Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout90-104^~ie~ ~~ p S'UPF _~. ~ ' • ., .pi ` ; ^, :gip + r :~a. °_~; BOARD OF SUPERVISQRS ~'k ~ ' *' COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNEA ;,~j; :~ :, ~ °~ '•., ~,.pUN~~~ Resolufion No.90-104 t~s+ri~~~~-~e RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE PALERMO AREA LAND USE PLAN, THE HONCUT AREA LAND USE PLAN AND THE BUTTE COUNTY LAND USE PLAN AND ADDING A PARADISE URBAN RESERVE POLICY STATEMENT TO THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN. WHEREAS, the Butte County Planning Commission has initiated an Amendment to the Butte County General Plan Land Use Element amending the Palermo Area Land Use Plan Map, the Honcut Area Land Use Plan Map, and the Butte County General Plan Land Use Map, for changes from Commercial, Orchard and Field Crops, Grazing and Open Land, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Agricultural Residential to Commercial, Industrial, Public, and Agricultural Residential, as identified on Exhibits A-1, A-2, and A-3, attached hereto, and adding Paradise Urban Reserve Policies as contained in Exhibit A-4 to the Butte County General Plan Land Use Map as identified on Exhibit A-S; and WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan Amendments have been studied and reviewed by the Butte County Planning Commission and a public hearing held pursuant to law, at which time all interested parties were heard; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors has considered the contents of the initial studies (Environmental Checklist -Appendix F) and Negative Declarations for the Proposed amendments as described above and attached hereto as Exhibits B-1 and B-2 pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors finds that the proposed General Plan Amendments and subsequent development could not have a significant impact on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors has held hearings on the General Plan Amendments at which all interested parties were heard; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors finds the land use designation changes for the Palermo Area Land Use Plan Map, the Honcut Area Land Use Plan Map, and the Butte County Land Use Plan Map, from Commercial, Orchard and Field Crops, Grazing and Open Land, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residen#ial and Agricultural Residential to Commercial, Industrial, Public, and Agricultural Residential that property identified on Exhibits A-L, A-2, and A-3 attached hereto comply with the policies of the Butte County General Plan specifically: 1. The amendments comply with the policies of all elements of the Butte County General Plan. 2. The amendments recognize the existing uses of the land. 3. The amendments provide for compatible development in the various areas. WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors finds the General Plan Urban Reserve Policies as contained in Exhibit A-4 and map as identified on Exhibit A-5 complies with the policies of all elements of the Butte County General Plan specifically: 1. The Urban Reserve Policies coordinate development in the South Paradise Area with infrastructure and public service demands. 2. The Urban Reserve Policies formalize planning and development inter- relationships involved with the South Paradise Area to ensure that timely and quality development occurs. 3. The Urban Reserve Policies together with the zoning and subdivision regulations are intended to effectively accomplish upgrading the living environment and preventing premature developmen#. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: That the Board of Supervisors does hereby adopt and certify the Negative Declarations attached hereto as Exhibits B-1 and B-2 for the General Plan Amendments pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the land use designation changes for the Palermo Area Land Use Plan Map, the Honcut Area Land Use Plan Map, and the Butte County Land Use Plan Map, from Commercial, Orchard and Field Crops, Grazing and Open Land, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Agricultural Residential to Commercial, Industrial, Public, and Agricultural Residential for that property identified on Exhibits A-1, A-2, and A-3 attached hereto and incorporated by reference, and that the Paradise Urban Reserve Policies as contained in Exhibit A-4, to the Butte County Land Use Plan Map, as delineated on Exhibit A-S for the South Paradise Area attached hereto and incorporated by reference, are hereby adopted and approved by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte as an amendment to the land use policy for the County of Butte in the affected area for all findings pursuant to law. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to Government Code Section 65359 the General Plan of the County of Butte shall be endorsed to show the above amendments have been approved by the Board of Supervisors. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Butte County Board of Supervisors on the 26tfi day of dune , 1990, by the following vo#e: AYES: Supervisors McInturf, Dolan, Fulton and Chairman McLaughlin NOES; None ABSENT: Supervisor Vercruse NOT VOTING: None ~ ~,c ED MCLAUG ,CHAIRMAN Butte County Board of Supervisors ATTEST: Will Randolph, Chief Admsnistrative Officer and Clerk of the Board by a.~ lL. i I - ~ V ~ ~ ~ J ~ ({1{15 YIL 1 1 1 ~~ COMYtERciAL , '~ ~l~ .::::: _ ._ PALERMD ..... .. ; ~, ~ ~ f, i~ _ _IUMwa. _- - - - --. __ - -- pUbL1G-- -------~ ® Y a M , ~~- SOUTH v{ ~ VILLp :®~ A EN I i t )NDUSTRIAL -_ ~' z .' q r ~ ---__ --- ~. a l :i :~ ? j ~I } ! i7 ;! ~ ~ _ . w ~ ~ U i~ !' 1~ , ~ y ~ ~~ LOUf9 AVENUE 4 ; f ;; " AR-MH-5 AG2lLVt-TURAL- 'Rt=S1i5ENT1AL ~ I ~ e 9 _ _. i ; I I7 t6 p ~I f~ ~1 ~ ~ .~~ ' , ~ a .~1; ' i ;~ a ~' ii a _...7 L.________.. L___._._. ALICE ~ AVENUE ~f "'7 r-'--°---~ ~------'- ~; ; . .~ FROM = COi'°1MG2C1AL, -'~~-- L.OW DENSITY RGSIDENTI AL _____ _ _ MED1~}Sh L~ENSIT'~ RESID~NTif>L j i~ ~~~~~°~~~- ORC t-~ARD AND F I~.LD CROSS ' Gr~A21i~IG~AND OPCN LANDS ~' ._...~~ i ~ - Co("tME.RCIAL' 1{~D~STf21AL~~'Ut3L# C l~ND ACs.- R~5lDENT1AL FILE NO. g?-~C- MAP AMENDING PALERMO~~AREA`LAND USE PLAN Resolution Date BUTTE COUNTY PLANNiI~G COMMISSION g~ ` ~ ! - 2S ~-RO BUTTE COUNTY 80ARD OF SUPERVISORS ' Pi~'-l»ERMO-HONCUT _ , SUBAREA 12 ,; i~ iE . AGf~1euL-i'13t2faL- i`ZESIOE.NT~A1, :~' ,L - a:iL 1~'. 4 z 6 M1?.1~'i'. .Y~ q ~ 1~~ ~ ~ - ~~ A- yONCUY 40W~p 4t ;:i.. '~ ;:. ______ _~.-r;- ,,.:,„~ , il~~: :~- ~~~" -s . =.'i't;a ,,, , n •;::' . r M :_`, ;: ~ ~. t 3 .{, ; 0 e ' ;:.:; . 0 0 -„s....,... ~ ~ I#f' -J ~.~` p z .} f ~. ~' ,;ii: .~~. b ~ ~4. .~ ~.lL . F ~.k ~ 1~{. Q .5~~.. .. _. }~~! a `~ `.4 : :.'~! ~, .~: ., ~~,. ~` ~ #t.- .' 1 AR H-I ~: !-.~ 4~ E If~~ ' ".~~ Fi;" P y VF ~~ PUr3L1 C_ if 1~ _ ° ot~1'MEgZC11~~ FtZDI`~l= coMNtE,RC+~.L~Low IJENSIT`9 RC.SlDCN2TI~L. ANA ORCI-1AIZD FIELD [ROr~S ~l"D: C[~"1MERCt~1L~ PU13L1-C. A-~It) AG- RE.StDE.NTI~IaL- ~ ~ FILE NO.g~-28 C MAP AMEN~iNG - H4NCUT AREA LAND USE PLAN Resolution Data BUTTE COUNTY PLANNl1~G COMMISSION _ ~~ ~' ~~ ~ `~~ ~ ~~ BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ' ` { ACrR1~VLTV`R L ;cR DE.NTIAL F ~ s - ~PtD~S~rRIAL, 2 ~;~-~ ~~~~~'~'~ ^ iY~ R MH 5 ~ AR-Mff2.5 r vr~r~~v~w~ Ts .i V Y !~ i r~ AP 'r ' ~t TAY ACrR 1 GV LT U ~,q ~,,,; ---- E ! 4 O PALE~M4-HONCUT ! ~ ' ~~~ '~ ~~~-"- '~- SUBAREA 2 . --~~; C.oM 1h EF~c I A L a _ ..o.. --- ~ ~ I - _ _ ____ li W r W `x F ~ m r .~ .~ - .. _ N - W „ - z ~ ~ti ~ o ~ .. NYh .. r. ~- r 1. .n _~. ~f ~~~:" ~ 0 t1 ` J .._. .. .... __~~ ~g~ .~~. k':~ ~ .moo ~XHIBIi ~-3 FRdM : COl"~ME2CIAL fACY.