Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCentral Valley Reg Water - AgendaAGENDA Public Meeting Central Valley Regional Wafer Quality Control Board Friday, March 30, 20'!2- 8:30 a.m. Central Valley Regional Water 4uality Control Board 11020 Sun Center Drive,- #200 Rancho Cardava, CA 95G7'0 The purpose of this meeting is for the Board to obtain testimony and information from concerned and affected parties and to make decisions based on the information received. Persons who want to submit written comments or evidence on any agenda item must comply with the Notice of Public Hearing for the item and the Meeting Procedures described at the end of the listing of Agenda items. Persons wishing to speak at the meeting should complete an attendance card and provide it to staff. Although filling out the attendance card is voluntary, we do appreciate receiving a card from all persons in attendance. Persons applying for, or ac#ively supporting or opposing, waste discharge requirements before the Board must comply with legal requiremen#s if they or their agents have or propose contributing more than $250 to a Board member for an election campaign. Contact the Board office for details if you fall into this category. Items showing times will begin no sooner than indicated. Items are numbered for identification purposes only and may not be considered in order. They may, however, be delayed by previous items. Items scheduled for the first day of a multi-day meeting may be delayed or continued to the next. day of the meeting. The Board, may conduct any scheduled hearing as a Panel Hearing as allowed by law in the event of a lack of a Board member quorum. In the event that a Panel Hearing is held, final action on that item will not be taken until a Board member quorum is present. Closed Session business is normally conducted~during the lunch break; although the Board may adjourn to Closed Session at any time. Depending on the extent of Closed Session items, the lunch break may be lengthy. The Board Chair will announce prior to any Closed Session the anticipated time that the public session will resume. Law Enforcement personnel may be present at the Board meeting. Technical questions regarding agenda items should be directed to the responsible staff person whose name and direct phone number are indicated by the agenda item. If no staff person is listed, or-for general questions and requests for agenda material, please contact Kiran Lanfranchi-Rizzardi at (916) 464-4839. The facility is accessible to people with disabilities. Individuals requiring special accommodations are requested to contact Ms. Rizzardi at (916) 464-4839 at least 5 working days prior to the meeting. TTY users may contact the California Relay Service at 1-800-735-2929 or voice line at 1-800-735-2922. Board agendas and the approved minutes of Board meetings are posted on the Board's website at htt~:/lwww.waterboards.ca.g_av/centralvalleylboard infolmeetingsl Copies of the items to be considered by the Board are posted on the Board's website at htt~llwww.waterboards.ca.aovlcentralvalleylboard decisionslter?tative ordersl organized by agenda item number. A listing of pending applications for Water Quality Certifcations, pursuant to section 401 of the Federal -Clean Water Act, may be obtained from the Board's website at htt alwww.waterboards.ca. ovlcentralvalle 1 ublic noticesbr by calling the office mainline at (916) 464-3291 Electronic presentations for board meetings: Power Point and other electronic presentations are frequently presented at the Regional Water Board Meetings. Please a-mail presentations to the Board Webmaster at: webmaster5(c~waterboards.ca.gov at least 24 hours in advance, or bring your files either on a USB l=lash drive, or CD ROM and give them to Baard Staff prior to the start of the meeting. Providing the electronic fles in advance will allow the Board Meeting to proceed without.any interruption. g~L1O1~~ ~ ~ Zd~~ Agenda 2 March 30, 2012 In order to move the Board meeting along in a timely manner, and assure time for adequate consideration of items later in the Agenda, the Chair may enforce maximum time limitations an each item. The goal is to complete all presentations, cross~examination, Board deliberation and voting within the allotted time. Allotted times are listed on the agenda following each item.