Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-072t ~, ,d~~„~---r----.~ ,--~ .~.. F, ,. BOAR'b QF SUPERVISORS ~~~` : *: COUNTY CAF .BUTTE,. STATE OF CALIFORNIA °~. Resolufion 2Vo. 88-072 RESOLUTION OF THE BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUBMITTING APPLICATION FOR A GRANT UNDER THE MAJOR NARCOTIC VENDOR PROSECUTION PROJECT WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors desires to undertake a certain project designated as the Major Narcotic Vendor Prosecution Project to be funded in part from funds made available through the Major Narcotic Vencor Prosecution (M.N.V.P.) Program administered by the Office of Criminal Justice Planning (hereafter referred to as OCJP). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chief Administrative Officer of the County of Butte is authorized, on its behalf to submit the attached proposal to OCJP and is authorized to execute on behalf of the County of Butte the attached Grant Award Agreement including any extentions or amend- ments thereof. IT IS AGREED that any liability arising out of the performance of this Grant Award Agreement, including civil court actions for damages, shall be the responsibility of the grant recipient and the authorizing agency. The State of California and OCJP disclaim responsibility for any such liability. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant expenditures controlled by this body. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, this 7th day of June, 1988, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Dolan, Fulton, McLaughlin, Vercruse and Chairman McInturf NOES: None ABSENT: None ASKEL McINTURF, Chair n of the Butte County Board of Supervisors ATTEST: MARTIN J. NICHOLS Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk f the Board By Deputy ..~._.. __ yT PROPOSAL/AWA~tD FACE SHEEI .~ . The Office of Criminal Justice Planning, hereafter designated OCJP, hereby makes a grant =~~ -~ award cif funds to (1 } COUNTY OF BI]TTE ~ ~ _, , hereafter designated Grantee, in the amount and for the purpose and duration set forth in this grant award. .Nate: If name exceeds 30~characters indicate below the abbreviated name ~~ for warrants: ~ _' (z} N/A _ (3} Project Title (6O character maximum}- '(6} Award No. Ffia. jor Narcotic Vendor ~ ' Prosecution Program . ~f~~~~~~~a ~~ (4} Project Director (Name, Title, Address, Telephone) (four lines maxizuum} Michael L. Ramsey, District Attorney County of Butte 2S County Center Dr., Oroville, CA 95965 (916) X38-7411 (5} -Financial Officer (Name, Title, Address, - Telephone) (four lines maximum} Jin Johansen, Auditor-Controller County of Butte 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 {916) 538-7607 . {7} Grant Period July ~.. I988 -June, 3O. 195,9 (8} Federal Amount N/A (g} State Amount $loa,oaa (30} Cash Match - N/A . {11}. In-Kind Match N/A (12} Tata1 Project Cost $100,OOO This grant award consists of this title page, the proposal for the grant which is attached and made a part hereof, and the Assurance of Compliance form which is attached. The grant recipient signifies acceptance of this grant award and agrees to aaminister the grant project in accordance with the statutes}, Program Guidelines, and the OC.7P Sub antee Ha.*:dbook (as revised} . 1 A w FOR OCJP USE ONLY Item: ~/~ /~~ ~~©/ft Chap ter : 431,~~~ PCA No.: ~Q~j~, Program No .: ,~ a• Sl U-~ Project No: (13? /~Off~,pEia~. Au t ~-- r~lily cv.~vnv~ Officer Title: Bute ounty Chief' Administrative/ Address: 25 ounty Center Dra.ve Oroville, CA 95965 ~. Telephone: (916) 53$-7224 Date: May 31, 1988 Amount: y$` f~i~~ Split Fund: Split Encumber: Year: ~$~S'~ Match Requirement: ~j I hereby certify laiowledge that b' avai 1 for th of i pendi~ ~- , FisLal .po own personal eted ands are . period d purposes e st d above. 9-~~- ~'~ 1~ate ti J ' ~~~`p. Fund ~.~~~-_ ~-_ - -- - ..~- p~T.~L.~ Execut~.ve Director, `~~ y~ ~~ I hereby cerEity that al] conditions for ex- Program•~~J ft~~ /~~~~i ~~ ~'-~P~/ZrS" emplion have been complied with, and ~Q this contract is exempt from Department l/ ~..~QL~f~~'/~ of Cxeneral Services approval_ €;~~fr.e ~.Af C~ifnint~i Justic@ Piannin~ e i3t~ '~.;' ~,#Fr~trt .CaVi~~ 300 ::u~,,~i;rf:s~?~, t;;c~li,ornia 958i~ .