Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARD OF SUPERVISORS (2)14 7 Environmental Planning Ecological Analysis Resource Managqment Rexford E. Palmer, Ph.D.. h Iton associates -1824 fourth street, berkeley, ca 94710; (415) 841-5484 IT AA t4 q Environmenial Planning 7�4�,Ecblodcal Analysis resource Managernerit Stephen L. Granholm Ph.D. h lion associates L 1824 fourth street, berkeley, ca 94710 (415) 841-5484 S—Al t '..A � J'Y'a•:: ni, NNING COMMISSION SUMMARY 99ET i.,pes= . APPLICANT __Butte Countv Board of Supervisors 85-03-06-01 85-48 ADDRESS' OWNER PROJECT 'DESCRIPTION To initiate an Area Plan to'the County General Plan for the Community of Durham LNPROPERTY ZONED A-2, A -5 A-20, Butte County Planning Area #8 (as per A-40 LOCATE —t e ousin Element of 'the B."C. Gen.P n Durham area: bounded on the north � omanc e ree on e eas y wy. , he south b Butte Creek the Western Canal and on 'the 'west 'by the Sac. River ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) IDENTIFIED AS AP ... Various GEN. PLAN PROJECT CONSISTENT? CITY Durham DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 3-6-85 DATE REZONING PETITION SIGNATURES CHECKED PERCENTAGE DATE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED OR CHECKED: DATE PUBLICATION.NOTICE.WRITTEN PUBLISHED DATE DISPLAY AD PREPARED PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICES) PUBLISHED - 0. C. P. G. B. DATE -.MAILING LIST PREPARED PUBLISHED DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN MAILED ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED DETERMINATION AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED 1 EIV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIFIED OTHER COMMISSION HEARING DATES r , COMMISSION ACTION {. BOARD ACTION . ORDINANCES) ADOPTED COMMENTS NUMBER PROJECT NAME. Butte Count . Board Of. Supervis'ors' SCH # AP # Various FILE # 85-48 85-03-0601 30 Day Review Period Ends SCH Review Period Ends OUT -GOING ACTIVITY Date Action 3/28/85 I Memo, Statement of Work and General Description to Bd of Supv. 4/3/85 Request for Proposal with maps (11 pages) to list of consultants 4/11%85 Letter RE: Clarification of Request for Proposal to list 4/11/85 of consultants Route slip with two new maps to Oscar Larson & Assoc. i _ r z PROJECT NAMEButte'County.Board of Supervisors SCH A,, ; AP # Various FILE.# 85-48 85-03-36-01 30 Day Review Period Ends SCH Review Period Ends CORRESPONDENCE/ , COMMENTS RECEIVED Date Agency/P.erson xf- K5 - .moi �s - Civ J ' t ` w . 0 Durham-Dayton,-Nei'son area plan goals and objectives. SET HEARING DATE FOR OCT08ER' 21,, 1986' AT 11:.30 A. M.� BOARD' OF SUPERVIS'ORS7MINUTEStfor,�,September,-16 i9'86 1 20 RtfPri8�Erivironmentali'Assessment'for Phso f) ' - ' 'fi .L(646) �^ -'the 'Durham-�-Plann-i_ng"-Area.- -� _ ---------r-r, -- - ---- �� -E r-(SUPERVISORWHEELERABSENT AT THIS TIME) ?'t ' _ �C}� * �• y L .. r _ x �:'•a• t• e3� <-•' 1 -'?i �,�` �s� v'V-.• '.I ,.it .?rr 4 .••, .v+ Y+}�rS Motion* APPROVED RFP. AND• 'DIRECTED ,PLANNING STAFF TO' DISTRIBUTE ��r LAJ S's°-3Y' (»fi`3'�s�/r �;Jx#�i'Yta ;" Vote: 1 y 2 Y. 3 AB 4 'y 5 Y (Motion carried) i ' 6 -- BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES - APRIL 2, 1985 - ; Star Brown of the Planning Staff,.presented the Commission with the MEA's for - .-t-he--Durham- Dayton-:Nelson- Area--and- explained the procedure and what, the MEAS would be used for. She-explained that this was approximately a 2 year process. She discussed"the"possible funding to do-an MEA on the Cohasset/Forest Ranch area. BUTTE COUNTY BOARD.OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES - January -15, 1985 5-25 Consideration of an-EIR consultant for Board initiated General Plan amend - (425) ments in south Chico and Durham -Dayton -areas. ` Motion: TABLED INDEFINITELY. S. M:> , Vote: 1 2 3 4 5 g Motion amended: SET DATE FOR ITEM TO BE BROUGHT BACK FOR NOVEMBER 19, 1985. S M Vote: 1-Y "'2'Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 Y (Unanimously carried) Vote on motion: 1 Y 2, Y 3 Y 43 5 Y. (Unanimously carried): BUTTE COUNTY BOARD.OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES - January -15, 1985 Z CL I C, A T 10 N F 0 R 6 PEN LwMx A i P L A fj-'n Lo'n E t -I T BUTTE COUNTY APPLICANT:. Read and follow instructions as set forth on reverse side of this form. Applicant's name B.C.'Board .of Supervisors Phone number Applicant's mailing address 25. County Center Drive Otoville.-CA 95965 Applicant's interest in property' (Owner, lessee, other) Owner's name and address Various Assessor's parcel number(,) Various Street address A-2, A-5 Present General Plan designation y4rlQus Present zoning A = 2 0,9 A-40 REQUESTED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Area Plan -to. the County General P1 an Location, dimension's and size of area(s) to be amended in'ended Bu to County Planii-J'n2 Area # 8* Ca q p e r the Housing of the B.C. General Plan) The lhirbwi a r Pq h n I jin Pd on the north by.Comanche-Cre0k, on the east by Highway 99, on.the south. by Butte Creek and' the Western Canal and -on the'west-by 'the- Sacramento River Applicant's reasons for amendment I hereby -declare under penalty of perjury that T have read and understand the instructions and that the foregoing statements are. true, complete and correct to the best of my knowledge., Dated 1-15 85 Applicant' s signature— Project file number Location Date Application Received Application 'Taken By ----.,.- S Location Description' Legal Description of Area 10 Maps of Area and Reproducible Master Receipt Nuinher:—. 0 UJ Verify: C4A.P. Nujnl)cr(s) D Ownership Vi 0 Proof of Agency (if needed) It' Present Zonin'T, and General IL Plan Designation Date Application Received Application 'Taken By ----.,.- S Location Description' Legal Description of Area 10 Maps of Area and Reproducible Master Receipt Nuinher:—. EST Ctl� i1� TO� CIi d�hd 5' 7'�`e� I P1f u1 A 0 B7D !ir "H 1. If applicant is not the owner, written authorization by the owner or other proof of ago�ncy must be submitted in. order for .the applicant to legally sign the application. Applications shall be considered void if not signed by the owner or legal agent. 2. All items on application shall be filled in as completely as possible. if an item is not applic-. able, please indicate by the -term "1`IA". 3. It is very important that the application include an accurate and complete description of the property proposed for amendment. The application will not be processed until we receive the following information about the area(s) to be amended. - a. Assessor's parcel nuniber(s) (from the tax -bills. or Assessor's Maps). b. Street addresses (if available). c. Distances and directions to named streets, bodies of water or railroads. d. Legal description (subdivision lot numbers, fractions of sections or distances and bearings of perimeter dimensions). e. 10 copies of map with areas) outlined (AssAssor's map, subdivision map, zoning map or other map showing parcels) and a reproducible master of the map. 4. Application must include a completed "Appendix E -Environmental Information Form". 5. Because. the California Government Code requires that local general plans be integrated and internally consistent, amendments to the Land Use Plan Nlap(s) of the Butte County General Plan. must he consistent :with written policies and standards contained in the adopted ele- ments of the plan. 6. The "Application for General Plan Amendment" is'subject. to public hearings and approval by both the Planning Commission and hoard of Supervisors. 7. Application fees as of (date) are 3 Fees may be paid in cash or by check made payable to "Treasurer of Butte County". i �8. Before submitting the application, applicant is requested to discuss with stuff all questions about .application requirements, County procedures, site designation criteria and policy con- side'rations 9. Applicant is requested to be as complete as possible in stating the reasons for the arplica- tion and.en.couraged to discu�:3 in writing the proposal's conformance with the policies and criteria of the Land ►Use Element of the Butte Couaty Ceueral Plan. Inter -Departmental Memorandum To: Planning Commission/Board of Supervisors FROM: Durham -Dayton -Nelson Citizens Advisory Committee SUBJECT: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES °ATE` June 11, 1986 The nine -member citizens advisory committee (CAC) is pleased to forward the attached list of goals and objectives for Planning Area #8, the 135 square miles of unincorporated land identified as the Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area. The committee unanimously adopted the final list at their June 4, 1986 meeting. . The CAC found the data base information in the Master Environ- mental Assessment (with inventories of existing environmental conditions, natural resources, existing development, public facilities and services and other significant information) to be very pertinent in developing the area plan goals. You received a copy of the environmental assessment in March 1986.. Personal knowledge of and experience within the planning area contributed to the phrasing of the goals. Implementation measures that were discussed are on the list attached after the goals and objectives. The committee wishes these items to be brought forward and discussed at the appropriate step of the Area Plan process. �lD SUNS&T L� Lq-US � fS= rice_app_o_intm nt of the -CAC_: on77IMar.ch^1:8-;-.19�8,-6� by the Board of Supervisors, the committee met on six occasions between April 2 and June 4; 1986. Steve Streeter, project manager for this area plan on behalf of the Planning Department, chaired all of the meetings. Starlyn Brown, coordinator of Advance Planning, participated in some of the meetings. The committee expects to remain active throughout the next steps of the area plan process and understands that they will review any revisions to their list of goals and objectives. As their schedules allow, the CAC members will attend the public hearings to assist in responding to questions. Durham -Dayton -Nelson Citizens Advisory Committee Don McNelis Brenda'Brimhall Gus Gore Morris Keeney —Susan Murphy _ Myles Pustejovsky Robert Sanders John Crowe -Rick Peterson SAS/sjs Enclosures i9R• b8, 8.,vo .March -25,-1987 ;:_....... lute OIIIZ L A N D O F NAT U RA L W EA LT H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: '538-7661 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE The- Citizens ' Advisory Committee for the. -Durham -Dayton - Nelson Planning Area will meet on Tuesday, April 9, 1987. The .meeting will begin at.6:30.p.m. in the Professional Development .Program.Room of the Durham -Unified School District, 9420 Putney Drive., ..Durham. The Committee. will continue discussing their ideas regarding future growth and development within the Planning .,area. A. consensus map will be prepared which reflects the areas of agreemerit amongst the Commission members for land use categories. Discussion will focus on lands located between the Midway and Stanford .Lane, as well