HomeMy WebLinkAboutCRAIG RECREATION AREA- CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCEFR. ...... ..........
'FR10
' 2
...... ......
•
.... ......
FR -10
. ...... ................ .. .......... . ......
R- G/
0
FR -5
l z
o
N
-5
yr
11 1
C-1
FR 5 .FR -20
) r
Ll I Z111
I T
F 0
T20N
T 19. N.
R -C.
FR -20
SOL
LAI
FR -5
FR -5
SCALE
R -C
BUTTE COUNTY CALIFORI
ZONING -DISTRICT MAI
FEATHER- FALLS
ol�l PLANNING DIRECT
APPROVED,
A
FR c
ORD.
DATE
By ORD. DATE
2061
4 MAWSO
O.R.N.
T
2117
2129
IOJUN.80
6 AUG. 00
D.R.H.
D.R.H.
2146
30SEP8(
0 E-0-
2227 ? -.4JVNBI
S.K.M.
7
INDEX MAP
NO SCALE
ES.
'R-160 , '
N\ I
SFR -5
SCALE
BUTTE COUNTY CALIFORNIA
ZONING DISTRICT MAP
FEATHER FALLS
PLANNING DIRECT
APPROVED,
ORD. DATE BY I ORD. DATE BY
j '-
FR -5
INDEX MAP
NO IIC(ALE
-
1 - - -- _ I • 2 3
CA l./ MQFf TO'M
. I
/ I
�l I
/ A I
MEN
i
2 2 26 25
26
i
`
FR -20
R -C �r
- !'tom
1
1
WE
NORTH�
R -C
SCALE
BUTTE COUNTY CALII
ZONING DISTRICT
CRAIG AREA
PLANNING DIRECTQfl -
APPROVED
ORD. DATE BY ORD. D/
2081 q NAR. �0!.R.X.
-- a - s
TP -160/
I�
11
INDEX MAP
11 NO SCALE
1
11
11 I �1s.2
i/
, 4
11 O MT
. /1 m HDPE a \/
II '7 CpN�D5
�I -J•
11
�2
11
LAKE 7
n
�% l
JROVI,LE 1�
10 ,.
R -C,,, -Z`
CRAIG AREA SHEET
R -C
FR -5
,1
II
ACCESS
REC
II
311 '
I I
II
I
_ I I
xl
0
ZI I
=I I
NECKL R �I I - + �.� WAY
R -C
R -C '
W W
U6 LD
Z Z
36
LAKE OROVILLE 'ILI SOUTH FORK
SCALE
BUTTE COUNTY CAUFOF
ZONING DISTRICT W
CRAIG AREA
/
PLANNING DIRECTOR
APPROVED
ORD. DATE Q^ ^BYu ORD. VDATE
INDEX MAP
NO SCALE
4 4
2. D
IJ' �p I] REFK
v: G
MT
/
OE
F-4¢1� IIIAP,
7
1 -KL
OROVILLL
10.
C-3
CRAIG AREA aNEET 12
TO:
F ROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Inter-D�pa�t���ta IMensnrandun�
Supervisor Nuck McInturf
Stuart Edell, Dept. of Public Works, Land Development Section
Craig Recreation Area -- Certificates of Compliance
January .8, 1992
Attached is some back ground information for our meeting January
8, 1992, with Neil McCabe to discuss proposed courses of action
for Certificates of Compliance within the Craig Recreation Area.
The Craig Recreation Area consists of approximately 160 existing parcels:
Of these, 29 have been issued Certificates of Compliance or, recorded.
parcel maps allowing them to develop. There are an -unknown number of
lots which cannot meet Environmental Health Department requirements
and therefore cannot be developed.
HISTORY:
1) Most, if not all, of the lots have deeded access to Craig
Recreation Road, which is not,publicly maintained.
2) At the time of lot creation,County- Ordinance required 60 feet of
access to a publicly maintained road. Therefore, most of the
lots are illegally created.
3) February 27, 1979, on notice by the Board of Supervisors, "Craig
access road was recognized as a non -county maintained access
providingthe conditions set forth by the Director of Public Works
is met, namely, that.the county recognize Craig access road
providing written permission be obtained from the state to use
the right-of-way, a road maintenance association agreement be
recorded. and signed to the satisfaction of the Department'of'
Public Works and further that the present three -ton limited small
bridge be replaced in accordance with the Department of Public
Works requirements and none of the cost at any time to be from the
County of Butte."
4) March 25, 1980, Board of Supervisors authorizes issuance of building
permit for AP 72-29-10, deleting requirements for bridge replacemeent
and road maintenance agreement.
5) April 29, 1980, approved low water crossing instead of bridge
replacement for Craig Recreation Road. This low water crossing was
constructed and approved.
6) Current typical conditions based on requirements at the.time the
parcels were created are:
1. Obtain a Ietter from"California Division of Parks and Beaches
granting permission to use Craig Access Road.
2. Verify legal access to Craig Access Road.
3. Provide two way traversable access to Craig Access Road.
4. Verify adequate sewage disposal area exists on the parcel.
5. Verify adequate quantities of domestic water are available to
the parcel.
MEMO TO SUPERVISOR- HACK MCINTURF PAGE'TWO
January 8, 1992
RE: CRAIG RECREATION AREA
William Cheff
Director-of Public Works
Stuart Edell
Assistant Director.
SE/ds
cc with co of each document to:
copy
Department, Paula Leasure
County Counsel, Neil McCabe.
F
F
,JAN 1992 ^
BUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
OEC VILLE, CALIFORNIA
346
RECOGNIZE CRAIG ACCESS ROAD AS APPROVED NON -COUNTY MAINTAINED ACCESS
Clay Castleberry, public works director, set out the background
of the reason for the need to recognize Craig access road as a non -county
maintained access road. This is state recreational property.. The state
acquired the right-of-way to the state recreational property. Over the
years many parcels have been created her. The county has.approved some
land divisions using some of the approved roads. There have been people
coming to the Board asking for approval of access. The Craig access road
is a better road than those approved for access to development. When a
building permit is issued it is.necessary to show access to a county road.
Discussion open to the public. Appearing:' Leslie Steidl.
Ms. Steidl asked that the Board delay any decision on this matter.
She has talked with Mr. Harold Bradshaw, Department of Parks and Recreation.
He did not feel that the state had been legally contacted regarding this '
matter. The stat's position is that the road exists now as egress and
ingress for state parks and the current residents on already approved
parcels for implied access rights to the road. However, the state feels
these are the only people who have the right to travel the road.
Ms. Steidl stated that the area is now under study regarding
the zoning. She felt that the decision should be delayed until after
the zoning considerations have been completed. Under the proposed
zoning there would be few new parcels, five acre minimum. 1
f
Matter closed to tl.,Q ublic.
BUTTE.. C0UNEY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MCYMTES - February 27 s, 1979 .
79-
a -
IRA
I
Supervisor Winston stated that the Board passed an ordinance
describing access requirements. This was.the first time that traversable
to the property owner to prove they have
access was defined. It is up
traversable access.,. The Craig access road is a -state road and any attempt
11'on the part of the state to give it to the county w--- be Tn with hasresist-
ance. This matter was -brought up because of a property owner who
asked that the Board acknowledge that Craig assess road is a traversable
access. It'meets the criteria for the requirements of traversable access..
It will be on the burden of the property owners to get written acess
agreements with the state and the property owner was asked to replace the
three -ton bridge and enter into am aintenance agreement. He felt that
the requirements were quite clear. He did not feel. that this matter had
anything to do with the zoning proposal.
Mr. Castleberry stated --that most of the parcels in the area
have access through rights-of-way. Today a property owner could come
in and apply for a parcel split if he met the zoning and show proof
of.a right-of-way down to a county road. This road is in better shape
than most of the roads. It is a convenience to those in the area to
legally use what they are using anyway. The state did -do extensive .
work on the Craig access road.
Supervisor Dolan fthatthisat lbethere
delayedwas
untilrafter thezoning.'approving
this, the people have asked t
She felt that the Board should delay the matter.
On motion of Supervisor Winston, seconded by Supervisor Wheeler
and carried, Cra-ig a=ess road was recognized
by the Directorofnon-county maintained
Public
access providing the conditions set Y
is met,.namely, that the county recognize Craig access road providing written
permission,be obtained from the state to use the right-of-way, a road
agreement be recorded and signed to the satisfaction
maintenance association a
of the Department of Public Worksand further that the present three -ton
limited small bridge be replaced in accordance with the Deparment of Public
Works requirements and none of the cosWheelerany
W nston andtime to be fChairman Lemke.
the County
of Butte: AYES: Supervisors Moseley,
NOES: Supervisor Dolan.
i'
DEPARTMENT OF -PUBLIC WORKS
CLAY CASTLEBERRY, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone: (916) 534-4681
August 9, 1979 H. W. McDONALD
Deputy Director
Mr. Robert Baird RE: AP 71-27-04
P.O. Box 738- Application for Determination
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Dear Mr. Baird:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Subdivision Violation
Committee held August 8, 1979, the Committee issued a conditional
Certificate of Compliance for AP 71-27-04. The conditions are as
follows:
1. Verify 60 feet of access -to a public maintained road from- f
the subject parcel. '
2. Provide two-way tr`aversable'access to the subject parcel.
3. Provide a road maintenance agreement.
4. Obtain a letter from California Divisibn of Barks and
Beaches granting permission_ to use Craig Access Road.
Replace the 3 -ton load limit bridge on Craio Access Road.
There is a fifteen (11.55) -day appeal period before this conditional
Certificate of Compliance can be recorded, unless you sign and re:-
turn
e=turn the attached waiver waiving your right to appeal the Committee's
decision.
if you have any questions regarding this matter -
please contact this
office.
Very truly yours,
Clay Castleberry
Director of Public Works
Ori. -,:nal si^nedlby
JOHN MEN DONSA
John Mlendonsa
JIA/mv Assistant Director
Attachment
cc Planning Department .w1o.,attachment "
Health Department, w/o attachment
Building Department w/o attachment
cau,
Jq
- LAND CF NAT ii RAI WEALTH AND BE-
N
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CLAY CASTLEBERRY, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95465
Telephons: (916) 534-4681
H. w. McOONALD
Deputy Direetor
March .31,, 1980
George D'Entremont RE: Craig Recreation Road
%l-
2325 Cathay Way
Sacramento, CA 95825
Dear Mr. D'Entremont
On ,larch 25, 1980 the Butte County Board of Supervisors authorized issuance of
a building permit for your parcel number 71-29-10 based on the letter of access
ment of Water Resources and Parks and Recreation.
permission from the State Depart
Of course, your building would have to.meet all building, zoning and sanitations
rules...
Very truly yours,
(�ftgittd, S,yi—ej Dy
Clay Castl66e++y .
Clay Castleberry.
Director of Public Works
CC:v�a
cc: Building Department
Environmental Health
ED&Au^ .
.•rte.
�,W�AI�OPZI
Y 4�
Op�..P �
REESOURCES
ARTN,FNT OF
px s88
.N•EK10
5502
6) 445-9248
�pR _1 O 1680
►Eutremont
Mr . George Delay
2325 Cathay 95825
ento , CA of
Sacramento, roving Use
. D�Ezt=emout: tier APP private
Dear �r � Craig Access Road . Z gr ss and Egress to
ion' Road for
oroville Drvis Access d 1g80,in Which
Craig 11, of the existing
Existing - of February
pronert to Sour letterPprothe use est9 71-29•
wing rOP No ,
s is in rePletter from ess and egress d Arse sor' s �aP
Sou ask f ess Road for ingr theattache of the existing dirt
l0 °u
Craig ,Aced parcel the se
tlfi as u
issi for ce °f
Iden on -
The State g= aed , OaT successors • th the mainteuaof the
is at onsibility
°u the basis
the sesP rove the Toad.
=odd by 9 iven ou °t
fission is g -road shall n on to CIDP
this
per""
r"" d -rthas no obligati
the and the -)
i •-J for
DePuty r�iT
Attar nt RecTeatiOu
and'DegaTtment of hercs pes° ssiou Granted.
Co curs �lth
in this Letter
term
is to
�a1
.ryy��e
77
471 AUTHORIZED ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PER'2T FOR CRAIG RECREATION ROAD AP 71-29-I0
On motion of Supervisor Winston, seconded by Supervi.sar Wheeler
and car-ied, authorized issuance of Craig Recreation Road building permit,
AP 71-29-10, from existing Craig access road for ingress, and: egress to.
private property. -
0
` '' + BUTTE COUNM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTE'S - March' 25, 1980
80-
8
674
6 7.5
x-wJ
a
676
677
April 29, 1980
sign and the Chairman authorize*o sign a quit claim deed for the surplus
parcel to Elaine Pfitzinger.
4. Resolution 80-89 in accordance with Section 2121 of the Streets
and Highways. Code to certify to Cal Trans the current maintained mileage
of county roads was adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign.
5. Resolution 80-90 supporting SB 348 (Alquist) regarai^.g workmen'
compensation insurance as a prerequisite to issuing permits to a contractcr
was adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign.,
ADDITIONAL FATTER' BY BOARD
Supervisor Wheeler announced that the signal lights were to start
blinking on Thursday.
Clay Castleberry, public works director, stated he had been inforTe
the contractor was unable to complete the signals until next week.
,ADDITIONAL PUBLIC WORKS ITEMS
On motion of Supervisor Winston, seconded by Supervisor Moseley
and unanimously carried, the additional Public Works itams were approved:
1. Approved authorization for Thermalito Irrigation District
to do emergency protective work on right-of-way for its sewer by abandoning
Sacramento Northern right-of-way, Thermalito area.
2. Approved replacement of three ton load limited bridge as
Low water crossing is provided adjacent to Craig Recreation Road.
Clay Castleberry, public works director, stated he would be Willi:
to answer the letters from the students -of Mrs. Nassie's Durham Elementary
School class.
SET PUBLIC HEARING DATES' _ -
1.Eublic hearing date was set for May 20, 1980 at 10:45 a.m. for
Irene Lund Parker consideration of a draft environmental impact report and
rezone from "A-5" (agricultural - 5 acre parcels) to "A-10" (agricultural
10 acre.parcels), property surrounding the intersection of Avocado Road
and Dunstone Drive, AP 28-20-5, 7 and.14 (portion), northwest o -f Bangor.
2 Public hearing date was set for May 20, 1980 at 11:15 a.m. for
Charles W. and.Sandra L. Avery consideration of a rezone (item not subject
to environmental review) from "A -R" (agricultural residential) to
((agricultural residential - mobile homes), property located on the north
side of Oak Knoll Way (V-5 Road), approximately 250 feet east of Seacresc
(V -F) Road, AP 36-44-15 and 25, Oroville.
ADOPTED Ry SOLUTIONS 80-91 AND 80-92 SETTING PUBLIC HEARING DATES FOR ABAirDC'!
ME�1"S OF l'UB1,IC UTILITIES EASE`�1'S AND RECREATIONAL EASE:504TS
On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor 1Nt+eeler
and unanimously carried, the following were approved:
1. Resolution 80-91 setting a public hearing date of June 3, 19s'(
at 10:00 a.m. for the William Mathews abandonment of public utilities aasa-
inent and recreational easement, Paradise Pines Unit 8, lot 47 was adopted
the Chairman authorized to sign.
