Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutALUC TIME ACCOUNTINGALUC - TIME ACCOUNTING_q 7- NAME- D. Doody FROM: 12/13/99 - 12/24/99 PP 26 t1 ,A 1r 1R 17 9n 91 99 94 9d lei 200. a/ N1 T' *V11k''TH iF."t�M� 14Tuii:WThsFkiOT. 'JOB OR# r 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 5.00 Breaks 0.50 0.50 Discussion with Larry Painter Re: Correct Map for Cuseo and Bird 0.75 0.75 Information Request - Fred Gerst 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 Information Request - Julie Wold City of Chico 0.25 0.25 Information request - Shutt Moen & Assoc. 6.25 4.00 4.50 4.00 2.75 3.00 2.50 2.00 29.00 1999 CLUP Analysis/Preparation of Staff report 0.25 0.50 0.251 1 1.001 Discussion w/Randy Wilson Re: 1999 CLUP Amendment _ 0.501 0.501 Telephone discussion w/Ken Brod Re: CLUPs _ 0.25 0.50 0.25 1.001 1 Telephone discussion with Neil McCabe Re: Jay White Letter _ 0.50 0.501 1 Telephone conversation and transmittal of information w/ County Rep Law Firm _ 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 Time Accounting the ALUC Lo _ 1.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 2.00 Staff Mtg and discussion of ALUC Activities 0.50 0.25 0.75 ALUC Agenda Preparation 0.50 0.50 1.00 ALUC Status Report Preparation - ALUC time for Pay periods 24 and 25 0.00 Staff Analysis of A 99-06 for Cuseo and Bird 1.00 1.00 Pre arartion of Response Memo to Steve Betts - Project Planner Cuseo and Bird 0.00 Staff Meeting and General Discussion with Paula Leasure Re: ALUC 0.25 0.25 Discussion with Nick Eleana of Chcio Enterprise Record Re: New ALUC Mtg on Dec 2 _ 0.50 0.50 Review and analysis of Jay White's Letter and Remy Thomas Response _ 1.00 1.00 Preparation, Review and Correction to ALUC Packet Prior to Final Mail -out _ 0.00 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ 0.00 _ 0.00 0.00 4.00 SL 4.001 1 Benefits 1.50 4.00 Vac 5.50 _ 8.00 HOL 8.00 0.00 0.00 _ 0.00 _ 0.00 _ 0.00 _ 1 0.001 8.00 M 6.00 T 8.00 W 5.25 Th 8.00 Fri 5.50 M 8.00 T 6.50 0.75 8.50 W Th F TOTALS 64.50 0.00 11 _HRS_ OT_ 8 6 8 5.25 8 5.5 8 6.5 0.75 8.5 64.5 BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - PLAN�N•I�NG L NAMES Teri B • SIGN:A PKYROLL # 33537 FROM:. 12-11-99 to 12- 9 , PP 26 SUPERVISOR APPROVAL: 4 . 6 7 8 9 . 10 13 14 -15 16 17 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 6 4.5 8 73.5 . Breaks CounterfTelephone �='General Office Time Card - Planning Staff Meeting - Planning Clerical Support Receive Training 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 6 4.5 8 73.5 . BUTTE COUNTY. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - LAFC NAME: Teri B SIGN.: PKYROLL # 33537 FROM: 12-1 99 uto ' 12-24-99 PAY PERIOD 05-98 26 SUPERVISOR APPROVAL:' 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 i 4 i General Office. Board Packet Record �_-_ 1 1 _��S_ 11 1 1 � • Set up file, Comments, Table Set up file, Comments, Table I® : 11 1 11 i 4 i ALUC - TIME,ACCO NTING NAME- Teri Bridenhagen F96M: '12/91/99 to 12/24/99 .' PP 26 0 -1 0. 0- ,0 0 0 2 3.5 , 0 16.5 y �Mmmm Copy, Assemble Packets _mm 1 1 = 1 1 - _-___ 0 -1 0. 0- ,0 0 0 2 3.5 , 0 16.5 y ALUC - TIME ACCOU6NG NAME- P Leasure FROM: 11/29-12/10/99 PP 25 nn �n 4 7 _1 A 7 A a 16 0 0.5 0 0.5 0.25 0 0.75 0 " 0.5 0 2.5 Review Db comments re: Nextel Organize & review Decem• Agenda -__ 1 1 _ - 1999CLUP PublicNotice 111 1 1 111 1 1®I 111 1 111 1 1 111 ® 1 111 0 0.5 0 0.5 0.25 0 0.75 0 " 0.5 0 2.5 ALUC - TIME ACCOJTING NAME- Barbra Duncan FROM: 11/27/99-12/10/99 PP 25 29 30 1 2 3 6 7- 8 9 10 wffi=M_ RM Minutes of 11 /17/99 meeting. M_ M_ m •. . • • ... - .•. - m • 111 „ . „ one He we me 1 11 we me Freya, M m 6.75 6.75 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 19.5 r ALUC - TIME ACCOU ING NAME- P Leasure FROM: 11/15/99-11/26/99 PP 24 A� we do n-1 1f9 7A 0 0 4.5 0.75 3.25 2 1 0 0 0 11.5 • : • Gerst at front• 1999 . • •DaveD cal Supervision _____ 1 1 __�� 1 1 • • _ . • • _ • • _ @oil_ 1 1/ 1 11 11 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 ® 1 1 11 ®® 0 0 4.5 0.75 3.25 2 1 0 0 0 11.5 ALUC - TIME ACCOUJSNG NAME- P Leasure FROM: 11/15/99-11/26/99 PP . 24 4c 4-7- 40 4n 77 71 ')A 7S 9A 0 0 4.5 0.75 3.25 2 1 0 0 0 11.5 WoM IF Gerst at front counter MMMMM MMMMMM �CEQA review/questions MMMMM EMMMMM =!Clerical Supervision mmmimmmmmm = WEIZER-1 —Ke-nB mmmmm mmmmm = —LauraW, about 1999 CLUP revisions mmmmm mmmmm m mmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmm — 1 1 1 m mmmmm mmmmm — 1 1 1m mmmmm mmmmm — 1 1 1m mmm mmmm m mmmmm mmmmm — 1 1 1m mmmmm mmmmm — 0 "ll I m mmmmm mmmmm — mmm mmmm m mmmmm mmmmm — 1 1 1 m mmmmm mmmmm — I 1 1 m mmmmm mmmm 0 mmm mmmmm — mmmmm mmmmm — mmmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmm — mmm m mmmmm — mmmmm mmm=M — mmmmm mmmmm mmmmm mmmmm — mmmm mmmm mmmmm mmmmm mmmmm mmmmm — mmmmm mmmmm — mmmmmOmmm mmmmm111 1 11 ®®® 11 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 : 11 I®� 0 0 4.5 0.75 3.25 2 1 0 0 0 11.5 ALUC - TIME ACCOUWG • NAME- P Leasure FROM: 11/29 - 12/10/99 PP . 25 nn 12n I-.. 7 Z R 7 A a 1n 0 0.5 0 0.5 0.25 0 0.75 0 0.5 0 2.5 Review DD comments re: Nextel Receive Barbara H. message & look for file. ...CLUP.Notice Review NMI of 0 0.5 0 0.5 0.25 0 0.75 0 0.5 0 2.5 ALUC -TIME ACCOUNTING • NAME- D. Doody FROM: 12/13/99 - 12/24/99 <_ PF 26 , I ,w ,c 1G 17 7n 71 77 114 7d Al 7 "F'.'Il �M -'*I '.'T - 1:,,iW,'l 5, -JOBOR# 0.50 0.50 0.501 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.501 5.00 Breaks 0.50 0.50 Discussion with Larry Painter Re: Correct Map for Cuseo and Bird 0-75 0.75 Information Request - Fred Gerst 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 Information Request - Julie Wold City of Chico 0.25 0.25 Information request - Shutt Moen & Assoc. 6.25 4.00 4.501 4.00 2.75 3.00 2.50 2.00 29.00 1999 CLUP Analysis/Preparation of Staff report 0.25 0.501 0.251 1.00 Discussion w/Randy Wilson Re: 1999 CLUP Amendment 0.501 0.50 Telephone discussion W/Ken Brody Re: CLUPs 0.251 0.50 0.25 1.00 Telephone discussion with Neil.McCabe Re: Jay White Letter 0.501 0.50 Telephone conversation and transmittal of information w/ County Rep Law Firm 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 Time Accounting the ALUC Log 1.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 2.00 Staff Mt g and discussion of ALUC Activities 0.50 0.25 0.751 IALUC Agenda Preparation 0.50 1 0.50 1.00 ALUC Status Report Preparation - ALUC time for Pay periods 24 and 25 0.00 Staff Analysis of A 99-06 for Cuseo and Bird 1.00 1.00 Preparartion of Response Memo to Steve Betts - Project Planner Cuseo and Bird 0.00 Staff Meeting and General Discussion with Paula Leasure Re: ALUC 0.25 0.25 Discussion with Nick Eleana of Chcio Enterprise Record Re: New ALUC Mt g on Dec 2 0.50 0.50. Review and analysis of Jay White's Letter and Remy Thomas Response 1.00 1.001 1 Preparation. Review and Correction to ALUC Packet Prior to Final Mail -out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00. 0.001 1 0.00 4.00 SL 4.00 Benefits 1.50 4.00 Vac 5.50 8.00 HOL 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3)01 M 6.001 T 8.001 W 5.251 Th 8.001 Fri 1 5.501 M 8.001 T 6.501 W 0.751 67510 Th F TOTALS E4.501 0.00 HRS OT IF 8 6 8 5.25 8 5.5 8 6.5 0.75 8.5 64.5 ALUC - TIME ACCOWING NAME- Barbra Duncan FROM: 11/13/99-11/26/99 PP • 24 15 1R - 11 1R 1G 22 21 24 25 26 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 __ 1 1 __ ALUC Meeting _ 1 1 ___ Meeting preparation _____ ___- 111 _-___ -____ - 1 1 1 _ -___- ____- - 1I 1 _____ -__- 1 1 1 _ _____ _____ - 11 1 _____ -__- 1 1 1 - -____ _____ - 11 1 _-___ ____- - 111 _____ -____ - 1 1 1 _-___ _____ - mm _-___ _____ - 1 1 1 _ ___m_ m_-_- -____ -____ - 0 1 1 1 _-__- _____ - 0 "111 -____ -____ - 0 1 1 1 -_-_- -____ - 11 1 _____ _-__- - 0 1 1 1 ____- --__- - 0 1 1 1 -____ - ffll Me 11 1 _ 11 1 ffel 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 Frlm= 11 1 11 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 ALUC - TIME ACCOJTING + NAME- Barbra Duncan FROM: 11/27/99-12/10/99 PP • 25 29 30 T 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 6.75 6.75 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 19.5 MMMMM - ®�!Minutes of 11/17/99 meeting. NMI _Filing system reorganization =====- ee e one e e one e e e me e e e e me e ee a ee ee a ee a ee a ee ee a ee KNE M e e ee 6.75 6.75 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 19.5 r ALUC - TIME ACCOWING NAME- Barbra Duncan FROM: 11/13/99 - 11/26/99 ~ PP 24 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r t� s 4 . t mmm�� vmmm� one , . mmmm mmmm mmm mm©m mmmmm , „ mmmmmmmmm mm ommm mmmmm, mol o mmmmm mmmmm �m. „ m mmmmm mmmmm , ., mmmma mmmmm �=rl ,. mmm mmmmm o . „ mmmmm amm®s ® , l m msmmm mmmmm ® , ,. mmmmm mmmm o, „ Me 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r t� s 4 . t Pagel of 1 Duncan, Barbra From: Broderson, Jill Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 3:03 PM To: Doody, Dave; Duncan., Barbra; Leasure, Paula Subject: ALUC Time for Pay Period No. 25 Teri 8.25 Dave 11.00 Barbra 19.50 Paula 2.50 12/14/99 r ►BUTTE COUN Y AIRPORT LAND USLOCOMMISSION + • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 • AGENDA ITEM - F. TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: ALUC Staff SUBJECT: Monthly Status Report DATE: January 11, 2000 FOR: Airport Land Use Commission Meeting of January 19, 2000 1. North Chico Specific Plan Airport Overflight Signs: This item will be discussed at the proposed joint meeting with the Board of Supervisors. 2. Comprehensive Land Use Plan - Shutt Moen Associates: An administrative draft of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan was received by ALUC staff on January 10, 2000. Staff will review the administrative draft and prepare comments for Shutt -Moen. 3. ftuesCounty Counsel for CouCounsel Opinion• At the September 1999 ALUC meeting, the Commission directed staff to request a legal opinion regarding ability of the Commission to adopt conditions, conflict of interest, and statutory time limits for keeping files., Staff requested this opinion on October 6, 1999. The response was received at the ALUC office on January 7, 2000. A discussion of this item will be placed on the February 2000 ALUC agenda for discussion. At this time, staff has attached a copy of the legal opinion for informational purposes. 