Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutB16-1933 000-000-00011114511111 11 111 1 1 111 1 jjmiiii ... liiivii '119134n IS Prepared By: BUTTE r"jq COUNTY rig SEP 01 2016 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EN INEE I Site Name: AWE - KNVR Site ID: CVL00230 LISID: 9883 FA Location: 10090470 Site Type: Self Support Location: Center Gap and Doe Mill Rd. Chico, CA 95928 Latitude (NAD83): 39.7835469 Longitude (NAD83): -121.6788089 Report Completed: May 02, 2016 AT&T M-RFSC Casey Chan Prepared for: AT&T Mobility c/o Caldwell Compliance, Inc. 6900 Koll Center Parkway. Ste. 401 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Site Overview and Description • The antennas are mounted on a guyed tower • The site consists of two (2) sectors with a total of six (6) antennas • There are no separate structures within forty (40) feet of the transmitting antennas • The site is within a fenced in area, access to the site is via a gate • The site is co -located with Unknown panel, dish and omni antennas Compliant with recommendations OSC Engineering Inc. I www.OSCengineering.com 1 858 436 4120 Page 2/16 Compliance Notes Occupational Safety & Compliance Engineering (OSC Engineering) has been contracted by Caldwell Compliance, Inc. to conduct an RF (radio frequency) computer simulated analysis. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has set limits on RF energy exposed to humans on a wireless cell site in order to ensure safety. The FCC has also mandated that all RF wireless sites must be in compliance with the FCC limits and a compliance check must be performed annually to ensure site compliance. This report is an in depth analysis summarizing the results of the RF modeling provided to us by AT&T and in relation to relevant FCC RF compliance standards. A reanalysis is recommended upon the site going on air. OSC Engineering uses the. FCC OET-65 as well as AT&T Standards to make recommendations based on results and information gathered from drawings and Radio Frequency Data Sheets. For this report, OSC Engineering utilized Roofview0 software for the theoretical analysis of the AT&T Cellular Facility. A site-specific compliance plan is recommended for each transmitting site. This report serves as a single piece of the overall compliance plan. Information utilized for this report: RFDS: SAN-FRANCISCO-SACRAM ENTO_SACRAM ENTO_CN 00230_2016 -Fixed -Wireless- Local-Loop_FWLL-1 C_km477n_3701 A05C55_10090470_9883_01-06-2016_Final- Approved_v2.00 (1) DWGs: CVL00230-10090470 3-28-16 -90% CD OSC Engineering Inc. I www.OSCengineering.com 1858 436 4120 Page 3/16 ;I Compliance Results of the Proposed Site (theoretical simulation) Max RF Exposure Level simulated (AT&T antennas @ ground): 3.30 % FCC General Population MPE Limit Max RF Exposure Level simulated (cumulative ground): 3.40 % FCC General Population MPE Limit j OSC Engineering Inc. l www.OSCengineering.com l 858 436 4120 L_ Page 4/16 FCC Regulations and Guidelines from OET 65 When considering the contributions to field strength or power density from other RF sources, care should be taken to ensure that such variables as reflection and re -radiation are considered. In cases involving very complex sites predictions of RF fields may not be possible, and a measurement survey may be necessary The process for determining compliance for other situations can be similarly accomplished using the techniques described in this section and in Supplement A to this bulletin that deals with radio and television broadcast operations. However, as mentioned above, at very complex sites measurements may be necessary. In the simple example shown in the below diagram, it is desired to determine the power density at a given location X meters from the base of a tower on which are mounted two antennas. One antenna is a CMRS antenna with several channels, and the other is an FM broadcast antenna. The system parameters that must be known are the total ERP for each antenna and the operating frequencies (to determine which MPE limits apply). The heights above ground level for each antenna, H1 and H2, must be known in order to calculate the distances, R1 and R2, from the antennas to the point of interest.' HI Antenna I OET Bulletin 65, Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, Page 