Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-130~ • • • ~i ~ • Q~ ~' ~"A: ? ~~, ^ ~i• ~° TA^ • ~ ^ .;. ~ , ~ .• tit ,~~R~OUN ~~•• BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~eSOlUfiOn N0. 03-130 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO SUBMIT AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FRAUD GRANT APPLICATION WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors desires to undertake a certain program designated as the Automobile Insurance Fraud Program as authorized under California Insurance Code Seetion 1872.8, California Cade of Regulations Subchapter 9, Article 4, Seetion 2698.65 administered by the California Department of Insurance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the District Attorney of the Butte County District Attorney's Office is authorized, on its behalf to submit the attached proposal to the California Department of Insurance and is authorized to execute on behalf of the Board of~ Supervisors the Grant Au=ard Agreement upon award including any extensions or amendments thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant expenditures controlled by this body. [ hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the resolution adopted by the Butte County F3oard of Supervisor, in a meeting thereofheld on the 26`x' of August, 2003, by the following vote: AYH Supervisor> Dolan, Houx, Josiassen, Yamabuchi and (}~^~~ ,iee.e; NOE?S: None NOT VOTING: Noz.e AI3SENT: i`~,;~z ,~ R.J. BEELER, Chair Butte County Board of Supervisors A"1'"I'ES"I': PAUL MCINTOSH, Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By , ~ ~ ~ :~` ~ ~~°~: 3~~ ~; ,:,~,,, _ ~x ~`~~ _ ~- ~~ a~ ~~ .~ $utte County District Attorney APPLICATION FOR A PROGRAIi'I FOR THE INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FRAUD Fiscal bear 2003 - 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS z. .SECTION ONE 1. Grant Transmittal 2. Board of Supervisors Resolution j. Program Contact Information z. BUDGET ELEMENTS A. Personnel (Salary and Benefits) B. Operating Expenses c. Equipment z. BUTTE COUNTY PLAN a. Qualifications B. Problem Statement c. Program Strategy D. Objectives E. Organizational Chart i. JOINT Il`~TESTIGATIVE PLAN .... ~. .f ~ ~ f ~. a `C k s r' i~ ~ F 4 i ~f i - ~_ - ... ~ _ ._ ~~~rd~ ~f ~~ap~~~~~~~r~ ~te~solut~~t~ \\ f~ ,.,.'..~r ~ ... . --- - ~. -~ ~,}~~L ~'' , '~` . b~~ p~ CA ~, ~~~ 4'P ~, r r'- .. .~ , s .2 r, ~ ~ , ,, ,_,,, - ,~ ~er .. .~ ..~ .e .~,~' C. PROGI2A.M CONTACT SHEET 2 3 4 Provide the name, title, address and telephone number for the person having day to day responsibility for the program. Name: Tony Koester Title: District Attorney's Assistant Chief Investigator Address: 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Telephone: (530) 538-7624 FAX: (530) 538-7071 E-Mail: tkoester~ buttecountv.net Provide the name, title, address and telephone number of the Chair of the County Board of Supen~isors. Name: Curt Josiassen Title: Chairman, Butte County Board of Supervisors Address: 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Telephone: (530) 882-4447 F.AX: (530) 538-7120 Provide the name, title, address and telephone number for the District Attamey's Financial Officer Name: Constance Carter Title: District Attorney's Chief Administrator Address: 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Telephone: (530) 538-7207 FAX: (530) 538-7071 E-Mail: ccarteric~,buttecountv.net Provide the name, title, address and telephone number for the person responsible for the data collection /reporting for the applicant agency. Name: V~iilliam Proffitt Title: District Attorney's Investigator II Address: 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Telephone: (530) 538-7411 FAX: (530) 538-7071 E-Mail: ~roffitt~a7buttecounty.net ~u~[ge~ ~l~tt~~~~~ ~, :~ 1 ~-~ ~ ~~~ ~- ~4g~s ~~ ,~~ EY ~/ ~/~. ' ,, ~~ , ire S F ~. 7~C r ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ,T A , ~,4.: ~~f - '~~ 0~ t ~f ~~ ~~ 5 ~ . ~d~ OP ., - - - `.., r s ;; °'....~.,: r. e 17... ~ S .ate ..ice .~ t )~ ~~ E ~ ~ _ ~ ~.'j. ~~ ~. ~ ..a ._oF ,_.~ .~ ..,.,,d' .. .. .. ~:.~€ ~ .. .... ...~c.o. O~ .ICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE-ITEM DETAIL A. Personal ServiceslSalaries -Employee Benefits July 1, 2003 -June 30, 2004 .AUTO `FRAUD GRANT' .90159 FIFTH YEAR AWARD CATEGORY FY 03 / 04 CASH NO CASH MATGH REQUIREMENT IN THIS GRANT COST MATCH TOTAL Kevin Maloney Deputy DA IV 25°l° to Projec 320-12011 Salary $20,544 50 520,544 Benefits $5,923 50 55,923 Hrly rate 50.88 520 Overtime 50 50 50 William Proffitt DA Investigator II 100°I° to Projec 320-14016S Salary $51,880 50 $51,880 Benefits 527,463 50 527,463 Hrly rate 38.15 2,080 Overtime 58,500 50 58,500 TBD Paralegal 50°I° to Projec TBD Salary 518,136 50 518,136 Benefits $7,418 50 57,418 Hrly rate 24.57 1,040 CATEGORY TOTAL $139,864 50 5139,864 TOTAL $139,864 OCJP-A303a (Rev. 7/97) 320004-Baseline--FY 03 04--Not Posted AUTO 03 04 8r1/2003 OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE-ITEM DETAIL C. EQUIPMENT July 1, 2003_-June 30, 2004 AUTO"FRAUD GRANT ` 90159' FIFTH YEAR AWARD CATEGORY FY 03 104 "CASH NO GASH MATCH REQUIREMENT tN THIS GRANT COST MATCH TOTAL Equipment $ - $0 $0 $0 CATEGORY TOTAL $0 $o $0 $1s2,s2o) $0~ $182,620 PROJECT TOTAL $182,szo FUND DISTRIBUTION COST ASH MATC TOTALS 1. Amount of Funds $182,620 - $182,620 2. Percentage of Funds 100°l0 0% 100°l0 $182, 620 $D OCJP-A303c (Rev. 7!97} 320004-Baseline--~ Y 03 04--Not Posted AUTO 03 04 8r'1I2003 ~.,_'~ .~ ~ ~. ~ .....,'' .~f..,.~~ ._.e ~ ~ _ Irv .v,.~ F ,...~' ._.. _ d. .~..,.` ..... _. ~ ~ ... ..~~ _s ~~ ..i `.. 1 ~, v. _ ~ ~~rr~~v~r ~Nr~~~ ~.. ~.~-----~.l~i'r''/ G Q~L ~ ~`'~~5 ~, ~~ ~ ~ ,, ~,/ r ` ~.~ til J ~ f -"a. ~,~~_, ~_ c,,,, ~ ~:~ ~ . ~~~ O~ t" `~17 ~ti .. _ ~ ~~ ~`~ ®..-- O1 ~...nF ...~ ~ ~. ~~.od~ tir1'~_ ~ ~ `.ems + ~. ~.w'~ .{ ~ ti.P--..~ i .t ,. R . ... ~ a ~^ Butte County District Attorney AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FRAUD Fiscal Year 2003/2004 CARRYOVER JUSTIFICATIO1tiT The Butte County District Attorney's Office requests to carryover approximately $182,620 in unexpended funds for the FY 2002/2003 Auto Insurance Fraud Grant. The Project showed a 2001/2002FY carryover of $$33,027 internally as a result of building the budget on a calendar year rather than a fiscal year in an attempt to accommodate DOI's funding cycle. These funds were inadvertently absorbed into the General Fund at 02/03 year end closing. A February 2~th, 2003 Board of Supervisors action reinstated the $33,022 to an Automobile Insurance Fraud Trust Account. The Board of Supervisors also recognized the unanticipated revenue in the amount of $113,682, bringing the total grant award to $216,017 plus the carryover. The additional carry over funds are the result of unexpended salary and benefits. The District Attorney's Office did not receive the grant award notification until December 2002. The Butte County Administration and Board of Supervisors is very conservative in approving a budget that is not supported with a formal notification of a grant award. Because of the late notification which fell into the holiday schedule far the Board, the first available agenda date was in late February. The Board of Supervisors also authorized the additional positions requested in the grant. The investigator position had been upgraded a 100% funded position and was filled in May with a tenured investigator. The Attorney and Paralegal positions are currently being recruited. However, based. on the proposed Worker's compensation Grant award the additional ~0% attorney position ~zll not be filled. The 50°t° funded Paralegal position should be filled soon. Assigning the investigator and hiring the paralegal has been somewhat troublesome with concerns for State budget impacts on existing staff u>ho would be good /// 1 s V_ q _ ~~ 3:; t~ ~ i? ~ q- _ ~~ ~ w I A~~ aP ~ ~, t ~_ , t ~ -<- ~- - , . - o ~. ~„ .~ , f ~ y ~ _ r.- { ~~~T r~~ O~TTT~..~'d BUTTE COUNTY AUTO INSURANCE FRAUD County Plan Qualification O~=en~iew To assess where we have come, one must take a look at where we were. In fiscal year 1998 / 1999 Butte County began to address the problems of automobile insurance fraud issues in a vigorous and professional manner. We received funding from the State Department of Insurance to launch this multi-year effort. The combined resources of the Butte County District Attorney and the State Department of Insurance was launched against these crimes. . In the spring of 1999, DDA Kevin Maloney was assigned to our Automobile Insurance Fraud Program. Later that same year, DDA Michael Candela joined the program. This same year, as a benefit of the funding received from the State Department of Insurance and our dedication to the goal of combating automobile insurance fraud, we were able to add seasoned investigator Bernie Lightner. VJe initialed an ongoing training and communication between the Investigator and the two deputy District Attorneys assigned to the program. In fiscal year 1999/00, the Automobile Insurance Fraud grant was not sufficient to adequately provide for investigative support far the prosecution team. VJe were, however, able to use some grant funding to support the outreach programs performed in conj unction writh the Workers C ompensation Insurance Fraud Grant. Additionally, non-grant funded investigative resources were provided by the Major Crimes Unit of the Butte County District Attorney. In mid year we were able to assign Investigator Lightner to exclusive effort within our Insurance Fraud program. A combination of aggressive outreach, inter-agency contacts, program coordination and case investigation has demonstrated how effective a skilled program staff can be. During fiscal 1999/2000 we experienced an increase in reported insurance fraud and it became apparent there was a need to expand the program to meet the needs. With the partnership of the Butte County District Attorney and the State Department of Insurance in fiscal 2000/2001 we were able to expand our resources to address the fraud problem. Through the funding provided in fiscal year 2000/2001; we brought Investigator Jos V an Hout (25°loFTE) and Investigator Ross Pack (25°lo FTE) into the Automobile Insurance Fraud Program. In fiscal 2000/2001 we opened seven (7) automobile insurance fraud investigations and six (6) remained open during that fiscal year. In addition, we have documented eighty nine (89) prosecutions of violations of Vehicle Code Section 10851 and 10852 with fines totaling $43,071 and. restitutions in the amount of $4,463.43. In fiscal 200112002 we introduced Investigators Bruce Wristen and John Bowers to the Insurance Fraud Program. Investigator Bowers was fully dedicated {50% FTE) to investigating this type of BUTTE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY QUALIFICATIONS REVISED FY 2003 J 2004 If the District Attorney has received a grand from CDI prior to this application, list only those achievements made possible by the use of grant funds. Also, complete the Summary of closed a~zd pending prosecutions for FY 2D02 - 2D03. A page listing program achievements realized with the use of other funds may be included in the Appendix. 