Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutALUC_JANUARY_20024 0 -0 AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE —December 11, 2001 — January 14, 2002 1 Date Received Incoming To Outgoing To . From Subject /Sent 12/12/01 Glen Dilley ALUC Sent ALUCP binder upon " request. 12/17/01 M. A. Meleka/ Tom Buford, DDS ' Acknowledgement of receipt of - ALUC Interim Director ALUC letter advising of 180 - day time limit for bringing County. General Plan into conformance—Distributed to Commissioners 12/19/01. 12/21/01 M. A. Meleka/ Kim Seidler, Acknowledgement of receipt. of ALUC Planning Director ALUC letter advising of 180 - day time limit for bringing City's General Plan into conformance. 1/7/02 M. A. Meleka Tom Buford, DDS Report on Consistency Study. and Members of Interim Director the ALUC - ` 1/14/02 Tom Buford, DDS- M. A. Meleka on .Letter advising of amendment Interim Director behalf of ALUC to 2000 ALUCP adopted at the Butte County December.l.9, 2001 meeting. Jo Sherman, Planning Manager City of Oroville , Kim Seidler, Planning Director City of Chico Al McGreehan, Director Planning & Community Development Town of Paradise 1 ,�� :...... �. Counfy LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT. SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVIL,LE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 December 17, 2001 FAX: (530) 538-7785 www.buttecounty.net Mr. M. A. Meleka Principal Planner Staff to the Airport Land Use Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) Dear Mr. Meleka: Thanks you for your' letter regarding the status of the County's review of the above referenced plan Our Department has contracted with Environmental Science Associates, Inc. (ESA) to conduct the review required by state law. We will be advising the Airport Land Use Commission of our progress in the near future. 'Thanks you :also for your invitation'to'comment on potential amendments to the current plan. We will, as you note, direct our'suggestions to your office. my you To Buford Interim Director Cc: Dan Breedon, Senior Planner Craig Sanders, Senior Planner Felix Warmenmacher, Deputy County Counsel COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING ��- 411 Main Street j1TYorCHICO P.O. Box 3420 INC.1872 Chico, CA 95927 (530) 895-4851 FAX (530) 895-4726 ATSS 459-4851 Mr. M.A. Meleka, Principal Planner Airport Land Use Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965-3397 . Re: 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Dear Mr. Meleka: December 18, 2001 - � C W -E D EC 2 1 2001 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION This letter will respond to your 12/5/01 letter to Tony Baptiste, in which you requested an update on progress made by the City in achieving General Plan and zoning consistency with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The City is. currently drafting a General Plan amendment and anew zoning overlay district that will incorporate the great majority of the provisions of the ALUCP. I anticipate that we will be bringing several issues, including the ALUCP's infill policy, back to the ALUC for further discussion and • possible resolution that will eliminate any need for the adoption of overruling findings by the City, and I truly hope that this will be the outcome. In the meantime, until the City adopts the General Plan and zoning amendments and, achieves consistency with the ALUCP (or overrules if necessary), we are forwarding for ALUC review those major land use actions listed in the ALUCP, including rezonings and tentative subdivision maps (except for those maps that involve property lying within the D compatibity zone, if the maps are otherwise consistent with the ALUCP). We are not sending for ALUC review those minor projects that are clearly consistent with the ALUCP. If any adjustment in this practice is necessary at this point to satisfy the requirements of ALUC, please let me know. In a month or so, I expect to be in a position to provide you with a significantly greater level of detail, both concerning the work City staff is currently engaged in regarding the ALUCP, and also with regard to the Commission's offer to review the ALUCP for potential modifications. I will certainly keep you informed, and anticipate formally involving ALUC in a discussion of the City's proposals before we initiate our own City adoption process. Respectfully, r—� • Kim Seidler Planning Director cc: CDD Baptiste Q;& Made From Recycled Paper • • In his letter dated December 5, 2001, Mr. Meleka asked, on behalf of the Commission, for a status report on achieving General Plan consistency. I am pleased to report that we have completed our kick-off meeting with the consultant retained by the County to review the Compatibility Plan, and report on consistency issues. We anticipate that a study session will be held with the Board of Supervisors and.Planning Commission in March, with Board review of options tentatively scheduled for mid -summer 2002. The planner assigned to this project is Dan Breedon. If you would like further information regarding this issue, please let me know 1dE MEMORANDUM ® DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TO: Members of the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Tom Buford, Interim Director (538-6821) .. CC: Board of Supervisors \ Pla ing Commission L wrence Odle, Interim CAO A. Meleka, Principal Planner Dan Breedon, Senior Planner SUBJECT: 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan DATE: January 7, 2002 • • In his letter dated December 5, 2001, Mr. Meleka asked, on behalf of the Commission, for a status report on achieving General Plan consistency. I am pleased to report that we have completed our kick-off meeting with the consultant retained by the County to review the Compatibility Plan, and report on consistency issues. We anticipate that a study session will be held with the Board of Supervisors and.Planning Commission in March, with Board review of options tentatively scheduled for mid -summer 2002. The planner assigned to this project is Dan