Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REZONE NO 00-1REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: Date: February 7, 2000 ■ CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR ❑ CHICO AREA REC. AND PARK DIST ■ CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ❑ CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ■ CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT ■ COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR In CITY CHIEF OF POLICE ❑ COUNTY ENV. HEALTH DEPT. (CHICO ■ CITY FIRE CHIEF ❑ COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DIST ■ CITY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ■ COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMM. ■ CITY ASST. DIR. PUBLIC WORKS (HISLOP) ❑ COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIST. ■ CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL ❑ DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME ❑ CITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR ■ WATER QUALITY CONTROL. BOARD ❑ CITY URBAN FORESTER ❑ - UTILITY COMPANIES ■ CITY WPCP SUPERVISOR (PAC BELL; PG&E; CAL WATER) ■ CITY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING (TV/FM) ■ NORTHEAST INFO CENTER ❑ CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ❑ CAL TRANS In SENIOR PLANNER (CURRENT) ■ AIRPORT DIRECTOR ❑ Other PROJECT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Name/Address: General Plan Amendment/Rezone No. 00-1 46.06 acres on the west side of Marauder Street, south of Mud Creek Assessor's Parcel No. 047-280-014, 015, 020, 094, & 095 Project Description: Request to amend the General Plan from Open Space for Environmental Conservation/Safety to Industrial Park and rezone the subject area from RR Rurd Residential to MP Manufacturing/Industrial Park to facilitate development ofa research and manufacturing office park. A Sphere of Influence amendment and annexation are also required. Attached is the preliminary data regarding a project which as been submitted to the City of Chico fora discretionary action (Use Permit, Rezone, Subdivision, etc.). An assessment of the potential impacts of tfe project is being made. Please review and submit comments within ten working days. ■ This item will be on the Planning Commission agenda of TBA 14 l A ❑ This item will be approved by the Planning Director. u of// Thank You Project Planner: Claudia Sigona PROJECT NO. UP -99-005 TOWN OF PARADISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST TO: POLICE, -FIRE, ENGINEERING, BUILDING, SANITATION, PID, PG&E, PACIFIC BELL, PUSD, CALTRANS, AND BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMISSION FROM: CRAIG BAKER, SENIOR PLANNER , REQUEST: Review and Comment DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: NEXTEL COMMUNICATION -_ (UP -99-005) (055-180-083) USE.PERMIT APPLICATION PROPOSING THE INSTALLATION OF AN ADDITIONAL ANTENNA ON EXISTING +/7160 FOOT TALLISELF- SUPPORTING LATTICTOWER AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITIONAL. 200 SQ. FT. EQUIPMENT SHELTER AT'THE BASE OF THE EXISTING TOWER LOCATION: 5075 CLARK RD u , ; -; �, :; __•. AP NO. 055-180-083 APPLICANT: NEXTEL CO`24UNICAT IONS CONTACT PHONE: q- (916) 568-4447 = , Dl i?SION RETURN DATE REQUESTED: 12/17/99 DATE DISTRIBUTED: '12%02/99 DOES YOUR AGENCY HAVE*THE CAPACITY TO SERVE THIS PROJECT? YES YES, WITH.CONDITIONS NO (EXPLAIN BELOW) COMMENTS AND/OR RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS IF NECESSARY: NO RESPONSE FROM'YOUR AGENCY MAY BE TO SERVE THIS PROJECT. PLEASE MAKE A COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS. HAS ABILITY PRO ECT NO. UP -99-006 TOWN OF -PARADISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST TO: POLICE, FIRE,.ENGINEERING, BUILDING,. SANITATION,' PID, PG&E, PACIFIC BELL, PUSD, CALTRANS, AND BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION OM: R CRAIG BAKER, SENIOR PLANNE FR REQUEST: -Review and Comment t DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: NEXTEL• COMMUNICATIONS (UP -991-006) - USE PERMIT APPLICATION PROPOSING TO ESTABLISH AN UNSTAFFED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY VIA THE CONSTRUCTION, OF A +19.5 FOOT`TALL SELF-SUPPORTING.LATTICE TOWER AND A7+200 SQ. FT. EQUIPMENT, SHELTER ON PROPERTY CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY THE ELKS LODGE. LOCATION 63,09 CLARK ROAD �r' 7 ED AP NO.: 053-011-104 NOV 5 ,1999 APPLICANT: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS . ,i. r L U U v T zi CONTACT PHONE: (916) 568-4447 ? ' �, TTN DTVIS[O'`, RETURN DATE REQUESTED.: 11/23/99 DATE DISTRIBUTED: 11/10/99 DOESS'YOUR AGENCY HAVE THE CAPACITY,TO SERVE THIS PROJECT? YES YES, WITH CONDITIONS NO (EXPLAIN BELOW) COMMENTS AND/OR RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS IF NECESSARY: I // -4 /' _ - // i /o,- iJWF o NO RESPONSE FROMYOUR • YOUR TO S ERVE THIS PROJECT. PLEASE MAKE A •. FOR YOUR •-D 2230 of +BUTT E COU N AIRPORT LAND VI -1 MMISSION � O CO ►� • Department of Development Services • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (916) 538-7601 FAX (916) 538-7785 • y TO: Dan Breedon, Planning Division. -FROM: Dave Doody, ALUC Staff \y(" SUBJECT: Request for Comments - Pre -development Conference for Harold Ball - Proposed Rezone and General Plan Amendment. Located on the west side of Esplanade, 1000 feet south of Nord Road, north of the City of Chico. ` • . DATE: October 25, 1999 _ ALUC staff has received your request for comments and appreciates the opportunity to respond to the above mentioned project proposal. In reviewing the project we have utilized the 1978 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan (CMAEP), as amended October 1998. The following. are our findings: a. The project site is not within the new CLUP areas `--`A," "Al," or `B" as described•within the amended 1998 CMAEP. ` b. The project site is outside the Area of Influence Map boundary adopted by'ALUC May, 1998. The project is not within the jurisdiction of ALUC and formal'consistency,review is not required. Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment and review on this project. j K: �A L UCT ROJ ECT. M E W B A LL. LTR a Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • #I . i. October 8, 1999 To Whom It May Concern: _- 0 Ito u t� LAND O.F NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ' 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE:- (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 www.buttecounty.net The Butte County Development Service. Department has received a request for a pre -development conference regarding'a proposed Rezone and General PlanAmendment from A-20 (Agricultural, 20 - acre parcels) and Orchard and Field Crops, to C-2 (General Commercial) and Commercial on a 10 acre parcel. The parcel is located on thewest side of the Esplanade approximately 1,000 feet south of Nord Road, north Chico. The purpose of the meeting is to inform the applicant of local or state requirements that may apply to their project. This allows the applicant to incorporate those requirements into the design of the project when the actual application is made. The pre -development conference will be held in the Development Services Department conference room located at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville on October 27, 1999 at 9:30 a.m. If your department has concerns or comments regarding the proposal, please have someone attend or submit written comments to this department prior to the meeting. Comments may be faxed to (530)538-7785 attention Dan Breedon. If you have any questions please contact me at (530)538-7601. Sincerely Dan Breedon Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Butte County Environmental Health Butte County Local Agency Formation Commission Butte County Department of Development Services Butte County Public Works Butte County Airport Land Use Commission✓ City of Chico Butte County Agricultural Commission California Department of Forestry Butte County Farm Bureau -WERVICES DEPARTMEPO OF DEVELOPMEN BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 176 ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE- FILE NUMBER (FOR OFFICE USE) 'e'--p-owr , 'Piov/ NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) TELEPHONE I ( ) &P." - Ay fe LOCATION OF PROJECT Major cross streets and Addmm, if any) G ENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OWNER'S NAME [3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TELEPHONE hWMO. A4zz- I ( I ADDRESS: CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE, zez9,*11qK— , -. .9d e' ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Acres) 0 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 0, fefIe 77 10. CV o9C - EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) /& :,,F ±- eo7lt4 (Check One) (Check One) C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED E3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED [3 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 13 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP E3 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP E3 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION E3 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION E3 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER C3 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN OTHER � me - PR OJECT DE FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division ,describe } sic size of parcels.) oar IeIZI,7�Y 611'C' e19 4e,rZ4*Z7,�f E— aee745C,14 '9Z1,Ve7 oroville, Cal? AP a7 OVII-TER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OFTHE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. NOWLEDGETHE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OFTHE ABOVE FURTHER. I ACY E INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (if an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and the affidavit with this plication.) DATE: 9)ZF-p /9 SIGNATURE: 2�21 [3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT [3 REZONE [3 USE PERMIT [3 MINOR USE PERMIT [3 VARIANCE [3 MINOR VARIANCE [3 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT 0 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION REQUESTED [3 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 13 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP E3 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP E3 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION E3 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION E3 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER C3 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN OTHER � me - PR OJECT DE FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division ,describe } sic size of parcels.) oar IeIZI,7�Y 611'C' e19 4e,rZ4*Z7,�f E— aee745C,14 '9Z1,Ve7 oroville, Cal? AP a7 OVII-TER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OFTHE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. NOWLEDGETHE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OFTHE ABOVE FURTHER. I ACY E INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (if an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and the affidavit with this plication.) DATE: 9)ZF-p /9 SIGNATURE: 2�21 r COUNTY OF BUTTE " ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed General Information: 1. Name and address of,owner, and/or developer, and/or projects nsor. Ile51"44) �i9LL 6846 u/ G!/k9f/E2LY �E00//!l? , Cr9• 9"l 2. Address of project: •3.3•%�.i �5����' Assessor's Parcel Number. D6-�` 17S /Td 3: Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: eraAI:974•e F�rG11745�/rYG 8.9.E /! l ZG1I rJECL✓9�T/Q�!' .Oeiv� Cf!/CO , G9 . .OT.a7.3 ' 4. list and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: lY fI 5. E)dsting general plan designation: a• 6. Ebsting zoning district: 7. How is land currently used? E,— f/e90-91T 8. Proposed. use of site (Project for which this form is filed): l'OE•2C19G. Project Description: F. 9. • Site size: �D•OD (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off s#reet parking spaces: Full size: !111 'Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes No 12. Proposed development schedule �7i9 13. Associated projects ae' lg 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development _ - fl -Manninpivleon Oroville, CeC�om!a O Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O . l • Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of. - household size expected. /;l,4 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and lobding facilities. eli9 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities..lJ�!y 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. .1 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued; please attach . as Exhibit IY%f% Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Charige,in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. _ 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing"residential areas or public lands or roads. — 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. ✓ yG rn CD�1l',/E.PC/�9G . 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or fitter. — 24: Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. — 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns'. _ 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. — 27.. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. — 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous "materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. — 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services ,(police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). — 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). — 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _ 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, - plants and animals, and any cultural, Historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be. accepted. ,,e= 33. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, Including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. D,?G'1�i9,2/�qG TO TyE ,7Oxr1r'5GYJTy e,- wEST Certification CO�lCl�9L Z) �9C,e055 SJ,�'�ET 171 lE E.sT I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this Initial evaluation to the best of my abTity, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date K:\FORMS\EW-INFO 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 3 Coo • i' - °.: �••�••• •• • �.• �•� •• ••ter ♦•♦• •i•�► . � � ;. •� ••••• •• ;•• •• �'••S•.•i • •i �:•° !ice �i�♦ •r� •� , Ik • 176 • ♦ .�� �♦ o�„I un f BASIS OF BEARINGS \ \ \ • THE BASIS of P.EA61INGS 'OR ',I'S plrH •r!• .HI �,e\ \ ry/f . NC'm7 'RC 1t /.If I INF of {•aaffl Al 9•/�.�NN{ - \ - - TrIfEN Ir IN'rn Yf�H11Y{•Ir!i AS 'lil •N/Atrr• �y q..l•• - 1 ! ,� '•, _ , aq of veo�Et Yn{•y„n• :SCF sr A: •.r.•Ir •. r.r{_ I �. BEARING It 51'16'31';! . - ' •4... .o Jam. - ••.• - �. ``�� / � Jam• AO ACC(S, PJa) ANU IUPtrC :•.I II.FS EA';Fvf H• •i F! 1 r +rP•,1� IrI lT:Iq ANIIUfffrc�'4w ''/ X L0CAr10N ,SAP . ^)q b[L'IL'1. hOq TO COUNTr Of / GV�/ !\/ _ - _ - PU'r! G Pr' \\ /OT TO !CAI[ yoo SCALE C-200, - `a ''`\�' / • .p ; .A o�t> \. �N� t _ •, 9\ / r '.• I NOTE -Z— HER, r•f-,^fO A OUB41C-UhIITIES CASEMENT. ' 40'ESY7 PER - N OEECS IS^\ 1TO Qp.cp , LEGEND / • 9`\�,� •. / , - ` 0 UT !N' WON PU•E TAOOEO R.C.L. 10463'-, '.r POUNO 0/4 r10N Po't IAlwlau By a. {efy / X76 •(.� .j ,. FOND OH"MON OWE TA00[O ILC[..4128 ' 1 9fi,' .! � r X. [lgTnO WATER WELL - �� 16 i r r[Awao DA do' u � • 42 [rMAC[S BECU4O OATi A. R[CORO DATA F(R SOL 41 ►r.. PG. i1' ' PAACF I' NUMREN PEN •t. IB Pr•, P0. 11 - .. AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONE TO C-2 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO COMMERCIAL, 10 AC. - 3395 ESPLANADE ' PARCEL _MAP BEING PARCEL I AS SHOWN IN BOOK' 48' PLAT TO ACCOMPANY of PARCEL MAPs , AT PACE 12. CE PRE -DEVELOPMENT CONFERENBUTTE couNTy CALIFORNIA & 176 �. ' apC1!•',r)ti for 06-02-175 (_ ''° BOB G. SHIREY et al.. , - BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: Butte County Airport Land Use Commission FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Robert Minton, VAR 00-02 DATE: October 4, 1999 CONTACT PERSON: Stephen Betts The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please ca11538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. , This is an application for- a Variance to allow an existing structure to remain within the 5 foot side yard setback on property zoned Suburban Residential - 1 acre minimum, located at 97 Parsley Lane, in North Cbico, identified as APN' 047_460_ 021. Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) . _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - —DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON December 9 , 1999. . COMMENTS, 'IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN October 18, 1999. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By: Date: lU /ted �i 9 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 J . 1 DEPARTND r OF DEVELOPMF,- SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is an other side: APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is'required 1 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: "e64?7- 411Yr4.7r 47 -w -0.4s ADDRESS: 97 nA �Lcr CITY. STATE &ZIP CODE FILEN ER (FOROFFICEUSE) !" r,Aer� eotirrD, f�9. 9It973 NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Many) _. TEL9PiiORE LOCATION OF PROJECT (Major cross wand Address, if any -- - 97 ?4e,11SX ,44e "-sr off IlivY. 99 , /!'0.2Tff AF ieDi9J RMATION RE UI]tED 004ERAL INFO Q OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE ,"b5er— 41171!x: IW ( ) 893 - 3aCS9 ADDRESS: CITY, STATE 8t: ZIP CODE .97 ` ZONE GENERAL PIAN E7QS"TIIdG LAND USE SITE SIZE (in Square Fea a wags ) ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT VARIANCE EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Fat) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) ❑ ADM]NISTRATIW PERMIT (Che& One) (Chaff one) t ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERFD E3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO -BE ON PUBLIC WATER PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER AILUN K.0 UCJICL _ `.w'..... ;:y ^.cl.;w���`:�:.:.a: •;off., �iC,: ,�� •Ar •vc•�c_�:,... s j.... a�:. Xi. i. ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ OTHER cs.;: ,i•i= venrprr nFSCRTP'TION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheers. If this application is for a land division . describe the number and size of parcels.) rt� ALGOG</ �l% �X�STIl1G .ST.etJCf t!%�L� 7& ,�E r9r� SE rnia c�wNr.It ctx t frt%—A t tvty I CERTIFY THAT I AN PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED 'INT OFTHE OWvER OF Ti ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEI)GETHE F4.LNG OFTHIS APPLICATION AND CER T T L OFTHE ION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (if an agent u to be authorized. exet:ute an affidavit of authcri=ion and ' u the i vit with ' pl*e a ) DATE: X OL I k l 4\ SIGNATURE: ,K ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ REZONE ❑ USE PERMIT ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT VARIANCE ❑ MINOR VARIANCE ❑ ADM]NISTRATIW PERMIT f x: ❑ DEVELOPMFN'T AGREEMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ OTHER cs.;: ,i•i= venrprr nFSCRTP'TION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheers. If this application is for a land division . describe the number and size of parcels.) rt� ALGOG</ �l% �X�STIl1G .ST.etJCf t!%�L� 7& ,�E r9r� SE rnia c�wNr.It ctx t frt%—A t tvty I CERTIFY THAT I AN PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED 'INT OFTHE OWvER OF Ti ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEI)GETHE F4.LNG OFTHIS APPLICATION AND CER T T L OFTHE ION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (if an agent u to be authorized. exet:ute an affidavit of authcri=ion and ' u the i vit with ' pl*e a ) DATE: X OL I k l 4\ SIGNATURE: ,K Submittal Requirements - Variance To be completed by Applicant (attach additional sheets if necessary): - 1. The following exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property in question which do not apply generally to other property., under identical zoning classification: ,SEE C'G,�lI�E�T �J O1�' lJ7TACf1��11T '�4 '' 2. The granting of the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights is supported by the following 3. The granting of the Variance will not adversely affect the neighborhood or be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or adversely affect property improvements in the neighborhood and zone.in which the property is located in that: ,SEE L"U J�9f.�'r '�.3 OF. ArTACI>�EIrT '�9 K: VonnslsubmitaRvariance.frm revised 4/22/96 BKH Planning Division SEP Al ing Oroville, Cad vornia Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division .' 3 r r Variance Application for Bob Minton APN 47-46-025 ATTACHMENT "A" COMMENT #1: It is our understanding that the barn that is extending into the side yard has been there for a number of years, surviving at least through two recorded parcel maps. These two maps were Book 62 Parcel Maps, Page 2 recorded June 29, 1977 and Book 92 Parcel Maps, Page 55 recorded March 30, 1983. According to Darrel Parsley, who recorded the 4 -parcel parcel map in March 1983, said barn was there when he purchased the property in 1979. COMMENT #2: Mr. Minton purchased the property with the intent of utilizing all of the' buildings on site. The fact that neither of the two parcel maps addressed the location of the barn and that no conditions to remove or relocate the ham were imposed it was Minton's interpretation that the location of the barn was, in each case, accepted as a pre- existing non -conforming use. To deny the variance request would deny Mr. Minton from enjoying the property rights that he, or anyone else, should be entitled to from any pfe- existing use. COMMENT #3: During the period from said Parsley map (1983) to the present there has never been a complaint or inquiry into the existing location of the barn or the legality of the barn from any of the neighbors or from the County of Butte, including the County's inspection "to determine encroachment of various structures into easements and setbacks." . See attached letter dated February 6, 1996. Regardless, the existing location of the barn is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare of the citizens of Butte County nor, does its location adversely affect property improvements. FRrU,l .: FRFRIAN FJ k4SWT PM77,FR5 FY1 Nn.,' : tai PI 17A 17AA Mar. AS 1999 1 A:14;fl PAI 02/06i96 16:21 COMPANY INC + 916 5330197 ,N0.488 . 1702 • �� W,r AVaA.7r. OVA. a-vV.r+Ly - IM�f`- ei4o P. i Aga tie, o n IAN pr NATUtAj WCA11H N0 y,tAQrY - / W(L.OINO DIVISION +� 0PARTMINT ar VEVEWMENT 8 -CW 90 ". /� 7 tnr+fT�':,�:/�:: x.e►r • s:a•J14.1N: ^•td•WmHai 1T}�.1hr- •-- . • � � 1EEt1uNE: 19101 S3*7541 FAX: tAtIN Sut•?tao February 8,AL0aa _,• Saywood Company Incorporated 500 Main Street, SU06 C Chico, CA 06628 Ra: Verification of 61dayard Setback A.P. A 047.480-025 87 Pq(6k y Lane, Chico Dear Ms. Motto, On .lune 22. 1995 an insp9cMan- cgs -mass -on the-abov9-retsrsnced-farcal-W ..: dlaermine encroachment of various str0ctufaa into easement$ and adtbncks. At that times. h was determined that the cmfed. aorrat structure was lass then ton (10) Jett from the p'rWrty Una on the Cast side of the property and would therefore be within the minimuni two (10) fvut sidbyard seek eaquitud bill,* 1995 Butte County Zoning Ord;nanca. However, it has boon concluded that since the i=slet side setback roquifement was five (5) foot at the time.1110. corral wae.or4nally cohatruotod, It wao not a setback violation at that time and is not now. Should you have any queetions.coneerning this matter, Pfoxse aontaol.Scatt Puthorford of INC off !6o at tho Sditos or ph" numWt listed dbbve.: $i11t�flly. Scott Rutherford Supervisor, 8uitdng Inspection COPY TO CLIENT PER -9t) 711 MA1l.ED4& BY"4. V COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer,`and/or project sponsor: f A06 !11l7702'Y X97 /N—e54f)r L,9YrE Cflwo C'A. . Pja73 2. Address of project: X97s�r Lin Assessors Parcel Number: q7' 96 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: rro.Qt�Y�5r�9.�- ao 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approv Is required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing general plan designation: 6. Existing zoning district: 7. How is land currently used? 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): �2ES/pEIT!?HG Project Description: 9. Site size: .4-1,9 mac. (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: 4-74A Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes No 12. Proposed development schedule l�3 3�'ri' fi3 if71S�,J�l� 13. Associated projects 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development n//f SEp og99 1a 0 Butte County oebactment of oeveiopment'secvices 0 P1annln0049%iJatOr� 1 Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit.sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. J 114W 16. If commercial, indicate the.type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. n0N 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. �/� 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project �//9 19. If -the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit A/W Are the following items applicable to the project. or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. — 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _ 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. — 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. .� 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quaritity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. _ 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. — — 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10.percent or more. — 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. — 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). — - T 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. — — 0 Butt? County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division ❑ 2 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, .or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. J .041076 E 604140' �We4&t9E;- W/Mw v- evel6eEr% 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals'and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of *land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. R" 00411 JTEGY 9we .60-5 Wl.�Vloz'e ff�/7/U' �.PE3/per Certification ' Sv ��,Sid??' T� ;fE !70"W a F9 ir. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented aro true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date K:\FORMS\EW-INFO Signature for 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 3 CHI/C Record at the Request of Mid Valley TWO & Escrow Company Order No. Escrow No. 1681 23T Loan No. WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Robert L. Minton Sandra L. Minton 805 Cedar MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: SAME, AS ABOVE Planning Division hl nil111111111111111111111111111 SEP 1999 i 998-004530,3 Recorded I REC FEE 10.00 �rOV1�l8, a�OrntaOfficialyyRecords I TAX 272.25 CDButteOf I CMM J. SRUBBS I Recorder I' Myles 03:08PM 19 -Oct -1998 -I Page 1 of 2 SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR RECORDERS USE DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $$2T225 I Computed an the consideratbn or value of property conveyed; OR Computed on the consideration or value less Bens or er amtranoes remaining at time of sate. ThA i ind8i;S!gnAd rMntnr dedamS Signature of Oectarent or Apert determining taut —'FBm None GRANT DEED ap#047-460-025 "The true consideration 'for this conveyance is pursuant to an IEC Tax Deferired Exchange on behalf of the -Grantee" FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which Is hereby acknowledged, Lance S. Blanshei and Shelly J. Blanshei, husband and -wife hereby GRANT(S) to Robert L Minton and Sandra L Minton, Husband: -.and Wife, as joint tenants the real property In the City of County of described as SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION unincorporated area, Butte Dated—RAptAmhAr 29 1 QQR -- } STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF Butte } o October 13, 1998 before me, ras sn oft, otary sc sante s es and Shelly persoJa.yilnea personally known to me (of proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons) whose name(s) Is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacitypes), and that by his/her/their signatures) on the Instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the Instrument. VVITNESS-mfr hand arAQHjEtal seal Signature State of California, COMM. #1092360 5) NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA O COUNTY OF WrrE �.: ky tin Dogt Aletcfi 24. 