- IZG.S}1~EEU~' lAL AI~~ pRLWARD ~ FIELD CR0t~5 ~O = CaMME2cIAL~}NDUST2tAL, AG, - REStDCN T 1At_ FILE NO. ~~-28C ._ MAP AMENDING ___ BUTTE COUNT' GENERAL ~P~LAN LAND USE MAP Resolution Date BUTTE COUNTY PLANNIl1~G COMMISSION B~- 8 i- 2S -- ~?D _~ BUTTE COUNTY 80ARD OF SUPERVISORS ' EXHIBIT ~4 ~- PARADISE URBAN RESERVE POLICY STATEMENT ,South Paradise Area 1. Situated on a Mountain ridge top divided by canyon areas which restrict the development opportunities of the Paradise area many challenges for future urban/rural residential development are created. This area is located adjacent to the Town Limits of Paradise. Currently devoted to a mixture of mountain recrea#ion, open space, and rural residential uses, this area is designated "Agricultural-Residential" by the Butte County General Plan and the Paradise Area Land Use Plan for future urban expansion. To preserve the residential, density options, for the time frame of the plan, and to coordinate the county's development policies with those of the town's, the county area within the South Paradise Area as depicted by the a#tached Exhibit "C" shall bean "URBAN RESERVE." To achieve these ends in a manner consistent with the Land Use Element's policies regarding orderly deveIopxnent and the Housing Elemen#'s policy regarding adequate facilities and services, the policies below are applicable #o the Paradise Area Land Use Plan and that portion of the Butte County General Plan as depicted by Exhibit "C". A. The County's land use policy, zoning and subdivision shall be coordinated with the Town of Paradise and any other service district within the Urban Reserve; and B. The Agricultural-Residen#ial land use designations in the South Paradise Area as depicted by Exhibit "C" shall be managed as an "URBAN RESERVE", permitting rural residential development and uses on parcels of not less than forty (40) acres in those areas designated by the California Department of Fish and Game as NO DEVELOPMENT ZONES for the protection of cri#ical deer herd winter ranges and twenty (20) acres on all other properties until such time as they are needed for development and adequate services are available to serve this area; and C. Any proposal for a General Plan Amendment, Rezoning or Subdivision which would permit parcels of less than twenty (20) acres to be created shall be coordinated with all public ~ agencies which provide utility and p ublic services as well as the plans of the Town of Paradise for ex#ension of water, sewer, circulation, drainage, and shall be required to submit the following plans prior to or concurrently with the adoption: 1. A capital improvement plan or such other program that indicates where and when physical improvements are to be made, the size of these improvements, standards, phasing of treatment facilities and lines to service the area, and how they will be financed. This plan should be based on the desired land pattern for future growth, the costs of initial service, and the continued operation costs to the designated area. 2. A park and open space plan that identifies locations and standards for park and recreation areas to serve future growth, and natural open space areas that are to be preserved. 3. An environmental plan that identifies critical areas that should be protected from development if applicable. 4. A street and transportation plan that indicates the location, capacity, and nature of the system and off-site transportation impacts. 5. Health department standards for control of septic systems, and water wells. Areas where wells and septic systems are not permissible should be identified. 6. A fiscal plan that identifies the proportion of costs of public facilities and services that is to be reimbursed from new subdivisions. D. Any parcel which is now less than forty (40) acres which was legally created, pre-existing, and non conforming may be developed according to i#s zoning and the provisions ~ of Butte County Code Section 24-37. E. Development standards compatible with the Town of Paradise shall be utilized far urban development pro,~ects within the Urban Reserve Area as depicted by Exhibit "C". Wo n ; y~ Y / A W a w a z a J Z a J Lt,. J d W Z W t'~ r z 0 U W F- H Q] ..~, Inter--Departmental Memorandum T0. Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff ~ ~ ~ . SUBJECT: Environmental Documentat~bnan ReservetProjectthFiler$9~36 General Plan Amendment U DATE: April 2]., X989 ~ .~~ - -- -- -. ~ - An initial study regarding environmental impact was prepared for the project area on August 23, 1988 for the Planning Commission rezone. A Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact is recommended far the proposed General Plan Amendment {GPA) based on the Initial Study prepared for the rezone and the comments received on the .proposed GPA. The proposed GPA is a policy amendment which is intended tv control the timing of urban development already allowed by the General Plan. The Urban Reserve Policies are being proposed as part of the current rezone project in order to coordinate the planning regulations and policies of both the Town of Paradise and ..County of Butte . -; ~ ~ . .. ~ . - BLM:lr ., .: - ~ ~ ~ .. EXHI~i~ S-1 APPENDIX F ' CDtTNTY OF BL1'S'LE ~ °_ ENV2RONMENTAL CI3ECKL=ST FORM - - - - -- - (To be completed by Lead Agency) - . LOG No. aa-o7-26-a1 AP No. Various Eile No. 89-4 I . BACKGROUND - ~. -_ - ~_ _-_ ._- _ w- - - - 1. Name of graponent BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - _ 2. Address of progonent and representative (if applicable): _ Butte Count P ~ _ __ - - .. _ .. __ 7 Count Center D 'v __ __..__ .. Oroville, - CA 95965-3397 - - .~~._ _ .....-__ 3. Project description: Rezone_ - II. ~LANDATORY ~FZIYI]2NGS OF S2GPTTF=LANCE ~ YES MAYBE NO ' _ 1. Does the project have tha•potential to degrade the c}uality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wiidiife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, thxeaten to eliminate . -- a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods , . of California history or prehistory? ~ - ' 2. Does the project Nava the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the . detriment of song-term environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs ist a relatively brief period of time while , long-term impacts will endure into the future.) - V 3. Dues the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively - considerable? (A project may impact on two ar more separate resources where _~ the impact on each resouxce is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) - 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. DETERM2NAT2 ON (To be completed by the Lead Agency). On the basis of / this initial evaluation: V I1wE find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 11wE find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECI~e1RATI0N will be prepared. I/WE find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. DATE: ALgli c '~ ~ 1 g R •- V COUNTY OF $UTTE, PLANMI G DEP ay: Brent L. Moore, Associate Planner Reviewed by:. / IV..' ENV =.gc»iENTAL IMPACTS ._ ._ . ,- (Explanations of all "YES" and "HAYBE" answers are required on attached street(s). 1. EARTfi. Will the proposal result in sig~nif icant: YE5 1~fAYBE NO a. -Unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic substructures? b.----Disruption, .displacement, compaction ar overcvvering of the soil? ? c.-- Change-in topography or ground surface relief features d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical ~ ~- features? ~ e.- Increase in wind ar water erosion of sails, either on or off site? ~ f. Changes in deposition or erasion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river ar stream f ~/ -- or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet ar lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban - / v `. - areas? _ ~~ h. Exposure of people ar property to geologic hazards such as earthqua[ces, landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar razards? '= . 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: - a: •-Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, yr any change in ~-climate, locally or regionally? -. 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: - a. Changes in currents, yr the course ar direction of water movements in ~- Y ' either marine or fresh waters? . . b. Ganges in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount V -- of surface runoff? - c. Need far off-site surface drainage improvements, including vegetation ? i ~ on removal, channelizativn or culvert installat _ "'' d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? _ e.~ Change fn the amount o£ surface water in any water body? ._ ,_,,,~. f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or , ! turbidity? - g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ~_ Er. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters, either through direct additions ar withdrawals, or thraugtr interception of an aquifer ~~ by Cuts or excavations? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available far public water ~ supplies? ..- j. Exposure of people or grvperty to water-related hazards such as flooding? ~~ 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants}? ~.G b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered, species of plants? ~- c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, ar in a barrier to V the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? t..i -2- 5.. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the r_oposal result in substantial: YES MAYBE NO a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals _ (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, organisms .- or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species`af ----animalsY -- c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a, barzier to ----the migration ar movement of animals? ~ _ d:-Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? ~„~ 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: l ? l ~ eve s ~ a.-- Increases in existing noise `J b. Exposure of people to seveze noise levels? '+ ht d l ? ifi t Li i - / L 7. an g aze gn can g Will the proposal product s LIGHT AND GLARE. _,J $. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an axes? - ~" - 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial: ' ssatural resources? a: increase in the rate of use of any b.-~ Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? 10. RFSK QF UPSET. Will the•praposal involve: • a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited ta, ail, pesticides, chemicals or radiation} in the event --• of an accident or upset conditions? _ ' b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan ar emergency - evacuation plan? - ~~ ', 11. POPULATION.-~Will the proposal alter location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population? _ - • •--... __ . _~ 12. tIOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, .or create a demand . for additional housing? V 13. TRp.NSPORTATIdN/CIRCULATTON. Will the proposal result in: - ~ - ~ - s, Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? ~ _~ b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? _~ c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? _i4~ d. Significant alterations tv present patterns of cisculatian or ~ movement of people and/or goads? . e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ~L lk. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services: s. Fire protection? _~ b. Police protection? ~C c. Schools? ~~ d, Parrs ar other recreational facilities? ~-~ e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ~1~ f. Other governmental services? _~,/ -3- ~' 15. ENERGY. Will the propcs~._ result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel ar energy? ~-- b. Substantial increase in demaxid upon existing sources of energy, or / `-- require the development of new sources of energy? 15. U'TILIT'IES. Will the proposal result in a need far new systems, ar _ ~` ~ substantial alterations Co the following: - - - a.- -Power -or natural gas? ~ - ~L b. -Camm~uticatian§ systems? - -~' c. Water availability? ""'~ • d: Sewer or septic systems? e. Storm water drainage? ~ - f. Solid waste and disposal? ~i 17. HUMAN HEAL1Ii. Will the proposal result in: - a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard {excluding mental ~ health)? ~ b.~ Exposure of people to potential health hazards'. -~ 18. AES~S. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista ar view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the ~ creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ~ 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or / _ . quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ~- • 20. CULTS3RAia RESOURCES . ~ .. - _ - _-- . a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or destruction of a _. .. .. _ ___ ~ prehistoric ar historic ar~haeolagical site? b. Will the proposal result zn adverse physical or aesthetic effects ~ .. :-'to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change `/ which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? - d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within U the potential impact area? - D2SCi7SS=ON ~F ENV=RONMENTAL EvALUA-T20N ~- See attached. -4- DISCUSSI©N ©F ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION File No» 89-4 1b= The proposed zoning amendment is necessary to better reflect and implement the County's General Plan and will not result in any change in land use in and of itself. No impacts concerning disruption, displacement, compaction or nvercovering of the sail are anticipated as a result of this action. 1g= No lass of prime agriculturally productive sails will occur as a result of this zoning amendment. The project site is characterized by residuals soils from lava flaws, rough rack outcroppings and boujders, and shallow soils overlying Tuscan formations. The relief features of the project site are also extreme, ranging from ridge tops to canyon lands which do not lend themselves to commercial agricultural operations. Soils that are typically found in the project area have marginal agricultural value. 1h: Some seismic activity has occurred within the genera] foothill zone. All of Butte County is within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity bane VIII. Construction of buildings to the Uniform Building Code standards far seismically active areas, however, should provide adequate protection to residents in case of seismic activity. 3b: The proposed protect will not change the absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff. The proposed zoning classifications maintain the rural character of the protect site. The majority of the site is designated for 4a-acre minimums per residential unit. Such densities will have very .little impact on surface runoff and drainage patterns. 3f: The proposed protect site is located in a setting of ridge tops and canyon lands. As such, there exists the potential for degradation 1 ~ of surface water quality due to erasion and sedimentation associated ' with construction activities and the exposure of bare and/or disturbed ~~-ghound. Runoff from paved ground surfaces and rooftops associated with rQSidential development may carry organic materials and typical urban pollutants into Dry Creek, Clear Creek and Hamlin Greek. Excessive fertilization of landscaped areas and irrigation runoff from residential yards and fields could generate nutrient-rich flows downstream, thus resulting in eutrophication of the various creeks and their drainage systems within the protect site. SetGack requirements of the Butte County Environmental health Department and the Butte County Grading Ordinance are anticipated to mitigate such environmental issues. In addition, the rural nature of the proposed zoning will also help to mitigate any adverse impacts. Further mitigation measures may be necessary at'time of subdividing or development of any property within the project site. 4a: The diversity of species will be expanded as residential urban landscape plantings occur and non-native species are added to the protect site. No substantial reduction of the number of existing species is anticipated due to the large-acreage parcel sizes required by the Proposed zoning and the low overall density of.allowed development within the project site. -5- 8- The project site is designated by the County General Plan as A-R tAgricultural--Residential), O&G tOpen ~ Grazing Land), and P (Public). The zoning designations within the project site range from FR-14 to FR- 160. The sma3ler densities are located adjacent to the Town limits of paradise, and densities increase toward the south to the high of 160 acres per residential unit. The FR-24 through FR-164 is consistent zoning within the General Plan designations._ The Genera] Plan requires, however, that special findings be made prior to approving the FR-10 zoning. The following is a list of the criteria to be utilized in making the findings conditional Z nin and E7evelo ment Criteria. 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. 3. Availability of adequate fire protection facilities. 4. Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity to serve area. . 