Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
UP05-05 040-490-018
'APPLICATION ACTIVITY LOG UP 05-05 APN 040-490-018 Robertson & Dominick, Inc. PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET FILE NO.: UP 05-05 PROJECT TYPE: Use Permit APN: 040-490-018 APPLICANT:. Robertson & Dominick, Inc. ADDRESS: 888 Manzanita Court, Suite A, Chico, CA 95926 PHONE: (530) 894-3500 • t OWNER: William Isaac - ADDRESS: 2865 Coldwater Canyon Dr., Beverly Hills, CA 90210 REPRESENTATIVE: Robertson & Dominick, Inc. ADDRESS: 888 Manzanita Court, Suite A, Chico, CA 95926 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit to allow a gas station/mini-mart use. Included would be four 12,000 gallon underground storage tanks LOCATED: on the south side of Durham-Pentz Road, approximately 0.2 miles east of SR -99, south of Chico PROPERTY ZONED: M-1 (Light Industrial) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: I (Industrial) TOWN/AREA: Chico 1. Application accepted: 7/30/2004 Amount: $ 3399 Receipt #: 407052 2. Assigned To: Stephen Betts 3. Comments sent to: Development Services Director, Public Works Director, Environmental Health, Assessor, LAFCo, Agricultural Commissioner, CDF, Building Manager, County Counsel 4. Sent to Inter -Departmental Review Committee (IDR): 5. Status Letter sent to applicant: 6. Date scheduled for IDR: 8/18/2004 , 7. Comments received from: 8. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: 9. Mailing List/Lead-in Sheet: 10. Environmental Determination: State Clearinghouse No. Categorical Exemption'-CEQA# Negative Declaration Mitigation Negative Declaration Subject to Fish & Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. — CEQA # Other 11. Staff Report: Project Video: 12. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 13. Publication Notice Written: Display Ad Prepared: 14. Notices Mailed: Number of Notices: 15. Newspaper Publication Date: O C P G B 16. Planning Commission Hearing(s): Action taken: 17. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(s): Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No: Adopted: 18. Type Use Permit/Send for signature: 19. N.O.E. / N.O.D. / APPENDIX G: Fish & Game Fees Paid: Yes No 20. Send validated Use Permit/Minor Use Permit to applicant, representative: 21. Assessor's Memo (Use Permit, Minor Use Permit): 22. Copy of Use Permit/Minor Use Permit to Planning Technician: a 0 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUTTE COUNTY UNIFORM APPLICATION APPLICANT: Agent information to be provided is on page 2 APPLICANT'S NAME: (If application is different from owner an affidavit is required.) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Robertson & Dominick, Inc. 040 -490 -018 ADDRESS: STREET, CITY, STATE, & ZIP CODE FILE NUMBER: (FOR OFFICE USE) 888 Manzanita Court, Suite7A, Chico, CA 95926 U/0 05-05 OF PROPOSED PROJECT (If any) TELEPHONE: DP Commerce Center 530 894- 3500 LOCATION OF PROJECT (Major cross streets and Address, if any) East of Durham Pentz and Hwy 99 GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OWNER'S NAME: TELEPHONE: William Isaac ( ) - ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, & ZIP CODE: 2865 Coldwater Canyon Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 ZONE IGENERALPLAN I EXISTING LAND USE SITE SIZE (in Square Feet or Acres) M-1 Industri 1 Undeveloped Lot 15.1 Acres EXISTING STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) PROPOSED STRUCTURES (in Square Feet) None (Check One) (Check One) ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE SEWERED ❑ PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON PUBLIC WATER ❑X PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON SEPTIC PROPERTY IS OR PROPOSED TO BE ON WELL WATER .....APPLICATION REQUESTED ❑ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ❑ REZONE ❑ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP USE PERMIT ❑ WAIVER OF PARCEL MAP ❑ MINOR USE PERMIT ❑ BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ❑ VARIANCE ❑ LEGAL LOT DETERMINATION ❑ MINOR VARIANCE ❑ CERTIFICATE OF MERGER ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT ❑ MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN ❑ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ❑ OTHER PROJECT DESCRIPTION . FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (Attach necessary sheets. If this application is for a land division, describe the number and size of parcels.) Gas Station Mini—mart COUNTY 6. SERVICES OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER OR THE AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURA'T'E. (If an agent is to be authorized, execute an affidavit of authorization and include the affidavit with this application.) DATE: k -01 SIGNATURE: KAFORMS\UN I FORM APPLICATION Page I of 2 AGENT AUTHORIZATION TO: Butte County, Department of Development Services: Robertson & Dominick, Inc. Phone Number ( 530 ) 894 -3500 Print Name 888 Manzanita Court Suite A, Chico, CA 95926 Mailing Address is hereby authorized to process the application for William Isaac on my property, identified as Butte County Assessor Parcel Number: APN# _ 040 - 490 - 018 This authorization allows representation for all applications, hearings, appeals, etc. and to sign all documents necessary for said processing, but not including document(s) relating to record title interest. Owner(s) of Record: (sign and print name) Wil2am Is Print Name Signauu•e Print Name Signature Architect aAglor Engineer: Russ Erickson Print Name of Architect/Engineer 888 Manzanita Court, Suite A, Chico, CA 95926 Mailing Address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Verify: Date Received: ❑ AP Numbers) ❑ Owners Authorization ❑ Project Description Taken by Phone Number5( 30) 894 - 3500 Total Amount Received: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Zoning Requirements ❑ Copies of plot plan Receipt No PW/LD Plan E.H. CDF NODINOE Fees Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of a deposit) will be returned upon final action. Current fee for this application is as of Make check payable to "Butte County Treasurer" K:`.F01,1MS-,0NIP0RM APPLICATION Page 2 oft m COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be completed By Project Applicant) Date Filed 7/15/04 GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Name and address of owner, and/or developer, and/or project sponsor: Wil i nm Tsaac 2865 Coldwater Canyon Drive, Reverky Hills, CA (10910 2. Address of project: East of Highway 99 and Durham—Pentz Road Assessor's Parcel Number: n4n-49n—n1 R 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Robertson & Dominick, Inc. 888 Manzanita Court, Suite A, Chico, CA, 95926 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: N/A 5. Existing general plan designation:_ _sight Industrial 6. Existing zoning district: M-1 7. How is land currently used? Undeveloped Lot 8. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Gas Station Mini—mart Project Description: 9. Site size: 15.1 Acres (Acres/Sq. Feet) 10. Off-street parking spaces: Full size: Compact: - Total: 11. Plans attached: Yes _ No x , 12. Proposed development schedule Unknown at this time 13. Associated projects N/A 14. Anticipated incremental or phased development N/A ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services ❑ Planning Division ❑ I Attach description of project containing the following information: 15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. N/A 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area and loading facilities. 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 19. If the project involves a minor variance, conditional use, rezoning application, or any development permits, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. If permits have already been issued, please attach as Exhibit N Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). e. 20. Change in,existing features of any hills, buttes, canyons or substantial alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 22. Change in pattern or character of. general area of project. 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. i t 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 25. Change in bay, lake, river, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 27. Site on filled land or on slopes of 10 percent or more. 28. Use of, or disposal of potentially.hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. including special districts) 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. YES �X _ X Discuss below all items NO X X X X UG Gasoline Storage Tank ❑ Butte County Department of Development Services O Planning Division O X X -I— W 0 Environmental Setting: (Attach brief description) 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date Signature FBUTTE COUNTY JUL 3 0 2004 DEVELOPm E AlT kt, SERVICES K:1Planning\FORMS\Submittal\ENV-INFO.FRM 0 Butte County Department of Development Services 0 Planning Division 0 32. The site is a vacant generally level area with no trees, bounded on the west by State Highway 99, on the north by Durham Pentz Road and on the south by Falager Court. The property easterly of the site is also vacant. 33. The surrounding property easterly of Highway 99 is similar, with no trees, vacant and -generally level. The area westerly of Highway 99 is vacant south of Durham Pentz Road and industrial to the north of Durham Pentz Road. Environ info #32, 33.doc Page 1/1 r USE PERMIT - APPLICATION PACKET CHECKLIST This checklist is designed to assist applicants in making sure all necessary information is included in their application packet. Please include this checklist along with your submittal. Applicant Planner Z ❑ A completed, signed, Uniform Application and Environmental Information form. If the application is signed by an agent for the property owner, an agent authorization form must be submitted along with the Uniform Application. The application shall not be accepted unless signed by the owner or authorized agent. ?. ❑ Payment of the currently required Application Fee and/or Deposit (Any unused portion of the deposit will be returned upon final action, if any remains.) (Planner advises applicant) 3. ❑ Thirty-five(35) copies of plans which shall include a detailed site plan drawn to scale. All plans shall be drawn on uniform size sheets no greater than 24" x 36". The finished plans shall be folded to 8 %" x 11 ". The detailed site plan must include: E] c. ® ❑ d. �, ❑ e. ❑ ❑ Name and address of Applicant, Engineer and/or person who prepared the plan Property lines and lot dimensions Assessor Parcel Number(s) and the street address. Proposed use and/or uses of the property. Proposed landscaping plan, if applicable. f. © ❑ Dimensioned locations of existing and proposed improvements on the property (including, but not limited to, buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields). Ful ❑ Distances from any significant natural and constructed features of the property, such as streets, access roads, streams, rock outcroppings, major tree stands, storm drains, bodies of water, railroads, to the property lines. ii IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 1 9 C] ii . ® ❑ Location of al l slope banks, ponds, creeks, buttes, sloughs, rock outcroppings, natural drainage courses, irrigation canals and existing vegetation worthy of consideration for preservation, such as oak trees. 1.0 ❑ Any existing faults or fractures and geologic hazards. ❑ North arrow and scale of drawing. All plans shall be drawn to an engineering scale with the preferred scale of 1" = 20', with a north arrow preferably oriented to the top of sheet. k. [S� ❑ All plans must be clear and legible. 