Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3927Ordinance No. 3927 2 3 4 S 61 71 8 c~ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19'~ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE AMENDING SECTIONS 3-I5, 3-16, 3-101, 3-I03, and 3-164 OF CHAPTER 3 AND SECTIONS 10-30.1, 10-33.5 AND 10-34 OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE BUTTE COUNTY CODE The Board of Su~er~-isors of~ the County of Butte ordai~ls as follows: Section 1. Sections 3-15 and 3-l G of Article II, entitled "Development Impact Fees for SheriFl's .lail Facilities", of Chapter 3, entitled "Fees", of the Butte County Code are amended to read as (allows: 3-15 Amount of impact fees for sheriff s jail facilities. The amo~mt of impact fees for sheriff's jail facilities assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this article shall be as follows: Land Use Fee Single Family Dwelling $288.00 (Including mobilehome and manufactured homes) Multiple Dwelling (including mobilehome and manufactured homes) $197.00 Commercial, Industrial and x.03 per square foot and all other non-residential uses (including manufactured buildings) The most recent amount on the index, dated January 2006, is 8468.45. 3-16 Periodic adjustments to development impact fees for sheriff's jail facilities. From time to time, the Sheriff's Department may submit documentation substantiating that there has been an increase in the cost of acquiring and/or developing jail facilities and requesting an increase in the jail facility fee authorized and levied pursuant to the provisions of this article. The board of supervisors may increase this fee in an amount proportional to the increase in such costs, The detenl~ination of whether there has been an increase in the cost of acquiring and/or de~~eloping such jail facilities and the amount of the increase in the jail facility fee which is proportional to the increase in such costs shall be made by the board of supervisors based on the followil~Ig: The net percentage increase in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for San 2 3 4' 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Francisco (using the CCI column of the "ENR City Cast Index -- San Francisco"} (based on 1913 U.S. average = 100) as last published in the Engineering News Record McGraw Hill Construction Weekly (or on the interlet} between the date of such increase and the effective date of this section or any prior increase in the fee made pursuant to the provisions of this section. The formula for adjusting the fee is: (New index amountlamount of index at time of existing fee) x existing fee =new fee. Section 2. Sections 3-101 and 3-103 of Article XI, entitled "Drainage Impact Fees", of Chapter 3, entitled "Fees", of the Butte Co~u~ty Code are amended to read as follows: 3-101 Findings. The Board of Supervisors makes the following findings and determinations required by Section 66001 of the California Government Code in regard to the fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this article: {a) Thermalito Drainage Study and fees. (1) The 1979 Thenmalito Drainage Study was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on October 21, 1980, by Ordinance 2154. Said study established the location, size and priority of construction which would resolve drainage problems in the Thermalito area; (2) The Board of Supervisors adopted the drainage fees established in said study by Resolution 82-106 and, based on public comment, adjusted the development fee by Resolution 82-173; (3) Said fees were adjusted by the Board of Supervisors on August 7, ] 990, by Resolution 90- 123, based on the ratio of: the July 1990 ENR CCI (formerly "Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index") value of 4734.77 divided by the 1979 ENR CCI rounded down to the nearest five dollars ($5.00) [The current method of adjustment is set forth in section 3-103]; (4) Said fees were again adjusted and placed in the Butte County Code by Ordinance 3304, adopted December 10, 1996, as well as by subseduent ordinances as indicated in parentheses after section 3-103; and (5) Said fees have been kept in a separate fund specifically for drainage improvements in the Thermalito area. (b) Chico Storm Drainage Master Flan. (1) The August 1987 Preliminary Stonm Drainage Master Plan and September 1997 Addendum 2 were adopted by Resolt-tion of the City of Chico, September 5, 2000. Said Storm Drainage Master Plan and Addendint~ establish the location, size and priority of construction for drainage facilities which 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 11 12 l3 l4 15 16 17 1$ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 would resolve potential and existing drainage problems in the Chico area; (2) The storm drainage facilities identified in said plan serve properties in the incorporated as well as unincorporated areas within the Chico Urban Area; (3) A coordinated