The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCLUP CORRESPONDENCE & DOCUMENTS 1999I: COUNTY MASNIA . OROVILLE, t F —,C'ni;co >terprise Record EK -.r r F . N Attn: Donx+a/Legal. fids D Issued 0 0. Box 1 R LChicop: CA 95927- ' _ 21>0, r URCHASE'ORD R r'` a2 00, 1s • K :�, �?� t..l'j tft '"7+ '� �f .. i .1'^`r d n tF �i t Project Sub , Invoice No... Invoice Date` Z DATE QUAN. - INVOICE NO. AND' DESCRIPTI ON •'•'�t * ^'*f �., .r� AMOUNT �. 'CHARGE -TO--, '' - W.O:,H :/8/99 140TIC.T OV, PUBL.IC ',� jc y liQ O. To be fitonday; 19.99.y published December, 13, 1 :f.t1�! , >'Y'„ rora.-3i - V "�vtt r. ,�.0 - Zr. �. -Kf ci rZ>v •, �.y a~ •� ' f"'+*hj� n'St Size: 1/8 yya , .t,� _ . -i�� I.. _. • •• i�r_t`i _r'``•x S _ ,;, gge ♦h , 4i. fry a' .4 ; 'C^ •..• .. -..a> •r,..� 'fes', �.J ��''1ir<• v •. r> aY.a..v r,V. -lease this Yc r v•t'.:. r�',�r.. `.�� 1 Drovide office with two sftadaysts. 4-''''~:�, :+'�: .. '+'•, ;' •` Of d�'c blication. r j .r X ;;. .r.,z L. i.; • .µ r moi§.;. �•t ti r `- • y'• y ] �yr Rutte \,t �. +.. r Si.�ri n,.UC i' t�`' _w' ,�_ s� •,G•� 1;�.:'",•W f • c,� A t Barbra • `j t. :21" - ra �7 cam 5`38=7764 , _ 7 Cotu�ty_ Center Drive le rovi:23e CA 95965-3397'�',{ f- > r , '''; f'. ti;. '• ,,f,, a , _,. !{ .,. � - +Y r - i� �. �r ,,' fi t ?� '� f fi y �' 4�`tr#. � h u ._ t r Iw- i• .W� _'�` 7,IV ? .�,.i,. t e•• S VleTa7 and Vpdat6.6f .J9 .th. ,C� i 74.}'!nc '_ fir.• .. Yti.?{� . ;.�.` `�U�.J _ F k }) . fw � _ r•::: - 4 ' 1` .. r t{j f. �- '"� w�;q 4. f - � '��J �• -{ w..l� fv lr�ji'\' i� � +,rLj wM .. - - ti 1 .Y: k•' �}r1\U�a�i C• -t .L ).} rr�..`iti3• t;e,a x, a `, - , - .. ?�/}�- `�t .�., p•y,,,,ra`.y i Yy`i 1fr �'. '�.{,. , ..'�. ,> ' , a., y •�' t. C_."� k•'. ;t. �'r j, ' .'g•'C trw � rY A _ �3. T """ -� •d r\ tt`tx n,R N 9ali `. ,. •�` a ?' TOTAL ' w, :�y� .- _ K.:.. :ti ; '- -:•: ti -r »:i - ar { .`' AI 1...' - . •l G.".•+..fy'� I, the undersigned, hereby.ce�that,.;to the best of.my.knowledge •the services or articles s�. �/ a � # �t K �, t ,y .. 4, M� Af rW. i. specified'above,have.been performed,or delivered or ;where authorized, are herebyacr. contrted ter}3"; Ads,'" for and that -there is a Budget:Appropriafion�for the same. w, •. • . • . .Fa y ` � J i,:.. .n a .e. _r ' � "� ;. "�� .r a ;1 ,,.,, 3 �'L 1 • � °�'w'^+ b x�, r .z: 4. j — ^ S O �.- ` � 6 r :� Ya n ,3tx r'a., ..••,n • � :Datedzed�,Deputy.Deportent Head oAutko6� mtSr' e �w ct' . � v''' �"t, Yv�;�7 •:.,� `M 'rS,>;.~t..rr�.!,• * j _ri <23�. 1 ^ Dept. 8 Sub: Project Sub , Invoice No... Invoice Date` `'"Encumbrance:: ',; Amount ` Discount _ :Obj.`- .Gross { 1 :f.t1�! , >'Y'„ rora.-3i - V "�vtt r. ,�.0 - Zr. �. -Kf ci rZ>v •, �.y a~ •� ' f"'+*hj� n'St ' , .t,� _ . -i�� I.. _. • •• i�r_t`i _r'``•x S _ ,;, i -i!' i.-<...�`:� c ,tom .: ♦h , 4i. fry a' .4 ; 'C^ •..• .• J. '�' ,C ; ^} y� ,- •` rrK �e : Y ! k r c ;yx�: ^� .r.,z L. i.; • Y r .µ r moi§.;. �•t ti r Submit..WHITE,:CANARY and PINK ta'PURCHASING with:vendor's invoice:>Retam'GOLDENRODt 014 .' ENTERPRISE-l�RD jw cl, Mercury-Register ""BILL"DATE si �"aBICL'FROAi1 ,`` :, v "BILL TO 12/13/99 LQDM[�G��OaC� '^ 'tr='•TERMS OF PAYMENT ,>r'F* .PAGE SSALES RE PRESENTATIVE` Judyy,,.Sinor, ..., . l!BILLE-D ACCOUNT NUMBER?" '0 BUTTE ,COUNTY -ADMINISTRATION , ` '� ¢' - 016230 25 County Center Drive`s- Oroville Ca 95965 a '. AMO ' U_NT . DUE'AMLINT P AID ^;ar K'•.,. Y� 7'. r ! t ,L f+ dD' �, # r,.f .t 4 .KS Ff, $ 340.16 DETACH AND REMIT TOP PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT. , '• DATE . �: DESCRIPTION '~- TIMES `"`'`, UNITS ,,; RATE • ' Notice` of.. Public M etin "' 12%13 < �A,�A.. 16:' �;.ri 21..26 $340.16 {= . - hh 7 n. • '� fY,�� . [ .. .` �� (,fir v i. v ' r �_µ�. . r , r.i ix ,a ..;..,* :•ti "x (it y r'n -'l t• +'x' -it x *4� ,. fit••• ' ,•� 4�L"(u-+""'. OVER 30 DAYS OVER 60 DAYS OVER 90 DAYS CURRENT AMOUNT ® ( e • t! rw`„K t�� r 1 .(• �r11' 4 k ate" 4 tiy. �eRri � .rn �-+•'.. 3<ex f $340.46" r . fixt'6.. . i .t�S}. E�. 4..18 C f • ..d1T-T . .. `'+�x,I �fk"-,.; L , Y TOTAL BALANCE DUE WITHIN 15 DAYS BILLEDACCOONT�NO. BILLED ACCOUNT NAME' 016230 Butte co. Administration $ILL DATE ENTERPRISE-REC®RD P.O. BOX 9 • CHICO, CA 95927-0009. (530) 891-1234 Mercury -Register , P.O. BOX 651 OROVILLE, CA 95965 (530) 533-3131 (SPACE FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) I . f IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE In the Matter of Notice of .Public Meeting. .................................................................. No ..................................................... r— AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of California County of Butte ss. The undersigned resident of the county of Butte, State of California, says: That I am, and at all time herein mentioned was a citizen of the United States and not a party to nor interested in the above entitled matter; that I am the principal clerk of the printer and '.n .r .•.".., publisher of + The Chico Enterprise -Record - Oroville Mercury Register. That said newspaper is one of general circula- tion as defined by Section 6000 Government Code of the State of California, Case No. 26796 by the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Butte; that said newspa- per at all times herein mentioned was printed and published daily in the City of Chico and County of Butte; that the notice of which the annexed is a true printed copy, was published in said newspaper on the following days: Dec. 13, 1999. I certify (or declare), under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct, at Chico, California. O M O O Dec. 21 1999 C-' Dated.........................z................................... ....... 1,Q at Chico, California. 0 eA3 CAD c� ... ...... ........... ... .............................. ..... (i nature) O D v 0n NOTICE ,OF PUBL" IC MEETING Notice ishereby,given that the Butte.:County Airportland Use 6mmissi6h (ALUC)'will'consider the'following. item ; at their regular meeting on December 29, 4999 9:00 a.m:. in the Butte C.ountyBoard of Supervisors' Chambers (25 County Center!Drive, Oroville, CA): 1999 Annual Reviewand•Updateof the `Chico, ! 5�' Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero'.Comprehensive Land Use Plans: ..• Y ice, 'The ALUC will co nsider'adoptiontof development criteria y ma : } and a densittrix correlated'to maps of Chico �Orovill'e, Paradise anal Ranchaero Comprehensive Land,U;e; Plans ;,'The amendments specify persons per acre; 4minimum lot" size and other,'development regulations for•the various'. safety zones that surround.each of the'public use'airports". �in'Butte County..�This_ arnendmerit is proposed iri accor-` ., = dance'with'.Public Utility Code Section's 21674:7 and'21675" which allows a once a. year update'to the comprehensive' land use plans; for each of the'County's public use airports:, Y. ,:.. This is'.a"lannin ro ect consisting of a ieg islative act to ' p .g p 1 i g g ` update Chko,�Oroville,� Paradise and. Ranchaero "`.comprehensive Land UseTlans.•The proposed'programs" ,i,. specify the manner in which the land will be perm' ted to be used so that development can proceed in a'responsible manner. Planning programs consisting;of a legislative act'. ;, does'not result in a physical change'iri'ihe enviionment ' untila future -project is aually.proposed to be carried out `pursuantto the proposed criteria of the,regulatory pro.-' f -gram. Atthat time;'the project shall be fully subject to , !CEQA andmitigation can be'incorporated into the project..- '• v . `� is i 4. , ;,, r ' i -,.. An.Initial Study, and Negative Declaration have been pre -,y, pared pursuant to'the' California Erivironmentai ality _..Act. This document is,availableioi review at the'Butte County Department of Development Services, 7 County; - Center Drive, ;OrovilleCalifornia between,thehours of 8:00 and '4 00 p.m ,,,Members of the public are encouraged.to attend ,the.meet-' ,..' ing and provide input ,to the Commission. Written com ! , ments will ,also" 'be accepted up to.the day of tlie, hearing , 4Questions regarding this`item should be directed to -Dave Doody, Sepior�Palnner,,Butte'County ALUC staff at (530) -538-7601. w 4, f .. ._ �. No...................... In the Matter of ......................................... : ......................... ................................................................... ................................................................... ................................................................... ............................ ...................................... Affidavitof Publication Of ................................................................... B-02 • l FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Subject: AL 06 � 1212 ?, At v Number of pages (including this cover sheet): f /'7 Telephone Number of Receiving Telecopier: 5- If you do not receive all of the pages, please call (530) 538-7541 as soon as possible. Special Instructions: • )W Review and respond accordingly. o For your information only. 0 Sincerely, CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information contained in this facsimile is confidential and may also contain privileged information. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, of copying of this communications is strictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile, in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, and return toe original to us. Thank you. • FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: / 2 To: 7-47K From: Subject: Number of pages (including this cover sheet): 1"2- /z 9/9 y Telephone Number of Receiving Telecopier: f3�5 If you do not receive all of the pages, please call.(530) 538-7541 as soon as possible. Special Instructions: ?� Review and respond accordingly. O For your information only., /2 z8 t� sincerely, -D.- Qtt�j CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information contained in this facsimile is confidential and may also contain privileged information. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, of copying of this communications is strictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile, in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, and return toe original to us. Thank you. 52 SW -2; 15 JUC 1999- Amdt 7 99196 VOR/DME RWY 13L CHICO MUNI (CIC) AL -557 (FAA) : CHICO, CALIFORNIA OAKLAND CENTER IAF OAKLAND NDC ' RED BLUFF 115.7 RBL�•�� 04100± CHICO TOWER* 121.0(CTAF)0239.3 'Chan GNDCON O.tiy 121.9 p ppm UNICOM - 122.95 3000 CIC 116° (12) 13.8 A3943± . 1=J 2150 ZV61 A- 572± T A When control tower closed, except P� for operators with approved ?? ± weather reporting service, use /.��5 Redding altimeter setting. ^1815 CHICO 109.8 CIC L Chan 35 Local altimeter seeing minimums: 1353 Afor inoperative MALSR, increase ^ 1685 S -13L Cat. D visibility to 1 y. / Jv / �P CIC ?g ` N,y otie 1,20 e i DURHA INT \ 850-0 CIC ED 2500 ��70• 0�+1 `'•.. rap ' � G ' MISSED APPROACH ELEY 238. CIC Climb to 2500 via CIC R=135 to 122" 5.7 NM 13.8 CIC DURHA Int/CIC 8.7 DME and �� from FAF 3000 � 68 hold. /286± 1�2;�% Cl' 275±/. ;N�� Procedure Turn NA 2000 4 4; 1A TDZE �J�� {x312 7 NM , 5.7 NM 236 Ilk CATEGORY A B C D• S-13 6640-'/2 402 (500-'h) 640 4 402 (500 s/.) 402(00-1) IRCLING 640-1 700-1 700-1'h 8QQ-2402 (500.1) 462 (500.1) 462 (500.1'6) 562 600.2REDDING ALTIMETER SETTING MINIMUMS S -13L 780-%2 542 (600.15) 780-1 780-1'% REIT Rw 31R 542(600-1 542 (600.1 V..) Y 780-1 Y2 800-2 HIRL Rwy 13L -31R0 CIRCLING 780-1 542 (600-1) 542 (600-1'h) 562 (600-2) � " Knots 60 90 120 150 180 Girding not authorized east of Rory 13L-31R.OQ Min:Sec I I I I I ] VOR/ E RWY 13L* 39.48'N - 121& • CHIC IFORNIA Arndt 991 —^ CHIC4WNI (CIC) - a • 4 -' Arndt 1099 �' � - `' • •. �� x- '''• ILS R 1 3 L _ AL -557. FAA _- CHIC�INI (CIC) CHICO, CALIFORNIA Opp _ py9 opt OAKLAND CENTER - 132.2 350.3 DME OR RADAR REQUIRED CHICO TOWER- `'' 121.0 (CTAF)0239.3 9➢ :;``ie• GER T GND CONS 4100; 1219 CIC =17.1:UNICOM 122.95 IAF. ^ RED BLUFF n 3943; 115.7 RBL••; • I` t Chan 104 CIC 17.1 a _ s!u - w- t 3490 • •Cl CO 7.1 / I + •RA • �. 296 When control tower dosed, except for r 2150 A operators with approved weather reporting 11 service, use Redding altimeter setting.*- Circling not authorized east of Rwy 13L-31 R. r N 72± IAF Redding altimeter seeing minimums: for CHICO ' CIC•�•�; inoperative MALSR, increase S•ILS 13L109.8 visibility to I V." /1., Chan 35- 0A NA - _ . i0 - 6051 ^1815 'by LOCALIZER 111.3 I•CIC ^ 1685 SACK 25 3000 315° (8.7) }4 1353 `�o• 8700 p \ - DURHA CIC 8.7 JINGO 2700 o y �,• R-135 NO VOR/DME ELEV 23"118 CIC7.1 _ RA C%C c 7 92 . _ Climb to 900, then continue . MISSED APPROACH7,A 1' S.9 NM • climb to 2500 via CIC R-135rom FAF to DURHA Int/CIC 8.7 DME286i MM 22115 11 and hold. 275+A I.- 1,1. TDZE 23 000 "i 1 CIC GS 3.00" 2 500 `2< 312 TCH54 10 3* 12 f—s.�wM os CATEGORY A 8 C D°$ S•ILS 131 438-'/z 200 200•V2 S -LOC 13L 640-'/2 402 (500.55) 640-3/ 402 (500-24) 0' m� 1 640-1 700-1 700-1'/z 800-2 �� CIRCLING 402 (500.1) 462 (500-1) 462 (500.1 y2) 1 562(600-2) ®��p REDDING ALTIMETER SETTING MINIMUMS S -ILS •131 584-3/ 346 400-1A REIL Rwy 31R 5 LCtC 13L -800 1/2 562 (600 'h) 800-1 800-11/4 HIRL Rwy 13L -31R0 562 (600.1) _ 562.(600.1 V.) FAF to MAP 5.9 NM CIRCLING 800-1 562(600-1) 800-1'/2 800-2 Knots 1 60 1 KI 120 1150 1180 562 (600.1 Y2 562(600-2) Min:Sef 5:54 3:56 2:57 2:22 1:58 ILS RWY 3 L i 39.48'N - 121"52'W -aCHICO, CALIFORNIA , CHICO MUNI (CIC) Amdt 10 99196 51 - - SW -2,45 JUL"1.999 Orig-A 991: ��II - - -. CHI CNI (CIC) VOR/�A•E RV" 31.R- AS (FAA) CHIC ;CALIFORNIA OAKLAND CENTER A3490 - 5778- 132.2.350.3 CHICOTOWER* 121.0 (CTAF)0239.3 GND «, it 2150 SP,CIC ?S l2 _ CON , r 2961^ 1.9 ICOM T 30t,, 8500 . .95 4* ( t r r 5724'. CHICO 169.8 CIC �• '.'Chan 35 - - - ^605 _ i . - , . •„ .A 1815. Z' ' CIC 4 +- - 2.5 ` When control tower dosed, except _ 1353 A ' �/A for operators with approved 1685. ,�• weather reporting service, use t. Redding altimeter setting. -a ; ' ABERG _ _ .' CIC©_ - r o tr ; e t 3005 - ` 81LBO INT , • CIC 16 " .. IAF 3000 • WILLIAMS 007" (30.8) •- 114.4-ILA;•• Chan 91 MISSED APPROACH BILBO INT ELEV `238 „q Climbing left tum to 2000 via CIC'� 1 -.CIC16 v '' R-147 to ABERG16 DME and hold. c 3000 r ABERG + o I /1 286f CIC© VORIDME + 2 5 I �� - procedure Turn NA . } ^ ' %2000 z7s+_ 1 # ..\ 312 11200 `I `, f..�-� -2 2.5---j- 3.5 -- WNM "•'ter ,�\a {� CATEGORY A. B C -D� S-31 R - 620-1 396 (400.11. 620-1%, 396 (400.116) -620-1 700-1 700-1 Y2 800-2 CIRCLING 382 (400-1)_ 462 (500-'1) 462 (500--1%) .562 (600.2) ® ^ t„ TDZE \Q REDDING ALTIMETER SETTING MINIMUMS - `' . , 224t'u REIL'Rwy 31R x.327° to HIRL Rwy'IX-31R-VOR/DME S-31 R 760-1 536 (600-1) 760-1 Y2 536�(600.1'f)) 760-12G 536 (600.1 $A) CIRCLING ' ` 760-1 522 (boot) - 760-1'/2 522 (600 11`+) 800-2-- 562 (600.2) Knots F 60 1,90 1.120 050 1180 Circling not authorized east of Rwy 13L-31 R. V&MiniSec - VOR/DME RV'" 31RM '39.48'N'-'2'°52'W � CHICO,'CALIFORNIA CHICO MUNI (CIC) Orig•A 99196 _ 53 SW-2; 15 JUL' 1999 54 SW -2, 15 JUL 1999 Amdt 9 919196 VOR RVNY 1 '1I AI_ss7 IFAAI - CHICO MUNI (CIC) ' RED LLUF 115.7 RBI•'; Ghan 104 i JINGO When control tower dosed, except for operators with approved weather reporting service, use Redding altimeter setting. Remain within 10 NM a 3p2 2300 • r:rnGO, CALIFORNIA OAKLAND CENTER 132.2 350.3 CHICO TOWER* 1 121.0 (CTAF) 9 239.3 3943f GND CON A 121.9 10 NM ^3490 UNICOM 122.95 5778 ^50 2961 IAF AF !? 572± CHICO 7:.—. ?0 n 109.8 CIC Chan 35 A 45605± ^1815 B ?l 1353 ^1685 3000 A X315°(8.7) i h p'10 MISSED APPROACH Climb to 2500 via CIC R-135 to DURHA Int/CIC 8.7 DME and hold. 500 2500. '�io 0 ELEv 238 122° to �6 VOR/DME n 286f 275± *Maintain 2400 or above until „•''- TDZE ` 312 established outbound for procedure tum. """ 238 �6 ye j} " 312 CATEGORY A B C D 6^ 5 131. 800-'/z 562 (600-12) 800-1 800-1'/4 1, 562 (600-1) 562 (600-1 A) \�\ CIRCLING 800-1 562 (600-1). 800-1 Vi 800'2 562 (600-1'h) 562 (600.2) ® J REDDING ALTIMETER SETTING MINIMUMS 3�a 5131 960-'/z 722 (B0D-K) 72 8(0o�iu) 722 (S -/,� REIL Rwy 31R 960-2 960-2'/4 HIRL Rwy 131-31R@ CIRCLING 960-1 722 (800.1) ° 722 (600-2) 722 (800.2%)90 180 120 150 Knots .60 Circling not authorized east of Rwy 13L-31 R. 8� Min:Sec VOR RWY 131 _ 39°48'N - 121°5�k CHICJ1111116ALIFORNIA Arndt 9 991 _ - CHIC4WNI (CIC CHICO (CIC) R 1 3 L AL -557 (FAA) • CHICO, CALIFORNIA \ 3000 RED BLUFF �D 01\ .6) ' RBL \ (IAF) LAND CENTER GERBE 350.3 -010WER • � 121.0 (CTAP) Q 239.3 ��d� �0 " GND CON 3943± 121.9 - ^ UNICOM 122.95 ZOTWY - - /.3490 u, 2150 Mro t \(�AF 13L RW 13L A1815 SSP,* 13L ?Sti �f 8300 /.2961 A1353 A 1685 ® DURIIA,� ' 6 • 1, ZOTWY MISSED APPROACH ELEV 238 Climb to 2200 direct DURHA 131 ° ro 2400 URMAF WP and hold. �RW13L ^ 286± 131° 2.5 NM to �x RWl3L RW13L TDZE 1900 n ,£\ 238 I 275± INJA 1100 -Q 312 5 NM -2.5 NM -- -- 2.1 rJM� -.. 0 • X312 CATEGORY A B C. D,,.A - S-1.31 560-1 322(400-1) _ b 600-1 700-1 700-1Y2 800-2 CIRCLING 362(400-1) 462(500-1) 1 462 (500-1K) 562 (600-2) 3\ RED BLUFF ALTIMETER SETTING MINIMA O S-1 3L 640-1 402 (500-1) 640-1Y 402 (500-1Y 1 660-1 700-1 700-1Y2 800-2 REILRwy 31R CIRCLING 422(500-1) 462(500-1) 462 (500-1ih) 1 562 (600-2) HIRL Rwy 13L -31R Q When control tower closed, except for operators With approved weather reporting sevice, use Red Bluff altimeter setting. : Circling not authorized east of Rwy 13L/31 R. 00 NA GPS R Y Y 1 1, 3 L 39 `48'N - 121 '52W CHICO, CALIFORNIA Orig 99196 55 CHICO MUNI, (CIC) SW -2,15 JUL 1999 56 Orig 99196 GPS RWY 51.R AL 557 (FAAI SSW -2; f5:JUL-1999 CHICO MUNI (CIC) CHICO' CALIFORNIA , 2150 OAKLAND CENTER „ 2961 - 132.2 350.3 A CHICOTOWER• 121.0 (CTAF)0239.3 _ GNDCON _ 121.9 UNICOM 122.95 (MAP). „ TOHLY '' A 1815 r / , 2.5 NM to 1' TOHLY 1�- `' CJI A1353 n 1685; t • ; t ~IPKOW ? JINGO „ ifs ° • ` S ED S. ' 3005 C°„ , SPj0HLY 25 0il`' ^� F83-0-01 EFIXU EFUCU 4 LA � _ GRIDD MISSED APPROACH UNJEL) Ems/ 238 r Climbing left tum to 3000 direct JINGO 2600 WP and hold. IPKOW 2:5 NM to 1-1-0,3AZ° A286± TOHLY WP I TOHLY 1 3>x2000 __ Procedure ATurn NA 275± 1200 ° VGSI and descent a L 2.86° angles not coincident. 0 312' f `T H5 -- t16 „a Q 0.5 2.5 NM ----2.5 NM5NM Q9� - 312 CATEGORY A B C D $� S-31 R 560-1 336(400-1) $ CIRCLING 600-1- 700-1 .700-116 1 800-2 362(400- 462(500-1) 1 46211500-1111) 1 562 (600-2) TDZE RED BLUFF ALTIMETER SETTING MINIMUMS 224 1R 6401 4161500-1)- 640-1Ye 416(500-1V.) , 311 660-1 7001 700-1Y2 800-2 CLINGS 422 (500-1) 462 (500-.1) 462 (500-1)1 562 (600-2) REIL Rwy 31 R TOHLY HIRL Rwy 13L-31 R 0 Circling not authorized east of Rwy 31 R/13L " ' ' When control tower closed, except for operators with approved weather reporting service, use Red Bluff altimeter setting. V© NA GPS RWY 31 R 3Y"48'N-121°52'W CHICO CALIFORNIA Orifi 99196 _ f., • • CHICO I (CIC) I (PILOTI�)(GONGSI .G S) 94342 ® w it, GONGS ONE DEPARTURE SL-5571FTA) CHICO (CIC) CHICO, CAUFORNIA GND CON 121.9 CHI CO P FF �73LLU— . 1;•121.0(CTAF) t > OAKLAND CENTER `',, 4•• N40°05.93' 2 D W122°14.18' `r 0 L-2, H-1 CHICO log 8CIC•••=• L-2 NOTE: Chart not to scale. (Continued°on next page) _ GONGS ONE DEPARTURE - (PILOT NAV) (GONGS I.GONGS) 94342 57 Chan 35 kIN M fR.43g / l-2600 1 NM 05 JINGO N39 °39.01' W122-00-12' GRIDD N39°19.65' W121°50.12' MKW�. R-070 R .a o f" P a 0 :RAMENTO 0^ 2 SAC Chan 99 S2' -W 121 °33.10 L-2, H-2 CHICO, CALIFORNIA CHICO MUNI (CIC) SW -2,15 JUL 1999 58 (PILOT NAV) (GONGS I.GONGS) WAX P•r1A1P C /1\IG nenA nr1 inr vv-Nyy v1 Vl- VLI /1I%I %;I% L. JL -JJ/ 0 DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION. TAKE -Off RUNWAYS 13LIR: Turn right heading 260° within 1 NM of take -off; SW -2,15 JUL 1999 CHICO MUNI (CIC) CHICV, CAUKJK VIA intercept CIC R-238 to GONGS INT. Thence .... TAKE -OFF RUNWAYS 31L/R: Turn left heading 210° within 1 NM of take -off; intercept CIC R-238 to GONGS.INT. Thence .... .... via (transition) or (assigned route): MAXWELL TRANSITION (GONGSI.MXW): From over GONGS INT via MXW R-359 to MXW VORTAC. POINT REYES TRANSITION (GONGSI .PYE): From over GONGS INT via MXW R-359 to MXW VORTAC; then via MXW R-184 and PYE R-005 to PYE VORTAC. RED BLUFF TRANSITION, (GONGS 1.RBL): From over GONGS INT via RIBL R-140 to RBL VORTAC. SACRAMENTO TRANSITION (GONGSI .SAC): From over GONGS INT via V23 and SAC R-329 to SAC VORTAC. - WILLIAMS TRANSITION (GONGSI .ILA): From over GONGS INT via RBL R-140 and V195 to ILA.VORTAC. L GONGS ONE DEPARTURE CHICO, CALIFORNIA (PILOT W(GONGSI:GQ#S) 9A3A2 . • T cHlco I (cIC> `Amd10,99 .�`Or Q 5 , ,. `t- 7, 'A q> A':... V CHI r(CIC) t L rr 3l 557_ 6 CHIC04 CALIFORNIA ..�.�..:T r..._.._ J OOH : tOAKIANDsCENTER r 4 /999 °T --1e, .;. ` ,T..___ �,L. �;.. X132:2 350:31 6, DME`°AOR RADAR ,REQ.U'IRED - eHICOTOWER' .... a _ w ._ ._ -. 9 7. iJ_-. , i. _,r....._.__-"" _ _,�.,_., _ ..__. _i :.G=35i�r><a ; 3: •! .,T,'ra, 0 't•' (CTAF) 239.3 GERQjjNT.._ i F,>t .._._ ` 4100± GND CONS 'UNICOM• `. er r t d- 122.951 iii _ (r <i x i SJRIAFl :31RED BLUFF 11V) 0 �� I 9G3 rr } u• 115.7 --RBL. _. _fi -•_ " /� 3_94f f• 3. Ch'8ri1:04. CIC t - _..._ 17:1 o. 34 90' x s 1 } I S a � No RAD i i ` ` When control tower dosed„exce t'for �`Ir 3 x f'� - 2961 i t 2150 n.•v P ^ 1 operators with oppr�oved'weother reporting r - t g i sernce;?use Redding altimeter setting.';--” >;s't tR I r 8o`f R i Circling not authorized east of Rwy 1301 R. s3^;EStil�r t,,ti a �^ 72± IAF, Redding alhewer setting minimums: For ._-..«f 1 ti. ? > s� I '} 'CHICON til t inoperative MALSR, increase S -ILS 13L it6t. , 31x1` -., M f 109,8 CIC`• i visibility to 1 Y.. t a t j'_.®"L•�NA._:�,....,_ __.____<-_ .moo.....:..._ .._.,........... __. _...._._ ,..../,�_....� �- ~, E", Ckan�35 � LOCALIZER 111.3 605± ^1815 ` ti -CIC �. e.. p_A I •, a�� e.. � e �� °`'•..._. Ort' i . ' t �� .^ 1685 p•CIC•3000 nY" 353 , 1 3' I 1, 315 (857) + r_i��1� 8700 r:C:!-re twi F .•�i.,7� ®.�;? .y ` + nj Oryt�'\ Y ,! .. /i �, (�`�`� a. . lit t� DURHA CIC i }va •0 2 00 ' ' • ! K est r JINGO" LLLIII . j �'s4 .i `�tt'Yt�-•'JL .�t:a:,+ .,af,. f5l:. - -• ¢ - °' R.135 M1 CO VOR/DME V, ,' ELEV. 238' , 4M C7.1 ;. r G1C MISSED APPROACHt ? *, '� Climb to 900; then continue .'•; 1310 5.9 NM ai k• L k+ e a tT'' • cn5r i - climb to 2500 vic CICrR 135 :rte from FAF ;M ' '4i E' " °' ear •• to DURHA Int%CIC Bal DME A " t 1 I and hold" 286f r ' +^ 1 �TDZE 2215 ;+ t I 3000 .11 275_ <f \ 1 238 t t GS 3.00° ;;:. -. , TCH 54 2500 �;.: �'` 41 , I 312 tt X312 c s.4 NM 0 S a i' F, CATEGORY A :. tB D G s as 13L V. 438-y 200�2o01h 5 -LOC 13L 640-!/s 402 (500IN" �° _. 640-3/. 402 (500-a/.) m F i CIRCLING ,64a 700-1. 6` :_ .,. _ 800-2 9 .. 700 1 % ®` w �¢ .402 (500.1) 462 (500;1) -462 (500-1 Y-) 562(600-2) REDDING ALTIMETEfF'SETTING MINIMUMS S 433L; ' •' 346(400- -584-31A �. REIL Rwy 31R SLOG 13L 562 (600 80O 1 y HIRL Rwy 13L-31 RQ ` 562,(600-1) w 562;(600-1 Ya) FAF to MAP 5.9 NM CIRCLING ` 800=9 562'(600-1)-f:. - __.800-1 th 800-2 Knots 60 90 120 `150 180. `-562.1(600-'114) , 562-(600 2) NIin:Sec 5 54' 3 56 2 57 J :. ._ S RWY$_�^ 3 �� -.z `` 39°48'N - 121 °52'W , I CHICO CALIFORNIA, , CHIC'' MUNI' _ t 10 99196 Y. , 5v. 1 t , ,... LSW 2-,,jk5 JUL4999 ~' ,�^ 3 i- syr .... a _ w ._ ._ -. 9 7. iJ_-. , i. _,r....._.__-"" _ _,�.,_., _ ..__. _i :.G=35i�r><a ; 3: •! .,T,'ra, 0 't•' (CTAF) 239.3 GERQjjNT.._ i F,>t .._._ ` 4100± GND CONS 'UNICOM• `. er r t d- 122.951 iii _ (r <i x i SJRIAFl :31RED BLUFF 11V) 0 �� I 9G3 rr } u• 115.7 --RBL. _. _fi -•_ " /� 3_94f f• 3. Ch'8ri1:04. CIC t - _..._ 17:1 o. 34 90' x s 1 } I S a � No RAD i i ` ` When control tower dosed„exce t'for �`Ir 3 x f'� - 2961 i t 2150 n.•v P ^ 1 operators with oppr�oved'weother reporting r - t g i sernce;?use Redding altimeter setting.';--” >;s't tR I r 8o`f R i Circling not authorized east of Rwy 1301 R. s3^;EStil�r t,,ti a �^ 72± IAF, Redding alhewer setting minimums: For ._-..«f 1 ti. ? > s� I '} 'CHICON til t inoperative MALSR, increase S -ILS 13L it6t. , 31x1` -., M f 109,8 CIC`• i visibility to 1 Y.. t a t j'_.®"L•�NA._:�,....,_ __.____<-_ .moo.....:..._ .._.,........... __. _...._._ ,..../,�_....� �- ~, E", Ckan�35 � LOCALIZER 111.3 605± ^1815 ` ti -CIC �. e.. p_A I •, a�� e.. � e �� °`'•..._. Ort' i . ' t �� .^ 1685 p•CIC•3000 nY" 353 , 1 3' I 1, 315 (857) + r_i��1� 8700 r:C:!-re twi F .•�i.,7� ®.�;? .y ` + nj Oryt�'\ Y ,! .. /i �, (�`�`� a. . lit t� DURHA CIC i }va •0 2 00 ' ' • ! K est r JINGO" LLLIII . j �'s4 .i `�tt'Yt�-•'JL .�t:a:,+ .,af,. f5l:. - -• ¢ - °' R.135 M1 CO VOR/DME V, ,' ELEV. 238' , 4M C7.1 ;. r G1C MISSED APPROACHt ? *, '� Climb to 900; then continue .'•; 1310 5.9 NM ai k• L k+ e a tT'' • cn5r i - climb to 2500 vic CICrR 135 :rte from FAF ;M ' '4i E' " °' ear •• to DURHA Int%CIC Bal DME A " t 1 I and hold" 286f r ' +^ 1 �TDZE 2215 ;+ t I 3000 .11 275_ <f \ 1 238 t t GS 3.00° ;;:. -. , TCH 54 2500 �;.: �'` 41 , I 312 tt X312 c s.4 NM 0 S a i' F, CATEGORY A :. tB D G s as 13L V. 438-y 200�2o01h 5 -LOC 13L 640-!/s 402 (500IN" �° _. 640-3/. 402 (500-a/.) m F i CIRCLING ,64a 700-1. 6` :_ .,. _ 800-2 9 .. 700 1 % ®` w �¢ .402 (500.1) 462 (500;1) -462 (500-1 Y-) 562(600-2) REDDING ALTIMETEfF'SETTING MINIMUMS S 433L; ' •' 346(400- -584-31A �. REIL Rwy 31R SLOG 13L 562 (600 80O 1 y HIRL Rwy 13L-31 RQ ` 562,(600-1) w 562;(600-1 Ya) FAF to MAP 5.9 NM CIRCLING ` 800=9 562'(600-1)-f:. - __.800-1 th 800-2 Knots 60 90 120 `150 180. `-562.1(600-'114) , 562-(600 2) NIin:Sec 5 54' 3 56 2 57 J :. ._ S RWY$_�^ 3 �� -.z `` 39°48'N - 121 °52'W , I CHICO CALIFORNIA, , CHIC'' MUNI' _ t 10 99196 Y. , 5v. 1 t , ,... LSW 2-,,jk5 JUL4999 ~' ,�^ 3 52'$'W�2'•1'5 JIgJL 1'999"' CHIGO-Z I 'MUNI. LA�,-557' - r .:� CHICO CALIFORN0) OAKLAND CENTER a "{r�4yA T�Qt�s R77 ED „BLUFF' 41U0� -1-32:2 350 3F— t {� 1 S zJ 0 t aruf {IiICOTQWEfI• .f€'� las4''p `Ch n 10 � 1 1 {� ,... r�FYi KFC, , L 121 0 (CTAP)®'239 3 _ _ 4 � j e `q GND. CON ) c�^� , k 1M. "P1 F. .-- , �%ty>3 !'� rY'•E"$4 C 4`_�--Y{YP �i s.�'9!. - ..l1NICOM•�-. � � j �, ��w •,, ; 122 95 �Cy 5 3000`x" n 3943+ . �-, h #,tetp f { W. 349 . J • GIC�� y f� rtt w 6.8 = *,2961 i lw ✓u 2150. ^ ' div 6 C • s r k T'J j' e ^- s When control tower dosed except w + � for operators with approved 605+ r v i a '.;.� weather r@pOAln9-S@Nic@ use -j ro ti { {" 9-? •�/,jt'S F " t�-" i%�. - 'v 1 A A,tir Redding altimeter,settmg�-, Xwa�; rsrF<}z ,� "� I '1�'� ° 11815 CO < - «. Chan 35 2� tnx j Locol altimeter setting minimums: a ^1353 Afor,InoperaUve MAL'SR;, increase i-„' �+' 1685 ,.; Sl) 3L Cot. D visibility to; l Y.. SP. CIC'?S •M , ti� k r !1? iLZ Irl n �. DURHA INT” 8500 �� n s CIC 8.7 F,25001�'2/ cp o Eley 238 MISSED APP,RMH ' y CICS - r Climb to 2500 vlo CIC R 135'to 13$ r y r N iso' DURHA Int/CIC 8 TDME and, _ •3000 ; ;{ , ; s, Li cic hold., { s r ,a . >..,.es t � w �,t at��'i•r... I •� n a..+ 6 B � ' i r AC:dKrCXs::f el 7L°KS,? .�3rz �Zfa I �. 1 1 x �' lG; \ f 275± . .` * i Procedure Turn NAI ZOOO TDZE s}31 2 ; {' 7 NM. a rt iy 312 5 7�NM; 238 ?CAA g TEGORY ' t D. $ a +s13t Fi S rf 640 Yz 402 (500 ,�) r'640 �/a 640-1 402 (500.3/a) 402 (500-1) x 6{40-1 700 1F r 700 1 th 800=Z` f� CIRCLING j '402 (500`1) 462 500 lr) 462.(500-1 1/h) 562 600=2 ' REDDING;ALTIAETER,tSETTINGMINIMUMS''_ 9��4?ti.Cstti j. 7 8 0 A "14_ t c IS-131, %86. %2\ 542.(600 Y4) ?542 wy REIL R31R 542 (600 1) (600-1 Y.) , f HIRL Rwy 131-31 RQi j ` } t ° _' 3 " ,5780 1 Yz ° , =R8.00 3 ; CIRCLING %80 1 542 1� 11 y g : , 542 (600115), 562 (Grdin notT66 oAied ecst of-Rwy 13.L 3.1.R; q0� W. r_ Knots 60 90 1:2Q, 1•SOt tU80 � `.k. -:e•/(i ,I'SeA1:t `3't39°49'N 7.121'52'W 1 K,CHI'CC UfORWA;) 4 VOR/, `4E R AY-1 3V' AmdY7"9911` CHIC(. JNI (CIC) MeD, R I UM E.. °R,_ 1...3.1. � _ . ` h _AL�.557 (FAA) r:...CHICo, ` CAUfORNIA , ;. <•� r Lta?`7 ,.'.?�'ac±u'i a 't .{ ., S1f+?. /� t � q— ' t ,,:�,;•��.,., .. . OAKLAND CENTER 3490 k I , �v ' £ f 132:2 330.3 (._ �1_: a 57.78- "1 ,,.. it of r ° -r ,zQ 1 rK F • CHICOTOWER* `.. �.. Y ix4 i a�: x i 121:0 (C VA 9239.3._. f :S� CIC ps GND CON V { 12150 t ' 2961 121.9 UNICOM c4 �qti Z o {+ 4 d\ 4 8300 3X i NO 6", t 4S 4 tt s s c t? 9�+I 109'SCCIhoe'; 4 t ln=35 .1 �5 1 .♦ - , !' '$''S i�"` ; � 4 • c.. t h{v r 2500..,%, - i -77 l 1815 s• 1a `ztrnla i fag a yr ._ CIC } {' VA, }%>P 3 f•'• -•i .rA-"f r 2.5 _ ' i LcY _ nr wiY {fit,, Y ! I •1 }1•- - ". ,� a• 1353 '^q .� ." • <" When control tower dosed,`_Gxcept for operators with cppro'ved weather re' in service, use Redding dllmeter ing ABERG s a sett'V r : i CIC© ! �o �t 3 + . ✓.i{s� aEli^ I� iti':3r I i 3005 l^ � h*:+j:>txf �� 11'e •s a �.,.._,+ er$t�•'�'t . �tiUO"f ;e ` --•-- _._......_��a,z . _..... _.._.. y:.-_ _� �.G�',L.._. .�_- _ ... _ ..;� _• Via{ _ .,' r - f r 01. Ht - BILBO IN F r CIC 16S • 3000 4 r 007' (30.8( 'IAF ax t y WILLIAMS `. � ff � . ` rte`' �~r�<• X8`1: - �� t .. «x� ..•_.238 - MISSED APPROACH �BILBO'INT ELEVt Climbtng.left'tum to' 2000 via.CIC .:CIC 16 R447 I6XkRGl6 DME!and hold. `' ' 3000` - { ABERG' ao� % ^ii 286 CIC©- ' VOR/DME i. CIC' 3 ^ {.. , ED Procedure Turn NA " I X' 275 2000 312 1200. E . j +.- - F "ITi?'•'`^• f 312 2:5 35 10 NM Ys. f7p� CATEGORY c -D t GA 620 1 396 (400-1) • t s -az �c,+ t ' 396'(400 Ty.) 700:1 700-1 t/2 800-2 CIRCLING : 382.(400-1) '`462 (500`=1 462>(500-1 % ..562 (600.2(: r`' ( ( TDZE �� o REDDING ALTIMETER'SETTINTMINIMUMt----- - 760-1 yr 760-1,/a '' 760=1'536 `(600-1)REIL Rwy 31 R f X327 kto ? 44 530 (660-1lrt) 536.(600 lsli(' : HIRI Rv+y 131TM3JR0IVOR/DAhE 760-11/2. 800=2 ,V r� CIRCLING t �•.: 760-1 522 X600.1) ': - a 522'(600-1 Yz)' 562 (600-2) F Circling not outhorized .east of. Rwy 131.,31 R. Q • Knots 6011,90A1}20;3 r150 180 .:, w _ + a 39'48'N° 1`2T°52:W CHICQ' CALIFORNIA, ER WY 3:1'R _ ;=�4 sy� , �,. CHICO MUNI (CIC) Ong A 991:'96 S3 '` ' �� S-!'I:V=2 .15:::JUL•` 1999 . ' IT SW 2, 15'JOL 1999 �A"dt 9 991'96„ ;M g t` r ala I�(CIC) f d CV I{ YVO R�R� _ CHCH COMUN t CALIFORNIA •. • . r f i atDt i iq1 �§e-sitq�y3m ! 1? � .I'Ia'' £a .,._...... V i H ^L �".•'^'�.. -3 S ` • , �� r ! '��Q�°,. .- ",M +••..--=• —�� OAKLAND CENTER' c�e� . "S ).2551( 110"Y3 �3'u,�'115) a Y� i� t 1322 350.3 a 4: CHICO`TOWER* 12101yCTAF 239:3r si3{1w J GN CON ^3943±� 121.9 r,, a• `. _sd'► gYvr ,'3t # E� et it: r ih„A_l OINM i _ .13490 UNICOM 122!93 5778 BLUFFc4° 1.15.7 RBl �.:. q L ` : a "Chan 104 -- . , 077°_ ` µA!. 12150 al F r Y R - CHIC O - 46; 9° .e, c s + 572± 109.9 CIC }' ' _ r '::,tle•i '. �o A Chan 35, • ' �y 9 9 P, ' i 1 605 tip„ I;. , 4 q3 a °t ta'�'r5Y.9r,�a1v J,jirdS !�.i�` 1rG,rti ?`• .�*J.t�•+'•.} .+» ti< .. - _ ; a;rss:�:rsO }.:(ry l�tsr ha iY�.•fe -sJa r (C: 4 ' �1�.� u1 r e . S '+Dt-f b "VI1 1 1 Cr;-? 353 1 ' 1685 ,..3000 y3150 (8.7)....".. ti -. ` •�'' � `=��3!','+ y' r' 4 {� .l - Orli x ` 1 . ..`•r x"`* •• y ..ie�,'a,t pry\ R. 'v,. Q-4,:•. x... . i t., t_• _._ _..3� o t s' 3) DUR A t h r r�T? CIC 8.7. • ` ^. � . - _ '___ �, ;�,+ / CIC •4 1. JINGO r•J ,fv�O s Ki��: !vt+ �•:.` 00 8500, A; When control tower closed, except' .for operators with approved- ° ". % eother reporting service, use. 2500. + ! ^ Redding altimeter setting. �0' �o° �, e ,, tv VO •.,. . ,+ r _within ,• /DM Remain E CH > EIEv 238 0 NM ,o MISSED1APPROA 122ao � OZ ,—Climb to 2500 via CIC to 3: VOR/DME a DURHA Int/CIC'B:7 DME and hold.` ' � . ;23001'��P�': ''i!�.t6.}� � ' - • Y�, • .. •� • t'.�.� t^ l 275+ . Y tx'; 'LNiiE- Yrr l+rF2Y `' r s 312 *Maintain 2400 or above until n v established outbound for procedure turn. ”" _ n ,' 238 � • ' P 312 • _ ;CATEGORY AB • �;C p' $G �� S13L 800-t/2 5azt�soo � 800-1t�. $A ,r ;800- V . s6z (boo 1) Ss e( w).� A ,. 800 11/ 800 2 n.. s 19 ` CIRCLING 800-1 562 (600-1) ` .. ,_. 562 (600=1.y:) •1.562 (600�2)� � •® ' REDDING ALTIMETER'$ETTING MINIMUMS- e t. 960-11/i 960 1 1/. ' 5 13L r✓ 960-/2 722 (800'i4) 722 (800-1lh) 722 (800=TsG) REIL�Rwv 31R~--- HIRL Rwy 13L=31R0:' c. ==x ReLl a 3� s a 960-2 960-21/4 . • CIRCLING 960-1 7zz (a0o1) . sa +� 722 (e00 2) .722(800 2v.):, j }v,�d ry ,ia ,T Knots 60 90 12011501189- 39*UN s. Cirdmg not authonzed•_eustroE.Rwy-.,131-3.1.R.._0�._ -- Min:Sec —•_,_ __. t � -113 X. tyv'r' — 121 52'1N.,_W'4�L{IFORNIA . .- Anid19 991 C EN— `W(`CIC)' 'Ong 99196 �. - . r •,, �` '- • ^' - •. .; G'PS 13L CHICO i, A(CIC) wvAL.55Ts(FAA)51+ i' GIilGO PF CALIFORNW'= BRED BLUFF, 101", /0-j ua atai t n X73 aF6 ::Kit .—3toAQq :^wvt� eQgk4!,id K -w � f RBL a is 6 OAKL4ND CEIVTER`l t `t' - i ':'TG RBE j V £ i {?a �c�ii ') `1n t J �•� i t , `y r` CHICO TOWER • ' V, d (0 l GND CON t`sv0 5. 3943+14 ' UNICOM t �" t (� y ~ ZOTWY �' 122951 r' /3490 •.dy�2"Yc�,`�7., .j,_ . vt, ..-_. � 1. �`[ I � i b'+ro� ..._. .� Y `'d7� � - i � Ate.. ' n _ r . d, -„„R .. � 4"�. � -... __ � �%�?oJE:. ixn t �:.}' t t l„ r'� f � ,� i•o�,• MIFAF)Tj F 4. 2150<' _ /.2961 ' 2.5 RWI 3L V, W. gat „1 tRW13L I �- - - A1353`/1685 SPEW 13L ?s� {Wo , r 8300 © DURHA A +. "' g�y�� leo � '��•� , .. ' +.l -. � • , d a,; p'f1��5 � � It kr$.d' i � •�' t� ELEV .238 x ' ZOTWY MISSED APPROACH tf° Climb to 2200 direct DURHA, 131° to 2400 " WP and hold. �RW13C ' ,3 URMAF a� n 286± ikF r 2.5 NM to RW13L RW13L TDZE fi# 1900'' x <, /� ',��,� 238 Procedure1 275 # e =® Na . - 1100 ' . t : } k 312 5 N --2.5NM-- i+' x?i �'P s o�yO 12 CATEGORY r' q 8 YG y D y .€��- 9 �, S -13L 560-1 322(400-1).5' .4 600-1 -700-1 700 1%z 800-2. , ,� CIRCLING 362,(4001), 462(5001) F462(5001Yz1 562(6002)`+tj1 RED.BWFF ALTIMETER SETTING°MINIMA ' Op` } 9. S -13L 640-1'402(500-1) 640-1Y • 402(500-1V) 660-1 ., ` 7001 7001h 800-2' REILRwy 31R 'CIRCLING HIRL Rwy 13L=31 R 0^ 422 (500- "T 500 1) 4621500 1) , 4621500 l h ► 5621600 2) When control tower closed, except For operators with approved weather repotting sevice d'i 1 ($lye "� iwi�L' • use Red Bluff altimeter setting. Circling not authorized east of Rwy 13L/31 R. ©0 NA Al i?L� 1 J 7f Ci a J` R3'4°, 1`3L; 39°48N 121v52'W ECHICO CALIFORNIA' _o�lg 9919.6 CHICQ*16N RCIC) , 5s; SW,2��" 15¢JUK199.9 z •... 56 'S -12,' 115`JUL :1'999 Orifi 99196 ` 5 '.CHICO `MUNI (C:1C) GR5 Rita1=' i 3 -UR AL7557,FAA), , CHICO; CALIFORNIA • u;uTySciftr,Oxcta: 'if t` 6 , 't? OAKLAND CENTER 2150 + ` 132.2 350.3 -.2961 n CHICOTOWERir. _ , Sax'4rJ 1; y fY l ie -at `3r��tiv's j < 3 i�r.r 121.0ICTAF)0239.3: rTSr 5an; f ';t; ; %If. GND CON; 121.9 UNICOM 122.95. LT t t� �'Ji 13i^ c ",�,t yrs rrb .J ey -TOHLY, i='t...n1815 r ......._.r._.. N to .w A 16856' ; 000 to n t 1 +•.IPKOW f JINGO .,�sr�,..^.i /tjv'�o '� afs� • UNJEDy , u:, 3005 _. ..... ............. . 0 moo. X#:z:�•+��v tOH Y?SA' 6300 t > ti,.t.;�,. EF IXU T �?1 • �v a` GRIDD -� MISSED APPROACH ELEV 238 T< = UNJED Climbing left tum to 3000 direct JINGO .xWs sf WP and hold. IPKOWT, 2600 �'t4 286± 2:5 NM to ' 3 A TOHLY WP r TOHIY °x2000 �� ' ` "Procedure t?};t""v'. TNAurn 275 + 1200 + VGSI and descents angle"s _not coincident. 312 � � • °, TC -H:50 \ Q� 0.5j—:2.5M N =— —= 2:S NM — `5 NM 12 CATEGORY A B *: > C 0a�$`^ 560-1 336(400-1) 600-1 700-1 s 700-U6 800-2 :CIRCLING ;-•��.�' 362 (400.1) 462 (500 r1�;,, 462:(500 lYz) 562 (600 2) TDZE 0 C t U RED BLUFF ALTIMETER SETTING MINIMUMS "'' ' 224 5�31R�. 640-1 416 (500 1) 640-1% 416 (500-1I4) �� 660-1 70.0=1 Z00-1 800-2 311 to >CIRCUNGS> .,, REIL Rwy 31 R TOHLY vsa s.aa.�,� t..�fd22 (500 i) 462 (500;1'►. 462 (500-11�) . 562 (600.2) r ttte; HIRL Rwy 13L-31 R Q Circling'lnot authorized eastNof Rwy 31 R/13L. When control tow4� cldsed, except for operators with approved weather reporting.service, use Red Bluff altimeter"ssetting. GR Ss R'� 3;1t R 39°48'Nl=ili21,'a52 W CHICO; ;CALIFORNIA �r,s y.r..Y6 : :,Nt�O ►� !t (CIG) (PILOT F �),IG,ON¢GS 1:G,C .75) 94342; 'y i C»� �Q ICO �1 i41 a(CIQ ,C�`O Ne, jG`S O 4 p E PA RTU 'E SL -557 (FAA) ` c► lco: uwFOeNIA }: L b V --0' Y ai u ¢ 2 il X' C _ ...n..E.•u..d,..�_' .. + '• .�.': 121.9 s .. RED BLUFF .. + r: , GHICO��TOWER P 1.15'.7 RBL;;; 121.0 (CTAF) L a Chan IO OAKLAND CENTER ''� N400 3' 132:2 a iv" a W122014.18' 1 �va ap : _ CHICO' � �. ppO 109.9 CIC�.�• p than 35 1 NM. 236 238._�,,.� 260 0 1.NM { = GONGS N390".60' W122°03,02. O may. JINGO W1229.01' W122°00.12' . r• yx o ntoi MAXWELLo o GRIDD 110.OMXW;-*•� p�M N39019.65' Chan 37 �a W 121056.12' N39°19t05 W122°d13 291-d ^s p C?AV (".et s S.t•at� p � A'O h rFY s.� tS�+w _ .. :�C � ¢• '�'t7•> �'Gq j�-o'O.�»'-. Elr¢''+�'`°`E # ' � a�.� 4 G. SiE y�snp.;�;! '# n d Ai"� iCt�� .. ;' �- ¢. t h. �ij Q1P`'ahfi1 2 �q ¢`�� G> tr. `•n ':+fit N f;•s 4 f 1. ;.S +. +a Ix 1.. �`�a a,n. V�.M�fr«P?�:°ss�IA �,�'��`'�°.s`s;?`.✓f �t�a;^a t.�2`;�e:`a' ��s^•tet �hii �,�S, �.C��: ��C '0.��:; '`." � ".° .4 yam., POINT REYES' ;-' 1`1377 PYEM• _ w 5 : J , . 9 f z' S E "Jul- f-. :y "•"y ;Ai42 '�,:+� m<f Chan 84 i # k�� °. f gg a, <<WILLIAMS GC ;X 4. l t ".fi It ?{ 9 N38°0478'-W,T22°5207,.barS ��.1 #�1r1��A� �•• c s� Chan 91 s0° N39'04T27 VJ-122°01.63' a _ a }, ,; a"li3ku ' Lz2 Ci.%-`, :;,�, i� i ;, � ; F R i1: e t:• -.. d cfi�:� C.' '�`A. 7;.`•n'scG3 -•r e• �` �. N�'.+:s �� "��'•�� SO �4;sf�-��[•'v''ss� ��+� �4,s .+. SACRAMENTO y ,,, • k?, .1Ll'S 2 SAC3�• • .�s'iY11�3ri. �?.✓ 6CE'i� f:i-v 6 F Chan 99 ' a _ ' NOTE: Chart not to scale NW26 62' W 12.1.!33.1 O " (COntiriu �'d 1. j''y �+ ;( e* �.SN'}* M r ed on i4jW0a9) L 2 OG cHlcov+ilFOR1v1,;,4# ' ~CHICO.�V UNI' (CIG' (PILOT. NAV)(GONGSI:GONGS) 94342 �1 �` ti`s Et � t, ��. � ��a•Q,� r � � .� ,��a� s S11V-2; 10&4999 ' 0 R 0 0 Amok Asilk (PILOT5 JUL N GONGS) G g, 10 A Hy j $L-557 (FAA) ';A DEPARTURE k66TE DMRI 'FF RUNWAYS 13UR: Turn right' of take -'off; TAKE -0 .ght heading 2,66 .c intercept jl� ;v '?V �fe 6'pt CIC R ?.8.f5).PP.NGS INT.'Thence.-r--!--.-_.._ k Turn', "N. left, di"" 0 S.4 ke-off; tAK.E"-.O.FF;.-,,�.RUN,WkA�Y-S�:3.li,-J ea ing 2 10 within -1 NM 0, 4438:.tor CIC .--IC- IWO nn Xii V0 on rll fltd4�� x;l R-140to'k6L.'VbktAC. - \i SACRAMENTO TRANSITIO and SAC R-329 to SAC VO WILLIAMS TRANSITION (G, 1'(GON,GS:I.PYE): in via MXW R=184 '70NGSIIRBLI: Fi I over GONGS m over GONGS I PYE R;.Ob o over GONGSa via MXW .,XW VolkTAC, via' RBL 1,(GONGSI.SAC): From over GONGS INT via V23 14C. iNGSIJLA): From 6'vie-r-G," ',TNT via RBL R-140 4 of W-6 zj elA �fQN�A VSs ME— EPART tE 77-iFt.;gh-.4t, ). 7- MF 45) ��34 SIN4CIC H, Arndt 6 9941 OROVILLE *I (OVE) VOR or GPS -A AL -5+ AA) OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO APP CON 3320 125.4 327.5 /330 UNICOM 122.8 (CTAF) 0 ASOS 134.75 �cr-j,/ ^358± 2168 RA62LERMO INT 110.000 MYV 18.1 Chan 37 W N P co C> 110.0 MXW Chan 37 R-075 HAAIWMYMRGGO 2275 ^W �, pCAOb� O� �gPMYV 2,s& li YUBBA �sOa ® p�3000 83 173-30-0-1 ® (9.3) �� IAF O �3� . MARYSVILLE 110.8 MYV = Chan 45 MISSED APPROACH Procedure Turn NA . ELEV . 192 Climbing le6 tum to 3000 HAZED INT via MYV R-338 to HAZED MYV 11.6 VOR/DME Int/MYV 11.6 DME and LERMO INT I hold. MYV 18.1 338° 3000 ./250 �� o MYV I 13000- ` z3 x 2000 4.8 NM 6.6 NM 11.6 NM CATEGORY A B C D CIRCLING 620-1 660-1 660-1 Yz 438(500-1) 468 (500-1) 468 (500.1 K) NA 338° 4.8 NM Circling not authorized Northeast Rwy 12-30 From FAF v - NA MIRL Rwys 1-19 and 12.30 0 FAF to MAP 4.8 NM Knots 1 60 1 90 112011501180 Min:Sec 4:48 3:12 2:24 1:55 1:36 VOR or GPS -A 39°29 N -121°37'W OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA Arndt 6 99140 OROVILLE MUNI (OVE) 279 SW -2,15, JUL 1999 Arndt 3 99140 NDB RWY 1 SACRAMENTO APP CON 125.4 327.5 UNICOM 122.8 (CTAF) 0 ASOS 134.75 DURHA GRIDD / Remain within 10 NM �q2 2000 '. o12y 280 SW -2, 15 JUL 1999 OROVILLE MUNI (OVE) AL -5938 (FAA) OROVILLE, CAUFORNIA 1685 4000 3005 _ i X250 A330 IAF OR 212 OVE 423 ± MISSED APPROACH ELEV NDB* Climbing left turn to 3000 via 2090 bearing from OVE NDB to GRIDD Int. Maintain 2600 or above until established outbound /. for Procedure tum. CATEGORY A 1 8 C D S-1 840-1 655 (700-1) 840-1 N NA 655 (700-13A) CIRCLING 840-1 648(700-1) 840-1 NA 648 (700-11•:) Frcling not authorized Northeast of Rwy 12-30 V 3320 2168 f \0120to NDB MIRL Rwys 1-19 and 12-30 0 ,I NA s Knots 1 60 1 90 1 120 1 150 1180 Min:Sec NDB 1 39029' 37 W ORO VI CALIFORNIA Arndt 3 99 OROVILLE jbI (OVE) Orig 9914 OROVILLE 01 (OVE) GPS R AL -5 AA) 1 OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO APP CON DURHA 125.4 327.5 UNICOM 122.8 (RAF) 0 ASOS 134.75 o - 1068^ a 1 A33 0 2�9922y.-� , 2 N SJR y RWOI 2168 to RWOI- - (FAF). 423± TAWM DACE N lz� ti (IAF) ESVOW GRIDD o Q1 SP RVJ 01 25 H \ 4100 �r M 2710 F69-00-1 Z K n l?3, 1J 00 V C'i © 2275 n "' — MRGGO (IAF) YUBBA MISSED APPROACH ELEV 192 ' One Minute Climbing left turn to 3000 direct Holding Pattern ESVOW GRIDD WP and hold. I 1.1 NM FQ IXACE to RW01 07"�. -I- 2 tNoM I I or%^ Rwnl RWOI CATEGORY A 1 e 1C S-1 560-1 375 (400.1) CIRCLING 600-1 660-1 660-11� 408 (500-1) 1 468 (500-1) 1 468 (500.11 Circling not authorized northeast of Rory 12-30 0 NA GPS RWY 1 39°29 N -121'37'W Prig 99140 281 D NA NA 1 M X017 o to RWOI MIRL Rvrys 1-19 and 12-30 Q OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA OROVIUE MUNI (OVE) SW -2, 15 JUL -1999 s2e2 - SW-2; 1'SJUL "1999'• Amdi 8 99196 " ` ILS RWY 25 "`' OXNARD (OXR)•: °AL-674 (FAA) s OXNARD, CALIFORNIA - •6003 t '; ., ` ATIS*11 ,05. 6704 5079• POINT MUGU APP CON* r • 124.7 325.0 OXNARD TOWER* t 4864 6367 ' , t 4524. 134.95 (CTAF) ()257.8 i ' GNDCON 3430; 121.9 4957. s 7 A2850 2161 IAF ' ^ ' { FIIIMORE ^112.5 FIM �_' „Cjp�D 2326 2706^ 1383 /�. Chan.72 ^ i 6PI 1226 Al AMAR LLO .• 3756: 1367 ��? ' CMA 114 7T 366 115.8 CMA."• Chan 105 4000 to Hyden Int .251- . (19.6' A A372 R-080 1310± �' ' 214A3300 y 2��" 403•.••• CMA 069° ..158 ,a T6 . -R 249 R-086 6.2 ^'•., .249°•'7 MM PARRS NELLY HYDEN INT LOCALIZER 108.7 OM/IN CMA 4.3 CMA10.5 :g - I-OXR IAF VAN NUYS' " •113.1 VNY =-- 20522 3111 = 256 (`6). _ Cho, 7B' ' 2824 .A. 3013±' VENTURA 4000 to Hyden Int 108.2 VTU �'_� 328°'(9:9)*ond (IAF)_ ©gyp Chan 19- �Jr LOC (3.1) _ SADDE 'CMA �p 15 N 8600 tiL� 1 090* 400 2900 7� Inoperative table does not apply. When local altimeier setting not received, use Camarillo altimeter setting minimums.QO MISSED APPROACH Climb to 2000 via CMA R-249 NELLY• HYDEN ELEV 43 Rwy 25 Idg 4578' Rwy 7 Idg 5630' to SQUID Int/CMA - 14.7 DME INT ' ' INT and hold.• ' PARDS 1 OM/INT 3192 r CMA 1681 ` ;a::; ?; %' , 256 4000 256° 5.1 NM . 5.4 MM . I GS 3.00° T �I•,..,....,, ::::....::::.::. I _- 3300 Procedure Turn .. I3300t *at Displ Thld NA `. from FAF ' T402E ..�,•""'"'000t, �' f LOC onl 80 at Rw Thld • 5950 x 100 0.7`•: w C.0 --� r t.6 NM-► 6.2 Nm � . �CA�TEGRY A B . C 290.1 250 300.1 ". 115• Bl 101* 5-LOC 25 460-1 420 soot a 460-11/4 azo soot v. 500-1 457 (500.1) ' 50.0-1I/: 700-21457 41RCLING (500-1'/i) - 657 (700-2)AMARILLO ALTIMETER SETTING MINIMUMSL525 310_1 270 5-LOC zs 480-1 440 (500-1) _ - 480-1 t/2 'd40 (500.11:) 480-1 t/2 440 (500-1 VI) MIRL Ry 7.250 CIRCLING 520-( 477 (500-1) = 520.1 %2 -720-21 FAF to MAP 5 NM 477,(500 ISS) 677 (700.2'/.) Knot° 60 90 120 115011801 ILS R25 34°1 19°12'W Min:Sec 5:00 3:20 2:30 2:00 1:40 Arndt B 9,W .r .� •... t , OXNA CALIFORNIA -.--_ OX (OXR) is L Arndt 6 99{. (OVE) OROVAUOR OCGl�Al$ F OROVILLE, CALIF&RALA SACRAMENTO APP CON _ 125.4 327.5 •UNICOM 122.8 (CTAF) 0 /.330 - ...._ ASOS' 134.75 358± „£Jt 2168 .. •. `•'�i '.d'C�YAiiS.a%i;I e..iT;;{,.:. ., atrJa i .. `^tii c,r R-062 . LERMO IN 1.0 J0 Chori 37, y 9:1,10.0; MXW Chan 37� R-075 ,.�HAZED•INT,•'. ['MYV Pl 6 ° ,>~Il^t;^. >.N;Tf)'v'Puba_:sc`. MRGGO yY..:r....• 'tt;�;I3Q�'..ha 2275^ Wo -.. b° 1�gbl/,� , SP MYV 25N 7 ; YUBBA F4-8-0-0-1 �.a�3000''' `•'� -.; 3k, MARYSVILIE_ O� ©, o �`� ` ° 110.8 MYV = _\ Chan 45 �' MISSED APPROACH � .`:� + �, Procedure TumELEV . 192-NA"•-�a�' � Climbing !eft turn to 3000f HAZED INT` ( �. via MYV R 338 to HAZED,' t tai €p'r �. MYV 116,. VOR/DME ::a Int/MYV 11.6 DME and -i, "' • LERMOINT� hold. ¢r nnYv 1a 1 '>''w�:338' 3000 A. MYV 23 '. � `3'000 ..� ' f a 3 �r F .41 2000 #�o 4.8 NM6:6 NM 11.6 NM CATEGORY A *L1 8 ` C. D "b p CIRCLING, 620-.1660-1":; 660-1 �i NA '`, 438 (500 1) 466 (500=1,)9`.- ' 468 (500 1)�) ° 338° 4.8.NM Circling n6t authorized Northeast Rwy 1:1-30,.'/ from FAF NA MIRL Rwys 1 19 g� and 12-30 0'` Y- ,a FAF to MAP 4.8 NM Knots 1 0. 90 1,120 1 150 11801 Min:SeC "4_ :48 3:12 2:24 1:55 1:36 ° ' 3929'PN 121•°`37'• W •VOR orFrGPS-A OROVILLE CALIFORNIA- Amdt 6 99.1'40 OROV1111E-MUNI (OVE) 2 9 R SW= Z,,15-J.UL' 1.999 280 SW4, i 5 JUL 1999 (` n Amdt 3'99,130 OROVILLEMUM(QAVt A5938(Fk�OR PIA SACRAMENTO APP CON 168 125.4 327.5 "• �' UNKOM 122.8 (CTAP) ® 7. _ .