4. ❑ ❑ One copy of 8 %" x I I" transparency reduction of the detailed site plan. 5. ❑ A vicinity map showing closest major cross streets, zoning and existing land use. After a meeting with a Butte County Planner the following checked items will be reouired to be submitted at the time of application: (optional) 6. ❑ ❑ One (1) set of colored plans mounted on foam boards, which shall include an illustrative site plan, illustrative building elevations, and any necessary cross-sections. Portions of this requirement may be waived by the Planning Manager. Portions waved ❑ YES ❑ NO 7. ❑ ❑ One (1) full size reproducible sepia for each sheet in the plan set of the detailed site plan. 8. ❑ ❑ Building materials on a sample board, 8 %" X 11 V. 9. ❑ ❑ Detailed site plan including the following: a. ❑ ❑ Building setbacks from the ultimate road right-of-way (front, rear, sides). b. ❑ ❑ Proposed and existing on-site driveways and/or roads. c. ❑ ❑ Location, height, and materials of walls and fences (sections may be required). d. ❑ ❑ All driveways, drawn to scale, on adjacent and across the street properties within 100 feet of the subject site. 1 F INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED,THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 2 9 e. ❑ ❑ Existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks and existing paving widths on-site or within 100 feet of the site, on adjacent and across the street properties. f. ❑ ❑ Typical street section(s). g. ❑ ❑ Nearest cross streets on both sides with plus or minus distances from subject site. h. ❑ ❑ Approximate location of all buildings within 100 feet, on adjacentproperties. 1. ❑ ❑ Proposed method of sewer and water connection or alternative method of sewage disposal and potable water supply. j. ❑ ❑ Existing and nearest fire hydrants. I:. ❑ ❑ Access, both pedestrian and vehicular, showing service areas and points of ingress and egress. 1. ❑ ❑ Internal circulation pattern. nl. ❑ ❑ Elevation contours, at a minimum per USGS maps. 10. ❑ ❑ Illustrative Site Plan The plan should include a graphic scale and north arrow, all proposed and existing improvements, landscape concepts such as earth mounding and meandering walkways, walls, ground cover, trees, shrubs, shadows, paving and other elements as may be necessary to illustrate the site plan. (Dimensions maybe excluded from this plan.) 11. ❑ ❑ Conceptual Grading Plan Items to be shown include: it. ❑ ❑ Natural areas to be preserved. b. ❑ ❑ Proposed cut and fill areas in contrasting colors of zipatone pattern. c. ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contours within 100 feet of project boundaries. IF INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 3 d. ❑ ❑ Proposed drainage and flood control facilities. e. ❑ ❑ Erosion control measures (e.g. - slope landscaping). f. ❑ ❑ Natural drainage. g. ❑ ❑ Elevations and finished contours. l�. ❑ ❑ Location of retaining walls, drainage channels and existing structures. 1. ❑ ❑ Location, elevation and size of proposed building pads. l?. ❑ ❑ Illustrative Building Elevations Illustrative building elevations showing all sides of existing and proposed buildings and structures. Illustrative building elevations means architectural elevations showing typical materials to be used, trees, landscaping and shadows to give the elevations graphic,dimension. Additional information may be required in order to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement the above' submittal information or to complete any required environmental review documents, as deemed necessary by the Department of Development Services, Public Works, Environmental Health Division, Butte County Fire Department, or Agriculture Commissioner. Signature: i`� Date 7"QC,. owl Applicant/Representative Signature: Planner Receiving Application K:'d'I:mnim_%I OR K4S\.Submiu.d\CI-1 ECKLISWSEPERMURM Date: /Dtrr1'E COUNTY' JUL 3 D 254 I F] NSUI-171CI ENT INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE. 4 �:•,; � xp ,: , . ;, �; ,UP 05=04 Rates) f � . �� r� :PROJECT WORKSHEET'�`� Balance of Payment :; Retainer Credit ' Aug -04 $ 137.00 1.11 $. 152.99 _ Apr -08 $ 157.40 1.75 $ 275.45 $ 2,541.56 Sep -09 $ • _ 163.00 2.00 $ 326.00 FLAT FEE'PROJECT� Feb -10 $ 163.00 0.08 $ 13.58 $ 2,201.98 4.94 $ 768.02 1$=2;201!981 $ - ' DATE: 30 -Jul -04 t i . ^ APPLICANT: ' William-1§sac PROJECT TYPE: USE_PERMIT AP NUMBER: 040-130-0381 - PROJECT PLANNER PAYMENT HISTORY /DISBURSEMENTS ':• K ,Planning Division'of:Development Services , GPMF/TIFFEES. Y:. GPMF/TIF FLAT: FEES :-,, S tate Other Butte County Departments ` - r r Planner ~ 204401 `� .`,Planner r 4 $-Y 204402 General r 204402 u h 204404 4611700 4614901 TOTAL f, Services W ., Servicest'-4? � >, 5204401i 4210900. .: : ;°?Plan. ., Technology.4610311:':: 4610312;'; 4612319 Land Land .Environ- ` - • AMOUNT OF Ex enses u p Ez enses L `Publishm ' 0.: p g Publishing g Maintenance _Fee `' '. General Plan Technolo9Y.: 1011460 Fish ,.� Clerk ' Develop- p- Develop- p - mental 4617240 DATE RECEIPT RECEIPTS &MINIMUM'FEE . G RETAINER : RETAINER-., ';FLAT FEE , RETAINER> ;RETAINER: . Maintenance n Fee 8 Game Recorder ment ment. Health • Fire 4612200 Ag 7/30/2004 407051 $ 3,399.00 $ .F' 2;970.00 "; = ;-r: z a _- x : "i $ 'ti 36.00 $ 165.00 $ 185.00 $ 43.00 $ 3,399.00 $ . t,%,2,970.00' _ ... _ ... : $ .._ .: . - .. $ , ,.. _ : $ . ... $ _ ....: :� $ - .. . $' ` -. $ :: $ i$=t 36;007 $ . $ 165.00: "-:185.00 $ : $ ::.43.00 $ - PLANNING CHARGES'``' 36: HRS r Date(s) T Rates) f Time- Hr/Min ;in Decimals;;. " . , Amount Balance of Payment :; Retainer Credit ' Aug -04 $ 137.00 1.11 $. 152.99 $ 2,817.01 $ 2,970.00 Apr -08 $ 157.40 1.75 $ 275.45 $ 2,541.56 Sep -09 $ • _ 163.00 2.00 $ 326.00 $ 2,215.56 Feb -10 $ 163.00 0.08 $ 13.58 $ 2,201.98 4.94 $ 768.02 1$=2;201!981 $ - Planning Services & Expenses RETAINER �-. REFUNDIDUE - -- - 1$36:00) ���y x.. -. UP:05=05 " - `.Rate(s) r{' n N = PROJECT�WORKSHEET :"'. *=�� , -4d_ ,_�. � 4wAmount .. _ Balance Paymen Retainer -: -'Credit Aug -04 $ 137.00 1.15 : FLAT;FEE-PROJEC.T $ 2,812.45 $ 2,970.00 Sep -09 $ 163.00 2.00 $ 326.00 $ 2,486.45 Feb -10 DATE: 30 -Jul -04 0.08 $ 13.58 1 $ 2,472.87 3.23 $ 497.13 -,$ .` 2,472:87 1 $ - • APPLICANT: William Issac ' � �:, �- �'� ,,z-� a + PROJECT TYPE: USE`PERMIT?r''>c M,F= ,r s � - 4 • . r_ x f # AP NUMBER: 040-490-018 .;; PROJECT PLANNER:" PAYMENT HISTORY/ DISBURSEMENTS -, P.Ianning Division of;Development:Seniices `' ` t `GPMF/TIF FEES' , >.'"`° GPMF/TIFrFLAT..FEES e: State r Other Butte County Departments r 'f• Planner * 204401 zK ` Planner 2114 General' 204402_ :: 4; 204404' 4611700 4614901 TOTAL -'Services 8 - Services & ='. 204401 F 4210900. .104402 Plan eTechnology hry 4610311: 4610312; 4612319 Land Land Environ- ' "� ' ' '•' AMOUNT OF Expenses Expenses ;Publishing ,,Publishing ` Maintenancex rfee General Plan :Technology 1011460 Fish Clerk Develop- Develop- mental 4617240 DATE RECEIPT RECEIPTS . MINIMUM FEE ;" . RETAIN ER:RETAINER,.; FLAT FEE' " ' RETAINER RETAINER _ Maintenance <'Fee' ": & Game Recorder ment ment Health Fire f 4612200 Ag 7/30/2004 407052 $ 3,363.00 2,970.00 7:. _ , ,_ _` _ :;.� .:s. `.. # . ' _` ._ $ 165.00 $_ 185.00 $ -43.00 $ 3,363.00 $.:, 2,970.00 �f _ $ ..... _ _r. .. $.. , , s . -.. $ _. $ .. .$ _. $" , $ _ $ - S : _ $ =S. 165.00 1 $ _ $ 85:00 i 4.3:00 $ PLANNING CHARGES : -36 HRS.- :Time RS. Dates) ' `.` - `.Rate(s) Time = Hr/Min, in Decimals : ,_�. � 4wAmount .. _ Balance Paymen Retainer -: -'Credit Aug -04 $ 137.00 1.15 $ 157.55 $ 2,812.45 $ 2,970.00 Sep -09 $ 163.00 2.00 $ 326.00 $ 2,486.45 Feb -10 $ 163.00 1 0.08 $ 13.58 1 $ 2,472.87 3.23 $ 497.13 -,$ .` 2,472:87 1 $ - Planning Services & Expenses RETAINER $ 2,472A7 - -. .• _ .. .. �` a •' - -r� r • .. w TSM04N13 r �.• l =-P,ROJECTWORKSHEET'�� Jun -04 $ 137.00 1.15 $ 157.55 $ 3,320.45 $ 3,478.00 Jul -04 $ 137.00 6.37 $ 872.23 $ 2,448.22 Aug -04 $ 137.00 1.75 $ 239.75 $ 2,208.47 Sep -09 FLAT FEE'PROJECT :,w 1.75 $ 285.25 $ 1,923.22 Feb -10 $ 163.00 0.08 $ 13.58 $ 1,909.64 DATE: 11 -May -04 11.10 $ 1,568.36 1,9.09.64 APPLICANTr William Issac. PROJECT TYPE: TENTATIVE; SUBDIVISION MAP:. = AP NUMBER: 646 -4k -01811e;. ,f r r I PROJECT PLANNER: g PAYMENT HISTORY /.DISBURSEMENTS , • ♦ - � r- Planning, Division of Development Services.....: - `GPMF/TIF. FEES GPMF/TIF�FLAT FEES ::::, State : ' +♦ •a Other Butte County Departments 1... • Y r4 •.' ! . ; • - , • i. . • 204401 ,•r ..• . •. ,. Planner': <: 'Planner t 204402,General 204402: ' 204404 .4611700 4614901 + . • TOTAL TOTAL Services'8 ; w, :.,,,.Services 8_ 204401, 4210900 'Plan . '. Technology 4610311';x` 4610312 4612319 ' Land Land Environ— - - AMOUNT OF :,'Expenses cT Expenses `: Publishing .' Publishing '�' Maintenance`- Fee General Plan Technology 1011460 Fish Clerk Develop- Develop- mental 4617240 { DATE RECEIPT RECEIPTS _MINIMUM FEE "RETAINER RETAINER; nFLAT,FEE' '`, RETAINER.;- RETAINER Maintenance `r Fee. 8 Game Recorder ment' ment Health •' j Fire 4612200 Ag 6/24/2004 406532 $ 4,143.00 $ - :.'3478.00: 4.; ' = a _ , ..; , 450.00 215.00 - r - r . c $ 4,143.00 . $. - .3,478.00 , $ . t , $ $ . , _ ... $ .._ $ ^.. ` . - $. n $: - $ ` - $ ,... $ $.:. 450:00 $ . $.' ..215:00 PLANNINGCHARGES . - :.- 36 HRS,,,.,,. s' ' `Date(s) E Rates) Time Hr/Min Balance of'Payment in Decimals'. .. Amount g T: Retainer y -' Credit.,, Jun -04 $ 137.00 1.15 $ 157.55 $ 3,320.45 $ 3,478.00 Jul -04 $ 137.00 6.37 $ 872.23 $ 2,448.22 Aug -04 $ 137.00 1.75 $ 239.75 $ 2,208.47 Sep -09 $ 163.00 1.75 $ 285.25 $ 1,923.22 Feb -10 $ 163.00 0.08 $ 13.58 $ 1,909.64 11.10 $ 1,568.36 1,9.09.64 Planning Services & Expenses RETAINER , $ .:;1;909:64 [ '� _ �• , . ,� ., • f I `. i - '` i • . k- , • ♦ - � r- • • l °. ~ - e • •, • •.j I= - .. . J . • : . • . , 4 •••• y't� , : ' +♦ •a - 1... • Y r4 •.' ! . ; • - , • i. . • ,y ,•r ..• . •. 1 44 0 14 Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR I PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile www.buttecounty.net/dds www.buttegeneralplan.net ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * PLANNING September 4, 2009 Isaac Family Trust 2865 Coldwater Canyon Dr. Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Subject: 60 -day Notice of Action on three project located east of Highway 99, south of Durham Pentz Road: Use Permit 05-04 (Distribution Warehouse and Office; 040-130-047) Use Permit 05-05 (Gas Station and Market; 040-490-018), and Tentative Subdivision Map 04N-13 (to divide a 15.1 acre parcel into 14 parcels for light industrial use; 040-490-018 ) Dear Members of the Isaac Family Trust: You are being contacted as the owner of record for the above referenced properties. Our records indicate three 2004 and 2005 entitlement applications have not been deemed `complete' and are not actively being processed. We are attempting to work to completion all outstanding applications ,prior to adoption of Butte County's comprehensive update to the General Plan, GP2030. A brief status of the projects is as follows: UP05-04 Project is incomplete (August 24, 2006) Additional information was requested from CA Department of Fish and Game (July 13, 2004) Additional information and mitigation requested from CA Department of Transportation (September 1, 2004) This project remains inconsistent with the current and proposed General Plan designations for the site UP05-05 Project is incomplete (August 26, 2004) Project lacks adequate access (Butte County Public Works June 9, 2003) TSM04-13 , An Environmental Impact Report was determined necessary (July 9, 2004) While we understand the complexities of the project sites involved, and we have spoken with Mr. Bert Garland from time to time on related matters, no material advancement has been made relative to the entitlement applications on file. I spoke with Mr. Eric Robertson with Robertson & Dominick, as authorized agent, on September 4 about the status of the projects. In my telephone