2. Resolution 80-92 setting a public hearing date of June 3,
at 10:00 a.m. for the Kenneth R. Cookson abandonment of public utilities
easement and recreational easement, Paradise Pines, Unit 8., Lot 32 was
adopted and the Chairman authorizedto sign.
Page 377.
April 29, 1980
S _...�....._.... -- - .,......_r,..rW...�.�Y.�.... ... -y.e• . . -:��- ..�......a^:u:acs�:,•,eJca..• V�-.:..��':t�oea>c-�atrc - - -- rreno++r+�"" _ 'hrAW'F..Y9• �JO�1
_.j if: 5�'?' rL'� a aa}SaLyrf t to ,,n 3"t).1 f! :�?�'.�ffir TS J' yt
y 'y *___- !�', z5 . {1 . -_ie •i N iSrr!r• V - `ay 'i"'F - rt d. '0
t S'{:" �• x v tl )i T 1'>:-'rtil _ tf4 r1: 't• rr #'� .A - �'' l9 .t Jf" rt S'� J +. r°' ` i'.[r `} �^3' �� -:7 r^''q. ,�'y� �.#.:
it'; c< r * f r: 1 a ;:i fta P ec t t$LLX o a �_ R ;c.
,, ,"+• tl- i Y ,' y :Q�':QfK .7rte .f`. r y ^jtl •u:•rr.ti y,f�t�+, •t t,Jy x.. �:• .D yrs, a, '-�- . ',;. -
L1 _ "J. 'r. '•T{;... ';a:;y ••,1 '{ Tir ? ,h:a "' •'i1: To?X' e.nwJu c _ y�{'yr.�4''.ie,••ri'w
.`4F F . N } ,P'j, F `'.1 f!:'. 'if 1.-f >f'01 r., ,r,.: �..',n tG !u r; f^.ri3� :tr.� k?�,1y1, ....t ��;J.� _��G. q, �
��+•' :7• 5 t 3 5r4E- • v, -.c S: J.'K'a. ., l•gr. ,k 4 - r .In �. :<:
'v ! {_ r r . )1 r lQ, - + �,` 1 c,t �{.'> .}t,�"` � 1: .- J;»•ti y.{' .? f (j;?4• } :r-:�.k�i �c .r!cp' P, J",
. , ' ' " _ - •�.1 - •, if-. Y L.- S. f>i •.�'SL �( ` J }/ f {.a t 1�
i T k P i
�f • - �` V 4.} r`?�� .°�"k, R,,'i t r /. r`'�y. ti }flt r� 4, i:11. ?f"' " c �."
•� - - .. t r 5 t3 sN Ei si ^.b tr- t -f "fix. \y r{ "< �- Af r <
i r t tr • r r
d • 4 Qi Q f �.• .�[� R .� t r ? -�+; ? i •. Y; , fr �F,.Sa to �t+.,. ii.- „� • �:i , r 1,yt ` •
f_
�J' - :'r : ' t} Iw (.2:v':!- J 1 _l M, Y" , p 5.,M1 j 'rt J�Lyr�... . tom(
N_N7 :l: • •• U' t ../ f Y ti 4a f f Y t .} �4 O y
.. ,� .: 7i tLb -r .[' j. ' r F ° *' i T r { I r t rx x . xs (� �.
` , \ t /ar 1 C� •� } f •any y�yt�2- F!lfq "'1`���
i 1 +,l t ` ,Q �: Qttk r f y.�f' r ) F r `,.� >. 7\ 4,d! ! 7H Q a.N .. �•'�.
p " r n J ':." �:
• . 0 • y 4 It ;Q • • � :11� �D V) ,, i } v q ! �1 ". \ ..
5 0 • t 5UU -
t b h'' _� '' j ;itf
{ C bt- Elhbt $ {tit: �' 1�. : - v y _ � r,
! - ` , j 'i 1 'r y .fes
1 .,� y (b v.. c L E sf tt[1 U f 'I/ ih l /� v t'.;,)yytJ' �- J P• V •f i
- I U l(1 _/ - 'tar.:.°') cY4' \ t j J r F t. _, c a 1 1- .�,,r. i
- . ti Y) 1 d r!r r 4 a r ' . r > r �i j 1 . r 1 2 . ° � fly ; ". tlt
'.tti y. �vrl f '''t AV.S ti r i. j:1J ` J *r #3 r
1 r f' s ' ; . ., . .• Jb 1 I L i SS:T 1 `t r C'Clt i�� }} A
. Gf i _ i t r , + f �e a �'y.v C,-, [ i�iM5 Y`• 4."
' ^ { r t4[t, ft `''a3• t i M'J Leaf �'`�}T- �} �.\.� �.. '± j>vf- ..
/^i Q� E 3 �} �} . f f yy k. ref btu• v - : '� 't. r%y
, �) ' + • � 'i i -,•„- •t .•>_ + - * { rS�,[ti pi e t z ,7.. r
� �; tit. jJ �? {{{ r" �xY
• �) t£ / - ik y.' / # rt F St -[ ����,. `Tt r,} f,.a',f"•KY�•'�s41� -.
. r• r 1 !. 5 ;tt
/r .t1 _ it + '' l� t�
. - ll]' J • _ 1�. /} '.. !�• . . .Y' 1 } t y ' J .t a rv`ta
\ `t l%1 ' . " bi ✓5 .1 j � � t ve 1 V l ' t t J 'r'karSJ `L' f
4 • • LS r _ h •' t f ' ,� i . J . ` `i, �, j v .• c S '+xS•tr>
• t t. ! t a SCrj 9 a r y �,
- , -' t5 ° f s i}} ,p. j v:. t r aS f r x kP 4e`'•'�i'1,p 't
. U ` - .,r r �. - ...� '.k.4 ' lree'�'"y ? ? . 4 _ v; .!°4-fif�:�J"i•+.� N e t t °'t Irk `-t r� 5,
�,:.. tt.. - #) ' t. �• i t J r, 5.^ r v r 4r r a' y ;^(a
I -".' . ,' - Y (•�. \ J)t �t{ 4 f t{.fr f ` ..�y, f Xy
v .cF -... 1 i '1N1 ` ,C r h tr K, •. 4a vyr+r t J.} ✓ hsa
• yq f. �1 ttk ' 'ef 7�a Y'r f, �,f 15'i} Zr
• t .r. f t . 1. i ,: .7 Y` ,r k `lc cEs` r.1 v, •w J ." Tr. '+ .,13.E Fist '�C r x
1 a �� 9 r J fix- & .t r .If )•'EJ'�# , S> ia!rs iAn
• • - t' -,f 39 1t'Y 2 'U � - l ,i�,:4 .i] 1 rJ.
t L.: Yy #ff r, r �? Y.t. s- J Y' c �tf 77 v 5 t t �
/, c '(' r +�+.. ry t A.f -...i tall 1eii:�saI o t o•tJ fi c.S,-i- tJ!'{a�„7
!!"rr ,/ � _s r Y . T � ii /4/'/1��r N fa f 4 - � J` •ta r �o-q, '}'
�. f ., _ _ l (l, 1 ' SJ ��l h�V,�/i , . nF -J�4 'lir .. �{
\ ]I/ o Y
_ _ • _ - • C\r ., t :Y' a ^ a. n P. e >+. / .. v. ``. E e s>` `r+E
I�nn1 �y �.f
' • `• .-.__�_.__. �... tf �1��i i ' `' i ,�tt,Y� 1 f d' 4.. ,\t 'iF-fj,� 1r1 �•t '. y isr3 k
i h
,. ., r
y Q
li t
, .1 . ,• /-'\ '• ?r1. r' _r 1< rf ..r Jt. l-.t'r�[G �„ytf , i;. j }r.
.. ^J�_.
' i f , f �% ey { n d y -I t•' -.� i r �'1��,, [ �iS£ ::T }*': �t
.. . • �� �x J6 r q, f r raj R }:. ?4 . 4 a �,�,, ,i' '•`d••, c r.
,,• 4) i # �, tj }� - 4Yu •: la t 31a 1� :§f4 tit T, r�°� �L�C 3 t
. \ - . 1 r ..
f f
O' '•) 4'� '. ) d Di� f : , tti' f 0r'!t ! r f d � x � ! t •q e - %(i,F� 1 `
L- C �' V f r% r r. , I G"y�'�A rat f 9 1 r `� .. k kJ�
1. f -i t r } ' ti f •� V2 -
• - \ I. �.• ' ,,-r f s t� , + xf J 8., 1i1t ;� i t 1 rr; �,�;.+i 4_'kt�}y f L_ 3:-
.. ... �_. t 5 s c t ra ,: Y) 7 Lrgr.,u7 :'�! v r }' �r y�f q 7 } yhsF�L
'r) t 1 Lp } 1 ( L ! : tti k' v z ey�,Ty;,J f .1.:
li7 ` t_ FN {, \ , , - 1 tk jf{. f1 { s w.*S'7r� r r ,p ° at°'-�ic"rb' �3'�}`ti> }
�• r !• , r lv 1 i x Illtlll,...J ! } t 'ti c r J Y >afia ,'�rr``l i� . f.
jA 5 i 5- 'YJ) t r. J r t�F3 i) t
.. Y �' 1 f ft4 - S }f i t^ [ J ,
r�` `` ..r-.7...
x.
f er' t , 1• , t. rt Sti x
`^' ,
. J t i ?�1� yQ:.,:.G.a ts.-f .. t F t[ i_r J < ` {� �. t: l $"! )
\ , r ► {
VVV :,) C ��+�� ��1 � . tta h rcr Y'��'�lt f ry �� p
I, A c
y y'� � Ilt } f > a {t tr x ,f ti. X 1}r y�?ir
• r s A. I �:i. y j'[
t J A' f r }`v1, i
tt�� t
'� .' '1) `ti` �_-, R eS)t ` {' rs 3 y/.r�•'�r "* ,y }r S1P, t t f r , •� .
rf. u; , Y f
if • }}p, .y ( i f T- /
^�• , 3 , .Y" Ye/ - t" .i�. v. �4 wh '.r� h i,.�l� -
_ r.. •,' fes. .. : r
s `'' v tt
7 L .t } °j�'r: U f �} rri yY4 �$ �!hJt f f
` t r.; f !" jt'ry r I.„{_y71 "`�' "i`t)+' !)11}" :'�.#'r` ,�" sf,` t Je 7 r. _} ..
((� ` f S �, �'' f < !. r 4 q ,[-1 r e iX$� P r 'f _ �77�y 'tri 1 f �F*ril. z J 1� f
.,) _ t F t < ^:!f~���i 7 ('q r ^f a ar arx:J
l \ r s - • t` : t `} t �•• ; t s 4 - -5 •j},'ri• FL #' i\yr �e-h t , > Zq' 4yp N& + ar' �"K^ t •,1 ( ,� fi 1
V,' •,y r 1 t x.''44 �s e� fYi/� f4 ' .Ieiw,L S ,t 131 '' !r F t
} 'J D 1 � i 7 t ,e' e� 1 v-y'�° �F r ..fir 1 Hr. [ f . •?j,. �'s , p
1
!.I { h r rf 7 ilk x t �y, 1 1 ,1 a>
- J ` s. S F i W. t} *
I .. Ql�1 v f '� f an •s..t•iiAl k.r t ) [ y " t
1 I \- ViJ `1 �. i ♦ tS .t r .i" "' tru k rff ,F�J',fj y { ; t , , r f 1 r' � Tr J
':) J#1'.$ it 5 f?}+."i P. rt 't 4 rry t
s t 7 r ti ��� i
h a ^. -.[( i�•ri'vi.l vt 4,r �h� �.•r 4{S ti`r rtcJ 'Y-rry r'L°�
' _ s r, 4 r az, q
_._-'__..____ ._........_ r
�_.._.__. r7 �$)s k 1 r 7. n :} i 5f 1 t r } �t`v f - 4; f t
R tit f c 'ae3i}P7 r rl t n 21 ` t 6� e}S'Q7
f _ _ --, 'J?i�'ytlk4K�F"/ six '�` t [c`' rb° 'tf� + qt' '` {F
r
w - • ' 'r j • .c r Jr Er ? ` 1 t m t 1,rr r �'"' ��� '!.)' �x `
vVb ti11 ti�
3 J v
•� 7\ a,j � b • ♦. r 1 f 1 , Jt r_vt £ -,c.•y t J
r {
_ y - '� ri Ik .� '. r / } + } • -t �,t Sa jv(l._-e r rY o-
- ., f V / t)S �'f� �; wT f r' , I.1 c •,". �f�a,,S r
c. t Y' 't' f ,! 1 Z qq
_ Al N f v t ` rt 1
r t t i t,�� 7}sr f{,
• (n� !,� .94 �+G S t. r /1 L .sl�t4ip N E qx' r '2rr5 t r a jUrf a A
. `V• \j f r1 y _.415 t �.. S J J-2 7�5 ^Il i "1''�> f'7 J�+ t.- '�' ii
N ,.:,. �.y '.,f. S ` { }!n< r F 1 ! t C) Y" Q t • r L !C.4' j , ,l •h
} 1, f # C 2 '... a i.' A S S.
, r , s ,.. rG r !r l y res f } r > i e !L l' 1
1 C Jr. -) 4 A r� •J id i t C•( l�,ti
• !r �')}^r "i �'4 >. it 4 7 r.'j r , f1• '.t9a it t r 1 x ? 1c ;4�'... -� t _
+. J r t f 7 'h s ritr
�\ . �. t 1 i �# 4 tC [J .J'q t. r *� F°a,^f. tf
L` s a i J t _. r y . �- fY p F ��s 1 r
ori:• r r r fR ,'1 1 r f tfir` r ,�:V' txf:11.A+
Li . ..:t -. (..'-,.:t Y "a r .''.,4 f•. .1,•S.. M, f .>•c1,NVL,:',
7
. . .
_...,......::_`i1...Jt3u+i:VSJ.•..ei�+f'az�dcGc•R.°C°r .o_..__.__ .. .1.�•ndCt,✓.w'.nn ►.9.:- 'E.:..r...�F__..:.>?'•9'._.r$2St•.Tt..:,awi:J:*1`:SsiLG�:Sd.`['.,Sm•.rr�w'E43,i�'Nl��.".'N'"ailir`�itl�.S�:•rsRfSi,riE..�.nxt:e..v,.._.:,:'...
08M. - r
.. ..- --- - . --- -- ---.-- ,_1 1 _. ...._.w -,w.__.,____
' " •. . Rri
-- ' -- - 4 r,:,• Awa-:� rhtfit+.4i
i $:?Rii rv.�� R?" '� yyy,s 4'., 'l�.l..f, p;-$' a.�.r y....,,�p _� v*p• %.;7R!:� `qty �q �,� ". W,,� -. - - _ - r .-.y.. '',�y
_�fy .Ji. Znt .6 .:;et,'+r, - .*d. �.� :;:r "d �'ai , 317.'�+17`.�':�+E. 2 f �,, �;Tr. ^:{" j,�F7Y'. 5�..�-WC i�•: ^.T•S�4
' - °`�i-'513.v+'ri:��l? 4 r ., y_}r;•',i-1,�,' ' :lisl �, .;�' j •y°E�h) -. trl ,y:,r {: 4.tF,tr'.T`�'SC'{•10- ' ts=.i[�'%S. a-{fV - '% 11".'rte - '...i.. w�' y.• �.