4. R nest for Information on Subdivision located on the north side of Feather Avenue west of Ruddy Creek: Commissioner Gerst and David Doody did a site visit on 12/29/99. Improvements are in the process of being installed. The City of Oroville reported that a tentative subdivision map was approved in February 1993 and the final map was filed in October 1998. Staff could find no record of the proposal being referred to ALUC. Unfortunately, the time period for filing any appeal on the proposed subdivision occurred ten days after the subdivision map was tentatively approved in 1993. 5. Itemized Time Accounting for ALUC Staff Members: This information is not currently available due to illness within the Department 6. ALUC Staff Time Accounting: Information for pay period s 26/99 and 01/00 is not available due to illness within the Department. K:\ALUCVvIEETINGS\01-19-OO.MTG\01-19SR-WPD *Butte County •Airport Land Use Commission 0 • , • .• li/04/1999 17:00 209-533-5657 TUOL. CO. AIRFORTS PACE b�4 the absent Members shall be notified. If all Members are absent, the Secretary of the Commission may adjourn the meeting to a stated time and place. and notify all Members. Mge Qin to the 12"Wir All meetings of the Commission are open to the public. All meetings shall adhere to all current open Meeting laws, as established by the State of.California, or the policies of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Tuolumne, whichever shall be the more stringent. ulsaual rieation of M=borg Y When the Commission is considering a proposal, or is taking any action, as to which a Regular Member r' of the Commission is personally interested, that Regular Member is disqualified from participating in the proceedings of the Commission with respect to such proposal or action. When a disqualification for financial interest is required by the Political Reform Act/Fair Political Practices Commission, the Member must disclose the financial interest causing the disquali- fication. Such disclosure must be made a part of the ALUC's official record, or made in writing to the appointing power, or any other person specified in the-ALUC's conflict of interest code. A Member's relationship with an agency or geographical area having representation on the Commission shall not be the grounds for such disqualification. All Members shall adhere to all current conflict .of interest laws established by the State of California and administered by the Fair Political Practices Commission, or the relevant policies of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Tuolumne, whichever shall be the more stringent. Challiange If the impartiality of any Member with respect to any proposal is questioned by any person appearing before the Commission, and the Member has not disqualified himself, such Member may be permitted to participate in the proceedings by majority vote of the Members of the Commission Present. PrOxv- Each Member shall appoint .a single Proxy to represent him in Commission affairs, and to vote on all Commission matters, when the Member is. not in attendance. The Proxy shall be desig- nated in a signed written instrument which shall be kept on file with the Secretary. The Proxy shall serve at the pleasure of the Member who appointed him. Any vacancy in the office of Proxy shall be filled promptly by the appointment of a new Proxy by the Member. 4 NOU-09-1S99 / Section 6.3. I IN Hearing Notice. .� ► c o�-I4 A- LO C- ,6v1 la ws The date and subject matter of each hearing shall be "Noticed" by publication at least one time .in.a newspaper having general circulation in the .part of the County in which the subject matter of the hearing is situated.. The -hearing. notice shall be caused to -be published at least ten working days prior to the date of the hearing. At the same time the published'notice is submitted. to the newspaper, a special notice shall be sent to the local zoning authority or person. requesting the hearing and to all public agencies having an interest in the matter to be heard. Section 6.4. Rules of Hearing. The order of the hearings held by,the Commission shall be: A. Open hearing. B. Staff to present evaluation and recommendations. C. Proponents to present case. D. Opponents to present case. E. Rebuttal by proponents. F. Any member of the Commission to call for such additional -information, pros and cons, in the order he desires. G. Close hearing. H. Commission discussion and deliberation. I. Motions and voting. Section 6.5. Quorum and Action. Four members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum for the conduct of business. A majority of the -Commissioners present and eligible to vote shall be required for any action of the Commission. ICLE VTI: CONFLICT OF INTEREST. DISCLOSURE, AND DISOUALIFICATION. Section 7.1. Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosure. Provisions relating to conflict of,interest'and financial disclosure are.con- tained in the Conflict of Interest Code of the Airport Land Use Commission. Section 7.2. Disqualification of Commission Member by Challenge. The qualification of any member(s) to take part in the Commission deliberations and voting may be challenged by any part to the hearings. 'It shall be the. duty of the Commission Chairman to evaluate the challenge and the testimony presented -� 'and then to rule upon the Qualification of the challenged member. If the _6_ NOU-09-1999 10:29 CONTRA COSTA—CDD Dle, Chairman is the member' so challenged, he. shall immediately surrender his chair j to the.•Vice-Chairman, who will act as Chairman until .the qualification of the challenged member has been decided. ARTICLE VIII. COMMISSION'S STAFF MEMBERS. The Secretary to the Commission shall be its administrative officer. The Contra Costa County Director of Planning, or his designee, shall act as Secretary of the Commission. ARTICLE IX. PRESIDING OFFICER. Section 9.1. Chairman and Vice -Chairman. The members of the Commission shall elect a Chairman and Vice -Chairman who shall serve until the election of their successors. Section 9.2. Successor to Chairman and Vice -Chairman. Commencing in 1972, and annually thereafter, at the first regular meeting of the Commission held in May, the members of the Commission shall elect a. Chairman and Vice -Chairman to serve until the election of their successors. Section 9.3. Duties of .the Chairman. The Chairman shall preside at all meetings of the Commission and shall conduct the business of the Commission in the manner prescribed by these rules. The Chairman shall preserve order and decorum and shall decide all questions of order subject to the action of a majority of the Commission. members present. There may be circumstances that come to the attention of the. Chairman which he/she feels warrant the attention and/or action of the Commission prior to the next scheduled Commission meeting. In such circumstances, the Chairman should attempt to call a special meeting of the Commission in accord with State law and the Commission Rules and Regulations to allow the.matter to be reviewed. If the Chairman determines that a special Commission meeting cannot be called in a timely manner, then the Chairman shall be 'empowered to act on behalf of the Commission to address the urgency of the..situation in accord with the commissio'n's duties and responsibilities. The Chairman shall report to the Commission at the next regularly scheduled meeti.ng on any action he/she undertook on behalf of the Commi.ssion. Section 9.4. Duties of the Vice -Chairman. In the absence or inability to act of the Chairman, the Vice -Chairman shall act as Chairman and when so acting shall have all of the powers and duties of the Chairman. In the absence of the Chairman from the County of Contra Costa, the authority of the Vice -Chairman includes the authority to call special meetings. RD: rjs BOB3:cccal'uc.apx Urc TOTAL P.04 Aeronautics Program October 4, 1999 AIRPORT LAND USE CON MI SSIONS Alameda Countv Alameda County ALUC (510) 670-6511 FAX (510) 670-6529 Alameda. County Planning Department 224 West Winton Ave., Room 151 Hayward, CA 94544 Contact: Joanne Parker Alpine Countv No ALUC - (Exempt) (916) 694-2255 (ENEMPT) Alpine County Public Work FAX ( ) 694-2214 916 50 Diamond Valley Road . Markleeville, CA 96120 Contact: Leonard'Turnbeaugh Amador County Amador County ALUC (209) 223-6380 (209) 22-�-0637 Amador County Land Use Agency 108 Court Street Jackson, CA 95642 Contact: GaryClark Butte County Butte County ALUC (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Contact: Paula Leasure / Laura Webster........... (530) 533-1131 Calaveras Countv Calaveras County ALUC (209 ) 754-6394 (209) 754-6566 Calaveras County Planning Department 891 Mountain Ranch Road San Andreas, CA 95249 Contact: Mary Pitto Colusa County Colusa County ALUC (530) 458-0580 FAX (530) 458-5000 Colusa County Airport 100 Sunrise Boulevard, Suite F Colusa, CA 95932 ` Contact: Harry A. Krug Contra Costa Countv Del Norte Countv • Contra Costa County ALUC County Administration Bldg. Community Development Department 651 Pine Street 4th Floor, North. Wing Martinez, CA 94553-0095 0 (925) 335-1214 FAX (925) 335-1222 Contact: Bob Drake E -Mail: bdrak@bicd.co.contra-costa.ca.us Del Norte County ALUC Del Norte County Community Development Department 700 Fifth Street Crescent City, CA 95531 Contact: Karl Brown . (707) 464-7229 FAX (707) 465-0340 El Dorado County Foothill ALUC (530) 823-4703 Sierra Planning Organization FAX (530) 823-4142 560 Wall Street, Suite F Auburn, CA 95603 Contact:ieir� Fresno Countv Fresno County ALUC (559) 262-4853 Planning & Resource FAX (209) 