37- 38 OSC Engineering Inc. I www.OSCengineering.com 1858 436 4120 Page 5/16 Computer Simulation Analysis The federal Communications Commission (FCC) governs the telecommunications services, facilities, and devices used by the public, industrial and state organizations in the United States. "RoofView® is a software analysis tool for evaluating radiofrequency (RF) field levels at roof -top telecommunications sites produced by vertical collinear antennas of the type commonly used in the cellular, paging, PCS, ESMR and conventional two-way radio communications services.112 "RF near -field levels are computed from selected antennas by applying a cylindrical model that takes into account the antenna's aperture height, mounting height above the roof, azimuthal beam width for directional antennas and the location of the antennas on the roof Resulting, spatially averaged power densities are expressed as a percentage of a user selectable exposure limit depending on frequency. The entire roof is composed of one -square -foot pixels and RF fields are computed for each of these pixels for each selected antenna." 3 Computer simulations produced for clients are simulated with "Uptime = 100%". This means that all transmitters associated with an antenna are considered to be "on". 4 RoofView® uses a near -field method of computing the field based on assuming that the total input power delivered to the antenna, at its input terminal, is distributed over an imaginary cylindrical surface surrounding the antenna. The height of the cylinder is equal to the aperture height of the antenna while the radius is simply the distance from the antenna at which the field power density is to be computed. Within the aperture of the antenna, this approximation is quite accurate but as the antenna is elevated above the region of interest, the model output must be corrected for mounting height. 5 2 Roofview User Guide 4.15, Page 7, Richard A Tell Associates 3 Roofview User Guide 4.15, Page 7, Richard A Tell Associates If 4 Roofview User Guide 4.15, Page 10, Richard A Tell Associates 5 Roofview User Guide 4.15, Page 45; Richard A Tell Associates OSC Engineering Inc. I www.OSCengineering.com 1 858 436 4120 1 1 Page 6/16 Antenna Inventory All technical data and specifications shown below are collected from drawings and/or documents provided by the client, as well as from online databases and/or a visit to this facility. Unknown wireless transmitting antennas are simulated using conservative values when information is not available. OSC Engineering Inc. I www.OSCengineering.com 1 858 436 4120 Page 7/16 Theoretical Simulation Result Diagram -Cumulative Ground Level (Max Emission = 3.40% GP) For the purpose of theoretical simulation, OSC Engineering models antennas as if they are operating at full power (100%, capacity). This assumption yields more conservative_ (higher) results. On-site measurements may yield different results, as antennas do not always operate at full capacity. To the right is a result diagram of the site in question. The diagram is a color - coded map per ND -00059 levels, which coincide with FCC MPE Limits. Any exposure resulting in a level higher than 100% exceeds the Limits and requires further action, such as barriers. A level exceeding 100% does not make a site out of compliance. All results are given in General Population percentages even when a site may be considered Occupational. OSC Engineering Inc. I www.OSCengineering.com l 858 436 4120 Page 8/16 I Microwave a w ve Antennas . The input power for the microwave antenna (s) utilizes a generic default value of .01 Watts. This value is below the maximum for General Population RF Safety Compliance per the AT&T ND -00059 document. Therefore the microwave antennas are determined to be compliant with AT&T Mobility's guidelines. Microwave Antenna D------------------------ r ------------------------- T ---------------------- * R Near -Field Region Transition Region Far --Field Region ---------------1--------------------- --;------------ ------------;-------------------- 1 16-qp ; 1S _ Power I <1 nf 702 St _ �nf� sff, pD Density li 1 (Max power density R 4PR2 CL 1 as in the near -field ' 1 1 region) ---------------1-------------------------'--------------------------1-------------------- At