[ ys 3 '1' rtt$: �5 i;tr ��4 mf `,jf, f.: a. V 2 ti �: q� v,1'! ' 'i.' l lj
•/� -� t �:ftT•�k,s/rt`s.f-. to ,^jl. Yu `" + �+§.st8. ;b,`� ,� ,'e{S(� ,t<
l \ , $� t• * S. ;. �f ti•• ' hr tom'+r. f 4 d t i8i�„.'.4t sS `R,---'. t - t rr' {a'v�
` \�I, ('S l { a• . ! - t t t _ i j i �, a �h fo-i r}•1�"1 1( K'It 1 j Y�f''{- �1 S�'. t'+..1.'7:4f{' i ; .%.,I. '..
(�,' v 1 't + ,i�-11 .b; 4 is +`u,+ait E txr i t 4{ t - ,rc : y'� r `y y,
: t Ix +;5. p K W4 w t "� 't'ra �1`'trlj % .. v v aa`i:?r. r t.:11 G�' /'
v? , { '�''.. .^,r' - df'a .�-v.i"`a �i{'7,} ').+• 1 r+t T _#,..yi,•Y�,{}� f,4.'st t , (t. r e n 1.
t 1 [: -a n .r - I i ..)� Y y ' •T , . e, [ , r ; `ir, l+ ,.2 'E,. Ati , `J �- . .
A I' ) '^'I/ f o -it y, .. ,'O v ,s t 11 C r t � v r - rst Y•rj {�: 'r f•^C - }:•' t "Y7 :>:�
. ` s
r
I _ •/ ,! M` 1 t,, 1 r rtl war d ; �iriHs !7 "-;� , r M rE '' + - °h �� t-,•' - ' 111
II sTv
•+% . t , . `` Ir. 4 4,. .tlY' il.. ' :t.4f ° 5YY 1{, -
• 44 ' 'O 'l f
0%.
I ... . . .
.1. I %ft , . . , I . ... I �.- I . ” . . . r. , 1.11 "it -41 I .
v it 4'/ +� ( \-,-\ /(1� t y`1 '�7 rf !` iso %i�-i?,, `4�•.
C4\ \ 0 R 3 S±`. tl tw
N °..: 1 r 1 r .�tI. C or
1 N `\ ' .. -' ` \ is J fC 4 L r r i y l ' ,�.-/• L Ii .— s7,
��\ Y�I. perV.,' \ j �, • [ � +, t , , 1 1
141
�i \ \ :t t I v rt r Y sr }14, yrr t .
P- 7-,;, 11 .r ":o- Q. E' L; 1 \. .d i` ' ` t'L. FI n :a.V..4`..It
V . �a . -- N_ . v ; •..y i. t
I.
i � J SS . 04
V .i -`i . 'ti '^ ,TA j a, moi, 4y ,. 4 ' ..a '.-. ! , r \ ,� '-;
, .
y I/
5. '. 1 r .i. ['� j r .tr.
r ; i —rr. ( `r 'T r S ,:Al.� i fir 34`r ,pq �. t.::; 4
'J ' � --- g,iFt Ft. t f.."� +t ii r2 r7. '. .? �•yTI 'C �d .r i i? 4 i
�� \ice �` ,�-� ?•r, 1 :�. t y 1. � v. i•4,, o! t,a N- 'El .' { °i
. h ^ S
,yt Q .;,' i J c N .�ft) i`Q. (fry I 'Q',3:. . � " ° j
ak. i < ! i
t, _ ^ O lV -11�,> { X. tits 1'N� � rt .s`
I
'rt..f t� s , r= r,.
Q Vin. ` �`V1? .'� ' r V
V7 ` 1' -1 .` - r
. 1 ") tV dam}��:,Ya+•� rt i., y5 t 4 t� r7 � •'t ,
!� S£�8�``�/� IL J.ti� 11-!Qg���/ pyo r .,� ,yam{ ; , y
•/q�J�•s >,H ��_ " •�! 't�'i !rl 1y+�i� •O�"/�I �,• r' i ...: •;7�.fy t ;'`_ -ari
Y . . d� .
(r ----- l / N.:n �� :r /
1- I
L (CV " Q .. � .r r tr -a M ,, _ n sr� ti. ,I. u Iw (1 , . 't ' i4-
t_ "J� %A.4:+1 yk i� .- '� •• �V n!. -r' ret7�� - )
. '} V i 4, lis W t ^,• ..l
�1 ,�y ! . 1 f. S fi ?:
1.
.l I.ti't S t i.i }Y'•' r 1 '✓ { a< - r[ i t) a ,., v he -,p,
i. .� a.1. t- .Y't t 5 '9 i o
. ): vim( i ' i
1,." . . 4 rn , r,:
C(r j .. 3. S t ° •'x a : i f `,` ui' .:y'.
/ • t t e I t te' t• `
r _ .i,R`
! ' ! •y k 1 r fir` r "St .. ?
, r. .. Qy.'p4 Yn f t o Y • `. i i s r.Y. r
Sr.. It.e .aid\it ;' rds ;.. t .lam t1k�t3 y ,
..-___. ._ �� It .y : S'�W �s,`,i r Sl'- }.' ± \-r' E !;, ti d'T r
�Li i V v E:': 'N � a," d r, ,. ►ym„ ' s. l i ' k3 r 0r: � .
" / 1 m t,. i ! 4 ., ai , . V �, �1 y/ . T
N ^ pn< i K r t t. .
.. til -*j: .1 .1 1 f• ±I n.. Y;t-•
i ° t . ."
... 'r I. 1 I', 1 x , V P'(. , .�I
K_ n
.. i v rt ' j I 4 ` 1. Jrti'r3d i'i Y T 1 I
n +C. 7 z rli;•f
r 1, a i� i n' 4 1 s r1^ Ij?�` 'r tiIt
rq
- _—___ — ._.- -----' --.-----'----- , •-
'_'—_..—_ -_ _.._ ._ _. __.� i E t. y10� i _`},� ��t,J c'. 11 v ..tf .. cd C *r Er � l,�'.
\ i ^ J. V(� ,- ! 5+ t r n nt i^ s i h 4�PR'S{•1c ti Y�-
ii
- ✓ 1\ i DS l
. i r
6
y e i
I ? ct a ,•
(N J i __)
;.$. .< `` ` ` N dv 4 ' �' ScI ` � '
. '- 's -i' , 1 i. . 7, {� l - i y am. . r'Y
i s a Sj k d,•(
l •t iN i
1 1\ - qi t It i_ : k
'T q ' v . nnt.+..n '1' lrt: fy' F ^rf- h N a ,;
. ' ': v t.
A: f t 1.'�I1',I�'"' Int_) Y r . , b "\ 'y.
r., N .ate •1 } I\ 1 '�. -.` y [
1
•:
.. a
b:p',' v ''.N:•' ti?, '�ji, �.j,.'r•, t.v~ Aj L ✓ ,r,p j �3 Juj ��3`lw.".;" 1J� a 4' .
mmull '9u , b; <r
1 '.
m n
1
d
1 ,I Ck
toozbYz;
1j ` . u i �� v c� „j1211 Q' • 1 1�
r \ `W `�
l►'1 C '� ZI 'l Zr.i
/� to V
V14 v _ q of A y, �h<� �•--`--•�. i 1 Q
N
gh
co
NA
ci ;{�`%U�/ a Lo Q h; �i w M41
11 1 a z0(' ►c'Gac SY 6L[ q b
I F t p 06i I V tx
1 lll��V I Q bi
b „
ki
19
Ob
„l. O
tjLn
kq
In
Q
,
I 4,
w
h' �d�iilua�
Ton
Q 1 I o .:
P ' o, v
� 0 �
04
� l
(O a
1.0
1\ •OLJ 1 (\Ij d224,
A In ChV Q1
® m I u
Ar'f he
ry) £Q�6G -�li (� "i O n cb 1 N V ^
b ddE/ob/£lel
Li N
h d Q , r
Q ►�
i S +,00,11 to n
cl
N h
1 _
b t6
O
r
•. a , t. s .� �j� � o 0
01 of
b
6Lb9C 'O f/ G6a.099 i
S
F• : , .:
' , R .B
> �. _. ...
... •
. . •}.
;y t 4:' ..a a-:.:' `oi3' : ( ° ' R"'.r � '� } r -' sib , 95 4 , _ _ . _ —. __ . _.�.—
'l� NL+ -Y Y �,�y' fY Yom}. -i 1�L. ti'"7 tf ♦};*x..:�s' > -•, - �v
3.. , • ;'jy �' ".-* C .. 3r ;+•�r ?Y i+7'i i�f . .1 :r' 4 ' a i �)'�. 'S ^sl �+1'i4"L'f .y -�'F t! k -!"
y! ,. `,'^I ., �: hr..l . .� . t - r . - . ^ice , .:�' +1i 4... �%'i ^.. � ..+SS 8 r,'1� �7h' r.` is {,7, ^.1 n_ i
i 1.. t S .e ? �.1 r ,. $ `i+ A1. a .. �. .�. m 1 $a 'a 'a _.
ice.. ,: .. , rT iq_- r-,+� u, C'1p�, F: •„t .,Y + 1r i, r
1_1
O s:.:;";7 i.:Sy t Fttth �Vi!'i`�54 �'.�✓ i3,i, rric1. ti '. 4i�1� ice. �..f
�'%
".: sr ht .i ✓ 1 •e af� Yg i .{ t•t - q °tt �!^°A`. �fl 'n .,.:
- , t- r. Z't � tir.: r aj i` 1 r A W 5!•9 ty `S F'Pi?. t, ,�`* S.. r' fi'S�' ��'Y
0$�
' ^`T r# N' v IkLgy q..},Y,'7Lt_ i� ' �a 7 .'f"�t'�v"I'N'6e.. "�, } 2, j >1' �'�iI ��� fS 1 O
1 f 5) y }1z aiY yrl.;f Yj Y <f '4+i .�? }F a�5� *1 � y .,�, ( `
r z t `' g 4' i, •AS t f �4'r �t r 1 t.I 14 it V
A\ r I '�':��, r T : �, i '1 t 1 y %�55 + t} }'rl' ' t eae h t , k '
1 1_ � r . i�! r..r - i r ,_' ,tti i1 ; 4 -.1 �,.vwfi>wytl'+�r.',: ' • -11,
O
0
. )
. C
O
. ly C99 • ,8'C99 49900 90*87f . d ` "�. J
.....�) .,..;,�
11 N'T.I. I �
/ „ Z14a . i . t ,,� , t1 "v�
1^,1) ''1 1. 11):. r. :,•F �•: ~'•" h. I t 11h W. •• -vA •.`J 1. ' .rO
5*6if , ,�
, 1, --,) PO__- , ,t� .1 * ,0�` k,).— - - 2 -_ SL NL 9 ,�
I
!...
/ �;_�.,. . �...;�..,..�,,
A 10 .
t(" 1 . Cz. v
1. ,
.,: %J ) � tj ... 11.1 "
. .1
.. 'I / 1.� ...
1;3.,
�i�,�,V,,� / , _''::,�
. , , _� kni -) - . -
" - . . .;:�
�3 �
I \1_1 .7, . ; wq ". ,., .
. _
��
, /.
. ,
.. .... ,
- '. .. � /. . .
I �;
_. *-i.,* " k . I
11 11 . ') Iq i /_ ;..
1 , �._. .x5`19 r1 /shy -- � `.c.' ' "` j'"� ✓ / ..
r t 7
t n: v �;'
�� s o1. r
to N (q,' ) U .r : "v. : K yt r 4b 7 , +ht��* .
_11z ��� J _ i
\4) in ry A F • tc. iut. Y
r. ! ti 1 1 Q ' r�� _ _ _ / Q 01 N O r''1 .1, C �',� �e . '
I U.
r. ,r \ .� to t It... _
>' 1 �3
/ ,
. f ,
1
. .. { ,-.1,_ . I.
5..
IF�(�-:. .
�� r a L_, ;
z, "1. ". "...': .
,,�`�- ,t5. .. r; 6
,
. .
_ - _-1
- -
I .
( �' .� ; ;
/ :1.,.
Lil��,. , 1.
b r .'�! ,,,,:, ) , , . :.... i -
I - IX",
.. ._:%;�,-
.. ..
- ::..: I
" t, S�. . — . 9OR - . . . . : , ��, 1', 1.4.,', . .., . . . l
fi i � r �. S
11 `.. i ` >
1 l t
y5 ,,, 1 1 MSC. Ir' i:._;" i.
t J 5 yN
t t S�
.' n «i W :Y . °vsr t x \ �' b'� F RT r P� ?;r„ 1 «d
. i r r.
1rr t{ { ''yJ C r t .a„1 7 {`aly5. \ "},,” �It > d.p, ,y�:
r 11+ - r 1 • Yt , Y . ,' 11, - _ O' F t r .�, '1 . J:
. :� ,r � ':13. , :.,
.� .
S� , o �t r . Q [ i4 ;;¢ iop
. c. 1
S. ,2
0.4•. 1 ` ? t
.J' ` y 9a ^'v. �. i '
J,
.. .r ! 5yr r'
. � �i a t
y' ii a e
`� \�'
1:J y } +. .k, e
. Q - > r Y 5,,. - '1
n �...
- ,,�L',, - , ,:- ;',,;.�_ . .
.,�
-4
1 1..
' 1 r 0 . ..4
. � isI. >..
: I, i r, o
W I. 1 t
:N r,. �' \. S ti a
z I
y. ` PD 7 r�,f .�
l k. t ' r fr gi �-t� `';5 -.�
• .'1 r' J r Ci 54 1 s ,t, �'�j►';{R�ry Yr'' y C
. 11 J Y �, a y_ �yi -,:tu; "' r ' ' .0
t 1. F 1 - 1.Ji�}.�' }Y =y.
y k
,\`\\ 70 ',- a. "5.1 i• 7�`drr-AI.
•Sy''gi7�"f}��ry*r_ ��
�: Ir', 1 + r 'r�1 'I
r/ i' 7 '• it. f
C 1\` ' i r. 4t
Sc 'Sr' nl .1 y, h) ` 1 r,
., b� ,80 o io s h a
r r, �_ _% §• S,R ?!. -; ,
i .s y�,d-r t
.I f .; ti' ' t J , ''P} -f R'! '..5�" f -,5 ;,1y.' v>
�tr r
. . ._ AY
. .. , . .
_. 5. '
'
. .rA. .. - .,,.} {bn.-1,;-a•.,.'iWAitr�t'',
fOYK L •. _•.,.. • Z� - • I r 1 I .. -
u.:
::E •
/_ II
(� \ M."✓ L;::f - 111\
R -C \
• I I �� \ . NDRr«
FR - 20
FR -5 R -C
``` - ��'•`, I I I ! '
BUTTE COUNTY'' CAUFORW
1 -
'ZONING DISTRICT MAP
CRAIG AREA
i _ .. - _ I i • PLANNING DIRECTQW— i
'r•, ,ter'' _ - , , ; ,' %''
FR -10 APPROVED:
_ ` • -''r•' ` ` .. I 1 •� •'. 'r ORD. DATE
BY ORD. DATE NY
27 26 i' r cE THE __...__.�!EF C \ 1,\ / Wei ♦ WR. D.R.«
2
2466 9x7105 G0
SAM.
34135 / \� 26 -5 1 \ ��
------ --- 3= ?6 1
/
ROAD
• - \ 1 ,•, ACCESS
..r REO.
