO=WorthChico Subftsion(609(1-0001)lagendareport (bos).wpd 8 3WI2:24PM 10. Section 3.4 of the Development Agreement shall be revised to reflect the applicants' commitments to the Board of Supervisors and the ALUC regarding the Airport Land Use Commission's review of the tentative subdivision map to create the 34 Density Transfer Units (DTU's) within the 126 acre portion of the property or other property located within the North Chico Specific Plan Area. The Development Agreement shall stipulate that the tentative subdivision map to create 34 DTUs within the 126 acre portion of the subject property is to be reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission for consistency with the Updated CLUP for the Chico Municipal Airport when adopted or the existing Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan, if the CLUP update has not been completed within 24 months (subsequently changed to 30 months by the Planning Commission) from the date that the Development Agreement is executed. If the proposal to create the 34 DTUs within the 126 acre portion of the property is found by the ALUC to be inconsistent with the applicable Airport Land Use Plan, the property owner/applicant waives their right to request that the Board of Supervisors adopt Overriding Findings. to approve the project. However, if a finding of inconsistency is made by the ALUC to create the 34 DTUs within the 126 acre portion of the subject property, the property owner/applicant may submit a subsequent tentative subdivision map to create the 34 DTUs within another property that is located within the North Chico Specific Plan Area. The tentative subdivision map for such a transfer must also be reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission for consistency with the applicable Airport Land Use Plan. The property owner/applicant agrees to waive their right to request that the Board of Supervisors adopt Overriding Findings to approve the transfer of the units to another property if that proposal is also found to be inconsistent by the ALUC. N. On October 21, 1998, the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) amended the 1978 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan finding that the standards within the plan were not compatible with the intent of the State Aeronautics Act and the guidelines contained in the CalTrans' 9993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. The amendment adopted an Overflight Protection Zone (OPZ) and Outer Safety Zone. Under the amendment, the Stephens property is located in both an Overflight Protection Zone "A" and "B". Said zones "A" and "B" purport to prohibit new single family dwelling uses. If the Stephens' project were brought back before ALUC for consistency findings, it is acknowledged that the project would not be found compatible with the amended plan and overriding findings would be required to approve the project. The Board hereby makes the findings required by Public Utility Code 21670 and 21676 et seq., as supported by those specific findings set forth in Sections J through M above, which findings are incorporated herein and support the conclusion that approval .of the Stephens' project, as conditioned, will not create any new noise and safety problems near the Chico Municipal Airport. Furthermore, the approval of the Stephens' project, as conditioned, includes land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards. These conclusions are further supported by the detailed information contained in the "Exhibits in the Administrative Record," dated June 23, 1998, submitted by the applicant. Therefore, the approval of the Stephens' project is consis'fent with the ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ Wchusw HonwWorth Chico Subduision (6046-0001))aWda repot (bos).wpd 9 3181012:24 PM purposes of Article 3.5 of Chapter 4 of Part I of Division 9 of the Public Utilities Code, as stated in Section 21670. O. If the Board of Supervisors, pursuant to Public Utilities Code Sections 21670 and 21676, in the alternative, approves the Development Agreement, amendment to the NCSP and the rezone by a 2/3 vote, the Board of Supervisors hereby makes Specific Findings that the Stephens' project is consistent with the purposes of Public Utilities Code Section 21670, based upon all of the findings previously described above. II. Override findings to the 1998 amended Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan On October 21,1998, ALUC purported to adopt an amendment to the 1978 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan (CMAEP) (Because there is significant legal uncertainty as to whether the October 21 amendment is legally in force and effect because of the manner by which ALUC provided public notice prior to their adoption .of the October 21 amendment to the CMAEP, the Board of Supervisors has also made the above findings pertaining to ALUC's prior consistency findings under the 1978 CMAEP for the Stephens' project.). On November 18, 1998, ALUC reviewed the Stephens' application for consistency with the 1978 CMAEP as amended on October 21, 1998. While the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook ("CalTrans Handbook") identifies four functional categories for determining airportland use compatibility: Safety, Overflight, Noise and Airspace Protection, on November 18th, ALUC reviewed the Stephens' project application for consistency with the amended CMAEP regarding policies to address Safety and Overflight Protection. However, because Exhibit B to ALUC's October 21 amendment to the CMAEP and "Other Commission Comments" included outside of the Project Consistency Findings in the November 18 ALUC review of the Stephens' project, discuss noise compatibility and. allude to airspace protection, the following override findings address all four issues: Safety, Overflight, Noise and Airspace Protection, to factually demonstrate that approval of the Stephens' project by the Board of Supervisors meets all Public Utilities Code Section 21670 -and 21676 requirements: A. Safety and Overflight. 1. On October 21, ALUC purported to adopt an Overflight Protection Zone (OPZ) with two subzones identified as Zone A and Zone B, both of which are stated to prohibit new single-family residential development entirely within their boundaries. ALUC Exhibit A (Drawing CIC -14) depicts the OPZ.' Exhibit A is designed to depict the OPZ identified. in Exhibit III -1, "2010 Airport Noise Compatibility Plan," of the FAR Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Program and Environs Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport (FAR Part 150). The four safety zones depicted on page 9-16 of the 1.993 CalTrans Handbook have also been overlaid onto this exhibit. The Runway Protection Zone (1), Inner Safety Zone (2), and Inner Turning Zone (3) are all contained within the OPZ. The only CalTrans safety zone which ALUC states the OPZ does not incorporate is the Outer Safety Zone (4). Because the CalTrans Handbook at page 9-16 indicates that there are a total of six safety zones, including a Sideline Safety Zone (5) and a Traffic Pattern Zone (6), the OPZ must therefore also incorporate the Sideline Safety Zone (5) and Traffic Pattern Zone (6) since the only CalTrans ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ USchuster Hw esWolh CNw Subdivision (6096-0001)tapenda repot (bos).wpd .10 318101 2:24 PM safety zone which the OPZ does not incorporate, is the Outer Safety Zone (4) according to ALUC's October, 22 letter to Thomas Parilo. (pps. 2-3). 2. Approximately one-third of the. northern portion of the Stephens' property lies within the Inner Turning Zone as identified in Drawing CIC -14 and in the CalTrans Handbook in Figure 9G at page 9-16. In its discussions of "The Concept of Acceptable Risk" and "Protecting People and Property on the Ground" (Chapter 9), the CalTrans Handbook states on - page 9-22 under "Acceptable Forms of Development" that for the Inner Turning Zone, "[t]he minimum lot size criteria for residential uses should be somewhere in the range encompassed by the inner and outer safety zones; that is, between 2 and 10 acres." To assure Chico Municipal Airport safety and overflight compatibility, the Board requires that the Stephens' Development Agreement incorporate the following language from the August 20, 1998 ALUC Consistency Findings, requiring that: Residential densities within the Inner Turning Zone shall be restricted to the densities recommended within the 1993 Airport Land. Use Planning Handbook (no more than one dwelling unit per two acres) to protect the safety of _aircraft and persons on the ground. Based upon CalTrans criteria, the Board of Supervisors has determined that one residential dwelling unit per two acres on the Stephens' property within the Inner Turning Zone is an acceptable form of development, as recommended in the CalTrans Handbook on pages 9-21 and 9-22. For this reason, a complete prohibition on residential development within Zones A and B on the Stephens' property is unnecessary to satisfy the requirements of Public Utilities Code Section 21670. 3. For the remaining majority of the Stephens' property which is located within the Traffic Pattern Zone as identified in Drawing. CIC -14 and in the CalTrans Handbook in. Figure 9G at page 9-16, the discussion of "Acceptable Forms of Development states that: Traffic Pattern Zone -- Within other portions of the airport area routinely overflown by aircraft, the potential for aircraft accidents is relatively.low and the need for land use restrictions is thus minimal: Only very large assemblies of people -- in the 150 or more people -per -acre range -- need to be avoided:... Typical residential subdivision densities.of 4 to 6 dwelling units -per -acre are acceptable from a safety perspective. . . . Even higher densities may be reasonable, fespecially if development is clustered to provide open. space... . The Stephens' Development Agreement also incorporates from the August 20, 1998 ALUC Consistency Findings, the requirement that: "[R]esidential densities within the Traffic Pattern Zone shall not exceed 6 units per acre." ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ ICASchuster HonwWorlh Chico Subdivision (609rM1)Wenda report (bos).wpd 11 3WI 2:24 PM Based upon CalTrans criteria, the Board of Supervisors has determined that six residential dwelling units per acre on the Stephens' property within the Traffic Pattern Zone is an acceptable form of development satisfying the requirements . of Public Utilities Code Section 21670, as recommended in the CalTrans Handbook.on pages 9-21. through 9-23. For this reason, a complete prohibition on residential development within Zones A and B on the Stephens' property is unnecessary. 4. The Stephens' Development Agreement incorporates an amendment to the text of the North Chico Specific Plan (NCSP) adding a PD -Planned Development Combining Zone which requires that a minimum of 25% of the gross acreage within the PD designation will be retained as open space and that residential dwelling units.will be built upon a variety of lot sizes, including the clustering of residential dwelling units. The retention of open space and the use of clustering residential dwellings are recommended by CalTrans as strategies to improve the compatibility of residential development. within all CalTrans safety zones, including the Inner Turning Zone and Traffic Pattern Zone, within the airport environment. The CalTrans Handbook, on page 9724, in its discussion of "Clustering Versus Spreading of Development," states that: [T]radeoffs between safety and economic concerns usually dictate some amount of development near airports.... The premise behind the concept of clustering is that, in most off-airportmishaps, the aircraft are under some degree of control when forced to land. Clustering thus allows a greater amount of open space towards which the pilot can aim. In addition to reducing the risks for people on the ground, open space also provides benefits for aircraft occupants. Regarding the Inner Turning Zone, the CalTrans Handbook states on page 9-27, "[a]t least 15% to 20% of the zone should remain as open space." Regarding the Traffic Pattern Zone, the CalTrans Handbook states on page 9-27, "... 10% to 15% useable open space or an open area approximately every 1/4 to'/2 mile should be provided." Because the new PD zoning and the Developrrient Agreement both require the retention of 25% of the gross acreage as open space, the Board of Supervisors hereby determines that the goals and objectives of Public Utilities Code 21670 to minimize the public's exposure to excessive safety (and. noise) hazards are already accomplished by the Stephens' project design. In fact, the new PD zoning, NCSP amendment and the Development Agreement together now, for the first time, allows clustering of dwellings, variable lost sizes and- requires much greater open space retention, actually making residential development upon the Stephens' property more airport compatible than under the prior zoning for the property. 5. In Exhibit D (Drawing CIC -17) and Exhibit E (Drawing CIC -18) to the ALUC October 21, 1998 action, ALUC alleges that these exhibits -- which were adapted from the CalTrans Handbook and the University of California Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies (1993) -- identify areas with particular safety-related concerns. When the text and Exhibit 8F, "Accident Sites for ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ K9Schuster Hom ftdh Chico Subdivision (6096-0001)tapnda report (bas).wpd 12 3101 224 PM Runways of 6,000 Feet or More," in the CalTrans Handbook are referenced to explain the meaning of ALUC Exhibits D and E depicted in Drawings CIC -17 and CIC -18, CalTrans Handbook states on pages 8-32 and 9-26 that, "Accidents in which aircraft are under control are bunched relatively close to the runway ends -- mostly within about 3,000 feet -- both for arrivals and departures. ... These observations lead to the following suggested criteria: .... Inner Turning Zone -- ... 15% to 20% .. open space Traffic Pattern Zone -- 10% to 15% usable open space...." As described previously in these findings, particular safety-related concerns are minimized by design requirements for the Stephens' project so that the Stephens' property no longer needs to be identified as an area with particular safety-related concerns.. For example, residential land uses at densities greater than one (1) unit per acre, will not be allowed within 3,700 feet from the centerline of the existing main runway, thus. limiting the potential for complaints of incompatibility with airport uses. Furthermore, the Board of Supervisors finds that, because the open space provided by the new PD zoning exceeds. that recommended by CalTrans for residential developments within both the Inner Turning Zone and Traffic Pattern Zone, where the Stephens' project is located, safety, as well as noise, overflight and air space protection concerns, are reduced well below CalTrans' recommended thresholds to ensure airport compatibility. 6. Based upon the location of the Stephens' project within the Inner Turning Zone and the Traffic Pattern Zone, CalTrans data further demonstrates that the safety hazard risk for all accident sites -- arrivals and departures -- is minimal. Specifically, the CaiTrans Handbook indicates on page 9-17 that for airports with runways of 6,000 feet or more, the chance of all aircraft accidents within the Inner Turning Zone is 0.03%/acre in Table 9A, "Safety Compatibility Issues." The likelihood of all.aircraft accidents within the Traffic Pattern Zone for runways of the same length is 0.02%/acre as indicated in Table 9A in the CalTrans Handbook: Because the likelihood of an aircraft accident is so low, between 2/100 of 1 % and 3/100 of 1 % anywhere.within a full one -acre area, the Board of Supervisors finds that the likelihood of an aircraft accident involving any particular residential dwelling represents an exceptionally low safety risk, well within the acceptable limits recommended by the CalTrans Handbook. 7. As described above, on November 18, 1998, ALUC reviewed the Stephens' application for consistency with the October 21, 1998 purported amendment to the 1978 CMAEP. The Overflight Protection Zone (OPZ) adopted as part of these amendments seeks to prohibit new single-family residential development. Based solely upon unspecified information allegedly from the Chico Municipal Airport tower, ALUC's unsubstantiated opinion is that an unquantified number of heavy military aircraft and firefighting air tankers make unscheduled low -altitude approaches, which operations involving these types of aircraft can be particularly annoying to residents because of their size. Based solely upon this statement unsupported by substantial evidence in the administrative record, ALUC concluded that the only effective strategy. is to prohibit residential development because the CalTrans Handbook recommends that the ideal strategy cited on Page 3-9 of the handbook is to' avoid development of Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ KiSchustw Hom %Nohh Mco Sub&slon (6096-W)1)lVenda mpon (bos).wpd 13 3W1224 PM residential uses in affected locations. However, page 3-9 of the CalTrahs Handbook also states that: To the extent that this approach is not practical, the alternative is to make people better aware of the airport's proximity before they move to the area. This can be accomplished through buyer awareness measures such as:. -- Dedication of aviation or overflight easements; -- Recorded deed notices; and/or. -- Real estate disclosure statements. Thus, the Board of Supervisors concludes that a .complete prohibition of new single-family residential. dwellings is not only not practical, but clearly not necessary if these three CalTrans-recommended measures are followed. In this case, the Stephens' Development Agreement minimizes potential incompatibility with the airport by already incorporating all three of these buyer awareness measures. Because of the. inclusion of these several buyer awareness measures in the Development Agreement, the Stephens' application incorporates other adequate "compatibility strategies" recommended by CalTrans to make the project compatible with the. Chico Municipal Airport without the need to avoid residential developmentin this location. 