The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBUTTE COUNTY SHERIFFS HELIPORT..... Same LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 PHONE: 534-4601 March 13, 1985 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Division of Aeronautics 1120 N Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Attn: Betty Clark Re: BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S HELIPORT Dear Ms. Clark: At its meeting of March 11, 1985, the Butte County Airport' Land Use Commission found that the Heliport is outside the Airport. area of influence, that there is no conflict, and recommended that the City of Oroville approve the operation of the Heliport. Very truly yours, BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH/ss ' . .�� . BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION MINUTES -March ll, 1985 Page 3 Commissioner Feiler felt he should have something by the next meeting. Commissioner Lando stated that it might take longer to get the noise contours done. This item was put on the April agenda for a draft to be brought forward for review. ******** Staff requested April 15, 1985 instead of April 8, 1985 for the next ALUC meeting due to a conflict with the Planning staff. This met with the approval of the commission. ******** Discussion on time line for Environs Plan on Paradise Airport Land Use Plan. Staff stated that there would be a 30 day review period for comments on the EIR, time was needed tb write the EIR and this would probably have to be sent out to a consultant to write due to work load on the staff. Chairman Behunin wanted staff to brief the committee on April 15 as to the status of funds and dispense date. le, Sh ' nt." � Staff stated that this item is at the final stages of its hearings, it has had the use permit approved by the City of Oroville and at this point all ALUC needs to do is to find it in conformity with the ' Airport plans that they have and the areas outside the area of influence of the proposed Oroville Plan. Staff felt that they could find this in conformity. They also need to make a finding that it is not within 1000 ft. of any school with grades Kindergarten through 12 and it is not. Chairman Behunin asked if staff was saying that they had to find it in conformity with the General Plan. Staff stated no with the Oroville Airport Land Use Plan as proposed because this is outside the area of influence and should be no problem. It was moved by Commissioner Lando, seconded by Commissioner Montgomery, and unanimously carried to find that the Heliport is {]outside the Airport area of influence and that there is no conflict and recommend that the City of Oroville approve the operation of the Heliport. {] NOTICE OF aX&ION AND ENVIROI4 AL DO SMITTAL FORM Mail to: State Clearingbouse, 1400 TentJi'St, Rm 121, Sacramento, C1S 95814--916/44.-0613 I see NOTE below SCH a 85020515 1. Project Title: Butte County Sheriff's Heliport 2. Lead Agency: City of Oroville 3. Contact Person: Mary Ann Dilbeck 3a. Street Address: 1735 Montgomery Street 3b. City: Oroville 3c. (runty: Butte 3d. zip: 95965-4897 3e. Phone: (916) 533-4764 PBC3KTLOC&TIOR 4. County: Butte 4a. city/Ccm:mm+ty: Oroville 4b. As Parcel No. 31- 0 4 - 0- 0 2 Qc. Section Twp. 19N Range 4E 5a. Cross streets: County Center Drive 5b. _Final Document 15. 6. Within 2 miles: a. State 7 0 b' ports 7. DOCUUMT TYPE Agricultural land 8. L AL ACriaR 2�B 03. CEQA 10. Oi. General Plan Update 01. ' NCP 06. NOE 02. New Element 02. Early Cons 07. NOC 03. General Plan Amendment 03. Neg Dec 08. X NCD 04. Master Plan 04. Draft EIR 05. Annexation Supplement/ 06. Plan 05. Subsequent EIR _Specific (Prior SCA No.: 07. ' C;=mudty Plan 08. Redevelopment NEPA 09. Draft _Rezone 09. NOI 11. EIS 10. Land Division z&Odivision, Parcel 10. FONSI 12. EA Map, Tract Map, etc.) 1�. Joint Document 14. _Final Document 15. _Other 11. Use Permit' 12. Waste Mgmt Plan 13. _Cancel Ag Preserve 14. _Other 14. PEMMNT LAM USE AM 20RIM: For Rural, Nearest Coamu ,s ty: Rail_ Water` Thermalito ` ways Union Pac. d ways Power Canal 9. DEVffiMPUMT TYPB 01. _Residential: Units Acres 02. Office: Sq. Ft. Acres Employees 03. Shopping/Commercial: Sq. Ft. Acres Employees 04. Industrial: Sq. Ft. Acres Employees 05. _Water Facilities: iGD 06. 2S -Transportation: Type Heliport 07. 10. 70 AL ACRES: 70' x 70' 12. PBWWT ISSUES DISCUSSED DR, DOCMMT 10. 01. Aesthetic/Visual. 08. Flooding/Drainage 02. Agricultural land 09. Geologic/Seismic 03. Air Quality 10. Jobs/Housing Balance 04. -_Archaeological /Historical 11. Minerals 05. Coastal Zone 12. X Noise 06. Economic 13. Public Services 07. X Fire Hazard 14. Schools 13. FID®DU (approx) Federal $ Unknown State $ 14. PEMMNT LAM USE AM 20RIM: For Rural, Nearest Coamu ,s ty: Rail_ Water` Thermalito ` ways Union Pac. d ways Power Canal 9. DEVffiMPUMT TYPB 01. _Residential: Units Acres 02. Office: Sq. Ft. Acres Employees 03. Shopping/Commercial: Sq. Ft. Acres Employees 04. Industrial: Sq. Ft. Acres Employees 05. _Water Facilities: iGD 06. 2S -Transportation: Type Heliport 07. Mining: Miceral 08. Power: Type Watts 09. _Waste Treatment: Type 10. OCS Related 11. _Other: 11. 7ym JOBS Cmu=: N/A 15. Septic Systems 16. Sewer Capacity 17. _Social 18. _Soil Erosion 19. Solid Waste 20. Toxic/Hazardous 21. Traffic/Circulation 22. _Vegetation Unknown a 23. _Water Quality 24. Water Supply 25. Wetland/Riparian 26. _Wildlife 27. Growth Inducing 28. Incompatible Landuse 29. Cumulative Effects 30. _Otber Risk of Upset ;Ozal $ Unknown Butte County Sheriff's Office & Jail Facility - P -Q (Quasi Public) 15. P1iQ=. DE 90RD ON: , Heliport 16. SIGNAMM OF IBAD At.NCY tA'I'IVE: , nets: 3/12/85 ��' (� l RM: Clearinghouse will assign identification n rs for all new projects. If a SCH comber already exists for a projetp(e. � 1rm a Notice of Preparation or previous ft document) please fill St in. '�� FURV BEFISED 1/84 - RKPLACESS CA189 ME DLS RIBUTIOR CK RBVSFisb �• 13 O� aFviWIM aE=s _X Resources Agency Caltrans 'District Boating/Waterways Dept. of Transportation Ping Conservation x Aeronautics Fish and Game CA Highway Patrol Forestry Housing & Community Dev't Colorado River Board Statewide Health Ping Dept. Water Resources Health Reclamation Food & Agriculture Parks and Rec Public Utilities Cam Office of Historic Preservation Public Works Native American Heri'age Cc;rLn Corrections S.F. Bay Cons. & Dev't. Cc= General Services Coastal Comm OLA -Energy Comm Santa Monica Mtns State Lands Coma MPA-CALTRPA Air Resources Board OPR - OLGA Solid Waste Mgmt Board OPR - Coastal SWRC B : Sac",.o Bureau of Land Management RWQCB: Region Forest Service Water Rights x Other • Butte Count Aiport Land Use Commission Water Quality x_ Other: Butte County Sheriff ?OR SM Date Received at SCH OSE QALY Catalog Number Date Review Starts Applicant Date to Acencies Consultant ate to SCFi Contact Phone Clearance Date y y " Address NOt�S: .:l 14 T0. FROM: 1: :v0 _CE 0F DETER1MiINF:TIO: 01 X Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 X County Clerk County of Butte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 City of Oroville 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965-4897 L E D MAR 111985 ELEANOR M. BECKER, Courcy Clerk By IL 'JACK0i Deputy B&O Co. Manning Cotte; MAR 131985 Orovllla, Cafgmw RE: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152. of the Public Resources Code. PROJECT TITLE: Butte County*Sheriff's Heliport STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. (If submitted to Clearinghouse): SCH 85020515 CONTACT PERSON: Mary Ann Dilbeck PHONE NO: (916) 533-4764 PROJECT LOCATION: 33 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Heliport to facilitate law enforcement, search and rescue operations. This is to advise that the City of Oroville has approved the above described project and has made the .following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project will, x will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. x A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant. to .the provisions of CEQA. The Environmental Impact Report and Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at the City of Oroville Planning Department, 1675 Montgomery Street, Oroville, CA 95965-4897. 3. x Mitigation measures x were, were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. x A statement of Overriding Considerations was, r x was not, adopted for this project. NUMBER: 02-85 X�Iwz SIG TURF Mary Ann Dilbeck Planning Technician TITLE �0 9 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA--0FFICE OF THE GOVERNOR GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Gowrnw OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 9581.4 � March 7, 1985 Mary .Ann 'Di 1 beck City of Oroville 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 Subject: Butte County Sheriff's Heliport, SCH 785020515 Dear Ms. Dilbeck: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named proposed Negative Declaration to select state acenci.es for review. The review period is closed and the com- ments of the individual agency(ies) is(are) attached. if you would like to discuss the concerns and rec=nendations in their c=ments► please contact the staff from the appropriate agency(ies). You may formally respond to the Ming agency(ies) by writing to than, in- cluding the State Clearinghouse number on all such correspondence. You should attempt to resolve any concerns of the state agencies before taking further ac- tion on the project. Once you have responded to the cc=entsr state review of your draft environmental document will be complete. If the project rewires discretionary approval from any state agency, the Notice of Determination must be filed with the Secretary for Resources as well. as with the County Clerk.