The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About87-233ARESOLUTION OF BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVING WHEREAS, the County Correctional Facility Capital Expenditure Bond Act of 1986 was approved by California voters in June 1986; and WHEREAS, the Act authorized the issuance, pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law, of bonds in the amount of $475,000,000 for construction, recon- struction, remodeling, replacement, and deferred maintenance of local adult correc- tional facilities; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 2543 (Chapter 1519, Statutes of 1986) required the State Board of Corrections to develop regulations by which the funds would be adminis- tered; and WHEREAS, Butte County is eligible to receive up to $5,911,957.00 under the Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Butte County Board of Supervisors as follows: 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby approves the "Formal Project Proposal" for submittal to the State Board of Corrections in reserving Butte County's allocation of $5,911,957.00. 2. The Board of Supervisors agrees that it is the county's intent the proposed project will be consistent with the needs assessment to be undertaken as part of the project. 3. It is the Board of Supervisors intent to provide the necessary matching funds for the project being submitted. -2- PASSED AND ADOPTED this first day of September, 1987 by the foilow- ing vote: AYES: Supervisors Fulton, McInturf, McLaughlin, Vercruse and Chair Dolan NOES: None ABSENT: None NOT VOTING: None ty Board of Supervisors ATTEST: Martin J. Nichols, Chief Administ tive Officer and Cler of th B a d of Supervisors BY / ~ \ ` ~_~ \\ 1 D~pUt State of California Page 1 of 5 BOC Form CGJCEF OOl (S/87) FORMAL PROJECY PROPOSAL $oard of Corrections County Correctional Facility Capital Expenditure Bond Act of 19$6 Submittal Deadline: September 30, 1987 COUNTY BUTTE PROPOSAL DATE September 1, 1987 CONTACT PERSON Mike Pyeatt TELEPHONE ( } _(9.16.}_538-7631 ADDRESS ESTIMATED PROJECT DATES ,~,,.,~R~hPr '1,~._, 987 li3nP 3(7+ 1991 (start) (Completion) (Beginning with the start of the needs assessment process and ending with the completion of construction.} Check one: (X ~ The county will apply for bond act moneys and is submitting this proposal to reserve its allocation. ( } The county has determined that it is in its best interest to defer its allocation at this time, and understands that it will have second priority in subsequent fail bond measures. Signature JA~i~ OLAN, Chair _ - - D~__ September 1, 1987 Board ~ Supervrsars Page 2 of 6 A. PR03ECT DESCRIPTION Is the county requesting.state funds for more than one project? ( ) yes (X} no If yes, please identify project information in this proposal as Project A, B, C, etc, when responding to questions. This project addresses: (Check all appropriate responses) ( ) Deferred Maintenance (X} Remodeling (X1 Facility Replacement ( ) Fire and Life Safety Deficiencies (X) overcrowding through: ( ) Remodeling of (Name of Facility) ()(} New Construction 1. Type and number of Board-rated beds/cells to be added or lost. Board rated capacity excludes special use cells; i.e., safety, detoxification, medical/mental health, holding, and disciplinary cells. ( ) Minimum Number of Beds Added -- Beds Last -- (X} Medium Number of Beds Added 230 Beds Lost 152 p() Maximum Number of Beds Added •_,,,, 170 Beds Lost ~,-- 21- ,_ 2. Are there any non-rated beds/cells being added (includes special use cells; i.e., safety, detoxification, medical/mental health, holding, and disciplinary)? (X} yes ( ) no. If yes, describe the type and number. Type Number Type Number Medical 20 Safety __ 10 MentaE 20 Holdin ~ 10 Detox 25 3. Are beds being added to provide adequate separation for public inebriates? (X) Yes Number of beds 10._ ( ) No; we adequately separate public inebriates in the fallowing facilities: Facility No, of Beds Page 3 of 6 4. Are beds being added to provide adequate separation for mentally'~isordered inmates? ( X) Yes Number of beds r,2,Q_ ( ) No; we adequately separate the mentally disordered in the following facilities; Facility No, of Beds 5, rovide a brief arrative descri tion of the sco a of the ro ect and roblerns to be reined ed f the count does not k ow the sco a of the ro ect at this time, indicate„_problem areas to be addressed. The Butte County main jai 1 complex at 33 County Center Drive, Orovi l le, California was occupied in '1965 and is classified as a Type II facility for the incarceration of both pre-trial and sentenced inmates. The jai! has a rated capacity by the State Board of Corrections of 173, representing 155 men and 1$ women, The jail is a traditional, linear design facility