8. Regarding whether the Stephens' project creates a safety or overflight concern posing any threat to continued firefighting air tanker operations at the Chico Municipal Airport, Gary F. Ross, Unit Chief, Butte Ranger Unit, Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, states in his May 6, 1998 letter to the Board of Supervisors that: The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the Butte 'County Fire Department find no potential -negative impact resulting from the proposed amendment to the North Chico Specific Plan which would allow increased 'residential density on certain ' portions of the property owned by Robert and Ann Stephens. The properly, identified as APN 047-250-141, is located west of Hicks Lane in Chico, California. In that the planned development provides for leaving 103 acres along Hicks. Lane as open space, adjacent to the Chico Airport, there will be no significant. impact on the fire fighting air tanker activities- that operate from the airport. Likewise, the increased density from one acre parcels to 3/4 acre parcels on the remainder of the property, as specified in the proposal, will have no significant negative impact on fire fighting resource planning requirements. Based upon Mr. Ross' letter and all of the reasons described in these findings, the Board of Supervisors hereby concludes that establishment and application ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ - Mhustu HomesWath Chico SubQ rasion (6W4IDot)%apenda report (bos).wpd 14 IWI z z4 PM of the OPZ by ALUC on October 21 and November 18, 1998 along with ALUC's corresponding policies and measures are unnecessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare, as well as to protect the continued viability of aircraft operations to and from the Chico Municipal Airport. Furthermore, the Board concludes that because the Stephens' application' already includes the application of.the several significant land use measures described herein which minimize the public's exposure to excessive safety (and noise) hazards in compliance with Public.Utilities Code Section 21670 and 21676. B. Noise. The Chico Municipal Airport FAR Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Program and Environs Plan (FAR Part 150) states on pages 1-5 and 1-8 that the General Plans of Chico and Butte County set forth maximum exterior noise levels for residential and other noise -sensitive uses to be a Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL/Ldn) of 65 decibels (dB). The intent of these standards is to establish guidelines and methods for determining the acceptability of specific land uses with respect to various noise levels since these levels usually allow normal outdoor and indoor activities, such as communication and sleep, to occur without interruption. CNEL 65 dB is the criterion noise level above which residential and other noise -sensitive land uses (e.g., schools, churches, hospitals and libraries) should not. be allowed unless noise attenuating construction is utilized. Table III -1, "Recommended Land Use Compatibility Designations Chico Municipal Airport" from FAR Part 150, states that residential land uses are compatible in areas exposed to a CNEL of up to 70 dB, but recommends that measures to achieve outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction levels (NLR) of at least 25 dB and 30 dB should be incorporated into building codes and be considered in individual approvals: According to the FAR Part 150 study, the maximum amount of noise to which any portion of the Stephens' project site is exposed, even projected for the year 2010, is a CNEL of 60 dB. Approximately 25% of the site lies between the 60 dB and 55 dB contours. The remaining approximately 75% of the site lies outside of the 55 dB contours as demonstrated in Exhibit 1-3, "Noise Exposure Map: 2010 Forecast Conditions," and Exhibit III -1, 'Airport Noise Compatibility Plan., 2. As explained previously, in Exhibit B (Drawing CIC -15) to the October 21, 1998 action, ALUC sought to amend the 1978 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan (CMAEP). by combining the "CNEL Noise Contours" (Drawing CIC -3) in the 1978 CMAEP with the CalTrans Safety Zones described above. The noise contours from CIC -3, which were prepared in 1978, have been shown by much more recent analysis to be an overly optimistic view of future air traffic potential for the Chico- Municipal Airport. In an "Aviation Activity Forecast' prepared by P & D Aviation (P & D) as'part of the Aircraft Noise Exposure Map Report in 1992, it was revealed that the Federal Aviation Admi.nistration's National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) growth forecast was in excess of 5% per year for Chico airport expansion. This underlying assumption for. the noise contours in CIC -3' of the 1978 CMAEP is, now "believed to be an ■ Butte County Department of Development Services.Agenda Report ■ K..MAusler Hw=WoM Moo Subftsbn (6096-0001)lagenda report (bos).wpd 15 31 01224 PM overly -optimistic view of future air traffic potential." (P & D, p. 111-10.) The result being that, "[t]he 1978 Environs Plan [CMAEP] forecasts have proven to be highly optimistic." (Ibid.) Based upon more current and more precise data, P & D also considered an "Enhanced Growth Forecast" for the Chico Municipal Airport to seek to determine a more accurate upper range for aircraft activity that more realistically might result from increased aircraft activity at the Chico Municipal Airport. The Enhanced Growth Forecast assumed the commencement of a Flight Training Center at the Chico Municipal Airport by the year 1995. Flight training operations were assumed to increase at an average annual rate of 3% per year through the year 2010 forecast period. (P & D, Exhibit III -1 on p. 9 and pp. III -12 to III -14.) At the end of 1998, a flight training facility has not yet been established. "The Enhanced Growth Forecast provides for the introduction of approximately 5,000 annual operations of turboprop aircraft operations (e.g., Beech King Air) by the year 2000.... The Enhanced Growth Forecast also includes allowances for yet additional flight operations of multi -engine aircraft for several classes of general aviation users.... Allows for greater use by heavy turboprop.... For example, expanded aerial firebomber operations or additional corporate aviation.... The potential for greater levels of corporate turbojet activity is also provided for in the "Enhanced Growth Forecast." (Ibid.) The Enhanced Growth scenario resulted in a total of approximately 173,000 total annual aircraft operations in the year 2010 for the Chico Municipal Airport. (P & D, Exhibit III -2 on page 111-16.) The 1978 CMAEP assumed a total of 250,000 annual aircraft operations in the year 2010. (Ibid.) (This is 77,000 fewer operations or 31% less than the assumptions which created the noise contours in Drawing CIC -3 of the CMAEP that were relied upon in Drawing CIC -1.5 by ALUC on October 21, 1998.) P & D also analyzed in the same study an "Indigenous Demand Forecast" projecting growth based upon actual annual aircraft operations at the Chico Municipal Airport. The Indigenous Demand Forecast projected a total of approximately 130,000 annual aircraft operations in the year 2010. (Ibid.) (This is 120,000 fewer operations or 52% less than the assumptions which created the noise contours in Drawing CIC -3 which were relied upon in Drawing CIC -15 by ALUC on October 21, 1998.) Based upon this expert analysis, P & D concludes that, "[i]t is very important to note that available annual airport capacity greatly exceeds the 20 -year forecast .for aircraft operations under both the indigenous and enhanced growth scenarios." (P & D, p. III -15.) This means that under either current total aircraft operations, or a more realistic forecast of future growth, total aircraft operations at the Chico Municipal Airport fall far short of the much higher total aircraft operations assumption reflected in the noise contours in Drawing CIC -3 of the 1978.CMAEP which comprise the noise contours now relied upon by ALUC in Exhibit B (Drawing CIC -14) to the October 21, 1998 ALUC action. It is unclear why ALUC only chose to incorporate portions of the 1995 FAR Part 150 study in its 1998 Safety and Overflight analysis and not to incorporate the updated Noise analysis from the same 1995 study found on Exhibit 1-3, "Noise Exposure Map: 2010 Forecast Conditions" and Exhibit III -1, "Airport Noise Compatibility Plan." A portion of Exhibit III -1 was incorporated into ALUC Exhibit ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ K:Wustu HomesWoM Chico Subdivision (60g6.0001)lagenda report (bos).wpd 16 .11012:24 PM A (Drawing CIC -14) and ALUC Exhibit B (Drawing CIC -15) in the October 21 ALUC action'to establish the Overflight Protection Zone but the noise contours in Exhibit III -1, which are based upon the better data described above which are 17 years more current, were ignored by ALUC with no explanation. This aberration is significant and would appear quite arbitrary since ALUC has stated in writing repeatedly that its, position is that the entire 1978 CMAEP is "terribly outdated." The Board of Supervisors chooses instead to rely upon the much more recent and reliable data found in the 1995 FAR Part 150 program to determine airport noise compatibility, in addition to the 1992 Aviation Activity Forecast for the Chico Municipal Airport by P-& D. Both of these more recent studies conclude that, even with future growth scenarios for the Chico Municipal Airport, the Stephens' project is, and will likely remain for some time, compatible with, Chico Municipal Airport operations. 3. In ALUC's November 18, 1998 transmittal, ALUC states outside of its "findings" in "Section 3: Other Commission Comments" that the project site is likely to be exposed to single -event noise levels and other episodes which exceed "normally acceptable" noise levels for residential development. Potential single -event noise level generators are listed as unquantified "intensive" CDF air tanker operations during campaign fires and occasional military activities, Aero Union and other businesses under contract with CDF and the U. S. Department of Forestrywhich periodically run up their aircraft engines at night for the purposes of aircraft engine maintenance and operational testing. No known or estimated decibel levels were specified by ALUC and no noise studies are cited to support this contention. To the contrary, the Board of Supervisors cites the 1993 CalTrans Handbook at'Page 6-27 in its discussion entitled, "Sleep Disturbance," which states that: �A British study (UK Department of Transport --1992) found that an average person has only a 1 in 75 chance of being awakened by an aircraft noise in the outdoor range of 90 dB to 100 dB SEL. Allowing for the noise level reduction of the structure, this indicates that " indoor single -event sound levels of 70 dB to 80 dB will cause less than a 2% chance of sleep disturbance. Based upon this recent British study and other supporting analysis in Chapter 6 of the CalTrans Handbook, the Board of Supervisors finds that the likelihood of single -event noise, even at extreme 90 dB to 100 dI3 SEL outdoor ranges to which people might be exposed during summer months with open windows at nighttime, present no more than minimal public.exposure to noise. 4. Based upon the testimony of Robert Koch, an ALUC member representing the City of Chico and present in ALUC's public hearings on October 21 and November 18, 1998, the City of Chico has, experienced minimal if any complaints by the public regarding single -event or any other •noise levels generated by the Chico Municipal Airport. Mr. Koch stated on:the,public record that the City of Chico keeps detailed,logs of'citizen complaints and the logs ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ K1Sohuster HomoswoAA Chico soe&visioo ( +. )oda report (eos).wpa 17 3WI 2:24 ant reflect few if any complaints regarding noise of any type generated by the Chico Municipal Airport.- - In the ALUC public hearing on November 18, Commission Member Norman Rosene also stated on the record that it was his belief that no noise study.data existed for single -event noise to support ALUC's conclusion that single -event noise exposed the public to a hazard of excessive noise. ALUC staff member, Laura Webster, stated, too, that she was unaware of whether CalTrans or any other expert in the field had established specific standards for determining when single -event noise exposure to the public was excessive. 5: ALUC relies upon Exhibit 4-4, "Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments" found on page 4-33 of the 1978 CMAEP for the premise that noise levels for residential land uses. are "normally acceptable" up to CNEL 60 dB. However, Exhibit 4-4 also states that exposure of residential land uses to CNEL up to 70 dB is also acceptable if new construction or development is conditioned to require noise reduction and noise insulation features in housing design. Exhibit 4-4 also states that,'.'[c]onventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice" by itself to keep noise levels in the acceptable range -- even without noise reduction and noise insulation features included in design and construction. Because the Stephens' Development Agreement already requires that "[r]esidential dwelling units shall be designed and constructed to achieve an interior noise level of no more than 45 dB," the Board of Supervisors concludes that community noise environments for residential dwellings on the Stephens' project, including single -event noise.levels, will remain within acceptable levels under not only the 1.978 CMAEP, but also according to the specifications in the FAR Part 150 program and the CalTrans Handbook. C. Airspace Protection. 1. The November 18 ALUC "Project Consistency Findings" state that Chapter 3 of the CalTrans Handbook identifies four functional categories that address airport land use compatibility concerns. These include:. Noise, Safety, Airspace Protection and Overflight Protection. While ALUC only found the applicant's proposal to be inconsistent with the 1998 amendments to the 1978 CMAEP based upon measures and policies designed to address Overflight Protection and Safety, the Board of Supervisors also hereby finds that the Stephens' project is compatible with Chico Municipal Airport operations because it does .not cause a significant risk to the Airspace Protection. In.determining a project's compatibility with Airspace Protection, the CalTrans Handbook states on pages 3-7 and 3-8 that the particular hazards of concern are "airspace obstructions" and land use characteristics which pose "other potential hazards to flight by attracting birds or creating .visual or electronic interference with air navigation." "Compatibility Strategies" recommended by CalTrans for protection of airport airspace are (1) to avoid airspace obstructions by limiting the height of buildings and antennas and other types of structures and trees so as not to pose a potential hazard to flight and (2) land uses which may create the types of ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ Wcbustu HwwWoM Chico Subdivision (6096 -=)%agenda repot (bos).wpd 18 3WI 224 PM hazards described above should be avoided near an airport or modified so as not to include the offending characteristic (i.e., attractions to birds, creation of visual or electronic interference with air navigation). The Stephens' project. proposes single-family residential dwellings and related land uses.which, bytheirnature, and byexisting design standards, are generally limited to heights below 35 feet and are otherwise designed so as not to pose a potential airspace obstruction. Furthermore, no evidence has been presented by ALUC or otherwise on the record to demonstrate that land uses associated with the project create potential hazards to flight by attracting birds or.creating visual or electronic interference with air navigation. These types of hazards are not hazards which would normally be expected as a component of a standard single-family residential development of this type on the Stephens' property. D. Conclusion to airport consistency findings I and II above. Based upon all of the substantial factual evidence submitted into the record during the course of the several public hearings .upon the Stephens' application before ALUC, the Butte County Planning Commission, and the Butte County Board of Supervisors in 1997 and 1998 as describedin these findings and the exhibits and attachments and other data referenced herein, including the Applicant's Exhibits in. the Administrative Record dated June 23, 1998, all of which are incorporated herein into the administrative record by reference, the. Board of Supervisors hereby concludes in. fulfillment of the requirements of Public Utilities Code Sections 21670 and 21676 that approval of the Stephens' project provides for the orderly development of the Chico Municipal Airport and the area surrounding the airport so as to promote the overall goals and objectives of the California Airport Noise Standards adopted pursuant to Section 21669 of the Public Utilities Code, and, as designed and conditioned, the Stephens' project prevents the creation of new noise and safety problems. Furthermore, as designed and conditioned, approval of the Stephens' project protects the public health, safety and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of the Chico Municipal Airport by and through the adoption'of the numerous land use measures described herein and in the exhibits attached hereto which minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around the Chico Municipal Airport, and which also adequately provides for overflight and airspace protection. E. Documents to be made part of the Administrative Record Data supporting the Board of Supervisors- findings have been accumulated from studies and reports prepared by recognized professionals and agencies with expertise in airport land use planning and airport land use compatibility. These documents that are available to the public and include: 1978 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan - R. Dixon Speak Associates 1995 FAR Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Program and Environs Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport - P & D Aviation ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ KASchuster HornaMorth Chico SuWAsion (609RW1)%a9enda report (hos).wpd 19 3BI01 224 PM r 1 Aviation Activity Forecasts for the Chico Municipal Airport, May 1, 1992 - McClintock, Becker &- Associates Aircraft Noise Exposure Map Report including Aviation, Activity Forecasts for the - Chico Municipal Airport = December 7, 1992 - McClintock, Becker & Associates { 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook - Cal Trans Division of Aeronautics' Notice of adopted amendments to the Chico Municipal Airport -Environs Plan, October 22, 1998 -.Butte County Airport Land Use Commission Butte County Airport Land Use Commission recommendations and findings regarding Development Agreement DEV99-01 (Stephens) on APN 047-250-141 - Butte County Airport Land .Use Commission Stephens' application exhibits in the administrative record - Robert & Ann Stephens Section 4: Development Agreement findings. A. Find that the proposed Development Agreement is consistent with the Butte County, General Plan, the North Chico 'Specific Plan, and Board of Supervisors Resolution 84-160 because the Development Agreement simply implements conditions of the Specific Plan Amendment and Rezoning which have been found to be consistent with the General Plan and°North Chico Specific Plan, as per sections 2 and 3 above. Section 5: Action. A. Adopt Negative Declarations for amendment to the North Chico Specific Plan and the Development Agreement; and B. Adopt a Resolution to amend the North Chico Specific Plan to add a PD combining designation, amend the uses permitted in the OS designation, and amend policy 7.1-6 .as well as any other section to make the document consistent with the proposed action, as stated in exhibit "A" of Board Packet for 10/27/98. C. Adopt an Ordinance rezoning 83t acres from 8R-1/OS to SR -1 and applying a PD combining zone to approximately 230 acres zoned SR -1 and OS affected by.file SPA 97-01; and D. Adopt an Ordinance entering into a Development Agreement with Robert and Ann Stephens, file DEV99701,+as stated in exhibit "C" of Board Packet for 10/27/98. Attachments: A: Override Procedures B: ALUC report and'findings 11/20/98 - ■ Butte County Department of Development Services Agenda Report ■ Mhuster Homesftrth Chico SuMvision (609&0001)lagenda report 0=).vrpd 20 YNI 224 PM United States ® Department of Agriculture Forest Lassen Service National Forest Almanor Ranger District P.O. Box 767 Chester, CA 96020 (530) 258-2141 Voice/TT! (530) 258-5194 Fax i Butte County Department of Developmental Services ECEIVte: April 6, 2001 Planning Division 7 County Center Drive APR 1 2 2 0 01 Oroville, CA 95965 Dear County Planners: BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA fWE The Lassen National Forest would like to notify you that we will be submitting a grant proposal to CALFED that, if approved, will allow us to continue to accelerate our watershed restoration treatments at known sediment producing sites in the Antelope Creek Watershed. As the land steward for thousands of acres within the anadromous watersheds of Antelope, Butte, Battle, Deer, and Mill Creeks, the Forest has a responsibility to address the goals and objectives of the Calfed Ecosystem Restoration Program Plan and to collaborate with Watershed Conservancies, private landowners, and other interested stakeholders when planning, prioritizing, and implementing restoration projects. The Forest is working in these watersheds with stakeholders to develop consistent inventory techniques, complimentary implementation strategies, uniform monitoring protocols, and adaptive management strategies. We are committed -to implementing the best watershed restoration program possible in these very important watersheds. In 1997, the Forest received a Calfed grant to complete Phase I of its long-term restoration strategy within the Deer, Mill, and Antelope Creek watersheds. The Phase I projects included identifying restoration sites, developing site treatments, and implementing several demonstration projects. This Phase II proposal calls for the implementation of dozens of restoration treatments at the identified sites within the Antelope Creek watershed. By treating our highest sediment producing sites wehope to bring about a significant improvement to watershed condition and resiliency in the upper watershed and provide additional protection to downstream beneficial uses. This proposal will. compliment planned restoration work within the Deer and Mill Creek watersheds supported by a 2001 CALFED grant. In Butte County, we have been working with the Butte Creek Watershed Conservancy to identify and prioritize potential restoration projects. A copy of our Antelope Creek grant concept proposal is attached. With the continued help of the Conservancies, other stakeholders, and State and local governments, we hope to again receive supplemental funding for watershed stewardship programs from Calfed. We would appreciate any comments you might have concerning this grant proposal by April 23, 2001. Your input is very important to us, as it will help us to develop a final proposal that incorporates your suggestions and addresses your concerns. For further information regarding this proposal please contact Russ Volke at the Alamanor Ranger District Office, P.O. Box 767, Chester, CA 96020, or call (530) 258-2141. Sincerely, SUSAN &EBER-MATTHEWS Almanor District Ranger Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recyaea Paper CONCEPT PROPOSAL FORM 11 APR 1.2 2001 For proposals with emphasis on watershed assessment, monitoring, and/or on -the -ground projecPUTTE ts. COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA Use this form to describe your concept for a proposal or project to apply to the CALFED Watershed Program for finding. support. Use only the space provided, leaving at least a half-inch margin with type size no smaller than 10 points. ' These guidelines are also available in electronic format on the Watershed Program site Project Applicant Information .Name of Protect: Budget Estimate: Lassen National Forest Watershed Stewardship Funds