HomeMy WebLinkAboutCentral Valley Regional Water AgendaAGENDA JAN 2 3 2013
Public Meeting ~~~,~~~
Central Valley Regional
Water Quality Control Board
Thursday, January 31, 2013 - 9:00 a.m.
Friday, February 1, 2013- 8:30 a.rr~.
Central Va[[ey Regional
Water Quality Control Board
11020 Sun Center Drive, #200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95fi70
The purpose of this meeting is for the Board to obtain testimony and information from concerned and affected parties
and to make decisions based on the information received,
Persons who want to submit written comments or evidence on any agenda item must comply with the Notice of Public
Hearing for the item and the Meetin Procedures described at the end of the listing of Agenda items. Persons wishing
to speak at the meeting should complete an attendance card and provide it to staff. Although filling out the attendance
card is volun#ary, we do appreciate receiving a card from all persons in attendance.
Persons applying for, or actively supporting or opposing, waste discharge requirements before the Board must comply
with legal requirements if they or their agents have or propose contributing more than $250 to a Board member far an
election campaign. Contact the Board ofFce for details if you fall into this category,
f#ems showing times will begin no sooner than indicated. [terns are numbered far identification purposes only and may not
be considered in order. They may, however, be delayed by previous items. Items scheduled for the first day of a multi-day
meeting may be delayed or continued to the next day of the meeting. The Baard may conduct any scheduled hearing as a
Panel Hearing as allowed by law in the event of a lack of a Board member quorum. [n the event that a Panel Hearing is
held, final action on that item will not be taken until a Board member quorum is present. Closed Session business is
normally conducted during the lunch break, although the Board may adjourn to Closed Session a# any time. Depending on
the extent of Closed Session items, the lunch break may be lengthy. The Board Chair will announce prior to any Closed
Session the anticipated time tha# the public session will resume. Law Enforcement personnel may be present at the Board
meeting.
Technical questions regarding agenda items should be directed to the responsible staff person whose name and direct
phone number are indicated by the agenda item. If no staff person is listed, or for general questions and requests for
agenda material, please contact Kiran Lanfranchi-Rizzardi at (916) 464-4839.
The facility is accessible to people with disabilities. Individuals requiring special accommodations are requested to
contact Ms. Rizzardi at (916) 464-4839 at least 5 working days prior to the meeting. TTY users may contact the
California Relay Service at 1-800-735-2929 or voice line at 1-800-735-2922.
Board agendas and the approved minutes of Board meetings are posted on the Board's website at
http_:1/www.waterboa rds. ca. govlce ntralva l l evlboa rd_i nfolm eeti ng sl
Copies of the items to be considered by the Baard are posted on the Board's website at
htt :I/www.waterboards.ca. ovlcentraivaile /board decisionsltentative orders) organized by agenda iterri number.
A listing of pending applications for Water Quality Certifications, pursuant to section 401 of the Federal Clean Water
Act, may be obtained from the Board's website at h_ttp;llwww.wat_erbaards.ca.qov/centralvallev/oublic_notices/or by
calling the office mainline at (916} 464-3291
Electronic presentations for board meetings: Power Point and other electronic presentations are frequently presented at
the Regional Water Board Meetings. Please a-mail presentations #o the Board Webmas#er at:
webmaster5(a~waterboards.ca.gov at least 24 hours in advance, or bring your files either on a USB Flash drive, or CD
ROM and give them to Board StafF prior to the star# of the meeting. Providing the electronic files in advance will allow
the Board Meeting to proceed withou# any interruption.
Ag
enda 2 Janua 311Februa 1, 2D
TIME LIMITATIONS
In order to move the Board meeting along in a timely manner, and assure time for adequate consideration
of items later in the Agenda, the Chair may enforce maximum time limitations on each item. The goal is to
complete all presentations, cross-examination, Board deliberation and voting within the allotted time.
Allotted times are listed on the agenda following each item. Please consider the allotted time when
preparing your presentations. Items with specific times listed will not be heard before that time but may
be heard later.
ELECTRONIC PRESENTATIONS FOR BOARD MEETINGS
Power Paint and other electronic presentations are frequently presented at the Regional Water Board
Meetings. Please a-mail presentations to the Regional Board Webmaster at:
webmaster5@waterboards.ca.gov at least 24 hours in advance, or bring your fifes either on a USB Flash
Drive, or CD ROM and give them to Board Staff prior to the start of the meeting. Providing the electronic
files in advance will allow the Board Meetin to roceed without an interru tion.
