Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout74-089WIiEREAS, Governor Ronald Reagan signed into Zaw Assembly Bill 392, Chapter 912 Statutes of 19'72~ The S~ate Beach~ Park~ Recreational and His~oxical Facilities Bond Act of 1974; and WHEREAS, this act was approved by ~he voters as Proposition One in June of 19'74; and WHEREAS, the Act calls for ~ach county to consult wi~h all ci~ies and districts within the county which are authorized to provide park and recreational services, the purpose of such meetings being to develop a priority pLan for expenditure of tne county's allocation of 19~4 ~ona ~unas; and WHEREAS~ an ad hoc Fiecrea~ion Committee was appointed by the Butte County Association of Governments to develop a prior- aty pl.an for expenditure for But~e Co~unty; and WHEREAS~ a priority plan f'or expenditure has been approved by al1 ~he said cities and districts in the County and the ad hoc Recreation Committee; and WHEREAS, a Priori~y Plan for Expenditure~ a~~ached h~reto as E~ibit "A", has been subznitted by the ad hoc Recreation Committee. NOTN~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLjTED that the Bu~~e County Board of Supervisors has met in regular session to review the attached priority plan for expenditure and approves said priority plan for expenditure. HESOLiJTION OF fiHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVING PRIOR~TY PLAN FOR E~.'ENDITURE REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF ~ALI~ORNIA FOR ALLOCATION OF FtiNDS FOR FtECREAT~ON BOND ACT OF ~f 97~+. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors ~his 2nd day of _. 7ulv 1974, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Cameron, Gilman, Ladd, McKillop and Chairman Madigan NOES: None ABSENT: None NOT VOTING: None ' ~ ~ ,TACK DTGAN~ Ch rman of the Board of Superv s rs A~TEST: C~.ARK A. NELSON~ County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board ~ p~ By ~--~!~'c~-~-Y~ ~ , c3~ 20 ` EXHTBIT "A" - ~ _ - STAT$ BEACFt, PARI:, RECREATTONAL F~Np HISTQRICA7, F~CILIT'IES FsGnD ACT OF 1974 PRIORITY PLAN FOR EXPENDITURE In accordance wzth the provisions of Section 5~96.86 oE Assembly Bi11 392, chaptered as Chapter 912, Statutes o£ 1972, 2 prio"ri[y plan far expenditure of the Cotal B~tCe County apporefonment of State Beach, Fark, RecreaCion&1 and Historical Facilities Bond Act oi Z974 is being presented. Definitions a, Act. "P.ct" means the State Beach, Fark, Recreational, and Historical Ftxcilities Bond Act of 197~ or the Z'Berg - Coll.ier Park Eond Act. b. ALlocation. "A1location" means the amount of funds made available Co ela.gibl.e agencies from Sutte County's total apportionment. c. Applicant. "Applicant" means any public agency or political subdivision .of the Sta~e eligible for, and applying for, Park bond ~ct funds. For the purposes of the AcC, eligible agencies are counties, cities, and special districts author- ized by law to provide public park and recreatiion services without undue restric~ions placed on public uses. d. Apportionment. "Apportionment" means that amount of funds allocated by the State and msde available to Eutte County, ` e. Board. "Board" means E3utte Co[anty Board of Supervisors. ~. f. CommiCtee. "Committee" means ad hoc Recreation Committee as established by the Butte County Association of Governments. • g, Fund. "Fund" means the local Recreation Bond Act Fund, created by the Z'Berg - Collier Park Bond Act. ~ General Frovisions . a, Iacrease services, Encourage eligible agencies prav~ding a 100~ Ievel o~ service or no services to accept their responsibility in the area of recreation. This will primariiy be accomplished through the groject priarity allacation portion of the plan. ~ b. Natchin~ funds. Require a11 eligible agencies desirin~ to submit projects txnder the Acti to provi~e a minimur~ of 25% local matching funds of project(s) cost. Reasans for a matching fund requirement are:• - ' 1. To haae eligible agencies make a committment in avoiding indiscrim- inate expenditure of Park Bond Act funds; . 2. To help enable the funding of more projects within an agencies ~ 'aLlocaCion. ~c. Continued ~eration ?nd maintenance. itequire each eligible agencq to give assurances and show capability £or continued operation and maintenance before a project can be apQroved. -2- ~ . ~ ' ~ + d. itevieca and recommendation, Require that eiigible agencies £irst submit project a~p7,ications eo the Com;nittee for review.and recommendation prior to forwardin~ to the Board for ti.nal approval, e. Fina1 filin•~, Eligible agencies shall~submit project applications to the Committee by i•:ay 15, 1978 so they may be reviewed and a recommendatiion £orwarded to the Board of Supervisors no later than June 30, 1978. AEter June 30, 1978 all unused Parlc Bond Act £unds will revart