2A00 ORDER NO. BU -168123 TB ''DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO IN .THIS REPORT IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA., COUNTY OF BUTTE, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL I: PARCEL 1, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE,RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF -BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA; ON MARCH 30, 1983, IN BOOK 92 OF MAPS, AT PAGES) 55. PARCEL II: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS;• EGRESS AND 'PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES OVER PARSLEY LANE, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE, OF. CALIFORNIA, ON MARCH 30, 1983, IN BOOK 92 OF MAPS, AT PAGE (S) 5 5 :. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF PARCEL I, DESCRIBED HEREIN. r �3. o/ BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION ' TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Larry Ruby, UP 00-01 DATE: August 19, 1999 CONTACT PERSON: Daniel Breedon The Planning Division has received a project application for the property described below. The purpose of this comment sheet is to: 1. Determine if the information contained in the application is adequate to allow your jurisdiction to review the project and submit conditions, if any; and to, , 2. Determine the appropriate environmental documents to prepare for .this project, as well as to identify particular environmental concerns to be addressed or mitigation. measures your agency/department may want incorporated. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Use Permit to allow a 1400 sq f. f. . expansion of an existing commercial building as a non- conforming use on property zoned R-3 (Residential) located -at 1166 and 1170 East Lasqen Avenue, Cbico, identified as APN 007-160-014. Supervisorial District No. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X_ PLANNING COMMISSION - ' _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON October 28, 1999. COMMENTSJF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN • September 2; 1999. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. 7 COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): p '�4 / `` to /Qli8Azo 4 4fi� -r By: Date:f a ~% 9 cj 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 530-538-7601 - FAX 530-538-7785 +BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION + + 7 County Center Drive, OroyWe, -CA 95965+ (916) 538-7601 FAX (916) 536-7785 • MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Lisa Purvis Wilson, City of Oroville Planning Manager FROM: Laura Webster, Butte County ALUC Staff DATE: December 4, 1998 SUBJECT: Request For Comments on DRB98-10 (Modem Building Company) Project Description/Location: A request for comments regarding a 50,000 square foot paint booth manufacturing facility and a 4,000 square foot office on property zoned C -L -M (Commercial Light Manufacturing): The 11.7 acre project site is located on the southeast comer of Airport Parkway and Airport Drive within the Oroville Airport Business Park. The site plan indicates that a 32,000 square foot addition may be developed to the west of the initial structure and that an 18,000 square foot addition* may be developed to the east of the initial structure as future phases of the project. The timing of the future additions is not known. The following informal comments and recommendations are provided by staff based upon a cursory review of the proposal: (1)' Staff reviewed the request pursuant to the currently adopted Oroville Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan (1985)..A determination was made that the project site is located within the Area of Influence for the Oroville Municipal Airport and the Overflight/General Airport Traffic Pattern Zone for that facility (Exhibit 1 - Oroville Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan). Exhibit 2 "Land Use Guidelines for Safety Compatibility Only' Note (3) indicates that miscellaneous manufacturing uses within the Overflight Zone are subject to ALUC review if they will result in "large concentrations" of people underneath the downwind and base legs or departure paths of frequently used airport patterns. The threshold for review of non-residential uses is concentrations of more than 25 people per acre. ,According to the City of Oroville Planning Department, the first phase of the project will involve 34 on-site employees. Based upon the size of the parcel, the proposal will result in a concentration of 2.90 people per acre. While conducting the project review, staff also consulted Chapter 9 of the 1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook to obtain additional guidance regarding acceptable non-residential densities within various airport safety zones. The application of the safety zones identified within the Airport Land Use Planning Handbook indicates that the entire site is located within the Traffic Pattern Zone for both runways. ,According to text on page 9-21 of the Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, within the, Traffic Pattern Zone, only very large assemblies of people (in the 150 or more people per acre range) need to be avoided: The current proposal as well as any future phases are not anticipated to approach this threshold. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • (2) Chapter 2 of the Oroville Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan "Guidelines for Land Use" notes that various land uses have been evaluated -and their suitability as airport contiguous, land uses summarized. In general; industrial land uses are considered acceptable except those that produce smoke, steam, electronic interference, or misleading lights. No exterior emissions -will be generated by the facility and no unusual lighting features are proposed. The types of equipment utilized and products being manufactured are not anticipated to generate any type of electronic interference. Staff recommends that the. building and roofing materials utilized be selected to avoid the creation of significant reflection or glare. (3) Since the 1985 Oroville AirportComprehensive Land Use Plan does not contain diagrams depicting the location of the FAR Part 77 Surfaces for the airport, Staff consulted an exhibit within the 1992 Airport Facilities and Land Use Manual prepared by P & D Aviation to determine the location of those surfaces. According to that document, the project site is located within the Horizontal Surface of the broville Municipal Airport. The elevation of the Horizontal Surface is 340.47 feet -MSL. According to the applicant's site plan, the finished floor elevation of the buildings will be at 172.50 feet MSL. The maximum height of the building will be 24 feet, therefore, the proposed development will not penetrate'the Horizontal Surface. (4) According to Exhibit 1 in the Oroville Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Plates 7 and 9 within the 1990 Master Plan for the Oroville Municipal Airport, the project site is , located outside ofthe projected 55 dB CNEL contour for the airport: According•to Appendices 7 and .8 of the Environmental Impact Report for the 1985 Oroville Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan, industrial and manufacturing uses are considered normally acceptable in locations exposed to between 70 and 75 dB CNEL. (5) Based upon the above staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the 1985 Oroville Airport Land Use Plan. Since the proposed concentration of people per acre is below 25, this project is not required to be reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission for formal consistency findings. However; the following conditions are recommended by staff to improve the compatibility t. of the project with airport'operations: A. ' All project .lighting shall be directed within the project site and shielded to prevent adverse impacts on adjacent properties and aircraft flight activities.. B. Building and roofing materials shall be selected which do not create significant reflection or glare. Please call me at 533-1131 if you have any questions regarding this information or staffs recommendations. , • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 2 Z23: 6/ •����;�''adr3��'.�x• ' ` :'fitButte Count, L A N D O F N A T U RAL WEALTH A N D BEAUTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 September 25; 1998 Mr. Craig Baker TOWN OF PARADISE 5555 Skyway Paradise, CA 95969 Subject: Request for Comments on UP -98-004 (Nextel Communications) Dear Craig: Thank you for providing the FAA obstruction analysis conducted for the original 160 foot tower located at 5075 Clark Road (APN 055-180-083). According to the project materials whichwere received by ALUC staff, the applicant is proposing.to construct a small equipment shelter and add an additional antenna to the existing 160 foot tower at a height of 135 feet. As described within the FAA analysis for the existing tower, the facility was found to be an obstruction by exceeding the standards of Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77, Subpart C. because the height of the tower exceeds the Paradise Skypark conical surface by approximately 85 feet.. Although. the facility was found to be an obstruction, it was also determined that it would not have a substantial adverse effect upon the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace utilized by aircraft. However safety painting and lighting were required. At the conclusion ofthe report, the FAA noted that in order to remain acceptable from an airspace utilization standpoint, any future change or additions to the frequency. radiated power,or antenna characteristics at the site would require the filing of an 'FAA Form 7460-1 and presumably the completion of a new obstruction analysis. ALUC staff requests that the new obstruction analysis or any other documentation provided by the FAA in response to filing of the 7460-1 Form be submitted for our review so that we can complete our analysis of the project. Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at 533-1131. Sincerely, J0,0" Laura Webster Butte County ALUC Staff • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 • MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division FROM: Laura Webster, ALUC Staff .DATE: August 24, 1998 SUBJECT: Request For Courtesy Comments on Myers Tentative Parcel Map (TPM99-02) Project Description/Location: Tentative Parcel Map to divide a 2.0 acre parcel into two 1.0 acre single family lots. The property is currently zoned SR (Suburban Residential). The project site is located on the east side of Godman Avenue, approximately 700 feet south of Eaton Road at 3166 Godman Avenue. APN 007-210-040 and 041. This request for comments was received on August 14, 1998: The following informal comments are provided by staff based upon a cursory review of.the application materials and maps that were provided. (1) According to drawings within the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan (CMAEP), the project site is located within the Airport Area of Influence for the Chico Municipal Airport (CIC -6) and the Horizontal Surface (CIC -5) for that facility. (2) The site is located outside of, the following: • All Compatible Land Use Zones as defined within the 1978 CMAEP (CIC -13). • The projected 55 dB CNEL contour for the airport (CIC -3). (3) The project is not located within any specific flight tracks identified in Drawing CIC -2 of the CMAEP, however, future development will be subject to overflight activities and single event noise incidences which may exceed 55 dB. (4) The site is shown as "low density residential" in Drawing CIC -10 within the CMAEP which is defined as 1 to 4 dwelling units per acre. (5), Although not an adopted document by the Butte County ALUC, the project is also located outside the existing and projected 55 CNEL contours identified within the 1995 FAR Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Program for the Chico Municipal Airport. (6) Because the project does not involve a legislative action, formal ALUC review is not required. However, based upon the above,. it appears that the project would be consistent with the 1978 Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan: • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • (7) The following conditions are recommended: a. The property owner shall sign an avigation easement granting the right of continued use of the Chico Municipal Airport in the airspace above the subject parcel and acknowledging any and all existing or potential airport operational impacts. (See attached sample easement). b. All project lighting should be directed within the project site and shielded to prevent adverse impacts on adjacent properties and aircraft flight activities. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please call me at 533-1131. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • 2 RECORDING REQUESTED AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: CITY OF CHICO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 3420 CHICO, CA 95927 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DEED GRANTING AVIGATION EASEMENT Deed made this day of , 19_, by a (n) (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor") to the City of Chico ,(hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). In consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby, acknowledged, Grantor, for itself, its heirs, administrator, executors, successors, and assigns, does hereby grant and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement, and right of way for the unobstructed passage of all aircraft of any and all kinds now or hereafter known and in any numbers, in the airspace above the property located in the City of Chico, County of Butte, State of California, described in Exhibit A and shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (hereinafter called "the Property") from a height of feet above sea level to an infinite height above the Property in a manner, consistent with the safe operating procedures as provided under applicable governmental regulations. Concomitant and coextensive with said easement and right of way, Grantee shall have the continuing right 1.) To remove all or any portion of any structure, natural growth or other object on the property which extends into the airspace over the property to a height of more than feet above mean sea level; and 2.) To cause in all airspace above the surface of the property such noise, vibrations, fumes, dust, fuel particles, and all other effects that may be caused by the operation of aircraft landing at or taking off from or operating at or on the Chico Municipal Airport; and Grantor does hereby fully waive, remise, and release any right or cause,of action which it may now have or which it may have in the future against Grantee, its successors and assigns, due to such noise, vibrations, fumes, dust, fuel particles,. and all other effects that may be caused or may have been caused by the operation of aircraft landing at, or taking off from, or operating at or on the Chico Municipal Airport. Grantor, for itself, its heirs, administrators, executors, successors, and assigns, does hereby agree not: 1.) To cause or permit any structure, natural growth or other object on the property which extends into the airspace over the property more than feet above mean sea level; and 2.) To use or permit the use of the property in such a manner as to create electrical interference with aircraft navigational equipment and radio communications between aircraft and the Chico Municipal Airport; and 3.) To make it difficult for flyers to distinguish between airport lights and other lights, to impair, visibility in the vicinity of the Chico Municipal Airport; or 4.) To otherwise endanger aircraft landing at or taking off from the Chico Municipal Airport. This easement and right of way shall be appurtenant to the Chico Municipal Airport and shall be for the benefit of Grantee and members of the general public operating aircraft which land at or take off from the Chico Municipal Airport. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, by their officers thereunto duly authorized, have executed this Agreement on the date hereinabove first written. GRANTOR: (Signature) (ryped Name) (Typed Title) NOTARY SEAL State of California, County of Butte. On this day of in the year of 19_, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for the State of California +BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION + • 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965. (530) 538-7601 FAX (530) 538-7785 • MEMORANDUM TO: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division FROM: Laura Webster, ALUC Staff DATE: August 21, 1998 SUBJECT: Request For Comments on UP99-02 (Pacific Bell Mobile Services) TRA # 062195 Project Description/Location: Use Permit to construct a 104 foot monopole communications tower as a public/quasi public use on property zoned SR -1. The project site is located on " the east side of Mariposa Avenue, approximately .32 mile north of East Avenue. APN, 0_48- 061-052. Request for Additional Information . In order to determine if the project will have an impact on airport communications and navigation equipment or penetrate any airspace surfaces, the applicant must submit a Form 7460-1 to the FAA notifying that agency of the intent to construct the tower. The FAA will then conduct FAR Part 77 Airspace Analysis to determ i ne. whether*the proposal will exceed any obstruction. standards or create a hazard to air navigation. A copy of the determination made by the FAA is necessary before the Airport Land Use Commission will review the project for consistency with the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan. Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at 533-1131. • Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission • NORM ROSENE, D.D.S. R10 Planning g Di ° ° visson August 18, 1998 AUG 19'1998 ®roville, Gamma Robert E. Koch Risk Manager, City of Chico P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 Dear Bob, Thank you for sending me the information regarding the Adoption of the Chico General Plan and the override of the Butte County ALUC Findings of Inconsistency. In reviewing the information documenting the City of Chico's position, I am unable to locate specific items which are required in order to legally override an ALUC decision. Below I have summarized the missing items ac- cording to my "layman's understanding" of the law. 1. The Brown Act requires that meeting agendas be posted at least 72 hours prior to a public meeting and that a brief general de- scription be listed for each item to be discussed. The meeting notices for the 1994 Chico General Plan Update (which included the override of ALUC) do not list or mention overriding the ALUC finding of inconsistency. The Brown Act states, "The purpose of the brief general description is to inform interested members of the public about the subject matter under consideration so that they can determine whether to monitor or participate in the meeting of the body." Could you please refer me to the meeting notices that specifically refer to the ALUC override for the Chico City Council/Planning Commission meeting of 11/16/97? 2. Another requirement for the legal override process is a public hearing and presentation of evidence which justifies the override. While the record demonstrates that a public hearing occurred re- garding the General Plan Update, it does not appear that a public hearing took place regarding and pertaining to the override of ALUC. No discussion ever occurred (that I can find in the minutes) re- garding the evidence supporting the ALUC override. No public tes- timony specific to the ALUC override seems to have occurred, or exists in the meeting records. Since the General Plan Update was read by title only, it appears that potential public testimony regarding the override of ALUC was procedurally dismissed. Again, this is my impression from reading the minutes and evaluating the override requirements. I would appreciate an explanation from 1049 VILLAGE LANE CHICO. CALIFORNIA 95926 TELEPHONE (916) 342-4300 Page 2 of 3 the City of Chico regarding this apparent omission, or be given the documents which demonstrate that a public hearing occurred specific to the evidence and override. 3. The actual requirements for the override of an ALUC specify a two-thirds vote of the governing body (such as the City Council). While I can read in the minutes that the City Council voted 7-0 to adopt the General Plan Update, I do not see evidence in the minutes where they voted specifically regarding the ALUC override. Since the General Plan Update was read by title only, was there ever a vote regarding the override of ALUC that occurred separately from the General Plan Update? 4. Lastly, the override of an ALUC requires the presence of "specific findings" which support the override. The listed findings in the text of the General Plan Update include: a. "That the Comprehensive Update of the General Plan is consistent with the updated 1994 Chico Municipal Airport Noise Compati- bility Plan." b. "That the Comprehensive Update of the General Plan pertaining to the CMA Environs area shall be consistent with the update, of the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan." Regarding "b" above, how can a specific finding exist that relies on a future, and as yet unwritten, document? We (ALUC) have yet to update the CLUPs. Since the document does not exist, it is illogical to base any sort of argument upon it. I must conclude that this specific finding lacks merit. Regarding "a" above, the noise compatibility study (while debatably flawed) is certainly not comprehensive enough by itself to support massive changes in zoning and land uses around the Chico Municipal Airport. By definition, the noise study was just that, a noise study. It never addressed other key factors which must be considered when planning development around an airport. In fact, I do not believe that the FAA Part 150 document had been approved by the FAA at that point in time. After reviewing the specific findings, I must conclude that they are ex- tremely weak. They certainly do not justify the necessity for massive zoning and land use changes as they occur in the General Plan Update. I would certainly like to hear an explanation of the specific findings from the City of Chico. In order to keep this in the public forum, I would appreciate a written • Page 3 of, 3 response to the above noted items 1-4. We can then discuss the city's response at the next ALUC meeting. Since the City of Chico feels justified in its override, more documentation must exist that I've not been privi- ledged to examine in order to satisfy the criteria for a legal override. Again, thank you for your effort in this matter. I look forward to the city's response prior to the next ALUC meeting. Sincerely, Norm Rosene pc: ALUC Commissioners and Alternates NR: j pr ,.+IBUTTE,'COUNii-P�kIR-PORT'L,-AND-Uslt- COMMISSION + • Department of Development Services e 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 • (916) 5384601 FAX (916) 538-7785 • MEMORANDUM04 10 { TO: Mr. Bob Summerville, City. of Chico Planning Department FROM: Laura Webster, Butte County ALUC Staff DATE: June,24, 1998 SUBJECT: Request For Courtesy Comments on Bostrom Tentative Subdivision -.2646 Floral Avenue (S-97-12) ' Project Description/Location: Tentative Subdivision' Map to,;divide a 1.36 acre parcelJnto 7 single.' ' family lots. Gross lot-sizes would range between 6,900 and 10,530 square feet in size. Gross density,for the project would be 5.1 units/acre. The project site is located on the east side of FloralAvenue, approximately, 1,100 feet north of its intersection with East Avenue. This request for comments was received.on,June 18,1998. Ar The followinginformal, comments are.provided by staff based upon a cursory review of the initial j - study and, site maps that were provided. - (1)' .The project site i§ located within, the.Airport'Area of Influence for the Chico Municipal Airport and both the Conical and 40:1 Approach Surfaces for;that facility. : , (2) , The site is located outside of; but within closeproximity to the following: ' K` Compatible Land UseZone (CLUZ) Category V as defined within the ,1978,Chico: w .° Municipal Airport Environs Plan (CMAEP). • ' Existing and' ,'projected 55 CNEL-contours identified-within the CMAEP:, �(3) The project is not located within any specific flight tracks identified in Drawing CIC-2 of the ' CMAEP, however, future development will be subject to overflight activities and single event noise incidences which may-exceed 55 dB: -(4)j The" site is shown as-"medium low.density residential" in brawind CIC-10' within. the -CMAEP which is defined ras 5 to 8 dwelling units per acre. (5) Although not an adopted document by the Butte County ALUC, the project is also located outside the existing and'projected 55 CNEL contours identified withinFthe 1995.FAR Part r 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Program4dr the Chico Municipal Airport.. (6) Because the project does not involve a legislative action, formal ALUC review is not required. However, based upon the above, it appears that the project would be consistent , withzthe 1978 Chico Municipal Airport•Enviroris Plan. e Butte County • Airport Land Use Commission , •' • Butte County •Airport Land Use Commission • 2 ` F j. ' _.•ms's` 1 � � ; ♦a.. .. - • . ' - • •. CITY OF CHI O'MEMORANDUM,. _ CITYaCHICOINC 187Z CL 7— + ��a� �" DATE: June 16, 1998 •� TO: County of Butte T� �--��,,,�, - ' • FROM: Bob Summerville, Assistant Planner FILE: S-97-12 _ RE: Bostrom Tentative'Subdivision, - 2646 Floral'Avenue, Chico ` Transmitted ..herewith is the Initial Study and proposed negative declaration .for'the above referenced project. The document is being forwarded to you as a courtesy for. ,. - Co ments and concerns related to, Butte County and the County Airport:l_and Use Commission (ALUC). � • Should you wish to comment --on the proposed project, ,please forward your comments to me by Friday, July 3, 1998. The project is tentatively scheduled for consideration'by the Chico Planning Commission at its = Monday, July 6, 1998 meeting. _ b �,w m � h C•yfR p,.•yj � hr.f {,_• �' i13••3,?Kh jj`` 'a+y..�rI�I'•r'7`,:1 ,Sa�j({,-v2`{+. • - C',• �''' W Y ... • .\ _ v' i : • {' '( 3 t LSi 41 1• i S� Ycs 4`T'� 1. IY t X ; P. r. - . :!' r - '! 'i.knitr,i,i i .ta •.;\, a. `` rtrt',rs',,a {_ •t" .� - ' a, '-♦ n. ', �� •%o., ,' ; `rc ''pr«. s • G,,,r, # �'�t����•c��,tS,� .t . Y .-;a^ ^. �v L� y`.{ r.r • , •y �, / ya,:� K4. J• •t'. ... ..A •.♦. WV i. T h• yI. fµ YY "'y�.111t �. i t - •r }. `+V; r p ti w 's` N s4 ,;t17 . • r r' . �;. 1, +`,+{�� 'y •{,trf �^" ire Kt .+}�$z.7'.•.}',` .a �l ` • 14 planill on - JUN 1998 • Orovifie,al,'ro;>>ia, �. INITIAL STUDY City of Chico Environmental Coordination and Review ROUTE TO: (X) City of Chico - Planning Commission 1. Project Description ., A. Project Name: Bostrom Tentative Subdivision (File No. S-97-12) B. Project Location: In the northeast quadrant of the City of Chico, the 1.36 acre site is located on the Eastside of Floral'Avenue, approximately 1,100 feet north of its intersection with. East Avenue. C. Type of Application(s): A tentative subdivision map approved by the City of Chico Planning Commission. D. Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 048-680-042 E. Current Zoning: R-1 Single Family Residential General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential F. Environmental Setting: The project site has been developed over the past 40+ years with a"single rural residential use and is occupied by various structures and buildings including an older home, two barns/garages, and an in -ground concrete pool. Topography is mostly level and cultivated with grass and sparsely, planted olive and almond trees. The rectangular site is surrounded on three sides by six foot high wooden fencing of adjacent residences. Although not fully improved, Floral Avenue is a four lane major arterial; East Avenue, approximately 1,100 feet to the south, is a fully improved four lane arterial. The site is classified as Urban in the city's Master Environmental Assessment (MEA). Norindications,of wetlands or special status habitats exist on the project site. -G. Project Description: Project applicants, William and Jeanette Bostrom, propose to subdivide a 1.36 acre parcel into 7 single family lots. Proposed with private street standards, gross lot sizes would range from 6,900 square feet"to 1.0,530 square feet. Gross density for the project would be 5.1 units/acre. A single street court ("hammer -head" design) is proposed -into the development The existing I esidence and pool is proposed to remain, although the two garage/barns will be removed. The home's existing septic tank will be abandoned„with municipal sanitary sewer service provided to each of the newly created lots. An existing private well will be retained near, the pool for landscaping purposes only, with water service to the newly created lots provided, by the Califomia Water Service Company. Thirteen mature trees will also be retained. The following modifications to the City of Chico subdivision design standards are proposed: 1. On-site, private street easement is proposed to be reduced by 4 feet to 40 feet to: reduce impact on shallow lot depths. The reduction in width will be accomplished by eliminating th e sidewalk on the south side of the street. In addition, a portion of the pedestrian access is proposed to be provided by a "striped walking area” as shown on Parcels 3 and 14. The subdivision will be condtioned to extend the sidewalk across the entire Parcel 4 frontage to City of Chico Initial Study Page 2 the turn -around. Except at driveway openings, there shall be curb on- both sides of the interior street. 2. Parcels 1 through 4 have .lot depths.of 68 or 70 feet. The minimum required is 80 feet. 3. Parcel 6 has a lot width of 38 feet at the front set -back line. The minimum required is 50 feet. 4. The private street is proposed to be all concrete rather than the AC street section with PCC valley gutter as depicted in Standard Detail S -18F (of Chico Municipal Code. Title 18R). Surrounding Land Uses: The project site is surrounded on three sides (north, south and east) by small lot, developed by the Chico Housing Improvement Program (CHIP). The Floral Gardens subdivision exists west of the site, fully developed with single family residences on standard lot sizes. Average density of this surrounding residential development is 4.3 units/acre. Public Agency Approvals: • A tentative subdivision map approved by the City of Chico Planning Commission. Applicant: William and Jeanette Bostrom Address: 2646 Floral Avenue, Chico, CA 95973 Initiated By: William and Jeanette Bostrom Contact: Bob Summerville, Assistant Planner Prepared By: Bob Summerville, Assistant. Planner Location Map R] K. // PLEASA i MOBILE c City of Chico Initial Study Page 3 Site Plan 4141 O Y' ca 1 ! l W1 ° 1 n . f '_ i� 1I th Z'= ii ``J i:`Iii: 2 iiia s 3 i_ 1: flit l a, 9 �F3 i3• + i =z a° �` Zl 3i . _ '� �•l.i. .a i:�i'; j::'.t:tl!+sIT•�; Sv 'fi 1 s+3li`t9�:€1 hw I m % ��;si�so22E iIIlf 3; �iiIl;'It�lA 1 j ! ~ i, `' dEc:al l2=8i=:it�:3eadw + a `1 L: 1 J ; o ---t-i 3nN3AV 'IV1191.4 ' 4: v o DEC 2 4 l99T CITY DF CHICO City of Chico`Initial Study. • Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS" POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors.checked below would be potentially affected,by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Geophysical Factors ■ Cultural Resources ❑ Energy and Natural Resources O 'Biological Resources ❑ Open Space/Recreation ❑ Econom ic Factors ■ Hydrological Factors D Hazards ❑ Transportation/Circulation ■ Air Quality ❑ Noise/Light and Glare ❑ Public Services ❑ Land Use and Planning PLANNING DIRECTOR DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find 'that the proposed project COULD, NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ■ 1 find that although the proposed project could have.a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described herein have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, but at least one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant o applicable legal, standards. Any such effect(s) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described herein. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that.earlier EIR, including revisions'or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the p oposed project G 9� Sig ture 15ate Printed Name For i City of Chico Initial Study Page 5 2. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • Responses to the following questions and related discussion indicate if the proposed project will have or potentially have a significant adverse impact, on the environment. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources -show that the impact simply does not apply to,projects like the one involved (e.g. the'project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants based on established'threshold criteria). All answers must take into account all phases of project planning, implementation and operation, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operation impacts. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is °substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more '"Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made an EIR is required. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies when the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact" The initial study will describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section 4, "Earlier Analysis," may be cross-referenced). • Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to tiering, a program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been -adequately analyzed in an earlier .EIR or negative declaration- [Section 15063(c)(3)(D)]. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section 4 at the end of the checklist. • Initial studies may incorporate references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. the general plan or zoning ordinances, etc.). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted are cited in the discussion. City of Chico Initial Study • • Page 6 DISCUSSION: ' Previously graded and/or disturbed surfaces for the site's existing residential use has resulted in a virtually level project site, which will closely resemble the finished grades of the proposed project.. The potential for wind and water erosion created through development of the property will be controlled using Best Management Practices (BMPs) as discussed in Section C of this Initial,Study. No unique geologic features exist on the project site, nor' is the site in an area of geologic hazards. Potentially Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than A. Geophysical Factors: Will the project or its Significant Mitigation -Significant No related activities result in:. • Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1., Substantial change in topography or unstable soil X conditions due to excavating, grading orfilling? Significant No 2. The destruction, covering, or modification of any X unusual or unique geologic or physical features? Impact Impact 3. Any changes in wind or'water erosion of soils or X sands or any erosion which may modify the channel X of a waterway or other body of ' water? (Water or animal officially listed as, threatened or Quality is discussed in Section C.) 4. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards X such as' earthquakes, expansive soils, volcanic hazards, liquefaction hazards, land subsidence, Substantial loss or degradation of any habitat slope instability, or similar hazards? _ X DISCUSSION: ' Previously graded and/or disturbed surfaces for the site's existing residential use has resulted in a virtually level project site, which will closely resemble the finished grades of the proposed project.. The potential for wind and water erosion created through development of the property will be controlled using Best Management Practices (BMPs) as discussed in Section C of this Initial,Study. No unique geologic features exist on the project site, nor' is the site in an area of geologic hazards. DISCUSSION: The City of Chico's Biological Resources Inventory, prepared --in conjunction with the Master Environmental - Assessment (MEA) and General Plan, identifies the site as "Urban". Development of the site during the past 75+ years and surrounding development has substantially reduced the potential for sensitive biological resources to exist. Site investigations conducted by planning staff confirm the potential is low for the site to contain special habitats, including wetlands. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than B. Biological Resources: Will the project or its Significant Mitigation Significant No related activities result in: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. Removal or degradation of critical habitat of a plant X or animal officially listed as, threatened or endangered? 2. Substantial loss or degradation of any habitat X identified as sensitive in the MEA? 3. Substantial interference with the movement of any X resident or migratory fish or wildlife species? 4. Substantial reduction or degradation of habitat for a X fish, wildlife, or plant species? 5. Substantial fragmentation of large areas of X contiguous wildlife habitat? 6. Increase in the danger of fire hazard in areas with X flammable grass, brush, or trees? DISCUSSION: The City of Chico's Biological Resources Inventory, prepared --in conjunction with the Master Environmental - Assessment (MEA) and General Plan, identifies the site as "Urban". Development of the site during the past 75+ years and surrounding development has substantially reduced the potential for sensitive biological resources to exist. Site investigations conducted by planning staff confirm the potential is low for the site to contain special habitats, including wetlands. City of Chico Initial Study • • Page 7 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than C. - Hydrological Factors: Will the project or its Significant Mitigation Significant No related activities result in: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. Changes in ` the course or direction of water X movements? 2. Generation of runoff from new development that X exceeds the capacity of Planning Area storm drains or substantial obstruction to groundwater recharge? 3. Exposure of people or property to flood hazard? X 4. Generation of pollutants or sedimentation which X would affect surface or subsurface water quality? 5. Development of five acres or more as defined by X the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permitting Process (NPDES)? DISCUSSION: Construction of impervious surfaces through development of the proposal will create an increase in urban run-off and potential obstruction to groundwater recharge. As standard. mitigation (Measure C.1, below) to reduce the amount of pollutants and sedimentation generated from the development and prior to entering a designated public storm drainage system, Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be employedas`identified below. A variety of BMPs can be utilized with a menu of options provided in the City's Best Practices Manual. MITIGATION MEASURE CA: The applicant shall prepare and submit a storm drainage plan for review and approval by the Department of Public Works. Approval of the plan shall be based on criteria including, but not limited to: A. No net increase' in peak flows of receiving streams or storm drain channels. B. Approval from Butte County for storm water discharge to its facilities in the Pleasant Valley Drainage Assessment District or Sycamore Creek. In addition, ensure a reliable long term funding mechanism for the ongoing operation and maintenance of the flood control and storm water treatment facilities. C. Incorporation of BMPs such as grass or lawn filter strips, infiltration trenches, oil/grease trap separators, and/or retention swales into the project drainage design to intercept "first flush" contaminants from the initial 1/2 inch of rainfall for each storm event prior to discharge into affected channels and to reduce storm water runoff pollutants generated by the project to the maximum extent practical which satisfy City water quality protection goals. The system shall include reduction of suspended solids and reduction of heavy metal concentrations by increasing infiltration time. The design and selection of BMPs shall be based on site specific considerations such as geology, topography, and hydrology, in addition to the type and size of the subject proposal. BMPs shall be included in improvement plans or landscaping plans, whichever is applicable, for review and approval by City staff. In addition, prior to issuance of building permits, the developer(s) shall comply with all requirements of the RWQCB, including procurement of a General Storm Water Permit and/or water quality certification. The 1/2 inch standard shall be accomplished'even if the project density, must be reduced in order to do so. MITIGATION MONITORING CA: The applicant is responsible for developing the plan. The Department of Public Works will review and approve the plan. Building and/or Public Works inspectors shall conduct periodic site.inspections during the construction phase to ensure that the measures are being implemented. City of Chico Initial Study• • Page 8 DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 21083.3 of the Public Resources Code, the project is exempt from analysis of this section because the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (GPEIR) acknowledges significant and unavoidable impacts to air quality with build -out of the General Plan Planning Area, specifically, the GPEIR recognizes. cumulative construction related emissions of particulate dust, NOX, CO, and PM10 for the duration of construction activity as well as cumulative regional mobile 'source emissions, wood, leaf, and agricultural waste burning emissions, and point and area source emissions (ozone, CO, and PM10)1in the long term. The General Plan also contains a threshold of 125 dwelling units to trigger a special study for air quality impacts. This project is well under that threshold. Findings of overriding consideration were adopted -and the GPEIR was certified on November 6, 1994. The following mitigations for air quality are requirements by the GPEIR and are reiterated here for ease of implementation: MITIGATION MEASURE D.1: A. During clearing , grading, ground disturbance or excavation operations, fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled by regular watering, paving of construction roads, or other dust preventative measures. B.' All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering, with complete coverage, shall occur at least twice daily, preferably in the late morning and after work is done for the day. C. All clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 15 mph averaged over 1 hour. . D. The area disturbed by demolition, clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized at all times. . E. Portions of the construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of 3 months shall be seeded and watered until.grass cover is grown. F. All on-site roads shall be paved as soon as feasible or watered periodically or chemically stabilized. G. Mud carried onto street surfaces by construction equipment shall be removed on a daily basis. H. Haul trucks shall be covered with tarpaulins or other effective. covers at all times. i Potentially Significant Potentially . Unless Less Than D. Air Quality Factors: Will the project or its Significant Mitigation Significant No related activities result in: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. Generating pollutants (hydrocarbon, thermal, odor, smoke, radiation, etc.) which would deteriorate ambient air quality? 2: , Exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? 3. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or ' temperature, or any change in climate locally or regionally? 4. Inconsistency with air quality related plans (e.g., Northern Sacramento Valley Air Basin 1994 Air Quality Attainment Plan, and Chico Urban Area CO Attainment Plan)? DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Section 21083.3 of the Public Resources Code, the project is exempt from analysis of this section because the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (GPEIR) acknowledges significant and unavoidable impacts to air quality with build -out of the General Plan Planning Area, specifically, the GPEIR recognizes. cumulative construction related emissions of particulate dust, NOX, CO, and PM10 for the duration of construction activity as well as cumulative regional mobile 'source emissions, wood, leaf, and agricultural waste burning emissions, and point and area source emissions (ozone, CO, and PM10)1in the long term. The General Plan also contains a threshold of 125 dwelling units to trigger a special study for air quality impacts. This project is well under that threshold. Findings of overriding consideration were adopted -and the GPEIR was certified on November 6, 1994. The following mitigations for air quality are requirements by the GPEIR and are reiterated here for ease of implementation: MITIGATION MEASURE D.1: A. During clearing , grading, ground disturbance or excavation operations, fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled by regular watering, paving of construction roads, or other dust preventative measures. B.' All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering, with complete coverage, shall occur at least twice daily, preferably in the late morning and after work is done for the day. C. All clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 15 mph averaged over 1 hour. . D. The area disturbed by demolition, clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized at all times. . E. Portions of the construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of 3 months shall be seeded and watered until.grass cover is grown. F. All on-site roads shall be paved as soon as feasible or watered periodically or chemically stabilized. G. Mud carried onto street surfaces by construction equipment shall be removed on a daily basis. H. Haul trucks shall be covered with tarpaulins or other effective. covers at all times. i City of Chico Initial Study , Page 9 ' I. Wood burning stoves installed in all..residences shall be EPA Phase 2 certified. MITIGATION MONITORING 'D.1 Measures A through H shall be contained within a dust suppression plan required to be submitted as specification on subdivision. improvement plans.' Appropriate staff members from the Department of Public Works shall conduct periodic site inspections to verify compliance with fugitive dust control measures. The City Building Division will monitor building plans and conduct site inspections to ensure that any proposed wood burning stoves'are EPA Phase 2 Certified. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than. E. Land Use, Planning: Will the project or its Significant Mitigation Significant No related activities be inconsistent with: -- impact. Incorporated Impact Impact 1. General Plan or Specific Plan policies, or zoning X regulations?, 2.. General Plan population growth rates for its X ` ;planning areas in conjunction with other recentlyJ. approved development? ' I Result in substantial conflict with the established X character, -aesthetics or functioning .of the surrounding community? 4. Be a part of a larger project involving a series of X cumulative actions? 5. Result in displacement of people or business X activity?. 6. Conversion of viable prime agricultural land to non- X agricultural use, or substantial conflicts with existing agricultural operations? (Viable agricultural land is defined as land on Class I or Class II' agricultural soils of 5 acres or -greater, .adjacent on no more than one side to existing urban development.). DISCUSSION: - Surrounded by existing development, the project is considered infill development, and as such, is encouraged by General Plan policies. 'Designated Low Density Residential, the project site allows residential development at a range of 2.1 to 7 dwelling unites (DU) per acre. Consistent with the allowable density, the gross density for the ' proposal would be 5.1 DU per acre. Similarly, the proposal is compatible- with the surrounding, residential properties which have been developed at approximately 4.3 DU/acre. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less, Than F. Cultural Factors: Will the projector its related Significant Mitigation Significant No activities: , t Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. Disruptor adversely' affect historical buildings or X sites? 2. Disrupt or.adv&sely affect a prehistoric or historic ` X archaeological site or a property or historical or cultural significance to a, community or ethnic or social group? City of Chico Initial Study • Page 10 C� 3. Disruptor adversely affect a paleontological site X except as part of a scientific study? DISCUSSION: The project site is in an area of low to moderate archaeological sensitivity as designated by the Northeast Information Center and discussed in 'the Master Environmental Assessment (MEA). Given the developed characteristic of the project site, the potential for disturbing surface related cultural resources has been substantially reduced. However, subsurface resources may still exist and potentially be disturbed during ground level construction activities.' To reduce related impacts to prehistoric or historic resources, the following mitigation measures shall apply. MITIGATION MEASURE F.1: If, during ground disturbing activities, any cultural resources are encountered, all work shall cease within the area of the find pending an examination of the site and -materials by a professional archaeologist. This person will assess the significance of the find and prepare appropriate mitigation measures for review by the Planning Director. All mitigation measures determined to be appropriate for this project by the Planning Director shall be implemented pursuant to the terms of the archaeologist's report. MITIGATION MONITORING FA: Should cultural resources be encountered, the supervising inspector shall be responsible for reporting any such findings to the Planning Division, and a qualified archaeologist will be contacted to conduct meetings with on-site employees and monitor the referenced, mitigation ,measures. f Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than G. Open Space/Recreation: Will the project or its Significant. Mitigation,= Significant No- related orelated activities: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. Affect -an 'officially designated scenic vista -point, X F scenic highway or corridor or other unique aesthetic value? 2. Affect an important existing or potential community X recreation area? 3.' Affect lands preserved under an agricultural, scenic, X or open space contract or easement? DISCUSSION: Rear yard fencing of the existing residential development encompasses the site on the north, south and east sides and limits the potential of the project to obstruct any viewsheds. As such, the project is a small infill development and will not create impacts to viewsheds, nor affect recreational or open space areas. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than H. Hazards: Will the project or its related Significant Mitigation Significant No activities: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. Present a hazard to people or property from risk of X explosion or release of hazardous substances -- either on site or in transit, in the event of accident or otherwise? City of Chico Initial Study M S Page 11 2. Result in the creation of health hazards, or potential X health hazards, or in the increased exposure of people to existing or potential health hazards? 3. Increase the danger of fire hazard in areas with X flammable grass, brush or trees? 4. Expose people or property to wind hazards? X DISCUSSION: No hazardous uses or impacts are associated with this project. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than I. ' Noise/Light and Glare: Will the project or its Significant Mitigation Significant No related activities result in: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1: Exposure of residents in new hotels, motels, X apartment houses, and dwellings (other than single- family dwellings) to interior noise levels (CNEL) higher than. 45 dBA in any habitable room with windows closed? 2. Exposure of sensitive receptors (residential, parks, X hospitals, schools) to exterior noise levels of 60 dBA or higher? 3. Significant new light or glare impacts on the site or X surrounding area? DISCUSSION: The uses proposed for thisproject will not prompt a significant increase in ambient noise levels and will be compatible with the existing noise environment which is shared by residential and traffic uses. Although temporary and single noise events will be created during the construction phase, impacts are considered to be less than significant because projectcontractors will be requireflo comply with the existing City Noise Ordinance which restricts the hours of construction activity and regulates related noise emissions. The project will result in new lighting for residences and outdoor activity areas where none currently exist. Sectio n 19.26.290 of the City Land Use Regulations (Development Standards, Outdoor Lighting) mandates outdoor lighting be located and/or shielded to prevent glare onto neighboring properties. Any new lighting introduced by the project will be consistent with existing residential lighting. Therefore, less than significant impacts are anticipated. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than J. Energy and Natural Resources: Will the project Significant Mitigation' Significant No or its related activities: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. Affect the use, extraction or conservation of any X natural resources? 2. Use an excessive amount of fuel or energy or X require development of new sources of energy? DISCUSSION: ' Construction of the project will require a limited amount of fuel driven construction vehicles, however, no significant affects to natural resources or excessive amounts of fuel will be required. City of Chico Initial Study • Page 12 Potentially Significant. 