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. _. Zon i na Factors = - - ~ , _ . -' 1. Existing Parcel sizes and residential densities. 2. Slope: ~ - ~.. 3. Sail conditions and water availability. _.. ~.~_ Effects on adjacent uses, crop production, livestock, forestry, resource extraction, and wildlife habitat, 5.. Proximity .to public roads and other public facilities. 6. Distance from airports, railroads, and industrial uses. 7. Existing utility and drainage facilities. $, Potential for st,.arface cracking, landslides, and erosion- 9. Effects on noise, traffic flow and safety, water quality, a'r quality, wildlife habitat, and general envirvnrnental quality. 10. Local desires. 11. Potential for pest insect breeding. The General Plan sets out many factors which must be considered in amending the Zoning Ordinance which are mostly quantifiable in nature. In addition, the unquantifiable factors set out by the plan in terms of. goals and objectives must also be con=idpred tv ensure the _aning of a -6- given parcel reflects the communltY's desire as to quantity, character, location, and. rate of growth which has been set forth by the plan's recommendations. - 13a,c= The proposed project will not increase the allowable residential units ponsibinshi tto theJ9enerat~on of veh~iclecmovemePtst is anticipated in relatto P ar to the level of service of the existing transportationoJeCt site can infrastructure. It is estimated that at buildout the P support apprv;cimately 301 residential units. Traffic generation is estimated at apProx~mately 3,010 vehicle trips per day at buildaut. The project site is serviced by several major arterial and collector roadways. Such trip generation factor should not significant impact upon the level of service ad outsove9 ao~2WSquare~m~leearea wh~ch 'ts vehicle trips will be sprees _ . serviced by fire major arterial roadways» , 14a=. The project site is iesateThelnearesthGountyrfirezstataionawhich no fire--figi'~ting caPabil ~t is manned year round, Station #33, is located in Paradise Plnes. County Fire Station #35 is located approximately 3-4 miles away from the project site and is a seasonally manned fir~o~eCtisiteahashbeen wildfire season. The proposed zoning for the p _ designed to decrease the ~zabds.ofi-iowever,tifla~yefutu9e subdrdesions mitigate Potential fire h do occur, fire mitigatioChm~~~~assoc~ated wethrthais~southern'graid9ethe _extreme fire hazards why area. Such mitigation mweZ'1SeSa~d9othercwater~st8~"`agandac~litiesmcould fire flow from domestic be provided» 14b~ The Butte County Sheriff's Depg~~ctnarea.reRap~dldevelopment in enforcement and protection in the p J rural areas of the county and restricted budgets have reduced the department's capability and capac~tYTherpproRosedizonPngrhasltakendsuch rapid response to emergency calls. constraints into consideration by restricting the amount of residential growth on this south ridge. 14c,: The Paradise Un i f i eds~c~od9eDa~~a i ctScnoo 11 e f ac i l Ptci esdare chose urban growth vn the Pared to capacity and, as a result, a school impact fee has been instituted to finance new school facilities» Such fees are anticipated to mitigate any potential impacts on local schools. 16c= The proposed rezoning will not result in any additional potential for increased residen~iaaldew~~'smenttheHareaewil~sneed`tonProvide development does occu , r-ession uses. The water' suitable flows for domestic and fire supp supply and the water quality will need to meet the requirements of the Butte County Publ~~`ae~eparDtmenttofnForestr-Yea~dtF~reaPrate~tion, and Department/Cal~fo Water Act_ the State of California Safe Drinking -7- Zbd• The project site is not serviced by anY municipal or urban~~eeld sewage disposal system. As a result, individual septic and 1eac. systems are proposed for future residential development, due to the Tuscan formations, such systems may be prone to failure. Yn addition, some portions of the project site have slopes of over 307. which are unsuitable for septic/leachfield systems. Ft is anticipated, however, that the 20- and 40-acre minimum parcel sizes as proposed by the zoning amendment will adequately accommodate most residential septic requirements. 20a: The project site is identified as`an sensitfvhtghfactortof~thefor archaevTogical resources. Due to the h ~ _ site, any anticipated subdivision will be rega~r~netCa~pfoonmaaStaterd checi< through the Department of Anthropology university, Chico, in order to determine if significant mites may be located on anY Property proposed for subdivision. The records checi{ will determine whether an archaeoiagical survey of the property will be necessary, and whether anY further mitigation measures will be Headed. _g_ ~-PPl i cart= Sung County P1 ann'rng Commission DATA SHEET q. PRO.lECT DESCRIPTION File Na. 89-4 Log #88-07-26-Q1 1. Type of Project: Rezone. 2. Brief Description= Rezone existing "U" tUnclassified) classifications to reflect the policies of the County's General Plan. 3. Location South of the Town of Paradise town limits, east of Skyway, west of Lake Oroville, and extending some two miles south of the Towns limits of Paradise. Qr. Proposed Density of Develppment= Proposed density of zoning varies from one dwelling unit per 10 acres to one dwelling unit per 160 acres. 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing- Minimal - less than 5~ in most cases.' b. Access and Nearest Public Roads= The`pro,ject site is accesse by Pentz-Magalia Highway, State Highway 1~1, Neal Road, The S}~yy~ay, and other residential and neighborhood streets. 7. [yethod of Sewage Disposal= Individual septic and leachfield systems. ~ - 8. Source of Water Supply= Individual wells. 9. Proximity of Power Lines= Adjacent to properties. iQ. Potential for Furttier Land Divisions and Development= Under the proposed zoning scenario, approximately 300 additional- lots could be created by subdivision based on geographic --- -~ ---~- constraints. -~ - ... ._-. B. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Phvsica3 nviranmeszt 1. Terrain a. General Topographic Character= Relatively flat ridge tops and canyon lands. b. Slopes- Varies - ridge tops from Z• to 5~i canyon portions are over 30~. c. Elevation= Ranges from 800 to 15Q0 feet above Sea Level. d. Limiting Factors= Slopes of over 30~ are unsuitable for septic systems and pose extreme difficulties for residential ar commercial developments. 2. Sails a. .Types and Characteristics= Soil is mostly characteri_ed by the Aiken Stony Phase, stones, comprise approximately 50x or more of the volume of the soil. Soil is approximately six feet deep in the Project area. Residual soil from lava flows, rough rock outcroppin9~, boulders, -~- -and shallow soils overlying Tuscan formations also exist in the south Paradise area. b. Limiting Factors= Soil depths are shallow; stoniness; underlying volcanic mudflow and rock autcrgppings. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zane Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. b. Erasion Potential= S]ighs:. c. Landslide Potential: Moderate. d. Fire Hazard: Varies with vegetation type in the Paradise area; however, the pra,ject site is generally considered high in fire hazard risks. e. Expansive Soil Potential= Moderate. 4_ Hydrology a. Surface Water= Several strea+~s traverse this area including Hamlin Creek, Dry Creek and Clear Creel{; small intermittent streams feed into these creeks within the drainage basin of the pra,ject site. b» Ground~rater= Several springs are found throughout the pro,jsct site; however, aquifers ors generally found at depths of over 500 feet on this ridge tap. At the lower end of the proposed project site, there is an histaria spring icnawn as Dead Man Spring. c. Drainage Characteristics= The pro,~ect site generally drains toward the south, Properties are drained by _ ~- various small intermittent streams which flow into the _ drainage network including the Hamlin Creek, Dry Creek and Clear Creek systems. d. Annual Rainfall tnormal). Approximately 40". e. Limiting Factors= [done. 5. Visual/Scenic Cuality= Excellent. __ b. Acoustic Quality: Excellent. ., 7. Air ©uality~ Goad. B i o l c~ i cal Env + ronRSent S. Vegetation: Chaparral, sparse Footi-sill Woodland. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Upper Sonoran Life Zone. Cultural Environment 10. Arcf-saeological and Historical Resources in the Area: High . .. Sensitivity. . 11. Butte County General Plan Designation= Agricultural- Residential, Public, and Open and Graying. 12. Existing Zoning- Unclassified, A-5, S-H, MHP and A-40. 13. Existing Land Use on Site= Open space graying lands, recreational areas, rural residential estates, and some .____ commercial]and uses.-. _ _ 14. - Surrounding Area= a. Land Uses= Dpen space, Town of Parad'+se, and recreational facilities. b_ Zoninr,~: Town of Paradise, A-160, A-1(], and 3-H. -ia- _ c. General Plan Designations: Agricultural-Residential, Open and Grazing Land, and Public. d. Parcel Sizes= The average parcel site on the pro;ect'site _ is approximately 32 acres; however, parcel si_es range from as ]ow as 1-1/2 acres to as high as 64Q acres. e. Population. Rural residential. 15. Character of Site and Area= Open space on relatively flat ridge tap and canyon land areas. 16. Nearest Urban Area= Town of Paradise. 1~. Relevant Spheres of Influence= Town of Paradise, Paradise Irrigation District, 18, Improvement Standards Urban Area= of a. 19. Fire Protection Service= - a. Nearest County tState) Fire Station- County Fire Station #33 located approximately 6-7 miles north of the site. Seasonal County Fire Station #35 is located 3-4 miles north of the site, off of Clam Road. b. Water Availability= Individual wells and tanker truck capacity only. 2Q» Schools in Area: Paradise Unified School District. BLM/s~s ~~ -1~- :•~ . ~.` !' l .may.!` •~ ~ APPENDIX F COUNTY OF BUTTE ENV=RONr1EN'TAL CHECKL=5'T FORM Lead Agency) LOG NO. 87-01-29-03 >~ .~ AP N0. Variflus '~ ~ ~ ~ File Na . 87 -2$A/B 1. Name of proponent BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable): Butte County Planning Commission County Center Drive OrOVI e, CA 95 6 -339 3_ Project description. General Plan Amendment and Rezone II. Mp,,NDATORY FT_1~FDINGS OF STGNIF=LANCE ~ YES MAYBE NO 7.. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish ar wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant ax animal community, reduce rho number or restrict the range of a rare ox endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory? 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve shox-term benefits to the detriment of long-term environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure into the future.} 3. Dues the project have impacts which era individually limited but cumulatively considerahie? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts an the environment is significant.) 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly ar indirectly? III. DETERM2 NAT2 OIL (Ta be completed by the Lead Agency). On the basis of ~/ this initial evaluation: /\ 11~ find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect an the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. IIwE Eind that although the proposed project C013LD have a significant effect an the environment, there will not 6e a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEA5URE5 described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 11wE Eind the proposed project MAY have a significant effect an the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. COUNTY OF Sl71TE, PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Jul 1.9 , 19 8 8 ~~ r By. "' Associate Planner David R. Hironimus, ;~ Reviewed by: t .~, . IV. NV=ROi~7ME1VTAL =MPACTS {Explattations of all "YES" and "MAYBE"' answers are required on attached sheet(s), 1. EA RTH. Will the proposal result in significant: YES MAYBE KO a. Unstable earth conditions, ar changes in ge6lagiC substructures? b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or overcovering of the soli? ~_G c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering ar modification of arty unique geologic or physical features? x e. Increase in wind or water erasion of sails, either on or off site? ?( f. Changes in deposition ar erosion of beach sands, ar changes in siltation , deposition or erosion whicEt may modify the cioaiuiel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? ~ G h. Exgasure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes , landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? ~( G. 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Air emissions or deteriaratian of ambient air quality? x b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? x c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? X 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements, including vegetation removal ah li _ , anne zation or culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? ~~( e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X f. Discharge into surface waters, or i.n any alteration of surface water quality, including but not Limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen ar turbidity? g. Alteration o£ the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? 'S h. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters, either through di t ddi rec a tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts ar excavations? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available For public water supplies? j. Exposure of peagle or property to water-related hazards such as flooding? XG 4. PI.ABIT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversity of species, or rttimber of any species of plants (ircluding trees, shrubs grass cro d , , ps, an aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare ar attdangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crap? x ~ -2- r 5. ~TMAi• LIFE. Will tine proposal result in substantial: YES MAYBE HO a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, organisms or insects}? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare ar endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Qeterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? ~C,,. 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in existing noise levels? x b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _~G 7. I,IOIiT AND GLARE. Will the proposal product significant light and glare? _~ 8. LAND U5E. Will the proposal result 3.n a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? ~ C„ 4. NA~'tfRAL_12ESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x b. Qepletian of any non-renewable natural resources? ~- I0. RISK OF UPSF,T. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of explosion ar release o£ hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, ail, pesticides, chemicals or rad3.atian) i.n the event of an accident or upset conditions? `, ~c b. Passible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency ti l ? X evacua on g en 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal altex location, distribution, density or growth rate of ~e human population? x G 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X G 13. TRANSPORTATI4NLCIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? ~L b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact an existing transportation systems? }~ ~ d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement af.peaple and/or goods? ~~ e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? /~ G 14. PUBLIC SIItVICES. Will the proposal have an affect upon, or result i.n a need for new or altered government services: a. Fire protection? ~[ G b. Police protection? x C c. Schools? ~_~ d. Parks or other recreational facilities? }~ G e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x L f. Other governmental services? }C G -3- '. ' ~r-- .- ~ ~- 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel ar energy? b.~ Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Wi11 the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the fallowing: a. Power ar natural gas? b. Cammunicatians systems? c. hater availability? d. Sewer or septic systems? e. Storm water drainage." f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. HUMAN }lEAL1T~. Wi11 the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AES IC Will the proposal result i.n the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of anaesthetically offensive site open to public viewT 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 24. CULTURAL RESOURC$S. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or destruction o£ a prehistoric ar historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure ar object? c. floes the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? D=SGLTSS=ON OF EN`7=RONMEiV'SAL EVALUAT2ON See attached. YE5 I~}AYBE NO K C x >C ~C X _~~ ~" Applicant: Butte-County Planning Commission AP # Various File # 87-28A/B DATA SHEET A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Type of Pre~#ect: General Plan Amendment and Rezone. 2_ Brief Description: General Plan Amendment from Commercial, Agricultural-Residential and Orchard & Field Crops to Commercial, Industrial, Agricultural-Residential, Qrchard & Field Crops, Grazing & i~pen Land and Public; and Rezoning from U, C-2, M-2, RR-1, A-5 and A-10 to P-~, R-C, C-1, M-1, M-2, AR-1, ARMH-1, ARMH-2.5, ARMH-5, A-5, A-10, A-~0 and A--160. 3. Location: From north of Palermo Road south to the Gounty boundary, and from the Feather River to Palermo-Honcut Road and including the townsite of Honcut. 4. Proposed Density of development: n/a. 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: n/a. 6_ Access and Nearest Public Roads: n/a. ~. Method of Sewage Diisposal: Individual septic systems. 8. Source of Water Supply: Both individual wells and OWID. 9_ Proximity of Power Lines: Throughout aroma. 11I. Potential far Purifier Land Divisions and Development: The proposal would allow the number of parcels within the area to almost double. B. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING PhYSicai Environment 1 . Terra i n a. General Topographic Character: Flat to gently rolling valley lands. b. Slopes: Generally 0-5~ slopes, with same areas somewhat steeper, c. Elevation: 65 feet above Sea Level up to 200 feet above Sea Level. d_ Limiting Factors: None. 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics: Areas of tailings, Corning- Keefers Soil Association, Columbia Association, Honcut Association, Redding-San Joaquin-RocEclin Association, Vince-Farwell Association and Cone,jo-Berrendos Association. The area is dominated by Class I, II and IV soils. The Class I soils are very deep soils of the Columbia Loam Association. The Class II soils generally have a clay layer from two to four feet deep, and the Class IV soils have a layer of hardpan between one and three feet deep. b. Limiting Factors= Mast of the area is sub,~ect to limited -5- ;. ` `~ r. soil depths. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone- Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. b. Erasion Potential: Class I soils, slight; Class II soils, none; Class IV soils, moderate; Class VITT soils, none_ c. Landslide Potential: None. d. Fire Hazard: Moderate, e. Expansive Soil Potential: Class I sails, low; Class TI soils, moderate, Class IV soils, high. 4_ Hydrology a. Surface Water: Numerous streams and swales traverse the subject area. The area is bounded on the west by the Feather River and on the south by Honcut Creek, Wyman Ravine and Wyandotte Creek, both major drainageways, traverse the area. b_ Groundwater: Abundant valley aquifers. c. Drainage Characteristics: The area generally drains to the south and southwest to Honcut Creek and the Feather River. d. Annual Rainfall Cnormal3: 20-22". e_ L3:niting Factors: Many areas subject to flooding. Potential for subsidence due to heavy groundwater withdrawal aver most of the area. 5. VisuaitScenic (duality: Generally good. 6. Acoustic ©uality: Generally good, except near railroads and State Highway 70. The 60 dB noise cantqurs associated with Seale Air Force Base intr~.tde into the area near Hancut_ 7. Air Quality: Good, except for periods of stagnant valley air, B i o f o~i ca l ,_Env i ronme3-st 8. Vegetation: Mixed agriculture and rolling Oak grasslands. 9_ Wildlife Habitat: Lower Sonoran Life Zane. Cultural Environment 'E 0. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the Area: High sensitivity within one mile of the Feather River and Hancut Creek, and the upper reaches of Wyman Ravine, with low to• unknown sensitivity elsewhere within the area. ~3_ Butte County General Plan Designation: Commercial, Agricultural-Residential and Orchard & Field Crops. 'i2. Existing Zoning: U, C-2, M-2, AR-1, A-5, A-10_ Z3. Existing Land Use on Site= Varying from extensive agricultural uses to urban density development including residential, commercial and industrial uses. Z4_ Surrounding Area a. Land Uses: Varying from extensive agricultural and open space uses to urban development in Palermo. b. Zoning: A-5, ARMH-l, ARMH-2.5, ARMH-5, M-2, R-C, P~-©, A- 40, and R-3. c. General Plan Designations: Public, Medium Density _.S- ~ ~ C~ Residential, Orchard & Field Craps, Agricuitural- Residential, Grazing & Open Land, and Industrial. d. Parcel Siaes: Varies from urban--size residential lots to large agricultural holdings in excess of 600 acres. e. Pcspulation: Varies from urban densities to sparsely pvpuiated agricultural areas. 15. Character of Site and Area: Suburban fringe an the north tr-ansitianing to extensive agricultural uses to the south, with the townsite of Hancut in the southeasterly corner of the planning area, 16. Nearest Urban Area: Oroville, approximately eight miles north. 17_ Relevant Spheres of Ynfluence: Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District, Feather River Recreation & Park District, Butte County Mosquito Abatement District. 18. Improvement Standards Urban Area: iVo. 19. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County CState) Fire Station: Year-round Station #72 in Palermo, ,just inside the northerly edge of the study area, and Volunteer Station #75 in Honcut, yvithin the southeasterly portion of the study area. Year-Round Station #74 in Gridley is located approximately three miles west of the study area. b. Water` Availability: Fire tankers only. 20. Sci-tioals in Area: Palermo Union School District, Gridley Union Elementary School District, arovilie Union High School District and Gridley Union High School District. DRH/s,js -7- r!l~ 4 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION File No. 88-27A/B This project was initiated by the Butte County Planning Commission as a result of growing development pressures in areas that were last studied for appropriate zoning between 1957 and 1964 and for appropriate General Plan designations in 1979. The area described in the data Sheet consists of approximately 41.64 square miles and consists of approximately 1,340 separate parcels. The largest numbers of those parcels are located in Subareas 2, 4 and 12, which comprise the Oak Grove area, the bulk of Palermo, and Honcut. The remainder of the study area is relatively sparsely settled. Subareas 1, 2, 4, 5 and 12 are mostly zoned U (Unclassified). The U zoning is mandated to be replaced by appropriate zoning by policies in the Butte County General Plan Land Use Element, Of the 1,340 parcels within the entire area, 406 conform to the requirements of the respective zones. This relatively law number is because of the 20-acre minimum lot size required by the Unclassified zoning. i~owever, the larger parcels in the area that are presently zoned for smaller parcels would allow a total of over 5,6flfl parcels to be created under the existing zoning, which would represent a 418 increase. This increase, of course, would be reflected in increased demands for public services, roads, schools, commercial services, etc. The Butte County Planning Commission proposal, which includes extensive areas of A-160~CAgriculture - 160-acre parcels}, would continue to allow extensive opportunity for development within the area. At full buildout, there could be over 2,300 parcels, which would represent 176q of those now existing, An alternative to the Planning Commission proposal would be to convert all of the areas proposed for A-160 to A- 40. This would add approximately 280 parcels to the possible total, representing an increase of approximately 21 T. For analysis of the above, see Figures 1, 2 and 3 attached. Discussion of the checklist items below will refer to the entire area in general unless stated differently by subareas in each individual item. 1b= Development allowed by this proposal would increase the number of buildable parcels to 1761° of those now in the area. Development on these parcels will cause some disruption, displacement, compaction or overcovering of the soil as a result of construction of homes, outbuildings, driveways, roads, etc. Because of the generally large parcel sizes being proposed, this should not represent a significant impact. It should be kept in mind that retaining the existing zoning would permit more than twice as many parcels as the proposal and thus create more than twice the impacts. 