conversation, Mr. Robertson indicated that a wetland mitigation bank is currently being processed with State and federal agencies for a portion of the project area. He also indicated that industrial uses continue to be contemplated on that portion of the area designated for industrial use, and a revised map for TSM04-13 is anticipated to incorporate project modifications. The Department of Development Services has an expectation that projects not persist in the system for long periods of time without progress towards completion. From the Department's perspective, there are four options for the projects: 1. Withdraw the applications; 2. Submit required funds and materials that will allow the Department to begin processing your applications as submitted; 3. Provide updated project description(s), timeframes, additional applications (if necessary) and funds for processing; or 4. If we do not receive information from you relative to #1 #2 or #3 above by November 4, 2009, the projects will be moved forward to the Planning Commission for action with a recommendation of denial without prejudice. This means your projects would be denied for procedural reasons and not on their merits, leaving you free to resubmit them at such time as you are able to provide all the materials necessary for their processing. We would like to work with you to process these applications to completion, if that continues to be the desire, or to close them out if your plans have changed for the property. Depending on your planned objectives, we can provide additional detail on what additional materials are needed relative to #2 and #3 above. Please find attached an authorized agent form for each of the three applications. It is necessary that you re -submit these forms if pursing items #2 or #3, because property ownerships have changed since the applications were filed by Mr. William Isaac. After completing the forms with necessary owner signature(s), please return them to this office. Please let me know if you would like additional detail, have questions, or would like to discuss this matter further. You can contact me at 530-538-6573, Monday through Friday between 7:30am and 4:30pm, or via email at sjolliffegbuttecounty.net. Sincerely, Stacey Jolliffe Principal Planner cc: Eric Robertson, Robertson & Dominick, Inc. 888 Manzanita Court, Suite A, Chico, CA 95926 Butte County Department of Development Services TIM SNELLINGS, DIRECTOR 1 PETE CALARCO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538.7601 Telephone (530) 538.7785 Facsimile www.buttecountv.bet ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * PLANNING June 21, 2006 William Isaac 2865 Coldwater Canyon Drive Beverly Hills, CA, 90210 Re: Use. Permit, UP 05-05, 040-490-018 Dear Mr. Isaac: In an effort to keep our customers informed, we are notifying you that your project has been reassigned to Stacey Jolliffe and she can be reached at 538-7153, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Should you have any questions regarding your application, please call the planner listed above. Sincerely, LyRichardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant , Cc: Robertson & Dominick civil Engineers888 Manzanita Court, Suite A, Chico, CA 95926 �r William Isaac 2865 Coldwater Canyon Drive Beverly Hills, CA, 90210 Re: Use. Permit, UP 05-05, 040-490-018 Dear Mr. Isaac: In an effort to keep our customers informed, we are notifying you that your project has been reassigned to Stacey Jolliffe and she can be reached at 538-7153, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Should you have any questions regarding your application, please call the planner listed above. Sincerely, LyRichardson Planning/Administrative Support Service Assistant , Cc: Robertson & Dominick civil Engineers888 Manzanita Court, Suite A, Chico, CA 95926 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY ARNO] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOPPATION DISTRICT 3 703 B STREET P. O. BOX 911 MARYSVILLE, CA 95901-0911 PHONE (530) 741-4025 FAX (530) 741-5346 TTY (530) 741-4509 September 2, 2004 04BUT0028 03 -BUT -99, P.M. 23.6 Gas Station and Mini -Mart, UP 05-05 Application Flex your power! Be energy efficient! BUTTE COUNTY SEP - 7 2004 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Mr. Stephen Betts, Senior Planner Butte County ' Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397, Dear Mf. Betts: Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comments on the application for a use permit to construct a gas station and mini -market on,a portion of. a 15.1 acre parcel located along the south side of Durham-Pentz Road and the State Route (SR) 9.9/Durham-Pentz Road off -ramp, and east of SR 99, in the community of Durham. Our comments on_ the.application (project) are as follows: Potential aesthetic -impacts; mitigation measures sug eg sted: • On page 2 of the Environmental Information Form, item 21 indicates no change in scenic views or vistas from public lands or roads. Although the portion, of SR 99 adjacent to the project site has not been officially desibnated as a State Scenic Highway; and is not listed on the current eligibility list, improvements associated with this project will visually impact the State Route Corridor. We typically have concerns with parking, screening and visibility of structures, architectural styles, height and setbacks of buildings, and signs affecting the visual integrity -6f the highway corridor: To help mitigate any visual impacts to highway motorists due to the project, we suggest that a condition of approval or mitigation measure in the environmental document be added to the project that requires placement and maintenance of a vegetated, visual landscapebuffer along the west and south edge of the property to - adequately screen -the market, -gas pump, trash enclosure, and canopy areas and parking areas from the -SR -99 and SR 99/Durham-Pentz. Road off-rampylew shed. • Potential exposure to motorists traveling on SR 99 adjacent to the project site of excessive dight and glare should be evaluated in the environmental document and appropriate mitigation measures developed to minimize the impacts. "Caltrans improves mobility across California" Mr. Stephen Betts September 2, 2004 Page 2 Potential hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality impacts; mitigation requested: The proposed project site is located along the east shoulder of the off -ramp of northbound SR 99 and along the south shoulder of eastbound Durham-Pentz Road. The proposed project will redirect the un -named meandering creek bed that flows from the northeast to the southwest beneath Durham -Peutz Road and then beneath SR 99 from east to west. As proposed, the redirected channel will flow along the shoulder of the off -ramp until it reaches the existing double 8 -foot by 4 -foot RCB, where it currently crosses beneath the highway. The development of this site will increase impervious surface area through the construction of roads, driveways, parking areas, fuel stands, and buildings with a corresponding increase in surface water (storm water) runoff. This project will decrease surface water detention, retention and infiltration. • The project has the potential to create a significant negative hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality impact to the State's highway ROW. Any cumulative impacts to the State's drainage facilities arising from the effects of this development on surface water runoff discharge from the peak (100 -year) storm event should be minimized through project drainage mitigation measures. • We recommend that the environmental document prepared for the project include mitigation measures that will minimize potentially significant hydrology and water quality impacts to the State's drainage facilities. Such mitigation measures should include the following: Pre- and post -project hydrologic/hydraulic plans and calculations for the project showing the coverage quantities for buildings, streets, parking, and landscaped areas shall be required, and submitted to the Butte County and to the State Department of Transportation for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Said plans and calculations shall examine potential cumulative impacts to the State's drainage facilities arising from effects of development on surface water runoff discharge from the peak (100 year) storm event, and identify appropriate mitigation measures. Any potential increases of discharge into. the State drainage system-irust be .:litigated. Increases in peak runoff discharge for the 100 -year return storm event to the State's highway right-of-way and drainage facilities must be reduced to at or below the pre - construction levels. Runoff identified in the plans and calculations must meet all Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) water quality standards prior to entering the State's right-of-way or drainage facilities. No net increase to the surface water (storm water) peak runoff discharge (100 year storm event) within the State's right-of-way and drainage facilities may be realized as a result of the completion of the project. Best Management Practices (BMP) systems should be included to remove pollutants and to manage storm water prior to discharging into the State's right-of-way. Once installed, the property owner must properly maintain these systems. The proponent/developer may be held liable for future damages due to impacts for which adequate mitigation was not undertaken or sustained. Acceptable constituency levels and appropriate BMP information can be obtained from the RWQCB. "Caltrans improves mobility across California" r kr 1 - Mr. Stephen Betts September 2„2004 Page 3 • The requested drainage plans and calculations should be sent to Mr. Mike DeWall, District 3 Hydraulics Branch at the above address in Marysville. Mr. DeWall can be reached at (530) 741-4056. Potential transportation/traffic impacts; mitigation requested: • The -mini -market and gas station will generate additional vehicle trips, which may result in significant traffic circulation impacts to the SR99/Durham-Pentz Road/Durham-Dayton Road interchange and to Durham-Pentz Road. The Level of Service along Durham-Pentz Road will . ,continue to decrease as new development is constructed until this roadway is widened. The proposed development will also impact the timing for the need for the widening of the off -ramps to provide separate left and right turn lanes, and the interchange widening at Durham-Pentz Road/SR99. • The site plan did not show any widening, or placement of both a right turn lane and a left turn lane into the project access road. Without the widening of Durham -Peutz Road or construction of turn lanes, delay and back up of traffic through the traffic signal at the SR 99 northbound ramps at Durham-Pentz Road will increase. • The mini -market and gas station will increase traffic hazards. Without channelization, there may be a negative impact to the traffic operations on Durham -Peutz Road, including the likelihood of an increase in rear -end accidents. • A focused Traffic Impact Study (TIS), which contains appropriate mitigation measures, should be provided for in the environmental document prepared for the project in accordance with the "Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies” updated December 2002. A copy of the guide can be downloaded at htti)://www.dot.ca.Dov/hQ/traffol)s/develoosery/oi)erationalsystems/reports/tiseuide.Ddf. The TIS should include the following: ■ Trip generation, distribution, and assignment for both AM, PM, and college peak -hour volume data, and Level of Service analysis for the following scenarios: • Existing Conditions; • Existing + Proposed Project + Approved and Pending Projects in the area; and Proposed