Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-047A RESOLUTION OF THE BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AMENDING THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTING THE NORTH CHICO SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, Butte County initiated the speafic planning process for the land area generally Known as CSA 87 in the north portion of Chico; and WHEREAS, numerous informational and discussion meetings were held by the consultants and representa#nres of the County with the property owners in CSA 87 and with representatives of the City of Chico on many subjects pertaining to the North Chico speafic Plan, Rezone, General Plan Amendment, including but not limited to, environmental constraints ,growth pressures, arculation, drainage, airport compatibility ;and WHEREAS, a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEiR} was prepared and circulated for public comment arid the Planning Commission extended the public comment period for an additional thirty days beyond the statutorily required thirty days; and WHEREAS, the speafic Plan text and accompanying maps were prepared with reference to and in consideration of the 1983 Airport Land Use Handbook and, when . they bocame available, the 1993 Draft Airport Land Use Handbook and the Fnal Airport Land Use Handbook; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan text and accompanying maps were prepared with reference to and in consideration of the F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Exposure Map and related reports drafted in connection with the City of Chico Airport Environs Plan update process and consultations regarding land use compatibility conducted with the City of Chico's airport planning consultant; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Planning Commission held duly advertised and noticed public hearings starting on January i3, 1994 and concluding on November 16, 1994 with a recommendation to adopt the Rezone, General Plan Amendment, speafic Plan and EIR; and WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors held a duly advertised and noticed public hearing on January 10, 1995 to consider the Planning Commission's recommendations regarding the Rezone, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan and ElR and the action of the Butte County Airport Land Use Commission's finding of inconsistency with the 1978 Airport Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS, public hearings at both the Butte County Planning Commission and the Butte County Board of Supervisors, considered the issue of overriding the ftndings of inconsistency wi#h the 1978 adopted Airport Land Use Plan for Chico Muniapal Airport; and ~ . WHEREAS, substantial testimony has been heard both. pro and con, and changes to the Plan have been made as a result of testimony ~ and public review of the Specific Plan and EIR; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Butte County Board of Supervisors do herehy find and adopt the following: Section 1: Environmental Endings. A. An Environmental Impact Report (EiR) has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and . B, Comments on the Draft EIR were soGated, received, adequately addressed and incorporated into the Fnal EIR; and C. Changes, alterations or mitigation measures fisted in Section 3 of the 1=mal EIR have been required or incorporated into the project thereby eliminating or substantially lessening significant effects identified by the County, responsible agendas and members of the public; and D. The Board of Supervisors has independently reviewed, analyzed and considered the EIR and finds that the ElR reflects the independent judgement of the County of Butte; and E. Implementation of the Specific Plan will result in unavoidable and adverse impacts in which no mitigation is available other than implementation of the No- Project/No Deveiopmen# Alternative. These significant unavoidable impacts indude #raffic and arculation, air quality impacts and land use impacts. However, benefits discussed in 1', 2, and 3 below override these significant adverse impacts and the Board of Supervisors makes the following Statement of Overriding Considerations: 1. Traffic and Circul~tiQn_ Impacts: As discussed on Pages 9-9 of the Draft E1R the impacts of the project were examined based upon the assumption that no new traffic signals would be installed along State Route 99 (per Caitrans policy) and that e~dsting lane conftgura#ions would be used as a basis for all scenarios. In