Breedon. If you would like further information regarding this issue, please let me know 1dE • 0 1/14/02 Original Letter per attached sent to: AV Tom Buford, Interim Director Department of Development Services 7 County. Center Drive (J� Oroville, CA 95965 Jo Sherman, Planning Manager City of Oroville 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 Kim Seidler, Planning Director City. of Chico P. O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 Al McGreehan, Director -Planning & Community Development Town of Paradise 5555 Skyway Paradise, CA 95969 I • January 14, 2002 Tom Buford, Interim Director Department of Development Services �Y 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH AND 'BEAUTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Re: Recent change to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Dear Mr. Buford: On December 19, 2001 the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission adopted an amendment to the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The Commission approved a change to Section 1.5.2 Other Land Use Actions.Subject to ALUC Review. The following text shows the new wording for the section, the new language is shown in bold italics, deleted portions are shown in s*kRt: In addition to the above types of land use actions for which ALUC review is mandatory, other types of land use actions are subject to review under the following circumstances: (a) Until such time as (1) the Commission finds that a local agency's general plan or specific plan is consistent with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), or (2) the local agency has overruled the Commission's determination of inconsistency, state law requires the local agency to refer all actions, regulations, and permits involving land within an airport influence area to the Commission for review; (Public Utilities Code 21676 (b)). Only those actions which the ALUC elects not to review are exempt from this requirement. Commission. policy is that only the major land use actions listed in Policy 1.5.3 shall be submitted for review in an ALUC public hearing. A non -major land use action shall initially be reviewed by the ALUC Secretary/staff. If such action is found to be consistent with the AL UCP, the ALUC Secretary/staff shall inform the referring agency. If such action is found to be inconsistent, the action shall be submitted by the ALUC Secretary for review in' an ALUC public hearing. All actions referred by a local agency must be submitted with the Butte County ALUC Referral Form and any applicable review fee as established by the ALUC. If a non -major land use action is found to be consistent with the ALUCP by the ALUC Secretary/staff and no public hearing is held, the review fee shall be returned. Recent change to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan January 14, 2002 Page Two • I 1 The effect of this change is that, until local jurisdictions have brought their General Plans into conformity with the ALUCP or adopted an override, all discretionary projects within an airport area of influence must be submitted for review along with an application and fee. The application fee will be refunded if the project is found to be consistent and does not need to go to an ALUC hearing. If you have any questions about this change please feel free to call me at 538-6572. Sincerely, M.A. leka Princi 1 Planner r MAM: cs • • 0 #FILE. ....... utte 1610u) L A N D O F NAT U RA L W EA LT H A N D BEAUTY AIRPORT LAND'USE COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 January 14, 2002 Jo Sherman, Planning Manager City of Oroville 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Recent change to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Dear Ms. Sherman: On December 19, 2001 the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission adopted an amendment to the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The Commission approved a change to Section 1.5.2 Other Land Use Actions Subject to ALUC Review. The following text shows the new wording for the section, the new language is shown in bold italics, deleted portions are shown in s#ikeeut: In addition to the above types of land use actions for which ALUC review is mandatory, other types of land use actions are subject to review under the following circumstances: (a) Until such time as (1) the Commission finds that a local agency's general plan or specific plan is consistent with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), or (2) the local agency has overruled the Commission's determination of inconsistency, state law requires the local agency to refer all actions, regulations, and permits involving land within an airport influence area to the Commission for review, (Public Utilities Code 21676 (b)). Only those actions which the ALUC elects not to review are exempt from this requirement. Commission policy is that only the major land use actions listed in Policy 1.5.3 shall be submitted for review in an ALUC public hearing. A non -major land use action shall initially be reviewed by the ALUC Secretary/staff. If such' action is found to be consistent with the AL UCP, the ALUC Secretary/staff shall inform the referring agency. If such action is found to be inconsistent, the action shall be submitted by the ALUC Secretary for review in an ALUC. public hearing. All actions referred by a local agency must be submitted with the Butte County ALUC Referral Form and any applicable review fee as established by the ALUC. If a non -major land use action is found to be consistent with the AL UCP by the ALUC Secretary/staff and no public hearing is held, the review fee shall be returned. Recent change to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan January 14, 2002 Page Two The effect of this change is that, until local jurisdictions have brought their General Plans into . conformity with the ALUCP or adopted an override, all discretionary projects within an airport area of influence must be submitted for review along with an application and fee. The application fee will be