1g. The bulk of the land in Subareas 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 is currently in agricultural production or suitable for agricultural production. The proposal would result in A-160 and~or A-40 zoning on most of those properties. The larger parcel sizes would help promote the ongoing viability of those agricultural operations. Subarea 1 is -8- ~~ currently zoned U LUnclassified), which would permit division of the property into 2E3-acre parcels and allow mast uses through the Use Permit process. Subareas 6, 7, S, 9, 'itl and 11 are, for the most part, zoned A-5 or A-10. Past experience has indicated that 5- and 7Q-acre parcels are nvt agriculturally viable, Subareas '[ and 10 are predominantly of Glass I Columbia and Vina- Farweli Association Soii Series, consisting of deep soils that are nearly level. These areas are proposed for A-1bEl zoning with a General Plan designation of Orchard & Field Craps. These designations are very much in keeping with existing land uses and parcel sizes in the area. Most of the remainder of the study area consists of Class IV soils, which are generally shallow C'E-3 feet deep), over a layer of clay or hardpan, with some areas of Class II soils which have better subsurface drainage but are over a layer of e3 ay approximately three feet deep, The soil characteristics in these areas would "rndicate that the more extensive forms of agriculture are more viable, Examples would include rice, dry farming or grazing. These areas are proposed for A-160 zoning and a Grazing & Open Land General Plan designation, The Oak Grove, Palermo and Honcut areas are currently in suburban development and are proposed for zoning and General Plan designations that would recognize the existing uses in the area and allow infilling of similar uses CSubareas 2, 3, 4, 5 and 12?. 1h• All of Butte County is located within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The subject property is locates! from one to six miles west of the Foothill Shear Zone which supported the 1975 Oraville earthquake. The very northwesterly portion of the study area, ]acated in Palermo, is within the area that experienced aftershocks from that earthquake. The major epicenter in 1975 was located approximately 1!2 to 3!4 mile east of the most northeasterly corner of the study area. Construction of buildings tc~ Uniform Building Code standards for seismically active areas should provide adequate protection to occupants in case of seismic activity. 3,~: Most of Subareas 1 and 1fl and much of Subarea 17 are subject to flooding. Smaller portions of all of the other subareas are also subject to flooding. The major flood areas are a result of high water flows in the Feather River, Honcut Creek, Wyman Ravine and Wyandotte Creek , 4d= While this proposal would allow the number of parcels in the area to almost double, most of the lots that will be created will be irr areas that are already impacted by suburban and urban development. At the present time, the 4QQ7. increase in parcels that is possible would take place primarily in areas that are new devoted to agricultural uses_ As such, the area will experience a shift in development - potential from the agricultural lands to the areas already experiencing urban growth. 5d: The study area encompasses many areas of riparian habitat and potential sites for various rare and endangered species. Site-specific surveys for these resources will be necessary upon each individual -9- {- development project. 6b: The study area is subject to several noise sources. These include State Highway 70, the Union Pacific Railroad tracks tWestern Pacific Railroad) and noise associated with the traffic patterns from Beale Air Force Base. The 60- and b5-dB contours associated with the base encroach into Butte County as far north as Hancut Creek, within the study area, Since this is an area that is planned for extensive agricultural uses and a 160-acre minimum zone, no significant impacts should occur. Similarly, the lower densities of the agricultura] zones along the railroad tracks and State Highway 70 will limit the potential for exposure pf humans to severe noise levels, The areas in Oak Grove along Highway 70 and in Palermo along the railroad tracks are already mostly developed, and this project wi]1 not have a significant effect on noise conditions in those areas. 8. This project will result in significant changes in General Plan designations throughout the study area, However, these changes will serve to implement the policies contained within the text of the General Plan, including the Land Use Element, and will help to better recognize existing development within the area. 71,12= This proposal will shift the development potential from tl-ze areas now devoted to agriculture to the areas that are currently `=xperiencing urban and suburban growth tree above>. With appropriate zoning in the suburban areas, additional development may be possible in those areas where none is now possible under the existing ^U" zone which requires new parcels to be at least 20 acres in size, 13a,c,d,f: While any additional development in the area will create additional traffic and related traffic hazards, the proposal, if successful, will limit development throughout the area to less than half of what is now possible. The development that will be allowed is to be concentrated in areas where roads and streets are Mostly developed, and wi]1 limit development in the~more rural areas where the infrastructure is not in place. As such, the proposed pi an will shift development pressures on roads to suburban areas and help alleviate many problems that potentially exist at this time, 14: Any development within the project area will represent an incremental increase in demand far public services in a mostly rural area. Because of the shift in location of potentia3 development with this proposal (see above), impacts to public services will be minimized while still allowing a reasonable amount of development within the area. 16e: Many of the areas that are proposed for suburban development are currently subject to some flooding. Any future development will require a permanent solution to drainage as a standard condition of approval for development pro,jects_ 20a: Much of the study area is highly sensitive for archaeological resources, Individual analysis of development projects occurring within the study area will be required, -1~- . .. ~- f- . ~,-~ - ~ i c7mmN*rr~mminRES~ •. i n ~ ~ ~0 J I . m Q1 Q1 ... O N +••r lD Er ~ !~. h I m ~ ! NRcDmin•a••rvln.yma ~ ~ , ~ v~ i ~ i ~ ' 01 ~ • ~ 1 ! •e i I R O O O g O O O 0 0 0 q O f O N •~~ I O~ET~DNaizlRin.-~~m 1 v •.._ X I E31 ~ R ~D [!] tD O N ll] w '~ ~ ~ X fa J . .. ! C r'l ll .l 1 ; .r I I I c~1 . I E u7 m ~ E3ti .• N m ~ ~ !71 ~~.i I RO~~m . -+m. +0+••~01 1 C tJ J ~ G~•~ ! 11] mEJ1~ll]~~tb•tON~h I Ifi m•• • , k I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I .~ I ~ It°l o~ i i Qat~oaooac~ooa i s a s n. n I s. 1 u7olmRm+~EnEnma-[n~i7 I N NNm.aCD.BU7~nmNU7 ~ ~_ ~ d E ~ i m N it3 ~••~ R ~a O E •-+ E I N O I L 01 I ~ ~RON~d'~il7NmO11] D ! •.. ~ Ot ~ J 1 ~ R m .•~ Q +-~ E] E7 li7 ~+ C7 R R..r l O E]1 . ~ J ~ •~ i r+ [J1 '~ tD Il] m R 117 lD EJ1 ~-+ tf3 i N ~ C ~ E ~ ~'" E17 m ~i3 •••• w ~t R ,~ ! ET 9 N m t~ O U I I I M 0 ~+~ E QC70©L70O000CE9 I 4. NZ E O N.•+t]~QNNIl7tiD~E~Uym I ~+ cFyi tF ~~ ~i•~+ I ~nmr~.•an.ILw..~,yNm I a .. F~- LsX1 ! ~ ~' N IJ7 •t (71 N (J1 R O ~•+ I t4 F X I I ~ Il1 11 J i O'q'fT~'COQOQ~mC]tDN i R X 1 InomWNO00~117-+NR} i N cu~os+mtn+~s~nic*imo+n' i ~ . I ~crtDm~.~vawE7mv~n I R uz ~ ~....M ,~ ~, .., r., ~., ~, .. 1 ., I 1 I ai En otimRmvu-mmmcnw i N q o I cvcvmwm~nln~DanNlnln I u3 , 0 N E~ +~+ R N L (Z. 1 ; ~ Q. fA 1 I ~ fy \ I O-+NC]OItiO~Q011171f]m I G1 U i O CJ1 C3 ©(3 1p Ei} m u7 [71 +-+ tD 1 Q+ U ~ 1 I!'7~t1iQOtDll7NQQC~IV 1 1~. L ` cl. yr i ~~aclvmmN.ymEnN I r. ~ a ~ N ..