- Please contact Price Walker at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions about the environmental review process. Sincerely John B. Ghanian Chief Deputy Director cc: Resources Agency Attachment State of Gallfomia Memorandum To: State Clearinghouse Office of Planning and Programming 1400 tenth Street Sacramento, CA 9S814 .attention Price Walker Busin*ss, Transport tion and Housing Agepcy Date: February 26, 1985 File: From: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DMSION Of A RONAUnCS Subject Butte Countv Sheriff's Heliport - City of Orovi1le - SCH=8S020S15 The California Department of Transportation, Division of .aeronautics, has reviewed the above -referenced document and it appears to address all of the issues of concern to the Division. In addition, the Division is working with the applicant concern- i:ig- the required State Permit. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. JACK D. KE`tMERLY, Chief Division of .aeronautics Sandv�esnard Environmental Planner N • CITi' 07 OROVILLE NEGATIVE DECLAP.ATION NYBER 02-85 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the pro.ject described below: has been reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, including amendments thereto, (Public Resources Code Section 21100, et seq), and a determination has been:made that it VIII not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. Description of Project: Heliport to facilitate.law enforcement, search and rescue operations. 3. Location of Project: 33 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 4. DEME and Address of Project Applicant: Butte County Sheriff's Department 33 County Center Drive Oroviile, CA 95965 5. A Public Hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by the decision making body. Hearing Body: City of Oroville Planning Ccmmission Date of Determination: June 11, 1984 On the basis of the Initial Study, the information presented at hearing(s), comments received on the proposal and our o -.-n, knowledge and independent research it was determined that: We find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby idopted. x We find. that although the proposed project could have a signifi- cant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION I- ASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby approved. Date: June 11, 1984 Sign re Mary Ann Dilbeck Planning Technician Title C_ 0_ OROViLLO- E.`;\': NTAL EVALL'ATI ON Gu* I. BACKGROMM 1. Name of Proponent(s): Butte County Sheriff's Department 2. Addres.s and Phone Number of Proponent(s): 5:34-4321 3.3 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 3. Name of Proposal (Project Description) : Heliport 4. Guide Prepared by: City of Oroville Planning Department 5. Date Prepared: lune 6. ] 98d 6. Recommended Determination: Negative Declaration II. KAY-DATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE • 1-. Does the -project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environ- ment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop bElow sElf-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reauce the number or restrict the 7ange of a rare or en6angered aviral or eliminate i:Jmpor.ant examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Y ES ?'-YBE T\'0 ✓ 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the cis - advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A snort -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively briEf, definitive period of time while long -ter -m impacts will endure well into the future.) YES MAYBE NO ✓ 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? YES MAYBE NO &1.- 11-11. III. - DISCUSSION OF FNYIRONMENTAL I'TACTS / ✓/ See attached sheets. No discussion. 'IV. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: 1. We find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 2. We :ind that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will be no significant effect in this case bacause the mitigation measures described on the attached sheets have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 3. We find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIROM ENTAL I'TACT REPORT is required. DATE: June 11, 1984 CITY OF OROVILLE �-, 1 :ja-y. ;-.nn Diibecx p_ar= ring Technician 0 ON ��i �` `y - �J:=a^a.lO 1£ Q. a__ \E5a:✓E, an s':E'f are C attached sheet£.) Oc YES "u.YBE 1,0 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? ✓ b.' Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over - covering of the soil? ✓ .' C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d.. The destructi6n, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical feature?.' ✓ e. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river, stream, or bed of the ocean; or any bay, inlet, or lake? .✓ f. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground -failure, or similar hazards? .� 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: E. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temper- ature, or any change in climate; either regionally or locally? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction.of water movement, in either marine or fresh waters? .✓ b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, c: in the rate and amount of surface water runoff? C. Alteration to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? JG e. Discharge into surface Waters, or in any altera- tion of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or rurbidiry? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? .✓ g. Change in the.quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area,.'on in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? ✓ d.. e Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? t S. A' :",AL LIFE. Will the proposal result in? a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of unique., rare or . endangered species of animals? ✓ C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? .� d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? -2- 6. N0, SF1_ ;.r cpcsa_ result in: • ✓ a. IriCrEa5E5 e>:isting noise levels. 13. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ✓ i. LIGHT A.ND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposl result in a substantial alteration of present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCE.$. Will the proposal. result in: ✓ a. Increase in the :ate of use of -any natural ✓ resource? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural �✓ e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? resource? 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: ✓ 14. a. A risk of explosion or the release of hazardous substances (includ.ing but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human ✓ population of an area? 12. HOUSING. Fill the proposal affect existing housing, cr create a demand for addicionel housing? 13. TRr?NSPORTAIION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular traffic? b.. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? ✓ C. Substantial impact on existing transportation? ✓ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? �✓ e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ✓ 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a.need for r.e, or altered govern- mental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? C. Schools? d.Parks or other recreational facilities? e.•` Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _,C '• f. Other governmental services? _�✓ 15. ENERGY. -Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? } Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of nes., sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communication systems? C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Stcr=. water drainage? X. Sclid waste and disposal? -3- 1 i . rILT'' L,1; 'r.r�.:!'r. 0 11 the proposal result :n: a. Creation c_ an\' health 'hazard or potentic1 }lealtfl hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? ✓ 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion'of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RFCREATI0N. Wil- the proposal result in an impact Upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities. 20. CULTURkL .RESOURCES. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. fill the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic ./ cultural values? d. Fill the proposal- restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? -4- • ---------------- OSE PERMIT CITY OF OROVILLE FUNNING COMMISSION Date Permit NO. to the Provisions of the Zoning issuance of this Use Permit docs not i aai�c requirement of obtaining Building Pcrmit'bcforc starting construction. Building Officials Zonio6 Ad,nioi�tr•ror .