1) In FY 1999-2000, twenty {20) investigations were initiated and involved an average of one (1) identified suspects per investigation. In FY 2000-2001, ninety six (96) investigations were initiated and involved an average of one {1) identified suspects per investigation. In FY 2001- 2002 one hundred. ninety two {192) investigations were initiated and involved an average of one (1) identified suspects per investigations. From July 1, 2002 to June 15, 2003, one hundred forty eight (148) investigations were initiated anal involved an average of one (1) identified suspects per investigation: 2) In FY 1999-2000, sixteen (16) warrants/indictments were issued, involving an average of one (1) suspects and t or defendants. In FY 2000-2001, eighty nine (89) warrants/indictments were issued involving an average of one (l) suspects and / or defendants. In FY 2001-2002, twenty four (24) warrants/indictments were issued, involving an average of one (1) suspects and / or defendants. From July 1, 2002 to June 15, 2003, thirty (30) warrants/indictments were issued involving an average of one (1) suspects and / or defendants. 3) In FY 1999-2000, thirty five (35) arrests and zero (0) surrenders were made. In FY 2000-2001, eighty nine (89) arrests and zero (0) surrenders were made. In FY 2001-2002, one hundred ninety two (192} arrests and zero (0) surrenders were made. From July 1, 2002 to June 13, 2003, one hundred forty eight (148) arrests and zero (0) surrenders were made. 4) In FY 1999-2000, seventeen (17) convictions were obtained involving seventeen (17) defendants. Of these convictions, two (2) were obtained by trial verdict, fifteen (15) were obtained by plea or settlement. In FY 2000-2001 fifty five (S~) convictions were obtained involving fifty five (55) defendants. Of these convictions two (2) were obtained by trial verdict and forty eighth (48) were obtained by plea or settlement. In FY 2001-2002, one hundred thirty one (131) convictions were obtained involving one hundred thirty one {131) defendants. Of these convictions one (1) was obtained by trial verdict and eighty seven {87) were obtained by plea or settlement. From July 1, 2002, to June 15, 2003, one hundred three (103) convictions were obtained involving one hundred three {103) defendants. Of these convictions five (5) were obtained by trial verdict and ninety seven (97) ~rere obtained by plea or settlement. BUTTE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FRAUD PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS 2002 / 2003 We have one pending case awaiting possible plea after the preliminary hearing. This case arose out of a traffic collision. The suspect claimed moderate damage occurred after being hit from behind and then being pushed into another vehicle in front of him. Through a joint DOI and Butte County District Attorney investigation, it was determined that the suspect rear ended a vehicle stopped in front of him. There was no damage to the other vehicle and the suspect told the other driver to leave. DOI and DA investigators inten~iewed the suspect and he admitted the fraud. VJe have filed a suspected arson far insurance fraud case involving tuJo suspects. Suspect number one hired suspect number tt~=o to steal his car and then set it on fire. Suspect number one then turned in a fraudulent insurance claim. The California Highway Patrol did the initial investigation, getting suspect number one to admit to the insurance fraud. DA Investigators inters=iewed suspect number one who agreed to help with pretext phone calls to suspect number twro. A sting was set up with joint cooperation of the DA's office and DOI. Suspect number one agreed to wear a body wire, and DOI provided. their sun%eillance van to monitor the sting. Suspect number two was taken into custody by DOI and DA investigators and booked for insurance fraud and arson. Both suspects have recently pled to felony insurance fraud charges. • DA investigators are can ently investigating an auto insurance fraud case wherein the subj ect claims he sustained significant injuries while involved in a very minor traffic accident. The subject claims he now has amnesia and stutters due to the accident and can no longer work. Vie are currently seeking the expert advice of a speech pathologist and neurologist to conduct an investigation into his claims. • We are also actively working another vehicle arson for fraud case. The suspect suffered ?°a degree burns on his hands and face. He has continued to deny his involvement. Investigators with the cooperation of the Department of Insurance, and DOJ have put together a time line and case lay out because of all of the inconsistencies in the case. This case is still under active investigation at this time. DA investigators recently concluded a case in w=hick two subjects were riding on a Butte County Transit bus that slightly rear-ended into a passenger vehicle. Both subjects said they were injured in the impact. One subject filed an insurance claim. After the investigation the subject was charged with felony insurance fraud, which he pled guilty to recently. The second subject has recently come forward and filed a claim for 5100,000 against Butte County. His claim is currently being investigated by this office. '~~~ :~, ~ AFL L n'A~,j~~Y ~~~~~~ : ~ ~l'l~~ .~~~, \r 4 F •• ~ ~~ F' ANNOITNCING A NEW SERVICE FOR THE Il\TVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTIOl'+t OF Workers' Compensation Fraud Auto Insurance Fraud The District Attorney's Office has been awarded a Grant by the CaIifarnia State Department of Insurance to investigate and prosecute suspected fraud in both Workers' Compensation and Auto Insurance Claims. The District Attorney has the ability to handle these cases independently qr in concert with the Department of Insurance Investigations Division. Types of cases we can become involved in include: APPLICANT FRAUD: where a person lies about being injured or a person who gets injured off the jab claims the injury occurred at work or the person exaggerates the seriousness of an injury to receive a higher benefit . PREMIUM FRAUD: where an employer falsely claims the number of employees or their work classification in order to reduce the amount of premiums paid. PRACTITIONER FRAUD: where a Medical Doctor or Chiropractor bills an insurance company for treatments not received by the patient or extends the number of treatments beyond what is necessary in order to collect additional insurance money. TO REPORT SUSPECTED Il'~'SUR~IOTCE FRAUD CALL THE DISTRICT ATTORNE~"S FRAUD HOTLINE TOLL FREE 24 HOURS A DAYAT p Y ti ,. :~"_ _ f J a f~. ~` - ~ - `7TH. 4r~~~. ~~. ~~; Insurance Fraud Unit FOR~THE INVESTIGATION AND PROSEGUTION OF l~~a~rkes~s' Gca~pen5ati~n Fca~ad Auto Insurance F~'aa~d The District Attorney's Office is funded by the California State Department of Insurance to investigate and prosecute suspected fraud in both Workers' Compensation and Auto Insurance Claims. Both of these types of crimes are felonies and are punishable by state prison. The District Attorney may invesfigate these cases independently ar with the assistance of the Department of Insurance investigations Division. Types ®f We~ri:Qrs' C®mpec:satac~n 6rrsaar~:vice fraa~d cases we anvestigate onc6a~de: APPLICANT FRAUD: typically occurs when a person Pies about being injured or when a person gets injured off the job but claims the injury occurred at work. This type of fraud also occurs when a person exaggerates the seriousness of an injury in order to receive a higher dollar benefit or extend the benefit for a longer period of time. PREMIUM FRAUD: typically occurs when an employer falsely claims a lower number of employees or changes their work classification in order to reduce the amount of their premiums for workers' compensation insurance coverage. PRACTITIONER FRAUD: typically occurs when a Medical Doctor or Chiropractor bills an insurance company far treatments not actual-y received by the patient or extends the number of treatments beyond what is necessary in order to collect additional insurance money. PROVIDER FRAUD: typically occurs when the insurance company misleads prospective clients, collects premiums for insurance coverage nat provided, inflates premiums, or fraudulently fails to pay an appropriate claim. Types ®f ~,~><mca~o6aGe ov:sr~ra¢~ce fraud cases we i~~vesfa:~afe ao~c9~de: FALSE CLAfMS: typically occurs when a person falsely claims a loss that never occurred. This may include such claims as theft or loss of personal property which the claimant has secreted or disposed of for