HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-103_..~.
.. i
_ ,r
y,
,.
O''`
~. ~~ =#,
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF
BUTTE VACATINCx APPROVAL OF THE CANYON PARK ESTATES TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP
WHEREAS, on June 3, 1988, the Superior Court of the
State of California in and for the County of Butte issued and
entered a Supplemental Writ of Mandate and Supplemental Judgment
in Friends of the Foothills v. County of Butte, Case No. 80050,
which Supplemental Writ and Judgment are attached hereto as
Exhibits A and B, respectively, and incorporated herein by this
reference; and
WHEREAS, said Supplemental Writ and Judgment direct the
County of Butte and the Butte County Board of Supervisors to set
aside approval of the Canyon Park Estates Tentative Subdivision
Map (also known as Quail Canyon Park Estates Tentative
Subdivision Map), previously approved on December 21, 1982, on
the grounds set forth in the said Supplemental Judgment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Butte, as directed by the Superior
Court of the State of California, hereby vacates approval of the
Canyon Park Estates Tentative Subdivision Map (also known as
Quail Canyon Tentative Subdivision Map), previously approved on
December 21, 1982.
PASSED, AFPROVED ANA ADOPTED by the Board of
Supervisors, County of Butte, State of California, this 28th day
of June, 1988, by the following votes:
AYES: Supervisors Dolan, Fulton, McLaughlin and Chairman McInturf
NOES : None
ABSENT: Supervisor Vercruse
ABSTAINED: None
HASKEL A. McINTURF, Chai n,
Butte County Board of S ervisors
ATTEST:
R H
Chief Administr tive Officer
and Clerk of the Board
`,~
1
. ~
4
5
6
.~
8
90
31
1~
13
14
15
18
~~
18
1~
~~
~~
22
23
~4
a~
F8
27'
28
JOHN L. L€~VAAS, Jlt.
Attorney $t Law
P. d. Box 376
Chien, Californ~.a X5927
(91~) 853--1758
PAUr, T. PERSbNS
Attorney gt Law
1834 Arroyo Canyon brave
Ch~.co, Cal~.f'ornia 95928
(915y 89~-d~710
Attorneys fox` Petitioner
,lUN ~ ~~BB
CAN[ . t~~1~~88, ['~Kt~ do. CIOrk
E3y €~eputy.
TN THE SU1+KR10R COURT dF THE STATE OF GALI~'QRNIA
IN ANt3 FCfFt THE Gd~N'~X OF HUT~`E
FRI:EN~IS pr THE ~'dC7THTLLS, et aI. , ~ CB:se Na. 8p~5~
}
Petitl.c~ners, } SUPPLEMENTAL WRIT OF
} MANDATE ON REMAND
vs , ~ ....... - --- --
}
CpUNTY off' Bi~TTE, et ai. , 3
. }
~tespondente;, 1
JC?~iN U, pRAKL, ~~ Ell. , }
}
Real-PaYt~.es~~.n-~n~.erest. )
The People of the State of Laliforn.~,~e '.
To the County of Hutte and Butte County Board of
SUp~rvi sorts, Respondents:
Judgment having been entered in this actisari, ordering that a
Supplemental Peremptory Writ of Mandate be issued from this
Couart,
YaU X1fiE HEREBY COMMANbEb immediately up~s~ reoeipt of th.i~
Writ to vacate approval of the Cernyon Fark Estates Tentative
Subdivision Map (also ~Cnotan as Quail. Canynrt Tentati~re Subc~ivis:}on
-1~-
_..~..
~.~" ~~ ~
I
t
2
4
6
B
7
B
8
9~
~1
12
1~
1~
~5
~S
17
18
99
2C7
21
22
2~
24
25
2B
27
2B
Maps , approvdd on t~ecember 21, 19820 The Court fides r~ct
otherw~.se l~.m~,t, exptend, ox' drde~ the ~te8pandent's exercise of
its i~rw~ul disaretir~n pertaining th~retc~.
YI~U A1~~ ~`tiR'T~3E~t C~}MMANDEb to ma~Ce and file a return t4 this
~Trit an or~ ~~~or~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~'"`~`~~1988, setting forth what
action you ha~re taken to vaca'~e appro~ral of said subdivision mmp.
an ace J. Gru s, C er
~ta~:~~. apt ~
qtr tx~c
X -_,_ __ ._..~.~.._.. .._..._.--~-- .-..._.
Dep~y G
F.ET THE FpREGt~1NG WRIT ~~SL~E,
Ds.te; ~___-~ ~ , 1988
, JUbCk;
ROGER GILB~tT
-- 2-
__._.~~,
~ A.
~~ .~.