as ' lands located, between the-. .Durham Dayton. Highway and the Oro Chico Highway, east of the Midway, as well as lands in the Nelson area. Public attendance is encourage although: discussion will be !limited to the Committee and County staff members present. Por addi.tional.in'formation, contact: Starlyn S. Brown 538-7601 (.10:00 a.m. to -3:00 p.m.) N 0 ,quite Co. L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE: 534-4601 December 12, 1986 BILL CHEFF, DIRECTOR Department of Public Works 7 County Center Drive' Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Bill: Attached please find a copy .of a Master'Environmental Assessment.that will. be used for the preparation of land use policies for the -Durham -Dayton' -Nelson Planning Area. Portions of this document were compiled from information and/or interviews given by you or members of your staff. We would appreciate it if you would review those portions of the document relevant to your area(s) of responsibility to make sure that the information provided within the document is accurate and complete. Please provide us with a response by December 31, 1986. If I don't hear from you by that date, I will assume that you have no comments. You are welcome to keep the Master Environmental Assessment. However, if you intend to throw it away, we'd appreciate getting it back as the demand is high and the supply is low. Thanks for taking the time. If you have any questions, or if you have a problem with the December 31, date, please let me know. Sincerely, 'Adc� Starlyn Brown Senior Planner SB:jmc Attachment i4w;wfid 04F U, C, e-yr.a,NSI0,I -.70'a- -40m m • • XIV. TRANSPORTATION �j--� XIV. TRANSPORI-ATION A. Introduction 108 The transportation system in the Planning Area consists primarily of a road and highway network. Rail service, public transportation, pedestrian/bicycle facilities and aviation services and facilities . comprise a small component of the transportation system. Energy transmission facilities are covered in the Energy Resources section (Section X),".and water transport facilities are described in the Public ---" Services and Facilities section (Section XV). Noise and air quality effects of the transportation system are covered in their respective sections. Adequate transportation is an important part of any socioeconomic system. Transportation mobility allows residents of an area freedom to travel to various places for needed -goods and services, increased recreation opportunities, and the means to deliver goods produced locally and services offered to available markets. Inadequate transportation facilities hamper the ability of the residents to obtain goods and services needed, and constrains commerce. This is particularly critical in a rural, agricultural area where people live far from urban centers and markets for the products of the area are far away. The Circulation Element of the Butte County General Plan was updated and approved in 1984. It, along with the Butte County Regional Transportation Plan, discusses goals and sets policy for the entire county. Both documents were prepared by the staff of the Butte County Association of Governments (BCAG). The Regional Transportation Plan is in the process of being updated and will be presented to BCAG in March 1987. New to the plan is a transportation systems management (TSM) element which discusses ways to more efficiently make use of existing transportation facilities. Subjects covered in the element include ridesharing and carpooling, park-and-ride lots, traffic flow improvements, and coordination between various modes of transportation. 11 109 B. Hinhmays and Roads State Highway Route 99 is the main inter -regional transportation route serving the Study,Area. Butte County maintains a road system that .provides a circulation network within the Planning Area as well as providing access to other areas. Table XIV -1 lists mileages and classifications for the major roads. Figure XIV -1, Transportation Map, shows the major roads and average daily traffic (ADT) counts. An adequate road system and the private automobile have allowed people to live i•.n the.Planning Area but commute to,work, schools, recreation and to shop in the urban areas such as Chico and Oroville. Agricultural commodities are trucked along county collector roads to rail transportation or to major inter -regional arterials to be shipped to urban areas for processing, distribution and marketing. State Highway 99 borders the Planning'Area on the east and is the principal transportation route serving the area. Adjacent.to the study area Highway 99 is a two-lane expressway except for a 2.5 -mile section of four -lane expressway between the State Route 149 junction and the Pentz Road overcrossing. Highway 99 between Durham -Dayton Highway and the Southgate Industrial Park is the only road in the Planning Area considered to have a capacity deficiency (Butte County Regional Transportation Plan, 1982, p.`V-2). Highway 99 from Durham -Dayton Highway north to the Skyway is scheduled for upgrading from a two-lane to a four -lane expressway in fiscal year (FY) 1986-87 (CalTrans District 3, 1985). The Midway is the major north -south county road in the Planning Area. It serves as a major access road for both Durham and Nelson area residents north to the Chico area and for the town of Richvale and State Highway 162 to the south. Most of the residents of the Planning Area live in the Durham area. The Midway is below capacity for a major rural collector road, although at peak hours some pressure is felt between Chico and Durham, most notably at the intersection with the Durham -Dayton Highway. The impact on the intersection is expected to increase and become a circulation problem as growth in the area continues (Butte County Circulation Element, 1984, Figure II). Portions of the Midway were overlain with a new chip seal in FY 1985-86 and the Butte Creek and Butte Creek overflow bridges are scheduled for replacement in FY 1988-89. The Oroville-Chico Highway branches off of the Midway north of Durham and serves as a collector for the more populated areas northeast of Durham. It is scheduled for improvement in the county's twenty-year plan. The bridge over Butte Creek was replaced in fiscal year 1985-86. This is a Federal Aid Secondary (FAS) roadway which utilized Highway Bridge Reconstruction (HERR) funds. • • 111 Seven Mile Lane, which connects with Road Z in Glenn County, provides another north -south route through the Planning Area. The route starts at the intersection of Ord Ferry Road about two miles west of Dayton, then heads south as Seven Mile Lane to the county line. There it turns to the west at Road 48 for a mile, then heads south again as Road Z. Road Z intersects State Highway 162 in Glenn County. Dayton Road and Aguas Frias Road serveas another major north -south collector route in the Planning Area. This route runs south from State Route 32.1n the Chico Urban Area and enters the Planning Area at Comanche Creek. The route continues intersection with Ord Ferry Road and south to State Highway 162 the route functions as a minor collector. south through the Dayton the Durham -Dayton Highway. Heading continues as Aguas Frias Road and The major east -west route through the Planning Area is the Ord Ferry Road/Durham-Dayton Highway route. Ord Ferry Road, a major collector, serves as the primary route from the area to Glenn County and State Route 45 on the west side of the Sacramento River.. Ord Ferry Road also provides access for Glenn County residents to the Chico Metropolitan area (by way of Dayton Road). Ord Ferry Road enters the Planning Area at the Sacramento River and moves east to the Dayton Road intersection passing through the community of Dayton: The route then continues east along the Durham -Dayton Highway to the town of Durham where it meets the Midway. Continuing east the route intersects State Highway 99 and Durham-Pentz Road, which goes to Butte College and provides access to the Town of Paradise. A number of rural residential roads intersect this route both east and west of Durham. Nelson Road is another east -west route in the southern part of the Planning Area. It runs between Seven Mile Lane and State Highway 99 intersecting the Midway at the community of Nelson. Other local roads are shown in Figure XIV -1, Transportation Map, and ADT figures are shown for them where available. Table XIV -2 lists tentatively scheduled road and bridge improvements in the Planning Area. Proposed improvements on Federal Aid Secondary (FAS) roads are identified as such. Most bridges in the Planning Area are considered by the Butte County Public Works Department to be substandard according to Federal and State guidelines. The Butte County General Plan Circulation Element (p. 27) warns of continuing road maintenance deficits. • 0 112 Table XIV -1 Ma-ior Road Classifications and MileaQes (within Planning Area) BUTTE COUNTY FEDERAL AID MILEAGE ROAD CLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION (APPROX.) State Highway Route 99 Principal FAP 99 14.3 Arterial Midway --Northern Boundary to Major Collector FAS Y761 7.6 r Durham -Dayton Highway. M Midway--Durham-Dayton Highway Minor Collector FAS Y761 3.5 to Western Canal Ord Ferry Road --Glenn County Major Collector FAS V460 7.9 Line to Dayton Road Durham -Dayton Highway --Dayton Minor Collector FAS V460 3.7 Road to the Midway ' Durham -Dayton Highway --Midway Major Collector FAS V460 4.6 x Midway to S.R. 99 t Dayton Road --Comanche Creek Major Collector FAS Y775 3.1 to Ord Ferry Road Aguas Frias Road --Dayton Road Minor Collector FAS Y775 8.2 - to State Highway 162 Nelson Road --Aguas Frias Road Minor Collector 5.0 to Midway Nelson Road --Seven Mile Lane Minor Collector FAS V454 3.0 to Aguas Frias Road Nelson-Shippee R6ad--Midway Local 3.8 to State Highway Route 99 Oroville-Chico Highway --Midway Local 4.9 to Durham -Dayton Highway Seven Mile Lane --Ord Ferry Local* 6.3 Road to Nelson Road Grainland Road --Seven Mile Local 5.8 Lane to Durnel *Last 1/2 mile from Nelson Road to County line is FAS: 6.3 to 6.8 ' SOURCE: Butte County Planning Department, General Plan Circulation Element, 1984. 