D3 0.6 Da Distance Aperture Rnf 4h Rff = A Geometry and equations for computation of exposure 1evels6 Maixinwm Power iWo 141icrewwe Antenna In ut Potts D iameter Power (ft) (c m) (VV ) 1 30.5 0.017 2 61.0 0.7 3 91.4 1.6 4 121.9 2.9 5 152.4 4.5 6 102.9 6.5 7 213.4 8.8 8 243.8 11.6 9 274.3 14.7 10 304.8 18.2 11 335.3 22.0 12 365.8 26.2 13 396.2 30.7 14 426.7 35.6 15 1 457.2 1 40.9 Maximum power into microwave antenna ports for GP RF safety compiiance7 6 ND -00059 Rev 5.1 Page 29 of 81. Section; Microwave site 7 ND -00059 Rev 5.1 Page 30 of 81. Section; Microwave site OSC Engineering Inc. www.OSCengineering.com 1 858 436 4120 Page 9/16 Certification The undersigned is a Professional Engineer, holding a California Registration No. 19677 Reviewed and approved by: John B. Bachoua, PE Date: May 02, 2016 The engineering and design of all related structures as well as the impact of the antennas on the structural integrity of the design are specifically excluded from this report's scope of work. This report's scope of work is limited to an evaluation of the Electromagnetic Energy (EME) RF emissions field generated by the antennas listed in this report. When client and others have supplied data, it is assumed to be correct. OSC Engineering Inc. www.OSCengineering.com j 858 436 4120 Page 10/16 FCC MPE Limits (from OET-65I OSC Engineering uses the FCC's and clients' guidelines to model the computer simulation. Explained in detail in Office of Engineering & Technology, Bulletin No. 65 ("OET-65") "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation". Occupational/controlled8 exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general population/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. As discussed later, the occupational/controlled exposure limits also apply to amateur radio operators and members of their immediate household. General population/uncontrolled9 exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment-related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area. 8 OET-65 "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields pg. 9. 9 OET-65 "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields pg. 9. OSC Engineering Inc. I www.OSCengineering.com 1 858 436 4120 Page 11/16 Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MU)IO "The FCC Exposure limits are based on data showing that the human body absorbs RF energy at some frequencies more efficiently than at others. The most restrictive limits occur in the frequency range of 30-300MHz where whole-body absorption of RF energy by human beings is most efficient. At other frequencies whole-body absorption is less efficient, and, consequently, the MPE limits are less restrictive."] I (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure 1.63 (100). 30 1.34-30 824/f Frequency Electric Field Magnetic Feld Power Density (S) Averaging rime Range (MHz) Strength (E) (V/m) Strength (H) (A/m) (MW/CM2) ( E E 2_1 H 12 or S (minutes) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100). 6; 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/x).6 32-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 . 6 300-1500 - f/300 6 1500-100,000 -- -- 5 6 (B) Limits for General Population /Uncontrolled Exposure Frequency Electric Field > Magnetic Field Power Density (S) Averaging Time Range (MHz)`' Strength (E) (Vfm) Strength (H) (A/m), (mW/cm') I E 1 2, (H 12 or S (minutes) 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100). 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f)* 30 30-300 27.5` 0.073'' 02 30 300-1500 f/1500 30 1500-100,000 -- -- 1.0 30 f= Frequency in MHz *Plane -wave equivalent power density 10 OET-65 "FCC Guidelines Table 1 pg. 72. >> OET-65 "FCC Guidelines for Evaluating Exposure to RF Emissions", pg. 8 OSC Engineering Inc. I www.OSCengineering.com 1 858 436 4120 Page 12/16 Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) continued 12 Egure 1. FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Plane-wave,Equivalent Power Density OccupationalContralled Exposure Genera! PppuWmUncontrofied Exposure; 0_11 I I I I I I I I 1 1 0.03 0.3 1 3 30 300 13,000 30,000 1300.000 1.34 1,500 100,000 Frequency (MHz) "WE Limits are defined in terms of power density (units of milliwatts per centimeter