~ ,•r ~., m m ••+ 1 '7 ~ m+~- : 411 T 0• ,~ : m~+ 1 ~A IA ~ { 1 Q N ul•.• I N.•-.a~ONNU]~tr©tom i .» N N •, O (} X E r~mC]~I~h.~D•-+~'.,l~iln I O O O X ZCLisI 1 ..~...~Nll7 ~t0'~NQ1RO~" 1 ~ ~ CL !V 1 E ..~ I fJ 1 Q,l I ~C3L17IllmtttF7b'QNOET I ~D ^' I:L o~i im ~ I tn~ 4 ~ I U W ~ i a.1 0 ~ 1 I !~ 4.. E i1 1 m m l~. *~+ •••+ 7 m N N m m (A E t0 O I O t~ N ~ Q Q X 1 N W 11] ~• ll] R .•+ ~ I v .~d I . . ~ ... i 4 ~[JktJ ~ Y i ~ ~ ZU[J U1 1 NmQ11*.m~mmEJ1tiA~D~ ! ~ 011 41 I L I +•+I~tDtJ2m+~N.w~gE31RCD I m . . t I U i -++tmli?Il1Ntb-•.tgmm~tt i .~ { l I >r CG i tD R 1!] 1~ ~ Iii ll] EI7 01 [D R ED f 117 . ~ Li m I m~Nmmin«+..i,.ln., "~ cY1i ~ I 1 m .~ Eum.~~min ~ ~ ~ I i N ~ "" I 'n 4.. 1 C~4TV1NC7Q1R11y•-.~i*i 1 O C E L N I ~„J 0~ i ~'~01~-+I~~DIf1tiOmNU3113 I '7 Al I 4. O IA ~ I I ! I I -yNm~tlf7cQRmQ1O-+N I ~t 1~ i i? d I ,w rr .r I `~ i ~ ~ N . ~~~ rr .a a i LFI ~ i i H •'~' ZZ E l!1 ~ cammEV~vmminRm.-. i o a3o-m,.+oN.,~nm•rr~i~ I m NRm,.aln~v~In-••mv I m m ,..tm ©OC~OOOpCOGC]C] I I ! 17 Od•a1u3NO011~117.-~y'tTl E O '~f .~ E31 +-+ R tQ 1!] tJ3 m N to I!7 i •t' ^~ m -•+ I m I ~•+ 1 I mm+.oQ-..i~.mmmwmN i ~• o •••~ q W tiff m tD u7 m ~ .~ ci ~ I Q1 ts, mmm~lnln~~owEr~ I ~ t3+ i '~ voava©oc~oaoo I i Q n I Er ~+mRm.~~•mEnmEn~n I N o ~mm(J1W~m~117 m N l tt m ., [i3 N N 4 L I N I E ~'Itir~EV~etll3NG]alA~O I E !~ f m.-+a.•rOOU7~ORR,~ E o E -•En~wlt~mltikl7~m.~m k N ~ ~ .-gym mw.~m~rRr. I In ~ E ~m ! OOOC]OflOQQOOO 1 ! q E N~O~DNNIfJ~l3~tOiF]O i ..-~ ! ~DmQ*~*RR~O•irt•-~Nm E E -^-•~Nli7 ~ETNCIIROY+ E uti E I j ~ II i avm~moNVlv~InES+N I tl7 0 i inam~DNammNVmm I -• ~ i t~ ~ En m iri rri Qi t\i In v- ~ t~ i E~ v i.~rvam~.-~mlr~aR,.-~mw I cn N i m~r...~,r..~r.......,•rNr, i I i .~ 1 v~oemRm-+trmmmmw 1 i N a N fD CD ~ ti0~ (I3 ti I!] m 1 ~ Q I N !i] •. .. N t S N I I E L I l \ \ ~ \ 1: \ t \ \ \ \ X k I O .-+ N O EO R Ql ET Q1 tl7 11] O I O'1 k OE11E70vu3LflmIAfJ1.~03 ~ Q1 117~fVOOtDl17NOOmN i R E O•wOL]QO]mN.~OQlN E .+ E ~~+N.•s.tiR~m~•+mlb.~ I ,y, .-. ~ m ~ 1 I I I tV .+ Ci tii EV N ll] ~Fi ~ C7 Ell m i .~ •••~ ••+ N ii7 ~t ~ N ~ R D r+ I SD I 1 i Ii] I I ~•ou7rnminm•ro~mm I i o ~• I Nik.m.+NNN m-••mv I d7 O ••+ i i ~ ~ v I I i '" mmlti.-+.~+~mNN00~ i tD I ~ Naornltim~mmrnww=r i o- .•R~nwm.•+N-ymmn.m I m r• m li} il] CV ~ .,r ~,E7 m m ci7 I .-+ tD R EI] Q u3 Ii} LI] 117 0'~ m R O I li] m~•Nmmin,.,,..l~ln..,m I m m .-. N m .•+ .r m In i n`oi I 0 4' [)1 lr7 N C7 Q- R 1t3 .~ ~ Kri I q b'-+01••+RtDl17~DmN1171fi 1 ~ GJ ...r t17 ,~ i ~ ~ ~Nm"~f'117~Li~ZDE5~0••+N ~ ~ ri .., ,~ .~ i ~ ~ I F- Cl ~. .~. u. ~NA~t~fSlS BY ZQNE ~~'``GQRY '~ ~ Traffic &eneratioe Passible Ione/Area ~ of cls A Conferring E Pcls. ~ Pcls Poss. Exist Ioaes Prop. Iones p cres xist Proposed Exist -- Prop. H L N L A-i60 _ __.,,____ _ ~.. _~ ,,.~ _ sub-area I 32 2596.56 22 6 124 32 1240 868 320 224 Sub-area 6 46 2251.94 40 3 414 4fi 4140 2898 450 322 sub-area 7 59 3156.23 48 5 965 59 9650 6755 59D 413 suh-area 4 85 4796.b9 72 10 444 8$ 9440 6608 880 61fi sub-area f0 21 3588.96 18 7 710 29 1100 497D 29D 2D3 sub-area 11 54 5113.16 48 10 1025 59 10250 7175 590 413 Total 297 21564.25 289 4t 4182 313 41820 29274 3134 2191 A-40 suh-area 6 14 300.20 14 1 58 14 58D 406 140 98 suh-area B 67 1151,18 52 4 215 fig 2160 L512 690 483 Total S1 1451.37 66 5 274 83 2740 1918 834 581 A-1D suh-area 3 99 1258.69 fi7 35 200 i38 2000 1400 1380 966 sub-area 12 2 112.90 2 2 21 10 . 2!4 147 100 70 Total 101 1371.59 69 37 221 148 2210 1547 1480 1036 A-5 sub-area 12 20 114.41 3 ~___ 9 _ 23 27 230 161 270 189 Total 20 114.41 3 .. 9M 23 ~ 27 230 161 270- -~i84 ~~ ARHH-5 sub-area 5 12 365.83 I ____ _ 23 72 83 724 504 830 581 Total 72 365.83 __-- 1 __ 23 ~72 ~~83 720 504 830 Y 581 AR!!H-2.5 suh-area 2 26 213.98 3 -~ W 21 40 84 400 280 840 588 Total 26 213.98 3 ~ ~ 21 48w 84 -~400 -280 840 588 ~- ARlIH-1 sub-area 4 461 343.67 1 62 4fi1 5l7 4614 322T 5770 4039 suh-area 12 125 156.61 0 32 125 200 f250 875 2000 1400 Total 586 500.21 1 94 586 177 5860 4102 1770 5439 Ft~. ~ Traffic fieneration Passible Caafaning Pcls. t Pcls Poss. Exist Zanes Prop. Zones Iaee/Area ~ of pcls Acres Exist Proposed Exist Prnp. H t H L A~-1 `"'------------~~__~..---------------~~_~~~..,~~---_-..-~~ -___------_--=-mow sub-area 2 84 186.86 4 45 85 I87 85D 595 187D 1309 ~__~_ _ Ta#al 84 f85.85 4 45 B5 i87 w 85D~ 595 1810 1309 ~- ~!-2 sub-area Z i 75.40 1 1 233 233 2330 1531 2334 1531 Total 1 75.40 i Y~~i ---- 233~w 233 --- 233DY 1631- 2330 ~ 1531_-_ n-1 sub-area 4 Z 8.54 0 2 2 26 2D 14 264 I8Z Total 2 8.50 0 ~~2 ~ 2 ~ 26 N r 24~ 14~w26pw 182 ~~ C-1 sub-area i 1 11.04 1 0 1 f24 10 7 1200 B40 sub-area 2 3 7.09 0 3 3 34 30 21 340 238 sub-area 4 40 14.04 D 39 40 132 400 280 1324 924 sub-area 12 4 1.1$ 3 4 11 17 170 119 170 119 Tatal 48 33.95 4 46 51 303 610 427 3036 2121 P-B :: sub-area 4 13 19.47 0 12 13 32 134 91 320 224 sub-area 12 2 1.15 L 2 2 2 20 14 20 i4 Total 15 20.51 L 14 15 ... 34 150 105 340 238 R-C sub-area I 7 75$.42 5 7 37 73 370 259 734 5I1 Tatal 7 753.42 6 Yw 7~-- 37 r~73 N 37D~ 259 Y730r S11 ~- ~- UNITEfl STATES _ c- _. }fONCUT GUAORANp{F °a• flEPARTMENT OFTFlE INTI:RfOR !~ / uuralrnlL j ra ~ SPATE O!' CA[JFORHIA ~' OFALDCSCAI. SURVEY oflanllLMT s><.4T0 ..+•• - ~ ~ 7! XYNR[ 3iM[/ f7D1a7pRAMNq ' ~~~p T M' . L L L .YI .e a1 I ~~ Sil'1C It V~ ~ rti \' ~ f.' .GV Ic.~~l4~f ~ ~i`~' r. •~ . ~`i. ~: ~(~ rat` ~~ ~ ~,,1, ~ - s - ~ ... fr,l ~~.~ 1 ~ ~la ~._,. ~ r -~ ~.rr ~f G'~ v li ,`.~ ~ `~~ '~/ may.. ~ r. ~ is ! 71 , '~ ;~ _ :~(1e "~~t ~ ~1 0 ~.~,.,., ;' ,~ ~_ ,. ^~~ ,~~C ~ ,: ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ o~ -•~.~ tea..` .. ps ~ r 7~ ` ~ is f:~, r 0 .oa..... Cit ' {~~ ~.r'~J Q Y i A 7 - 1 ~~\J LfMi ~> 3 •24 ~ J O 21 ~ 'r :1 ~p ~,, r ~ o~ V - - i L. ' O ~ ~ r .y -z.. '~ ' ~ t ~: tri~~ r i 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V I 1~~~~ ~~~i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I r~ ~ ti~ ~ l a I ~ ! !~~w If `i L ~ r ~ ~~ .~ h I ~ ~ ~ Imo.. Silyf7T «. .rl~nrt l.... ~M~~ 'R ri •.1• •.i ...ti.s.... w la]r 7r • ~. Yn7 ,ayf ~wria .FlwL w~I S~.~pe~fr~r~i.+..r SCrsR I:II.V 'r ~. s]l'1P 1 c.+..urswvw4s ^ro wurranel. yS • ~ •...ISna ~.rvu fr.w.w.....~.rrusw I ..L.+r ~w err ~. -t*. ~....~......... ,r.. IMn~ ............. . . Tww.w..w~wrr uSG{1157 „~„ .I w. ~'• ~~~ r~.~ 11ir 14+..wo,rL.. COI.NU+wr[Ly.L 1 R(T 'aww>ti.lti.~w ~-~Lww..rwi t . 11O~mwmR ~.w uw ~.r tq ~ ~+~ HOnC4UY' GA~LF. sa...+w...~wl.....rr..r .n ..w.r..... c1.h.[1 w...,rn.~.~.cer...a rrrw.rs ~~~ ^ r.»rr+rrssvea 1.Irr w~w.w •Ir 1{111 WL T V-i •..:.~ 11w1r 9f1.1L mpL.p1 ra+L1L .(1R41'11~ILL pp~ tm6.rr~r.._.wwrnww rLr.eL •lworv~,rlr.t rw ... a~w1w •.w.arw+. s..r...o~1-r.r.rw~w.~ ,~..F~.,..m ~ urnm 6TATR FALSIlYO WAD~AMpj ~~ ~' r'0[PAIRMRIT OF THi Ili7'i11bR - ST~A yYY OF G[!tW ~!1 ~ ~~a-~vrn m. ~_'S nrnrmr~._ r~rrv .~... .~ ~,..~ ~.'a. is rwrs ~amo rtnw~a...~ w ~ww ww Lt[ ! 7t® ~ ew~r.r~s... . ~ ~ 4•o aauners .ter +r..-.~. ~ ~.r ~ i ~ ..~...~ `~ : ~W~~ ~~~ ww ~ +.a ~1r. .....~ ~ v...... ,.,...~.~..._ .~., p,~ p~.~ per,... ~~~ `~.....~.......M.wr ~. ur..~..-........ _ 'r~.~....r~~r~~-.r~..rr rr~~~. PALifI}10. GLJF. .~rr.u..r~rrrr .~.w ti. ~ee..ny. ~. ~~c+a ... mre•n~.w. wrt~~~~ ~~~.. ~,,,,•.,.. ......,...rr.. _ 1w rr w a a morr a.w+. oawa m.ew~o 0 0...u..ane.~ ae~ •~rs-...w. s ..~.I.~ (~ ,• _:: - ~.. ~~ 1 w.. ~~ Yom. ~~"~. iL 1 ~ , r ~ ~ I (( ~Y J3 ~ «~ ~ ~~ ry ! .tea _ r.. , ~ ,». .. I 1 ~ -.1 • ~ l '. ' c 1 ~ I _ i 1! it ~ ~" ~ • ~ ~-~ ~ ~~ 1 ~..}~ ` ~.] I + ga. 1 I ; ;~ +-~ -1 • ; d ..~f: J ,1. ~a 1 I ~ .r .." r•. ~ ~ F ' 1 ~\~ __ .. .. _ / - ~ _ .~~ . . ~ E [a.• IwS. ~~+r. ~ 1 w.. ~ _..L~- ~ .. I.;i1 p.l.pd. i, `~`yIn . If ~ 17 I ' ; i ~II...'~' ~ .t' { w 1~ .A~'~ 1~1A111' ~~' i'IL~wrirL +w ;.. ~. ~ •:1 '+i ~.n ~: ~ RNA- ,•ll]]~ .' 1~1' ~ ~. ~ ;t~~T;~' - ~ Y.-^-~ ~~ ~ ~ . ~ `tea . , . , [J _ .. ~ _- - ' ~~ r . c~.i. a.nll-n , i 3• r ~..____: 1' ~•_._y r:r-~ ~ ~ 0 A ; ~ `Y. ~~~ I~i•y ~ ~ w I .WET. Ys y ~± ~...' •.. w1 1 K 1CJ111]~00~ ~ ~ -ry 11r~sy R .~ra • rrn ..~ ~•• 1 y .rww~ ~Y•r~ 1Ywwr .I..+~.Iw moon. uur. a .nc 1~ y .rr '- - y I_ ~~ I~i. ,J ~~ I ~~~' y1 ;4 }. it ' .....L.: •11 1. i.. ~•r~_ ~ .. `- ..~ f/ ~ • ~ f y ~. ~.+ ~ I 9~ :1 t~ ~I - -a `E ra I ~ 9 y~ ~ 0.Tru 00 r. -~ . ~, ^ ~ r ~ t• r~ ~ , ze 7y s ar ~ln ~ ~~ 1 ~~ 'r;~ e ~ `- r. rra ~~.,~/ ~ ` ~ -' i ~ ]6~~ e--.., 11 f ~ y:~ I ~ r ! '^w+i d`` € i ~ \ `- 1. ,~~~ ~ ~ j: '~~ 1 f --"' •~y ~.--c , - ~, - . . 09MRi111 wr[Mwa t HR CRfCLEY CA 4: rC