effort between the City of Chico and County of Butte is necessary in order to construct these inter-jurisdictional drainage fees; and (4) The fees for construction of the drainage facilities within each identified drainage basin are established in the P]an and adjusted by the Addendum and subsequent adjustments based on nexus studies by the City of Chico. (c) It is in the best interest of the public to have said fees reviewed annually and adjusted as necessary to insure there are sufficient fiu~ds to install the required facilities. (d) The Board of Supervisors hereby finds that the fees amended and adopted by this article do not exceed the estimated reasonab]e cost of recovering the actual expenses for the construction of the drainage facilities specified by the adopted plans and necessitated by the new development upon which such fees will be imposed. The Board further finds that there is a reasonable relationship between said fees and the cost of the drainage facilities needed by and attributable to said new developlr~ent. (e) The drainage fees imposed pursuant to this article will be collected for public improvements or facilities for which specific accounts have been established and funds appropriated and for which the county has adopted drainage facilities plans. 3-103 Amount of drainage impact fees. {a) Rationale for fee amounts. The drainage impact fees specified below have been determined based upon the estimated costs of the facilities necessary to provide drainage for the specified areas and upon the anticipated coefficient of runoff generated by various types of land use. The coefficient ("C") is the anticipated coefficient of runoff generated by various types of land use. The coefficient ("C") is expressed as a decimal value based upon standard engineering principles and egi~-ations for determining runoff volumes. (b) Thermalito Drainage Area. Residential development on existing parcels or lots: $ 684.00 for each new living unit (i.e. duplex =two {2) living units) for any building permit for new living unit(s) on any existing lot for which full drainage fees have not been paid. Temporary living units allowed under Chapter 24: $ 136.00 prior to issuance of building permit. $ 136.00 annual renewal payment for the first four (4) renewals. Total amount not to exceed $ 684.00. 3 2 3 Parcel Maps for single family residential development: $ 1,228.00 per acre, for the first division subject to fee pa}~nent. $ 684.00 per parcel if property is further divided. $ 684.00 per living unit for new building permit an each of the resulting parcels. t~11 other uses: band Use Class Cost/Acre 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B ll Ruddv Creek Basin '5,380.00 .6,877.00 6,504.00 '832.00 West Basin 2,556.00 3,268.00 4,489.00 188.00 East Basin 9,028.00 1 l ,541.00 10, 152.00 631.00 Southeast Basin 1,827.00 2,335.00 2,704.00 449.00 Qasin 39 3,317.00 4,241.00 4,307.00 0 Class A: Subdivision within asingle-familyresidential land use with an assumed density of four (4) dwelling units per acre. C - 0.54. Class B: Multi-family residential, medium density. C 0.67. Class C: Commercial, office buildings and shops, mobile home parks. C = 0.78. Class D: Existing unimproved land which is anticipated to be developed to some more highly developed use at a future date. C varies, Total fee for other uses to be the stun of Class A or B or C plus Class D multiplied by the acreage of the property. Credit for facilities constructed in conformance with the adopted master drainage plan i'or the Thennalito Area, or fees paid maybe applicable pursuant to Appendix VIII of the Butte County Improvement Standards. Adjustment based on ENR CCI increase from January 2005 (20-City CCI - 7297) to January 2006 (20-City CCI=7660). Formula (766017297) x old fee _ 1.049746 x old fee =new fee. In the future to be consistent with other County Impact Fees, adjustment will be made based on the net percentage increase in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for San Francisco {using the CCI column of the "ENR City Cost Index -- San Francisco") (based on 1913 U.S. average = 100) as last published in the Engineering News Record McGraw Hill Construction Weekly {or on the Internet) between the date of suc11 increase and the effective date of this section or any prior increase in the fee trade pursuant to the provisions of this section. The formula for adjusting the fee is: (New index amount/amount of index at time of existing fee) x existing fee =new fee, The most recent amount on the index, dated .lanuary 2006, is 8468.45. 