~. if during the term of the grant award, the state and/or federal funds appropriated for the purposes of the grant award are reduced or eliminated by the California Legislature or by the United States Government, or in the event revenues are not collected at the level a ra riated QCJP may immediately terminate or reduce the grant award by written notice to the grantee. However, no such termination or reduction shall apply to allowable - F costs already incurred by the grantee to the extent that state or federal ~ funds are available for payment of such casts: The agreement entered into with QCJP is subject to any applicable restrictions, limitations.or conditions enacted by the California Legislature and/or the United States government subsequent to execution of the agreement. AUDIT INFORMATION 1) Grant recipients will arrange for a financial and compliance audit in accordance with QCJP policy, and if applicable, with the Single Audit Act of 1984 (OMB Circular A-128}, Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the withholding of grant funds or termination of the grant award agreement. 2) Audits must be conducted at the conclusion of the project year, However, the QCJP audit may be included in the grantee agency-wide audit if the details of the specific QCJP grants} are shown separately by supplemental information. ~} Audits will be conducted by qualified state or local government auditors or independent public accountants licensed by the State of California in accordance with the financial and compliance audit requirements of the Standards for Audit of Governmental Or~anization5,__Programs, Activities, and Functions published by the United States General Accounting Office (revised 1881}. ~}} Audits will be completed no later than six months after the close of the grant period unless a time extension is preapproved by QCJP. A11 grant recipients will submit the completed audit report to the QCJP Audits Division for review. 5} QCJP or its representatives will have access to all audit reports, audit working papers, correspondence or other documents related to the audit reports. QCJP performs quality control reviews of working papers of randomly selected grant recipients. 5) Payment by the grant recipient for audits may be made upon receipt of audit reports and invoices from the auditors conducting the audit. 7) Audit programs will be provided by the QCJP Audits Division upozi request of the project auditor. $} QCJP reserves the right to perform audit examinations of any QCJP grant award. .._. .. MAJOR NARCOTIC VENDOR PROSECUTION PROGRAP] PROPOSED AUDIT PE.AN Applicant: Count of Butte A. The attached Audit Information has been reviewed and the project will have the required financial and compliance audit completed:. (check appropriate box) ~ ] On a grant-by-grant basis. [~ As part of the agency-wide audit with OCJP grants detailed separately by supplemental information. B. It is anticipated that the services will be obtained from: Coo ers & L brand (Name of Firm or Government Audit Organization) 555 Capital Mall ,~,_„_,_, (Address) Sacramento, CA 9584 ~, , „ , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, {License Number) (916) 44I-4334 (Partner-in-Charge) (Telephone Number) C. It is estimated that the required audit report will be .submitted to the , OCJP Audit Division on: Januar I990 ~ ' onth Year ~~ C~, ., ~i~ ial Officer ~LJP USE ONE': '/~j /~ /~ Grant Award No. ~~ (/ d ~U~Q~~~/`~~ Input Date AS AC ---------~ GS.- ~- ----- -. Form 601 {12/86) ~~~ ~ r ~ z i WHEREAS. the Butte Caunty Board of Supervisors desires to undertake a certain project designated as the Major Narcotic Vendor Prosecution Project to be funded in part from funds made available through the Major Narcotic Vencor Prosecution (M.N.V.P.} Program administered by the Office of Criminal Justice Planning (heFeafter referred to as OCJP). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chief Administrative Officer of the County of Butte is authorized, on its behalf to submit the attached proposal to OCJP and is authorized to execute on behalf of the County of Butte the attached Grant Award Agreement including any extentions or amend-- ments thereof. IT TS AGREED that any liability arising out of the performance of this Grant Award Agreement, including civil court actions for damages, shall be the responsibility of the grant recipient and the authorizing agency. The State of California and DCJP disclaim responsibility for any such liability. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to sugplant expenditures controlled by this body. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, this 7$~iday of June, l98$, by the following vote: AYES: Sapervisars Dolan, Fulton. McLaughlin. Vercruse and Chairman McInturf NOES : None ABSENT: None { ASKEL MtINTURF, Chair n of the Butte Caunty Board of Supervisors ATTEST: MARTIN J. NICHOLS Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk ~f the Board: .~ By i Deputy ~'~ _,~~ T! IE FOREGOIN ~ 14~STbaSnhF~~ i IS P, CCpRF:.T COPY p"r 1 r'tE OI!`~.'Ith;,l OU FILc F,t:=7 rF RECr{J~~r; ~!•: 7~;n',~Sn0F~-,CE ti:P.tti-ii!" S i 1 .':J 5 .. r~a frc .... ~.... -~ u.'~ -. SYat.: ,c:i Cr- .c, ~~2 s~ RESOLUTION OF THE BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUBMITTING APPLICATION P'OR A GRANT UNDER THE MAJOR NARCOTIC VENDOR PROSECUTION PROJECT BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE-ITEM DETAIL P.. Personal Services - Salaries Project Attornev One Deputy District Attorney IV $3,144 per month @ 100 time x 12 months The Project Attorney is responsible for prosecuting MNVP cases and directing the activities of the Project Investigator and clerical support. The Project Attorney reports to the Chief Criminal Deputy District Attorney. I Project Investi ator -" One District Attorney Investigator II $2,418 per month @ 100 time x ~.,2 months This experienced Investigator will have primary responsibility for the investigation and coordination of all NI~fVP cases with the Project Attorney as well as a role iri the seizure of assets. Overtime Investigator oril.y TOTAL COST $ 37,725 $ 29,OI7 $ 148 ~ ~6,89a ~C.7P A303a BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE-ITEM "',"TAIL B. Personal Services - Employee Benefits One De t District Attorney N (Salary - $3,144 per month Social Security $232 per month X 12 months (7.51%) State Comprehensive Insurance $21 per month X 12 months (.b6%) Health Insurance $236.92 per month X 12 months *Public Employee Retirement System $~03 per month X 12 months (8.961% + 7.00%) One District Attorne Tnvesti ator II Salary - $2,418 per month) Social, Security $182 per month X 12 months (7.51%) State Comprehensive Insurance $535 per month X 12 months (22.1]:%} Health Insurance $233.92 per month X 12 months *Public ~nployee Retirement System $709 per month X 12 months (22.337% + 7.00%} *Butte County's costs for P. E.R.S. includes the employee's (7.00%) contribution which is paid for by the County. This contribution is shown as being in addition to the C05t5 of Comity.contribution. TOTAL ac~P A3o3b COST $ 2,784 252 2,843 6;036 $ 11,915 $ 2,184 6,420 2,807 $,508 $ 19,919 $ 31,834 ~BCIDGET CATEGORY AND LINE-ITEM --'TAIL ~ ~ C. Travel COST T~' One mandatory O.C.J.P. Training/Meeting session during Grant period. Project Attorney and Investigator Registration/tuition fee $75 X 2 $ 150.00 ~ Three days' per diem @ $95 per day = $285 X 2 570.00 Air Fares: Sacramento-Southey California-Sacramento $278 X 2 ~ 556.00 [~ The Applicant will use OCJP's travel policy. Q The applicant will. use a travel policy other than QCJP's. The applicant will. use the written policy of which is more/less restrictive than OCJ•P's. (agency) (circle one) $1,27b.00 TDT AL oc.rn A3o3c OC3P A303d acs A303e U}.'~~''.k.~,#S ~ C.}:(~"i"111V1iL JUD11l+t+ ~].iriivA.iu BUDGc~T CATEGORY AND LINE-ITEi~ DETAIL CAST F. Equipment No equipment requested $ "0" CATEGORY TOTAL $ ~- PRD.7ECT TDTAL ~ $100,000 FUND DISTRIBUTION FEDERAL STATE CASH MATCH IN-KIND MATCH a. Amount of Funds N/A $100,000 N/A N/A b. Percentage of Funds N/A ~1DOx N/A N/A aCTP A3D3f r' PF?OJECT S[TMM.4AY PROJECT TITLE Major Narcotic Vendor Prosecution Program PROJECT HUMBER APPLICANT GRANT PERIOD Name: County of Butte From: 7/D1/$$ Address: 25 County Center Dr., Oroville, CA 95965 To: b/30/89 IMPL~.tiiENTI~'G AGr^~~iCY FUNDS REQUESTED Name: Butte County District Attorney Address: 25 County Center Drive Federal Funds Droville, G.