�,♦ :lr.�/JOGS/CPE Ocovillc and the spgta�tcd editions Ordinance of the Ciry of Pursuant a Use '..' :.' ' 3 •�: _ _ . is hereby denied r.-, -• `. :.� _ set forth belos-: lith application, filed: -pw TE Permit in accordance for approval of application and. specified herein as the basis Failure to comply with the conditions With procedures to revoke said permit in accordance cause for Commission .t, constirutes issuance of Permi forth in Zoning Ordinance. set SPECIAL CONDITIONS. ..5 f I .. .. .. ..- ... - -.__ 1_�•. _ v. r - issuance of this Use Permit docs not i aai�c requirement of obtaining Building Pcrmit'bcforc starting construction. Building Officials Zonio6 Ad,nioi�tr•ror .�,♦ :lr.�/JOGS/CPE This matter was continued to the Planning Commission Meeting of July 9, 1984, pending further information to be supplied by the Director of Public Works. _ 9. Thur -man C. Clark. Variance application. Auto repair/smog inspection shop. A.? No. 12-08-6-007,1724 Robinson Street. Zoned C-1. (Ca'tegcrically exempt from environmental review requirements.)_ PROPONENT: Thurman C. Clark, 1169 Roy Drive, Oroville. OPPONENTS. ' None A motion was made by Commissioner Le Clerc and seconded by Commissioner Bell to grant.-a.variance to Thurman C. Clark to utilized the building a 1724 Robinson Street for an auto repair/smog inspection shop finding that: 1. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the building and the fo:-mer uses of the building that do not generally apply to other buildings and uses in the same district. 2. Granting of such variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of -Oroville. 3. Such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone denied to the property in question. 4. The 372nr.ing of ouch variance will nor be materially detrimental to the nublic. welfare or injLIious to the property Or impTOV,_menzs in such -vicinity. The varian-ce was conditioned as follows: 1. All work shall be conducted within the building. Any Darts (new, used Or junked) shall be stored within an enclosed structure. 2:' No vehicles in a state of disrepair shall be stored, outside the building. Other vehicles in for repair shall not be stored outdoors in excess of 72 hou-s. (NOTE: The Butte County Superintendent of Schools will retain the use of the parking spaces on the west side of the building for school vehicles.) 3. Weed the landscaped areas and maintain routinely. 4. Remove weeds from the parking areas and maintain routinely. S. Repair gate on garbage enclosure. 6. Install a 6 foot sight obscuring fence on the north and east property 1inef-. Fence shall be compatible with the development adjacent to the site. 7. Paint the exterior of the building in a color or colors comaa:ible with surround- ing development. -8. Meet all applicable requirements of the Uniform Building and Fire Codes. 9. Applicant shall provide the City with a letter of permission from the property owner granting the lessee, Butte County Superintendent of Schools, permission to sublease the property. 10. Submit exterior building color(s) and fencing materials for review and approval by the Development Review Board. 11-. Obtain a City of Oroville Occupancy Permit and Business License. 12. Variance shall be reviewed in 24 months for compliance with conditions. AYES: Commissioners Joplin, Le Clerc, Massey, Crowe NOES: Commissioners Bell, Robison EXCUSED: Cc-Aissioner Trinidad Notion carr:4-'d. 10. Butte County Sheriff. Use permit application. Heliport. AP No. 31-04-0-020, 33 County Center Drive. Zoned ?-Q. (A Negative . Declaration of Environmental Impact with mitigation, measures is recommended.) PROPONENT: Sheriff Hal Brooks; 33 County Center Drive, Oroville. LETTER OF OPPOSITION: Harr), K. Samuelian, 5843 Natick Avenue, Van Nuys. C A notion .-as made by Ce-:missioner Robison and seconded by Cc--:iss:one, Bel: ;o approve a `:ebative Declaration of Environmental Impact finding that the proposed heliport ,•ill not have a significant effect on the environ..ent i.` a,,,iica'� e federap, state and _ ' __ ______-__.. ... .. ,.p......� -, .,a hip .n�. r,nn��tin•,c mru ^,P' C1._'Y ,.Ti, _ L. .,•, nen.. c�1 ,` JUNE 1]., 1984 - MINUTES - PAGE 6 This matter was continued to the Planning Commission Meeting of July 9, 1984, pending further information to be supplied by the Director of Public Works. _ 9. Thur -man C. Clark. Variance application. Auto repair/smog inspection shop. A.? No. 12-08-6-007,1724 Robinson Street. Zoned C-1. (Ca'tegcrically exempt from environmental review requirements.)_ PROPONENT: Thurman C. Clark, 1169 Roy Drive, Oroville. OPPONENTS. ' None A motion was made by Commissioner Le Clerc and seconded by Commissioner Bell to grant.-a.variance to Thurman C. Clark to utilized the building a 1724 Robinson Street for an auto repair/smog inspection shop finding that: 1. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the building and the fo:-mer uses of the building that do not generally apply to other buildings and uses in the same district. 2. Granting of such variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of -Oroville. 3. Such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone denied to the property in question. 4. The 372nr.ing of ouch variance will nor be materially detrimental to the nublic. welfare or injLIious to the property Or impTOV,_menzs in such -vicinity. The varian-ce was conditioned as follows: 1. All work shall be conducted within the building. Any Darts (new, used Or junked) shall be stored within an enclosed structure. 2:' No vehicles in a state of disrepair shall be stored, outside the building. Other vehicles in for repair shall not be stored outdoors in excess of 72 hou-s. (NOTE: The Butte County Superintendent of Schools will retain the use of the parking spaces on the west side of the building for school vehicles.) 3. Weed the landscaped areas and maintain routinely. 4. Remove weeds from the parking areas and maintain routinely. S. Repair gate on garbage enclosure. 6. Install a 6 foot sight obscuring fence on the north and east property 1inef-. Fence shall be compatible with the development adjacent to the site. 7. Paint the exterior of the building in a color or colors comaa:ible with surround- ing development. -8. Meet all applicable requirements of the Uniform Building and Fire Codes. 9. Applicant shall provide the City with a letter of permission from the property owner granting the lessee, Butte County Superintendent of Schools, permission to sublease the property. 10. Submit exterior building color(s) and fencing materials for review and approval by the Development Review Board. 11-. Obtain a City of Oroville Occupancy Permit and Business License. 12. Variance shall be reviewed in 24 months for compliance with conditions. AYES: Commissioners Joplin, Le Clerc, Massey, Crowe NOES: Commissioners Bell, Robison EXCUSED: Cc-Aissioner Trinidad Notion carr:4-'d. 10. Butte County Sheriff. Use permit application. Heliport. AP No. 31-04-0-020, 33 County Center Drive. Zoned ?-Q. (A Negative . Declaration of Environmental Impact with mitigation, measures is recommended.) PROPONENT: Sheriff Hal Brooks; 33 County Center Drive, Oroville. LETTER OF OPPOSITION: Harr), K. Samuelian, 5843 Natick Avenue, Van Nuys. C A notion .-as made by Ce-:missioner Robison and seconded by Cc--:iss:one, Bel: ;o approve a `:ebative Declaration of Environmental Impact finding that the proposed heliport ,•ill not have a significant effect on the environ..ent i.` a,,,iica'� e federap, state and _ ' __ ______-__.. ... .. ,.p......� -, .,a hip .n�. r,nn��tin•,c mru ^,P' i t CITY OF OROVILL E PLAl"IAG CO"LMISSION E 11, 1954 - XINUTES - PAGE 7 AYES: Commissioners Bell, Joplin, Le Clerc, Massey, Robison, Crowe NOES: None EXCUSED: Commissionei Trinidad Motion carried. A motion was made by Commissioner Robison and seconded -dy Commissioner Bell to approve a use permit -for a heliport for the.Butte County Sheriff's Office finding that .the proposed heliport will not adversely affect the General Plan of the -City of'Oroville if applicable federal, state and local requirements are met and the following conditions implemented: 1. Construction, operation, and maintenance of the heliport shall be in strict compliance with all requirements of the California State Depart- ment of Transportation Division of Aeronautics and the Federal Aviation Administration. 2. 'hen issued, the City of Oroville Public Works Department shall be provided with copies of the Department of Transportation site approval per -mit and heliport permit. 3. Construction plans shall be submitted to the City of Oroviile Development Review Board for approval prior to construction. 4. t;nen development occurs within the landing and departure zone, a new zone shall be designated. The new zone, when needed, will provide a landing and departure path northwesterly from the site over the Theiva.1ito Power Canal and State Highway 70. AYES: Commissioners Bell, Joplin, Le Clerc, Massey, Robison, Crowe NOES: Tone XCUSED: Commissioner Trinidad Motion carried. 