113 Hazardous Materials Routes: State Highway 99 and the Southern Pacific Rail Line are designated hazardous toxic materials routes (Butte County General Plan Circulation Element). State agencies do not collect statistics regarding the types of materials or specific quantities of toxic or hazardous substances transported. The only materials that are limited to specific routes by the state are explosives.. State Highway.99 is a designated.explosives transportation route. Nuclear wastes are subject to the policies of the Federal Department of Transportation which confines them to interstate highways wherever possible. State legislation went into effect January 1986 to initiate a process at the state level to ban transportation of hazardous materials from certain routes (California Highway Patrol, Hazardous Cargo Licensing Branch). Table XIV -2 Proposed Bridge and Road Improvements FISCAL YEAR (FY) 85-86 1. Oroville-Chico Highway Butte Creek Bridge Replacement 2. Midway --Seal Coat (possible shoulder widening) Five -Year Plan 3. Midway --Butte Creek and Butte Creek Overflow Bridges (FY 88-89) 4. Durnel Road--Grainland Road to .5 mile north Twenty -Year Plan Roads 5. Lott Road--Durham-Dayton to'Oroville-Chico Highway 6. Grainland Road --Aguas Frias Road to Durnel Road 7. Deleted 8. Oroville-Chico Highway --Midway to.Lott Road 9. Nelson-Shippee Road --Midway to Gage Road 10. Midway --Durham to Hegan Lane 11. Nelson Road --Seven Mile Lane to Midway Bridges 12. Durnel Road= -at Butte Creek 13. Ord Ferry Road --at Angel Slough (completed FY 85-86) 14. Ord Ferry Road --at the Dips 15. Midway --over Sheep Camp Slough 16. Midway --South Fork Hamlin Slough 17. Midway --McRae Slough 18. Nelson-Shippee Road --at Western Canal 19. Nelson Road --at Edgar Slough Overflow SOURCE: Butte County Public Works Department 114 FAS ROUTE X X X ( port ion ) • C. Railroads • 115 Two rail lines exist in the Planning Area. The Southern Pacific Line runs through the communities of Nelson and Durham in the eastern portion of the.Planning Area. The Sacramento Northern Line runs between Durham and Chico along the Midway. Southern Pacific's rail line is a major north -south route on the east - side of_the Sacramento Valley. The line runs from Roseville (where it connects to the.east-west, trans -Sierra line), to a. -junction with the- westside line.in Tehama County and goes on to the Pacific Northwest. Approximately 280 freight trains pass through the Planning'Area per month, averaging 9-10 per day. Local freight trains stop in the Planning Area by prior arrangement only. These average one to two trains per day. The line has sidings in Durham and Nelson, and a major siding just north of the Planning Area, south of Chico. Some agricultural products are shipped by rail, but the majority are handled by trucking. Two Amtrak trains, one in each direction, pass through the Planning Area each day. The nearest stop is at Chico. In addition,'a bus connection to San Joaquin Valley.rail service leaves Chico once a day and stops in Oroville on its way to connections in Sacramento and Stockton. The other rail line is the Sacramento Northern. It is a remnant of an all -electric rail line that ran to Oakland. The portion of the line that ran south to Sutter County and branched to connect with the Western Pacific's Feather River route has long been abandoned and the tracks torn up. The remaining portion of the line was recently acquired by the Union Pacific system when it merged with the Western Pacific Railroad Company. This line, which maintains a spur at Durham and branches from the Southern Pacific Rail Line a little north of there, follows the Midway north into downtown Chico and north through the City to the Chico Municipal Airport. For connections south the Sacramento Northern Line uses the Southern Pacific Line into Sutter County where it connects to additional Sacramento Northern tracks. Regular service on this line was abandoned as of December 6, 1985. The Union Pacific System has yet to determine the future of the right-of-way. D. Aviation The only airport facilities in the Planning Area are private use airstrips used primarily for agricultural purposes. Aerial spraying of pesticides and fertilizers are common for rice and nut orchards and aerial seeding is commonly used for rice and other grains. Private use airstrips require a use permit. 116 The nearest public use general aviation airstrips are Ranchaero Airport to the north and Oroville Airport to the east. Ranchaero Airport is southwest of Chico and provides a paved landing strip, hangars and tiedowns for private aircraft. Oroville Airport is owned by the City of. Oroville but is privately operated. It is located five miles east of State Highway 99 off of.State Route 162. It also provides services for private aircraft. The only commercial air service 'in Butte County is available at Chico. Municipal Airport. Connections to major metropolitan airports are _•available from there. _. E. Public Transit Butte County Transit provides bus service to the Planning Area with stops only in Durham. Presently there are two stops on the northbound route and one on the southbound route. The route follows the Midway north to Chico, and the Durham -Dayton Highway east to Highways 99 and 149 and on into Oroville. Greyhound provides through bus service to the area with stops in Chico and Oroville. The only other transit services available are a service provided for Medicare recipients and a volunteer service for medical patients. Both of these services are for medical purposes only. F. Bicycle and Pedestrian The only facilities specifically for pedestrians and bicyclists in the Planning Area -are found in the Durham area. Bicycle lanes run between downtown Durham and the Durham Community Park along the Durham -Dayton Highway. Sidewalks are found in'a few locations in the downtown Durham area. 117 References AIV. Transportation Butte County Association of Governments in Conjunction.with the Butte County Planning Department, Circulation Element of the Butte County General Plan, 1984. Butte County -Association of Governments, Butte County Regional Transportation'Plan, 1982. Butte County Public Works Department, 1985 Traffic Volume Survey. California Department of Transportation, Division of Traffic Engineering, 1984 Traffic Volumes on the California State Hinhwa System. California Department of Transportation, Official State Road System Maps, 1984. WADE ASSOCIATES PLANNING • DESIGN • ECONOMICS _ -TRANSMITTAL T0: DATE 12-3-86 Butte County Planning Department - PROJECT N0: 85-019 7 County Center Drive Oroville,' CA 95965 ATTN: Starlyn Brown SUBJECT: Durham -Dayton -Nelson MEA -THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED: X HEREWITH UNDER SEPARATE COVER 1 Table X -IV - 2 .from MEA review draft with original editing notes. -2. Staff researcher's original notes from conversations with Pat Patten of Butte County Public Works Department., THE ABOVE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED: AT YOUR REQUEST X FOR YOUR INFORMATION FOR YOUR REVIEW GENERAL REMARKS: _ I_hope these help answer the questions from Public Works_ Please let us know if we.can help further. FROM: Connie Wade 735 Sunrise Ave. Suite 145 • Roseville, California 95678 916 783.8980 106. Table XIV -2. Proposed 'Bridge and Road Improvements _ Fi scal ' Year- (FY) 85-86• FAS_ 1.. Oroville-Chico Highway.Butte Creek Bridge Replacement X 2:.- Midway-- Seal Coat (possible shoul der- wi den i ng) X. Five -Year Plan 3`., Midway --Butte Creek and Butte Creek Overflow. -Bridges X (FY 88-89) l� Durnel Rd.. -- Grai nl and Road to .5 miles northf� 17�' 5. Hol 1 and', Ave. - Durham -Dayton Highway to Servi ss St. V� G • reconstruction (FY 88-89) 6.. Lott Road: --Durham Dayton to Oroville-Chico Highway (no date) T., Grainland,Road -= Aguas Fri.as Road to Durnell Road (no date) 20 -Year Plan .� Roads • 8:.. Orovillle-Chico' Highway --Midway, to.Lott Road 9_ Nel-son-Shippee. Road - Midway to. Gage Road., 10.. Midway--Durham.to Hegan Lane X 11'. Nelson Road -- Midway to Gage Road i Bridges. -� 12'. Durnell Road - at Butte Creek X: �1 13- Ord Ferry Road -- at Angel Slough. X p 14.. Ord. Ferry Road -- at the, D.ips. X 15., Midway --Over Sheep Camp Slough X 16.. Midway --South Fork Hamlin S.l'ough X. 17. Midway --Mcrae: Slough X` 18'.. Nelson-Shi ppee Road_ -- at Western Canal X 1.9.. Nelson Road -- at Edgar Slough. Overflow SOURCE.: Butte County Public Works -Department cv/d i < j - i �. -_..._ _ -- -_ ,..._ _ .--fes- ... ti-. .... _ ____' ` _ _ --`-- - ---- .._. _ .__ _.- - _-- �--+� - ----' - - - - .. -� . _ . -.._- - __.__ s___ -_ . __ .._ __ _ __ _ .. - ,._ J-- _ ____ --. `. ►� �= f 1 V.. `4 � � t . � � � } � -� "1" 3 � �� ('i � r .i � ' ,� S ' Y _ � k _ y1 ,D. I� ,� L;T • � ,f f - , .. -� � � _ � � � �� I� *-, dw OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA :GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT: _ David Wade & Associates ADDRFSS: —___—_735 Sunrise Avenue- Suite 145 101 Roseville, Ca. 95678 � � CITY �, STATE: — IMPORTANT: • January 21, 1986 SEE- INSTRUCTIONS .DATE OF CLAIM: _ ON REVERSE SIDE SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES )ATE DESCRIPTION OF !CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT SUB. OBJ. CLAIM NO. / 16f 85 ._� : Consultant_ Services:Preparation of _Master Environmental - ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. Assessment for the Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area as per Contract signed June 18, 1985. rr..1.' .4,166 00 ! Third and last installment. 1' • w..,�w.+n 1.•+111 ,�VI+ECwA f.1M'�J1f^.-rrKy1 N..'),; ��1 ii,`;1�'+ai•Y+�-, .� i .11 Ary 01 i, Ijr EE7'R . i► I,,,, .. r.TOTAL �- 4,16 00 I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury thetltherservices or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that thin r.inim is trur and cn rrect oe stated. 1 Dated ,,,;, 16th••••••••• •••. day of • Janaury.••.• 1 19.8§ o,. Oroville �, iif: see attached billin,8 statement ........... •• I .... 11� `I`tT •• ••Signature of •Claimant •••.. 1, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of -my, knowledge. the services or articles specir ov hav b n pert ed orale- - ,-.. _ T livered and that there is a Budget Appropriation❑ or•. Speelfie Board Approvta-l, i(S4Zcko ie) fort ' a e. 21st January 86 ' f Oroville .;,uiy' Dated hi......21st ........ .... day of .. 19 .. a c .. ,�� ........ ...-................ ..... - ...... ...... ... ..... .. . .. Dep rt nt cad or Authorized Deputy xp Coati ,.....:..,..480-001 • c deI 36' f`IPAYABLE FROM•PrOf'and Specilized Services .......„...................................... FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS• LINE - AUDITOR'S' USE ONLY DEPT. & SUB. PROJ. SUB. OBJ. CLAIM NO. INV. N0. f, INV. DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. .� w..,�w.+n 1.•+111 ,�VI+ECwA f.1M'�J1f^.-rrKy1 N..'),; ��1 ii,`;1�'+ai•Y+�-, .� r�.r �. .11 Ary 01 L�67 C({. F Ijr \-J) % �©v r t a Memorandum FROM: SUBJECT: 46G.�w(iytJ< DATE: �j7j g� 4. -4?1--Y ---_ • T . V. '�� � Y moi.. - t••wh'- mob` .M1 ^, T'1 P "h)jA"e'�S.s' - f ,Y. �$.: l .41 :•i�` 'k,.- 2' '':T .y" it�t'_ :`_€;� cN,,,l.,?yl1 iv :;y 5�.. :�t i,;�:./i.. .S .'!., • -,'E^•3 e �i.:;m �T.�_.r.f� :.q ,.!^S,n �i vri'-':t ,:s:- ..� _ ��Y-?�. - t . •moi t �a. Jr tr<.. � - F,.S'N..±T'-..5 . �,':'. .�J:,-ed{t_'�t.. 5%..�:c.^'a� r :. i � S• � - ?� � ':1'-•i•�A'4-�: a :.>^':.ti..+ �.... •Pi i. •\*... -:tet-.`:T: r .fi .`Y ..c 5 '+4•'.r.. r. d r - '-y ^- .rT..: `"� , [ � 9 .'1:.Y.•. ..}V ` .Cr:; 't-il'" 1.: A V'U'-•'°! � Jydl' �i,:x .r ,t � 5�i;' t,>. r �Ft , 1�.; ,.,r•.�d;,�,�cb.:.;--?�' , r,rrtt ,. �•':.�;�s}r�,:;'t� >:,:•i.:�:s. at{z t�: r _ •c'• r S a xq+i<il ep.-rr<. .._t .