Project + Approved and Pending Projects + Cumulative Conditions. ■ Provide an Average Annual Daily Traffic that is representative of average daily traffic when schools are in session. This information will be needed by the County in evaluating the need for left turn channelization on Durham-Pentz Road, right turn channelization on the northbound off- ramp and left turn channelization on the.southbound off -ramp. ■ In order to help determine the number of vehicles anticipated to use facility, address the following questions: • Will the mini -mart be open 24 hours a day or not? • Will the primary feature of the facility be the gas station or the mini -mart? • Will the mini -mart house a fast food franchise or not? "Caltrans improves mobility across California" Mr. Stephen Betts September 2, 2004 Page 4 • Will the driveway geometrics permit trucks to exit out of the driveway off the proposed access road? • What Institute of Transportation Engineering Land Use Codes are being assumed? • How many fueling positions are planned. This information is critical in determining the number of vehicles anticipated to use this facility. ■ Determine what improvements should be required to mitigate project specific traffic and circulation impacts, or if the impacts would be limited to the assessment of traffic impact fees to mitigate cumulative traffic and circulation impacts. • Durham-Peritz Road from SR 99 to SR 191 is designated in the Butte County Bikeway Master Plan as a high priority segment. Bicyclists presently use this segment, and bicycle use is anticipated to increase once the SR 70/149/99 project is constructed. Therefore, we suggest that the County ensure that any development that fronts on Durham -Peutz Road dedicate frontage to construct a standard Class II bike lane. This frontage dedication should take into account if further expansion is needed for left turn or right turn lanes. The width needed for left turn lanes should not be taken from the shoulder but should be planned for by ROW dedication. Please see our additional ROW dedication comments below. • The SR 149/99 Interchange. project will impact some of the frontage along SR 99 near the Durham-Pentz interchange. We suggest that the applicant should check with the Project Manager of the interchange project to ensure that his design proposals will not be in conflict with the State's plans on the interchange project and their frontage road designs. Winder Bajwa is the Project Manager for the interchange project. Mr. Bajwa can be reached at (530) 741-4432: . Site Design Comments: • The location of the proposed access road is unacceptable. The State's Highway Design Manual recommends a minimum of 160 meters (525 feet) between an off -ramp intersection and any new roadway coniieetion. The location of.the proposed access road -does not meet this'minimum requirement. Therefore, we recommend that the proposed access road be moved to the east where it can be aligned opposite the existing private driveway on Durham-Pentz Road. • The site plan did not include what site signing was proposed. Signing should fit in with the surroundings, be aesthetically pleasing and not hinder sight distance along ramps or public road accesses to the property. Request ROW dedication as condition of approval: • The State ROW is controlled access along the entire west side of the project property and along Durham-Pentz Road 194.64 feet from the off ramp. Due to the cumulative traffic impacts caused from development in the area, additional lanes on the ramps will be required when the future interchange planned at the SR 99/Durham-Peutz Road is constructed. To provide the minimum improvements with enough room to construct one more lane on the northbound off ramp, the State will require an additional 12 feet of land for ROW so that permanent structures cannot be built in the area that is needed for the improvement. "Caltrans improves mobility across California" 0, Mr. Stephen Betts September 2, 2004 Page 5 • Although only part of the parcel is proposed for development with this application, we suggest that the County consider requiring the applicant to dedicate the additional 12 feet'of land for ROW in this first phase of the project. • Along Durham-Pentz Road the State will require a dedication of 17 feet of ROW to facilitate a right turn lane and a Class H bike lane, 12 feet and 5 feet respectively. The State will process the dedications when an encroachment permit is applied for. Once the dedications are recorded by the State and all other requirements of the encroachment permit are met, the State will issue the encroachment permit. • -It is suggested that the County, in compliance with Butte County Bikeway Master Plan, require the dedication of 17 feet of ROW along Durham-Pentz Road to provide the right turn only lane and the bike lane up to the proposed access road intersection. • We request that the County include in the conditions of approval for the use permit an _ irrevocable offer of dedication requirement to the State for the above stated ROW. For more .information on the dedication procedure, please contact Jim Adams at the California Department of Transportation, District 3, North Region Office of Surveyors, Right Of Way Engineering Department, P.O. Box 911, Marysville. Mr. Adams telephone number is (530) 741-5302. Encroachment Permit Required: • An Encroachment Permit will be required for any work conducted in the State's right of way, including for sign placement, traffic control, light installation, culvert maintenance, drainage pattern changes, sidewalk installation, or any new or rehabilitated access construction. To secure an application, please contact Mr. Bruce Capaul, Caltrans District 3, Office of Permits, at 530=741-4403. Please send us:a copy of the environmental document prepared for the project when available. If ...you' h.ave any questions regarding these comments, -please contact Prick Helman-,.Local Development/Inter-Governmental Review Coordinator, at (530) 634-7612. Sincerely, BRUCE DE TERRA, CHIEF Office of Transportation Planning - North "Caltrans improves mobility across California" Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538.7785 Facsimile ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * GIS * PLANNING August 5, 2004 Robertson & Dominick, Inc. 888 Manzanita Court, Suite A Chico, CA 95926 Re: Use Permit, UP 05-05, APN 040-490-018 Dear Mr. Isaac: In an effort to keep our customers informed, we are notifying all applicants about the current'status of their application and assigned Planner. Your project has been assigned to Stephen Betts and he can be reached at 538-7153, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Your project is being reviewed for completeness. Should you have any questions regarding your application, please call the planner listed above. Sincerely, Lynn Richard P lanning/Administrative Support Service Assistant cc: William Isaac Butte County Department of Development Services PLANNING DIVISION 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile Date August 6, 2004 �VTrF pO III Op i o o o FROM: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Robertson & Dominick, Inc., Use Permit - UP 05-05 rt APN: 040-490-018 DATE OF IDR*: 8/18/2004 *Inter -Departmental Review Committee IDR RESPONSE REGARDING COMPLETENESS OF APPLICATION DUE BY: August 16, 2004 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS/MITIGATION MEASURES DUE BY: September 2, 2004 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, to be determined at the Inter -Departmental Review (IDR) Committee meeting on 8/18/2004, and/or to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit to allow a gas station/mini-mart use. Included would be four 12,000 gallon underground storage tanks PROJECT LOCATION: on the south side of Durham-Pentz Road, approximately 0.2 miles east of SR -99, south of Chico I - COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.: 4 • ZONING: M-1 (Light Industrial) GENERAL PLAN: I (Industrial) If a response cannot be submitted prior to the due dates listed above, please call Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153 or send him an email at Sbetts@buttecounty.net. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for 12:00:00 AM, before the Planning Commission. IDR COMMITTEE - APPLICATION COMPLETE: ❑ No (Please send response to Stephen Betts by August 16, 2004) El Yes (Conditions/mitigation measures due by September 2, 2004) K:\Planning\Projects\CommentRequefform.dot "DRAFT" LEAD IN SHEET FILENO: �P 05-05 AP# 040- 4g0'OlP APPLICANT: �y V/ 2� FS °''� t 00,/K Cn LC L, /NC. OWNER: - but tl4pq REPRESENTATIVE: U�t J-S6K F- DGtM(n(_CL , lAI'C- PROPOSED REQUEST: (to befilled illed out by person taking in application) C---00 FINAL REQUEST: (to be filled ou by project planner) Use r -r 1' � a S nor -A WCO l a :620C O OyNa ^ s- SIZE: 1 s f e SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT # 4' EXISTING ZONING: NA GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ASSIGNED PLANNER: .JfiA� Date Application Received -7630 A L/ Date Proiect Assigned .1a 10 7' IDR Date l p f 30 Day Complete 8-2.710 5Z Preset Hearine Date 1271-0 2A 1 KAP1anning\Forms\Lead In Sheet.doc PLANNER'S INITIALS cZ rBUTTE COUNTY JUL 3 0 2004 DEVELOPMENT b -. SERVICES 46. j COMMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST County Offices and Cities: _ Chief Administrative Officer X Environmental Health _ Sheriff X LAFCo Biggs _ Oroville Information Systems Dept. X County Counsel Irrigation District: _ Butte Water _ OWID Table Mountain Irrigation Domestic Water _ Butte Water District OWID Sewer _ Butte Water District _ Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) Fire Protection X California Department of Forestry Recreation Districts _ Chico Area Recreation Paradise Recreation & Park Utilities _ZPG&E North - Chico _ PG&E South - Oroville State Agencies ZCaiTrans (Traffic) Corestry (Attn: Craig Carter) entral Reg. Water Quality Cont. _ Department of Conservation Dept.Social Services, Comm.Care Licensing Federal Agencies _ US Forest Service Army Corps of Engineers Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. _ Lime Saddle Dist _ Drainage _ Reclamation _ Butte Co. Mining Committee _Paradise Pines Com. Assoc. _Mosq. Abatement. Oroville/Butte Co X Develop. Services Director X Assesor BCAG Air Quality Mgmt. _ Gridley _ Paradise —Animal Control _Biggs/W. Gridley Water _ Paradise Irrigation Thennalito Irrigation _California Water Service Co. Thermalito IrrigationDistrict _ Themalito Irrigation L.O.A. PUD _ EI Medio Fire Protection District _ Durham Area Recreation Richvale Recreation & Parks _ Chambers Cable TV Viacom Cable TV _ Dept. of Water Resources _ Dept of Parks and Rec. _ Caltrans, Aeronautics Program Off. of Mining Reclamation US Bureau of Land Management National Marine Fisheries Sservice _ Community Association _ Butte Env.l Council _ Cal Native Plant Society _ Forest Ranch Community Assoc. Butte Ck. Watershed Conservancy • X Public Works Director X Building Manager _ ALUC _ Butte Co. Farm Bureau _ Chico _ Chico Airport Commission X Agricultural Commission _ Durham Irrigation _ Richvale Irrigation . Other _ Del Oro Water Co. Other Sterling City Sewer Main Feather River Rec. & Park ✓ Pacific Bell /Dept. of Fish and Game Highway Patrol Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations ZUS Fish & Wildlife Service School Districts K:\Planning\FormskDISTR.wpd A TRANSMITTAL From: Robertson & Dominick, Inc. Civil Engineers and Surveyors & 888 Manzanita Court, Suite A inc, Chico, CA 95926 530-894-3500 894-8955 fax robertson-dominick.com , Chico o Red Bluff o Redding 07/30/04 Of: BUTTE COUNTY, PLANNING DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES Re: ISAAC CONSTRUCTION - DP COMMERCE USE PERMIT CC: ❑ Urgent ❑ Please Reply ❑ Per Your Request • Comments: JOE: ' INCLUDED PLEASE FIND THE COMPLETED "USE PERMIT" ` APPLICATION AND CHECK FOR ISAAC CONSTRUCTION'S DP COMMERCE PROJECT. SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, OR COMMENTS PLEASE CALL ME. RUSS CBU'rr� OUNT'/ ' ENCL: ISAAC / DP COMMERCE 02-638 JUL 3 0 2004 DEVEI:0 'jqE T SERVICES 4 Butte County Department ofDevelopment Services YVONNE CHRISTOPHER, DIRECTOR 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile ADMINISTRATION * BUILDING * GIS * PLANNING August.26, 2004 .'William Isaac _ 2865 Coldwater Canyon Drive Beverly Hills,. CA 90210 Re: ' Proj ect Incomplete –Use Permit for a Gas Station/Mini-Mart for William Isaac. on APN 040-490-018, File # UP 05-05 Dear Mr. Isaac: On August 18, 2004, the Butte County Inter -Departmental Review Committee (IDR) reviewed the above referenced project for completeness. The IDR determined that the project is incomplete for the following reasons: 1. The site plan submitted with your application shows that access to the project site would be from a new road off of Durham -Peutz Road. A portion of the 60 -foot wide road easement would lie on an adjacent parcel (APN 040-490-036), which is ---- -riot a part of the–project and is--uirder �eparare owrierslup (Horning).