to the 1oca1 £und. The Committee will then ~tsk that additio3ial projects be submitted for evaluation, A1location of Fun~s. Butte CounCy's total apportionment of Fark Band AcC fands will be aliocate~ as £oliows: ~ a, Generel, dllocation. Fifty percent of the estamated $394,215 apportionment • ($197,108) shail be alloc~ted on the basis of popuJ.ation toithin rhe five existing park and recreati_on district boundaries and the population of the Greater Biggs - Gri.dley area. The Bi~gs - Gridley area shaii be dafined as that sonthwestern portzon of the county not within the boundara.es of an exisCing recreation and park district. ~, ; PROPOSED ALLOCATION FORviULA (Subject to Changel Percentage Proposed Al.locations District or Area Po ulation of Po clation (to be Iater finalized7 Feather River 26,929 26.41 • $52,056 Paradise 16,669 16.35 $32,227 . C.A.R.D. 43,682 42.84 $84,441 Richvale 510 .50 $ 986 Durham 3,~03 3.33 $ 6,564 Biggs - GridleY 10,776 10.57 $20,834 ' f Example. ~ : Total cost o£ project $l0,OQ0 . , Less Ioca1 matching 2,_500 ~ ~Eligible Act monies $ ~,500 *Provi.ded the eligible Act moni,es do not exceed an agencies allocation. b. Pro_ject Priority Aliocation. The rernaining 50% of the estimated -apportionment ($197,i07) shall be allocated to an eligible agency or agenczes based on the individual merits of the project(s), As i.n the "General A1location," each agency must be willzng to match ~ at least 25~ of their tot11 project(s) cost. It is permissibl,e £or an agency to utili.ze a portion of al~ the 257 matching requirement for pri.ority projects. -3- Examples• ' 1. Total cost of project $40,OOQ Less General A1location marching 2,500 ' ••• Less eiigible Gen. Alloc, monies ~ 7,500 ~ligible project priority monzes $30,000 2. To~al cost af project $40,000 Less local makchzng ,10,000 Eligible project priori~y monies $30,000 in any ca5e, the net fundable amount cai1Z not exceed 50/ of the total County's apportionmenC plus an agency's "General A1location" for any one project. That is the fundable ~mount fos a projett will not exceed the Priority Project Allocation plus the agency's share of the General A1location. In recommending specific projects for approval o£ Project Priority Allocation funds, the Committee will put e~phasis on encouraging eligible a~encies providin~ a low level of service er no services to accept their responsibility in the area of recreation. The Committee will aZso consider those projects thaC best fulfill the purposes o£ the Act at the local level; areas of gre4test demand; ~zctivities in the greatesC demand; and othe~ criteria as may be necessary to evaluate and select one projecC over another on a non-discriminatory basis. . _._. . _ _.. _ ._. . . _ __._.. _... _. . . ....._ -,..__ --- __ : ~ ~ ~~l ` . _ _ ,> PROdEET I.IST - 19"I~- EC3~iD ACT Ch~co Axea Recre2tion ar_d Par~c District . S~caniore Pool~One ~2ile Dam Project (3~d;a°ll Park~ Hoo!cer Oak Recreation Area rmprovement ~roisc~ (Bidi•relZ 1'ark~ So£tball~~aseball Field Compiex (Chico ~:ur.ici.pal AS.rpox-t} ~ Tenni.s ~ourt CompZex -(sita 1.oca~ion to be de~erninsd) Graharn PT'dp°1^t~ - 900 acres acquisiti.on {loca~.ed adjacent to Bifl~ae?7 1'ar~c. To be acquired as environmental. oufier to California Park Develozxnent:) Biicawa~ ~rai1 system t,hrougk~ Hi.ci~•re7.l Par~c ~ldditional imp: over:.ents to ~id.~e11 Park ~ . IJurham Recreation and Park District Durham Aqua~Eics ~'aeilities ~ Conerete Tables and Play Equa.~en~ E?ectiical System - Par.c and Ballfields Road ~.~s~zrfacino zn Par~ 4rea PieVt Park Res~rooms Two ACZ'° Land Purchase far Park . ~ Recrea~ional BuzZd~ng t,~.th Office Fea~her River Reereatior~ and Par'.t Dis~ric~ Southsa.d~ ParK ancI Community B,zildinQ Fdel.son Park. Exnaresa.on , Bedrock Tennis Cour-t and Restroom Pz~oject Renovation of Table tiountain Public Goli Coi;xsa Sprznkling Sys~em Senior Ci.tzzens' B~ailding Recrea~~ion and Office Bu9.lding 0.£f Road Vehicle Pa.r~c ~ r . ;. _ . ~ . . I . -2- . / Paradise Recreation and Par'_~t District ~ Build~i.efurbzsh Tennis Courts : Cover for Outdoor Swimm;n~ Poo1 Lighting for Riding Arena . Bu~li3 Two ~ighted and Grassed So~'tball Fields Master Plan - Bi11e Park . - . Improve.Trails on Coutelenc Pask R~ichvale Recrea~ion an.d Paxk 3?istr3ct Picni.c and Park DeveloFznent (R'zchvale Elementary ScY:ool) . • Tennis Co~~-t (Ric~vale E~z~nen~ary Schao].) . Playgx~ounc~ and Equ.i~.snent {Rich;rale Elementary SchooJ.) . CitY of GricLlev . Recreational Land I'urchase for h1un5.cipal Par~c Area . Two Baseball Diamonds rrithin t-tunicipal Park Area Muni.c~.paJ. Park Area Recreational Improvemer,t . City of Orov.il~e Badrack Park Control ~uildin~ Replacemnr.L ~ . Southside Park and Commun~.ty Buildin~ -- Land Acquisition Het~tt Park Restoration - Plan..*ur-g and Construction