262-4166 Management Department 2220 Tulare Street, Sixth -Floor. Fresno, CA 93721. Contact: Joanne Striebich Glenn Countv Glenn County Glenn County Planning Department 125 South Murdock Avenue Willows, CA 95988 Contact: John Benoit Humboldt County Humboldt County ALUC Department of Public Works, Land Use Division 3033 H Street Eureka, CA 95501 Contact: Harless McKinley Imperial County Imperial County Planning Department 939 Main Street. El Centro, CA 92243-2856 Contact: Jurg Heuberger -2- (530) 934-6540 FAX (530) 934-6542 (707) 445-7205 FAX (707) 445-7388 E -Mail: hmckinley@co.humboldt.ca.us (760) 339-4236 FAX (760) 353-8338 Ingo County Inyo County Planning Department (Alternative process) P.O. Drawer L Independence, CA 93526 Contact: Peter Chamberlain Kern Countv Kern Co Planning and Development (Alternative Process) 2700 "M" Street, Suite 100 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Contact: Lorelei H. Oviatt Kings County Kings County Planning Department (Alternative Process) Kings County Government Center Hanford, CA 93230 Contact: Steven Sopp Lake County Lake County Planning Department (Exempt) 255 North Forbes Lakeport, CA 95453 Contact: Mark Phillips Lassen County Lassen County ALUC Lassen County Planning Department 707 Nevada Street, Room 236 ' Susanville, CA 96130-- Contact: 6130Contact: Kent Hector Los Angeles County Los Angeles County ALUC Department of.Regional Planning 320 West Temple Street, Room 1356 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Contact: Sorin Alexanian Madera Countv Madera County ALUC Madera County Planning Department 135 West Yosemite Avenue Madera, CA 93637 Contact: Ken Young Marin Countv Marin County ALUC Marin County Planning Department 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 308 San Rafael, CA 94903 Contact: Kim Hansen -3- (760) 872-2706 Ext -2263 Fax (76 0) 872-2712 (805) 862-8866 FAX (805) 862-8601 (209) 582-3211 Extension 2675 FAX (209) 584-8989 (707) 263-2221 FAX (707) 263-2207 (530) 251-8264 FAX (530) 251-8373 (213) 974-6425 FAX (213) 626-0434 (209) 675-7821 (415).499-6290 FAX (415) 499-7880 Mariposa Countv Mendocino County Merced County r • Mariposa County ALUC Mariposa County Public Works Department 4639 Ben Hur Road Mariposa, CA 95338 Contact: Gwendolyn Foster Mendocino County ALUC Department of Planning and Building Services 501 Low Gap Rd., Room 1440 Ukiah, CA 95482 Contact: Gary Pedroni A Merced County ALUC Merced County Planning Department 2222 "M" Street Merced, CA 95340 (209) 966-5356 FAX (209) 966-2828 (707) 463-4281 FAX (707) 463-5709 (209.) 385-7654 FAX (209) 726-1710 Contact: Desmond Johnston E -Mail: PL02@co.merced.ca.us Modoc County No ALUC Contact Modoc County Department (E-XEMPT) of Public Works 202 West Fourth Street Alturas, CA 96101 Mono County Mono County ALUC Mono County. Planning Department P_O. Box 347 Mammoth Lakes, CA 93 546 . Contact: Scott Burns/lbiammoth Keith Hartstrom/Bridgeport Monterev Countv Monterey County ALUC County Planning and Building Department P.O. Box 1208. Salinas, CA 93902 Contact: Bill Hopkins Naga County Napa County ALUC Napa County Conservation, Development, & Planning Department 1195 - 3rd Street, Room 210 Napa, CA 94559-3092 -4- (530) 2333-3939 (760) 924-5450 Fax (760) 924-5458 (760) 932-5217 FAX (760) 912-7145. (408) 755-5141 FAX (408) 755-5487 (707) 259-8228 FAX (707) 253-4176 -5 •Contact: •E . Michael Miller -Mail: mmiller@co.napa.ca.us Nevada County Foothill ALUC (530) 823-4703 Sierra Planning Organization FAX (530) 823-4142. 560 Wall Street, Suite F Auburn, CA 95603 Contact: Andrew Reid Orange County_ Orange County ALUC (949 ) 252-5170 John Wayne Airport FAX (949) 252-5290 3160 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 . Contact: Eric Freed E -Mail: efreed@ocair.com Placer Countv Placer County Transportation (530) 823-4033. Planning Agency FAX (530) 823-4036 550 High Street, Suite 107 Auburn, CA '95603 Contact: 'Kathryn F. Mathews . Plumas County Plumas County ALUC (530) 283-6210 Plumas County Planning Department FAX (530) 282-0946 P.O. Box 10437 Quincy, CA 95971-6012 Contact: John S. McMorrow Riverside County County of Riverside (9.09 ) 955-5990 Attention: ALUC FAY (909) 955-6686 3525 14th ST. Riverside, CA 92501-3813 Contact: Keith Downs E-Mail:edal.kdowns@co.riverside.ca.us Sacramento County Sacramento County ALUC (916) 457-2264 Sacramento Area Council of. FAX (916) 457-3299 Governments (SACOG) , 3000 "S" Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95816 Contact: Dave Boyer .............. .........................; • (916) 733-3227 San Benito County San Benito County ALUC (408 ) 637-3725 San Benito County Council FAX (408) 637-2378 of Governments 3216 Southside Road Hollister, CA 95023 Contact: John Johnson -5 Michael Powers, Dir. WE San Bernardino County San Bernardino County Planning Department. (909) 387-4180 . (Alternative Process) 385 North Arrowhead Avenue FAX (909) 387-3223 Third Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415-0182 Contact: Tun Squire E -Mail: jsquire@lus.co.san-bemardino.ca.us San Diego County San Diego ALUC (619) 595-5372 San Diego Association of Governments FAX (619) 595-5605 First Interstate Plaza 401 'B" Street, Suite, 800 San Diego, CA .92101 Contact: Jack Koerper San Francisco County NO ALUC REQUIRED San Joaquin County San Joaquin County ALUC (209) 468-3913 San Joaquin County Council. FAX (209) 468-1084 of Governments 6 South El Dorado Street, Suite 400 Stockton, CA. 95202 Contact: Lara Delaney San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo County ALUC (805) 781-5600 County San Luis Obispo County Department. of Planning and Building County Government Center San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 Contact: Michael Draze/Ted Bench San Mateo County San Mateo County ALUC (650):363-4417 Planning & Building Division FAX (650) 363-4849 Environmental Services Agency 455 County Center, 2nd Floor Redwood City, CA 94063 Roundtable Office Contact: David F. Carbone (650) 876-7812 Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara County ALUC (805).568-2546 Santa Barbara County Association FAX (805) 568-2941 of Governments 222 East Anapamu Street, Suite 11 Santa Barbara, CA 93101-2006 Contact: Bill Yim (805).568-2914 Michael Powers, Dir. WE Solano County Solano County ALUC Solano County Department of Environmental Management 601 Texas Street' Fairfield, CA 94533 Contact: Gary Lane. -7- (707) 42-1--6765. FAX (707) 429-7912 19 Santa Clara County Santa Clara County ALUC (408) 299-2454 X 233 Santa Clara County Planning Office FAX (408) 279-8537 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing -7th Floor San Jose, 'CA 95110 Contact: Rachael Gibson E -Mail: Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz County (408) 454-3183 (Alternative Process) Planning Department FAX (408) 454-2131 Governmental Center 701 Ocean Street Santa Cruz, CA 95060-4071 Contact: Mark Deming City of Watsonville Planning Department (408) 728-6020 P.O. Box 50000 FAX (408) 728=6173 Watsonville, CA 95077-5000 Contact: Paul Kaneko Shasta County Shasta County ALUC (51.) 225-5532 Shasta County Planning Division FAX (530) 245-6468 1855 Placer Street Redding, CA 96001-1795 Contact: Paul Bolton or Tim Cook Sierra County Foothill ALUC (5)-0) 823-4703 (EXEMPT) Sierra Planning -Organization FAX (530) 823-4142 560 Wall Street, Suite F Auburn, CA 95603 Contact: Andrew Reid Siskivou County Siskiyou County ALUC (530) 842-8269 305 Butte Street (530) 842-8288 . Yreka, CA 96097 Contact: Tom Anderson E -Mail: stage@snowcrest.net Solano County Solano County ALUC Solano County Department of Environmental Management 601 Texas Street' Fairfield, CA 94533 Contact: Gary Lane. -7- (707) 42-1--6765. FAX (707) 429-7912 19 -8- *Sonoma Sonoma County County ALUC tY (707).527-1948 Permit Resource Management FAX (707) 527-3767 2550 Ventura Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Contact: Ron Taddei E -Mail: Rtaddei@sonoma-county.org South Lake Tahoe South Lake Tahoe ALUC (530) 542-6020 c/o Teri Jamin City Planning Director 1900 Lake Tahoe Boulevard South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Stanislaus County Stanislaus County ALUC (209) 525-6330 Stanislaus County Department FAX (209) 525-5911 of Planning & Community Development 1100 H Street Modesto, CA 95354 Contact: Fran Sutton -Berardi Sutter County Sacramento County ALUC (916) 457-2264 Sacramento Area Council of FAX (916) 457-3299 Governments (SACOG) 3000 "S" Street, Suite 300 Sacramento,. CA 95816 Contact: Dave Boyer (916) 733-3227 Tehama County Tehama County ALUC (530) 527-2200 Tehama County Planning Department FAX (530) 527-2655 Court House Annex, Room 1, 444 Oak Street Red Bluff, CA 96080 Contact: George Robson Trinity County Trinity County ALUC '(530) 623-1351 Trinity County Department of FAX (530) 623-1353 Transportation & Planning P.O. Box 2819 Weaverville, CA 96093-2819 Contact: Scott White Tulare Countv Tulare County ALUC (209 ) 733-6291 ext. 4201 Resource Management Agency FAX (209) 730-2653 5961 South Mooney Blvd. Visalia, CA 93277 Contact: Dave Bryant -8- Tuolumne County Tuolumne County ALUC (209) 5.33-5685 10723 Airport Road FAX (209) 532-1609 Columbia, CA 95310 Contact: Mark Bautista Ventura County Ventura County ALUC (805) 642-1591-ext.105 950 County Square Drive, Suite 207 FAX (805) 6424860 Ventura,. CA 93003 . Contact: Chris Stephens E -Mail: cstephens@goventura.org Yolo County Yolo County.ALUC (916) 457-2264 Sacramento Area Council of FAX (916)457--j299 Governments (SACOG) 3000 "S" Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95816 Contact:, Dave Boyer (916) 733.