addition, the New Arterial 2 intersection is proposed to remain as an at grade intersecc#ion of State Route-99. As stated on Page 2-2 0# the- Fnal ElR (FEIR), traffic operations at the unsignalized intersection of Keefer Road/State Route 99 intersection will operate at unacceptable levels, during the morning peak period only, for left turn movements from Keefer Road onto State Route 99. The Specific Plan, through conditions of approval, has been modified to require the County to work with CalTrans on the installation of traffic signals at SR~ 99 and the new arterial and Keefer Road. The Speafic Plan util'~zes the e~asting creeks and sloughs as bicyde and pedestrian traits connecting to the various land use area. This will assist in minimizing the use of the automobile. in addition, the Speafic Plan has planned office, commeraal and industrial areas which will make local jobs available for persons residing within the North Chico Speafic Plan Area and thereby reduce commuting traffic into and out of the area. The -Chico General Plan identifies this land as a future growth area and constrains growth in other areas. The Chico General Plan Map also depicts the Alterative Land Use Plan identified in the FEIR. Growth in the Chico area is further constrained through agricultural preservation polices, zoning, and "the greenline'. The Chico General Plan requires the infilling and increased densities to create a more compact urban form. Thus, development within the North Chico Speafic Plan (NCSP) area is necessary to accommodate future growth. 2. Air Duality lmoacts: As discussed on Pages 10-1 through 10-11 of the Draft EIR, the project will contribute indirect emissions assoaated with project-related automobile use, and will cumulatively exceed emissions thresholds contained in the Air Quality Attainment Plan. Implementation of the Speafic Plan wiA contribute indirect emissions assoaated with project related automobile use, and will cumulatively exceed emission thresholds contained in the Air Quality Attainment Plan. The NCSP, more than any plan in the vianity is designed to reduce the dependency upon the automobile and to reduce automobile trips. The location of the Village Core, the connection of the Village Core to the various land uses within the Plan, and the extensive trail and pathway system, will contribute to lower emissions than standard urban/suburban developmert. Air quality impacts affect a regional area much larger than just the North Chico Speafic Plan. Air quality impacts from any development within the Northern Sacramento Valley Air Basin are of a type which would be expected to occur in connection with development anywhere in the 3 County and can only effectively be addressed on a region-wide basis. It is questionable whether such cumulative impacts attributable to the adoption of this Pian are significant and they could not be completely mitigated without prohibiting all new development. The cumulative impacts cannot be resohred with project spedfic mitigation measures, but could only be addressed~in connection with overall development poiides in the Northern Sacramento. Valley Air Basin as a whole. 3. ,Land Use impacts: As discussed on Page 2-3 0# the FEIR, the implementation of the Spedfic Plan will cause the conversion of appro~amately 1,630 acres of existing open space to urban/suburban uses. This area has been designated as a growth area for the City of Chico in their proposed Genera! Plan Update. The use of a specific plan for more detailed planning allows for a workable solution to the traffic and drainage problems which have plagued the area. The Chico General Plan.identifies this land as a future growth area and constrains growth in other areas. The Chico General Plan Map also depicts the Alternative Land Use Plan identified in the FEIR. Growth in the Chico area is further constrained through agricultural preservation poiides, zoning, and "the greenline". The Chico General Plan requires the infilling and increased densities to. create a more compact urban form. Thus, development within the NCSP area is necessary to accommodate future growth. F. Project Alternative: In Chapter 5 of the FEIR, the Alternative Land Use Plan to the project represents an environmentally superior alternative to the proposed Land Use Plan contained in the Spedfic Plan as Fgure 3-2. The Alternative Land Use Plan locates proposed residential at densities greater than 1 dwelling unit per acre, to a point 3,700 fee# or more from the centerline of the main