11. Thomas Self. Use permit application. Used car lot/RV storage area. AP No. 68-2.7-0-015, 3022 Olive Highway. Zoned C-2. (Categorically exempt from environmental review requirements.) Co=issioner Robison left his seat on the Planning Commission during the discussion and voting on the application. PROPONENTS: None OPPONENTS: None A motion was made by Commissioner Bell and seconded by Commissioner Joplin to grant a use permit to Thomas Self to allow establishment of a used car sales lot and recreationval vehicle storage area at 3022 Olive Highway finding that the proposed use meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan subject to implementation of the following conditions: 1. Public parking spaces shall be provided per City Ordinance. Spaces shall be striped and bumpered. 2. Landscaping and planters shall be -renovated and brought up to current st.�,Iards. Renovation shall include, but may not be limited to: a-. concrete curbing b. removal of old soil, plants and trees C. removal of rocks d. installation of new soil, plants and trees 3. Improvements listed above are subject to review and aprrovai by the Development Review Board. AYE : Co=. issioners Bell, Joplin, Le Clerc, ",asset', Crowe NOES: None ABSENT FROM QUORU';: Commissioner Robison EXCUSED: Com issioner Trinidad Motion Carried. 12 . Jehn I%. and `'=%, X:.ne- Far:zince appIica._en. :'ence height. AP No. 12-13-5-01' , 11 1365 St-tCL. Zcnt�c CITY OF OROVILLE ?LANG CO'•a;I-ISSION • STP.FF REPORT JUNE 11, 1984 III. 10. Butte County Sheriff. Use permit application. Heliport. AP No. 31-04-0-020, 33 County Center Drive. Zoned P -Q. (A.Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact w/mitication measures is recommended.) The attached application and exhibits explains in detail the rea- sons for the proposed heliport. Staff has no further comments. RECOM-11,1LENDATIONS: A. Finding that the proposed heliport will not have a significant effect on the environ-nent if applicable federal, state and Local requirements pertaining to heliports and heliport oper- ations are met, approve a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact subject to implementation of these requirements. B. Finding that the proposed heliport will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Oroville if applicable federal, state and local requirements are met, approve a use permit X or the Butte County Sheriff's Department subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction, operation, and maintenance of the heliport s)ia21 be 1n ST.rict compliance with -.1.1 rec':irem ents of the California State Department of Transporctlon Division of Aeronautics and the Federal Aviation A(L-ninistration. 2. Wher, issued, the City of Oroville Public Works Department- shall epar``mentshall be provided with copies of the Department of Trans- portation site approval perm t and hel? port' vermit. 3. Construction plans shall be submitted to the City of Oroville Development Review board for approval prior to construction. 4. When development occurs ...,ithin the landing and departure zone, a new zone shall be designated. The new zone, when needed, will provide a landing and departure path north- westerly from the site over the Ther-malito Power Canal and State Highway 70. q - Tu��A SITE CITY OF OP.OVILLE X USE PERIIT APPLICATION FOR: Appropriate fees shall be submitted with VARIANCE aoplication. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 33 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, OROVILLE, CA r —20 ZOP;IP�G: P. Q. (Quasi-�ublic) A. P. r: 31-0G APPLICA01S r!A;lE: BUTTS COUNTY S?:BRI:F' S 0 -.IC:: 33 CO"''�`' ""�R DRhV�, OROV °S°6S A.°PLICAI,T'S ADDRESS: Cir. - IL:� C 1'. P L I CANTS INTEREST IN PROPERTY: owner -tenant -etc: S NAME (If different from above): C'...:ER'S ADDRESS:SAM--C AS ABOVE LIVE REASON FOR THIS APPLICATION, EXPLAIN! FULLY: '7*n appl i cation is bei n submitted for the purpose of establishing a Federal Aviats ion A6minitrati ( ^. A. A.) certif ien heliport anG landing ,pad in the lower oarkinc lot area (northeast corner) of the BLtte County Sher_=.'s 0_fice. The establishment of ar'.A.A. -approved heliport is necessary' r0_. the proiilot_c ofsafety and regulation. Of the approach and 6eparture of helicopters to Butte County Sheriff's Office. An established helioort (con't on next pa SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: DATE: USE PERAIT (When appropriate, please submit the folloajing with your application). A site plan, drawn to scale on an 8h" x 11" sheet, showing existing and proposed structures, 6treets and other relevant features. VARIANCE 1. Attach a site plan, d.ra•,,•n to scale on an 8z" x 11" sheet, showing existing structures, streets arid other relevant improvements. Show clearly the areas of va r i Ince. 2. State :hat excepticnal or extraordinary circumstances apply to the subject site makingthe �:` ::,c�: necessary. The M.-nning Commission must r.3ke four (4) mandatory fi-.uings prior to issuing a variance. at the Butte County Sheriff's Office is necessary to insure a fast reaction time in. emergency s.it.uations and search and rescue operations. The heliport is additionally necessary for the transportation of equipment and personnel during ongoing investigat_o..^.s as well as emergencies. The proposed heliport under consideration 1s _or private use only, meaning that helicopters other than law enforcement operated heli- copt ert must have prior permission from the Sheriri OI Butte County Or his designee to land. 1� heliports li' CallrOrP._a are required to :have a heliport permit 5cEG ':r� ��:E Depc_ tmE:�t �- a^spOr�c? �_C' , �_\'..51+ :? O" '.Ero^a.-, c5 1 11 . As Germed by ane F.A.A.,Ja nel_port 1s an area o= land, water, or StrUCtL`re L'Sed Or �? tended to be used . Cr Wine land and takeoff of nel_copters Prior to an*, aenC�J S�✓i,lt= nc an aD_p!D lica-lon to the epartment PgOf _ J 'i'ra?�SpOr�G�1Cn t0 operate a new J�eI�DOrt, the proviSiOnS Or SeCt10n 21661.5 of the pub11C Utilities Code (?.U.C.) ,rost be complied with. Section 2166!.5 of the P.U.C. states ghat in Order to apply 'for a permit t0 operate .a heliport, the rol?owinc inforriation must be St:bmi.tted t0 .the Department Cf Transportatl0;;,' D1vlElon 0= Aerona `Cics1 1. Documented approval, by the BOar6 Cr Super\%15Cr5 and/Or 'a the City Council the Dl an t0 ConstrU'Ct a heliport per Section 21661.5 of the P.U.C. 2. Local land use approval. 3 . Confirmation of action by the. Airport Land Use ComLm, iss10n. 4. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act."(1970) . 5. Documents establishing ownership or control of property. 6. Airspace utilization clearance by the F.A.A. 7. Tcn ographical map showing_ proposed heliport site, out- wards' for a radius of two (2) rales depicting public utilities, schools, churches, railroads, highways, etc. 8. Scaled layout plans of the facility. When all the above requirements have been complied with and submitted to ,he Department of Transportation, a site approval permit is issued. Upon completion of the facility, an inspection is made and if approved, a heliport permit is issued. The anticipated .:se of the heliport is apprcximately five (5) arrivals ^d depart:._ es per month d-%. i ng the dF. t4 7.e ho:_ s o-, an irrec ;lar, C bac c n `,:O t\'�e5 Or ^-2CC;�:? s �111Z1:1C ane 7I'o- -cn-sc^e% C _ - _ - _sec: he'_ _c= she :'a=;cr_ )' o. thece the �cll CC6 �cac ^c: ��e -cs _OC�. 7 -o -h o: _'-ese . <:__._a��:.re In proposing tO establish a heliport at the Butte Co•--ntyShe_ i� � r f f s Office, it is recognized t,at the arrival and departure of helicopters will create some noise, however, it is believed that the low level of activitf planned along the proposed landing and depart'_lre Dath will render this impact neglicible. ATTACHED XHIBITS: 1. Copy of F.A.A. Form 7480-1/Notice of Landinc Area Provosal. 2. Propcsed heliport location map. 3. Proposed Heliport layout sketch. 4. Color aerial Dhotocrar.*- de_Dicting the D:ODosec landing and depart,jre path to the area of the Heliport site. Bell 206 Long Ranger iEl1CODter noise exposi:-re con Bell and landing profile. 6. Bell 206 Long Ranger helicopter handing noise time hi=_tory. 7'. lt�.a ghes SOOD Helicopter sound exposure level info_-mation. r .. rEAw.aCwT rAtar T,w, OFFICE:1076-676-127 _ --_ — 0`•R-OD94 a v.z• GO_ — ---" --------�'� Approved. ON.B No. D AIRPORT • ESTABLIsNKENT OR ACTIVATION Of HELIPORT ANfSPORTA7IDK p ,ALTERATION pEPA>;TN,E� Of TR R L6ANDDN+KENT p SEAPLANE BASE t$PDRTaA7tow }1 p DEACTIVATION D FEDERLL .LV IATIOw AO PROPOS^ C) CHANGE OF STATUS 1, �• K0110E Or 'LANDING AREA z; code (ADDRESS (P1a, $trtrot, City, $tmc, P Orov1 i e OR DRGANIZ&ZION r nte- Dive l� Ce r ROPONENT, INDIVIDUAL .u`— (;p'Lr �I;A►+•E OF P I Dep "J� b (RECTION .- 6. Sherlr� s _ [.DISTANCE D ?12�te Cour. _ ST LTE I FROµ NEAREST CITY kNDING kREk �; i prr12 oR TOKN Ik, L0CkTIDN OF L IZ COUNTY C2_ Iµ1LES DIRECTION 'TSLlite g; ELEVATION SOv.th 1. NEAREST CITY OR TOKN LONGITUDE I ON DLT ES NAME Of L orov- 11e. b. LATITUDE .1 ANDING AREA I —° •� 3 22 -r ne11"Port / CONSTRUCTI 3L2t ,e Sher; c STATUS 0R L TERLTION, F'TL• EEGIw/EEC' IIF CK LNG- Of r, PURPOSE -TP SERVED IES IDESCR16E CHANGE. mo�I-B4 TYPE USE O-NERSHIP P 1C2•Dle EST. cDMPLET °� 1 _ ,� . p PUBLIC None �I-I_1 B PRIvATE 'P'•°UeL1C �RsoNLL D PRIVATE AREA Dk i k p P� REF. �5 ABOVE EXISTING (11 any) I, PROPOSED DRcT. DIST. D. LAhIDING AR- RO-R>Fa0►ti FRO - R> E s EkS L,-vD'wV ' Llll-". I ARC AARE& eLGwETIC 2,EARIwC OF I L AwE1S) I I II RVrr LT(S) DR St.LL I SSW 5 W -1•�� V C< LEwtTM OF RUwr AYlS1T I ri l� e 7lT1T'Z Iw FEE I I Q`. _ OG Di SE&LL"E151 II rIDTri Of RVwr LT(S) OR I I L J SE ALawE(S) tw FE i? I I I II • C L '� < W rLGwCTIC 6 I 0 LAw II I '^ rRtr ART gw*DIwL DIRECTIDw � I • I IF RVwr LT SURFLCE• TTrE 0 AtPt.PI;, C.OtI. E.cl II � IICe r.