HomeMy WebLinkAbout77-007RESOL~TION APPROUING PRIORITY PLAN FOR EXPENDITURE UNDER
PROUISTONS OF THE NEJEDLY-HART STATE, URBA~, AND COASTAL
PARK BOND ACT 0~ ~976
WHEREAS, the Nejedly-Hart State, Urban and Coastal Park Bond
Act of 1976 requ3res that each county shall consult with all cities and
districts w9thin the county which are eligible to rece~ve grant funds under
provisions of the Act and develop and subroit to the state for approval a
priority plan for expenditure of the county's allocation; and
WHEREAS, the County of Butte has cQnsulted with said cities
and districts and has prepared a priority plan for expenditure of the
county's allocatTOn, including expenditures by eligible c9ty and districts,
said priority plan being a~tached hereto marked Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, said priority plan has be~n approved by at least 50
per cent of the cities and districts representing 5~ per cent of the
population of the cities and districts within the county.
NOW, 7HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the priority p1an for the
expenditure of the county's a1location of funds under the Nejedly-Hart
State, Urban, and Coastal Park Bond Act af 1976, a copy of wh~ch plan is
attached hereto marked Exhibit "A°, be an~ the same is hereby approved.
BE I7 FURTHER RESOLVED t~at the County Administrative Office is
hereby directed to forward a certified copy of the resolution ta the State
Depart~ent of Parks and Recreation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by ~he Butte County Board of Supervisors
this 25th day of January , 1977, by the fo7lowing vote:
AYES:3upervisors Lemke, Madigan, Moseley, Winston and Chairman g3.chter
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
NOT WOTTNG: None
~~~z~~~~~~
• BERNARD D. RICHTER, Chairman of the
Board of Supervisors
A77EST:
CLARK A. NELSON, County Clerk and
ex-offic~o Clerk of the Board
. _ . ...
____
By. . . . . . ..:;c: a: o ~:
1976 Sta~e Bond Ac~
Prior~t Plan for Ex ~~diture
Ta~al A~1oca~~on Available - $455,325
District or area
Feather River/Orovi~l~
Paradise
~ARD/Chico
Richvale
Durha~
B~ggs/Gridley
To~al
1980 Propased *
Population Percent A~Tocatio~
37,200 24.2 $107,769
28,000 21.7 96,636
53,2~0 43.3 783,919
10,000
A~,OQQ 3.2 T4,25Q
12,400 9,6 42,75~
128,800 100% ~455,325
* These allocations are based on ~he fact that no project can be fur~ded
for 1ess than $10,~00. A~i a~~ocations, excep~ R~chva1e are proportioned
on popula~ion p~rcentage, less Richval~'s papula~ion, of ~~55,325 7ess
$10,000 - $455,325.
' ~xh~ bi t "A`~
_ -..