runway of the Chico Munidpal Airport. The Alternative Land Use Plan relocates the main arterial of the proposed Plan out of known wetland habits#; thus minimiang potential impacts #o wetlands. Section 2: Overriding Endings regarding the Airport Land Use Commission. On February 9, 1994 the Airport Land Use Commission found the North Chico Spedfic Plan inconsistent with the currently adopted Airport Land Use Plan for the Chico Municipal Airport, bu# did not make findings specifying the reasons for such inconsistency, Government Code Section 65302.3 requires the NCSP #o be consistent with the said Airport Land Use Plan, unless the Board of Supervisors does not concur with any provision of the Plan and adopts findings pursuant to Section 21676 of the Public Util~ies Code. The Board of Supervisors does not concur with provisions in the Chico Airport Land Use Plan which predudes any development in the airport environs other than 1 acre or larger residential lots and agricultural uses. Furthermore, following the action of the Airport Land Use Commission, an Alternate Land Use Plan 4 was prepared and is incorporated into the FEiR and the NCSP to provide for the orderly development, expansion, and long term viability ofi the Chico .Municipal Airport and orderly development ofi the area surrounding the airport. Therefore, the Board of Supervisors makes the following findings pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 2~ 676. A. The NCSP provides for the orderly development, expansion,. and long term viability of the Chico Municioal Airport and orderlv_deveio~rnent of the area surroundin the air ort as follows: 1. Existing general plan and zoning provisions would have allowed 1 acre parcels north of the airport which could create significant operational concerns for the airport. See attached City of Chico letter dated February 1, 1995. 2. The NCSP reduces existing allowed densities off the north end of the Clear Zone by increasing minimum parcel sizes from ~ acre to 3 acres, as shown on the Alternative Land Use Plan and thus makes the potential development in the area more compatible with the orderly development and expansion and long term viability of the airport; 3. Residential land uses, at densities greater than ~ unit per acre, are not ai[owed within 3,700 feet from the centerline of the main runway as shown on the Alternative Land Use Map in the FElR, thus limiting the potential for complaints of incompatibility with airport uses; 4. Pursuant to the Alternative Land Use Plan noise sensitive land uses are buffered from ground generated noise at the airport, such as engine run-up, by locating industrial, commercial and office land uses rather than residential uses, closest to and adjacent to the airport; 5. Open space has been planned for the area westerly of the Clear Zone, northerly of Mud Creek as shown on the Alternative Land Use Plan in the FEIR, further reducing the potential for complaints of incompatibility with airport uses; 6. One acre minimum parcel sizes are planned for the area north and west of Mud Creek as shown on the Alternative Land Use Plan in the FEIR, which is consistent with the currently adopted Airport Land Use Plan for the Airport and with the Airport Land Use Handbook pages 3-13, 9-19 through 9-25; 5 7. Airport expansion through the year 2D1 D is accommodated by excluding new development within the 55 dB CNEL projected for the year 201 D as projected by the Noise Exposure Map for the Alternative Land Use Pian in Chapter 5 of the FE1R; 8. The Specific Plan provides for airport protection measures as part of the Development Regulations in Chapter 7 of the Specific Plan, pages 7-6 and ~-7; B. The NCSP protects the public health, safety. and welfare by minimizing exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas adjacent to the Chico Municipal Airport as follows: Intensive uses as shown on the Alternative Land Use Map, including the proposed elementary school, are located abeam the runway, where the great majority of the overflying trafFic is light single engine aircraft, at reduced throttle settings prior to landing as stated by the County's consultant, Steve Honeycutt, in public hearings at the Planning Commission on November 16, 1994 and at the Board of Supervisors on January 10, 1995. This is also shown on the Generalized Flight Tracks exhibit following page 3-12 of the FEiR and is depicted on the exhibit titled Generalized Flight Tracks Over Chico Urban Area attached hereto and presented by the County's consultant, Steve