THURSDAY, JANUARY 31, 2013- 9:OD A.M.
1. Introductions, Pledge of Allegiance ahd approval of the 523rd Board meeting minutes.
2. Meeting Rules and Procedures. -- ... ,
3. Board Member Communications -Board Members and the State Board Liaison Member may discuss
meetings, communications, correspondence, or other items of general interest relating to matters within the
Board's jurisdiction. There will be no voting or formal action taken.
4. Public Forum -Any member of the public may address the Board on any mafter within the Board's jurisdiction
and not scheduled for consideration at this meeting, or pending before the Board (3 minute time limit per
subject} 9:QO.A.M.
5. Executive Officer's Report {htt :Ilwww.waterboards.ca. ovlcentralvalle Iboard infolexec officer re artsl
6. Election of Chair and Vice-Chair
7. Legislative Update -Informational Item on SB 965 and AB 685.
Changes in Ex Parte Rule for General Orders --implementation of SB 965
Human Right to Water Act -Implementation of AB 685
[Lori Okun (916) 341-5165] (Time Limit 30 minutes)
OTHI=R BUSINESS
8. City of Folsom -Update on Sanitary Sewer System Complaints- Informational Item Only
[Lucio Orellana (916) 464-4660] (Time Limit 60 minutes)
9. Policy Issues in Granting Mixing Zones - lnformatianal Item only [Ken Laridau {916) 464-4726]
(Time Limit 30 minutes)
13
NPDES PERMITS AND TIME SCHEDULE ORDER5
10. City of Rio Vista, Northwest Wastewater Treatment Plant, Solano County -Consideration of OrderAmending
Waste Discharge Requirements Order R5-2010-0081 {NPDES Permit No. CA0083771) .
[Jim Marshall (916} 464-4772] [Time Limit 30 minutes)
11. County of Sacramento Department of Waste Management and Recycling, Kiefer Landfll Groundwater Extraction
and Treatment Plant, Sacramento County -Consideration of NPDES Permit Rerrewa!
(NPDES Permit No. CA0083681) [Kari Holmes {916) 464-4843] (Time Limit 30 minutes)
12. EI Dorado Irrigation District, E1 Dorado Hills Wastewater Treatment Plant, EI Dorado County -Consideration of
NPDES Permit Renewal and Time Schedule Order (NPDES Permit No. CAQ078671) [David Kirn {916} 464-4761]
(Time Limit 20 minutes}
13. Mountain House Community Services District, Mountain House Wastewater Treatment Plant, San Joaquin
County -- Consideration of NPDES Permit Renewal and rime Schedule Oroler {NPDES Permit No. CA0084271)
[Kari Holmes (916) 464-4843] (Time limit 40 minutes)
Agenda 3 January 39IFebruary 1, 2Q'i3
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2D13- $:30 A.M.
14. Introductions, Pledge of Allegiance.
15. Meeting Rules and Procedures.
16. Board Member Communications -Board Members and the State Beard Liaison Member may discuss meetings,
communications, correspondence, or other i#ems of general interest relating to matters within the Board's
jurisdiction. There will be no voting or formal action taken.
17. Public Forum -Any member of the public may address the Board on any mafter within the Board's jurisdiction
and not scheduled for consideration a# this meeting, or pending before the Board {3 minute time limit per
subject) 8:30.A.M.
18. Executive Offcer's Report (htt :Ilwww.waterboards.ca. ovlcentralvalle (board infolexec officer re arts)
19. The Board will be asked to approve items 25 through 28 with no discussion if no one is here to testify about
them. See pages 3-4.
OTHER BUSINESS
20. Background and status of the Delta Regional Monitoring Program -Informational Item only
(Meghan Sullivan (916) 464-485$] (Time Limit 30 minutes)
21. Update on Project Evaluating MUN Designa#ion in ConstructedlAg Dominated Water Bodies Receiving Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTW) Effluent -Informational Item only [Anne Littlejohn (916) 464-4840]
(Time Limit 15 minutes}
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
22. Horizon Nut, LLC and Global Ag Properties USA, LLC, Lost Hills Pistachio Processing Plant, Kern County -
Consideratian ofNet+~ Waste Discharge Requirements [Scott Hatton (559} 444-2502] {Time Limit 45 minutes}
23. Nichols Pistachio, Pistachio Processing Plant, Kings and Tulare Counties - Considerafion of Revised Waste
Discharge Requirements Order 93-006 [Katie Carpenter (559) 445-5551] (Time Limit 45 minutes)
24. Workshop on draft Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges from Irrigated Lands for Individual Growers.
lnfarmationa! Item only [Adam Laputz (916) 464-4848] {Time Limit 120 minutes)
UNCONTESTED CALENDAR
Uncontested items are expected #o be routine and non-controversial; recommendatianswsll be acted on
without discussion. If any interested party, Board, or staff member requests discussian, the item may be
removed from the Uncontested Items Calendar and taken up in the regular agenda order, or in an order
determined by the Board Chair.
25. WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS
a. Butte Sand and Gravel, Morehead Land LLC, Begonia McPherrin, Rose McPherrin and Anna McPherrin,
South Butte Quarry, Sutter County, WDRs Order 5-00-174 (revised}
b. Calaveras County Water District, Douglas FIatlVallecito Wastewater Tree#ment Facility, Cafaveras County
WDRs Order 92-018 {revised}
c. Ironhouse Sanitary District, Ironhouse Water Recycling 1=acility,Contra Costa County
WDRs Order 5-01-237) (revised)
d. Post-Closure Maintenance and Correc#ive Action, Kern Valley Sanitary Landfill, Kern County,
Order R5-00-157 (revised)
e. Post-Closure Maintenance and Corrective Action, McFarland-Delano Sanitary Landfill, Kern County,
Order R5-01-159 {revised}
f. San Joaquin County Department of Public Works, Corral Hallow Sanitary Landfill, Class III Municipal
Solid Waste Landfill, San Joaquin County, WDRs Order 5-01-176 (revised}
g. Univar USA Inc., In-Situ Groundwater Bioremediation Project, Fresno County (new)
Agenda
26. CDO RESCISSIONS
January 311February 1, 2013
a. Richvale Sanitary District, Wastewater Treatment Facility, Butte County-Order No. 5-00-111
27. WDRINPDES RESCISSIONS
a. California Department of Fish and Game, Moccasin Creek Fish Hatchery, Tuolumne County, WDRs
Order R5-2007-0068{NPDES No. CA0004804)
b. Newcastle Sanitary District, Newcastle Wastewater Treatment Facility, Placer County
WDRs Order 5-00-198
28. CHANGE OF NAME AND ORIOWNERSHIF
a. Grizzly Lake Resort Improvement Distric#, Crocker Mountain Community Services District,
. Plumes County, WDRs Order 86-206
b. Campbell Soup Supply Company, LLC, Seed Research and Development Facility, Yoly County
WDRs Order R5-2003-0136
c.: Prima Bella Produce, Inc. and Mark Bacchetti, Prima Bella Faod Processing Facility,-. .
San Joaquin County, WDRs Order R5-2012-0037
CLOSED SESSION
The Board may meet in closed session to consider personnel matters [Authority: Government Code section
11126(a)]; to deliberate on a decision to be reached based upon evidence introduced in a hearing [Authority:
Government Code section 11126(c) (3}]; yr to discuss matters in litigation, including discussion of initiated
litigation, significant exposure to litigation, ar decisions to initiate litigation [Authority: Government Code section
11126(e)]. Litigation items that may be discussed are listed below by the type of item:
Litigation filed against the Centra€ Valley Water Board andlor the State Water Board:
a. Bell Carter NPDES Permit- Environmental Law Foundation v. Central Valley Water Board (Tehama County Sup. Ct.,
Case No. 60668} '
b. Preston Avery, an Individual, and Lois Avery, an Individual, and as Trustees of the Avery Family Revocable Trust of
July 14, 2000 v. State Water Board et al. (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 06CS00399)
c. Dairy Genera[ Was#e Discharge Requirements -Association de Gente tJnida par el Agua et al. v. Central Valley Water
Board (Ca. C#, of Appeal. 3`d DCA, Case No. C066410) Sacramento County Sup. Ct., No. 2008-00003604}
d. Dixon Commercial Park CAO - DCP v. State Water Board (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 06CS00299}, and
ConAgra Foods and Monfort, Inc. v. Central Valley Water Board (Solano County Sup. C#., Case Na. FCS027420)
e. EI Dorado Irrigation Distric# NPDES Permit -California Sporifishing Protec#ion Alliance v. Central Valley Water Board
(Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 34-2009-80000309)
f. Greener Globe Landfill WDRs -Centra[ Valley Water Board v. A Greener Globe Corp. et al. (Placer County Sup. Ct.,
Case No. SCV11383)
g. City of Manteca v. State Water Board et al. (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 34-2011-80000-831)
h. Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District v. Central Valley Water Board and State Water Board (Sacramento
County Sup. Ct., Case No. 34-2011-80001028).