profit. Where a person falsely reports his or her vehicle as stolen when in fact, they abandoned it after having been involved in an accident while driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Where a person falsely claims the details of an accident in order to cover up another crime such as hit and run. Where a person stages a false automobile accident in order to receive payment for damages or faked injury. INFLATED t_OSS CLAIftfS: where a person exaggerates the dollar loss or the type and number of items lost or damages to an automobile in order to receive an additional settlement. ~~-"'J" ,c" c „ 1 ~. X111 C•t r.l '~ Telemarketing Fraud Jump to.... Prize PrQl~o~imlls/Sv~ee~ss~akes O~fers These scams represent the majority of all fraudulent telemarketing calls, accounting for over one half of all complaints. Usually, they are initiated with a brochure or postcard sent to the victim to inform them that they have been selected to win a fabulous prize, such as a car, jewelry, cash, or a vacation package. Victims are told to call an 800 or 900 number, possibly subjecting themselves to the long distance charges. Vctims who call the number are often told that in order to receive their prize, they must send the company a check to cover shipping, insurance, storage costs, etc. Some victims are told that they have won a merchandise certificate {which is worthless, if the victim receives it), and that for a fee, they will be entered into atie-breaker contest for the grand prize. Victims do not ever receive anything of value from the company. P,eport a Prize Promotion ar Sweepstakes Fraud JG"iVeS'~rGIE?I'i'f SGairiS Investment scams generally invaive larger amounts of money compared to other scams. Seniors often sink their entire fife savings into the investment offer, only to lose it all. Telemarketers may self gemstones, rare coins, FCC licenses, oil wells, and stacks. The promise of high returns within a short period of time is used to entice the victims. Follow-up calls are made to investors in an attempt to get them to send more money. Once the consumer receives their purchase, if it is a tangible item, he discovers that it is either worthless, or worth far less than the cast of the purchase. Investors discover that it is difficult to determine the status of their investment. Those who do receive an accounting of their investment find it is impossible to decipher. Report an Investment Scam Fake Cilari~ies Telemarketers running charity scams fall generally into one of two classes: those who do not work for a charity at all, and those who work for a charity but keep a high percentage of the money that they collect. Sometimes, as little as five percent of the money collected goes to the charity. Victims may be contacted by phone by telemarketers asking for money, or they may receive a mailing falsely informing them that they have given to the charity previously, or have pledged a certain amount of money aver the phone. Many assume that what is stated in the mailing is true and send money, even though they have never given to the charity. reoo-i a Charii~ Scam TeieNho~e aiiiin~ SGariiS There are two primary variations of the telephone biking scam: cramming and slamming. Cramming ~_~` - -~> .f4 u . ~~~ ~' ~~_ ~~~ ~~~ Secure Form far Contacting the Fraud Unit of the Butte County District Attorney's Office If you have been defrauded; or if you think someone is conducting fra!~d, please complete the following form and describe the circumstances. Information you supply will be transmitted securely over the Internet, and we will treat it with complete canfideniiality upon receipt. Thank you for your input. Name Address Company (if applicable} City ~~ State ~~ Zip ~- Phone ~- E-Mail Have you been defrauded? r` Yes ~ No Do you think someone is conducting a fraud? ~' Yes ~"' fdo If yes, what type of fraud is being conducted? r Telemarketing (-Internet 1- Insurance 1- Investment Scam IJ Prize Promotion or Sweepstakes Offer l- Travel Scam 1- Lottery I- False Charity f Credit Repair/Debt Consolidation f Employment Scam I- Office Supplies (- Recovery Rooms I- Rip and Tear f Telephone Billing f Business Opportunities f Home Repair (- Real Estate f Identity Fraud f Qther Please provide as much detail as you can regarding the fraud that you think was, or is, being conducted. -J ~'' ' v - .:"'~i ..C~J ;/` ~.. f. rf ,.N .~,~ .~` The Butte County District Attorney's Office is funded by the .,, California State Department of Insurance to investigate and prosecute Workers' Compensation and Auto Insurance Fraud. ~, Both of these types of crimes are felonies and are punishable ~l ~~(~ f by state pris^n. Please contact us if Y you have been a victim of either of these types of crimes or if you have information re ardin these ~~ 9 9 types `_.. ""` of fraud which have been committed in Butte County. Our office 7 will investigate, and when possible, prosecute these crimes to the fullest extent of the law. Insurance Fraud ! Tefemarl<efin Fraud ! Internet Fraud Contac! Us Coniidentia~~ Butte County District Attorney-Fraud Division Web Site Developed & Hosted by Access ftlo+n! 2D00. Copyright ©2000 #21Q3 --m ~' / ~ F'~~/ f~ ~~ ~~ ~~ t `~ ~ i ~ P ~ f-h~ - `~'~ - r {.. ~~V~ J ~r ~. Y -T ~~ ~ rrlJ ,~j' « ,, ~ ~ *"~ ~~ "y'' y,~ MCU CASE LOAD STATUS CASE # SOURCE OF SUSPECT INV' PROJECTED ASSIGNMENT NOTES FILED i 2000-ll44 FILING DATE ' Re-hied i1-26-02 for DA review ~g 2000-1390 Ready to File (D1J15J02) Received from Donna on DD 04!22 4 19 02 Criminal char es files 6/28/02 arrest warrant ~ 2001-1522 Starting UJC Operation. Contacted AAA, Kemper, State BW Farm, and SCIF for help with pre-text poliq~. UJCs set for training. DOI to assist with U/C op. Pre-text policy in place, Two U/Cs have been in. No bills as of 4-10-02. bills have come in. it appears ----- is billing for services not rendered. Search Warrant served on June 14, 2002. Second S W 1D-30-02 2001-1545 Starting UJC Operation. Contacted AAA, Kemper, State BW Farm, and SCIF for help with pre-text policy. UJCs set for training, DOI to assisi with U/C op. Pre-text policy in place. UJC has been in for 10+ visits. Started receiving bills through Kernper. Investigator Wristen went in to ---- UJC. Wristen was referred to -----. Wristen went to ---- office and signed a retainer for services. Wristen was told by both ---- the the two of them had been doing referrals for several years and had worked over 100 cases. Search Warrant served on June 19, 2002 2001-1561 Pending information from W/C appeal board. Potentially BW not a criminalcase.(4j22J02) 2001 2619 ~ .With Kevin Maloney forfllirig. DOIrcantacted, --- rTA'd. 3B --- td contact TnvVan Hcutto arrange for new tuPri-in j -I I day Court date ~ssiarr_d pending potential plea. (4; X2/02) PXon 5(1/02 held to an~~er on one count of SSO,a) (1) P~ I 2001-1695 Awaiting SIU follow up. BW 2001-1641 ~ ~ Needs suspect and Victirn'IntervieH~s Contacted victim, Bt"J phon interview set far 1 .,1<02 . Intero)etvad v tIm and 9L I claims r p R~fA~red to BAR not an lr;u-ance case. Case closed. (-r ~?; C2) I i 2001-1648 ` ~ Awaiting review from SIU BW 2002-1000 Pending follow up from SIU Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance BW 2002-1016 Interview Suspect and Witnesses. Left message for BW Suspe~ and his girlfriend to contact me. Will set of interview of suspect. Evidence at BCSO for latent print in fume tank, (7-11 Big Gulp cup). Had contact with ---, will come in For statement. Interviewed ----. Still denies the arson. DOJ doing time line for case. Jos and Bruce to reinterview ---, have copies of signed mail receipt depo. Sister and brother interviewed. Working on tracking down girlfriend. Writing Search Warrant for Financial 2002-1042 I I ~ 12-19-02--Cook sentenced to 5 yrs state Anson for 451PC )B I (and S50(a)PC ~OS(;2 I i i ~ !I SOURCE OF PROTECTED - CASE ~ ASSIGNMENT SUSPECT NOTES INV: FILED FILING DATE"' " 99-? 03?-CM13525 Tony Koester Follow up and trial prep required. Update the discovery DOI I NJA NJA binders by Bate stamping the discovery in files.Contact JVH the 14 base ball players of ----- team and question each one of them about ------ shaulder injury and whether or not he complained or favored it. Additionally I need to authenticate the roster itseif.Also I will need to authenticate the storekeeping documents by locating and interviewing the scorekeepers. This may involve locating 7 or 8 additional individuals.Interview Doctor ---- and support staff if needed to authenticate the dortor's reports.Interview 4 to 5 CHP officer's including -----, referencing the woodcutting incident. Additional folow up ,from attorney. Pending follow up I ~ 200i-1o22 ~ _ - ~ i / -- a ~ 7,oltit;lrivestlgatian with DJI"Casa lied. PY, schedtile~3or D0, ~1,, 03n; ° 0919,C2conhnJed.Artarn_ylrouo~~upregvirea,Swp~.r IJ'd:1 `' ~ r ____ _ __ 2001-;625 plc.d ,rending sent rcin . CaseCiosed -- ~ i ~r Jart,nvestiu~ i,n Receiv a use rrgm GPI on 4pnl B, 200 "'asefilP~' 4/3D,'l7' Attorney follo~~up r_gw~ed. DOl i JVH`, 04,23 ' Follow up co-npl tact on Fah 7ZCL3 AddiSonal roliow~ up j ~~ ~ fqr tna' :,n ~;r~3/G3 Pieo uwiry bn 4j2~~03 Case i i ~. - - C{trsed I _ _ ~ - ~ OD 1189. Assl neo vase 9 '° Submitted to Mike Candela for review in December 2002. JVH - Unk -- - Per meeting with Ramsey on June 11, 2003: Prep patient files for distribution to several experts to review pdtential overtreatment. Candela to supply names of experts. Interviews conducted and Experts contacted.. Preliminary reports receved Indicating gross negligence, excessive treatment and unprofessional conduct. Pending further input from experts'. G2-1029. Assigned Case 6 Follow up interviews to be completed. All but two JVH .NJA 09J16/02 i nterviews done. One interviewee is a suspect in a similar S.D. Case so I wIII not interview her to comprornise their i nvestigation; Suspect interview left'to do. Pending ~ s uspect interview. 