� ASOS 134.75DURHA . { 4000 • r - 1 ' i ;3005 + ..�a,P ,.c:?i antifit,3rh r rL?80ii �j",% i.5 -^'y , ?.rv; 0111 F r"•/� 3 320:. ,• /. . ,'1•! 330.. ry . 4 .50 Uu IAF. • - "` •�yv� �` �s8 °�;+ .� .�• }SCOROVILLE( 21'68' ` �a ulz,t t��3} jr 3i3t1£? : ► . a r.: ` 212 OVE v y. _.......___......__.__...._�._........_.O ._. .-..�...._...._...__...._.`-�4•+.—_+sw+ W� SPO 2S N p 4 t _ + 'S fry . • • �`, ;24;v ` Z. illdr:X110° 7$00 w r:f '� 2000 yi4,`>, ` i �. �;' 3300 r�O V EL_Ey 192 . f MISSED APPROACH Remain NDB , Climbin left'tum ro 3000 via 209 9 ` within 10 NM f '' y E�bea�ing from OVE NDB'ro GRIDD Int F ` r� q2 y,. • Mgin7toin-2600 or above _ _ :✓ < - . until a tablished outbound ^ 250 i o + ` 20.00 I t for Procedure tum. (a P^ 07 \\ t!'1yA: _4 _A•MWr�. VSs :_ B ': CATEGORY A 'C C 7. 5 r. SCI tZ 840 1 655 (700-1) ' 655 (700=10TDZJ: e 840..=134 '.'/. 185' ''.CIRCLING . .: - 840-1^' 648 (700-1) � PIA � ; 648 (700 1 �4) r t Circling not authorized Northeast of R412-36 ^� ~ '`~_r `' \012°ro NDB i" }' •• 1NA �.. , t , 1 9 qnd 12-30 y + 'V ^ ;'I <Knots 60 90'. 120:.:1:50 180 • - - - - - 4 - -...y ;.rt,!'�+�$;ad1� @973 �•i1Z 5 S: ^ice � ,_ +4' � - Min:Sec ,�, 99°29 —. 21°1,37 W+ . 1 A OROVI 4CAlJFORNIA , i Amdi 3 99i ' r 't. (OVE.). • e � r " ;L„o,;"• 'WJ '' � „ ' pOr 99Gl d} s F j OROVItLE h VxE) b pp `GPSR�s • t OROVILLE CAUFORNIA �: ___ AL 5938.IfAA) .;. Sbdral 7�•4io`r1^, } i +c g r'c r t� a Fm 8r, � .' SACRAMENTO APP CON z (� 7 , i � DU�RFI,41 37e ' a a �L�4 yarG�,r�" C° •¢ a iTl F 125:'43 327.5. , 0Y } i "' S::t UNICOM'1"22:8'(CTAF)v _ ax %ASO$ 134'%5ryOQ ?u.;i f{-'4..r� 'rr ,z.#3f'_�n`7 s _ 10Mc Fsa $ <r 10 1068 `' r ii..t , s -._ .._.:'.?t•.) 1 J"tc.C''ii ,! £„p`i �",,Er [ .t� a !_ ` n 3301 FW -01 i 2166 �,togRW01, qe'7 �Fyn,,U iLrs 'j z.„.r u �v• u3v t`"d�'�v .423+-- a. inr yrr i (FAFbR,,, �#trt� ',-0,V,3„2 v TAWM IXACE Q Mill t4;d I v 1 It�l Joe '.K 5 ' . ,. ° j.., f , �� h� Kk-I� 't. — - -- y i ?"f1¢"e Sa>bi9i �t� �� a••4• -r, :� �:Y..,, - � 0 �O .:r. „ .M"•rcT.'-aw- rf9P, ' W -111:113 O M1?. :ye; �7�rk5rvs'S a zy Yt"x ..•i'7" •i. T R." { A Y»-• �, i � s d�;,SY/ .k- . '€� W-111: '� 6 s..;s 3 .,Yw : +..,`:•.:':'i%T:..:- -'s , r { p.y(IAfltn i e _ A...�5 � �:. -<�. ��:,,�_ ;._. -GRD ! r., : c; -.�,=,-.F,;.�:..:. #t':' -F::: =S •'- R. y RVJ Ol �S: ' >.� hn PPP �-i �i�' „>r ,B,�n�t_.4`:: Q� • t SP. t IIA.. 4':i;;r;'�t v"'`',•,"'.r,”` '':-^cam' Y "a "'�` !?3 ' ` ` f: 6900 i f r} w r t 'a SwsS bgy' as n r i f ' `� :A..: ':c';'.•;�'3T.'9i „r ��' „O�<:NY rs->.•t,�o ''c^ir'�� :.> z "`s ,-k-� 4_ a?:3 �.°.i:>'c•- ..1.. :e�f; t:03Mi_m:,,"`'",_,Yc't�'r,.'t-.„�','•'_`.j'`'_,gS'%` ?? ,. z,�yQ�. '�":''YK SST¢ ' i'#1:: h •q+.�!FsS. 2'r:. � ^t1IriMRGGO ',�, r'.i°x'��Xe �$ '`cse'-a's: 1;°.r'S�:f�izR-'`. t - kt,.. ' 't•'.':.� wIginte'i s rk A. w(IAF)� a a� a ; Y Ay', .;c�tfg„''r`„;r: i.kr_;-'F,yy':'.•r•`Y.r- %R`-,.✓i::N:.. .� a;h�:-e is 9 � r ..,�; ''R" EIEV 192, J W MISSED -APPROACH a .. s>rc:;r3.•„5 "'- .„ ......:..:c:.:l:.3?:-. .l:.', p',y,+14•t`'+C�q,� ,.7 M3nute CLmbing leh tum to13000 direct } ' NoldmgPattem "? ESVO*W GRIDDtWPondolcd rrk £s.� r3 t� F (970 i `IXACE s vxa'Sk v ' 250c 1 °� /A 3400 0170" °,�� - x w g � S. ,,, its Olrj'o I i�st2NM I 4rG'. ' M U "<'z`'I�l%800 4aRW0, ;T -CH 40 .4 ! :!•S'3 Cif i� `" - 5.$ NM , 3 NW CATEFiORY 1 A' B C , D t. 560 1 `J375 (400 l) NA i CIRC%z 600-1 660 1 660,;:1.- " .` 85 ` r LING 408(500-1) 468'(500=.1) 468-(500=1Y4 ) Circling not authorized northeast of Rwy 12-30 `\017 oro RWO1 y. Na ,. , cz, 1 ,r r t MIRL+Rwys 1-19 and 12 ¢ 39°29 Ny1521° 37 \W OROVIl1ECAgl1FORNW PSRWY '1' OROVILIE�MUNI(OVE F: S$ Ong 99140"�' , lei a". o,'SW205.dUL W INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES • STANDARD TERMINAL ARRIVALS DEPARTURE PROCEDURES * AIRPORT DIAGRAMS CONSULT THE CHANGE NOTICE (CN) EFFECTIVE 12 AUG 1999 FOR REVISED INSTRUMENT PROCEDURE CHARTS FOR THIS VOLUME X n Inoperative. Components TABLE OF CONTENTS Table...................:...................Inside Front Cover Explanotion,ofTerms/Landing Minima Format...............:..................:........................A 1 Index of Terminal Charts . and Minimums.................................................B1 IFR Takeoff Minimums and .Departure Procedures..........................:............Cl Rate of Climb Table..........................................D1 IFR Alternate Minimums.....................................El 1 General Information and Abbreviations........:...................................Fl Back Cover Legend— IAP Plonview....................................GI Back Cover Legend —IAP Profile........................................Hl Cove Legend—Departure Procedures and Standard Terminal Arrival Charts..... Legend—Airport Diagram/Sketch......................K1 Legend —Approach Lighting Systems...................LI Frequency Pairing and MLS Channeling......................:................................Ml Radar Minimums...............................................N1 Standard Terminal Arrival Charts .........................Pl. Terminal Charts...........................................Page 1 LORAN TD Correction Table............................Opposite Inside Back Cover Rate of Descent Table...................Inside Back Cover Area of Coverage.'...............................Back Cove ENT or COPublished by.the oa,Mas,v P1�* 41 U.S. Department of Commerce b ap �T National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration t6 National Ocean Service y i PUBLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERAGENCY AIR CARTOGRAPHIC COMMITTEE, �4 SPECIFICATIONS AND AGREEMENTS APPROVED BY: �SrarEs of r`� DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE * FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION * DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE�gP+r,MEMafco+ 4.� INOP COMPONENTS 99084 INOPERATIVE COMPONENTS OR VISUAL AIDS TABLE Landing minimums published on instrument approach procedure charts are based upon full operation of all components and visual aids associated with the particular instrument approach chart being used. Higher minimums are required with inoperative components or visual aids as indicated below. If more than one component is inoperative, each minimum is raised to the highest minimum required by any single component that is inoperative. ILS glide slope inoperative minimums are published on the instrument approach charts as locolizer minimums. This table may be amended by notes on the approach chart. Such notes apply only to the particular approach cotergory(ies) as stated. See legend page far description of components indicated below. (1) ILS, MLS, and PAR Inoperative Approach Increase Component or Aid Category Visibili ALSF 1 & 2, MALSR, ABCD 1 4 mi e & SSALR ABCD To 1/2 mile (2) ILS with visibility minimum Of 1,800 RVR ALSF 1 & 2, MALSR, ABCD To 4000 RVR . & SSALR Category Visibili TDZL RCLS ABCD To 2400 RVR RVIR ABCD To 1/2 mile (3) VOR,VOR/DME, VORTAC, VOR (TAC), VOR/DME (TAC), LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME, GPS, RNAV,and ASR Inoperative Approach Increase Visual Aid Category Visibili ALSF 1 & 2, MALSR, ABCD 1/2 mile & SSALR Contact Federal Aviation Administration, ATA 110 NOAA, N/ACC3 1305 East-West Highway SSALS,MALS, & ABC 114 mile (4) NDB ALSF 1 & 2, MALSR, C mile & SSALR ABD 1 /4 mile MALS, SSALS, ODALS ABC 1 /4.mile CORRECTIONS, COMMENTS AND/OR PROCUREMENT V FOR CHARTING FOR CHANGES, ADDITIONS, OR TO PURCHASE ERRORS CONTACT: RECOMMENDATIONS ON CHARTS CONTACT: National Ocean Service/NOAA PROCEDURAL ASPECTS: National Ocean Service N/ACC 1, SSMC -4, Sta. #2335 Contact Federal Aviation Administration, ATA 110 NOAA, N/ACC3 1305 East-West Highway 800 Independence Avenue, SW Distribution Division Silver Spring, MD 20910-3281 Washington, DC 20591 Riverdale, MD 20737 `r Telephone Toll -Free (800) 626-3677 Telephone Toll Free (800) 457-6656 Telephone Toll Free (800) 638.8972 Intemet/E-Mail: Aerochort@NOAA.GOV Requests for the creation or revisions to Airport Diagrams should be in accordance with FAA Order 7910.48. INOP COMPONENTS 99084 • FREGOR& • FREQUENCY PAIRING AND MLS CHANNELING TABLE MLS VHF TACAN MLS VHF TACAN MLS VHF TACAN CHANNEL FREQUENCY CHANNEL CHANNEL FREQUENCY CHANNEL CHANNEL FREQUENCY CHANNEL 500 108.10 18X 568 109.45 31Y 636 114.15 88Y 502 108.30 20X 570 109.55 32Y 638 114.25 89Y 504 108.50 22X 572 109.65 33.Y 640 114.35 90Y 506 108.70 24X ,574 109.75 34Y 642 114.45 91Y 508 108.90 _ 26X 576 109.85 35Y 644 114.55 92Y 510 109.10 28X 578 109.95 36Y 646 114.65 93Y 512 109.30 30X 580 110.05 37Y 648 114.75 94Y 514 109.50' 32X 582 110.15 38Y 650 114.85 95Y 516 109.70 34X 584 110.25 39Y 652 114.95 96Y 518 109.90 36X 586 110.35 40Y 654 115.05 97Y 520 ' 110.10 38X 588 110.45 41Y 656 115.15 98Y 522 110.30 40X 590 110.55 42Y 658 115.25 99Y 524 110.50 42X 592 110.65 43Y 660• 115.35 100Y 526 110.70 44X 594 110.75 44Y 662 115.45 lolY 528 110.90 46X 596 110.85 45Y 664 115.55 102Y 530 111.10 48X 598 110.95 46Y 666 115.65 103Y 532 111.30 50X 600 111.05 47Y 668 115.75 104Y 534 111.50 52X 602 111.15 48Y 670 115.85 105Y 536 111.70 54X 604 111.25 49Y 672 .115.95 106Y 538 111.90 56X 606 111.35 50Y 674 116.05 107Y 540 108.05 17Y 608 111.45 51Y 676 116.15 108Y 542 108.15 18Y 610 111.55 52Y 678 116.25 109Y 544 108.25 19Y 612 111.65 53Y 680 116.35 110Y 546 108.35 20Y 614 111.75 54Y 682 116.45 111Y 548 108.45 21Y 616 111.85 55Y 684 116.55 112.Y 550 108.55 22Y 618 111.95 56Y 686 116.65. 113Y 552 108.65 23Y 620 • 113.35 80Y 688 116.75 114Y 554 108.75 24Y -622 622 113.45 .81Y 690 116.85 115Y .556 108.85 25Y , ,,., 624 113.55 82Y 692 - 116:95 116Y 558 108.95 26Y 626 113.65 - 83Y 694 -.117.05 117Y 560 109.05 27Y 628 113.75 84Y 696 117.15 118Y 562 109.15 28Y 630 113.85 85Y 698 117.25 119Y 564 109.25 29Y 632 113.95 86Y 566 109.35 30Y 634 114.05 87Y FREQ PAIRING mi SW -2,15 JUL 1999 1 95033 - L2 LEGEND.- INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES (CHARTS) APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM —UNITED STATES SW -2,15 JUL 1999 Each approach lighting system indicated on Airport Diagrams will bear a system identification indicated in legend. A dot "'e " portrayed with approach lighting letter identifier indicates sequenced flashing lights (F) installed with the • approach lighting system e.g., A, Negative symbology, e.g.,O, O indicates Pilot Controlled lighting (PGL). Q PRECISION APPROACH © 1, PULSATING VISUAL APPROACH,; PATH INDICATOR SLOPE INDICATOR PAPI PVASI Too low Slightly low ' 00�� On correct - approach path Pulsating Whim eSteady White or t. d :• 4AItermting Red/White hyo C,pd°Path * Pulsating Red O ga\o+t;Ae Qa 000 •000 ThrerhOW .. Slightly high t Too high - ' - CAUTION: When viewing the pulsating visual approach slope indicators legend: aWhire Red in the pulsating white or pulsating red sectors, it is possible to mistake this lighting aid for another aircraft or a ground vehicle. Pilots should exercise caution when using'this type of system. Ot"T"-VISUAL APPROACH O TRI -COLOR VISUAL APPROACH W uo SLOPE INDICATOR "T"-VASI SLOPE INDICATOR Amber TRCV QatY d° e� Green "T" ON BOTH SIDES OF RWY - All LIGHTS VARIABLE WHITE. CORRECT APPROACH SLOPE- P0° pot —Amber O Oa CA`de Poll,Red G\\de ONLY CROSS BAR VISIBLE. ge\ow UPRIGHT'T' - FLY UP, INVERTED "T" - FLY DOWN RED ",r - GROSS UNDERSHOOT. CAUTION: When the'aircraft descends from green to red, the pilot may see a dark amber color during the transition from green to red. ALIGNMENT OF ELEMENTS SYSTEMS * APAP 0�0 000 000 ' Above Glide Path On Glide Path - Wow Glide Path Painted panels which may be lighted at night. To use the system the pilot positions the aircraft t so the elements are in alignment. t LEGE 95033 95033 • LEGE _ INSi*NT APPROACH PROCEDU&ARTS) APDRAA(•H IIP WTI►Ir LVcrcu u►Hrcn erwrce 16 Each approach lighting system indicated on Airport Diagrams will bear a system identification indicated in legend. A dot". " portrayed with approach lighting letter identifier indicotes sequenced flashing lights (F) installed with the approach lighting system'0.9•, An, , Negative symbology, e.g., , indicates Pilot Controlled Lighting (PCL). RUNWAY TOUCHDOWN ZONE SHORT APPROACH OMNIDIRECTIONAL AND CENTERLINELIGHTING SYSTEM APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM 'LIGHTING SYSTEMS' A2 ODALS . TDI/CL SALS/SALSFg 36 RUNWAY ' CENTERLINE LIGHTING (High Intensity) THRESHOLD Cl. TDZ TDZL SAME AS INNER 1500' OF ALSF-1 SEQUENCED I SHING LIHTS uGrs SIMPLIFIED SHORT ' APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM LENGTH 1500 FEET VISUAL APPROACH AVAILABILITY of TDZ/CL will be shown by with Runway Alignmerit Indicator Lights NOTE in SKETCH e.g. "TDZ/CL Rwy 15" A, SSALR SLOPE INDICATOR VASI APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM ALSF? ^................ ••• •••••� GREEN VISUAL INDICATOR 7---» \ WITH STANDARD THRESHOLD CLEARANCE ,_•, GREEN /HE ` 1_ a- PROVIDED. ALL LIGHTS WHITE — -TOO HIGH ,./wH • FAR LIGHTS RED ON GLIDE SLOPE } `RED SEQUENCED : FLASHING l NEAR LIGHTS WHITE TOO -. ..— ».. LIGHTS ALL LIGHTS RED — LOW IRED •" •- ' ••»•�� TTl VASI 2 VASI 4 74 (High Intensity) LENGTH LENGTH 2400/3000 FEET -T- _ MEDIUM INTENSITY (MALS.andMAY •=•• NOTE: CIVIL ALSF•2 $ RE OPERATED -SEQUENCED—y7.» AS SSALR DURING MALSF) OR SIMPLIFIED SHORT 36 36 FLASHING FAVORABLETHRESHOLD LIGHTS WEATHER CONDITIONS (SSALSand SSALF) THRESHOLD r APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEMS VASI 12 (High Intensity) - _ LENGTH 2400/3000 FEETGREEN » » •.•....•• •••••� •• 36 APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM AI ALSF•1 ». + THRESHOLD • 1 ••• GREEN RE -FLASHING • »' SEQUENCED VISUAL APPROACH �3 SLOPE INDICATOR LIGHTS FOR I WHIT MALSF/SSALF VASI _ I "� L I ONLY - VISUAL APPROACH St'OPE INDICATOR ••••t••• • . •••••••• �• LENGTH 1400 FEET , WITH A THRESHOLD CROSSING HEIGHT TO ACCOMODATE LONG BODIED OR JUMBO ,w wHLrE\_= MEDIUM INTENSITY AIRCRAFT. APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM VASI6 VASI 16 SEQUENCED with Runway Alignment Indicator Lights FLASHING LIGHTS i}, �1 MALSR �� •• ]36_ SAME LIGHT CONFIGURATION 36 (High Intensity) AS SSALR. 1_ THRESHOLD THRESHOLD LENGTH 2400/3000 FEET LEGEND 95033 LI SW -2,15 JUL 1999 'K1 'SW -2, 15'Jue 1999 95201 _t LEGEND -= - INSTRUMENT•APPROACH PROCEDURES (CHARTS)- AIRPORT DIAGRAM/AIRPORT SKETCH ' Runways _ M-1 + Helicopter Alighting Areas® ❑'k' ® ® O Hard Other Than. Stopways, Displaced i Negative Symbols used to identify Captor Procedures Surface Hard Surface Taxiways, Parking Threshold Areas landing point. ............ O © MAL 0 I Closed Closed Under er Metal - Runwaayy Runway TDZ elevation ..... :........ ..... TDZE 123 3 —0.3% DOWN Runway Taxiway Construction Surface Centerline _ Lighting Runway Slope ............................... 0.8%UP— ARRESTING GEAR: Specific arresting gear systems; . (shown when runway slope exceeds 0.3%) e.g., BAK-12, MA -1A etc., shown on airport diagrams, { not applicable to Civil Pilots. Military Pilots Refer to NOTE: Appropriate DODPublications. Runway Slope measured to midpoint on runways ' t runi-directional ' ' VJet Barrier. 8000 feet or longer. 'OLS' _Fbi-directional ® U.S. Navy Optical landing System (OLS) location is shown because of its height of REFERENCE FEATURES approximately 7 Feet and proximity to edge of F runway may create an obstruction for some types , Buildings 8 .......................................................... ■ of aircrofi. Tanks...........:.:.................................:.............. 0Approach light symbols are shown in the Obstruction .......................... .A Flight Information Handbook. t Airport Beacon 0 .................................................y} Airport diagram scales are variable. I Runway Radar Reflectors .............................. ...,; Z True/ma netic North orientation -may vary from dia- g - .gram to diagram. ControlTowert......:............................................ e Coordinate values aro shown in 1 or % minute incro- • When Control Tower and Rotating Beacon aro ments. They are further broken down into 6 second ticks, co -located, Beacon symbol will be used and within each 1 minute increment. Further identified as TWR. Positional accurary within *600 feet unless otherwise Runway length depicted is the pphysical length of the runway (end-to-end, including displaced thresholds noted on the chant. if any) but excluding areas designated as stopways. _ NOTE: Where a displaced threshold is shown and/orrt of the runway is otherwise not available For landing, All new and revised airport diagrams are shown refer - enced to the World Geodetic System (WGS) (noted on an annotation is added to indicate the landing length appropriate diagram), and may not be compatible Only) of the runway; e.g., RWY 131dg 5000'. with local coordinates published in FLIP. (Foreign Runway Weight Bearing Capacity/or PCN Pavement Classification Number is shown as a codified expression. { Refer to the appropriate Supplement/Directory for applicable codes, e.g.; RWY 14-32 S75, T185, ST175, TT325 • '_ I PCN 80 F/D/X/U - < I Runwav FIEL I EtEV a I 7 BAK-12 i uispiacea Inresnora .0.7% UP Runway Identification t s 9000 X 200 , 023.2" 0 ' 1000 X 2,00 Runway End Elevation �— �� Runway Dimensions R\ way Heading Sropway Dimensions (in Feet) (Magnetic) (in Feet) r SCOPE -Airport diagrams are specifically designed to assist in the movement of ground traffic at locations with complex runway/taxiway configurations and provide information For updating Computer Based Navigation Systems (I.E., INS, GPS) aboard aircraft., Airport diagrams aro not intended to be used For approach and landing or departuro- operations. For. revisions to Airport Diagrams: Consult FAA Order 7910.dB. LEGE T 95201 �� .. INTENTIONALLY- SW-2,15-JUL NTENTIONALLY SW-2,15-JUL 1999 ° 98337 =SW-2, 15 JUL 1999 '.LEGEND LEGEND STANDARD TERMINAL ARRIVAL (STAR) CHARTS DEPARTURE PROCEDURE (DP) CHARTS s S RADIO AIDS TO NAVIGATION ROUTES Q VOR TACAN 4500 ,MEA-Minimum Enroute Altitude ' �� •3500 MOCA-Minimum Obstruction Clearance Altitude VOR/DME ice' . NDB/DME �. 2700 � Departure Route - Arrival Route (65) Mileage between Radio Aids, Reporting Points, . V VORTAC LOC/DMEand-Route Breaks> i f WAYPOINT 0 -LOC Transition Route • R-275 Radial line and value ® FLYOVER WAYPOINT ! ............................ lost Communications Track }i:_.` NDB, Non-directionol Radio Beacon) - V12 080 ( - . - Airway/Route Identification ' LMM, LOM (Compass Locator) CD .Holding Changeover ` Pattern Point • . '��-. �...,4.�.'�.`,�-,'�.'..�,'..�..'_. Marker Beacons x - Holding pattern with max. restricted airspeed __ `' ' 175k applies to all altitudes ..—..... localizes Course 210k applies to altitudes above SDF Course 6000' to and including 14000" SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE t (T)indicates frequency (Y) TACAN must be placed protection range in "Y" mode to receive R-5 R-Restricted W-Warning Identifier distance information. VX1,W1111ZZAP-Prohibited A-Alert 1 I Frequency RLANDO i 32.45 T) Rl =--29 (Y) ALTITUDES DME or IN N29°02.54' W95°29.30' TACAN Underline indicates Channel 5500 >.2300 4800 2200. L-17, H-4- }' Geographic !� no voice transmitted f Mandatory' Min{mum Maximum Recommended on this frequency Enroute Chart Position Altitude- Altitude Altitude Altitude Reference MCA y Woypaint Name ti (Minimum Crossing Altitude) ' Coordinates r• - '' t CINCINNATI Distance Altitude change at other than Radio Aids N42°d7.23'- W82'32:67' Frequency IJ7.3 CVG '046.9°-32.6 AIRPORTS / e 3 Identifier f Radial Reference Facility Joint j Elevation Q Civil O -Military' O Cisil-Military t Reporting Points x Mileage Breakdown/ - NOW00.00' Computer Navigation Fix (CNF) _ NOTES W00°06.00' N00°00.00' ,' Q 'Non-Compulsory W00°00.00' All mileages are nautical P n # Indicates control tower temporarily dosed UFN. s ' -A. Compulsory TS DME Mileage *Indicates a non-continuously operating facility, i (when not obvious) 'fee A/FD or flight supplement. DME,Fiz All radials beatings are magnetic. t I'S All altitudes/elevations are in feet — MSL i Z Distance Not to Scale MRA — Minimum RecepPtion Attitude MAA — Maximum AuMorized Altitude 4 (NAME2.NAME) — Example of SID flight plan Computer Code.! (NAME.NAME2) — Example of STAR Flight plan Computer Code. + SL4X= (FAA) — Example of a chart reference number. } OToke-Off Minimums not standard and/or Departure ! Procedures are published. LEGEO ... 98337 95145 LEGEt* • _•, INSTRAT APPROACH' PR- OCEDQItES (CHART PROFILE ' Z0� ' Remain within LOM 2400 10. NM, 1254_1 Glide Slope Altitude ° of Outer Marker/FAF Teardrop Turn 301 Procedure Turn / . FAF (non -precision approaches) 2156 Missed Approach Point 24LO 270 .l.. ILS Glide Slope° f Glide Slope.44 GS 3.00 •''• Missed Approach Track Threshold•Crossing Height—yTCH 100 Glide Slope Intercepf Altitude Airport Profiles ��_( Primary) . .------('Secondary) . DESCENT FROM HOLDING PATTERN R VOR VOA -307° 1600 ° ,1C4307"-�1600 \ MAP WPT. Final Approoch An le for Vertical' Bath Computers 11300' (RNAV Descent) \ 3.02 °� MLS,APPROACH Glidepath Altitude at FAF • M -ALE VOR 6.5 / Final Approach Fix (FAF) 0 3230 M•AJE 3� I z.2 • I I. f 3300 180° MLS Glidepath I MLS 00'R/L"- Glidepoth_3.0° 3300 I i 1 TCH 50 FACILITIES/FIXES .,-ALTITUDES PROFILE SYMBOLS FM 5500 Manda Altitude . K Final Approach Fix (FAF) IM I (for non -precision approaches) MM FIX I 2500 •, Minimum Altitude Glide Slope/Glide Path Intercept NDB �� Altitude and" Final Approach Fix OM INTI 2400 for precision approaches. Unless 43 VOR ' - I 00 Maximum Altitude otherwise indicated the non- VORTACI precision final approach altitude 'T CAN 3000` Recommended Altiiude is to, be maintained untilthe next .. WPT - fix. ''• 5000 Mandatory Block r Visual Descirt Point (VDP) 3000 Altitude { . , �, Y • . � � �� Visuol Flight.Path . _ V LEGEND ' 95145 M) SW -2, 151JUL•1999 I 98001_ LEGEND G1 PROCEDURES (CH SW -2,15 JUL 1999 PLANVIEW SYMBOLS TERMINAL ROUTES " SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE 165 • R•Restricted VJ=Warning Procedure Track 74V R-352 P -Prohibited A•Alert •""""""'� ' • Procedure Turn Missed Approach - ••` _ _ _ _ (Type degreennd,point RADIO AIDS TO NAVIGATION' • Visual Flight Path of turn optional) ' - ,110.1 Underline indicates No Voice transmitted on this 3100 NOPT 5.6 NM to GS In"tcpt — frequency —� 045` ;O VOR VOR/DME- 0 TACAN VV . ORTAC / (14.2 to LOM) NDB' DME � WAYPOINT Minimum Altitude '- NDB / _— 2000 uuu« _ a;;r Feeder Route 155' ®` MAP WP FLYOVER WAYPOINT (15.1) Mileage Airspace Penetrates Special Use .. P P � �'�.� LOM (Compass locator at Outer Marker) HOLDING PATTERNS Marker Beacon In lieu of - Procedure Turn Missed Approach Arrival Localizer (LOC/LDA) Course C03609-- •.' `SDF Course ° -'••+180°••' 180 180* Holding pattern with max. restricted airspeed . MLS Approach Azimuth 175k applies to all altitudes 21 Ok applies to altitudes above 6000' to and including 14000' MICROWAVE MLS Chan 14 TAC AN must Limits will only be specified when they deviate Identifier M-VDZ P. in "Y" mode from the standard. DME fixes may be shown.to receive Glidepoth 6.20' distance REPORTING POINT/FIXES DME 111.5 Chan 48(Y) information. Reporting Point A Nome. (Compulsory) \ / Fix or - LOC/DME A Name (Non -Compulsory) n intersection p LOC/LDA/SDF/MLS Transmitter (shown when installation is offset from its 15 DME Distance I normal position off the end of the runway.) From as 'ty ARC/DME/RNAV Fix Woypoint Data _ R•198 Radial line and value PRAYS N38°58.30' W89-51.50' 1R.198 lead Radial 112.7 CAP 187.1°•56.2 MINIMUM SAFE ALTITUDE (MSA) 00�D ' Facility Identifier (Arrows on distance circle identify sectors) OBSTACLES • Spot Elevation A Obstacle A Highest Obstacle LEGENIS I- 98001 e Highest Spot Elevation AN Group of Obstacles t Doubtful Accuracy 590 Waypoint Name, Coordinates, quency fre, Identifier, Radial/Distance (Facility to Waypoint) Reference Facility Elevation Primary Nov Aid Secondary with Coordinate Values Nov Aid LIMA 'MM 114.5 LIM ��' LIMA Chan 92 248 NT —• S12°00.80' wn°o7.o0' ' MISCELLANEOUS rVOR Changeover Point J RWY 15 S12°00.52' W77°06.91' End of Rwy Coordinates (DOD Only) Distance not to scale " International Boundary I W40 . GENERAL INFO ABBREVIATIONS ASF....................................Automatic Direction Finder ALS.....................................Approach light System ALSF................................... Approach Light System with MDA ................................. Sequenced Flashing Lights APP CON ........................... Approach Control ARR........................ :........... Arrival ASOS................................. Automated Surface Observing NA ..................................... System ASR/PAR................:........... Published Radar Minimums at NM .................................... this Airport ATIS................... ::............... Automatic Terminal Information Service AWOS..........:.:..........:........Automated Weather Observing System AZ ...................................... Azimuth BC ......... :............................ Back Course C ........................................ Circling CAT................................... Cattery CCW .................................. Counter Clockwise Chan ................................... Channel CWC DEL ........................... Clearance Delivery CNF .................................... Computer Navigation Fix CTAF..............................::...Common Traffic Advisory Frequency CW ..................................... Clockwise DH ...................................... Decision Height DME....................................Distance Measuring Equipment DR........:.........................c.. Dead Reckoning ELEV................................... Elevation FAF..................................... Final Approach Fix FM ..................................... Fan Marker FMS .................................... Flight Management System GCO...................................Ground Communication Outlet PI.................. GPI..*'* ... ..........Ground Point of Interception, GPS ..................................... Global Positioning System . GS .......................... ............ Glide Slope HAA ................................... Height above Airport ' HAL ................................... Height above landing HAT ................... :............... :. Height above Touchdown HIRL................................... High Intensity Runway lights IAF......................................Initial Approach Fix ICAO..................................International Civil Aviation Organization IM.......................................Inner Marker Intcp....................................Intercept. Zone Elevation INT ................................:.... Intersection IDA .................................... Locolizer Type Directional Aid Ldg...:................. •..............:.landi ng LDIN....................................Lead in Light System - L1RL:................................... Low Intensity Runway lights LOC .................................... Localizer LR.................:.............z..... lead Radial. Provides at least VGSI.............. *................... 2 NM (Copier 1 NM) of lead to WP/WPT...........................: assist in turning onto the X........................;.............. intermediate/final course.. MALS .................................. Medium Intensity Approach Light System GENERAL INFO 99140 MALSR ..:............................ Medium Intensity Approach Light System with RAIL MAP .............. :.................... Missed Approach Point MDA ................................. Minimum Descent Altitude MIRL.................................. Medium Intensity Runway Lights MLS ................................... Microwave Landing System MM .................................... Middle Marker NA ..................................... Not Authorized NDB .................................. Non-directionol Radio Beacon NM .................................... Nautical Mile NoPT................................. No Procedure Turn Required (Procedure Tum shall not be executed without ATC Clearance) ODALS................................Omnidirectional Approach Light System OM .................................... Outer Marker R........................................ Radial RA... :................................... Radio Altimeter setting height. RAIL .... .............:............... .. Runway Alignment Indicator Lights RBn..................................... Radio Beacon. RCLS........................... :....... Runway Centedine Light System' REIL.:................................. Runway End Identifier Lights RNAV.................................Area Navigafion RNP....................................Required Navigation Performance RPI ..................................... Runway Point of Interception) RRL ......:................. :............ Runway Remaining Lights Rwy.................................... Runway RVR ................................... Runway Visual Range S ........................................ Straight -in SALS................................... Short Approach Light System SSALR................................ Simplified Short Approach Light System with RAIL SDF.................................... Simplified Directional Facility TA....... .'............................. Transition Altitude TAC.................................... TACAN TCH.................................... Threshold Crossing Height (height in feet Above Ground level) TDZ.....................................Touchdown Zone TDZE...................................Touchdown Zone Elevation TDZ/CL............................... I Touchdown Zone and Runway Centedine Lighting - TDZL...................................Touchdown Zone Lights TLv........................:............Transition level VASI......:.......... :................ Visual Approach Slope . I Indicator VDP..........:........................ Visual Descent Point VGSI.............. *................... Visual Glide Slope Indicator WP/WPT...........................: Waypoint (RNA%) X........................;.............. Radar Only Frequency F2 SW -2,15 JUL 1999. F1 1. 98001 GENERAL. INFO SW -2,15 JUL 1999 GENERAL INFORMATION This publication includes Instrument Approach Procedures (IAPB), Standard Instrument Departures (SIDS), and Standard Terminal Arrivals (STARS) for use by both civil and military aviation and is i"ssued'every 56 days. STANDARD TERMINAL ARRIVAL AND STANDARD INSTRUMENT DEPARTURES The use of the associated codified STAR/SID and transition identifiers are requested of users when filing flight plans via teletype and are required for users filing flight plans via computer interface. It must be noted that when filing a STAR/SID with a transition, the first three coded characters of the STARand the last three coded characters of the SIDare replaced by the transition code. Examples: ACTON SIX ARRIVAL, file (AQN.AQN6); ACTON SIX ARRIVAL EDNAS'TRANSITION, file (EDNAS.AQN6). FREEHOLD THREE DEPARTURE, file (FREH3. RBV), FREEHOLD THREE DEPARTURE, . ELWOOD CITY TRANSITION, file (FREH3.EWC). PILOT CONTROLLED AIRPORT LIGHTING SYSTEMS Available pilot controlled lighting (PCL) systems are indicated as follows: 1. Approach lighting systems that bear a system identification are symbolized using negative symbology, e.g.,6,0, ® ` 2. Approoch lighting systems that do not bear a system identification ore indicated with a negative "Q" beside the name. A star (+) indicates non-standard PCL, consult Directory/Supplement, e.g., () To activate lights use frequency indicated in the communication section of the chart with o 0 or the appropriate lighting system identification e.g.,.UNICOM'l22.8 0, 6. 0 KEY MIKE FUNCTION 7 times within 5 seconds `Highest intensity available 5 times within 5 seconds Medium or lower intensity (Lower REIL or REIL-off) 3 times within 5 seconds Lowest intensity available (Lower REIL or REIL-off) CHART CURRENCY INFORMATION FAA procedure amendment number Ct I IA 99365�Data of latest change Orig 00365 The Chart Date identifies the Julian date the chart was added to the volume or lost revised for any reason. The first two digits indicate the year, the last three digits indicate the day of the year (001 to 365/6) in which the latest addition or change was first published. The Procedure Amendment Number precedes the Chart Date, and changes onY'time instrument information (e.g., DH, MDA, approach routing, etc.) changes. Procedure changes also cause the Chart Date to change. MISCELLANEOUS * Indicates a non -continuously, operating facility, see AIFD or flight supplement. # Indicates control tower temporarily closed UFN. Distances in nautical miles (except visibility in statute miles and Runway Visual Range in hundreds of feet). Runway Dimensions in feet. Elevations in feet. Mean Sea Level (MSL). Ceilings in feet above airport elevation. Radials/bearings/headings/courses are magnetic. Horizontal Datum: Unless otherwise noted on the chart, all coordinates are referenced to North American Datum 1983 (NAD 83), which for charting purposes is considered equivalent to World' Geodetic System 1984 (WG584). •t r GENER %Nj9. . 98001 SW -2 ALTERNATE MINS A W140 , E5 SW -2, 15 JUL 1999, • ALS .O' MINS _ - • Q 99t4o - NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS TORRANCE, CA ZAMPERINI FIELD ...................... ILS Rwy AR, VOR or GPS Rwy 11 L,900-12 'NA when control tower closed. 2 N when control zone not in effect except for - operators with approved weather reporting service. UKIAH,,CA , UKIAH MUNI .............:......... ..... LOC Rwy 15'. , VOR/OME RNAV or GPS -B2 - VOR or GPS -A' NA when Ukiah FSS closed. 'Categories A,B, 1200-2; Categories C,D, 1200-3. 2Categories A,B, 1900-2; Categories C,D, +' 1900-3. 2Categories A,B, 2800-2; Categories C,D, 2800-3.,. VAN NUYS, CA VAN NUYS................:'............... ILS Rwy 16R' l LDA -C2 VOR_or GPS -A2 'NA when control tower closed:, .F 2Categories A, B; 1900-2; Categories C,D, 1900-3. 3Category D, 800-2Y.. VISALIA, CA Y VISALIA MUNI ......;...................:.... VOR Rwy 12 NA when control zone not in effect. SW -2 ALTERNATE MINS A W140 , E5 SW -2, 15 JUL 1999, A IALTERNATE MINS W96 NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS SAN DIEGO(EL CAJON), CA • - GILLESPIE FIELD ................................:.. LOC -D NA when control tower closed. Categories A,B, 2400-2; Categories C,D, 2400-3. SAN FRANCISCO,' CA SAN FRANCISCO INTL ...........................:...............MLS Rwy 19L1 ILS Rwy, 28L1 ILS Rwy 28R2 VOR or GPS -8,1200-3 VOR Rwy 19L3 ILS; Category A, 800-2; Category B, 1000-2; Category C, 1100-3; Category D, 1300-3. LOC, Category B,,1000-2; CategoryC, 1100-3;, Category D, 1300-3. 2Category A, 800-2; Category B, 1000-2; Category C, 1100-3; Category P, 1300-3. 3Category B, 1000-2; Category C, 1100-3; Category D, 1300-3. SAN JOSE, CA SAN JOSE INTL.............................ILS Rwy 12R ' ILS Rwy 30L LCC/DME Rwy 30L NA when control tower closed. SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY -MC CHESNEY FIELD ......::.................................... ILS Rwy 1113 VOR or TACAN or GPS -A,1400-32, 'NA when control tower closed. ,2 NA when control zone not in effect except for, operators with approved weather reporting service. ' 3Categories A,B, 900=2;Category C, 1000-23/.; Category D, 1100-3. - . SANTA ANA, CA JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT- , ORANGE COUNTY ................:... ILS Rwy 19R 12 LDA Rwy 19R2 LOC BC Rwy 1 L2 NDB or GPS Rwy 1 L2I NDB or GPS Rwy 19R# ILS, Categories A,B,C, 800-2; Category D, 800-2'/.. LOC, Category D, 800-2Y.. INA when control zone not in effect. 3Categories A,B, 900-2; Category C, 900-2'/.; Category D, 900-21/2.' #NA when control tower closed. ALN1IAINS • E4 SW -2,15 JUL 1999 A NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS SANTA BARBARA, CA' SANTA BARBARA MUNI ................ ILS Rwy 712 VOR or GPS Rwy 252# NA when control tower closed. ' 21LS, Categories A,B, 800-2;Category C,800- 2%; Category D, 1000-3. LOC, Category C,800-2'/.; Category D, 1000-3. INA when control zone not in effect except for operators with approved weather reporting service. #Categories A,B, 1000-2;.Categories C,D, 1000-3. SANTA MARIA, CA SANTA MARIA PUBLIC/CAPTAIN G. ALLAN HANCOCK FIELD ......... ILS Rwy 1211 LOC/DME BC -A,1000-32 VOR or GPS Rwy 1213 'Category D, 1000-3. 2 N when control tower closed. 3NA when control zone not in effect except for operators with approved weather reporting'. service. SANTA MONICA, CA SANTA MONICA MUNI .............. VOR or GPS -A Category A,B; 1000-2; Category C, 1000-23/.; Category D, 1000-3. SANTA ROSA, CA SONOMA COUNTY '....................... ILS Rwy 3212 VOR/DME Rwy 143 'ILS, Categories C,D, 700-2. INA when control.zone not in effect. LOC, NA. 3 N when control zone not in effect except for operators with approved weather reporting, service. SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CA LAKE TAHOE ................... LDA/DME-1 Rwy 18f3 LDA/DME-2 Rwy 18,2300-5' VOR/DME or GPS -A,2600-52 INA when control tower closed. 2 N when control zone not in effect except for operators with approved weather reporting service. 3Category A, 1200-5; Categories B,C, 1300-5; Category D, 2300-5. A AAYI AW..IINS 99196 NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS NEEDLES,CA NEEDLES .................................. VOR or GPS -A NA when local altimeter not available. Category D, 900-3. OAKLAND,CA METROPOLITAN OAKLAND INTL............................................... ILS Rwy 111 ILS Rwy 2711' ILS Rwy 291 NDB Rwy 27R2 VOR/DME Rwy 293 VOR/DME Rwy27L3 VOR or GPS Rwy 9R3 'ILS, Category C,•700-2; Category D, 700- 2'%. -LOC, Category D, 800-2'/.. 2Categories A,B, 1400-2; Categories C,D, 1400-3. - 3Category D, 800-2%. ONTARIO, CA ONTARIO INTL ............ NDB or GPS Rwy 261-1 VOR/DME or GPS Rwy 8L2 'Categories C,D, 800-21/2. 2Category D; 800-2'h. OXNARD,CA OXNARD...................................... ILS Rwy 2512 VOR Rwy 253 'NA when control tower closed. 21LS, Category D, 700-2. 'Category D, 800-3. PALM SPRINGS, CA DESERTRESORTS REGIONAL ..................... VOR or GPS -A,1300-3 PALM SPRINGS INTL ........................ :.... :VOR or GPS -B,1400-3 NA when control zone not in effect except for operators with approved weather reporting service. PALMDALE, CA PALMDALE PRODUCTION FLT/TEST INSTLN AF PLANT 42 .......:........... ILS Rwy 25 VOR/DME or TACAN or GPS Rwy 25 NA when control zone not in effect. - PALO ALTO, CA PALO ALTO AIRPORT OF -SANTA CLARA COUNTY .... VOR/DME Rwy 30 NA when control tower closed. IA. ALTERNATE. MINS 99196 r W OA NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS PASO ROBLES, CA PASO ROBLES MUNI ................. VOR or GPS -A Categories A,B, 1300-2; Categories C,D, 1300-3. REDDING, CA E3 REDDING MUNI .............................ILS Rwy 341 LOC/DME BC Rwy 16' . NDB Rwy 34' VOR or GPS Rwy 342 'NA when control tower closed. 'Category C, 800-2%; Category D, 800.2'/2. RIVERSIDE, CA RIVERSIDE MUNI ............................ ILS Rwy 912 VOR or GPS -A13 VOR or GPS -B# VOR or GPS Rwy 9' 'NA when control tower closed. 2Category C, 900-1'%;Category D, 900-21/2. 3Categories A,B,1200-2;Categories C,D,1200-3. #CategoriesA,B, 16004. `NA when control zone not effective except'for operators with approved weather reporting service. SACRAMENTO, CA SACRAMENTO EXECUTIVE ............ ILS Rwy 2 NDB Rwy 2 NA when control tower closed. SALINAS, CA SALINAS MUNI ...............................ILS Rwy 311 LOC/DME Rwy 312 VOR Rwy 133 'ILS, Category D, 700-21/.. LOC, NA. 2Category D, 800-2%. 'Category D, 1000-3. SAN DIEGO, CA BROWN FIELD MUNI ... VOR or GPS -A,800-2% NA when control tower closed. MONTGOMERY FIELD .......ILS Rwy 28R,900-2 NDB or GPS Rwy 28R,1000-2 NA when control zone not in effect. SAN DIEGO INTL LINDBERGH FIELD .........................ILS Rwy 91 LOC Rwy 272 NDB or GPS Rwy 93 NDB or GPS Rwy 27# 'ILS, Categories A,B, 800-2; Categories C,D, 900-21/2. LOC, Categories C,D, 900-21/2. 2Category B, 900-2; Categories C,D, 900-21/2. 'Categories C,D, 900-21/2. #Categories A,B, 1200-2; Categories C,D, 1200-3. SW -2,15 JUL 1999 A• ALTERNATE MINS" 9x,96 NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS FULL•ERTON,CA E2 SW -2, 15 JUL 1999 A NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS LOS ANGELES, CA WHITEMAN................................. VOR or GPS -A Categories A,B, 900-2; Category C, 900-2'/. NA when control tower closed. FULLERTON MUNI ....................... LOC Rwy 24' VOR or GPS -A2 . 'NA when control tower closed. , 2Categories A,B, 1500-2. HAWTHORNE, CA ` HAWTHORNE MUNI .................:::. LOC Rwy 25 NA when control tower closed. HAYWARD, CA HAYWARD AIR ` TERMINAL- ......................... LOC/DME Rwy 28L VOR or.GPS-A' ' VOR/DME or GPS -B ` NA when control zone not in effect. "'Category C, 800-2'/.; Category D, 800-2'/2. LA VERNE, CA'- BRACKETT FIELD .:.................... ILS Rwy 26L r VOR'or GPS -A' NA when control zone not in effect: ' J'Category C, 800-2%. _ LANCASTER, CA • GENERAL WILLIAM J: FOX " AIRFIELD............................1..... NDB or GPS ' VOR or GPS -B2 'Category D, 800-21/.. 2Categories A,B, 1000-2; Categories C,D, 1000-3_- LIVERMORE, 000-3.- LIVERMORE, CA - LIVERMORE MUNI ........................ILS Rwy 25R NA when'control zone not in effect. Category D, 800-2%. LOMPOC,CA LOMPOC ........................... VOR/DME or GPS -A Categories A;B, 900-2. LONG BEACH,,CA + LONG BEACH(DAUGHERTY FIELD) ............................................ ILS Rwy 30' ` NDB Rwy 302 VOR or TACAN or GPS Rwy 302. NA when control zone not in effect. , . . , tCategories A,B, 800-2; Category C, 800-2'%; ^ . Category D, 800-2'/2. LOC, Category C, 800-2'/.; Category D,-800-2'/2. 'Categories A,B, 800-2; Category C,'800-2%; ' Category D, 800-21/2. A ALN�C*MINS MARYSVILLE, CA YUBA COUNTY, .............................. ILS Rwy 14' NDB or GPS Rwy.14 ' VOR Rwy 14 VOR Rwy 32 - NA when Marysville weather not available. 'ILS, Category D, 700-2. MERCED, CA r- MERCED MUNI-MACREADY �. FIELD .....................................:.......: ILS Rwy 30' LOC BC Rwy 12' VOR Rwy 122 "J VOR Rwy 302• . 'NA when class E airspace not in effect. ,2 NA when class E airspace not in effect except for operators with approved weather reporting service.- MODESTO; CA MODESTO CITY-COUNTY=HARRY SHAM FIELD ............................ . ILS Rwy 28R' �::^..ri` t : • NDB Rwy 2t3R' ter, VOR Rwy 28R2 'NA when control tower closed. 2Category A,B, 900-2; Category C, 900-2'/2; Category D, 900-2%. MONTEREY, CA -MONTEREY PENINSULA ............ ILS Rwy 10R' LOC/DME Rwy 28L2' NDB Rwy 10R3 NA when control tower closed. . 'ILS, Categories A,B,C, 700-2; Category,D, y 900-3. LOC-, Category D, 900-3. 'Categories A,B, 1500-2, Categories C,D, +� 1500=3. 'Categories A,B,1100-2;Categories C,D, 1100-3. n - NAPA, CA NAPA COUNTY ............................ LOC Rwy 36L t.VOR or GPS Rwy 6 NA when control zone not in effect. Category D, 1200-3.. 1.. - SW -2 ! 0 'AALNAINS OA INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE CHARTS A IFR ALTERNATE MINIMUMS (NOT APPLICABLE TO USA/USN/USAF) Standard alternate minimums for non precision approaches are 800-2 (NDB, VOR, LOC; TACAN, LDA, VORTAC, VOR/DME orASR);for precision approaches 600-2 (ILS or PAR). Airports within this geographical area that require alternate minimums other than standard or alternate minimums with restrictions are listed below. NA- means alternate minimums are not authorized due to unmonitored facility or absence of weather reporting service. Civil pilots see FAR 91. USA/USN/USAF pilots refer to appropriate regulations. + NAMEALTERNATE MINIMUMS NAME ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ARCATA-EUREKA, CA CHICO, CA ARCATA.....:..:.:......'