requiring lengthy foot patrol routes to surveil prisoners. The design is such that the routes required to see each prisoner are exceptionally lengthy. The design in many respects is staff intensive, requiring more staff and efforts to carry out the various jail functions. While worse designs exist, and there are jails more poorly conceived and built, this facility is certainly in a high percentile for jails of its size. The existence of the north and south dormitories make a poor design much worse. Butte County in the past has experienced severe overcrowding within the jail complex and presently is being monitored as part of a consent decree as part of a lawsuit over jail conditions. In addition to overcrowding, this project is intended to address the following areas: --Mentally il! inmates --Medical program space --Dealing with public inebriates --High profile (security) inmates --Female inmates --Lastly, replace a poorly designed, high maintenance and staffing costs faci I i ty. Page 4 of 6 .. ESTIMATED BUDGET ' 1. (Provide separate pages if the county is requesting funds for more than one project, babel them Project A, B, C, etc.} n State Dollars Requested $ 5,9~~,9'S7•0d ( 21 8) County Hard Match $ 2.2,~Q$$~[l43_(]~ ( 79 $) County Soft Match $ -(1_ ( .... ~) TOTAi. ~ $ ( 1008} 2. Identify the source of your matching funds (e.g., county general funds, lease back, certificates of participation, federal funds, etc.) General bond or Certificates of Participation 3. Does the county have an estimate of the operating budget for the new project(s) (i.e. staffing, maintenance, utilities, etc.?) ( ) Yes (X~ No If yes, what is the estimated annual budget? $ 4. Are Proposition 52 funds being used to reimburse previous county expenditures on Propositions 2 and/or l6 projects? (X~ Yes ( ) No if yes, specify project and dollar amount. 85 300 from Pro os:ition ~6 which Gras used to construct the Butte Count ' isn 5ecurit Facli~r Board of Corrections' Contract No. 305 Page 5 of 6 C. NEEDS ASSESSMENT 1. Is the county conducting a minor or major needs assessment study? ( ) Minor Needs Assessment (X X) Major Needs Assessment 2. Have you hired or are you planning on hiring an outside consultant to com- plete your needs assessment? (x )¢ Yes. Name and address of consultant: Request for Proposal attached _ . _ { ) No, because the needs assessment: ( ) is being completed by county staff. ( ) Other: D. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESOLUTION Attach a resolution which addresses the following: 1. Authorization to submit the Formal Project Proposal to reserve the county's allocation. 2. The county's intent that the proposed project will be consistent with the needs assessment. 3. The county's intent to provide necessary matching funds for the project. Page 6 of 6 Indicate the appznacim3te.start and ca~leta.an dates for each phase of the Project. Space is provided far o~nents, if any, and may be used to provide the names of consultants hired. Phase Start Campletian ~.s Needs n~,nr Sept. 1, 1987 March 31, 1988 Master Siting Plan Sept. 1, 1987 March 31, 1988 Schematics After April 1, 1 88 Design Developmer-t II II Tz-arLsition Team III! Staffing Costs II,I Analysis vL''n"r ~at~ ~.i.Ja I.w7 I,1 ~ Analysis ~~ZOn I! II 1Mrl.illlCl ltr~'7 Oaa~struct~on li it Bids aonstntcti.on Sept. 30, 1989 June 30, 1991 ~~ June 3Q, 1991 -- CHIEri AI]MINISTRATIVE JFFICE COUNTY OF BUTTE oe~1Tt~•e 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 45965.338a - (4 i6} 538-7631 o ~ o o e o e MEMBERS OF THIr BOARD: COrJR~~ HASKEL A. McINTURF JANE DOLAN MARTIN J.NICHOL5 KAREN VERCRUS£ CHIEFAOMINISTRATiVEpFFICER Ep McLAUGHLIN LEN FULTON September 8, 1987 Mrs. Karen Graham State Board of Corrections 600 Bercut Drives Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Karen: RE: Formal Project Proposal Butte County Please find enclosed the formal project proposal of Butte County reserving funding under the County Correctional Facility Capital Expenditure Bond Act of 1986. We are also enclosing a copy of Board of Supervisors Resolution 87-322A which authori2ed submittal of the formal project proposal, states the county's intention that the project will be consistent with the needs assessment, and that the county intends to provide county matching funds. Butte County has also issued an RFP for the conduct of a needs assessment and master facility plan. A copy of the RFP is enclosed for your information. Hopefully the formal project proposal and resolution of the Board of Supervisors are acceptable. Please call me at (916) 538-7631 should clarifying information be necessary. Very truly yours, i y t Deputy Adm'nistrative officer MP/cap Encl. cc: Leroy Wood, Sheriff-Coroner (w/encl) Helen Ryan, Jail Commander (w/encl)