squared: MW/CM2), electric field strength (units of volts per meter: V/m) and magnetic field strength (units of amperes per meter: A/m). In the far -field of a transmitting antenna, where the electric field vector (E), the magnetic field vector (H), and the direction of propagation can be considered to be all mutually orthogonal ("[plane -wave" conditions], these quantities are related by the following equation: ,g = E, — 37.7H 2 3770 xvhere: S = power density (mWtcni?) �E = electric field strength (Vlm) H = magnetic fidd strength (Alm) 12 OET-65 "FCC Guidelines Table I pg. 72. OSC Engineering Inc. I www.OSCengineering.com 1 858 436 4120 Page 13/16 Limitations OSC Engineering completed this evaluation analysis based on information and data provided by the client. The data provided by the client is assumed to be accurate. Estimates of the unknown, standard, and additional transmitting sites are noted and based on FCC regulation and client requirements. These are estimated to the best of our professional knowledge. This report is completed by OSC Engineering to determine whether the wireless communications facility complies with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Radio Frequency (RF) Safety Guidelines. The Office of Engineering and Technology (OET-65) Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation has been prepared to provide assistance in determining whether proposed or existing transmitting facilities, operations or devices comply with limits for human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)13. As each site is getting upgraded and changed, this report will become obsolete as this report is based on current information per the client, per the date of the report. Use of this document will not hold OSC Engineering Inc. nor it's employees liable legally or otherwise. This report shall not be used as a determination as to what is safe or unsafe on a given site. All workers or other people accessing any transmitting site should have proper EME awareness training. This includes, but is not limited to, obeying posted signage, keeping a minimum distance from antennas, watching EME awareness videos and formal classroom training. 13 OET-65 "FCC Guidelines for Evaluating Exposure to RF Emissions", pg. 1 OSC Engineering Inc. I www.OSCengineering.com 1 858 436 4120 Page 14/16 AT&T Antenna Shut -Down Protocol AT&T provides lockout/Tagout (LOTO) procedures in Section 9.414 (9.4.1- 9.4.9) In the ND -00059. These procedures are to be followed in the event of anyone who needs access at or in the vicinity of transmitting AT&T antennas. Contact AT&T when accessing the rooftop near the transmitting antennas. Below is information regarding when to contact an AT&T representative. 9.4.7 Maintenance work being performed near transmitting antennas Whenever anyone is working within close proximity to the transmitting antenna(s), the antenna sector, multiple sectors, or entire cell site may need to be shut down to ensure compliance with the applicable FCC MPE limit. This work may include but is not limited to structural repairs, painting or non -RF equipment services by AT&T personnel/contractors or the owner of a tower, water tank, rooftop, or other low -centerline sites. The particular method of energy control will depend on the scope of work (e.g., duration, impact to the antenna or transmission cabling, etc.) and potential for RF levels to exceed the FCC MPE limits for General Population/Uncontrolled environments 9.4.8 AT&T Employees and Contractors AT&T employees and contractors performing work on AT&T cell sites must be trained in RF awareness and must exercise control over their exposure to ensure compliance with the FCC MPE limit for,Occupational/Controlled Environments ("Occupational MPE Limit"). The rule of staying at least 3 feet from antennas is no longer always adequate to prevent exposure above the Occupational MPE -Limit. That general rule was applied early in the development of cellular when omni -directional antennas were primarily used and later when wide-beamwidth antennas were used. That application was then appropriate for the Occupational exposure category. However, the current prevalence of antennas with 60- and 70- degree horizontal half -power beamwidths at urban and suburban GSM and UMTS/HSDPA sites raises some question about the continued reliability of the 3 -foot rule. Antennas with low bottom -tip heights and total input powers around 70-80 W can produce exposure levels exceeding the Occupational MPE Limits at 4 feet, and these levels can be augmented by emissions of co -located operators. Therefore, AT&T employees and contractors should apply the above general work procedures and use an RF personal monitor to assess exposure levels within the work vicinity. 