• Please consider the allotted time when preparing your presentations. Items with specific times Fisted will nvt be heard before that time but may be heard later. ELECTRONIC PRESENTATIONS FOR BOARD MEETINGS Power Point and other electronic presentations are frequently presented at the Regional Water Board Meetings. PIease a-mail presentations to the Regional Board Webmaster at: webmaster5@waterboards.ca.gov at least 24 hours in advance, or bring your files either on a USB Flash Drive, or CD ROM and give them to Board Staff prior to the start of the meeting. Providing the electronic files in advance will allow the Board Meeting to proceed without any interru tion. p..--- ------ FRIDAY, MARCH 30 - 8:30 A.M. 1. Introductions, Pledge of Allegiance and approval of the 518~h Board meeting minutes. 2. Meeting Rules and Procedures. 3. Board Member Comriiunications --Board Members and the State Board Liaison Member may discuss meetings, communications, correspondence, or other items of general interest relating to matters within the Board's jurisdiction. There will be no voting or formal action taken. 4. Public f=orum -Any member of the public may address the Board on any matter within the Board's jurisdiction and not scheduled for consideration at this meefing, or pending before the Board (3 minute time limit per subject) 8:30.A.M. 5. Executive Officer's Report (http:llwww.waterboards.ca.govlcentralvalleylboard-,infolexec officer reportsl} 6. The Board will be asked to approve items 14 through 17 with no discussion if no one is here to testify about them. See pages 3 NPDES PERMITS AND TIME SCHEDULE ORDER 7. Clear Creek Community Services District, Drinking Water Treatment Plan#; Shasta County -Consideration of NPDES Permif Renewal and Adoption of Time Schedule Order [Bryan Smith, {530) 226-3425] {Time Limit 20 minutes) 8. City of Shasta Lake, Fisherman's Point Drinking Water Treatment Plant, Shas#a County -Consideration of NPDES Permit Renewal and Adoption of Time Schedule Order BBryan Smith, (530) 226-3425] (Time Limit 20 minutes) ENFORCEMENT 9. Steven Evangelho, Lakeview Dairy, Stanislaus County -Consideration of Administrative Civil Liability Complaint and Recommended Administrative Civil Liabilify Order [Charlene Herbst (916) 464-4724] (Time Limit 45 minutes} 10. Hilmar Cheese Company, Inc., Hilmar Cheese Processing Plant, Merced County -Consideration of Rescission of Time Schedule Order R5-2090-0009 [Jeffrey Pyle (559) 445-5145] (Time Limit 20 Minutes} 11. Golden Hills Sanitation Company, Kern County-Consideration ofAdoption of New Cease and Desist Order [Warren Gross (559) 445-1528] (Time Limit 20 minutes) 12. City of lone, Wastewater Treatmen# Plant, Amador County -Consideration of Modification of Cease and Desist OrderRS-2079-0019 [Mary Boyd (916) 464-4676] {Time Limit 180 Minutes) 13. Riviera West Mutual Water Company, Domestic Water Treatment Plant, Lake County -Consideration of an Administrative Civil Liability Order [Barry Hilton (916) 464-4762] (Time Limit 180 minutes) Agenda 3 March 30, 2012 UNCONTESTED CALENDAR Uncontested items are expected to be routine and .non-controversial; recommendations will be acted on without discussion. If any interested party, Board, or staff member requests discussion, the item may be removed from-the Uncontested Items Calendar and taken up in the regular agenda order, or in an order determined by the Board Chair -- 8:30 a.m. 14. RESOLUTIDN a) Central Valley Region Emergency, Abandoned and Recalcitrant 2012193 Annual Site Priority List - Considerafion of Resolution Adopting the Priority Lisf 15. WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS a} East Bay Municipal Utility District, Comanche North Shore Water Treatment Plant Land Application, Amador County (new) b} Wifdhurst Vineyards, Wildhurst Vineyards Wastewater Treatment Facility, Lake county {new} c) City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District, Lakeport Wastewater Treatment Facility, Lake County, Order No. 98-207 (revised) d) Sierra County Department of Public Works and Transportation, Loyaltan Landfll, Sierra County, Order No. 96-026 (revision) 16. NPDESIWDR RESCISSIONS a) 39th District Agricultural Association, Calaveras County Fairgrounds (aka Frogtown) Wastewater Treatment Facility, Calaveras County, Order No. 90-145 b) Brush Creek Mining Company, Brush Creek