~ 95965 S -0- • State Ponds ., ~ S 100 , 000_ PROBLEM: {Clearly define the problem you intend to address. Support the existence of the problem with crime data, survey data, number of persons who need se_vices, etc.) The increase of major narcotic offenders in Butte County. Arrests for felony narcotics offenders have increased by 50% since 198b. 13 clandestine labs were seized in 1987, ma3cing Butte County fifth in the State far Iab seizures. marijuana cultivators in Butte County. Further, to reduce the number of major OBJECTIVES: (Must reduce or eliminate the problem. Objectives must speczfy measurable outcomes within specific time frames. List each separately.) .Through vertical-prosecution, asset forfeitures, and ongoing coordination and training of participating agencies, by 19$9, to impact the major-manufacturers and cultivators by: 1. Increasing true vertical prosecutions by 10%; 2. Reducing the unit caseload by 3D%; •• 3. Increase by 10~ the number of defendants not released prior to trial; 4. Attempting to educate the Probation Department and the courts as to the seriousness of major offenders, to increase by 40% the number of defendants receiving the mast severe sentence; 5. Reducing the time to close a case by 40%; 6. Increase the conviction rate by 1D%. /vaaa ua. ar va rai~v~ rru ia. y [7VV VL'u ya.}yaii•JLLi J,y Reporting Time Period: January 1, 19$'] - December 31, 1987 NUMBER Number of cases referred to the MNVP unit~and reviewed for ~ possible filing: 416 Number of defendants referred to MNUP unit and reviewed for possible filing: X16 Number of cases accepted/filed for MNVP prosecution: # Number of defendants accepted/filed for MNVP prosecution: _ 96 Number of MNVP'cases completed: ~ # Number of MNVP defendants prosecuted: ~- Number of MNVP cases completed using "true" vertical prosecution: 75 Number of cases completed using "unit" vertical prosecution: __ 15 Average caseload of MNVP prosecutor(s): 1Q~ Average caseload of non-MNVP felony prosecutor(s): ~ 92 Total number of defendants convicted: 73 Number of defendants convicted on the most serious charge 35 Number of MNVP defendants convicted receiving the most severe sentence: ~ Overall conviction rate {x) far MNVP cases: _ ~~#~ Total number of staff ass~.gned to the MNVP unit (grant and non-grant funded personnel). UNIT PERSONNEL Prosecutors Investigators Support Staff GRANT FUNDED 1 1 1 (6 mos) COUNTY FUNDED 1 n 1 ~' Stets were reported by "case" and "individual defendants" up to June 1987. Per OCJP at the May 1987 Grant Conference the stars were changed, to begin July 1987 to report by "individual defendant". As a result, stets were terminated relative to "cases". It is now logistically impossible to ga back and attempt to re-create this statistic. Stets w~.ll continue to be reported on a "defendant" equals a "case" basis. ~~Overall conviction rate is somewhat lower based on a readjustment of the MNVP guidelines and subsequent purge of cases that no longer meet the criteria. Form MN-1 PROBLEM STATEMENT Butte County continues to be a major center for clandestine lab activity, cocaine sales, "Black Tar" heroin, and marijuana cultivation. Butte County also has an inordi- nantly high homicide rate, with several murders related to drug sales or manufacturing activity. Butte County has a service population of approximately 170,000 with 1,650 square miles of, largely rural and inaccessible areas. Butte County's low law enforcement levels and close proximity to major population areas makes a perfect haven for dealers, growers and lab operators. However, the consolidation of narcotics enforcement efforts in the Butte Inter-Agency Narcotics Task Force and MNVP appears to have impacted the narcotics problem. Statistics from the Oroville Police Department shows a significant reduction in Part I crimes. The Narcotics Task Force has increased its' rate of arrests by approximately 50~ from 1986 to 1987. The number of major cultivators of marijuana has decreased. Given the above impact on the narcotics traffic in Butte County, the number of felony cases in the system keeps rising. The only way to keep up the caseload is through multiple continuances, resulting in a dramatic increase in case closure rates. The MNVP guidelines are being studied for a second adjustment toward reducing the caseload and reducing the case duration. A County funded attorney, previously designated as 50~ MNVP backup and 50~ CAVP is being altered to 100 MNVP backup and to handle alI those cases submitted by the ,task force, which are not accepted by MNVP. Form MN- 2 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE 1: To vertically prosecute all MiT]VP defendants T. Of the 104 (total number) defendants prosecuted January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1987 _..