� t 9 a ik t x ra , i',r! _ ;',. L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH AND B E A U T Y PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397• PHONE: 534 -4601 - December 16', 1985 David:Hatzoff David' Wade° ,and Associates 735 Sunrise Avenue, Suite 145 Roseville, Ca. 956.78 `h Dear David: As per our phone conversation on December 13,1985, please find enclosed the following: 1. Assessor's pages: 39-45, 39-46, 39-52, 39-54 The Assessors land use codes are written on the •face of the maps. 2'. As I told you over the phone,.the land use codes for the following parcels are: 39-27-39 RSXTX . -45 RSXXX -46 RSXXX -53 RSLZX -54 RSH2X 39-23-94 EOXBA I believe that this'is everything that you requested. If you need anything else,.please let me know. Sincerely, Starly Silvey, Brown, Senior Planner SSB:sb .DE ASSOCIATES NG • DESIGN -,ECONOMICS - Bt&o Co. Planning Comm r JAN ' 1ybb Orovilla. Califonle T0: DATE 1-16-85- Butte County Planni,ng Department PROJECT_ No: 85-19 7 County Center. Drive Oroville, CA 95965 - ATTN: Starlyn Brown SUBJECT: Durham -Dayton -Nelson MEA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED: XX HEREWITH UNDER SEPARATE COVER 1. A copy .of the final report with your requested changes which are marked with a_:red pencil and a new copy of the final report with the said corrections. :.. WADE ASSOCIATES. _ PLANNING • DESIGN - ECONOMICS _ Co. PtanningC4nm - DEC 31 1985 TRANSMITTAL 'OrovillB,'Catifordq. - T0: DATE , 12-27-85 - Butte -County Planning Department," --PROJECT`N0: 85-19 • - -17 County:Center Drive - Orovill.e, CA 95965 - ATTN: Starlyn Brown SUBJECT:,, Durham=Dayton-Nelson Pl.anning..Area (MEA) , THE'FOL'LOWING'ITEMS-ARE TRANSMITTED: XX HEREWITH UNDER SEPARATE -COVER ' 1. Final draft of the -Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning -Area Master Environmental Assessment. - - THE -ABOVE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED: ' AT YOUR REQUEST FOR`YOUR INFORMATION -FOR YOUR REVIEW,- GENERAL EVIEW-GENERAL REMARKS: All graphics will be shipped,under separate"cover. Placement for = graphics is noted by, blank pages in text. FROM: - ,David Wade 735 Sunrise Ave. Suite 145 - Roseville, California 95678' ' } - 916 783.8980 CLAIMANT: C ,..of Joutte OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA GENERAL CLAIM DAVID WADE & ASSOCIATES ADDRESS: 735 Sunrise Avenue, Suite 145 CITY & STATE: Roseville, CA 95678 IMPORTANT: DATE OF CLAIM: August 19, 1985 SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE SUBMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES ri DATE DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT 8%19%85 Consultant Services: Preparation of Master Environmental Assessment for Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area as per ' contract signed June 18, 1985. Y Second Installment $4167.)0 TOTAL $4167 W 00 ► 1, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this claim is true and correct as stated. QC //�� , y, Dated this .Rs�.�.etererxitb.... day of ... .A.ugu>9t....... . 198,5.. et.Qx:QVi11e........ Calif. S.P_Q....a.} ta.('.yMQrd...N�.11ing... 5taUn.pul Signature of Claimant v 1, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specific bove have be perform or de- livered and that there is a Budget Appropriation ❑ or Specific Board Approval O (Checkone) for the wl�rl Dated this * A QS /� ..............2.1n5.k.......... doy of ..,Augus.ti......... 1917..1.. at ....Qum ,�.�.�... . Cauf..{%........Departmented or Authorize D d eputy r _ Dept. Exp. Code ...........480-.01............ Code ................................ .3.0 .......... PAYABLE FROM .Speciializad... StwX:viaes......... FUND �u r DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE AUDITORS USE ONLYi3 r DEPT. & SUB. PROJ. SUB. OBJ. CLAIM NO. INV. NO. INV. DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. rs f a • • r DAV1D WADE & ASSOCIATES 735 SUNRISE AVENUE, SUITE 145 ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95678 (916) 783-8980 (916) 454-0366 From Sacramento BILLING STATEMENT IN ACCOUNT WITH: Butte County Planning Department ATTN: Star Brown 7, County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Invoice No. `85-040 Job No. 85-19 Date August 16, 1985 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THRU: August 18, 1985 PROJECV NAME: Durham -Dayton -Nelson MEA SERVICES: As per "Agreement for Services", dated June 11, .1985 a 6 ,' For Services Rendered: Labor: $ 4,167.00 Expenses:. $ Sub Total: $ 4,167.00 Previous invoices billed unpaid: # $ TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE: $ 4,167.00 Please disregard previous invoice amounts if they have been paid. Thank you for your consideration. mto Co. manning Comm AUG 19 1985. Omvale, �,a itorala URBAN PLANNING 9 DESIGN e. ECONOMICS LAND OF NATURAJ WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 August 14, 1985 David Wade DAVID WADE AND ASSOCIATES 735 Sunrise Avenue, Suite 145 Roseville, CA .95678 Dear David: Out of the 77 notices sent out regarding the availability of water quality testing, 32 were returned. The responses were, luckily, somewhat spread, out and hopefully the 15 selected sites will provide us with a representative sample. I have copied the 15 responses and they are found on the attached S sheets. As you'll see, we asked them to indicate a daytime phone number as well as the best time to reach them at home. As the Requests for Water Quality Testing also include a street address, I haven't included Assessor's parcel maps indicating the exact location of each parcel. If they would be helpful to you, please let me know and I'll either mail them to you or hold them here for someone to pick up. I've also included 20 copies of the well survey. To save you time, and to give the property owner adequate time to complete the survey, you may wish to provide the survey to the property owner ahead of time. In looking at it, I'd have to say that although it is only one page, they may have to spend more time in.order to fully respond to all the questions. Sincerely, Starlyn,S. Brown' Senior Planner SSB/ss Enclosures David Wade & Associates 735 Sunrise Avenue Suite 145 Roseville, CA 95678 PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE; CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 November 15, 1985 Dear David: After we completed..our review of the Master Environmental As for the Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area on November 4, 1985, I indicated that I would provide several items so that they could be.included in the document. This information is itemized below: 1. I have included materials describing Master Environmental Assessments. Please include a brief statement describing a Master Environmental Assessment and the different ways it can be used in the introduction. 2. Map showing the Sacramento River. This map is to be included in the Hydrology Section under the Sacramento River. `The source was the Western Water Magazine, "The, Sacramento River,Ever Changing, Ever Challenging published by the Western Water Educational Foundation, January/February 1985. 3. 4. 5. Under Transportation on page 103, third paragraph, we need to identify the intersection of the Midway1with the u Durham-Dayton:Highway in downtown Durham as a problem area. According to our recently adopted Circulation Element (May 1984), ADT is 2000 + on both roads by the year 2000. On page 112, under Chico Unified School District, it should - be noted that the.district has declared a condition of. overcrowding and fees are being assessed against residential developments. Enclosed are Butte County Ordinance No. 2463, School Facilities Fee Ordinance, and Resolution 85-40, Concurring in Findings of Overcrowding'in the Chico Unified School District and Adopting a Schedule of -Fees. Under Drainage..on page 118, you need to include Flood Control Maintenance Districts No. 5 and 15. I asked Bill Turpin why the map I gave.,; you indicated that these were State Districts. His explanation is that the state required the formation -of these districts to maintain the levees -on the Sacramento River and Butte Creek. The money comes from the County's tax rolls and goes to the state who maintain the levees. Al. r Under Transportation on page 103, third paragraph, we need to identify the intersection of the Midway1with the u Durham-Dayton:Highway in downtown Durham as a problem area. According to our recently adopted Circulation Element (May 1984), ADT is 2000 + on both roads by the year 2000. On page 112, under Chico Unified School District, it should - be noted that the.district has declared a condition of. overcrowding and fees are being assessed against residential developments. Enclosed are Butte County Ordinance No. 2463, School Facilities Fee Ordinance, and Resolution 85-40, Concurring in Findings of Overcrowding'in the Chico Unified School District and Adopting a Schedule of -Fees. Under Drainage..on page 118, you need to include Flood Control Maintenance Districts No. 5 and 15. I asked Bill Turpin why the map I gave.,; you indicated that these were State Districts. His explanation is that the state required the formation -of these districts to maintain the levees -on the Sacramento River and Butte Creek. The money comes from the County's tax rolls and goes to the state who maintain the levees. Al. David Wade & Assoktes Page Two November 15, 1985 a 6`. Page 36,.Groundwater Quality Test Results. I've enclosed a map indicating the general location of wells tested. 'On the.Sheet from Monarch Lab which sums up the.test results, I have indicated how the sample.numbers on Table V-1 (page 36). in. the Master Environmental Assessment correspond to ''the location of wells that were maeed (eg.•sample No.'1 in•Table.V-1 is actually site No. 15 on the map, and the property owner is F. Jauregui). 7. On the Geology Map, I believe its Figure 11-1, an additional- sand and gravel operation should be shown at the confluence of the Western Canal and Cherokee Canal. On the marked up map I gave to you, delete the sand and gravel site I included in -pencil along Butte Creek, just South of the Durham -Dayton Highway. It is an illegal operation. 8. On page 72, Number 4, Chinook salmon. Rewrite the last sentence .to read as follows: Bank protection along the Sacramento River could have a serious negative impact on salmon populations las bank protection work has'a significant -]effect on the amount of available spawning gravel. Please remove S. Evans as the reference and list the following document as the reference: * Middle S'acramento•'River Spawning Gravel Study, State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Water Resources, Northern District, August 1984, page 107. 9. The boundaries of Drainage District No. 2 as* -shown on the Public Services Map is incorrect. •A map is included showing the correct boundaries. 10. To enable you to create large scale inserts -of the Durham, Dayton '& Nelson Area with lot specific land use designations, I have enclosed the following: 1: One land use legenk_which depicts and describes t the -land use designations to be used; 2. Two assessors parcel maps at scales of 1°=800' andel" =200 depicting the community of Dayton;. 