Mine, Sierra-County, Order No. 75-026 c) Cedar Ridge View, LLC, Cedar Ridge View Wastewater Treatment Facility, Amador County, Order No. R5-2005-0176 d) Chevron Environmental Management Company, Kern County, Order No. R5-2006-0087 . e) Gardener's Point Mine Property, Gardner Point Mine, Sierra County, Order No. 85-021 fl Joubert Pitt Placer Company and Sierra Paving and Excavating, Joubert Pitt Placer Mine, Sierra County, Order No. 5-00-266 g) Indian Springs School District, Geo#hermal Heating System, Shasta County, Order No. R5-2006-0904, NPDES Permit No. CA0081655 h) Nava[ Air Station Lemoore (NASL), Kings County, Order No. 5-00-091 i) Robert W. Reynolds, Reynolds Seed Washing and Drying, Colusa County, Order No. 96-127 )) Vaughn Hughes, Winkeye Mine, Sierra County, Order No. 85-019 17. CHANGE OF NAME ANDIOR OWNERSHIP a} Pac Pactiv Corporation, Tehama County, Order No. R5.-2011-0036 Agenda 4 March 30, 2012 CLOSED SESSION The Board may meet in closed session to consider personnel matters [Authority: Government Code section 11126(a)]; #o deliberate on a decision to be reached based upon evidence introduced in a hearing [Authority: Government Code section 11126(c){3)j; or to discuss matters in litigation, including discussion of initiated litigation, significant exposure to litigation, or decisions to initiate litigation [Authority: Government Cade section 11126{e)]. Litigation items that may be discussed are listed below by the type of item: Litigation filed against the Central Valley Water Board andlor the State Water Board: a. Bell Carter NPDES Permit -Environmental L.aw Foundation v. Central Valley Water Board (Tehama County Sup. Ct., Case No. 60668) b. Preston Avery, an Individual, and Lois Avery, an Individual, and as Trustees of the Avery Family Revocable Trust of July 14, 2000 v. State Water Board et al. (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 06CSD0399} c. Dairy General Waste Qischarge Requirements -Association de Gente Unida por el Agua et al. v. Central Valley Water Board (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., No. 200$-00003604); Baykeeper et al. v. Centro! Valley Water Board (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 2008-00003603) d. Dixon Commercial Park CAO -- DCP v. State Water Board (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 06CS00299), and ConAgra Foods and Monfort, Inc. v. Central Valley Water Board (Solano County Sup. Ct., Case No. FCS027420} e. EI Dorado Irrigation District NPDES Permit-California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Central Valley Water Board (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 34-2009-80000309) f. Greener Globe Landfill WDRs -Central Valley Water Board v. A Greener Globe Corp. et al. (Placer County Sup. Ct., Case No. SCV11383) g. City of Manteca v. State Water Board et al. (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 34-2011-80000-831) h. Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District v. Central Valley Water Board and State Water Board (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case.No. 34-2011-80DDiD28). i. Tehama Market ACL -Garland v. Central Valley Water Board (CA Third District Ct. of Appeal., Case No. 0067130) j. Toxic Not Spots -San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. et al. v. State Water Board et al. {Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 99CS02722) k. City of Tracy v. State Water Board {San Joaquin County Sup. Ct., Case No. 39-2011-00256340-CU-JR-STK) I. Tracy NPDES Permit R5-2007-0036 -Environmental Law Foundation and California Sporlfishing Protection Alliance v. Central Valley Water Board {Sacramento County Superior Ct., Case No. 34-2D09-00047273) m. Vacaville NPDES Permit -City of Vacaville et al. v. Central Valley Water Board and State Water.Board {Ca. Ct. of Appeal, 1$t DCA, Case No. A127207) n. Califomia Spartfishing Protection Alliance et al. v. California Department of Parks and Recreation et al. [Central Valley Water Board named as real party in interest] (Alameda County Sup. Ct., Case No. RG09474549} Litigation filed by the Central Valley Water Board against other parties: a. Aerojet Cleanup -Central Valley Water Board et al. v. Aerojet-General Corp. et al. (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 286073, consolidated with Case Nos. 288302 and 291981); Central Valley Water