'Potentially Unless Less Than K. Transportation/Circulation' Factors: Will the Significant Mitigation Significant No project or its related activities result in: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. Traffic volumes which exceed established Level of • X Service (LOS) standards on roadway segments or at intersections, or which do not meet applicable,, safety standards? Based on proposed General Plan policies, significant impacts would generally result if traffic; exceeded LOS C on residential streets, LOS . D on arterial ' and .. collector streetsrntersections, acid (under- specific circumstances) LOS Erin built -out areas served by transit. +• 2. The absence .of bikeway facilities in the general X locations identified in the General Plan, consistent µ -with guidelines in the Chico Urban Area Bicycle } ' Plan, or failure to meet applicable design ' " requirements and safety standards? 3. Travel characteristics which are not consistent with X , standards established in. the Butte County Congestion Management' Plan (CMP), or, other - General Plan policies related to Transportation Systems Management (TSM)? , 4. Substantial: impact on existing or proposed public X transit systems including waterborne, rail and air. traffic? 5. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for. X_ new parking not provided for by the project? 6. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicycles, s X pedestrian or other traffic? EXISTING REGULATIONS ' Maintain Level of Service.(LOS) Standard "D" on arterials and collectors and "C" on residential streets; accept LOS "E" in built -out areas served by transit if specified findings are made (General Plan Policies T-G-11,and T -G-12). a_ Pursuant to the General Plan Implementation Guide for Project Review,"Types of Projects Subject to Review to Determine Compliance with Standards", the following standards are used to determine if additional project -specific traffic analysis is required: Any project located on a residential street with future LOS of C; any project located on a non-residential 'street with LOS D; or any project generating more than 75 peak -hour vehicle trips. The Plan further indicates that these thresholds are normally triggered by residential projects over 125' units. DISCUSSION: Area roadways have been designed to accommodate the future buildout of the area based ort traffic projections from the General Plan land use designations for the area. Since 'the density of the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan designations for the. area, no significant impacts are anticipated in this regard. Furthermore, based on trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, peak trip generation rates are 1.01, per single, family. residence -and 0.54 per multi-family/townhouse unit Therefore, the. project is.expected to generate approximately 7 peak trips, which is well below the General Plan threshold for further study. City of Chico Initial Study • Page 13 The City of Chico Municipal Code requires new development to be appropriately designed to accommodate off- street parking which meets City development standards. Thus, the project will not create a demand for parking. The project may result in a negligible impact to area transit; however, the Chico Area Transit System has adequate capacity for additional ridership which may occur as a result of the project. Any increase in traffic hazards is expected to be negligible and less than significant due to the incremental increase in the number of peak vehicle trips. DISCUSSION: Fire protection to the project is provided by the City Fire Department.' Serving the full development of the project will not require additional fire fighting equipment or personnel due to the limited size of the project Development of the property should actually reduce the degree of fire hazard in the area by eliminating the growth/existence of dry annual grasses during the summer months. The City Police Department is responsible -for enforcing State laws and City ordinances in the area of the project site. Due to the limited size of the project, no measurable impacts related to provision of services will occur and it is expected that the Department will continue to utilize existing resources to patrol the area. The proposal may result in an increased demand on the already over -crowded school system. Based on the Chico Unified School Districts formula of 0.43 students generated per residential unit, the project is expected to generate approximately 3 students. The cost of accommodating additional students generated by this project will be reduced by the project proponent's payment of school impact fees (cash or in lieu equivalent) to the fullest extent possible, as required and allowed by the California School Facilities Act. The proposal may' result in an increased demand on the park system. However, no adverse impacts are anticipated because the proponents will be required to pay park impact fees at the time of issuance of building permits. Deterioration of on-site and off-site road surfaces due to the project would be minimal because of the incremental amount of traffic generated by the project Since the project is residential in nature, heavy vehicles which typically cause the most roadway damage would generally not be associated with the project. Ongoing maintenance and operation of storm drain facilities will tie- provided by districts formed by the City of Chico and funded by residents in the vicinity. Project proponents will be required to install public right-of-way improvements and full infrastructure within and adjacent to the project. No other governmental services are affected by the project. Potentially L. Public Service Factors: Will the project or its. Significant related activities have an effect upon or result in Potentially Unless Less Than a need for altered governmental services in any Significant Mitigation Significant No of the following areas: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. Fire protection? X 2. Police protection? X 3. Schools? X 4. Parks and recreation facilities? '(See Section G. _ X Open Space/Recreation) 5. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads, X canals, etc.? 6. Other government services? X DISCUSSION: Fire protection to the project is provided by the City Fire Department.' Serving the full development of the project will not require additional fire fighting equipment or personnel due to the limited size of the project Development of the property should actually reduce the degree of fire hazard in the area by eliminating the growth/existence of dry annual grasses during the summer months. The City Police Department is responsible -for enforcing State laws and City ordinances in the area of the project site. Due to the limited size of the project, no measurable impacts related to provision of services will occur and it is expected that the Department will continue to utilize existing resources to patrol the area. The proposal may result in an increased demand on the already over -crowded school system. Based on the Chico Unified School Districts formula of 0.43 students generated per residential unit, the project is expected to generate approximately 3 students. The cost of accommodating additional students generated by this project will be reduced by the project proponent's payment of school impact fees (cash or in lieu equivalent) to the fullest extent possible, as required and allowed by the California School Facilities Act. The proposal may' result in an increased demand on the park system. However, no adverse impacts are anticipated because the proponents will be required to pay park impact fees at the time of issuance of building permits. Deterioration of on-site and off-site road surfaces due to the project would be minimal because of the incremental amount of traffic generated by the project Since the project is residential in nature, heavy vehicles which typically cause the most roadway damage would generally not be associated with the project. Ongoing maintenance and operation of storm drain facilities will tie- provided by districts formed by the City of Chico and funded by residents in the vicinity. Project proponents will be required to install public right-of-way improvements and full infrastructure within and adjacent to the project. No other governmental services are affected by the project. 0 City of Chico Initial Study • • Page 14 DISCUSSION: • The project will require connection to the City of Chico sanitary'sewer system which has the capacity to serve the number of units proposed. Existing California Water Service Company Facilities are in proximity to the site with adequate capacity to serve the project. Furthermore, existing gas and electric facilities are present at the site with adequate capacity to serve the project See Section II. C. Hydrological Factors of.this Initial Study for discussion related to storm water.drainage. The project would increase the stream of waste from the Chic Urban Area to the Neal roadlandfill by a very, incremental amount. The Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum holding capacity by the year 2008. To ensure adequate landfill capacity up to and beyond 2008, Butte County will be updating its solid waste management plan every three years to identify needed landfill sites. In addition, the city recently started a voluntary compost diversion program to extend the holding capacity of,existing and future, landfills. Mandatory compost programs are expected to be adopted as part of joint City/County integrated waste management measures. Pacific Bell provides telephone service to the project area and there are existing facilities with adequate capacity for additional connections generated by the project ' No other plant facilities will be required or affected. Potentially M.' Public Utility Factors: Will the project or its Significant related activities have an effect upon or result in Potentially Unless Less Than a need for new systems 'or- substantial Significant-: Mitigation Significant No alterations to the following utilities: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact , 1. Sewer or septic systems? X 2. Water for domestic use and fire protection? X 3., Natural gas, electricity, or telephone? X 4. Storm water drainage? (See Section C. X Hydrological Factors) 5. Solid waste disposal? X 6. Communication systems? ; X 7. Plant facilities for any of the above (sewer plants,. X microwave station, water, etc.)? DISCUSSION: • The project will require connection to the City of Chico sanitary'sewer system which has the capacity to serve the number of units proposed. Existing California Water Service Company Facilities are in proximity to the site with adequate capacity to serve the project. Furthermore, existing gas and electric facilities are present at the site with adequate capacity to serve the project See Section II. C. Hydrological Factors of.this Initial Study for discussion related to storm water.drainage. The project would increase the stream of waste from the Chic Urban Area to the Neal roadlandfill by a very, incremental amount. The Neal Road Landfill is expected to reach maximum holding capacity by the year 2008. To ensure adequate landfill capacity up to and beyond 2008, Butte County will be updating its solid waste management plan every three years to identify needed landfill sites. In addition, the city recently started a voluntary compost diversion program to extend the holding capacity of,existing and future, landfills. Mandatory compost programs are expected to be adopted as part of joint City/County integrated waste management measures. Pacific Bell provides telephone service to the project area and there are existing facilities with adequate capacity for additional connections generated by the project ' No other plant facilities will be required or affected. City of Chico Initial Study • Page 15 - 3. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Pursuant to Section 15382 of the State EIR Guidelines, a project shall be found to have a significant effect on the environment if any of the following are true: 4. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to tiering, a program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration [Section 15063(c)(3)(D)]. In this case a discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b. r Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal - standards, and state whether such -effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation.measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless '. Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. The project has the potential to degrade the quality X . of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important . examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 2. The project has possible environmental effects X which are individually' limited but cumulatively . considerable. (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past, current and probable future projects. 3. The environmental effects of the project will cause X substantial adverse effects on human beings, either ' directly or indirectly. DISCUSSION: Based on the on the preceding environmental analysis and the proposed mitigation measures, the project will not result in or indirect adverse effects on human beings, nor cumulative impacts. 4. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to tiering, a program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration [Section 15063(c)(3)(D)]. In this case a discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b. r Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal - standards, and state whether such -effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation.measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. City of, Chico Initial Study Page 16 6. SIGNIFICANT'IMPACTS AND FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES All significant or potentially significant impacts indicated in Section 2 above have been described and feasible mitigation measures recommended wherever possible. Any participant of the Initial Study may also make a recommendation as to whether a Negative Declaration, a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures, more study in a particular area, or an EIR should be prepared. Please indicate any source.date relied upon'and your name and date of comments in -the space indicated: Use additional pages if necessary. Reviewed by:` on / 12 Y Adate) Department Reviewed by: on (date) Department: 6. PROJECT'S SPONSOR'S INCORPORATION OF MITIGATION INTO THE PROPOSED PROJECT: have reviewed the Initial Study for the project and any mitigation measures identified herein. ` I hereby will modify the project on file with the City of Chico Department to include and incorporate all mitigation set.forth in this Initial Study. Project Sponsor/Applican Date REFERENCES: • City of Chico General Plan, 1994. • City of Chico Master Environmental Assessment, Blaney Dyett/Michael Brandman Associates, January, 1994. • City of Chico Best Practices Manual. Note: The above referenced information is available forpublic review at the City of Chico Planning Division, 411 Main Street, Chico, California. COMMUNITY; ELOPMENT- DEPARTMENT 411 Main Street May 26, 1998 P.O. Box 3420 CITYo►CHICO Chico. CA 95927 ' INC 1872 (916) 895-4845. FAX (916) 895-4726 ATSS 459-4893 � RE: Tentative*Subdivision Map- Stonecreek Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Subdivision Account No.: 863-00.0/70217-4710 Enclosed is "a tentative map of the subject subdivision. Please review this map and forward to the City of 'Chico your, recommendations regarding facilities, easements, etc. under your organization's jurisdiction. Return one (1) copy of the tentative map within'fifteen (15) days to City of Chico Community Development Department P.O Box 3420 Chico, CA.95927-3420 Attention: Mr. Fritz McKinley This will allow the City to incorporate your recommendations into the final map or improvement plans for the subdivision. If you have any questions or wish to discuss the map in further detail, please call me at (530) 895-4982, at your convenience. Sincerely, Fritz McKinley Development Engineer Enclosures) Subd File - TF (2 weeks) .cc CDD L:\USERS\BUILD\DEVEGR\SUBD\FORMS\TM-COM.LTR MAY 2 s 1SC,3 Rev 03/20/99 t. REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: Date: February27,'1998 ® CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT. • CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR ❑ CHICO AREA REC. AND PARK DIST. • CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ® CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ■ CITY CHIEF OF POLICE ❑ COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR © CITY FIRE CHIEF ® ,COUNTY ENV. HEALTH DEPT: (CHICO) ■ CITY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ❑ COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DIST. ❑ CITY ASSISTANT DPW ❑ , CAL TRANS •. CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL ❑ DEPARTMENT, OF FISH & GAME • CITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR ❑ WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ® ..CITY URBAN FORESTER. ❑ UTILITY COMPANIES ® CITY WPCP SUPERVISOR (PAC BELL; PG&E; CAL WATER) ® CITY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING (TV/FM) ❑ NORTHEAST INFO CENTER ❑ CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 0COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMM SENIOR PLANNER (CURRENT) ❑ ASIRPORT DIRECTOR" ❑ Other ® COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIST. PROJECT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Name/Address: 'Planned Development Use Permit No. 98-01 (Hughes/PDQ Market) Northwest corner of East and Ceanothus Avenues Project Description: Proposed commercial development on one acre zoned PD/N-C Planned Development Neighborhood Commercial to include gasoline sales, a 1500 sq. ft. convenience store, a 1500 sq. ft. deli, and an automated car wash-. Attached is the preliminary data regarding 'a project which as been submitted to the City of Chico for a discretionary action (Use Permit, Rezone, Subdivision, etc.). An assessment of the potential impacts of the project is being made. Please review and submit comments within ten working days. ■ This item will be on the Planning Commission agenda of To be determined. ❑ This item will be approved by the Planning Director. . COMMENTS: ' a Hing i islon MAR 0 3 IM U Thank You �s 3 � Project Planner: _ Claudia Sigona . r. CITY OF CHICO MEMORANDUM - CITYorCHICO INC. 1872 TO: INTERESTED PARTIES DATE: February 27, 1998 FROM: ASSOCIATE PLANNER FILE: PD/UP No. 98-1 RE: Planned Development Use Permit No. 98-1 (Hughes/PDQ Market) APPLICANT: Orval Hughes, PDQ Market, 156 Eaton Rd., Chico, CA 95973 OWNER: Dennis &.Sherrill Allan, Ann Marie Bellin, Jay R. & Analie C. -Perko, and Ross & Kathryn Bradford, c/o Georgie Bellin, 250 Cohasset Rd. #20, Chico, CA 95926 REQUESTED ACTION: Planned Development Use Permit PURPOSE: Proposed commercial development to include gasoline sales., a 1500 sq. ft. convenience store, a 1500 sq. ft. restaurant/deli, and an automated car wash. LOCATION: Northwest corner of East Avenue and Ceanothus Ave. EXISTING ZONING: PD/N-C Planned Development Use Permit (pending) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 048-061-038 (portion of) SIZE: 1.04 acres EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE: N Vacant R -P then Rural Residential S Vacant; Single Family Residential & Cabinet Shop E Offices W. Neighborhood Commercial-Safeway.Shopping Center GENERAL PLAN DESIG.: `Community Commercial (pending) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Mitigated Negative Declaration anticipated OTHER: Parcel Map Pending (see attached) C1WINWORDUNFO.DOC - -" 10"ALMONO I Z Ex. FENCE\ I • � nulnlFnS, DENNIS ALLEN ET AL C/o OEORGIE OELLIN. THE GROUP 1900 COHA95ET ROAD 9TE. 10 ' CNCO. CA. 99976 f I B 0-0-NC. � Q 1 1?CCE�L I Ac rot NOTES: 4.6 1 �J' � NO TREES ARE BEING REMOVED. BOX )I ' 4 PROPOSED LOTS- AVERAGE AREA Lig ACRES. L 6116' I 9,03,30"M 6J9K TELEX "OUE B r PACIFIC BELL EXCL I FG 0 SEIIlER B Y CITY OF CHICO ' 1 I I Q CRY OF CMCO 9TORM DRAINS I I I I I ENGINEER- ERIC ROBERTSON I 1 670 MANZAMrA Cr. 9TE D RSN 99.19go CHICO. CA. 99976 II THF LOTS ARE RF-LATIVELI FLAT 50 1 1 I � 1 � ' 1 70• PIPELINE Plow OF WAY PER > 1 O, Ex/9 TING iREE9 TO REMAN ' 1 I R9N 91.8064 I 1 A CEL 2 I I � . 1 PR BEDE cm cALET• 9o'I °° I I 10' 1 I Ja- ' 1 I 71/TR E ALONI, i I 79' NON-FXCLUSNE EriM7 I � I P R L , I SMT PFR 91.463551 PER Rs" 90--40096 I I I O Ac I I IFLOATG ESH'T AS M — — — 1 ALIGNED III/ SAFEIVAY ��• s evrn•n"u 714/0' 1 ORIVELANEI G �T T- EAST AVENUE UrILIrYEASH7PEP 10"ALMONO I Z Ex. FENCE\ I • � nulnlFnS, DENNIS ALLEN ET AL C/o OEORGIE OELLIN. THE GROUP 1900 COHA95ET ROAD 9TE. 10 ' CNCO. CA. 99976 f I B 0-0-NC. � Q 1 1?CCE�L I Ac rot NOTES: 1 �J' � NO TREES ARE BEING REMOVED. P. o. 48- 047 )I ' 4 PROPOSED LOTS- AVERAGE AREA Lig ACRES. L 6116' I couJ T TELEX "OUE B r PACIFIC BELL EXCL I FG 0 SEIIlER B Y CITY OF CHICO ' -- ' STORM DRAINAGE TO EX19 MNG OFF91 rE PUBLIC RIGH OF 01 CRY OF CMCO 9TORM DRAINS CABLE SY CNAMBERS CABLE 'I ENGINEER- ERIC ROBERTSON 1 670 MANZAMrA Cr. 9TE D RSN 99.19go CHICO. CA. 99976 II THF LOTS ARE RF-LATIVELI FLAT 50 1 I I m � %1•� e G� J �arce I 1 � y -17J- CONTOUR LWE O - MI TERVAL > O, Ex/9 TING iREE9 TO REMAN I I Ctow I I A CEL 2 I I I I � . UT I n01 1 I I 1 APE ' 1 I 71/TR E ALONI, -4eooe � I PUDUC U , I SMT PFR 91.463551 <M x ' I I — — — --' ��• s evrn•n"u 714/0' EX. C.G. I S. _ _— _ — _ - 9-' SLOPE i PUBLIC" G �T T- EAST AVENUE UrILIrYEASH7PEP ' 7044-OR.-Jd 10"ALMONO I Z Ex. FENCE\ I • � nulnlFnS, DENNIS ALLEN ET AL C/o OEORGIE OELLIN. THE GROUP 1900 COHA95ET ROAD 9TE. 10 ' CNCO. CA. 99976 f I B 0-0-NC. � Q 1 1?CCE�L I Ac rot SITE W i EA 5 a f Q � 1 `jQSxLI � Y L NI�p CITY OF CI4CO VIC"rY MAP NT - VESTING rEN TA TIVE MAR PARCEL MAP for DENNIS ALLEN et al OEING A PORTION OF LOT 44 OF THE TfAP OF THE FIFTEEN rH sUBOIVSION OF TIS JOM•1 BIDe.ELL-RANCHO. NEAR CHICO. BUTTE CO. CALIFORNIA• RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, A r PAGE 40. FEBRUARY, /996 ROBERTSON and DOMINICK Civil Engineers & Surveyors am u.....,,ll. CL 110 rl.,. M. J'l.. 0 /l.d Ai..n. c,.. .4000 lsu-'swo Tswlaw-aeso a NOTES: 1 �J' � NO TREES ARE BEING REMOVED. TOTAL ACREAGE- 5" ACRES )I ' 4 PROPOSED LOTS- AVERAGE AREA Lig ACRES. L 6116' POUIER BY P.G < E couJ T TELEX "OUE B r PACIFIC BELL - WATER or CAL OIA TER 0 SEIIlER B Y CITY OF CHICO ' -- ' STORM DRAINAGE TO EX19 MNG OFF91 rE PUBLIC RIGH OF 01 CRY OF CMCO 9TORM DRAINS CABLE SY CNAMBERS CABLE 'I ENGINEER- ERIC ROBERTSON 1 670 MANZAMrA Cr. 9TE D RSN 99.19go CHICO. CA. 99976 II THF LOTS ARE RF-LATIVELI FLAT 50 ER0510N CONTROL IS NOT A PROBLEM. .I m � %1•� e G� J �arce I L EGENDI y -17J- CONTOUR LWE O - MI TERVAL > O, Ex/9 TING iREE9 TO REMAN CG. • 6. CURB CUTTER 4 6/DEt4ALK SITE W i EA 5 a f Q � 1 `jQSxLI � Y L NI�p CITY OF CI4CO VIC"rY MAP NT - VESTING rEN TA TIVE MAR PARCEL MAP for DENNIS ALLEN et al OEING A PORTION OF LOT 44 OF THE TfAP OF THE FIFTEEN rH sUBOIVSION OF TIS JOM•1 BIDe.ELL-RANCHO. NEAR CHICO. BUTTE CO. CALIFORNIA• RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, A r PAGE 40. FEBRUARY, /996 ROBERTSON and DOMINICK Civil Engineers & Surveyors am u.....,,ll. CL 110 rl.,. M. J'l.. 0 /l.d Ai..n. c,.. .4000 lsu-'swo Tswlaw-aeso a �J' � o • oo' r v . . A ♦� R 3900' L 6116' couJ T olT• _ - -- PUBLIC RIGH OF 01 I PFR R: N .• 914 To, RSN 99.19go SITE W i EA 5 a f Q � 1 `jQSxLI � Y L NI�p CITY OF CI4CO VIC"rY MAP NT - VESTING rEN TA TIVE MAR PARCEL MAP for DENNIS ALLEN et al OEING A PORTION OF LOT 44 OF THE TfAP OF THE FIFTEEN rH sUBOIVSION OF TIS JOM•1 BIDe.ELL-RANCHO. NEAR CHICO. BUTTE CO. CALIFORNIA• RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, A r PAGE 40. FEBRUARY, /996 ROBERTSON and DOMINICK Civil Engineers & Surveyors am u.....,,ll. CL 110 rl.,. M. J'l.. 0 /l.d Ai..n. c,.. .4000 lsu-'swo Tswlaw-aeso a I I I I 10 111111 UI II Li Z: w I SArEWAV, — I r t ' < N .t rti I t N t tIIIIIUIIIIIIUIII'illlllllIUIIIIIIUI I 1111 1111 I' I I I I u I I I I I 11= _ U I Z RETAIL SIIOrS AND RESTAURANTS NOT A FART L IIIUIIIIIIUIIIIIUIIIIIIUIIIIIII j'" � ✓,' `,' '��'/� � ,71 I GHM I I I HM 1 ] II�I��I II 111UIIIIIU ✓✓ _ orriCE COMPLEX 1��>71�►1����l�ln►�11►L11L111-1. . i•I�iii�r EAST AVENUE VACANT ; ry LEGEND: PARCEL t scNooL 1 I Parcel 1 - .96 Acres - 1 Parcel 2 - 1.17 Acres r PARCEL l 4 0.46 AC.25. ItE t 501 SrATICH L------------- ------.J I I (�,,-' ..���`\ r• NOTES ... X A 1500 SP RETAIL BLD 15 1500/200; D PARKIN& SPAC&S _ ` I •�' \� j / �� �+ 1500 SP RETAIL BLD 15 1500/15• ZO PARKI1a9 SPACES I •I+ \\\ i 12 IIDOO SP OIDOOR. PATIO 15 1000/'75. 15 PARKING SPACES TOTAL REOUIRED,41 /TOTAL PROPOSED. 55 / 60% OP TOTAL SHADE GALLSfs r— I rin PARKING AND BACKUP AREA 11.940 SP SHAD£ AREA 6JI05P I f C PERC WT SHADE 51.6% .. \ +'+ c - .. �..,'. ^!:, `•� I . rTl 33' KALL. •`•fa;'�- ""'�x`. .?4 ,iwl;.'c �%��� `7 .tii52 Ir � `� I ,.*c�" . �-•e• J;u. �'Y -Ya ��Y'�-r4� �.-. naEu.fs �.\ PATIO - - • - - ' •. ]4' DRI VD"y, PAO".• w EAST AVENUE r , is •' C A t I 1 0 1 X I A •' DR0PI'lN'G YES s ---- APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEUERRGE LICENSES) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 1130 Civic Center Blvd., Suite F Yuba City, CA 95993 (916)751-8570 CENSUS TRACT 0001. DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? Mailine Address: YUBA CITY PDQ MARKET & DELI File Number..............339.951 Receipt Number ......... 1173771 Geographical Code........ 0402 Copies Mailed Date..248-98 Issued Date EAST AVE NNNI CORNER AND CEANOTHUS AVE CHICO CA 95926 BUTTE YES PART,\ER N O (If different from 1_56 EATON RD premise address) CHICO CA 95926 If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: License Tvve Transaction 7,.DA Fee 7'^e. 1':asrer DroD �.ie 20 OFF -SALE BEER A2`1) ORIGIN'- NA YES 0 FEB 18,1958 $100.00 20 1 OFF -SALE BEER rw0 r,^,QUAL .—_= NA Y ___ S 0 .77—B 18. 1958 $=S . 00 TOTAL $139.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? NO Act, or re`ulations of the Department penaining to the Act? NO Exp)ain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed pan of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on -sale licensed premise swill have all the quabfications.of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORINIA County of ' BUTTE Date FEB 18,1998 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: ()) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the comenu thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (S) that no person.other than the apPplicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be cot�ducted under the license(s) fer Mhich this a; plicz=on is rnzde; (n) that the rrarsfer. or ptoposgd pansfrr is not made to satisfy the paymem'of a loan nr to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on Which the cansfer'arplicadon is filled With the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for zny creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of u-ansferor, (5) that the transfer application may be uithdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signatlo , ' t � pn HUGHES ORVAL NV - SEE ATTACHED ABC 211 SIG ' f �� U -• M Ku CA DPW YO ­__.HO DEV. ENGR ,. sp.0 fA-F SA•J__SP-P OK—OTHER G C-0 ABC 211 (5/96) FEB Z 61998 CLKE=c�'+DESK ✓ ACM U Dc X _nN_---tSD PERS.O. R\..D. t/ ' COD ✓ r.: PRK4 LA AJ f ti' P?T Z_ T 90 � rno N M0 A r Ko C to z — v t m (If different from 1_56 EATON RD premise address) CHICO CA 95926 If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: License Tvve Transaction 7,.DA Fee 7'^e. 1':asrer DroD �.ie 20 OFF -SALE BEER A2`1) ORIGIN'- NA YES 0 FEB 18,1958 $100.00 20 1 OFF -SALE BEER rw0 r,^,QUAL .—_= NA Y ___ S 0 .77—B 18. 1958 $=S . 00 TOTAL $139.