-3227 Yuba Countv Yolo County ALUC (916) 457-2264 Sacramento Area Council ofFA.Y (916)457-3299 Governments (SACOG 3000 "S" Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95816 Contact: Dave Boyer (916) 733-3227. +BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION + • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 • AGENDA ITEM - F: TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: ALUC Staff SUBJECT: Monthly Status Report DATE: June 7, 1999 FOR: Airport Land Use Commission Meeting of June 16, 1999 1. Commissioner Appointments: As the Commission is aware, Commissioner Gerst's term of office expired May 1999. The Board of Supervisors has still not made a change in appointment to the Commission. Mr. Gerst's term of office will be until May 3, 2002, until further notice. Attached you will find a letter from Tom Lando which designates Robert Grierson as the City of Chico's ALUC commissioner in his absence, including acting as his proxy. Staff has noted this new appointment and his letter is being kept in the Department's ALUC "proxy" file. The member list will also be updated. 2. Airport Land Use Planning Workshop in Redding: Commissioner Lambert mentioned to staff that she would be looking into the cost of chartering a bus to the workshop. To date, staff has only received one (1) registration form to attend the workshop. 3. Airport Area of Influence Maps: At the May 19, 1999, ALUC meeting staff presented the adopted Airport Area of Influence maps. Several Commissioners questioned whether ALUC had formally adopted the Caltrans Traffic Pattern Zone. Staff was directed to research this issue. Staff found that ALUC had only adopted the Traffic Pattern Zones for planning purposes and that ALUC had not formally adopted the Caltrans Traffic Pattern Zones. Staff had included this additional item on the Airport Area of Influence map for informational purposes. Staff thought that including this information would further serve the public interest for general planning purposes. 0 Butte County •Airport Land Use Commission 0 G� 4. Board of Supervisors Action to Adopt an Interim Ordinance for CelloT weVUU At the June 8, 1999, meeting of the Board of Supervisors, an interim ordinance was adopted that prohibited communication towers in any zone that allows a residential use. 4. ALUC Staff Time Accounting: Pay periods 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 (3/20/99 through 5/28/99). Total hours dedicated to work on ALUC issues by individual staff members. Pay Periods Tom Parilo Jill Broderson Paula Leasure David Doody Lynn Richardson Laura Webster Diana Shuey Larry Painter Sub -total 7 8 9 10 11 HOURS. 1.5 3.5 - - - - .25 3 - 6.0 2.75 10.75 14 7.25 7.25 18.5 25.00 23.50 26.75 16.25 - .5 - - 7.0 19.75 (Period 3/20/99 - 4/16/99) 2.0 4.0 2.0 6.0 4.5 1.0 0.5 - - - 25.75 64.25 42.5 40.00 30.00 TOTAL HOURS, PERIODS 7 - 11 = 202.50 Laura Webster of PMC has also reported that as of the end of May, 1999, there are 22.5 hours remaining in PMC contract. PMC has indicated that these hours will be adequate through to the end of the fiscal year, which is June 30, 1999. 1::\.\,L.UC1,%1LGTI\GS'•6-16-99.NI f&6-16-99.SR • Brute Coruuy 0.44 port Land Use Commission • 2 -s OFFICE OF THE ' CITY MANAGER n 411 Main Street P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927. _ (530) 895-4800 FAX (530) 895-4825 ATSS 459-4800 June 7, 1999 Butte County Airport Land Use Commission c/o Dave Doody, ALUC Staff Butte County Planning 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 In,accordance with the provisions of Public Utility Code Section 21670, I hereby designate Robert A. Grierson, Airport Manager, as the representative to the Airport Land Use Commission in my absence, including acting as my proxy: Sincere , lw Thomas J. Lando City Manager cc: County Administrative Officer County Planning Director City Attorney Airport Manager Grierson SUN g 1999 U:%WPYEWWKPORTALUC Rep Ltr.wpd G-GA-2.10/0-90-I/Chrono - ZX9 Made From Recycled, Paper /ud- 544-7us +BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION + • 7 County Center Drive, Orovik CA 95965 • (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 o AGENDA ITEM - F. TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: ALUC Staff SUBJECT: Monthly Status Report DATE: December 4, 1998 FOR: Airport Land Use Commission Meeting of December 16, 1998 1. Status of the CLUP Update - ALUC staff forwarded several documents to Shutt Moen Associates (SMA) in late November and is currently. in the process of collecting a number of remaining items, such as, existing General Plans and Zoning" Ordinances from local agencies. SMA is presently focusing on their review of the existing documents that have already been forwarded to them and additional data collection (as necessary). It is anticipated that the consultant will meet with the ALUC during the Commission's regular meeting in January. The purpose of this meeting will be to walk through the scope of work and obtain any preliminary input from the Commission regarding issues of particular concern. Although verbal input will be acceptable, it may be helpful if Commission members prepare written comments in advance and provide them to staff and the consultant before or during the meeting. 2. Request for a Legal Opinion from the Butte County Counsel's Office Regarding Vested Development Rights within the Overflight Protection Zone of the Chico Municipal Airport - Paula Leasure submitted a request for a legal opinion from the County Counsel's Office on November 24, 1998 as directed by the ALUC during its November 18, 1998 meeting. The purpose of the request is to determine the impact of the ALUC's October 21, 1998 amendments to the CMAEP on subdivision projects within the Overflight Protection Zone that are currently at various stages in the approval process by asking at what point a developer becomes vested. The request also asked for an opinion regarding whether or not the ALUC's actions can prevent the development of single family dwellings on existing legally created parcels. A response from the County Counsel's Office has not been received at the time of this report. Any legal opinion that is provided in the future will be forwarded to the Commission. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 3. Project Reviews - On November 23, 1998, staff received a request for comments on a Development Review Board application from the City of Oroville. The proposal involved the construction of a 50,000 square foot paint booth manufacturing facility and a 4,000 square foot office on an 11.7 acre site in the Oroville Airport Business Park. The maximum height of the structure would be 24 feet. The site is located within the Overflight Zone/Traffic Pattern Zone for,the Oroville Municipal Airport. According to the Oroville Planning Department, the facility will be operated with 34 on-site employees. The project will result in a concentration of 2.90 people per acre. The minimum concentration subject to ALUC review according the 1985 Oroville Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan is 25 people per acre. Staff found that the project was clearly consistent with Oroville Airport CLUP and recommended the following conditions: — A. All project lighting shall be directed within the project site and shielded to prevent adverse impacts on adjacent properties and aircraft flight activities. B,. Building and roofing materials shall be selected which do not create significant reflection or glare. 4. ALUC Staff Time Accounting - Pay periods 23 and 24 (10/31/98 through 11127/98). Total hours dedicated to work on ALUC issues by individual staff members. Tom Parilo Paula Leasure Laura Webster Paula Atterberry HOURS 'None 21.75 hours 46.75 hours 68.75 hours • -Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 2 +BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION + • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 • . AGENDA ITEM - F. TO: , Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: ALUC Staff SUBJECT: Monthly Status Report DATE: November 9, 1998 FOR: ..Airport Land Use Commission Meeting of November 18, 1998 Status of the CLUP Update - According to Department of Development Services staff, the contract for the CLUP update project has been fully executed and was distributed to Shutt Moen Associates (SMA) on November 6, 1998. Prior to the execution of the contract, staff initiated the collection of a number of pertinent documents that will be needed by the consultant. The' initial set of documents is expected to be distributed to SMA the week of November 13, 1998. The consultant will initially focus on additional data collection (as necessary) and the review of existing documents. It is anticipated that the consultant will meet with the ALUC during the Commission's regular meeting in January. 2. Status of Butte County Tower Ordinance and Amendments to the Existing County Ordinance Addressing the Maintenance of Obstruction Clearances at the Airports - According to Department of Development Services staff, completion of the draft Tower Ordinance and draft amendments to the ordinance addressing the maintenance of obstruction clearances at airports in Butte County has been given high priority. Draft versions of the documents are expected to be finalized within the next two to three months. Both documents will be provided to the ALUC for its review and comment prior to being considered by the Butte County Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. 3. Stonecreek Subdivision GPA Rezone and Vesting TSM/ Drake (City of Chico) - This application, known as ALUC File A98-08, involves a request for a General Plan Amendment, Rezone and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map to allow an existing 18+- acre parcel to be subdivided into 89 single family residential lots. The project site is located on the south side of Eaton Road between Eaton Road and East Lassen Avenue in Chico. Ceres Avenue runs in_a_ north/south direction through the site. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • A public hearing notice was recently published in the Enterprise Record stating that the project would be reviewed by the City of Chico Planning Commission at their November 16, 1998 meeting. Staff has learned that the item will be continued to a subsequent meeting at the applicant's request and that the City of Chico Planning Department is recommending denial of the project. The ALUC reviewed this item during its regular meeting on July 15, 1998 and made a finding that the project was inconsistent with the 1978 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan. Staff briefly reviewed the Commission's July 15, 1998 findings to determine if significant modifications were likely to be necessary based upon the ALUC's adoption of a number of amendments to the CMAEP on October 21, 1998. Based upon staffs recent review, no significant modifications to the findings would be necessary or recommended. Therefore, it is not recommended that the project be required to be re -submitted to the Commission. 4. ALUC Staff Time Accounting - Pay periods 20, 21, and 22 (9/19/98 through 10/30/98). Total hours dedicated to work on ALUC issues by individual staff members. HOURS Tom Parilo 1.00 hour Paula Leasure 19.75 hours Laura Webster 49.00 hours Paula Atterberry 85.75 hours • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 2 COUNTY OF BUTTE AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION Minutes of September 16, 1998 F. MONTHLY STATUS REPORT Alternate Koch reported to the Commission on the information provided at the first meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for the Chico Municipal Airport Master Plan, which was held on September 3, 1998. The TAC was provided with the Consultant's report containing the facilities analysis, the aviation. forecast; and the demand capacity analysis, all of which are a preliminary analysis of what is needed in the next 20 -year period. The Consultant recommended the extension of the small runway, and the reservation of approximately 2,000 feet of area, for the future potential extension of the main runway. He mentioned that the Consultant based this analysis on passenger and general aviation usage, and will be reporting to TAC on his updated forecasts for freight and cargo issue. He said that the next scheduled TAC meeting'will be an Environmental Scoping Session held on October 1, 1998, at 3:30 p.m., in Conference Room One. The City of Chico's Consultant, the Environmental Consultant, and Staff will be in: attendance to listen to an overview of the environmental review process and potential issues. Commissioner Rosene said that according to the Consultant's recommendation the long runway may eventually be extended to 8,600 feet, and the shorter runway to 6,000 feet. He feels that since land uses in the area surrounding the runway extensions will be greatly impacted, this information should be included in the letter to the Board as another reason to delay action on the Stephens' project until the Master Plan update is finalized. Alternate Koch said that the Chico Airport Commission will have to approve the Master Plan, and recommend that it be approved by the City Council. The City Council will ultimately be deciding the future of the Chico Municipal Airport. ■ Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of September 16, 1998 ■ Page 1 ■ +BU"ICT E COUNTY AIRPORT ][ate USE COMMISSION + e 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 • AGENDA ITEM - F. TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: ALUC Staff SUBJECT: Monthly Status Report DATE: For the Meeting of October 21, 1998 Status of California Pilot's Association Lawsuit = ALUC staff spoke to Jay White, President of the California Pilot's Association (CPA), on September 28, 1998 to - obtain an update on the status of the CPA lawsuit against the City of Chico. According to Mr. White, the CPA originally filed a complaint with five causes of action against the City of Chico. These included allegations that the City of Chico General Plan was never brought into compliance with the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan (this item also indirectly alleges that the City did not properly override the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission's findings of inconsistency during adoption of the 1994 General Plan); that the Foothill Subdivision map should not have been approved, as well as, other projects including the Curry Bradshaw/Drake Dufore project; that approval of the Cal Northern School of Law "created a public nuisance"; and, that the Englebert Subdivision should not have been approved. In response, the City filed a demurrer which essentially requested that the complaints be dismissed or thrown out of court. A judicial hearing was conducted by Butte County Superior Court Judge Roger Gilbert in response to the City's action. During that review, Judge Gilbert ruled against all complaints other than the contention that the City should not have allowed approval of the Englebert Subdivision (this item also indirectly alleges that the City improperly overrode the Airport Land Use Commission's inconsistency finding for the project). Mr. White said -with regard to the appropriateness of the procedures which were followed by the City to override the ALUC's inconsistency finding during adoption of the 1994 General Plan, Judge Gilbert essentially found that the statute of limitations had run out on that item. According to Mr. White's understanding of legal procedures, the Englebert case must be disposed of by either a trial or motion for summary judgement before any appeal may be filed to pursue the other causes of action. Mr. White also mentioned that the CPA will decide if it wants to appeal the ruling on the remaining causes of action after the Englebert case has been fully processed. 2. --Status of the CLUP Update - On September 22, 1998, the Board of Supervisors tentatively approved the work program and contract with Shutt Moen Associates to complete the CLUP update. This approval was contingent upon the City of Chico's • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • commitment to financial participation in the project. Caltrans Aeronautics Program staff also reviewed and approved the refined work program on September 22, 1998. The Chico City Council approved the allocation of $5,000.00 toward the project during a City Council meeting conducted on September 29, 1998. The consultant has signed the contract with the County and we are in the process of coordinating all the necessary signatures to fully execute the grant agreement. Staff anticipates receiving a copy of the fully executed grant agreement and a letter authorizing the commencement of work from Caltrans Aeronautics Program staff during the second or third week of October. The consultant will initially focus on data collection and the review of existing documents. It is anticipated that the consultant will meet with the ALUC during the Commission's regular meeting in November or December. 3. City of Chico Airport Master Plan Update - The City of Chico Airport Commission is continuing to proceed with the update of the Master Plan for the Chico Municipal --. Airport. An environmental scoping meeting was conducted on October 1, 1998 to provide interested parties and agencies with an opportunity to identify environmental issues, project alternatives and feasible mitigation measures that should be addressed by the Environmental Impact Report that will be prepared for the project. 4. Status of CSA 87 Sign Re -installation - Correspondence submitted from the ALUC to the Board of Supervisors requesting immediate re -installation of the CSA 87 overflight signs will be presented as Correspondence Item H. at the Board's regular meeting on October 13, 1998. A separate letter from Commissioner Rosene will be presented as Correspondence. Item I. on the same agenda. It is staff's understanding that these letters have been referred to the Chief Administrative Officer, County Counsel, the Public Works Director and the Director of Development Services. Those staff members will be examining the most feasible options to facilitate re -installation of the signs and present a recommended course of action to the Board on a future agenda. Staff will inform the Commission when a specific action item has been scheduled for consideration by the Board. 5. ALUC Staff Time Accounting - Pay periods 16, 17, 18, and 19 (7/25/98 through 9/18/98). Total hours dedicated to work on ALUC issues by individual staff members. Tom Parilo 19.25 hours Paula Leasure 27.00 hours Laura Webster 77.50 hours __. Paula Atterberry 98.00 hours Larry Painter 0.50 hours • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 2 +BU7CT E COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION +' • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 9 1 AGENDA ITEM - F. TO: . Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: ALUC Staff SUBJECT: Monthly Status Report DATE: For the Meeting of August 19, 1998 1. Notification of Official ALUC Address - Following the July 15, 1998 Commission meeting staff distributed letters to all local agencies within the County notifying them of ALUC's official address and the need to direct project review requests and correspondence to that address in order for documents to be concerned "received" by the Commission. Staff has also subsequently modified the Commission's letterhead to delete "Department of Development Services" from the heading. 2. Cellular Tower Ordinance - Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division staff is still in the process of preparing a cellular tower ordinance to establish uniform standards and criteria for cellular towers. The draft ordinance will be submitted to the ALUC for its review and comment when available. In the - interim, representatives from the Planning Division noted that for some time staff has been recommending a consistent set of conditions for painting, lighting, etc., however, these requirements have been modified on a number of occasions during Planning Commission consideration of individual permits. 