02"? 27b f~I~F, Trial aariuary 2 LOGS Susoert pled gwly tc 12 Felpn; 7VH ra A ,10/27I62 ~~ > ~r-guns on Thu ~day.3a,~2 2003.?Ju Tna~ on Jan Llth. J ~ I -Cased Closed by arrest and conviction ~ I i j = ~ WFU 01-SJ_; Tnn~ Koester ___ Complete report and possible additional interviews. JVHJ ~ _ __ i__ N/A 12(19/02 Interviewed ----- in SusanVille, .Report originally SR submitted to Intake on Dec 19th. Case numberprdblem fixed and resubmitted to Intake on Jan. 28th. Two additional Interviews left, Shane was going to assist: On 3/19/031 attempted to contact ----- and his wife, ---- at ----and It appeared that no one is living in the residence. follow-up needed on current address of subjects. (sr) ---- were interviewed nothing more developed. Completed Follow up interviewjreport on ------. (SR) Pager calls made and report submitted. 6/24J03-]os completed follow up on pager seized in this case. Automated records deleted from pager company, search warrant required to obtain the records, also interview will be conducted with ------ daughter. SR 98-1231 OPD Tony Koester Attorney Follow Up required: Search Warrant for two JVH NjA OSJO1/02 98-2160 bank accounts, Financial evaluatian of two business accounts. Review Civil documentation. Determine if Chico Location for business was free or not. Determine If ---- was selling product to numerous Chico merchan+s and not i delivering the proceeds to the victim. Review Search Warrant material when it arrives. Obtain settlement agreement from Oregon company (united Grocers). 3/16/03 Wrote and served another search warrant for three more locations Pending that material for review. Ali material received Pending my data input and review l of approximately 4000 documents a .i^".' , ~ _nr2 Ca5_ ~ Pgtl)y d af~Drf4Pal sear -, l/n',ac: ~rf_.:,r ~-t--,;--- iJv ! .r,: - _ rl-~ ;. Yi ,i,/,,,,i ii ~ ,~ Con~u ~ ~~ "omaJ ~ r3~e i.> or d~ vF nit ip,~ a~ I ' ?'fir. ~ t10~+1'J tC ~l 1~.0^ ~ 3 t f til ,itl L P ~ ~ ~„ ~ . K, mod; .,rsor C~ ; , CI eia fae~tsi rPp,rt;-,t s ~~~ ~~/, ,,-,,,, :.Meyer 1 ony Koester Acquired Hard U~rve at search warran~ site ror Jon Meyer. JVH N(A N/A ~ Conducting Computer forensics on drive. Nothing found on Hard Drive awaiting further instructians fram J Meyer, Case on hold CASE # SOURCE OF SUSPECT .NOTES INY PROJECTED FILED ASSIGNMENT FILING DATE.- MCU 03- Self Assigned SR MCU C3- ~SelfASSigned i SR CMy6952 Requested b KH N/A NJA Robed Tho rr~ z s i i -1437 Requested by MLR SR I Requested be SR Chief DDA "Pancho" Zarate CM01793 Assigned byTK ' On 03 _f-D3 DDA Gatlos requested assistance with#his KH NJA N/>", case. DDA Earlos asked me to locate a wltriess and hwe i her one tc cour. DDA Carlos.also asked me to locate { en 3r es, repot fr om a pnor dnv'iction On l13-12-033 I 1 ~ , con u~t d a racords the 1. a d located the wlmess. i ais~ obtained a copy of the a-re~t r?port. I forwarded the ~ A-igned byTk _ _ I KH nra ~~? i ' - ~ ~ i CM.G~309 Repue~ted by DDA Or rr2G-I3 I A -stet DDP. Canoe a v,~lt~r the spouse to f;ii I n; a i n!a-- ~ Candela a wrlt os habeas ccrpus by oreoarino a decioratlon in support of tde r Burr he ~1a qulred to Pile. r va asked I to do tnls hec3 _1 times inv -ti;at°o the orimal o rase ~ When I v;as employ~a atr BC50, WJC I On 3/17JD3 I received this case from Investigator Bruce SR Wristen regarding former ----- employee ----- who is suspected of working for a Janitorial Service during the time she had been receiving Workers Compensation benefits. I will attempt to contact Jantorial employer in Chico. On 4/1/03 I made phone contact with ----- to set CM18743 A ssigned by'Kris On;3/25103 ?was assigned to assist DDA M1lurphy with .` KH n/a nra S lmpsar~ f dllow ap c a 245 pC'ori BCSO Sgt: Tom Coleman. 'DAA P 1urp ~y and ? cin:acted the DR who treated :Coleman and ~ ~ i nfervi_~,_d hlrn, Dn4/2J031 ran~fhe ser]al #of a our, t _ hat the defendant tiac when he ws~ arrested and I ~r evievdaa a report oreoa~ed by7nv Gill so that? could I as i~ned 'oy Shane i ~RUDinoff -` F 'H n ra ~ n'd i ~ i 1' ii n ;'a ~n;a i -1502 - Assi ned b DDA - - - S - R Assigned b MLR K H n /a nla ..e-d'~ ,..e~. ..+. ! .~ .'~'F ~...1`f .~~ .~F- .s .~ ~ ...~+ttry' e_.er .,: ..~~ .-..~. .~ -a... a.. .- d ..~. ..... ~-.~' M`~ u ~~~tQ c~u~t~ ~'la~~¢ ~q 9~~c~[al~m ~~~t~m~~?t f' f y~p,Et L R,q~yj -:~ -~~` '~ 3 ~~~~' ~ ~- ~~: ~~ ~.: rS~' ~~ t~ `GE`C ~~~ ~ ~ a ~'~ o~ BUTTE COUNTY AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FRAUD COUNTY PLAN PROBLEM STATEMENT 2003/2004 Butte County is a semi-rural county with a population of slightly over 203,000 people. The population is largely concentrated within the four (4) cities of Chico, Paradise, Oroville and Gridley, ~~th a large population living in the rural unincorporated and mountain areas of the county. Major employers include the California State University at Chico, local, state and federal government agencies, and agricultural interests and farming in rice and orchard products. We have both unemployment and public assistance averages higher than the state average. The economy of Butte County is generally depressed and crime of all i~~pes, including fraud, is a major concern. The Scope and'Vlaanitude of Automobile Insurance Fraud in Butte County Vv e are now entering our fifth year of participation within the California Automobile Insurance Fraud Program. The Butte County District Attorney currently has dedicated l00% of one (1) District Attorney Investigator and a total of 50°l0 of one (1) Deputy District Attorney to the Automobile Insurance Fraud Program. We have been working on establishing a viable public and industry outreach program with the use of handout materials, public service announcements, Internet web site and flyers along with local law enforcement agency training and a toll -free hot line. While a marginal number of direct automobile fraud cases were referred for investigation and several of these have the potential to be large frauds, we are just beginning to open the door to automobile insurance fraud in Butte County. The Butte County District Attorney has begun working with the local offices of the California Highway Patrol as well as all other law enforcement in Butte County as part of our effort in this program . In FY 2002/2003 up to June 10th. there were a total of 130 prosecutions of vehicle theft and vandalism. To date, there have been 75 convictions with 19 of those being sent to state prison. There are approximately 8 case still pending. There were a total of $9,930 of fines and restitution ordered by the court, with approximately $12,169 actually collected thus far. W e are developing a program to identify those cases of automobile vandalism received by the office and will in future years, be able to review these cases for the passibility of inflated ar otherwise fraudulent insurance claims. In terms of the total automobile fraud problem, we believe we are just beginning to see the magnitude of the problem. Our perception of the fraud problem is supported by information gathered innumerous discussions with insurance companies, such as Fanners, State Farm and the California State Automobile Association. In fiscal 2001 / 2002 we developed a case of arson for hire, automobile insurance fraud, and conspiracy which arose from astraight-forward appearing case of automobile theft. An alert Case Development: In FY 2001/2002 we identified a method of identifying cases within the Butte County District Attorney's office of potential fraud associated with both auto theft and vandalism cases. With the staff in place, we can subject those questionable cases to field investigation. In addition to several county programs currently in place to collect fines and restitution.. the current staff will. allow the monitoring of adjudicated cases to ensure restitution monies are sought and collected. The Butte County District Attorney's Office is in the process of implementing a plan wherein the sentencing Judge will order the convicted offender to report to the grant Investigator. The purpose of this visit will be to have the offender complete a financial data form to give the Investigator the necessary tools to ensure the offender is complying with the sentence given, and that restitution monies are collected as ordered by the Court. Further case development will come through our continuing and expanding outreach programs and our working relationship with the Department of Insurance. We are currently in the research and planning stages of obtaining a "bait car" for would-be car thieves to steal. This program has had great success where it had been used in other area's of the state. We feel we would have such success in Butte County, our staff is very motivated to get this program off the ground and running. There were 852 vehicles reported stolen in Butte County in calendar year 2002. A similar "bait car" program in Los Angeles County spurred a ~ 1 °lo decrease in stolen vehicle's in that county after the inception of the program. With the average car theft loss estimated at approximately $4,000, the savings to just Butte County could reach fairly substantial numbers. We have obtained the ``bait car" from the National Insurance Crime Bureau recently and have made necessary repairs to the vehicle to make it safe for use. The vehicle will then be sent to a local,vendor to have the specialized theft deterrent equipment installed such as remote door locks, audiolvisual recording capability, and Ground Position System (GPS) equipment. We can actually place the vehicle in situations where it may be stolen. A surveillance team will monitor the vehicle. After the ``bait" is taken, the team can shut down the vehicle's engine while locking the doors, trapping the thief inside the car. The theft process will be caught on video and audiotape for evidence/prosecution purposes from equipment installed within the car. We have obtained the "bait