9.4.9 Other Incidental Workers All other incidental workers who are not trained in RF safety are considered general public and subject to the FCC MPE limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Environments. In such instance, the M-RFSC (primary contact) or R-RFSC (secondary contact) must refer to the Mobility RF site survey plan to assess the potential RF exposure levels associated with the antenna system. If capable of exceeding the FCC General Population/Uncontrolled MPE limit, then local sector/site shutdown is necessary. The FE/FT must also follow the local shutdown procedure and use their RF personal monitor as a screening tool for verification, as necessary. is ND-00059—Rev-5.1 "Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) Procedures" Page 45. OSC Engineering Inc. I www.OSCengineering.com 1 858 436 4120 Page 15/16 RECOMMENDATIONS • Access Point Information 1 Sign @ access gate or base of guyed tower (to be posted) Tower Caution Sign @ base of guyed tower (to be posted) • AT&T Sector A No signage or barrier action required • AT&T Sector B No signage or barrier action required ul�jllu Fitviiujineca in me viciniTy OT Tne Transmitting antennas, site shut -down procedures must be followed. See page entitled AT&T Antenna Shut -down protocol for further information. OSC Engineering Inc. I www.OSCengineering.com 1 858 436 4120 Page 16116 GENERAL. 22. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING AND PAYING 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FOLLOWING ALL LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND RULES FOR ALL PERMITS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION. ' SET FORTH BY FEDERAL STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES WITH JURISDICTION OVER THE ' 23. THE VINCULUMS PROJECT MANAGER IMAY RETAIN THE SERVICES OF A TESTING LABORATORY TO PROJECT. THIS RESPONSIBILITY IS IN EFFECT REGARDLESS SOF WHETHER` THE LAW, ORDINANCE, PERFORM QUALITY ASSURANCE TESTING ON VARIOUS PORTIONS OF THE CONTRACTORS WORK. REGULATION OR RULE IS MENTIONED IN THESE SPECIFICATIONS. WHEN REQUESTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INFORM THE TESTING LABORATORY AND ASSIST THEM IN COMPLETING TESTS. 2. ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS, AT&T PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS' AND THE AT&T CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT OO UMENTS. 24. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AND SUPPLY .THE .VINCULUMS PROJECT MANAGER WITH 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AND MAINTAIN A VALID CONTRACTORS LICENSE FOR THE AS BUILT PLANS UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. D LOCATION IN WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED. FOR JURISDICTIONS THAT LICENSE INDIVIDUAL TRADES THE TRADESMAN OR SUBCONTRACTOR PERFORMING THOSE 'TRADES SHALL BE LICENSED. 4. FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OSHA AND STATE LAW AS DEFINED IN THE FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT. 5. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF THE BID THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE FIELD CONDITIONS. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE VINCULUMS PROJECT MANAGER. 