4 1 3 4 5 G 7 8 10 121 13 14 15 16 ]71 18 I l9 I 20 21 22~~ 23 ?4 25 26 ~~ ?g (c) Chico Storm Drainage Master Plan. All owners or developers of property located within the I Chico Storm Drainage Master Plan Area shall pay storm drainage fees prior to issuance of a building ~~ permit for an enclosed building or upon a change in use of the property. Such fees shall be based on the drainage basin in which the development is located and shall be calculated by applying the acreage, or portion thereof, for each particular development or change in use to the per acre fees set fo1-th in the table below. Fees will be collected as follows: Parcels with no pitted enclosed building(s) or structures (vacant land) with a net acreage of 1 acre or less - fit11 fees will be collected based on the size of t11e parcel. Fee to be the sum of the Per Acre Cost times the area of the parcel in acres. Parcels with no permitted enclosed building(s) or structures (vacant land) with a net acreage of more than ]acre - fi~l1 fees will be collected based on the area being improved as calculated by the Department of Public Works. Fee to be the sum of the Per Acre Cost times the area of the area being improved in acres. Parcels with existing permitted enclosed building(s) or structures -full fees will be collected based on the area being improved as calculated by the Department of Public Works. 1'ee to be the sum of the Per Acre Cost times the area of the area being improved its acres- hnprovement and the area being improved, is defined for this section as new: enclosed building(s); driveways; sidewalks; parking; landscaping; and any other site development requirement necessary for construction of the new enclosed building(s). Drainage Watercourse "hotal Cost Single Family Multiple Commercial A r e a (Drainage Basin) Per Acre Residential Per Family and Industrial Number Aere Cost Residential Per Acre Cost (0,50 rLmoff Per Acre (0.80 runoff coefficient) Cost (0.75 coefficient) r u n o f f coefficient) 770 Butte Creek $15,943 $7,947 $ l 1,995 812,974 771 Comanche Creek $16,683 $8,34 ] $12,512 $ 13,346 772 Little Chico $18,177 $9,088 $13,632 814,54 l Creek 773 Big Chico Creek 813,552 $6,776 810,164 $10,841 774 Lm o C 7anne 16,535 8,267 ~ 12,401 13,228 775 S.U.D.A.D Ditch $14,422 $7,21 1 810,$17 $1 1,538 776 Mud-Sycamore 812,551 $6,275 89,413 $10,040 Creek 777 P. V. Ditch 817,786 88,893 $ l 3,340 $14,229 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 c 10 11 12 13 l4 15 1G 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Credits against Chico Storm Drainage Master Plan Facility Fees. In dctenmining the stone drainage facility fees, for construction of storm drainage facilities as identified in the adopted Chico Master Drainage Plan as set forth in Butte County Cade Section 20-210, to be assessed and levied upon the owner of residential or nonresidential property pursuant to the provisions of this chapter at the time the owner of such property commences to use the property for a residential or nonresidential purpose, expands the area of the properly devoted to an existing residential or nonresidential use, or changes the use of the property to a di fferent use, the owner of the property steal] be entitled to one (1) or more of the following credits against such fee; provided, however, that no such credit or credits shall exceed the amount of such fee, nor shall any credit or credits be transferable from one property to another property. A. Where the owner of the property constructs and installs a portion of the off-site drainage facilities, identi Lied in the adopted Chico Master Drainage Plan as set forth in Butte County Code Section 20-210, which would he necessary to collect the runoff from stormwater falling on the property, transport such stormwater runoff to a natural stream or an existing public drainage channel, detain and/or treat the stormwater runoff where necessary and dispose of the stormwater runoff in such stream or drainage channel in a manner provided for or authorized by this code and the improvement Standards adopted pursuant thereto, the owner ofthe property shall be entitled to a credit against the storm drainage facility fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter i-1 an amount equal to the reasonable actual costs of the collector/outfall, peak attenuation and/or water quality facilities. B. Whe--e the owner of the property is changing the use of the property to a different use having a runoff coefficient which is greater than the runoff coefficient for the property when devoted to its previous use, the owner of the property steal] be entitled to a credit against the storm drainage fact lity fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this in an amount equal to the collector/outfall, peak attenuation and water quality portions of the storm drainage fees which would have been assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter for such previous use. C. Where the property is or was located within an asscss-~lcnt district formed for a purpose tivhich included construction and installation of a portion of the storm drainage facilities, identified in the adopted Chico Master Drainage Plan as set forth in Butte County Code Section 20-210, necessary to collect, treat