car" for the cost of $1.00 (one dollar} from the National Insurance Crime Bureau for a one year period, with optional renewals for the same cost. We have entered into a contract with the N.LC.B. to obtain, use, and maintain the vehicle, as well as equipping the vehicle ~ ith the necessary special equipment to lock the doors, shut down the engine, etc. In light ofthe fact that there were 852 vehicle thefts in Butte County in FY2002/2003 and this office was only able to identify and prosecute li0 suspects shows the need for an aggressive bait car program wherein we can capture and prosecute these individuals as they are committing the crime instead of "stale" thefts oftentimes lacking in good evidence or any evidence at all. We believe an aggressive bait car program will greatly deter thieves from thinking about stealing cars in Butte County once the "word gets out" to the local criminal element. ~'e hope that at least one of the thieves that we capture trying to steal the vehicle will want to make a deal with our prosecuting attorney and perhaps lead us to a "chop shop" or similar operation wherein this investigative unit can make a lame impact into the local auto theft and vandalism scene. A recent newspaper article from the OravilleEnterprise-Record dated 7/3/03 stated new information agency people know to call to report fraud. Those who would commit automobile insurance fraud will know Butte County District Attorney will aggressively investigate and prosecute fraud and, as we have learned in welfare fraud investigation and prosecutions, people will believe there is a strong likelihood of arrest and prosecution if they attempt automobile insurance fraud. To capture these goals, it is indispensable that aggressive investigation anal prosecution be the foundation of our long term goals. We expect our staff to be leaders in this area of crime investigation and, as is the case in many other Butte County District Attorney programs, emulated and copied by other agencies. «Te have achieved state and national recognition for leadership in the areas of Drug Endangered Children (DEC}, Welfare Fraud, Asset Forfeiture and Child Abuse Response Team concepts and programs. We will be adding Automobile Insurance Fraud Investigation and Prosecution to this list of areas where we are ]coders. In Summary, our goals for fisca1 2003 - 2004 are to: • Continue to increase our outreach and education program in an effort to reduce the actual incidents of automobile fraud in Butte County by vigorously investigating and prosecuting this crime and by making the public keenly aware of the consequences of committing this offense. • Have adequate staffing to deal with an anticipated increase in the volume of investigations and prosecutions over prior fisca] years, including fraudulent automobile theft cases. • Identify existing automobile fraud cases within the District Attorneys caseload and develop enhanced restitution procedures and policies • Expand public exposure to the Insurance Fraud Program through the mediums of our web sight, our Fraud Hotline, radio, television, print media, local community gatherings, fairs and our television public service announcements. We also hope to develop a regular local newspaper section to discuss fraud called "Fraud Watch" • Continue to explore identifying fraud through networking with the Department of Insurance Fraud Division, local law enforcement agencies, insurance companies and the Northern California Fraud Investigators Association. Enhanced staffing will allow us to review "insurance only" type theft and vandalism reports with local law enforcement for fraud indicators. • Implement and operate a "bait car" program in both the incorporated and unincorporated area's of the county to aggressively attack the auto theft and tampering problem in Butte County thereby decreasing the number of actual vehicle thefts and insurance claims/losses, and the discovery of "chop shop" operations in the area. Page 1 of 2 Oroville Mercury Register BIG JUMP IN VEHICLE THEFT CAUSES BUTTE CRIME RATE RISE Thursday, July 03, 2003 - By ELEANOR CAP~IERON/MediaNews Group Vehicle thefts are up by 45 percent in Butte County, according to an advance release of crime statistics far the year 2002. The Galifornia Department of Justice report, "Crime in California, 2002, Advance Release," provides a summary of crimes and arrests reported by law enforcement jurisdictions in the state and adult felony dispositions reported by police, sheriffs, prosecutors and courts. The report, released by attorney general Bill Lockyer's office on Tuesday, also included some county data. In Butte County, the total number of violent crimes are down. However the county numbers rose significantly in vehicle thefts. Vehicle theft rase by 45 percent in 2002, from 463 to 673 per 100, 000. "It is consistent with what we have experienced anecdotally," said Chico police Capt. Mike Maloney. "With in the fast year we've sensed an increase in vehicle thefts." The states statistics prove the impressions of the department were correct, he added. "We don't know what to attribute it to, but it's a good time to remind people to not leave keys in their car, lock their doors and no to leave valuables in plain sight in a vehicle." Overall, in California the numbers show an increase of 2.4 percent in the overall crime rate compared to 2001, with a 4.9 percent increase in property crime and a 2.7 percent decrease in the rate of violent crimes, according to a press release from Lockyer's office. Butte Gounty crime rates Number of crimes per 100,000 population: 2001 2002 change All Crime 1,627.7 1701.6+4.5% Violent crime 304.2 259.6 -14.7% Homicide 5.3 2.4 rorcible rape 39.2 30.7 -21.7% Robbery 63.8 65.1 +2.0% Assault 195.8 161.4 -17.6°l0 Property crimes 1,323.5 1,442.0 +g.0% Burglary 850.3 7692 -10.6% Vehicle theft 463.2 672.9 +45.3% hrtp:;!~~~-w.oro~~illemr.com,~cdarartiele!printl0.l6?4,1 ~?%7E26686°%7E1~919 ^ 6.OO.htm1 7!3%2(}fl3 P~ISl~? Money -The 25 vehicles thieves love most -Insure your car Page 1 of 7 ~. M:~$~ ~o;`,R ! ~ ,~ €~~~< I ;-:ot ;,ail I S so ~;ing I ~I~"v. I " eo;:ie ~ mat Sign In '~i"ad .,eWrc;~. ~ r ~:._ - _. ti, ~ r .-~ ~ ~ ~''± ~ _ 6.'"dr.':' =' I ..^=ass:?'3`"~,y' I ;3antGi;;y l~"ic.:.aii"t~ T2X~~ I ~~e:o ~~ :".uS ~;R, ~ ` _ { I -Planning Home Retirement Savings _^s;ran~.M rr"amilylCclie~,e Insurance Quotes ~. ^r=~r- ; Auto Insurance z Home Insurance ~ .: _ Life Insurance ~ '~~ ~ ~ ~; Health Insurance ~ ~'x-~. ...~ Planner Insurance Planner Print-friends version Resources Sen_d_ th_.s_to__a._frie_nd Decision Centers Assess Your Needs - ~ ' - ~ r ~+~~;~ Insure Your Carte; ~; Insure Your Life more on this topic Insure Your Home Car insurance Insure Your Health quotes online Avoid Rip-offs Know Your Rights MSN Auto`s reliability ratings Articles More Tools Insure.comC_ostly states for car insurance EZeEctr^d Links Message Boards Insure.com s Retirement Planner crash__test_ratings Find It! Article-.Index Finance &A Tools Index Sit_e__m..ap >~~~ E~e!a`.ed Sites Research ne__w and used cars at MSN Autos The Basics The 25 vehicles thieves love most Some are easier to steal, and some are easier to sell. Is your carat risk? Here are the most- stolen cars and trucks and the reasons they are targeted. By Bankrate,com • is 4~eht k~~~in~'~~r~~~_i yip ~t rii~ht%. • Ln~r~er ~~oi~ir monthl~~ i~~~,jm~nts_ 1 +~ ~'~it~RI4~~G~ ;elect a Loan ~ Go .rte`. - `;., ;. r. et r ~ s T _.. - Toyotas and Hondas dominated the list of most-stolen cars in 2002, according to a report from CCC Information Services. While overall theft losses declined 3%, that's still a total of $8 billion. Of the top 25 most-stolen cars, 20 are Toyotas or Hondas. The Honda Accord is the single-most-stolen model, according to CCC, which analyzes losses submitted by property and casualty insurers. The most-stolen brand? Chevrolet. Among the trends CCC reported: • Minivans and sport-utilities continue to gain the attention of thieves, with 2002 showing a 10% increase in thefts since 2000. . Thefts of full-sized models and muscle cars like the Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Gamaro continue to slide, reflecting their fall-off in popularity with consumers. . All of the domestic brands on the top 25 list are pickup trucks. }lttll'i~Tll(1TleFCP.T1tTal mcn rnm/rnntPnt/Tncnran~aRnc,~ravn„rn~r/P:',~~/1 gyn.. G/'l:r'~ftn'1 MSN Money -The ?5 vehicles thieves love most -Insure your car Pale 3 of 7 13.6°!