HomeMy WebLinkAbout76-087~ LASSEN AVENUE .
. ASSESSPiENT DISTRICT N0. 1
. . ~
+ - . .. '
RESOLUTION Nb.4' 76-87
APPROVING REPOR~', CONFIRMING ASSESSP~~NT '
ORDEi2ING ASSESSMENT RECORDED
ORDEF2I?4G IMPROVEMENTS TO BE COidSTRUC'I'ED .
AND • ~
T~BSIGNA~'ING TREASUREI2 TO COLLEC`r AND TO RECEZVE
MONEY
WHER~AS, on~March 9, 1976, this Board adopted its
Resolution No. 76-42, Resolution of•Intention, and decZared
_
therea.n its intention to construct.cer~ain public improvement
work on designated public streets and easements in ~h'e County
of Butte under {~he provisions o~ the Municipal Improvemen-~ Act
ot 1913, and
WH~REAS, on March 9, 1976, in said Resolu~ion No.
76-42, this Board directed Everd McCain to make a~eport -Eo
~his Board in the for~, s~yle and manner requir~d by said
Ac~, and ' ~
WHETtEAS, on March 9. 1976, said Everd McCain did
make a report and did~fil.e the same wzth the Clerk of the Baard,
and ~ ~
w°T-iEREAS, on March 9, ~.976, this ~oard ciuly
considered said Report and then adopted Resolution No. 76-43
entitled in part "Approving Report of Fr~ginee'r Prepared for
Proposed Lassen Avenue Assessment 17z.strict i~o. 1" and ~herel~y
preliminarily approved said r~port, and on tha-~ date set -
~ Apra.J. 20 , 1976, as the date for a public hearS.ng on
alI matters contained in said Resoluti.on of Intention and in
said R~port and on the matter of the Covn~y of Butte constructing
the public improvement work descx3.bed in said Reso7.ution and in
said Report and on the matter of the extent of the proposed
Assessmen~ District described in said Repor~ and on the matter
of the proposed assessmen~ set forth in said Report, and
WHEREAS, on April 20, 1976, this Board continued said
hearing to May 9, 1976, and
4/15/76 ~
GEP:cg ~
_ _ __ _. ... _....... ... _ ; _ .__ ~ , _..... ._, .. ___ _,_
~~ ~l
. WHElE~AS, on March 9, 1976, this Board ordered the
Clerk of the Board to give notice of said hearing by posting; •
publishing and mai~ing a~I as required under said act, and
- WHEREAS, on this date ~he Clerk af the Board has
shown the aff~davi~ of his deputy fi~ed with this Board that ~~
~ he caused notices of the said hearing to be posted, published
and~~mailed all in the time and form required by.said Act, and •
WHEREAS, this day is the day regularly set far hearing
any person who desires to object to any matters contained in
said Resolution of Intention or to the CountX of Butte construct-
zng the public improvement work described in~said Report or
for hearing any person who desires to object to ~he extent af .
the proposed Assessment District described in said Report or .
to any matter respectzng the Assessment con~ained in said
Aeport, and. •
WHE~~S;, certain perSOris who's~ names ~axe 5~own in the
minutes o~.the meeting of this Board have filed protests respect-
ing the proposed assessments for the public improvement work
for Lassen Avenu~ Assessment District No, l, and
~ WHER~I3S, this Board has heard and considered all o~
said protests and has made a determination in respect to sazd
protests and is now fully advised,
I~OW, THEREFORE, RESOLVED BY TH~ BOARD QF SUPERVIS~RS ~F
THE CQUNTY O~' BUTTE, CALIFORNIA:
1. That ~his Board finds that each of the recitals of
-~his Resoluti~n is true, i
2. That this Board hereby overrules aIl pxotes~s of
every kind and nature, zncluding without any limitation ~.ntended
by the 3.isting that follows below, al~. protests fi~ed agains~ the
proposed public zznprovement work for Lassen Avenue Assessment
District No. 1 tl-cat is described in said Report and agains~ the
extent of the District of lands proposed to be assessed, and _
~against the amount of any proposed indzvidual assessment and
~ against the County of Butte doing the public improvement work
described in the Report.
,
_ ~F-lp~'~I~c _.._ ~_. _......~.., Z _ ____. _ _,...._. _.
-.- W~._ _ . ~ ~1 ~I ~ .