Board et al. v. Aerojet-General Corp. et al. (EDCaI, Case No. CIV-S-86-0064-EJG) consolidated with U.S. v. Aerojet-General Corp. et al., (EDCaI, Case No. CIV-5-86-D063-EJG) b. Bonzi Landfill -Central Valley Water Board v. Ma-Ru Holding Company et al. (Stanislaus County Sup. Ct., Case No. 643740) c. Iron Moun#ain Mine Cleanup -Central Valley Water Board e# al. v. Iran Mountain Mines, Inc. et al. (EDCaI, Case No. CIV-S-91-1167-QFL-PAN) and U.S. v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc. et al., (EDCaI, Case No. S-91-D768 DFL/JFM) d. Central Valley Water Board et al. v. Original Sixteen-to-One Mine, Inc. et al. (Sierra County. Sup.C#., Case No. 7019) Petitions for Review of Central Valley Water Board Actions fated with State Water Board: a. City of Aubum Wastewater Treatment Plant, WDRs Order R5-2011-003 (Amending WQRs Order R5-2010-0090) [NPDES Permit No. CA0077712] -Petition filed by California Sportfishing Protection Alliance b. Discovery Bay Wastewater Treatment Plant, WDRs Order R5-2008-0179 [NPDES Permit No. CA007859] -Petitions Bled by San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al. and California Sportfishing Protection Alliance {State Water Board File Nos. A-1982 and A-'! 982(a}} c. Vacaville Easterly WWTP WDRs Order R5-2008-0055 and TSO R5-2008-0056 [NPDES Permit No. CAOD77691] -Petition filed by the City of Vacaville (state Water Board File No. A-1932) d. Sacramento Regional Wastewater "treatment Plant, WDRs Order R5-2010-0114 [NPDES Permit No. CA0077682] - Petitionsfled by Sacramento County Sanitation District and the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (State Water Board File No. A-2144} e. Resolution R5-2011-0032, Approving aShort-Term Renewal of the Coalition Group Conditional Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges From Irrigated Lands -Petitions file by California 5portfishing Protec#ion Agenda 5 March 30, 2012 Alliance eta{. and Southern San Joaquin Valley Water Quality Coalition et al. (State Water Board File Nos: A-2973(a} and A-2173(b)) f. Nevada County Sanitation District No. 1, Lake of the Piges WWTP, WDRs Order R5-2009-0031 [NPDES Permit No. CA0081612] (S#ate Water Board File No. A-2019) g. City of Live Oak, NPDES Permit R5-2011-0034 and TSO R5-2009-0092-01 [NPDES Permit Na. CA0079022J (State _ Water Board File Nos. A-2172(a) and 2172(b}} h. James G. Sweeney and Amelia M. Sweeney, Administrative Civil Liability Order R5-2011-0068 (State Water Bcard File No. A-2990) CENTRAL VALLEY REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROI" BOARD MEETING PROCEDURES GENERAL MEETING RULES The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board {Central Valley Water Board, or Board} and staff welcome informs#ion an issues and matters within the Board's jurisdic#ion, but comments and submittals a# the meeting should be concise and directed to specifics of the item under discussion to enable the Board to be fully informed and take appropriate action. Persons wishing to speak a# the meeting are asked to complete an attendance card and provide it to staf€. Although filling out the attendance card is volun#ary, we do appreciate receiving a card from all persons in attendance. Any person planning tv make a presentation to the Board that requires the use of visual aids (such as overheads, slides, or video projector} should contact the assigned staff person to make arrangements before the meeting date in order to avoid unnecessary delays daring the meeting. If the Meeting Procedures in this agenda conflict with a specific Notice of Public Hearing or Hearing Procedures for a specific item, the Notice of Public Hearing or specific Hearing Procedures will control. All interested persons may speak at the Board meeting, and are expected to orally summarize their written submittals. Testimony and policy statements should be presented in writing prior tv the meeting and only a summary of pertinent points presen#ed orally. Oral presentations (e.g., direct testimony, policy comments, cross examination and closing statements} will be limited in time by the Board Chair. A timer may be used and speakers are expected tv honor the #ime limits. Oral presentations must be relevant. Where speakers can be grouped by affiliation or interes#, such groups will be expec#ed to select a spokesperson and not be repetitive. The Board will accommodate