—Y6ur -- - Tentative Subdivision Map recently submitted shows that access to Durham-Pentz Road would be completely over APN 040-490-036. At our meeting of August 12, 2004, it was understood that you would be 'submitting a revised Tentative Subdivision Map showing the access road completely on your parcel. We require that you submit a revised site plan for this Use Permit project that shows the proposed access from Durham=Pentz Road to be the same as will'be for your Tentative Subdivision Map. 2. Insufficient information was received with your Use Permit application regarding on-site sewage disposal. The Butte County Environmental Health Division cannot evaluate your Use Permit project until such time as they receive detailed information on waste disposal. It was also discussed at the August 12 meeting that on-site sewage disposal must occur on the same parcel that the proposed use would occur on. Also discussed was the fact that Butte County Board of Supervisor's Resolution 87-108 does not permit the .use of ponds --for sewage disposal. The Butte County Environmental Health Division also requires that you 1 submit detailed information on the quantity and quality of groundwater that would. be utilized for the proposed gas station/mini-mart. 3. The Butte County Public Works Department cannot evaluate your Use Permit project until such time as they receive a detailed traffic study, including existing traffic conditions and the average daily traffic that the proposed gas station/mini- mart would generate. Additionally, the Public Works Department requires that the location of the access road be determined before they can comment on your proj ect. 4. The south side of the project site lies adjacent to a Grazing and Open Land General Plan designation. The current policies of the Agricultural Element of the Butte County General Plan require a 300 -foot .building setback from lands designated as Grazing and Open Land. Please submit a revised site plan that shows a 300 -foot building setback from the south property line. 5.. The following studies will need to be prepared to allow the County to adequately review the project pursuant fo the California Environmental Quality Act: • Biological/botanical study (rare, threatened, or endangered plant and animal species) • Wetlands/vernal pool- delineations • Archaeological study As was discussed at the August 12 meeting, you have already prepared these studies. However, I have not yet received a copy of these studies. No further processing of this project will occur until such time as the required information is submitted to, reviewed, and approved by the applicable County department. The timelines pursuant to the California Permit Streamlining Act are hereby suspended until such time as the required information is submitted. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter please contact me between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, at (530) 538-7153, or via e-mail at sbetts@buttecounty.net. Sincerely, Stephen Betts Senior Planner cc: Robertson & Dominick, Inc. 2 Department J. Michael Crump, Director Warner C. Phillips, Assistant Director June 9, 2003 Russell Erickson, P.E. Robertson & Dominick 888 Manzanita Court, Suite A Chico, CA 95926 Public Works Re: D P Commerce Center, AP 040-490-018, SI -703 Dear Mr. Erickson: LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7266 (FAX) 538-7171 We have begun review of your May 9, 2003, submittal and have several concerns. The first being that a proposal of this type requires a Use Permit and permits from the Building Division and Environmental Health Division, unfortunately this proposal has not been applied for or submitted to all of the appropriate Departments for review, comment and approval. The second major concern is the proposed access to Durham Pentz, Road. This property has access from Falager Court, the proposed access on Durham Pentz Road is offset from the proposed road to the north and to close to the Highway 99 ramps for traffic safety and therefore cannot be approved. Access to Durham Pentz Road in this area would need to align with the approach on the north side of Durham Pentz Road at station 49 + 60, as shown on the attached plans file E-2388. This would require an easement from the neighboring property to the east.. Minimum requirements for commercial access at this location would be -public road approach, left turn channelization, acceleration and deceleration lanes. Standard plan and profile sheets are required for all proposed road improvements. The third major concern is storm drainage. Insufficient information has been provided with respect to your streambed alteration to determine if the concept has been permitted or otherwise approved by the State Department of Fish and Game. Insufficient tributary and grade information has been provided to evaluate your proposed channel along the westerly property line to the existing Highway 99 crossing. Please remember that Butte County Improvement Standards require a minimum of 1.5 freeboard above a Qio design water surface, the plans indicate 1 foot but do.not relate to a design storm. A hydraulic analysis needs to be provided to show the relationship of the detention basin to this proposed channel in a typical storm situation (Qlo and D P Comeree Center June 9, 2003 Page 2 of 2 Qioo) to evaluate storm water storage and peak runoff attenuation expected from your design. Most of the information printed on the plan is too small to be legible on the print and the contour information is illegible, therefore the extent of the extent of the proposed storm drainage system and drainage basin tributary area is unknown. Please submit the appropriate information to the above noted Divisions. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact this office Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., at (530) 538-7266. Sincerely, 'Z'' - Stuart Edell, P. E. Manager, Land Development Division SE cc: Mike Crump, Director of Public Works (File 300) Yvonne Christopher,. Director of Development Services Doug Fogel, Program Manager, Environmental Health Division Tom Kuykendall, Associate Civil Engineer Mike Mays, Associate Surveyor I - l BERT. GARLAND � te=a" REAL ESTATE av CA NSULTING i ¢ #A Cell: (530) 200-0900 Q 1802 North Carson Street i * dd Fax: (775) 884-1938 i �., Suite 212 701 Email: Garlandcanv@msn.com Carson City. NV 89� California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Terry Tamminen Arnold Schwarzenegger .Secretaryfor Redding Office Governor Environmental 415 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 100, Redding, California 96002 Protection Phone (530) 224-4845 • FAX (530) 224-4857 _ http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwgcb5 ' 13 August 2004 BUTTE COUMV AUG Stephen Betts DESERvICESN Butte County Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Z_ a COMMENTS ON WILLIAM ISAAC UP 65-05 FOR GAS STATION/MINI MART, APN 0404-490-018, SOUTH OF CHICO, BUTTE COUNTY We have reviewed an application for a use permit (UP. 05-05) for a new gas station/mini mart at the intersection of SR 99 and Durham Pentz Road. Earlier this year, the proponent of the project, William Isaac, applied for a tentative subdivision map for the same parcel. We sent you comments on the proposed subdivision in a letter date 2 July 2004 and find these comments are also relevant to the proposed use permit. The only additional comment we would have relates to sewage disposal. The use permit application states the "property is or [is] proposed to be on septic," implying onsite disposal. However, there is no discussion of onsite disposal in the application. The provided map shows a sewer main terminating at the southern boundary of the property. Documents provided previously by Mr. Isaac's engineer indicate that wastewater from the subject parcel will be conveyed off site and disposed of on another parcel, which is also owned by Mr. Isaac. The wastewater disposal plan for the other parcel, submitted to 'the Regional Board in December 2003, has been declared incomplete.' It appears, therefore, that no demonstrated means of wastewater disposal exists for the proposed gas station/mini mart. If you have any questions, please contact me at (530) 224-3249 or the letterhead address. Ray Bruun, P.E. Associate Engineer Shasta -Cascade Watershed RB: sae �;.'J t.-%'�t~ti is [`r�`i^ �'iE: • d'..!�' 4'."i t'�`. - roJ.r v h :ieVC a r' . �»�.Z t.F .i^" ► . `(fit^ l t' ♦.. -'" <�: a '- f trC• California Environmental Protection Agency 4Ma Recycles! Paper BUTTE COUNTY, STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR ` USE PERMIT APPLICANT: Robertson & Dominick, Inc. for DATE: 7/30/2004 William Isaac AGENT: Robertson & Dominick, Inc. APN: 040-490-018 - FILE #: UP 05-05 PLANNER: Stephen Betts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit to allow a gas station/mini-mart use. Included would be four 12,000 gallon underground storage tanks Those items checked are conditions of approval. - PLEASE CONTACT THE BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CHECKED CONDITIONS: X 1. Construction; installation or development of structures or facilities on the parcels/lots'shall comply with the latest California Fire Safe Regulations, (Public Resources Code 4290), and all other applicable State and County codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of application for improvement permits. • X 2. Building identification and/or addresses shall be installed in conformance with Public Resources Code 4290 and shall be posted at the beginning of building construction and maintained continuously thereafter. X 3. Fire hydrant identification, reflector or post reflectors shall be installed acceptable to the County Fire Warden. ❑ 4. In lieu of a pressurized water system or water storage tank, payment of $200.00 per created parcel into the Battalion water tend fund, is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. X 5. A pressurized community water system for fire protection is required. The specific locations and fire flow requirements shall be in accordance with the Fire Department specifications and to the satisfaction of the County Fire Warden. Average required hydrant spacing _300_ feet, hydrant size _6 inches, and residual fire flow _2000_ gpm. Submit plans to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction of facilities. ❑ 6. In lieu of hydrant installation, payment may be made into the hydrant fund at a cost of $1.72 per lineal foot of street frontage. The estimated fee amount is $ ❑ 7. Prior to recordation of the Map or application for a building permit, the applicant shall pay the then current fee for the West Chico Fire Station Fund. ❑ 8. Provide an all weather access of at least 10 foot wide and with a vertical clearance of 15 feet that will accommodate a 40,000 pound fire apparatus to all structures. ❑ 9. Provide plans and specifications to the Butte County Fire Marshal to determine compliance with fire and life safety standards of Titles 19 and 24, California Code of Regulations. X 10. Install commercial sprinklers in all buildings and fueling area per NFPA 13 Revised 8/13/03RT Butte County Department of Development Services PLANNING DIVISION 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 538-7601 Telephone (530) 538-7785 Facsimile August 5, 2004 TO: Inter -Departmental Review Committee FROM: Stephen Betts, Butte County Planning Division SUBJECT: Request for Comments on a Development/Land Use Application APPLICANT: Robertson & Dominick, Inc. for William Isaac, Use Permit - UP 05-05 APN: 040-490-018 DATE OF IDR*: 8/18/2004 *Inter -Departmental Review Committee IDR RESPONSE REGARDING COMPLETENESS OF APPLICATION DUE BY: August 16, 2004 , AGENCY/DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS/MITIGATION MEASURES DUE BY: September 2, 2004 The Planning Division has received a project application as described below. This application is being provided to you for review. This is your opportunity to make comments regarding the completeness of this application, to be determined at the Inter -Departmental Review (IDR) Committee meeting on 8/18/2004, and/or to recommend conditions and/or mitigation measures relevant to your agency's/department's area of expertise and jurisdiction. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Use Permit to allow a gas station/mini-mart use. Included would be four 12,000 gallon underground storage tanks PROJECT LOCATION: on the south side of Durham-Pentz Road, approximately 0.2 miles east of SR -99, south of Chico COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.: 4 ZONING: M-1 (Light Industrial) GENERAL PLAN: I (Industrial) If a response cannot be submitted prior to the due dates listed above, please call Stephen Betts at (530) 538-7153 or send him an email at Sbetts@buttecounty.net. You do not have to respond to this request if you have no comments to include. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A hearing on this application has been tentatively scheduled for 12/09/04, before the Planning Commission. IDR COIVIIMIITTEE '=' APPLICATION COMPLETE: No (Please send response to Stephen Betts by August 16, 2004) Yes (Conditions/mitigation measures due by September 2, 2004) I. See memo tiom Mike Crump to Stephen Betts, dated July 7, 2004 for comments with respect to site access from Durham Dayton Highway. Provide copy of recorded documents from neighboring property granting access or revise plan to show access from Falager Court. 4 V _ __ �—_�_�--•-- _�..�____.--._._�_.___ • a .. _ r i �. ___��. .. _. A � 1 - � 1 • I� A� ._______�_—�—._ ' i ; t I _— I � � ' I '� � - � .. I I�� �I Betts, Steve - From: Wannenmacher, Felix Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 3:07 PM To: Betts, Steve; Christopher, Yvonne; Baker, Joseph , Cc: Miller, Gloria Subject: Robertson & Dominick Application (UP 05-05) A#04-326 Hi Steve, Yvonne, and Joe, There is a concurrent application for a map on this property. You need to determine whether this application is consistent with that one. If it is not, bring it to the attention of the applicant and ask which he wishes to pursue. Felix CONFIDENTIAL -- ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email transmission, and any documents or messages attached to it, may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for ' - delivering this email to the intended recipient, then you are (1) notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, saving, reading or use of this information is strictly prohibited, (2) requested to discard and delete this email and any attachments, and (3) requested to immediately notify us by email that you mistakenly received this message. Thank you. • 1 .Y f • 1 R 4 SEP -02-2004 16:43 CALTRANS D3 PLANNING 530,741 5346 P:01i06 _ ,STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TR OATATION • FACSIMILE COVERA& MR•i009 (AEV 07/92) _ Attention From Steve Betts - NORTH REGION — DISTRICT 3 _ Division of Planning, Office of Regional & Transit Planning 703 "B" Street P.O. Box 911 Marysville, CA 95901 U&VC,ompany Sender's Name Butte County Planning Rick Heiman Date , Total Pages (Including rover) September 2, 2004 6 Subject FAX # (area code) CALNET FAX # (530) 741-5346 8.457-5346 Comment Letter for UP 05-05, Gas Station & Mini -Mart, SR 99 & D -P Rd - Phone #(area code) email. (530) 634-7612 rheiman@dot.ca.gov . Phone # (area code) FAX # (ansa code) Number of Pages Sent 530-538-7153 530-538-7785. 5 RECEIVED., SEP. '.2 2004 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES . SEP -02-2004 16:43 CALTRANS D3 PLANNING ,DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPITATION .DISTRICT 3' 703 B STREET P. O. BOX 911 MARYSVILLE, CA 95901.0911 PHONE (530) 741.4025 FAX (530) 741.5346 TTY (530) 741-4509 September 2, 2004 04BU1'0028 03-BUC-99, P.M. 23.6 Gas Station and Mini -Mart, UP 05-05 Application Mr. Stephen Betts, Senior Planner Butte County Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Dear Mr. Betts: 530 741 5346 P.02i06 Flex your poi Wee Be energy '08riend Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comments on the application for a use permit to construct a gas station and mini -market on a portion of a 15.1 acre parcel located along the south side of Durham-Pentz Road and the State Route (SR) 99/Durham-Pentz Road off -ramp, and east of SR 99, in the community of Durham. Our comments on the application (project) are as follows: Potential aesthetic impacts; mitigation measures sueQested: • On page 2 of the Environmental Information Form, item 21 indicates no change in scenic views or vistas from public lands or roads. Although the portion of SR 99 adjacent to the project site has not been officially designated as a State Scenic Highway, and is not listed on the current eligibility list, improvements associated with this project will visually impact the State Route Corridor. We typically have concerns with parking, screening and visibility of structures, architectural styles, height and setbacks of buildings, and signs affecting the visual integrity of the highway corridor. To help mitigate any visual impacts to highway motorists due to the project, we suggest that a condition of approval or mitigation measure in the environmental document be added to the project that requires placement and maintenance of a vegetated, visual landscape buffer along the west and south edge of the property to adequately screen the market, gas pump, trash enclosure, and canopy areas and parking areas from the SR 99 and SR 99/Durham-Peutz Road off -ramp view shed. • Potential exposure to motorists traveling on SR 99 adjacent to the project site of excessive light and glare should be evaluated in the environmental document and appropriate mitigation measures developed to minimize the impacts. "Caltrans improves mamity across Caljlomin" 4 RECEIVED SEP 2 2004 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SEP -02-2004 16:43 CALTRANS D3 PLANNING ' ,i30 741 5346 P.03/06 • • �. • Mr. Stephen Betts " . - ` September 2, 2004 ' Page 2 Potential h drolo 'c h drew 'c and water qualitY im acts mitigation uested: The proposed project site. is located along the east shoulder of the off -ramp of.northbound SR 99 and along the south shoulder of eastbound Durham-Pentz Road. The proposed project will redirect the un -named meandering creek bed that flows from the northeast to the southwest beneath Durham-Pentz Road and then beneath SR 99 from east to west. As proposed, the y ' redirected channel will flow along the shoulder of the off -ramp until it reaches the existing double 8 -foot by 4 -foot RCB, where it currently crosses beneath the highway. The development of this site will increase impervious surface area through the construction of roads, driveways, parking areas, fuel stands, and buildings with a corresponding increase in surface water (storm water) runoff. This project will decrease surface water detention, retention and infiltration. The project has the potential to create a significant negative hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality impact to the State's highway ROW. Any cumulative impacts to the State's drainage , facilities arising from the effects of this development on surface water runoff discharge from ` the peak (100 -year) storm event should be minimized through project drainage mitigation measures. • We recommend that the environmental document prepared for the project include mitigation measures that will minimize potentially significant hydrology and water quality impacts to the State's drainage facilities. Such mitigation measures should include the following: • Pre- and post -project hydrologic/hydraulic plans and calculations for the project showing . the coverage quantities for buildings, streets, parking, and landscaped areas shall be ' required, and submitted to the Butte County and to the State Department of Transportation for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Said plans and calculations shall examine potential'cumulative impacts to the State's drainage facilities arising from effects of development on surface water runoff discharge from the ' peak (100 year) storm event, and identify appropriate mitigation measures. Any potential increases of discharge into the State drainage system must be mitigated. ■ Increases in peak runoff discharge for the 100 -year return storm event to the State's highway right-of-way and drainage facilities must be reduced to at or below the pre - construction levels. Runoff identified in the plans and calculations must meet all Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) water quality standards prior to - entering the State's right-of-way or drainage facilities. No net increase to the surface water (storm water) peak runoff discharge (1.00 year storm event) within the State's right-of-way and drainage facilities may be realized as a result ' of the completion of the project. Best Management'Praetices (BMP) systems should be included to remove pollutants and to manage storm water prior to discharging into the State's right-of-way. Once installed, the property owner must properly maintain these systems. The proponent/developer may be held liable for future damages due to impacts for which adequate mitigation was not _ undertaken or sustained. Acceptable constituency levels and appropriate BMP information can be obtained from the RWQCB. ' "Calrroar improver maluliry arroec Colitumia" r s � r SEP -02-2004 16:43 CALTRANS D3 PLANNING 530 ?41 5346 P.04i06' Mr. Stephen Betts • • _ September 2, 2004 Page 3 r • The requested drainage plans and calculations should be sent to Mr. Nuke DeWall, District 3 Hydraulics Branch at the above address in Marysville. Mr. DeWall can be reached at (530) 741-4056. ' Potential transportation/traffic impacts,• mitigation rid: • The mini -market and gas station will generate additional vehicle trips, which may result in significant traffic circulation impacts to the SR99/Durharn-Pent. Road/Durham-Dayton Road interchange and to Durham -Peutz Road. The bevel of Service along Durham -Peutz Road will continue to decrease as new development is constructed until this roadway is widened. The proposed s development will also impact the timing for the need for the widening