requested $600.900 Within the Anadromous Antelope Creek Watershed Match (cash & inkind) $150.000 Total $750,900 Proiect Avolicant(sl and/or Principle Investigators) and affiliations) — use additional sheet if necessary: USDA, Forest Service, Lassen National Forest Proiect manager or contact person, address, telephone and e-mail (if fiscal aeent is different. nrovide that information, also): Jeff Withroe, Forest Ecosystem Manager Elaine Courtright, Forest Chief Financial Officer Supervisors Office, Lassen National Forest Supervisors Office, Lassen National Forest 2550 South Riverside Drive 2550 South Riverside Drive Susanville, CA 96130 Susanville, CA 96130 jwithroe@fs.fed.us ecourtright@fs. fed. us Proiect Abstract (include the county, watershed or other geographic reference): The Lassen National Forest -Phase II proposal builds on Forest's goal to bring about a significant improvement to watershed condition and resiliency in the upper watersheds and provide additional protection to downstream beneficial uses. Of particular emphasis is to make the upper watersheds more resilient to wildfire and extreme.precipitation events. This proposal includes a sub -watershed -based task (Task 1) within the Antelope Creek anadromous watershed in Tehama County, and an expanded technology transfer/education program (Task 2) within the Antelope, Battle, Butte, Deer, and Mill Creek watersheds within Butte, Shasta, and Tehama Counties. Task 1 includes 67 restoration projects that were. prioritized from a list'of over 80 problem sites identified as part of our Phase I 1997 Calfed grant. The restoration activities focus on the stabilization, restoration, and maintenance of ecological processes, compliment the restoration work of others, and are designed to allow for adaptive management. Task 2 is designed to expand our technology transfer/education outreach to our partners and fellow watershed stakeholders. This task builds on an existing database and restoration treatments to transfer knowledge.at the "local" and regional levels. The technology transfer will include site identification methods, developing restoration opportunities, assessing long-term benefits and costs, designs, implementation monitoring, effectiveness monitoring, and before and after photographs. We also h e to share our increased data and knowledge made possible with the help of our 1997 and 2001 Calfed grants, by conducting�ield trips and workshops, and preparing CD-rom and video guides. Our goal is to assist those partners who are already implementing restoration work, and to encourage those who have yet to become partners. It is our hope that both tasks will strengthen our current partnerships and initiate new ones. As these partnerships grow, and more stakeholders see and understand the long-term benefits of improving ecosystem and water quality, so to will the number of successfully implemented coordinated restoration efforts. Ifyour conceptproposal is not selected for further consideration in.this round of funding, wouldyou like referral to . other possible funding sources? YES x No 1. Describe your anticipated outcome, or what you plan to achieve, or what practices or Programs you intend to use If a construction Prolect, include the basis for selecting this particular type of construction and/or site location.• Task I, Implementation of road restoration work at 67 sites: The proposed project is a combination of site-specific measures applied at the subwatershed scale. Restoration sites were selected based on both physical and biological criteria applied to all 13 upper Antelope Creek subwatersheds. Five primary criteria were used to prioritize sites: 1. Diversion potential, 2. Subwatersheds with the highest biological or physical sensitivity, 3. Potential to produce the most sediment, 4. Subwatersheds with other planned or ongoing restoration activities, and 5. Site treatments having the greatest chance of success. In addition, site and treatment selection was based on a recently completed, CALFED funded, Roads Analysis Process that identified the long-term transportation system needs for the Antelope Creek watershed. This process ensures that appropriate treatments are based on long-term management objectives, not short-term needs. From the 13 subwatersheds, _ high priority subwatersheds were identified.- The restoration treatments will target altered hydrographic regimes and are designed to reduce source sediment production and stabilize, restore, and maintain ecological processes and hydrologic function. Construction specifications and implementation procedures will follow guidelines as specified in numerous Federal publications including the US Department of Agriculture, San Demas Technology and Development Center, Water/Road Interaction Technology Series. We will also continue to adapt our site-specific treatments incorporating valuable technology and knowledge gained from the results of implementation and effectiveness monitoring from earlier treatments. . Task 2, Expansion of our Technology Transfer/Education Program: This task is designed to collectively transfer successful plan, design, implementation, and monitoring of restoration treatments. We would share a compendium of our data and knowledge gained through ongoing restoration work. This would include cost and effectiveness of alternative treatments, monitoring protocol and results, any adaptive management that was applied during implementation, before and after photographs, and results from our. ongoing effectiveness monitoring program. We would also employ the services of University (e.g. Chico State or U.C. Cooperative Extension) to develop an educational video and CD-rom. Workshops, and field trips to a variety of treatment sites would compliment the data. The program would encourage and assist other landowners conduct field trips to completed restoration or potential restoration sites on their holdings. Many of our current partners and potential partners want to expand their watershed restoration involvement, but may not have the time or expertise to identify problems, develop plans, and initiate restoration treatments, especially when they are unsure of the benefits and costs. Potential partners may also be more inclined to participate after seeing the beneficial on -the -ground results of treatments, especially if they can relate these treatments to similar problem areas on their property. Our goal is to assist those partners who are already implementing restoration work, and those who have yet to become partners to identify problems, develop economical restoration opportunities, and successfully implement treatments. 2. Describe the level of communitv involvement and activity anticipated in this proiect, including the following elements: a. Describe how your activity will promote community and landowner involvement in design, implementation, and management or maintenance. Task 1, the implementation of an array of road related restoration treatments will provide a'visual template to other landowners of what treatments look like, what they cost, and what the expected long-term benefits are. Task 2, the dissemination of technical information, before and after photos, and implementation and effectiveness monitoring data, will provide landowners considering similar restoration work on.their land a guide to use to identify problem sites, develop opportunities, and implement cost effective treatments with long-term ecosystem benefits. b. What level of support is there from the local community and local agencies and tribal governments? The Forest has developed strong working relationships with the Battle, Butte, Deer, and Mill Creek Watershed Conservancies, and the two principle landowners, Collins Pine and Sierra Pacific. Members of these groups as well as the State Department of Fish and Game, Department of Water Resources, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, private consultants, and interested publics have contributed to the development of this proposal as well as our approved 1997 and 2001 Calfed grant proposals. We have shared Calfed's Watershed Program Plan and our watershed restoration plans with an extensive list of interested publics, including several tubal governments. Allthose who have responded to our restoration plans. support our efforts to improve the quality of watersheds tributary to the upper Bay -Delta system. M C. What level of cooperation exists if the proposal requires access to private lands? The proposal includes restoration sites on cost -share roads with private landowners. There is a strong level of cooperation between the involved landowners. d. How will the activity foster collaboration among multiple interests, and/or meet multiple objectives? Task 1 is designed to improve ecosystem quality within the Antelope Creek watershed, and,compliment ongoing'restoration made possible by our 1997 and 2001 Calfed grants in the adjacent Deer and Mill Creek watersheds. Collectively, 'these three watersheds support most of the few remaining naturally reproducing stocks of anadromous fish in the Sacramento . Valley. Task 2 is designed to, share information and knowledge in an effort to promote collaboration with other stakeholders in collectively and efficiently restoring and maintaining ecosystem quality. e. What environmental compliance permits, such as CEQA or NEPA, and other approvals may be necessary to implement your project? What permits have_been obtained? Are permitting agencies involved with project design? Task 1: A NEPA document with supporting specialist reports, including a wildlife biological assessment, is necessary before project implementation. Consultation will also be required with the National Marine Fisheries Service. Our 1997 Calfed grant enabled us to complete the majority of other necessary supporting NEPA documents including a Roads Analysis, a Heritage Resource Inventory, and a Botanical Assessment. No special permits are required. Task 2:. No environmental documents or.approvals are required to implement this task. f. How will the activity contribute to. watershed improvement beyond the immediate implementation site? The proposal is designed to improve and protect quality habitat, including that of Spring -run Chinook salmon and steelhead across all ownerships in the Antelope Creek watershed. These active restoration efforts are focused on the highest priority sites and subwatersheds on public lands. This.proposal compliments other recently completed and ongoing restoration efforts in the adjacent Deer and Mill Creek watersheds, and those lower watershed efforts designed to provide fish with, access to the upper watershed habitat. g. What are the potential benefits to the local community, and will those benefits be measured? Potential benefits include providing technical assistance to local property owners on how to identify problem sites, develop restoration opportunities, and implement cost-effective long-term treatments. This can be measured by tallying the number of those community members attending the workshops and field trips, and those who become proactive in watershed restoration and stewardship activities on their own land.. Other benefits include the enhancement of ecosystem and water quality through the implementation of restoration work and the continued community exposure to the values of responsible watershed stewardship. These benefits can be measured by photographing the recovery of treated areas and by conducting implementation at the site of the restoration activities, and effectiveness monitoring at the restoration site and across the watershed where the actions are implemented. Lastly, benefits include the economic return to local communities by those (contractors) who would implement a siieable portion of the restoration work. These benefits can be measured by the value of the awarded contracts. h. What impacts do you anticipate from your project implementation in.other portions of the community? The proposed restoration treatments will include the closure and/or decommissioning of some roads. Although an extensive transportation network will remain, allowing for the full range of currently permitted recreational and commercial activities; vehicular access on some existing roads within the Antelope Creek watershed will no longer be available. i. How does your project. promote local community involvement with the continued development and implementation of the CALFED Bay Delta Program? Most importantly, the community has.been asked to participate in the planning.of restoration work, including the selection of restoration sites and the treatments to implement. This proposal continues to build on the foundation of our 1997 and 2001 Calfed grant by reaching out to the community for help and support, and increasing.their understanding of the . Watershed Program Plan. This proposal provides local property owners with additional demonstration restoration projects plus an opportunity to team how to identify restoration sites, develop restoration opportunities, assess the benefits and costs, and initiate implementation. Acceptance and understanding through education and interpretation is key to the timely implementation of the Calfed program. 3. Describe the methods used to determine the estimated costs of your proiect, including a cost estimate on environmental compliance. Under Task 1, all site-specific restoration treatments were developed after specialists reviewed road inventory data and visited the sites. Forest Engineers', after reviewing the actual costs of similar restoration work that has been performed over the last three years in the Deer, Battle, and Mill Creek watersheds, developed the cost estimates for each Antelope Creek site: The total estimate cost of $700,900 includes planning and implementation costs. Planning costs, representing S% of the proposal, include public scoping and meetings, NEPA document preparation, consultation with National Marine Fisheries, and coordination of all implementation and monitoring activities. Planning can occupy a considerable amount of time and represent 50% of project costs in many cases, but much of the preliminary or "left -side" planning for the Antelope Creek watershed sites, including heritage resource evaluations, botanical inventories, engineering evaluations, a roads inventory, and a roads analysis have already been completed with funding from our 1997 Calfed grant. Related implementation costs, representing 10% of the proposal, include engineering design, contract preparation, contract administration, and implementation monitoring. A 20 percent overhead charge is assessed only to the work completed by Forest Service employees. We estimate that contractors will implement over 50% of the restoration treatments. Under Task 2, the $50,000 cost estimate is based on the number of direct labor hours it will take specialists to compile site restoration information (designs, project implementation costs, before and after photos, and implementation and effectiveness monitoringdata), plan and conduct workshops and field trips, and procure the services of professionals to assemble the watershed restoration CD-rom and video guide. 4. Describe -how the proposal promotes one or more of the initial implementation priorities of the watershed program (see Section 5). Our proposal directly promotes two of Calfed's initial implementation priorities. Task 1 implements a variety of site-, specific watershed conservation and restoration actions. The planned restoration actions are designed to: contribute to increased watershed resiliency, reduce accelerated levels of erosion from roads, require low maintenance, and allow for adaptive management. Task 2 is designed to expand the community's knowledge and understanding of our ongoing restoration efforts, including adaptive management, that support Calfed's mission, We believe that many of our current community partners and potential partners want to expand their watershed restoration involvement, but do not know how to begin to identify problems,, develop plans, and initiate restoration treatments. Our goal is to help build local community capacity to assess, and then effectively manage the watersheds that affect the Bay -Deltas ss�. Both tasks are designed to meet Catfed's Watershed Program objectives and priorities as well as the Forest's long-term commitment to watershed restoration and management. The Forest is committed to taking all the necessary steps to ensure that the upper anadromous watersheds continue to provide the best available habitat for its aquatic and biotic inhabitants. With a watershed restoration and management strategy more accurately defined than ever before, a demonstrated commitment to implement projects, and the continued support of stakeholder groups and local, state and federal agencies, the Forest is in a position to accelerate its own watershed stewardship programs and assist others. 5. Describe how your proposal will establish or enhance a partnership between the local community andtheCALFED Bay Delta Program. Our proposal will expand the local community's understanding of two of Calfed's program objectives, ecosystem and water quality through education and more importantly demonstration projects. Some leaders within the local communities have been critical of Calfed's Watershed Program Plan, in particular the issues surrounding the water supply objective. Because of water supply issues some of our community leaders may not be fully recognizing the potential benefits of the whole program. Our proposal will demonstrate the positive effects that. the Calfed program can have on restoring and maintaining quality habitat and clean water, items valued as much as water supply by the community. When the community sees that Calfed's objectives and funding go beyond the Valley floor, the fledgling partnership that currently exists between the upper watershed community and Calfed should grow. Calfed's past and present support of numerous upper watershed projects can only help build stronger partnerships. 6._ Describe how your pro iect will promote information exchange including monitoring and technical transfer among CALFED and others interested in watershed management Task 1, the implementation of restoration treatments, will add to our current technology database, and Task 2 will improve and expand the technology transfer of implementation and effectiveness monitoring results, and educational outreach to the upper watershed communityand all other parties involved in watershed restoration work across the Country. As previously discussed, we hope to share our watershed restoration knowledge, from site identification and opportunity development, to implementation costs and longterm effectiveness monitoring results with all interested community members and landowners. To date, we have focused quite extensively on the identification of watershed problems, the needed treatments, and the implementation and monitoring of those treatments. This work would not have been as effective, or even possible, without the continued support and coordination with our partners. If we focus the same energy on education and technology sharing, this effort will promote the expansion of responsible watershed stewardship by all users and property owners. Our goal is to assist those partners who are already implementing restoration work, and those who have yet to become partners to identify problems, develop economical restoration opportunities, and successfully implement treatments. 