Honeycutt at said hearing on January 10, 1995; 2. Intensive uses as shown on the Alternative Land Use Map, including the proposed elementary school are located inside and away from the Heavy Aircraft Pattern 1 flight track, which will minimize overtlight and single event noise occurrences from hearty aircraft, as stated by the County's consultant, Steve Honeycutt in public hearings at the Planning Commission on November 16, 1994 and at the Board of Supervisors on January 10, 1995. This is also shown on the Generalized Flight Tracks exhibit following page 3-12 of the FEIR and is depicted on the exhibit titled Generalized Flight Tracks Over Chico Urban Area attached hereto and presented by the County's consultant, Steve Honeycutt at said hearing on January 1D, 1995; 3. The State Division of Aeronautics, in its letter of May 19, 1992, determined that the proposed elementary school site provides the minimum level of safety suitable for a school; 6 4. Prior to development of an elementary school at the proposed Eocation, which may be ten years or more in the future, there will be additional opportunities to re-evaluate safety and noise considerations through involvement of the Chico Unified School District, the City of Chico, the State Division of Aeronautics, the Airport Land Use Commission, and the County. 5. Avigation easements are required, as indicated on page 7-fi of the NCSP text, for all residential development within the Plan area; 6. The NCSP provides for airport protection measures as part of the Development Regulation in Chapter 7 of the Specific Plan, pages 7-fi and 7-7; 7. The Accident Sites for Runways of 6,000 Feet or More, Figure 8F, taken from the 1994 Airport Land_Use Handbook and superimposed with the Alternative Land Use Map for the NCSP (see attached Exhibit A), together with testimony pertaining thereto at the Board of Supervisors' public hearing on January 1 D, 1995 by the County's consultant Steve Honeycutt, indicates that the accident probability is highest within the boundaries of the Chico Municipal Airport Clear Zones and very low in the vicinity of the Village Core, including high density residential and the elementary school site. 8. The attached Exhibit B, Comparison of Flight Tracks and School Sites, together with the testimony pertaining thereto at the Board of Supervisors' public hearing on January 1D, 1995 by the County's consultant Steve Honeycutt, indicates that aircraft on flight tracks at Chico Municipal Airport are at a sufficient flight distance and altitude so as to not expose the high density residential and the elementary school sites to excessive noise or safety hazards. C. The NCSP rovide land use measures that minimize the ublic's ex osure to excessive noise and safet~r hazards within areas around the airport as folfows:_ 1. Noise attenuation is required to be incorporated into al! new residential construction as indicated in the additional requirements recommended by the Planning Commission and incorporated into the NCSP in Chapter 4 on page 4-7.; 2. Enhanced disclosure measures, alerting potential buyers and renters of the operations of the airport, avigation easements, and aircraft operations, will be required by Chapter 7, Section 7.fi-3 of the NCSP; 7 3. The NCSP provides for airport protection measures as part of the Development Regulation in Chapter 7 of the Specific Plan, pages 7-6 and 7-7; 4. Intensive uses as shown on the Alternative Land Use Map, including the proposed elementary school are located inside and away from the Heavy Aircraft Pattern 1 flight track, which will minimize overflight and single event noise occurrences from heavy aircraft, as stated by the County's consultant, Steve Honeycutt in public hearings at the Planning Commission on November 16, 1994 and on January 10, 1995. This is also shown on the Generalized Flight Tracks exhibit following page 3-12 of the FEIR and is depicted on the exhibit titled Generalized Flight Tracks Over Chico Urban Area attached hereto and presented by the County's consultant, Steve Honeycutt at said hearing on January 10, 1995; 5. The State Division of Aeronautics, in its letter of May 19, 1992, determined that the proposed elementary school site provides the minimum level of safiety suitable for a school; fi. Prior to development of an elementary school at the proposed location, which may be ten years or more in the future, there will be additional opportunities to re-evaluate safety and noise considerations through involvement of the Chico Unified School District, the City of Chico, the State Division of Aeronautics, the Airport Land Use Commission, and the County. 