HomeMy WebLinkAbout66-0021'
2
3
4
;5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
z5
16
17
`18
'.19
20
21
22
23
24
'25
26
27
2$
29
30
31
32
RESOLUTION NO.v ~ ~~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ADOPTING POLICY TO BE FOLLOWED BY PLANNING
COMMISSION CONCERNING UTILITY TRANSMISSION
INSTALLATION
WHEREAS, .the Gonstitution of the State of California has
placed the authority for the routing of utility transmission
facilities with the State Public Utilities Commission; and
WHEREAS, the routing of utility transmission facilities
concerns county insofar as it affects county facilities; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable to be of record in expressing the
county's position as to utility transmission routings as it
affects county facility, location, and use of land,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, as follows:
1. That it is their policy that al.l routing of utility
transmission facilities shall be presented to the Planning
Commission, and they shall consider and report to the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Butte as follows:
Ca) In considering the routing of the utility trans-
mission facility, the Planning Commission shall determine
whether or not the route will conflict with school sites,
airports, subdivisions which have, in fact, been submitted,
road or highway expansion, drainage, flood control, prot-
ection of water sheds, prevention and control of pollution
to streams and other waters, parks, playgrounds, recreation
areas, public buildings, community centers, libraries,
police and fire stations, and all other existing or pfopose'!I.
county facilities.
2. The Planning Commission shall consid er the foregoing f~
elements exclusively in making their determination as to whet'-!
or not the proposed route is or is not in conflict with the
r
county's use. The Planning Commission shall then forward -_;trf
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
'10
11
12
13
14
15
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
X23
24
25
26
27
28
X29
30
31
32
report to the Board of Supervisors with its recommendations,
which recommendation shall be in one of two forms:
(a) "That the proposed route is not in conflict with
the county's use of land for public purposes", or
(b) "The route proposed is in conflict with the county's
use of land for public purposes".
3. The report of the Planning Commission and their
recommendation shall be considered by the Board of Supervisors
and either affirmed by the board, or returned to the Planning
Commission for further discussion-with the utility.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS of the
Caunty of Butte, State of California, this 4th day of January,
1966, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Howsden, Maxon, McKil~.op, Pryde and Chairman Giles
NOES: None
ABSENT : None
FLO~~ES, Chairman
Butte County Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
JESSIE ROGERS, County Clerk
and ex-officio Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors
Bye o
Deputy
2.