+r. I 7c1 1+ ( f'') OI Z• DI.KEO O" Of LI.&rwFEf1 AKD y DRCT. DIST. II 7O 1 L. 701 FRO" FROM I UCT 10hS TOU CriDOr'ri OBS 1 ABOVC LA•%71ML L� 71wL D,wEMLOKS OF II C' ¢ AREA tK FEET L• .!OiwG AREA ARE& o X50 Deg' TYPE AREA L DIRECTIoll or P't '1OO 1 SI�1 700 t W "w CRESS% CRESS ROVTES II Vit=en z lower 2 0, 1001 5 TT►E OF SURf LC[ w - DIREC110 Tree sPRE VULIKC Nor L DESCRIr110w OF IIGKTIwG (tl ^t) aw0 None ALL PRESENT ANTICIPATI DATA I (1{ est. indicote $ YRS. NEW F. OPERk•TIONAL by lettrr '.E..I 1. EST. OR ACTUAL N0. BASED ACFT. VLTIEwCIwE AIRPORTS SIwCLE-EwGIKE 0 0 UwDER 7500 LBS. �'G~ I O 015T. ovEr, 500 LBS. "" O FiELIPORTI I c CO'ri51DERkTIOhS DRO,( FRO^( C. N01S- LMOIw' MONTHLY LANDINGS LAwD'wG L AVERAGE NO. I ARE ARC&.. �. IDENTIFICATION A,R CARRIER c� GEwEAAL """ow S/W 2000 R r -• Court DT wE Ir.I .. Atte Suttee -lo: S 1B00 � ARE IFR'oPERXTIONS ANTICIPATE.DEA.RS NAV AID: �111C11n �0 p YES MITH1N�� ?lug ve H kPPLICkTION FOR I jRPORT LICENSING D COUNTY D NOT REQUIRED V KUNICiF&L AUT D NAS BEEN µADE $1 ATE :A"wILL BE uADE Ir,r to rhr Let. ��... l..o-I•r• 1 o.r vvr 0. c' co�+C 1L 1 1 ol�rrtl ..ode b. ^� II„c; o•.e eoc.t fID E CC i'EL. wC. r,,,l. t1.el o • -T IFICki12!": I ti.,rb• c I111LE i 1 G' - — I t' p RI o35 D !Pc i . 1 0C1� O PROPOSED nr=rc0F,CH vest �� P�RK1\JC� r. CU M:. COUWT'5KVZO = F'5 GT r\ L1J%PLC•;' = ?k'TRKIQ& f,REA `1 FN \ L r f•h C- I L \ 1 `( Q GU nr=rc0F,CH vest �� P�RK1\JC� r. CU M:. COUWT'5KVZO = F'5 GT r\ L1J%PLC•;' = ?k'TRKIQ& f,REA `1 FN \ L r f•h C- I L \ 1 `( %�'1"'�"".C".. ••tom.. - ... :l�s:�-_�''T./�.�� ' .T.ti..:� CC`"Li', •��y�� ^+j �-� f�'-J� .� r • 's. �,,, irLL � .= `mac �-%"'�:.C•.�t- --+��• � _ •'.'i[C..�'�'- •�� T• f�-' /1 � j��`±yT�ttyd�,.v"'-`��i ��i` i'•y;�� '' ��_ -� .'� •.. �-?fir .'.,i•a'�_.y,/ � � .�-.%�'- _ � - _ •.�.. :fir-Y`�,..♦� �Y X .� 'C•?"" `,�^? �� - .�^ � •� ��_..s•��a r'=z'7n� _ _ ��"�►' _��a ��a�7 ��9. }'�'�'� �i ,i �� ^ �• l . \ . .i!a. �-�:� � .�a�-►��.o . � •yam . ..1� rte• �•_'-•- .r -V ... .-" rte. 1 "� �l.Y - - rY\ .t - "'_1 _ .• .. - - - •, • •• - Q .!' r�� `-�J ...��7i '..- .�� t � J •-.rte ,� :::�,``:-: /.�^,� -.t - .. • ^Y f _ ''. Q � � 1�.'. �� _ l L r%ti "-• ; ..,.5"�'��.� � -1 �� 4^r.•�4_p�� ,64•i� � i i:l • ��rI-_Z�� Tom.-C� �%.: rc:.•� ��•• �j a'c - �i � �%.i-�- rJ"-.t..: rJ. T'�'�'a��_�Y� �;�'r ��: _�. ��.� s`_�.r1s.��r- Sr_ _ _ ate• ` `+s_. j S:' �.y- � :`+'r�.:,yL��.1� . !tom I.. . �\ �� , `� � �7'rr..�� .• .. :y�.��C � - om� Eza •.._ .�N\-• �. f� .�•_. � •!'1 .� rte✓ •`y� - STI -J- •. ^ 1' 'f• �r 1 �'\ _.'-Qi�•AI��,ir.L �..-,�� ,_ . ��.�.-•••'.��..i►S.r.1' i..r.��`��J��,r``i`...R:.f�/ � _J - j'5,.� �y�Q.c��`��'1{.{,�"-++r: x �C�,` �+ ,c ' /��` �-^-�- tai •� • .. � _ _ ��•aJ` C .a �"�C`,��^�:_� ��T"� � _ T_ ! . �C�� Ste" �' i('� -x:,-� :.""'�-^�_-• 1'�.rY``�+`y'-��''"r .. _ � ,•Z.._ ..� "?.' �..+,�1 1�'� �^'�c �,�.�'►)'4•tr,!,�'j.-."1?"'-��"`�_"`I;,;y�!�_�` :',� � y _ �_^' i�-.'.+.�t-/`` ✓.. 3 e+� -r• r': MCS r� _ -�'�Cti •r _ �t][��- - � n. y��..o.-� rr•" �+"oi� !�� ' jr� •, i . r `"-7'-��.5..77��'✓_ � y^ ♦ . = Q�� .. 1 {i_n'4 �f'C= I'•'- ��•�-r1� ice. ✓��c,.�+-••• - �1 ;,_sa_ • - r •fs.__.�i�T77.F_f,:;� _ ,. _.,rte ;.�sY J- �•�; o "y! -•ice"' L.�..._as�ti C ---Oe l Com' ' rte:- _ •-:�.;7�t� 14, MWMF!IL - � v'. �`�r. a��w �-fit !t�'��,K.wJ.��=��.� _ �� - �► K sr7r � _ _� 1►L'fl'w� _ _ _ i • _ S'r • �- �_��s�/�i�•lr!► � 'T'rlolr`a �._ _ _ _ �!' W •GrCtr'+r, � ..�,a � ,�.j i �`�f��• �1'-�Ltts�_ .rt• ,C Vim' !• Q �,1ef0�.ytl'y`�i'�'}-�'7•�� ^ ` i � �i�� "� �� . ,�C.� � � �•f^-L. ��" `y_^•� '!i"+'`•'Cr� -�Ci�• -. �•� y •O C''. �-rY , n` �C' i �AsI ---i'-�y � �11� �.,1 � 4��' �: • - �y,.'�i�-�� ;� 1f' ;�_,as� ,�..�• �"5 � •��1� ;,,,� • ' �I vdC— � • `•' •' = ' _ -' .�— --'� . ,;-_.. . _ — .. ._ _" � :mit;,.' �C/-�' L/ N • F� O } . IJ W W Y • N , ' Z Ln 0 0 r. C> _ _... ' N m O Ln > C> t_n C1 v v Cr.) - R'i m L p Ln O V I O Q I o p , -� m i �w 30 - LPDA 70 - i 60 - B[LL 20GL LAI ID I I IG 1.10 l SE I J ill. IJ 1 S 101;'( LOCA i 10; 1 ,$ CLQ; i E C f SII0iIHu Cil Wil', D E In 1 H I I I AL 50 10 5 0 5 10 )1=C011 ,) • architect 71i 011ice P2rLwcv. St. Louis, MO. eu•,='1 '� e7wE r, 7 u `''J St .•1. Nove=ger t; 0'1 0 9 1081 Ger st_-mE7 m•.:n_cl�al Building 5th ar,d *jaia Streets C, -.:co, Califf o=:i_a 95926 E ' ?�. C I I o e 'Ie=or__1 ? espi t_1 C^ -4„c, Ca_irc-rnzia _s cc-.:= �_n2 eu. t�_epho:,e ccnVE7SP_:_e-, e_ Octebe- 29, 1c,81 in rel' -ye:, to you fol?o::_ng sound e-:?osu_e level for _ne 500D :velideter. IELICDP 7-R 500-D S -D 1. Approach: 89.3 SEL 400' Corse.cn :actors: 4GG' to 200' DBA 400' to 1C00' -4 1/2 DBA r 403' to 2000' - 8 1/2 DBA Cur_ -cticn 'oc:,_):s. 600' _0 200' -5 1/2 L3,; 60^' t:. 1000' - 2 1/= D3:, �r0' .c 2000' -i D?.k .-its o�:a_-e� ;.1,- '1-. L'oL �;:f;�1 Cer.:;ul_.i-. , 0 • CHIEF DMII�TISTRATIVE C"=FICA !)?� 25 COUNT f CENTE.< [)R. GA0\/:L1.:. CALIFOF.NI:. 9586: 336: (916) 5s4-4631 • {. • ' ►AEWBERS V "►4E BOARD ��DURZy til S•�CENi • JANE DC7..�.►1 bA4rZT KRDA, --(EELER Cj.;,cF kDy1NI;TRL11VE pFFISER BERImi- MOSELEY LEwi FVL1ON February 8, 1984 V.ayor Jana Wilson City of Orovi l l e 1735 Niontoomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 Deas w,=yor Wi 1 son: Re: Sheriff's Heliport Enclosed please find E certified copy of the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Resolution of Intention to Apply for Application to Establish. a Heliport at the Butte County Government Center, Please advise what action, if any, is necessary at this time with regard to an application for environmental review for this project. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Ve y/ t �l y yeIrs I I Marin J. ichc,ls Chief Administrative Officer N,JN/GL/rd Enclosure cc: Sheriff Hal T. Brooks Ron Chaplin., Sheriff's Department Resolution No. 84-03 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPLY 'FOR APPLICATION TO ESTABLISH HELIPORT AT THE BUTTE COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Butte County Sheriff's Department in cooperation with other law enforcement agencies has determined the need to establish an official heliport; and WHEREAS, the Department of Transportation Division of Aeron: utics, Sacramento requires the Board's expression of intention to*apply; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors designates the Butte Count), Sheriff or his designee to proceed with the requirements set forth by the Department of Transoortation. NOl';, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Butte County Sheriff, on behalf of , butte County Board of Supervisors, will proceed with application .or establishment of a Butte County Heliport located at the Butte County GO-vernment Center, Oroville, California. PASSED AND ADOE TED by the Butte County Board of Supervisors this 10th day of z:nu�tr19F•4 , by the following vote: AYES: rut.,ervjsors Dolan, Fulton, moselow, V,heele-r and Ch i i rrnr:�n Sarocer,i NOES. NOnc' n',BSENT : hone NOT VOTING: IN! onc ATTEST: Al, 1;AX .CEN1 , Cha i rman Butte County Board of Supervisors M .1 J. NICHOLS,,Chief Administrative Officer; and Clerk of: the Board Dy "Hi FOCEGOiNG 110STRUMENT IS A CORFECT COPY OF THE UkIGINP•L ON FILE AND OF RE RD IN 'IS OFFICE ATTEST DATE NOTICE OF DETERMINATION r. :;�-mss �:•w+ r� � � ;ri FEB 11985 TO: X Office of Planning & Research 3bbx�i,�.rocxxa.�dxxatotuc�23c1: 1400 - 10th, Street ci EnNOR .�� ECCE, CGuily Clerk' 5zomx==x9&>8&.-kkx Sacramento', CA 95814 & —_ X Deputy x County Clerk County of Butte 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 FROM: City of .Oroville 1735 Montgomery Street Oroville, CA 95965-4897 RE: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. PROJECT TITLE: Butte County Sheriff's Heliport STATE CLEARING HOUSE NO. (If submitted to Clearinghouse): CONTACT PERSON: Kirt M. Hunter PHONE NO.: 533-4764 PROJECT"LOCATION: 33 County Center Drive, �Oroville, CA 95965 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Heliport to facilitate law enforcement, search and rescue operations. This is to advise that the Cite of Oroville has approved the above described pro- ject and has made the detE=inations regarding the describes project: .... Y=cjEct :•�_ , _�S nOt, riaVe c s:gnl'icant Effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at the City of Oroville Planning Department, 1675 Montgomery Street, Oroville, CA 95965-4897. 3. Mitigation measures x were, were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A State of Overriding Considerations was, _ x was not, adopted for this project. tJL?BER: 02-25 i % : /'A 1ket S gna. ,re Mary Ann Dilbeck Planninv Technician CIT).' OF OROVILLE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NUMBER 02-85 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described below has been reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, including amendments thereto, (Public Resources Code Section 21100, et seq), and a determination has been.made that it will not have .a significant effect on the environment. 