° of those thefts led to an arrest back in 2001. (Is it any wander studies also show these criminals rate their chances of get<ing caught in the low-to-zilch range?) And car theft tends to follow a local flavor of the month. For example, Texas thieves prefer pickups: 19 of the top 20 are cargo haulers. Michigan's criminals lean more toward domestic cars, while California and New York lowlifes drool over imports. They love them so much on the East Coast that you'll find only one domestic car on New York's list: the flashy Cadillac Escalade sport-utility. Phoenix holds NICB's current top honors for most stolen vehicles in 2002 with State College, Pa., coming in dead last at No. 336. "Groups of thieves pass the knowledge of how to steal a particular vehicle on to the next person, and they tell two friends who tell two friends. Pretty soon you have a whole section of the country that specializes in a certain type of vehicle," says Michelle Lanham, manager of the Reduce Auto Theft in Texas office. So dig deep enough and you'll find your baby fisted on someone's Stolen Hall of Fame. "But you do get points for doing research and making informed choices to reduce your risk," says McGoey. Take a peek at some of the whys behind the NICB's latest reports from the FBI 2001 statistics to see if you're in the hot seat: 1. Toyota Camry This car also topped the list of CCC Information Services for the past five years, the 1999, 1989 and 1990 models to be exact. In this case, popularity has its downfalls. When you look at the per-capita sale rate for vehicles in this country, the Camry and Honda Accord lead the pack. 2. Honda Accord It's a common posting in the classifieds: silver 1994 Honda Accord, chrome wheels, air rod suspension, stolen in Pennsville, N.J. 11ttT?:%(TrlOne~%Central.IllSn~COmi'COT1t~nt~ns~IrancP,~nct~revrnimarlP~S'?fid acre ~J~:J7(1(12 MSN Money -The 25 vehicles Thieves love most -Insure your car Page 5 of 7 model's appearance in the Top 10. "If you can drive manuals, take them because they're less likely to have an alarm," he recommends. Real men buy stick-shift trucks, so real riff-Taff rip them off. 7. Toyota Corolla Yes, vehicles vanish from street curbs, driveways; parking lots and even car dealership lots. But, says McGoey, the frequency increases when the dishonest can bet you'll be gone for an extended time. Think airports, movie complexes, large apartment complexes at night, shopping centers during business hours, fairgrounds and sporting events. They tend to avoid fee- based parking lots (too much hassle explaining to the old guy sitting in the little booth why they don't have a ticket) as well as stacked parking garages that offerjust one escape route. But consider open lots as a smorgasbord, McGoey adds. Toyota Corollas are the salad bar. 8. Ford Taurus According to McGoey, some cars are stolen on order, meaning that someone has placed an order for a specific make, model and color. The Pennsylvania State Police find that of this state's 93 stolen cars each day, 40% end up being sold whole or in pieces, 44% serve as transportation for thrill-seekers, 11 °I° are used to commit other crimes and 5% can be traced to insurance fraud. 9. Chevrolet Caprice Chalk up another one to the General Motors curse and the dazzle of American styling. "The Top 10 vehicles are popular in other countries, and organized theft rings will illegally export them to foreign destinations," confirms NICE president and CEO Robert M. Bryant. Criminals in custody cite Poland, Russia and other Eastern-bloc countries as their best customers. u;~u~rs~~,~~,t Approximately 200,000 }~tt-r~• J%m nn ac~nar, 4,-n~ .-., ,.« .....-.., /,. ,.«c...-.~,?.... ___.__~ _ _ fi __ ____._______._ _ -. m^~ r~ r ~ ~ ,- _ ._ _ _ _ 1 i n'esr ...r,..s%.. wssc. C+orrris M W1~GC7PiStN E3oard v# Police and Fire Carnmissicsners August 4= 2003 Chief James E. Carr Fire Chief Kentwood Fire Departttient 4775 Walma Avenue, S.E. 1'.(~, Box x$48 Kentwood, M14951 g-8$48 Dear Chief Care-; ;'i~t 7 K , ,~, . WA'1".'~`E B. CLARK PR.£SII~E~T J.~'~'ET ?~£LS02V' VICE PRESI£7~FT' €DW.ARU ~E'4"ER SirCttETARY K.~iTfiLEEN DAGE:tiHARTiT .105EPH F. Kir:vtPEl` C?n behalf of the West Allis Police and Fire Commission and, I'm sure, Chief Nac3k and his leadership team, 1 want to thank you and your accreditation team for the invaluable service you provided list v,-eek. I was particularly impressed with the way you and Chief Wassman conducted the exit meeting. Your comments were constructive and insightful which turned the audit report into a roadmap for continuous improvement. Thank, you far yauF prafessionalism? The results ofyou audit validate the past four }cars of stellar ~~ork by the `~~est Allis fire service in preparing the department for accreditation. Thank you for your team's unanimous decision to recammend acc;reditatian of the ~~jc;st Allis Fire Department. I was pleased you were able to attend the Grand t~pening c~fhew Fire Station hun~ber 1, Saturday, and sit in on the Special Ivlectiz~~; afthe Vest Allis Police and Fire C°aanmissic~n Thursdu;; .a.~3iY:iI~.~. I trust your experience- last week gave you a sense of our vibrant city. Chief Carr, if we can ever be of sen=ice, please let me knave. l~indest Regards, a~ ff Wayn .Clark Copy: Jeannette Rall, Mayor Steven 1. Ht~ok, Fire Chief Police and Fire Commission t't30i WEST !!lNCQLN AVENUE WEST ALLtS, WtSCC}htStN 5322.7 PNOh#i= {414)302-8ot)Gi ~ FAX 1414}~ta2-8D99 ^ TTY X414}30~-8t}C~} {NST SPACE SAR} http:l~www.ci.west-a tl is.wi.vs '~ `=~ cw ~'~,,~ i NATIONAL INSURANCE CRIME BUREAU ifEHICLE SSE ~GREEIViE~IT The National Insurance Grime Bureau ("NIGH") does hereby lease to the Butte County District Attorney ("Agency"), the vehicle described as: Year: 1997 Make: Honda Model: Accord VIN: 1 HGCD560XVA06$184 This vehicle will be used by the Agency for the purpose of auto sting operations and in the investigation of insurance related crimes. This agreement is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Agency leases from the NICB, the above-described vehicle far one dollar ($1.00) and other valuable considerations for use in pursuit of its lawful purpose. The Agency shall accept said vehicle "as is". The NICB shall retain remainder interest in said vehicle and that remainder interest shall take full force and effect on the 365th day after the effective date of this agreement, or longer if the term is extended in writing. 2. The Agency warrants that it will not sell, convey or in any way dispose of said vehicles in a manner which may impair the NICB's remainder interest. However, in the event that the above described vehicle is stolen or in any way damaged while in the custody of the Agency, its agents or assigns, the Agency shall be liable far any repair or replacement costs. 3. The Agency does hereby release the NICB from all claims for property damage or bodily injury arising from the operation or maintenance of the vehicle described herein by an employee, agent ar assignee of the agency during the term of this agreement. 4. The Agency agrees and warrants that it shall provide insurance coverage (self-insured agency) for the above-described vehicle in the normal course of its business. 5. The effective date of this agreement shall be the date the vehicle is delivered into the custody of the Agency. OPERATION PLAs'v BUTTE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY Case# 00314800005 May 28, 2003 ?~A C'~[~"?'~C,-U1~?D INEORI4%IATIQN: Butte County is located in Northern California approximately 80 miles north of Sacramento. The county has tlu-ee major incorporated cities and a large unincorporated area. It has come to the attention of the District Attoneys office that the auto thefts continue to rise from year to year in Butte County. Statistics shov,~ that Butte County law enforcement agencies reported 613 stolen vehicles in 2001 and 854 in 2002. The most commonly stolen vehicles are the Toyota Camry, Honda Accords and Honda Civics. The District Attorneys office has contacted the law enforcement agencies within the county and all have indicated a willingness to participate in a concerted effort to stem the increase of stolen vehicles within the county. Butte County District Attorneys office will be the lead agency in a task force type operation in cooperation with the major law enforcement agencies within the county to do undercover auto theft sting operations by use of a bait vehicle. This proactive approach should help member companies in reducing insured losses within the county. They would like to obtain a vehicle to be used as a bait and undercover vehicle in an effort to combat this gi-oz~,~ing problem. The vehicle will be used in surveillance, sting operations and other proactive auto theft investigations. I l.~ave received a letter from Michael Ramsey, the District Attorney of Butte County stating these facts and requesting assistance from NICB in obtaining a vehicle. PROPOSED PLAN: The District atfon7eys office will be the lead agent}~. They «~i11 equip the vehicle with the propel- equipment (ignition intemipt, locking devices, tracking devices, etc.) to minimize the risk of the vehicle being stolen and not recovered. The vehicle will then be used in a proactive bait car program through out the county. ~~ - ..ter .~.~` ..,: ~t .~ ~ ~ ,~ ~- ~ ~ .. _. - _ _ .~ ~. _ ..~ ~. _ __ ~ - - - f ~`~ ~~` ~:r,~~ .. G ~~L ~ RAMS~Y ~„ f ~' ~ °~ ~a~ ~~ ~~ ,~, o .. ~~~ ~~ E p ^` ~^".N, t BUTTE COUNTY AUTOll~IOBILE INSURANCE FRAUD COUNTY PLAN PROGRAM STRATEGY In Summary, our goals for fisca1 2003 - 2004 are to: Continue and expand our outreach and education program to reduce the incident of actual or attempted automobile insurance fraud in Butte County. Ta accomplish this objective, we plan to aggressively and vigorously investigate and prosecute this area of crime, and by increasing public awareness of the penalties one will face when attempting or actually committing this crime. • To maintain staff assignments, and increase staff where possible to deal with an increase in the number of investigations and prosecutions. • Continue to work toward identifying existing cases of automobile insurance fraud within the caseload and develop enhanced restitution procedures. • Continue to expand public exposure to our Insurance Fraud Program through our web site, our Fraud Hotline and with all broadcast and print he dr ~e of fraud through partp potion community outreach to foster public a~~areness of in community gatherings and fairs. • Continue to explore identifying fraud through networking with the State Department of Insurance Fraud Division, local. law enforcement agencies. insurance companies and the Northern California Fraud Investigators Association. • Enhance the detection, investigation, and prosecution of automobile insurance fraud through networking, education, and partnership u-ith local law enforcement in the area of fraud related to reported cases of vehicle theft. • Develop and implement an aggressive `'bait car" program within the county to catch car thieve's as they are actually trying to v~ dduc na the numbe ofhefts~that ~ ill occur time and thereby preventing future thefts an NARRATIVE We have discovered the combination of key staff members, effective use and development of resources, and excellent inter-agency relations are imperative to