3. That this Board~£inds and de~ermines that Everd ,
McCain's estimate of' the cast of constructing and doing the new
work described in said Report which is not installed in place
was the sutn of $544,513.00 based upon Everd McCain's estimated
quan~ities and estimated unit prices.,
• That this Board finds and determines that t~e Clerk has '
adver~ised for bids on said new work and that Everd McCain has
advised this Board that the eost of the work based upon Everd McCain's
estzmated quantities and the successful contractor's unit prices is
the sum o~. $509,852.10. ' ~
-. That•this Board hereby finds and determines tha~ because
the successful contractor's bzd foz the new work described in the ~
Report is lower than Everd McCain's estimate for said work and for
other reasons that ~he~Repo~t and Assessment shou~d be xevi'sed in
the fo~Zowing narticulars:
~ •. a. Revise Everd McCain`s e5timate in the Report to ~
. show ~he contxactor's bid pzice.for each i~em
• of work.and to show the new "Total Esti~a~ed
Construction•Cost" derived from such bid prices.
~,. b. Revise the items~of Incidental Expenses in the ,
Report that are computed as percentages of ~he'~ . ..
bid price. ~ . ~
c. Revise the page in the.Report to.show ~he ~.otal
amount of mor~ey to be assessed which r~sults from
tkie bid ~rice, , ~
d. Revise the assessment pages to~show,the con~ractor's
unit prices and.-to show the changes in the incidental
expenses•and in the total amount tn be assessed which
resuAt from said prices. ~ ,
e. Revise the amount~of money.assessed on each suhdiv9.sion.
of~~land described in the Assessment to show the bene-
~. ~its from ~he new work to each such subdivision that
result from ~he cont'rac'tar's bid prices for the new work
. being.l.'ower than Everd McCain's estimate of prices for
` said new work. . .
f. Reva.se..the amount o~ bond discoun~ shown from 94~ to
~ 95.24g of par.,~ _ ~
. , .
GEP:cg
__ --4/15/7 6. ._ _ __ ,. _ v_3'.. __ __ _. .
.. ~~~ il . ' . . .
g. Chan~e the description ~or Asseasment No.
1Q i~m the description shown i the
Assessment to: "~
Lot 8 and a portion of Lot 4 of the Esmeralda
Tract described as follawrs:
Begz.nning at the northeas~ corner of said Lot 4;
thence southerly, along the easterly line of said
Lot 4, 198 feet; thence westerly, parallel with
the northerly line af said Lot 4. 300 feet; thence
southerly, parallel wi.th said easterly line, .
433.9 feet; thence eas~erly, parallel with the
southerl~ Iine of said Lot 4, 300 feet to said
easterly line of said I,ot 4; thence sou~herly,
along said easterly line'of saa.d Lot ~!, 30
feet to the sou~heast coznex of.said Lot 4;
~hence easterly, along the southerZy Ii.ne of
said Lot 8, 660 feet to the sautheast corner of
said Lot 8; thence northerly, along the easterly
line of said Lot 8, 660 feet to the northeast
corner of said Lot 8; thence westerly, aI.ong
the northerly line of said Lot 8, G60 feet to the
true point of beginning.:
h. Change1the description for Assessment No. 52
fram the description shown in the Assessment to:
Lots 15 and.1.6 and a portion Of I{p~S 10. 11, 12 &.
14 of the Esmeral.da Trac~ 8escribed as follows: ~
. _
Gommencing' at the most easterly corner bf said
Lot l4; thence north 37-~4-30 west 3b.00 £eet ~o
the true point of bega.nn~.ng; thence south 52-15-30
west 221.82 feet; thence westerly along the arc of
a 20 ~eet rad~.us curve, concave to tYi.e north,
~hrough•a centza]. angel of 90-00-00 a distance of
31.42 feet; thence south 52-~15-30 west 60.00
feet; thence southerly along_the arc of a 20 feet
radius.curve, concave to the west, through a
centraL angel ot 90-00-00 a distance of 3I.42
feet; t~?ence sauth 52-15-30 west 365.68 ~eet; -•
thence.north 88-05-30 west 24:94 feet; thence
north 43--45c-34 west 235.37 feet; thence north
45~11-29 west 4~~.12 feet; thence north 43-45~34
west 12fl0.00 feet; thence north 40-53-48 west 100.13
feet; thence north 43-45-34 west 10.16 feet, more
or less, to the northwes'terly line of said Lot 12;
thence nor~h 52-15-30 east, along the northwesterly
line of:said Lots 12 &.16, 915.65 feet to the
most n.ortherly corner of said Lot 3.6; thence south
37-44-30 east 1950.00 feet ~o ~he true point of
beginning.