7. The NCSP reduces existing allowed densities off the north end of the Clear Zone have been reduced by increasing minimum parcel sizes from 1 acre to 3 acres, as shown on the Alternative Land Use Plan in the FEIR and thus makes the potential development in the area more campatibie with the orderly development and expansion and long term viability of the airport; 8. Uses involving high concentrations of people, including such uses as social halls, churches, rest homes, convalescent homes, sanitariums and foster or group homes will not be allowed as a matter of right within areas designated as residential zones, but will only be allowed if a use permit is obtained in each case, subject to findings being made, following a public hearing, that such use would not be detrimental to the health and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or to the general health, welfare and safety. Chapter 7 of the NCSP, pages 7-os through 7-12, and Butte County Code Section 24- 45.10. Section 3: Action 8 A. Certification of the EIR: Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this resolution, certify the Final Environmental Impact Report with mitigation measures as contained in documents entitled Draft Environmental Impact Report on amendment of the Genera! Plan and adoption of the North Chico Specific Plan, dated December, 1993, Final Environmental Impact Report on amendment of the General Plan and adoption of the North Chico Specific Plan, dated October, 1994. B. Adoption of the Specific_Plan: Adopt the North Chico Specific Plan amended by the Revised Draft North Chico Specific Plan, dated Revised October, 1994 with the conditions indicated below: 1. The Alternative Land Use Plan shown attached and labeled Figure 3-2 shall replace Figure 3-2 contained in the North County Specific Plan {NCSP). This shall be the Land Use Plan far the NCSP. 2. The -Final NCSP shall be revised to incorporate all of the changes shown in the Revised NCSP, dated October, 1994 and the mitigation measures of the FEIR, where appropriate, as policies or regulations of the NCSP. The Figures and Tables shall be revised to reflect the Alternative Land Use Plan. All Figures and Tables shall indicate the source, the preparer, and the date of preparation. All references to the Rezone and the General Plan Amendment shall be purged from NCSP, except for a historical reference to this approval process. 3. An Agricultural Policies subsection shall be added to the Chapter 3 -Land Use and a policy shall be added which states as follows: All existing orchards shall be permitted to continue, without interference or interruption by development. 4. Staff shall work with PG&E to select a street lighting fixture which shall be utilized as the standard street light in the area south of Mud Creek. The Specific Plan shall be amended to require the installation of street lights in the area south of Mud Creek as a requirement of development. in addition, the CSA or other funding mechanism shall be utilized for the payment and maintenance of street lights. 5. The NCSP, Chapter 4 -Circulation, page 4-7, shall be revised to add the following policies: 8. Enhanced street entries shall be required at the following locations: a. The new arterial/Highway 99 9 b. The north and south entry to the industrial area c. The new Hicks Road/Eaton Road d. The new arterial near Mud Creek e. The new arterial near Sycamore Creek The entry shall consist of landscaping and hardscape. Rock or block walls shat! be installed behind the sidewalk. The name of each land use area shall be designed into the Rock or block wall, such as Village Area, Industrial Park, and the [ike. Shrubbery and at least four specimen size trees shall be used to further enhance the entry. Each entry area shall also have a raised landscaped median with a left turn pocket. The design ofi the street entries shall be approved by the Directors of Development Services and Public Works. 9. A detailed alignment study for Qld Hicks Road/New Hicks Road and Eaton Road shall be prepared by or under the direction of Butte County. The study shall indicate the precise engineering of the (right of way) alignment , the removal or relocation of structures, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and other infrastructure necessary to accomplish the re- alignment. 