2. Description of Project: 3 4 Heliport to facilitate.law enforcement, search and rescue operations. Location of Project: 33 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Name and Address of Project Applicant: Butte County Sheriff's Department 33 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 5. A Public Hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by the decis-on making body. Hearing Body: City of Oroville Planning Commission Date of Determination: June 11, 1984 On the basis of the Initial Study, the information presented at hearing(s), comments received on the proposal and our own knowledge and independent research it was determined that: We find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby. adopted. x We find that although the proposed project could have a signifi- cant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby approved. . 7 Date: June 11, 1984 Sign re Mary Ann Dilbeck Planning Technician Title CIT:' OF OROVILLE is ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION GUIDE I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent(s): Butte County Sheriff's Department 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent(s): 5.34-4321 33 County Center Drive Oroville, CA.95965 3. Name of Proposal (Project Description) : Heliport: 4. Guide Prepared by: City of Oroville Planning Department 5. Date Prepared: ,lune 6 1984 6. Recommended Determination: Neqative Declaration II. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 1% Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environ- ment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the- ran3e of a =are or endangered animal cr eliminate impor-Lant examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? YES MAYBE NO 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) YES MAY BE NO 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? YES MAYBE NO ✓ !'I DISCUSSION OF EN--IRONMENTAL IMPACTS /,71 See attached sheets. / / No discussion. IV. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: 1. We find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 2. We find that although the proposed project could have a signi- ficant effect on the environment, there will be no significant effect in this case bacause the mitigation measures described on the attached sheets have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 3. We find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. CITE' OF OROVILLE A DATE: June 11, 1984 Ma _ y.- jinn Di lbec Plac,'.ning Technician ENV I RON" ENT,_,.,_ 1"20. S (Exp! aria t.ions o all "vee" � -e._'he,. answers are on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO ~ 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? ✓ b.' Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over - covering of the soil? ✓ C. Change in topography or ground surface.relief features? .d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic.or physical feature?'. e. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in'siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river, stream, or bed of the ocean; or any bay, inlet, or lake? f. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? ✓ 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ✓ .b. The creation of objectionable odors? ✓ c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temper- ature, or any change in climate; either regionally or locally? ✓ 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movement, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or in the rate and amount of surface water runoff? C. Alteration to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? �C e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any altera- tion of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ✓ f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground.waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? .✓ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, -on in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? ✓ d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. A:,`MAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in? a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? ✓ b. Reduction of the numbers of unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ✓ C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? ✓ d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? ✓ -2- 6. NOISE. mill 0 proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? : 8. LAND USE. Will the proposl result in a substantial alteration of present or planned land use of an area?. 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: : a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO .✓ 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human ✓ population, of an area? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for addiciondl hous_ng? ✓ 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular traffic? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? ✓ C. Substantial impact on existing transportation? ✓ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? ✓ e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ✓ 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govern- mental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? ✓ d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e.Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? �✓ 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communication systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Ste -: vater drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? -3- 17. 'r.0?LAIN rEALT-:& 112 the proposal result in: 9 a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or'quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. CULTURJ.-L RESOURCES. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic . building, structure or object? C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. 'A'ill the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? C& - y - i ES KAYBE :0 01 USE PERMIT I CITY OF OROVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Date Permit No. Provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Oroville and the special conditions -Pursuant to the granted a Use is hereby denied . . set forth below: Permit in accordance with application filed: "c�Te i with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and Failure to comply I issuance of Permit, cons in accordance with procedures titutes cause for Commission to revoke said per set forth in Zoning Ordinance. I .. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 7. NOTE: issuance of [his Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building Permit before starting construction. I l .,,A 2;:1./3ccs /c r Building Official R Zoning Adminiecreror CITY OF OROVILLE PLANNI;�C CO12;ISSIO1N JUKE 11, 1954 - MINUTES - PAGE 6 This matter was continued to the Planning Commission Meeting of July 9, 1984, pending further information to be supplied by the Director of Public Works. 9. Thur -man C. Clark. Variance application. Auto repair/smog inspection shop. AP No. 12-08-6-007, 1724 Robinson Street. Zoned C-1. (Categorically exempt from environmental review requirements.). PROPONENT: Thurman C. Clark, 1169 Roy Drive, Oroville. OPPONENTS: None A motion was made by Commissioner Le Clerc and seconded by Commissioner Bell to grant'a variance to Thurman C. Clark to utilized the building a 1724 Robinson Street for an auto repair/smog inspection'shop finding that: 1. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying. to the building and the former uses of the building that do not generally apply to other buildings and uses in the same district. 2. Granting of such variance will not adversely affect the.General Plan of the City of -Oroville. 3. Such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone denied to the property in question. 4. The £ranr.ing of such, variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity. The variance was conditioned as follows: 1. All work shall be conducted within the building. Any parts (new, used or junked) shall be stored within an enclosed structure. 2: No vehicles in a state of disrepair shall be stored.o.utside the building. Other vehicles in for repair shall not be stored outdoors in excess of 72 hours. (NOTE: The Butte County Superintendent of Schools will retain the use of the parking spaces on the west side of the building for school vehicles.) 3. Weed the landscaped areas and maintain routinely. 4. Remove weeds from the parking areas and maintain routinely. 5. Repair gate on garbage enclosure. 6. Install a 6 foot sight obscuring fence on the north and east property line:._ Fence shall be compatible with the development adjacent to the site. 7. Paint the exterior of the building in a color or colors compatible with surround- ing development. 8. Meet all applicable requirements of the Uniform Building and Fire Codes. 