3. Preparation of Draft County Ordinance - The work effort involving the preparation of revisions to the County Ordinance as it applies to airports in ,Butte County has been delayed due to the lack of available personnel within the County Counsel's office during the month of July. ALUC staff will continue to work with the County Counsel's office and forward draft revisions to the Commission as soon as they are available. 4. Follow-up With Firms Who Did Not Respond to the CLUP'RFP - As noted within Agenda Item E.3., staff distributed the CLUP RFP to five consultants in June and only one of the firms responded. Although the proposal we received is considered adequate by staff and the ALUC Subcommittee, the Commission indicated during its July 15th meeting that it would like staff to contact the firms who did not respond to determine why they chose not to submit a proposal. Individual responses from three of the four consultants who did not submit a proposal are summarized below: • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • Eirm Response Aries Consultants Because of its thoroughness, this firm got the impression that the RFP had been prepared for the - ALUC by a consultant that was already likely to get the contract. Cortright & Seibold They are a small firm who has had difficulty competing with Shutt Moen Associates on CLUP update projects. They chose not to respond to the RFP because they have essentially quit preparing proposals for these types of assignments. Walt Gillfillan & Associates Mr. Gillfillan runs a "one man" operation which provides assistance to ALUC staff members who are preparing CLUP updates "in house." At times he also works as a subconsultant for larger firms. Since he does not have the staff or resources to support completion of an update of this magnitude, he chose not to respond to the RFP. 5. City of Chico Airport Master Plan Technical Advisory Committee Meeting - The first meeting of -the City of Chico Airport MasterPlan Technical Advisory Committee will be held on Thursday[, September 1 1998 at 3:30 p.m. in Conference Room #1 of the Chico Municipal Center (421 Main Street, Chico,. The City's airport planning consultant is expected to review the results of the inventory of Airport facilities, aviation activity forecasts and estimated future aviation demands generated for the airport, a demand capacity analysis and resulting facility requirements for such future demand. The Committee will be requested to provide its opinions and recommendations to the consultant and City staff regarding the analysis, potential future facility needs, and other issues relating to development of the Master Plan. 7. ALUC Staff Time Accounting - Pay periods 14 and 1.5 (6/27/98 through 7/24/98). Total hours dedicated to work on ALUC issues by individual staff members. Tom Parilo 2.50 hours Paula Leasure 19.75 hours - • Butte County *Airport Land Use Commission • 2 Laura Webster 10.75 hours Paula Atterberry 49.50 hours • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 3 • AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE Date Incoming Outgoing From Subject Received/ Sent ' I 7-7-98 Bob Hennigan City of Chico - Chico Municipal Airport FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Bob Koch Program 7-15-98 Tom Parilo Shutt, Moen, & CLUP proposal Associates 7-15-98 Bob Hennigan, Fred Gerst, & Staff CLUP proposal by Shutt, Moen, & Associates Norm Rosene 7-20-98 Christa Marie Engle/Caltrans Paula Atterberry Memo & CLUP proposal 7-20-98 Stacy Joliffe Laura Webster Letter of inconsistency findings by ALUC on (Stonecreek - Drake project) 7-20-98 Dan Drake Laura Webster Letter of inconsistency findings by ALUC on (Stonecreek - Drake project) 7-21-98 Bob Hennigan Paula Leasure Letter regarding Paula Atterberry taking over the clerical duties as of August 1, 1998 7-21-98 Christa Maria Engle/Caltrans Paula Leasure Notification of ALUC official address with attached letters sent to the City Managers/Directors 7-21-98 Ron Myers, Manager, City of Paula Leasure Notification of ALUC official address Oroville & Planning Manager Lisa Purvis -Wilson 7-21.-98 Chuck Rough, Manager, Paula Leasure Notification of ALUC official address Town of Paradise & Al McGreehan, Planning Director 7-21-98 Tom Lando, Manager, City Paula Leasure Notification of ALUC official address of Chico, & Kim Sidler, Planning Director 7-22-98 Paula Leasure City of Chico Notice of Chico Municipal Airport Master Plan Technical Advisory Committee Meeting 7-27-98 ALUC - given to Al McGreehan - Request for map information that depicts the overflight zone of Paula Leasure Town of Paradise the Paradise Airport Skypark, Butte County. 7-28-98 Paula Leasure - by fax Christa Marie Comments on the Shutt Moen Association proposal for the Butte Engle - Caltrans County Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan 7-28-98 Craig Baker & Chuck Rough Paula Leasure Map of the Paradise Airport Overflight Zone, per request with the Town of Paradise 7-28-98 Norm Rosene, Fred Gerst, & Laura Webster Letter regarding the ALUC Subcommittee Meeting to Review ' Bob Hennigan CLUP Proposal, &Comments from Caltrans on the Shutt Moen Associates proposal for the Butte County Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan attached 8-3-98 Brian Baldridge Laura Webster Letter of Appreciation for transportation to the ALUC Workshop +BU'fl"d']E COUA AIIIIt]POIIt'1C LAND USE COMMISSION + • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 * (916) 538-7601 FAX (916) 538-7785 • FY*1 August 3, 1998. Mr. Brian Baldridge, President Northern California Pilots Association 11088 Midway Chico, CA 95928 Subject: Letter of Appreciation Dear Brian: On behalf of the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission I would like to express our sincere appreciation to you and the members of the Northern California Pilots Association for providing air transportation to the Airport Land Use Workshop in Visalia on June 25, 1998. Due to the considerable distance to the workshop, staff and commission member-=- participation emberparticipation would not have been possible without your assistance. Continuing education regarding the role of Airport Land Use Commissions and strategies to ensure improved airport protection is essential. Therefore, the importance of your efforts to make the educational opportunities provided at the workshop available to local staff members and decision-making bodies cannot be overstated. Thank you again for your service to the community. Sincerely, Robert Hennigan, Chairman Butte County ALUC • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • Commissioner Nina Lambert 1643 River Road Chico, CA 95928 Home: 342-3780 Work: Fred Gerst 1860 Laurel St. Gridley, CA 95948 Home: 846-2913 Work: Jim Causey 3801 Hildale Ave. Oroville, Ca 95966 Home: 532-9206 Tom Lando P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 Home: Work: 895-4805 Art Hatley 1176 20th St. Oroville, CA 95965 Home: 533-9234 Work: Robert N. Hennigan 5130 Anita Road Chico, CA 95926 Home: 893-8492 Work: 891-1862 BUTTE CRNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION Alternate Agency that Appointed John Papadakis Member At Large 1462 Creek Haven PI. Chico, CA 95926 Dr. Chester Ward 4 Lemmon Hill Court Oroville, CA 95966-3708 Home: 532-0105 Terry Hodges 865 Long Bar Road Oroville, CA 95965 533-0698 Bob Koch P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 Home: Work: 895-4805 VACANT Donald R. Wallrich 400 Broadway Chico, CA 95928 Home: Work: 891-7081 Board of Supervisors Airport Managers Airport Managers City Selection Committee City Selection Committee Norm Rosene Brian Baldridge Board of Supervisors 1049 Village Lane 11088 Midway Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95928 342-4300 Wk: 345-0779 Term Expires First Monday in May 2002 1999 2001 2000 1999 2000 2002 Za0'0f +B=IE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION + • Department of Development Services • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (916) 538-7601 FAX (916) 538-7785 • MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: ALUC Staff SUBJECT: Monthly Status Report DATE: For the Meeting of July 15, 1998 1. Board of Supervisors June 23. 1998 Action on Stephens General Plan Amendment - The Board continued consideration of the amendment request to an unspecified open date. They also directed that a Development Agreement be developed to embody conditions -that would govern future tentative map application. The Development Agreement is subject to a public hearing by the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. 2. Finding=s of Staff Research Regarding 35 Unit Subdivision in Chico on Floral Avenue - ALUC staff is unable to determine whether a request for consistency findings was submitted by the City of Chico. At the time the project was circulated by the City, ALUC did not maintain a log of incoming correspondence. However, all projects received by ALUC that require a legislative action are referred•to Laura Webster for review. If a legislative act is not involved, staff prepares a letter to the City requesting standard conditions be imposed. Steve Lucas spoke with Bob Summerville about the subdivision of Floral Avenue, and was advised that the City is unable to tell if the project was submitted specifically to ALUC or to the Planning Division. If submitted to the Planning Division, it would not necessarily be referred to ALUC. 3. Status of the RFP for CLUP Preparation - The RFP for the CLUP was distributed to prospective consultants on June 12, 1998. Proposals are due by 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, July 15, 1998. It appears that two, or possibly three firms will submit proposals. 