.................:....... ILS Rwy 32' - CHICO MUNI .:.................... VOR/DME Rwy 13L ILS/DME Rwy 3T2 VOR Rwy 13L NDB or GPS-A3 VOR/DME Rwy 31R '.LOC, NA. NA when control tower closed except for 21LS - 700-2. operators with approved weather reporting ., 'Category C, 800-2%; Category D, 800-2V2. service. ' BAKERSFIELD,CA CHINO,' CA" MEADOWS FIELD ......................... ILS Rwy 30R CHINO..:._........................................ ILS,Rwy 26R 4 ' - r NDB Rwy 30R' VOR or GPS-B NA when control tower closed. NA when control tower closed. . .'Category D, 800-3. v ' ` CONCORD, CA BISHOP, CA- , BUCHANAN FIELD ..................... LDA Rwy 19R BISHOP ......................... VOR or GPS-A,3300-3' , , NDB or GPS Rwy, 19R' ' ' VOR/DME or GPS4P VOR Rwy 19R 'NA when Bishop altimeter setting not available. NA when control zone not in effect. 2 Categories A,B,2200-2;Categories C,D,2200-3. 'Categories A, B, 1100-2; Category C, 1100-3. BLYTHE,CA DAGGETT,CA BLYTHE..................................... VOR or GPS=A •BARSTOW-DAGGETT VOR or TACAN or GPS VOR/DME or GPS Rwy 26 Rwy 22,15.00-3 r NA when Blythe weather not available. r Category D, 900-2'/.. EL MONTE, CA - _ _ EL MONTE................................ NDB or GPS-C' BURBANK, CA ' - VOR or GPS-A' BURBANK-GLENDALE-' . w ., VOR/DME or GPS-B' . PASADENA....................................... ILS'Rw8' y „ NA when control tower closed. ' LOC Rwy 8,900-3 - 'Categories A,B, 1000-2. 'Category D, 700-2. =Categories A,B, 1100-2. ^ FRESNO;CA ` CARLSBAD, CA FRESNO YOSEMITE INTL ... LOC BC Rwy 11L ` McCLELLAN-PALOMAR ......:......... ILS Rwy 24t2 VOR or TACAN or GPS Rwy 11L ' VOR or GPS_A3 Category E, 800-23/.. ' 'NA when control tower closed. ' 21LS, 700-2. 'Categories A,B, 1000-2; Category C, 1000-3. _ - 0' ALTERNATE MINS" SW 2 EI SW-2,-15 JUL:1999 D1 SW -2, •15 JUL 1999 CLIMB TABLE t RATE OF CLIMB TABLE A rate of climb table is provided for use in planning and executing takeoff procedures under known or approximate ground speed conditions. (ft. per min.) REQUIRED CLIMB RATE (ft. per NM) 30 60 GROUND SPEED (KNOTS) 80 90 100 M 120 140 200 100 200 267 300 333 400 467 250 -.125 250 333 375 417 500 583 300 150 300 .400 450 500 600 700 350 ' 175 350 467 525 583 700 816 400 200 400 533 600 667 800' 933 450 225 450 600 675 750 900 1050 500 250 500 667 750 833 1000 1167 550 275 550 733 825 917 1100 1283 600 300 600 800 900 1000 1200 1400 650 325 650 867 975 1083 1300 1516 700 350' 700 933 1050' -1167 1400 1633 REQUIRED CLIMB RATE (ft. per NM) 150 180 GROUND SPEED (KNOTS) 210 240 270 300 200 500 600 700 800 900 1000 250 625 750 875 1000 1125 1250 300 750 900 1050 1200 1350 1500 350 875 1050 1225 1400 1575 1750 400 1000 1200 1400 1600 1700 2000 450' 1125 1350 1575 1800 2025 2250 500 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 550 1375 1650 1925 2200 2475 2750 600 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 3000 650 1625 1950 2275 2600 2925 3250 ` 700 1750 2100 2450 2800 3150 3500 CLIMB WA .10 0 ! • O TAKAFI RUMS A^BSTACLE) DE&URE OWEAS O 99196 TRUCKEE; CA TRUCKEE-TAHOE TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 1, 28, 3500.3 or std. with min. chmbof426per NIM to8300. Rwys 10,19, NA. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 1, climb runway heading to7500, then climbing lefttumvia heading 280° to intercept SWR R-002. Proceed via SWR R-002toTRUCKInt Rwy 28, climbing rightturn via heading 320* and SWR R-W2toTRUCK Int. All aircraft climb in TRUCK holding pattern IS, leftturns, 002" inbound) to cross TRUCK Int ator above 11500 before proceeding on course. TULARE,CA MEFFORD FIELD DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 13,climbing fight turn. Rwy 31, climbing leftturn. All aircraftclimb direct to VIS VOR/DME. Aircraft departing VIS R-001 CW R-140 continue climb in VIS holding pattern (E, right turns, 287' inbound) to cross VIS VOR/DME atorabove 4000. All other aircraftclimb on course. TWENTYNINE PALMS, CA TWENTYNINE PALMS TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 17,800-2, Rwy26,300-1 DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 8, 26, 35, rightturn. Rwy 17, lefttum, climb directtoTNP VORTAC. Eastbound V264 continue climbon course. All others climb inTNP holding pattern (E, left turns, 255' inbound) to 6000 before continuing climb on course. UKIAH, CA UKIAH MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 15, NA. Rwy 33, 300-1 and min. climb of 350' per NM to 4000. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Climbto 4000via heading 350'then climbing lefttum to 6000 direct ENI. UPLAND,CA CABLE TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rory 6, 300-1 or std. with min. climbof 240' per NM to 1900. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 6, climbing right turn. Rwy 24, climbing leftturn. All alrcraftclimbdirect PDZ VORTAC. Aircraft departing PDZ R-091 CW R-140and R-231 CW R-280climbon course. All others continue climb in PDZ holding pattern (E, rightturns, 258' inbound)tocross PDZ VORTAC at or above: R-281 CW R-090,6700; R-141 CW R-230, 4000. VACAVILLE, CA NUT TREE TAKE=OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 20, 10013-2 orstd. with min. climb of 320' per NM to 1300. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: All departures maintain 250 kts or less until inbound TZZ VOR. Rwy 2, climbing rightturn to 2000 directTZZ VOR. Rwy 20, climbing left tum to 2000 direct TZZ VOR. - VAN NUYS, CA VAN NUYS TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys16L,16R,250D-2orstd. with min. climbof300'per NMto3800. ` Rwys 34L, 34R, 3300-2 or std. with min. climb of 425' per NM to 4500. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 16L, 16R, climbing lefttum. Rwys 34L, 34R, climbing rightturn. All aircraft intercept VNY R-095 to DARTS Int Aircraft eastbound, a V186and southeastboundvia V459climb on course. All others, continue climbing rightturn direct VNY VOR/DME before proceeding on course. VICTORVILLE, CA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 3, 500-2orstd. with min. climb of 240' per NM to 3500. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 3, 35, climbing left turn heading 220'. Rwy 17, 21, climbing righttum heading 325'. All alrcraftclimbvia VCV R-269to ETHER Int. Aircraftdepaning ETHER Int220'CW 120° climb on course. All others climb in ETHER holding pattern (E, leftturns, 247' inbound) to depart ETHER Int atorabove8500. VISALIA, CA VISALIA MUNI N, DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 30, turn left Rwy 12, turn right, climb heading 230'to 2000to interceptV23. WATSONVILLE, CA WATSONVILLE MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 2,1100-2CATA,B,1900.2 CAT C,D or std. with a min. climb of'. CAT A,B330'per NM to 2200; CAT C,D 460' per NM to 2400. Rwy 8, std. with a min. climb of 290' per NM to 2200. Rwy 20, std. with a min. climb of 33O' per NM to 2200. Rwy 26, std. with a min. climbof330' per NM to 2200. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 2 climbing righttum. Rwy 20, climb runwayheading. Rwy26, climbing left tum. All aircraft intercept 212' bearing from PAJAR NDB and climb to cross MOVER Int ator above 220 0. Climb in MOVER INT holding pattern (NE, righttums, 212' inbound) until reaching MEA orassigned attitude. NOTE: Rwy 2, 40' AGL pole 1 T from deparhire end of runway, 340' leftof centedine. Rtvy8,189AGI-tower 4696' from departure end of runway,12W rightof centerline. Rwy20,1 W AGI -tree 954' from departure end of runway, 550' leftofcentedine. Rwy26,174'AGL tree 625 from departure end of runway, 580' left of centedine. I WILLOWS, CA WILLOWS -GLENN COUNTY DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Climb directto MXW VORTAC. WOODLAND, CA WATTS -WOODLAND DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Eastboundclimbto2000 via SAC R-296to SAC VORTAC. Southbound or westbound climbto 5000 via TZZ R-335 and SACft-257 to RAGGS Int Northbound climb to 5000via ILA R-142 to ILA VORTAC 99196 © TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES O C11 SW -2 SW -2,15 JUL 1999 CIO SW -2,15 JUL 1999 Q TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES 99337 I SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY -MC CHESNEY FIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 7, 25, NA. Rwy 11,1800.2 or std. with a min. climb of 320' per NM to 2300. Rwy 29, 1200.2 orstd. with a min. climb of 390' per NM to 1700. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwyll,climbrunway heading to 900, then climbing right turn direct MOO VORTAC. Rwy29,climbvia runwayheading and MOO R-050to MOO VORTAC. All aircraft departing on MOO R-130 CW R-320 climb on course. All others continue climbing in MOO holding pattern (SE, left turns, 306° inbound) to cross MOO VORTAC ator above4000. SANTA ANA,CA JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT -ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: All runways climb runway headingto700.Rwys1L,1lR,tumIeft Rwys19L,19R, turn right. All aircraft climb direct SLI VORTAC. AircraftdepartingSLIR-040CW R-345climbon course. All others continue climbingvia SLI R-1 71 southbound then climbing right turn directSLI VORTAC to cross atorabove 4600. SANTA BARBARA, CA SANTA BARBARA MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 33L, 33R, NA. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 7, turn right heading 170°. Rwy 25,turn left heading 155°. Rwys 1SL, 15R climb runway heading. All aircraft climb via RZS R- 185toGOLETInt. Aircraft departing GOLET Int 050° CW 300* climb on course. All others continue climb in GOLET holding pattern (SE, right turns, 307° inbound) to cross GOLET Int ator above 2800, then climb on course. SANTA MARIA, CA SANTA MARIA PUBLIC/ CAPTAIN G. ALLAN HANCOCK FIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy.12, CATC,D3400-2or std. with min. climb of 31 Uper NM to 3600. Rwy 20, CAT A,B 1300-2orstd. with min. climb of 250' per NM to1500; CATC,D1600-2 or std. with min. climb of 250' per NM to 2100. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 2,12, climbing left turn. Rwy 20, climbing rightturn. Rwy 30, climbvia runway heading. All aircraft climb directGLJ VOR. Continueclimbvia GLJ R-300 northwestboundto 2000, then continue climbing direct MOO VORTAC. NOTE: 400'- 559 trees beginning''/. mile from departureendofRwyl2. SANTA MONICA, CA SANTA MONICA MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 3, 700-2orstd. with min. climb of 290' per NM to 1000. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 3, climbto 1000, then climbing right turn direct SMO VOR/DME. Proceedvia SMO R-261 to SADDE Int. Rwy 21, climbing rightturn to intercept SMO R-250 and FIM R-148 to SADDE Int All aircraftcontinueclimbon course. SANTA ROSA, CA SONOMA COUNTY TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 1, CAT A,B 1900.2 or std. withamin.climbof240'perNMto2400. CATC;D 3100-2or std. with a min. climb of 28(Yper NM to 3800. Rwy 19, 300-2or std. with a min, climb of 220' per NM to 500. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 1,19, 32, climbto .1800, then climbing leftturn. Rwy 14, climbto 1800, then climbing right turn. All aircraft climb direct STS VOR/ DME. NOTEi 253'tree 15W from departure end of Rwy 19, 800' rightof centerline. SANTA YNEZ, CA SANTA YNEZ TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 8, CATC,D 1100-2or std. with min, climb of 28U par NM to 2000. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy8,turn left climbto 6000 heading 260° and V27 toORCUT Int. Rwy26, climb to 6000 via RZS R-275 and V27 to ORCUT Int. SHAFTER, CA SHAFTER-MINTER FIELD DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 12,16, turn right. Rwys 30,34, turn left. Cllmbwestbound to4000via V248. Westbound aircraftcontinue at4000on course. Eastbound aircraftturn right at 4000 direct EHF VORTAC. SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CA LAKETAHOE TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 18, 4000.3orstd. with min. climb of 700'per NM to 9800. Rwy36,2700-3orstd. with min. climb of 400' per NM to 8300. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 18, climb runway heading to 9800, then continue climbing rightturn via heading 280* and SWRR-152 to SWR VOR/DME. Rwy 36, climb runway heading to8300, then continue climbing leftturnvia heading 340* and SWR R-102to SWRVOR/DME. Then'all aircraft proceed on course. TORRANCE, CA ZAMPERINI FIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 11 L,11 R,400-1 or std. with a min. climb of 325' per NM to 500. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 29L, 29R, climb runway heading. Rwys 11 L,11 R, climbing leftturn to heading 290°. Both departures climbto 3000, intercept LAX R-170 to LIMBO Int. TRACY,CA TRACY MUNI DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 25, 30, turn right Rwys 7,12, turn left Climbto 2000 direct ECA VORTAC. 983;17 © TA FF RUMS A OBSTACLE) DEP TURE PfEED'S O - � � sw-z © TAKNFF LOMUMS APOBSTACLE)•DE&URE AWC EDAS O 96337 SALINAS, CA SALINAS MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 3,14, 21, 32, NA. RwyB, CAT C, D 3600-2 or std. with a min. climbof 420' per NMto4100. Rwy13,CATC,D3600-2orstd.with min. climbof500'perNMto4000. Rwy31,RVR/24.FAR 135. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 8,13, 26, turn right. Rwy 31, turn lett Climbon SNS R-275to 2000, then climbing rightturn to cross SNS VORTAC at or above 3000 SAN ANDREAS, CA CALAVERAS CO-MAURY RASMUSSEN FIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rory 13,1800.5orstd.with a min. climbof 290' perNMto 3100. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 13, climb runway heading to 3100, then climbing rightturn via LIN R-085 to LIN VORTAC. Rwy 31, climb runway heading to2300, then climbing leftturnvia LIN R-029toLIN VORTAC. SAN BERNARDINO, CA SAN BERNARDINO INTL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 6,CATA,B2100.2orstd. with a min. climbof 340' perNMto 3700. CAT C,D 3100.2 or std. with a min. climbof 480' per NM to4600. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 6, climbing right turn. Rwy24,climbing leftturn. All aircraftclimbdirect PDZ VORTAC. Aircraft departing PDZ R-091 CW R- 140 and R-231 CW R-280climb on course. All others continue climb in PDZ holding pattern (Hold NE, right turns, 210' inbound) to cross PDZ VORTAC ator above: R-281 CW R-090.7700; R-141 CW R-230,4900. SAN CARLOS, CA SAN CARLOS TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 30, NA. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 12, climbvia heading 113° and SJC VOR/DME R-276to SJC VOR/DME before proceeding on course. SAN DIEGO, CA BROWN FIELD MUNI -TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys8L,8R, CAT A,B 1900-2 or std. with min. climb of 460' per NM to 2600. CAT C, D 3100.3 or std. with min: climbof 520' perNMto 3900. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys BL,BR, climbing left turn. Rwys 26L,26R, climbing rightturn. All aircraft climb heading 280° to intercept MZB R-160 northwestbound to MZB VORTAC. SAN DIEGO, CA (CONT) MONTGOMERY FIELD TAKE-OFFM MMUMS' Rwy5,1500.2or.std. witha min. climbof 290' perNMto 1700. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 5,1 OUR, climbing rightturn. Rwy 28UR, climbing leftturn. Allaircraft climb direct to MZB VORTAC. Aircraft departing MZB R-090 CW R-360 climb on course. All others climb in MZB holding pattern (W, rightturns, 075° inbound) to cross MZB VORTAC at or above 1800. SAN DIEGO INTL-LINDBERGH FIELD TAKE -OFF MININMUMS: Rwy 9, CAT A, B 900-2or std. withamin.climbof570'perNMto600. CATC,D 1600.2 or std. with a min. climbof 570' perNMto 600. Rwy 27,400-1 or std. with a min. climbof 260' per NM to 400. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 9, climbing leftturn direct MZB VORTAC. Rwy 27, climb runway heading to 900, then climbing rightturn direct MZB VORTAC; aircraft departing MZB R-090CW R-360 climb on course. All others climb in MZB holding pattern (W, rightturns, 075' inbound) to cross MZB VORTAC at or above 1800. SAN DIEGO (EL CAJON), CA GILLESPIE FIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 9L, 9R, 900.2 or std. with a min. climbof 1000' perNMto 1600. Rwy 17; 500-1 or std. with a min. climbof 260perNMto800. Rwys27L, 27R,CATA,B500-1 orstd.with amin. climb of370'per NM to 900. CAT C,O 2500-2 or std. with a min. climb of 379per NM to 2500. Rwy 35,1300.2 or std. wfth a min. climbof 460' perNMto 1800. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 9L, 9R, 27L, 27R, climbing rightturn. Rwys 17, 35, climbing leftturn. All aircraftclimbvia heading 165' and MZB R-076to MZB VORTAC. SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO INTL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy19L,2000-2orstd.writha min. climbof 5201perNMto2300. Rwy19R, 2000-2or std. with a min. climbof 500' perNMto 2300. Rwy 28L, 28R, 800-2 or std. with a min. climb of 270' per NM to 1000. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 1 L,1 R, 28L, 28R, climb runway heading to 2000. Rwys10L,10R,19L, 19R, climbing leftturn via heading 050° and SFOR-090. All aircraft continue climb on course. SAN JOSE, CA SAN JOSE INTL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 11,12L,12R, 2800.26r std. with amin. climb of330'perNMto3200. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 11,12L,12R, .climbing rightturn. All aircraftclimb direct OAK VORTAC, then proceed on course. 963;17 Q TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES Q SW -2 C9 SW -2, 15 JUL 1999 C8 I SW -2, 15 JUL-1,999 D TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES O 66337 - PETALUMA, CA.. PETALUMAMUNI DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 11,climbto2400or .above direct SGD VORTAC. Rwy 29, climb runway heading to 1500then climbing leftturn to 3000 direct SG D VORTAC. All aircraftcontinue climbto MEA for ,route of flight. PLACERVILLE, CA PLACERVILLE TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 5, NA. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 23, climb runway heading to 3600 beforeturning on course. PORTERVILLE, CA PORTERVILLE MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 12,2013-1 or std. with a min. climb rate of 220' per NM to 600. - DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 12, climbing right turn. Rwy 30, climbing lefttum. All aircraftclimbdirect to TTE VOR/DME. Aircraft departing TTE R-146 CW R-330 climb on course. All others, continue climb in WE holding pattern (NW, rightturns, 143* inbound) to cross: TTE R-331 CW R-060, 8600; R-061 CW R-145, 7000. NOTE: 55V frostfan 3000' East Southeast runway 12. RAMONA, CA RAMONA• TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 9, CAT A, B 1100-2 or 700. 1 with min. climbof 269 per NM to2700. CATC 2800.2 or 700-2with a min climb of 360' per NM to 4600. Rwy 27,8013-2 or std. with a min. climb of 280' per NM to 2400. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy9, turn left. Rwy 27, turn right. Climb to5000via OCN R-100 to intercept MZB R-007to BONDO Int. Continue climbvia V208/458 toatoraboveMEA. - RED BLUFF, CA RED BLUFF MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 33, CATS C,D 2500-2 or std. with a min. climb of 300' per NM to 3300. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 15, climb direct RBL VORTAC. Rwy.33, climbing right tum direct RBL VORTAC. All aircraitdeparting RBL R-091 CWR-200 climb on course. All others climb in RBL holdingpattern (S, right turns, 341' inbound) to depart RBL VORTAC at or above: R-021 CW R-060,4500; R-061 CW R-090, 2100; R-201 CW R-270,4000; R-271 CW R-020,2400. REDDING, CA REDDING MUNI. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 12,16; turn right.. Climbvia heading 285° and RDD R-256 to BEIRA Int climb in holding pattern' (SE, rightturns, 324° inbound) until reaching MEA for route of flight Rwys 30,34, turn right. Climb via heading 075° and RDD R-044 to ITMOR Int, climb in holding pattern (S, left turns, 357° inbound) until reaching MEA or MCA for route of flight. REDLANDS,CA REDLANDS MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 8, NA. Rwy 26,1700 -tor std. with a min. climb of 309 per NM to 4000. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Climbing left turn direct PDZ VORTAC. Aircraft departing PDZ VORTAC R-091 CW R-140 and R-231 CW R=280climb on course. All others continue in PDZ VORTAC holding pattern (hold NE, rightturns, 21 W inbound) to cross PDZ VORTAC ator above, R-281 CW R-090, 7700; R- 141 CW R-230,4900. RIALTO, CA RIALTO MUNI-MIRO FIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 17, 35, NA DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 6, climbing right turn. Rwy 24, climbing leftturn. All alrcraftclimbvia PDZ R-012 to PDZ VORTAC. Aircraft departing PDZ. R-091 CW R-140andR-231 CW R-280climb an course. All others continue climb in PDZ holding pattern (NE, right turns, 210° inbound) to cross PDZ VORTACatorabove: R-281 CWR-090, 6700; R-141 CW R-230,4000. RIO VISTA, CA RIO VISTA MUNI DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 7, turn left Rwys . 14,25,32 turn right. All aircraft climb directSAC VORTAC. RIVERSIDE,CA ' RIVERSIDE MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 9, CAT A,B 1200-2orstd. with a min. climbof 210' perNM to 2300. CATC,D 2100.2 or std. with a min. climb of 240' per NM to 3500. Rwy16,NA. Rwy 27,CATC,D 2400-2orstd. with a min. climb of 230'per NM to 3860. , Rwy34,CAT A, B 700-2 or std. with a min. climb of 400' per NM to 1600. CATC,D 1600.2 or std. with a min, climb of 400' per NM to 2600. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 9, climbing right turn. Rwy34, climbing leftturn. Rwy 27, climb heading 280°to 2000, then climbing leftturn. Allaircraftclimb direct PDZ VORTAC. Aircraft departing PDZR-091 CWR-140andR-231CW R-280 climb on course. All others continue climb in PDZ holding pattern (NE, right turns, 210° inbound) to cross PDZ VORTAC at or above: R-281 CW R-090, 6700; R-141 CW R-230,. 4000; orAirway MEA. SACRAMENTO, CA SACRAMENTOMATHER DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 4L,4R, climbing rightturn direct SAC VORTAC. Rwys 22 L,22R climb direct SAC VORTAC. 96337 V TAKEF i UMS AN OBSTACLE) DEP TORE PACED S Q QITAKF. F Ar1AUMS AN�(OBSTACLE) DEPOTURE EDS Q 9boea # . OCEANSIDE; CA OCEANSIDE MUNI TAKE-OFFMINIMUMS: Rwy6, 400.1 orstd. withal min. climbof329per NMto500. Rwy24,300-torstd. with a min. climb of670'perNMto30.., • DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 6: climbing right turn. Rwy 24, climbing lefttum. All alrcraftclimbvia heading 235° to 1500, then climbing rightturn direct OCN VORTAC. ONTARIO; CA L ONTARIO INTL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 8L,8R, CAT C, D1000-2 orstd. with min. climbof220' perNMto 2200. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 8L,8R, climbing righttum. Rwys 26L,26R, climbing leftturn. All aircraft climb direct PDZ VORTAC. Aircraft departing PDZ R- 091 CW R-140and R-231 CW . R-280climb on course. All others continue climb in PDZ holding pattern (NE, rightturns, 210' inbound) to cross PDZ VORTAC at or above: R-281 CW R-090, 6700; R-141 CW R-230, ORLAND, CA' ' HAIGH FIELD w DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 15, climbing leftturn. Rwy 33, climbing right turn. All aircraftclimb via CIC R-238 to GONGS Int. Aircraft departing GONGS Int 070°CW 240°or290°CW 360°climboncourse. All,s others climb in GONGS holding pattern (NE, right turns, 238' inbound) to departGONGS Intator above: Ot °CW 069., 3200; 241 °CW 289°, 230. OROVILLE,CA OROVILLE MUNI 'TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 1, 1300.2orstd. with a min. climb of 260' per NMto 170. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 1, 30, climbing left .tum heading 170°. Rwys 12,19, climbing rightturn heading 290°. All alrcraftclimbvia MXW R-052 to TALUM InUMXW 16.9 DME. Continue climb on course. OXNARD,CA OXNARD . DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 7, climbing lefttum. Rwy 25, climb runway heading. All alrcraftcontinue climb via CMA R-249 to SQUID Int. Aircraft departing' SQUID Int040'CW 3O°climb oncourse. Allothers continue climb in SQUID holding pattern (W, rightturns, 069° inbound) to cross SQUID ator above 2300. . PALM SPRINGS, CA - } BERMUDA DUNES t TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 28,CATA,B1200.2orstd. with a min. climbof per NM to '2100-2 orstd."a �.cl bof49UperNMto34 0. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 10, climbing right tum heading 150°. RWy 28, climbing leftturn heading 090'. All aircraft continue climbvia TRM R-304to TRM VORTAC. Aircraft departing TRM ,'R-095 CW R-165 climb on course.'Altothers continue climb in TRM holding pattern (E, rightturns, 289° inbound) to cross TRM VORTAC ator above: R-166 CW 290°, 650; 291 °CWR-310, 490; R-311 CW 094', 320. PALM SPRINGS, CA (CONT) DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 30, CRTC, D 3400.2 or std. with a min. climbof410'per NMto370. ' Rwy 35, CAT A, B 400.2 or std. with a min. climb of 210' per NM to 400. CAT C, D 3400-2 orstd. with a min. climb of 410' per NM to 370. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 12,17, climbing left turn. Rwys 30, 35, climbing rightturn heading 150°. _ Aircraft departing TRM R-101 CW R-139, climb on course. All others continue climb east- bound via the TRM R-109 then climbing right turn to cross TRM VORTAC ator above: R-304 CW R-100, 4000; R-140 CW R-199,4700; R-200CW R-303, 660. PALM SPRINGS INTL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 31 L,31 R, 30.00.2 orstd, with a min. climb of 360' perNMto 400. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 13L,13R, tum left heading 090° to intercept TRM R-304 to TRM VORTAC. Rwys31L,31R,tumrightdirectPSP VORTAC, then via PSP R-124 and TRM R-304 to TRM VORTAC. Aircraft departing TRM R-300CW R-160 climb on course. All otherscontinueclimb inTRIM , holding pattern (E, rightturns, 289° inbound) to cross TRM VORTAC atorabove 7300., r , PALMDALE, CA- r- PALMDALE PRODUCTION FLT/TEST INSTLN AF PLANT 42 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 22,1000-1 orstd. with min. climb of 260' perNMto 420. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys4, 7, turn left. Rwys 22, 25, turn right Eastbound V12, J6 climb on course. All others climbon R-298to FISCH Int (northwestbound climb in holding pattem SE, lefttums, 298° inbound. Departat8l O), continue climb direct PMD VORTAC to departator above published MCA. PALO ALTO,,CA PALO ALTO AIRPORT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 12, turn left. Rwy 30, turn right All aircraft climb direct SJC VOR/DME before proceeding on course. PASO ROBLES, CA PASO ROBLES MUNI DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: All departures maintain 250 kts or less until inbound to PRB. Rwy 1, climbto 3000via heading 280°to intercept PRB R-326 outbound. t..- V248northboundclimboncourse.Allothersclimbing rightturnto4500direct PRB: Rwy13,climbto3000 via heading 160°to intercept PRB R-133outbound. V25 southbound continueclimb on course. All others climbing dghtturnto4500directPRB. Rwy 19, climbto 3000via heading 150°to intercept PRB R-179 outbound. V113southboundcontinueclimboncourse. All others climbing leftturn to 4500 direct PRB. Rwy 31, climbto 3000via heading 340°to intercept PRB R-326 outbound. V248 northbound climb on course. All others climbing right turn to 4500 directPR8. - 99064 V' a TAKE OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES, Q CC7 $W;2, 15-JUL 199,9, C6 SW=2, 15 JUL 1999 O TAKE-OFF.MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES 9M , MADERA, CA' MADERA MUNI DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 30, climbing right turn via FRA R-243 to BEREN InVFRA 18.6 DME then via assigned route. Rwy 12, turn left, climb heading 095° to 1500, continue climb direct CZO VORTAC, then via assigned route. MAMMOTH LAKES, CA MAMMOTH LAKES TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy9,500-2orstd.withamin. climbof400'perNMto10700.Rwy27, 5000.5orstd. with a min. climb of 450' per NM to 11800. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 9, climbing left turn heading 050°to intercept BIH R-307. Rwy 27, climbing rightturn to heading 095°to intercept BIH R-307. All aircraft proceed via BIH R-307 to BIH VOR/DME, then via BIH R-322 (V381) to NICOL Intthen via assigned route. MARYSVILLE, CA YUBA COUNTY bEPARTURE PROCEDURE: All Rwysclimb direct ILA VORTAC. MERCED, CA MERCED MUNI-MACREADY FIELD DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 12, climbing right turn to 3000 via heading 330° and MOD R-120to MOD. Rwy 30, climbto3000via heading 300* and MOD R-120 to MOD. MODESTO,CA MODESTO CITY -COUNTY HARRY SHAM FIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 10L, 28L; 300.1 or std. with min. climb of 300' per NM to 300. Rwy I OR, 300-1 or std. with min. climb of 350' per NM to 300. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: All runways, climbto 1000on runway heading before proceeding on course. MONTAGUE, CA' SISKIYOU COUNTY TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 17, CAT A,8 240D-2 or std. with min. climbof350'perNMto5500. ' CATC,D 4100-2 or std. with min. climb of 350' per NM to 7400. Rwy 35, 4000-2or std. with min. climb of 300' per NM to 7000. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 17, climb direct `MOG NDB. Continue climb to 10000 in MOG holding pattern (N,right turns, 172°inbound). Rwy35,climb to 7000via runway heading and 352° bearing from MOG NDB, then climbing right turn to 10000 direct MOG NDB. All aircraftdepart MOG NDB at or above MEA for route of flight. MONTEREY, CA MONTEREY PENINSULA TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys IOL, IOR,1100-2orstd. withamin. climbof36O'perNMto1100. Rwys28L, 28R, 600.2 or std. with a min. climb of 220' per NM to 900. - DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 1 OL,I OR, climbing left turn heading 295°. Rwys 28L, 28R, climbing right turn heading 330°. All aircrafteontinueclimbviathe SNS R-260 to SNS VORTAC. MURRIETA TEMECULA, CA FRENCH VALLEY TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 18; NA. Rwy 36, 700-2 or std. with a min. climb of 340' per NM to 2200. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 36, climb runway heading to 2200, then climbing left turn via HDFR- 145 to HOF VOR. Aircraft departing HDF VOR 065° CW 352"climb on course. Aircraftdeparting northeastbound, climb in HDF holding pattern, (SE, rightturns, 315° inbound) to depart HDF VOR ator above: 353'CW 054°, 6800; 055°CW 064°, 5800; before proceeding on course. NAPA, CA NAPA COUNTY TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy6,1200.2orstd.with min. climbof290'perNMto1500. Rwys36L,36R, 1000-2 or std. with min. climb of 370' per NM to 1200. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 6,18L,18R,turn right. Rwys 24,36L,36R, turn left. All aircraft climb direct SGD VORTAC. Aircraft departing SGD R-060 CW R-270 climb on course. All others continue climb via the SGD R-165to 2000, then climbing rightturn direct SGD VORTAC, climb on course. NEEDLES, CA NEEDLES DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 2, 29, turn right. Rwy 20, turn left All aircraftclimb directEED VORTAC, then continue climbon curse. Departures on V12, J6, and J8 cross EED VORTAC at or above 2600. NOVATO, CA GNOSS FIELD TAKEOFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 13, NA. Rwy 31, 500.2 or std. with a min. climb of 250' per NM to 1000. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 31, climbing right turn direct SGD VORTAC before proceeding on course. OAKLAND,CA METROPOLITAN OAKLAND INTL DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys9L,9R,11,15,29, turn right Rwys 27L,27R, maintain runway heading. Rwy 33,turnleft. Allalrcraftclimbto4000oraboveviaV107 to COMMO Int. If not at 4000 at COMMO Int, climb in holding pattern (E, rightturns, 288* inbound) before proceeding on course.. 99084 O TAKE-0FF MUMS AND OBSTACLE) DEPA TURE PWEDU S Q • � � � SW -2 TAKAF 1 MUMS APOBSTACLE) DE&URE ISCEAS Q 98337 LA VERNE, CA BRACKETT FIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 8L,8R,26L,26R, 300-1. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 8L,8R, climb runway heading to 1400, then climbing rightturn heading 195°. Rwys 26L,26R, climb runwayheadingto 1400, then climbing leftturn heading 130°. All aircraft intercept and climbvia POM R-164 to PRADO Int Aircraft departing PRADOInt heading 141 *CW290* climb on course. All others climb in PRADO holding pattern IN, rightturns, 1160 inbound) to depart PRADO Int atorabove: 291 ° CW 340°, 4500; 341 ° CW 050°, 6800; 051"CW 090°, 5200; 091 °CW 140°, 4200. LAKEPORT,CA LAMPSON FIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 10,1700-3 or std. with min. climbof619perNMto3200. Rwy28,1500.3orstd. with min. climb of 620' per NM to 2200. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 10, climbing leftturn to heading 275°. Rwy 28, climbing rightturn to heading 035°. Interceptand climb northwestboundvia the LOP NDB 336° bearing to 4000, then climbing leftturn direct ENI VORTAC. Cross ENI VORTAC at or above 6000. LANCASTER,CA GENERAL WILLIAM J. FOX AIRFIELD DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Climb southeastbound on R-299 to PMD VORTAC. Depart PMD at published MCA for direction of flight. LINCOLN, CA LINCOLN REGIONAL AIRPORT/ KARL HARDER FIELD DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 115, climbing right turn. Rwy 33, climbing lefttum. All aircraft climbdirect MYV VOR/DME, then climb on course. . LIVERMORE, CA LIVERMORE MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 7L, 7R, 1500-2 or std. `withamin. climbof260'perNMto2200. Rwys 25L, 25R, 2300-2 or std. with a min. climb of 375 per NM to 3100. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 7L, 7R, climbdirect REIGA LOM, then climbing left turn via the 030° bearing from REIGA LOM to intercept V109, then proceed on course. Rwys 25L, 25R, climb runway heading to 1200, then climbing rightturn via heading 020° and OAK R- 060to ALTAM Int, then proceed on course. LODI, CA LODI DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Climb direct to LIN VORTAC. LOMPOC, CA LOMPOC TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 7, 2900-2orstd. with a min.climbof240' perNMto1800. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 7, turn right. Rwy 25, turn right heading 130°. All aircraft interceptand climbvia GVO R-278 to GVO VORTAC. Aircraft departing GVO R-120CW R-020 climb on course. All others climb in GVO holding pattern (NW, right turns, 127° inbound) to departGVO VORTAC ator above 5000. LONG BEACH, CA LONG BEACH (DAUGHERTY FIELD) TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 16L, 500-1 or std. with min. climb of 270' per NMto 400. Rwy 16R, 500-1 or std. with min. climb of464' perNM to 400. Rwy 25L. 300-1 or std. with min. climb of 284' per NM to 300. Rwys 34L, 34R, 300-1. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 7L, 7R, climbto 800, turn right direct SLI VORTAC and proceed to PADDR Intvia R-210. Rwy 12, climb runwayheading to interceptand proceed via SLI VORTAC R-21 Oto PADDR Int. Rwys 16L,16R, climbto 800, turn right heading 180°to intercept and proceed via SLI R-210 to PADDR Int Rwys 25L,25R,30,climbto800,turn left heading 200°to intercept and proceed via LAX R-145 to PADDR Int. LOS ANGELES, CA LOS ANGELES INTL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 25L,25R, turbojetstd, non -turbojet std. with a min. climbof 360' per NM to 600. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 6L, 6R, 7L, 7R, climbto 2000 heading 070°, then climbing rightturn. Rwys 24L, 24R, climbto3000 heading 250°, then climbing leftturn. Rwys25L,25R,turbojetclimbto3000 heading 250°, then climbing lefttum; non-turbojetclimb via heading 250°, atthe SMO 154° radial turn left heading 200°. Then all aircraft climb direct SLI VORTAC, then climb on course. WHITEMAN TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys12,30,2900.2orstd. with a min. climb of 350' per NM to 4300. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 12, climbing right turn direct VNY VOR/DME. Rwy 30, climbing leftturn heading260°. All alrcraftclimbto4500viaVNY R-325, then climbing left turn direct VNY VOR/DME. LOS BANOS, CA' LOS BANOS MUNI DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Aircraft departing 320° CW 120°climboncourse. Allothersclimbvia heading 240°tointercept V109. Southeaslboundvia V109 .requires a climb rate of 300' per NM to 4000. 98337 Q TAKE -OFF ,MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE)DEPARTURE PROCEDURES SW -2 cs SW, -2'; 1;5JV.L 1:999 C4 SM2, 15 `JUL .1999 Q TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES O x9337 _ FIREBAUGH, CA FIREBAUGH DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 12, climbing right turn. Rwy 30, climbing leftturn. All alrcraftclimbvia heading 150° and PXN R-061 to MENDO Int. Aircraft departing MENDO Int, heading 230°CW 150° climb on course. All others climb in MENDO holding pattern (NE, right turns, 241" inbound) to cross MENDO Int at crabove2000. FORTUNA,CA „ ROHNERVILLE TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 11, NA. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Climb direct FOT VORTAC. Continue climb in holding pattern IN, right turns,161 ° inbound) to cross FOT VORTAC ator aboe3ODO. FRESNO, CA FRESNO YOSEMITE INTL DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Climb direct to CZQ VORTAC. All aircraft departing CZQ R-330 CW R- 120climbto 4000 in CZO holding pattern ISE, left turns; 322° inbound) before proceeding on course. FRESNO -CHANDLER DOWNTOWN DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 12L,12R, climb heading 165°. Rwys 30L;30R,climb heading 345°to 1000 before proceeding on course. FULLERTON,CA 'FULLERTON MUNI DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 6, climbing right turn. Rwy 24, climbing leftturn. All aircraft climbdirect SLI VORTAC. Aircraft departing SLI R-040 CW R-345 climb on course. All others climb via the SLI R-171 southbound, then climbing leftturn direct SLI VORTAC, to cross SLI VORTAC at or above 4600. GRASS VALLEY, CA _-NEVADA COUNTY AIR PARK TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy7, NA. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 25, climbvia MYV R-058to 6000 then continue climb on course. GROVELAND,CA PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy9,400-2orstd. with a min. climb of 400'per NM to 4000. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy9, turn right. Rwy 27;turn left. All a! rcraft climb direct LIN VORTAC. Cross LIN VORTAC ator above 5000. HALF MOON BAY, CA HALF MOON BAY TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 12, 2600.2 orstd. with a min. climbof300•perNMto3000.Rwy30,NA. , DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 12, climb runway heading to 3000, then climb directOSI VORTAC, to cross OSI VORTAC ator above 3500 before proceeding oncourse. HANFORD,CA HANFORD MUNI DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 14, turn left. Rwy 32, turn rightclimbvia VIS R-230 to intercept V23. HAWTHORNE, CA JACK NORTHROP FIELD/HAWTHORNE MUNI - TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: 'Rwy7; 300-2orstd. with min. climb rate of 250'per NM to 400. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy7,turn right climb via heading 240°. Rwy 25, turn left, climbvia heading 210*. All runways climbto3000via LAX R-170to LIMBO Int. HAYWARD,CA HAYWARD AIR TERMINAL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 1 UL,1 OR, 300.1. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 28L,28R, climb straightahead. Rwys t OLJ OR, turn right, climb to2500 via directOAK VORTAC and OAK R-288. Aircraft southeastbound and capable of climbing 250• per NM to 4500 may proceed directto MABRY Intvia OAK R-114. .HEMET, CA HEMET-RYAN TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys 4,22, NA. Rwys 5, 23, 1200-2 or std. with min. climb of 4001 per NM to 3000. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 5, tum left, direct HOF VOR. Rwy 23, turn right., HOLLISTER, CA HOLLISTER MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy6,24,NA. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 13, rightturn " heading325°.Rwy 31,climb runwayheading.All aircraft climb to 6000to interceptand proceed via SJC R-121 direct SJC VOR/DME before proceeding on course. IMPERIAL, CA IMPERIAL COUNTY DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 8, 32, turn right. Rwy 14, climb runway heading. Rwy 26, turn left All aircraft climb direct IPL VORTAC. ' JACKSON,CA WESTOVER FIELD AMADOR COUNTY DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 1, turn left. Rwy 19, turn right. All aircraftclimb direct LIN VORTAC, continue climboncourse. _ 98337 . © TAK UMS A OBSTACLE) DEPWUREPHWEDLMS O Q TAKE*F AUMS'A(*OBSTACLE) DEP*URE P&EDA Q ..Sew COLUMBIA, CA DAVIS, CA COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TAKE,0FFMINIMUMS.RWyl7,400.20istdWIMMin. DEPARTUREPROCEDURE•Eastboundclimbto2000 . climb of21UperNMto3000.Rwy35,800-lhorstd. to SAC VORTACvia SAC R-277. Northbound climb to withmi6.climb6f442'OrNMt63000., '' _ 5000toILA VORTACviaILA R-142. Southbound and DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy17,climbon175° westbound climbto 3000 directTZZ VOR. bearing from CUF NOB to 3000, continue climbing right turn to 5000 or above direct CUFNDB.Rwy35,climbon DAVISIWOODLANDMINTERS,CA 355° bearing from CUF ND13 to 3000, continue climbing 4YOLO COUNTY-DAVIS/WOODLAND/ Ieftturnto5000orabovedirect CUFND13. WINTERS DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy116,South, eastand COLUSA; CA westbound, climbto 3000directTZZ VOR. Northbound COLUSA COUNTY -- climbing lefttumto5000via ILA R-146 to ILA VORTAC. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Climl directtoICA Rwy34,climbto5000via , ILAR-146tolLA _ VORTAC. VORTAC.South, east, andwestbound climbing right turn to 3000 direct toTZZ VOR. CONCORD CA' t BUCHANAN FIELD DELANO;CA TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys14UR,191JR,50G-1. DELANO MUNI DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Climb direct CCR VOR TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy32,`400-1orstd.with a .orcomplywithpublishedCCR SIDs.Min. climb rate of min.c6mbrate,03917perNMto400. .. 359 per NM to 1000 required.. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: All runwaysclimb ' '— outboundviaEHFR-324 to 2000, continue climb direct COR&W CA TTE VOR/DME; or, aircraft proceeding via V23 CORONA MUNI continue climb on course. NOTE: 65'AGLtree6Wfromdeparture end ofrunway. TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy7,1000.2orstd.with a - 500' leftofcentedine runway 14. min. climbof31UperNMto1700.Rwy25,600-2orstd. with a min. climb of 280' per NM to 1200. ` DEPARTURE PROCEDURE:Rwy7,cliri bingleftturn. EL MONTE, CA r - Rwy25,climbingrighttum.All aircraftcontinueclimb ELMONTE directtoPDZVORTAC. Aircraft departing PDZR-091 TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 1, 600-1 orstd. with min. CWR-140andR-231 CW R-280 climb on course. 61imbof28O'perNMto1000.Rwy19,1200.2orstd. AllotherscontinueclimbinPDZVORTACholding r with min. climbof230'perNMto1900. - pattern (Hold NE, rightturns,210*inbound) tocross DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 1. climbing right POZ VORTAC at or above: R-1 41 CWR-2304000, R- turn. Rwy19, climb runway headingto800thenclimbing 281CWR-0906700. leftturn. All aircraft interceptPDZR-278toPDZ + VORTAC. Aircraft departing PDZ R-091 CW "-a, CRESCENT CITY, CA R-280 climb on course. All others continue climb in JACK MCNAMARA FIELD ; PDZ holding pattern (NE, rightturns, 210° inbound) to TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy11,300-1.Rwy17,300-1 cross POZ VORTAC at or above: R-281 CW + orstd.with min. climb of249per NMto300.. R-090,6700. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 11,17, climbing EUREKA,CA rightturn.Rwys29,35,climbing leftturn.All aircraft climb direct CEC VORTAC. Aircraft departing CEC R- MURRAY FIELD _ t 131 CW R-330climbon course. All others continue TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy7,NA. Rwy29,300-1. Rwy climb in CEC holding pattern (8, leftturns, 341' 11,300.3.Rwy25,400.1., c , inbound) to cross CEC VORTAC ator above: R-331 DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 11, 25, turn right. CWR-010, 1100;R-011 CW R-050,2200; R-051 CW IRwy29, turn left All aircraftclimbheading 265°to R-090,4100;R-091CWR-130,2700. r .. intercept FOT R-341 (V27). ' DAGGETT, CA , ;. ,. FALLBROOK, CA BARSTOW-DAGGETT FALLBROOK COMMUNITY AIRPARK l_ •,TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 22,1800-2orstd. with min. TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy36,CATA,B,700-2orstd. climb of380'perNMto4000.Rwy26,CATC,D2700-2` -withamin.climbof349perNMto5000. ' . orstd. with min. climb of380'perNMto5000. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 18, climb runway DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys4,8,climb direct, heading to 1200, then climbing lefttumvia heading 160' DAG VORTAC. Rwys22,26,climbing rightturn, , 4tojoinV208-458. Aircraftwestboundproceed oncourse. heading 090°and DAG R-223 to DAG VORTAC, then AircrafteastboundV208.458proceed toVISTA Int and climb in DAG holding pattern (NE,rightturns,223_ climb in holding pattern (E, leftturns, 263, inbound) to inbound) to7500 beforedepading on course.. 5000 before proceeding on course. Rwy 36. climb runway headingto1500,then climbing right turn to , -^ interceptOCN VORTA6R-027toTANNRIntbefore 1 proceeding on course. 98337 Q TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS AND 'OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES O — -- r.� ',sw-2 Ca SW72;.15 JUL 1999-'__ C2` SW-2,15-'JUL 1999 O TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES Wigs BAKERSFIELD, CA BAKERSFIELD MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 16,300-1 or std. with a min. climbof 230' perNMto500. Rwy 34,4013-2 or std. with a min. climb of 400' per NM to 800. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 16, turn right Rwy34,turnleft. All alrcraftclimbdirect EHF VORTAC. Aircraft departing EHF R-1 20 R-360, climb on course, all others continue climb in EHF VORTAC holding pattern (NW, right turns, 144" inbound) to cross EHF atorabove 4000, before proceeding on course. NOTE: 12Upowerinesoncentedine,2551'from . departure end of runway 16. MEADOWS FIELD DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: All aircraft climbing right turn direct EHF VORTAC. Aircraft departing EHF R-180CW R-350 climb on course. All others continue climb northwestbound via EHF R-324, then climbing left turn to cross EHF VORTAC at Or above: EHF R-110 CW R-179 3000; EHF R-351 CW R-1094000. BISHOP, CA BISHOP TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwys7,12,16, NA. Rwys25, 30,34, 4000.2 or std. with min. climb of 350' per NM to 9000. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys 25,30, tum right Rwy 34, turn left climb northwestboundto 13000via BIH R-322to NICOL Int. BLYTHE,CA .BLYTHE TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 26, 700-2 or std. with min. climb of 330' per NM to 1100. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys8,17,35,turn Nghi Rwy 26, tum left, climbto 1500via heading 180°and BLH R-120, then climbing leftturn direct BLH VORTAC,'MCA 2000. BORREGO SPRINGS, CA BORREGO VALLEY TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 7, 25, NA. BRAWLEY, CA BRAWLEY MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 26, NA. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 8, turn right Climbto 3000via IPL R-009 to IPL VORTAC, then climb on course. BURBANK, CA BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 8,Cats A,B1500-2orstd. with 489 per NM to 2400. Cats C,D 2300-2 or std. with 659 per NM to 3200. Rwy 15,1300.2 or std. with 299 per NM to 2100. Rwy 33,1100.2 or std: with 390' per NMto2000. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 26, climb direct VNY VOR/DME. Rwys8;15, climbing righttum, Rwy33, climbing leftturn directto VNY VOR/DME. All aircraft ' curtbnueclimbtoMEA. NorUVwestboundviaV326to 98196 GINNAInt, South/eastbound via V1 86to DARTS Int BYRON, CA BYRON TAKE-OFFMINIMUMS Rwy12,300-1orstd.witha min. climb of 300'per NM to 500. Rwy 23, NA. Rwy30, 400-2 or std. with a min. climb of 330' per NM to 500. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 5, climb runway heading to2000beforetumingwes(bound. Rwy12, climb runway heading to 2500 before W ming westbound. Rwy 30, climb runwayheading to 1500 beforetuming westbound. CAMARILLO, CA' CAMARILLO TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy B,1100.2orstd. with min. climb of 259 per NM to 1500. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: RWyB,climbto2500via CMA R-061. Rwy 26,climbing righttum to 2500via CMA R-265. All aircraft climbing lefttum direct CMA VOR/DME. Continue climb on courseto assigned altitude. CARLSBAD,CA MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR TAKE=OFF MINIMUMS: R Wy 6,1400.2 or std. with a min, climb of 260' per NM to 2100. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 6, climbing leftturn to3100 heading 245". Rwy 24, climb runwayheading to 2800. All alrcraftclimb on course. CHICO, CA CHICO MUNI DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys13UR,climbing rightturn. Rwys 31 UR, climbing leftturn. All aircraft climb via CIC R-205 to JINGO Int. Aircraft departing JINGO Int020° CW 350° climb on course. All others climb in JINGO Int holding pattern (Hold SE, right turns,320°inbound) to depart JINGO Int atorabove 2800. CHINO, CA CHINO TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 3, 300-1. DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 3, climb runway heading to 1400 then climbing right tum to PDZ VORTAC. Rwy 8L, climbing right tuin direct PDZ VORTAC. Rwy 26 R, climb ru nway head ing to 1400 then climbing left turn to intercept PDZ R-270 to PDZ VORTAC. Rwy 21, climbing left tuin to intercept PDZ R-270 to PDZ VORTAC: Aircraft departing PDZ R-091 CW R-140and R-231 CW R-280climbon course. All others continue climb in PDZ VORTAC holding pattern (Hold NE, rig httums, 210° inbound) to cross PDZ VORTAC at or above: R-141 CW R-2304000, R-281 CW R-0906700. O TAK F NWUMS A B$TACLE) DEPURE P ED O SW -2 , ©TA^FMUMS AIIOOBSTACLE) DEIOTURE FCED&S ��. INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE CHARTS VFRTAKE-OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES 'Civil Airports and Selected Military Airports ALL.USERS: Airports that have Departure Procedures (DPs) designed specifically to assist pilots in avoiding obstacles during the climb to the minimum enroute altitude , and/or airports that have civil IFR take -off minimums other than standard, are listed below. Take -off Minimums and Departure Procedures, apply to all runways unless otherwise specified. Altitudes, unless `otherwise indicated, are minimurin altitudes in MSL. DPs specifically designed for. obstacle avoidance are described below in text; or. published separately as a graphic procedure. If the (Obstacle) DP is published as a graphic procedure, its name will be listed below, and it'can be found in either this volume (civil), or a separate Departure Procedure volume, (military), as appropriate. Users will recognize (Obstacle) graphic DPs • - referenced below by the folllowing note printed on the charted procedure: "If not assigned a Departure Procedure by ATC, this procedure may be flown to provide obstacle clearance:'.,The term "(OBSTACLE)" will also be printed on the charted procedure. - • ' t [Note: Graphic Departure Procedures that have been designed primarily to assist Air Traffic ' Control in providing air traffic separation (as well as providing obstacle clearance) are usually assigned by name in an ATC clearance and are not listed'by name in this section.] ,X CIVIL USERS NOTE: FAR 91 prescribes standard take -off rules and establishes take=off. minimums for certain operators as follows:'(1) Aircraft having two engines or less - one statute mile. (2) Aircraft having more than two engines - one-half statute mile: These standard minima apply in the absence of any different minima listed below. x MILITARY USERS NOTE: Civil (nonstandard) take-off.minima are published below. For military take -off minima, refer to appropriate service directives.- . - ..-:a NAME r TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS NAME TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ALTURAS,CA ATWATER,CA ALTURAS MUNI CASTLE DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: All departures climb DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwyl3,climbdirectHYP directtoARUNDB.Climb inholding pattern on148° VOR/DME. Rwy 31,climbto800,then climbing right , bearing (328* inbound) leftturns, to follow MCA: turn direct HYP VOR/DME. Aircraft departing HYP R- northwestonV452,AaBACHSint7GDO;southeaston 350CWR•100continue climb inHYPVOR/DME V452viaBACHSIntl 1200;V165viaCHOIR Int,9600. ;y, holding pattern ISE, rightturns,305°inbound) tocross ContinueclimbtoMEA orassigned attitude. HYPVOR/DMEatorabove 3500before proceeding on course' All others climb on course. APPLE VALLEY, CA It APPLE VALLEYAUBURN, CA TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS:Rwy18,36,NA. M AUBURN MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 7,CAT A,8600-2orstd. +^ ARCATA-EUREKA,CA - withamin. climb of350'per NM to 2300. CAT C,D NA. ARCATA , Rwy 25, CATA, B 300-1 or std. with a min, climb of 390' TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS: Rwy2,120D-2or300-lwitha per NMto 1700. CATC,DNA. min. climb of 320' per NM to 1600. Rwy 14,400-2 or std. . DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwy 7, climbing leftturn with a min. climbof250'perNMto700.to 3000 heading 305°,intercept MYVR-089toMYV VOR/DME, thenvia assigned routing. Rwy 25, climb DEPARTUREPROCEDURE:Rwys2,32,turn left. Rwys runway heading to 3000, intercept and proceed via MYV 14,20, turn right. All aircraftclimbto 1500via ACV R- R-098 to MYV VOR/DME, then via assigned heading. 250 to HOCUT Int. Continue climb to MEA on V27. AVALON, CA CATALINA DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: Rwys4,22, climbstraight ahea d to 2300then proceed on course. - © TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES Q . sw-2 gClsyv-z i 5 J.UL 1999 B14 SW -2; ty JUL 1999' INDEX 99196 INDEX OF TERMINAL CHARTS AND MINIMUMS NAME PROC SECT PG NAME PROC SECT PG UPLAND, CA WATTS -WOODLAND -SEE WOODLAND, CA ' CABLE _ TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................. ............. C WESTOVER FIELD AMADOR COUNTY [APS :.... VOR RWY 6 ............................................... 493 —SEE JACKSON, CA GPS RWY 6 .................:............................ 494 WHITEMAN-SEE LOS ANGELES, CA VACAVILLEXA NUTTREE WILLOWS, CA TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ...............::............................... C WILLOWS -GLENN COUNTY IAPS ,.... VOR OR GPS -A .......................................... 495 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C GPS RWY 20 ............................................. 496 IAPS ..... VOR/DME OR GPS RWY 34 .................... 516 VAN NUYS, CA ` VOR RWY 34 .............................................. 517 ,. VAN NUYS WOODLAND, CA ` TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ...` ............................................. C WATTS -WOODLAND ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C STARS . FERNANDO FIVE ...................................... P16 IAPS ....: VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 518 LYNXX SEVEN .......` ................................... P32 IAPS....., ILS RWY 16R ........:.................................... 497 YOLOCOUNTY-DAVISIWOODLANDIWINTERS LDA -O,:....:? ..........:..:.......' ^:....................498 VOR/DME OR GPS -B ............................... 499 —SEE DAVISIWOODLANDIWINTERS,CA WR OR GPS -A .........::....:.......:.....'......1.... AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ 500 501 ;YUBACOUNTY�SEEMARYSVILLE,CA DPS......: CANOGA SEVEN (PILOT NAV) ............... 502 .GLENDALE,SEVEN (PILOT NAV) ....:......503 ZAMPERINI FIELD—SEE TORRANCE, CA' NEWHALL. FIVE (PILOT NAV)..................504 - VICTORVILLE, CA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTL '. TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ............................................... C _ IAPS ..... ILS RVVY.17............................................... 505 VOR/DME RWY 17 .................................... 506 ' GPS RWY 17 ............................................. 507 VISALIA, CA VISALIA MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ........... ...................................:. C ` ALTERNATE MINIMUMS............................................E IAPS ILS RWY-30 ............................................... 508 VOR-RWY 12. ............................................ 509 NDB RWY 30 .......... :................................... 510 GPS RWY 12 ............................................. 511 GPS RWY 30 ............................................. 512 WATSONVILLE, CA a WATSONVILLE MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ............................... :................ C IAPS ..... LOC RWY 2 ................................................ 513 VOR/DME OR GPS -A ............................... 514 NDB OR GPS -8 ...............................:......... 515 INDEX 99196 - • 02 IINDEX 99196 INDEXOF TERMINAL CHARTS AND MINIMUMS NAME PROC SECT PG NAME PROC SECT PG SANTAROSA,CA' TORRANCE,CA y .•- SONOMACOUNTY ZAMPERINIFIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS.........................:�.................. C -. ALTERNATE MINIMUMS .................................:......'.... E ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E �• IAPS ..... ILS RWY 32 ............................................... 453 STARS. KAYOH FOUR ............'.............................. P26 VOR/DME RWY 14 .................................... 454 IAPS ..... ILS RWY 29R .......'..................................... 477 VOR RWY 32 ........................... :................. 455 ' VOR OR GPS RWY 11L ..........................: 478 GPS RWY 14 : ........................................... 456 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ........................................'.....:.. 479 GPSRWY 32 ................................ :............ 457 AIRPORT DIAGRAM .............................................:... 458 TRACY,CA OPS.n!.. FREES FIVE (PILOT NAV) ....................... 459 ' TRACY MUNI SANTA ROSA FIVE (PILOT NAV) ........... 460 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ......................................... IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 480 SANTAYNEZ,CA NDB RWY 12.... 7.......` ................................. 481 - SANTAYNEZ .., : , . v NDB RWY 25 .............................................. 482 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ..................................:............. C GPS RWY 25 ............................................. 483 - IAPS ..'. VOR OR GPS -B .....................................^.. 461 GPS RWY 30 ............................:..,........... 484 .!I,,rGPS-A-..t..'....:.a.^...........................462 ,,, ),.f, -. •- _ TRAVISAFB—SEEFAIRFIELD,CA SHAFTER, CA SHAFTER-MINTER FIELD TRUCKEE, CA TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ............... •.......:...................... C TRUCKEE-TAHOE ,� ; ! ,•:.�, IAPS ...-VOR OR GPS RWY: 30.7 ..:...: .:........:...... 463 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS .................................... :........... C - .' '^ ' ; •.. IAPS :.... VOR/DME RNAV OR GPS -A ................... 485 SISKIYOUCOUNTY�EEMONTAGUE,CA "GPS RWY 19..`.".:.....'...''...._....':.'...........486 •i }' . ' .....RUCK .TWO (PILOT NAV) ...................... DPS. T 487 SONOMA COUNTY—SEE SANTA ROSA,CA "• ;. - +" TULARE,CA SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CA ' - MEFFORDFIELD .• LAKETAHOE ., TAKE-OFF,MINIMUMS................... :............................ C' TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS .............................................. C IAPS ..... VOR/DME OR GPS RWY 13 ..............,..... 488 ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ....: .......................................E �... ,._... , !APS. LDA/DME.1 RWY 18 ...:............................. 464 TWENTYNINE PALMS, CA +' -LDA/DME-2 RWY 18 ............. :....:.............. 465 TWENTYNINEPALMS .y ' VOR/DME OR GPS -A ............................... 466 :........................ TAKE -OFF . MINIMUMS ................................................. C • GPS RWY 18 ..................... :....................... 467, IAPS ..... VOR OR. GPS RWY 26...........!.....: ;. 489 DPS ...... RICHY FIVE PILOT NAV 468 ` SHOLE ONE (PILOT NAV) .........:............. 469 - UKIAH,CA. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTL + UKIAHMUNI —SEEVICTORVILLE,CA j TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS....................r....::...::................. C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ........................................... E • IAPS ..... LOC RWY 15..... .......................................... 490 STOCKTON,CA r VOR/DME RNAV OR GPS -B ...............:.... 491 STOCKTON METROPOLITAN VOR OR Gas -A...`........ '..........1 ................ 492 IAPS..... ILS RWY 29R ...................................:......... 470 -. . 4. •1` VOR RWY 29R .:........:............................... 471 - UNIVERSITY—SEE_ DAVIS, CA NDB RWY 29R ........................................... 472 GPS RWY 29R ........................................... 473 'AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ 474 DPS ...... DORES,TWO (PILOT NAV) .................... 475 t STOCKTON FIVE PILOT NAV • r- 476+. •' '' S • t . �� • � •• INDEX.,_. - , 99196 SW:2 813 SW -2; 15 JUL 1,9,99 BI2. SW -2' 15 JUL 1999 INDEX 99196 INDEX OF.TERMINALCHARTS AND MINIMUMS - NAME PROC SECT PG- NAME PROC SECT PG SAN JOSE, CA(CON'T) SANTA ANA, CA SARJOSE INTL JOHN WAYNEAIRPORT-ORANGE COUNTY TAKE -OFF, MINIMUMS .............................................. C ' TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ..........................................: E =ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ........................................:.. E. STARS. BRINY ONE .................................................. P8 STARS. KAYOH FOUR ............................................ P26 CAPITOL THREE..................................:.....:P9 TANDY THREE .......................................... P60 EL NIDO FOUR ......:................................... P15 IAPS ..... ILS RWY 19R .............................................. 431 GOLDEN GATE FOUR .............................. P20 LOC BC RWY 1L ....................................... 432 JAWWS ONE .............................................. P23 LDA RWY 19R ........................................... 433 " POINT REYES ONE ..................... :............ P44 NDB OR GPS RWY 1 L ................... "........... 434 ROBIE TWO ..... .......................................... P51 NDB OR GPS RWY 19R ........................... 435 . IAPS.....ILS RWY 12R ............................................. 409- FREEWAY VISUAL RWY 19R ................. 436. ILS RWY 30L .....:....................................... 410 AIRPORT DIAGRAM .......... :..................................... 437 LOC/DME RWY 30L .................................. 411 DPS ...... ANAHEIM TWO (VECTOR). .................. :... 438 VOR/DME RWY 30L .................................. 412 CHANNEL ONE (PILOT NAV) ..................439 VOR RWY 12R ...... ..................................... 413- MUSEL SIX (PILOT NAV) ......................... 440 NDB/DME RWY 30L .................................. 414 GPS RWY 12R :.....................:.................... 415 SANTA BARBARA, CA GPS RWY 30L ........................................... 416 SANTA BARBARA MUNI FAIRGROUNDS VISUAL RWY 30L.......... AIRPORT DIAGRAM ............:.: . ........................ 417 418 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ..........................................:..... C DPS ...... AITAM SIX (PILOT NAV) .:........................ 419 ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ................. . ' """"""""""""' E DANVILLE ONE (PILOT NAV) .................. 420 IAPS ..... ILS RWY 7..............;:................................. 441 LOUPE NINE (PILOT NAV) ...................... 421 . VOR OR GPS RWY,25 .......... :................... 442 MOONY ONE (PILOT NAV)......................422 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ..........:.....................................443 SAN JOSE EIGHT (PILOT NAV) .............. 423 DPS ...... FLOUT FIVE (PILOT NAV)....................... 444. SUNOL FIVE (PILOT NAV) ..........,........... 424 HABUT FOUR (PILOT NAV) ....:................ 445 KWANG FOUR (PILOT NAV) .................... 446 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA SANTA MARIA, CA SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY -MC CHESNEY FIELD < . SANTA MARIA PUBLIC/CAPTAING.ALLAN • TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS.:..............:...............:..............•C HANCOCK FIELD - . _ ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C- IAPS.....ILS RWY 11 425 ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E ............................*................... VOR OR TACAN OR GPS -A ...:................. 426 IAPS,.... ILS RWY 12 ............................................... 447 AIRPORT DIAGRAM .................. :.... ..... .............. 427 LOC/DME"BC-A ........................................ 448 DPS ...... AVILA THREE (PILOT NAV) V) .................... 428 VOR OR GPS RWY 12......................... ..... 449 CREPE THREE (PILOT NAV) .................. 429 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ...........................................:.... 450, WYNNR ONE (PILOT NAV) ...................... 430 DPS ...... BUELT ONE (PILOT NAV -• • ••••••••• ) --- • 451 - SANTA MONICA, CA SANTA MONICA MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E STARS-. FERNANDO FIVE......................................P16 ... KIMMO ONE ......................................:....... P27 IAPS ...:: VOR OR GPS -A .....................................:... 452 INDEX 99196 INDEX 99196 INDEXOF TERMINALCHARTS AND MINIMUMS NAME PROC SECT PG_ NAME PROC SECT PG SAN DIEGO, CA(CONT) MONTGOMERYFIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ..........:..................................... C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E IAPS ..... ILS RWY 28R ........................................... 368 NDB OR GPS RWY 28R ........................... 369 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ 370 NORTH ISLAND NAS (HALSEY FIELD) P31 STARS : BARET FOUR .............................................. P3 SAN DIEGO INTL-LINDBERGH FIELD P44 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ............................:................... C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E STARS. BARET FOUR .............................................. P3 , CARDI THREE ........................................... P10 SHAMU ONE..............................................P57 384 IAPS ..... ILS RWY 9 ........................................ :.......:. 371 LOC RWY 27 .............................................. 372 NDB OR GPS RWY 9 ................................ 373 NDB OR GPS RWY 27 .............................. 374 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ 375 DPS ...... BORDER FOUR (PILOT NAV) .................. 376 LNSAY ONE (PILOT NAV) ....................... 377 PEBLE TWO (PILOT NAV) ....:.................. 378 SAN DIEGO/EL CAJON, CA GILLESPIEFIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................:............... C ALTERNATE^MINIMUMS............................................ E IAPS ..... LOC -D ................................... :..................... 379 GPS RWY 17 ............................................. 380 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ......:......................................... 381 INDEX 99196 SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO INTL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E STARS. BIG SUR TWO ............................................. P7 GOLDEN GATE FOUR..............................P20 HADLY TWO .............................................. P21 LOCKE ONE .............................................. P31 MODESTO TWO ....................................... P36 POINT REYES ONE .................................. P44 RISTI THREE.............................................P50 STINS ONE ................................................ P59 [APS ..... ILS RWY 19L ............................................. 382 ILS RWY 28L ............................................. 383 ILS RWY 28R ............................................. 384 ILS RWY 28R(CAT II) ................................ 385 ILS RWY 28R(CAT III) ............................... 386 VOR OR GPS -B ......................................... 387 VOR RWY 19L ........:.................................. 388 GPS RWY 19L ........................................... 389 DOWN THE BAY VISUAL RWY 28UR .... 390 QUIET BRIDGE VISUAL RWYS 28UR ... 391 TIPP TOE VISUAL RWY 28L ...................392 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ 393 DPS ...... DUMBARTON SIX (PILOT NAV) .............. 394 EUGEN FIVE (PILOT NAV) ...................... 395 GAP THREE (VECTOR) ........................... 396 LUVVE TWO (VECTOR) ........................... 397 MOLEN THREE .(PILOT NAV)..................398 OFFSHORE FOUR (PILOT NAV) (HI) ...... 399 PORTE THREE (PILOT NAV) .................. 401 QUIET TWO (PILOT NAV) ....................... 403 REBAS THREE (PILOT NAV) (PROP)..... 405 SAN FRANCISCO EIGHT (VECTOR) ...... 406 SHORELINE ONE (PILOT NAV) .............. 407 ` SAN JOSE, CA REID-HILLVIEW OF SANTA CLARA CO STARS. POINT REYES ONE .................................. P44 SW -2 . .1311 SW -2,15 JUL 1999 INDEX 99196 NAME PROC' RIO VISTA, CA RIO VISTA MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS .....:: ..................:...................... C ZAPS..... VOR -A ......................................................... 325 GPS RWY 25 ......................................::..... 326 RIVERSIDE, CA MARCH FIELD STARS. HITOP ONE ............................................... P22 MARCH FOUR .................................:......... P34 " RIVERSIDEMUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ....:.......................... ................. C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E STARS. SETER TWO .................. :........................... P56 . ZIGGY THREE ........................................... P65 IAPS ..... ILS RWY 9 ............................... :.................. 327 VOR OR GPS RWY 9 ................................ 328 VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 329 VOR -OR GPS -B ...................:..................... 330 AIRPORT, DIAGRAM ................................................ 331 ROHNERVILLE—SEE FORTUNA, CA f B10 SW -2, 15 JUL 1999 INDEX OF TERMINAL CHARTS AND MINIMUMS SECT PG NAME PROC SACRAMENTO, CA SACRAMENTO EXECUTIVE SECT PG SACRAMENTO,CA(CON'T) E SACRAMENTO MATHER TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS :........................ ..................... C IAPS ..... ILS RWY 22L ............................................. 350 VOR/DME OR GPS RWY 22L .................. 351 VOR OR GPS RWY 4R .................:........... 352 SALINAS, CA SALINAS MUNI C TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ... ....................................... E IAPS ..... ILS RWY 31 ..... ..........................................353 . LOC/DME RWY 31 ..................................... 354 VOR RWY 13 .................. .......... :............... 355 GPS RVVY 13 .......::..........:.......................... 356 GPS RWY 31 ................... :............. :........... 357 ' AIRPORT DIAGRAM ............................... :................. 358 DPS ...... CHALONE TWO (PILOT NAV) ...:............. 359 SALINAS TWO (VECTOR) ..:.................... 360 ' SAN ANDREAS, CA P64 CALAVERASCOUNTY-MAURYRASMUSSEN FIELD e� IAPS ..... ILS. RWY 16L ............................................. TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ...............................................:. C ZAPS:..,. GPS RWY 31 ............................................. 361 ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E IAPS ..... ILS RWY 2 ....:................................. :........... 332 SAN BERNARDINO, CA VOR OR GPS RWY 2 ................................ 333 SAN BERNARDINO INTL ' NDB RWY 2 ............:....................................334 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ..:............................................ C AIRPORT DIAGRAM ...................................:........:..: 335 STARS. SETER TWO .............................................. P56 " SACRAMENTOINTL ZIGGY THREE...........................................P65 STARS'. CONCORD ONE ................... :..................... P12 IAPS ..... ILS RWY 6 .................................................. 362 FLUNK THREE .............. !........................... P18NDB OR GPS RWY 6 ...............................: 363 TUDOR ONE...........:.................................,P61 = WRAPS FIVE ............................................. P64 SAN CARLOS, CA IAPS ..... ILS. RWY 16L ............................................. 336 SAN CARLOS ILS RWY 16R: ............................................. ILS RWY 34L 337 338 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ............................................. ILS RWY 16R(CAT II) ............................... 339 STARS. POINT REYES ONE .................................. P44 :ILS RWY 16R(CAT III) ............................... 340 IAPS ..... GPS RWY 30 ............................................. 364 NDB OR GPS RWY 34L ............................ 341 NDB OR GPS RWY 34R ....................:...... 342 SAN DIEGO, CA NDB RWY 16L ........................................... 343 • BROWNFIELDMUNI NDB RWY 16R ........................................... 344 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ............. :.................................... C AIRPORT DIAGRAM.......'............................'........:... 345- `ALTERNATE ............................ ....:........... E . DPS ....:. DUDES NINE (PILOT NAV) ...................... 346 _MINIMUMS IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 365 FROGO SIX (PILOT NAV) ........................ 348 GPS RWY 8L ............................................. 366 METRO ONE (VECTOR) .......................... 349 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................367 INDEX 99136 INDEX 99196 INDEX OF TERMINAL CHARTS AND MINIMUMS NAME PROC SECT PG PALM SPRINGS, CA(CON-T) DESERT RESORTS REGIONAL i . TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E IAPS ..... VOR/DME OR GPS RWY 30 .................... 289 VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 290 PALM SPRINGS INTL 299 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS -B ......................................... 291 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ 292 DPS ...... CATHEDRAL SEVEN (PILOT NAV)......... 293 PALM SPRINGS THREE (VECTOR) ....... 294 THERMAL FOUR (PILOT NAV) ............... 295 PALMDALE,CA PALMDALE PRODUCTION FLT/TEST INSTL_N AF PLANT 42 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS............................................E IAPS..... ILS RWY 25 ............................................... 296 VOR/DME OR TACAN OR GPS RWY 25 297 AIRPORT DIAGRAM .................. :............................. 298 PALO ALTO, CA PALO ALTO AIRPORT OF SANTA CLARA . COUNTY C TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ....:........................................... C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS............................................E E STARS . POINT REYES ONE ..................:............... P44 IAPS..... VOR/DME RWY 30 .................................... 299 GPS RWY 30 ............................................. 300 PASO ROBLES, CA PASO ROBLES.MUNI C TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E IAPS ..... VOR/DME OR GPS RWY 19 .................... 301 VOR/DME OR GPS -13 ............................... 302 VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 303 PETALUMA,CA PETALUMA MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ............................................... C IAPS ..... VOR RWY 29 ............................................. 304 VOR/DME RWY 29 .................................... 305 GPS RWY 29 ............................................. 306 PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE -SEEGROVELAND,CA INDEX 9919s B9 NAME PROC SECT PG PLACERVILLE, CA PL' ACERVILLE- TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ...:: GPS RWY 5 ............................................... 307 PORTERVILLE, CA PORTERVILLE MUNI. TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 308 GPS RWY'12............................................. 309 GPS RWY 30 ............................................. 310 RAMONA, CA- RAMONA TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... VOR/DME OR GPS -A ............................... 311 GPS RWY 9 ............................................... 312 RED BLUFF, CA REDBLUFFMUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... VOR/DME OR GPS RWY 15 .................... 313 VOR OR GPVWY 33 .............................. 314 NDB RWY 33 ......................:....................... 315 REDDING, CA REDDINGMUNI - TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E IAPS ..... ILS RWY 34 ............................................... 316 LOC/DME BC RWY 16 .............................. 317 VOR OR GPS RWY 34............... ................ 318 NDB RWY 34 .............................................. 319 DPS ...... HOMAN TWO (PILOT NAV) ..................... 320 KENDL ONE (PILOT NAV) ....:.................. 321 KREST THREE (PILOT NAV) .................. 322 REDLANDS,CA REDLANDSMUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ............................................. `. C IAPS ..... GPS -A ......................................................... 323 REID-HILLVIEW OF SANTACLARA CO -SEE SAN JOSE, CA RIALTO, CA RIALTO MUNI-MIRO FIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C STARS. SETER TWO .............................................. P56 ZIGGY THREE...........................................P65 IAPS ..... NDB OR GPS -A ......................................... 324 SW -2 SW -2,15 JUL 1999 INDEX 99196 88 1999�-.� n SVV-2, 15 JUL ' INDEX OF TERMINAL CHARTS AND MINIMUMS NAME PROC SECT PG NAME PROC SECT PG OAKLAND, CA ONTARIO, CA METROPOLITAN OAKLAND INTL ONTARIOINTL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS :.....:::....................................... C TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ..............................:............... C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E STARS. HADLY TWO .......................... !.................. P21 STARS. SETER TWO .............................................. P56 ' LOCKE'ONE.......................... :................... P31 ZIGGY THREE ........................................... P65 MADWIN THREE ....................................... P33 IAPS ..... ILS RWY 8L ............................................... 264 PANOCHE TWO ...................... :............ :.*.. P41 ILS'RWY 26L ............................................. 265 IAPS ..... ILS RWY 11 ............................................... 238 ILS RWY 26R ...............-.................:............ 266 ILS RWY 27R ...:' ........................................ 239 ILS RWY 26L(CAT II) ................................ 267 ILS RWY 29 .............................................. 240 ILS RWY 26L(CAT III) ............................... 268 ILS RWY 29(CAT II) .........:........................ 241 VOR/DME OR GPS RWY 8L .................... 269 ILS RWY 29(CAT III) z.......:i...:.::............... 242 VOR OR TACAN OR GPS RWY 26R ....... 270 _ VOR/DWIE RWY 27L .................................. 243 NDB OR GPS RWY 26L ............................ 271 VOR/DME RWY 29..."......:: ....................... 244 INTERSTATE VISUAL RWY 8L ............... 272 VOR OR GPS RWY 9R ............................. 245 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ 273 NDB RWY 27R ........................................... 246 DPS ...::. HASSA FOUR (PILOT NAV) ..................... 274 GPS RWY 11 ............................. :................ 247 ONTARIO TWO (PILOT NAV) .................. 275 GPS RWY 27L ......................................... :. 248 POMONA,SIX (PILOT NAV) ..................... 276 GPS RWY 29 ............................................. 249' PRADO FIVE (PILOT NAV) ...................... 277 AIRPORT -DIAGRAM ................................................250 DPS ...... COAST FIVE (PILOT NAV) ...................... 251 ORLAND, CA MARINA FOUR (PILOT NAV) ................... 253 HAIGHFIELD NIMITZ TWO (VECTOR) ........................... 254 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS C NUEVO FIVE (PILOT NAV) ...................... 255 ................................................ ZAPS VOR OR GPS -A 278 OAKLAND FIVE (VECTOR) ....................... 256 ..... ..........::............................ ' SCAGGS ISLAND ONE (PILOT NAV) ..... 257 OROVILLE,CA SILENT SEVEN (PILOT NAV) .................. 258 r ' r, SKYLINE THREE (PILOT NAV) ............... 259 OROVILLEMUNI TAKE -OFF. MINIMUMS .:..........:.::................................ C OCEAN$IDE, CA IAPS: VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 279 OCEANSIDE MUNI NDB RWY 1 ................................................ 280 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ..................................... C GPS RWY 1 ............................................... 281 IAPS ..... VOR OR,GPS-A ......................................... 261 OXNARD, CA GPS RWY 6 ................................................ 262 • GPS RWY 24 ...............................:...........: 263 OXNARD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C .. 'ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E IAPS ..... ILS RWY 25 .................................:............. 282 VOR RWY 25 ............................................. 283 GPS RWY 7 ............................................... 284 GPS RWY 25 ............................................. 285 DPS ...... CAMARILLO THREE (PILOT NAV) ......... 286 SKIFF FOUR (PILOT NAV) ....................... 287 ' PALM SPRINGS, CA BERMUDADUNES , TAKE -OFF. MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS RWY 28 .............................. 288 ' i • �.. •SW -2 INDEX 99196 • r INDEX OF TERMINAL CHARTS AND MINIMUMS NAME PROC SECT PG NAME -•PROC SECT PG f MODESTO, CA NAPA, CA ' MODESTOCITY-COUNTY-HARRY SHAM FIELD NAPACOUNTY� J TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS : ............................................... . C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ........................................... E IAPS ..... ILS RWY 28R ............................................. 208 'IAPS ..... LOC RWY 36L ..:..:.............................'....... 230 VOR/DME RWY 28R ..................................209 VOR OR GPS RWY 6 ................................ 231 VOR RWY 28R ...................`.:......:............... 210 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ 232 ' NDB RWY 28R ........................................... 211 DPS ...... LIZRD TWO (PILOT NAV)......................... 233 GPS RWY 28R ........................................... 212 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ......:......................................... 213 NEEDLES, CA ' tNEEDLES - MOFFETTFEDERAL•AIRFIELD .TAKE -OFF. MINIMUMS ................................................ C —SEE MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA .. '. 'ALTERNATE'.. MINIMUMS ........................................... E . • IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 234 MONTAGUE,CA ;ySISK1YOt1COUNTY NEVADA COUNTY AIR PARK , TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C --SEE GRASS VALLEY, CA IAPS ..... NDB OR GPS -A ......:.:........:....................... 2.14 n . . , NORTH ISLAND NAS (HALSEY FIELD) MONTEREY,CA , r._ s• a�SEESAN DIEGO, CA MONTEREY PENINSULA •Y u TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS .........::' ....:.............................. C - NOVATO, CA,. _- : r ALTERNATE MINIMUMS .......- :...................................E GNOSS FIELD - IAPS ....: ILS RWY 10R ............................................. 215 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS .................................' ......... C LOC/DME RWY 28L ................ :................. 216. IAPS ...: GPS RWY.13 ............................................. 235 NDB RWY 10R ........................................... 217 GPS RWY 1101_. ......................... 'GPS 218 NUT TREE-SEEVACAVILLE,.CA RWY 10R ................'......................... 219 GPS RWY 28L .......................................... 220 ' OAKDALECA GPS RWY 28R ........................ 221 ,................... = CARMEL VISUAL RWY 28L ..................... 222 'OAKDALE LOBOS VISUAL RWY 10R ....................... 223 IAPS ..... VOR RWY 10.-..! �.......................... 236 AIRPORT DIAGRAM..' .......................................... 224 GPS RWY 10 `..:........;............................:.. 237 DPS ...... MONTEREY. EIGHT (VECTOR) ............... 225 ' MUNSO TWO (PILOT NAV) ..................... 226 ` - 'SECA TWO (PILOT NAV).........................227 'TORO FOUR (VECTOR) .....................:..... 228 MONTGOMERY FIELD—SEE SAN DIEGO, CA ` MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA M OFFETT FEDERAL AI RFI ELD STARS : POINT REYES ONE .................................. P44 MURRAY FIELD --SEE EUREKA, CA r •. a C '. MURRIETA/TEMECULA,CA FRENCH VALLEY " ``' TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS .....GPS RWY 18 ........... t'i`� ynl..f.!'r' 22947i INDEX 99196 i • sw.2 B� Y 'SW -2,15 JUL 1999 1°5 JUL INDEX 99196 INDEX OF TERMINAL CHARTS AND MINIMUMS NAME, PROC SECT PG NAME PROC SECT PG LOSANGELES CA LOS BANOS, CA LOSANGELESWL LOS BANOS MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ....................................... TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ............... : ................................ C STARS. BASET ONE .................... : : ........... P5 IAPS VOR/DME OR GPS RWY 1.4 .................... 