7. Describe here any other important aspects of your program that you could not address in the above items and that you feel are critical to fully describing your concept In 1997, the Lassen National Forest received a Phase I CALFED grant to plan extensive restoration work, and implement and monitor several demonstration projects within the Deer, Mill, and Antelope Creek watersheds, and in 2001 will receive a Phase II CALFED grant to implement additional restoration projects in Deer and Mill Creek watersheds. Our watershed analysis found the condition of two key watershed elements, surface erosion and near stream disturbance, were significantly different than their historical condition. We now estimate that erosion rates in the upper watershed are sixty percent higher than historic rates. The analysis further determined that roads were the primary source of near stream disturbance, and also the primary source of accelerated surface erosion. The hypothesis being tested is whether we can bring about a significant improvement to condition and resiliency in the upper watershed and provide additional protection to downstream beneficial uses by systematically identifying and then effectively restoring the highest sediment producing sites. Our Phase I work has significantly reduced many uncertainties. We have identified the locations and causes of our chronic sediment sources and implemented many effective restoration treatments.. We are monitoring these treatments and aquatic habitat condition, and are applying adaptive management principles to continually refine and improve our restoration practices. With the continued understanding and support of our partners, we hope to expand our Phase II restoration treatments to the Antelope Creek Watershed... Do you anticipate a desire for possible technical assistance from CALFED to fully develop your proposal? YES NO _ If yes, what type of assistance do you anticipate? If the review of this proposal identifies deficiencies, we would welcome CALFED assistance to address them. V �.. United States Forest Lassen Almanor Ranger District Department of Service National P.O. Boa 767. Agriculture Forest Chester, CA 96020 (530) 258-2141 Voice/TTY (530) 258-5194 Fax Butte County Board of Supervisors 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Dear County Supervisors: RECMWIV - APR 1 3 2001 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA Date: April 6, 2001 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APR 1 2' 2001 OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA The Lassen National Forest would like to notify you that we will be submitting a grant proposal to CALFED that, if approved, will allow us to.continue to accelerate our watershed restoration treatments at known sediment producing sites in the Antelope Creek Watershed. As the land steward for thousands of acres within the anadromous watersheds of Antelope, Butte, Battle, Deer, and Mill Creeks, the Forest has a responsibility to address the goals and objectives of the Calfed Ecosystem Restoration Program Plan and to collaborate .with Watershed Conservancies, private landowners, and other interested stakeholders when planning, prioritizing, and implementing restoration projects. The Forest is working in these watersheds with stakeholders to develop consistent inventory techniques, complimentary implementation strategies, uniform monitoring protocols, and adaptive management strategies. We are committed to implementing the best watershed restoration program possible in these very important watersheds. In 1997, the Forest received a Calfed grant to complete Phase I of its long-term restoration strategy within the Deer, Mill, and Antelope Creek watersheds. The Phase I projects included identifying restoration sites, developing site treatments, and implementing several demonstration projects. This Phase II proposal calls for the implementation of dozens of restoration treatments at the identified sites within the Antelope Creek watershed. By treating our highest sediment producing sites we hope to bring about a significant improvement to watershed condition and resiliency in the upper watershed and provide additional protection to downstream beneficial uses. This proposal will compliment planned restoration work within the Deer and Mill Creek watersheds supported by a 2001 CALFED grant. In Butte County, we have been working with the Butte Creek Watershed Conservancy to identify and prioritize potential restoration projects. A copy of our Antelope Creek grant concept proposal is attached. With the continued help of the Conservanci es,, other stakeholders, and State and local governments, we hope to. again receive supplemental funding for watershed stewardship programs from Calfed. We would appreciate any comments you might have concerning this grant proposal by April 23, 2001. Your input is very important'to us, as it will help unto develop a final proposal that incorporates your suggestions and addresses your concerns. For further information regarding this proposal please contact Russ Volke at the Alamanor Ranger District Office, P.O. Box 767, Chester, CA 96020, or call (530) 258-2141. Sincerely, SUSA HEBER-MATTHEWS Almanor District Ranger Caring for the Land and Serving PeoPrinted an Recycled Paper CONCEPT PROPOSAL FORM II For proposals with emphasis on watershed assessment, monitoring, and/or on -the -ground projects. Use this form to describe your concept for a proposal or project to apply to the CALFED Watershed Program for funding support. Use only the space provided, leaving at least a half-inch margin with type size no smaller than 10 points. These guidelines are also available in electronic format on the Watershed Program site Project Applicant Information Name of Project: Lassen National Forest Watershed Stewardship Within the Anadromous Antelope Creek Watershed Budeet Estimate: Funds requested 5600.900 Match (cash & inkind) 5150.000 Total 5750,900 Proiect Applicant(s) and/or Principle Investieator(s) and affiliations) – use additional sheet if necessary: USDA, Forest Service, Lassen National Forest . Proiect manaeer or contact person. address, telephone and e-mail (if fiscal agent is different, provide that information, also): Jeff Withroe, Forest Ecosystem Manager Supervisors Office, Lassen National Forest 2550 South Riverside Drive Susanville, CA 96130 jwithroe@fs.fed.us Elaine Courtright, Forest Chief Financial Officer Supervisors Office, Lassen National Forest 2550 South Riverside Drive Susanville, CA 96130 ecourtright@fs. fed. us Proiect Abstract (include the county, watershed or other geographic reference): The Lassen National Forest Phase II proposal builds on Forest's goal to bring about a significant improvement to watershed condition and resiliency in the upper watersheds and provide additional protection to downstream beneficial uses. Of particular emphasis is to make the upper watersheds more resilient to wildfire and extreme precipitation events. This proposal includes a sub -watershed -based task (Task 1) within the Antelope Creek anadromous watershed in Tehama County, and an expanded technology transfer/education program (Task 2) within the Antelope, Battle, Butte, Deer, and Mill Creek watersheds within Butte., Shasta, and Tehama Counties. Task 1 includes 67 restoration projects that were prioritized .from a list of over 80 problem sites identified as part of our Phase 11997 Calfed grant. The restoration activities focus on the stabilization, restoration, and maintenance of ecological processes, compliment the restoration work of others, and are designed to allow for adaptive management. Task 2 is designed to expand our technology transfer/education outreach to *our partners and fellow watershed stakeholders. This task builds on an existing database and restoration treatments to transfer knowledge at the "local" and regional levels. The technology transfer will include site identification methods, developing restoration opportunities, assessing long-term benefits and costs, designs, implementation monitoring, effectiveness monitoring, and before and after photographs We also hoe to share our increased data and knowledge made possible with the help of our 1997 and 2001 Calfed grants, by conducting field trips and workshops, and preparing CD-rom and video guides. Our goal is to assist those partners who are already implementing restoration work, and to encourage those who have yet to become partners. It is our hope that both tasks will strengthen our current partnerships and initiate new ones. As*these partnerships grow, and more stakeholders see and understand the long-term benefits of improving ecosystem and water quality, so to will the number of successfully implemented coordinated restoration efforts. If your concept proposal is not selected for further consideration in this round of funding, would you like referral to other possible funding sources? YES a No— 1. Describe your anticipated outcome, or what you plan to achieve, or what practices or Programs you intend to use. If a. construction project, include the basis for selecting this Particular lupe of construction and/or site location: Task I, Implementation of road restoration work at 67 sites: The proposed project is a combination of site-specific measures applied at the subwatershed scale. Restoration sites were selected based on both physical and biological criteria applied to all 13 upper Antelope Creek subwatersheds. Five primary criteria were used to prioritize sites: 1. Diversion potential, 2. Subwatersheds with the highest biological or physical sensitivity, 3. Potential to produce the most sediment, 4. Subwatersheds with other planned or ongoing restoration activities, and S. Site treatments having the greatest chance of success. In addition, site and treatment selection was based on a recently completed,. CALFED funded, Roads Analysis Process that identified.the long-term transportation system needs for the Antelope Creek watershed. This process ensures that appropriate treatments are based on long-term management objectives, not short-term needs. From the 13 subwatersheds, _ high priority subwatersheds were identified. The restoration treatments will target altered hydrographic regimes and are designed to reduce source sediment production and stabilize, restore, and maintain ecological processes and hydrologic function. Construction specifications and implementation procedures will follow guidelines as specified in numerous Federal publications °including the US Department of Agriculture, San Demas Technology and Development Center, Water/Road Interaction Technology Series. We will also continue to adapt our site-specific treatments incorporating valuable technology and knowledge gained from the results of implementation and effectiveness monitoring from earlier treatments. Task 2, Expansion of our Technology Transfer/Education Program: This task is designed to collectively transfer successful plan, design, implementation, and monitoring of restoration treatments. We would share a compendium of our data and knowledge gained through ongoing restoration work This would include cost and effectiveness of alternative treatments, monitoring protocol and results, any adaptive management that was applied during implementation, before and after photographs, and results from our ongoing effectiveness monitoring program. We would also employ the services of a University (e.g. Chico State or U.C. Cooperative Extension) to develop an educational video and CD-rom. Workshops, and field trips to a variety of treatment sites would compliment the data. The program would encourage and assist other landowners conduct field trips to completed restoration or potential restoration sites on their holdings. Many of our current partners and potential partners want to expand their watershed restoration involvement, but may not have the.time or expertise to identify problems, develop plans, and initiate restoration treatments, especially when they are unsure of the benefits and costs. Potential partners may also be more inclined to participate after seeing the beneficial on -the -ground results of treatments, especially if they can relate these treatments to similar problem areas on their property. Our goal is to assist those partners who are already implementing restoration work, and those who have yet to become partners to identify problems, develop economical restoration opportunities, and successfully implement treatments. 2. Describe the level of community involvement and activity anticipated in this proiect, including the following elements: a. Describe how your activity will promote community and landowner involvement in design, implementation, and management or maintenance. Task 1, the implementation of an array of road related restoration treatments will provide a visual template to other landowners of what treatments look hike, what they cost, and what the expected long-term benefits are. Task 2, the dissemination of technical information, before and after photos, and implementation and effectiveness monitoring data, will provide landowners considering similar restoration work on their land a guide to use to identify problem sites, develop opportunities, and implement cost effective treatments with long-term ecosystem benefits. b. What level of support is there from the local community and local agencies and tribal governments? The Forest has developed strong working relationships with the Battle, Butte, Deer, and Mill Creek Watershed Conservancies, and the two principle landowners, Collins Pine and Sierra Pacific. Members of these groups as well as the State Department of Fish and Game, Department of Water Resources, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, private consultants, and interested publics have contnbuted.to the development of this proposal as well as our approved 1997 and 2001 Calfed grant proposals. We have shared Calfed's Watershed Program Plan and our watershed restoration plans with an extensive list of interested publics, including several tnbal governments. All those who have responded to our restoration plans. support our efforts to improve the quality of watersheds tnbutary to the upper Bay -Delta system. c. What level of cooperation exists if the proposal requires access to private lands? The proposal includes restoration sites on cost -share roads with private landowners. There is a strong level of cooperation between the involved landowners.. d. How will the activity foster collaboration among,multiple interests, and/or meet multiple objectives? Task l' is designed to improve ecosystem quality within the Antelope Creek watershed, and compliment ongoing restoration made possible by our 1997 and 2001 Calfed grants in the adjacent Deer and Mill Creek watersheds. Collectively, these three watersheds support most of the few remaining naturally reproducing stocks of anadromous fish in the Sacramento Valley. Task 2 is designed' to share information and knowledge in an effort to promote collaboration with other stakeholders in collectively and efficiently restoring and maintaining ecosystem quality. e. What environmental compliance permits, such as CEQA or NEPA, and other approvals may be necessary to implement your project? What permits have been obtained? Are permitting agencies involved with project design? Task 1: A NEPA document with supporting specialist reports, including a wildlife biological. assessment, is necessary before project implementation. Consultation will also be required with the National Marine Fisheries Service. Our 1997 Calfed grant enabled us to complete the majority of other necessary supporting NEPA documents including a Roads Analysis, a Heritage Resource Inventory, and a Botanical Assessment. No special permits are required. Task 2: No environmental documents or approvals are required to implement this task. f. How will the activity contribute to watershed improvement beyond the immediate implementation site? The proposal is designed to improve and protect quality habitat, including that of Spring -run Chinook salmon and steelhead across all ownerships in the Antelope Creek watershed. These active restoration efforts are focused on the highest priority sites and subwatersheds on public lands. This proposal compliments other recently completed and ongoing restoration efforts in the adjacent Deer and Mill Creek watersheds, and those lower watershed efforts designed to provide fish with access to the upper watershed habitat. g. What are the potential benefits to the local community, and.will those benefits be measured? Potential benefits include providing technical assistance to local property owners on how to identify problem sites, develop restoration opportunities, and implement cost-effective long-term treatments. This can be measured by tallying the number of those community members attending the workshops and field trips, and those who become proactive in watershed restoration and stewardship activities on their own land. Other benefits include the enhancement of ecosystem and water quality through the implementation of restoration work and the continued communityexposure to.the values of responsible watershed stewardship. These benefits can be measured by photographing the recovery of treated areas and by conducting implementation at the site of the restoration activities, and effectiveness monitoring at the restoration site and across the watershed where the actions are implemented. Lastly, benefits include the economic return to local communities by those (contractors) who would implement a sizeable portion of the restoration work. These benefits can be measured by the value of the awarded contracts. What impacts do you anticipate from your project implementation in other portions of the community? The proposed restoration treatments will include the closure and/or decommissioning of some roads. Although an extensive transportation network will remain, allowing for the full range of currently permitted recreational and commercial activities; vehicular access on some existing roads within the Antelope Creek watershed will no longer be available. L How does your project promote local community involvement with the continued development and. implementation of the CALFED Bay Delta Program? Most importantly, "the community has been asked to participate in the planning of restoration work, including the selection of restoration sites and.the.treatments to implement. This proposal continues to build on the foundation of our 1997 and 2001 Calfed grant by reaching.out to the community for help and support, and increasing their understanding of the Watershed Program Plan. This proposal provides local property owners with'additional demonstration restoration projects plus an opportunity to learn how to identify restoration sites, develop restoration opportunities, assess the benefits and costs, and initiate implementation. Acceptance and understanding through education and interpretation is key to the timely implementation of the Calfed program: 3. Describe the methods used to determine the estimated costs of your project, including a cost estimate on environmental compliance. Under Task 1, all site-specific restoration, treatments were developed after specialists reviewed road inventory data and visited the sites. Forest Engineers, after reviewing the actual costs of similar restoration work that has been performed over the last three years in the Deer, Battle, and Mill Creek watersheds, developed the cost estimates for each Antelope Creek site. The total estimate cost of 5700,900 includes planning and implementation costs. Planning costs, representing 5% of the proposal, include public scoping and meetings, NEPA document preparation, consultation with National Marine Fisheries, and coordination of all implementation and monitoring activities. Planning can occupy a considerable amount of time and represent 50% of project costs in many cases, but much of the preliminary or "left -side" planning for the Antelope Creek watershed sites, including heritage resource evaluations, botanical inventories, engineering evaluations, a roads inventory, and a roads analysis have already been completed with funding from our 1997 Calfed grant. Related implementation costs, representing 10% of the proposal, include engineering design, contract preparation, contract administration, and implementation monitoring. A 20 percent overhead charge is assessed only to the work completed by Forest Service employees. We estimate that contractors will implement over 50% of the restoration treatments. Under Task 2, the 350,000 cost estimate is based on the number of direct labor hours it will take specialists to compile site restoration information (designs, project implementation costs, before and after photos, and implementation and effectiveness monitoring data), plan and' conduct workshops and field trips, and procure the services of professionals to assemble the watershed restoration CD-rom and video guide. 4. Describe how the proposal promotes one or more of the initial implementation priorities of the watershed program (see Section 5). Our proposal directly promotes two of Calfed's initial implementation priorities. Task 1 implements a variety of site- specific watershed conservation and restoration actions. The planned restoration actions are designed to: contribute to increased watershed resiliency, reduce accelerated levels of erosion from roads, require low maintenance, and allow for adaptive. management. Task 2 is designed to expand the community's knowledge and understanding of our ongoing restoration efforts, including adaptive management, that support Calfed's mission. We believe.that many of our current community partners and potential partners want to expand their watershed restoration involvement, but do not know how to begin to identify problems, develop..plans, and initiate restoration treatments. Our goal is to help build local community capacity to assess, and then effectively manage the watersheds that affect the Bav-Delta system. Both tasks are designed to meet Calfed's Watershed Program objectives and priorities as well as the Forest's long-term m comitment to watershed restoration and management. The Forest is committed to taking all the necessary steps to ensure that the upper anadromous watersheds continue to provide the best available. habitat for its aquatic and biotic inhabitants. With a watershed restoration and management strategy more accurately defined than ever before, a demonstrated commitment to implement projects, and the continued support of stakeholder groups and local, state and federal agencies, the Forest is in a position to accelerate its own watershed stewardship programs and assist others. 5. Describe how Your Proposal will esiablish or enhance a parinership between the local community and the CALFED Bay Delta Program. Our proposal willexpand the local community's understanding of two of Calfed's program objectives, ecosystem and water quality through education and. more importantly demonstration projects. Some leaders within the local communities have been critical of Calfed's Watershed Program Plan, in particular the issues surrounding the water supply objective. Because of water supply issues some of our community leaders may not be. fully recognizing the potential benefits of the whole programa Our proposal will demonstrate the positive effects that the Calfed program can have on restoring'and maintaining quality habitat and clean water, items valued as much as water supply by the community. When the community sees that Calfed's objectives and funding go beyond the Valley floor, the fledgling partnership that currently exists between the upper watershed community and Calfed.should grow. Calfed's past and present support of numerous upper watershed projects can only help build stronger, partnerships. 