Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout67-134RESOLUTION N0. L 7 - / 3 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE WHOLE OF THE BUTTE COUN'T'Y SERVICE AREA NO. 26 AS-BEING BENEFITED BY THE ACCONLpLISHMENT OF THE PURPOSES OF SAID SERVICE AREA WHEREAS, heretofore on June 27, 1967, the Board of 'Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, adopted 'and passed a resolution to incur bonded indebtedness for Butte County Service Area No. 26; and WHEREAS, said resolution fixed the 18th day of July, 1967, in the Board of Supervisors room of the Butte County Court-- house, in the City of Oroville, State of California, as the time -and place for the public hearing on the following questions: 1. will the whole or a portion of the Butte County Service Area No. 26 be benefited by the accomplishment of the .purpose? 2. If only a portion of the area will be benefited, what portion will be so benefited? and WHEREAS, said Board, at said time and place, proceeded to hear a~"guments from any person interested, including all persons owning property in said Butte County Service Area No. 26, ''upon the questions stated above; there being no protest received from residents, property owners or registered voters within the ''service area boundaries, or otherwise, except the following objectors who asked that their land be excluded. from the Service Area for one or more of the following reasons: 1. REASONS The objector had provided an adequate dry well; pre- ferred to install a dry well at his own expense; planned no .;development which will require a sewer; is unable to afford I!higher property taxes; the land is not residential in nature; the objector has a properly functioning septic system; the objector ;does not wish to finance a sewer for the benefit of land specu- lators; the land or development on it cannot stand further finan- cial encumbrances; the matter should be delayed to see what the .economics of the area will justify; the sewage plan of the Service ;!Area is inadvisable or incompatible with the proposed recreation uses of the Oroville area; the land could be annexed to the City of Oroville for sewer service; the cost is too great; economic hardship; no great growth in the area is anticipated. NAMES OF OBJECTORS (If names not correct y stated, it is due to illegible signatures.) Mrs. Rita R. Holcomb Harold A. Varnum V. D. Heath Marilyn R. Thrasher S. R. Heath Candice K. Wyman Laura M. Heath Marilyn R. Wyman Mrs. Verde G. Rubino John Neal Joseph A. Rubino 'John H, Marshall Mrs. Maudie Marshall !Mrs. Dora E. Bird Maxine M. Minton Bob E. Carter C. N. Ramsdale Ann Fisher Lita G. We11s 2. Daphne Neal Jesse E. Smith Alva J. Ramick Doris M. Ramick Joy N. Hamill Lloyd L. Klein Mary Myers Jed Pulley Hazel Pulley Elsie M. Fairley .Dorothy Richter Sidney V. Voorhees Mrs. Violet C. Dooley 'Charles L. Roderick Zack Kelley " Mrs. Marjorie E. Marler James D. Powell 'Mrs. Patricia A. Powe11 ',!Dave L. Brown ':Wanda M. Brown Jack W. Cook Martha E. Cook .;Jerry L. Rice ILee Castleberry Gladys Castleberry iLeonard V. Pulley Earl R. Blair 'Richard E. Blair M. E, Glynn '-Roy T, Rogers Beulah F. Rogers H. S. Townshend, Jr. Claudia L. Townshend Thomas R. Bauguess .Carl E. Davis .Lucille D. Cafferatti '.,Edith M. Jones Kenneth Nelson 'Leslie W. Jones Virginia M. Calkin Harold B. Calkin Walter Stafford Geneva Stafford Mary Zavalus Robert E. Adams Tom H. Phillips Peggy L. Phillips Gladys Clendenin Margaret M. Shipley Mrs. Helen D. Maynard D. L. Lamb M. E. Lamb Martha Wright Maxine Law Mrs. H. G. Shackelford Mrs. Jack Brereton Mable J. Walsh Walter R. Phinney Harold E. Walsh Howard Moseley Bertha Moseley Clyde M. Wixom Mrs. Thelma A. Wixom Mrs. Zetta P. Marongiu Mrs. Cathryn B. White Robert A. White Mrs. McLelland E1z.ada Noel Joe Dalmasso 3. ~ ~ 'Gene Higgins !Mary G. Higgins Roy N. Wheeler 'Clara B. Wharton ~A. Appelman Agnes Appelman G. R. Backus ',Paul C. Adams 'Albert E. Rocchi '!Lucille L. Rocchi Anna M. Rhyne Elisha J. Rhyne :.Gene L. George Mrs. Mary Ellen George Lizzie C. Christenson 'Jewell L. Grant Glenn E. Wixom !Mrs. Mildred R. Wixom :Edmund or Eleanor Mann Arthur Keene Ernest Anderson jDonald G. Lawson 'Mrs. Wanda F. Lawson Ralph Wyatt Laura J. Wyatt C. A. Vinson '!Ronald E. Bishop (Annie V. Bishop 4. D. P. Terry Edith M. Terry Mrs. Isabell A. Moseley Albert R. Moseley Cecil C. Mott Jessie Mott Arthur J. Chamberlain Anna K. Chamberlain Mrs . El2eryl Breardon Douglas B. Coggan Wanda Jean Coggan Dale M. Anderson Wanda F. Anderson Joyce Maclselprang Tony Mackelprang Mr. Earl F. Calloway, Jr. Mrs. Elaine G. Calloway J. B. White Marie A. White Jesus Gomez Dorothy Gomez J. L. Willis Mrs. Gilbert French William B. Roush A. H. Blackwell Janice L. Flick Clark A. Flick George Riley Baggett 'Arthur Kaelin Mrs. Myrtle Johns ''Arthur Sheldon Roxie S. Frasier Ola Sheldon Alma Ghianda ,!Virgil R. Phillips Joseph Ghianda Harold Bramble Rudolph Ghianda Elizabeth Bramble Norma Ghianda !Mrs. Ella P. Rover Allan William Johnston ','.Mrs. Mary A. Lee Mrs. Quartum G. Johnston Joseph Arlen Massae Pearl Kelley J. A. Massae C. E. Pennock Gladys I. Massae Mark Burns W. L. Belcher Tandy Fryar Paul Mangrum Bart Casillas ('.Edith Mangrum Charlie L. Chitwood ~'Otha Ramick J. A. Redmayne (;Jack W. Corbin 0. P. Sondree Mrs. J. W. Corbin John Lemberger A. Floyd Mi11s Lyell L. Lavy '(Katherine D. Andrews G. L. Bowen H. C. Andrews Maria Dalmasso Michael L. Kirkhoven Nual C. Masoner Ernestine Kirkhoven Curtis J. Nettling James E. McCleery Jess P. West Verna McCleery Clive V. Slack : Nally Gibson Duane G. Palm !.Bruno Kaelin Norman W. Crasswell -Mrs. Mabel L. Kaelin John M. Walters iWilliam A. Keyes, Jr. Joseph G. Kochinski Mrs. Barbara F. Keyes p. W. Slack 'Mrs. Ruth H. Kiely May Slack ', and 5. WHEREAS, each objection was read and considered separ- ''ately and each objector, his counsel and other interested ..parties given an opportunity to express their views and present !facts and arguments to support the objection; and WHEREAS, at said hearing a few of the signatures of the petitioners were illegible but the address of the party was read as well as the. name and the description of the property in- valved and any interested party given the opportunity to speak; and WHEREAS, Attorney Norris Goodwin was present representing protestants and presented arguments and evidence in their behalf; and WHEREAS, the engineer and other members of the staff of the Service Area presented evidence and expressed their views ',as to the benefits each of the parcels involved in the protests and objections would receive; and WHEREAS, on motion duly made, seconded and carried, each of the protests and objections were separately acted upon and 'overruled; NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Beard of Super- ''visors of the County of Butte, State of California, as follows: That said Board of Supervisors hereby finds and deter- mines `that the whole of the Butte County Service Area No. 26 will 'be benefited by the accomplishment of providing within the Service 'Area sewage service, requiring the construction and installation of facilities for the collection, treatment, and disposal of 'sewage, comprising main trunk lines, pipes, pumps, machinery, e lands, easements, rights of way, and other works, property or ..structures, useful or necessary for the collection, treatment or ..disposal of sewage of said County Service Area No. 26 and its inhabitants. 6. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, this 18th day of July, .1967, by the following votes: AYES: Supervisors NOES: ABSENT: A HOWSDEN, Chairman, Butte County Board of Supervisors ATTEST: JESSIE ROGERS, County Clerk 'and ex-officio clerk of the .;Board of Supervisors By ~ Deuy 7.