4. Airport Land Use Workshop (Visalia - June 25, 1998) - Staff would like to extend a sincere thank you to the Northern California Pilot's Association for providing air transportation to the Airport Land Use Workshop in Visalia. The event was attended by Commissioner Gerst, Alternate Baldridge, Alternate Ward, and Laura Webster. Presentations were given by experienced land use planners from San Mateo County, the City of Ceres, Shutt Moen & Associates, and specialists from the Caltrans Aeronautics Program. Topics discussed included: • An overview of the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. • State requirements and review processes for siting schools near airports. • Use of FAA Airport Hazard Form 7460-1. • Aircraft noise descriptions, measurement standards, management and mitigation. • Formulation of a Comprehensive -Land Use Plan (San Mateo County - In -Progress) • Conforming a City General Plan with a Comprehensive Land Use Plan (Approach taken by the City of Ceres) • Overview of the authority and legal basis for Airport Land Use Commissions and their activities. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission v Copies of the workshop agenda and handout materials collected by staff have been provided to the full Commission. The agenda contains the name and phone number for each member of the workshop panel. Other pertinent information includes a website address where you can access almost all state codes: www.leginfo.ca.gov.. A phone number was also given for Dan Burkland, President of the National Business Aviation Association (760) 749-6303. 5. Status on Ranchaero Airpo - An agreement has been reached and signed by both parties. However, there is a question whether the Division of Aeronautics and the FAA would accept the agreement, as is. If an agreement is accepted by their agencies, then the license can return to an unrestricted status. Staff will report on any future status in the August monthly report. 6. ALUC Membership - as requested by the Commission on June 17, 1998 an updated roster of members is attached to this review. 7. Resolutions of Appreciation - Copies of the Resolution of Appreciation are attached to this report. 8. Request for Proposals for the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Attached to this report is a copy of the RFP distributed to consultants. 9. Letter to FAA. At the June 17, 1998 meeting the Commission directed staff to prepare a letter to the FAA summarizing the Commissions comments regarding the Compatible Land Use Planning Initiative. Staff prepared this letter for the Chairman's signature and it is attached to this report. 10. Preparation of Draft County Ordinance - ALUC Staff is in the process of making revisions to the County Ordinance as it applies to airports in Butte County. During a detailed review of the current ordinance, staff determined that there were several questions that needed to be answered. County Counsels office contacted staff on Thursday, July 2, 1998, regarding this ordinance. The draft ordinance may be ready for the Commission to review at the August meeting. 11. ALUC Project Review Authority ALUC review of certain types of actions is --or appears to be -- still required even after a local agency has made its general plan and any specific plans consistent with the commission's compatibility plan or overridden the commission. Review of individual development projects becomes optional once the general plans and specific plans have been made consistent with the compatibility plan. This review is optional because it requires an agreement between the jurisdiction and the Commission which states ALUC has review authority. ALUC retains review authority over any project which requires a general plan, specific plan, or zoning ordinance amendment. In Butte County there are four public use airports subject to ALUC review of projects within the airport area. The Chico Municipalport lies with the jurisdiction of the City of Chico. However ALUC retains authority over lands within the City of Chico and Butte County. The City of Chico prepared and adopted findings to override the ALUC findings of inconsistency of the City of Chico General Plan. Therefore, in the Chico incorporated area, projects subject to ALUC review are, projects which require a legislative act. These are general plan amendments, • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 9 specific plans, and rezones. The unincorporated area west and northwest of the airport is subject to the North Chico Specific Plan. The Commission prepared findings of inconsistency for the NCSP. The Butte County Board of Supervisors prepared and adopted findings to override the ALUC findings of inconsistency. Again, the only projects subject to ALUC review are legislative acts, which are general plan amendments, specific plans, and rezones. The remaining unincorporated area within the Chico Overflight area must submit all development projects to the ALUC for consistency findings. The Commission tried to establish a MOU with the City of Chico and the Butte County Board of Supervisors which would 'subject projects within the incorporated area and' North Chico Specific Plan Area to ALUC for review; however, the MOU was rejected by the'City of Chico and therefore not submitted to the Board of Supervisors. Recently, ALUC staff has received courtesy requests for project review from the City of Chico. In this instance, ALUC staff prepares a courtesy response advising the City of Chico of the projects compatibility or incompatibility with the Land Use Plan and recommends conditions for approval. These courtesy reviews do not require overriding findings if the Council does not agree with staff and approves the project without the recommended conditions. The Ranchaero Aires is also multi jurisdictional having lands within the City of Chico and Butte County. Discretionary development projects in the unincorporated portion of the overflight area are subject to ALUC review. .Projects within the City of Chico are subject to ALUC review in the same manner as the Chico Airport. All discretionary development projects within the overflight area of the Oroville and Paradise Aires must be submitted to ALUC for consistency findings. 12. Correspondence - Attached to this report is a copy of the ALUC Correspondence Log instituted June 8, 1998 at the request of Chairman Hennigan. Some of the more important correspondence not related to the above items is attached for your information. 13. ALUC Staff Time Accountino - Pay periods 11, 12 and 13(5/16/98 through 6/26/98). Total hours dedicated to work on ALUC issues by individual staff members. Tom Parilo 16 Paula Leasure 16 Laura Webster Total Hours Remaining on Contract at the beginning of this Reporting Period: 50.50 hours Total Hours Worked: 56.50 hours. (Note - PMC will not bill for hours worked over the initial contract _.... amount) Additional Hours Absorbed by PMC for 6-25-96 Airport Land Use Workshop: 8.00 hours Paula Atterberry 58.5 • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • +BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION + • Department of Development Services • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (916) 538-7601 FAX (916) 538-T/85 • MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: ALUC Staff SUBJECT: Monthly Status Report DATE: For the Meeting of June 17, 1998 Status of Caltrans Grant for CLUP Preparation - On May 19, 1998, the Butte County ALUC received written notification from the Department of Transportation Aeronautics Program, that the California Transportation Commission (CTC) approved the allocation of an additional $40,000 to the Butte County ALUC from the California Aid to Airports Program. This supplemental allocation, together with the earlier allocation of $41,000 is intended to assist with funding updates to the Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plans (CLUP) for all four public use airports within the County. The combined allocation of $81,000 is considered by the CTC and Caltrans to be up to 90% of the total project cost. Therefore, the match for the total grant amount is 10% of the total project cost or $9,000. This can be a cash match, an "in kind" match, or some combination of both. Although the precise project cost will not be known until proposals are submitted by qualified consultants and a firm is selected, the grant funding that has been approved is expected to be adequate for a majority of the total project. According to previous information provided by the Department of Transportation, the allocated funds are not released as a lump sum. They are released as a reimbursement for monies which the ALUC pays to the consultant, less the 10% county match and a 10% holdback until the project is completed. Since the funds can only be released in the form of a reimbursement, it is likely that the '98299 annual budget for the Butte County ALUC will need to be modified in some fashion to ensure that adequate funding is available for up front project costs. In order to complete the grant agreement process, an authorized official of the sponsor identified by minute order or resolution must sign and return an executed copy of the Public Entity's Acceptance of the Allocation for Additional Funds on or before June 18, 1998. The necessary resolution will be presented to the Board of Supervisors for approval at their regular meeting on June 9, 1998 to ensure that acceptance of the funds is completed well in advance of the deadline. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 2. Status of the RFP for CLUP Preparation - At the time of this report (June .1, 1998), ALUC staff has not received written comments from the Department of Transportation Aeronautics Program regarding that agency's suggestions for changes to the Draft RFP for preparation of the CLUP for all public use airports within the County. The Draft RFP was originally submitted to Caltrans for their authorization on May 6, 1998. Prior to and following ALUC's regular meeting on May 20th, staff has kept in close contact with Christa Engle of the Aeronautics Program to help expedite completion of that agency's response. The last estimate from Caltrans for the submittal of formal comments was June 5, 1998. Following the receipt of Caltrans' comments on both the Draft RFP and Airport Layout Plans for the Chico Municipal Airport, Paradise Skypark Airport and Ranchaero Airport, staff will finalize the RFP and distribute it to a list of qualified consultants. The tentative due date for proposal submittal is one month following the release of the RFP. 3. Airport Land Use Workshop (Visalia - June 25. 