andlor detain the runoff from stormwater falling on the property, transport such stormwater runoff to a natural stream or a public drainage ehamlel and dispose of the stormwater runoff in such stream or drainage channel, and where the owner of the property is commencing to use the property for a use which has the same runoff coefficient as the existing or assumed use of the property at the time an assessment was levied against the property as part of the assessment district proceedings, then the owner of the property shall be entitled to a credit against the stone drainage facility fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter in an amount equal to that portion of the assessment levied against the property as part of the assessment district proceedings reasonably attributable to the 28 ~~ C property's fair share of the cost of the collectorioutfall, peak attenuation and water quality portion of the storm drainage facilities co-~~strueted as part of the assessment district proceedings. 3 4 5 G 7 8 9 l0 1l 12 13 14 l5 16 17 l~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 D. Where the property is located within au assessment district formed for a purpose which included construction and installation of all or a portion of the storm drainage facilities, identified in the adopted Chico Master Drainage Plan as set forth in Butte County Code Section 20-210, necessary to collect, treat andlor detain the runoff from stormwater falling on the property, transport such stormwater runoff to a natural stream or public drainage channel and dispose of the stormwater runoff in such stream or drainage channel, and the owner of the property is commencing to use the property or changing the use of the property to a use which has a runoff coefficient which is greater than the existing or assumed runoff coefficient for the property at the time an assessment was levied against the property as part of the assessment district proceedings, then the owner of the property shall be entitled to a credit against the storm drainage facility fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter in an amount equal to the storm drainage fees which would have been assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter for the existing or assumed use of the property at the timme an assessment was levied against the property as part of the assessment district proceedings, or that portion of the assessment levied against the property as part of the assessment district proceedings which is reasonably attributable t© the property's fair share of the cost of the collectorioutfall, peak attenuation and water quality portion of the stone drainage facilities constructed and installed as part of the assessment district proceedings, whichever is less. E. Where the owner of the property reconstructs a building or structure located on the property which was damaged or destroyed by fire or other casualty or which was voluntarily demolished during the prior three (3) year period, the owner of the property shall be entitled to a credit against the stone drainage facility fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter in an amount equal to the collectorroutfall, peak attenuation and water quality portions of the storm drainage facility fees which would have been assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. However, if the owner of the property expands the area of the property devoted to a residential or nonresidential use incident to the reconstruction of such building or structure, stone drainage facility fees shall be assessed and levied upon the owner of the property for all additional area of the property devoted to such residential or nonresidential use. F. Where the owner of the property constructs and installs all of the onsite stone drainage facilities necessary to retain and dispose of one hundred (100) percent of the stormwater falling an the property, the owner of the property shall be entitled to a credit against the storm drainage facility fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions ofthis chapter in an amount equal to the peak attenuation, and water qualityportions ofthe storm drainage facility fees which would have been assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, all in the manner provided far or authorized by this code. 28 ~~ 7 G. Where the owner of such property constructs and installs al] of the off-site stone drainage 2 3 4 5 G 7 8 9 10 l2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ~~ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ~g facilities, identi fled in the adopted Chico Master Drainage Plan as set forth in Butte CountyCode Section 20-210, necessary to collect the runoff from stormwater falling on such property, transport all such storn~water runoff to a natural stream or an existing public drainage channel, treat and/or detain the stormwater runoff where necessary and