1Q. Noise attenuation along existing and proposed arterials shall be required to protect residential development proposed to be located adjacent to the proposed arterials. Noise attenuation measures shalt be required to reduce interior noise levels to 45 dB for proposed residential development adjacent to existing or planned arterials and/or when adjacent to Highway 99. 6. The Alternative Land Use Plan contained in the FEIR indicates a mini park on the new arterial. The Land Use Pian shall be revised to eliminate the mini park. ~Q 7. The Alternative Land Use Plan shall be amended to remove the Land Use Summary table, to show the Heavy Industrial area and the surrounding Open Space/Greenbelt as a green and blue cross hatched area and to show an area west of Hicks Lane as R-1 Low Density Residential. In addition, the following note shall be added to the map: Street alignments are conceptual and subject to precise engineering. The Greenbelt areas along the creeks and sloughs are conceptual in nature. The precise extent of those areas shall be defined on the basis of land division maps, detailed engineered site plans and the Tike. 8. Add additional policies to the Circulation Chapter 4, which state, "No new street alignments shall exclude safe and convenient access to properties." and "County staff shall pursue negotiations with Caltrans for appropriate traffic control, including but not limited to, traffic signals and street alignments along Highway 99, primarily at the intersections of Keefer Road and the new arterial." 9. All revisions to the NCSP text and maps shall be made within 45 calendar days from the effective date of approval of the related rezone ordinance. 10. For al! residential properties of the North Chico Specific Plan, fup mitigation of school impacts shall be required in accordance with the following policy added to page 6-13, under Chapter 6, Public Facilities and Services Element, under School Policies: 4. Impacts to school facilities within the Chico Unified Schoo! District (CUSD) shall be fully mitigated through the payment of mitigation fees in the amounts justified by CUSD prepared nexus studies, including adjustments, and adopted by the District, or through the implementation of other equivalent measures acceptable to CUSD, including those measures specified in the CUSD Board of Education Resolution No. 486-92. The County recognizes that the new residential growth contemplated by this Specific Plan will result in significant increases in the student population of the Chico Unified School District {"CUSD"). The County also recognizes that funding limitations have severely hampered CUSD's ability to 11 accommodate students generated by new residential development. Accordingly, the County, as a condition of approval of this Specific Plan, has required that new residential development fully mitigate its impacts to school facilities. But for this~full mitigation requirement, the County would not have approved this Specific Plan. Section 4 Effective Date This action shall become effective on April 2$, 1995, thirty calendar days from the date of adoption of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of California, on the 2sthday of Maxch , 1995 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Meyer, Dolan, Thomas and Vice Chair Houx NOES: None ABSENT: Chair McLaughlin NOT VOTING: None MARY ROUX, VICE CH R Butte County Board of Supervisors ATTEST: John Blackiock, Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Bo By Attachments: Exhibit A: Aircraft Accident Characteristics: Accident Sites for Runways of 6,000 Feet or More Exhibit B: Comparison of Flight Tracks and School Sites Exhibit C: Generalized Flight Tracks Exhibit D: Generalized Flight Tracks over Chico Urban Area Exhibit E: Increases in Residential Densities as a Result of the Specific Plan FIGURE 3-2: North Ghico Specific Plan I..and Use Map 12 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER 505 Wall Street _ CITYa-CHICO p.0. Box 3420 ~~'1872 Chico, CA 95927 (916}895-4800 Fax{916}895-4825 Al'SS 459-4800 L-AGR-5-1-10/Chrono Bd McLaughlin, chair Butte County Board of Supervisors 2S County center Drive oroville, CA 95965 Dear Ed: February 1, 1995 I am writing on behalf of the City Council regarding the County~s proposed action approving the Specific Plan far County Service Area 87. As you are aware, the City council, in a cooperative effort with the soard of Supervisors, incorporated the cSA 87 Specific Plan into the newly adopted General Plan of the city of Chico, That action was taken based upon the county~s efforts to meet the City~s