FR -10 "
I/
zl I ) 1
=1 .
I I .-/�, \1 1 r, _ - - NECKL ELR
I P-
00
1I . �� 111 - • /�� ,
61
INDEX MAP
- - 1 \ - - - . _ - - 111 r .. _ • _ - . - - - . -.. - - - y — �. - "D WALE
11 _ F -1
1/ 3
REFK
BEA
CRE
42 DIE
RC �\
lI r i
1
• � � FR-160`
NCRTN
R-C
SCALE .
BUTTE COUNTY CA'
ZONING DISTRICT
CRAIG AREA
r PLANNING DIRECTFR—"
MIDDLE ,:cPFK ' APPROVED:
LAKE CGCViLLE '
— — --- do
es
-
Li
f
--- C -S S
I'
i
it
�I
r-.. .\. A...• n- •. Y � i1. � .. -t
t �rT <..i�
'! X• .•' � . �• �,. T M1 3._+
«<.
� 7 i 1St •a, w-�J a
b .f
.. t'.• - A -_. .. � .4 t Sr•-
.� r � iY:t. a. �' r J< f a.�•L ,�+ .S }^C
I s.
qw
•
•��
r� . ' `= Via. • ,.
, `
,•y • �. 44
ir
4 • r
/.♦_
V'a ., twa.... f M .... •"• ` _ � r L � i.♦ ..yE .:�} ;rG - . <a �l � r' Y t* .4 :it
.f "'- ♦:
� `` •u : •}. " i. +` '
M� 1. '�'` � � .. :,r t� �.r � .r�:r'+f Y �
� ��.}- •Y• t- •+��
�}♦�.�'!
e a. •
n: �'. � 'i. �:.�r,
,r,;+- " r
� � �..r
� ••y
AA
. i - r ~ib it.. ` �` ` T' • ` r .
•`_T
'� �`i.cY � -. y:
• �. . t t � r �• • 1 � � a �� �` s � ., (,..., ♦...
t� •- � 'y fa�'
'�S • .;... t r a
�,r
1 ' a
�.�',.
-
r 1; .t= S t • +x y
" 3.• i
�
a • jam♦ !`±
.-' r ti..t ,v
•
� � �,
" . '� • 'r � r,'+•!
• ' � A� •4.
{i.,r «• k_. �'.
.
- �� a'r ,Y ?
� _ d` iii.
"'.,t -
• • • �afnn 2 y. }••
j
•' Y
i` �.. �. i � *f. �-.}• `- 1.;_ y.Z�y _. '�'�'. y 4 � _ i t. ' � _ a
'� -
`
tr
. ,�.• a1. � a
y% a �: { �7 y . ; a * :{ f 'i i �.f• - ' ♦� a: _. - ,fi
Y -
•
^ 1 7 • ,t ♦
a r a•
•
- � .•i �. ( f • +. -I� 'fit... Y � -
.. � . a �
L. Y ��. �•yam •'i f lv 1� A, t � `"•
�
, -i
-L?, F f r.- � -4 - si4 - - t "t. •.• to
- - .*
. i' •".• .
•rt � Y�+Z+ � S r r ° r t:„ k r
'►r. 7a
a _
X r I s
•w,
�' a _ / _ / ae( ,,. �, o �. ! ' L44 .til:- x +i• L. v '�' P ` a E '4 14t
(.L. •~ ~.
•-^
•
4.._, ate.. -.� - p M :S� .L tf M � J. asl• .V
rrt." e.. .. . Z � s
"•.� r 1Yv
� 3 -
T "7
- d � n �
< 'f
'
.
4, ?r
-'y • tom„
,��
�t�
r*•.
• ter.
• . ki. ' 4 � .. r .. 4 • . .td ` � a � .a � �,.. _ - , .,c . - y
�} , `a" - r .•
Sti Or ' ♦ .'.er t h - '°� .. �[. "_ -1;,{ • 'EM f+ - • f �- 4 " .s•• Yi''4.. S. '• . F ., } • # a
♦ a, i
� :.. - �� i"` '� �• � ka _ e ti as � � i
,t;aw e 1 w
is •i. ,. *�� � _' e - w y� �. . S
' '•� 8 R a , � ��.ar-� � 1/���.�* 'rF �• ' .:"�•sa_ d... �# 1 fi n�}
_ _ __�-... _ _ .!. tee^ ._ _ Win.. -._. _.'•_ _ .'-___ '—. � __..__"_'�. .�...._ _ . .. .. Yt'..�_.. '..C" th S.•
1II � 1u
Sc.:«. ,a.., -. i...�+' at':
MI* OLE PO;K •'••• �- I I II
_4AE ONO/I_LE U
II
1
.V 11
M E�
R-C
I NORTN
FR-20
FR-5 R-C ........,;,.............. SCALE
If -
""'`—me— ANMINNINNINNINN, BUTTE COUNTY CAUFORNIA
ZONING DISTRICT MAP
W _'' _ CRAIG AREA
' - \ - _ _ • I I - PUNNING DIRECTQY•- 7
FR-10 ,PPRIONM
F .. _ ••1 • - - - / I I I
iv e, i 0110. WTE GT OR0. D1 M
___ _ ♦ i\ 1
27 6 ice_-_-�� - ••`� - P _1NEF_,,..._-•�, lEP'' 1\\ 2p1 •WR. $J&H 2480 9YI8 f8
\ :. �...-
5 �5 25 \` "
Y 136
// - \ //-f• ROAD
ACCESS
REG �
FR-10
C.
1 '
j
• 1 1 / - - zl I �l i
MEci111 9
WW -�
ck� Elf
ZZ •
l l P-Q 11 - 1 - NN
1
INDEX MAP
``\•\ I I — '•1 NO xxE
RL
1 \ 1 1 10 �
J
\ II
4 6
R-C
11
7ZA.
89
n11
1
3413 --� r'W"X 77 .c / , .6. _ %``. 040v,E lill ,. f
FR -40
4 v
LAKE OROVILLE
U
T 20 R. R 6 E ,� � rt►d carat
<'D
a
3
li
IBUM COUNTY .- ,.
ZONING -DISTRICT
MAP
INDEX
(
�
512
��'�� ��Q r�
DATE:
TO:
FROM
SUBJECT:
FOR:
Background
MEMORANDUM
July 25, 1996
Honorable Chairman and Board of Supervisors
William Farrel, Director of Department of Development Se s
Mike Crump, Director of Department of Public Works j
DRAFT IMPROVEMENT PLAIN FOR THE BELL 5 AREA
Board Meeting of August 13, 1996
In 1987 the Board of Supervisors certified an Environmental Impact Report and granted tentative
approval to a privately initiated request to amend the County General Plan in the Bell Muir area. The
amendment would redesignate the area from Orchard and Field Crops to Agricultural Residential.
It was anticipated that the amendment would be followed by modification of the zoning ordinance
from the current Agricultural 5 acre minimum zoning to Suburban Residential with one acre minimum
lot sizes.
The Board's approval action was conditional on several steps first being taken. These items are set
forth in the attached minutes of the Board meetings of April 7th, and May 5th, 1987 and August 15,
1989. The Board's conditions, which were based on impacts and mitigation measures of the certified
EIR, required the property. owners to work with the County to address drainage system deficiencies,
and road and traffic problems. County staff was instructed to prepare a policy statement, applicable
at the time of rezoning;, regarding water, roads, traffic lights, fire station fund and hydrants. The
Board further stated the frontage improvements would not be required to include sidewalks, curbs,
and gutters.
In the last several years a group of property owner's have endeavored to complete the tasks set out
by the Board. In 1995, the property owner's retained NorthStar Engineering to address road and
drainage improvements and to recommend how the improvements could be paid for and maintained.
The County Development Services and Public Works Departments have worked in cooperation with
the property owner's representatives and with NorthStar Engineering to refine the proposals. The
attached draft Bell Muir Improvement Report is the result of that effort.
Summary of Improvement Plan Proposals
Improved Infrastructure
Each of the items of cor.cern to the Board in its previous Bell Muir actions is addressed in the drat?
Improvement Plan. The plan identifies the locations of intersections to be realigned, roads to be:
reconstructed, and establishes specific standards for frontage improvements.
These improvements have been designed to ensure reasonable traffic safety and convenience while
retaining the semi -rural ambiance of the neighborhood sought by residents and the Board. A storm
water drainage system is proposed that can be constructed gradually over time utilizing buried storm
drain pipes feeding to a retention pond. During the time this system is being gradually constructed,
the plan allows for property owners that are developing their properties to retain storm water on site.
The road design varies slightly from earlier Board direction in that it does include curbs and gutters.
However, it is believed by staff that these improvements are necessary for the drainage system to
function properly and for the County to maintain the roads in an cost efficient and visually attractive
manner.
Engineering Design Studies Needed
The Improvement Plan is conceptual in nature in order to retain flexibility, and because funding for
more detailed engineering studies must be secured before this additional work .can proceed.
Engineering work is needed in the area of intersection realignment, and to design and precisely locate
the storm drainage pipe system and retention ponds. These engineering studies, which will be
prepared by a private engineering consulting firm, under the direction of the Public Works
Department, will determine the actual costs of installing the improvements, and will be used to
establish development impact fees to be paid by property owners/developers at the time that
individual properties are developed. The costs of the engineering studies are proposed to be paid for
through funds collected by a new county service area to be established for this purpose. When
completed these studies will be added as appendices to the Final Improvement Plan.
Enhancing Nei hborhood Identity
Also proposed in the Improvement Plan is the construction of several entryway monuments to be
erected at suitable locations within the community. The Improvement Plan includes an illustration of
a possible design, yet this is a subjective area where more direct involvement of residents is needed.
It is anticipated that as part of the initial CSA work that the County will retain. the assistance of a
landscape architect to work with interested residents to select a simple. design that will help embellish
several intersections leading into the neighborhood, enhance the sense of community place and
identity, and support property values.
Financing of Improvements
Improvements will be installed -and financed as follows:
At the time of development, the property owner will install the following improvements in
front of the property:
Street reconstruction - one half street plus 12'
- Curbs and gutters
- Storm drainage pipe
- Fire hydrants/public water line extension
2. At the time of development, impact fees will be paid to the County by the property owner
to cover a pro -rata share of the following items. The impact fees will be used to construct
these improvements at a later time:
- Completion of area road system reconstruction
- Intersection realignment/reconstruction
- Area wide traffic improvements
- Completion of area storm drainage system including collection lines, ponding basin
- Right of way acquisition, construction and outfall
- Entryway monuments
Formation of New County Service Area (CSA
The Improvement Plan calls for the formation of a new CSA as a financing mechanism initially to
complete engineering design plans for the improvements above and to acquire an interest in the
properties that will used for storm water ponding. Following construction, the CSA will continue
to maintain the improvements. Assessments will be reflected on individual property taxes. The
approximate amount of the funds required for the initial phase in $87,500. This is an estimate only,
and is subject to adjustment. This initial charge to the CSA can be spread over one or two years. The
product of this initial part of the CSA work will be street and drainage system plans, detailed cost
projections to complete construction of the improvements and proposed development impact fees to
pay for this work.
Recommendations
In order to complete all of the interrelated activities it is recommended the Board take the following
steps at this or a subsequent meeting:
1. Instruct staff as to any changes to the attached draft Improvement Plan, then adopt a motion
to approve the plan in concept (final adoption to be later).
2. Invite area residents to collect signatures petitioning the Board to forma CSA based upon
the Improvement Plan and the attached information about CSA charges and zones of benefit.
Request residents to consider the question as to whether CSA charges of $87,500 for
engineering design work should be spread over one or two years. A'two year spread could
delay the time at which residents can begin the process of developing land by an extra year
unless the County is able to make an initial loan to the CSA to get the work started.
3. Proponents of the General Plan amendment have requested the County further assist the
process by loaning funds to the CSA in order to get an early start on preparation of
engineering work. The County would then be repaid by the CSA charges over a period of
one or two years. It is suggested that at this time the Board refer this request to the
Administrative Officer and Auditor for a report as to budgetary feasibility and any pertinent
policy issues.
Future actions of the Board related to Bell Muir should include the following, and will be
scheduled at the appropriate time:
■ Accept citizen petition, adopt resolution of intent to form CSA, and submit to
LAFCO for approval
■ Following LAFCo approval of CSA, authorize transfer of loan funds (optional)
to CSA, conclude amendment of General Plan text and maps, and initiate
companion zoning. amendments. at Planning Commission level
■ Retain consultant to prepare drainage and road improvement plans and impact fee
schedule for offsite improvements
■ At conclusion of consultant work, adopt final Improvement Plan, fee schedule and
conduct hearing and amend zoning map for area
The Board is requested to note that until all engineering work is completed and the fee schedule
adopted, that final Board action to amend zoning should be withheld. This is necessary in order
to promote orderly/development and permit Final Improvement Plan to be applied.
I
Attachments:
Board Minutes April 7, 1987; May 5, 1987: August 15, 1989 '
- Draft Improvement Plan
BF - K:\dds\memos\bellmemo
_o.. area; c: cue ?'_aan�aQ
C37-1-75 Closed hea__�y - ;cse;h Bu-- == - Gey ?,
as s de�_a? c� :)Cc'' e: a- as
Com�issi cr.�e�ca� :-^ac. :eYor_ has
aaendment (_ 02 aa�C— 3 C= 3:: =- -:C1? 1r-aI
been _�a=c and f:e:_ c_cps Co ag
pre^a_ �c, r _ .a c -
cpe_ as_ _ J ' _ 1r3: 6- �e acre
resident -4a]. A.enuescuta a: Be?? Road,
parcels) -=
�- = ' e 34 -SB i . (Re;c: . cm Suyez'::sars
vest of ,La=c Azenue, C.._�_ (: --
Dolan and Ver --vase ca pcss:sle n__:;ac_ca aeasures Aad
impleaentat:ca prcce3ure.
;�" HO'TION C- '.1TT_.1T TO A??°OV:: TEE Ge �:A1, ?Lm
Notion: � .� -�R "H' .z3C; T,7, -g THE STI?TTLATION THAT TXO
,Dt�:7' _'JR: (_ ADRAZ.• -,., GE 7ISTR�C7 BE FOR:°E7 FOR
..cE
ARE;, AT .7. :'T ;TION OF .::D ?ROPrRTY OWNE:JS
.iD
THAT, Z) • Aryl, :*UiR AR=A BE INCLUDED IN :HE
,, ( ,..