spokespersons by granting additional time if other group members will not also be speaking. Any person may submit comments in writing on any agenda item. Written comments shall not be read into the record unless allowed by the Board Chair. Persons who wan# to submit written materials for any agenda i#em must provide such written documents to the Board office in advance of the meeting, which must be by the date and time specified in the applicable Notice of Public Hearing andlor Hearing Procedures. Materials received by the deadline and in compliance wifh the Notice of Public Hearing andlor Hearing Procedures will be included in the administrative record. Staff may provide written responses to comments. Late written materials will not be provided to Board members or included in the administrative record, uNess the Chair allows the fate submission. A party reques#ing to submit late ma#erials must demonstrate good cause far the late submission, and the Chair must find that the late submission would not prejudice the Cen#ral Valley Water Board or any designated party. The Chair may modify this rule if a party shows severe hardship. La#e submissions that consist of evidence (as opposed to policy statements) will generally be deemed prejudicial unless all designated parties and Board staff have time to consider the evidence before the meeting. Written materials or other documents submitted at the Board meeting must be provided first to Board counsel who will advise the Board regarding acceptance into the record. PROCEDURE FOR UNCONTESTEI] (CONSENT) AGIENDA ITEMS (see also 23 CCR 647.2(f)) tJncon#ested or consent agenda items are items for which there appears to be no controversy and which can be acted upon by the Board with limited or no discussion. Such items have been properly noticed and all interested parties consent to the staff recommendation. The Board Chair will recognize late revisions submitted by staff and will then call far a motion and vote by the Board. !f any Board member or member of the public raises a question ar issue regarding the item #hat requires Board discussion, the i#em may be removed from the consent calendar and considered in i#s numerical order on the agenda, or in an order determined by the Board Chair. Anyone wishing to contest a consent item on the agenda must appear in person at the Board meeting and explain to the Board the reason the item is contested. PROCEDURE FOR INFDRMATION ITEMS (see also 23 CCR 649 etseq.) information items are items presen#ed to the Board for discussion only and for which nv Board ac#ion or vote is taken. The Board may, however, provide direction to staff. The Board usually will hear a presentation by staff, and comments by Meeting Procedures 1 Updated January, 2012 interested persons shall also be allowed. Members of the public wishing to address the Board on the topic under discussion should submit an attendance card beforehand indicating their request to speak to the Board. Time limits may be imposed on interested persons. PROCEDURE FOR ACTION ITEMS (see also 23 CCR 649 etseq.) Contested agenda items are items to which the parties involved have not consented and the staff recommendation is in dispute. The procedure that applies to such items depends on the nature of the matter. Matters before the Board may be quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial (adjudicative proceedings). Such items may require a public hearing and all interested persons will be provided an opportuni#y to make comments. Contested agenda items that are adjudicative, not quasi legislative, are governed by the rules for adjudicative proceedings..The regulations setting forth the procedures for adjudicative proceedings are codified in Title 23 California Code of Regulations Division 3. Adjudicative proceedings before the Central Valley Water Board are governed by these regulations as authorized by chapter 4.5 of the Administrative Procedure Act (commencing with section 1140Q of the Government Code). The regulations provide that, with certain exceptions, adjudicative proceedings will be conducted in accordance with sections 80Q-805 of the Evidence Code and section 11513 of Chapter 5 of the Government Cade. (Other provisions of chapter 5 do not apply}. A copy of those regulations and chapter4:5 of #h~e Administrative Procedure Act; - section 11513 