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? NO Act, or re`ulations of the Department penaining to the Act? NO Exp)ain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed pan of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on -sale licensed premise swill have all the quabfications.of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORINIA County of ' BUTTE Date FEB 18,1998 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: ()) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the comenu thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (S) that no person.other than the apPplicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be cot�ducted under the license(s) fer Mhich this a; plicz=on is rnzde; (n) that the rrarsfer. or ptoposgd pansfrr is not made to satisfy the paymem'of a loan nr to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on Which the cansfer'arplicadon is filled With the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for zny creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of u-ansferor, (5) that the transfer application may be uithdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signatlo , ' t � pn HUGHES ORVAL NV - SEE ATTACHED ABC 211 SIG ' f �� U -• M Ku CA DPW YO ­__.HO DEV. ENGR ,. sp.0 fA-F SA•J__SP-P OK—OTHER G C-0 ABC 211 (5/96) FEB Z 61998 CLKE=c�'+DESK ✓ ACM U Dc X _nN_---tSD PERS.O. R\..D. t/ ' COD ✓ r.: PRK4 LA AJ f ti' P?T REQUEST FOR COMRNTS,TO: �i Date: January•12,'1998 Z. 'PLANNING DIRECTOR' " E]'• ' CHICO AREA REC. AND PARK DIST. ® CITY COMM UNITY'DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ❑ •CHICO UNIFIED`SCH_OOL DISTRICT . ® CITY CHIEF OF POLICE. ❑ . COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR s. ® CITY FIRE CHIEF • ❑ COUNTY ENV. HEALTH DEPT: (CHICO) ® CITY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS'; ❑ - COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DIST. ❑ CITY SENIOR CIVIL ENG. (HISLOP). ❑­� CAL TRANS ® CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL ❑• DEPARTMENT OF FISH &.GAME ❑ CITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR' ❑ WATER QUALITY. CONTROL. BOARD- " ❑ `CITY URBAN FORESTER' ❑ UTILITY COMPANIES ❑ CITY WPCP SUPERVISOR (PAC BELL;.PGBE;.CAL WATER) ® DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING (TV/FM) ❑ NORTHEAST•INFO CENTER ❑ CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER •. ® COUNTY AIRPORT LAND -USE COMMit ® SENIOR PLANNER (CURRENT) : •❑ AIRPORT DIRECTOR ❑ SENIOR PLANNER (ADVANCED) ,.,f ' ❑ COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL t DIST. ` PROJECT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. 'AUX, ItisCbWi4k=, 64ri Project Name/Address:, Administrative Use ,Permit- 97=52 (Prestige Care/Chico Ventures) .1351 East, - Lassen Avenue�(Assessor's Parcel'Number 048:390 -008) -The site is zoned_R-P�Residential-Professional `+.a.. J Business Office Zoning District and is shown •on the General Plan Diagram as'Office. , Project Description:' Request to. allow the placement of a temporary sales office at a construction site "for a period of three to six' 'months. The applicant•is'providing three (3) improved parking spaces for the sales ' office. - x Attached is'the preliminary data regarding "a -project which as been submitted to the City of Chico for a • discretionary'action (Use Permit, Rezone,- Subdivision, etc.). An assessment oftthe potential impacts of the project is being made. Please review and submit'conments within ten working days. , ' x Planning Division ❑ This item will;be on the Planning Commission agenda of - ® This item will be approved by the Planning Director. ` JAN 1 51998 COMMENTS = Oroville, California . �03EGT `SL -FE lS LO 1,A/rteNDEr> 'APf"Pc'kcH. �; F Ei , E_ -R=} F '� ► � p o 2 lz U r, r�Ti f LF_ CIC Pry TS F1;2 E. 4N (iia+eft Thank You 4 Project Planner:, Ed Palmeri 0 City of Chico, . REPORT. TO: City Staff and Interested Parties DATE: January 12, 1998 FROM: Ed Palmeri, Senior Planner FILE: AUP 97-52 SUBJECT: Administrative Use Permit 97-52 (Prestige Care/Chico Ventures) 1351 East Lassen Avenue GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Prestige Care, Inc./Chico Ventures, LLC 6623 NE 82nd Avenue, Portland, Oregon, 97221 OWNER:, Chico Ventures, LLC 6623 NE 82nd Avenue, Portland, Oregon, 97221 REQUESTED ACTION: Planning Director approval of an.administrative use permit PURPOSE:. To allow the placement.of a temporary sales office at a construction site. LOCATION: 1351 East Lassen Avenue EXISTING ZONING: R -P Residential-Professional/Business Office Zoning District ASSESSOR'S PARCEL #: 048-390-008 SIZE: 2.53 acres EXISTING LAND USE: Assisted Living Care Facility (under construction) SURROUNDING LAND USE: N 'Offices S Offices E Offices W Cohasset Road - Mini storage GENERAL PLAN: Office ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Categorically Exempt CEQA Section 15311 Accessory Structures. i ! � I AVENUE I I ---- 1 - - - - i -- :� - -----�---- -- y ( Cr~i LUCKIE p VAY i I _ I I I I I I I I I I I I / 9L� f ----�.yyS FOR INFORMATIONAL USE ONLY SHEET Y4 LOWER CONTACT CITY OF CM CO OR COUNTY Of BUTTE DEPAXT1lEN1S Of PUBLIC WOf06 f0R DETAILED CDNNECTTON REOuiREwEKM THIS IS A SCHEmATIC ILLUSTRATION OF FACILITIES: THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF FACILITIES 94CFWT ON THIS PUT SHOULD BE VERIFIED. SCALE: ,. l = 400 FEET I, ol , C O I -I A S S E T ROAD*,, I Ii...---'---------'----'---'---------------------�: --- ' •~ �'� I ti--- --------------'--'- -•--' �_�-J.--'ci:ac--'- --'- --'- i� 1 I i�- \---------- e kN ' I %j r •1• _.. i �� ip 711 %C pmCp17 C•. t% n ..F e • m '.I I�vl., ii: ': •'�n ' \\, � / � 8� �tE�� a�R8�7 m � ¢ by '� ' �-I��,L-•I. � � g y r gsi t.��d g I I z q m .I D I M SITE PLAN PRESTIGE ASSISTED LIVING AT CHICO �PRESTIGE :: '' CARE INC. CWO. CALPORNA W,•.9. nec t4 I t°ITL.......G t]nt Itttl]]f- T BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: William & Sandra Sherwood, TPM 97-25 DATE: July 28,1997 CONTACT PERSON: Steve Betts The Planning Division has received an application for development of the below described property. The application is being reviewed for completeness and , if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a two acre parcel into 2 parcels, each at one acre on property zoned SR -1 ( Suburban Residential, one acre parcel ) located on 3119 Morseman Ave.. 400 ft. south of intersection with Eaton Rd.. Chico, identified as APN 007-210-025. It is within Supervisorial District No. 3. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _ PLANNING COMMISSION - X DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON October 9, 1997. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED. BY NO LATER -THAN August 12, 1997. K no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. By: k:\forms\comment.frm (Rev. 01-29-97 cbs) 147 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785 DEPARTNIENOOF DEVELOPMENAERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION �PPLICAINT: Azent information to be provided is on other side: \PPLICAN7S NALME If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUNJBER. WILLIAM AND SANDRA SHERWOOD 007-210-025 .ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE. FILE NUMBM-;" ­­( 3119 Morseman Avenue, Chico, CA 95973 T P wl !t. ,4AIME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) TELEPHONE 016 ) 894-8210 . -OCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any) 3119 MORSEMAN AVENUE — 400 ft SOUTH OF INTERSECTION W/EATON ROAD GENERAL INFORMATION RFnrTMFn OWNER'S NAME 'N' :V t: .7 :W !L - TELEPHONE Same ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE. ZONE PLAN EXISTG LAND USE INSITE M SME (in Square Fen or Acres) SR -1 SL 3 bR HOMESITE 2.0 ac.-* Ea=G STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Fea) 1500 sf 1500 sf (Check One) (Check One) C3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED r.3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER M PROPEATY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC 'W PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER C3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT C3 REZONE 13 USE PERMIT t3 MINOR USE PERMIT C3 VARIANCE [3 MINOR VARIANCE C3 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT C3 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION REQUESTED YM TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP [3 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP C3 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP r3 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION E3 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION C3 CERTIFICATE OF MERGER C3 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN C3 OTHER PRojEcr DESCRnMON FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets If this application is for a land division, desmbe the numlxs and size of parcels.) TO CREATE 2 PARCELS — EACH I ACRE PER SEC. 20-136 Plannin Division, . 19W 0WNM CERTIFICATION R; I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY- FLIRT HEX I ACKNOwLEDGErFILING OF AE THIS APPLICATION A& ND CERTIFY THAT ALL OFTIM ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCUMM (If an agent is to be 3ULhodzed. eleam an affidwit of Mhorindan and inch&ds the aftia, 42- th this appl- DATE:- SIGNATURE. f° AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM To Butte County, Department of Development Services; BACHMAN & ASSOC. (gtF) 342-4111 Print AV= Nmw and Phone Nombcr - F F 3012 ESPLANADE. Maffing Ad&= is hereby authorized to process this application for A P A R T ET. M A P on my property, identified as Butte County Assesors Parcel Numbers .0 0 7 - 210 - 025 This authorization allowsi representation for all applications,hearings, appeals; etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record t*tle interest. Owner(s) of Record: (Sign and Print Name) WILLIAM SHEPWOOD Psimt Nano Architect and/or. Engineer: SANDRA SHERWnnn' Pd= Name BACHMAN & ASSOC. 916 342-4136 Ptmt Acehjtoet/Fj*oa Name and Pbmo Number 3012 ESPLANADE, CHICO CALIF'..95973 MaTog Addr Planning Division JUN 0 2 1997 Oroville, California COUNTY OF BUTTE.. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed General Information: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor: WILLIAM' SHERWOOD, ' 3119 Morseman Avenue phi co, r A 9597' 2. Address of project: Same Assessor's Parcel Number: 007-210-025 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Cal Bachman, BACHMAN & ASSOCIATES,_ 3012 Esplanade,, Chico, CA 95973 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: None 5. Existing general plan designation: RES 6. Existing zoning district* _ SR - 7. How island currently used? HomZ 5 :,te S. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Tn create 7 _ rest eJPnti a 1 Project Description: 9. Site size 2.0 acres (Acres/Sq. Feet) 1o. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: NIA Compact: Total: 11. Plans attached Yes —No 12. Proposed development schedule N/A 13. Associated projects 'A 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development N/A Attach description of project containing the following information: is. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading faclNes. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits.to be derived from the project. O Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O Planning Division 1 JUN 0 2 1997 Orovlpe, California 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been Issued, please attach as Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or Its effects? Discuss below all Items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. __.. x 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. X 22. Change In pattern or character of general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _ g 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. X 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. _ 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. „ 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. _ x 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. „� g 29. Substantial change In demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). X 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural.gas, etc.). .31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. x Planning Division JUN 0 21997 Oroville, Callfornia a Butte County Department of Development Services a Planning Division D 2 brief description) Environmental Setting. Attach 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical,or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use .of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family; apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and Information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date ,Signature for iam d Sandra Sherwood K.XFORMSISUBMITTALIENV-INFO Planning Division . J U N 0, 2 1997 Oroville, California O Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O C WILLIAM SHERWOOD, APN 007-210-025 Environmental Information Form DESCRIPTION: 15. Single family residential dwelling; approximately 1600 sf; family size (5 persons); sales price anticipated to be $135,000.00. 16. N/A 17. N/A 18. N/A ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: 32. The project site exists as a single family residential homesite. The soil type is typical Chico loam. The ground is' flat and partially landscaped. There. are no . cultural or scenic aspects. 33. The surrounding properties are• single family residential homesites of approximately 1+ acres in size to the West and North, a city subdivision to the South, and duplex lots to the East. Planning Division .'JUN. 0 2 1997 Oroville; rallfomla BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF'DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION. TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Smart SMR of CA, UP 98-04 DATE: September 8,1997 : CONTACT PERSON: Steve Betts The Planning Division has received an application for development of the below described property. The application is being reviewed for completeness and , if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submitial it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or' possible conditions of approval are requested. If a response cannot be submitted within the timeframe given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Use Permit for a communications tower on property zoned C-2 (General Commercial) located on 3902 Esplanade, appro mately 700 ft. south of Highway 99/Esalanade, identified as APN 006-400-056. It is within Supervisorial District No. 3. - THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _X PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON Janurary 8, 1998. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY,NO LATER THAN September 22, 1997. If no "comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COWENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): By:/ Date: 7 / k:\forms\comment.frm (Rev. 01-29-97 cbs) 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785 ' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be ptovided.is on other side:_ - APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applicant is different ftcm owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Smart SMR of CA (dba NEXTEL Communications'c/oDenn y 006-400-056 ADDRESS: CITY. STATE A ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER: (FOR FRCS L:SE: 475 14th St., Ste. 200 Oakland, CA 94612- t, —Q NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT ( If any TELEPHONE NEXTEL Site CA -713B Sycamore Creek .. (9'16 )417-8872 LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross sweets and Address, if any ) ' 3902 Esplanade, approx. 7001 south of Highway 99/Esplande intersection GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE - David L. & Nell Stevens 19161 894-2921 I ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE. 4192 Stone Valley Ct., Chico, CA 95973 ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SrM SIZE (in Square Fen or .AAacs I l C-2 C Residence & portable storag $Oa9F leaase area F ) Vo' �'' n1RE5 W`ence�t,400 SF± PROPOSED STRCCM7- ES ( in Sguarc Fcct I o uaerrr rest Metal Warehouse 4,000 SF± 200 SF Prefab. bldg. (Clxsk ooe) NA (check Onc)NA ❑ 'PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC O PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ REZONE it USE PERMIT ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT ❑ VARIANCE ❑ MINOR VARIANCE ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION REQUESTED - 1 i ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAI' i ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP i i ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL. MAP ❑ BOUNDARY LME MODIFICATION " ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ OTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Anach necessary sheets If this application is for a land division , describe the number and size of parcels.) See attached Pro 'ect °Descri tion Planning Division - i onot,noe, Califomial i OWNER CERTIFICATION CERTJFY THAT I AM PRESE`TLY THE LEGAL OW TER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGE`'T OF THE OWNER OF TMJ:: AHU ll UESC WHED Pkt�l'F-F : FLRTHER 1 ACKNOWLEDGE THE 17112`G OF TJ -11S APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE AHUN. k LSH F-*%t:\:IUN Ib I kL I::`.I. ACCURATE. (If an a cnt u Ix suiLor•u d, cyecute an atlidavit of authorwuo oand m.ludc Vic addsvit with Utu appb.atwu DATT: ig ? SIGNATURE. See attached Letter of Authorization AGENT AL'TSORTL MON To Butte Counry, Depart -rent of Development scmctt; ( 916) 417-8872 Denny Frazer, Smart SMR- .of California A-4. b. a. Nextel Communications) Princ;iaana ef.+►sast and Paocs� Ntanber _ 475. 14th St.,_ Ste. 200 Oakland, CA -94612 W.&Mng Addnssa is hereby authorized to process this application for a Conditional Use•Per on my property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel dumber 006-400-056 This authorization. allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document (s) relating to record title interest. Owners) of Record: (sign, and print name) David L. & Nell Stevens Prat Naa+o See.attached Letter of Authorization sigmaa++e PLANNER. Print .Name s7p�sanue James N. Simpson, THe Planning Center (916) 646-0325 Prat 14=c of Ars`titealf:�&c w and Pboae ; Iumber 2277 Fair 0 .M=Wne Address t FOR OFFICE USE. ONLY Verify: Date received: Total amount received: _SAP Number(s) tJ�,�Ltgal Description _Owners Authorization ✓ Zoning requirements V-" Project Descri tion &,' Copies of plot plan foo oa p g lZS oo LD I 3-0 •oc Plate FD N� Taken by 5� Receipt No. l o � E.H- Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee forthis application is S as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer". LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO: BUTTE COUNTY APPLICATION FOR ZONINGIUSE/BUILDING PERMIT DAVID L. STEPHENS & NELL STEPHENS, husband and wife as Community Property, as owner of the below -described property, do hereby appoint Smart SMR of California, Inc. as agent for the purpose of consummating any application necessary to ensure their ability to -use and/or construct improvements to the property leased, or licensed, to them for the purpose of constructing a communications site. We understand that the application may be denied, modified or approved with conditions and that such conditions or modifications must be complied with prior to issuance of building permits. We hereby authorize employees of the County of Butte to enter upon the subject property during normal business hours as necessary to inspect the property for the purpose of processing this application. Located at: 3902 Esplanade Chico, CA 95973 Assessor's Parcel Number: 006-400-056 Signature of Property Owner: LESSOR: DAVID L. STEPHENS & NELL STEPHENS, husb and wife as �om roperty r 1 By:_ David L. Stephens Date: 7., 7 % By: b�, Nell Stephe ' Date: Y-, r% Planning Division AUG 2.7 1997 Oroville, Caldomia CA713A.LOA Project Description The requested Conditional Use Permit is for the proposed development of a portion of this 4.84± acre parcel for a Smart SMR of California (d.b.a. NEXTEL Communications) wireless telecommunication transceiving facility consisting of an 86'f lattice tower, whip and panel antennas, microwave dishes, prefabricated building, back-up generator and propane fuel tank located within a 50' x 50' leased area. This site is designed to provide service to the Highway 99 corridor in the Chico area from approximately 2 miles north of the site (Highway 99/Keefer Road intersection) to approximately 2 miles south of the site (Chico/East Lassen Avenue proper). Site Improvements: The 50'x 50' lease area will be accessed by an existing gravel drive via a new 12' easement. The lease area will be fenced with chain-link fencing topped with three (3) strands of barbed wire. A double, 12' wide vehicle gate will provide access to the fenced enclosure. A 10' x 20' prefabricated equipment shelter, propane tank and back-up generator will be installed on graded pads with concrete foundation slabs. Electrical and telephone utilities will be extended from adjacent services. Tower: The 86' lattice tower will be a three (3) legged style finished in a galvanized coating which will weather to a non -glare grey finish. No tower lighting is proposed unless required by the FAA. A light is proposed over the door to the equipment shelter. This light is typically motion detector activated and is not on all night. Equipment: The tower will be equipped initiallywith three (3) whip antennas fourteen (14) feet in height. The overall height is 100'. A future modification will change the whips to twelve (12) panel type antennas"mounted to a "tophat" structure. The panel antennas will be arrayed with four (4) per sector or side of the three sided tophat. Panel antennas are approximately 4'-6" (h) x 12" (w) x 9" (d): Up to four (4) eight (8) foot diameter microwave dishes are proposed for the facility. These would be mounted below the panel antennas. Two (2) 12" high, G.P.S. (Global Positioning System) antennas will be mounted to the eave of the prefabricated shelter structure. All other radio equipment is installed within the prefabricated shelter building. Two (2) air conditioning units will be installed on one end of the prefabricated shelter building. A 499 gallon propane tank is provide for the emergency generator. The propane fueled generator is for emergency back-up and is only intended to operate for a limited time during electrical power outages. It is automatically cycled for approximately 15 minutes a. week for operational testing. The overall size is approximately 3' (w) x 4' (h) x 6' (1). Equipment utilized will meet State and local requirements for containment and siting. Planning Division AUG 2 7 1997 Oroville, California N EXCA-713 8 S-wamoreCreek Page I of I P..PROMATANEN-0AAWc7,13,71WRDrs.wPr) • COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed By Project Applicant) Date Fled General Information: Smart SMR of Calif. 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor: NEXTEL Communications Q/0 r)PnnU Frazer 475 14th St., Ste. 200 Oakland, CA 94612 2. Address of project: 3902 Esplanade Chido CA 95973 Assessors Parcel Number: n 0 6- 4 0 0- 0 5 6 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: James 1T. Simpson, The Planning Center 2277 Fair Oaks Blvd., -Ste. 450 Sacramento, CA 95825 (916) 646-0325 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: Building Permit 5. Existing general plan designation: r• cnmmPrri a 1 6. Existing zoning district: C-2 7. How island currently used? Residence & portable storage rental business 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Unmanned wireless telecom- mnninatinn farili �z_ project Description: 9. Sitesize: 4.84 Ac. gross 2,500 SF lease area (Acres/Sq.Feet.. 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: 1 Compact: 0 Total.- 1 111. Plans attached Yes X No _ 12. Proposed development schedule Upon approval of CUP, Winter 97/98. 13. Associated projects? additional sites within Butte County, 2 in the City of Chico and 1 in the City nf oroville. 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development Thi c p rn�pct- will he develop ed in a singly nhacP Attach' description of project containing the following informatiow. 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type c' household size expected. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. FlEmIng iviision O Butte County Department of Development Services C Planning Division 4UG 2.7 1997 Oroville, California 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancyloadir:, facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. , 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional.use, rezoning application, or any development.permits. state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit Are the following items applicable to the project or Its effects? Discuss below all items checkec yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 20. Change in existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons 4 or substantial atteration of ground contours. _ 21. Change, in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or'public lands or roads. X 22. Change in pattern or character of general area of project. _ X 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. _ X 24. Change in dust, ash,'smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _ X 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality X " or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. - 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. _ X 27. Site on filled land. or on slopes of:10 percent or more. _ X 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. X 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services X (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts). _ _ 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption " (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). _ X 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. _ - _ X Planning Division i AUG 2 7 1991 Oroville, Cairfomia 0 Butte County Department of Development Services "r Planning Division i r Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as d exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability. planti and animals, and any cultural,. historical, or scenic aspects: Describe any existing structures on the site.anc the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be acceptec. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and "animals and any cultural, historic.:: or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-farnii-Y apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rea- yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and informatic7 required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented a.