of the off -ramps to provide separate left and right turn lanes, and the interchange widening at Durham -Peutz Road/SR99. • The site plan did not show any widening, or placement of both a right turn lane and a left turn lane into the project access road. Without the widening of Durham -Peutz Road or construction of turn lanes, delay and back up of traffic through the traffic signal at the SR 99 northbound ramps at Durham-Pentz Road will increase. , • The mini -market and gas station will increase traffic hazards. Without channelization, there may be a negative impact to the traffic operations on Durham -Peutz Road, including the likelihood of an increase in rear -end accidents. • A focused Traffic Impact Study (TIS), which contains appropriate mitigation measures, should be provided for in the environmental document prepared for the project in accordance with the "Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies" updated December 2002. A copy of the guide can be downloaded at htt ://www.dot.ca. ov/hq/traffops/develoDserv/oDei-ationalsystems/reports/tiseuide.vdf. The TIS should include the following: • Trip generation, distribution, and assignment for both AM, PM, and college peak -hour volume data, and Level of Service analysis for the following scenarios: • Existing Conditions; • Existing + Proposed Project + Approved and Pending Projects in the area; and • Proposed Project + Approved and Pending Projects + Cumulative Conditions. • Provide an Average Annual Daily Traffic that is representative of average daily traffic when schools are in session. This information will be needed by the County in evaluating the need for left turn channelization on Durham -Peutz Road, right turn channelization on the northbound off- ramp and left turn channelization on the southbound off -ramp. • In order to help determine the number of vehicles anticipated to use facility, address the following questions: • Will the mini -mart be open 24 hours a day or not? • Will the primary feature of the facility be the gas station or the mini -mart? • 1 Will the mini -mart house a fast food franchise or not? "Catrmns lmpraver maobiliry urmss ralifomia•' SEP -02-2004 16:43. - , CALTRANS D3 PLANNING, 530 741 5346' P.05/06 Mr. Stephen Betts, September 2, 2004. • ' Page 4 • . - : • • •Will the drivewayeometrics permit '�� . � ,,. • � � � • - • r , g p - t wcks to exit out of the driveway off the • 1 proposed access mad? • ' What Institute of Transportation Engineering .hand 'Use Codes are being assumed? • How many fueling positions are planned. This information is critical in determining ' . r • . the number of vehicles anticipated to use this facility. ■ Determine what improvements should be required to mitigate project specific traffic and , circulation impacts, or if the impacts would be limited to the assessment of traffic impact fees to mitigate cumulative traffic and circulation impacts. • • Durham -Peutz Road from SR 99 to SR 191 is designated in the Butte County Bikeway Master Plan as a high priority segment: Bicyclists presently use this segment, and bicycle use is anticipated to increase once the SR 70/149/99 project is constructed. Therefore, we suggest that the County ensure that any development that fronts on Durham -Peutz Road dedicate frontage to construct a standard Class 11 bike lane. This frontage dedication should r take into account if further expansion is needed for left tumor right turn lanes. The width needed for left turn lanes should not be taken from the shoulder but should be planned for by ROW dedication. Please see our additional ROW dedication comments below. • The SR 149/99 Interchange project will impact some of the frontage along SR 99 near the' Durham-Pentz interchange. We suggest that the applicant should check with the Project. y ` Manager of the interchange project to ensure that his design proposals will not be in conflict with the State's plans on the interchange project and their frontage road designs. Winder 6 Bajwa is the Project Manager for the interchange project. Mr. Bajwa can be reached at (530) 741-4432.` Site Desien Comments: _ • The location of the proposed access road is unacceptable. The State's Highway Design Manual recommends a minimum of 160 meters (525 feet) between an off -ramp intersection and any new roadway connection. The location of the proposed access road does not meet this minimum requirement. Therefore, we recommend that the proposed access road be moved to the east where it can be aligned opposite the existing private driveway on Durham -Penta Road. • The site plan did not include what site signing was proposed. Signing should fit in with the r surroundings, be aesthetically pleasing and not hinder sight distance along ramps or public ti road accesses to the property. Request ROW dedication as condition of a val: The State ROW is controlled access along the entire west side of the project property and r along Durham-Pentz Road 194.64 feet from the off ramp. Due to the cumulative traffic impacts caused from development in the area, additional lanes on the ramps will be required when the future interchange planned at the SR 99/Durham-Pentz Road is constructed. To provide the minimum improvements with enough room to construct one more lane on the northbound off ramp, the State will require an additional 12 feet of land for ROW so that permanent structures cannot be built in the area that is needed for the improvement. ' - "Ca/r►anrlmprovra mnhility ecm.c.c Cof(%umia" , I -, "• .d .. ' , • ; . . .. a .j r � r f • , s }'- ♦ ' SEP -02-2004 16:44 CALTRANS D3 PLANNING 530 741 5346 P.06i06. Mr. Stephen Bett • September 2, 2004 Page 5 Although only part of the parcel is proposed for development with this application, we suggest that the County consider requiting the applicant to dedicate the additional 12 feet of land for ROW in this first phase of the project. Along Durham-Pentz Road the State will require a dedication of 17 feet of ROW to facilitate a right turn lane and a Class If bike lane, 12 feet and 5 feet respectively. The State will process the dedications when an encroachment permit is applied for. Once the dedications are recorded by the State and all other requirements of the encroachment permit are met, the State will issue the encroachment permit, • It is suggested that the County, in compliance with Butte County Bikeway Master Plan, require the dedication of 17 feet of ROW along Durham -Peutz Road to provide the right turn only lane and the bike lane up to the proposed access road intersection_ We request that the County include in the conditions of approval for the use permit an irrevocable offer of dedication requitement to the State for the above stated ROW. For more information on the dedication procedure, please contact Jim Adams at the California Department of Transportation, District 3, North Region Office of Surveyors, Right Of Way Engineering Department, P.O. Box 911, Marysville. Mr. Adams telephone number is (530) 741-5302. Encroachment Permit Required: An Encroachment Permit will be required for any work conducted in the State's right of way, including for sign placement, traffic control, light installation, culvert maintenance, drainage pattern changes, sidewalk installation, or any new or rehabilitated access construction. To secure an application, please contact Mr. Bruce Capaul, Caltrans District 3, Office of Permits, at 530-741-4403. Please send us a copy of the environmental document prepared for the project when available. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Rick Helman, Local Development/Inter-Governmental Review Coordinator, at (530) 634-7612. Sincerely, BRUCE DE TERRA, CHIEF Office of Transportation Planning - North "Callmns HnPrftes Innhlliry arr»,ee California" TOTAL P.06 WPacific Gas and Electric Company 460 Rio Lindo Avenue Don Chambers ell Chico, CA 95926 Chico Land Rights Office 530/894-4423 FAX 530/894-4414 BUTTE COUNTY AUG 16 2004 August 12, 2004 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Mr. Stephen Betts Butte County Department of Development Services, Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 RE-: Use-Permit-(Rolbertson &- Dominick, Inc:) File: UP 05-05, APN: 040-490-018 Dear Mr. Betts: We have reviewed the subject site plan. Any relocation or rearrangement of any existing PG&E facilities in the area to accommodate this project will be at the expense of the developer. There shall be no building of structures, or the storage of any materials allowed over or under any existing PG&E facilities, or inside any easements that exist. Thank you for the opportunity to review this matter. If you have any questions, please call me in Chico at 894-4423. Sincerely, Donald W. Chambers Land Agent (file: UP05-05.doc) . .. .. ➢_. ..._ .....c .. ..S s.e S . ... ➢ ... �� o. ,1. I 2525 Dominic Drive, Suite J Chico, CA 95928 (530)891-2882 (530) 891-2878 Fax August 24, 2004 Stephen Betts, Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Robertson & Dominick, Inc., Use Permit UP -05-05 Dear Mr. Betts: W. James Wagoner Air Pollution Control Officer Robert McLaughlin Asst Air Pollution Control Officer Vr." BUTTE 77, COUNTY AUG 2 6 2004 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES The District has reviewed the request for comments 4o allow a gas station/mini-mart to be located on the south side of Durham-Pentz Road, east of SR -99, south of Chico. Based on the information submitted the District recommends incorporating the District Indirect Source Review Guidelines standard mitigation measure into the proposed project. In addition,, the applicant will be required to obtain a District Authority to Construct Permit for the gasoline dispensing facility prior to construction. , Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed project. If you have any questions, please contact me at 891-2882. Sincerely, Gail Williams Air Quality Planner File No 3452 i t:\aMsJi1es\eir\bcup0505gas.doc r\bcup0505gas.doc 2525 Dominic Drive, Suite J Chico, CA 95928 (530) 891-2882 (530) 891-2878 Fax August 24, 2004 Stephen Betts, Butte County Department of Development Services Planning Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Robertson & Dominick, Inc., Use Permit UP -05-05 Dear Mr. Betts: W. James Wagoner Air Pollution Control Officer Robert McLaughlin Asst Air Pollution Control Officer ' BUTTE COUNTY AUG 2 6 2004 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES The District has reviewed the request for comments to allow a gas station/mini-mart to be located on the south side of Durham -Peutz Road, east of SR -99, south of Chico. Based on the information submitted the District recommends incorporating the District Indirect Source Review Guidelines standard mitigation measure into the proposed project. In addition, the applicant will be required to obtain a District Authority to Construct Permit for the gasoline dispensing facility prior to construction. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed project. If you have any questions, please contact the District at 891-2882. Sincerely, f S d f Gail Williams Air Quality Planner File No 3452 t:\apps_files\eir\bcup05O5g3s.doc COUNTY OF BUTTE , AUDITOR'S CERT 1FICATE AND TREASURER'S RECEWT OROVILLE, CA ATR NO 76548 RECEIVED FROM PLANNING INN BAG 3'z,Q DATE 812f2004 - FUND FUND DEP ACCT. CASH DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE CODE AMOUNT DEPOSIT DATE: BQ RECEIPTS: 4074 1-407W..6 PLANNING APDL FEES GENL W10 44tlWl 42509W 101001 TMAS ` Project Number _ _Amount of Fee PN:04 i'�Q-Q3� iei C CONST - UP 051 t $2,970.001 FN:C4 � �!