6. Describe how Your Proiect will promote information exchange Including monitoring and technical transfer among CALFED and others interested in watershed management Task 1, the implementation of restorationtreatments, will add to our current technology database, and Task 2 will improve and expand the technology transfer of implementation and effectiveness monitoring results, and educational outreach to the upper watershed community and all other parties involved in watershed restoration work across the Country. As previously discussed, we hope to share our watershed restoration knowledge, from site identification and opportunity development, to implementation costs and long term effectiveness monitoring results with all interested community members and landowners. To date, we have focused quite extensively on the identification of watershed problems, the.needed treatments, and the implementation and monitoring of those treatments. This work would not have been as effective, or even possible, without the continued support and coordination with our partners. If we focus the same energy on education and technology sharing, this effort will promote the expansion of responsible watershed stewardship by all users and property owners. Our goal is to assist those partners who are already implementing restoration work, and those who have yet to become partners to identify problems, develop economical restoration opportunities, and successfully implement treatments. 7. Describe here anv other important aspects of your Program that you could not address in the above items and that you feel are critical to fully describing your concept In 1997, the Lassen National Forest received a Phase I CALFED grant to plan extensive restoration work, and implement and monitor several demonstration projects within the Deer, Mill, and Antelope Creek watersheds, and in 2001 will receive a Phase II CALFED grant to implement additional restoration projects in Deer and Mill Creek watersheds. Our watershed analysis found the condition of two key watershed elements, surface erosion and near stream disturbance, were significantly different than their historical condition. We now estimate that erosion rates in the upper watershed are sixty percent higher than historic rates. The analysis further determined that roads were the primary source of near stream disturbance, and also the primary source of accelerated surface erosion. The hypothesis being tested is whether we can bring about a significant improvement to condition and resiliency in the upper watershed and provide additional protection to downstream beneficial uses by systematically identifying and then effectively restoring the highest sediment producing sites. Our Phase 1 work has significantly reduced many uncertainties. We have identified the locations and causes of our chronic sediment sources and implemented many effective restoration treatments. We are monitoring these treatments and aquatic habitat condition, and are applying adaptive management principles to continually refine and improve our restoration practices. With the continued understanding and support of our partners, we hope to expand our Phase II restoration treatments to the Antelope Creek Watershed.. Do you anticipate a desire for possible technical assistance from CALFED to fully develop your proposal? YES NO _ If yes, what type of assistance do you anticipate? If the review of this proposal identifies deficiencies, we would welcome CALFED assistance to address them. Antelope Vicinity Map Legend OAntelope Watershed Boundary OAntelope Subbasin Boundary Major Highways Local Towns 1 1 1 - Subbasins With Proposed Treatments O Non NF Within National Forest Boundary National Forest Antelope Creek Watershed Lassen National Forest 2002 CALFED Proposal Vicinity Map Watershed Stewardship Within the Antelope Creek Watershed .4 Butte Mdws Ct2u &*td� e s BUTTE COUNTY E C E 0 U E. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES D PLANNING DIVISION. MAA 2 7 c TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division TT COUNTY RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Landmark Missionary Bapt st, b*TWA. gE COMMISSION DATE: March 23, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the projeci and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete Within -30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit for a 7,000 square foot multi-purpose building- Activities to be conducted inside the building include roller skating, basketball, bible studies; and fellowship dinners- The building will contain a small kitchen and restrooms. on property zoned R-4 esidentiall located on the east side of Cohasset Road, across from L.indo Lane, at 2626 Cohasset Road, Chico., identified as APN 048-040-065 & 066, Supervisorial District No. -a. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FORA HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) –X --PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON July 21, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN April 6, 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): f By: Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 5307538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785' March 26, 2001 To Reviewing Agencies and Departments: utte Count LAND'_' OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVIIPES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE TELEPHONE: 5 7 e FAX: (53 3 hta� 2 6 1001. .j BUTTE COUNTY I LAND USE COMMISSION ! AjRpORT. Subject: Pre -development Review for a Use Permit for the Pleasant Valley -Baptist Church, APNs 007-420-0062 & 060, File # PRED 01-03 The Butte County Department of Development Services has received a request for a pre -application conference regarding a Use Permit for the Pleasant Valley Baptist Church. The church proposes to add additional facilities to the existing church on the project site. The proposed facilities include: • Artwork to include a concrete and brick flower garden with three crosses, and a metal world globe. • Three playing fields for baseball, football, and soccer games. Two of the playing fields are proposed to be lighted. 6 Outdoor lighted basketball court. • 12,000 square foot multi-purpose room to be used for the following: Junior church services with seating for approximately 500 people All sports gymnasium Church banquets with seating for approximately 400 people with tables Community events Special services meeting room Special church events 0 Private school from pre-school to twelfth grade • Day care and kindergarten facility • Family garden. area and family park Please refer to the attached site plans for. the location of the proposed improvements. Also attached is a project description written by the applicant. Sewage disposal will be handled by on-site septic systems, and domestic water obtained from on- site wells. The site is zoned P-Q.(Public, Quasi Public) and SR -1 (Suburban Residential, 1 -acre minimum parcel size) and has a General Plan.land use.designation of Public and Agricultural Residential. The site is located on the north side of Highway 99 and west of Garner Lane; at 1339 Garner Lane. Chico. The existing church was allowed in 1994 under Use Permit UP 94-100. The purpose of the meeting is to inform the applicant.of local or state requirements that may apply to their project.. This allows the applicant to incorporate those requirements into the design of the project when the actual Use Permit application is made. The pre -development conference will be held in- the Department of Development Services' conference room,`located at -7 County Center Drive; Oroville, on April 10, 2001, at _10:00: p.m. -The meeting is expected to end prior to 12:00 noon. 'If your department or agency has concerns or comments regarding the proposal, please have someone attend or submit written comments to this department prior to the meeting. Comments may be faxed to (530) 538-7785, attention Stephen Betts., . If you have any questions please contact me at '(530) 53.8-7153, or via E-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, �- Stephen R. Betts Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Butte County Environmental Health Department Butte County Public Works Department, Land Development Division Butte County Fire Department/CDF Building Division Butte -County Airport Land Use Commission. (staff) Caltrans California Regional Water Quality Control Board MAR .5 2001 RF.VISFD PLANNING DIVISION BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA ALTJC Tb �- Butte County Planning Division Request for Comments on a Dbyelopinent Application: John and Sharon Byrne, TSM 01-03 65 March 1, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Dan Breedon 11MIRMT•• 1 ., • ••• ,• �• 1 •, �Ueie parcels ,•.•• • n. .., •• • •• a and nrovided viater sew -ice IMM ■ 7 County Center Drive .m Oroville, California 95965 ■ Office 538-7601 - FAX 538-7785,m— BUTTE COUNTY . DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Jerry and Lori Ernst, TPM 01-07 DATE: February 16, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Dan Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be'addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Lot Line Adjustment and Tentative Parcel Map involving two existing Parcels of 57-29 (+/-1 acres and 51.55 (+/-) acres. The two existing parcels will be adjusted to create Parcel 1 of 57.3 (+/-) acres and Parcel 2 of 20 acres. A third parcel of 20 acres will be created byth . P� arcel Man, on property zoned FR -20 (Foothill Recreational - 20 acrearcels) located on adjacent to Richardson Springs Road, approximately 3/4 of a ile northeast of Cohasset Road northeast of the City of Chico., identified as APN 047-280-065, 100. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _ PLANNING COMMISSION - X DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON June 14_, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 2, 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION IFLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME (if applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: OVI7— Z6ko — aer5- ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: '- (FOR OFFICE USE) 14-�,',7Z _97.3 TELEPHONE NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any ,��Cy.9.P.��i' ✓P,e/lr1r.5 �Of�'.� �Y.^ ' �.i: y.�, : ,�lM1^,A: � .� .. _ . , MATTON RRoLTIRED OWNER'S NAME 7- GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TELEPHONE ADDRESS: t crry, STATE & ZIP CODE: 7 ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SrrE SIZE (in Square Fed or Acres) /5e _Z0-mssC9 /9,L-1 USE PERMIT EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) :3,a,V50-rf,- (Check One) (Check One) ( 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC PKPROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER MINOR VARL-kNCE ON- APPLICATION REQUInSiti 0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 0 REZONE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 0 USE PERMIT 0 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP 0 MINOR USE PERM O BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION 13 VARIANCE E3 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION C3 MINOR VARL-kNCE ON- ICATE OF MERGER 0 ADMINISTRATIVE PE IT ,,G AND RECLAMATION PLAN 0 DEVELOPSIENTAGREE?v ❑ OTHER CT DESMRrCQN�' FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Att necessary Mills*7'pjNiatiort is r a land division, describe Lhe number and size of parcels.) 4 R - *2 - -1-15019 e'"I'p /"_7 . Z 5, -,I-,:9r 17 alll,;y /77E of eg OWNER CERT[FICATION I CERTIFY THAT I ANI PRESENTLYTHE LEGAL OWNER OR II IE AUTHORIZED AGENT OFTILE OWN'F R OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPER 1 7. - F1'R'I'I1FR. I ACKNOWI-ED(JR .NG THE FILIOFTRIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION ISTRUE AND ACCV,\'(T. (Ii an agent is to N authors/.:d, ex"vie in affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this .applicat ion.) SIGNATURE: 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. enation: C 0 Name and address of owner, and/or rY O -J, F FORM INS act Applicant) Date Filed or, and/or project sponsor: -072 V"917 i"9%/ CUff Address of project. �/�'y�9.Q0.�0!!• S�•Q/li' � �Z /�/ � l%� /�/�3 Assessors Parcel Number.- • - ro ect Name, address, and telephonenumber f n �;o �,Q be conted Cy�tiCoP 1►9 5 List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: ung general plan designation: E:dsting zoning district: How is land currently used? Proposed use of site (Project -for which this form is filed): Project Description: (Acres/Sq. Feet; 9. Site size: 10, off-street parking spaces: Full size: compact Total: No 11. Plans attached Yes 12. Proposed development schedule 13. Associated projects �GYrE 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development C 9utte County Cepa,t:nent o: oevelopment 3e,vlces C3 Plannlnq olvlalon 0 Attach description of.project containing the following.Infortrnation: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of.unit sizes, range.of sale prices or rents, and type of - _ household size expected. liDl /9U•9lLf �1� �9T 7�/3 'J71��. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.<A 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per stilt, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be. derived from the project ly/� 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. N permits have already been Issued, please attach as Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or its -effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons ✓, or substantial alteration of ground contours. — — 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. — —. 22. Change in pattem•or character of general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or. litter. 24. Change indust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vici 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns.. — — 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. -- — 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more.— �,COP�S of 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. — — 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption f (electricity; oil, natural gas, etc.). — -- 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects:. — C 3,::e County Cepjccmen: Of Cevelopment Secvlcea 0 Planning Clvlilon 0 2 Environmental Setting: (A tach brief description). 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soca stability,' . Plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of.the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be. accepted. i/qC;I'T GY�,e T^�ZF 63 ' Z h'A'�E5/TES Gtr DUT�iI,C/i/l1GS 33. Describe the surrounding properties, Ind udl� Information on plants and animals and any cultural, 'historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use.,(residential, commercial, etc.). Intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, near yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted.,!T/C�?�L. f�Tf//LL r9,P.fi9. r2 s��G�F f���y Certification I hereby certify that the statements fumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for oris initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and Information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature for; / K:\FORNIS\,ENV-INFO 0, Butte County Department of Development Secvlcsa 0 Plannlnq 0lvlalon 0 3 BUTTE COUNTYd"� DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Jerry and Lori Ernst, TPM 01-07 DATE February 16, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Dan Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Lot Line e Admtment and Tentative Parcel lean involving two existing Parcels of 57.29 (+/-) acres and 51-55 (.+/-) acresThe two existingsparcels will be adjusted to create Parcel 1 of 57-3 (+/-)ars and Parcel 2 of 20 acres- parcel of 20 acres will be created by the Parcel Map, on property zoned FR 20 (Foothill Recreational - 20 acre parcels) located on adjacent to Richardson Spring-, Road proximately 3/4 of a mile northeast of Cohasset Road_, northeast of the City of Chico., identified as APN 047-280-065. 100. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _ PLANNING COMMISSION - X DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON June 14_, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN March 2, 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM_ APPLICATION PPLICANT: . Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 0,/.7- 76ko - 45kCr ro ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: F (FOR OFFICE USE) ,7 Z ,7 O"r 3 NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) TELEPHONE LOCATION OF PROJECT Major cross streets and Address, if any 77,77 gr- rlr!%T AT• Tkn=nD Xx A rT T 'W =T1 rl?,T R P0 ITR F;T) 0 MINOR VARL-kNCE 0 ADMINISTRATIVE 1 E3 DEVELOPMENT AG ICATE OF MERGER G AND RECLAMATION PLAN L L 0 OTHER CT CT DESMPT19 FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attnecessary s$re-L:S, n is a land division describe the number and size of parcels.) SOT 17 C-,� Z,9 3 OWNER CERTIFICATION (:I-:RTIr7Y TI (AT IANI PRESENTLY THE LEGM. OWNER OR 111E AUTI IORIZED AGENT OFTILE OWN& R Of: THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPEK I y MATIO Ft'R'I"l If: R. I ACKNOWLEDGETI IE F-11- ING OFTI THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFOR. N IS TRU-E AND 'fidavit ofauthocization and include the affidavit with this application.) ACCCRAIT. (11'an agent is to �< authon&:d. executean ai IRP- TELEPHONE OWNER'S NAME AMENDMENT GENERAL PLNN AMENDMENT ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: 14'47Z ,elehKe-12,Wv7 ,7? XPOeV , - ZONE ' I NERAL PLAN GE EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Acres) /91� 0 USE PERMIT 0 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP E3 MINOR USE PERM O EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) C3 PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) C3 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION - (Check One) Check One) ( C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC PROPERTY I . S OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER 0 MINOR VARL-kNCE 0 ADMINISTRATIVE 1 E3 DEVELOPMENT AG ICATE OF MERGER G AND RECLAMATION PLAN L L 0 OTHER CT CT DESMPT19 FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attnecessary s$re-L:S, n is a land division describe the number and size of parcels.) SOT 17 C-,� Z,9 3 OWNER CERTIFICATION (:I-:RTIr7Y TI (AT IANI PRESENTLY THE LEGM. OWNER OR 111E AUTI IORIZED AGENT OFTILE OWN& R Of: THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPEK I y MATIO Ft'R'I"l If: R. I ACKNOWLEDGETI IE F-11- ING OFTI THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFOR. N IS TRU-E AND 'fidavit ofauthocization and include the affidavit with this application.) ACCCRAIT. (11'an agent is to �< authon&:d. executean ai IRP- APPLICATION R.EQUESTED . ..... 0 AMENDMENT GENERAL PLNN AMENDMENT E3 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 0 REZONE %I- ., - - - NTATIVE PARCEL MAP /91� 0 USE PERMIT 0 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP E3 MINOR USE PERM O * BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION C3 VARL-XNCE C3 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION - 0 MINOR VARL-kNCE 0 ADMINISTRATIVE 1 E3 DEVELOPMENT AG ICATE OF MERGER G AND RECLAMATION PLAN L L 0 OTHER CT CT DESMPT19 FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attnecessary s$re-L:S, n is a land division describe the number and size of parcels.) SOT 17 C-,� Z,9 3 OWNER CERTIFICATION (:I-:RTIr7Y TI (AT IANI PRESENTLY THE LEGM. OWNER OR 111E AUTI IORIZED AGENT OFTILE OWN& R Of: THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPEK I y MATIO Ft'R'I"l If: R. I ACKNOWLEDGETI IE F-11- ING OFTI THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFOR. N IS TRU-E AND 'fidavit ofauthocization and include the affidavit with this application.) ACCCRAIT. (11'an agent is to �< authon&:d. executean ai IRP- i od g CWTY OF EN R N FORM GOUNroN o Comp at Applicant)' eP�NNGp���S Date Filed Q� Ge nforrnation: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor Cy" PJ P7 3 2 Address of project: ��Cy�.�0!! SO.2/li' /ZJ �/Z Assessors Parcel Number. 9Z -lam –065 E—/00 3, Name, address, and telephone of person Tconcerning this project Z? 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by,city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5• ung general plan designation: 6. Edsting zoning district: j5e -Z40 7. How is land currently used? Off g. Proposed use of site (Project -for which this form is filed): Project Description: ��• 8 'JC- f • (Acres/Sq. Feet; g• Site size: 10. Off-street parivng spaces: Full size://f– Compact: Total: No 11. Plans attached Yes 12. Proposed development schedule i95 13. Associated projects 14, Anticipated incremental or phased .development nnlnq Olvlalon C 9utte County cepattment o: Development SGCVICGJ 0 PlaO Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. _ If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of. household size expected. !? r AU.9rLh'�L� r9T r/1i3 J7t9�, 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. ljh 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Are the following Items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all'ftems checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in e)dsting features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. — 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. -- — 22. Change in pattem or character of general area of project 23.. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.. _ =� 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage pattern's. — — 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. — — 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more.— �,COP�S 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as to)dc substances, flammable or explosives. — — 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services - (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantiaily increase fossil fuel consumption f (electricity, oil-, natural gas, etc.). — — 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. — C 3�_te County Cepactrnent of Cevelopment Secvlcei C Planning OlvtJlon 0 2 32. Describe the project site as It exists before the project including infortnadon on topography, son stabrTdy, _ plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or.Polaroid photos'will be accepted. V JCr r AWI,41/GL �'C1� w��r9T/UE G PSS. S �r .�'i9 E�2E� 33. Describe the surrounding properties; indudifig information on plants 'and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type .of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartrnent houses, shops, department stores, etc ); and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification nw�/�,e,A7 C—JeAG Ozz/.SST/ES: �4G. USES. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached xhibits present the data and information required for this Initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the fads, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and beset Date Signature for a } K:\FORMS\ENV-INFO 0 Butte County Oepactment of Cavelopment secvlcej 0 planning Olvls:on 0 3 s ; BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION . TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Kimberly Jensen, REZ 01-01 DATE: January 19, 2001 CONTACT PERSON: Dan Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate. environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below: • If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame, given_ , or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for .11FT3i�:k`'i.Ta� • � �Irl�e.ralr�� - • • . -•�`��:s�:rm��■:rz�r�;�■rs��sr�n��r��■1■� - pro-ject resides wift k(L *e Tomi-i of Paradise Sphere of IT4uenc - the -Paradise Urban Resexze. as desimo-ated bv the Buxe County General Plan, and the area of influence for the Paradise Skypark Airpo on property zoned FR -40 (Foothill ecreational1 arre narcel I t • t•• •. u, 111 feet eaqt of •.• Route 19 on Out of identified as APN. Supervisorial District No. 4. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON May 10 , 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY .NO LATER THAN February 2, 2001.• If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): :'M Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION LICANT: Agent information to he Druvided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applicant is d&fcmnt from owner an affidavit is required ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Kimberly Jensen n4i - - ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE FILE NUMBER (FGR OFFICE USE) 1025 Clotilde Way, Chico, CA 95926 NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT ( If any TELEPHONE Rezone (530 ) 899-1963 LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross SU=ts and Address, if any ) i Out Of The Way Road GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OWNER'S NAME ❑ TELEPHONE Same as above M ( ) ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE. ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE ❑ SITE S12E (m Square Fea or Acres) FR 40 AR/UR Vacant 209 acres F7 mm,iG STRUCTURES (in Square Fea) PROPOSED STRUCIURFS (in Square Feet) None None (Cheat Orae) (Check Ore) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ® PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION RE UESTED n;- Q ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL NIAP ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODOCATION ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach accessary sheets. If this application is for a land division. describe the number and size of parcels.) ❑ GENERAL PLAN A.MENDN F " M REZONE PLANNING DI ❑ USE PERMIT ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT ❑ VARIANCE ❑ MINOR VARIANCE ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PE L\4rr d DEVELOPMENT AGREENIENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL NIAP ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODOCATION ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach accessary sheets. If this application is for a land division. describe the number and size of parcels.) Rezone to 20 acre parcels. Iluil 122 %-_w fli a- Val Jul ju ul gifff-cOUNTY PLANNING DI OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I Am PRFSExMY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OFTHE OWNER OFTHE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER I ACY-NOWLEDGE THE FILV;G OFTHIS APPLICATION AND CERTHAT ALL OFTHE ABOVE INr.oR�tATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (if an a ent is a be execute an drtdavit of authcriauionV!i T w• this application.) DATE: � / t� GO SIGNATURE ��od ��D I � JAN, 8 2001 D BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION General Information: COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant)' . - Date Filed 1. Name and address of owner, and/or devel 1025 Clotilde Way, Chico,. CA ! 2: Address of project: Out Of The Way Assessor's Parcel'Number. 41-008-04' 3. Name, address, and telephone number of Ron Graves & Associates F.I r, and/or project sponsor: Kimberly Jensen n to be contacted concerninq this proiec 4. List and describe any other, related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, -state and federal agencies: N/A 5. Existing general plan designation: AR UR 6. Existing zoning district: FR 40 7. How is land currently used? Vacant 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Divide into 10 -"20 acre. parcels. Project Description: 9. Site size: 209 acres (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: full size:. N/A Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes—No -A- 12. Proposed development schedule N/A 13. Associated projects NZA 1.4. Anticipated incremental or phased development N/A Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. N/A 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. N/A 17. If,industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A 0 Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division 0 1 . 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit N/A Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential . X areas or public lands or roads. — — 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project _ X 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. — X 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. — X 25. Change in bay, lake; river, stream or ground water quality X or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. — — 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels X in the vicinity. — — 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. X 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. — X 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services X (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil .fuel consumption X (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). — — 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. — X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 .2 . Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and'animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the: site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be. accepted. See Below 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale.of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. See .Below o Certification I hereby certify that the statements fumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature for l � K:\FORMS\S UBMITfAL\ENV-I NFO 32) The.site as existing is -typical foothill property. Steep to moderate to gentle slopes; stable soil; native plants and animals; scattered Oaks, Pines, brush. No known cultural, historical or scenic aspects.: No structures. 33) The surrounding properties are much the same.. Paradise Airport.to the West;. scattered` single family, residences. No, known, cultural, historical or .scenic aspects. BUTTE COUNTY //Z�/� DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7i (-yt b" PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division CS RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: John and Sharon Byrne, TSM 01-06 DATE: January 19, 2001 CONTACT'PERSON: Dan Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: L Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Tentative Subdivision Map on a 10 2 (+/-ll acre parcel The man includes 3 phases which each phase com prising ten parcels, for a total of `30 parcels Average parcel size is one-quarter acre Phase one will be provided with a co�rr m_unityy sewage disposal system. to be located on phase two and three. prior to recordation Phase two and three shall not be recorded until sewer service becomes available from the City ofhi .o At that time all of thehn aces,'nc� luding phase one, will be pprovided with City sewer, Water supply is provided by the California Water Company. A 7,700(++-)sq,ft. lot. (Lot "A") will be provided for storm water retention The applicant additionally requests an exception to the County Subdivision Ordinance Section 20-133, to allow for a cul-de-sac road exceeding 500 feet in length on property zoned S -R (Suburb n Residential) located on at the southwest comer of Eaton Road and Godman Avenue, in the north Chico area., identified as APN 007-260-081, 082. Supervisorial District No. -1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) PLANNING COMMISSION -. _X_ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON May10, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN February 2, 2001. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has.no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary.): By: Date: ■ 7 County Center Drive ■ Oroville, California 95965 ■ Office 538-7601 - FAX 538-7785 ■ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICA A DDT TrA A1T. A.....• :-4r ..., :-- •- L- ----=- � ' - - APPLICANTS AME (If applicant is different fromer an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ADDRESS: CPIY, STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE U 3 a G �cZ-""mac-.� j . G'C' 5"i Z NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) TELEPHONE LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any " JG lJ� / /�Zi7Vt / � t� . �G7�✓7f�ti� ........ .....:: ....:..:.. . .. , ...:x . •: •., ..�,::•. ..... .. .....:....... ....< GFNRR OT iN1FllDtu ATrntJ Dznrrrorn OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE _ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP REZONE ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SITE STLE ( in Square Feet or Acres ) USE PERMIT W *— c ? Q � z EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) T PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) O MINOR USE PERMIT (Check One) (Check One) OPERTY IS'OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERE> �i'¢ ` G •, PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTI �/e4� O PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER AFFLICA D O GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT n u w a: TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP REZONE C� O TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP C USE PERMIT W *— c ? Q � z 0 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP O MINOR USE PERMIT c g 2 z = G BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION O VARIANCE c%t •"� `O LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION O MINOR VARIANCE Qo ui O CERTIFICATE OF MERGER C ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT W 11 � O MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN 13 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT m O OTHER .. ....,... . _. ....... . ...... Ai?(lTR(''T T1CcnottirrnwT FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division ,'describe the number and size of parcels.) n u w a: O WNER CER TII-iCA TT ON :;PLaHN 1 CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORDEED AGENT OF THE OWNER OFTHEABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE AJiORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (If an agent is to be authorized, exeaue an affidavit at authorization and indude the affidavit with this application.) DATE: Z SIGNATURE: COUNTY OF BUTTE. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FC (To be Completed By Project Applicant) p C CE E JAN 16 2401 BUTTE COUNTY Date Filed _General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor: ���' 7'i A-6 2. Address of project: Assessor's Parcel Number: e.' 67 - Z � a c jq ; d'6 S' - 3. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: 4.. List and describe any other related permits and other public those required bycity, regional, state and federal agencies required. for this project, including S. Existing general plan designation:_ "e -i -� 5 6. Existing zoning district: L.� iZ 7. ' How is land currently used? 8. Proposed use_of site (Project for which this form is filed): Project Description: 9. Site size: Feet) (Acres/Sq. 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes ✓No 12. Proposed development schedule --:5 i Zc; fG / 13. Associated projects 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development 3 �th95 `5 Attach description of project -containing the following information: is. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading 0 Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O 1 p ECEod� facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. JAN 1 E 2001 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, o, any and indicate clearly why the application is required: If permits have al ady evelopmentpermits,stpleth eenBOM Exhibit Oplamse attach PLANNING DIVISION Are the following, items applicable to the project or its effects?. Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. ✓ 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or lands / public or roads. 22-- Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _ t/ 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _ 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or*odors in vicinity. .25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or.ground water quality or quantity, or'alteration of'existing,drainage'pattems.- (/ 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity, - !/ 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, / flammable or explosives. — (/ 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services _ fire, (police, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). _ 30. Substantially increase fossil'fuel consumption / (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. 0 Butte -County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural; historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures., Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on-plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.),_ intensity of land use (one- family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity.. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements fumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature for K:IFORMS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑Planning Division ❑ 3 Tentative Subdivision Map 'Checklist Attachments for John & Sharon Byrne January 12; 2001 Overview: This project .is unique with regards to normal county standards. Due to the fact that this property will be annexed into the City of Chico, we are. proposing to build it to current City standards. The project will be build in three phases. The first phase will be built while still in the county. However, phases two and three will not be built until city sewer is available.. At that time, we,will be requesting to have the entire project annexed into the City of Chico. The City has tentatively scheduled to build a sewer main down Eaton Road in the Spring of 2002. Item #6 - a. We are requesting an exception to -the cul-de-sac maximum length requirement: b: We are requesting an exception to the cul-de-sac maximum lot requirement. c. We are requesting a "deferred road improvement agreement" on Eaton Road due to the fact that we are proposing a "phased project". We would like to do the road improvements for only the areas that we are working on. This will allow for a logical and economical plan. Item #15 - We are expecting create a total of 30 lots. We have not determined what type of housing would be built there at this time. Thus, we cannot estimate a sales price or household size. Page 1 Environmental Setting: DIE C E � W E ELV S- hN PL%AG'VMS79' I" Item #32 - The land that will be developed has historically been seA as a primary residence with boarding stables for horses. There is currently on house, "n I ISION mobile homes along with a barn and several stalls on the site. I a e!ep on of the house and barn, all of the stables and mobiles are in disrepair and will be removed. There is not any wildlife that on the property due to the fact that there have been so many horses and people using the facilities. Additionally, flood irrigation has been used in order to water the fields which has limited potential wildlife. The land is relatively flat with a clay -loam type of soil which appears to be very stable. There are several non -indigenous trees on the site which we will attempt to save. However, most are at the end of their life cycle and can easily be replaced. There is not any redeeming cultural, historical or scenic value to the land. The stables have been neglected for several years and do not contribute anything to the neighborhood. Site Photographs Facing south at the intersection of Eaton Road and Godman Avenue. Page 2 BGJT E`COt Environmental Setting: Conlin led PLANNING DI BUTTE Item #33 - The surrounding properties are mainly single family dWulmi-PLANNIN(gs-Ort— roughly 1/4 to 2+ acre lots. The homes are a mix of older, moderate size residences and mobile homes. There are also commercial properties nearby. The setback and yard configurations seem to conform to typical low density requirements. The area is not conducive to any indigenous wildlife due to the fact that there are already low density subdivisions in the general area. There is no cultural, historical or scenic value in the area other than as a typical older neighborhood. Site Photographs 0 Facing southwest on Troy Lane (pdvate road). raumg Uuumwcm UU XYUUIBRB tivrUm— Page 5 ' r ' • • BUTTE COUNTY E C `v D DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVI PLANNING DIVISION j $-J� TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning DivisionE COUNTY AIRPORT LANTD USF :—M.1 RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: John and Sharon Byrne, - DATE: October 18, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Dan Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described. below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is'adequate to allow -your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to • 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be. addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to.be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. '•�` This is an application for The applicant proposes Tentative Subdivision Map creating ten 1.01 (1+/-) acre parcels from an existing 10.2 (+/-) acre parcel The parcels would be served with individual onsite sewage disposal systems and provided water service from Cal -Water, on property zoned S -R (Suburban Residential) located on -I]= proneM is located at the southwest comer of Eaton Rd and Godman Ave, in the north Chico area., identified as APN 007-260-081 & 082. Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) PLANNING COMMISSION - __X_ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON February 8, 2001. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER. THAN November 1, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: 0 7 County Center Drive 0 Oroville, California 95965 0 Office 538-7601 - FAX 538-7785 ■ Sep -01-00 10:31A butte county planning 530 538 7785 P_05 DEPARTML IT OF DEVELOPME. T SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION &PLICANT: Agent anlofmatim W vc ERVIUCU 15 va t3ulra Slut. APPLICANT'S NA ( If applicant is different fmm owner an affidavit is requuod) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 4007 _ A60 _ og/ ADDRESS: CITY, STATE 6t ZIP CODE: FILE NMB R: (FOR OPFICE USE) (9t- 0 [NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) TFLEPHONE (.530) Sid LOCATION OF PROJECT (Major cross streets and Address, if any ) S d oc,ri�cl i C [.E h► o. �iyQN dE. GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OWNER'S NAME —✓pfy�cJ 8( /1�1E GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TELEPHONE c s3rn 3Y�Z - 9 -?