a successful and viable program. Staffing: Putting the most qualified persons in key positions Currently staffing our Automobile Insurance Fraud Program are DDA Kevin Maloney and Mike Candella (each at 25% FTE} who have proven strong prosecutorial backgrounds. In the previous years the prosecutors have been assisted by Investigator John Bowers, with almost 25 years of law enforcement experience and Investigator Jos VanHout, who developed the computer tracking system for the grant and our web-site. Investigator William Proffitt is responsible to see all requirements of the program are carried through. Legal Secretary Marci Hummel (non-grant funded) is assigned to support the efforts of the team. Ms. Hummel is the personal secretary for both DD A's and has extensive experience working with the assigned prosecutors. Use and De~~elopment of Resources:_ Through the continued development ofpublic education, industry networking and case development, fiscal year X003 / 200 should be our strongest year. Public Education: Outreach and education. is the key to building public confidence in our ability to protect the citizens from those who cheat the system and drive up insurance costs by stealing. Public outreach and education are essential to develop the needed communication. between the citizens and government to identify the fraud which is taking place. To further these goals, the Butte County District Attorney has established atoll-free Fraud Hotline and Fraud Internet Web Page. We also participate in local community fairs with our District Attorney's booth using banners and handouts advertising our anti-fraud efforts. We also have produced and show our public service announcement to combat fraud at these fairs and on local television. The combination of all of these efforts acts to educate the public about awareness of fraud and our efforts to investigate and prosecute these crimes. It is believed the education of the public from all of these efforts will have a significant impact on the number of fraudulent automobile insurance claims, which should translate into lower insurance premiums far our citizens. ~i;=: ,.,e ~..~ ,,,,fir ~...~' _~ i ..a ._ ~ ~ ~.>s' e ~,.~ ..e ~-~." ~. _ ~ - - -f ._ - - _. _ _ u_ - - -... - ~- ,~ ,.~, J ~ ,~~~~ L f2,q~gf~,~,~.t~ ~~~ ~ J.-%'~! ~ t : ~ ~ a .~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ C fo ~~~ .L L ~~_ ~ ~_ ~~~ t ) a~.- fio~'e ~JfJ, 1 .4`' [+/~ ~d. O~ ~~~ ~ti~ _ - ~ ~, ~d~ O~ BUTTE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FRAUD PROGRAM STAFF DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS: DDA Kevin Maloney, formerly with the Mendocino County District Attorney's Office, has extensive knowledge of both Workers Compensation and Automobile Insurance Fraud investigation and prosecution. Kevin handles half of the split of assigned prosecutions with DDA Michael Candela. A graduate of San Francisco School of Law, Kevin spent his first years as a criminal prosecutor in Mendocino County with the District Attorney and was that agency's Insurance Grant Administrator and prosecutor. A member of the California District Attorney's Association , Insurance Fraud Committee, and an instructor at CDAA / DOI fraud seminars DDA Miehaei Candela graduated from the University of San Francisco School of Law in 1987. Prior to graduation, he served as a law clerk for the California Supreme Court. Upon graduation, Mike worked as a research attorney for the Superior Court of California, San Francisco County. A former Deputy District Attorney for Morin County, Mike worked in private practice before joining the Butte County District Attorney team in 1997. Mr. Candela is a co-author of the second and third editions of the CEB, California Criminal. Law, Practice and procedure. ASSISTANT CHIEF INVESTIGATOR: Assistant Chief Tony Koester is a twenty eight (28) year law enforcement officer and a twenty three (23) year veteran of the Butte County District Attorney, Investigation Bureau. Serving as an Investigator in the Real Estate Fraud /Economic Crimes Unit, Homicide, Child Support, and as a supervisor or in a command level position in the Criminal Division,VJelfare Fraud and Child Support Investigation Units. Currently in command of the Criminal Division. A former member of the Board of Directors of the California Welfare Fraud Investigators Association, Tony holds a Juris Doctor degree from Cal Northern School of Law received in 1993, and was admitted to the practice of law by the California Bar Association the same year. \1 !/i / ' EI.LR ,.,-~,, ~,~ o, ~- ter, ~~~.. ~~'~ ~ ;. .~ k~r:- ~~ ~~ - ~ ~~ ~~ - 7T ~~' l~' `[~ `fit y{S~ °': ~r~ ~~~ a~ ~. r - ~ .rte - ..r '"' ± -~"' ~ ~~... .Y t -` - ~M BUTTE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORl~TEY AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FRAUD UNIT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART 2003 / 200 MICHAEL L. RAIVISEY BUTTE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY KRISTIN J. SIMPSON FRANCISCO ZARATE Chief Investigator Chief Deputy District Attorney a TONY KOESTER Assistant Chief Investigator s MAJOR CRIMES UNIT i SHANE RUBINOFF Sr. Investigator i WILLIAM PROFFITT Fraud Investigator i KEVIN MALONEY Deputy District Attorney Z MICHAEL CANDELA Deputy District Attorney i MARCIE RUNNEL Legal Secretary ~e .~ ~ vim` ~/ .a _ ..1 ~. ~ ~ 1 .._.~1 _ ~ ~ ._ ~. ~` .~ d ` ~,t t _ ~ - ~~ ,..a~ a~ ~. ..~ ,..~ - .... ...~ ,.._ \ ~' i t _.,y ~ a ``1 .~ ~" ~r ~ x i F+i a~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~~., ~„~~,:~ -,_ :~, ~~:: '~: ~~ ~~ t ~~," 5~ \ _ ~i ~d~ ~.- oP _. ~ ___. _.. .... ~. _. .,.m,F .... ~ ..., ,..... .~.. l~'Iemorandum of Understanding Re: Joint Investigative Plan 1. Introduction (a} The "parties" to this joint investigative plan are the California Department of Insurance -Fraud Division, and the Butte County District Attorney's Insurance Fraud Unit. (b) The parties to this joint investigative plan recognize that the C.D.I. -Fraud Division was established to investigate allegations of insurance fraud throughout the State of California, and is the primary investigative agency in this field. However, while the headquarters for the Fraud Division in Central - I`~orthern California is based in Sacramento, its investigative responsibilities encompass twenty-five central and northern counties. Due to this considerable geographical territory, the number of referrals/cases, and the finite number of investigators available, the Fraud Division cannot reasonably be expected to devote its efforts in any one particular county. Thus the important need for ail effective joint plan to address the problem of insurance fraud in each jurisdictional territory. (c) The ability of the Butte County D.A.'s insurance fraud unit to conduct independent investigations enhances the goals of the state«~ide program to combat insurance fraud, as well as relieving some of the investigative burden the Fraud Division would otherwise experience in Butte County, better enabling the Fraud Division to meet its investigative obligations throughout the state. The ability to conduct independent investigations also enables the D.A.'s insurance fraud unit to respond quickly to the concerns of local employers, insurance carriers and administrators, and law enforcement agencies. 2. Statement of Coals (a) To promote a close working relationship between the D.A.'s insurance fraud unit and the Fraud Division, based an dedication to the common goal of fighting insurance fraud, commitment to the highest pi-ofessionai and ethical standards, and mutual respect as law enforcement officers devoted to the pursuit of justice and the protection of the citizens of Butte County and the State of California. (b) Ta investigate in a timely manner, using professional standards and procedures, and prosecute when appropriate, as many identifiable causes of suspected insurance fraud as we can. (g) If the D.A.'s insurance fraud unit receives a case referral from an insurer and it is determined that jurisdiction does not lie in Butte County or venue is better placed in another county, the case will be forwarded to the district attorney's office in the appropriate county, with written notice of this fact to the C.D.I. 4. Investigations (a) Pursuant to the above provision, and to maximize the expenditure of resources it is expected that each party will conduct its own investigations independently in most cases. However, it is understood and agreed that either party will provide assistance to the other upon request in any investigation where such assistance is needed. This could include serving search warrants, interviewing witnesses, making arrests, etc. (b} ~ Joint investigation may be undertaken in cases where the parties determine it is beneficial to combine resources to achieve the most efficient and effective result. This will be determined oil acase-by-case basis. (c) It is expected that cases will be developed from referrals by insurers, other law enforcement/governmental agencies (CIIP; EDD; etc.), informants, and other responsible sources of information. Outreach programs are encouraged to promote this aspect of the plan. (d} It is the intent of this joint investigative plan to avoid duplication of investigative efforts by maintaining regular communication to discuss case loads and share information concerning current investigations. (e) The supervising deputy district attorney of the D.A.'s insurance fraud unit, or hislher designee, will be available to meet with the Fraud Division investigator at any time during the investigation of a case when so requested by the investigator to discuss any aspect of the case. (f) It is the intent of the parties that by maintaining regular communication and adhering to the agreed upon plans and procedures, the completed investigation will result in the filing of criminal charges and a successful prosecution. At the same time, however, it is understood that not every case that is investigated will result in a prosecution. This can happen when the evidence does not develop as expected, material witnesses are no Langer available, the case lacks jury appeal, the reasonable likelihood of conviction is minimal, or other unforeseen circumstances develop. The parties will take all passible steps to avoid such situations, as it is not desirable to expend investigative resources on cases that are not prosecuted in court. tihe alleged false statements or misrepresentation to the claim. The investigator should also identify any perceived problems or weaknesses in the case. (c) To promote efficiency in this area, Fraud Division investigators are encouraged to contact the Butte D.A. early in the investigation of a case to share ideas and develop strategies that w•i11 lead to a prosecutable case. (d} After the formal presentation of a case by a Fraud Division investigator to the D.A.'s insurance fraud unit, a filing decision will be made within fourteen (14) working days, with notice to the investigator of the decision. If additional investigation is necessary, the investigator will be notified immediately in writing of the additional investigation requested. If a case is rejected, the investigator will be notified of the reasons for the rejection. 