3. Three assessors parcel maps at scales.of 1"=1200' and 1"=200' depicting the community of -Nelson;- 4. Maps of the Durham community as follows: a) One map at a scale of 1"=800' b) One. map at a scale of 1"=400'. c) Assessors parcel maps for the area to be included on the insert map. The area outlined in yellow -should be included in the map. David,Wade & AssocPates Page -Three - • . November 15, 1985 5.. A 'copy of. the current tax rolls for the parcels located' within insert areas. 11. Enclosed is a memo from Craig Gilmore, Butte County Air Pollution Control Officer; regarding the Air Quality section of the document. He.suggests that you -contact .him at (916) 534-4381 so that he can discuss his comments with you. 12. I will be meeting with Bill Dryer of the California Archeaological Inventory Information Center, Chico State University, to discuss the Cultural Resources Map and to . doublecheck that they want to release the information as shown on the map, and to see why his map conflicts with'the map currently in use by the Planning Staff. I'll notify you of the results'of the meeting shortly.: <_ I think thatais about everything. If I forgot'something,'please let me know. According to my calendar, we will be at day 153 on Monday, November.18, 1985. That leaves 27 days .to complete this"project according to the terms of our contract of June 10, 1985. If you see any problems in meeting this :deadline, please* let me:know as soon as possible. If you have any questions or comments on any of this material, please give me' a. call. Respectfully, Starlyn.Brown - Senior Planner SB:jmc' P.S. I talked with'Bill Dryer of Chico State and he asked that instead of saying"recorded aboriginal camp sites and habitation areas"on the cultural resources map r a that you say instead area of extreme sensitivity; ' known cultural resources present: t State Approved Laboratory Water -Waste Water C/ CLIENT: David Wade & Associates 735 Sunrise Ave. Suite 145 Roseville, CA 95678 WATER and WASTE WATER- ANALYSIS DATE SUBMITTED: 9/7/85 DATE REPORTED: 9/10/85 •MPN/100 ml SPC/100 ml JTU mg/I Sample =Number OC Coliform 24 hr 335 PH C PH Mg/l EC X 106 Residual BOD Suspended F. Jauregui CoTurbidity Total Fecal Plate Count P, Chlorine Chlorine 5 day a 200 Solids Cl, N-NO3 7.5 Alta Lee 25 1.0 7.4 L.W. BethardI 13 5-o .J="(S a 1 a do 7-6 60 13.5 Michael Ra44e Rp&o 'oto 7.5 27 7.8 R. Brinson -2-AL— A 7.419 M. Pustejovsky 6.0 7-6 N. McDonald 12 3.0 7.4 ry Leach 3 1 9 4.5 7.2 Wvogrenes_2 8 2.3 7.;3 Joan Marsh 9. -4.3 7.4 M. Hocke r .smith,' 14 5.1 7.4 H. Smith'. V 23 7.1 7.6 S. Burge 1 2-.4 7.4 'E. Bowen 1 4-.8 7-.6 9 3.4 MONARCH LABORATORY 563 East Undo Avenue Chico, California 95926 Phone (916) 343-5818 Ron Barnes, Agronomist FM -5 \ s o *AV ull,oudaw CL 38 Puo11oN is Poo •poop - r1 �p0S as us oiu 630 AV uOSJO.4, 410,4.430 .191 •6u wwno e �. 0 1 • o PU 1401 a a s Pa uonb•6 ; 06 n• • I • • 11.11•.•.1• •N,I 1 ' 1 1 — 1 • ..� o . 1. N 1 .. ; IA owe.. rale, ,. _ • le.•e • G�' 1— 01 I 1 . CMU , C.fr w Uv I rn 1 �• • lM x/ "•• i . l caw t1 .�:' ;�. • ..� o . 1. ...r •w I ;' owe.. rale, ,. _ • le.•e • G�' 1— 01 I 1 . rn 1 �• • lM x/ "•• i . l caw t1 .�:' ;�. 1 ��0 EA 1 ,1 1 _ " 7/ — — �r'!�\ ./L.,:.�:",M5�7'::�i:.�.+-.yes•---.. saga 1 October 28, 1985 Dear Property Owner: t Couni e u to LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHON E.: 534.4601 In July of this year,,our office sent a letter. to property owners in the Durham•Dayton•Nelson area stating that we were looking for 15 wells on which to perform water quality testing. - So many people responded that we were easily able to select 15 wells in areas that we feel will give us a good.representa- tive water quality sample for the area. Although you were not selected for testing,.we would like to take this opportunity to thank you for taking time to respond to our request, and for your willingness to participate in the water quality.testing program. The results of the testing program will be available in a public document entitled Master Environmental Assessment for the Durham•Dayton•Nelson Planning Area currently being prepared for the County by David Wade and Associates. I would expect the document to be available.to the public sometime in'late November. Sincerely; Starly S. Brown Senior Planner SSB/ss i c' _ _ _ _. ,� ._ �s�.�. _ . _ _ , _ . � _ _ _ ` _� . 95138.. t r •0 X&� —. .:ti+ _ - �• 1Fa!?'*.�'��'•Y *",c.-4►.S�`.a'�.1"`�1i+a:.�•' ` g� a tie ®ut ' `='�! CAN -`OF •I .,''•l D' •NATURAL WEALTH- AN D' a-E•A U Y' PLANNING COMMISSION t;i�x�S ;j_ti.�' , • '7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534.4601 F December 10, 1985 �. z David -Wade w ' D'avi'd Wade and Associates.._, # 735 Sunrise Mall, Suite 145 'Roseville, CA 95679- 5678RE: RE:.'-Agreement Agreement for`Services,by Independent Contractor for the preparation of,a Master.Environmental. -. Assessment for the Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area. Dear David: "As per our phone conversation this date-, the -County hereby mutually agrees to a two week extension of time to the terms of the above referenced, agreement -between the County of Butte and David'Wade and Associates, _ dated June.18, 1985. - Sincerely, , ' Starlyn Brown, Senior Planner.' Project Representative for County ' SB:jmc ` q 1. , •. .M ,' „ tf 't • R``' `,' � r , � �F� ••.. .. Route :aa.q�, BuHe Co• Plann ate 6/19/85 a •� Referral �� ,JUN 2? 85 Board Action 5/21/85 . T.ransmt'Atal X'�� r OFFICE OF CLERK OF THE BOARD' . Department Document Action Requested AGRICULTURE X AGREEMENT(S) . '` 1 ,2 FOR YOUR FILES ' ASSESSOR BUDGET TRANSFER(S) FOR YOUR"INFORMATION AUDITOR/CONTROLLER C.A.A. CERTIFIED MINUTES FOR RECORDING COUNTY CLERK/ELECTIONS 'CORRESPONDENCE OBTAIN SIGNATURES COUNTY COUNSEL ' DISTRICT ATTORNEY DEEDS RECOMMENDATI. N FIRE DEPARTMENT ORDINANCE(S) REPORT TO BOARD e HEALTH SERVICES LIBRARY PENALTY ABATEMENT REQUESTS RETURN ORIGINAL: PERSONNEL/P.I.C. •" ' RESOLUTIONS) �— PLANNING/COMMISSION/LAFCo ' PROBATION PUBLIC WORKS PURCHASING/CIVIL DISASTER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: RECORDER RISK MANAGEMENT David Wade & Associates - Master , Environment SHERIFF/CORONER ASS2SSnlent - DUrhdm/DdytOn/Nel SOn PlAra e f}eC Pannn9Comm• TREASURER/TAX COLLECTOR 4' WELFARE += i np �1�1iL Butte Co. Planning Cornet. )UN I i 905 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES BY s INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR C?roville� C:alitcrnia --- `? THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 18 day of June, 1985, C `i by and between the County of Butte, a political subdivision of the 1 State of California (hereinafter referred to as "County"),.and David 5 Wade and Associates, an independent contractor (hereinafter referred f, to- as "Contractor"). 7 W I •T N E 'S S E T H R WHEREAS, County is,' in the process of preparing an area plan 9 in the Durham -Dayton -Nelson area of the County and desires technical ill services in the preparation of a Master Environmental Assessment for ll. said area; and 1`L WHEREAS, 'Contractor is'qualified to perform such special I:. services; 11 NOW; THEREFORE, the parties do hereby mutually agree as follows. l� 1. Contractor agrees to provide County with the following 17 special services: 18 (a) Preparation of a Master Environmental Assessment 19 for the Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area in conformity with the 20 specifications and itemized outline set forth in Appendix' "A" -and 21 Appendix "B", `attached hereto and incorporated herein. (b) .The preparation of maps; or other graphics for each 2'1 of the 18 subject areas found under Specifications on page•2 of the 21 Request for Proposal (at.tached'her.eto as Appendix "B"). 25 (c) Noise exposure contours for both near and long 2F term levels of growth and traffic activity shall be developed 27 utilizing the provision::,.of Government Code Section 65302(g),and 28 -the Noise Element of the Butte County General Plan. 1 2.. Contractor shall assume the cost of all independent `? testing necessary to complete the Master Environmental Assessment. 3. Contractor shall.'submit to the Butte County Planning .I Department prior to _September -18 _-, 1985, a draft copy of the 5 Master Environmental Assessment. Contractor shall make any changes 6 to the Master Environmental Assessment deemed appropriate by the 71 Planning Department. 8 4. Contractor agrees -that its key personnel .shall not be 9 replaced or reassigned to other duties without prior written approval I(1 of County. 11 5. 'County shall,pay Contractor as compensation in full, 12 for al: .l s(Irvices performed by Contractor pursuant to this agreement, I'. the Burn of $1275(1(1. TIii:r1)nII Igo Lhrne equal payments. The H first payment shall be made thirty (30) days after the date of 15 this agreement.. The second payment shall be made sixty (60) days IF) after commencement of this agreement. The final payment shall be. 17 made after Submission to and acceptance by the County of the 1S Master.Environment.al Assessment document. 19 6. It is understood that time is of the essence. Further, 20 it is understood that in case all the work called for under the -11 agreement is riot finished or completed within the number of working days as set forth in Paragraph 7 of this Agreement, damage will `", be sustained by County, and that it is and will be difficult and `A and imposs.ible'to ascertain and determine the actual damage which 2.5 County will sustain i -n the event of and by reason of such delay; 26 and it is therefore agreed that Con'tractor shall pay County the 27 sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per day for each and every calendar 28 day's delay in finishing the work in excess of the number of -2- N 6 7 8 9 10 Ill IM 2 fi 27 28 working days prescribed; and Contractor agrees to pay said liquidated damages as herein provided, and in case the same is not paid, agrees that County may deduct the amount thereof from any money due or that may become due Contractor under this agreement. 7: This agreement shall commence on June 18 , 1985; and shall terminate upon completion of the'work to be performed, but no later than one hundred eighty (180) days thereafter. 8. Either party may terminate this agreement at any time by giving the other party 15 days written notice of such termination. Contractor shall be paid for all.work satisfactorily completed prior to the effective date of said termination. 9. If' Contractor shall violate any of the terms or provi- sions of this agreement, County shall have the right to terminate this agreement effective immediately upon County's written notice` thereof to Contractor. 10. The parties hereto, may, by mutual written agreement, change the scope of the services or the amount of compensation set forth hereinabove in this agreement. 11. Contractor shall not assign, transfer, or sublet this agreement or any interest therein without the prior written consent of the County. 12. No reports, maps, documents, or other material produced in whole or part under this agreement shall be subject to an application for copyright by or on behalf of Contractor. 13. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the County, its officers, agents and employees, from any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expense or liability arising out of.this agreement or occasioned by the performance or attempted performance -3- 9 ,; 11 15 16 17 2 `? 7 'h attempted performance of the provisions hereof, including, but not limited to, any act or omission to act on the part of the Contractor or his agents or employees or other independent contractors. 14. Contractor shall, during the entire term of this agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor, and shall in no event be construed to be an employee of the County. 15. Contractor and County shall each designate a project representative who shallbe totally responsible for coordinating the efforts of the respective party with regard to the performance of the work as set forth under this agreement. Project represen- tative for Contractor shall he David Wade and project representative for County shall. he Starlyn Brown. Project representative may be changed upon the mutur.]1 agreement -of the County and Contractor. 161 The County shall: (a) Provide full information as to the requirement for the project. (b) Assist Contractor by placing at his disposal available information pertinent to the project including previous reports and.ot.her data relative to the plan, all of which Contractor may rely upon in performing his service. 17. For any work directed by County which is not delineated in this agreement, a supplemental agreement or amendment to this agreement shall be entered into delineating the additional work, associated provisions, and compensation for same prior to Contractor performing said additional work. 18. In the event that either County or Contractor shall at / any time or times waive any breach of this agreement by the..other,,/ -4- I 3 tl 5 fi 7 R 9 1(1 11 1`_> 13 14 15 16 17 1 �+ ly 20 21 22 23 24 25 2r 27 28 such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or succeeding breach of this agreement.. whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. 19. All notices hereinafter shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, addressed as •fol lows : TO COUNTY: Planning Director County of Butte #7 County Center Drive 0rovi11e, CA 95965 TO CONTRACTOR: David Wade .735 Sunrise Avenue, Suite 145 Roseville, CA 95678 20. This document represents the 'entire and integrated agreement between County and Contractor and supercedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral. This document may be amended only.by written instrument, signed by both County and Contractor. All provisions of this agreement are expressly made conditions. This agreement, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. -5- 1 9 1� 5 6 7 R 9 12 1! III 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2.`)i 21 25' 26 27 28 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have set their hands this �p _ day of June, 1.985. DAVID WADE AND ASSOCIATES By DAVI OADE COUNTY OF BUTTE ED McLAUGHLIN, XceC'hairman of the .Butte County Board of Supervisors ATTEST: MARTIN J. NICHOLS, Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM DELBERT M. SIEMSEN Butte County Counsel, By APPROVED RISKk-MANAGER Approved as tocal and Budgetary ntrol Auditor' Department By J�_ APPROVED AS TO BUDGETARY AND FISCAL CONTROL JAMES L. JOHANSEN Butte County Auditor By THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT; IS A CORRECT COPY Of THE ORIGINAL ON FILE AND -,OF -RECORD IN THIS OFFICE ATTEST DATE -- Clerk of the Poard of Supervisors MARTIN J. NICHOLS in and for the"County of Butte, State of California. -6- By "' ` DEPUTY Infer -Depart e ,Memorandum •�ouN'� TO: Starlin Brown, Senior Planner FROM: Craig Gilmour, Deputy Air Pollution Control OfficerI SUBJECT:. Durham Area -Plan - Air Quality Analysis DATE: 11.13.85 , - Per your request' I have reviewed the draft air quality element contained in the Durham study. As a result of this review, I offer the following comments. o General organization of the analysis lacks cohesiveness. The authors should consider a more structured format. o Significant errors exist in many areas of the document. Such errors involve nonattainment designations, sources of air pollution', transport of air pollutants, and assumption on air quality trends. o' Air monitoring data contained in the analysis reflects only a period of one months data. The authors should incorporate the 1984 annual summary com- piled and available from the California Air Resources Board (ARB). o The authors have incorrectly placed the responsibility for the control of air contaminants on the ARB. The local district is the responsible agency for the regulation of air pollution sources except mobile sources. There- fore, the authors should incorporate language'which accurately expresses the roles and responsibilities of each agency. 6In conclusion, we recommend that the.air quality analysis be amended as specified above. Further, we would welcome the opportunity to discuss our comments in greater detail with the authors. r DAVID WADE & ASSOCIATES 735 SUNRISE AVENUE, SUITE 145 ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95678 (916) 783-8980 Dune Co. Planning Corny& (916) 454-0366 From Sacramento f_ -i 1985 Oroville, Cali#orni TRANSMITTAL The fol 1 owi ng items are transmitted, HerewithUnder separate cover The above items are transmitted, At your request zFor your information k For your review GENERAL REMARKS: 4 DAVID WADE & ASSO10ATES 735 SUNRISE AVENUE, SUITE 145 ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95678 (916) 783-8980 (916) 454-0366 From Sacramento August 24, 1985 Dear Property Owner: As you know through Butte County's letter to you requesting water quality testing of your household tap water, we are under contract to prepare a Master Environmental Assessment for the Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area. Starlyn Brown of.the Butte -County Planning Department sent us your response to the "Request for Water Quality Testing." We commend you on your willingness to assist in our study of your area. Monarch Labs of Chico will be collecting the water samples from your household taps and performing the required tests for water quality. Staff persons from Monarch Labs will be contacting you early next week to arrange a convenient time to come to your home and collect the water sample. As the Butte County letter -explained, -the County Health Department has requested;s.ome general information. That requested information is included in the enclosed well survey questionnaire. We ask that you please complete the questionnaire and give it to the Monarch Labs staff person who collects your tap water sample. We are mailing this questionnaire to you now tQ allow adequate time for you to complete it.. We again thank you for your cooperation. Please do not hesitate to call or write us with any questions you may have concerning the water quality testing. Sincerely, CONNIE L. WADE Enclosure URBAN PLANNING • DESIGN • ECONOMICS October 28, 1985 ._ Dear PropertyOwner: You will find below the results of the water quality.testing,recently performed'on"your•household tap water byMonarch-"Laboratory'in conjunction with David Wade and Associates. If you wish assistance in interpreting the results of the testing, please contact the Butte County Health Department, Division of Environmental-Health,'at one of the following two locations: Chico: 695 Oleander Avenue 891-2727 . Oroville: -7 County Center Drive 534-4281 On the well survey that was returned to this office you indicated a. willingness to provide a copy of a well log for the.'well that'was tested' for this study. In order. for us to obtain the copy-, I have.enclosed a' self -addressed -stamped envelope for your convenience. If you.do not have . access to:a copy, machine, we would be happy to make a copy and "return the original to you. . Your participation .in this well testing program was greatly appreciated. We hope that the results of the testing will be of benefit to you. WATER QUALITY TESTING RESULTS NAME NITRATES CHLORIDES pH Sincerely, Starlyn S. Brown Senior Planner 'SSB/ss October 28, 1985 Dear Property'.Owner: You will find"below the results of the water quality testing recently performed on your household tap water by Monarch Laboratory in`conjunction with David Wade and Associates. If you wish assistance in interpreting the results of the testing, please�contact:the Butte -County Health Department, Division,of-•Environmental Health, at one of the following two locations: Chico: 695 Oleander Avenue 891-2727 Oroville: `�7 County Center -Drive 53474281 ' Your..participation in this well testing.program was greatly,appreciated. 'We hope that the results of the testing will, be of benefit -to you WATER QUALITY-TESTING,RESULTS NAME NITRATES CHLORIDES ,pH." Sincerely.. ,. Starlyn S. Brown ; Senior Planner . SSB/ss , ....... _ .4 � a gi Dnp— Boc.Jen J, 4 �) .. Dwighf arMsor> _ - C 3 9 3q- .I*x,n+ S--+. -�- S 7 3 8 _ f 43 • • - - ... - I- tea aA -eaAA 80. 85 i O.. (�Jr llia� _ �. % .. �ernr�c1-, ��-/ _ �. _ 3 7-�.._ - a� -- . - -.. 7• S Cu vYl m K�rs Lour kvm cd g57q3 . J c�2 r) ria n5� J . - u ..�4 bvt ; 9538 -L� ►m �. Ies i�us+e�ovs Com) q`f3sCxA�I� zo�l r kAvA Ca h) i-�ae I Q bo L 3> ._ X15" 35 �oves. �Vev�cc ctrhAvn R59 38 �. _ ._ .. � � r -, , ,, •,. �,. • , 1 a .4 • i J r � ti r. t �' F r_ r • • � � � R i .. � •. � .e � .' i.. /p o o-"R� oo°F ; •' ' � � •e.. ..moo• � ; t .. July 23, 1985. -' ...B, to �l LAND OF NATURA•.L WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION ' 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - 'OROVILLE CALIFORNIA .95965-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 Dear Property Owner: The County of Butte recently contracted with David.Wade and. Associates of.Roseville to pr.epare,a Master Environmental.Assessment (MEA) for the' Durham•Dayton•.Nelson Planning Area. An MEA is an in-depth inven- tory and study that details the physical, environmental, social and economic elements.and constraints of a planning area. The Durham - Dayton -Nelson Planning Area is approximately 135 square miles in size, and is generally bounded to the north by the Chico urban area, to the. west by the Sacramento River, to the south by Butte Creek and the Western Canal, and to the east by -State Highway 99. One. of the -topics. -that will be addressed in the MEA is hydrology; including water quality. In order to obtain groundwater.quality information for the Planning Area, Butte County must test well water .from a minimum of 15 different sites. 