refunded if the project is found to be consistent and does not need to go to an ALUC hearing. If you have any questions about this change please feel free to call me at 538-6572. Sincerely M.A. Me eka Principall Planner MAM:cs • t • .,3 ?j'"s.:r'+7x7 ,'t, "'} :•i� January 14, 2002 Kim Seidler, Planning Director City of Chico P. O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 ffutte. counk LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY t. AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Re: Recent change to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Dear Mr. Seidler: On December 19, 2001 the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission adopted an amendment to the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The Commission approved a change • to Section 1.5.2 Other Land Use Actions Subject to ALUC Review. The following text shows the new wording for the section, the new language is shown in bold italics, deleted portions are shown in strikeetrt: In addition to the above types of land use actions for which ALUC review is mandatory, other types of land use actions are subject to review under the following circumstances: (a) Until such time as (1) the Commission finds that a local agency's general plan or specific plan is consistent with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), or (2) the local agency has overruled the Commission's determination of inconsistency, state law requires the local agency to refer all actions, regulations, and permits involving land within an airport influence area to the Commission for review, (Public Utilities Code 21676 (b)). Only those actions which the ALUC elects not to review are exempt from this requirement. Commission policy is that only the major land use actions listed in Policy 1.5.3 shall be submitted for review in an ALUC public hearing. A non -major land use action shall initially be reviewed by the ALUC Secretary/staff. If such action is found to be consistent with the ALUCP, the ALUC Secretary/staff shall inform the referring agency. If such action is found to be inconsistent, the action shall be submitted by the ALUC Secretary for review in an ALUC public hearing. All actions referred by a local agency must be submitted with the Butte County ALUC Referral Form and any applicable review fee as established by the ALUC. If a non -major land use action is found to be consistent with the ALUCP by the ALUC Secretary/staff and no . public hearing is held, the review fee shall be returned. . f Recent change to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan January 14, 2002 ti Page Two - 1 The effect of this change is that, until local jurisdictions have brought their General Plans into j conformity with the ALUCP or adopted an override, all discretionary projects within an airport area of influence must be submitted for review along with an application and fee. The application fee will be refunded if the project is found consistent and does not need to go to an ALUC hearing. If you have any questions abbut this change please feel free to call me at 538-6572. r Sincerely, M.A. M eka Principa Planner MAM:cs ..... ,.. ­ lp4Ao?/ Eatte, 16 • �4 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 ?:�• TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 January 14, 2002 Al McGreehan, Director -Planning & Community Development Town of Paradise 5555 Skyway Paradise, CA 95969 Re: Recent change to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Dear Mr. McGreehan: On December 19, 2001 the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission adopted an amendment to the 2000 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The Commission approved a change • to Section 1.5.2 Other Land Use Actions Subject to ALUC Review. The following text shows the new wording for the section, the new language is shown in bold italics, deleted portions are shown in strrilEeeut: In addition to the above types of land use actions for which ALUC review is mandatory, other types of land use actions are subject to review under the following circumstances: (a) Until such time as (1) the Commission finds that a local agency's general plan or specific plan is consistent with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), or (2) the local agency has overruled the Commission's determination of inconsistency, state law requires the local agency to refer all actions, regulations, and permits involving land within an airport influence area to the Commission for review, (Public Utilities Code 21676 (b)). Only those actions which the ALUC elects not to review are exempt from this requirement. Commission policy is that only the major land use actions listed in Policy 1.5.3 shall be submitted for review in an ALUC public hearing. A non -major land use action shall initially be reviewed by the ALUC Secretary/staff. If such action is found to be consistent with the AL UCP, the ALUC Secretary/staff shall inform the referring agency. If such action is found to be inconsistent, the action shall be submitted by the ALUC Secretary for review in an ALUC public hearing. All actions referred by a local agency must be submitted with the Butte County ALUC Referral Form and any applicable review fee as established by the ALUC. If a non -major land use action is found to be consistent with the ALUCP by the ALUC Secretary/staff and no is public hearing is held, the review fee shall be returned. Recent change to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan January 14, 2002 Page Two The effect of this change is that, until local jurisdictions have brought their General Plans into ; conformity with the ALUCP or adopted an override, all discretionary projects within an airport area of influence must be submitted for review along with an application and fee. The application i fee will be refunded if the project is found to be consistent and does not need to go to an ALUC hearing. If you have any questions about this change please feel free to call meat 538-6572. Sincerely, M.A. M leka Princip Planner r MAM: cs