To•-r_C STUDY CURRENTLY BEING DONE ALONG THE EAS':
_r„ _
-- - Ay�:iLTr COR.4IDOR AS ?ART OF ';HAT STUDY AREA AND THAI
- RE;,C;�iE2iDATIONS :3C:i THAT S T'JDY :.1C�:TDE BELL WIR AS PAR2
• 8? -275 OF T3TiR CONSIDSRI►:'-r ON AND THAT iiOULD 3B TO INCLUDE HOT
(CaIIt' d). ONLY STUDYING TR3 AREA AS ?AR'_" OF TAB OVER.ILL BUT ALSO TO
��' ?iC:UDg THE -A.4SA AS ?ART' OF "HX RESOLUTION FOR iiR,�?I"T9.+R
mH :00 RATA SEARS =GAT BE REQUIRED ?OR THE I?D?40VE Y'iS
:i?Fu,3D . T30SE T aC THINGS S3CU'LD BE DONE PRIOR TO TBE
F __NALIZATION 0? THZ GMRAL PLAN AYz...�'`0 ENT. SECONDLY,
Ta: Z71g VERE 3AIS£D REGARDING BOTH
::iFJRS N]EZ.0,S AND :YV=RO 1AL CONCERNS AND A2r"ER
7vCSF,. Tye THINGS CCC73 AND THE G.P . COULD MOVE ?ORii3l.itD I
O IiCLUDE AS ?OLC-:iCULD Li REQU%ST THAT STAFF
_ DE'7EuvP LANGUAGE TH:+T FOR VEATE'J=R REZONE MIGET OCCUR
EF..�.Etsl'T��-
, ^ s, CONNEC -ONS TO CAL WATER BE REQUIRED VI T H ' i
_
AREA FOR ANY YT JRE DEVELOPxF,NT - 4. THAT ALSO THE-
RASTQUC':URv, TH. ROAD STRUCTURE=�iSIDE THE AREA, TAE
THAT VIGaT BE 9XZDED ?OR ROAD 7IDENING AND
LIG3TS ON LAST AVENUE - TL'E =R0 RATA SaARZ OF
T?AT BE REQUIRED - CONTRIBUTION TO FIRE FUND AND HYDRANTS
AND TAI.n-, 70 THE NITRATE AC'T ION PLAN OR HOW T33
ArZ4;, USE OF SE?TIC TANKS IN THIS AREA iiOULD RELATE TO TH3
!1:7R, -v AC TON ?L�+.,'7 -i---LL ALSO BE DONE AT THAT TIME. �+
jZ'_L_'E TEV S?E:-:RE OF INF�JEYC�, THE URBA?7 pOUNDARY LINES
. - ^E•^EZA 7OULD 3E :•+.MINDED =_ THE GENERAL PLAN ANrNDHENT
THROUGa THE 317RATE AC•TIGN PLAIN WOULD HATE TO BE
ADDRESSED AT THAT '.I'_!E 3ECAUSE IT IOULD BECOME ?ART OF
a:& CalCO URBAN AREA AND THAT THOSE THINGS OULD 3E DEALT
i7= :'? FOLLOWING THE G - ? . ; 3MENDMINT -
:! S
Vote: _ �.3 3 't ? y 4 Y 5 AB (Mac- carred)*
(HQTZOIf OF I:d'T '7AS ".ADE SUB.:ECT TO A ?T.JBLIC HEARING. 33ARING
DJLT= FOR "aE ?TJBLIC 3EARING ON THE :10T:CN OF :'i;E.'iT SE 'OR UY 5
d? -Z36 ?vslie beatinq - =otion of intent to approve the 6aneril P?an
ae�seat for Joseph aur -rel - appeal of ie Planninq C-aaission' s
denial at Donna Aoober-7/,ce Burre1. General Plan anendmeat (item on
,,hick a draft
env -4z -impact report has been prepared) Era
orchard mad field c=ops to agricultsral,residential on property toaec
1-5 (aQ=ic! lural - !-i-.e acre parcels) ? ocatad on both sides at Yui:
lvenue south at Bell Road, gest of alamc A-:kC"ice (= _le 84-3�i
frith the stipulation that a drainage dist:ic= be formed at the
initiation of'the area proper+Y axaers, and that the Bell Muir arca
be included in the current traffic study. (from 4/7/87)
IMM: 30VE TO FORMILIZ3 NOTION OF I3iTXM r A)!D CSR?IP"I TH3
�I3OMMTAL REYItiMW OCMUMTS r THE 3IR • MID 1�iA�a . i 33
R=UTS OF CSQA RAVE BEAN NET AND THA': Tfi3
ENVI30N2Si2tT.1I, 3Q7T_�d' ZS COEP*.►3T3: BUT STI?ULATS THAT TE3
. G�i3RAL ?LAN . a2�.YDN__.s''iT iTIId, NOT 3S FIIiA2; UNTIL:
• TaAT A DRnI?i�,�sE DISTRICT BE POR`S3D FOR THE ARBA AT THZ
• L'iITI3?ICN
OF THE ?QOP33"`_' OWMS TO ?ROVIDE . Tr3
F,?iANCI�iG FCR CONS?RUCTI03i AND Y223iTmiANC3 OF YEC3SSAR7
- _ n9ROVEXENTS; ..'M
Z. THAT THE USA BE .LNCLUDED L't T33 TRAFFIC STUDY THAT :S
viR.RE:i' Y BE14G .DOHS TOR THS 2i0RTMS'7 C3ICO , AM 1�='
,HZ 3AS'T IVSHUS CO1RJCR AND A MNS TO L'�PL32SE2iT ►`�
STUDY; AND -
3. THA': OTHER I:�?ACTS 3S IDBN'!I7I3D Za THE 3ELi+-xUIR 3' 3%
ADDRESSED 13 A POLIO: ST11132EM TO BE A ?ART OF 7
G3NERAL K'Am A2 MME iT .
4. PEEN T11OS3 TVC TH'L-4GS ARB DONE, THE GENERAL ?t.,A63
jwvNDNaNT TILL BE DONS VIM THE OTHER IFAS CSRTIi 13D
THE 3IR_
B_ DIRECT PUBLIC JORSS S','�* TO '.SEB': WI'T3 THE PROPON3X'"-
AND GBT `7IT3 S3AST1 UNION DRAT-NAGE ASSESSMZNT DIS TRIC
OTgsR DISTRICTS, DRAY ZAPS, AND DrnMOP A PROPOSAL F=.=•
. Aj3TZxANC.3 !M THE ARM.
I S
3 Y 4 Y' 5 Y (Notion csr:ied)
• 89-35� Caztsidera.�=cry c= Tet=;= _-cm �ese�z �. Eur=__? r�gar3ing
the He? ? -uu,_ S �_c T A= e= - ac:_cr. ==e•.:est AL,CP'i' Z'a..E
---iD 3'T G
EIGHT RrC�N`�'VDED AC�=C:i AS Sr_: -=
v --"v .� Y:.C6! DA'='�'D T Z % , _° 8 S
MOTION:
MOS TO:
1. C;.'t,2T Pr3LMC WORE Rz'C^I�=VDA�T_ON FOR
S �pRM DR3_N- AG= �`'f°gOiT 'QT='S , Al'3D ALLOW TsTTsTE
ROPE" ON RS TO CONT -2 = `:'O WCR� W'2'TMy
:L'3LZC wop-7s CN 'I"=' S =SSv=:
FORM—A7---ON OF A
r,R� r��,C-r. D,S== ZC'- :OR C^NSRIIC�?ON AND
C: R�:QII_R ID
• -3 NCTTFV 'r+�-s, Ax--i—G=TIS _ vOP�'^`r
vaST BE,
"EE
S u BZC'='
�c^+rM :mrD CCS= OF S_, 000.00 FCR=`�:a-�YD:.I?G
• Vic- Cr
.COT ?ARE. 'T'_'`r= =C MODEL, TO
_NCLIIDE S u r.� zC'T' ?L�. `_�G51' 3E
DE. OS 2 �z'D WITH
4. RE GZITR? PLAN� �•VDl-f--- N T TO
=-ILT FOR RE'POR'T' ON
�CSS�3Lc. iT1 ;'= AC';_ON
PT NT AN�NDI�`1'T':
5 D_REC' ?�-.i�N�VG S ter- : �R�= ='
S-+Ayz�V'r,
AZ-=- C_XB LZ y^_' : == C F RE--Cl-TZ-NG r
REGARDING WA==�Gn 5 ,
=R: .5-r. N _- u YD ND HYDRANTS
6 DIREC'�'
T CS c. -CA=L=- 'T'Q A
CNE (1) AC_�' '== SCE=. (NCT _.00= ACRES) + (IN
:T WOU= :1C
7 . NOT=y APP%ICANTS/FROPE=y OWNMS TMT
'"IONS FOR SP✓CM.2- C ZONING OR
APPLICA
SUBDIVISIONS OF PROPETY CANNOT BE
.CA ABLY (=NSIDE.RED UNTT�+ M.E. BOARD FAS
SDE. A FIMiL "DECI5SON ON TEED r--MTER L
PLANAPPLIC; "T_ON: AND
a. CONTINUE T32S ITEM AND HAVE STAFF PUT SACS .
ON THE AGrMM& WHEN RESPONSES ARE READY.
M S
NOTE: I y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 ously Carried)
- DRAFT
BELL MUIR AREA
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
r, k
PREPARED BY
BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
AND
BUTTE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
In Cooperation With The
NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING
August 1996
z
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction.
2. Improvement Plan Objectives.
3. Recommended Improvements.
Local Traffic/Transportation Facilities
Chico Urban Area Traffic Transportation Facilities
Storm Drainage System
Curb and Gutter Design and Pedestrian Access
Water Supply and Fire Protection System
Community Aesthetics and Identity
4. Implementation Program.
What Developers are Responsible For
What All Property Owners are Responsible For
- The County's Role
- Formation of County Service Area
Summary of Responsibilities
- Other Agencies (LAFCo, Chico, SUADAD)
FIGURES
Typical Street Section.
- Entryway Monuments.
Bell Muir Area Overall Drainage and Street Improvement Plan
ATTACHMENTS
A. Drainage Calculations
B. Preliminary Budget and Zones of Benefit for Bell Muir CSA
1
Page
2
3
4
13
10
13
INTRODUCTION
General Back rg`ound
The development of an improvement plan for the Bell Muir area was brought about by desire of a
number of residents to ultimately convert their properties to suburban residential use. Amendments
to the County General Plan were proposed and an EIR was addressing the effects of the amendments
prepared and certified by the Board of Supervisors in January 1987. Subsequent to this action and
prior to formal adoption of a General Plan change to begin the conversion process, several action
items were required by the Board. These included formation of a drainage assessment district to fund
the design and construction of extensive drainage improvements, completion of a "traffic study" and
the development of policies related to fire protection, wastewater treatment water supply and
community character. Further clarification of the requirements for completing the amendment was
given by the Board in 1989. (See Attachments A & B).
Several years have passed since the Board took action. During this time, interested property owners
have explored approaches to meeting the conditions established by the Board. Two separate drainage
studies were privately prepared and submitted to the County, but there was disagreement as to the
approach taken, and the County did not approve the plans. There have been several preliminary
proposals presented to the Board in recent years by the property owners that would have reduced
the requirements of completing the General Plan amendment. The Board declined to accept those
requests, and reaffirmed the need for specific solutions to the key development issues facing the area
consistent with previous Board direction.
In 1995 a group of property owners joined together and retained NorthStar Engineering to work
with the County to develop detailed solutions to roadway, drainage, and fire safety needs in the area.
NorthStar subsequently worked in close cooperation with the County Public Works and
Development Services Departments to prepare the proposals contained herein. This Improvement
Plan describes the infrastructure improvements and their conceptual design and financing, necessary
to comply with the Board of Supervisors instructions for completion of the General Plan
amendment. Figure 1 shows the general vicinity of the northwest Chico area, and Figure 2 shows the
Bell Muir Improvement Plan area and boundaries.
Related Planning and Development
Subsequent to the action of the Board of Supervisors in January, 1987, several items have been
initiated or completed that have bearing on the proposed project. The City of Chico completed and
adopted a 20 year updated General Plan. During development of the City's plan, considerable
discussion was directed to the feasibility of developing the Bell Muir area as a future urban growth
area. A conceptual plan was developed showing medium density residential uses and neighborhood
commercial areas. The proposals reflected the City's need for land to accommodate future urban
growth.
2
However, the financial feasibility of this more intensive development concept was never
demonstrated, and it is clear that significant improvements to the roadway system in the area would
be needed, and public sewers would also need to be extended. Moreover, a significant number of Bell
Muir residents objected to the City's plans to intensify development of the semi -rural area. As a
result, the City dropped further consideration of Bell Muir as an urban extension of the City. The
adopted City General Plan now shows the area as predominantly rural residential at one dwelling unit
per five acres.
Other significant recent events include approval of plans to construct an elementary school in
Henshaw Avenue area, adoption of developer impact fees by the County and City for the urban area
to address area wide traffic improvements, and completion of the North West Chico Annexation.
Finally, through the adoption of the Agricultural Element of the General Plan in 1995, the Board of
Supervisors reaffirmed the County's commitment to long term retention of agriculture. It is
envisioned by the County that with development of the Bell Muir area as a large lot, estate residential
area on the outer edge of the Chico urban area, that a logical transitional area will have been
established between the portions of the community developed to urban densities and the areas planned
to remain permanently in commercial agricultural use. The County does not anticipate further non-
agricultural development north of Muir Avenue or Bell Road.
The formulation of the Improvement Plan was guided in part by the following studies and reports.
They are referenced in the detailed descriptions of improvements required for the area:
■ City of Chico, General Plan and EIR (1994)
■ Bell Muir EIR, January 1987
■ Henshaw Elementary School EIR
■ Street Fee Program, Chico Urban Area
IMPROVEMENT PLAN OBJECTIVES
The Bell Muir Area Improvement Plan is a key document intended to guide implementation of `the
General Plan amendment allowing the area to transition from minimum lot sizes of five acres to one
acre. The Plan is designed to address current deficiencies in the public street system, and to describe
drainage, fire safety, and water supply improvements that will be required to be installed as new
development proceeds. This draft plan also provides preliminary information about the street and
drainage improvements, establishes standards for street reconstruction, and addresses treatment of
curbs, gutters, and pedestrian access. It presents preliminary cost estimates for these community
improvements, establishes the methods of funding to pay for the improvements and describes
formation of a County Service Area. The draft Improvement Plan anticipates the need for more
detailed design studies of drainage improvements and conceptual street intersection layouts. When
this work is completed it will be adopted in the form of a Final Improvement Plan, and will guide the
construction of these improvements.
3
TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN BELL MUIR
Local traffic issues that have been identified concern primarily the condition and width of the local
streets. The intersections of Bell. Road and Alamo, Guynn, and Nord were identified in the Bell Muir
EIR as being non perpendicular and in need of reconstruction as part of an overall plan to develop
the area. Right of way would need to be acquired to accomplish this. The intersection of Rodeo and
Nord Avenues is also skewed but is more constrained due to the existence of the Grange Hall. Some
minor improvement may be accomplished at this intersection. Alternatively, establishing a new
connector street between Nord and Rodeo with a cul-de-sac on Rodeo is a potential solution. Finally,
it is envisioned that a new street connections be made between Nord and Guynn to facilitate east/west
circulation in the area.
Exhibit "A" is the basic Circulation Plan component of this Improvement Plan, and illustrates the
locations where new or modified road facilities are to be constructed.
This plan anticipates that property owners and developers will be responsible ,for the reconstruction
of existing streets, along the frontage of their properties. At a minimum, this will include that the
street be reconstructed to the ultimate width and structural section along the frontage and an
additional twelve feet on the opposite side. This is consistent with longstanding County policy for
development along existing streets and roads.
This reconstruction alone will not be sufficient to accomplish full improvement of existing streets in
the area. Several areas along the existing streets are already developed with homes and therefore will
not be further developed. In order to provide for the full design widening and reconstruction of these
areas, it is proposed that a development fee be established to allow for the ultimate section to be
constructed. Developers could receive credit for those portions that are done as a part of their
individual development. The ultimate authority for determining when the street is reconstructed shall
rest with the Public Works Department and should be determined as development patterns progress.