-Of 9 ADDRESS: CITY. STATE dt ZIP CODE: 333 6,,�c�7Z �� . �'��Co Cf� 9S� 7-3 ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE USE PERMIT SITE S17F (in Square Fear or Acres) WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP D MINOR USE PERMIT I,SES/I>Ef/L— t/D, G S DaSTING STRUCi-URLS (in Square Fea) S.vGL E 6✓ioE /7o73iGE _ �.2 S • PROPOSED 5TRUCTURES (in Square Fee ) /Q siilr4L E's sic- y 1�G✓E�-c. i�Vti S /,SLE GcJiDE /�E = /lSl�a S O (Check Oat) (Check Ooe) O PROPERTY Is OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED )<PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WA71 R XPROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC a PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED O GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP O REZONE / f`, / TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP O USE PERMIT RW .���t WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP D MINOR USE PERMIT O 1, ! Q ��� BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION D VARIANCE O LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION O MINOR VARIANCE BUTT—cm—, Amy 13 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER O ADMIM MUTIVEPERMIT P L ANi N - —'CrUION O b4INING AND RECLAMATION PLAN C3 DEVELOPMENTAGRE9MENT O OTHER PROJECT T ESCRITON - - _ FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach nom"ary sheets. If this application is for a Land division, describe the number and size of els.) SU/� (/ C ES , V ec-'L S vc 71-' etc =z:�- .¢e Z2 771,w - OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRFSF.N7LY THE LEGAL OWNER OR IM AUTHORED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS QPPLICATIOtl AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (It an a=em is to be auuwriaa. execute qp itfldavit of audwrization and include the affidavit with this applicaim) DATE: 9.1/ SIGNATURE: Sep -01-00 10:31A butte county planning 530 538 7785 AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services, �,Q�C/S/G� Sve✓c:Y1�s D%C, %f/E/� �Cs'�icJ%S Print Name of Agent and Pbone Number P.06 is hereby authori7.ed to process this application for 3Y/ZitiE ffr9�'aA,1 /3Y/I.Vt on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number ,00 This authorization allows representation for allapplications, hearings, appeals, etc_ and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including documents) relating to record title interest_ Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Ptint Name Architect and/or Engineer: Print Na= of ArchijeCU :agineer and Phone Number ✓may%lll Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: Total Amount Received: - yL y AP Numbers) Legal Description Owners Authorization Zoning Requirements Project Description Copies of plot plan Taken by Receipt No. E.H. LD Plan FD Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is S as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". Sep -01-00 10:31A butte county planning 530 538 7785 COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Pr*ct Applicant) Date Filed` 9 / / �� CM General Information: P.07 1. Name and address of owner. and/or developer, and/or projed sponsor. & W/c0 '54C14 95?V; - 2. Address Of project �g� �C�//� C/it�CGE ( `�•eNE.e C1f rf�'?�D Assessors parcel Number. 007 - ;?6D - D 8 / 9, d �- 3. Name, address. and telephone number of person this to be contacted concerning 4. List and describe any other related pefrn is and other public approvals required for this project, Including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. edstinggeneral plan designation: Lots 4- 6. Existing zoning district7. Howls Howls land currently used -rvG�.E/may 1�wE�/'`rte & 1 -1°73/Z -a AGaNL G//iY ,ffiQSE 730Ai4 /rtlG AL/G/TIES . 8. Proposed use of site (project for which this form Is filed): /0y,UiT Su�� ✓/s/�/ Project Description: 9. Site size•, /O . Ac/1 5 (Ac resf$q. Feet) 10. off3treet paring spaces: Full ske: To BE.� riMAOCompact Total: 11. Pians attached Yes✓ No 12. Proposed development schedule 1W CN ;Zoo/ 13. Associated projects_ 14. An4cipated Incremental or phased development AJQ a Butts County Department of flgvslopment 9scvicss a Flannlnq oivision O 1 Sep -01'-00 10:31A butte county planning 530 538 7.785 P_08 Attach desctiptlon of project containing the following Information: 15. if residential; include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of. household size expected: .-.s'c-- le. 1e. if commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city, or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and lobding faclliies. 17. If industrial, k9ftats type. camsted employment per sly and loading tacili6es. 18. If Institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shin, estimated occupancy, loadrng facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project 19. if the project involves a vartance, conditional use, rezoning applicatlon, or any development permits, state this and Indicate clearly why the application b required. If pens have already been issued, please attach as EAibit Are the following Itentts applicable to the project or its effects? oiscucs below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). O Butte County Oepactnhnt of DeWlOp+"nt SKylcu O Planning 17y}}* { 2 YES NO 20. Change in exlsang features of any hills. buttes, canyons of substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. 22. 23. 24. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. Change In pattern or character of general area of project Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _ Change in dust ash, smoke, fumes or odors In vicinity. _ / r! 25. Change in bay, lake, -river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drWnege patterns. 26. 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels In the vicinity. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous rhaterlals, such as toxic subsUnces, flammable or explosives. _ L� 29. Substantial change In demand for municipal services (police, bre, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). / 30. ;1. Substantially increase toad) fuel corAum*n (electricity. OR. natural qas, - Rilsdonshlp to a larger project or series of projects. �G O Butte County Oepactnhnt of DeWlOp+"nt SKylcu O Planning 17y}}* { 2 Sep -01-00 10:32A butte county planning 530 538 7785 P.09 Environmental Setting: (°►ftch brief descriplbn) 32. OSw a the pmjsd slte as K s>dt before the project. Includeq informsIon on topography. soil stakAty, - plants and animals, and any cultural, historical. or scenic aspects. Describe any e*Ang structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site: Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe On surmurm ft properties, including inforrrretbn on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Ir>dkats the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), lntenWty of land use (on*4ampy, apartment houses, shops, department stores. etc.), and scale of development (height, ft~, set -back, tsar yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vldnty: Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. // �c 6�7% ell, 14 Certification { hereby certiy that the Ponta a of ��mftbft sm and Informadon ��t and ithe dab omnaton presented required for this kdeel eva my OMY, and OW #0 are true and correct to the beet of my bwAedge and belief Date Signature for K.%FORMSWNV4NFO p Hutto County DapartwAnt of D.volopa,.nt Services 0 Planning Division 0 i BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ' PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Jennifer Ann Shults, MUP 01-07 DATE: September 13, 2000 CONTACT PERSON: Steve Hackney 'The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow.your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be'submitted within the time frame given,. or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for To expand existing small Day Care Center from 8 children to a large Day Care to 14 children, onproperty zoned R 1 (Residential) located On Lawn Drive off of Codman Avenue, in north Chico area., identified as APN AP# 007-360-038. Supervisorial District No. I . THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING MANAGER - ON September 27, 2000. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE. REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN, September 27, 2000. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: 7 County_ Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 DEPARTMY..NT OF DEVELOPMEN, T SERVICES BUTTWOUNTY UNIFORM APAICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( U applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: n - —039 ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT ( If any) TELEPHONE ( 0D) 8q L4 -2'4 43 LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address if any ) E G NERAL INFORMATION RE UIp ED OWNS NAME TELEPHONE AM 3& q -z+E 3 ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND SE . SITE SIZE ( in S Feet or Aces) -=1 �� ►rL' 1 Ent . 3 acres EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) 131 • _R - Wyle' (Check One) (Check One) 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER )K PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC 0 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION IJEST ss -•. -_ RE ED 0 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0 REZONE RECEIVED 0 USE PERMIT MINOR USE PERMIT 0 VARIANCE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNT' — . ,JISION 0 MINOR VARIANCE 0 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT 0 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 0 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 0 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 0 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP 0 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION 0 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION 0 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER 0 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN 0 OTHER PROJECT D SCRIPTI E N 0 =FFULLOF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and f parcels.) OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AH PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORStATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: U11 O) SIGNATURE: to G , PMEM, gnIF, C Uicin-1� (�1a� •� :ti r. . C LTi': -r •.aY - %N�.n ice' •; i:. ��ri w Wfel FROM: PROJECT NO. SR -00-004. TOWN OF PARADISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 5555 SKYWAY PARADISE, CA 95969 TELEPHONE (530) 872-6291 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST Police, Fire, Engineering, Sanitation,YA UC; PacBell, PG & E, Building, PID Craig Baker, Principal Planner REQUEST: REVIEW AND COMMENT DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Site Plan Review Application Proposing to Establish a Cellular Communications Facility (Additional Antennas) on an Existing Cellular Communications Tower LOCATION: AP NO.: APPLICANT: CONTACT PHONE: 5075 Clark Road a 055-180-083 UBIQUITEL Leasing Company (530) 897-5005 DATE DISTRIBUTED: 09/19/2000 RETURN DATE REQUESTED: 09/28/2000 DOES YOUR AGENCY HAVE THE CAPACITY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT? YES YES, WITH CONDITIONS NO (EXPLAIN BELOW) COMMENTS AND/OR RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS IF NECESSARY: J t NO RESPONSE FROM YOUR AGENCY MAY BE CONSTRUED THAT YOUR AGENCY HAS THE ABILITY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT. PLEASE MAKE A COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS. , Merge/DRR-sg RECEIVED SEP 2 0 2000 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING nMMON I., ............I ... V. J 'JI X AMERICAN 01 McKALE NATURES__WAY EASY ST , 7 DEERHAVEN CT OWNER: Guadalupe G. Bravo. ADDRESS: 5075 Clark Road APPLICANT: UBIQUITEL Leasing Company REQUEST: Site Plan Review Application Proposing to Establish a Cellular Communications Facility (Additional Antennas) on an Existing Cellular Communications Tower ZONING: I -S GENERAL PLAN: L -I FILE NO: SR -00-004 ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.: 055-180-083 HEARING DATE: I., ............I ... V. HEOWE 0 SEP 7 2000 TOWN OF PARADISE 3;Zs 6 DEPARTMENTAL`//: 'CC: E.. ONLY: c� Receipt No w. sz; C Feel Project No. - TOWN OF PARADISE COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENTDEPT. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Detailed project de$cription:(attagh additional sheets if necessary) ('r) - L Oc Prmo o © ( > au rL f ) PCS RNTEI vry (ITS . RTV o R &LrI F o r, -4P -n u rU )0 Purpose of project: ESTTb5 USH K5 LUZRELESS C,�p\l Ek ►9GE Atp0 Cr ' T1i & SK11 W R -To flit -To LJ' O(-- eftgf yz-,-C: Radial distance to the nearest billboard: )J Sq. ft. of proposed structure/project a°Approx. no. yards of cut/fill Percentage in in area of structures on site Qdo (For example: A 250 sq..ft. .addition to a 1,000 sq.. ft. _building = 250) Distance to nearest fire hydrant Distance from centerline Times of operation: Days 01pr Hours N Proposed no. of employees P FT Density PIR Max. occupancy &LLP Max. heigh>� of proposed structure/project jJ Describe exterior design and exterior finish: � � (Attach additional sheets) if necesary.) Method of sewage disposal?y1pr Is the proposed project site considered sensitive for archaeological resources? Yes No_' (Please consult staff.) [NOTE: IF YES, PLEASE SUBMIT A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $30.00 TO -"NORTHEASTERN INFORMATION CENTER" FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS INVENTORY SEARCH.] *NOTE: If applicant is NOT the property owner, the owner's signature or attached letter of authorization signed•by owner MUST accompany this application. I HEREBY DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND ATTACHED PLOT PLAN ARE TRUE, ACCURATE, CQMPLETE RRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. Applicant's Signature Date ' S)� Property Owner Signature Date (If applicable) PLEASE ALLOW 6-8 WEEKS FOR PROCESSING. NOTE: By signing this application form, the applicant is indicating that the project site is not included on any state or local list of hazardous waste sites compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5, effective July 1, 1987. G:\A.FPS\WPSI\CDD\CDD\FORMS\SPR.APP (04/99) M Applicant U6-TQuzVU-�- ! Lo!! o Cr (Y1 P nr" .i Phone 5 30 - .,C3CJ'J-"- SQO S Applicant's Mailing Address 40 Uk)G -f6\J0 C C=- , . sTeP, Qrxw, clf-) cis"14-5 Applicant's Interest in Property (Owner, Lessee*, Other*) UG- S G -C Owner's Name OpAyo &unio4LuPC Phone Owner's Mailing Address 5p--5 GL"I2�f�D {nF �S� (i� q1, ot Property Address_ SPIS Prf3pv 1E Parcel Size_ Engineer (Name, Address) AP Number (s) p - zone 1- Existing Use' LE �, ���0 Detailed project de$cription:(attagh additional sheets if necessary) ('r) - L Oc Prmo o © ( > au rL f ) PCS RNTEI vry (ITS . RTV o R &LrI F o r, -4P -n u rU )0 Purpose of project: ESTTb5 USH K5 LUZRELESS C,�p\l Ek ►9GE Atp0 Cr ' T1i & SK11 W R -To flit -To LJ' O(-- eftgf yz-,-C: Radial distance to the nearest billboard: )J Sq. ft. of proposed structure/project a°Approx. no. yards of cut/fill Percentage in in area of structures on site Qdo (For example: A 250 sq..ft. .addition to a 1,000 sq.. ft. _building = 250) Distance to nearest fire hydrant Distance from centerline Times of operation: Days 01pr Hours N Proposed no. of employees P FT Density PIR Max. occupancy &LLP Max. heigh>� of proposed structure/project jJ Describe exterior design and exterior finish: � � (Attach additional sheets) if necesary.) Method of sewage disposal?y1pr Is the proposed project site considered sensitive for archaeological resources? Yes No_' (Please consult staff.) [NOTE: IF YES, PLEASE SUBMIT A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $30.00 TO -"NORTHEASTERN INFORMATION CENTER" FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS INVENTORY SEARCH.] *NOTE: If applicant is NOT the property owner, the owner's signature or attached letter of authorization signed•by owner MUST accompany this application. I HEREBY DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND ATTACHED PLOT PLAN ARE TRUE, ACCURATE, CQMPLETE RRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. Applicant's Signature Date ' S)� Property Owner Signature Date (If applicable) PLEASE ALLOW 6-8 WEEKS FOR PROCESSING. NOTE: By signing this application form, the applicant is indicating that the project site is not included on any state or local list of hazardous waste sites compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5, effective July 1, 1987. G:\A.FPS\WPSI\CDD\CDD\FORMS\SPR.APP (04/99) M . . -INN CONSENT OF OWNER RE: Premises at�5�%:J APV T: ti-/�[8-C 3Cit C . I--Q3G County The undersigned does hereby consents and authorizes LCC International: Inc. ("LCC''), actin; as avents for UbiquiTel. LLC "UbiquiTzl"). at LCC's sole expense to make application to the Cit Jry fl�St and/or anv other governmental entity or aaencv for site plan approval. special permits. variances, building permits and any and all other regulatory applications, permits and approvals from the City and/or County in which the Premises are situated and/or other governmental or regulatory body having jurisdiction, including and without limitation the execution of any and all such applications in the name of the undersigned, for installing, removing, replacing, maintaining and operating a wireless- telecommunications facility including and without limitation, tower, base station, related antenna equipment and fixtures. The undersigned also hereby consents to the entry by LCC, its agents. employees and independent contractors, upon the Premises to perform or to cause to be performed suitability determinations, including but not limited to, drive tests, surveys, environmental audits and engineering studies. The undersigned certifies that the undersigned is the owner of the Premises or is otherwise authorized to grant this consent and authorization. Dated: 4Z'1ga5-'Ztip Authorized Signature TECTONIC • . 4 e • OaIIZLMM P.Q . 9100 Centra Pante Or. Ste. 100 ` �+ - • - •. West C mater. ON 45069 ` 1 r Phone: (513) 942-9530 Four (513) 442-9531' LP C 1,11i -T j �.• 4 UX NIERNATONAL INC 7923 ,ONES BRANCH ORFVE - . McLEAK VA 22102 iquiTel • `_, 4 PALMP ILL-lH ` C, r ^ + 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE s' SUITE A • CHICO. CA 95973 5075 CLA IC ROAD - THE PARADISE; 'CA 95969 r„ A -TION CONTAINED IN, IsPROPRET�' DOCUMENTSTIS ' I •,. USOR DISCLOSURE THAN BUTTE COUNTY THAT wIaH MATS TO UNUM II w + S STRICTLY PROHIBITED. S F 0 3 ' CO -LOCATION 6F ANTENNAS � w • I PALMER HILL A' N ,� S17030325B } • a 4 • ; '. Y • • • �. j - , 5975 PAR.CA 95 95 ' • T - - .t" , a '' � .. ' � .. •• . � - f -�06E G %9 « PROJECT M0: 2683SF325B GENERAL NOTES -e GENERAL`LEGEND - NO. „- 1. CRIACTOR SHALL vudN ALL PIANS, Exam CONDITWt6, AND D. CONTRACTOR SIIALL INSULL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING ONT SECTION f 1 vNUMBER 1 NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE • , STOCKfON G 95207 PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME PRECEDENCE 121'36=49.9' W. NAD a3- SITE ADDRESS: 5075 CLARK ROAD PARAOSE• G 95969 APPU m.. UBIQUITEL 'FK;URED 15315 MAYO B8 (BASHS OF DRAWING) - •4- 140 INDUODENCE CIRCLE= SUITE A 2. DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED _ DRAWING' SECTION CHICO• G 95973 HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TECTONIC • . 4 e • OaIIZLMM P.Q . 9100 Centra Pante Or. Ste. 100 ` �+ - • - •. West C mater. ON 45069 ` 1 r Phone: (513) 942-9530 Four (513) 442-9531' LP C 1,11i -T j �.• 4 UX NIERNATONAL INC 7923 ,ONES BRANCH ORFVE - . McLEAK VA 22102 iquiTel • `_, 4 PALMP ILL-lH ` C, r ^ + 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE s' SUITE A • CHICO. CA 95973 5075 CLA IC ROAD - THE PARADISE; 'CA 95969 r„ A -TION CONTAINED IN, IsPROPRET�' DOCUMENTSTIS ' I •,. USOR DISCLOSURE THAN BUTTE COUNTY THAT wIaH MATS TO UNUM II w + S STRICTLY PROHIBITED. S F 0 3 ' CO -LOCATION 6F ANTENNAS � w • I PALMER HILL A' N ,� S17030325B } • a 4 • ; '. Y • • • �. j - , 5975 PAR.CA 95 95 ' • T - - .t" , a '' � .. ' � .. •• . � - f -�06E G %9 « PROJECT M0: 2683SF325B GENERAL NOTES -e GENERAL`LEGEND - NO. „- 1. CRIACTOR SHALL vudN ALL PIANS, Exam CONDITWt6, AND D. CONTRACTOR SIIALL INSULL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING ONT SECTION f 1 vNUMBER 1 NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE 39'44'05.9' N. NAD 83 , STOCKfON G 95207 PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME PRECEDENCE 121'36=49.9' W. NAD a3- SITE ADDRESS: 5075 CLARK ROAD PARAOSE• G 95969 APPU m.. UBIQUITEL 'FK;URED 15315 MAYO B8 (BASHS OF DRAWING) - SHEET NUMBER 140 INDUODENCE CIRCLE= SUITE A 2. DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED _ DRAWING' SECTION CHICO• G 95973 HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DEED BOOK PAGE N/A SHALL 8E SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR MAORI( PROCEEDING 3 CONTRACTOR SN IN A SANE AND ALL ORDERLY MANNERS ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION MEMS METHODS, TECHNIQUES. SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS of THE MAORI( „ SECTION NUMBER • , CONTACT PERSON: STINE RUPPENTHAL APPIFJABLE CODES AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPATKINAL SAFELY THE CONTRACT. (530) 897-5005 AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES /OR LOT NUMBER 13 MUST DNEDNTLIY ROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF, ANY B. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY. PRONASIONS TO PROTECT _ F UNSAFE COMMOLI DURING THE COURSE OF'WORK.EIOSTING 6PROVEMETS, EASEMENTS. PAVING, CURBING, ETC. SHEET'NUMBER JURISDICTIft BUTTE COUNTY DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. THE • 4. TECTONIC • . 4 e • OaIIZLMM P.Q . 9100 Centra Pante Or. Ste. 100 ` �+ - • - •. West C mater. ON 45069 ` 1 r Phone: (513) 942-9530 Four (513) 442-9531' LP C 1,11i -T j �.• 4 UX NIERNATONAL INC 7923 ,ONES BRANCH ORFVE - . McLEAK VA 22102 iquiTel • `_, 4 PALMP ILL-lH ` C, r ^ + 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE s' SUITE A • CHICO. CA 95973 5075 CLA IC ROAD - THE PARADISE; 'CA 95969 r„ A -TION CONTAINED IN, IsPROPRET�' DOCUMENTSTIS ' I •,. USOR DISCLOSURE THAN BUTTE COUNTY THAT wIaH MATS TO UNUM II w + S STRICTLY PROHIBITED. S F 0 3 ' CO -LOCATION 6F ANTENNAS � w • I PALMER HILL A' N ,� S17030325B } • a 4 • ; '. Y • • • �. j - , 5975 PAR.CA 95 95 ' • T - - .t" , a '' � .. ' � .. •• . � - f -�06E G %9 « PROJECT M0: 2683SF325B GENERAL NOTES -e GENERAL`LEGEND - NO. „- 1. CRIACTOR SHALL vudN ALL PIANS, Exam CONDITWt6, AND D. CONTRACTOR SIIALL INSULL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING ONT SECTION f 1 vNUMBER 1 NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE 39'44'05.9' N. NAD 83 , STOCKfON G 95207 PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME PRECEDENCE TECTONIC • . 4 e • OaIIZLMM P.Q . 9100 Centra Pante Or. Ste. 100 ` �+ - • - •. West C mater. ON 45069 ` 1 r Phone: (513) 942-9530 Four (513) 442-9531' LP C 1,11i -T j �.• 4 UX NIERNATONAL INC 7923 ,ONES BRANCH ORFVE - . McLEAK VA 22102 iquiTel • `_, 4 PALMP ILL-lH ` C, r ^ + 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE s' SUITE A • CHICO. CA 95973 5075 CLA IC ROAD - THE PARADISE; 'CA 95969 r„ A -TION CONTAINED IN, IsPROPRET�' DOCUMENTSTIS ' I •,. USOR DISCLOSURE THAN BUTTE COUNTY THAT wIaH MATS TO UNUM II w + S STRICTLY PROHIBITED. S F 0 3 ' CO -LOCATION 6F ANTENNAS � w • I PALMER HILL A' N ,� S17030325B } • a 4 • ; '. Y • • • �. j - , 5975 PAR.CA 95 95 ' • T - - .t" , a '' � .. ' � .. •• . � - f -�06E G %9 « PROJECT M0: 2683SF325B GENERAL NOTES -e GENERAL`LEGEND - NO. „- 1. CRIACTOR SHALL vudN ALL PIANS, Exam CONDITWt6, AND D. CONTRACTOR SIIALL INSULL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING ONT SECTION DIMENSIONS OF THE JOB SITE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK IMMEDIATELY, - TO THE MANUFACTURER'S / VENDOR'S SPEOFIGTIONS UNLESS NOTED 1 vNUMBER 1 NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE 39'44'05.9' N. NAD 83 - STOCKfON G 95207 PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME PRECEDENCE 121'36=49.9' W. NAD a3- SITE ADDRESS: 5075 CLARK ROAD PARAOSE• G 95969 APPU m.. UBIQUITEL 'FK;URED 15315 MAYO B8 (BASHS OF DRAWING) - SHEET NUMBER 140 INDUODENCE CIRCLE= SUITE A 2. DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED _ DRAWING' SECTION CHICO• G 95973 HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DEED BOOK PAGE N/A SHALL 8E SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR MAORI( PROCEEDING 3 CONTRACTOR SN IN A SANE AND ALL ORDERLY MANNERS ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION MEMS METHODS, TECHNIQUES. SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS of THE MAORI( „ SECTION NUMBER • , CONTACT PERSON: STINE RUPPENTHAL APPIFJABLE CODES AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPATKINAL SAFELY THE CONTRACT. (530) 897-5005 AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THEIR EMPLOYEES /OR LOT NUMBER 13 MUST DNEDNTLIY ROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF, ANY B. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY. PRONASIONS TO PROTECT _ F UNSAFE COMMOLI DURING THE COURSE OF'WORK.EIOSTING 6PROVEMETS, EASEMENTS. PAVING, CURBING, ETC. SHEET'NUMBER JURISDICTIft BUTTE COUNTY DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. THE D ETAI L 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL GNE ALL NDTM AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED r • ORDINANCES. InA M REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY DUE TO CONSMUCIIDN ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. SECTION NUMBER PUBLIC AUTHORITY, WMIGPAL AND MR COMPANY SPEC9ICIATIQNS , +• AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE . 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE GENERAL WORK AREA CLEW AND • PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK THE WORK PERFORMED ON THE PRUCT WARD FREE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT.. THE MATLRNLS INSTALLED SWILL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND RELINE EOUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS 1 ,AND ALLAPPLICAME CODES, REGULATIONS. AND ORDINANCES REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY. PREMISES SWUL' BE LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST. OR SMUDGES OF SHE NUMBER J 5 THE SCOPE OF MAORI( SNHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS ANY NATURE BOR EQUIPMENT, LABDR AND ALL OTHER MATERIALS AND TADEEMED •DETAIL ENLARGEMENT' ` NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK/PROJECT AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. 10, THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED FOR 24 -LW (SUE D� DO NOT _; • ,'s 'SCALE DIETER SIZED VERSIONS OF THESE DRAWINGS NTS ' NOT • TO SCALE SHEET INDEX NO. SHEET TITLE NO. T-1 TIRE SHEET 1 Z-1 PLOT PUMA r 1 Z-2 ELEVATKIN, SITE PLAN, 3 DETAILS 1 LATITUDE 39'44'05.9' N. NAD 83 STOCKfON G 95207 Y LON GITUDE:EIiVATIQR 121'36=49.9' W. NAD a3- SITE ADDRESS: 5075 CLARK ROAD PARAOSE• G 95969 APPU m.. UBIQUITEL ; ' 15315 MAYO B8 (BASHS OF DRAWING) - • INDEPENDENCE 140 INDUODENCE CIRCLE= SUITE A PEARSON TO CLARK ROAD, CHICO• G 95973 DEED BOOK PAGE N/A „ PARCEL NUMBER 055-180-M CONTACT PERSON: STINE RUPPENTHAL PROJECT SUMMARY SITE NuMBER SF03U83258 PROPERTY OWNER GUADALUPE G. BRA% SITE DATk SITE NAME: PALMER HILL 2943 MAItVERN CT. LATITUDE 39'44'05.9' N. NAD 83 STOCKfON G 95207 Y LON GITUDE:EIiVATIQR 121'36=49.9' W. NAD a3- SITE ADDRESS: 5075 CLARK ROAD PARAOSE• G 95969 APPU m.. UBIQUITEL ; ' 15315 MAYO B8 (BASHS OF DRAWING) - • INDEPENDENCE 140 INDUODENCE CIRCLE= SUITE A PEARSON TO CLARK ROAD, CHICO• G 95973 DEED BOOK PAGE N/A „ PARCEL NUMBER 055-180-M CONTACT PERSON: STINE RUPPENTHAL (530) 897-5005 + ' LOT NUMBER 13 dIRRENT ZONING: A JURISDICTIft BUTTE COUNTY VICINITY .• ��iC3�.i7YW DRIVING'. DIR'ECTIONS • INDEPENDENCE ON HWY 99 . LEFT ON SKYWAY. RIGHT ON PEARSON TO CLARK ROAD, PROJECT DESCRIPTION INSTALLATION OF THE UBIOUITEL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY CONSISTING OF SEVEN EOUIPMENT CABINETS (3 INITIAL. 4 FUTURE). ANTENNAS CONSIST OF (2) SECTORS WITH (2) INITIAL AND (1) FUTURE. PANEL ANTENNAS AT EACH SECTOR LOCATED AT AN ANTENNA CENTER OF 130' ON THE EXISTING LATTICE TOWER. 1 � Mfg APPROVALS I� tV . L%lsq, T-1 } NOTES I 11 \ t.TECTONIC `¢ I �a \� \ • mE PWI esSm OM caner of AOSVICE 0[54M OWNER: GUADALUPE C. BRAVO - .. - C019LTAVR, LRt. DA1m 4/1//04 - •.. - . • � I ��. �• - 1 II .. / 9100 Centro Pointe W. Ste. 100 . M 'APR 55-t80-083 - « .1' I I I I, - • / \ - \ ' 1 , • Weal Cheater. OH 45069 • THE INFORMATION 511D1RN HEREON IS BASED•UPON A FIELD SURVEY ANO A COMP4ATION : ,, - I - 1 I .' Ivry \ a \` ' Phone: (35)13142942-9530 • + -OF AVAILABLE RECORD AND TOILE INFORMATION. UNLESS NOTED OMERWISE, PROPERTY .{� I" . I I ` _ a LINES ARE DERIVED FROM RECORD INFORMATION. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. / / \ — — Fax: (01 -9531 . -. - THE FASEl1ENM (IF ANY) THAT APPEAR ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN PLATTED BASED SOLELY ON INFORMATION CUNUINED IN THE PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT BY. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE ��� ,• •°� COMPANY. ORDER NO. 00191104. OATEDJUNE 30. 2000. //------�/� �� \\- \\\ \ ; PORTION OF SECTION"26, THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (IF ANY) THAT APPEAR ON THIS MAP NAVE BEEN LOCATED BY I I I �-----_-- \ \ ' UTILITIES TOFIELD WN COTION MPS AL SUCH U�RLRIIES�IN THE AAREk EITHER Of SERVICE UNDERGROUND 711AT THE .. ' 1� i ; I 1•�; r I \ •\ _\ ' \• + ' T: 22 - R 3 E, M:D:M. - \ '. �. AEANDONEa THE SURVEYOR FORMER GOES NIOT WARRANT TINT THE uMDERGROUND - _ I :i I I . fl .• RIMo \ \` \ " '� APN: 55-180-083 G ALf'"oR1rE` » UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES STATE TMT .. THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. 1 I I \ \ \ #' - McLEAK VA 22102 r - _ - , ., , I `{ /• PROPOSED 1533 '0' \ . 7 \ = �E AREA\ _ 49%iluiTet ME LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE AT ME CENTER OF _ I 1 \ — ` \\ \ \\ I • ATt�:TOWER EtE1wlION5 ♦ N 'r MTHELE45E AREA WAS DETERMINED BY GPS � � Ow car rim LIE KaNOM eccom rsomrnow - ' .. I 1 pA I " / / — � � � � `\ \ - \\ � 4.. ? V OBSEWATI1. FASEIIOR TO ORD CLEM= COM. FOR POLE LAE WL13S I S «. I ' 1 - j• ` \\. '• .-_ I �. M LAT. 3744'059• N. MAD 83 " _ OF Orms Pam I j I • 1, ' t ` �. ` —' l \ \ \ • - I LANG. 121'36'49.9• W. NAD 83 ' Z- E.LSEVOR TOH a OOWI9UGaES FOR ROWS, MGM • ' . • y. I ` — — — .' ELEV. 15313 NAW 88 (BASIS OF DRAWING) PPELPIES PER 81L SM M w GA -. • . I i I I ie 1j I \ \ . • LAT. 3744'0&4• N. NAD 27 'J 1L� TO PACFXWL 460. Pa. RTD9AOE AND RLLLRKw FOR Pat[ I 1 14. ` 1 1 i • RI I I I \\ \ \\ I . LANG. 121.36'4&05' W. HAD 27- •' - I 2 ELEV. 1529.1 N VD 29 . - - _ a ' . • I ¢ The information shorn above meets or exceeds the , 1 W •• a - mcguiements set forth in FM order 8260.19c far 1-A , • I / yl I I II •I-. •• e - •,♦ •� y I \\ \' •I Oeeurocy (t 15• horizontally and A 36 verticcly). The • / '. S>S M 11 . horizontal datum (coordinatm) are expressed es degrees, , / ♦if ' I • \ \ . minutes and smoM4'to the nearest tenth of o secon& / R 11 •�. I •'ATT TOWER • i. The vertical datum (heights) Om mpre sed n fest and + y / / } �� 11 ' - ' ... decim is thereof and one determined to the neomst 0.1 - ... - - foot ,- ' .. • ,. ' .. / / I � j � t I •, CWON T I\ I • \VVV�/ r \ ' • / NEVE cowl PRO '• \ I \ ' - GROUND EL". - 1531.3. AY.S.L (MAVD 88) ' TDP OF STRUCTURE ELM - )=X* AM.S.L (NAVO 881 DESCRIP110N ELEVATION TOP TOWER 1693.32 DISH TOP 1692.40 • DISH STM .168&113 AM 1 TOP 1683.o8 AM 1 BIM 4 1683.04 r. ' ANT 2 TOP 1684.91 • r. AMT 2 87Y 168291 AM 3 TOP 1684.83 AM 3 BTU 1682.84 TOWER FLARE \. 1651,45 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE 'SUITE A CHICO, CA 95973 "r 1' STRUCTURE HEK,M XXX 'q I 1 _ , - '2` CAME MY E11V.- 113103 S SGa6 .. �� I \\ - ' • .. - j PALMEHILL (r. - (AMOUR INTERVAL- r - - - _ ,_ - ( • SF03U83258 SF03U ' - • - _ - OI I 1 ry ed I A / , TOP OF emwc ocE - • / ' \\ F - 'li'. ' 4 5075 GAIR RIND r'4 _. - - y EILWTXM- 1511.13 MR105a CA 95869 a • ♦ g Et I " ,— — — y, I �' �.• 1 • . L. -, IAKA • I I I / / • , I f ND. 2 PROJECT 1i8J,5F3256 \ =- P1AMtFA V, T� u L I,�, L 191 •• /� A>�/---------------�----------------- - --- --- --- -1 -- -------- _ DRAWN BY: BJA • •. .. I` / . .I Y V " / ,s• RIND F I / DEEMro FAN[ Bn rL , OF OEms Pa.S/ • 3RFA PER 1 4 CHECKED 8T: _ x•'' 1 - i _. ' , �- •' .. x: „•. AMYL PROPER" 1pE. - / I ELAIE ,s• PVUsneR To PARAOM Den= '' "a • • .. - 1 I +I .i-'' 1 • PER WL 2001• Pa 6% as ,. _ r... SUBMITTALS / lfi AIER CMI ' MT ' '14 , • t ° . J { . " Z 1 SME : t'_,10, ' F • .. . ? _ � • SITE 4 191 - _ ,. r 134 PM 91 - • Y' ♦' , - ` , , - r 1 1 , • ' - - ,• , 09/01/00 RLNSED LEASE AREA , «. .. PIRn 3' s • ( , PARCa 7 , PAIICQ 1 . « I ~ 'E' �/23/pp FAME Za1WA ly • V J / „ ♦ t - F it t .. - + OIPm Yw • Z 1 PAYm ROAD r . .. 9rxE : Mls ' ' • • , i ' if - r• L - , ,` GRAPHIC SCALE LEGEN ' - --r - - Lowww aim sum • - �- - -� - - - -0- - - Lonow O m TEIEAORE(m UNDER IMM LAmRORaAo qts - , III ACCE53 AM , - I ' . ' f FQY) 4•.. • 1 tRe1f m _ fi /��^ « - ---- _ sm eak'" f LAZE _ . _ • .. t qb.6 > , tpan RA• a 3/' PION) - t {�� V n) - 0 APN:. 55-180-083 ', :. t G 279 " .� Ppeopo am ;LEu`ror.1 rum 11 -6 Z o _ Ucw FIRE 1nW�MR NEVE - �,. - " • r . 1 I �� '"-,\\ - ' 1+ . .. r 9�QT`t9/IE` O smRR ELEORC METER , •• 1 \ • 1 ' 1. ` �/ • - Ism .17FER -' V .. . • r ' D \ r � 1 � ' civ l• I Y . r �f�• CLEWJ M AT TOP OF CONCRETE _ --------------------- ` F Q A�\C � t, �T ELrAnW AT FTDMUIE - , J nEwm AT E00E 0, PAVDEIIT r. _ - SITE a - , 9En EAa9 r SYR CLAS]p1 AT IMi1RAL gLMM ' _ •- F , �,:, L �S CEW6"C OF STREET A: - . 1/1 COIL SOL 26 ='1 MS f• Z — 1 , . SCIAAE : • , . • - -. • - . r • ; PROPOSED Pic a -Cos - tDNOURIHG SEE aEtlae31. PVC ,> u-BOLR 4•-0• 3I 1 �aPa931 R OPT. ATI CM 10 XV Gtr. rI _ tOCUL SEE STEEL POST. TW. r-------�-`--,r-----,r-----, u-eDLR / 1 P 1r • m' e i NITTER7 i e6¢ oeY11cLD FJIOEIM d CTIO•RTM i m0•nM mRp®N LEAUL = _- oOEOH 1NQ11 -7--- F /1 Y n • /3 1 ----------------- PCOPOSCO 1a WA , AREw SEE OETAA •, ; � GBeET aacr GBPET ; GL4T ; GB1E7 ; R ' • _•--__-- --- - LEASE AREA _ 1 i I Z-2 i • e 1 z_2 ♦` _ ____ z. q r B21L 072 1 I „ ' ♦ ' 0 0 1 .7 J ' . 12 CNIGESTEEL umurw 1 _ �' ♦ • 0 1 n n '•__- POSIER TELCO - \ PSMJCW BOoc6W o________ ________ T 01T. SEE =04. = Ir 31• ]I• RC 3O- 2Y >tY 22- lY CO RNR ICON ECT TO � 1 :_: �` 711 i _ 1_, 1 1 1 ! 1 _ ��♦, EQUIPMENT PAD PLAN _____________ 1344" , I. '1 -,p' . PLANTER ,, '` r =-= SGYL: NIS ' d 1 BLOC[ SEE OEdI :♦♦ j� - _ -- __-- 1 ` DOSTING LGHTN o ROD TECTONIC ammu 0 m A4 - - - 9100 Centro Pante Dr. .Ste. 100 West Cheater, OH 45069 Phone•. (513) 942-9530 For (513) 442-9531 LCC ECC INTERNATIONAL. NC a - 7925 JONES BRANCH ORNE • - YdENI. VA 22102 FUTURE ,. UbiqulTel 140 INDEPENDENCE CIRCLE SUITE A CHICO, CA 95973 THE WdRMTK)N CONTi19(ED 9( ON N J//1 WECUCE IA60EN PROPOSED MWMEXT ,y , sEL nL1ETon ' i 0 I `: law Exerm 0 i 1 _ • ; eI V I Lum TOWER PALMER -HILL 1• �� , ' r L —.- CAME MY _ —•_.— 1, 4 'SF03UB325B rEwP (aGTO16 so.NFOR REFERENCE ONLY. A5075 OM RWSTRUCTLOML ~SS TO. MOSL CA 9M I . . t TOP OP- 154 y t - 437 SIR'OILf T1E 1OW01 6 NECF.4Nt1'. - ELLMtCN.. fSH1]S •` , ' RlWE7t 1 PRQIECT N0: 2683 SF3258 DVN LM FENCE 6 R. DRAWN RAI �. , . - , ]--�- sR[ P{AN G� w SJINE7 Br ADIE,cE OESLM CHECKED RY: SCJ . "' . - H H I mNAATNR, uL aRn 11/1•/08 SATE PLAN t SUBMITTALS t 1 I { v 1 lop STRNo • • - • - .• IT OF BANDED e03 E3nosoN ARMS • E TOP OF - BOLT 13 MORL102 10 FABRIC t♦.• MpNLOMf•L - - .. • .. t'-6• 11/•h IOP RAA • ' WDLM HEM ourf • - •— Y ,nOE aALr MRSP No STARL L uxlqur-w La MICRORECT 8701 ' 1 7/eb PO51 • Cd BG (31 CORNER POSTS) - OVE/✓$ED R9O6 .r Yd 11 G GW -Y lY-0• •V,_ )RADE t 1 09/01/0) REVD SITE PIAN YEIa ERNE. S '� .. •0 �. a«N U4 (3) STRANDS OF auHaa Y w R, PROPOSED COUP W H 0C/23/CO NIIAI zONN6 A11cIL . , .—�.— aursaE` , 1.ERDP,ER 11,190 IWiSIRV J LLL /• ./11wTwr SCREW , °°'m'sm. 7/a/e,. oLrs MEAN aw R 3 ELEVATION p .. t 1/1.12 Sp14o MUf ' 6 GTEmm" WPIE 1/2- aAeM y TOP ItAL SOV r. Mrs • E CJIn COPE MOIL UT = P100, UH6TRT/GWDE 1 1/2ti GTE J NE SW*CRT - ` NEED Due= CGL•L GRIL ./ • 1•d ac mm FRNE 1Ry •t�EW STAYm DqU-BOLT ; i • ) T~ lA1DSGPE SRR CARL -NmGER .- I ; _ • r Or WE Pm (rrq , 3/.• CRUSHED STONE MOM OR [OUAI 2% PPE �• 1 1 N. CO1C�'TL ASM CM Sm ,10. 57 • .. 11 - LLE (1•P, �. 2279 C .GRWE U r 11; IMP. mam a nP SLOTTED l TM IA19N0011 CAP Fa 1 I toER (SEE - /T, C 1 \!'1%` C3\. 6,. o TOLE °Ef"`). DO EM CTCO 4srAroE �" F` ERVA DA WE mv) j /1 GRAVEL SURFACING DETAIL 1 _2 . 2`2 �.. E FENCE DETAIL a GATE DETAIL SELL � Mrs- = SCAM NTS _2 SCAM NIS Z-2 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Director's Office TO: Norm Rosene, Chairman Butte County Airport Land.Use Commission FROM: Tho s A. Parilo, Director SUBJECT: V OUS ALUC.ISSUES DATE: September 11, 2000 This is a follow-up from the meeting with Bruce Alpert, County Counsel, M. A. Meleka, and me on Thursday, August 31, 2000. We discussed two overall topics, along with some of ALUC's frustrations with past responses from the County. Under the _spirit of opening communication and trust, I would like to report on the status of some of the topics raised during our meeting. The first one concerns your request to receive either a marked out copy or a new opinion from the contract law firm of Remy, Thomas, & Moose. As you recall the County Counsels' office referred the questions raised by ALUC concerning some relevant court cases to this firm for response. In the course of presenting the questions to them, there were other questions that the County Counsel requested of that firm. Upon receiving the opinion, County Counsel in turn issued their own opinion based on Remy, Thomas & Moose's analysis of the referenced court cases. On August 31, 2000,. Bruce Alpert requested Remy, Thomas and Moose to. answer only. ALUC's specific questions. You also raised concerns over the validity of the opinion provided by Neil McCabe about the ability of a lower level hearing body can override ALUC's compatibility decision. In Mr. McCabe's opinion of March 30, 2000, he indicated that the County Code is silent on the topic of who may take action to overrule an ALUC decision on a non -legislative project. This opinion provided two options for the Board to consider. One was to allow the lower body. (Planning Commission) to take the action to override subject to appeal to the Board of Supervisors. The other option was to require the Board to act on the override following the Planning Commission's action to approve the project. The Board discussed this opinion during the joint meeting with ALUC on April 3, 2000. It was the consensus of the Board that any override action should be processed to the Board of Supervisors for action after the lower body 'approved a project that ALUC determined was incompatible with the affected CLUP. Staff is operating under that direction and advising those who inquire about that process. I am taking the opportunity to report this direction, as we did not focus ori the outcome during our meeting on Thursday, August 31, 2000.. ; Norm Rosene, Chairman Butte County Airport Land Use Commission, September 11, 2000 Page 2 Mr. Alpert is still in the process of evaluating your request for legal counsel during the upcommg CLUP adoption hearings. As indicated, he will provide a response in the next two weeks. We also discussed staff training. You referenced some training programs that Bob Grierson has suggested. Please .provide us with course- descriptions. 'I do have reservations about the high cost ($1,800 to $3,000) of the raining you referenced, as these amounts exceed budgeted resources for individual training. We are aware of Airport an * t Land Use Planning classes offered by UCD Extension that are much more affordable. Nonetheless, I would like the opportunity to review those classes that Bob is aware of. It is my goal to. avail at least one, and possibly two,. staff -members to relevant training during this fiscal year. I hope that *this'information is helpful. If you have any additional questions regarding these matters, or any other ones, please let me know. TAP.jb cc: Bruce Alpert, County Counsel kAdds\memos\a1uc issues OUR aev TFe • o 0 0 • o • e �OUR�'� BRUCES.ALPERT COUNTY COUNSEL OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY OF BUTTE i 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3380 PHONE (530) 538-7621 FAX (530) 538-6891 countycounsel@buttecountv.net August 31, 2000 Mr. Michael Remy Remy' & Thomas 455 Capi.tol Mall #210 Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: ALUC Opinion Request Dear Mr. Remy: ASSISTANT COUNTY COUNSEL NEIL H. MCCABE CHIEF DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL DAVID M. MCCLAIN ROBERT W. MACKENZIE DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL FELIX WANNENMACHER We have been asked by Tom Parilo, the Director of Development Services, to obtain an additional opinion from you with regard to the two questions previously raised by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) relating to adoption of a proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP). The original Opinion Request asked for an analysis of two cases, Furey v. CitV of Sacramento (1979) 24 Cal. -3d 862 and City of Coachella v. Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 1277. Your previous opinion to us is dated May 17, 2.000. While you were preparing your previous opinion, we had discussions with your office which resulted in an expansion of the request beyond the specific questions raised by ALUC. As a result, your opinion was broader in some respects than necessary to answer those specific questions, and we decided here that we would edit your opinion. I am enclosing a copy of the final opinion which was sent out on our letterhead and is dated May 26, 2000. The final paragraph of our opinion stated: "Also, please be advised that the firm of Remy, Thomas and Moose was consulted by County Counsel and participated, in the drafting of this opinion." This statement prompted..the current chair of ALUC (Norm Rosene) to ask us to -furnish ALUC a copy of your opinion, which we declined to do. However, as an alternative approach, he now indicates -that -he -Would be satisfied if you wrote an opinion limited to answering the original two questions. ALUC then could determine whether our opinion dated May 26,-2000, is consistent with your opinion. Your opinion would be written to Tom Parilo, not to ALUC. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, BRUCE ALPERT Butte County Counsel By Neil H. McCabe Assistant County Counsel cc: Tom Parilo