1
3
4
5
8
7'
9
1~
9~
12
t3
'~ 4
'15
16
17
1@
y~
2D
2~
22
23
24
~~
28
~7
28
L.AW 0~~ dJA
jaxrr L. Luv~~s, j~,
~~rror;tt~r ~r :ww
l52a Ww~t Sr.-P b. fax 3275
C~uoa, eALSr'PRr11w 9S8g7
(g19) sea-x7~B
~Ar~r, T. PERSaNs
Attorney at Law
1834 Arroyo Canyon L7rive
Chicor Californ~,a 95928
(91fi) 893°471D
Att.tarneys far Pet~.t~.oner
.~
Fo~Ep
JAM ~ ~~a~
GAN J. daUg85, ~uEte Co. ~le~k
~y p~~~~ ~
IN THE 5UPERx~}R CC3CJRT OF THE SmAmE Cfk' GXI,LIFORNIA
IN ANb `Oft THE C{~UNTY C]F BUTTE `
~'RIENbS OF THE Fdi~~'HI.LLSr et al. r ~ Case Nt~• $O~S(?
}
Pet,~t~.oners r ) SUPPt,EMENTAL JUDGMENT
y GRANTING PERE1~1~'TORY W1~I'~'
Vs. ) of MANDATE ON REMAND
~ '
COUNTX 0~' A~'TTE, et $I.. , )
Rtssp~-nde~zts, f
JOJ~N A. 17RAKE, et al. ,
'Read-Parties~in-Interest,
Th#.s matter has been remanded froth the Court of Appeal. of
the State of Ca~.~.fvrnia, Th~.rd appellate Districts w~.th
darectl.ans that the superior Couz't issue a further` Writ of
Mandate cc~nsistertt Frith the views expressed by the Gouxt of
Appeal..
Having heard petitioners' motion for a further wait, IT IS
THEREFQR$ bRp,E~tE~], that,
Z, A l~e~emptory Wrl.t of Mandate shall issue from this
court, remanding to Respondents the administrat~.ve proceedings
-1-
-~.,,
.-_~a,r...~, a
1
4
7
'i D
~1
12
13
14
1~
48
'I ? i
1$
~$
2[?
Z1
~~
23
~,4
2~
26
2T
2$
,. .~ _
regarding the Car~yan Park Estates Subdiv~.sion ~a1.so known as
Quail. Canyon Subdivisiari} , tend command~.rig'Respondents to set
aside their decision of December 21r 1982 apprav~.ng the tentative
subdivision map. Respondents shall z~evoke the subd3vi$is~n map
a,ppr~rval on the grounds stated in the decis~.on of the Caur~ of
~,.ppeal, particularly in that ,Respondents failed to adopt adequate
admx.nistrati~re findings as to a) whether the subdiv~.sl,an ig
consistent with the previously adapted specific plan; b) why tt~e
Responderst's Board deleted subdivision Cc~nditian 17 on Drakers
appeal of that canrlition; and c) envixonmental effects of the
subdivision as identif.~ed in the EIR, 1.ncludinc~ cumulative
effects.
2. This Court reaffl.x'ms 3.ts judgment o1: May 21, 1384,
~.;~~srafar as it ordered that a t~Trit of lManda-rnus shall issue,
remanding the subdivision proceedings to Respondents and.
cairananding' Respondents to set. aside their appxc~val- an the ground
of fal.lure to condition the subdl.vis~.an ~t~.p upon the eub jest
property being rexc~ned in G~,nfarm~.ty with the Butte Coutzty
General Plan.
3, pet~.tioners shall recover their gists ~.n th1.s .action as
claimed ~.n the Niemaranda a~ Cast~3 dated June 1~, 1984 ar~d ,Tune
23, 1984, in the seam of $X2.47, after taxing costs as ordered by
this Court's rull.ng of November 16, 1984. petitic~nex's shah.
further recovex` their casts on appe~cl, as ela~,med in their
Memorandum Q~ Casts filed in NSay, 1988, in the amount o£ ~,.~~3•~.x.
~. lPUrsuant to the d~.rect~.an of the Cauzt of Appeal that
this Count re~evaluete itg award df attorney$ fees ~.n ~,ic~ht of
Petitioners` success at trial arld an appeal, this Court reserves
further ruling on attorney fees, until, such time as Petitioners
_2_
T BTFY TlIR~'I~%R Q -~~~ E
2
8
7
8
iq
t~
1~
13
~4
1~
y6
~t
1$
~8
~~
ZY
2~
23
~4
25
~$
27
28
\...~'
s
file t~ mc~ticatx fay a heax~3ng ran this i~~ue.
--- a ~UDG~
K~~R ~~~.~~~T
Judgm~Mt ~nti~r~d an , 3.988, in
Jud~m~nt l~oe~k, 'Volume No. , 33'a~e __...
Can ace J. Gru bs `~"""- -
Dy
Deputy C ~r
~#!.~[~ ~ ~'F#YSiCf~~,LY Pt./1CE~1 ~N ,!Ul~~M~N7' 13C1i~#;,
~ c~~~~-ar~~ u~n~ r• EAl1~~.~`Y O~ P~~~HY i~~ ~ -~~~
Yo ~~ ~u~ ~r~n car~€r~o . a~~~ ~~
~~ ~~av#~.t.~, c~vvt~ac, t a~ur~~~, ca~~rrY c~~~~
CM~.i~'a1~N~ BY D~PU~Y
-~-
F,7~H6BPT g ~..