��C � 0NS - UP 06•� �5 $2,970.f10 �-_.PN:026-090034 PAT A Ir rsER AC tui 0,. Cc 5-. - � , � _,� �' 4 00.00 APN:030-432-C47 R. HALL & CO TSLA04-03 $1,058.49 LAND DEVELOPMENT GENL 0010 44(4004 4611760 101001 331X0 • Project Number Amount of Fee PN ('49-1 iS C �._Oi�1ST- UP 05-04 � $i465.0p R1:04i]�&3^ ' S C CGtdST- UP 0 Q $465.00 .IRO6�liViEf�TAL FILTI-I C»ENL. 00110 54MM 4614501 1C;1Eo1 370.00 Pruiect lNumber Amount of Fee PIU:040` 3��S AC CONST- UP 05-0A � $485.00 PW3. ''3.' �.. C Cvf'LSi- :1P CS-Q"es, $185.00 iRE PLNG ADPL FEE FIRE PROTECT 0100 4617240 101001 36.00 Project Number- Amount of Fee PIS! Cl4C't- "�1-Ci38 In1� .0 CG�Lr-r- UP tic,i14 _ .� $43.Q0 04 CONS i C' - UP 054�0� $43.00 I►&i 'C} f"as4C � CLERK'S FILING FEE. GENL 0010 470001 4612319 101001 12.00 ($i) Project Number Amount of Fee APPJ:t 40- i 3333 IS.�C CONS f'- UP 05-04 ��+ $36.00 - ��4�-4 is GOKIST- UP a5. 4- ESS _ - TOTAL 5 7,956.19 I"O277 Kai APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR-CONTROLLER TREASURER Ite=treasu ep Pink--auditor canacir deposito - noWen coc=fite Y 1 . COUNTY OF BUTTE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE AND `i REASURER'SS RECEWT ORQ',vgLE-E, CA ti ATR RECEIVED FROM PLANNING BAG ®AI FUND FUND DEPT' ACCT CA DESCRIPTION TITLE CODE CODE CODE. CO RECEIPTS: 407051-407056 �PLA.NNING'APPL FEES rENL M0 440W1 425 .I 101001 7,M.19 Project Number Amount of Fee APM04i tQ-03? C,,,�CC-CON CONS T - UP 0-5-04 $2,970.00PN-04 ST - uP 05-04- 85 ..$2,970.00 �`.W026--090-J034IiA- Til EKIOA'SSER ADMI 05-05 - <PN:030-132-ai7 P HALL & CO TSV 04-a3 $4,a5s.13 LAND DEVELOPMENT T OENL 0010 44CO04 46117LIC 101wi 330 -OIL Project Number Amount of Fee - FN**'4G ,'-G�_s iS C t_CiiiST- UP M-04 $165.an A (14ST-CSP 05-84— IR 5.84 -IRGENL 0010 -540M 4614901 101WIl 370.00 Project Number Amount of Fee PG4a-�"`CFa3 S: C CONST- LP 05-04 $185.00 l . PP4:G4 C C lms-e, up Ci' -� $185.00 l4RE FIRE PROTECT 016 4617240 MOW 06.00 Froded Number Arnount of Fee PN 04ci- ` L1-Ci38 I =A C �: ON!5-r - UP ?i5-G4� $43.GQ G4 i C C�`NS T -IJP 05- Q ^ $43.00 NO L6 CIE CLERK'S FILING FEE GE --NL CM 47 11 46i2M 101001 P2.aa -- {$36) Projeut Number Amount of Fee APN:040-130-038 jSAAC CONST - OF 05 -CA X39-00 - �t:f1 E�}[ &4S.AAC CONST- UP 05-G4- a ' $39.60 � TOTAL$ 7,950.19 FOR MAI APPROVED BY: RECEIVED BY: AUDITOR-COMWOLLER TREASURER BY Ite-treasureo pink= auditor canarv---deposito - aolcien rod=fite i;: I Monday, August 02, 2004 Counter _ Person Mark rk Payment Date1-7/30/2004 Receipt Number 407052 Development Services PLANNING DIVISION ver. 1.0 Received From Isaac Construction T $2,970.00 Robertson & Dominick Applicant UP #05-05 Application Number or In Reference To (Land Development) 040-490-018 Parcel Number y Check Number/ Cash $3,399.00 Total Received Total Fees x$3,399.00 DDS Planning $2,970.00 (General Fund) Public Works T $165.00 (Land Development) Environmental Health $185.00 $43.00 CDF (Fire Department) $36.00 NOD / NOE (Recording Fee) Minnie $0.00 1Aunt $1, 500 or $2,000 Planning Review / EIR $0.00 Fish/Game ALUC (Airport Land Use) Non Sufficient Funds ($25.00 Fee) Cell Tower ($2500.00) Public Sales/Copies Other: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 - $0.00 $0.00 • BUTTE COUM y _y September 9, 2009 SEP 9 0109 Ms. Stacy Jolliffe, Butte, County Planning Dept.. DEVELOPMENT 7 County Center Drive SERVICES Oroville, CA 95965 _ - - -Re: Pe6jecfiApplications fog William Isaac (now Isaac Family Trust) Dear Ms. Jolliffe, Thank you for your letter, addressed to the Members of the Isaac Family Trust, dated September 4, 2009. It does a very good job of explaining the current status of the referenced project applications. In your letter you gave the owners four options of proceeding with the project along with descnptions:of,what-they need to do or submit with each option. The owners would like to keep Elie projects "open" and in the process and they have decided to proceed with option #3 which is:.. "Provide .updated, project description(s), timeframes, additional applications (if necessary), and funds for processing." ,However: we cannot provide:timeframes.or revised project :descriptions. because:all of the projects rely on the adoption of the new wastewater/sewage treatment ordinance(s) being developed by, Butte. County.. It is my. understanding that this process, which has been going on for almost five years, is nearing completion.. But no one can tell us when, or if, the ordinances will be adpted or -if their content will.remain the;same. as the published:drafts.- So we are•in a "Catch 22". We cannot provide Butte County with the requested information until Butte County provides us with the wastewater information. With that". the owners requestthat,the November; 4; 2009 deadline for submittal -of. additional information.be extended to sixty -days after the adoption (or denial) of the new wastewater/sewage treatment ordinances. Additionally will you please.elaborate-on-the:"..-.fun'ds for.processing"-you.mention:in. option #3. What are they for and how much are they. Sincerely,, ,_ ".1K• '14.3.1 k•' ..%, `.�.�c: >w ,-\: 91:1 _:�L:.. - '! .. x..: . .N - .. ��;; }"•Li,.;`," e.. �_ �? .. - . _ .._ .. _.�%> �5;:;t. .. .;:�'•_. . , >....,.`:C�n::: :i,.,. �..;C3.i s."? '..ii£�:.J Eric,Robertson .P.E _rr. tr �;:�;_ �::.• 4 t �13,y i. 4/✓.r. - .pll .-.„ yC. lv.ti �ili�r ✓. .. .. r,• •-.. -:�-ii ; ..5..'••:: i�V�%p_..... )tJ�(�4.t �iT•._'.'f.S C%_J _3 F.• ChicoORed Bluff ORedd'i`ng % o 888 Manzanita Court, Suite AOChico, CA 959260530-894-35000894-8955 fax DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-2922 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF November 10, 2004 Y Regulatory Branch (200300827) William Isaac 14424 Vanowen Van Nuys,. California .9140.5 Dear Mr. Isaac: We are responding to your consultant's request for an approved jurisdictional determination for the Durham=Pentz Commerce Park site. This approximately 15 -acre site . is located near Hamlin 'Slough and Little Dry Creek in Section 26, Township 21 North, Range 2 East, MDB&M, near the City of Chico, Butte County, California. Based on available information, we concur with the estimate of waters of the United States, as depicted on the Eco -Analysts, Wetlands Delineation Map for DP Commerce Center, dated September 11, 2004, as amended by the following determination by this office: the wetlands your consultant has labeled as "isolated wetlands" are jurisdictional on, the basis of adjacency to the unnamed drainage in the northeast portion of the project site and are included in the total acreage of waters of the United States verified in this letter. Approximately 0.224 acres of waters of the United States, including wetlands, are present within the survey area. These waters are regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act since they are tributary to Hamlin Slough. Hamlin Slough is a tributary to Butte Creek. Butte Creek is a tributary to the Sacramento River. The Sacramento River is a navigaUte water ul the Utli-t A States. 0 This verification is valid for five years from the date of this letter, unless new information warrants revision of the determination before the expiration date. A Notification of Administrative Appeal Options and Process and Request for Appeal form is enclosed. If you wish to appeal this approved jurisdictional determination, please follow the procedures on the form. You should provide a copy of this letter and notice to all ' other affected parties, including any individual who has an identifiable and substantial legal interest in the property. a T -2- Please refer to identification number 200300827 in any correspondence concerning this project. If you have any questions, please contact Andrea Jones at our Sacramento ~ . Valley Office, 1325 J Street, Room 1480, Sacramento, California 95814-2922, email Andrea.J.Jones@usace.army.mil, or telephone 916-557-7745. You may also use our website: www.spk.usace.army.mil/regulatory.html. Sincerely, ' Thomas J. Cavanaugh Chief, Sacramento Valley Office Enclosure Copy furnished without enclosure: Albert Beck, Eco -Analysts, 2550 Floral Avenue, Suite 10, Chico, California 95926' Scott Zaitz, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 415 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 100, Redding, California 96002-0182 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wetlands Branch, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W2605, Sacramento, California 95825-3901 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered Species Division, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W2605, Sacramento, California 95825-3901 WETLANDS -9 3138 SO.FT LEGEND ISOLATED DEPRESSION WETLANDS NDS AREA SYMBOL �`'.:•1- AREA OF SANDY LOAM ' WATERS OF USA AREA SYMBOL -p WETLAND SAMPLE POINT -� OPEN WATERS ISOLATED WETLAND SUMMARY WETLAND 1 SIZE AS PLOTTED 91,903 SO. FT. WETLAND 2 SIZE AS PLOTTED 12,543 SO. FT. WETLAND 3 SIZE AS PLOTTED 501 50. FT. WETLAND 4 SIZE AS PLOTTED 3,863 SO. FT. WETLAND 5 SIZE AS PLOTTED 5,416 SO. FT. WETLAND 6 SIZE AS PLOTTED 7,055 SO. FT. WETLAND 7 SIZE AS PLOTTED 2,197 SO. FT. WETLAND 8 SIZE AS PLOTTED 499 SO. FT. WETLAND 9 SIZE AS PLOTTED 3,138 SO. FT. WETLAND 23 SIZE AS PLOTTED 1,867 SO. FT. WETLAND 24 SIZE AS PLOTTED 7,439 SO. FT. WETLAND 27 SIZE AS PLOTTED 6,899 SO. FT. WETLAND 28 SIZE AS PLOTTED 5,354 SO. FT. WETLAND 29 SIZE AS PLOTTED 170 SO. FT. WETLAND 30 SIZE AS PLOTTED 3,017 SO. FT. WATER OF USA SUMMARY WATERS OF THE USA -1 SIZE AS PLOTTED 32,460 SO. FT. WATERS OF THE USA -2 SIZE AS PLOTTED 7,916 S0. FT. WATERS OF THE USA -3 SIZE AS PLOTTED 23,929 SO. FT. WATERS OF THE USA -6 SIZE AS, PLOTTED 186,263 SO. FT. WATERS OF THE USA -7 SIZE AS PLOTTED 11,981 SO. FT. OPEN WATER -1 SIZE AS PLOTTED 85,597 SO. FT. ISOLATED DEPRESSION TOTAL 500,007 SO. FT. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHANNA DOWNS WETLANDS DELINEATION BY ECO -ANALYSTS ALBERT J. BECK, PH.D PRINCIPAL KINGSLEY R. STERN, PH.D FIELD BOTANY CONSULTANT RICHARD SNOW, BIOLOGIST (530) 342-5991 200 0 200 400 600 SCALE 1'= 200' SCALE 1-- 200' "1 t _ G UNIT c S ,- ,;' 1,�..._..... ..-_'--�^-. y—Z � t; < _ .=T)OR,NX�PE10T1'RO'AD ,1 J :... t �•. „ ..- .. ;i�,-✓:�, _ _" '., :.�' +:i. Yid: ,tt'.,: .✓✓^".r. •r! t: y.i AN • '30t "\\" _ wEn s \ - 1` \ a:! ! 1, , s ,..,, \i / .�. ,3 301 7J SWT'J "r -`—J+En NDS -.z9• / l.• _� ,,. \. \.. S:r�•.;.. ,,%`' .:. ANDS 28 .._.. \ _. / - � �-•�.:: ...,. .. ...: �., .,.., :.,�, _�:. .:'7�,:' �F ..f r �'S35 � •. \ / 'NDS' -t7 NDS V „:,; •. � f: 1 - ,... •. .'iU., _ .:\...,... �:�.-` rr„ i1- T\ 1 _ � i \ ..r i ♦ 1 I� '\, } \ y'. ,. ! 1 1 t r. ..i ` f y / _ \f l WETlAND5-6 ,... \ � � .. � .,- ... .I ,, .:, i . Vr. ;_4 _ �•j;t;.. 7.055.S0.T;T /%:1'r ':! I / :I ; •'r: i s 't..� : 111 "UNDE SOFf Y.. TOPR tt ,4. J : , t i • , i .�.: :. .. •. .. Ill , .y,,...J} rl. V 1 } .,, 1. `✓ \ " ,:/;,;,.;,.•+, .x`� +dr2:' -.'tis •1.' . i` \ a : � :: / ... LLS Z r .... , •. �,\, . �' ' t n lam• ,�%=-' 'ice 'I l'`'' .. ::: ....._ \ S i ? :::: \ ! . . ,APIC . .:. T3a,39 �` :`i `'; c � :_+•^, • \ • . f1 f 9r r Nos -s ::. ._-- .. .. / - : , _ .,�"..:• , �1 EtLP i '` _ `rf 4 a , ,y : 1 i �t„ .. r .. WATERS OF"THE ♦ .. �'• .: ..... .. .. , 3 ti 55:5 7' S -.\,\� '\•, ._. .... ,... .:. .,...tt ;rte- �..., .:.1• .1 ;����}Y{�:;5-. •:tom �`' nANdS :4 1:,90:3 SOFT L :: ; r}. . .. `...: :. , : .:- \. , :..... ',S"•"' '�i'"i!/..�- - :,L• - .: 3, 3. SOFT [: - •�:.s: ,/ __ \ WETLANDS -24 i l 7,439 SQ.FT .=` / ; / , , \; oc , ^\ ,.f:.: f.: _ :.:• -., -\\ - , ..Y ,l 1\ �i"� - moi' �.... ; `\ ♦ N.ti;; -,-,.. ` ND 3 r:;,�� rr- �,r/ .�:y....,,:..: .�.. .�..•.,l:Y�:%T�' ,J ``�'• o. «Y • 1 f. W� 114r'•. - - (t 1 .: Q,�'.y .r �\� �\: t�l�✓:t i�- y� r.J\ \�.,'� - _ �i\ lL WETLANDS- 12,543 ETLANDS_12 543 SOFT, , F t l % ':. "•.. � ,'\ ♦.. � �_.v : `i'�[ Y.!`S O Q .tae :; \ ,/ � ✓;%�`"�. �• _ i J LL WETLANDS -2 .':. \ y`\ .._�:./' `e\ 'L/,+. _./•' '\ / \ �-'� W 1.867 SQ.FT . '♦ ,% ` ';i ,_ 1 �' _ - - - cn •�ERS OF THE ' 186,263 SQ.FT \ \ Lli \-. M•A�a'p�-'' NOT A PART \ \