~ percent were prosecuted with true vertical techniques. and I4 percent were completed with unit prosecution. ]4 percent were completed nan-vertically. (Should equal 100 percent). IT. In FY 1988/89. ~_ percent of all MNVP defendant's cases will be completed with true vertical prosecution techniques. III. The following procedures have been established to achieve true vertical prosecution: • All narcotics cases are reviewed by the Project Attorney. Those that do nat fall within the project guidelines are re-assigned to the other felony deputies. Retained cases are being handled in a true vertical prosecution manner, or are handled by the designated backup attorney in a unit vertical manner. IV. Problems encountered during the prior project year: Major trials assigned to the designated MNVP backup attorney and the impassibility of the Project Attorney covering three courts caused a shortfall in reaching the projected 75~ figure for true vertical techniques. However, true vertical prosecution was increased by I7~, unit vertical was reduced by 2~ and non-vertical prosecution was reduced by 15~, as compared to 1986. Form MN-3a PROGRAM OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE 2: To reduce, by a minimum of ane-third (33%} the P'iI+IVP prosecutor's caseload. X. From January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1987 the average caseload of the # MNVP unit prosecutor was 100 cases as compared to other felony prosecutors in non-vertical units with an average caseload of 92 cases. II. In FY 1988/$9 the MNVP prosecutor will carry a maximum of 62 cases. This is at least a one-third reduction in the average felony caseload carried by non-vertical deputies. III. The following procedures and policies are in place to achieve this objective. New guidelines are being prepared to raise the criteria for cases to be accepted by the MNVP Unit, In addition, current cases not meeting those adjusted guidelines will be reviewed for rejection from MNVP. IV. Problems encountered during the prior project year: Major problems still arise in the area of diversion hearings and pre-trial motions on narcotics cases. The increased rate of arrests by the &utte Inter-Agency Narcotics Task Force continues to impact the system. As a result of their activities more major dealers and manufacturers are being identified and arrested. 'This is a deceptive statistic based on the conversion from "cases" to "defendants". Last years R.F.P. showed 65 cases as the caseload. This statistic equated to 117 defendants. The project has been able to reduce caselo ad somewhat as indicated above, while non-MNVP caseload has increased dramatically. Form MN-3b . PROGRAM OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE 3: In appropriate cases and utilizing reasonable prosecutorial efforts, to prevent the pretrial release of a charged defendant meeting MNVP Program criteria. I. Of the 104 (number} defendants with completed cases from January 1, 19$~ through December 31, 198 ~~ percent remained in custody at the time of their trial. II. In FY 1988/89. ~_ percent of all MAFVP defendants will remain in custody at the time of their trial. III. Established actions} taken to prevent a defendant's pretrial release: Project staff resists O.R, releases and requests current hail or increased bail routinely. Due to a recent lawsuit involving the Butte County Jail, there is a court ordered O.R. Release Program mandating a maximum jail population. If jail population exceeds this figure, defendants are ordered released on O.R. prior to arraignment. Project will continue to resist O.R. releases and to file 1275 motions. IV. Problems encountered during the prior project year. The major problem for pre-trial releases is the Superior Court ordered "consent decree" which mandates an O.R, Release Program and a maximum jail population. In addition, low bail figures in major narcotics offenses contributes to early release. The number of defendants