i. Change the description for Assessmeret No.,68
from the description shown a.n the ~fssessment to:
Parcel 3, as shown on the parcel map filed in Book
50 of Parcel Maps at Page 25.
j. Change the.description for .Assessment No. 69
from the description shown in the .Assessment to:
Pax~cel 2 as shown on the parcel map fa.led i.n Boo]c
50 of Parcel Maps at page 25.
k. Change the description for Assessment No. 99
from the descx~ption shown in ~he Assessment to:
A po~tion of Lot 31 of the Hobart Subc3ivision
described as ~ollows:
_._,~~ ..
EP : cg -3a.- . - __--- _ ._..
. ~_ _,.». _ .. __.___.. _ _ _ ,
. . ji
~ • Beginning at tfie most westerly corner of said
Lot •',; thence north 53-12 eas 330;00 feet;
then~e south 36-48 east 330.00 reet; th~nce •~
north 53~12 east 305.00 feet to the southwesterly
line of Burnap Avenue; tihence south 36-48 east
3Qp.00 feet to the,northwesterly line of ~assen
- Avenue; thence south 53-12 west 480.00 feet;
thence North 36-48 west 173.00 feet; thence
south 53-12 west 156.33 feet; thence noxth 36-48
' west 457.64 feet to the true point pf beginning. ~
1. Change.the description for Assessment No. 107
from the description shown in the A~sessment ~o:
~ A portion o~ Lot 26 o~ the Hobart Subdivision
of the DanieZ Bidweli Ranchp described as
~ follows:
Beginning.at the mast northerly corner of Lot 26;
thence south 37-39-11 east 45.7.64 feef; thence
south 52-14-03 west 0.67 feet; ~hence south 37-49-~2
east 173.03 feet; thence south 52-14-03 west
148.25 feet; thence north 37-4~=54 west 220.00
feet; thence south 52-14-03 west 130.00 feet;
thence~.north 37-47-54 west 4I0.61 feet to the
northwesterly Iine of said Lofi 26.,•thence north
52-13-23 east 330.01 feet ~o the true point of
beginning., ~
m. Change the description for Assessmen~ No. 1'08
from the description shown in t~e Assessment to:
• A:.por~ion~:o€:-Lot 26 of the Hobart Subdivision of ~
fhe Danie~ Bidwell Rancho described as follows:
Commezzcing at the most easterly corrier of Lot 26;
thence souf.h 52-14-03 west 200.25 feet; -Ehence
north 37-47-54 west 30.00 feet to the true point
of beginning; thence south 52--14-03,~saest 130.00~
feet; ~.thence north 37-47-54 wes;~_ 220~.00 feet;
thence north 52-14-03 easf 130.00 feet; thence
south 3,.7.-47-54 east 220.00 fee't;to the true point
of bega~iining. " ~
n. De~.e'te Assessment.No. 122 and-add th~ ~ollowing
Assessin~nt Numbers, descriptions and~:Assessment
amounts•
Assessmen~ No. 137 ~~
A portion of Lot 29 of the Tiohart .Subdivis9.on
described as follows: ~ ~
Cammencing at the most wester]~y~corner of said
Lot 29; th~nce north 53--12 east.132':00 feet.ta
the~ ~rue pai~t of beginn.~ng;' thence' norfh 53=~.2
east 49-8-.00 feet; thence south 36-48 ~ast 259,25
feet to.~h~ westerly righ~ of way ~ine of the .