of the Government Code, and sections 8Q1-8Q5 of the Evidence Code can be found at httpalwww.waterboards.ca.c~ovllaws reAUla#ionsl An adjudicative proceeding is a hearing to receive evidence for determination of facts pursuant to which the Board formulates and issues a decision. A decision determines a legal right, duty, privilege, immunity, or other legal interest of a particular person or persons. Examples of adjudicative proceedings include hearings to receive evidence concerning the issuance of waste discharge requirements or National Pollutant Discharge Elimination-System (NPDES) permits; concerning cease and desis# orders, and concerning orders setting administrative civil liability. Adjudicative hearings are not conducted according to the technical rules of evidence, and the Board will accept any evidence or testimony that is .. reasonably relevant. The Notice of Public Hearing will set for the process for the hearing. All persons testifying must state their name, address, affiliation, and whether they.have taken the oath before testifying. PROCEDURE FOR CONTESTED HEARINGS IN ADJUDICATIVE MATTERS (WASTE D[SCHARGE OR WATER RECYCLING REQUIREMENTS, NPDES PERMITS AND INVESTIGATION OR ENFORCEMENT ORDERS [CWC §§ 13267, 133fl0-13308, 133$3]) All persons interested in a specific item should consult the Hearing Procedures issued far that item to see if any of the following information is inapplicable. Contact Board staff if you do not know whether (here are Hearing Procedures for the item or if you need a copy. If the following conflicts with a specific Notice of Public Hearing or Hearing Procedures, the Notice of Public Hearing or specific Hearing Procedures will control. All administrative civil liability orders are subject to specific Hearing Procedures. - Designated parties may request these procedures: to call and examine witnesses; to have witnesses testify under oath; to receive a witness list from other designated parties; to introduce exhibits; to cross-examine opposing witnesses; to impeach any witness; to rebut the evidence against him or her; to make or oppose evidentiary objections; to make opening or closing statements; or to have a preheating conference with the Board's advisors. A request for these hearing procedures must be received by the Executive Officer at least foe working days before the hearing, and must specify the procedures the designated party is requesting. Designated parties are any persons named in the proposed order. All other persons wishing to address the Board or provide comments are interested persons and not designated parties. Such interested persons may request status as a designated party for purposes of an item by submitting such request in writing #a staff assigned to the matter, no later than two weeks af#er the draft order is available far public comment. The request must explain the basis for status as a designated parry and, in particular, how the person is directly affected by the discharge. Central Valley Water Board staff will designate a prosecution team to serve as a designated party for prosecutorial matters, such as administrative civil liability. Advisory staff in prosecutorial matters, and all staff in non-prosecutorial matters, are not designated parties but are present to assist the Board. The order of testimony for adjudicative hearings generally will be as follows, unless modified by the Board Chair: • Testimony (and cross-examination, if provided} of Board staff Meeting Procedures ~ 2 Updated January, 2092 • Testimony (and cross-examination, if provided) of discharger • Testimony (and cross-examina#ion, if provided) of other designated parties • Statements of interested persons • Closing statement by designated parties other than discharger • Closing statement by discharger • Closing statement by staff • Recommendation by Executive Officer (as appropriate) • Close hearing • Deliberation and voting by Board Closing statements shall be for the purpose of summarization and rebuttal, and are not to be used to introduce new evidence or testimony, or to restate direct testimony. After considering evidence, testimony, and comments, the Regional Board may choose to adopt an order regarding a proposed agenda item. Persons wishing to introduce exhibits {i.e., maps, charts, photographs) must lease them with the Board's Assistant Executive