Table 1 below, summarizes the projected costs of local street improvements.
4
TABLE 1
LOCAL STREET EMPROVEMENTS
Location'
-Improvement
Source
Est. Cost/L.F.
(including
Engineering)
Total Cost
Nord
1/2 street 1950 11
Co.'Road.Standard
$44.85
$87,457.50
Rodeo
1/2 street 40501.f.
Co. Road Standard
$44.85
$181,642.50
Muir
1/2 street 12501.f.
Co. Road Standard
$44.85
$56,062.50
Gu
1/2 street 8101.f.
Co. Road Standard
$44.85,
$36,328.50
Bell/Alamo
Intersection
Reconstruct
Bell Muir EIR '
NA
$15,000
Bell/Nord
Intersection
Reconstruct
Bell Muir EIR
NA
$15,000
Nord/Rodeo
Intersection
Reconstruct
Bell Muir EIR
NA
$15,000
Bell/ Guynn
Intersection
Reconstruct
Bell Muir EIR
NA
$15,000
Alamo Ave
1/2 street 5201.f.
Co. Road Standard
$44.85
$23,322
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST - SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT
$444,813
In order to fund the improvements in Table 1, a fee will be necessary. The Bell Muir EIR states that
approximately 296 additional parcels could be created. Using this number, a fee of $444,813/296 or
$1,502.75 per acre is needed. This improvement fee must be established and used only for the stated
improvements. It may be used to reimburse developers who construct the improvements as a part
of their individual projects.
r
5
CHICO URBAN AREA
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
Traffic impacts associated with the development of the Bell Muir area were addressed in. the 1987
EIR. At that time, only limited transportation studies had been undertaken in the Chico Urban Area
(CUA) and funding mechanisms for development related impacts were not in place. Subsequent to
the certification of the EIR, the City of Chico and County of Butte adopted a transportation impact
mitigation program (street fees) that includes improvement of the regional impacts identified in the
1987 EIR. The projects are included in the Chico Urban Area 20 Year Summary of Street
Improvements, Traffic Signals, and Class I Bicycle Paths 1991 to 2001. Table 2 includes the traffic
impacts associated with the development of the Bell Muir area and the document identifying them.
Bell Muir is not current within The Chico Urban area street fee collection area, and consequently will
need to be added.
Bell Muir property owners desiring to develop will participate in these area -wide traffic facility
improvements by contributing a fee at the time of development.
TABLE 2
CHICO URBAN AREA IldPROVEMENTS
Location
Improvement
Source
Estimated
Cost
Funding
East Ave at Nord
Traffic Signals
Bell Muir EIR
$120,000
CUA Street fees
East Ave. at Cussick
Traffic Signals
Bell Muir EIR
$120,000
Completed
East Ave. at Alamo
Traffic Signals
Bell Muir EIR
$120,000
CUA Street fees.
East Ave. at Guynn
Traffic Signals
Bell Muir EIR
$120,000'
CUA Street fees.
Esplanade at Henshaw
Traffic Signals
Bell Muir EIR
$120;000
CUA Street fees.
Esplanade at Henshaw
Lt. turn lanes
Bell Muir EIR
Incl. W/Si nal
CUA Street fees.
Note: Above cost estimates were prepared in 1987 and are subject to adjustment.
T
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM
Two previous studies have been done that include the area contained in this plan. The first one was
commissioned by the County of Butte and completed by Rolls, Anderson and Rolls in 1985. The
Rolls study encompassed a larger area, including some areas to the east which would drain through
Bell Muir. The cost per acre for the improvements proposed under the plan were quite high. This'
was due to three factors: 1) Land use was assumed to be three units per acre with curb, gutter and
sidewalk, 2) The system was designed to carry the "100 year storm" completely within the pipe,
meaning larger pipes, and 3) Due to the need to widen and improve the existing SUDAD channel.
The second study by A & Q Engineering followed the same general layout as the Rolls plan, however
proposed lower densities and open roadside ditches with culverts in lieu of the more costly
underground piping system. The County Public Works Department was opposed at the time to use
of open roadside ditches for the entire system and approval of the proposal was not achieved.
Modified Drainage Concept
This Improvement Plan provides a permanent solution for storm drainage feasible from a cost and
that construction standpoint.
Unlike previous studies, the area north of Bell Road is not included. This area can, if needed, be
drained to the SUDAD channel independently. Also not included was the developed area east of
Alamo which currently does not have permanent facilities.
The plan differs from previous studies in that it proposes to use detention/retention as both interim
and permanent solutions to rainfall runoff.
The use of a detention/retention design was chosen for two primary reasons; to eliminate the need
for a major outfall to the SUDAD channel together with the cost of improving the existing channel,
and to provide a method for undeveloped properties within the study area to move ahead with
development plans, independent of other outside areas and interests. Additional side benefits to this
approach are groundwater recharge, water quality improvement and minimization of the impacts
of urbanization on the existing SUDAD channel and Mud creek. The basic assumptions are as
follows:
■ The area will develop to one acre densities.
■ That the underground collection system would be designed to flow full under the ten
year recurrence storm.
■ The detention facility would be designed to retain storm drainage peak runoff.
7
■ The Rational method was used for design of the collection system.
■ The SCS TR55 method was used for computing runoff and storage requirements for
the detention facility. A 10, 25, and 100 year, 24 hour storm was used.
■ That a minor outfall would be constructed, on the order of 24" in diameter, from the
detention facility to allow ultimate draining of the pond, from the pond site along the
SPRR R/W to Mud Creek.
■ Cost estimated were based on the Rolls and A&Q reports to maintain continuity and
sound basis of comparison.
■ Finally, that the pond would be sited adjacent to the SPRR to provide a buffer for the
residences along Rodeo Ave.
The project including construction of the storm drain facilities will be accomplished incrementally as
development occurs, with fees collected to complete acquisition of the pond site and to pay for
construction of the pond and outfall. (It is proposed that the CSA will secure a long term irrevocable
purchase option on the pond site). This will require the developing properties to provide interim
detention facilities in the form of temporary detention ponds for larger developments (over five acres)
and temporary seepage trenches for smaller developments. Credit will be given for pipe installed that
will be part of the ultimate system. The complete system must be designed in sufficient detail to allow
incremental construction.
Exhibit 1 illustrates the general layout and sizes of the proposed drainage collection system. The
laterals and local collectors will be designed as individual developments are planned and will be
connected to the overall collection system. The pipe sizes shown on the master layout are
conservative and may be reduced in size when actual design is undertaken.
The drainage facilities are a critical element in the conversion of the area from agricultural to
suburban uses. The ultimate construction of all facilities will provide adequate drainage and will
minimize the impacts of urbanization on the existing waterways.
In order to provide for the orderly construction of the drainage improvements, the proposed County
Service Area will fund the design of the storm drainage system, including the detention pond. This
will allow for the incremental construction of the system and assure that interim facilities will fit the
ultimate plan. Acquisition of the future detention pond site should proceed as soon as funds are
available, so as to assure it's completion.
Attachment A includes the drainage calculations, the detention pond storage estimates and engineer's
estimate.
9
CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
A chief objective of area residents and the Board of Supervisors has been to ensure the character of
the Bell Muir area retains its rural ambiance. Accordingly, the Board indicated in its 1989 discussion
that sidewalks, curbs and gutters would not be required. At that time, the drainage concept was
envisioned as an underground pipe system.
The drainage concept proposed in this is based in part on containing surface drainage within open
valley gutters and directing it to drop inlets and the underground storm drain pipes: Without the level
of drainage control provided by the valley gutters that the proposed system will not. work efficiently.
Open ditches would be required if gutters are not constructed. Keeping open ditches clear of debris
and obstructions will be impractical and costly for the County.
However, to be consistent with the Board of Supervisor's objective of preserving the informal, rural
character of Bell Muir, the plan utilizes an integrated rolled curb/valley gutter system. The sectional
design is shown by Figure 4 below. This will produce an effective storm water collection system, will
not appear "urban" in character, yet will help define the street scape in an attractive, orderly way.
Consisterit with Board direction, no sidewalks shall be installed. The wide streets and limited traffic
should enable pedestrians and younger cyclists to use the roadway to move about the community
safely.
Subdividers will be required to install these frontage improvements at the time of development and
as part of the street reconstruction and pay a pro rata fee at the time of building permit issuance to
complete the overall street system.
M
R/W F
10' TYP
PLANTING
AREA
R/W F
14' TYP
PLANTING
AREA
11%
R/W
40'
20' 20'
i
F
��x I 2y . q.S: m
BUTTE CO. STD.
2" ASPHALT CONCRETE S-1 ROLLED
t8" AGGREGATE BASE CURB & GUTTER
TTE COUNTY STANDARD R
MAJOR STREETS
RODEO AVENUE, NORD AVENUE, GUYNN AVENUE, ALAMO AVENUE;
HENSHAW AVENUE, MUIR AVENUE, AND BELL ROAD
AND FUTURE CONNECTOR STREETS
16'
R/W
32'
m
2% `
L. 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE
6" AGGREGATE BASE
BUTTE COUNTY STANDARD RS -2C
MINOR STREETS
F
BUTTE CO. STD.
S-1 ROLLED
CURB & GUTTER
ALL DETAILS NOT, SHOWN ARE PER COUNTY STANDARD
INCLUDING STRUCTURAL SECTION AND COMPACTION.
NOTE: Street Sections may be revised to. avoid 'existing street trees
9 TT
BELL MUIR AREA •
TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS 1
Figure 2 \� •
j 7125196 c war°
10
WATER SUPPLY AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM
The fire protection system in the Bell Muir area shall consist of:
Fire hydrants shall be installed on all public roads, in accordance with County standards, and
at a minimum, spaced at 800 foot intervals and supplied by a pressurized public water system
capable of providing at leash 500 gallons per minute fire flow.
2. Fire fighting equipment and personnel within the 5 minute response area sufficient to provide
protection from fires and supply other life safety needs.
The North Chico Butte County Fire Station, located at Cohasset and Frontier Circle is the closest
staffed station, and is at the outer limit of the five minute response time. It will be desirable to obtain
funding to staff the West Chico Butte County Fire Station which is currently a volunteer station and
is unstaffed. This may require institution of impact fees for fire protection which now are not charged
by the County. Alternatively, charges to the Bell Muir CSA could be established for fire protection
following the initial CSA charges for engineering design work.
Because many undeveloped properties in the central and northerly portions of the Bell Muir area are
now a considerable distance from the closest California Water Service Company water mains, it is
unlikely that all property owners will be able to afford the cost of extending the, mains at the time
development is proposed. Therefore, development of the area's fire protection system shall proceed
in a gradual or phased approach as follows:
Each property, and all parcels to be created therefrom, shall connect to and be served by a
public supply water system, if at the time the property is proposed for subdivision, it lies
within 1000 feet of a water supply main of a public water system. The property owner shall
be required to bear the cost of the water main extension and installation of any fire hydrants
that may be required. Reimbursement agreements may be used to provide for equitable cost
sharing by other properties.
2. A property, which does not have at the time of subdivision a public water supply within 1000
feet, shall install a water supply for fire protection purposes in accordance with applicable
county fire standards subject however, to the additional requirement that all such private
systems shall be designed and built to the standards required by the public water purveyor in
the area and suitable for connection to the public water system. at such time it becomes
available in the immediate area.
Properties proposing to utilize private water systems for fire protection shall contribute their
pro -rata share to the costs of maintaining the hydrant system through a County Service Area
created in part for this purpose.
11
4. Properties utilizing private water supply systems for fire protection, shall be required to
abandon such systems and connect to a public water system for both fire protection and
potable water service purposes at such time the public water system is extended to an
adjoining parcel, or to a location in the public road within two hundred feet of the parcel's
frontage on the same road. A written agreement between the subdivider and the water
purveyor will be required to assure this requirement is complied with.
COMMUNITY AESTHETICS AND IDENTITY
The Bell Muir area provides a pleasant semi rural residential living environment close in to the Chico
urban area. It is a place where orchard farming was once the dominant land use, and is. still much in
evidence. Verdant almond orchards and countless large oak and walnut trees create a shaded
environment characteristic of Chico and the Sacramento Valley's older communities. Bell Muir is a
graceful place that local residents take pride in. The Board of Supervisors recognized this by
directing that a statement of community character be developed for incorporation within the County's
General Plan or implementing ordinances. The Board objective was to identify additional
development guidelines that would help retain and enhance for the future those community
characteristics that give Bell Muir its special identity.
As a result of amending the General Plan and zoning ordinance to allow for parcels of one acre in
size to be created, a significant number of new residences will in time be constructed in the Bell Muir
area. Yet by retaining parcels of an acre or more, there will be ample room within each property to
site homes well back from the streets and adjoining properties, and tree cover can be retained and
enhanced.
Tree Guidelines
The Improvement Plan does not propose to regulate tree removal or require replanting. However,
property owners are encouraged to recognize the aesthetic values of the area's tree cover as well as
the considerable enhancement it provides to property values. The following guidelines are suggested:
■ New development including lots, roads, and homesites of should be designed to avoid
removal of existing valley oaks, or other large specimen shade trees. Where such
trees must be removed, replacement shall be required with the same or similar species
at a ratio of not less than two replacement trees for each tree removed. Replacement
trees shall be 15 gallon size or larger.
■ Tree species shall be selected that are large and stately at maturity. Species selected
shall have a minimum canopy diameter of 35 feet at maturity.
12
■ When it is the property owner's desire to no longer maintain existing orchards, the
trees should be removed to avoid development of blight and subsequent infestation
of other producing orchards in the area. Property owners should replace the orchard
with suitable shade or ornamental trees.
Entway Monuments
Bell Muir currently has a distinct neighborhood identity. This results in part from its low overall
density and semi -rural character, agricultural activities still on-going, and also from the affect of so
many trees. In time each of these factors will change. Specific attention should be given to
reinforcing these desireable characteristics. Establishment of entry monuments and decorative paving
at several key entry points to the neighborhood is a simple, yet effective step in this direction.
Suggested locations are: on Guynn Avenue at Henshaw, and Nord Avenue at Henshaw. There may
be other suitable locations for construction of entryway monuments.
Figure 3 illustrates a possible entry monument design. The idea is to create a simple, low
maintenance structure using native materials and landscaping typical of the area. The final design
should be developed by someone with a landscape architecture or similar background in cooperation
with community members. Construction of the entry monuments can be done at the time of other
road improvement work in the area. If properly designed, maintenance will be minimal, and will be
taken care of through the CSA.
FIGURE 3
ENTRYWAY MONUMENTS
13
Retention of Grange Hall as Community Center . k
The Grange Hall located at the intersection of Rodeo and Nord Avenues is a significant institution
in the community, reminding residents of the agricultural heritage and also providing a location for
community meetings. It serves informally as the community center of Bell Muir.' Residents of the
area should work with and encourage the Grange to retain this hall for the long term use and benefit
of the community. The intersection of Rodeo and Nord Avenues is proposed for redesign in this
Improvement Plan in order to improve safety. Attention should be given during the redesign to the
affects on the Grange Hall. Several intersection redesign alternatives are possible that if combined
with a property exchange could provide for better parking arrangements at the Grange Hall.
IlVIPLEMENTATION PLAN
Financing f Improvements/Cost Responsibilities
Financing of the improvements called for in this plan will be provided for in several ways.