concerns regarding development in the vicinity of the Chico Municipal Airport. Tt is our understanding that the Board has considered a direction which would provide one-acre Tats north of the airport. You should be aware that the City is very concerned about this direction and, in fact, an integral part of our approval was the designation of this area for 5-acre parcels. Tn an effort to compromise, we had agreed to the latest proposal of 3-acre parcels, again, however, clearly preferring a 5-acre minimum parcel size. We believe that any development north of the airport in the approach zone could create significant operational concerns for the airport and is an unwise course of action. As I believe you are aware, some of the residents of the existing development in that area have already opposed airport activities. The airport is critical to the economic future of the City and County, and we hope that you will reconsider this direction. sincerely, ~n~ ~~+~ rV ~ Michael McGinnis Mayor cc: City council Airport Commission Airport Land Use commission Jahn Blacklnck Steve Honeycutt city Attorney Assistant City Manager Community Development Director 4~ SpAFtD GF SL1P~5~ ...~ ~ 2 C ~'~` ~nuv';L1-E. ~~~ Made From Recycled Paper H H H fsl EXHIBIT A .'„ ~- CGMPARISON QF ~'~"'~ " ~ FLlGI-I'f TRACKS ..~..~~.. AND SCHOOL SITES ~, , ~- ~~ crlrca t ~: iRlt~C>PAL ~ AfRPCR>r • 10~1W I.E ~ _ ~s n,~rsw- \ \ ~ •rh.~ k,~\ ~ a~wn~o ~~r ~~' 14.700 Ll~ 70.800 EF .may ~ 4CMJV1Ua ~. B.fY. 1 rrr~~r~[ 13.3001E ~~ ~"~+'~ pµllfroG[EZ~ t7.8061F 14,9001E P1~MAIRYMJ.EY1nF 91GYrELL:~w.~~IOM 1. 013TAHC8TC flL~iWAY A~QNG ELlGIiF PATH ES THE ~AOST RELEVANT N4EA3UREMENT. ~iOT DIRECT. 2 LQCATiCN A8EAI417WE RR7NWAY EQL1AlS Ai.T[TUt}!= E:flkJIVALENT TO 2 72 TD 3 MILI:3 3, p{~gppg® i.OCATiQN CDIWRARES EQUALLY DR FAYDRAgLY TO 61DWELL JUNIOR HEGii, h~ICIMNl.44. AND OT11ER3. EXHIBIT B ~ ~ ~ G Q ~o & s -.~ O aC .W s ~ a Z o = ~° Nc.~ '° ~ ~ '~ ~ j ~ ~ 1Q N F- g ~ ~$ ~ i E ~ nE AE j ~ o° : a Q a ti ZD I-Zm~pu~ R b ~ t G pt °f ,~ E r= ~ t Q~ a~~ ~~ a~Q~QO ~ ~ 9 d i! ~: o !' ~ ~ ~ W f- v OQ ao oa z g ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ € E ~ W 'w~1~7 J = o ~-- ~ U " ~ w ~. X71 ~,~ J C . ( . ~I ~. fy <~~• !- .,1I ~,~ ~ q ~ i' ~'~ f ~ ~+ ~~ ~ ~ ) Y ^ ,a J ~J~ ~,.. "~ 1 ~~•''''~' i ~ ~,, I ~ ~ bbl' ~~ ~' ' ~ _ •~ t \ .,. ~I ' ~ ~~ :. ~, ~ ~ " "' ~~:, ~ ,,""{{yy~d \ ~:~ `~ ire o - ~- - ( ... I'' o `~~e : '• ~ it E; ~ `•~ 't! ~••~ s =~ ~ p~ ~. ~O l~r°', ~! ,y ,.,7t ,~L'. _ ~ •'.~~. •."'••.-'r:e.:z ~ e~'. 1 )~ I ''oi ' 11 ~. ~ ~~¢~~,,~ N i Q \/+ r/ d ~~ ' ~~ j ! ( ti •' t ~. y:.: ,,~ ?• 4 '~. !~!•~' ` ~ r 1 J' °0~ t- o js~•`% ~~i.. ~b'~~ ~C` ~ , t~`•1'°~ ~ ~ oµ ~ f '_`~v l~r,,`~ .i )n ~ ~• .1 fNS.~z x,~ J S ~ '~. c r 1. I ) Y {L' '~// ~ ARP S u a +Ir'}}tt((qqI r ~ /.) _~~}.. •~.. / ~/ I 4` I `+ ' „ ~f:,t l~lf~l.~. , nEil ~'al ~ „IILIU! i._ d~. ~ -- ~o . ,•~`''>•'i ~,~' .,.. ~ - a ` ..•.. a ~' ., ~ i3 ~ ; ~ p'~. ~ a ~ ~• f a '.~ I I {` `~ (` ') ~- ~' n~; N~ ,m ~ _ ( 1~~ 4~ ,DTs" F ,t~ ~` '' , .'`z r oFlA~,a alt L ~`~(, ~ I ..~' / 7'~ S7 y~:. I ~• - r. _ ~_~ S ~ ~ f i' t ;.fC}~l ~""-J 1 ~ 1,1 ~;.~ _ ~ ~vf~•1 ~ ~r,! X11 ~~~ .~ a ~ ,) (~ ~.~ t ~ l 1 J~ ( :I/~ ~f~ I I °~ _'_ F~_. ~~,' .~ ~ a n/~ '-Y,r &J' /-,F~ l\ ~! I~ ~` ~ ~ ) ~ % qp,, ~ ..111 n o ~ ~ s F ~ ,,.~ {i y ~ , _ ~ °~i"~ > so. -y~ ;~ ~j 11 ,o(~ •• `~~;, +~ GJ/ ~ "v r~p;, n ,~`p... ~i'~. ~~,~ r ~..~~. \ y w 1 ( ~ _~ i _)` ~/ a~"~ '' -",s"l/ ~ S~nid~ z ( .., t __ ( .--ter tl, t,, \ ~ t p~ ~. _ , !~a • 1 l`!1 ~ 7~ , .,.~ ~ ~ + ~ „~/~p'%" .a G--' `,(~ ~ \,~ ~~ ~~ C ~ot+os f~ iEPPe~ .. E) `_a °~ 1 ~.` X 1 , ~~v~"'ii: a u :a` 1 '( J.,~.,5~~~ `-'i ilk v~i ! ~r~. ~ I. ~~~`, I rF f 1-~~~ J `S ,( `~~ ); ~ )1) - L!7 ~c+ 1 ,. ~'t ~,\'! r til ~ T, '1 ~ "•l `- F s f _ r ~, '~ 'o ge,~ Y ,~ _ / l~fJ J~ ~~ e c? l ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ =~~~ U W __.... ~a ~a as a j. ', = Q ~~8 n~ ~ _ f ~~ !Y U~KOj ~ L~Og I~'1 .. L.L N CW m O~~A <•~ ~ f.. ~'v~.R ~~ tS~mm ~~,_ Q (~ S a ~ ~ v . mot.. _ _ ~'orvi'.'~ .1-~ ; l ~ 1. ~~ ~'~::''°` `,'~ u {~ ~ ty~ r: ~ ~J :~. < ~ ~ S ~ S ~ ~ J f , •+-< - ~ ~ fl. '~ ~ y .~ it I . ~ k 11/r r:,:~ ro ,~. 55• •.-~ ,r. •~ -ice ~„ . ~- ~~s .,:~1. ~f ~ :0~, `~'~~ .~•~_ y ~ r ~ ` r ,. '~ : ,': ' .... f ~~ '~ / ,: _ .. ~~'."• 'i~ ...~~I r ,: 'AGE,,... : ~ i ~ _' r r I' v~~: v:~~ ,I •~ Q H H H INCREASE IN RE5IDENTIAL DENSITIES EXF--iE3IT "E" . CSA 87 Naw Raadc 8k07 EXIiIB~T "F„ 0 ApDB 0 Ap4T LAND U6E '®~; North Chico Specific Plan No N~~ ~G~ LAND USE ~ ~z ~~ ~~ 1-IRi R-~ R~ .~. _.~ Butte Cnnniy Compreheas~ve Flan