in custody has increased by 5~ over 1986. Form MN-3c K PROGRAM OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE 4: To utilize reasonable prosecutorial efforts to ensure that the most severe authorized sentence is imposed ugon a convicted defendant. I. Of the 104 (number) of defendants with completed case prosecutions from January 1, 1987 to December 31, 1987 70 percent were convicted. - g (number) ar ~ percent of the convicted defendants received the most severe authorized sentence. (Excluding enhancements. the one chaxge among all charges filed which results in the maximum time allowed under the determinate sentencing law and not the time that a judge might impose using his/her own discretion). II. In FY 1888/89 ~_ percent of all convicted MNVP defendants will, receive the. most severe authorized sentence. III. Established action{s} taken to secure the mast severe authorized sentence: It is the policy of the Superior Court for the County o£ Butte to not recognize sentence bargaining. Therefore, the MNVP Unit attorney appears at sentencing on Unit cases, files statements in aggravation,.and argues strenuosuly for the most severe authorized sentence. IV. Problems encountered during the prior project year: None that can be addressed, Form MN-3d PROGRAM OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE 5: To reduce the amount of time between the arrest and disposition of charges against a defendant meeting MNVP Program criteria. I. From January 1, 1987 to December 31. 1987 the average amount of time between arrest and disposition for MNVP defendants was 3l9 days. The average amount of time required to far felony defendants in non-vertical units was X17 days. (Tf office-wzde data is unavailable use a sample of felony cases}. TT. in FY 1988/88 the average amount of time to adjudicate a MNVP defendant will be 200 days. III. Established action(s) taken to reduce the amount of time between arrest and disposition of charges for MNVP defendants. MNVP has developed and adds to a bank of points and authorities dealing with _ ~ -the complex motions filed in narcotics cases. Word processing capabilities enable quicker responses to these motions. A 100 unit backup is being assigned to assist with MNVP cases. II. Problems encountered during the prior project year: Complex motions, diversion hearings, increased arrests and backup unavailability due to trials has necessitated multiple continuances in project cases, causing an increase in the average time for case closure. In addition, there has been an increase in failures to appear by the defendant, and several defendants who were sought on warrants have been apprehended. Form MN-3e PROGRAM OBJECTIVRS OBJECTIVE 6: To increase the conviction rate of MNVP defendants. I. From January 1, 1887 to December 31, 198'], 104 (number) MNVP defendants were prosecuted. Of this number charges against 30~ percent of the MNVP defendants were dismissed, 0 percent were found not guilty and 70 percent were found guilty. This represents a 70~ MNVP unit conviction rate. The office felony conviction rate for this period was 73~ (If office-wide data is unavailable use a sample of felony cases}. II. In FY 1g88/8g, ~Q percent of the MNVP defendants will be convicted. III. Established action(s) taken to increase the conviction rate of MNVP defendants. Utilizing expertise gained from past cases, and by reducing project caseloads through more restrictive office guidelines, should result in a higher conviction rate of MNVP Unit cases. IV. Problems encountered during the prior project year: The purge of MNVP cases, due to more restrictive guidelines established in April of 1987 resulted in a decrease in the overall MNVP conviction rate. This statistic also. includes exceptional closures of cases that were initially MNVP but rejected on review aftier the intake criteria was revised early in 1987. Farm MN-3f DE. .