Engineering design of the street system, intersection reconstruction, and the storm drainage system
including the retention basin will be contracted out by the County. The costs of this work will be paid
for through fees charged to the County Service Area which will be formed. The CSA will also pay
for acquisition of property for the retention basin, and any necessary right of way for intersection
realignment of additional road construction. Fees charged to various properties will be based on the
level of benefits anticipated.
Improvements associated directly with the subdivision of individual properties will be installed by the
property owner/developer as a condition of recording a final subdivision map or a parcel map. Street
widening, reconstruction and paving, and installation of curbs, on-site drainage retention, the portion
of the area wide storm drain pipe system on the property's frontage, and construction of private
wells meeting public health and fire suppression standards are the direct and sole responsibility of
individual developers.
Storm drains will be installed underground to serve the entire Bell Muir area and will empty to a
retention basin. In addition to installing the portion of this system that fronts his or her _property, the
developer will also pay a fee which will be a prorata share of the cost of completing the area -wide
collection system, and development of the retention basin and outfall. Separate fees will be charged
at the time of development to fund construction of the street improvement plan for Bell Muir, and
for a prorata share of the cost of traffic and transportation improvements within the Chico Urban
Area.
14
EM
The following policies will wide the implementation of the Improvement Plan.
Regional Traffic Policv
The Bell/Muir area will be included in the Chico Urban Area Transportation Fee area. Appropriate
fees shall be collected consistent with the policies of the current fee area.
Local Traffic Polio
A special fee shall be established to ensure complete reconstruction of streets contained in the Plan
Area. This fee shall be administered and collected consistent with the Chico Urban Area Street fees.
This fee shall be allocated only to the orderly completion of street reconstruction within the plan area.
Storm Drainaize Policies
A County Service Area shall be formed and shall have the authority to provide for engineering
services for the design of the facilities, acquisition of the detention ponds, and maintenance
after construction.
2. Following completion of the General Plan amendment and rezoning to SR -1, completion of
the Final Improvement Plan formation of the CSA, and adoption of fees, subdividers shall be
required to install segments of the storm drain which are contained within the area being
developed.
3. Subdividers and parcel maps shall be conditioned to install the "planned" facilities and shall
provide for on-site detention of excess runoff until such time that all storm drainage facilities
are in place. Excess runoff is defined as the difference between pre and post development
runoff.
4. A drainage fee shall be collected at the time of obtaining a building permit. This fee shall be
based on the cost of facilities, engineering and land acquisition of the pond site. This fee shall
be used for completion of the facilities at such time as sufficient funds are available or at such
time as the Board deems necessary. A credit shall be given to developers who as a partof
their project install facilities consistent with the plan, which are beyond and in addition to the
frontage improvements normally required. The fee shall be adjusted from time to time based
on the current Engineering News Record construction cost index.
The County's Role in Plan Implementation
Butte County will participate in implementation of the Improvement Plan through the following
actions:
■ Complete amendments to the General Plan and zoning ordinance and maps; and
15
I
■ Form a County Service Area (CSA) following receipt of petitions from property
owners and LAFCo approval; and
■ Loan funds to the CSA to begin preparation of engineering plans; and
■ Retain consulting assistance to prepare an engineered drainage plan and a conceptual
road improvement plan; and
■ Process applications for building permits and subdivision approvals and perform
related inspections; and
■ Collect development impact fees and apply to Improvement Plan projects; and
■ Construct drainage, roadway and intersection improvements and entryway
monuments as fees allow; and
■ Maintain County facilities within the CSA and public right of way
Formation of County Service Area
Upon receiving petitions from area property owners, the County will initiate formation of a CSA
subject to approval by Lafco. The initial work of the CSA will be to complete engineering design of
the road and drainage system improvements described in this plan and to establish an impact fee
schedule to help pay for the improvements. Following this initial phase, the CSA will assume the task
of long term maintenance of the public facilities. Street lighting may be added. The work of the
CSA will be consistent with and be guided by the plans and policies for improvements set forth in this
plan.
Attachment "A" describes the preliminary budget and proposed zones of benefit for the Bell Muir
area CSA. This is illustrative only, and is subject to change as more detailed work is completed. .
Roles of Other Agencies
The Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission has authority to grant or deny formation
of a County CSA upon receipt of an application from the County. Following positive action by
Lafco, the Board of Supervisors can conclude formation of a CSA
The City of Chico will be requested to confer with the County at appropriate times concerning
development issues within the Bell Muir area. The City's views will be taken into consideration
during decisions by the County.
16
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENT PLAN COST•RESPONSIBILITIES
Improvement/Work
Developer Installs
Development Impact Fee
CSA Charge
Engineering Design of
to all properties
Road Intersections and
but with zones
Storm Drainage System
of benefit
Improvements and Entry
Way Monuments
Widen and Reconstruct
project frontage
pro rata share to complete
Street
system
Curb
project frontage
pro rata share to complete
system
Gutter
project frontage
pro rata share to complete
system
Intersection
pro rata share to complete
Reconstruction Within
system
Bell Muir
Urban Area Street
pro rata share to complete
Improvements
system
Storm Drainage
project frontage
pro rata share to complete
Collection Pipes
system
Storm Drainage Ponding
pro rata share to complete
CSA to acquire
Basin
system
pond
Public Water System
extend to site if
within 1000' of
main
Fire Hydrants
developer installs
on site if within
800' of closest
hydrant
'
Street Trees
voluntary planting
on site
Entry Monuments
pro rata share
Maintenance of
properties
Facilities
charged based
on benefit
17
ATTACHMENT A
BELL MUIR DRAINAGE PLAN
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
ATTACHMENT A
REV. '5-23-95 BELL MUIR DRAINAGE PLAN
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
Q�pfESS/q�,q
a ilto.2Q463 _;..
civic
9rF OF CAL�F`'� ,
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS PRICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STORM DRAIN PIPE
24"
3090
LF
$36.00
$111,240.00
30"
2640
LF
$49.00
$129,360.00
33"
1630
LF
$57.00
$92,910.00
36"
2280
LF
$62.00
$141,360.00
48"
1750
LF
$83.00
$145,250.00
54"
1660
LF
$91:00
$151,060.00
OUTFALL STRUCTURE
1
EA
$3,000.00
$3,000.00
TOTAL COLLECTION SYSTEM
$774,180.00
DETENTION RESERVOIR
CLEARING AND GRUBBING
5
AC
1500
$7,500.00
EXCAVATION
50000
CY
$5.00
$250,000.00
FENCING
1980
LF
$8.00
$15,840.00
LAND ACQUISITION
5
AC
$43,560.00
$217,800.00 $491,140.00
OUTFALL PIPE
24u
_ 3100 LF
OUTFALL STRUCTURE
1 EA
RIGHT OF WAY
46500 SF
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION
INCIDENTALS
ENGINEERING
10.00%
ADMINISTRATION,
5.00%
INSPECTION
5.00%
LEGAL
5.00%
CONTINGENCIES
10.00%
TOTAL INCIDENTALS
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
COST PER ACRE 350 AC
$36.00
$111,600.00
$3,500.00
$3,500.00
$0.25
$11,625.00 $126,725.00
$1,392,045.00
$139,204.50
$69,602.25
$69,602.25
$69,602.25
$139,204.50
$487,215.75
P;7,,h+ $1;879,260_75
$5,369.32
ATTACHMENT A
"Drainage Calculations"
r
Table 2.2a.—Runoff curve numbers for urban areasi
Curve numbers for
Cover description hydrologic Buil group—
Average percent
Cover type and hydrologic condition impervious area= A B C D
Fully developed urban arias (vegetation established)
Open space (lawns. parks, golf courses, cemeteries,
etc.?': '
Poor condition (grass cover < 50%) ..............
68
79
86
89
'Fair condition (grass cover 50% to 75%)...........
49 '
69
79
34
Good condition' (grass cover > 75%) ...............
39
61
74
801.
Impervious areas:
Paved parking lots, roofs. driveways, etc.
(excluding right-of-way)...........................
98
98 ,
98
98
Streets and roads:
Paved; curbs and storm sewers (excluding
right-of-way) ..................................
98
98
98
98
Paved; open ditches (including right-of-way) .......
33
89
93
Gravel (including right-of-way) ....................
76
85
89
89
91
Dirt (including right-of-way) .....................
72
32
37
39
Western desert urban areas:
77
3;
38
Natural desert landscaping (pervious areas onlyr...
G3'
Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed
barrier, desert shrub with 1- to 2 -inch sand
or gravel mulch and basin borders) ..............
96
96
96
96
Urban districts:
85
$9
92
94
95
- Commercial and business.. .....................
81
88
91
93
Industrial ........................................ 72
Residential districts by average lot size:
1/3 acre or less (town houses) ...................... 65
77
8.5
go
92
87
1/4 acre ... ... ............................. .38
fit
75
83
81
;tri
1/3 acre .......................................... 30
25
57
54
72
70
80
85
IPL acre ...........................................
20
51
68
79
84
1 acre ....................................<.......
12
46
65
77
82
2 acres ...........................................
Developing urban aren-t
Newly graded areas (pervious areas only,
no vegetation)s ...................................
77
86
91
94
Idle lands (CN's are determined using cover types
similar to those in table 2.20.
'Aver Re runufr condition, and 1, . 0.2S.
Mie -cent impervious area shown tial+ u+etl to develop the campowite CN's. Other. tc+umptinn+
are :le vil alrat •iuu•
:n•ra+
average iter
are :limctl�• i mnrcteil to the tlrriname .+,rgtem. imltervioua areas have a CN of w.
and pen i -sus ari:we
our aort'i:lrnd r,luivalr:u t��
riju
�qwn
in hydnihigic t'onrlitiun. CN's for other atmbinations of cmtlitions nary
he canputed aviag
fruuiv Yet &or'_4.
space .q:xwl
.iC,N,• =buten out pµtiealrnt to tht,+e of pasturt. Compo.+ite CN's may be computed
for other otmhination+
„f mien <pace
t•.cer tylve.
1('N
'c, mpo:4ite CN'< for natural :Inert I:unL4t:yrioK Ih,ndd he computed u+info 6ynrrrs 2-:1 or 24 hawYl on
the itniten'ina+
arra rKrcentar
t•
arta CN'+ are assumed rtluivalent
%,q :col the lter•iowt area CN. The pervi,nra m
itrn memmures durinit Kr diox and
to ilc+rrt Atrub in ims-ir hydndt.cic outilition.
cot..4tructutn thooltl he t,tmlxrtrd u+inl; fixure
'_'a ur 24.
,,,jx,:.itr C'.4 to o.�e for the lir. of temporuy
-*('oc!
h;v-ed ,in the dexrte of development (impervious area lwrvvnt tge) and the CN's for the newly xnalctl per•iote, are:z+.
(210 -VI -TR -55, Second Ed., June 1986) 2.5
Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff
c
Project By j--kC\.. Date
Location Checked Date
Circle one: Present Developed
1. Runoff curve number (CN)
Soil ,name
.and
hydrologic
group
(appendix A)
Cover description
(cover type, treatment, and
hydrologic condition;
percent impervious;
unconnected/connected impervious
area ratio)
1�
0 —
Area
❑ acres
Omit
❑ 7.
Product
of
CN x area
cv
cy
d
a
Ec-
i'
ea
"-4
�i
-4
k . OZ"
1
1/ Use only one CN source per line. Totals a
CN (weighted) - total product
total area
2. Runoff
Frequency ................6............. yr
Rainfall, P (24-hour) .................. in
Runoff, Q...... in
(Use P and CN with cable 2-1, fig. 2-1,
or eqs. 2-3 and 2-4.)
Use 'CN
Storm 01
Storm 32
Storm 03
C}T-
2S
\ co
�. \4
3 .'l
k . OZ"
1
D-2 (210 -VI -TR -55. Second Ed., June 1986)
POND-2 Version: 5.13 SIN: 122-0515080
» »> OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH ESTIMATOR « «<
10 YEAR STORM
Inflow Hydrograph: a:POST-10 .HYD
Qpeak = 27.0 cfs
Estimated Outflow: a:ESTIMATE.EST
Qpeak = 15.0 cfs
Approximate Storage Volume
(computed-from t= 7.90 to 19.90 hrs)
8.4 acre-ft
POND -2 Version: 5.13 SIN: 1220515080
Plotted: 05-23-1995
Flow (Cf S)
0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 15.0
18.0
21.0 24.0 27.0 30.0 33.0
.7
-
*
.8
-
1.9
-
x
x
3.0
-
x
x
3.1
-
x
x
3.2
-
x
*
x
*
3.3
-
x
x
*
3.4
-
x
x
*
8.5
-
x
x
*
8.6
-
x
x
8.7
-
x
x
8.8
-
x
*
x
8.9
-
x
*
x
*
9.0
-
x
*
x
*
9*. 1
-
x
x
9.2
-
x .
x
9.3
-
x
**
x
9.4
-
x
x
*
9.5
-
x
x
9.6
-
x
*
x
*
9.7
-
x
*
x
*
9.8
-
x
TIME
(hrs)
*
File: a:POST-10 .HYD Qmax =
27.0
cfs
x
File: a:ESTIMATE.EST Qmax =
15.0
cfs
?OND-2.Version: 5.13 SIN: 1220515080
> >>> OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH ESTIMATOR « «<
25 YEAR STORM
Inflow Hydrograph: a:POST-25 .HYD
Qpeak = 45:0 cfs
Estimated Outflow: a:ESTIMATE.EST
Qpeak = 20.0 cfs
Approximate Storage Volume
(computed from t=, 7.30 to 18.60 hrs)
11.7 acre -ft
POND -2 Version: 5.13 SIN: 1220515080
Plotted: 05-23-1995
Flow (cfs)
_0---4.0 -8.0--12.0--16.0--20.0--24.0--28.0--32.0--36.0--40.0--44.0
X
x
x * '
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
*
x
*
X
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
X.
x
x
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
X,
*
x
x
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
•x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
.ME
Lrs )
'ile: a:POST-25 .HYD Qmax = 45.0 cfs
pile: a:ESTIMATE.EST Qmax = 20.0 cfs
POND -2 Version: 5.13 SIN: 1220515080
>>>>> OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH ESTIMATOR <<<<<
100 YEAR STORM
Inflow Hydrograph: a:POST1 .HYD
Qpea = 80.0 cfs
Estimated Outflow: a:ESTIMATE.EST
Qpeak = 25.0 cfs
Approximate Storage Volume
(computed from t= 7.10 to 21.40 hrs)
17.5 acre -ft
POND -2 Version: 5.13 S/N:-1220515080
Plotted: 05-23-1995
Flow (cfs)
.0 8.0 16.0 24.0 32.0 40.0 48.0 56.0 64.0 72.0 80.0 88.0
X*
X*
X
x
x
x
x.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
*
x
*
x
*
x .
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
x
x
x
x
x
X,
x _
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
TIME
(hrs)
* File: a:POST1 .HYD Qmax = 80.0 cfs
x File: a:ESTIMATE-EST Qmax = 25.0 cfs
PROJECT
NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING
' JOB NO. S 28sBY
� '1 G -C_ — --
-
ENGINEERS
• PLANNERS • SURVEYORS
-
Sheet ` of
S-heets
DRAINAGE ZONE
S __
RUNOFF
BY
RATIONAL FORMULA
DESIGN
RECURR.QNCE
INTERVAL 1 Year
LOCATIONAREA
TIME OF
CONCENTRATION
�J -
DESIGN
PROFI LE
LINE
FROM
TO
LENGTH
(FT.)