'The' testing would be' at no cost to -the landowner. Water samples, which would be taken by a staff mem- ber, would e simply taken from any household tap, and would.take only a few minutes to.obtain. We would also ask each landowner to fill out _ a short (no more than one page) questionnaire that would provide such general information as.depth of the well, depth.to water, temperature, and.the.galloris per.minute. Test results would be made available to the landowner. Although the test results would be used within the MEA, well locations would not be site, -.specific and the property owner's name would not -be given.. The -County must be advised of your decision to participate by no later than Wednesday, August 14, 1985. If.you are willing to participate in this well testing program, please fill out the attached sheet and mail back to this office in the enclosed self. -addressed, stamped envelope, or call me or Stephen Streeter of this office at the number given above. The 15 wells to be tested will be selected from those land- owners who respond either in writing or by phone. If you.have any questions regarding this matter-, please do not hesitate to contact me.. Sincerely, Starlyn S. Brown Senior Planner SSB/ss l.� n ' 90 -'o u � utte un LAND Of NATU'RA'L :'WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE — OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 July 23, 1985 Dear Property.Owner: The County of Butte recently contracted with David.Wade and. Associates of Ros,eville.to prepare a Master Environmental Assessment (MEA) for. the'Durham•Dayton'Nelson Planning Area. An MEA is an in-depth inven.- to.r.yuand-study that details the physical; environmental, social and economic el.ements-and constraints of a planning area. The Durham. Dayton`Nelson Planning Area .is approxima.tely.135'square miles in size, .and is generally bounded to the north by the Chico urban area, to the west by.the Sacramento River, to the south by'Butte Creek and the Western Canal,.and to the east by'.State Highway 99... One of the topics that will be addressed in the MEA is hydrology, including water quality. In order to obtain groundwater.quality information for the Planning Area, Butte County must-test.well'water from a minimum of 15 different 'sites.*' The te's'ting would be at no cost to the.landowner. Water samples, which -would betaken by a staff mem,-_ er, would-be simply taken from any household tap, and would take only a few minutes to obtain. We would also ask each landowner to fill out _ a short (no more than one page) questionnaire that would provide such general.information as depth ofthe well, depth to water, temperature, and the gallons Iper minute. Test results would be made available to the landowner.. Although the test results would be used within the MEA, well.locations would not be.site-specific and the property owner's name would not be given. The County must be advised of your decision to participate by no later than Wednesday, August 14, 1985. If you are willing to participate in this well testing program, please fill out the attached sheet and mail back to this office in the enclosed self. -addressed, stamped envelope, or call me or Stephen Streeter of this office at the number given above. The 15 wells -to be tested will be selected from those -land- owners who respond either in writing or by phone. If you have any questions hesitate to contact.me.. Sincerely, Starlyn S. Brown. Senior Planner SSB/ss regarding this matter, please do not DurDayton-Nelson Planning AS. REQUEST FOR WATER QUALITY TESTING Name: . Mailing Address ::. Street.Address (if:different): Assesso.r's. Parcel ,Number '(if known) : _ Daytime Phone Number: When .'is the. best time to reach you? _ PLEASE RETURN BY WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1985, IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. y t i t � ,moi-- « - - - -- - - - _ - - -., _ y _ .•:.._:_l.. 'r.-��- - •- '.�-'" *-r- - - - - - - _ - _ __ _ . - - _ _ _ . _ ..... _ _ +� --• - -- - _ -'art*`_ - 1'•iil._. � - � � �.�� - _� ��,}..- - ----•- - - • - ---- - - -- . __- `1 __ - _ -_ --t - -._ -- - � ��._�._. !. �-.i_ �-r��`• __ ..t iii •.�.r�.[%••`.�.,-...�.. -.._. t_,+i' � "`. , � _ --�.__ -_ _ _ `-- __ .•k __ _y_}!_ �. _'. .1 r . _ ._ _— -_— - '- -- ---- - -• ---.--. -_ � _ sss,—,_`__'.}'V �._ _ ..-.: i. 1,: til. _' a _ �'._.� ---' 16 i -�----- _ - - —•--rte' - -- - _-- -- --- -- - __.:.._..;,�. . ---•�=�--•r-:----- _ - - - -- - - --� ._-- - a, IL —r �_ —_•Y• Y1 T .�L ._]� t, �` 1 .4t..�` �- r { 1'+�A4- 5a tr y VA i .. i 9s93P_.ZZ47 ._ -.-� ..-- - _•.-_ - — , '�� r�s�Y ----�i--r _. - 1i�1-.. -yam... •��:.«._ __ 1 .... � _ ` -__'-_ � _ - . ._ - _-.. .. _ - r `"- _ . ._ _ ._-- - � —_ _- _ — ...�..._—_- -� �_ _._ - - - - --- - -- -. ,tel _ -� iy • - • - — _ -� _"-� - _ . +_ _—_--_,--�--- - •}' - � 1 . ; • Y • _ � \ w y � ~ � _r— - -` � ` `.fir � -- _ _. n-_ -� -- l ♦. ,r r �. '-�-fir. _.}^•'. :� �4 ' .� � ---- •---��._,;, ,.._-. _-1 .. - ----- --•- - « k y • - 6.5� _- - 9/ 7-5r f 512-4 e-17- -Al •• /- -�._._ � ,_ - —. _ ��._.`� !Y ���A •tet _� _,Y __ —•--.'�' �--. - _ _' -_ _:..�'�. - _. � - _ .. _ _ _____ -.'2 J -------- ----•----- - •— -- -- --------- ------ �-- t- '�� - -----�',:.'.��:.,�--...: - .- ----- ----_ �-._ ice►* l ._ �_�. __.__� _ w._�..�__._ �.._---.�_... _- -- -�-- - - -- -_ � Y__ _ . � - - ---- -- ---• - - - . 1-t y.ti � •� � 7 •t c 1 • ' � ,1 ` ` • ti' �1>,l{ � �, �. . It . � �� .` �. � � a . •� j �c. j-- -� r • � sties �` �• ' �` Y �, y .+ _ -... .... � _� _ . _ - 1` - ♦i .'3��A` �• S, ` � a . _•fie .i �•� T - - - �i - Vis_ _. _ 1a__. .�'t.�'v � _ ��-,-,c_-3 _ _ 1 _ _ _ �._ �. _... - � - — --- -_ -____— ... _. . 4 . ��. i 9 July 23, 1985 1. Dear Property Owner: The County of Butte.recently contracted with David'Wade and. Associates of Roseville to prepare a Master Environmental Assessment (MEA) for the Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area. An MEA is an in-depth inven- tory and study that details the physical, environmental, social and economic elements and constraints of a planning area. The Durham. Dayton -Nelson Planning Area is approximately 135 square miles in size, and is generally bounded to the north by the Chico urban area, to th-e west by the Sacramento River, to the''south by Butte Creek and the Western Canal, and to the east by State'Highway 99.. One of the topics that will be addressed in the MEA is hydrology, including water quality. In order to obtain groundwater quality information'for the'Planning Area, Butte County must test well water from ' a minimum of 15 different sites. ' 'The' 'te'sti'ng would be at no cost to the landowner. Water samples, which would be taken by a staff mem- ber, would e simply taken from any household tap, and would take only a few minutes to obtain. 'We would also ask each landowner to fill out a short .(no more than one page) questionnaire that would provide such general information as depth of the well, depth to water, temperature, and the gallons pef minute. Test results would be made available to the landowner.. Although the.test results would be used within the: MEA, well locations would not be'site=specific and the property owner's .name would not be given. The County must be advised of your decision to participate by no later .than Wednesday, August 14', 1985. If. you are willing to participate in .this well testing program, please fill out the attached sheet and mail back to this office in the enclosed self, -addressed, stamped envelope, or call me or'Stephen Streeter. of this office at the number given above. The 1S wells to be tested will be selected from those land- owners who respond either in writing or by phone. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do no -t hesitate to contact ane .- . Sincerely, Starlyn �SBrown Senior Planner SSB/ss DurhaVDayton•Nelson Planning Are' REQUEST FOR WATER QUALITY TESTING Name: Mailing Address: Street Address (if different): Assessor's Parcel Number (if known):" Daytime Phone Number: When is the best time to reach you?" PLEASE RETURN BY WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1985, IN THE'ENVELOPE PROVIDED. Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area REQUEST FOR WATER QUALITY TESTING Name: Mailing Address: Street Address (if different): Assessor's Parcel -Number (if known): Daytime Phone Number: When is the -best• time to .reach you? " PLEASE RETURN BY WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1985, IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. •Durham•Dayton-Nelson.Planning Area REQUEST FOR WATER QUALITY TESTING" Name: Mailing Address: Street Address (if different) Assessor's Parcel Number (if known): Daytime;Phone Number: When is the best time to -reach you? PLEASE RETURN BY WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1985, IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. July 24,198S David Wade DAVDD WADE & ASSOCIATES 735 Sunrise Avenue, Suite' 145 Roseville, CA 95678 Dear David: �e BEAUTY ---... -- - - - - - -- - -5.3397 PHONE: 534.4601 Attached is a copy of a letter sent out.to 77 property owners in the Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area. When the responses come back in, we'll select the 15 wells and forward the infor- mation so that you•can obtain the samples and the testing. I talked to the Health Department the other day and they asked. that we also obtain some additional information from the property owner at the time their well is tested. It is general information regarding depth of well, depth to water, etc., and it should only take a few minutes to fill out.. I'll send the questionnaire down with the information on the 15 selected well sites. If this 'arrangement isn't agreeable to you, please let me know. Regards, Starlyn S. Brown Senior Planner SSB/ss Enclosure OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT: David Wade & ,Associates ADDRESS: 735 Sunrise Avenue, Suite 145 CITY & STATE: Roseville, CA 95678 IMPORTANT: July 18, 1985 SEE INSTRUCTIONS DATE OF CLAIM: ON REVERSE SIDE SUBMIT CLAIM .TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES. DATE DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT i 7/18/85 i Consultant Services: Preparation of roaster Environmental Assessment for Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area as per Contract signed June 18, 1985. :. First Installment $4,167.00 Lkl� TOTAL $4,167.00 I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this claim is true and correct as stated. Dated this ..CA,9111e.e.m.orhiay of ... ,Jul.y............. . 19..8.5at....... 0.ro.vi.11-eCalif..se.e.... at-ta•ch.cd.... b..l.l•i.ng.... statemen Signature of Claimant I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specifi ove h v een pe o or de- / livered and that there ii7ss� a Budget Appropriation O or Specific Board Approval[❑ (Check one) for th e. Dated this.......... 2.41h ............ day of ..JUl,y............. 19$.5.. at .-Dr.o.u.11.le . Calif. ..... ..... --Department e r Authorized D eputy Dept.Exp. n s e cc 36....................................PAYABLE FROM ..�.X Q..w.........�l.er.c.w..... v7!'..x i!.iLiS............. FUND Code .... 4 8 0 — 0 01 :.... . Code ...... 17. DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - AUDITOR'S USE ONLY VENDOR DEPT. SUB. CLAIM INVOICE INVOICE GROSS CODE & SUB. PROF 0BJ. NO. NO. DATE DISC. AMOUNT ENCUMB. SUB -DIST. r 71.. DAVID WADE & ASSOCIATES 735 SUNRISE AVENUE,' SUITE 145 ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95678 (916) 783-8980 Butte Co. Planning Capt, (916) 454-0366 From Sacramento JUS 181985 0MVa1% c temin BILLING STATEMENT IN ACCOUNT WITH: Invoice No. 85-039 Butte County Planning Department Job No. 85-19 Attn: Star Brown 7 County Center Drive Date July 15, 1985 Oroville,,Ca 95965=3397 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THRU: July 18, 1985 PROJECT NAME: DURHAM-DAYTON-NELSON,MEA SERVICES: As per "Agreement for Services", dated June 11, 1985 For Services Rendered: Labor: $ 4,167.00.;; Expenses: $ Sub Total: $ 4,167.00 Previous invoices billed unpaid: # $ TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE: $ 4,167.00 Please disregard previous invoice amounts if they have been paid. Thank you for your consideration. URBAN PLANNING • DESIGN • ECONOMICS ire µ • �7 /985' , r ' etC�, ` ���-,2.� �h.e- .,��e-(�-C-�-,•c,e_... �.ri—,��� �2-yc-c� � ��c. y,-1 � �t�-e_ �1� `�-�. et- "ea" �. 44ul-l' Lt Jl�c "a', e) �V? L 7w- 7 c �rw -rte ��cz� iz. C'�ccuJ Ata" v nut dam- Gee e-A4-.4� . - 4- f ,d®� LAN!) O1 F AI—URAt. WEA I. fH AND BEAU 1N PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE:534-4601 Dear David:. Please find enclosed an,original and one copy of a contract. entitled Agreement'f.or Services by Independent Contractor for the preparation of a.Master Environmental Assessment.for the Durham' -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area. Please review it and if you concur with its contents, please sign the original._.and return to me. In case it is not clear, Appendix A is your response to the Request for Proposal, and Appendix B is the Request for Proposal. The date within paragraph'3.on page 2 represents 91 days from June 18,.and the date within paragraph 7. on page 3 represents 120 days from June 18, 1985. Although this agreement was unfortunately delayed in the County Counsel's office, I have set this matter before the Board of Supervisors for the Chairman's signature on June 18. Due to budgetary constraints it is critical that this agreement be signed by all parties prior to July 1. As you can see from looking at the last page, I still must obtain five other signatures.' Therefore, please let me know if you have any problems with the contract so that they can be quickly resolved. If we get into a real time bind, perhaps we could meet z way to exchange the agreement. I apologize for -such 'a flurry of activity at the last minute.. I hope that such a reduced time #hedule.does not inflict a hardship on you. Please give me a call if.you have any questions. Sincerely,' B. A. KIRCHER Director of Planning Starlyn�S. Brown Senior Planner SSB:lkt Enc. June.5, 1985' David Wade David Wade and Associates 735 Sunrise Avenue, Suite 145 Roseville, CA 95678 LAN!) O1 F AI—URAt. WEA I. fH AND BEAU 1N PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE:534-4601 Dear David:. Please find enclosed an,original and one copy of a contract. entitled Agreement'f.or Services by Independent Contractor for the preparation of a.Master Environmental Assessment.for the Durham' -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area. Please review it and if you concur with its contents, please sign the original._.and return to me. In case it is not clear, Appendix A is your response to the Request for Proposal, and Appendix B is the Request for Proposal. The date within paragraph'3.on page 2 represents 91 days from June 18,.and the date within paragraph 7. on page 3 represents 120 days from June 18, 1985. Although this agreement was unfortunately delayed in the County Counsel's office, I have set this matter before the Board of Supervisors for the Chairman's signature on June 18. Due to budgetary constraints it is critical that this agreement be signed by all parties prior to July 1. As you can see from looking at the last page, I still must obtain five other signatures.' Therefore, please let me know if you have any problems with the contract so that they can be quickly resolved. If we get into a real time bind, perhaps we could meet z way to exchange the agreement. I apologize for -such 'a flurry of activity at the last minute.. I hope that such a reduced time #hedule.does not inflict a hardship on you. Please give me a call if.you have any questions. Sincerely,' B. A. KIRCHER Director of Planning Starlyn�S. Brown Senior Planner SSB:lkt Enc. 1 2 3 4' 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2'g AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 18 day of June, 1985, by and between the County of Butte; a political subdivision of the State of'California (hereinafter referred ,to a.s."Count.y"), and David Wade and Associates, an independent contractor.(hereinafter referred to 'Ps "Contractor',') . W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, County is in the process of preparing an area plan in .the Durham -Dayton -Nelson area of the County and desires technical services in the preparation of a Master.Environmental Assessment for said area; and WHEREAS, Contractor -is qualified to perform such special, services; NOW,'THEREFORE, the parties do hereby m.u,tually agree as follows: 1. Contractor agrees to provide County with.the following special services: (a) Preparation of a Master Environmental Assessment for.the Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area in conformity with.the specifications and itemized outline set forth in Appendix "A" and Appendix:."B",.attached hereto and incorporated herein. .(b) The preparation of maps or other graphics for each of the 18 subject areas found under Specifications on page 2 of the Request for Proposal (attached hereto as Appendix "B"). (c): Noise exposure..conto,urs fo'r;,both near, and long term levels of.growth and traffic activity shall be developed utilizing the provisions of Government Code. Sec.tion_65302(g) and .the Noise Element of.the.Butte County General Plan. 1 2. Contractor shall assume the cost of all independent 2 testing necessary to complete the Master Environmental Assessment. 3 3. Contractor shall submit to .the. Butte County Planning 4 Department prior to September 18 1985, a -draft copy of the 5 Master Environmental Assessment. Contractor shall make,any changes 6 to the Master Environmental Assessment deemed appropriate.by the 7 Planning Department. 8 4. Contractor agrees that its key personnel shall not be 9 replaced or reassigned to -other duties without prior written approval. 10 of County. 11 5. County shall pay Contractor as compensation in full, 12 for all services performed by Contractor.pursuant to this agreement, 13 the sum'of $12,5.00. There shall be three equal payments. The 14 first payment shall be made thirty (30) days after the date of 15 this agreement. The second payment shall be made sixty (60) days 16 after commencement of this agreement.. The final payment shall be 17 made after submission to.and acceptance by the County of the 18 Master Environmental Assessment document. 19 6. It.'is understood that time is of the essence. Further, 20 it is understood that in case all the work called for under the 21 agreement is not finished or completed within the number of working 22 days as set forth in Paragraph 7 of this Agreement, damage will 23 be:susta.ined by County, and that it is and will be. difficult and 24 and impossible to ascertain and determine the. -.,actual damage which 25 County will sustain in the event of and by reason of such delay; 26 and it is therefore agreed that Contractor shall pay County the 27 s -um `of Fifty,' Dollars ($50.00) per day for each ' and a-ve.ry calendar -28, da,y'..s delay in finishing the work in excess of the number of, -2- I working days prescribed; and Contractor agrees to;pay said liquidated 2 damages'as herein provided, and in case' the same is not paid, agrees 3 that.County.may deduct -the amount thereof from any money due or that 4 may become .due Contractor under this agreement. 5 7. This agreement shall commence on June 18 , 1985, and 6 shall terminate upon completion of the work to be performed, but no 7 later than one hundred eighty (180) days thereafter. 8 8. Either party may terminate this agreement at any time.by 9 giving the other party 15 days written notice of such termination. 10 Contractor shall be.paid for all work'satisfactorily completed prior 11 to the offe.ctive date of said termination. 12 .9. ,'If'Contractor shall violate any of the terms or provi- 13 sions-of.t.his.agreement, County shall have the right to terminate. 14 this agreeme.nt-.effe:ctive immediately upon County's written notice 15 thereof to Contractor. 16 10. The parties hereto, may, by mu'tual�written agreement, 1/ change the scope of the services or the amount of compensation 18 set forth hereinabove in this agreement. 19 11. Contractor shall not assign, transfer, or sublet this 20 agreement or any interest therein without the prior written consent 21 of the County. 22 12. No reports, maps, documents, or other material produced 23 in whole.or part under this agreement shall be. subject to an 24 application - for copyright by or on behalf of Contractor. 25 .13. Contractor shall defend,`indemnif,j, and save harmless the 26 County, its officers, agents and employees, f.rom,any and all claims, .27 dem.ands.,�.;damages, costs, expense or liability arising out of this 28 agr,eeme'n:t or occasioned by.the performance or attempted performance -3- l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26. 27 28 attempted performance of the provisions hereof, including, but not limited to, any act or omission to act on the part of the Contractor or his agents or employees or other independent contractors. 14. Contractor shall; during the entire term of this agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor,.and shall in no event be construed to be an employee of the County. - 15. Contractor and County shall each designate a project representative who. -shall be totally responsible for coordinating the efforts of the respective -party with regard -to the performance of the work as set forth under this agreement. Project represen- tative for Contractor shall be David Wade and project representative for County shall be Starlyn Brown. Project representative may be changed upon the mutual agreement of the County and Contractor. 16. The County shall: (a) Provide full information as to.the requirement for the project. (b.).. Assist Contractor by placing at his disposal available information pertinent to the project including previous reports and other data relative to the plan, all of which Contractor may rely upon in norfnrminn hic cPrvirP_ .17. For any work directed by Coun.ty which isnot delineated in this agreement, a supplemental agreement ox -amendment to this agreement shall'be entered into delineating the additional work, associatedprovisions, and compensation. for s=ame prior to Contractor perform:i;ng said.additional work. IriAhe event that either County or. Contractor shall at any' time or times waive any breach of thisag,r'eement by.,the other, -4-