~VATED STAFF/ROTATIONAL POLICIES DESIQ[3ATED STAFF Provide the name and level/civil service classification for the following grant reimbursed positions and designated backup to grant position: Prosecutor(s): Michael 0. Harvey Deputy District Attorney IV Grant• Funded 100% Time Investigator(s): Burt Akins ~ District Attorney Investigator II 100% Time Grant Funded 7.6% i o ~ ~/o - Co~ty Fined 1 4% Support Staff: Lori Macy Stenographer Clerk County Funded 100% Time Plus Extra Help Typist Clerk I 3.00% Time Designated Backup Attorney: Shawn Stinson Deputy District Attorney IV Will be rep3_aced prior to July $$. Recruitment process. County Funded I00% Time. ROTATIONAL POLICIES Describe rotational policies effecting and influencing grant reimbursed staff: There are no rotational policies in place, or anticipated. The project assignments are for the duration of the grant. A11 appearances are handled by the project attorney, excepting conflicting appearances, which are handled by the backup attorney. Form MN-~ ORGANIZATIONAL CHART . ~ Butte Countp District Attorney {MNVP Project Director) Co. Funded Chief Deputy Chief Deputy {Criminal) (Civil-FSD) Co. Funded Co. Funded Attorneys Co. Funded Attorney Attorney Attorney Attorneys Attorneys Attorney {MNVP) MNVP Backup (SAGA) Felony Trials Misd. Trials Juvenile Grant Funded and Co.Funded Co.Funded Co.Funded Ca.Funded (BINTF) Co.Funded Investigator (MNVP) 100 Grant Funded Steno Clerk Co.Funded Typist Clerk Extra Delp Co .Funded ADMINISTRATIVE RESFONSIBILITIES The Project Director will be responsible for assigning cases to the proposed Unit pursuant to the grant guidelines, The Project Attorney will be repansible for assigning cases to the Project Investigator and reviewing those investigations for prosecution. The Project Attorney and investigator will prepare monthly reports of unit activity. These reports will be used by the Froject Director to prepare the Quarterly reports which will be forwarded to the Office of Criminal Justice Planning. Form MN-~ ~~- lATION COMPLIANCE ASSi7RANCE The project will participate in the MNVP Program evaluation by complying with the reporting requirements of the evaluation. Minimally, this includes submitting progress reports and other data which may be designated as necessary by OCJ'P. Indicate the name, title and telephone number of the person who will be responsible for maintaining the records. Robert ~. Peterson Name Chief Inv./Adm.Asst. Title 91b 538-7610 {Area Code) Telephone Number Comment if you are conducting an independent evaluation. Form MN-6 f r~LAN FOR ASSUMPTION OF COSTS Every effort will be made by the project director to insure the continued funding of the Major Narcotic Vendor Prosecution Program after the grant period. The project director will work closely with the Butte County Administrative Office and County Auditor to advocate for the utilization of county funds for the continued funding of the program. Funds will also be sought from outside the county government in the form of grants from appropriate funding=sources, both public and private. It is anticipated that all program goals will be met, and that the success of the program will secure its priority with Butte County officials. Form NIN-7 , ~. I i , pFFIr pF CRIM]'NAL JUSTICE PLANNING .PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION f~pplicant: County of Butte Implementing Agency: $utte Count District Attorne 's Office (if applicable) Project Title: Major- Narcotic Vendor Prosecution Program- _ Grant Number (to be added by OCJP) Provide the name, title, address and telephone number for the project contact persons named below, if a section does not apply to your project, enter "N/A". a. The person having day-to-day responsibility Far the project: Name• Michael 0, Harvey Title•Deputy District Attorney Addres Butte County District Attorney f25 County Center Drive Telephone -Nu°mbe~c~' ~A 5965 916 538-7411 ;i~. The Chief Executive Officer ( e. g., District Attorney) of the implementing agency: Michael L. Ramsey Name: District Attorney - Tit1e: Butte County District Attorney Address: 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 'Telephone Number: (g16} 538-7411 c. The Chair of the Governing Body of the implementing agency: Haskel McZnturf iVame: Chairman, Butte County Board of Supervisors Title: Butte County District Attorney Address: 25 County Center Drive Oraville, CA 95965 Telephone Number: (916} 538-7224 d, The person responsible for project data/reporting: Robert B. Peterson Name: Chief Inv./Adm. Asst. Title: Butte County District Attorney Address: 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Telephone Number: {g16} 538-7411 _ .~ ~ K