INCRE-
MENT
Cf
For
TOTAL
TOTAL
TO
IN
LINE
aZ_
Z w
z�
a �?
SIZE
SIZE
SLOPE
0
0 A
A A
C A
C A
UPPER
END
LINE
TIME
STOR-
T�
Q zv
�_
�
Ft
�
(Fu I I)
(Full
V
Ft.
LENGTH
OF
FALL
Ft.
OTHER �
LOSSES
ELEV.
AGE
LINE
Ft.
Sec.
UENDR
LOWER
c s.
SLOPE f
Ft.
�'"
-�
--
•�
CR
WN*
-
n 1z
y
Z4,4-
\ .t'.o
Z �.q
?,
•,?'��. C��'a.4-
3ta
.
b 3
/[��
�✓
�,
IS
1'.
0
C L�,, E
C,1 C2
\32�
Go,1
• -
113.2
0025
\
`
�L2q.q
_
J
1
Zd.9 -z -z 24
2 &N
k.04
—1
413
0 , 5
`,A tom'
1 % ��
=•
-:
' i
8
29.4 `,3 2�i,q
1, oo
Mor v J
'
i
:0.3`1 i
c%).i�3
L�
1 M3
ll
'Ll .33.
8.q
ATTACHMENT B
PRELIMINARY BUDGET AND ZONES OF BENEFIT
FOR
BELL MUIR COUNTY SERVICE AREA
e-
1
1
Attachment B
PRELIMINARY BUDGET AND ZONES OF BENEFIT
' FOR
BELL MUIR COUNTY SERVICE AREA
PROPOSE:
The purpose of the budget is to fund the cost of engineering design for the storm
drainage collection system and detention pond, conceptual design for the road and
intersection layout, and the architectural design of the entryway monuments. In
addition, an impact fee schedule will be prepared. The proposed budget will spread
the cost of engineering over two years.
ESTIMATED COST:.
Engineering:
The estimated cost to prepare these plans is approximately $87,500. It is proposed to
fund this cost over a two year period. The engineering plans will provide sufficient
detail to allow subsequent development of individual parcels to install storm drainage
facilities of sufficient size and at the proper grades to eventually complete the entire.
system. The detention reservoir will be designed, including the outfall, to allow
subsequent construction with minimal additional engineering. (Essentially completing
specifications and contract documents). The conceptual road layout will be sufficient to
guide actual roadwork by developers and to allow the County to complete design work
for.realignment of certain intersections.
Pond Site Acquisition:
The owners of the parcels affected have agreed to provide purchase options which
would allow purchase from drainage fees collected at the time of development. It may
be desirable, however to include some amount of funds within the CSA budget to
secure purchase options for the pond sites. The $87,500 preliminary CSA budget does
not include this cost.
PROPOSED METHOD OF FUNDING:
Since the principal benefactors of the improvements will be the property owners that
have large enough parcels to be subdivided, the cost of engineering will be borne by
them. Property and therefore zones of benefit that will be subject to the CSA fees are
classified as follows:
Zone A. Two acres and larger parcels will pay a pro -rata share based on the total
Zone B. Two acres with an existing residence will pay only one half of the
acreage fee.
Zone C. Less than two acres which cannot be subdivided will not pay for the
engineering or pond site acquisition.
Approximately 285 acres fall within Zone A and 22 acres in zone B. Using the above
proposed method of cost spread, the cost per acre for years one and two will be $85
per year. Subsequent maintenance costs would be added in future years.
FUTURE MAINTENANCE:
One of the functions of the County Service Area will be to maintain drainage
improvements after construction.. These will include drainage facilities, fire hydrants,
the entryway monuments, and possibly street lights. The cost of maintenance will be
equally distributed over the entire CSA, including those parcels already developed.
No estimate of cost has been prepared at this time. Future maintenance fees would
not be assessed until improvements are actually constructed.
r
SHf£rIo/l
LEND
INDARY OF C.S.A.
IE OF BENEFIT "A"
IE".OF BENEFIT "B"
IE.OF BENEFIT "C"
SERVICE AREA NO.
for
BELL - MUIR AREA
NorthStar ��•^�•-
.0aa....,MWUVt.�P=.CALrOW" 9v=6
ENGINEERING MW 493.1900
Sheet1
BELL MUIR COUNTY SERVICE AREA i
PROPOSED BUDGET, 1996-1997
ZONES OF BENEFIT -
ZONE A AWN- —UA U. FEE _ .T^
42-02-07 i
5 $
1,476.50
42-02-08
5: $_].476.50
'
42-02-09
101 S
2.953.00 i
42-02-06
201 S
5.906.00
42-02-102:
5. S 1,476.50 `
,838.90
42-02-103;
5.5! 3
1,624.15
42-02.101 15
i $
1,476.50 i
S
1,476.
$
2.362.4u
42-02-21
2.953.
S
- ' S
5,906,
S 1,624.
.S 1,476•
�
$ 2 g53•
=7:377;:_' c P.
42-02-42
81 $ 2,362.404--
$
2.362.4u
42-02-21
10 I S 2, 963.00
S
2.953.00
42-02-1001
81 T 2,362.401
$
2,362.40
42-02-99 1
5. S 1,476.50 `
S
1,476.50
42-02-98
51 $ 1,470.50 !
- $
1.476.50
42-02-10 j
20 $ 5,906.00 ;
j S
5,906.00
42-02-04 i
20 $ 5,906-001
is
5.906.00
42-02-22 -
6 $ 2,362-401
$
2,362.40
_
42-02-89 j 4.84.8.-S 1.417.44
_
y S :
1,417.44
42-02-90
4.7. $ 1,387.91
i ` $
1,387.91
42-02-26
4° S 1,181.20 i
i ; S
1.181.20
42-02-56
4.4; $ 1,20-9.32
S
1,299.02
42-02-27 '
4! $ 1,181.20 i
$
1.181.20
42-07-01 i
1 2,953.00
$
2,953.00
42-07-196;
51 S 11476.50T- _
i - ` S
1,476.50
_
42-07-197;
5' $ 1-476.561 -
S
-1,476.50
42-05-15-i
:$ - i
5.5 $ 1,624.151
!S
$
-
1,624.15
42-05-147,
31 $ 2.155.69 1
$
2.155.69
42-05-50 j 10.7 S 3,159.71
3,159.71
42-Q5-70
7.51 $ 2,214.75
i i S
2.214.75
42-05-74
4.8� S 1,417.44 i
I S
1,417.44
42-05-73
5 $ 1,476.50.:
i , S�
1,475, 50
42-05-75 j
At ; $ —2,805.35 ?
! 5
2,805.35
42-05-76
9.5' $ 2,805.35 i_
i $
2,805.35
42-05-61
5.1� 1506.03 j
' $
1, 506.03
42-O5-51 i
6;.3 1,771.80 -
$
1,771.80
42-05-64 1
5; $ 1,476.50
$
1,476.50
42-05:9---
5 S 1,476.50
$
1,476.50
42-05-72
TOTAL
5 $ 1,416.50 j
286.3 $ 84,249.09 1
! 1,a7G.50
i $ 84,249.09
Page 1
TUL-1'"-i'�a5 11: �� FFUi'I ! •� - -= '',�� F.U.
Sheet1 (2) .
BELL MUIR COUNTY SERVICE AREA
PROPOSED 19SC-1997 BUDGET
26NES OF BENEFIT
DRAINAGE DESIGN FEE !S BBASED ON ONE ACRE ONLY i
ZONE 5 , ANNUAL FEE
i
!
!
A.P. NO. AREA. ACDESIGN/ADM.!MAINTENANCE
ISTREET
LIGHTSITOTAL
–•-"- -
42-02-16 _ 2 $ 296.301$ -1 . is -
42-02-17 - - 21 $ 296.30 1 j
42-02-43 -- - _ 2; _ _-$- 296.30
42-02-23 2I - $ 296.30 ! I
i
$
i $
$
$
296.30
296.30
296.30
296.30
42-02-35 2 $
296.30 !
; S
296.30
._.__ �._. $
296.30
1$
-
42-05-24 2 $
296.30
j i $
296.30
_
42-05.42 2 S
-296.30 —
I $
296.30
42-05.22 21 S
296.30 i
' S
296.30
42-05-25: 2; S
296.30 I
! $
296.30
42-05-07 j 2i $
296.30 , {.
296.30 I i
I $ 296.30
I S 296.30
TOTALS 221 $ 3,666.60 T
$
3.665.60
Y
Page 1
All that certain real property situate in the County of Butte,
State of California, described as follows;
Being a portion of Lots 8, 9, 27, and 36 and all of Lots 6, 7, 10,
11, 12, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38,
39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 and 55 of
the Third Subdivision of the John Bidwell Rancho as shown on that
certain map filed for record in Book 5 of Maps, at Page 8 on
September 17, 1900, more particularly described as follows;
BEGINNING at the intersection of the southeasterly right-of-way
line of Muir Avenue and the northeasterly line of the Southern
Pacific Railroad (formerly the California and Oregon Railroad) as
shown on that certain map filed for record in Book 88 of Parcel
Maps, at Page 21, said Point of Beginning also being the most
westerly corner "of said Lot •44 of said map of the Third Subdivision
of the John Bidwell Rancho;
Thence leaving said Point of Beginning along said northeasterly
line of the Southern Pacific Railroad, South 60°49' East,' 6155.8
feet to its intersection with the centerline of East Avenue as
shown on that certain map filed for record in Book 53 of Parcel
Maps, at Page 3;
Thence leaving said northeasterly line of the Southern Pacific
Railroad along said centerline of East Avenue, North 28127118"
East, 103.04 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right;
Thence. following said curve, northeasterly, along a radius of
999.97 feet, through a central angle of 230361'33" a distance of
412.05 feet;
Thence North 52104107" East, 163.75 feet to the northeasterly line
of said Lot 36;
Thence leaving said centerline of East Avenue along said north-
easterly line, North 37°56105" West, 40.18 feet to the easterly
corner of said Lot 35; ,
Thence along the northeasterly line of said Lots 35 & 34, North
37031' West, 13.20 feet to the centerline of Henshaw Avenue, said
point being the most easterly corner of said Lot 33;
Thence along said centerline of Henshaw Avenue, North 52029' East,
660 feet to the centerline - centerline intersection of said
Henshaw Avenue and Guynn Avenue;
Thence along said centerline of Guynn Avenue, North 37031' West,
660 feet to the most southerly corner of said Lot 12;
Exhibit "A" Page 1 of 3
Thence leaving said centerline of Guynn Avenue along the
southeasterly lines of said Lots. 12 & 6, North 52029' East, 1320
feet to the centerline of Alamo Avenue (formerly Bidwell Avenue as
shown on said Third Subdivision);
Thence along said centerline of Alamo Avenue, North 37031' West,
1948.32 feet to the centerline of Bell Road as shown on that
certain map filed for record in Book 73 of Parcel Maps. at Page 66;
Thence along said centerline, South 89032142" West, 43.07 feet as
shown on said parcel map;
Thence leaving said centerline of Bell Road, South 52029' West,
624.19 feet to the most easterly corner of said Lot 9;
Thence along the' southeasterly line of said Lot 9, South 52°29'
West, 352.15 feet to the southerly corner of that certain real
property described in Book 1656 of official Records, at Page 187;
Thence leaving said southeasterly line of said Lot 9 along the
southwesterly line of said certain real property and its
prolongation, North 37031' West, 564.61 feet to the most easterly
corner of that certain real property described in Book 2257 of
official Records, at Page 461;
Thence along the southerly line of said certain real property,
South 68°19152" West, 320.59 feet to said centerline of Guynn
Avenue;
Thence along said centerline, North 37°31' West, 20.36 feet to the
most easterly corner of said Lot 27 and the most easterly corner of
that certain real property described under Serial Number 95-29321;
Thence leaving said centerline of Guynn Avenue along the south-
easterly line of said Lot 27 and said certain real property, South
52°29' West, 170.00 feet to the easterly corner of that certain
real property described under Serial Number 90-05079;
Thence North 37°31' West, 82.00 feet;
Thence North 38°12' West, 168.66 feet;
Thence South 77 ° 04' West, 204.00 feet;
Thence *North 37°31' West, 59.64 feet;
Thence West, 217.88 feet;
Exhibit "A" Page 2 of 3
Thence South 52°29' West, 125.46 feet to the southwesterly line of
said Lot 27 and the most westerly corner of said certain real
property;
Thence along said southwesterly line, North 37°31' West, 273.50
feet to the. most westerly corner of said Lot 27 and the most
westerly corner of that certain real property described in Book
1128 of official Records, at Page 494, said corner being located on
the southerly.line of -Bell Road;
Thence along said southerly line of Bell. Road and the northerly
lines of said Lots 28 & 55, West, 1222.32 feet to an angle point in
said southerly line of Bell Road;
Thence continuing along the southwesterly line of said Bell Road,
North 37031' West, 245.52 feet to its intersection with said
southeasterly right-of-way line of Muir Avenue, said point. of
intersection being the northwesterly corner of said Lot 55;
Thence along said southeasterly line of Muir Avenue and the
northwesterly line of said Lots 55, 47 & 44, South 29012' West,
2299.44 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Exhibit "A" Page 3 of* 3
•
C`O�/•PSE /J.4TA
®
.V. 37' 3/ ' '. , ZO.JS'
O
S. SZ*Z5, x/., /70•Q�)'
N.
(D-5.
77-C4'W., ZO4.Q�)'
I'
�`
rG'EST 21.7,56' .
;J
J- -572'Z9'W , %15.6"
V
,1/. 37'3/'x!, 273.50'
O
/✓. 37'3/' !, Z9.3:5Z'
LEGEN/J
130C/N17A.?Y OF COUNTY
23 LOT NU/✓.'�c.�' PEn'' TH/R/J .SU/3/7/V/5/ON
OF THE ✓�. ;/✓ f3/DWELL /P,4NCiT'O
k
j
Q
55 54
53
ti
47 48 49
N
h
RO/2EO
44 43 42
.SOUTHE.PN P.4C/F/C
PO/NT OF OEG /NN/A/G
ti3
,9yB
32
1'?A/LR0/4 /J
.e
'9LF�fi
Z-OCAT/ON MAP
.SCALE:
s e
All
Al 51'04 / 0V,7 FO/P/t,fA T/ON OF CSA #
ld=Z3"3633" FOR
R=999.97'
I Z- - 4/Z. 05 fjELG MU/�P STU/.�Y �1 RE/�
N 2817
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SUN9CTORS
Nort hSta r
20 DECLARATION DRIVE - CMrO. CAUrMNU 97926
ENGINEERING 1916) e93 .160O
iCHICOA'"°°
U µ~e •
`e�•���,� + C"��
poi / v
I'
MumWbt .A .
•'�y..
�'' � Si n,v
���1 .Rum -
Z-OCAT/ON MAP
.SCALE:
s e
All
Al 51'04 / 0V,7 FO/P/t,fA T/ON OF CSA #
ld=Z3"3633" FOR
R=999.97'
I Z- - 4/Z. 05 fjELG MU/�P STU/.�Y �1 RE/�
N 2817
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SUN9CTORS
Nort hSta r
20 DECLARATION DRIVE - CMrO. CAUrMNU 97926
ENGINEERING 1916) e93 .160O