dispose of the stormwater runoff in such stream or drainage channel, the otivner of the property shall be entitled to a credit against the storm drainage facility fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter in an amount equal to the collectorloutfall, peak attenuation and water quality portions of the storm drainage facility fees which would have been assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, all in the manner provided for or authorized by this code. H. Where the owner of the property is changing the use of the property to a different use having runoff caeffcient equal to or less than the runoff coefficient for the property when devoted to its previous use, the owner of the property shall be entitled to a credit against the storm drainage facility fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter in an amount equal to the collectorloutfall, peak attenuation and water quality portions ofthe storm drainage facility fees which would have been assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. Where the property is or was located within an assessment district fornled for a purpose which included construction and installation of all storn~ drainage facilities, identified in the adopted Chico ~ Master Drainage Plan asset forth in Butte County Code Section 20-210, necessary to collect, treat and/or detain runoff from the stormwater falling on the property and transports al] such stormwater runoff to ~ a natura] stream or an existing public drainage channel and disposes of such stormwater runoff in such ~ stream or drainage channel, provided the owner of the property is not proposing to develop the property ~ in a manner or at a density which inc--eases the runaff coefficient for the property above the runoff`, coefficient used in designing the drainage facilities constructed and installed as part of the assessment district, the owner of the property sha]1 be entitled to a credit against the storm drainage facility fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter in an amount equal to the collector/outfall, peak attenuation and/or water quality portions ofthe storm drainage facility fees which would have been assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. Section 3. Section 3-164 of Artic]e XVI[ ,entitled "Development Impact Fees in the North Chico Specific Plan Area", of Chapter 3, entitled "Fees", of the Butte County Code is amended to read as follows: ~ 3-164 Amount of fees. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8' 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The amow7t of the fees assessed and ]evied pursuant to the provisions of this Article shall be as set forth in the Table below, except as exempted by Section 3-166 or reduced by a credit pursuant to Section 3-163 (C.), and shall be applicable as to all projects of the types specified in section 3-163 for which application is made to the County of Butte for a development permit on and after February 8, 2003: NORTH CHICO SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE TABLE Land Use Acres DU* Trails Roads & Storm Fire Parks Total S stem Brid es Draina e Station NCSP Tables 8-2(4} 8-4 8-5 8-6 8-2(6) Residential SR-3 109.8 35 $231 $],472 $387 $547 $1,017 $3,b54 /DU SR-1 698.6 G52 $231 $1,472 $387 $547 $1,017 $3,654 1DU SR-1/PD 126 160 $231 $1,472 $387 $547 $1,017 $3,654 /DU R-1 233.9 912 $231 $1,472 $483 $547 $1,017 $3,750 1DU R-2 118.4 829 $193 $1,472 $276 $455 $847 $3,243 /DU R-3 17.1 308 $173 $997 $114 $410 $763 $2,457 tDU Total 1,303.8 2,896 IndustriallCommercial Consd SF** Industrial 308.3 2,153,000 nia $0.1829/SF $0.1984/SF $0.0775/SF nla $0.4588 1SF Commercial 24.6 268,000 n/a $0.1928/SF $0.29761SF $0.1209/SF nla $0.6113 rSF Office 26 283,000 n/a $2.1623tSF $0.19841SF $0.1984/SF nla $2.5591 ISF School 8.5 n/a n/a $61,908 $18,122 nla n,~a $80,030 Total Industrial/ Commercial 3589 2,704,000 "Dwelling Units **Square Feet The most recent amount on the index, dated January 2006, is 8468.45. Section 4. Sections 10-30.1, 10-33.5 and 10-34 of Article IV, entitled "Chico Urban Area Street Facility Improvement Fees", of Chapter 10, entitled "Highways and Streets", of the Butte County Code are amended to read as follows: 10-30.1 Findings The Board of Supervisors makes the following findings and determinations in regard to the street facility improvement fees levied pursuant to the provisions of this Article: (a}The Board has previously levied Chico Urban Area Street Facility Improvement Fees pursuant to this Article N. 