9. Applicant shall provide the City with a letter of permission from the property owner granting the lessee, Butte County Superintendent of Schools, permission to sublease the property. 10. Submit exterior building color(s) and fencing materials for review and approval by the Development Review Board. ll-." Obtain a City of Oroville Occupancy Permit and Business License. 12. Variance shall be reviewed in 24 months for compliance with conditions. AYES: Commissioners•Joplin, Le Clerc, Massey, Crowe NOES: Commissioners Bell, Robison ' EXCUSED: Cc---•issioner Trinidad Motion carr:. 10. Butte County Sheriff. Use permit application. Heliport. AP No. 31-04-0-020, 33 County Center Drive. Zoned P -Q. (A Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact with mitigation measures is recommended.) PROPONENT: Sheriff Hal Brooks, 33 County Center Drive, Oroville. LETTER OF OPPOSITION: Harry K. Samuelian, 5843 Natick Avenue, Van Nuys. A motion was made b}• Comm-Assioner Robison and seconded by Cc=issioner Bell to approve Negative Declaration of Environ7:cntal Impact -inding that the proposed heiincrt will n E`e`fect on t:le onviron:ment i; applicably :ederal, state and local recu:remcnts pertainin to *heliports and heliport operations are met • CITY OF OROVILLE PLANNING CO?LiISSION JUNE 11, 1984 - MINUTES - PAGE 7 APES: Commissioners Bell, Joplin, Le Clerc, Massey, Robison, Crowe NOES: None EXCUSED: Commissioner Trinidad Motion carried. A motion was made by Commissioner Robison and seconded by Commissioner Bell to approve a use permit for a heliport for the.Butte County Sheriff's Office finding that the proposed heliport will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Oroville if applicable federal, state and local requirements are met and the following conditions implemented: 1. Construction, operation, and maintenance of the heliport shall be in strict compliance with all requirements of the California State Depart - went of Transportation Division of Aeronautics and the Federal Aviation Administration. 2, When issued, the City of Oroville Public Works Department shall be provided with copies of the Department of Transportation site approval permit and heliport permit. 3. Construction plans shall be submitted to the City of Oroville Development Review Board for approval prior.to construction. 4. When development occurs within the landing and departure zone, a new zone shall be designated. The new zone, when needed, will provide a landing and departure path northwesterly from the site over the Thermalito Power Canal and State Highway 70. AYES: Commissioners Bell, Joplin, Le Clerc, Massey, Robison, Crowe NOES: None EXCUSED: Commissioner Trinidad. Motion carried. 11. Thomas Self. Use permit application. Used car lot/RV storage area. AP No. 68-27-0-015, 3022 Olive Highway. Zoned C-2. (Categorically exempt from environmental review requirements.) Commissioner Robison left his seat on the Planning Commission during the discussion and voting on the application. PROPONENTS: None OPPONENTS: None A motion was made by Commissioner Bell and seconded by Commissioner Joplin to grant a use permit.t.o Thomas Self to allow establishment of a used car sales lot and recreationval vehicle storage area at 3022 Olive Highway finding that the proposed use meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan subject to implementation of the following conditions: 1. Public parking spaces shall be provided per City Ordinance. Spaces shall be striped and bumpered. 2. Landscaping and planters shall be renovated and brought up to current standards. Renovation shall include, but may not be limited to: a.. concrete curbing b. removal of old soil, plants and trees C. removal of rocks d. installation of new soil, plants and trees 3. Improvements listed above are subject to review and approval by the Development Review Board. AYES: Commissioners Bell, Joplin, Le Clerc, Massey, Crowe NOES: None ABSENT FROM QUORUM: Commissioner Robison EXCUSED: Coirnissioner Trinidad Motion Carried. Jehn I,. and `zr•: `'finer 1`ariance a -pp 1 Cat'_on. Fence -'eight. i'.1 C. __-lj-5-O_ , � 3SS :'.' :i Street. 7CM -?-... iC Le-or_Call e::e-:nt _rcl� Cn,_:cnment..l rc•%•1vu :equire:ren:5.) CITY OF OROVILLE PLANNING COYLMIISSION STAFF REPORT JUNE 11, 1984 III. 10. Butte County Sheriff. Use permit application. Heliport. AP No. 31-04-0-020, 33 County Center Drive. Zoned P -Q. (A Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact w/mitigation measures is recommended.) The attached application and exhibits explains in detail the rea- sons for the.proposed heliport. Staff has no further comments. RECOMiENDATIONS: A. Finding that the proposed heliport will not have a significant effect on the environment if applicable federal, state and local requirements pertaining to heliports and heliport oper- ations are met, approve a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact subject to implementation of these requirements. B. Finding that the proposed heliport will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Oroville if applicable federal, state and local requirements are met, approve a use permit for the Butte County Sheriff's Department subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction, operation, and maintenance of the heliport shall be in strict cc*r.pliance with =11 requirements of the California State Department of Transporation Division of Aeronautics and the Federal Aviation Administration. 2. When issued, the City of Oroville Public Works Department shall be provided with copies of the Department of Trans- portation site approval permit and heliport permit. 3. Construction plans shall be submitted to the City of Oroville Development Review Board for approval prior to construction. 4. VIhen development occurs within the landing and departure zone, a new zone shall be designated. The new zone, when needed, will provide a landing and departure path north- westerly from the site over the Ther-malito Power Canal and State Highway 70. 6AtZt�E1J 0i2. r,9g� SITE 0 ll� CITY OF OROVILLE X . USE PER1-iIT APPLICATION FOR: Appropriate fees shall be submitted with VARIANCE application. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 33 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, OROVILLE, CA A.P:r: 31-04-20 ZONING: P. Q. (Quasi -Public) APPLICANT'S MA; -'1E• BUTT Et COUNT`_' SHERIFF' S OFFICE A^PL''ANT'. ADDRESS: 33 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, OROVILLE, -CA 95965- P.rPLICANVS INTEREST IN PROPERTY: nt1jn1FR owner -tenant -etc. NAME (If different frrn above) C'°..':':cR'S ADDRESS: SME AS ABOVE GIVE REASON FOR THIS APPLICATION, .EXPLAIN. FULLY: Thi -c application is bei nc submitted for the purpose of establishinc a Federal Aviation Administratio: (F.A.A.) certified heliport and landing pad in the lower parkinc lot area (northeast corner) o the Butte County Sheriff's Office. The establishment of a F.A.A..approved heliport is necessary- for. the promotion of safety and regulation of the approach and departure of helicopters to th Butte County Sheriff's Office. SIGNATURE OF APPLICAUT: An established heliport DATE: (con't on next pac USE PERM T (When appropriate, please submit the following with your application). A site plan, drawn to scale on an 81" x 11" sheet, showing existing and proposed structures, streets and other relevant features. ze IJARIANCE 1. Attach a :-ite plan, drawn to scale on an 8=" x 11" sheet, showing existing s truct:; res , s tree �s and other relevant improvements. Show clearly the areas of v2mrilnce. 2. Stat_ .,hat excepticnal or extraordinary circumstances apply to the subject site raking t.be v;'^'::rice ncccssary. the Planning Comrnission must make four (4) mandatory fir:dings prior to. issuing a variance. C at the Butte County Sheriff's Office is necessary to insure a fast reaction time in emergency situations and search and rescue operations. The heliport is additionally necessary for the transportation of eo,,:ipment and personnel during ongoing investigations as well as emergencies. The proposed heliport under consideration is for private use only, meaning that helicopters other than law enforcement operated heli- copters must have prior permission from the Sheriff of Butte County or his designee to land. All heliports in California are required to have a heliport permit iSSi?Ed 'Dv the Department U= iransUOrtatiU':, Division Of Ae:.-OncUt1C5. As defined by the F.A.A., a heliport is an area of land, water, or structure used or intended to be used for the landing and takeoff of helicopters. Prior to any agency submitting an application to the Department of Transoortation to operate a new heliport, the provisions of Section 21661.5 of -the Public Utilities Code (P.U.C.) m.:st be complied with. Section 21661.5 of the P.U.C. states that in order to apply for a permit to operate a heliport, the following information must be submitted to the Department of Transportation, Division o_7 Aerona.UZics; 1. Documented approval, by the Board of Supervisors and/or the City Council, the plan to construct a heliport per Section 21661.5 of the P.U.C. 2. vocal land use approval. 3. Confirmation of action by the Airport Land Use Commission. 4. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. (1970) . 5. Documents establishing ownership or control of property. 6. Airspace utilization clearance by the F.A.A. 7. Topographical map showing proposed heliport site, out- wardsfor a radius of two (2) miles depicting public utilities, schools, churches, railroads, highways, etc. 8. Scaled layout plans of the facility. I..hen all the above requirements have been complied with and submitted to the Department of Transportation, a sit- approval permit is issued. Loon completion of the facility, an inspection is made and if appro,,•ed, a heliport permit is issued. ,:,e anticipated ,se o` t. -e heliport is approximately five ( 5 ) a= ri,,'als c=.nd depart::res per mo^t`i d•_,ring the d .\',i:`•= ;lou'rs on an irreg',:lar, C.,-�'r .� _.� ✓�s_s ^ :o t C's o' ('� ic^ ite s t11 .�1 C -C- :cl - _ t or the T.a.;c_ _ }- o_` the . �..._ _ncl e t'r,e yell 206 -On c. C In proposing to establish a heliport at the Butte Co-;:nty Sheriff's Office, it is recognized that the arrival and departure of helicopters will create some noise, however, it is believed that the low level of activity planned along the proposed -landing and depart•.�re path will render this impact negligible. ATTACHED EXHIBITS: 1. Copy of F.A.A. Form 74.60-1/Notice of Landing Area Proposal. 2.. Proposed Heliport location map. 3. Proposed Heliport layout sketch.. t. Color aerial photograph depicting the proposed landing and departure path to the area of the Heliport site. B.. 'Bell 206 Long Ranger Helicopter noise exposure conto-rs/approach and landing profile. 6. Bell 206 Long Ranger Helicopter landing noise time history. 7. Hughes 500D Helicopter sound exposure level information. t46 U.S. GOVERN'"iENT vRINTIN G-OFFIC E-1076-6`b=A27 ,_Approved. OMB h0. 04•R0094 ESTABLISHMENT OR ACTIVATION p ALTERATION i pEPAFTN.ENT OF TRANSPORTATION p DEACTIVATION OR ABANDONMENT FEDERAL AVIAT IOM ADMINISTRATION O CHANGE OF STATUS I�e zip Code) N0110E OF LANDING AREA PROPOSAL ADDREss (N0., stteC+, city, I �,..- Lv Center Drive, ROPONEN7, INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION -,t ' ) COunt� 1 p AIRPORT OF -9 HELIPORT p SEAPLANE BASE rov Me , Calif - 0 LAME OF P f s ep II'atte Co'L�ty SPle�7--f 1, STATE j A. LOCATION OF LANDING AREA Z COUNTY I California 1. NEAREST CITY OR TOWN I Butte ELEVATION LATITUDE 7. LONGITUDE fi 1601 Or6, Lovi lie I 4� 22 '" lin oTt 30 •I ?� c:7 't 2'� 3 I NAME OF LANDING AREA r j 3at-iCe Sherif- ze - MAGNETIC bEILRINC, OF SE ALAN EIS) B, PURPOSELOCALITIES RVNWAY(S)OR W C< LENGTM Of RUM�AYlS) IN FEET I7YFE US E TYPE OWNERSHIP SERVED WIDTH Of RUNWAY( SI DR 0 PUBLIC IN FEET None MAGNETIC BEARING 0 F CTION D Z PRIVATE ") UBLIC '0 5001 DRCT. C) PERSONAL PRIVATE RF -F. AS ABOVE FROM LANDING AREAS DRCT. FROM DIST. FROM LAID INTI LR LANDING .. C. O I fl F .. LA,"IDING AREA AREA S W 1rp0rt S/W I 5 n '„��o•.rille Tiuni p1rEp !�•"� •.•' ANTICIPATED TYPE E. OBSTRUCTIONS TYPE kntenna Tower- Trees owerTrees IF CHANGE OF STATUS OR AT LTERAION, DESCRIBE CHANGE. 11ot ,=pplicable D LANDING AREA DATA 1. I DRCT MAGNETIC bEILRINC, OF SE ALAN EIS) RVNWAY(S)OR W C< LENGTM Of RUM�AYlS) IN FEET OG OR SEALA•MEIs) I- W CZ WIDTH Of RUNWAY( SI DR J5E♦LANE(S) IN FEET C 4 <w MAGNETIC BEARING 0 F CTION D `^ PRIMARY LANDING DRCT DIST. FROM FROM NE IGH7 ABOVE LA NDING LANDING L�.NDING AREA AREA AREA oo' S/wt 5001 DRCT. r, 2 50 .100 FROM LANDING Ar(OING LAREA Of RUNWAY SURFACE TYPED Cy,c.e+e, AQPNoll. („ec1• EILI ( DIMENSIONS OF LANDING AND TAKEOFF AREA IN FEET I- DIMENSIONS DF TOUCHDOWN 0: AREA IN FEET O G J MAGNETIC DIRECTION OF Uj INGRESS/EGRESS ROUTES TYPE OF SURFACE T., r. .�ti�P• rrt 1 JDE$CRIPTION OF LIGHTINGAL None F. OPERATIONAL DATA t. DIS DIRECTIOn FROM NEAREST CITY OR TOWN (MILES DIRECTION �, South RCON57RUCTION DATES TO EEGIN/EEG AM 1 C-'► -a4 E--MPLET ION 11-1—a4 EXISTING (If any) PROPOSED ?0� X701. 70 X 70 J 50 De gr( !!!: DIRECTIONr OF PREVAILING No'rt PRET ANTICIPATE[ (If I. ind;E !� S YRS. HENC11 by letter OR ACTUAL N0. BASED ACFT. 1. EST. MULTIENGINE AIRPORTS SINGLE-ENGINE 0 uNDER 3S00 LBS. MOI+ I o DRCT. DIST. fROM HELIPORTS OVER 3$00 L65* "G" G NOISE CONSIDERATIONS FROM LANDING Ar(OING LAREA N p MONTHLY LANDINGS I IDENTIFICATION AREA 2. AVERAGE AIR CARRIER I S W 2000 GENERAL AVIATION "1 _ Court S,aper�o` I p1rEp !�•"� •.•' ANTICIPATED TYPE Butte S 1300 YEARS HAVA10: 1, ARE IFR OPERATI WNTHIN��- + �.d:^-- ' �'ail�in 3u�.e n+0 p YES PORO APPLICATION FOR NID j12EDENSINp COUNTY I{, RUTH' BEEN MADE. V.LINIUPAL p HAS STATE I eke Les' e! ^.• A^o_in^e• ,5, FILL BE .AA,DE ro 1 i and c0 u,e !,ve ^a`•le•e nwde Lr r•e Incl. o•rE eo�el i LATE f o1e fnrs I TEL. I Ocen— Ii,01 0I1: of -.T _ PRO�OSCD NORT, 0A71 0 W MAP _ INCA= =0o FEET N W4 -E i -u U cam, BUT i E C0Uh i Y SIIZRI, r 5 0= =10E STAT E Hw`! �O E BUTT E CO SUPE RI" R Ci" 13UT7 E CCS I �. hOM�ta�STRATOU ` = •J7 .r... l 1 i R0F;CH Ani PF,nTuRE Pr,TH I SCArE: i sQ= F\vs Ls) FLS't 11NCH = 5C FEET -EU77e CCUK7i SHE-- (= F.5 07 C iJ%?LC`;E = ?kRkIK,G AREA o'u R0F;CH Ani PF,nTuRE Pr,TH I SCArE: i sQ= F\vs Ls) FLS't 11NCH = 5C FEET -EU77e CCUK7i SHE-- (= F.5 07 C iJ%?LC`;E = ?kRkIK,G AREA ` AFE OR -plo-I 7111 AN 71 LA ze zt Iry BET,L 206L )IFLICOPTER ljOISF EXPOSURE CONTOURS 1 1 \ i LANDING 0 ti. PATH 1 I3 _�� 0 _ ... --7 1 ' 6 D 60 2 SS d BA • _ � f I--' —1— 2 1 0 - 1 .3 ?2 li i7 9 S 7 6 5 3 DISTANCE FROM LANDING, 1000 FT 80 FT HOVER ALT 10 FT 1 DECEL I60 MPf{ .2 SO FT 0 - A IN I ALIhTkill AQnrTI.F ORM 70 11 B 'ILL 206L LAI IHIG HOISE Tli,!E. 111"TOI-% LOCAT 10; 1 A E PLIIADL� MAL 50 .10 5 0 5 10 S_COI CLE s I i 0! P, I ill lu, - -,, - r C, i.1 1) L L E PLIIADL� MAL 50 .10 5 0 5 10 S_COI -derick S. Scot Architect 7'.7 Of'ice Park—ay S:. Louis. I'Ao. c :—* i ?'gone 31114-557.20_0 5 z �c Nove=bar .i, 1901 rr 0 09 1 °81 JI / r.1�11 r`In f LA441':l,.Lj Ger;c� u-. 7d Pal=eri Cly' r)` ~!CO ssis��t Plz:zner Municlpal Build-ing 5tz and Main Streets Chico,. Califo-:_� 95925 `. T. Enloe -`ae=rial Hospi t=1 C^_c0, Cal-_C—znia IDear.'* . Pal=eri r 's 1^_tter -s ccr.fi~t;-ng cur celenhone c0n-:e-sat4-e7, I of Octab__ 29, 1981 in ,;h4-rh I relayed to you "he following sound emposure level for the i u; jes 500D i:elico.tar. b`EL_COP":IR 500-D SOC\ _'OS:7, ? ',— (SZ I) ' 1. Approach: 89.3 SEL 400' Correction :actors. 400' to 200' =4 D—,A 400' to 1C00' -4 1/2 DBA 400' to 2000' - 8 1/2 DEA 2. Dep-srture: 84.4 Cor-action-ac_ors. 600' to 200' -5 1/2 D3A 60., is 1000' - 2 1/= DB?, ECS' tc 2000, -7 D?1 J��O'—�._ L.:r c _�11 ..J V'J_._..2C'. _•L . �•i LOU A_f? -, :�'� ..5=c�1 CJ[;+U1:?': f • CHIEF DMINI STRATIVE C''FICE 2S COUNrr CEN-rCr� DR. / UROV!LL.E. CALIFORNIA 9596E.-238-0 (916) 534-4631 MaC,711: N!CHO_S Cr -EF AOMINIGTRIIIVE OFFICER Niayor Jana Wi 1 son '-City of Oroville 1735 Montoomery Street Oroville, CA 95965 DeEr Nlayor Wilson: February 8, 1984 Re: Sheriff's Heliport MEMBERS OF THE BOARD AL SAQACENI JANE DOLAN HILDA -HEELER BERTHA MOSELEY LEN FULTON Enclosed please find a certified copy of the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Resolution of Intention to Apply for Application to Establish. a Heliport at the Butte County Government Center. Please advise what action, if any, is necessary at this time with regard to an application for environmental review for this project. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Ve' y/ t �l y y/di rs 1 Martin J. is ols Chief Administrative Officer MJN-/GL/rd Enclosure cc: Sheriff Hal T. Brooks Ron Chaplin, Sheriff's Department A fYl ' ��- iXA2' i � - 4 G.: �'• fy .'- - .:.•4i��i. r.,. y1.. ..> L � Y•�.b..i ` wr�: ;�.D'w��e.r „•:.. �`��14fi )� =�Z.�; �'ti�1t��S��/•yt .2��''y�r `tom � v a _ i'1� �u1;�R1Zl�ttii4,Ati�; 'l�y},1`�r.�G'�:s� �':•c?'��•�2 f ��s� `�ilj..o:'rt.:: •.tic: �--':�J'•'..::i. :',•�:?�= •is�ai:•�!:.�.�, Q''�,:t'e.�`"_7'Z.�' - i Resolufion No. 84-03 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPLY FOR APPLICATION TO ESTABLISH HELIPORT AT THE BUTTE COUNTY GOVERI4MENT CENTER, OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Butte County Sheriff's Department in cooperation with other law enforcement agencies has determined the need to establish an official heliport; and WHEREAS, the Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics, - Sacramento requires the Board's expression of intention to•apply; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors designates the Butte County 1!heriff or his designee to proceed with the requirements set forth by the -Department of Transportation. Klv!, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Butte County Sheriff, on behalf of the Butte County,Board of Supervisors, will proceed with application for establishment of a Butte County Heliport located at the Butte County Government Center, Oroville, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Butte County Board of Supervisors this 10th day of January 19s•4 by the following vote: AYES: Suj.ervisors Dolan, Fulton, Moseley, !':heeler and Ch.�irrn,)n Saraceri NOES: Mono ABSENT: gone NOT VOTING: Nonc AIL Sh•RACENI , Cha i rman Butte County Board of Supervisors ATTEST: MARTIN'J..NICHOLS,,Chief Administrative officer,, - and Clerk of 6e/`Board Dy I-STRUWiENT IS A CORRECT COPY CF THE ORIGINAL ON FILE AND OF RE RD 114 "'iS OFFICE ATTEST DATECO