6. DRAWING PLANS SHALL NOT BE SCALED. i 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PROCEED WITH ANY WORK NOT CLEARLY IDENTIFIED ON THE DRAWING WITHOUT HOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN ` APPROVAL OF THE VINCULUMS PROJECT MANAGER. IT I 8. THE CONTRA- EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACTOR SHALLINSTALL ALL Q MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY OTHERWISE NOTED. ERNS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION DEALING WITH TOWER CONSTRUCTION AND SAFETY 9. ALL M , L ERECTION, EXCAVATIONS _TRENCHING SCAFFOLDING FORMWORK ELECTRICAL AND WORK STEEL E C � � , INCONFINED SPACES ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. C 10. WHEN THE CONTRACTOR ACTIVITIES IMPEDE OR OBSTRUCT TRAFFIC FLOW CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 0 DEVICES, AND FLAGMEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE EVIC SIGNS, FEDERAL, STATE, DOT AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE SITE ACCESS AND SECURITY WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER MANAGER - .AND THE VINCULUMS PROJECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. PO 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH UTILITIES. E LOCAL PUBLIC UTILITY LOCATING PROVIDER 811 A MINIMUM 13. THE CONTRACTOR. SHALL CALL TH C ( ) OF THREE ,.BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING IN THE PUBLIC RIGHTOFWA Y 14. THE CONTRACTOR .SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING PRIVATE UTILITIES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ANY TEMPORARY UTILITIES OR FACILITIES IT DEEMS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK. THIS INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO WATER, SEWER, G POWER,. TELEPHONE, HEAT, LIGHTING OR SECURITY. 16. WHEN EXCAVATING IN THE AREA OF EXISTING UTILITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE REASONABLE CARE IN PROTECTING SUCH UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE VINCULUMS PROJECT MANAGER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY CONFLICTS BETWEEN EXISTING UTILITIES AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. 17. DAMAGE TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE VINCULUMS PROJECT B MANAGER AND THE OWNER OF THE UTILITY IMMEDIATELY. ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM CONTRACTORS NEGLIGENCE OR FAILURE TO ACT WITH DUE REGARD SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 18. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS, CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME ALL SURFACE FEATURES SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO BUILDINGS, PAVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING FEATURES, PLANTS ETC. ARE TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND UPON COMPLETION OF WORK REPAIR BACK TO ORIGINAL CONDITIONS ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 19. KEEP THE CONSTRUCTION SITE CLEAN, HAZARD FREE, AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, RUBBISH AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY. LEAVE . I H PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THE VINCULUMS PROJECT MANAGER. _ — 20. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ON—SITE TRASH RECEPTACLES FOR COLLECTION OF NON-TOXIC DEBRIS. ; ALL TRASH SHALL BE COLLECTED ON A DAILY BASIS. 21. ALL TOXIC AND ENVIRONMENTALLY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES .SHALL BE USED AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL RINSING OR DUMPING OF THESE SUBSTANCES OCCUR ON-SITE. A 0 6/27/16 FINAL RP .. o 100% REVIEW RP D 621 %1 .o OC / IL No FULLERTON o4RassioNgr ' p SITE NAME: AWE — KNVR x aE� .., C 3/28/16 95% REVIEW RP w4 �� vaincu ums, .. c SHEET NAME. SHEET NUMBER: E I ....:.,. DESIGN: a B 3 21 1 90% REVIEW RP W� p / a z 68925 x N SITE NO. CVL00230 / 9883 I 100 E. WOODFIELD ROAD, SUITE 500 A 3/01/1 80% REVIEW KS,,, 575 LENNON LANE, SUITE 125 SCHAUMBURG ILLINOIS 60173 . GENERAL NOTES Carl 1 WALNUT CREEK, CA 9459$-2414' ` TEL: 847-908-8400 CENTER GAP AND DOE MILL 5001 EXECUTIVE PKWY N0DATE REVISIONS BY �9r'�" s ~ ROAD SAN RAMON, CA 94583aF cA�tiFa w 949-783-3550 www.FullertonEngineering.com SCALE: AS NOTED CHECKED BY: ST APPROVED BY: MB CHICO, CA 95928 „ � 4 2 SIZE 22 x 34 ANSI D cL 5 1 tY NOTE: E• GENERAL ABBREVIATIONS SITE PLAN INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS TAKEN FROM AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR: ZEXISTING V��.