Officer. If you plan to use visual aids such as PowerPoint slides, contact staff prior to the meeting to arrange for equipment set-up: You must provide a printed or electronic copy of any visual aids. Photographs or slides of large exhibits are acceptable. All Board files, exhibits, and agenda material pertaining to adjudicative proceedings on the agenda are hereby made a part of the record. OTHER INIFORMATION Quasi-legis%ati~e matters include rulemaking and some informational proceedings. These matters may include hearings for the adoption or amendment of regulations; water quality control plans or state policy far water quality control and hearings tv gather information to assist the Board in formulating policy for future action. They are not adjudicative proceedings and are subject tv different procedures. (See PROCEDURE FOR ACTION ITEMS, above, and Cal. Code Regs., title 23, § 619 et. Seq.) Any person affected adversely by certain actions or failures to act of the Board may petition the State Water Resources Control Board {State Water Board) accordingto California Water Code section '13320 and Title 23 California Code of Regulations section 2050 et seq. The petition should be addressed to the Office of Chief Counsel at the State Water Board The State Water Board must receive the petition within 30 days of the date of the Board meeting at which the Board acted or failed to act. Copies of the law and regulations applicable for filing petitions {and cited above) will be provided upon request and are available at httpalwww.waterboards.ca.govllaws-,regulations , Any questions or comments regarding these procedures maybe directed to: Kiran Lanfranchi-Rizzardi, Administrative Assistant 11020 Sun Center Drive, #200 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Telephone (916) 464-4839 e-mail klanfranchita"~.waterboards.ca.ctov _ ,. _ ... »»»»»»C<C<C<CCCCCC Meeting irocedures 3 Updated Jancary, 2012 CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOAR© CENTRAL VALLEY REGION The primary duty of the Board is to protect the quality of the waters within the Region for all beneficial uses. This duty is implemented by formulating and adopting water quality plans for specific ground or surface water basins and by prescribing and enforcing requirements on all agricultural, domestic and industrial waste discharges. Specific responsibilities and procedures of the Boards and the State Water Resources Control Board are contained in the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. BOARD MEMBERS CITY OF RI=5IDENCE APPOINTMENT CATEGORY TERM EXPIRES Carmen L. Ramirez Atwater Public 9/30/2013 Jennifer Lester Moffitt Davis Irrigated Agriculture 9/30/2012 Jon Costantino Grass Valley CountylUnaffiliated Public 9/30/2015 Karl E. Longley Fresno Water Quality 9/30/2013 Katherine Hart Granite Bay Recreation, Fish, or Wild Life 9/30/2012 Robert Schneider Davis Water Quality 8/30/2014 Sandra Meraz Alpaugh Water Supply ~ 913 012 0 1 4 Pamela C. Creedon, Executive OfFcer ' Kiran Lanfranchi-Rizzardi, Administrative Assistant David Coupe, Sr.Staff Counse! Patrick Pulupa, Staff Counse! Alex Mayer, Sfafi Counsel SACRAMENTO OFFICE FRESNO OFFICE 11020 Sun Center Drive, Suite 200 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6114 Telephone: (916) 464-3291 Fax: {916) 464-4758 Assistant Executive Officers: Kenneth Landau Richard Loncarovich Frederick S. Moss Supervisors: Brian Newman Calvin McGee Diana C. Messina Duncan Austin Jerry Bruns Joe Karkoski Linda Bracamonte Robert Busby Wendy Wyels Seniors• Anne Olson Brett Stevens Charlene Herbst Cori Condon Dan Radulescu Elizabeth Lee Gayleen Perreira James Munch Jeanne Chilcott Jim. Marshall Joe Mello Patrick Morris Rudy Schnagl Stephanie Fong Steven Meeks Sue McConnell Steve Rosenbaum Susan Fregien Victor Izzo Victor Vasquez 1685 E Street Fresno, CA 93706 Telephone: (559) 445-5116 Fax: (559) 445-5910 Assistant Executive Officer: Clay Rodgers Su e~rvisors: Lonnie Wass Doug Patteson Seniors: . Dale Essary . Dane Johnson Sheiton Gray David Sholes Warren Gross Matt Scroggins Dale Harvey Russell Walls BEDDING OFFICE 415 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 200 Redding, CA 96002 Telephone: (530) 224-4845 Fax: (530) 224-4857 Assistant Executive Officer: Robert A. Crandall Supervisor Bryan Smith Seniors: Angela Wilson - Greg Cash George Day Clint Snyder