HomeMy WebLinkAbout72-194WHER~AS, ~his Board has reviewed the provisions of Proposition
20 which wi1~ appear on the bal~ot on ~he November 7, 1972, General
Election, known as the Coastal Zo~e Conservation.Act Initiative, and
WI-iEREAS, if Proposition 20 is passed by the electorate o~
this State, a loss of approximately $25,750,000 in ~a~ revenues in the
affected area along with the loss of millions of dollars and thousands
of jobs in needed develapment projects;will occur, and
WHEREAS, this Proposition is an undesirable atte~npt to
eliminate local control and local voice in local affairs, and
WHEREAS, this Proposition, if passed, wil~ create a threat
of increased power shortages and possible brown outs because of delays
of construction of new power.generating plants.
NOW, THEREFORE, B~ IT RESOLVED by this Board:
That this Board strongly opposes the provisions of Proposition
20 and respectfully submits to the electorate of this County and of
this State that this Proposition be defeated.
PASSED AN1} ADOPTED by t~e Butte County Soard of Supervisors
this 31st day of October, 1972, by the following vate:
AYES: 5upervisors Douthit,,~add, Madzgan, Maxon and~
Chairman Gilman,
NQES: None
ABSENT: None
NOT VOTING: None
ATTEST:
CLARK A. NELSON, County Clerk
and ex~officio Clerk of the Board
By~:_:~~ ~.r' ~~~
RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSITION 20