­_ true and correct to the best of my knowledge and' belief. Date Sign a for "000- iihmes, N. Simspori, Planner The Planning Center K:\FORMS\SUBMITTAL\ENV-INFO a Planning Division AUG 2 7 1997 Oroville, California 0 Butte County Department of Development Services, C. Planning Division 3 • Environmental Information Form (supplemental) PienMing Division AUG 2 7 1997 Orovllle, California Project description: The requested Conditional Use Permit is for the proposed development of a portion of this 4.84± acre parcel for a Smart SMR of California (d.b.a. NEXTEL Communications) -wireless telecommunication transceiving facility consisting of an 86'± lattice tower, whip and panel antennas, microwave dishes, prefabricated building, back-up generator and propane fuel tank located within a 50' x 50'•leased area. This site is designed to provide service to the Highway '99 corridor in the Chico area from approximately 2 miles north of the site (Highway 99/Keefer Road intersection) to approximately 2 miles south of the.site (Chico/East Lassen Avenue proper). Site Improvements: The 50'x 50' lease area will be accessed by an existing gravel drive via anew 12' easement. The lease area will be fenced with chain-link fencing topped with three (3) strands of barbed wire. A double, 12' wide vehicle gate will provide access to the fenced enclosure. A 10' x 20' prefabricated equipment shelter, propane tank and back-up generator will be installed on graded pads with concrete foundation slabs. Electrical and telephone utilities will be extended from adjacent services. Tower: The 86' lattice tower will be a three (3) legged style finished in a galvanized coating which will weather to' a non -glare grey finish. No tower lighting is proposed unless required by the FAA. A light is proposed over the door to the equipment shelter. This light is typically motion detector activated and is not on all night: Equipment: The tower will be equipped initially with three (3) whip antennas fourteen (14) feet in height. The overall height is 100'. A future modification will change the whips to twelve (12) panel type antennas mounted to a "tophat" structure. The panel antennas will be arrayed with four (4) per sector or side of the three sided tophat. Panel antennas are approximately 4'-6" (h) x 12" (w) x 9" (d). Up to four (4) eight (8) foot diameter microwave dishes are proposed for the facility. These would be mounted below the panel antennas. Two (2) 12" high, G.P.S. (Global Positioning System) antennas will be mounted to the eave of the prefabricated shelter structure. All other radio equipment is installed within the prefabricated shelter building. Two (2) air conditioning units will be installed on one end of the prefabricated shelter building. Service technicians will visit the site in SUV type vehicles approximately once a month for routine inspection and maintenance. A 499 gallon propane tank is provide for the emergency generator. The propane fueled generator is for emergency back-up and is only intended to operate for •a limited time during electrical power outages. It is automatically cycled.for approximately 15 minutes a week for operational testing. The overall size is approximately 3' (w) x 4' (h) x 6' (1). Equipment. utilized will meet State and local requirements for containment and siting. 19. This project requires a Conditional Use Permit for development of a Public/Quasi Public NEXCA-713B Swamorc Creek Page 1 of 3 J:\PROJDATA\NE\-04\JIWC713\713EADES.WPD • utility use within the C-2, Commercial zoning district. Planning Division AUG 2 7 1997 Oroville, California 28. The proposed project will includea propane fueled emergency generator. The 499 gallon propane tank utilized will meet all State,and local regulations as to'containment and siting. 32. Site Description: a. Topography:. Essentially flat b. Soil Stability: No evidence of erosion or slippage exists on-site or within the parcel. C. 'Plants and Animals: No sensitive or endangered species are known to inhabit the site. The following species are known to occur within Butte County: Animals • Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus • Swainsons Hawk Buteo swainsom • Western Yellow Billed Cuckoo Coccyzuz americanus occidentalis • Bank Swallow Riparia riparia • Giant Garter Snake Thamnophis gigas. • Conservancy FairyShrimp Branchinecta conservatio • Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta lynchi • Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp Lepidurus packardi • Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle Desmocerus califoinicus dimorphus Plants • Butte County Meadowfoam Limanthes floccosa ssp californica • Hairy Orcutt Grass Orcuttia pilosa • Green's Tuctoria Tuctoria greeni There are no natural springs or bodies of water on the parcel. The probability of the site providing habitat suitable for the noted species is extremely low. d. Cultural, Historical or Scenic Aspects: The site is not known to posses any significant cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. e. Existing Structures: Manufactured home structure, 2,400 SF± contemporary ranch style approximately 1 year old and a 4,000 SFt metal warehouse structure approximately, l year old.. f. . Photos: Attached. 33. Surrounding Properties: a. Cultural, Historical or Scenic aspects: The surrounding properties do not possess significant cultural, historical or scenic aspects. b. Plants and Animals: No known sensitive or endangered species are known to inhabit the surrounding properties. C. Surrounding Land Uses/Intensit - To the north is a vacant equipment storage lot and NE\CA-7 t 3 B Sycamore Creek Page 2 of 3 1:\PROIDATAWEX•04\IIWC713\713EADES.WPD 11 gasoline station further north, east is an RV sales and repair center, across Highway 99 is manufactured home sales, equipment storage and vacant land, south is vacant land and one older residence with a golf course further south, and west is productive orchard. d. Scale of Development: Single story residence on large lot, high bay warehouse type metal structures and low profile sale/retail office structures. Most development is on larger lots. Many surrounding parcels, are underdeveloped or utilize portions of the parcels for outdoor storage/display. e. Photos: Attached. Planning Division AUG 2 7 1997 Oroville, California NEXCA-713B Sycamore Creek Page 3 of 3 1:\PPOIDATA\NEX-04UIM\C713\713EADES.WPD ~ J STATE OF CALIFORNIA --BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATIO AND HOUSING AGENCY A PETE VNLSON, Governor`... DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - - AERONAUTICS PROGRAM M.S. #40 - + :1130 K STREET - 4TH FLOOR - - P".O. BOX 942873 ► 17 SACRAMENTO, CA 94273-0001". r • I (916) 322-3090 - TDD (916)654-4014 IMP FAX (916) 327-9093 , April 3, 1997 Ms.,' s. Claudia Sigona /.. a City of Chico Planning Department -. P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 959.27 Dear Ms. Sigona: Rezone No. 97-01-F We have received your request for comments on the application to rezone several parcels of land 4 near the Chico Municipal Airport. It appears that this property is located inside the airport boundary. Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) review is related to off -airport property within the ALUC-defined; planning boundary. However, since this property is impacted by airport and aircraft_ operations, we - encourage the uses to remain airport -compatible under all'circumstances.' a -As we have indicated in,the past, we,encourage the City of Chico to updatethe airportmaster plan = for the Chico Municipal Airport (CIC) and, through the ALUC, to update the airport comprehensive lard use plan (CLUP) for CIC: Both of these documents'are severely out of date and do not comply with Public . Utilities Code (PUC) Sections 21674'.7 and 21675. These code sections require that the ALUC prepare and 'adopt CLUPs that are,based upon a 20 -year master plan or an Airport Layout. Plan, as. determined by the i Aeronautics Piogram.' They also require that the'ALUC use the •1993 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook " in the preparation of the CLUP. ' x Please let us know if we•can be of further assistance•in these matters., • - -. Sincerely; M r CHRISTA-MARIA ENGLE ~ r y Aviation Planner F ' cc: Fred Gerst, Chair, Butte County Airport Land Use Commission ' Chico'City Council, c/o Tom Lando; City Manager ~ ' Terri Pencovic, CaltransDistrict 03- Rural Planning ,' w Jay White, President, California Pilots Association = M ` REQUEST FOR -COMMENTS TO: • Date: February 25. 1997 ❑ CITY GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR ❑ CHICO AREA REC.- AND PARK DIST CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ❑ CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Project Name/Address: Rezone No. 97-01-F Various parcels at the Chico Municipal Airport (see attached maps) Project Description: Correct zoning errors associated with General Plan adoption byYrezoning several parcels from M-1 Limited Manufacturing to A -M Airport Manufacturing; rezone three parcels from C-1 Restricted Commercial to A -C Airport Commercial; and two parcels from A -C to a split - zoned A -M and A -C (see attached maps). Attached is the preliminary data regarding a project which as been submitted -to the City of Chico for a discretionary action (Use Permit, Rezone, Subdivision, etc.). An assessment of the potential impacts of the project is being made. Please review and submit comments within ten working days. This item will be on the Airport Commission agenda of To be determined . ❑ This item will be approved by the Planning Director. COMMENTS: Thank You Project Planner: Claudia Sigona CITY CHIEF OF POLICE COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR CITY FIRE CHIEF ❑ COUNTY ENV. HEALTH DEPT. (CHICO) CITY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ❑ COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DIST. ❑ . CITY SENIOR CIVIL ENG. (HISLOP) CAL TRANS -Aeronautical Division CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL ❑ DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME ❑ CITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR ❑ WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD F] CITY URBAN FORESTER ❑ UTILITY COMPANIES .❑ CITY WPCP SUPERVISOR, (PAC BELL; PG&E; CAL WATER) ❑ CITY COMM DEV DEPT - ENG (TV/FM) ❑ NORTHEAST_INFO CENTERa ❑ CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER fCOUNTY.AIRP-ORT LAND .USE_COMM'. SENIOR PLANNER (CURRENT) AIRPORT DIRECTOR City Manager ❑ COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIST. PROJECT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Name/Address: Rezone No. 97-01-F Various parcels at the Chico Municipal Airport (see attached maps) Project Description: Correct zoning errors associated with General Plan adoption byYrezoning several parcels from M-1 Limited Manufacturing to A -M Airport Manufacturing; rezone three parcels from C-1 Restricted Commercial to A -C Airport Commercial; and two parcels from A -C to a split - zoned A -M and A -C (see attached maps). Attached is the preliminary data regarding a project which as been submitted -to the City of Chico for a discretionary action (Use Permit, Rezone, Subdivision, etc.). An assessment of the potential impacts of the project is being made. Please review and submit comments within ten working days. This item will be on the Airport Commission agenda of To be determined . ❑ This item will be approved by the Planning Director. COMMENTS: Thank You Project Planner: Claudia Sigona CITY OF CHICO REPORT. TO: INTERESTED PARTIES DATE:, FEBRUARY 20; 1997 FROM: ASSOCIATE PLANNER SIGONA . ' FILE: A-ZON-3 (RZ 97-01-F) 'SUBJECT: REZONE NO. 97-01-F GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: .City of Chico, P.O. Box 3420, Chico, CA 95927 OWNERS: Various REQUESTED ACTION: Rezone several parcels from M-1 Limited Manufacturing to A -M Airport Manufacturing; rezone 3 parcels -,from C-1 Restricted Commercial to A -C Airport.Commercial; and 2 parcels from A -C -to a split -zoned A -M and A -C. (see attached zoning maps) EXISTING ZONING: M-1 Limited Manufacturing; C-1 Restricted Commercial; and A -C Airport Commercial LOCATION: Various parcels at the Chico Municipal Airport A.P. NUMBERS: 1) M71 to A -M: 047-560-(002-007), 013-015, 018-019, 021-027, o 031, 040, 042-043, 045, 049, 053-057,•059; 047=570 -all except 022; and 047 -590 -all 2) C-1 to A -C: 047-560-01'1, 012, 016 3) A -C to split -zoned A -M and A -C: 047-560-036 and 044 TOTAL AREA: 157 acres (approximately) EXISTING LAND USE: Airport Commercial; Airport Manufacturing; and Vacant SURROUNDING North Rural Residential and Vacant LAND USE:. _ East Industrial and Vacant West Vacant South Vacant Airport Public GENERAL PLAN: Manufacturing and Warehousing/Community Commercial ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Reliance on previous GPEIR ; 1✓✓v�lv _l qv. PTN. SECTION 34 'T.23N. RIE. MO.B.AM. 47— A rea s -ib be re zJ�! ohQct 4,wl -6- r'l - 28 CITY OF CHICO 4I Cpy 9 A-- Mti 6.09ACo�� F% \ • y l.r6AC. O JO ©6 J.16 AC. 61 . R51/0.9 et3J �� S9J .. .. ..� .. 42 \ .23AC 15 -AQ ti O ^s 39 O I i 2.87AC J0 6Of -40 "y i a4.32AC n ,8AC I 295' m I I Ac 100 AE 54 9t AC - I I245Ae ;)SJ4C 731.93 4229- - hh(A YOEJ.4ST --i -4.7 1 —IC42 I 468 ?54.9 275.1 f 66 59 16f: AC 43 O - 19 s.C59d w / L XAtt 3 v � 43 `.?DAC _ O 4 _ • . 4Op _ _ _ 275 Z. 43A I W r .. II .>..II r r� 505. 75o 4 (89Ac o ' 2.844 m 1.2 25 f 24 WLI ERATOR 5 22 •re _ i A _ 3 oe y� 1r% t_ C AL1 I IJ2AC ¢ — - s.c 49 h ss ^o o, MflI 5 toslc i.�.. Al Aa S 08Ap 4 � w 7.5 AC w 2 19 = 21 6 2 10. 41 Ac / U n a A� a 23 ---- \j6�2. 4. AC 1 R fl 0 m a.42uAC Q 5g 2ca7 OJAC 3.6/Ae •� , Q a V W 550 fe/f'7 .►♦ dKy'i rREss A sesso7s Mop Na 47-56 r5 5 I County of Bute, Calif Area. +v be rezoned C- 1-6 'A 1 9J ... - eZo.vle No. 97-D./-� . • P TN. . SECTION 3 122 N. R IE. M. 0. a a M 47-57 J� 11, 28 re +o be -rezone A 4 y9Sb • 6 319 h .•. N 3 0112 -AC 318.86 .r 191.89 ` Ips( dRfl� u I 2.00 a 1.767wC I A'amo 1 6.79•aC 1 ' I T 208 331.n ` ---� 22 LIBERATOR ST _ 33.8731ac ` \ F561 _ v 11 , a 12 .3&1 tai 234 $1 I 10 m .c 0 319 4C ¢ SACRAMENT NORTH R 646.99 1 f5 .4751aC $ 14 .779 WC° 13 M'' \ • THUNOERBOLT ST2/ •3.3431AC n A ` nl 16 .381K a 3©...52 - (92"68 at. "!vi MA QQ - ct old Z Y l y l - ' 19 .4461 - I i 2b 0.21 S 324 37 54' E — — — FORTRESS —ST \ N, Asse3sos Map Na. 47-57 55 County of Butte, Calff, ZZ3., D / STATE OF CALIFORNIA --BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION D HOUSING AGENCY PETE WILSON, Govemcr DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AERONAUTICS PROGRAM M.S. #40 1130 K STREET - 4TH FLOOR P.O. BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, CA 94273-0001 (916) 322-3090 TDD (916) 654-4014 FAX (916) 327-9093 Ms. Claudia Sigona City of Chico Planning Department P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 Dear Ms. Sigona: April 3, 1997 Rezone No. 97 -01 - We have received your request for comments on the application to rezone several parcels of land, near the Chico Municipal Airport. It appears that this property is located inside the airport boundary. Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) review is related to off -airport property within the ALUC-defined planning boundary. However, since this property is impacted by airport and aircraft operations, we encourage the uses to remain airport -compatible under all circumstances. .As we have indicated in the past, we encourage the City of Chico to update the airportmaster plan for the Chico Municipal Airport (CIC) and, through the ALUC, to update the airport comprehensive land use plan (CLUP) for CIC.. Both of these documents are severely out of date and do not comply with Public Utilities Code (PUC) Sections 21674.7 and 21675. These code sections require that the ALUC prepare and adopt CLUPs that are based upon a 20 -year master plan or an Airport Layout Plan, as. determined by the Aeronautics Program.' They also require that the ALUC use the 199 Airport Land Use Planning Handbook in the preparation of the CLUP. Please let us know if we can be of further assistance in these matters. Sincerely, to CHRISTA-MARIA ENGLE Aviation Planner cc: Fred Gerst, Chair, Butte County Airport Land Use Commission Chico City Council, c/o Tom Lando, City Manager Terri Pencovic, Caltrans District -03- Rural Planning Jay White, President, California Pilots Association REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 2 CITY GENERALSERVICES.DIRECTOR Poet -It* Fax Note 7671 DatePe eeD i To 5kvt TT15,144 K. Co./Dept. AuC co. OLA; Phone a Phone `ii Fax -6,38 ._778145, Faxd CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRE „ ® CITY CHIEF OF POLICE ❑ COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR ®. CITY FIRE CHIEF ❑ COUNTY ENV. HEALTH DEPT. (CHICO) ® CITY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ❑ COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT,DIST, ❑ CITY SENIOR CIVIL ENG. (HISLOP) ❑ CAL TRANS , ® CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL [] DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME ❑ CITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR (] WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ❑ CITY URBAN FORESTER ❑ UTILITY COMPANIES ❑ CITY WPCP SUPERVISOR (PAC BELL;.PG&E; CAL WATER) ® CITY COMM DEV DEPT - ENG (TV/FM) ❑ NORTHEAST INFO CENTER ❑ CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ' COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMM SENIOR PLANNER (CURRENT) ❑ AIRPORT DIRECTOR ❑ other [] COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIST. PROJECT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project NamelAddress: Name of Project UP 96-20 (Kincade/Modern Bldg,) Address Corner of Ridgewood & Ceres Avenues Project, Description: A request to, construct and operate a private.Y law school in a R -P. Residential/Profess€onal Office zoning district. The proposed -hours of the school will be 5 p.m, to 10�p.rr.,., with approximately.l0-15 employees, A portion of the building may later be used 'as law offices and/c- court room space. Attached is the preliminary, data regarding a project which as been submitted to the City of Chico for a discretionary action (Use Permit, Rezone, Subdivision, 'etc.). An assessment of the potential Impacts, c' • - the project is being made. Please review and submit comments within five working day s. - la�tlni. Division ® This Item will be on the Planning Commission agenda of TBD.'- ' ' ❑ This item will be approved by the Planning Director, SEP j �cc� COMMENTS: C;;wilie, California This request will be reviewed for consistency findings at the October 1'6, 1996 ALUC meeting. This parcel is located in the flight corridor and in the approach surface. Preliminary review by ALUC staff indicates the parcel is inconsistent with the currently adopted Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan. The plan recommends_that use permits for any uses involving concentrations of people should.not be granted and that parcels in the flight corridor not be 'developed at all. ' Thank You Project Planner: Brad Pierce. 22.3, 0 I 0 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: Butte County Planning Division RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Victoria A. O'Hare, DET 97-08 DATE: March 24,1997 CONTACT PERSON: Steve Lucas The Planning Division has received an application for development of the below described property. The application is being reviewed for completeness and , if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. If a response cannot be submitted within the time frame given, or if additional information is needed, please call 538-7601. Thank youin advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Legal Lot Determination on property zoned AR ( Agricultural Residential ) located on Country Wood Lane & Middlehoff, Oroville, identified as APN 030-160-071. It is within Supervisorial District No. 1. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _ PLANNING COMMISSION - X DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON April 24, 1997. COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN April 7, 1997. If no comments or communications are received by the above date, the assumption will be made that your agency has no comment. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): j ec+-- loZ"'X a T--,: P Y'czc�tu5 4' -�1ne Oroy:l\,_ By. Date: k:\forms\comment.frm (Rev. 01-29-97 cbs) Planning Departrnent MAR, 1997 Greville, illPali#nrnta nr�- 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785 DEPART4I-, .I' OF DEVELOPNIE....* SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION .APPLICANT: A¢em information to be provided is on other side: LAS o S S APPLICANT'S NAME ( If applicant is different from uvrner an affidavit is required 1 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: `i I a- , ,1 Y� LCL• -'I ✓LC ,p1 ADDRESS: CITY. STATE & ZIP CODE: FILE NUMBER (FOR OFFICE USE) j CCS 95 NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT( If anv) TELEPHONE I � D� LOCATION OF PROJECT ( Major cross streets and Address, if any ) �► c Y Q yy\i GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OWNER'S NAME C TELEPHONE t Ctr kJ Gr LC:o1 �1 R 1Q0 9 - i C1,75 tl� Gt ADD S: CITY. STATE I CODE: CA ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE Sim ( in Square Feet or Acres) 1-0,z \jAc-A (N�- `1 a. k '�� 5 to t9u o EX S'I'IIVG STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES ( in Square Feet) Iii 0 V\,Q- None— one— (Check One) (Check (Check One) PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED jkr PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED. ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ REZONE ❑ USE PERMIT Planning Division ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT MAR U 3 1997 ❑ VARIANCE ❑ MINOR VARIANCE Droville, Caiifomia ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ OTHER - ; FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division , describe the number and size of parcels.) OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF TIIE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILL;G OF INS APPLICATION AND TIIAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE (If agento tx authorized ezeLute an afrtdavit of authorizui the airdavit 'thV plication.) DATE: t's q SIGNATURE: , AGENT AUTHORIZATION To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Print Name of Agent and Phone Number Mailing Address . is hereby authorized to process this application for on my property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel Number This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document (s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Print Nanw Signature Architect and/or Engineer: Print Name of and Phone Number Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Print.Narne signature Verify: Date received: Total amount received: ✓ AP Number(s) ,_Legal Description --owners Authorization :::f_Zoning requirements Project Description Copies of plot plan - Taken by 54 Receipt No. t5'Y by E.H. 252•co LD Hso.00 Planleo •oo FD Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or.Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is $ as of Make "check payable to "Butte County Treasurer.". - LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION If the parcel was created by gift deed to -the applicant or present owner. The undersigned hereby states and declares that the*herein described parcel. was created: (Circle one) (1. By giftde- e 2. As a remainder of a gift deed. This parcel is the result of a bona fide gift and was not created for the purpose of sale, lease or financing, whether immediate or future, as specified in California Subdivision Map Act, (Government Code.Section 66424). At the time of conveyance of .the gift deed the herein described parcel was not involved in any pending escrow and was not concurrently advertised, offered or listed for sale by the owner or by,any Real Estate corporation, broker or salesperson: I have read the above statement. I declare under penalty of•perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above statement is true,and corre t. Date: 7 �, Signature'8f Owner Print or type name Planning Division ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division Ar z MAR 0 3 1997 Oroville, Caiifornia FECCIAL F"OMYR OF'A?"TOY 1, tlugh Patrick O'Hare And Nolaxaa Jc,Lin t'),Iiare, residing at 3800 Wcst Wilson i-145,, Panning, California 92220, hereby aplvint Octoria A, OUre of 135 Lemon Hill Drivc, Oroville, California 9596-6, as my A-ttatcy-;ih-Fac^ ("Agent"). My Ag.;nt'sball have full po�yvcr a.nd authority to act on my behalf but only to the;exteut permitted by this Special Power ofA1.1t0-tnty. Nay Agent's powers shall include the power to: 1. Scll or convey any iaxtcrest 4f taxixte in.nal estate located at: Southeast Corner of Lot 14 Parccl #030-160-071 Ste Exhibit A Thcrtnalito, Cal ifo.rni a ,. . and legally described The total salos price miust' z a4 leases Y $1.8,000.00. This potiver shall include-tlxc power 1.6 (i) soil upon such tcrn�ts as ray Agent shall deem appropriate, `subjcot to lhe::limitaki.oras.(if arty) stated Above, (ii) sign any documents (including deeds) that may b�>� w.iluircd to convey title to such property, and (iii) collc;et and receive the proceeds frarn arty. such sale. I hoicby grant to taty Agent the full right, power, tmd authority to do every act; decd, and thing nccissary or advisable to b�c done .rga.rdirig.tjtc above powers, tw Fully as 1 could. do if personalty present and acting. Any porver.or authoritygran-ted to t7ny •Ai;Gnt un..dcr this docwnent shall be limited to the extent necessary .to prevent this PoW0r: of4V16rTI.eyftoW causing (i) t�ly income to be taxable to my Agitxt, (ii) my assets to besu�j ct.,tp;;r. eneral power of appobl nexnt by my Agcnt,-and (iii) my Agent to have any incidents of.ovi*n0-,,hill with respect to any life insurance policies -that 1 may own on ttae life of my Agent. My Agent shall notbc-liable for an,� xoss float results from a jud-Ment error that was made in good faith. However, my Agent sh.0 be liable for willful misconduct or the failure to act in good faith. while acting undot the adtllority of this rower of Attorney. My AgpTA shall not be cni to titic ally: c,Oplpetrsatior;,, &Iri.ng nay lifi;titne or upon my death, for arty services provided as my. Agei it.: D,I:y A.gotat :sba.11 be entitled W reiu1bursenaa.tt ofall reasonable expenses incurred -'ill cotixf.ectibn with this Power of Attorney. Pidnning Division MAR 0 3 1997 Jro;ille, California My Agent shall Prov._.,* accoullting:for all funds handled an* acts N' rformed as niy Agent, if t so rcqucst or if such a request is made by any Authorized personal representative or fiduciary acting on my behalf. This Dower of Attorney shalt becon-w- eMctive immediately. 'chis Power of Attorney shall continue .0frectivc until September 15, 1996. This Power of Attorney may be rcvokod by nic at any time by providing written n-otien, to my Agent. 1�atCd .June 12 Redlands 19-1 , at,�, California. RugE Patrick O'Hare and Norma. -tn O'T-I re State of California County of . San Bernardino t7n June 12, 1996 More me, Mary Ann Torres personally appeared Hugh Patrick O'Hare and Norma Jean O'Hare, I' 1 Ntsonally known to me -OR- provcd to -mc on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be. the Person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that h,c/she executed the satn+e in his/her -authorized capacity, and thatby his/her signature on the instrument the person, or the erltity upon, behalf of which the person acted, executed the itystrnment. WITNESS my hand a.nd official seal. Signature . Notary Page 2 of 3 9U4MAIiY/IMlbptE! l �flOs7�1 COUhWCamra. BOW AUG 28.190 E �h►b't /-'t Property 'That Can Be Sold Parcel 030-160-071 Comtncneing at the Southonst cornc:r 7f Lot 14 , as shown of that ccr'uiin map entitled, "Official Map of the Topham Tract, Thermalito, E;tutte County, California", which map was recorded in tho of'iccof the Recorder of the.C''ounty of Butte., State of California; on November 14, 1908, in Book 6 of Maps, at Page 65;thcrn:e South 1 degree 20' west 1320.00 feet; thencE: South 1 degree 20' East 326.50 feet: thence North 89degrees-41' Est 1194.2 feet to a paint in the West lioe of Eighth Street; thence South 89 degrees 4 V We.t 75.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this de.%' Hption; thence South 0l:detgee 28' Rmst,.parallel with said West Iine-of EiSht Street, 243.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 41' East,'72.00 feet to the 'point of bcgi.nning and the end of Ods.decrip lort. Containing 0.40 acres more or less. 72'x245' Planning Division Page 3 of 3 MAR 0 3 iCc` Oroville, Caiovi - nd �r . ORDII`JG REOUESTEL. , Dave Harrod AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO FF HUGH:PATR_TCK O'HARE OR - - Name WMA JEAN O 1 HAR Street 3�oO �• w1LSoA) SO /yam Address ctya 13ann i A 0 L State I A.P.- #30-16-55 (ptn.) 90-027231 Rec Fee 9.00 Cash 9.00 Recorded Official Records Planning Division County of Butte Candace J. Grubbs MAR 0 3 1997 Recorder arovi� Gailf�rplia 11:50am 28 -Jun -90 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE Deed of Gift This Deed, made the ................. Twe-nty... First ................................. day of .. .... ... May ....:................. one thousand nine hundred and ... ... Ni.nett'•..•.••••.•..•--•••••••.• Between ... Dave.. Harrod . and . Doren e..J. .. Har.r.od.,. • .husband. -and ..wif e • -as • • • .. • ... . . J.o.int. tenants..................................................................................... ........................................ .................. Grantor and .. Hugh Patrick O'Hare- and Norma Jean: O' Hare, husband and wife, as joint• • • • • • • . tenants................................................. ................................................. ....... .............. Grantee Witnesseth: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the love and affection which ......... he .y....... have.... for the Grantee, do ....... by these presents gift, give, and grant unto the Grantee, and to ... hi.s...... heirs and assigns forever, all ................................................. . ................................ ........................................ ................................. th . . at .... certain..#i W........,#Ipil • • • • • • • , h# . parcel . . . ........ of land situate in the.. unincorporated ..a,zea ........................................................... . .......................... County of ...... Butt.e....................... State of .... Ca.l i f o.rnxa ........... and bounded and described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof; 55 NL LA&Dsli aQ =P�p 1. No. 0 9� ORS NL Together with the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances thereunto belonging or appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof. To have and to hold the said premises, together with the appurtenances, unto' the Grantee, and to ..... h-ir s.... heirs and assigns forever. Tlus document is only a general form whrat may be DOOM for use in simple transactions and in no way acts. a ,s intended to act. as a substitute for the advice of an attorney. The printer does not make any warranty. either evpress a mod. as to the legal vafody of arty provision or the Sudabtkty of these forms in any specific transaction. Cowdery's From No. 480 — DEED OF GIFT — Short Form — (Rev. 1/83) t -.9 0 - In W1trieSS Whereof .the Grantor, h9.s........... hereunto set ...:......their.........:.......:... hands. ..... the day and year first above written. Signed and Delivered in the Presence of. a e Harfod -24 Dorene J. H rrod ' If . rn V 4-1 A' STATE OF CAL RNIA On t �.............. day of ., .... i!�` ..................... in the year ss,1.`� .. COUNTY `� /.. . ................................. before me, OF.. , l ./ .. . P.Z/ ...�l�l ............... , a Notary Public, §tate of California, duly mmisstoned and swop, pepnally appeared . �,7. f!` �r�n tel...... O.l>:..✓. -... 4rr� c. personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person. ....... whose name .................. %w'e... ....................... . subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged that ...... !�he executed it. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official ' sen the . ....!.W ....... ............... ...................................... County of ............................................on the date set forth above in this certificate. i OFFICIAL SEALJANE ANOOE Y PU9u�iCALIFORMIA Notary Public, State of California ECOM.:EXP. UTTE COUNTY JULY 23, 1493 y --2 My commission expires� 90-27231 EXHIBIT "A" Harrod to O'Hare Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 14, as shown on that certain map entitled, "Official Map of the Topham Tract, Thermalito, Butte County, California", which map was recorded in the office of the Recorder of the County of Butte, State of California, on November 14, 1908, in Book 6 of Maps, at Page 65; thence South 10 20' West 1320.00 feet; thence South 10 20' East 326.50 feet; thence North 890 41' East 1194.2 feet to a point in the West line of Eighth Street; thence North 10 28' West 558.00 feet along said West line of Eighth Street; thence South 890 41' West 75.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this description; thence North 10 28' West and parallel with the West line of Eighth Street a distance of 245 feet; thence South 89`41' West 72.00 feet; thence South 010 28' East, parallel with said West line of Eight Street, 245.00 feet; •thence North 890 41' East, 72.00 feet to the point of beginning and the end of this description. Containing 0.40 acres more or less. Reserving therefrom an easement for sewer line purposes 10 feet in width lying 5 feet on each side of.the following described - centerline; Commencing at the Southeast corner of the herein described parcel of land; thence South 89° 41' West along the South line of said parcel, 5 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence leaving said South line, North 010 28' West parallel with the East line of said parcel, 98.00 feet; thence South 89° 41' West, parallel with said South line, 176.00 feet to the end of said centerline. Together with a right of way for road and public utilities purposes over a strip of land 30 feet in width, the centerline of which is described as follows; Beginning at the Southeast corner of the above described parcel; thence North 890 41' East, 75 feet -to a point on the Westerly line of Eighth Street and the end of said centerline. Also together with a right of way for road and public utilities purposes over a strip of land 15 feet in width lying South of and adjacent to the Southerly line of the above described parcel. Also together with a right of way for road and public utilities purposes over a strip of land 30 feet in width lying Northerly of and adjacent to the Northerly line of the above described parcel. Also together with a right of way for road and public utilities purposes over a strip of land 60 feet in width,' the centerline of which is described as follows; Beginning at the Northeast corner of the above described parcel; thence North 890 41'. East, 75 feet to a point on the Westerly line of Eighth Street and the end of said centerline. The Basis of Bearings for this description is the said Westerly line of Eighth Street taken as North 010 28' West. END OF rj0C'11',1ENT RECORDING REQUESTED DY MID VALLEY TITLE CO. Older No. Esuuw No. Lrran No. 113360 WHEN nf:COnDEO MAIL TO: D. W. PATTON c/o Mid Valley Title Co P.O. Box 3039 Chico, Ca 95927 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: SAME AS ABOVE 90-27417 90-027417 Roc Fee 11.00 Total 11.00 Recorded Official Records County of Butte Candace J. Grubbs Recorder 8:00am 29 -Jun -90 VS 4 !;PACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECOROEM'S VS! DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX A......_.Q.Q....... ...._..,...._........ ...... Computed on the conslderstion or value of property com.y.d: OR ...... Computed on the conddsraion or value Ins lions or eneuml rsncn remelninpst rims of We. ASSIDEC:K4IIYT':FfJXRR1S.IGWH DEEDININ LIEU OF FORECLOSURE &RxAt��ltxR�tf��R FOn A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowllslqud, SHAWN BOELMAN and SUE BOELMAN, husband and wife hereby GRANT(S) to D. W. PATTON and CHARLOTTE PATTON, husband and wife the real property in the City of County of Butte SEE ATTAC14ED LEGAL DESCRIPTION AP NO: 30-16-54 State of California, described as ;1 Dated -^ AW BOELMAN STATE OF CALIFORNIA (J l-� Iss.p�� ��---- COUNTY OF_. On`%"��.l �.ar l j % C? _..._. _.__. ..... —...... __—_.—.--. —.._.....---.._-- .fit?, twlnre me. Ih.' un If end, d Notary Pubic •n and lot said Stale. nor• Zonally atmunred _ ��' Ci prnennnay hno-n to and Ila Ill—ell to me an Inc Pae1s of saeslactory evitoncal it? W the pursonlsl -nose wmmsl Vale suDx:ilDed to in �'^ LYNNE A GOULD r. S e NOTARY P." "10 URN'A IN s r—mly to -thin hlxttumont and ochn..I,dgcd to me Incl ho/She/they executed nt' 1 MyCrnurmsrrr F. o:ref a r • eren211, Zhu same. yglf IFfv r!4 RR¢O C■O ff af/N10 WI tNI:SS my Nand and olhc- ssal. t r ITh,, are, for allrcl,l nul,rrel -4011 1002 ie/ezl J r.� MAIL 'I'A,'. STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE ;1 Z 90-21417 EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION: ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PM.CEL It C0944ENCING at the Southeast corner of Lot 14; as shown on the Nap Entltlad, ^OFFICIAL MAP OF THE TOPHAM TRACT, TKRMALITO, BUTTE CO., CALIFORNIA*, which Hap was filed for record In the'Butte County 'Rocorder's Of•tice on November 14, 1908 In Book 6 of Maps, at Page 631 thence South 1. 201 West 1320.00 feet; thonco South 1. 201 fest 326.30 feet; thence North 89. 410 East 1194.2 feet to a�polnt In the Nest line of'Elghth Streetj thence North 1. 20' West 358.00 foot along said West gine of El�hth Stroet,.to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel of land described heroins thoncs from said TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING South 89•.41# Wcst'75 festj thenco North 1. 281 :;est end paral lot with the Nest Iina of Eighth Street, a distance of 245 feet! thonce North 89. 410 East 73 feet to a point on the ;fest line of Eighth Street; thence South alon4 the West line of Eighth Street, 245 feel to the TRUE POINT OF 8EGINYIhG. PARCEL lit A right of way for roal purposes over a strip of land 30 feet In width lying Northerly of and adjacent to the tor.therly line of the Parcel I, described above. PARCEL II1t A rIgNt of way for road purposes over a strip of land 15 feet In width lying Southerly of and adjacent to the Southerly Ilne of the Parcel 1, described above. ESTOPPEL AFFTDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) s'' COUNTY OF Burn ) 90-27417 SHAWN BOELMAN and SUE BOELMAN, husband and wife being first duly sworn; each for himself and herself, deposes and says: That they are the identical parties who made, executed, and delivered tha certain deed to D. W- PATTON -,nH rT4ART.OTTF DATTnN. husband and wife, dated the 18th day of May , 19 90, conveying Lhe LoLiowing described property, to wit: (See Exhibit "A", attached) That afflants now are, and at all times herein mentioned, were i That the aforesaid deed is intended to be and is an absolute conveyance of the title to said premises to the grantee named therein, and was not and is not now intended as.a mortgage, trust conveyance, or security of any kind; that is was the intention of affiants as grantors in said deed to convey, and by said deed these affiants did convey to the grantee taerein all right, title, and interest absolutely in and to said premises; that possession of said premises has been surrendered to the grantee; . That in the execution and delivery of said deed affiants were not acting under any misapprehension.as to the effect thereof, and acted freely and voluntarily and were not acting under coercion or duress; That the consideration for said deed was and is payment to affianLS of the sum of $ nnnn_nn by grantee, and the full concellation of all debts, obligations, costs, and charges secured by that certain deed of trust lTeretn- fore existing on said property executed by SHAWN BOELMAN and STJE BOELMAN, husband and wife , Trustor, to MID VALLEY TITT,E & ESCROW COMPANY , Trustee, for D. W. PATTON and cHAgLOTTE PATTON husband and wife as Beneficiary, dated .lune 14. 1989 , and recorded in Book of Official Records, page Serial Number 89-2,E235 County, California, and the re- conveyance of said property under said deed of trust; that at the time of making said deed affiants believed and now believe that the aforesaid consideration therefor represents the fair value of the property so deeded; This affidavit is made for the protection and benefit of the grantee in said deed, his sucsessors and assigns, and all ether parties hereafter dealing with or who may acquire an interest in the property herein described, and particularly for the benefit of MID VALLEY TITLE AND ESCROW COMPANY which may insure the title to said property in reliance thereon, and any other title company which may hereafter insure the title to said property; That affiants, and each of them will testify, declare, depose, or certify before any competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case now pending or whiL may hereafter be instituted, to the truth of the par�A wlar facts h "naboX-et forth. u E U Y BOEI STATE OF CALIFORNIA out t e Iss. COUNTYOF._— May 2 2 , 1990 „befote nte, the undersigned, a Notary PuW c m and Ior Shaven BOelman 6 Sue Boelman Said State, personally appeared �_._. __.-------. — -_ " "• - personally known to me (or proved to me M the ball] of salle- lactorydvrdencol lobe the Dersonls)whose namelslis/are Sub- scribed to the within instrument and acknowledged 10 me that he/she/they executed the same. WITNESS may/hand and dllrcial S.M. .................... .. .......... FFICIAL.:CAI VIENECA R:alls 0!x,1 NOTARY pU81IC • CACTORNIA •-r eul!E c,u:,n 61y Comm. Exp. Tett. 6, 1992 "illi .................................... (This area for official notarial seal) . .� EXHIBIT "A" DESCRiP•TION ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL. PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PIFCEL I t OOKC LACING at the Southeast corner of Lot 14, as shown on the l4ap Entitled, "OFFICIAL 'MAP OF TIE TOPHAM TRACT, TKIihIJ1�.ITO, BUTTE CO., CALIFORNIA", which Flap was'filed for record In the Butte County Rocordorls Office on November 14, 1908 In Boost 6 of Haps, et Page 65; thence Soaith 1. 201 ;fest 1320.00 feed thence South 1. 201 East 326.50 fset;'thence North 890 41f East 1194.2 feet to a point In the Nest line of Eighth. Street; thence North 10•201 West 558.00 feet along said West ,Ina of Eighth Stroet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. of the parcel of IaM described herein; thonco from said TRIr POINT OF BEGINNING South 89. 410 West•75 feet; thence North 1. 28' gest end parallel with the Nest Ilne of Eighth Street, a dis"onto of 245 feat) thence North 89. 41t East 75 feet to a point on the Westline of Elghth Str6,�r; thence So4jth along the Mast line of Eighth Street, 245 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARR III A right of way for road purposes over a strip of land 30 feet In width lying Northerly of and adjacent -to the Northerly Ilne of the Parcel 1, descr•Ibed above. PARCEL IIIc A right of way for road purposes over a strip of land 15 feet In width lying Sox,thorly of and adjacent to the Southerly.line of the Parcel I, described above. END OF DOCUMENT L Y.t I RECORDING nf.Ol1E.+; MID VALLEY TITLE qj j., I.:, N 111044-3 WHEN HEC0IU)E(1 MAIL If): MR. 8 MRS. DAVE HARROD 868 BIRD STREET OROVILLE, CA. 95965 9 0 -08 180 • 90-009100 Rec Fee DOC Recorded ; Total Official Records County of Butte Candace J.Grubbs Recorder 8:00am 1 -Mar -90 9.00 11.55 20.55 CD 3 GRANT DEED TRANSFER TAX PAID FOH A VALJADLE CONSIDERATION. rec.opt of whir." is hereby aeknowhAli{crl, HENRY T. RU:JGE, JR. & CYNTHIA A. RUNGE, HUSBAND AND WIFE hereby GRANT(S) to DAVE HARROD AND DORENE J. HARROD, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS. the real property in IheloilVA+l UNINCORPORATED AREA. OF THE State of Calilornid, described as county of BUITE SEE ATTACHED LiTAL DESCRIPTION (EXHIBIT A) SEEATTACHED EXHIBIT B RELEASE CLAUSE. STATE OF CA*LrFafi M 1 6 Ly of etme )aa' 28th day of 19 90 , txtore ne, the telaPublic in and fUr the State Of CALTE0 IA r duly llnlder9ltJiled, a Notary JR carrmissioned and morn, Personally appeared HENRY '• 4UNCe personally known to tm )0=Vmmd0=re:jxrtmetL a foretmngatastrurr " t axltrrrcl, to be the Individual described in and who execveed true foregoing Snatstal+ent for NIN self and as attorney in fact of sold scat t11c acme as .also thereMdescribed,nd eclvlyvtRdged n'af�the � voluntary act and derd of theels and Eed �ndf es �pubes therein trencioned, andld oath stv.+cr o[ ectn yNrizing cine oxervtion oL Ulii inxtrurIent livihas not betha the seSa crow living. WMIEof - 1 s I re affixed the day and year in Nis CortiLleate Idemems ebovO wrte.IIAX? DANIEL F. HUNT NOTARY PUOLIGCALWORFAA &Ate Cos" Si nature eq*"Oct 1. logo • 11 (Ms arca for official rot i�PriiL����■•■■�1������Ie�M FER. 21, 1990 Oatetl. $TATE. OF CALIFORNIA I aa. COUNTY OF._ ' On.. neloto mo. Ihu undo, ,gn d. a Nolaty nun,e:.n end lot anld tibia. pot a00ally 01110 ,vo 1 Ial,sonnlly I,nuwn In rel+• lu, {Ilnvdll III mu rv+ Ihl+ I+i,+.le UI anntllaclury unddncul lU low Inu Nmaomal wnoau nemnbl alard aubaeUbad to lhu wuhn mdln,n+enl :+n,l al:Un Wdoed to m++ that hW/ ho/jj, d.deumd HENRY T. RUNGE, JR. fU1 A. MR= IM eon"r W1Nf,:::; Iny nuno nnJ ulnl;lul a.+nl ,+n. lu+ ull,,.,n+ „u+ot .•.II 1002 Wall MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE r Alll/vL I—!; I.INL FUR ,IrcoROL R9AIL TAX STATEMENT.; 70: DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX 5....11.,55 .............................. Computed on the comidvelion Or vNua of prOPerly corrveved; OA S/r•1E AS ABOVE ... .M Computed on iM consideration or value Int Ilam or encumbrance ai'n/ivnp✓n�jdme of wle. / • $Ipn•lur• o, yK,-h1•r'nlnlnp 1•• — Plrm Nam• MID VALTEY TITLE & ESCROW co• APg030-16-0-055-0 GRANT DEED TRANSFER TAX PAID FOH A VALJADLE CONSIDERATION. rec.opt of whir." is hereby aeknowhAli{crl, HENRY T. RU:JGE, JR. & CYNTHIA A. RUNGE, HUSBAND AND WIFE hereby GRANT(S) to DAVE HARROD AND DORENE J. HARROD, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS. the real property in IheloilVA+l UNINCORPORATED AREA. OF THE State of Calilornid, described as county of BUITE SEE ATTACHED LiTAL DESCRIPTION (EXHIBIT A) SEEATTACHED EXHIBIT B RELEASE CLAUSE. STATE OF CA*LrFafi M 1 6 Ly of etme )aa' 28th day of 19 90 , txtore ne, the telaPublic in and fUr the State Of CALTE0 IA r duly llnlder9ltJiled, a Notary JR carrmissioned and morn, Personally appeared HENRY '• 4UNCe personally known to tm )0=Vmmd0=re:jxrtmetL a foretmngatastrurr " t axltrrrcl, to be the Individual described in and who execveed true foregoing Snatstal+ent for NIN self and as attorney in fact of sold scat t11c acme as .also thereMdescribed,nd eclvlyvtRdged n'af�the � voluntary act and derd of theels and Eed �ndf es �pubes therein trencioned, andld oath stv.+cr o[ ectn yNrizing cine oxervtion oL Ulii inxtrurIent livihas not betha the seSa crow living. WMIEof - 1 s I re affixed the day and year in Nis CortiLleate Idemems ebovO wrte.IIAX? DANIEL F. HUNT NOTARY PUOLIGCALWORFAA &Ate Cos" Si nature eq*"Oct 1. logo • 11 (Ms arca for official rot i�PriiL����■•■■�1������Ie�M FER. 21, 1990 Oatetl. $TATE. OF CALIFORNIA I aa. COUNTY OF._ ' On.. neloto mo. Ihu undo, ,gn d. a Nolaty nun,e:.n end lot anld tibia. pot a00ally 01110 ,vo 1 Ial,sonnlly I,nuwn In rel+• lu, {Ilnvdll III mu rv+ Ihl+ I+i,+.le UI anntllaclury unddncul lU low Inu Nmaomal wnoau nemnbl alard aubaeUbad to lhu wuhn mdln,n+enl :+n,l al:Un Wdoed to m++ that hW/ ho/jj, d.deumd HENRY T. RUNGE, JR. fU1 A. MR= IM eon"r W1Nf,:::; Iny nuno nnJ ulnl;lul a.+nl ,+n. lu+ ull,,.,n+ „u+ot .•.II 1002 Wall MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE r N" DESCRIPTION G?CHIDITII 9O-O8I8U � ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL .PROPERTY SITUATE •IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE,' DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL I• COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 14, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, "OFFICIAL MAP OF THE TOPHAM TRACT, THERMALITO, BUTTE CO., CALIFORNIA", WHICH MAP WAS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE' OF CALIFORNIA, ON NOVEMBER 14, 1908, IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, AT PAGE(S) 65; THENCE SOUTH 1 DEG. 20' WEST 1320.00 FEET; THENCE.SOUTH 1 DEG. 20' -EAST 326.50 .FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 CEG. 41' EAST 1194.2 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WEST LINE OF EIGHTH STREET; THENCE.NORTH 1 DEG. 28' WEST 558.00 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF EIGHTH STREET;' THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 41' WEST. 75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 1 DEG. .201 WEST AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF EIGHTH ,STREET A DISTANCE'OF 245 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 41' WEST 472 FEET TO A. POINT ON THE , WEST LINE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DEED FROM ALICE GADING SEAVER,TO FRANKLIN LEE MURPHY, ET UX, DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1953 AND RECORDED OCTOBER 23, 1953, IN BOOK 692, PAGE -483, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID MURPHY PARCEL, SOUTH 1 DEG. 31' EAST 245.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH -89 DEG. 41' WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT•OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 41' EAST 472 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ' RESERVING THEREFROM A RIGHT OF WAY. -FOR ROAD PURPOSES -OVER THE SOUTH 15 FEET OF THE EAST 305 FEET. PARCEL IT- A RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER A STRIP OF LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH LYING SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 305.00 FEET OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL I. - PARCEL III• A RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER A STRIP OF LAND 30 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF_WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL I; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. ''411. EAST, 75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF EIGHTH STREET AND THE -END OF SAID CENTERLINE. PARCEL IV: A RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER A STRIP OF LAND 30 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING NORTHERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO THE, NORTHERLY LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL I. ARIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER A STRIP OF LAND 60 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ' BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL I; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG. 41'•EAST, 75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF EIGHTH STREET AND THE END OF SAID CENTERLINE. • ,� •a�- it J yt7HI3IT ^a^ Rv- BB?.EA.4E CLAUSE LONG AS THE TRUSTOR SHALL NOT BE IN DEFAULT UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS DLED ' OF TRUST, A PARTIAL RELEASE AND RECONVEYANCE FROM THE LIEN OR CHARGE UEREOF `PAY U HAD AND WILL BB GIVEN, FROM TIME TO TIME AT ANY TIME WITHOUT NOTICE., Pl= TO KhTURITY OF THE NOTE SECURED HEREBY, UPON THE ESECUTION OF A SUBSTI- :' Y• f;VTUT=.Bn ls'VD TRUST DEED TO THE BENEFICIARY ON THAT PORTION SO RELEASED. SAID 3UBsTnm ...NOTE AND TRUST DEED SHALL APPLY TO REDUCE THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF T02!'.N= VRICH. IS SSCVRED HEREBY. SAID SUBSTITUTE NOTES AND DEED OF TRUST SHALL BE DRAWN ASA CONTINUATION OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE AS TO THE INTEREST RATE- AND TERMS, AND SHALL BE IN AN AMOUNT WITH A SCHEDULE Of PAYMENTS WHICH IS A PRO -RATA PORTION PER ACRE AS TO THE TOTAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AND THE SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS REMAINING UNDER THE ORIGINAL NOTE, AND SHALL REDUCE THE SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS ON THE ORIGINAL NOTE IN PRO- PORTION THERETO: IT IS THE PROVISION OF THIS DEED OF TRUST, :•AND,SHALL BEA PROVISION OF ANY DEED OF TRUST OR DEEDS OF TRUST CREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS FOR PARTIAL RELEASE AS SET FORTH ABOVE, THAT ADEQUATE LEGAL ACCESS IN THE FORM OF PASSABLE • EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES, WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH OF SIXTY (601) FEET SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ANY PORTION OF LAND COVERED BY THIS DEED OF TRUST AND ANY DEED OF TRUST OR DEEDS OF TRUST CREATED UNDER THE ABOVE PROVISIONS, AND TO ANY OTHER -PORTIONS OF LAND SO RELEASED FROM THIS :TEED OF TRUST. TO WHICH END, THIS DEEn OF TRUST AND ANY DEEDS OF TRURST CREATED HEREBY SHALL CONTAIN, IN ADDITION TO TIF LEGAL DESCRIPTION, A DESCRIPTION OF THE EASEMENT PROVIDING SUCH ADEQUATE ACCESS AS IS SET FORTH ABOVE. THIS RELEASE CLAUSE SHALL BE FOR THE BENEFIT. OF THE TRRSTOR, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE ORIGINAL TRUSTOR. IT WILL RUN WITH THE PROPERTY UNTIL' SUCH TIME SAID PROPERTY IS PAID IN FULL. CND OF DOCUMENT 9 0 2 7 2 3 0 f1(:C0F101N(,, nrOL07SIED BY Dave Harrod 90-027230 Rec Fee 9.00 AW ~CN 14L(:O110F.0 MAIL 70 •Cash 9.00 Recorded, Official Records Robert Lindberg County 0 ' f Butte \/I&, )_C-kiorj Candace J. Grubbs C)r,- V', I p CA 9-5,961- Recorder _j 11:50am 28 -Jun -90 CID 3 A.P. #30 -16 -SS (ptn.') II SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE Deed of Gift :1.. This Deed, made the ............. Twen-ty..F.irst ..................................... day of ...............Kay................ , one thousand nine hundred and ........ Ni -nett' ........................ MI Between . -Dave..H.arro.d..an.d. -Doxene - J.. - -Raxrod.,.. husband. and - wif.d. - as ........... j a in.t.. te na n. Its ...... I ............................. .......................................................................................................... Grantor and .... Robe r. t.. L i n.d b c r.g. -a n d San d j ... Kay Iindberg, bus band -and. -w-if e ........... As.joint.. tenants ...... ........................................................ :.1 .............. Grantee Witnessed.: T ' That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the love and affection which ....... . hey....... have.... for the Grantee, do ......... by these present's gift, give, and grafit unto the Grantee, and to.theix .... heirs and assigns forever, all ................................................... ..... ..................................................... -1 th .rt ..- . certain I(Rfl ....... oikodf ....... *11r parcel ....... of land situate in theunincorpo.rated-- area .............................................................................................................. ....................... County of .............. autto I ............... State of .... Cal -if orni a ........... and b(;unded and described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attach hereto and made a part hereof; -,,cjtk AL I. 0 VqFC Together with the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances thereunto belonging or appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remuinder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof. I To have and to hold the snid premises.. together with the appurtenances, unto the Grantee, and to r.... heir.; and assigns forever. From N,i. imo iwp:!) oy t;irr — Short Form — d(ev. I.mi -71F In Witness Whereof the Grantor, has ............. hereunto set ..theix..................... ands..-... the day and year first above written. Signed and Delivered in the Presence of cave Ra Z UY124 >1 .en i. 4-4 4-40 ---- — _- , in the ea s �"u................. .dayof.U.U.Ii?c'.:.......... ..... y .... , .. ,before me, /. ................................................... . j; c, f /JA�n ... . . ............... . a Notary Public, Stato of California, immi/ssioned and sworn, personallyappeared . L.�!`X • • tO• :�/ir(?.. .... fi c i...... �......................................... ally known to me for proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be raon whose name ..'............... �?'-:................................ ibed to this instrument, and acknowledk d that ...... the V ..... executed it. WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official I the.. . `:i�1 1-/........... County of Vii' on the date set forth above ... i certificate. Notary Public, State of California My commission expires Y 90-21230 13 EXHIBIT "A" Harrod to Lindberg Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 14, as shown on that certain map entitled, "Official Map of the Topham Tract, Thermalito, Butte County, California", which map was recorded in the -Office of the Recorder.of the County of Butte, State of California, on November 14, 1908, in Book 6 of Maps, at Page 65; thence South 1° 20' West 1320.00 feet; thence South 1° 20' East 326.50 feet; thence North 89° 41' East 1194.2 feet to a point in the West line of Eighth Street; thence North 1° 28' West 558.00 feet along said West line of Eighth Street; thence South 89° 41' West 147 feet to the True Point of Beginning for the herein described parcel of land; thence North 010 28' West, parallel with said'West line of Eighth Street , 245.00 feet; thence South 890 lineeof,100 Eightheet; thence Street, 245.00tfeet; thenceSparallel with said West North 89 .. to the point of beginning and the end of this descriptionEast, 100 feet Containing 0.56 acres more or less. Together with and reserving therefrom an easement 10 feet in width for sewer line purposes lying 5 feet on each side of the following described centerline; Commencing at the Southeast corner of the herein described parcel of land; thence North 89° 41' East along the South line, 70 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence leaving said South line, North 010 28' East, parallel with the East line of said.parcel, 98 feet; thence South 890 41' Wr:st, parallel with said South line, 176 feet to the end of said centerline. Also together with a right, of way for road and public utilities purposes over a strip of land 30 feet in width , the centerline of which is described as follows; Beginning at the Southeast corner of the above described parcel; thence North 89° 41' Fast, 147 feet to a point on the Westerly line of Eighth Street and the and of said centerline. Also together with a right of way for road and public utilities purposes over a strip of land 15 feat in width lying South of and adjacant to the Southerly line of the abovs described parcel from the Southwest corner of the above described parcel to a point 72 feet East of the Southeast corner of the above described parcel. Alro together :,lth a right of way for road and public utilities purposes over a strip of land 30.feet in width lying Northerly of and adjacent to the N,rtherly line of the above described parcel from the Northwest corner o1. the above described parcel to a point 72 feet East of the Northeast corner of the above described parcel. Also together with a*rtght of way forroadand blic 'utilii P"rPoses over a str±p of lend 60 feet In width the ucenterlinetofs which Is described ar, follows; Beginning a point 72 feet East of the Nnt'thFfast corner of tho above deacr.ibed Parce E.,l; thence North 89° 41 :at; 75 f ? et t�� a Poit;t on the Westerly bine of -Eighth Street and the sin(l of sat',l center) Ine. Thi Rests of. Bearings.f.or this descrlpti,on is the Westerly line of Fighth Street taken as North 016 28' Fest. END OF DOCUMENT � � I THERMAL /TO T. /9N. RJE. M. D. B. Q M, BK Iii1// I / I ; to 4 3 I I 3o-/6 /J1 28 Tax Area Code - /04 -/0 • - A 44 4 ' m 548.47 1 I� I _ — — _287. 73 74.51 /86.78 ~ — .. 134 O w .. .. • _I . ` J! 0 c�0 - 20Ac. '�J yam~ O h I ~ 151.49 -W-% " _ 485 AC Im _ 6.9AC VI 398.62 2 „ �• d 197Ac. 6 _ „ O2 I O 48 1 I Jo��. �L�' 54300 I 405.12 O 1 605.7/ 199Ac. e „ 26AC. 1.03 AC LV I /.365 S6 e /7 611.8 I p3© 14 JAC 3 © I 094c "I ` 634c a N 3 h LOSAe I . 4.46Ac. i >oovs:-- I A2 `�.cs = C 1 343 , 8K :3:5]I - - -� 4 . 22 .75 \ r ® IO2AC - 691.71 70 7/ $4� W - PM 73x0 . • .55Ac. AC. a 4\ 52 - 205 126.1 -56AC y ^ 64 1 ^ \ .9 r 63L/ . • 0.47 ,Z a 4.4Ac. J+7 JOO^^yq//I _?_ 72 _ o 217 Lro4drA � q � \ � * Cr - 73 ' /.494- += � O .. - -. - P Xv M 0 O li 4 AC WL • •. PN 73-6 468.16 628.14 2 198 I'G6 .. O 36 W 2 rz j 4 4.8Ac. Z o 59 03.7AC p P /9 o79AC lV I 0 3.93 At— J 1.91 -. 336.66 200 798.6 • .. tk A 5e Q .. 6472 O 4.7A: k 14 :L �1 This a mal not be -Wxf + Q Q F7] PIM68-21 739.79 I . ��m� W a Wryey of the de �'w d not rely upon f< 8 70 ' Jon t for ISAMOts 'h'n O1'efn°o0°'O ws general location the �'p , � • Notley TPoe RANCHO FERNANDEZ I Assessor's Mop NO. 30 -/IS and E-- Company ^rr gay�y mea Iota TNERMAC /TO M, O. R. WALL MAP NO. 6 � r.ny w .earnoauponlhtalaap �°R1°ga _ NOTE—ASSESSOR'S PARCEL BLOCK - f B -COU/l)ty Of Butte, Calif. d LOT NUMBERS SHOWN 3 IN CIRCLES afv/SCO: I-91 k•'Y 2' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES tPLANNING DIVISION > K - 'TO: ALUC FROM: Thomas A. Parilo, Director, Of Development Services RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application. Anderson Brothers Corp., UP 97-17 DATE: January 8, 1997 PLANNER: Steve Lucas , We. have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for completeness and, if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a ~ call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Use Permit for a 500 unit mini -storage on a portion of a 10.5 acre parcel on property zoned C-2 .(General Commercial) located on the east side of SR 99 approx.'600 ft. north of Wilson Landing Rd. at 13664 SR 99, Chico, identified as APN 047-270-027. It is within Supervisorial District No. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON May, 1997. YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN January 23, 1997.. IFNO COMMENTS OR COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YO UHAVE NONE. COMMENTS'(Attach additional twes if necessary): By: '" Date: 1 -j:\up\comment.wpd 10-16-95 BKH. ItPlanning ®iVISIOPi AN i 4 IN 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-5#C'tiOtiUit ge, BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: William Farrel, Director Of Development Services RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Bruce Roe, RZ 97-02 DATE: October 2, 1996 PLANNER: Steve Betts We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for completeness and , if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for Rezone of a 70.3 acre parcel on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural -40 acre parcels ) located on the souteast comer of Diesel Lane and Visnera Drive east of the Chico Municipal Aimort, identified as APN 48- 01- 074, 075. It is within Supervisorial District No. 3 . THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON January 23, 1997. YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN October 17,1996 -. IF NO COMMENTS OR COMMUNIC.9TIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YOUHAVE NONE. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): ■ J! � ► rl. u Ii V u V 1 By: �Date: / j:\mup\comment.wpd 10-16-95 BKH. It 1 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785 ' BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC FROM: , William Farrel, Director Of Development Services RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Bruce Roe, RZ 97-02 DATE: October 2, 1996 PLANNER: Steve,Betts We have received amapplication for development of the below.described property.. We are reviewing the application for completeness and., if complete, forconditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be heard ar.. the estimated hearing date indicated below. ' Comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please'do not hesitate to give us a call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application.for Rezone of a 70.3 acre parcel on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural -40 acre parcels) located on ,the souteast coiner of Diesel Lane and Vispera Drive east of the Chico Municipal Airport, identified as APN 48-01-074, 07. It is within Supervisorial District No. 3 .. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) X PLANNING COMMISSION —"DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE , ON January 23, 1997. YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN October 17, 1996_ IFNO COMMENTS OR COMMUNICA TION ARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YOU HA VE NONE. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): " i L r S O :TM -15 L r0 NAVAli�`���FI �'}t� I=ANT t j���IV ' 1 014 S I 27F- �j (,i t ~ 5f C -n4 -rWf AjD, IJILL (= Mme? E.' 13�t 4j"UC B IT -'[1L bj'11 Y4�' Date: / Y j:\mup\comment.wpd 10-16-95 BKFI. It 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785 0. BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: ALUC , Steve Lucas FROM: William Farrel, Director Of Development Services RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Lee, James W., GPA 96-05; REZ 96-06 DATE: September 26, 1996 PLANNER: Steve Hackney We have received an application for development of the below described property.. We are reviewing the application for completeness and , if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal it should be' heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. Should you not be able to respond in the time frame given, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a General Plan Amendment to change the desiranation from Orchard and Field Cron to Aericultural- Residential and a Rezone from A-10 to SR -1 to allow future development of nine lot subdivision with the minimum lot size of one acre on property zoned A-10 (Agricultural 10 acre ) located on 2591 Burdock Road Durham'; urham southeast corner at Burdock Road and Turner Lane , identified as'AP.N 39-24-75. It is within Supervisorial District No. 4 . THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) X PLANNING COMMISSION _ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON , 199. YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN,199. IFNO COMMENTS OR COMMUNICATION ARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YOU HAVE NONE. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): -j',.h20 icC� J� o WI�IN NTt/ ALU C tFi R06(� A2E�SOF �NF�UENGE By: VE LUCAS Date: 24 ver' div j:\mup\comment.,,vpd 10-16-95 BKH. It 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785 OWNER'S NAME t 'Y. t = TELEPHONE ( 209 ) 683-2380 James W. Lee ADDRESS c - . S: ' CITY, STATE' & ZIP CODE: 40943 Griffin Drive Oakhurst, CA'_ 93644 ZONE GENERAL PLANEXIS TING LAND USE SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Acres) A-10- Oichard'and Field -Crop Vacant { 9.98 •Adies". y EXISTING STRUCTURES (it Square Feet)' PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) i r" 3,200 Square Feet • None (Check One)' • (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ■ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER ■ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ❑ TENTATIVE. SUBDIVISION MAP rr ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP - 0 BOUNDARY LINE4 MODIFICATION , ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER O MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ OTHER w t FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels)' Change General Plan designation from orchard and.field crop to agricultural residential . and change zoning from A-10 to SR -1 'to allow future 'development of a nine lot subdivision with minimum` lot size. -of one acre. ,. , AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORT L _ To Butte County, Department of Development Services; , Rolls, Anderson & Rolls (Bruce A. Nash) _ ( 916 ) 895-1422 Print Agent Name and Phone Number C 965 Fir Street, Chico, CA 95928 Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process this application for General Plan Amendment and Rezone on my property, identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel Numbers 39 - 24 75 - - This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearing, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interests. Owner(s) of Record: (Sign and Print Name) James -W. Lee Print Name Martha Frances Dowd Gore Print Name Signature Architect and\or Engineer: Rolls; Anderson & Rolls (Bruce A. Nash) ( .916 .) 895-1422 Print Architect/&gincer Name and Phone Number 965 Fir Street, Chico, CA 95928 . Mailing Address E:\PROJECTS\960698N\GENVIN.FRM 01596 2 Si e Martha Frances Dowd Gore Print Name Signature Architect and\or Engineer: Rolls; Anderson & Rolls (Bruce A. Nash) ( .916 .) 895-1422 Print Architect/&gincer Name and Phone Number 965 Fir Street, Chico, CA 95928 . Mailing Address E:\PROJECTS\960698N\GENVIN.FRM 01596 2 T. 2/ N R. I Z M D 8.8 M.r 39- 24j ; � ' Je crae 4 or .,2 � O 231C- 1 S D� Mc ,cuveuv reAcr ��--z-,.s,� I ss ,rte t r .. J ( DAYTON DURHAM) DURHAM DAYTON ,�' ; �` , 41 77 , / 3743 380 300.7 t -l8 saA 800 r 8q /7.834:. to ------- - 59AC r b o► 5 vn 2 N 6 7&q aT.(8 :40.76AG 12oAa. - i • . TRANSFE�RR'D- - 1329 ----- - — —2 R RS101-99 39.5AC. Tb a 3 6 431-4:.1v 'f ti O 2a.05 AC. 24.94• 24.954: 24.9�4Ac. _ .-/6,2Ac. : PA183-/N2 Aa 54 26 O 46 Te.22Ae. r 82.69Ae. O /4.2 Ac. a /5 /4 42.384: 2 45 a. 6'2.7 4.94AC. 49.8BAc. 2560 .5AC. - I f B t 3/ 1 7� Easement 716 O '. 7 b ` q 7 66/.65 • R D .; /4.2AG 7 ' `. 40 • C4 ^2832AC. m 9044: , r 3762A-- 495 24.049 Q 76 5.00 AC .. I 266a 4 y N Q. N v o i g85./RS/27-54 % C® h /32ACiios.s3 /284.49 N k BURDICK - 6.23AC. O �C IOAC.6 .. , IO AC - 99AC Z T. Assessor's Mop No. 39-24 R. M. TURNERS /s/ SUB. m. 0. R. Bk./ Pp. 4s County of Butte, Calif. R M. TURN-ER'S 2!d. SUB. M. O. 1 Bk. B PR /O REVISED: 12-94 '. •1 DEPART F NT -OF DEVELOPMEa , ,. , � .-SERVICES •°: ���� L� , • BUTTE• COUNTY.UNIFORM APPLICATION • t' APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on other side: APPLICANT'S NAME (If applicant is different from owner an affidavit is required) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: James W. Lee r ' . 39-24-75 >5 ........................................................ CITY STATE &ZIP CODE:?FIENlJ1tMBER<'!.::;:RQITIGE.U....)_,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ADDRESS: <... ......::;:.:> ;:.;:.;:.;:.::::::::::::. ;• 40943 Griffin Drive Oakh C A 9 3644 9 TELEPHONE NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) - 209-). 683-2380Y J LOCATION OF PROJECT (Major cross streets and Address, if any) , 2591 Burdick Road, Durham, CA 95936 OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE - . ` James •W. -Lee .. - ❑ USE PERMIT ; ( ) 5 . 209 683-2380 - ADDRESS:. CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE: - — 40943 Griffin Drive "' - Oakhurst, CA'- 93644- { ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE .. SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Acres) A-10` Orchard and Field ICrop Vacant .-- 9.98 Acres , EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) t `PROPOSED' STRUCTURES (in Square Feet)` ' s 3,200 Square Feet None . - (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED s ■ PROPERTY•IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ONTUBLIC WATER;,, - ■ PROPERTY• IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER''' ■ . GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT • .; ■ REZONE' ~ ❑ USE PERMIT ❑ .MINOR USE PERMIT '0 ❑ VARIANCE " APR 1 1996 ❑ MINOR VARIANCE OrU'lt��@, mai (CTill� ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FULL DESCRIPTION. OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and - size of parcels) Change General Plan designation from orchard and field crop to agricultural residential and change zoning from A-10 to SR -1 to allow future development of a nine lot 'Subdivision with minimum lot site of.one acre. , _ - AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORi.i Y To Butte County, Department of Development Services; Rolls, Anderson & Rolls (Bruce A. Nash) ( 916 ) 895-1422 Print Agent Name and Phone Number 965 Fir Street, Chico, CA 95928 Mailing Address - is hereby authorized to process this application for General. Plan Amendment and Rezone on my property, .identified as Butte County Assessors Parcel- Numbers 39 -24 -75 - - This authorization • allows representation for all applications, hearing, appeals, etc: - and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s)'relating to record title interests. Owner(s) of Record: (Sign and Print Name) James W. Lee Martha Frances Dowd Gore Print Name Print Name Si e - . Signatdre Architect and\or Engineer: Rolls, Anderson & R611s . (Bruce 'A. Nash) - ( 916 ) 895-1422 Print Architect/Engineer Name and Phone Number 965 Fir Street, Chico, CA 95928 Mailing Address E:\PROJECTS\960698N\GENPLN.FRM 031596 2 �•- T.2/-N,. R.IZ W.- DB.BM. A. 39z4,re ccoe 41 ` f ✓` 23 I c- S �� `v` .M� .ovA.euv revcr DYTON DURHAM - �A) DLIRHL►M DAYTON 57&5 580 500.7 , .40-18 1 . 800 rk ' 84 /7.83Ac. V) * . W! '5 0-S578. 1 I i 35 12OAc. S IV OFTRANSFE%R�'D f2 1329 R5/0%-99 . 39.SAC. � 4= ' 39 ' � a O 3 6 '; 439 AC ' �t O2a:o5 Ac. 2494. 24.95Ac. 24.SWAc. PM83-102 -'Ar- 76-22 •Ac76 22 AC..' 82.69Ac. O /4.2 Ac. a /5 /4 42.38Ac ,Q I 45 0; ' 24.94Ac. 62.7 1 49.8BAc: rs 60 o.5slL. - I B ,{ ' 1 7' Eosemtnt. n . _ ir; 4 7/.6 ' /4.2AC .87 I 66/.65 40' ' R?AD � 1 ►� e e 2 p 5. 1 r 92 1 �2832Ac.m 9s4Ac 75 1 Qt I 2OAc. b 37.62 Ac h 4515 id 1 24.09R 76 5.00 AC At. �7 - p 9 c* ' RS /27-54 N I 585.1 © a (Ra v h /32 AC 1 4.98AG � /ios.s� /284.49 ` N 't 0 BURDICK - - - - � 9 � 6.23 AC. - 30 5 5 87 - _ IOAC.6 - 66L9V: 1it Ism 8 cm Q ' /OAC. 9.9AC 66/.65 6 2530 j t 36 31 p �1� Assessor's Map No. 39-24 R. M. TURNERS /.V SUB. M. 0. R. Bk./ Pg. 46 County of Butte, Calif. R M. TURNER'S 2.10-'S UB. M. O. R. Bk. B PR /O - REVISED: r2-94 W.� _ REQV EST_FOR COMMENTS TO: Post -It"" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 # of pages ►. To 'tl- (^i't =Z•1 _�1 1- U (` Fro-t1l,"lu.i ` �S �=f -,l �F C ' _4 �-' i, rst_r�r•v Co.- s .t i..,�.rS-►�, :.it- I f i. - r Dept. +++ CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER Phone '#." Fax # S-e,,rFax other # • .. , Poet -It°' Fax Note 7671 Dete 1-41410,115. 4 , Rojoe► To From r, to Co./Dept. d` u� + CITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR Phone # Phone A �I+! @ Fax k S38 , 77p Fax 0 ;fir 1 J r ra -, 0. moi, N .. 1 v+:, t_�� ® CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL ❑ CITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR �[]—,CITY.URBAN -FORESTER • ❑ CITY WPCP SUPERVISOR ® CITY COMM DEV DEPT - ENG (TV/FM) ❑ CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER SENIOR PLANNER (CURRENT) ❑ other ❑ COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR ❑ COUNTY ENV. HEALTH DEPT. (CHICO) ❑ COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DIST, ❑ CALTRANS [.] DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME (� WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ❑ UTILITY COMPANIES (PAC BELL; PG&E; CAL WATER) ❑ NORTHEAST INFO CENTER COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMM ❑ AIRPORT DIRECTOR ❑ COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL (DIST. PROJECT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Name/Address, Name of. Project UP 96-20 '(Kincade/Modern Bldg.) Address Corner of Ridgewood & Ceres Avenues Project Description: A request to construct and operate a private law school in a R -P, Residential/Professional Office zoning district. The proposed hours of the school will be 5 p.m, to 10 p.m. with approximately 10-15 employees. A portion of the building may later be used as law offices and/or court room space. Attached Is the preliminary data regarding a project which as been submitted to the City of. Chico for a discretionary action (Use Permit, Rezone; Subdivision, etc.). An assessment of the potential Impacts or the project is being made. Please review and submit comments within five working da. s. Vianning Division ® This Item will be on the Planning Commission agenda of . TBD. Ce,, ❑. This item will be approved by the Planning' Director. -SEP 1 1 ►.:.:o COMMENTS:ilfe, California This request will be reviewed for consistency findings at the October 16, 1996 ALUC meeting-- a 'This parcel is -located in the flight corridor and in the approach surface. Preliminary review by,_,- ALUC staff indicates the parcel is inconsistent with the currently adopted Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan. The plan,recommends hat use permits�for any uses involving concentrations of people shouldmgt,be granted and that parcels in the flight corridor not be.-... - ..developed at all. �„_, Thank You Project Planner: Brad Pierce BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION TO: • ALUC FROM: William Farrel, Director Of Development Services RE: Request for Comments on a Development Application: Ed Hay, File # TSM 97-01' DATE: August 22,1996 PLANNER: Stephen Hackney We have received an application for development of the below described property. We are reviewing the application for completeness and, if complete, for conditions of approval. If the application is determined to be complete within 30 days of its submittal . it should be heard at the estimated hearing date indicated below. Comments from your department/division/agency regarding completeness of the application and/or possible conditions of approval are requested. Should you not be able to respond in the time framegiven, or -if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give us a call at 538-7601. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. This is an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map to create 34 lots of an average size of 1 acre, over 4 phases on a .. proiect site of 35+ acres on property zoned SR -1 ( Suburban -Residential 1 acre parcel ) located on Garner Lane, Chico, identified as APN 047-440-006 . It is within Supervisorial District No. 3 . THIS ITEM HAS BEEN TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE (check one) _ PLANNING COMMISSION X DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON December I2, 1996. , YOUR COMMENTS, IF ANY, ARE REQUESTED BY NO LATER THAN September 5,.1996. IFNO COMMENTS OR COMMUNICATIONARE RECEIVED BY THAT DATE, WE WILL ASSUME THAT YOUHAVE NONE. COMMENTS (Attach additional pages if necessary): x' By. Date: k:\forms\comment.fim 10-16-95 BKH. It 7 County Center Drive - Oroville, California 95965 - 916-538-7601 - FAX 916-538-7785 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELORN11 ,*'-N,-T SERVICES BT--r7ii*6uNTyuNi:FoRm P ATION App-ILIC,1UNT: Aeenc information to be provided is on other side: -%-P?LIC.3UNT*S NAME If applicant is different ftm owner an affidavit is required ASSESSOR'S P.4LRCELNlJMBE3L-' ADDRESS: CITY. STATE ZIP CODE- FILE'NUNOM - .4m: 760 _W-� 73 -NAL ONE ME OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) 7(L,0�/) 8,99- 3932 LOCATION OF PROJECT (Major == streets and Address, if any) ale -"r 6K&7—,,�e Z -5L GENERAL INFORMATION REOMED OWNER'S NAME 1--3 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TELEPHONE ,E Pale5leO e -7a15, --/- 1 ("Id) 89 9- 3932 ADDRESS. crry. STATE & ZIP CODE VO 760 ee5f. 9j:973 ZONE GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE (in Square Feet oc Acim) [3 OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUM -RES in Square Feet) (Cheek o=) (Cbeck One) E-3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED. E3 PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC nvvw=o r=vi"T=t-Amnm PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER APPLICATION REQUESTED E-3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1--3 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 0 REZONE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 0 USE PERMIT Planning Division [3 WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP [3 MINOR USE PERMIT r JUL 2 5 1996 3 VARIANCE [3 MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN 13 BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION E3 MINOR VARIANCE Oroville, C - afifomia [3 LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION E3 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT El CERTIFICATE OF MERGER E3 DEVELOPMENT AGREDAENT [3 OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets). nvvw=o r=vi"T=t-Amnm I CER=THATI AIM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER. I ACKNOWLEDGETHEFILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. (If an agent is to be authociud execute the affidavit of autbodzLdom on the revere side 7 DATE. -7- %�- SIGNATURE. 2z I I 0 AGENT AUTHORIZATION KW To Butte County, Department of Development Services; lJ'Cr,17STfJ��l/G—llIEE,2/llG— &.03—/Zsw Print Nam. at AQWU and Phione Number ZO PECZe5W 9T/Q7' htiiiaq Addtm :. . ' is hereby authorized to process this application for 5v39ir/l��o�r fJr90 - on my property, identt ied as' Butte Caurtty Assesors Parcel Number This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings; appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but A not including documents) relating. to record title interest Owner(s) of Record: (Sign and Print Name) Print Name or Enaineer: //0,21�1ST�9.2 E�1G/�'.�fPl�'G X93 —/60D Print Name Signature Print Name of Architect/Engineer and Phone Number �y/CD e,-,5r.f�73 ZO iECLfJ�P�T/Q'i PWA2 /� Mainno Address FOR OFFICE, USE ONLY Verify: Date received AP Number(s) Owners Authorization Project Description Total amount received Legal Description Zoning requirements Copies of plot plan " Taken by _ Receipt No. EH _ LD_ Plan__ Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit will be returned upon final action). Current fee for this application is $ as of z REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: Date: July 24, 1996 ® CITY GENERAL SERVICES DIRECTOR ❑ CHICO AREA REC. AND PARK DIST. ® CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ® CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ® CITY CHIEF OF POLICE ® COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR ® CITY.RRE CHIEF - ❑ COUNTY ENV. HEALTH DEPT. (CHICO) ® CITY.DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ❑ COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DIST. ❑ CITY SENIOR CIVIL ENG. (HISLOP) , ❑ CAL TRANS ® CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL ❑ DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME ❑ CITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR ❑ WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD_ ❑ CITY URBAN FORESTER ❑ UTILITY COMPANIES ❑ CITY WPCP SUPERVISOR (PAC BELL; PG&E; CAL WATER) ® CITY -COMM DEV DEPT - ENG (TV/FM) ❑ NORTHEAST INFO CENTER ❑ CITY CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ® COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMM ® SENIOR PLANNER (CURRENT) ❑ AIRPORT DIRECTOR ® PLANNING DIRECTOR ❑ COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIST. PROJECT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Name/Address GPA/RZ -96-5 (Dan Hays) 2508 Floral Avenue Project Description: _General Plan Amendment and Rezone from Office and R -P, Residential Professional to Mixed Use Neighborhood Core and N -C, Neighborhood Commercial. Attached is the preliminary data regarding a project which as been submitted to the City of Chico for,a discretionary action (Use Permit, Rezone, Subdivision, etc.). An assessment of the potential impacts of the project is being made. Please review and submit comments within ten working days. ® This item will be on the Planning Commission agenda of _ ❑ This item will be approved by the Planning Director. COMMENTS: -RE woj I GT A'PPEAiZS -M SF G00SfS-F95N ►J M PPFUEtJj 9E - -EsE�v 7-c A -u c Ate- rrs A-ub /I _ III( M� � C6NSlI�L-ern/ Thank You Project Planner: +BUTTE COUNA Al . RPORT LAND COMMISSION + • Department of DevelopmentServices • 7 CountyCenter Drive, Oroville, CA 95965• • =-1111: M,J BUTTE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION FINDINGS FOR: City of Chico General Plan Amendment/Rezone on APN 048-034-069 The following findings have been prepared at the direction of the ALUC and are for the consideration of the City of Chico (local agency) when making a decision on this project. Section 1: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS A. Find that the ALUC accepts the City of Chico designation of this project as a Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 2: PROJECT CONSISTENCY FINDINGS A. The ALUC finds the project is consistent with the Chico Municipal Airport Environs Plan and that the project is compatible with the viable, responsible operation of the Chico Municipal Airport subject to the following recommended condition. Recommended Conditions 1. Property owners shall sign an avigation easement granting the right of continued use of the Chico Municipal Airport in the airspace above the subject parcel and acknowledging any and all ebsting or potential airport operational impacts. Reviewed and Approved by: �-e Fred Ge t, Chairman 1304 County Airport Land Use Commission K:\a1uc\aug21-96.mtg\flora1. rez • Butte County *Airport Land Use Commission •