Saczamen.to Northern RaiZroad; ~hence south 17--06-20
~aest 616'.3E1 feet; thence north 36-48 ~,Yest 622.32
~eet to+the true point of beginning, '
Assessed Value: $9,937.71
Assessment No. 138
A portion of Lots 28 and 29 of the Hobart Subdivision
described as follows:
~~P:cg -3b-
/3/76
Beginning at the most westerly ~orner o£ said
Lot 29; ~hence north 53-12 east 132.00 feet;
thence south 36-48 east 622.32 feet to the
westerly right of way Xine of the Sacramento
Northern Railroad; thence south 17-06-20 west,
along said wester~y zzght of way line, 370.38
feet to the southeriy line of said Lot 28; tlzence
south 71-52 west, along said sou~herly line,
153.12 feet to the easterly line of White Avenue;
thence north 17-07-45 east 188.I5 feet; thence
nor~herly, along the arc of a 380 foot radzus
curve concave to the west through a cen~ral
angel a£ 53-55-45 a distance of 357.67 feet;
fihence north 36W48 west 373.59 feet, thence
north 53-~2 east 4.00 feet to the txue point of
beginning. _
Assesse~ VaZue: $36,310.48
o. Delete from the Assessment the folzowing items
~ronting and adjacent to Assessment Na. 1U2:
140 l.f: vertzcal curb and gutter at $4.80
114 l.f. 4' sidewalk at $3.50
104 s.f, driveway at $1.20
120 c.y. Exc. at $7.00 ~
132 tons A.B. at $4.50
25 ~ons A.C. at $20.0~
Reduce the Assessment from $4,920.74 ~a $3,129.80.
p. Delete from the Assessment the following items
fronting and adjacent to Assessment No. 101:
660 l.f, 18" CL II CP at ~16.00
1 ea. G.O: Inlet at $1100.00
520 l.f. Vertical curb and gu~ter at $4.8p
520 l.f. 4' sidewalk at $3.50
453 c.y. Exc. at $7.Od
495 tons A.B. a~ $4.50 ~
97 tons A.C. at $20.00
Reduce the Assessment from $47,930.51 to $24,616.01.
>:cg -3c-
3/76 . .
That this Board tinds and determines that Everd McCain
has revised the Report and Assessment in each of the particuxars
above stated a~Z•to the satxsfaction o~ this Board and~hereby
declares that its action on such Repo~t and Assessment is that the
Report and Assessment as so revised should be confirmed with
no other changes or 'revisions except those stated~above in~this
Resolu~ion and fhis Board therefore hereby approves the Report
that was filed with this Board by Everd 2~cCain as~so revised and
hereby confirms the assessment aontained zn said Report as so
revised. . ~
. 4. Tha~ this-Board hereby orders the Clerk o~ the
Board to transmit to the County Surdeyor-Director of Public
Works of the County of Butte the Assessment and Dzagram contazned
in the Report hereinafte~ referred to and hereby d~rects said
County Suzveyor-Director ~of Public Works to record said Assessment
and Diagram in his office and to give notice of the fi~ing ''
thereof by publishing and mailing as provided~by.`law,
and to record the notice required by la~ in the office qf the "-
Recozder of-the County of Butte showing that.said Assessmen~ and
Diagram have been recorded in his office:~ ~
5. Tha~ ~his Board hereby o~ders that the public
improvem2nt work shall be constructed and done that this Board.
declared i~s intention to construct and dp in Resolution No. '. -
76-42, Resolution ot Intention, adopted D7arch 9, 1976, and this
Board hereby determines that said work is also the work that
Everd P~cCa~n described in his Report to this Eoard dated March 9,
,_ . ~
1976, as work -~o be construc~ed and done.
' 6. That thi.s Board hereby ordezs ~.hat the Treasurer
of the County of Butte shali collect and receive the money
from property owners on account of said Assessment.
7. That the'Re~ort hereinabove referred to is that
certain report appro~ed March 9, 1976, by this ~oazfl in its .
Resolu~ion No. 76-43 and that~bears the identifying lEgend as
fol.Iows : ~ ~ ~
i
"Repor~ Respecting Proposed
Lassen Avenue
Assessment District No. 1
Municipal Improvement Act of 1913"
On a motion by Supervisor Richter ,
seconded by Supervisor I,add' , the foregoing
Resolutipn was. passed and adopted by the BOARD OF SUPER~7TSOTtS OF ~
THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, this ~th day
of ..MaY - ,~97b, by the fol~owing vote, to wit:
AYES : SUPERVISORS ' Ladd, McKillop, Ric(iter and Ct~sirmen !Cameroa ~
~ NOES: SUPERVISORS aone ; - ~ "
ABSENT: SUPER'VE8012S' ~ladigasl _ . _
. _ . :_ ,s ~ . ~ .
~ Cha~rm~""an'-o~f the Board of 5uperv~sors
ATTEST: C~~aRK A. 1~7ELSON, COUIQTY CLER2C -
$y: . - ..~ ~ .
Clerk of he Roard of Supervisors
GEP:cg
....._._.._....._ __ ~n~.l,_s_/~.
-5= .
__ __ _ _ _ _ _..
~~ ~I .~'