1998) - An Airport Land Use Workshop sponsored by the California Pilots Association will be conducted on Friday, June 25, 1998, between 9:00 A.M. AND 3:00 P.M. in Visalia (see attached flyer). Presentations will be given by experienced land use planners and specialists from the Caltrans Aeronautics Program. The focus of the workshop will be the practical creation and implementation of Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plans. This is an excellent educational opportunity for all ALUC members, particularly in light of our upcoming CLUP preparation process. There is also a possibility that the Northern California Pilots Association may be able to provide air transportation to the event. Advanced registration is required for the workshop. Interested parties should contact Chairman Hennigan at (work) 891-1862 or by (fax) 898- 9341. This workshop notice has also been distributed to appropriate officials and agency staffs at Butte County, all cities within the county, and the Chico Airport Commission. 4. North Chico Specific Plan Signage. The North Chico Speck Plan requires the installation of 8 signs that are 5' by 2'/z' in size. The Butte County Public Works Department does not prepare signs of the size required. However they do prepare signs that are 36" x 45" in size. Planning staff is checking with County Counsel to see if an amendment to the Specific Plan is required in order to amend the sign size. The signs cost $143.50 each plus $100.00 per installation if all are made and installed at the same time. The total cost of preparing and installing the signs is $1,964. The, Development Services Department is making arrangements for Public Works Department to install signs in the near future. The signs are to read: . AIRCRAFT OVERFLIGHT ZONE This area is subject to noise impacts and safety hazards related to the operations of the Chico Municipal Airport and from aircraft overflight. 5. ALUC Staff Time Accounting - Pay periods 09 and 10 (4/18/98 through 5/15/98).. Total hours dedicated to work on ALUC issues by individual staff members. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 2 ri LJ Tom Parilo Paula Leasure Laura Webster Paula Atterberry 4.0 hours 13.25 hours 37.5 hours (4/8/98 through 5/15/98) 18.0 hours 6. Ranchaero Airport - The Moorehead's have signed the agreement with the Ranchaero Airport. However, Gary Griggs,, Ranchaero Airport owner has not yet signed. Mr. Griggs wanted to be assured by Cal -Trans that the restriction to flight operations would be lifted. Subsequently, Jim Michaels, required detailed drawings of the encroachment area prior to lifting restrictions. Mr. Griggs is having professional drawings prepared. After submission to Cal -Trans it is anticipated that the restrictions will be lifted. 7. Preparation of Draft County Ordinance - ALUC Staff is in the process of making revisions to the County Ordinance as it applies to airports in Butte County. During a detailed review of the current ordinance, staff determined that there were several questions that, needed to be answered. Staff also needs to meet with county counsel. The draft ordinance may be ready for the Commission to review at the July meeting. 8. Chico Master Plan Technical Advisory Committee - Craig Sanders has been appointed as the Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division representative. 9. Cell Tower Ordinance - Preparation of the draft ordinance is underway by the Planning Division. It is expected that the draft ordinance will be scheduled for hearing before the Planning Commission sometime this summer. ALUC will have the opportunity to review and comment on the draft ordinance. 10. Follow-up on Letters to City of Chico and the Federal Aviation Administration - At the January 21, 1998 meeting the Commission directed staff to send a letter to the City of Chico requesting them not to represent the FAR PART 150 Noise Study as an ALUC adopted document and to send a separate letter notifying the FAA also that the document was not adopted by ALUC. Staff prepared the letters as directed and did not request a response. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 3 'MEMORANDUM TO: Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Airport Land Use Commission Staff SUBJECT: Monthly Status Report DATE: For Meeting of May 20, 1998 1. City Selection Committee Commissioner Appointment. On Thursday, April 30, 1998, the City Selection Committee appointed Art Hatley to fill the unexpired term of Alan Campbell. Commissioner Hatley's term will expire May 3, 1999. 2. Board of Supervisors Commissioner Appointment. The Board of Supervisors will appoint a representative to the Commission on May 12, 1998. 'The new appointments term of office will be May 3, 2002. 3. Status of Chico Municipal Airport Master Plan - The City of Chico has officially initiated the preparation of its Airport Master Plan. The City's Airport Commission conducted public workshops on April 17th and April 28th to introduce the project to the community and give interested persons the opportunity to express their recommendations and opinions regarding the development of the Chico Municipal Airport over the next 20 years. Presentations were made by the project consultant, Reinard Brandley. The project is expected to be completed within the next twelve months. The first phase will focus on completing: • An inventory of existing facilities • Activity forecasts and aviation demands • A demand capacity analysis • A facility requirements determination • Preliminary portions of the environmental assessment One particular area of consideration during the study will be to determine the most suitable types of development for the west side of the airport. Initial public input was supportive of a new terminal building on the west side and possible conversion of the existing terminal to a fixed base operator and airport conference facility. Other comments supported the extension of both runways, improvements to accommodate heavier aircraft, lighting of runway 31 L, accommodation's for aeronautic related and/or dependent businesses, and some hotel and restaurant development. A Technical Advisory Committee will be created to provide additional input during the preparation of the Master Plan. Periodic public ■ Airport Land Use Commission • Butte County ■ Monthly Status Report ■ Page 1 ■ workshops will be scheduled as the project progresses. to present and discuss interim work products. 4. Status of the Northern California Aviation Systems Plan - According to discussions with BCAG representatives, work has not yet been initiated on the Northern California Aviation Systems Plan. Caltrans will actually be the lead agency on the project. .It is anticipated that start up activities will begin in October 1998. ALUC staff requested to be advised as more information on the details of the project become available. 5. Status of 1998 -1999 ALUC Budget - The Department of Development Services, Planning Division budget was submitted to Administration in early April. The ALUC operating monies are included within this budget item. 6. • Status of, Caltrans Grant Application to the CTC '- The Caltrans application has been submitted for review during the CTC meeting scheduled for May 6th and 7th. Caltrans representatives will inform the Butte County ALUC of the CTC's decision immediately following formal action on the request. A verbal update and any associated correspondence will- be provided at the ALUC meeting on May 20, 1998. 7. Status of Caltrans Conditions Placed on Butte County, per letter from. Marlin Beckwith dated December 2, 1997) - Use of the Airport Master Plan for the Oroville Municipal Airport has been approved by the Department of Transportation Aeronautics Program as the basis for the CLUP for that facility. Layout Plans for the Chico Municipal Airport, Paradise Skypark Airport and Ranchaero Airport were submitted to Caltrans for approval on April 6, 1998. According to subsequent telephone discussions with Caltrans staff (April 28, 1998), the Layout Plans were received and are in the process of being reviewed. Official correspondence from that agency regarding the use of the Layout Plans as the basis for the CLUPs is expected to be provided to ALUC staff on or before May 7, 1998. The'Draft RFP for preparation of the CLUP.was submitted to Caltrans on May 6, 1998, for that agency's review and comment. Following receipt and incorporation of Caltrans' comments, the RFP will be distributed to a list of qualified consultants. The tentative due date for proposal submittal is June 5, 1998. 8. Reminder: At the March 18, 1998 ALUC meeting the ALUC Policy Plan was tabled for six months pending progress on the CLUPs and the Caltrans grant. It will only be placed on the agenda of September 16, 1998 if the grant is not awarded. ■ Airport Land Use Commission ■ Butte County ■ Monthly Status Report ■ Page 2 ■ 9. ALUC Staff Time Accounting - Pay periods 07 and 08 (03/23/98-04/07/98). Total hours dedicated to work on ALUC issues by individual staff members. HOURS Tom Parilo 4 Paula Leasure 13.5 Laura Webster 4 Paula Atterberry. 24.5 10. Correspondence Received: 1. Letter from Norm Rosene to Supervisor Houx requesting appointment as a public member. 2. Agenda for Chico Airport Commission meeting of April 28, 1998. 3. Letter from John Blacklock to Art Hatley dated April 30, 1998. K:\PLANNING\ALUC\MEETINGS\MAY20.098\STFRPT5.98 ■ Airport Land Use Commission ■ Butte County ■ Monthly Status Report ■ Page 3 ■ _