191 CIVET FOUR.., ........................................... Pll VOR/DME OR GPS RWY 32 .................... 192 DOWNIE FOUR ........................................... P13 JULIAN FOUR ............................................ P25 MADERA,CA KIMMO ONE ........................... : ................... P27 MADERAMUNI LEENA THREE .......................................... P29 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS C MITTS ONE ; ........................................ %. P35 ............. .......................... IAPS..... VOR RWY 30 193 MOORPARK THREE .................................P37 ............................................. GPS RWY' 30 194 MUDDE FOUR ........................................... P38 .............. : .............................. OCEAN TWO ............................................. P40 MAMMOTH LAKES,CA PARADISE THREE .................................... e42 REDEYE ONE : ................................... P46 MAMMOTH LAKES REEDR THREE ............................ : .............. P4.8 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C SADDE SIX .......................................... P52 IAPS.! GPS RWY 27 ............................................. 195 VISTA ONE ................................................ P63 IAPS:ILS RWY'61L ....................................... -.156 MARCH FIELD_sEE RIVERSIDE, CA ILS RWY 6R ............................:...............:::.157 ALS RWY 7L• ..............................:............. 58 MARYSVILLE,'CA ILS RWY 7R ........................................... : 159 YUBACOUNTY ILS RWY 241_ .................................. : .......... ILS RWY 24R :Z ....... . ................ 160 161 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ..................... ............... ........... C ILS RWY 25L ................................... ........... 162 ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ................................... E ILS RWY 25R.. .................................. 163, IAPS ILS RWY 14 ............................................... 196 ILS RWY � 24R(CAY 11) ........... ........... 164 VOR RWY 14 ................ ........................ 197 ILS RWY 25L (CAT 11) .............. ; : 165. VOR RWY 32 ..........1 .......... .................. 198 ILS-RWY 24R(CAT 111) ............................... 24R(CAT 166 NDB OR GPS RWY 19 ........... ............ 196 ILS RWY 25L . ..............................37 GPS,RWY 14 .............................................. 200 VOR OR TACAN OR GPS RWY 7UR 168 GPS RWY 32 ............................................. 201 VOR OR TACAN OR GPS RWY 25UR 169' NDB OR GPS RWY 24R ........................... 170 MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR--SEE CARLSBAD, CA, HARBOR VISUAL RWY 25UR ................. 171 STADIUM VISUAL RWY 24UR ................172 MEADOWS FIELD—SEE BAKERSFIELD, CA AIRPORT DIAGRAM .............................:........:.......-173 DIPS CATALINA FIVE (VECTOR)..: .................. 174 MEFFORDFItLD—SEETULARE,CA CHATY TWO (PILOT NAV) ...................... 175 GABRE FIVE (PILOT NAV) ............ 177 MERCED,CA GORMAN TWO (PILOT NAV) .................. 178 MUNI-MACREADY FIELD HOLTZ TWO (PILOT NAV) (RNAV) 179 -MERCED ................................................. IMPERIAL , THREE (PILOT NAV) .............. 181' TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS c LAXX THREE (VECTOR) .......................... 182 ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E LOOP 'TWO -(PILOT NAV) ......................... 133 IAPS., ILS RWY 30 ............. : ................................. 202 PERCH, SEVEN (VECTOR) ....................... 184. LOC BC RWY 12 ....................................... 203 SAN DIEGO THREE (PILOT NAV) .......... 185 VOR RWY 12 ...................................... 204 SEAL BEACH THREE (VECTOR) ............ 1 86 VOR RWY 30 ............................................. 205 SEBBY ONE (PILOT NAV) ....................... 187 GPS RWYA 2 ........... .................................. 206 VENTURA TWO (PILOT NAV) ................. 188 GPSRWY 30 ............................................. 207 .,WHITEMAN METROPOLITAN OAKLANDINTL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................0 ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ...............................:.............6 —,SEEOAKLAND,CA IAPS VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 189 I GPS -B ......................................................... 19.0 INDEX 99196 0.. w 0SW-2 INDEX 99196 INDEX OF TERMINAL CHARTS AND MINIMUMS NAME PROC SECT PG NAME PROC SECT PG JACKSON,CA - WESTOVER FIELDAMADORCOUNTY TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ..........:..................................... C ZAPS ..... VOR/DME RWY 1 ...................................... 132 GPS RWY 1 ............................................... 133 JOHN WAYNEAIRPORT-ORANGECOUNTY -SEE SANTA ANA, CA LAVERNE,CA BRACKETT FIELD C TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E STARS. SETER TWO ....................... :...................... P56 ZIGGY THREE...........................................P65 145 IAPS ILS RWY 26L ............................................. 134 VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 135 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ 136 LAKETAHOE- SEE SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CA LAKEPORT,CA C LAMPSON FIELD C TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... NDB OR GPS.A......................................... 137 LAMPSON FIELD -SEE LAKEPORT, CA 145 LANCASTER,CA 146 GENERAL WM. J. FOX AIRFIELD 147 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS -B ......................................... 138 NDB OR GPS -C :........................................ 139 LINCOLN, CA LINCOLN REGIONALIKARL HARDER FIELD P26 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS .........:...................................... C IAPS ILS RWY 15 ........................................r..... 140 VOR RWY 15 ............................................. 1'41 GPS RWY 15 ............................................. 142 GPS RWY 33 ...................................:.........143 INDEX 99196 K.j LIVERMORE, CA LIVERMORE MUNI C TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E ZAPS ..... ILS RWY 25R ............................................. 144 GPS RWY 25R ........................................... 145 ,DPS ...... BYRON ONE (PILOT NAV) ....................... 146 LIVERMORE ONE (PILOT NAV) .............. 147 LODI, CA LODI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ........................... :.................... C IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS -A .........................................148 C LOMPOC,CA E LOMPOC P26 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E IAPS ..... VOR/DME OR GPS -A! .............................. 149 GPS RWY 25 ............................................. 150 LONG BEACH, CA LONG BEACH(DAUGHERTY FIELD) TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E STARS. KAYOH FOUR ............................................ P26 TANDY THREE..........................................P60 IAPS ..... ILS RWY 30 ............................................... 151 VOR OR TACAN OR GPS RWY 30 ......... 152 NDB RWY 30 .............................................. 153 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ 154 DPS ...... ANAHEIM TWO (VECTOR) ...................... 155 LOS ALAMITOS, CA LOS ALAMITOS AAF STARS. KAYOH FOUR .......................................... P26 SW -2 -SW-2,15 JUL 1999 INDEX 99196 B4 SW -2,15 JUL 1999 INDEXOF TERMINALCHARTS AND MINIMUMS NAME PROC SECT PG FRESNO, CA(COMT) FRESNO -CHANDLER DOWNTOWN TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS .........:...................................... C IAPS....: VOR/DME'OR GPS -C ............................... 102 ND8 OR GPS -B ......................................... 103 GPS RWY 12R ........................................... 104 :GPS RWY 30L ........................................... 105 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ..t ................:........:...................106 ALTERNATE. MINIMUMS ........................................... FULLERTON, CA' IAPS..L. LOC.RWY 25 .............................................. FULLERTONMUNI VOR OR GPS RWY 25 .............................. TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS' ............................................:... C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E STARS. KAYOH FOUR .......... .:........... :.................... P26 IAPS ...:: LOC RWY 24 .............................................. 107 VOROR GPS -A ......................................... 108 GPS RWY 24 ............'................................ 109 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ...............................................: 110 DPS ...... ANAHEIM TWO (VECTOR) ........:............. 111 GENERAL WM. J. FOX AIRFIELD. VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... -.SEE LANCASTER, CA GPS RWY 28L ...........................................126 GILLESPIEFIELD AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ -SEE SAN DIEGO/EL CAJON, CA HEMET, CA GNOSS FIELD -SEE NOVATO, CA HEMET-RYAN GRASS VALLEY, CA TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ....................:........................... NEVADA COUNTY AIR PARK IAPS ..... NDB OR GPS -A ......................................... TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ......:......................................... C IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 112 ' 'GPS RWY 7 ............................................... 113 GROVELAND, CA TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE IAPS ..... GPS RWY 31 ............................................. TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... GPS RWY 9 ............................................... 114 GPS RWY 27: .......................... ................. ! 115 HAIGH FIELD -SEE ORLAND, CA IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS -A ............... :......................... HALF MOON BAY, CA JACK MCNAMARA FIELD HALF MOON BAY -SEE CRESCENT CITY, CA TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ..::............................................ C IAPS,.... GPS RWY 12 ................. :.......... ................. 116 -GPS RWY W ............................................. 117 INDEX 9919: '•' . . NAME PROC SECT PG HANFORD,CA .HANFORDMUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 118 GPSRWY 32 ............................................. 119 HAWTHORNE, CA JACK NORTHROP FIELDIHAWTHORNE MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE. MINIMUMS ........................................... E IAPS..L. LOC.RWY 25 .............................................. 120 VOR OR GPS RWY 25 .............................. 121 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ 122 HAYWARD, CA HAYWARDAIRTERMINAL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E STARS. PANOCHE TWO ........................................ P41 IAPS ..... LOC/DME RWY 28L ..:............................... 123' VOR/DME OR GPS -B ............................... 124 VOR OR GPS -A ......................................... 125 GPS RWY 28L ...........................................126 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ................................................ 127 HEMET, CA HEMET-RYAN TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ....................:........................... C IAPS ..... NDB OR GPS -A ......................................... 128 GPS RWY 5 ............................................... 129 HOLLISTER, CA HOLLISTER MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... GPS RWY 31 ............................................. 130 IMPERIAL; CA IMPERIALCOUNTY TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS.............................1................. C IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS -A ............... :......................... 131 JACK MCNAMARA FIELD -SEE CRESCENT CITY, CA JACK NORTHROP FIELD/HAWTHORNE MUNI -SEE HAWTHORNE,CA. • �� • SW -2 INDEX 99196 INDEXOFTERMINALCHARTS AND MINIMUMS NAME PROC SECT PG NAME PROC SECT PG CRESCENTCITY,CA JACK MCNAMARA FIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... ILS/DME RWY 11 ........................................ 70 VOR/DME RWY 11 ...................................... 71 VOR/DME RWY 35 ...................................... 72 VOR RWY 11 ............................................... 73 GPS RWY'11............................................... 74 GPS RWY 35 ............................................... 75 DAGGETT, CA P58 BARSTOW-DAGGETT TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E IAPS ..... VOR OR TACAN OR GPS RWY 22 ........... 76 AIRPORT DIAGRAM .................................................. 77 DAVIS, CA UNIVERSITY C TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS .............................:.................. C ZAPS,.... VOR OR GPS RWY 16 ................................ 78 DAVISNVOODLAND/WINTERS, CA YOLO COUNTY-DAVISMOODLANDNVINTERS TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... VOR RWY 34 ............................................... 79 GPSRWY 16 .............:................................. 80 GPSRWY 34 ............................................... 81 DELANO,CA -SEE MURRIETA/TEMECULA, CA DELANO MUNI FRESNO;CA TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... VOR RWY 32 ............................................... 82 GPS RWY 32 ............................................... 83 DESERT RESORTSREGIONAL STARS. ALTTA SIX .....................:.............................. -,SEE PALM SPRINGS, CA GIVEN FOUR ............................................. EL MONTE, CA ZAPS ..... ILS RWY 29R ............................................... EL MONTE LOC BC RWY 11L ....................................... TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E STARS . SETER TWO............P56 CLOVIS VISUAL RWY 29R ........................ ZIGGY THREE...........................................P65 AIRPORT DIAGRAM..................................................99 IAPS.: VOR/DME OR GPS -13 ................................. 84 VOR OR GPS -A ........................................... 85 NDB OR GPS -C ........................................... 86 INDEX 99196 EUREKA, CA MURRAYFIELD _ TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... VOR/DME RNAV OR GPS RWY 11 ........... 87 VOR OR GPS -A ........................................... 88 FAIRFIELD, CA TRAVISAFB STARS. OAKEY TWO ............................................. P39 SEATO TWO ............................................. P54 SQUAW VALLEY ONE .............................. P58 FALLBROOK,CA FALLBROOK COMMUNITY AIRPARK TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... GPS RWY 18 ............................................... 89 FIREBAUGH,CA FIREBAUGH TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... VOR/DME OR GPS -A ................................. 90 FORTUNA,CA ROHNERVILLE TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ZAPS ..... VOR RWY 11 ...................................1........... 91 GPS RWY 11 ............................................... 92 GPS RWY 29 ............................................... 93 FRENCHVALLEY -SEE MURRIETA/TEMECULA, CA FRESNO;CA FRESNO YOSEMITE INTL TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ....................... :......................... C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............. :.............................. E STARS. ALTTA SIX .....................:.............................. P1 GIVEN FOUR ............................................. P19 ZAPS ..... ILS RWY 29R ............................................... 94 LOC BC RWY 11L ....................................... 95 VOR OR TACAN OR GPS RWY 11L ......... 96 NDB OR GPS RWY 29R ............................. 97 CLOVIS VISUAL RWY 29R ........................ 98 AIRPORT DIAGRAM..................................................99 DPS..'..7. CLOVIS TWO (PILOT NAV) ..................... 100 FRESNO FIVE (VECTOR) ......................... 101 B3 SW -2 SW-2,15-JUL 1999: !INDEX 99196 fB2 n�n..r� i•�'i *'>I T' laaa V*. 15 JUL'1999 INDEX OF TERMINAL CHARTS AND MINIMUMS I NAME PROC SECT PG BURBANK,CAt E BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA 51 TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS.: ............................................... C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E STARS. FERNANDO FIVE ..................................•.... P16 LYNXX SEVEN ........................................... P32 IAPS ..... ILS RWY 8 .................................................... 36 LOCRWY 8 .................................................. 37 v VOR OR GPS RWY 8.. .................................. 38 NDB RWY 8 .................................................. 39 GPS -A ........................................................... 40 FOUR' STACKS VISUAL RWY 15 .............. 41 AIRPORT DIAGRAM .................................................. 42 DPS ...:.. ELMOO FIVE (PILOT NAV) .......... :............. 43 VAN NUYS SEVEN (PILOT NAV) .............. 44 BYRON, CA" :..... 60 BYRON TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ..... GPS RWY 30 ............................................... 45 CABLE -SEE UPLAND, CA 61 COLUSA,CA CALAVERASCOUNTY-MAURYRASMUSSEN , FIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ --SEE SAN ANDREAS, CA IAPS ...:. VOR OR GPS -A .................................. ......... CAMARILLO, CA CONCORD,CA - CAMARILLO BUCHANANFIELD TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS .......... :..................................... C IAPS ..... VOR RWY 26 ............................................. :. 46 GPS RWY 8 ................................................. 47 GPSRWY 26 ............................................... 48 CARLSBAD,CA. NDB OR GPS RWY 19R ............................. MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT DIAGRAM .................................................. TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ............................................ E .......................................... IAPS.: ILS,RWY 24' .... .. 49 VOR OR GPS -A ........................................... 50 CASTLE—SEE ATWATER, CA TAKE=OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ CATALINA—SEE AVALON, CA STARS. SETER TWO ...........................................:.. +mss ZIGGY THREE...........................................P65 Fl NAME PROC SECT PG CHICO, CA CHICO MUNI TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS .:.......: ...................... :........... E IAPS ..... ILS RWY 13L ............................................... 51 VOR/DME RWY 13L .................................... 52 VOR/DME RWY 31R :.................................. 53 VOR RWY 13L ............................................. 54 GPS RWY 13L .................... :........................ 55 GPS RWY 31R .......:..................................... 56 DPS ....:. GONGS -ONE (PILOT NAV) ........................ 57 CHINO;CA ' - CHINO TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ........... :................................ E STARS . $EfER -TWO .............................................. P56 .. , ZIGGY THREE ........................................... P65 IAPS ..... ILS RWY 26R ............................................... 59 VOR"OR GPS -B .......... :.......................... :..... 60 COLUMBIA, CA COLUMBIA TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS" .. ............................'............... C IAPS .:... GPS RWY 35 ............................................... 61 COLUSA,CA COLUSACOUNTY . TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C IAPS ...:. VOR OR GPS -A .................................. ......... 62 CONCORD,CA - BUCHANANFIELD .TAKE -OFF MINIMUMS ........... ....:.......:.................... ..... C ALTERNATE MINIMUMS ........................................... M E IAPS ..... LDA RWY 19R ............................................. 63 VOR RWY 19R ............................................. 64 NDB OR GPS RWY 19R ............................. 65 AIRPORT DIAGRAM .................................................. 66 DPS'...... BUCHANAN SEVEN (PILOT NAV) ............. 67 KANAN ONE (PILOT NAV) ......................... 68 CORONA, CA • • - CORONAMUNI TAKE=OFF MINIMUMS ................................................ C STARS. SETER TWO ...........................................:.. P56 ZIGGY THREE...........................................P65 IAPS ..... VOR OR GPS -A ........................................... 69 INDEX 99194 • SW -2 INDEX ' 99196 : INDEX OF TERMINALCHARTS AND MINIMUMS NAME PROC SECT PG NAME PROC SECT PG 'ALTURAS, CA BAKERSFIELD, CA(CON`T) ALTURASMUNI MEADOWSFIELD TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS......:................1..............:'......... C ' TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS................................................ C ' IAPS...- NDB RWY 31:.....-....:..:...'...............................1 ALTERNATE MINIMUMS............................................ E GPS RWY 31................................................. 2 STARS. ARVIN ONE............;..................................... P2 IAPS ..:.. ILS RWY 30R............................................... 20 - APPLE VALLEY, CA ' "' - - VOR RWY. 30R............................................. 21 APPLEVALLEY f ' � VOR-A...........................................................22 NDB RWY 30R............................................. 23 TAKE-OFF, MINIMUMS ................................................. C GPS RWY 30R...:.'...................................... 24 IAPS ..... GPS RWY 18............................:...:.'...;......... ..rF • r,+. 3 AIRPORT DIAGRAM ...................-. ................... 25 DPS..:..: MARIC THREE (PILOT NAV) ..................... , 26 ARCATA-EUREKA,CA n MEADOWS ONE (VECTOR)....................... _ 27 ARCATA - WRING THREE (PILOT NAV) ..................... 28 TAKE-OFF' MINIMUMS................................................ C ' ALTERNATE MINIMUMS.............:.............................. E BARSTOW-DAGGETT—SEE DAGGETT, CA IAPS S. ILS RWY 32'.................................................. 4 ILS/DME RWY 32.......................................... 5. BERMUDA DUNES—SEE PALM SPRINGS, CA VOR/DME OR GPS RWY 3 ..........................•6 VOR OR GPS RWY 14.................................. ....... . 7 BISHOP, CA' .'+ NDB OR GPS-A..................................... 8 BISHOP - ' DPS `..... HOCUT TWO (PILOT NAV) .......................... 9 s. �. ,...' : • _ , ... TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS .......................... t.................. ALTERNATE MINIMUMS C E ATWAT_ ER, CA ........................................... ' `CASTLE" w i '• IAPS ....r VOR/DME OR GPS-13 ............1.................... 29 TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS................................................. C ', VOR OR GPS-A....:.....................................: 30 1 ,IAPS ...ILS/DME RWY 31......................................... 10 BLYTHE,CA ; e VOR/DME RWY 13 ................ ....................... 11 BLYTHE r VOR/DME RWY 31.........................:..:......... 12 ?f.GPS RWY 13 ...:............. TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS............................................... C GPS RWY 31.....................................'......... 14 ALTERNATE MINIMUMS............................................ E • LAPS ....: VOR/DME OR GPS RWY 26 ...................... 31 AUBURN,CAa~ VOR OR GPS-A........................................... 32 AUBURN MUNI BORREGO SPRINGS, CA TAKEOFF K11NIMUMS............................ :............. :..... C IAPS ..... GPS RWY 7................................................. 15 BORREGOVALLEY - , TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS.........-..................................... C ' AVALON, CA - IAPS..;.. GPS RWY 25............................................... 33 CATALINA BRACKETTFIELD—SEE LAVERNE, CA TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS.......... :..................................... C IAPS ..... VOR/DME OR GPS-8 ................................ 16 BRAWLEY, CA j VOR OR GPS-A..........' ............................... 17 y BRAWLEYMUNI , BAKERSFIELD,CA ' ' TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS......................................:......... C ., ,_ BAKERSFIELD MUNI IAPS.: VOR/DME OR GPS-A.:.:............................. ..,. , 34 .TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS............ :................................... G :VOR/DME OR GPS-13 ............................ ....: 35. IAPS..-.:VOR/DME RWY 34....................................... 18 BROMFIELD MUNI—SEE SAN DIEGO, CA GPS.RWY 34:............................................. ,19 BUCHANAN FIELD—SEE CONCORD, CA - INDEX +i 99196 SW-2 '» B1 • . SW-2' 15 J i 1.999' " A2. SW -2, 1'S JUL' 1'999 TERMS/LANDING MINIMA• DATA 91262 L. All minimums in Parentheses not cable RADAR MINIMA' c°Php;lots• to Military Pilots refer to eppro- Visibility " priate regulations. (RVR 100's of'feet) PAR(c) 10, 2.5°/42!1000 ABCDE 195/16 100 Y ,(1100—Y,I/ (d) 28 2.5°/48/1068 -ABCDE 16N16 ' 100 "(100 00/A) ASR ASR 10 ABC 560/40 463 • (500—s/.) , D 560/50 463 (500-1) }. E 580/60 463 (500-1'4) . 28 AB 600/50 1513' (600=1) C 600/60 513 (600-1 V.) DE 600-1 V2 513 (600-115) CIR(b) 10- AB 560-1Yi 463 (500-'1Y.I••,C a :560-1'h 463. (500-1 V,) 28 AB 600-1 V. 503. (600,-1 V.)' C 600-1 Vs •503 (600-1 Y.) 10, 28 DE 660-2 563 • - (600-2) w' - - , Visibility in Statute Miles - 4. Radar Minima: 1. Minima shown are the lowest permitted by established criteria. Pilots should ` consult applicable directives for their category of aircraft. ` 2. The circling MDA and weather minima to be used. are those for the runway'to which the final approach is flown = not the landing runway. In the above. RADAR MINIMA example, a category C aircraftflying a radar approach to. runway 10, circling to land on, runway 28, must use an MDA of 560 feet with weather minima of 500-11/2. • ` Alternate Minimums not standard. _ Q Civil users refer to tabulation. USA/USN/USAF pilots refer to approp'riate regulations. •• • a .Alternate minimums are. Not Authorized i 0 NA due to unmonitored facility or absence of weather reporting service. Takeoff Minimums not standard and/or Q Departure Procedures are published. Refer to. tabulation.; EXPLANATION OF TERMS The United Statei Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS) is the approved criteria for formulating instrument approach fe,, TERM--TANG•MIIOtAA DATA •. • TERMIJAN•DING•MIWA DATA • • IFR LANDING MINIMA Landing minima are established for six aircraft approach categories (ABCDE and COPTER). In the absence of COPTER MINIMA, helicopters may use the CAT A minimums of other procedures. The standard format for portrayal of landing minima is as follows: AIRCRAFT APPROACH CATEGORIES Speeds are based on 1.3 times the stall speed in the landing configuration of maximum gross landing weight. An aircraft shall fit in only one category. If it is necessary to maneuver at speeds in excess of the upper limit of a speed range fora category, the minimums for the next higher category should be -used. For exa mple, an a ircroft which falls in Category A, but iscircling to land ata speed in excessof 91 knots, should use the approach Category B minimumswhen circling to land. See following category limits: MANEUVERING TABLE Approach Category A B C D E Speed (Knots) 0-90 91.120 121-140 141-165 Abv 165 RVR/Meteorological Visibility Comparable Values The following table shall be used for converting RVR to meteorological visibility when RVR is not reported for the runway of intended operation. Adjustment of landing minima may be required — see Inoperative Components Table. RVR (feet) Visibility RVR (feet) Visibility (statute miles) (statute miles) 1600................................................................ V. 4000 ...................................... 2000................................................................i5 4500..............................................................'h . 2400.....................:.......................................... h 5000............................................................... 1 3200.................:..............................................36 6000..............................................................114 Straight -in ILS to Runway 27 Straight -in with Glide Slope Inoperativeor not used to Runway 27 LANDING MINIMA FORMAT In'this example airport elevation is 1179, and runway touchdown zone elevation is 1152. Visibility Aircraft Approach Category (RVR 1004 of feet) DH \ HAT CATEGORY A B C D -S-ILS-27 1352/24 200 (200.45) SAOC-27 1440/24 288 (300.45) 1"0/50- 288 (300.1) CIRCLING 1540-1 1640-1 1640-11h 1 1740-2 361 (400-1) 461 (500-1) 461 (500.1 Vi) 561 (600.2) i MDA HAA Visibility in Statute Miles COPTER MINIMA ONLY CATEGORY COPTER H-176* 680-11/2 363 (400.45) Copter Approach Direction Height of MDA/DH Above Landing Area (HAL) W circling minimums am provided TERMS/LANDING MINIMA'DATA Al All minimums in parentheses not applicable to Civil Pilots. Military Pilots refer to appro- priate regulations. SW -2,15 JUL 1999 t FILE No.145"12/1 SHUTT MOEN Asssoci.:-AJ_�- • - II Services to the Aviation industry: .Planning Engineering - Management .' • r, ' 707 AVIATION BLVD. , • .` SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 TEL: .(707)526-5010 ' FAX.: (707)526-9721 7*�-'-99.PM-03:47 ID:SHUTT.& MOEN FAX:5269721_ PAGE 1 ; i- s FAXCMEMO. n r Date: M1 December 17;1999 Number of Pages: (including' this page) . To: .x Dave Doody.; f De t.of p Butte Count.y p '. Ici ment Servlccs'� " • " - t '.Y '• Dcve Fax Number: (530) 538478 . From: IC n Brod Subject: ' ' Airport Noise Contours « 2 0 l - Y - The Original:- ,Will not %Ilow 1 1 4Nill follow - $ t r Message:' As discussed by phone earlier this week, attached are draft copies�of updated noise. -contours which we have prepared for the Oruville, Paradise, and Ranchaero airports. These are the contours which we arc using in°development of the,Air-' ,poet Land Use Compatibility Plan.} 'J - The contours are based upon pr9jected`activity levels for each of the, airports.;+.If' tiops, let me know.: l ne Ur data. r W With regard to, Chico airpe closer look at the several se prepared for various activil those contours prior to the + i 1• uompaunuity rlan win lncluac a summary yr ims over the next couple_of weeks we will be taking a of contours which Brown-Buntin Associates has _ xnarios. If we have any useful conclusions about ' ,cember 29"' ALUC meeting, I will let you know. <: -8 crJ Ju �~ - - • • .DEC i,7 1999 � •' ~: ' -+ f '.• . , BUTTE COUNTY ` .'PLANNINGDIVISION r •'e S FILE No .145 12/17 '99 PM 03:47 I D : SHUT_T & MOEN FAX : 5269721 PAGE 2: Background Data: Ora Wile Munlelpal Airport/Chapter • � + I jl • r � i�.ji1j � li 111.; I.I Ili,{Illil,i • I 14 t I I II�.II'i. III rt • •I � I - %/ �� 11 I 1I f� 65 CN • I 160 CNHj. j .I55 CN � j 1 N. 2,000' 0 (FEET 4.000" 1"Im 2,0W ,. IIVI. f:LIM.'AI .. � .. � • Sow -Ce: SAW Moon AssoC/nros (JAnuery?0M) . Exhibit SE - _ Noise Impact Area Orovllle Municipal Airport ' 0 0 0 FILE No.145 12/17 '99 PM 03:48 ID:SHUTT.& MOEN FAX:52 721 PAGE Background Date., Renchaero Airport/ Chapter % V .. N,p Sonans: Shutt Moen Amclaros (innuary -Pow) yji.'g I . *` --'t r 0 1:: 65 CNIFEL .60 cNgL. A 95 C N E L FEET 4.000' 11 2.0w P • !;i l 11 Exhlbft 7E Noise Impact Area Ranchaero Airport 4 4 FEET 4.000' 11 2.0w P • !;i l 11 Exhlbft 7E Noise Impact Area Ranchaero Airport 4 FILE No.145 12/17 '99 PM 03:47.ID:SHUTT & MOEN FAX:5269721 PAGE 3, Backgmund Data. -Paradise, Skypatk Airport /Chapter 6 • l • I IIS. i� - I �-�� ri•i I I i - .. � a .l�•' III � '55 CNEL I ; 60 CNEL I I I �� I 65 CNEL ! ;. I. i r• Vi I r'• %I N 2.0000, 0 i�EET 4.000' VAN [IMPAl 1 Vii' I 1, = 2.000' , . Souroe: Shutt Moen A89UCl9te9.(AnUJry2000) t• Exhibit SE _ - Noise Impact Area - Paradise Skypark Alrporr ' 0 0 0 FILE NP.157 12/21 '99 AM 11:38 ID:SHUTT & MOEN FAY,:526 721 PAGE Background Data: Renchearal AlWrt /Chapter 7 . . .......... ... Ih/ v". 2�. '3 N, X\ I" W V I1. i'Y 1, 1 Ij 4 I. r ij i II 10 % Ill.""till X A .. .... IILII >1 CN�L OR in 0 A" 05 CNEL V1 till ox" it Vii, % I % 464 t Source: Shutt Wan A8.9odstos (January 2010) Post -It' brand fax transmittal memo 7671 N of pages 0- ITO o- --X L 11 -IQ-tt vZ16-5 0k0 X0 li-ax. — V = 2,000'i" ;Y Exhibit 7E Noise Impact Area Renchaero Airport RECEIVED DEC 2 11999 * BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION FILE No.157 1221t'99'AM,11:39 ID:SHUTT & MOEN FAX:5269721 PAGE 2 Background Data: ParedlOO Skypark AIrpor[ /Chapter 6 Y �I II III. I I. jI �. I .I. ��. i I I .I I' I 1 I I ,� �..•ti. I j � I I i � •} I I i 'A1 t 55 CNEL I j 60 CNEL 65 CNEL e • - I �I �'`) .� �i\- \ \ I 111 _ , v i N 2,000%/ 0 /f EET 6,000' 2.000' Sourca : Shutt Moen Associates (January 2000) ' Exhibit 6E Nolle Impact Ar®a ' Paradise Skypark Airport FILE No .157 12/21 ' 99 • AM 1139 I D : SHUTT MOEN FAX : 526 721 PAGE 3 r aeokground Dere: OrovlNe Municipal Airport /Chapter 5 ., , 'yl I I I• � li I !I - II :I I I..�;.�II 1 �I lil I � •F, I I: I `ll,! , +III IIIIIII�.'ili r li .I I � I�Ililil �i • • I I• I I i I � I � I� ��. 1 � �jfi�',�.I I •' • 'I L � I is Ih:iiil �j 111 -i;. III ' I ..� _ 65 CNO�-4; 60 CN91L II I I, jj 55 CNO' I I O' yFEET 4,OOa 11�- 2.000' .Source: Shutt Moen A880601es (January 2w) Exhibit BE Nols® Impact Area, ` Oroville Municipal Airport OROVILLE- AIRPORT ' F�'' jF .._... T � f r ` . � . • ^•..••�,� % 4 s � •__.�� I..c =' t-. ;" 1' i "1 \ '�=-.� !, IV t f Y,11'f ( i [/ J s •-• +`• ii .1 r ^tt' -Y ft i'!1 1 1 4•— Y, ', -'� iz} - -c TI' j, 4t1j�� 4 � SFT I.Ga o3 4)E ' 4 W-1 IFu,4j� , t f, + , ; AM ,�1 T 1 i } 1 R i } t u. WiiSKW�W>� �J ii� . y 1�t;iT rs}Ltul Ir 1 P S Ir r • /r i l ( i 1 S i j"i r 4 • 4' Hit, � (1�� i',i6rt v _Ss f ! _ Sj . i ! J` l �... , ! t7U -` i)•61 t: t 1 Lt .t.JI:L j t 4 7 r.` ,,f �y4"'f't 5a'. - i� i Eq .r "" i ilJj i '_t ai .c }- _ 4r l ,1 1 S t �a..�'`T'�� i.}l.�r 7�tj{ yi-Y-•.fir' t k "! �ti t,y FMT tin lmcr skFyS� I.�i + - ,..♦. .� +. - � e° j � f • � .+r,1 '� � 114. �l.� ; 1 i iii n fR-1 v5 �i • r I r jj { /y T 4 ti' � i !+ la.'i.i 1♦° ��T� r "•r.•t � i +t'.'� e,.. 7�f�ir' N'+:15 � .Lt._ � �i� �f� , � - k - - `•.. ' �, >' � j ` i— " * �' (.. ' !L r;Y ''l`� � �� Wit. `��'. ■' ' 5.,: „c A or „' (I ; .. r i , {�' ♦i. i i..i.a �tit 1� I I '��r � � a' �r}}.�__� a -_, a. 'i : i'�.} +'�'?� .-f - { jS .- r t — i � "t"i-♦ -1 �_ }t jic � �,fj+TM1'i{i(r ' rQr+-'Frtrt•' i � � .-``'•'rT�■Y, 70`-�.� r • . `T� It lF�r a 3 ' g f ■ t 4 ✓ - j4 i j �� I t 1 •} 1 r ♦ 1 .e.._..' tom..:__ .rte, !jl'! • -t:- 11pp t f i i t. 4._. ••. •' ° ✓ 't � , ' ""� t -,7 •. �-m-F.�Q.•_tt .. _•__� i i. i 4 i./' tt �♦ d-+ 1 ti• ..1-- �i (.� .�! �! ily� t yt-.-rely 1 -1 � 7 � � t c- �a � ■ E�- � r _ 1— 1i. i 1.; i { .. e � •i I 1 ,. ( }}� -�i J • . ( 1 t 1; � , ,F �. f. '"�Y.•~ F " ij r r i'I !- 1� E��i _._.._.. _. }'• s' j'r—•� �� }y�t. f._[:. 4]:r tz ` �+' ■'�` � i �I y11_ - �t 1 � 4 '� t _ • t t a r�C ..J, .:`• . t�`+ j �' t � h '1 � J -� a -•4 T--,j' .4 I I .i S ;�i t _ yN• �' �',,•.:�•t �"\j. R r.. x i I 1 1 ■r r` i' e r P �'• 1 't 1 1 4 \} 1�s�+n � I _i '� ti I! It':,} :,�✓'TM -•4J {., '-, I t' l( t t � • , � j • � 1'� �� _ i i j _�: 4 �� is ;! �:_-•:- °.. �--3._= •?_ �•-. i-�,�:,- :i�� .-,�!-.t_ _ .i: �!.• _, _ � _.1j 7{' r �j�}17�� -�6 t r =� � .. 2 °•. P � r v � ,�� . j _ ;` °�`. y` _i� '', jy:,� ! � i- -��- -� 1 I s t + i � •1L•♦y �.r�: ' r M+s / ' /i- �iT .'1'Z t � 1' �is' , i � ' y ; � : � •.. _" llir•:.,W� Ii_.. j 3';t .�.• . �,° ' r ', - �� .`.� � _ - (( { a ' � �, _ •-'T i�;^ I i _t .1. �. �'`,.-° �,: , •- (i �- � • it 4 - ( }} Ie '� � , tom. , t I ( I J 1 S_, ✓.✓.,. a�1 �[( j. �^ + ; ._.l' ' � +-. r -, � Via.■ - �, 44 � , 1 ' is � f iEGOW 1. IMWsy Protogo n Zone %/{. 2. Inner Safety ZI: ( {: i •r i ' 3. Innerlcrnmgzono. , a outer sntel ZOM . _ � � � ■ , ..�.. r_.L__.. __.� '---:. - - _�_ t _ ! ' � /�.b � ,ti 5:� Shlfliae Safety lone _.. - j— & ,TrFM PYttan ZOno 4 ° ' ' i 7: Ara► of HAlnence Mmh694 1� ( coo o aoo Fed EsiR IN SCDS cls SERV r =. .rtPRINTED 214=r 1 -- 11 _i 1 ROUGH DRAFT } w•wYrvYr• MI4vc:sV' . lMRMl.�.MngOw,w v�.`.iaf4� w.e .� .- +� . r'MeY,+YMAYT�r ► a�w..Mw]�w. +}!p N�1�"�Y' 'M^�m.'My.Ya�- 4F+�:AMr-.lMw' W.1'•4n• w•.,�w w.��.y+.•. t ti 7 i'r r ,.. /y++, �•,-, ,:.. a .... .._:� _ ��•�rr,.,,-.i»...-M.....�,....,.+v.�,,.nn•...... ..r....n+..�n...,w..... ,w.»..�..Y....y.'.. :...r....n+.,,N �. ..+.,..,r.,.�.,.».«... .n.•w�,,.....r.y.-+...w.. ...,.....u�.,.n......... • 1999 CLUP DENSITY CRITERIA xt w Adopted by the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission December, 1999 • MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE DENSITY• No. Safety Zone People per Acre Dwelling Units per Acre 1 Runway Protection Zone 10 GH 0 - 2 Inner Safety Zone 10 ADHIJL 0 EKM - 3 Inner Turning, Zone 10 ADHIJL 1 EKM 10 4 Outer Safety Zone 25 CDFHIL 1 EKM 5 5 Sideline Safety Zone 25 CDFHIL 0 - 6 Traffic Pattern Zone 100 CDEM 1 EKM • 2.5.. M,�Um pu"l siu 7 Area of Influence No Limit. BCDHIT 4 EKM I* A. 20% Coverage Per Acre (Buildings and Structures). B. Uses compatible only if they do not result in a large concentration of people. A large concentration of people is defined as a gathering of individuals in an area that would result iri an average density of greater than 25 persons per acre per hour during any 24-hour period ending at midnight, not to exceed 50. persons per acre at any time. C. 'Caretaker residences are a compatible use within all CNEL ranges, provided that they are ancillary to the primary use of a property intended for the purpose of property protection or maintenance, and subject to the condition that all residential units be designed to limit intruding noise such that interior noise levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, with windows closed, in any habitable room. D. Measures to achieve an intenor.noise level of 45 CNEL must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of buildings where the public is r6ceived, office areas, and other areas where people work or congregate. 4. E. Residential development shall not occur in a noise level greater than 55 CNEL. F. Use compatible only if it does not result in a concentration of persons greater than 25 persons per acre at any time or the storage of flammable or explosive material above ground. G. No buildings, structures, above ground transmission lines, or storage of flammable or explosive material above ground, and no uses resulting in'a gathering of more than 10 persons at any time. ru2.Cvrrce'�. '`I - ge-l�e�-s /-IC,vc o 0PvG1,0-4r; n1 i2- 2- 99,. H. Communication Towers (Excluding airport related facilities): • 1. Prohibited in all safety zones except Zone 8. Free Standing Towers: 1. Alternative orange and white paint starting at 30 feet above the ground. 2. Strobe lighting at the top of the tower and shielded from striking the ground for a mile. Towers with Guy Wires: 1. Starting at 30 feet above the ground: a. Blinking lights along length of tower and guy wires at 20 foot intervals. b. Three feet in diameter orange safety markers attached at 20 foot intervals on tower and guy wires. I. Public and Quasi -Public: Prohibited Uses: Churches, nursing care facilities, hospitals, colleges and universities, elementary and secondary schools, child care facilities and similar aggregations of persons. J. 50% Open Space. K. Density Bonus Prohibited. L. No bulk petroleum products (except airport related), flammable or explosives or chemical storage above ground. M. Second dwelling units are prohibited. All zones in areas of influence. • 1. Permitted Uses: A. All projects covered.by a vested map or development. agreement. . B. Any uses covered by a valid building permit. C. All uses meeting the airport CLUP standards at time permit$ are issued. General Statements. 1. All ministerial and residential uses shall be referred to ALUC and findings shall be made that there will be no impacts to airport operations. 2. Avigation Easements shall be signed by property owners for all uses located within the planning boundaries of each public or special use airport. * The minimum parcel size is 8,000 square feet. K:\WLUC\CLUP 1999\99.CLU • ' I I Rock Cree-k QriyI I i I r(I - 1 -✓� i ter' � r' . W - gaI - SCI c Runway Sa' Inner rely _ l I I I inner Turning Zane Outer Safety Z ;ne JI \ \ \ I + 5 Sid-31ir-p- Safety Zone 5 Traffic Pattern Zone Idlrpor4 lnflwnc* Ara.a PMte=:lon 'ane O ; A j\ ; - a =coo 0 2000 - -.eco - %IAra of Inllu n 'our= T` v Adopted by r 1 1Jr M -ay 21,dj- r \ ' . J, _ IIS. -I �°'/ .,. ':!:�,}/� !- • 0 0 DR4 )V1111 IF, AA RVI PA(T IMP 'A 1 )1, f�Ui L: ably 7ollos ot 11,1! 11 l 1 Iy 111 (1 NJ C.- N .7 TIT if, W -. _ _ __ __ 7 11 LA *cU (m o RV m "P Ll 34fity ............. X.? V n. Airport Environs Plan Safety Zones 3afoty Zono2 Runway Protoctlull Zov- inner Safotv 7 -ono 3 Inner Turning Zcno -1 Outer Safety Zono Areo Uf 11 111LICI icu Uuuml0ty !:,Kjoliiwl Saluly ZUII(! T[ allic flail U111 L"U110 /Wopted by ALM, 1. ft Mc Zc- N .7 TIT if, W -. _ _ __ __ 7 11 LA *cU (m o RV m "P Ll 34fity ............. X.? V n. Airport Environs Plan Safety Zones 3afoty Zono2 Runway Protoctlull Zov- inner Safotv 7 -ono 3 Inner Turning Zcno -1 Outer Safety Zono Areo Uf 11 111LICI icu Uuuml0ty !:,Kjoliiwl Saluly ZUII(! T[ allic flail U111 L"U110 /Wopted by ALM, 0 >• x r' DAVE DOODY. . BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT -LAND. U� + COMMISSION - - ■ 7,County Center Drive, Oroville CA 95965 ■ (530) 538-7601 1(5) 5A -17R; r} • , ' REGULAR MEETING OF THE• COMMISSION Location: r,,Butte County Administration Building, Supervisors Chambers 25 `County Center Drive, Oroville California f�� l%G` • , Date/Time: December 29, 1999 9:00 a.m. _ • AGENDA ► a 1 ALL ITEMS ARE, OPEN FOR PUBLIC _COMMENT •A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Roll Call G'' Approval'of the Minutes of November 17, 1999. D. 'Acceptance of the Agenda " (Commission members -or staff may request additions, deletions, "or..; ' changes in'the Agenda order:) • E: ,Business Items: .-^., • . � : ^ � �,�" ' �.' '• . ,. ' ITEMS WITH PUBLIC HEARINGS .` 1. ;1999 Annual Review and Update of the .Chico, Oroville, Paradise and: Ranch_a_ ero Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUP) Continued from November 17, 1999. The Butte -Count Airport Land Use Commission proposes to •amend, the CLUPs`to include a new development criteria and density matrix for the various safety zones that surround ' �r each of the public use airports mi Butte County. This amendment is proposed -in accordance with " Public Utility Code Sections 21674.7 and•21675 which allows a once a.year update to the comprehensive land use plans for each of the County's public use airports. �, v ,. Staff Recommendation: Defer 'adoption of the proposedamendment and -direct staff to- forward the proposed CLUP Amendment material to Shutt Moen and Associates for inclusion, in the year 2000 CLUP'update.. 