�i`\ �� DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT AND PUBLICLY -- REE E SOURCES, INCLUDING THE COUNTY GIS AGL ABOVE GRADE LEVEL � T AVAILABLE ONLINE FOR AMSL ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL AREA ��DED TO BE A SUBSTITUTE WEB SITE. THIS IS NOT INTENDED APPROX APPRO XIMATEA FULL BOUNDARY SURVEY, AND NEITHER WARRANTY NOR ATS AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH ` .::: GUARANTEE IS GIVEN BY THE ENGINEER- NOR FULLERTON AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE 2EXISTING ...: ENGINEERING AS TO THE .ACCURACY: NOR. THE COMPLETENESS BLDG _ BUILDING TREE OF THE PROVIDED INFORMATION. � CENTERLINE AREA CLEAR C LR [) CONC CONCRETE CONDUIT , CND BUILDING TYP. DWG DRAWING EXISTING ( ) ,- FT FOOT(FEET) 2EXISTINGry ( ) ELEC ELECTRICAL GRASS ��... :: J EMT ELECTRICAL. METALLIC TUBING AREA ZEXISTING —1 ELEV ELEVATION _ — GRASS EQUIP EQUIPMENT I ZEXISTING AREA (E) EXISTING I� EXT GRASS EXTERIOR W FND FOUNDATION AREA. O , F FIBER GA GAUGE EXISTING FENCED COMPOUND GALV GALVANIZED GPS GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM GND GROUND ---EXISTING GUYED TOWER WITH NEW .MAX MAXIMUM �'�-�- PO _ D EXISTING AT&T ANTENNAS MFR MANUFACTURER � � �: �i AN - LAYOUT r � �- SEE C 4 FOR .ANTENNA LA MIN MINIMUM MTS MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH G y . NOT TO SCALE v N.T.S. P --; . _ � ,., —EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT SHELTER O.C. ON CENTER �� ZEXISTING � t.� �. SEE C-2 FOR ENLARGED LAYOUT ELECTRIC TELCO OE OT OVERHEAD ELE / EXISTING TREE / �. �1 POWER PROTECTION CABINET PPC TREE AREA P RTY LINE PL w PROPERTY RGS RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL AREA IN INCHES) INT INTERIOR LBS POUNDS-- SF SQUARE FOOT STL STEEL BATT R D TYP TYPICAL UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC rv^ UE/UT U TELCO / UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VIF VERIFY IN FIELD W/ WITH I XFMR TRANSFORMER r ZEXISTING TELECOM ABBREVIATIONS � TREE --� BTS BASE TRANSMISSION 2EXISTING ZSTATION EXISTING AREA DUL DIGITAL UNIT FOR LTE TREE TREE DUG DIGITAL UNIT FOR GSM _ AREA AREA 7 I DUS DIGITAL UNIT SYSTEM FIF FACILITY INTERFACE FRAME 7 LOCAL LOOP FWLL FIXED WIRELESS L I G SM GLOBAL SYSTEM FOR MOBILE COMMUNICATION LTE LONG TERM EVOLUTION .::. MCPA MULTI—CARRIER POWER AMPLIFIER RBS RADIO BASED STATION RET REMOTE ELECTRIC TILT - RRU REMOTE RADIO UNIT SIAD SMART INTEGRATED ACCESS DEVICE r TOWER MOUNTED AMPLIFIER TMA B UNIVERSAL MOBILE UMTS ZEXISTING TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEM GRASS ZEXISTING AREA A TREE AREA A LS .::: SYMBO I � 7 REVISION WORK POINT UTILITY POLE � BRICK \� COMPRESSED STONE \� CONCRETE EARTH GRAVEL -- - -- CENTERLINE rl - _ - PROPERTY LINE --- -- --- LEASE LINE EASEMENT LINE ✓" EXISTING ZEXISTING GRASS FENCE GRASS C HAI N LI N K �'� ' �/�'�� X X � AREA � AREA WOOD WROUGHT IRON E E ELECTRIC OE OE OVERHEAD UE UE UNDERGROUND F FIBER F � -- OF OF OVERHEAD A OFOF UNDERGROUND T T TELEPHONE SCALE: 1' = 40'-0>, 1 � OF OF OVERHEAD O UNDERGROUND � UT UT OVERALL SITE PLAN DC DC DCPOWER FINAL RPat-(ML 0 0 6/27 16o 100% REVIEW RPD6/21/1o 4FLOFESS/p RP Q�°. B[1 �F SHEET NUMBER: UR- C 3/28/16 95� REVIEW FULLERTON SITE NAME. AWE KN F �� SHEET NAME: RP c�2 s'm VinCumolUMSa... 3 21 1 90% REVIEW 25 N B / x 689 r � III,I«ER NG DESK u cv, I C, .,Ql REVIEW KS OVERALL SITE NO. CVL00230 /9883 , . A 3/01/1 80� zuz 1100 E. WOODFIELD ROAD, SUITE 500 C-1 SUITE 125 ILLINOIS 60173 MILL REVISIONS BY �T SITE .PLA D 10 575 LENNON LANE, S SCHAUMBURG, ILLIN CENTER GAP AND DOE 5001 EXECUTIVE PKWY NO. DATE �o cA���o w WALNUT CREEK CA 94598-2414 TEL: 847-908-8400 ROAD SAN RAMON, CA 94583 SCALE: AS NOTED CHECKED BY: ST APPROVED BY: MB 949-783-3550 www.FullertonEngineering.com CHICO CA 95928 SIZE 22" x 34" ANSI "D � 3 2 l li I ' I � _.._._.__ �a...._..._ ._... r. �...,.....�, RRH MINIMUM CLEARANCE TABLE RRH CABINET CLEARANCE COMMENTS FRONT 3'-0" INSTALLATION ACCESS REAR 0-2 ZERO REAR CLEARANCE IS -ALLOWED WHEN USING SUPPLIED MOUNTING BRACKETS LEFT o —4" AIR FLOW T OP $— off 1 0 AIR FLOW BOTTOM '- 0 1 CONDUIT ROUTING z PLAN N VIEW 2) CABLES FORLi , t DC POWERS 1 CABLE FOR _ 3 FIBER CO OPE R B 852084 SB 2 CK 4 1 PAIR FIBER SEISMIC RELAY RA NEW 1 2 COAX NEW 1 7 TWO POST / JUMPER R TYP } CABLE &NEW 3/8" 8 DC UNLOADED RACK WEIGHT 137 LBS -- --- PnWFR CABLE (NP.) z z w Q W w cn PLAN N VIEW 2) CABLES FORLi , t DC POWERS 1 CABLE FOR _ 3 FIBER CO OPE R B 852084 SB 2 CK 4 1 PAIR FIBER SEISMIC RELAY RA NEW 1 2 COAX NEW 1 7 TWO POST / JUMPER R TYP } CABLE &NEW 3/8" 8 DC UNLOADED RACK WEIGHT 137 LBS -- --- PnWFR CABLE (NP.)