7. Training (a) Both parties have been, and will continue to be, active participants in the annual CDAA/CDI insurance fraud-training seminar. This seminar will provide a significant portion of the ongoing training of both parties in the area of insurance fraud. In addition, NCFIA, VICIA, IASIU, and similar association training seminars will be attended when appropriate. (b) The parties will participate in joint informal training sessions as necessary on issues important to the investigation and prosecution of insurance fraud cases. (c) The parties will assist each other, when requested, in training sessions for insurance carriers and administrators, on issues important to the detection, investigation, and prosecution of insurance fraud cases. $. Problem Resolution {a) It is the intent of this joint plan that any problems or differences that may arise between parties be resolved quielay through early, direct, and open communication by those personnel directly involved in the dispute. If necessary, the Chief Investigator of the Fraud Division and the prosecutor in charge of the D.A.'s insurance fraud program may be called upon to resolve any dispute, concentrating on the best interests of the overall insurance fraud program. ATTACHMENT "D" CONFIDENTIAL MCU CASE LOAD CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE Ol? PROJECTED CASE # SUSPECT NOTES INV fILING DATE FILED - ASSIGNMENT s 2000-1144 Iaoarra Ismael ~ Re-fded 11-25-02 for DA review )B 2000-L9D Mulrennan ' Ready to File (01/15/02} Received from Donna on DD 04122 4 19 02 Criminal char es files 5(28 02 arrest warrant 2001-1522 Powers ~ ti Chi Starting U/C Operation. Contacted AAA, Kemper, State and SCIF for help with pre-tent policy. UJCs set for r""arm BW c roprac , training. DOI to assist with U(C op. Pre-text policy in place. Two UJCs have been in. No bills as of 4-10-02. Bills have came in. It appears Powers is billing for services not rendered. Search Warrant served on June 19, 2002. Second S W 10-30-02 12001-1545 Gibson Starting U/C Operation. Contacted AAA, Kemper, State BW Chiropractic Farm, and SCIF for help with pre-text policy. UJCs set for training. DOI to assist with UJC op. Pre-text policy in place. U(C has been in for 10+ visits. Started receiving bills through Kemper. Investigator Wristen went in to Gibson UjC. Wristen was referred to Richard GingeryJJustin Gingery. Wristen went to Gingery's ofFlce and signed a retainer for services. Wristen was told by both Gibson and Gingery the the two of them had been doing referrals for several years and had worked over 100 2001-1561 Cooper, William Pending information fram WJG appeal board. Potentially BW not a criminalcase.(4;22J02) 2002-2519 Murphy, Ga'ry' With Kevin Maloney for.'filing. DO? contacted, 1~1iirphy ~)0 •-fA'd. MurpYiy'ta contact Inv Van Hoot to arrange for. new turn in day. Court date assigned pending potential plea(4/22702) PXbn 5/1/C2 held toansvaer on one count of 550(c) (1) PC 2001-1645 Fuller, Pamela Awaiting SIU follow up. BW i 200'c47 Paradise Auto Heads Su>pect"and Virtim Inteniiev:•s. Contacted•victim, ; B BW Body phone lnterolew se! for 1 31-02 . Interviewed vl tlri, and BL claim, rep, Referred ho BAR not an irsurancu case. Case Closed t5i2LjO2} 2001-1548 Alvarez, Awaiting review from 51U BW Gumersindo 2002-1000 Espinosa, Joy Pending follow up from SIU Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance BW 2002-1016 Beryar, Ravinder Interview Suspect and Witnesses. Left message for BW Suspect and his girlfriend to contact me. Will set of interview of suspect. Evidence at BCSO for latent print in fume tank, (7-il Big Gulp cup). Had contact with Beryar, will come in for statement. Interviewed Beryar. Still denies the arson. DOJ doing time line for case. Jos and Bruce to reinterview Beryar. Have copies of signed mail I receipt depo. Sister and brother interviewed. Working an ~ i tracking down girlfriend. Writing Search Warrant for 2002-1042 ; Mead, Gary ' 12-19-02--Cook sentenced to 5 yrs state prison for 451PC JB 1 05/12 i and SSD(a}PC i I CASE # SOURCE OF SUSPECT NOTES INV PROJECTED FILING DATE FILED 99-1D34-CM13525 ASSIGNMENT Tony Koester Cornwell, Gary Follow up and trial prep required. Update the discovery DOI NJA ' N(A binders by Bate stamping the discovery in files.Contact JVH the 14 base bal', players of Mr. Cornwelts team and I question each one of them about Mr. Cornwell's shoulder ~ i injury and whether or not he complained or favored it. Additionally I need to authenticate the roster itself.Also i will need to authenticate the storekeeping documents by j locating and interviewing the scorekeepers. This may involve locating 7 or B additional individuals.Interview Doctor Egart and support staff if needed to authenticate I the doctor's reports.Interview 4 to 5 C4P officer's including Vic Vasquez, referencing the woodcutting incident. Additional folow up from attorney. Pending follow up 2pp1 ~6?2 Stephens;"3ackie ' JJh"'.7hvestlggl;jpq v+ithDC' Caste `r'ed 'oX;^heduledfo. ~0~ ~i03'?7 . i pv,1y~0-co~,irn~eu. k-:o ^,ey FoLw.~up reyui~ed.~~spe~t JUH r. "~' C pl d ~erdingse ~t nony Case Closed ' ~ - ZDO; l0 5 ___ _ 4,~n~5, r~ ae; i ' J i t v~a~a ~o~ Fe e vex; case ron D0: o A~rll 6, ~OC2 C e Hied h 3L',~ A gamey F !I ~J;ap eyu _d, IrC[ J/H~ Oq;2= ; °~ I ~ F~I~orr .,,c~mp~ iPJ~n t 7 2~'1 Addltl,,r31 fallov, „p ~ ~ ~ i 4 ~ I i i fo ~rla cri tir 3'03, ~~cd oJilry o , 23(G3 Case ~ Closed - ~ ~ ~ i ~~ L. 00-1189 ~~ Assigned Case --- Azevedo, Karen ' - -- - Submitted to Mike Candela for review in December 20D2. JVH Unk Per meeting with Ramsey on June ll, 2003: Prep patient files for distribution to several experts to review potential overtreatment. Candela to supply names of experts, interviews conducted and Experts contacted. Preliminary reportsYecelved intlicating gross negligence, excessive treatment and unprofessional conduct. Pending further input from experts. ' 02 1029 Assigned Case Gabriel, Denise b Follow up Interviews to be completed. All but two,.. 7VH NJA 09/16)02 interviews done. One interviewee is a suspect in a similar 5.0. Case so I will .not intefiew her to compromise their . investigation. Suspect interview left to do. Pending suspect interview Oe,`L;1 M!R ; "hli~ams,Glenr '; Trial~anuary 27,2003 ~uspec?"_ledquilh~t 12"~=elont~ ' JVN PJ'A ' 1D'~-,'0' I i ~coun+¢ o': Tn.:rscdYJan~~,'00?. f~a'.ia~: c~ Jan 2?tF. i ~ !Cased Closed by arrest and conviction WFU 01-5027 Tony Koester Schrntter, Steven Complete report and possible addibonai interviews. JVH/ N/A 12(19)02 Interviewed Schnitter m SusanVilie. Report originally. SR submitted to Intake on Dec 19th. Case number problem ... fixed and resubmitted to Intake on Jan. 28th, Two additional interviews left, Shane was going to assist. On 3/19)03 1 attempted to contact Robert Williams and his wife, Shannon Williams at B74 East 1st Avenue and it appeared that no one is living in the residence. follow-up needed on current address of subjects. {sr) Williams' were interviewed nothing more developed. Completed follow up interview report on Shannon & Robert Williams. (SR) .Pager calls made and report submitted. 6/24/03-7os completed follow up on pager seized in this case. Automated records deleted from pager company, search warrant required to obtain the records, also interview will be conducted with Shannon & Robert Williams daughter. SR 98-1231 OPD Tony Koester Holmes, Larry Attorney Follow Up required: Search Warrant for two JVH NJA OSJ01/02 98-2160 bank accounts, Financial evaluation of two business ' accounts. Review Civil documentation. Determine If Chico ~ Location for business was free or not. Determine If Holmes was selling product to numerous Chico merchants and not delivering the proceeds to the victim. Review Search Warrant material when it arrives. Obtain settlement agreement from oregon company (united Grocers). 3)18)03 Wrote and served another search I warrant for three more locations. Pending that material for review. All material received. Pending my data input and review of approximately 40D0 _ M„ i - ,f- n_G~ ~ssigo°aL~~e ''~tultifle ,, ..; ,i /i~ 1 I - I Meyer Tony Koester ~? IAq rep.-fard~ iv at-s ar a jn~~5r to G ~C,rnu~`ing a N,.ter ~ n i d~ -0_t tl ss!st ~D1R._ ~eev~~ v. :hOr~1v o~ ;-tC,D3 h _,~~e,~ horn dr`n~?. SubrlitiPtl f re 5~r rcG.> ~ ~ ~-91k~ _~n._ _n Case ~Giosed- ` Acgwred Haro Dnve at search warrant site for Jon Meyer Conducting Computer forensics on drive. Nothing found on Hard Drive awaiting further instructions from J Meyer. Case on hold ,L,,.i „' ~~~. JVH N(A- - - - I N A