'ITEMS WITHOUT PUBLICMEARINGS 2. Discussion regarding setting the date •and time for a joint meeting with` the Board of y 'Supervisors to discuss issues•of mutualconcern. F. Monthly Status Report G.. Committee Appointments H. Correspondence and Commission Announcements I. •Public Comment on Items Not Already on the Agenda - Oresentations'will be limited to five minutes. The Airport Land Use Commission is prohibited by state law from taking action on any item presented if it is not listed on the agenda.) J. Closed Session - None K. Adjournment i i Ar Airport Land Use Commission • December 29, 1999 Agenda • Page 2 • • Any disabled person needing special accommodation to participate in, the Commission proceeding is requested to contact Paula Leasure at (530) 538-7601 prior to the meeting and arrangements will be made to accommodate you. *Any person may address the Commission during the "Business From the Floor" segment of the agenda. *Copies of the agenda and documents relative to an agenda item may be obtained from the Clerk of the Commission at cost of $.08 per page. RULES APPLYING TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Members .of the public wishing to address the Commission upon any subject within the jurisdiction of Butte AL UC may do so upon receiving recognition from the-Chdirat the appropriate time. 2. Comment on items not on the agenda should be made at the time indicated for 'Public Comment" on the agenda; The Commission may not act on any matter'so raised and will have to put off action until a meeting at which the matter can be put on the agenda. 3. Comment on specific agenda items may be made during the discussion of that agenda item, upon recognition by the Chair. 4. After receiving recognition, please approach the podium and state your name and address at the microphone before making your presentation, so that the Clerk may take down this information. 5. All documents to be presented to the Commission shall be given to the Clerk of the Commission (original and seven copies) prior to Call of Order of meeting. Such documents shall be distributed to the Commission and made available for public inspection. This Agenda was mailed to those requesting notice and posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting at the following locations: Butte County Administration Building, front entrance and glass case. K;IPLANNINGUL OMEET/NGS)!1-'9-99.MTGUG£NDA. WPD ArAi port Land Use Commission • December 29, 1999 Agenda x Page 3 • t • • • • BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION Minutes of November 17,1999 A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE B. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Causey; Gerst, Grierson, Papadakis and Vice -Chair Rosene C. • • 1a E • . • Absent: Commissioner Hatley and Chair Hennigan Others Present: Paula Leasure, Principal Planner Dave Doody, Senior Planner _ Barbra Duncan, Administrative Assistant Alt. Commissioner Ward Alt. Commissioner Baldridge APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES of October 20, 1999. Vice -Chair Rosene said, during the meeting of October 20, 1999, staff was directed to invite Neil McCabe, Deputy County Counsel, to the meeting today to discuss the sign issue. Staff said County Counsel's office had declined to address the Commission on any issue due to the pending resolution of the lawsuit. It was moved by Commissioner Papadakis, seconded by Commissioner Causey, and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of October 20, 1999, as presented. ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner Causey, seconded by Commissioner Grierson, and unanimously carried to accept the agenda of November 17, 1999, as presented. BUSINESS ITEMS ITEM WITH PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUP). Continued from the meeting of October 20, 1999. a Mr. Doody explained that staff had received three separate proposals for CLUP amendments from Chair Henmgan, Commissioner Gerst, and Commissioner Grierson. He discussed the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for review of CLUP amendments. He said to accomplish the most basic CEQA review, they must define the actual project with enough clarity so that the lead agency (ALUC) can forward the project to other agencies for review and comnm�e t. 1"U Zl2c�� 9� AR-� �A- 'S� • • Ms. Leasure stated that the last CLUP amendment was adopted by the Commission without following CEQA guidelines and procedures before adoption, which was against staff s recommendation. Commissioner Grierson said if ALUC is going to proceed with the amendment within the required time limits, the scope of the project must be narrowed to specifically focus on the changes the Commission`wants to make this year. ` Ms. Leasure said staff s recommendation is that the Commission not move forward with the 1999 CLUP Update. ,Staff feels that the proposed amendments will significantly complicate the CLUP update currently being prepared by Shutt Moen Associates. Vice -Chair Rosene said Commissioner Grierson would lead today's discussion. ,. Commissioner Grierson requested the Commission to disregard the proposed amendments he submitted. It was the consensus of the Commission to specifically focus on the addition of Caltrans safety, turning and overflight, zones and the establishment of specific density limits.based on Caltrans safety zones for the 1999 Annual Review and Update of the CLUP. Commissioner Grierson said the Commission should address non -residential --people per acre (i.e., congregation of people gathering at any point in time, church, flea market, campsite, airport special events, etc.) and the number "of residential units per acre. Specific terminology should be established to insure that Shutt Moen Associates includes the language in the updated CLUP. The language should be consistent with ALUC plans and other communities and their plans. Commissioner Gerst explaineu-his proposed amendments regarding densities for non-residential people per acre and the residential units per acre. The Commission discussed modifying the map of the Ranchaero Airport Area of Influence to move the northwest Inner Safety Zone and the Inner Turning Zone farther to the west to avoid the high densities to the east of the runway. ` Commissioner Baldridge said the modification would work for the pilots using the airport. Commissioner Ward commented that the modification would,compromise the safety of the aircraft occupants. It was the consensus of the Commission that they widen the area encompassing Safety Zones 2, 3, and 4 to allow aviators the option to use the straight runway or the left-hand approach. r Commissioner Gerst explained his definitions for specific, appropriate 'uses or restrictions on uses. ` ■ Butte Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of November 17, 1999 ■ Page 2 ■ • • • • 4 a .• a' It was the consensus of the Commission to delete Item J., Flight Schools Permitted, and Item N.; -.All common aviation related uses acceptable from the list of uses. Commissioner Grierson referred to Section B, Items 4 and 5 of Chair Hennigan's proposed amendments where he separated Chico from the other airports for proposed density limits. Commissioner Grierson said that establishing general standards that can be applied in all cases to all airports was preferable. It was the consensus of the Commission to approve density limits and uses as shown on the following chart: • MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE DENSITY• No. Safety Zone People per Acre Dwelling Units per Acre 1 Runway Protection Zone 10 GH 0 - 2 Inner Safety Zone 10 ADHIJM 0 EKN, - .3 Inner Turning Zone 10 ADFHIJM 1 EKN 10 4 Outer Safety Zone 25 CDFHIM 1 EKN -5 5 Sideline Safety Zone 25 CDFHIM. 0 - 6 Traffic Pattern Zone 100 CDFHIM 1 unit EKLN 2.5 ac. minimum parcel size 7 Area of Influence No Limit BCDHI 4 EKLN 1 A. 20% Coverage Per Acre (Buildings and Structures). B. Uses compatible only if they do not result in �a large concentration of people. A large concentration of people is defined as a gathering of individuals in an area that would. result in an average density of greater than 25 persons per acre per hour during any 24-hour period ending at midnight, not to exceed 50 persons per acre at any time. C. Caretaker residences are a compatible use within all CNEL ranges, provided that they are ancillary to the primary use of a property intended for the purpose of property protection or maintenance, and subject to the condition that all residential units be designed to limit intruding noise such that interior noise levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, with windows closed, in any habitable room.- D. oom.D. Measures to achieve an interior noise level of 45 CNEL must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of buildings where the public is received, office areas, and other areas where people work or congregate. E. Residential development shall not occur in a noise level greater than 55 CNEL. F. Use compatible only if it does not result in a concentration of persons greater than 25 persons per acre at any time or the storage of flammable or explosive material above ground. ■ Butte airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of November 17, 1999 ■ Page 3 ■ N G. No bu1ldings,'structures, above ground transmission lines, or storage of flammable or explosive material above ground, and no uses resulting in a gathering of more-than 10 persons at any time. H. Communication Towers (excluding airport related facilities): 1. Prohibited in all safety zones except Zone 8. Free Standing Towers: 1. Alternative orange and white paint starting at 30 feet above the ground. 2. Strobe lighting at the top of-the tower and shielded from striking the ground for a ' mile. - Towers with Guy Wires: 1. Starting at 30 feet above the ground: a. Blinking lights along length of tower and guy wires at 20'foot intervals. b.Three feet in diameter orange safety markers attached at 20 foot intervals ` on tower and guy wires. y I. Public and Quasi-Public: 4 Prohibited Uses: Churches, nursing care facilities, hospitals, colleges and universities, elementary and secondary schools, child care facilities and similar aggregations of persons. J. 50% Open Space.. K. Density Bonus Prohibited. L: Aunt Minnie units pennitted with ALUC review for safety and noise protection. M. No bulk petroleum products (except airport related), flammable or,explosives or chemical storage above ground. N. Second dwelling units are prohibited. w Staff asked for clarification that these standards. are now the Commission's proposal for density and the Commission wishes for this to go forward for circulation to agencies, CEQA review and be brought back in December. The Commission advised that staff is correct. Commissioner Gerst said he would like to add uses permitted upon the adoption of a CLUP update and two general statements to the 1999 CLUP Update. Ms. Leasure restated the permitted uses upon the adoption of a CLUP update and the two general statements as agreed.to by the Commission as follows: All zones'in areas of influence. , 1. Permitted Uses: t A. . All projects covered by a vested map or development agreement. B. Any uses covered by a valid building permit. C.. All uses meeting the airport CLUP standards at time permits are issued. ■ Butte Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of November 17, 1999 ■ Page 4 ■ 0 . General Statements. • 1. Projects that do not meet the density or use criteria of the. CLUP within the planning area of influence boundary for each airport shall be referred to ALUC. 2. Avigation Easements shall be signed by property owners for all uses located within the planning boundaries of each public or.special use airport. The Commission discussed overlay zones. If the cities -and county would adopt the ALUC's area of influence for each airport as overlay zones it would make their planning process easier. It was moved by Commissioner Grierson to adopt the language as restated, by Ms. Leasure and to adopt as ALUC's proposed changes to the CLUP listing and establishing densities and uses for the zones at each airport within the purview `of the ALUC. Commissioner Gerst said they needed maps to accompany the proposed changes. Ms. Leasure said the Commission referred to the maps identified as 6-1 (Chico Municipal Airport), 7-1 (Oroville Airport), 8-1(Ranchaero Airport) and 9-1 (Paradise Airport). Additionally, the Commission discussed amending the Ranchaero Airport to make the fan wider (Area 3) at the north end: , • Ranchaero Air2ort Area of Influence (8-1) • It was the consensus of the I Commission to widen Areas 2 and 4 to correspond to the widening of Area 3. The map is to maintain the consistent left boundary and move the right boundary to its existing location so that a fan is established. Commissioner Grierson amended his motion to adopt the language as restated by Ms. Leasure and to adopt as ALUC's proposed changes to the CLUP, listing and establishing densities and uses for the zones at each airport within the purview of the ALUC, and the maps identified as 6-1 (Chico Municipal Airport), 7-1 (Oroville Airport), 8-1(Ranchaero Airport) as amended and 9-1 (Paradise Airport). Vice -Chair Rosene opened the hearing to the public. There were no public comments. The hearing was closed to the public. Commissioner Causey seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Causey, Gerst, Grierson, Papadakis and Vice -Chair Rosene NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Hatley and Chair Hennigan ABSTAINS: None • 5 MINUTE RECESS. ■ Butte Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of November 17, 1999'0 Page5 ■ • • • • • • It>was the consensus of the Commission to reschedule the regularly scheduled December 15, 1999 --meeting to Wednesday, December 29, 1999 at 9:00 a.m. F. MONTHLY STATUS REPORT Commissioner Grierson referred to ALUC Staff Time Accounting and asked what projects staff is working on for ALUC to account for the many staff hours reported? Ms Leasure said clerical staff has worked many hours to learn ALUC procedures and to reorganize the ALUC filing system. ` Commissioner Grierson announced that on January 14, 2000, at 9:00 a.m., there will be a Northern California Airport Manager's Conference. There will be speakers from the FAA and Caltrans to discuss airport land use planning. The meeting will be held at the Chico Municipal Airport in the conference room. Commissioner Grierson mentioned that there is a recommendation from City staff to the Chico City Council to override a portion of the CLUP. He asked staff to provide information to the Commissioners and Alternates when this occurs. Commissioner Gerst expressed concern about approval of several planning projects that will -be incompatible with the 1999 Annual Review and Update of the CLUP after final adoption. He a further commented that the First United Pentecostal Church in Thermalito was discussed at the last Planning Commission meeting. He said the Church is eventually planning to provide a school on. the site. Ms. Leasure said at ALUC's public hearing on the project, the applicants stated they were, not planning to provide a school. If they expand the use to include a school, the project should come back to the Commission. Vice -Chair Rosene asked staff to look into the issue and report back to the Commission. Vice -Chair Rosene raised the issue of the signs and asked what the County does if a developer does not meet the mitigation standards for a development? ■ Butte Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of November 17, 1999 ■ Page 6 ■ Ms. Leasure said mitigation measures are established that are to be complied with prior to • --development of the project. In this case, the County has issued building permits and allowed people to develop without all of the mitigations being met. She said she did not know what more ALUC could do. Letters have already been sent to the County Counsel and the Board of Supervisors requesting that the requirements are met. Vice -Chair Rosene said it was the County Counsel's responsibility to enforce the laws of Butte County and, it appears, they have chosen to ignore those laws. He said he did not want to file another lawsuit, but they are not doing what they promised they would do when they passed C.S.A. 87. Commissioner Grierson said they could file a writ of mandamus that would send a sheriff to force the public officials to do their job. Ms. Leasure said County Counsel's office would have to provide ALUC with legal counsel if this is the action that the Commission wishes to take. She suggested waiting six weeks and she would try to find out from another legal counselor what alternative actions ALUC can take. Tony St. Amant, interested person from the public, suggested the Commission consider writing a letter to the Board of Supervisors and having the Chair appear before the Board to say that ALUC • dislikes having to continually threaten legal action; however, this is an example of the frustration that comes when trying to follow through with things. The benefit of this action would be that it • becomes a public record that shows ALUC has tried a conciliatory approach which begins to balance some of the inaccurate assertions that the Commission is looking for a reason to sue the County. Vice -Chair Rosene said that ALUC has ,tried that approach. Earlier this year the Board of Supervisors and the developers had their representative meet with Susan Minasian and ALUC's representative met with Neil McCabe to try to iron out a compromise. ALUC came up with a proposed sign, but the Board's proposed sign said no more that "there is an airport over there." They did not address any of the issues that came close to the sign that was in C.S.A. 87. The Board then dropped the matter although ALUC wrote two letters requesting that the item be placed on the Board's agenda. ALUC's concerns have been ignored and now the Board will not communicate with the Commission. Commissioner Papadakis suggested the Commission find a Supervisor that will place the item on. the Board's agenda. Commissioner Gerst asks what criteria determines when a project should comeback to ALUC for reconsideration? • Ms. Leasure said if the Planning Comm,ission makes a substantial change to a project that has • previously come before ALUC, it should come back to the Commissioner for reconsideration. ■ Butte Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of November 17, 1999 ■ Page 7 ■ Commissioner Ger t said the Ruddy Creek project has been substantially changed since ALUC adopted their findings and should come back for reconsideration. Ms. Leasure said if ALUC found the project consistent and recommended 4 units per acre it would not come back because it was just a Commission recommendation. However, if the Commission found it consistent and adopted findings that said the project shall have no more than -4 units per acre and the project changes at the Planning Commission level, then it should come back for ALUC reconsideration. The problem is that the Planning Commission is not required to inform ALUC when they make substantial changes. G. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS None. H. CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS None., I. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA None. J. CLOSED SESSION None. K. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:52 a.m. AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION 4;11 z)� r z2� PAULA LEASURE, Principal Planner Minutes prepared by Barbra Duncan, Administrative Assistant. • • ■ Butte Airport Land Use Commission ■ Minutes of November 17, 1999 ■ Page 8 ■ r 1 Ilurnvay I'►ulucliu►i Zunu I►n►u►_ Salw _ Y Zu►►u 111f►ur 'I'u►►;inu ZU11U 'I Oulur. Salulp Zuni. Sidulillu Saltily Zuiie flallic Palluill Zune lLga of Influence ' r 7 F . 4-6-oo u 2,000 F?ov l c --p '13`I WED 6rc-e- r . � r -P II Si►luty 'Zu►iu Ulniunuiunu (Fuel) 20 C7 2000 4-50. L &55 Aux 4C OO C �5o r? ,4 o 0 aso S l 2 So F 500 T 2,So0 F . 4-6-oo u 2,000 F?ov l c --p '13`I WED 6rc-e- r +BICJTT E COUNTY AIRPORT. LAND USE COMMISSION ,+ r 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 • n w. I -4 9GcG%yam +° U 194 AGENDA ITEM - E.1. w/ � e L) a JJoLt�— ct�� . TO: Honorable Chair and Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Dave Doody, ALUC Staff DATE: December 22, 1999 ITEM:, 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUP): Public Utility Code (PUC)* Sections 21674.7 and 21675 allow a yearly CLUP update. The Commission will ` .consider adoption of new land use development criteria and density for the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero CLUPs. The proposed amendment specifies persons per acre, minimum lot size, and other development regulations for_ the safety zones surrounding each of the public use airports in Butte County. FOR:" Airport Land Use Commission Meeting of December 29, 1999.' (This item was • continued from November 17, 1999.) f • t recommends the ALUC direct staff to refer the proposed amendment to Shutt SUMMARY: Staff p p Moen and Associates for inclusion in the 2000 CLUP update. BACKGROUND: Staff received three proposals for CLUP amendments. On October 20, 1999, Chair Hennigan introduced a proposed CLUP amendment for the Chico, Paradise, Oroville and Ranchaero airports. The Commission discussed this proposal but did not take action. Commissioner Gerst also introduced a proposed CLUP amendment. Commissioner Gerst requested ALUC to review his proposal for discussion at the November 17, 1999, ALUC meeting. On' November 17, 1999, Commissioner Grierson. requested ALUC disregard the proposed amendments he submitted. ALUC discussed Commissioner Gerst's proposed amendment regarding densities for non-residential and residential uses, definitions,for appropriate uses, and the various restrictions on uses. Staff recommended ALUC not move forward with the 1999 CLUP update because the proposed amendments would significantly complicate the work in progress by Shutt Moen and Associates. However, ALUC directed staff to refer Commissioner Gerst's proposal, as amended by the Commission, to agencies for comment, prepare CEQA analysis, and to return. with the project for adoption by ALUC at a special meeting of the Commission to be held on December 29, 1999. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission, December 29, 1999 • 1 • • ANALYSIS: • CEQA: The Caltrans Handbook, page 2-13, states that the preparation of an Initial Study and Negative Declaration is the CEQA route most commonly taken by ALUCs when adopting a compatibility plan. Therefore, following the November 17, 1999, ALUC meeting, staff circulated the proposed CLUP amendment to affected agencies and prepared an Initial Study and Negative Declaration pursuant to CEQA. The Negative Declaration was referred to the State Clearinghouse (SCH #99112098) and was distributed to State and local agencies for review and comment. The review period of the State Clearinghouse ends December 28, 1999. The proposed Initial Study and Negative Declaration are included in this report as Attachment "B." Comments received in a timely manner are discussed under Agency Responses to the 1999 CLUP amendment. The following agencies were sent either the Comment Requested Transmittal or the proposed Initial Study and Negative Declaration: City of Chico: Airport Commission Planning Department Town of Paradise: Planning Department City of Oroville: Planning Department -Call fornia.Dept. of Forestry -Caltrans Division of Aeronautics -Paradise Skypark Airport Manager. Agency Responses to the Proposed 1999 CLUP Amendment: To date staff has received six (6) comment letters on the proposed CLUP amendment. All agency comments are attached (Attachment "D") for your review. The following is an analysis of the comments received: The City of Oroville Planning Department commented that the information is "incomplete" and that the accompanying map is illegible: The City maintains that the. Area of Influence boundary was not legally adopted. The City attorney also noted that there was not adequate information and time to comment on the proposal. The City of Oroville Planning Commission indicated the information provided was insufficient and stated similar concerns as described above. The City's Planning Commission respectfully requested that, "ALUC refrain from adopting any amendments, revisions or update to the CLUP -at this time." The City's Planning Commission suggests that ALUC wait for the soon to be. released draft CLUP . under preparation by Shutt Moen and Associates. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission, December 29, 1999 • 2 Butte County Offices: Environmental Health Public Works Agricultural Commissioner Air Pollution Control District • Planning Department • •LAFCo •Oroville Airport Manager •Ranchaero Airport Manager City of Chico: Airport Commission Planning Department Town of Paradise: Planning Department City of Oroville: Planning Department -Call fornia.Dept. of Forestry -Caltrans Division of Aeronautics -Paradise Skypark Airport Manager. Agency Responses to the Proposed 1999 CLUP Amendment: To date staff has received six (6) comment letters on the proposed CLUP amendment. All agency comments are attached (Attachment "D") for your review. The following is an analysis of the comments received: The City of Oroville Planning Department commented that the information is "incomplete" and that the accompanying map is illegible: The City maintains that the. Area of Influence boundary was not legally adopted. The City attorney also noted that there was not adequate information and time to comment on the proposal. The City of Oroville Planning Commission indicated the information provided was insufficient and stated similar concerns as described above. The City's Planning Commission respectfully requested that, "ALUC refrain from adopting any amendments, revisions or update to the CLUP -at this time." The City's Planning Commission suggests that ALUC wait for the soon to be. released draft CLUP . under preparation by Shutt Moen and Associates. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission, December 29, 1999 • 2 City of Chico commented that they had, "reservations about both the update and the rapidity of its • adoption process." The City further noted that there was not enough time to prepare a thorough analysis of the proposed 1999 CLUP amendment and that the maps were "barely legible." They also commented that there was also a lack of supporting data to substantiate the proposed amendment. The City of Chico respectfully requests the Commission not adopt the proposed 1999 update. The City believes the proposal should be deferred until next year and addressed along with the CLUP being prepared by Shutt Moen and Associates. The City of Chico may be forced into overrides, an alternative it prefers to avoid. The City of Chico indicates that the proposed CLUP amendment, "effectively precludes residential development on numerous vacant lots by requiring larger lot sizes than available." The City also commented that other non-residential uses which are compatible within residential neighborhoods, such as child care facilities, hospitals, colleges, etc., would be prohibited by the proposed CLUP amendment. The letter states that, "because the City cannot leave property owners without economic use of their property, the CLUP amendments are effectively promoting commercial, manufacturing, and industrial uses within these residential neighborhoods." The City's letter also states that the, "Initial Study should analyze the effects of these land use incompatibilities and propose mitigation such as allowing residential development on legal parcels, regardless of size." The City of Chico requests that the CLUP amendment be delayed until adequate environmental review can be completed and the Initial Study be recirculated for comment. • The City of Chico's comments indicates the Initial Study and Negative Declaration should undergo further review and analysis since the proposed CLUP amendment has the potential to promote incompatible land uses within established residential neighborhoods. ALUC staff agrees that this is a potential impact that deserves more consideration. The Caltrans Handbook, page 2-12, notes that there is no legal requirement that ALUCs involve local agencies in the process of developing a CLUP. The Handbook cautions that, "the practical matter is that CLUPs are generally much more effective if they are developed with close attention to local agency concerns. ALUC adoption of CLUPs which will routinely result in agency overrides will accomplish little to promote airport land use compatibility objectives." The City of Chico's comments indicates that they will likely be forced into overrides. This would be very counterproductive to responsible airport land use planning. The Caltrans Aeronautics Pro_—ram staff prepared a short hand-written response to the proposed CLUP amendment. They commented that the Initial Study "looked fine" and suggested it be sent to the Caltrans, District 3 Office. The Initial Study was sent to the Caltrans, District 3 Office via the State Clearinghouse. Caltrans commented on the proposed CLUP Density Criteria Table (Attachment "A") and the accompanying maps (Attachment C) that specify density parameters and land use restrictions. Caltrans suggested adding item "G" to "Area 1" (Runway Protection Zone). Item "G" was omitted • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission, December 29, 1999 • 3 from the Density Criteria Table by a staff error and has been corrected Also, Caltrans pointed out • that Item "F" at 25 persons per acre did not correlate to the persons per acre in Area 3, the Inner Turning Zone. Caltrans suggested changing the table so that 25 persons per acre were permitted in Area 3 " Inner Turning Zone" as well. The Butte County Department of Development Services, Planning Division has submitted comments reflecting concerns similar to those listed above. Staff Response: Several, comments were received noting that the maps sent to agencies were illegible. Due to the Commission's direction to complete the request for comments and CEQA analysis within 42 days, staff had to circulate copies of the maps prepared by Commissioner Gerst and amended by Commissioner Grierson. Staff will have GIS maps prepared; however, enough lead time is required to make assignments coordinate with other projects in process. Due to the minimal time provided, a thorough analysis could not be prepared regarding the new overflight and land use development criteria and restrictions. Staff is concerned about the ramifications of these new restrictions. The City of Chico indicates that the CLUP amendment may ` be too restrictive and create a "taking" issue for vacant residential lands within the "Area of Influence." For example, according to the proposed.CLUP amendment, the accompanying text item "E" states •. the following: "Residential development shall not occur in a noise level greater than 55 CNEL. " This prohibition significantly affects vacant lands.under the Inner Safety Zone, Inner Turning Zone and the Outer Safety Zone and is extended to include the Traffic Pattern Zone and the Area of Influence. Maps of the Chico Airport 55 CNEL are only in draft form and have -only recently been made available to staff. On December 20, 1999, Shutt Moen provided faxed copies of 55 CNEL maps for Ranchaero, Oroville and the Paradise Skypark. While the maps showed the extent of the 55 CNEL contour; the information still needs to be digitized into the County's GIS data base in order to permit a thorough analysis. While Shutt Moen was very cooperative about producing these maps, they also indicated to staff their concerns about proceeding with such a restrictive amendment. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends the Commission take the following actions: 1. Review and consider the staff report, Commissioner's Gerst's proposed • 1999 CLUP amendment as amended by the Commission, including letters from affected agencies, and • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission, December 29, 1999 • 4 . 2. Reject the adoption of a 1999 CLUP amendment for the following reasons: • a. Review and analysis required by the California Environmental Quality Act indicates further study and analysis should be undertaken. The Negative Declaration should be recirculated to affected agencies. b. Significant concerns were raised by the City of Chico, City of Oroville and Mr. Ken. Brody of Shutt Moen and Associates at the October 20, 1999, ALUC meeting, which include the following: i.. City of Oroville's Planning Division comments states that the maps are illegible and the information is incomplete. The City Attorney does not consider this to be adequate information for which to comment upon. ii. City of Chico Planning Division comments states the maps are barely legible and there were no accompanying explanations of the reasons for the changes as well as no direction from ALUC as to where the City's General Plan is required to be amended as is specified by the California Government Code. The City also indicates that there was not enough time to respond to such a comprehensive amendment. iii. City of Chico's Environmental Planning Division indicates that the Initial Study and Negative Declaration lack sufficient mitigation for the proposed CLUP amendment and that further study and review is warranted in examining the growth inducing effects of encouraging commercial, industrial • and manufacturing uses within established residential neighborhoods within • the area affected by the new CLUP. C. Adoption of the proposed amendments could have a fiscal impact on the.contract currently negotiated with Shutt Moen and Associates. d. Staff believes that the premature adoption of the proposed amendments without more closely working wiin the affected agencies could create legal liability and result in overrides by Butte County and -involved cities. Attachments: "A" Proposed CLUP Density Criteria Table "B" Initial Study and Negative Declaration "C" Proposed CLUP Maps Density Parameters and Land Use Restrictions. "D" Agency Responses • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission December 29, 1999 • 5. • • • ATTACHMENT "A" PROPOSED CLUP DENSITY CRITERIA • MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE DENSITY• No. Safety Zone People per Acre Dwelling Units per Acre 1 Runway Protection Zone 10 GH 0 - 2 Inner Safety Zone 10 ADHIJL 0 EKM - 3 Inner Turning Zone 10 AD/HIJL 1 EKM _ 10 4 Outer Safety Zone 25 CDFHIL 1 EKM 5 5 Sideline Safety Zone 25 CDFHIL 0 - 6 Traffic Pattern Zone 100 CDjIIL // 1 unit EKM 2.5 ac. minimum parcel size 7 Area of Influence No Limit . BCDHI 4 EKM I A. 20% Coverage Per Acre (Buildings and Structures). B. Uses compatible only if they do not result in a large concentration of people. A large concentration of people is defined as a gathering of individuals in an area that would result in an average density of greater than 25 persons per acre per hour during any 24-hour period ending at midnight, not to exceed 50 persons per acre at any time. C. Caretaker residences are a compatible use within all CNEL ranges, provided that they are ancillary to the primary use of a property intended for the purpose of property protection or maintenance, and subject to the condition that all residential units be designed to limit intruding noise such that interior noise levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, with windows closed, in any habitable room. D. Measures to achieve an interior noise level of 45 CNEL must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of buildings where the public is received, office areas, and other areas where people work or congregate. E. Residential development shall not occur in a noise level greater than 55 CNEL. F. Use compatible only if it does not result in a concentration of persons greater than 25 persons per acre at any time or the storage of flammable or explosive material above ground. G. No buildings, structures, above ground transmission lines, or storage of flammable or explosive material above ground, and no uses resulting in a gathering of more than 10 persons at any time. H. Communication Towers (Excluding airport related facilities): 1. Prohibited in all safety zones ekcept Zone 8. Free Standing Towers: 1. Alternative orange and white paint starting at 30 feet above the ground. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission, December 29, 1999 • .6 • • +BU'IIr'I[°IE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE C®MMISSION + • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 • 2. Strobe lighting at the top of the tower and shielded from striking the ground for a mile. Towers with Guy Wires: 1. Starting at 30 feet above the ground:. a. Blinking lights along length of tower and guy wires at 20 foot intervals. b. Three feet in diameter orange safety markers attached at 20 foot intervals on tower and guy wires. I. Public and Quasi -Public: Prohibited Uses: Churches, nursing care facilities, hospitals, colleges and universities, elementary and secondary schools,' child care facilities and similar aggregations of persons. J. 50% Open Space. K. Density Bonus Prohibited. L. No bulk petroleum products (except airport related), flammable or explosives or chemical storage aboveground. M. Second dwelling units are prohibited. All zones in areas of influence. 1. Permitted Uses: A. All projects covered by a vested map or development agreement. , B. Any -uses covered by a valid building permit. C. All uses meeting the airport CLUP standards at time permits are issued. General Statements. AU 1. Projects tha do not meet the density or use crit is of the CLUP within the area of influence boundary for each airport shall be referred to ALUC. 2. Avigation Easements shall be signed by property owners for all uses located within the planning boundaries of each public or special use_airport. KAPLANNING\ALUC\MEETINGS\12.29.99.MTG\E1A.RPT • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission, December 29, 1999.• 7 IM) TA -wt. ,%Xxl E ('p 1t4. Z7 A J, 1. jr, R Ito 14 P I -C V 1t1 4.611' 1 INA I'l. 1. 11 i',N C 11', 20LA) o 20flu 4111)1) V NO IL: L"aft.1t), 7u I I us ot I Iu I I Im I by III (I AI.UI'._-_-__...._____._...__ r7— in trA m Rj 110%.. try r IT kv I. 7- 7c— =ji jA J X HI Alrpurt Environs Plan Safety Zones 3 af c ty Zon ez k ,� _ / 1 Runway Protoctlon Z 2 Inner Safoty Zoi io ,t ��°�..'l,�`� ��L; :i � _.+ l I 3 Inner Turning Zono 4 Outor Safety Zono Area of 111111,1011c;(,l BumdalY 5 Sidoline Salely Zum -: ., 'I._If/\(IL)I)t(,,d by ALUC 6 I'lallic,pallum Lulls rvi; i Y 2 1, '1997(('' 1. . .......... �� 1 • ATTACHMENT "B" INITIAL STUDY AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project: 1999 .Aimual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans COUNTY OF BUTTE' INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND: 1. Name of Proponent: Butte County Airport Land Use Commission 2. Address: 7 County Center Drive Phone: 530_-538-7601 Oroville, CA. 95065 3. Name of Proposal: 1999 Annual. Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans 4. Type of Project: Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment 5. Project Description. Adoption of development criteria and a density matrix which is correlated to maps of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans. The amendments specify new persons per acre, minimum lot size and other development regulations for the various safety zones that surround each of the public use airports in Butte County. This iamendment is proposed in accordance with Public Utility Code Sections 21674.7 and 21675 which allows an once a year update to the comprehensive land use plans for each of the County's public use airports. 6. Location: Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Airports and environs' 7. Setting: N/A 8. Assessor's Parcel Number: various 9. Date Checklist Submitted: November 23, 1999 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None I1. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: -fit I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. O I find that although the proposed. project COULD have a significant 'effect .on the environment, there will NOT be a: significant effect in this case because revisions have been ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division 0 • Project: 1999 Annual Review and Update ofthe Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL EVIPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. /l 2299 Prepared by: Dave Soody, Senior Planner Date Reviewed by: Paula Leasure, Principal Planner Date III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Hazards/Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population /Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 2 • Project: 1999 .mutual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville; Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone. A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well'as general standards, (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on a project -specific screening analysis.) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct,. and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 3 • C ] • Project: 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Otoville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Less Than _. Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 4 • Project: 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico. Oroville. Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Potentially Significant Impact IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect Less Than Significant . Less With Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? k c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would -adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Response: The proposed CL UP amendment proposes no physical expansion of the runways or other airport facilities. No construction would occur to impact scenic resource. This is a planning project consisting of a legislative act to update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans. The project includes programs and development criteria and a matrix which is correlated to maps of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans. Adoption of the proposed amendments specify the manner in which the land will be permitted to be used so that development can proceed in a responsible manner. Legislative acts proposing programs that specify project development criteria do not result in a physical change in the environment until that time when a project is actually proposed to be carried out pursuant to the proposed criteria of the regulatory program. At that time a specific project shall be fully subject to ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑. 5 r i Project: 1999 .4jutual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Less Than Significant Potentially With Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact CEOA and mitigation can be incorporated into the project Therefore, no environmental impacts will occur. Mitigation: None required. 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site. Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department. of Conservation as an optional model to Use in . assessing. impacts on agriculture and farmland . Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? K b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? X Response: Since no new airport expansion is proposed, this project will not result -in loss of soils viable agricultural production. The proposed amendment is a regulatory program that contains development criteria and limitations of density and parcel size. A significant environmental impact with not occur. (Please refer to Item I above for further discussion and analysis • regarding this conclusion.) ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division o Project: 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero.Comprehensive Land Use Plans Potentially Significant Impact Mitigation: None required. 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be,relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or, contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a, substantial number of people? _ Response: Less Than" Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No, Impact x X The proposal CL UP amendment will not create objectionable odors, smoke or fumes. The project is a regulatory program to permit responsible growth surrounding the County's Public Use airports. A significant environmental impact with not occur. (Please refer to Item I abo>,e for firrther disczr.ssion and analysis,regarding this conclusion.) • 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ Project: 1999.Annual Review and Update of the Chico. Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project.. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or _ special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the _ California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X Z b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? )t c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetland -s as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act , (including, but -not limited to, -marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d) Interfere substantially with the , movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X . e) Conflict with any local policies or , ordinances protecting biological resources c Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 8 , lu *11 [7 0 Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat No Impact x conservation plan? x Response. The proposed CL UP amendment will not impact rare, endangered or candidate species. The project is a regulatory program and will not result in additional growth surrounding the County's Public Use airports. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion) Mitigation: None required. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? x 'b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? — x c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? x d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? x Response: The proposal CLUP amendment will not impact unique prehistoric or other cultural resources. No construction or earth moving is proposed as part of this planning project. The project is a regulatory program to permit responsible growth surrounding the ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 9 Project: 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact such as a tree preservatiori policy ordinance. 0 Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat No Impact x conservation plan? x Response. The proposed CL UP amendment will not impact rare, endangered or candidate species. The project is a regulatory program and will not result in additional growth surrounding the County's Public Use airports. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion) Mitigation: None required. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? x 'b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? — x c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? x d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? x Response: The proposal CLUP amendment will not impact unique prehistoric or other cultural resources. No construction or earth moving is proposed as part of this planning project. The project is a regulatory program to permit responsible growth surrounding the ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 9 Project: 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and"Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans _ Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant', Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact County's Public Use airports. A significant environmental impact with not occur. (Please refer to Item I above for further discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion.) Mitigation: None required. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: _ X 1) Rupture of a known earth- quake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other sub- stantial evidence of a know fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X 2) Strong seismic ground Shaking? X 3) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? X 4) Landslides? X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X • c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become o Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 10 s • Project: 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating sub- stantial risks to life or property? _ e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste -water? No Impact X Response: All of Butte County is in a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The project site is not located near any known earthquake faults (Butte County Constraints Map). The Seismic Safety Element indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The closest mapped Fault -Rupture Zone is the Cleveland Hills Fault line. The proposed project will result in lower density development around the subject airports and will foster responsible growth compatible with airport operations. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion.) Mitigation: None required. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport use, or disposal ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 11 Less Than Significant Less Potentially, VVith Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating sub- stantial risks to life or property? _ e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal system where sewers are not available for the disposal or waste -water? No Impact X Response: All of Butte County is in a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The project site is not located near any known earthquake faults (Butte County Constraints Map). The Seismic Safety Element indicates that all of Butte County is in Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The closest mapped Fault -Rupture Zone is the Cleveland Hills Fault line. The proposed project will result in lower density development around the subject airports and will foster responsible growth compatible with airport operations. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion.) Mitigation: None required. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport use, or disposal ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 11 1 0 0 • _of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division o 12 i No Impact X x X x X Project: 1999.Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Less Than Significant' Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact _of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed schools? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division o 12 i No Impact X x X x X • • No Impact. X X Response: The proposal will not involve the use of hazardous materials. The project will not create any health hazard and is not anticipated to expose people to health hazards. 1 he project will not affect emergency services planning. The proposed project is a regulatory program to permit responsible growth surrounding the County's Public Use airports. A significant environmental impact with not occur. (Please refer to Item 1 above ;for fitrther discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion.) Mitigation: None required. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: -- a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 13 x Project: 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? • • No Impact. X X Response: The proposal will not involve the use of hazardous materials. The project will not create any health hazard and is not anticipated to expose people to health hazards. 1 he project will not affect emergency services planning. The proposed project is a regulatory program to permit responsible growth surrounding the County's Public Use airports. A significant environmental impact with not occur. (Please refer to Item 1 above ;for fitrther discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion.) Mitigation: None required. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: -- a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 13 x • • • through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? - J) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 14 X X X X X x Project: 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Less Than _. Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? - J) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 14 X X X X X x • is • 0 i0. Project: 1999 Aimual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact mudflow? x . Response: The proposal CLUP-amendment will not impact hydrological features or place .sh•uctztre or people within a flood zone. No construction or earth moving is proposed as part of this planning project. The project is a regulatory program to permit responsible growth surrounding the County's Public Use airports. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion.) Mitigation: None. required. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project? a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding -or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? _ x x Response: According to the Public Utility Code (PUC), the AL UC is permitted to revise the C.:MAEP once a year. Following the revision, the Board of Supervisors and other City .jurisdictions have 180 -days to evaluate the amendment and then take action to bring their General Plans into compliance with the revised CLUPs or make overriding findings. The proposed CL UP revisions may require consistency analysis for Chico, Oroville Ranchaero and Paradise CLUPs. Section 65302.3 states the following: o Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 15 • Project: 1999 AMIUal Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (A) The general plan, and any applicable specific plan prepared pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with Section 65450), shall be consistent with the plan adopted or amended pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 21675. (B) The general plan, and any applicable specific plan, shall be amended, as necessary, within 180 days of any amendment to the plan required under Public Utilities Code Section 21675. (C:) If the legislative body does not concur with any provision of the plan required under .Public Utilities Code Section 21675, it may satisfy the provisions of this section by . adopting findings pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 21676. Individual analysis pursuant to CEOA will be required by the affected jurisdictions. Full C:EOA analysis is not required at this time because the project under consideration is only a regulatory program. No construction of changes to the Butte County General Plan are included within this project. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis . regarding this conclusion.) Mitigation: None required. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents or the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Response: The proposal will not affect any natural resources nor will it substantially deplete any natural resources. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion.) Mitigation: None required. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 16 Project: 1999 .iwual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ,11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels: 1t c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without • the project? X d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? _ X e) Fora project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? K 4 Response: ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 17 Project: 1999.Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The proposal will not increase noise levels and will provide greater protection to individuals living within the airport environs. No significant noise impacts are anticipated. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion.) Mitigation: None required. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? X b) Displace substantial numbers of • existing housing, necessitating the ' construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 1t c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? K Response: This project will not result in the loss of any existing dwellings and provides ample space for residential development. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion.) Mitigation: None required. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. a) Would the project result in substantial, adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause ❑ Butte County Department of. Development Services ❑ Planning Division o 18 '• '• Project: 1999 Amival Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services? X b) Fire protection? �t c) Police Protection? 1t d) Schools? 1t e) Parks? )t e) Other public services? X Response: • 7'heP Pro osal will not cause an incremental increase in demand for public services. The proposal will serve the existing population by preserving the utility of the airports and will not result in the addition of infrastructure or population needing additional public services. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion.) Mitigation: None required 14. RECREATION. a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration' of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 19 Project: 1999 AlUlUal Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans ..Less Than ' Significant Less Potentially With ' Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact 'Impact Response: The proposal will not result in an incremental increase in the demand for park and recreation facilities in Butte County., There will be no degradation of surrounding parks or recreational facilities. No significant noise impacts are anticipated. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion) Nlitigation: None required. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at • intersections)? X b) Exceed, either individually or cumula- tively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? _ X c) Result in a change in air traffic patters, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e) Result in inadequate emergency access? X ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 20 i Project: 1999 Amtual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X g) Conflict with accepted policies, plans or, programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? X • Response: The proposal will not result in an incremental increase in the demand for new transportation facilities in Butte County. No significant noise impacts are anticipated.. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis regarding, this conclusion.) Mitigation: None required. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. • World the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 1t d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from • existing entitlements and resources, or_ ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 21 • r Ul Project: 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact' Incorporated Impact Impact are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g) Comply with federal, state, and local, statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Response:. The project will not have an impact to any wastewater or sewage treatment .facilities. Theproject is not anticipated to cause a significant increase in the amount of waste being deposited in the Neal Road Landfill. (Please refer to Item 1 above for further discussion and analysis regarding this conclusion.) Mitigation: None required. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife ` species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or r restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 22 LJ • Project: 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x Response: The proposed CT,,UP amendment proposes no physical expansion of the runways or other airport facilities. No construction would occur to impact scenic resource. This is a planning project consisting of a legislative act to update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans. The project includes programs and development criteria and a matrix which is correlated to maps of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans. Adoption of the proposed amendments specify the manner in which the land will be permitted to be used so that development can proceed in a responsible manner. Legislative acts proposing programs that .specifiy project development criteria do not result in a physical change in the environment r.ultil that time when a project is actually proposed to be carried out pursuant to the proposed criteria of the regulatory program. At that time a specific project shall be fully subject to CEOA and mitigation can be incorporated into the project Therefore, no environmental impacts, will occur. Mitigation: None required. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 23 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively consider- able" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? _ X c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x Response: The proposed CT,,UP amendment proposes no physical expansion of the runways or other airport facilities. No construction would occur to impact scenic resource. This is a planning project consisting of a legislative act to update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans. The project includes programs and development criteria and a matrix which is correlated to maps of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans. Adoption of the proposed amendments specify the manner in which the land will be permitted to be used so that development can proceed in a responsible manner. Legislative acts proposing programs that .specifiy project development criteria do not result in a physical change in the environment r.ultil that time when a project is actually proposed to be carried out pursuant to the proposed criteria of the regulatory program. At that time a specific project shall be fully subject to CEOA and mitigation can be incorporated into the project Therefore, no environmental impacts, will occur. Mitigation: None required. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 23 • (• Project: 1999 .-lrmual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans A. Oww �J El DATA SHEET Project Description 1. Type of Project: Annual Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan Update and Amendment. 2. Proposed Density of Development: N/A I Amount of Impervious Surfacing: N/A 4. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): N/A 5. Method of Sewage Disposal: N/A 6. Source of Water Supply: N/A 7. Proximity of Power Lines: N/A: 8. Potential for further land divisions and development: None. Environmental Setting 1. Terrain a General Topographic Character: Level. b. Slopes: Average of 0-21/o. C. Elevation: 200 ft. above sea level: d. Limiting Factors: None. 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics: Mostly adequate drainage. b. Limiting Factors: None. J. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. b. Erosion Potential: Low. C. Landslide Potential: None.- d. one:d. Fire Hazard: Unclassified - Urban area. e. Expansive Soil Potential: Low. 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: None. b. Ground Water: Unknown. C. Drainage Characteristics: Varied d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 24 to 26 inches per year. e. Limiting Factors: None_ 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. N/A 7. Air Quality: Good, except when stagnant air conditions persist in the valley. ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 24 ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 25 y s Project: 1999 Ammal Review and Update ofthe Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans 8. Vegetation: N/A 9. Wildlife Habitat: N/A. 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: N/A 11. Butte County General Plan designation: N/A 12. Existing Zoning: N/A 13. Existing Land Use on-site: N/A 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: N/A b. Zoning: N/A C. Gen. Plan Designation: N/A d. Parcel Sizes: N/A 15, Character of.Site and Area.- Sub -urban residential and open space. 16. Nearest Urban Area: City of Chico, Town of Paradise and City of Oroville. 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: City of Chico, Town of Paradise and City of Oroville. City of Oroville 18. Improvement Standards Urban Area: City of Chico, Town of Paradise and City of Oroville. 19. Fire Protection Service: Near Airports. a. Water Availability: Fire hydrants. 20. Schools. N/A ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ 25 • Project: 1999 .imual Review and Update ofthe Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 2. Butte County Planning Department. Liquefaction Potential Map 11-2 Seismic Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 3. Butte County Planning Department. Subsidence and Landslide Potential Ma 1p 11-1, Safety Element. Oroville, CA CH2M Hill, 1977. 4. Butte County Planning Department. Erosion Potential Ma 1p 11-2, Safety Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 5. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Map 111-3. Safety Element Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 6. Butte County Planning Department. Noise Element Map IV -1, Scenic Highway Element. Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Highways Map V-1. Scenic Highway Element Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 8. Butte County Planning Department. Natural Fire Hazard Classes Map 111-4, Safety Element Oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. • 9. Butte County Planning Department. Archaeological Sensitivity Map. Oroville, CA: James P. Manning, 1983. , 10. Butte County Planning Department. School District Man. Oroville, CA. 11. Northwestern District Department of Water Resources. Chico Nitrate Study Map. Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells. The Resources Agency, State of California, 1983. '12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, CA: Butte County Planning Department, 1987. 13. National Flood Insurance Program. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1989. 14. USGS Quad Maps: 15. Soil Map, Chico ,19251/Oroville (1926)Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1925)/Oroville(1926).Area. United States Department of Agriculture. 17. Butte County Planning Department. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map. Butte County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry, 1989. 18. City of Oroville Planning Department. 1995 City of Oroville General Plan, Oroville Ca. 19. Transportation Planning Institute, 1997 Trip Generation Manual 20. State of California, Caltrans, 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. U] K: AL.1'C \9 EE"rINGS\12-29-99.1.VITGCLUP.IS ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ W n ATTACHMENT "C" PROPOSED CLUP MAPS WITH DENSITY PARAMETERS AND LAND'USE RESTRICTION Proposed 1999 Amendment to the x Butte County Airport Land Use Commission Comprehensive Land Use Plan Within all zones in the airport area* of influence. 1. Permitted uses: a. All projects covered by a vested map or development agreement. b. Any use covered by a valid building permit. C. All uses meeting the airport comprehensive land use plan standards at the time permits are issued. 2. Projects that do not meet the density or use criteria of the comprehensive land use plan within the area of influence shall be referred to the ALUC. 3. Avigation Easements shall be signed by property owners for all uses located within the planning boundaries of each public use airport. *This includes the Chico Municipal Airport, Oroville Airport, Paradise Skypark, and the • Ranchaero Airport. • • • • • • • Density Criteria Maximum Acceptable Density Area No. Safety Zone People Per Acre Dwelling Units per Parcel Minimum Parcel Size 1 Runway Protection Zone 10 G. H J, M 0 N/A 2 Inner Safety Zone 10 A, D, H, I, J, M 0 E, K, N 10 3 Inner Turning Zone 10 A, D, F, H, I, J, M 1 E, K, N 10 4 Outer Safety Zone 25 C, D, F, H, I, M 1 E, K, N 5 5 Sideline Safety Zone 25 C, D, F, H, I, M 0 N/A 6 Traffic Pattern Zone 100 C, D, F, H, I, M 1 E, K, L, N 2.5 7 Area of Influence No Limit B, C, D, H, I 4 E, K, L, N 1 A 20% coverage per'acre for buildings and structures B Uses compatible only if they do not result in a large concentration on people. A large`concentration of people is defined as a gathering of individuals in an area that would result in an average density of greater than 25 persons per acre per hour during any 24 hour period ending at midnight, not to exceed 50 persons per acre at any time. C Caretaker residences are a compatible use within all CNEL ranges, provided that they are ancillary to the primary use of a property, intended for the purpose of property protection or maintenance, land subject to the condition that all residential units be designed to limit intruding noise such that interior noise levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, with windows closed, in any habitable room. D Measures to achieve an interior noise level of 45 CNEL must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of buildings where the public is received, office areas, and other areas where people work or congregate. E Residential development shall not occur in a noise level greater than 55 CNEL. Use compatible only if it does not result in a concentration of persons greater than 25 persons per acre at any time or the storage of flammable or explosive material above ground. G No building, structures, above -ground transmission lines, or storage of flammable or explosive material above ground, and no uses resulting in a gathering of more than 10 persons per acre at any time. H Communication Towers (Excluding airport related facilities): Prohibited in all safety zones except Zone 7. Free Standing Towers: Alternative orange and white paint starting at 30 feet above the ground. Strobe lighting at the time on the tower and shielded from striking the ground for a mile. Towers with Guy Wires Starting at 30 feet above the ground: Blinking lights along length of tower and guywires at 20 foot intervals. Three foot in diameter orange safety markers attached at 20 foot intervals on tower and guy wires. I.. Public and Quasi Public Prohibited Uses: Churches, nursing care facilities, hospitals, colleges and • universities, elementary & secondary schools, child care facilities, and similar aggregations of persons. J 50% open space K Density bonus prohibited. L Aunt Minnie units permitted with ALUC review for safety and noise protection. M No bulk petroleum products, flammable or explosives or chemical storage above ground except airport related facilities. N Second dwelling units are prohibited. K: IALUCICLUP119991PROPOSED. WPD f•. .if vij. Ll �a�®rte _I __ , . .O;1. f�A :� 1., U �� 11T1)� IIIlff 1 IJ 0 — 1 cn 0, Cl y p a T: o di) 7 IJ c C3 j t� o t. C'> It; f �1 L 0 U t, (p I m to {�1 f•. .if vij. Ll �a�®rte _I __ , . .O;1. f�A r <' U lU!a epi U, Ut I. t., 1.) -• w v :� 1., U 0 — 1 cn 0, Cl y p a T: o di) 7 IJ c C3 j t� o t. C'> It; C) �1 L 0 U t, (p I m to {�1 r <' U lU!a epi U, Ut I. t., 1.) -• w v :� -1 — 1 cn 0, y a � t, (p I m to {�1 0 M. I , LA V( P 11 (T "K I t I ", /\ I )I1' I IN I I , I J I N (A SIZI(Cl I Y Z Of IUS ;It I 011tUd b)I I 10 ', > r5 As 1, p Mc PAItNT1 ..v _j I Al"of TIA"Coo rloqwxtpfy 14.10 {11DW r J7 - ha".13 - 'Lai �101*1111 IN Lit" i; All All 1--j-1 I I - I 7v ZLN'Q Itmw Zb,,o rport Environs Plan Safety Zones 3.1faty 7 -one -I iu•rnway Protoctlun Zur- Inner Safety Zoiio 3 hiner'ruming Zino 17, -1 OuLor Safoty Zono 5 sideline 'Salely zulw /\j co of It IIILICI )GL! 1.j(,)LJ1 R1,31 Y /\dLjpjuLI I)y /11.LJG Tmllic'Pall'ulll "L'ull(L" ,��. .♦ �♦ //1%��,��;�� .� �,;:1,,�� ,/ �,� /,�� %T` � ;:�i is .,,..-.�: •:: �..�- ;..: ;:.- '•�; • .\� �.-�°.. �-,:: _..iii. L_,.. i�L� „?R++ �►`' =.';' ::�. - �: t�'l� � !� 1 (Dl��C1��•►�'.\�• ��•�y�,..' .�.• Oliak .�'� 'ate• '''t.'�.` r l 7-4ANN �I �' 'fir- � � � •\� .. \ v�� ":�'• � � ,�„'�t�tii�iigjq�� ;�::�; `;, �Irrrllri�\�.:•. �1•;' : ,.v>: = �' ��' 46' CHIS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE • COUNTY OF BUTTE � 0, 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD a o o ,� ' OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3380 � °o __-a Telephone: (530)-538-7631 Fax: (530)-538-7120 R. J. BEELER cOUR t4 JANE DOLAN MARY ANNE ROUX JOHN S. BLACKLOCK CURT JOSIASSEN CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FRED C. DAVIS December 21, 1999 DEC Robert Hennigan, Chairman 'LAlUTV N Co t j v Ty Butte County Airport Land Use Commission G DI��SI011T 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Hennigan: On Tuesday, December 14 the Board of Supervisors directed that I plan and coordinate a time for a joint meeting of the Board of Supervisors and the Airport Land Use Commission • (ALUC) to discuss issues of mutual concern. The Board wishes to discuss how to achieve mutually supported protection of the County's airports. Preliminary issues identified by the Board for discussion include the following: • timeline and expectations regarding the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUPS) updates • clarification of the status and plans of the annual update process • staffing issues • the Commission has previously communicated its desire to clarify and resolve issues relating to signage in the vicinity of the Chico Municipal Airport . • the Board also wishes to include discussion of issues related to a pending Use Permit Appeal relating to a proposed mobile home park near the Oroville Airport The Board has requested that I plan a mutually convenient time, not on a currently scheduled Board meeting day, for the Board and the Commission to meet. I suggest a date in February. Perhaps.Tuesday, February 15, which is one of the Tuesdays not currently scheduled for a Board meeting date would work. Is a 9:00 a.m. starting convenient for ALUC members? • Please let me know your thoughts on this suggested date and time. Also, please advise me of. issues not identified above which ALUC would like included in the discussion. r Thank you in advance for your cooperation and interest in coordinating a joint meeting of -ALUC and the Board of Supervisors. Sincerely, cc: Board of Supervisors Director of Development Services 0 VE 'DEC 2 9119 G ATTACHMENT 64W AGENCY RESPONSE LETTERS Post -Ir t To Co. Dept. I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING 41 1 Main Street CITYoFCHICO P.O. Box 3420 !NC. !87Z Chico. CA 95927 (530) 895-4851 FAX (530) 895-4726 ATSS 459-4851 December 3, 1999 Butte County Airport Land Use Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 Re:' Proposed 1999 Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) Review and Update Dear Commissioners: Thank you for the opportunity you have provided to review the proposed 1999 update to the CLUP. I do have some general concerns about the update I'd like to share with you. In addition, we will also be providing further comments under separate cover on the initial study prepared by your staff. • The City of Chico views the Chico Municipal Airport as one of the City's paramount assets, and the long-term viability. and development of the airport as one of the very most important issues the City will face in the future. In this we obviously share the broader goals of the ALUC, and see the ALUC as an indispensable partner in working together to achieve those goals. To that end, we have very much been looking forward to fully participating in the process of updating the CLUP that has been underway for some time now, which we anticipate will culminate at some point around the middle of next year in an extensive public review of' a carefully researched, thoroughly prepared draft plan that would ultimately provide decisionmakers oft .e County, the affected Cities, and the ALUC with a solid informational and policy foundation upon which future land use decisions can be made that will not adversely affect our airports. I can appreciate the concerns that have.prompted your proposal of a stopgap 1999 update to the CLUP, but must express significant reservations about both the update and the rapidity of its adoption process. With the information that we have been provided for review, it is difficult to ascertain just what is proposed. The maps, which include expanded airport protection zones, are barely legible, and there are no accompanying explanations of the reasons for the proposed changes or analyses of their implications to, planning and land use issues in Chico. For these reasons, a detailed review of the proposed update, • as well as substantive comments from us that we hope would assist you in your deliberations on the matter, cannot be prepared, particularly in the brief time provided. Made Froin Recycled Paper Letter to Airport Land Use Commission December 3, 1999 Page 2 Our cursory review, nonetheless, has identified several major concerns, such as the absence of any reference to the status of nonconforming uses (which would apparently include much or most of the existing development north of East Avenue and west of Highway 32), and potential takings issues associated with the greatly reduced development options proposed in several of the safety zones. Either of these concerns could have the effect of forcing the City into overrides it would much prefer to avoid, and which I cannot imagine to be consistent with the ALUC's intentions. Not only is there insufficient time for a detailed review and response to you, but-] believe that the brevity of the process, which as I understand it would need to be completed before the end of the year, will ensure an inadequate opportunity for the public input that is so critical in the formulation of important policy issues. This is exacerbated by the fact that your consideration and possible adoption of the, proposed update will fall on December 29, hardly an ideal date for public participation because of the holidays. For these reasons, which I find compelling, and for additional reasons related to the environmental review conducted for this proposal that will be explained in another letter from our staff, I respectfully request that you not adopt the proposed 1999 update. I understand that you are making significant progress in the preparation of the planned 2000 CLUP update. We all stand to gain much more in careful preparation, clear analysis, a detailed discussion of issues, enhanced interagency cooperation, informed decisionmaking, and, perhaps most importantly, broad public participation and confidence in the process, than can be lost in taking a few months more to finish the extensive work of updating the CLUP already begun. The City would obviously much prefer not to have to override ALUC determinations, just as I expect the ALUC would greatly prefer not to be overridden. As I see it, we both have an incentive to work closely together to resolve as many of these land use compatibility issues through the CLUP adoption process as possible, and I'm confident that with sufficient time and good will, we can make real progress in doing so. Thank you in advance for considering this request. cc: City Council • Planning Commission CM, CA, CDD, Airport Manager Vim-SeiResptfully, dler Planning Director • 0 c: I� BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICY OF OROVILLE AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION N O Y 2 3 1999 TO: Public Agencies and Interested Parties ' PLANNING DEPT.. FROM: The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission RE: Request for Comments on the proposed 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUP). DATE: November 23, 1999 CONTACT PERSON: Dave Doody On November 17, 1999, the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission initiated the 1999 Annual' Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans. The attached Public Hearing notice describes the, project. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify .particular environmental concerns to be addressed or required mitigation measures your office may want incorporated. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank.you in advance for your time and efforts. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 15,1999.- If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the as- sumption will.be made that your agency has no comment. COMNMNTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): I �F�eM��dN IS 19dC34R1,E E - Is U1.1 e -L&- F-- ASD ILL&A(U-6- By: Date:Ih 6!� 7 Countv Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785 .��g Dave Doody, Senior Planner Dept. Of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Subject: Notice and Initial Study for the 1999 Annual Review and Update. of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise, and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUP) dated November 23, 1999 Dear Dave, We are in receipt of the above -referenced document; thank you for the opportunity to comment. We understand that the time fame available for completion of the Initial Study was quite limited. • .However, the proposed Initial 'Study/Negative Declaration fails to disclose basic land use ramifications of the CLUP revisions and potential environmental effects associated therewith such as traffic, roadway noise, land use compatibility, and availability of public services and utilities. We ask that action on the proposed CLUP revisions be delayed until adequate environmental review can be completed and the Initial Study recirculated for comment. By preparing the Initial Study, The Airport Land Use Commission `(ALUC) has conceded that adoption of the CLUP amendments is a project subject to environmental review. Unfortunately, the analysis is so superficial as to be of little use to ALUC itself, as the lead agency, or to affected cities such as the City of Chico, which serve as responsible agencies, in determining the potential environmentaleffects of implementing the CLUP amendments. We disagree with the fundamental premise of the Initial Study that plans such as the CLUP do not have environmental effects until specific projects are proposed. The initial study states: "Legislative acts proposing programs that specify project development criteria do not result in a physical change in the environment until that time when a project is actually proposed to be carried out pursuant to the proposed criteria of the regulatory program. At that time a specific project shall be fully subject to CEQA and mitigation can be incorporated into the project. Therefore no environmental impacts will occur." "Projects" requiring environmental review under CEQA are not limited to those causing direct physical effects on the environment, but also include those causing "a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change" (PRC 21065). The establishment of allowable uses,, densities, and development criteria for future development near the airport through the CLUP revisions is the • type of indirect physical change referenced by this code section as requiring environmental review. Additionally, implementation of the CLUP revisions would require amendment of the City General (?� Made From Recycled Paper • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING 411 Main Street CITYorCHICO P.O. Box 3420 INC iaiz Chico, CA 95927 (530) 895-4851 FAX (530) 895-4726 December 8, 1999 ATSS 459-4851 Dave Doody, Senior Planner Dept. Of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Subject: Notice and Initial Study for the 1999 Annual Review and Update. of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise, and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUP) dated November 23, 1999 Dear Dave, We are in receipt of the above -referenced document; thank you for the opportunity to comment. We understand that the time fame available for completion of the Initial Study was quite limited. • .However, the proposed Initial 'Study/Negative Declaration fails to disclose basic land use ramifications of the CLUP revisions and potential environmental effects associated therewith such as traffic, roadway noise, land use compatibility, and availability of public services and utilities. We ask that action on the proposed CLUP revisions be delayed until adequate environmental review can be completed and the Initial Study recirculated for comment. By preparing the Initial Study, The Airport Land Use Commission `(ALUC) has conceded that adoption of the CLUP amendments is a project subject to environmental review. Unfortunately, the analysis is so superficial as to be of little use to ALUC itself, as the lead agency, or to affected cities such as the City of Chico, which serve as responsible agencies, in determining the potential environmentaleffects of implementing the CLUP amendments. We disagree with the fundamental premise of the Initial Study that plans such as the CLUP do not have environmental effects until specific projects are proposed. The initial study states: "Legislative acts proposing programs that specify project development criteria do not result in a physical change in the environment until that time when a project is actually proposed to be carried out pursuant to the proposed criteria of the regulatory program. At that time a specific project shall be fully subject to CEQA and mitigation can be incorporated into the project. Therefore no environmental impacts will occur." "Projects" requiring environmental review under CEQA are not limited to those causing direct physical effects on the environment, but also include those causing "a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change" (PRC 21065). The establishment of allowable uses,, densities, and development criteria for future development near the airport through the CLUP revisions is the • type of indirect physical change referenced by this code section as requiring environmental review. Additionally, implementation of the CLUP revisions would require amendment of the City General (?