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1~ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ?4 ?5 2G 27 28 (b) The North Chico Specific Plan was adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte on March 28, 1995. Said Plan anticipated growth and new development in the North Chico Specific Plan Area and the need for infi~astructure, including street facility improvements to serve the traffic resulting from such growth and development Chapter 8, Implementation, of the; North Chico Specific Plan, including, but not limited to, pages 8-1, 8-2 and 8-7, and Tables 8-1, 8-2 (Schedule 1), 8-6 and 8-10 therein, contemplated that the street facility improvement fees assessed and levied within the other portions of the Chico Urban Area would also be assessed and levied within the Not-th Chico Specific Plan Area to fitlance, in part, the contemplated street infrastructure within these areas. (c) The North Chico Specific Plan Area is connected to the other portions of the Chico Urban Area by existing and proposed streets, and development within the North Chico Specific Plan Area will cause traffic impacts on streets within other portions of the Chico Urban Arca. (d) The purpose of the fees assessed and levied by this Article is to defray the cost af' improvements to street facilities within the Chico Urbau Area made necessary by the anticipated increase to or any change in the traffic impacts within such area caused by development within the Chico Urban Area, as documented by the City of Chico Update of Development Impact Fees, Analysis and Recommendations (Nexus Study), adopted by resolution of the City Council of the City of Chico, the North Chico Specific Plan approved by Resolution 95-47 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte on March 28, 1995, and the County of Butte 20 Year Capital hnprovement Program adopted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. (e) The street facilities which will be financed wholly or in part by the fees levied pursuant to this chapter are as defined and identified in this Article, including, but not limited to, Section 10-31(a). (f) There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees levied pursuant to this Article and the type of development project on which the fees are imposed, as set forth in t1~e provisions of this Article, including but not limited to Sections 10-32, 10-33, 10-33.5 and 10-37. (g) There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the street facilities and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed pursuant to this Article, including, but not limited to, Sectians 10-32 and 10-33. (h) There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fees and the cost of the street facilities or portions thereof attributable to the development on which the fees are imposed pursuant to this Article, including, but not limited to, Sections 10-33, 10-34, 10-35 and 10-39. 10-33.5 Amount of street facility improvement fees. 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2] 22 23 24 The amount ofthe street facility improvement fees assessed and levied pursuant to the provisions of this Article shall be as follows, except as exempted by section 10-36, and shall be applicable as to all projects of the types specified in section 10-32 for which application is made to the County of Butte for a permit on and after September 16, 1988: Single-Family residence (per unit) Multiple-Family residence {per unit) Office and Medical structures (per square foot) Commercial and Service structures (per square foot) Industrial structures {per square foot) Other--Average Daily Vehicle Trips (per trip) 10-34. Periodic adjustments to street facility impravement fees. $3,142 2,173 3.52 13.02 1.61 168.90 From time to time, the fee schedule as specified in Section 10-33.5 may be revised to make the fees the same as the fees established by the City of Chico based on the latest nexus study adopted by the City of Chico as discussed in Section 10-30.1(d). Section 5. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed severable, and the invalidity thereof shall not affect the remaining provisions or other applications of the Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application thereof. Section 6. Effective Date and Publication. This Ordinance shall take effect sixty (60) days after the date of its passage. The Clerk ofthe Board of Supervisors is authorized and directed to publish this ordinance before the expiration of fifteen { 15}days after its passage. This Ordinance shall be published once, with the names of the members of the Board of Supervisors voting for and against it, in the Chico Enterprise Record, a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of Butte, State of Califoz-~~ia. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of Califon~ia, on the 14th day of _ February , 2006, by the following vote: 25 / / 2C 27 28 1 AYES: Supervisors Connelly, Dolan, Houx, Yamaguchi and Chair Josiassen NOES: None 2 ABSENT: None 3 NOT VOTING: None 4 5 C,~RT J SIASSEN, Chair 6 ~~atte_. unty Board of Supervisors 7 ATTEST: 8 PAUL MCINTOSH, Chief Administrative Officer 9 and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 10 11 ,'h ~ _ / ~; Bar: ~ ~ a 12 Deputy 13 14 15 1C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 12 ~Q