� Made From Recycled Paper • Dave Doody, Senior Planner December 8, 1999 Page 2 Plan and zoning diagram which is explicitly subject to environmental review. The CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(a)(1) and (c) further refine the definition of a project as follows: An activity directly undertaken by any public agency including but not limited to public works construction and related activities clearing or grading of land, improvements to existing public structures, enactment and amendment of zoning ordinances, and the adoption and amendment of local General Plans or elements thereof pursuant to Government Code Section 65100-65700. The term "project' refers to the activity which is being approved and which may be subject to several discretionary approvals by governmental agencies. The term "project" does not mean each separate governmental approval. The CLUP revisions will establish land use and development criteria which will not be subject to change during the review of individual projects implementing the CLUP. The Initial Study should provide decision -makers with the overall environmental consequences of implementing the CLUP • revisions prior to adoption, consistent with Public Resources Code Section 21003.1 (b), which states: Information relevant to the significant effects of a project, alternatives, and mitigation measures which substantially reduce the effects shall be made available as soon as possible by lead agencies, other public agencies, and interested persons and organizations (Emphasis added). The CEQA Guidelines prohibit segmenting the project description and approval process such that the effects of the overall project remain unaddressed. "The lead agency must consider the whole of an action, not simply its constituent parts, when determining whether it will have a significant effect." (CEQA Guidelines at Section 15003(h), citing Citizens Assoc. For Sensible Development of Bishop Area V. County of Inyo, 172 Cal App. 3d 151, 1985.) Of particular concern are environmental consequences of land use limitations proposed for the Inner Safety Zone, Inner Turning Zone, and Outer Safety Zone within existing residential neighborhoods. The proposed CLUP revisions would effectively preclude residential development on numerous vacant lots within these areas by requiring larger lot sizes than available. Additionally, public and quasi -public uses such as nursing care facilities, hospitals, colleges and universities; elementary and secondary schools, child care facilities, and similar aggregations of persons (non-residential uses which are compatible with residential neighborhoods) are prohibited. Because the City cannot leave property owners without economic use of their property, the CLUP amendments are effectively promoting commercial, manufacturing, and industrial uses, within • these residential neighborhoods. These non-residential uses would likely introduce incompatible noise and traffic and may be inadequately served by public services and utilities. The Initial Study �• Dave Doody, Senior Planner December 8, 1999 Page 3 • 0 should analyze the effects of these land use incompatibilities and propose mitigation such as allowing residential development on legal parcels, regardless of size. Effects and potential mitigation should be considered by ALUC staff prior to action on the proposed CLUP amendments. Additionally, it would be appropriate for the Initial Study to describe how the proposed CLUP amendments are consistent with the Cal Trans Handbook relative to airport safety, noise, and hazards. CEQA is intended not only to protect the environment, but also to demonstrate to the public that the environment is being protected (CEQA Guidelines at Section 15003(b), citing County of Inyo v. Yorty, 32 Cal. App. 3d 795). Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study. If you have any questions regarding these comments,- please feel free to contact me at 530-895-4852. Sincerely, Stacey Jolliffe Senior Planner Jls xc: Tony Baptiste, City of Chico Community Development Director Kim Seidler, City of Chico -Planning Director Bob Grierson, City of Chico Airport Manager Paula Leasure, Butte County Principal Planner pii [-I LJ 11 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION TO: Public Agencies and Interested Parties FROM: The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission RE: Request for Comments on the proposed 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUP). DATE: November 23, 1999 CONTACT PERSON: Dave Doody On November 17, 1999, the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission initiated the 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans. The attached Public Hearing notice describes the project. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1 Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or required mitigation measures your office may want incorporated. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 15, 1999. If fro comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. CONII\LENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: dLr biz ti>ti / �JGt ��, �rilr.�l G Dater h: ALLY.' MEETINGS I ..9-99Nr1 OTR. \S 7 Countv Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 +; ,V - FAX 916-538-7785 CC Tbu c loco C n U December 14, 1999 Butte County Airport Land Use Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville,'CA 95965 Dear Commissioners: DISCOVER GOLD ... DISCOVER OROVILLE 1735 MONTGOMERY STREET • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-4897 PLANNING DEPARTMENT (530) 538-2430 We, the Planning Commission of the City of Oroville, have reviewed your request for comments on the proposed 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Oroville Airport Municipal Comprehensive Land Use Plan. We agree with City staff and City Counsel that the information sent for our review is inadequate in its scope and content for the following reasons ► The proposed Airport Environs Plan Safety Zones map is illegible and incomplete. ► The proposed Airport Environs Plan Safety Zones map does not accurately reflect the Oroville Airport runways and runway thresholds. ► The Area of Influence Boundary Adopted by the ALUC in 1997 was not legally adopted as the planning boundaries for the airport as required by Public Utilities Code Section 21675(c) which states "the planning boundaries shall be established by the commission [ALUC] after hearing and consultation with involved agencies". The ALUC only consulted with the airport manager at the time, and not with the elected officials of the City. ► The information submitted is not supported by any written justification or background information. We understand the ALUC's desire to see that airport environs and the public is protected; however,. we also have a duty to provide the City Council with an adequate recommendation on any proposed CLUP amendment that will effect the airport and surrounding -areas. At this time we believe that the information You have provided is insufficient and does not meet due process requirements. We respectfully request that the ALUC refrain from adopting any amendments, revisions, or update to the CLUP at this time. It is our suggestion that the ALUC wait for a draft CLUP that is being prepared by Shutt -Moen and that you provide adequate time for review and comment by the City. Sincerely, Thil Wilc Chair, City of Oroville Planning Commission MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: Butte County Airport Land Use Commission From: Randy Wilson, Principal `Planne f' O Subject: Proposed 1999 Review .and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise, and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans Date: December 22, 1999 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions of the Chico, Paradise, and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans and the proposed Negative Declaration for these revisions. The Department of Development Services, Planning Division has the following comments with regard to this effort: 1) What is the basis for determining the boundaries of the various Safety Zones proposed? The information provided contains no information or specific criteria as to the factors used in identifying and mapping these zones. Please verify the criteria and have the boundaries drawn by a professional engineer to precisely determine their relationship to the underlying legal parcels, most of which are in private ownership. 2) The exhibits showing the proposed Safety Zones for the individual airports lack the detail necessary to properly evaluate the effects of the proposed Density Criteria on. lands within the zones. Adoption of revisions based upon and including these exhibits leaves open to future interpretation the exact location of properties in relationship to the boundaries and whether or not the Density Criteria apply. Further, these. exhibits are not useful for_ the effected governmental jurisdictions to embark on efforts to bring their General Plans into consistency with the CLUPs. 3) An analysis is necessary on the part of the Airport Land Use Commission regarding the impacts and inconsistencies between the proposed revisions to the various CLUPs and the General Plan and Zoning for the lands affected. Without such an analysis the effects of the proposed revisions can not be analyzed properly by the Airport Land Use Commission, effected governmental jurisdictions including the County of Butte, the City of Chico, the City of Oroville, and the City of Paradise, and the public. In an opinion , dated May 13, 1999 • from the law office of Shine, Comption and Nelder, James A. Curtis opined that, "Unless ALUC specifically identifies existing provisions of the general plan to the CLUP, the County could be left to guess as to whether ALUC has determined the existing general plan to be inconsistent with the new amendments. In such a case, it would seen inappropriate to view the County as having an obligation to take action unless specific inconsistencies between the two plans are identified by ALUC with direction given to -the County to make appropriate amendments to the general plan." Your current contract with Shutt -Moen Associates includes this task in their work program. _4) The proposed Density Criteria establishes a maximum 55 CNEL noise standard for residential land uses. The information provided does not contain a map of the 55 CNEL noise contours. Without such a map the lands covered by the 55 CNEL noise standard can not be identified. The proposed revisions will impact private lands effected by this. criteria. Adoption of the proposed revisions without identifying those lands effected by this criteria should not be done until a full assessment of the impact is disclosed. The public has a right to know the meaning and effects of the proposed revisions on their property. It is also important for the various land use agencies in their evaluation of the possible land use implications. 5) Some of the Density Criteria will preclude residential development on properties presently planned and zoned for residential development. The lack of information on the 55 CNEL areas and the limitations on the details of the exhibits precludes a proper analysis of the exact areas covered by this particular Density Criteria. If residential development is precluded on properties which presently allow such development and there is no other use allowed on the properties because of the Density Criteria this could result in regulatory takings. Also, if there is a possible other use which is not residential (i.e. industrial) then there may be significant effects as a result of implementation of the Density Criteria which have not been addressed in the proposed Negative Declaration. Such impacts could be traffic, noise, dust, air quality, and other land use incompatibilities.- With ncompatibilities. With regard to the proposed Negative Declaration, which analyses the effects of the proposed revisions, the following comments are submitted: 1) Throughout the environmental checklist, it is stated that these changes to the CLUP are a regulatory program "...to permit responsible growth surrounding the County's Public Use Airports" and that a significant impact will not"occur. This conclusion is not and can not be substantiated from the information contained in the project description and initial study. As a lead land use agency, the County of Butte will either have to ,condemn lands due to no financially viable use allowed or create land uses (i.e. industrial) that are compatible with airports, but are incompatible with the predominate land uses (residential) surrounding the airports. We believe that this outcome has been completely overlooked in the initial study. 2) . In Section 1, and referenced to in Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and repeated in Section 16. "This is a planning project consisting of a legislative act to update the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans. The project includes. programs and development criteria and a matrix which is correlated to maps of the Chico, Oroville, • Paradise, and Ranchaero Comprehensive Plans. Adoption of the proposed amendments specify the manner'in which land will be permitted to be used so that development can proceed in a responsible manner. Legislative acts proposing programs that specify project development criteria do no result in a physical change in the environment until that time when"a project is actually proposed to be carried out pursuant to.the proposed criteria of the regulatory program. At that time a specific project shall be fully subject to CEQA and mitigation can be incorporated into the project (sic) Therefore, no environmental impact will occur." This proposal may lead to changes in use from residential to other more intensive uses (industrial, commercial, and etc.) that will be located next to existing residential uses as discussed above. Again, a more specific'project description, information, and analysis of the impacts of this proposal is needed in order to determine if this proposal will have significant effects the environment. The adoption of the CLUP amendments will require the County General Plan and zoning code to be amended or make a statement of overriding findings. Amending the General Plan and zoning is subject to environmental review taking into account the whole of the action. The proposed Negative Declaration is inadequate, as the document does not take into account the whole of the project and does not specifically identify and address the changes in land use which will result from the Density Criteria. The analysis in the checklist is inadequate because both possible and predictable specific changes that will result from the Density Criteria have not been identified, disclosed, or addressed. 3. We concur with the comments submitted by the City of Chico, dated December 8, 1999, regarding the initial study for this project. We also find that, ""Projects" requiring environmental review under CEQA are not limited to those causing direct physical effects on the environment, . but also include those causing "a' reasonably' foreseeable indirect physical change" (PRC 21065)." From our analysis of this project, it is highly possible that the only compatible uses allowed would be industrial and possibly other non-residential land uses. These changes will create significant incompatibility with existing residences, neighborhood traffic patterns, lighting, noise, dust, air .quality, etc.. In general, staff also believes that this proposal should be referred to Shutt -Moen Associates, the consultant retained to revise and update the CLUPs around the four public use airports within Butte County. This action is precipitous in nature and ignores the comprehensive planning currently being undertaken by a consultant who is professionally qualified to undertake the preparation of new plans. To staffs knowledge the proposals have not been prepared by a qualified professional familiar with the many.provisions of the Public Utilities Code and Caltrans Airport Planning Handbook. • q -T • c' { BUTTE COUNTY AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT- DISTRICT 2525 Dominic Drive, Suite 1 LAWRENCE D. ODLE Chico, California 95928 Air Pollution Control Officer Tel: (530) 891-2882 W. JAMES WAGONER Fax: (530) 891-2878 Asst. Air Pollution Control Officer December 7, 1999 David Doody, Butte County Development Services Department,. Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUP) Dear Mr. Doody: The District has- reviewed the request for comments for the CLUP density criteria and development standards. The District will be. pleased to submit comments when specific land use plans are considered for development. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed project. If you have any questions, please contact.me at 891-2882. Sincerely, Williams Air Quality Planner File No 3451.1. \Ys\aPPs�v4xl sleir\bcairpon land use review.doc EEC'"TVV DECO 8 1999 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 • MEMORANDUM TO: Affected and Interested Persons . FROM: Paula Leasure, Principal Planner DATE: December 6, 1999 SUBJECT: Rescheduling of ALUC Meeting - The Airport Land Use commission has rescheduled the December 15, 1999, regularly scheduled meeting to the following date, time and place: DATE: December 29, 1999 , , TIME: 9:00 a.m. PLACE: Butte County Board of Supervisor's Chambers , 25 County Center Drive , Oroville, CA • If you have any questions, Paula Leasure can be reached Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at (530) 538-7601. ` • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • • v COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST. APPLICATION: KEYBOARD_U DATE: DATE County Offices and Cities: _ Chief Administrative Officer X_ Develop. Services Director X_ Public Works Director X Environmental Health _ Building Manager Sheriff _ BCAG _ ALUC X_ LAFCo Air Quality Mgmt. Butte Co. Farm Bureau Biggs Gridley �. Chico p14'n n 1 Oroville Q'N-Y1 �� Paradise PIQ ,/SC Chico Airport Commission (&pl Axo'c BYL) . 7 X_ Agricultural Commission Irrigation District: Butte Water _ Bigp(W. Gridley Water _ Durham Irrigation OWID _ Paradise Irrigation _ Richvale Irrigation Table Mountain Irrigation _ Thecmalito Irrigation _ Other Domestic Water _ Butte Water District _ California Water Service Co. _ Del Oro Water Co. OWID _ Thermalito Irrigation District _ Other Sewer Butte Water District Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) _ Fire Protection California Department of Forestry _ Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Paradise Recreation & Park Themalito Irrigation _ L.O.A. PUD El Medio Fire Protection District Durham Area Recreation _ Richvale Recreation & Parks Utilities _ PG&E North - Chico _ Chainbers Cable TV _ PG&E South - Oroville Viacom Cable TV State Agencies _ CalTrans (Traffic) _ Dept. of Water Resources Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _ Dept of Parks and Rec. Central Reg, Water Quality Cont. _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program Department of Conservation Off. of Mining Reclamation _ Dept.Social Servicess,nComm.Care Licensing Federal AM.. es US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ Army Corps of Engineer ' Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association Drainage _ Butte Env.l Council _ Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society _ _ Butte Co. Mining Committee _ Forest Rands Community Assoc. _ Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy_ School Districts c�a.uoJ��^-el Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Ree. & Park Pacific Bell Dept. of Fish and Game Highway Patrol Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations US Fish & Wildlife Service Mosq. Abatement. Oroville(Butte Co Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. a r NEGATIVE DECLARATION DISTRIBUTION LIST REVIEW PERIOD: 20 days minimum APPLICATION:'Butte County - 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans DATE: November 22, 1999 20 Total Copies , Butte County Airport Land Use Commission Nance County Offices and Cities: _ Chief Administrative Officer X' Develop. Services Director /x_ Public Works Director _ Environmental Health � _ Building Manager Sheriff ✓x BCAG ALUC LAFCo Jx_ _ APCD Butte Co. Farm Bureau _ City of Biggs City of Gridley T City of Chico City of Oroville .Town of Paradise r%x_ Chico Airport Commission Agricultural Commission Irrigation District: Butte Water _ Biggs/W. Gridley Water _ Durham Irrigation OWID _ Paradise Irrigation _ Richvale Irrigation _ fable Mountain Irrigation _ Thermalito Irrigation _ Other Domestic Water _ Bine Water District _ California Water Service Co. _ Del Oro Water Co. OWID _ Therimalito Irrigation District _ Other Seaver Butte Water District _ Themalito Irrigation _ Sterling City Sewer Main Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) _ L.O.A. PUD - Fire Protection ✓x_ Butte County Fire Protection (CDF) _ El Medio Fire Protection District . Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation _ Durham Area Recreation _ Feather River Rec.'& Park Paradise Recreation & Park Richvale Recreation & Parks Utilities _ PG&E North - Chico _ Chambers Cable TV _ Pacific Bell PG&E South - Oroville Viacom Cable TV Federal Agencies US Forest Service _ US Bureau of Land Management _ US Fish & Wildlife Service' Amry Corps of Engineers Other Districts, .Agencies, Conunittees, local representatives of State agencies etc. , Lime Saddle Dist _ Community Association _ Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co Drainage _ Butte Env.1 Council _ Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. _ Reclamation _ Cal Native Plant Society _ School Districts Butte Co. Mining Committee _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. _ Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy, _ Dept. of Fish and Game (Henry Lomelli) _ Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Ron, Dykstra) State Agencies (Note: Review by State agencies requires submitting 11 copies of the Negative Declaration/Initial Study to the State Clearinghouse, 1400 Street Sacramento CA 95814. The review period must be extended to 30 days.) Tenth ✓x Caltrans Div of Aeronautics _Dept. of Water Resources _ Dept. of Fish and Game (Rancho Cordova) Forestry (Aum: Craig Carter) _ . Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Highway Patrol _ Central Reg. Water Quality Cont _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program Department of Conservation _ Off. of Mine Reclamation _ Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations Dept. Social Services, Comm. Care Licensing i ✓ .lulm Franklin Paradisz Skypark Airport Manager Name Address ✓Bob Greirson City of Chico Airport Manager Name V/City of Oroville Airport Manger Address Nance Address Ranchaero Airport Manager Name Address • TO +BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION + • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 * (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 • Public Agencies and Interested Parties 6 FROM: Butte County Airport Land Use Commission SUBJECT: NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING REGARDING: 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans . C� LUPE Commission initiated amendment to include new density criteria and development standards. ALUC proposes adopting DATE NOTICE MAILED: November 23, 1999 This is your official notice that the Airport Land Use Commission will hold a public meeting on the following matter at the time and place listed below: HEARING DATE: December 29, 1999 TIME: 9:00 a.m. PLACE: Board of Supervisors' Room Butte County. Administration Center 25 County Center Drive • Oroville, CA 95965 Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans: The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ALUC will consider adoption of a development criteria and density matrix and accompanying maps for the various safety zones that surround each of the public use airports in Butte County. This amendment is proposed in accordance with Public Utility Code Sections 21674.7 and 21675 which allows an once a year update to the comprehensive land use plans for each of the County's public use airports. The proposed amendments and maps are attached for your review and comment. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a proposed Initial Study is attached. If you have any further questions or desire additional information, please call David Doody, of the ALUC staff, at 538-7601. At the meeting, the Commission will consider. oral and written testimony by any interested person or affected agency and the report of staff. Additional project materials'and the existing comprehensive land use plans may be reviewed at the Department of Development Services, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. KAALUC\MEETINGS\12-29-99.MTG\N0TICE.WPD • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • r' 4. BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION TO: Public Agencies and Interested Parties FROM: The Butte County Airport Land Use Commission RE: •Request for Comments on the proposed 1999 Annual Review and Update of the Chico; Oroville, Paradise.and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUP). DATE: November 23, 1999 CONTACT PERSON Dave Doody On November 17, 1999,'the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission initiated the 1999. Annual Review and Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans.. The attached Public Hearing notice describes the project. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the'project and submit conditions, if any; and to . 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or required mitigation measures your office may want incorporated. n LJ If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538.7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. COMMENTS, l[F ANY,•ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 15, 1999. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your • x. agency has no comment. , CONV ENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary) By: K:;A1.UC• MEETINGSU2-29-99.:v1TG\TRANS.WPD Date: 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 f 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785 Proposed 1999. Amendment to the Butte County Airporf Land Use Commission Comprehensive Land Use Plan Within- all zones in the airport area* of influence. 1. Permitted uses: a. All projects covered by a vested map or development agreement. b: Any use covered by a valid building permit. C. All uses meeting the airport comprehensive land use plan standards at the time permits are issued. 2. Projects that do not meet the density or use criteria of the comprehensive land use plan within the area of influence shall be referred to the ALUC. 3. ' Avigation Easements. shall be signed by property owners for all uses located within the planning boundaries of each public use airport. *This includes the Chico Municipal Airport, Oroville Airport, Paradise Skypark, and the . Ranchaero Airport. 0 • Density Criteria Maximum Acceptable Density Area No. Safety Zone People Per Acre Dwelling Units per Parcel Minimum Parcel Size 1 Runway Protection Zone 10 J, M 0 N/A 2 Inner Safety Zone; 10 A, D, H, I, J, M 0 E, K, N 10 3' Inner Turning Zone 10 A, D, F, H, I, J, M 4 E, K, N 10 4 Outer Safety.Zone 25 C, D, F, H, I, M 1 E, K, N 5 5 Sideline Safety Zone 25 C, D, F, H, I, M 0 N/A 6 . Traffic Pattern Zone 100 C, D, F, H, I, M 1 E, K, L, N 2.5 7 Area of Influence No Limit B, C, D, H, I 4 E, K, L, N 1 A 20% coverage per acre -for buildings and structures '13 Uses compatible only if they do not result in a large concentration on people. A large concentration of - people is defined as a gathering of individuals in an area that would result in an average density of greater than 25 persons per acre per hour during any 24 hour period ending at midnight, not to exceed 50 persons per acre at any time. C Caretaker residences.are a compatible use within all CNEL ranges, provided that they are ancillary to the primary use of a property-, intended for the purpose of property protection or maintenance, and subject to the condition that all residential units be.designed to limit intruding noise such that interior noise levels do , not exceed 45 CNEL, with windows closed, in any habitable room. D Measures to achieve an interior noise level of 45 CNEL must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions of buildings where the public is received, office areas, and other areas where people work or congregate. E Residential development shall not occur in a noise level greater than 55 CNEL. F Use compatible only if it does not result in a concentration of persons greater than 25 persons per acre at any time or the storage of flammable or explosive material above ground. G No building, structures, above -ground transmission lines, or storage of flammable or explosive material above ground, and no uses resulting in a gathering of more than 10 persons per acre at any time.* H Communication Towers (Excluding airport related facilities): Prohibited in all safety zones except Zone 7. Free Standing Towers: - -, Alternative orange and white paint starting at 30 feet above the ground. Strobe lighting at the time on the tower and shielded from striking the ground for a mile. Towers with Guy Wires Starting at 30 feet above the ground:. ' Blinking lights along length of tower and guywires at 20 foot intervals. Three foot in diameter orange safety markers attached at 20 foot intervals on tower and guy wires. • � t e a - I . Public and Quasi Public Prohibited Uses: Churches, nursing care facilities, hospitals, colleges and • universities, elementary & secondary schools, child care facilities, and similar aggregations of persons. J 50% open space K Density bonus prohibited. L Aunt Minnie units permitted with ALUC review for safety and noise protection. M No bulk petroleum products, flammable or explosives or chemical storage above ground except airport related facilities. N Second dwelling units'are prohibited. K: IAL UCI CL UPI t 9991 PROPOSED. WPD c �1 .:rte � 3 A. ~ � s� Chico =,a. Sa�etyne= Runway P,'kion Zz-gns I _ Inner Safety Z^ne i 1 Inner Turning Zzne Outer Safety II \ \ (j 3 Sid3line Safety lone \ / i Traffic Pattern Zone ! �� Wrpori lnf uenc* Arai OvangI ht PcCIon :-one O A _2 00 0 20100 4CC0 �\IL Area of Influence ecu, n.,, J, — T•-' ��,� � .`\�• +�`+\ Imo_-- �.�. - •�Ci`� 'moi: 0 I I'll J) I i',N C rqo I E: '3ZI[Uty Z of I() S ;It It)pjUd by III LI AI AJU 9 &" of 11 AM" [loam ximy 71 fh-_T-_T4_ ji rr 120MIRIIINFIVAN M., 11FInc � P —.7 21JQU C _111. I i 3 _71- 1 1 W, 9 155 1 w LJji r_ lit - fu q INI UL -qt --D J. rry _T_ 3aWY ZEXW 12— NI �- art rf�� .rI � � — L�� ALI —7 _7 V j ,airport Environs Plan Safety Zones 3afaty Zon*2 Runway Protection Zuv- ...... 2 -lifter Safety Zona 7lifter3 lifter Tunilnu Zone 4 Outer Safety Zona al Y N(,,., of 11111LICHCO U['"lU"Salely zolle Tiallic Pallum Zone AUL)JACCI by AUX :IIN �: � i �.�� wAh `, � j 'i iii \• •.�1 � 7 . i I • ip� •;moi.- :;y' v ♦ � 1-` i _ 1 \ _ =��'�. ,i��..` ,��. •�, �• � 'ir !�;•'� ;�'.;'�/.�::�':'�l'r:!'?. _ '�' .f•\";'t� Vii:%��'. • . ' �.: :.�. MIME AM II'U I Ilii •� 1 �^�`�•\�.� .�� _ �''� �'��::• �'rl '•�. 1 Ili' /w It /••P�.%✓�� `�. , � � L �. � � tl'0 Ali,: .•016•�;�. ��/ �•�\\\\\\\ `-'� �'• / �'•••� � ani 1�'"�, �`• ,.• � �/�j �:�..;�;..�� •�, i �� .� � � ; '•`:':�::• ',�.:°:1' kill-�\,�:.��,;::;. � � :. ; �.'` •�. •;7 �'� � �a_1`�i_�ili�iil��►;:��1 i� ,;��Irrllri��.:�•F;�'`'.. �.� �-��'�`' �• it�4�::1,a .fin 'nr:�•,��1'.,'.. ��`.-;��r��t�./ ILI 1 u INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM • DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION To: Thomas Parilo, Director From: David Doody, Senior Planner ALUGr_'__' Subject: 1999 CLUP Amendment as Proposed by Commissioner Gerst Date: October 25, 1999 Comment and Update on ALUC Matters: The 1999 Update of the Chico, Oroville, Paradise and Ranchaero Comprehensive Land Use Plans appears to be still on track. Laura Webster and Ken Brody went to lunch with the Hennigans after the hearing. Upon returning, Laura called me and reported that Bob seemed to be seeing the light, but Barbra was obstinately wishing to push ahead. Last Friday, I met with Fred Gerst. There are two amendments that are being proposed. One that was • agendized by Bob Hennigan and was discussed at the 10/20 hearing and one that was introduced by Fred Gerst at the hearing (attached). Fred demands that his proposal goes forward and he asked my nicely if Development Services will put it on the agenda. I said the By -Laws allow any Commissioner to place an item of the agenda, so Fred told me to take this as a formal request to agendas his proposal. Also, you should know that there is considerable dissension among the members, but Fred wouldn't go into details. I don't know, but our conversation leads me to believe that it has to do with Bob's proposal not being ok with the rest of the Commission. This is really interesting. Technically, I should be circulating Fred's proposal now with the affected agencies: Fred told me he wants it adopted at November's meeting. Regarding Bob Hennigan's proposal: I really don't know where to begin. He wants it agendized too. At the 10/20 hearing Bob posted large display maps of his amendments. Following the meeting, they took their maps down and did not give staff small reproducible. The only support material we have are those vague handouts. There was 2 additional handouts at the meeting that were from the Hennigans. cc: Paula Leasure 3 KAALUMORRESPOW AME • 1: r ./I l ' r ./I l ' r Y i The following revision, as presented by Fred Gerst, is an annual'update to clarify a number • of issues that tend to be unclear and inconsistent. It is also recognized that all concerns are not addressed due to lack of information. It is. the intent that the major revisions and update due early next year will address the remaining requirements. Presented at the October 20, 1999 ALUC meeting. ee • s <`. AIRPORT LAND_ USE COMMISSION POLICY. PLAN ' AIRPORT LAND USE POLICY PLAN LAND USE COMPATiolLf TY GUIDELINES FOR SAFETY" COM AIIBILII'Y Wlfll LAND USE CATEGORY ZONE LOjVZ ( nurlway Inner Inner Outer Sideline Traffic Area of I - rotectioil Safety ruffling .Safety ' Safety Pattern . Influence No S 9 .I o 2 3 4-- � 5 � 7 . RLSMENTIAL 1-3 • Sinyle•family'detached No hJu Hu Yes . Yes Yes. No Yes _ Yes T%su•lamil y dwelling1Ju (Jo' Yrs Hu No No No Nu Yes 'fes' Alulti-family dwelliny (J+ families) No No, Yes IJu No No No No Yes (es lip ks or cols MuUile hom? uaiw ,. No No No (Ju No No No No N o Yes — 611%.UL•A1clURItlli 2-3 Yes Y4s No, Ito Yes 4" Yes -CMIMUNICATIONSs&UTILITIES WII-eieSS'Cot 1111111incatlon facilities towers 9. Ilu Nu Iln Ho Ilu fl„ lift flu (-to Yes y'i11QLESALE TrzA[JF 2~3 No ('lo - ..Yes Yes Ho [1E.[AILIQEID-E 3 No Viu No No No No Yes q" Yes ,# l3USIUES.S_&P_ERS_QUAL Z,3 No No No No Hu No Yes Yes S LIQeI'_I[LG_R1iLQlCIS s? - y ` Nu No Nu No No No No No (Jo Yes eU.E} L Lc=A!`LfZSlIlAS � ' Churches Nu- I-lu f lu hlu I lu No• flu No 'No Elementary & secondary schoolsNo No No No No No No No No Colleges & universities No No No No Nu, No No No (Jo Hospitals No No No. No Nu No No ` No ' No Nursing care facilities .Idu No Child care proyra(is = . Nu No No No No Nu Hu I !u No No No No _ No No No Nu (tECflEAJ_LQCI No No Ilu Yes No w t I llla.eiuluu, a\ccclilal►le • �- Ilcusily NQ Sareo, 'Lulls __ _(I'c�,l►Ic l,cr,�\crc)• (uwcllii�b ui,lts �\crc) _ Rlulway Prutcctiuu Zullc ' 11111c1• SalCty ZVIIC 40F, ! o 0 — 1111101• Turning ing ZUIIC I Outei- Salcty ZUIIC 2-S 5, Siddine Salcty Zuuc 10 0.. t. Trallic Paticru Z011c- 7 Area of ' Influence -- Overflight Protection Zcne �- --_ tl A 9 Al 2S l 0 13 i m L J •4 .. 0 c. I cn C o ' D O o © C cD C G7 N N C CC C C O �+ C O C O L.1 C O Cl L, C o •� C 4 � � N c ILI a a .. CJ N — A Ll -+ — N C C m .. C oN N C C co o C t. I N CD m L J 0 0 ! 'C—cri •4 .. 0 `K k C o ' D 0 0 ! 'C—cri •4 .. .,m00Co>l N N C CC C C O �+ C O C O L.1 C O Cl L, C O I C 4 ILI a a .. CJ N — A Ll -+ — m .. C C V Ln C C N N C C Cl o t. I N A L-1haN C Gt -• C� C C' 69 L C C C O G C'1 C C' ! . CcocCo� -4 C O C O C C O C L •4 .. 1. Residential development shall not occur in a noise level greater than 55 CNEL 2. Measures to achieve an interior noise level of 45 CNEL must be incorporated into the design and construction of all sensitive areas including, but not limited to, rooms designed for the purposes of sleep, libraries, churches, areas intended for indoor entertainment events and of portions of buildings where the public is received, office areas and other areas where people work or congregate. 3. All ministerial and discretionary residential uses shall. be reviewed by ALUC and findings must be made, that no adverse impacts will be created. 4. Uses compatible only if they do not result in a large concentration of people. A large concentration of people is defined as a gathering of individuals that would result in 25 persons per acre at any one time. 5. Uses in buildings must be compatible as determined by ALUC. 6. not permitted unless the Airport Land Use Commission can make findings that no adverse impacts will be created. 7. Avigation Easements shall be signed be property owners for all uses located within the planning boundaries of each public or special use airport. 8. Infill of residential uses shall be allowed in Zone A-1. Division of property shall be prohibited. Lot line adjustments to create an additional lot shall be prohibited. 9. Communication Towers: a. Prohibit in all safety zones except Zone 7. Free Standing Towers: 1. Alternative orange and white paint starting at 30 feet above the ground. 2. Strobe lighting at the tip on the tower and shielded from the striking the ground for a mile Towers with Guy Wires: 1. Starting at 30 feet above the ground: A. Blinking lights along length of tower and gut' wires at 20 foot intervals. B. Three foot in diameter orange safety markers attached at 20 foot intervals on tower and guy wires. •Sample Com alibi 'Crlterla and Maps /Appendix C - �t i I .............. 4 ' -= .. _ \� , `nom. y�--,�•R-. 4 1.000' Ors 4. lE0FN0 000 lO CLEAA DOBE O' APM ACH/DEPAATIJRE DDNE OOVFAfL10tR XNE- ®k. ETRO AJA PAA!( _ SPECUL PLANWNO MEA . Source: Sounmonto Metropoliten Airport Comprehensivo Lend Use Plan (1883) Airport Safety Zones Sacramento Metropolltan Airport - . C-33 Uecombor 1993 SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIRPORT - LAND USE COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR SAFETY FOOTNOTES: Use compatible only if directly related to agricultural use of Ute property for the provision of dwelling units lot the land owner's'immedrate family, or for employees required for the protection of the property. All such dwellings shall be encouraged to locate outside of the Approacrr• f}eparture Zone If parcel lines permit. . r ' Use comp tJble only,H It dots not result In a concentration of ersons `nater than 25 P p persona per acre at any time or the storage of flammable or explosive material above ground. ' No building, structures, above••ground transmission lines, or storage of flammable or explosive material above ground, and no uses resulting in a gathering of mon than 10 persona per acre at any time. y No bulk petroleum products or chemical storage. w ' Tour operator passenger facilities not allowed. , ' Uses compatible only If they do not result In a possibility that a water uta may cause ground fop or result In a bird hazard. , ' Household hazardous waste facilities operated as part of at Integratad waste management program and risulUng in'only temporary storaie Of materials is allowed. Y - Y ' Uses in buildings must 1),2 oompatlble. '• Use compatible only H requirements of Callforrila Education Code, Sections 317005.7, 81036 and 81038 are fulfilled. + f ° No chapels or funeral horses. No Gab houses, bas, restaurants or banquet facilities. Ancillary uses such as pro shops, snack bars, and apeclalty food and beverage services • are allowed. New coures layouts & nvislons to existing courses must be reviewed by ALUC for safety Impacts. This restriction does not +oozy to the Metro Ar Park Special Planning Ansa. No high intensity uses or facilities, such as structured playgrounds, ball0elds, or picnic pavilions. , Uses compatible only If they do not result In a lupe concentration of people. A large concentration• of people Ia defined as a gathering or individuals in an area that would result In an average density of greater than 25 persons per.acre per hour during any 24 hour period enomg at midnight, not to exceed 50 persons per acre at any time: This restriction does not apply to non-residential uses in the, Metro A4r,.Parr Special Planning Area. No uses that would cause electrical interference that would be detrimental to the operation or aircraft or aircraft instrumentation. SACMETACISAFET`r Y Formulating Airport Land Use Compatibility Policies / Chapter 3 Infill 3-18 By definition, infill areas are locations where development does"not al- ready exist. The areas thus are subject to ALUC review authority. the chief issue with regard to infill is whether it is realistic for ALUCs to at- tempt to prevent development of a small area surrounded by similar development even when that development is incompatible with airport activities. ALUCs clearly can determine such infill uses to be inconsis- tent with their adopted compatibility plan. From a practical standpoint, however, such determinations are often overridden by the local govern- ment agency. As an alternative, ALUCs should consider establishment of policies which indicate where and under what circumstances infill can be found-con- sistent with the compatibility plan.' • Infill Locations - In locations' where substantial airport impacts occur especially locations within the 65 dB CNEL contour or a runway protection zone - any incompatible development is considered un- desirable. However, in more distant locations where the impacts are less, infill of otherwise incompatible development might be deemed acceptable. • • Infill Conditions - For infill to be permitted, specific conditions should be met to assure that a substantial increase in the overall compatibil- ity status of the airport does not occur. For example: 3_19 The infill area should be bounded by uses similar to those pro- posed. - The proposed development should not extend the perimeter of the area already developed with incompatible uses. - Increases in the intensity and/or incompatibility of use through use permits, density transfers or other strategies 'should not be, per, mitted.` Other applicable development conditions -(such as easement dedi- cation requirements and special structural noise level attenuation criteria) must be met: Formulating Airport Land Use Compatibility Policies / Chapter 3 Legal Basis for Regulation The legal basis for local government regulation of land use is well de - 3 -20 fined by both statutory and case law. Generally, such regulations are founded upon the basic power of the state to enact legislation protect- ing the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare of its citizens. This authority is typically passed along to municipalities, by state enabling legislation. The principal form of land use regulation in most municipali- ties is zoning. The constitutionality of zoning was upheld in�a landmark » case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1926 'Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Company.. In California, the ability of local governments to regulate land use is an exercise of,the police power granted by -Article XI of the California Cori- stitution. The authority for airport land use commissions to establish land use regulations is provided by Section 21675(x) of the Public ties Code. This section states that "in formulating a land use plan, the commission may develop height restrictions on buildings, specify use of land, and determine building standards, including soundproofing'..." .(An earlier reference for ALUCs "to achieve by zoning" the purposes of the statutes were deleted from the law in 1982.) , 8 I I My,, MEN g�tg: w: &Y F .194M Ar -07.- , Ift 'v-,