i. Tehama Market ACL -Garland v. Central Valley Water Board (CA Third District Ct. of Appeal. Case No. C067130)
j. Toxic Ho# Spots -San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. et al. v. State Water Board et al. (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case
No. 99CS02722}
k. City of Tracy v. State Water Board (San Joaquin County Sup. Ct., Case No. 39-2011-00256340-CU~iR-STK}
]. Tracy NPDES Permit R5-2007-0036 - ]=nvironmentaE Law Foundation and California Sporifishing Protection Alliance v.
Central Valley Water Board (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 34-2009-00047273)
m. Vacaville NPDES Parmi# -City of Vacaville et al. v. Central Valley Water Board and State Water Board (Ca. Ct. of
Appeal, 151 DCA, Case No. A127207)
n. California Sportfishing Protection Alliance et al. ~. Central Valley Water Board (Alameda County Sup. Ct., Case No.
RG12632180)
o. San Joaquin County Resource Conservation District California Farm Bureau Federation et al. v. Central Valley Water
Board (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case No. 34-2012-80001186)
p. State Water Contractors, Inc. v. State Water Board and Central Valley Water Board (Sacramento County Sup. Ct.,
Case No. 34-2011-00107299}
Agenda 5 January 311February 1, 2013
Litigation filed by the Central Valley Wafer Board against other parties:
a. Aerojet Cleanup -Central Valley Water Board et al. v. Aerojet-General Corp. et al. (Sacramento County Sup. Ct., Case
No. 286073, consolidated with Case Nos. 288302 and 291981); Central Valley Water Board et al. v. Aerojet-General
Corp. et al. (EDCaI, Case No. CIV-S-86-0064-EJG) consolidated with U.S. v. Aerojet-General Corp. et al., (EDCaI,
Case No. CIV-S$6-0063-EJG}
b. Bonzi Landfill -Central Valley Water Board v. Ma-RG Holding Company et al. (Stanislaus County Sup. Ct., Case No.
643740)
c. Iron Mountain Mine Cleanup -Central Valley Water Board et al. v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc. et al. (EDCaI, Case No.
CIV-S-91-1167-DFL-PAN) and U.S. v. fron Mountain Mines, Enc. et al„ {EDCaI, Case No. 5-91-0768 DFLIJFM)
d. Central Valley Water Board et al. v. Original Sixteen-to-One Mine, Inc. et al. (Sierra County. Sup.C#., Case No. 7019)
Petitions for Review of Central Valley Water Board Actions fled with State Water Board:
a. City of Auburn Wastewater Treatment Plant, WDRs Order R5-2011-003 (Amending WDRs Order R5-2010-0090) [NPDES
Permit No. CA0077712] -Petition filed by California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
b. Discovery Bay Wastewater Treatment Plant, WDRs Order R5-2008-0179 [NPDES Permit No. CA007$59] -Petitions filed by
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al. and California Sportfishing Protection'Alliance (state Water Board File Nos.
A-1982 and A-1982(a))
c. Vacaville Easterly WWTP.WDRs Order R5-2008,D055 and TSO R5-2008-.0056 [NPDES_Permit No. CA0077691] -Petition
filed by fhe City of Vacaville (State Water Board File No. A=1932}
d. Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, WDRs Order R5-2010-0114 [NPDES Permit No. CA0077682] -
Petitionsfiled by Sacramento County Sanitation Disfrict and the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (State Water
Board File No. A-2144)
e. Nevada County Sanitation Disfrict No. 1, Lake of the Pines WWTP, WDRs Order R5-2009-0031 [NPDES Permit No.
CA0081612] (State Water Board File No. A-2019)
f. City of Lire Oak, NPDES Permit R5-2011-0034 and TSO R5-2009-0012-01 (NPDES Permit No. CA0079022] (State
Water Board File Nos. A-2172(a) and 2172(b}}
g. James G. Sweeney and Amelia M. Sweeney, Administrative Civil Liability Order R5-2011-0068 (State Water Board File
No. A-2190)
h. James. G. Sweeney and Amelia M. Sweeney, Groundwater Monitoring Directive (State Water Board Fife No. A-2213)
'r. James G. Sweeney and Amelia M. Sweeney, Administrative Cfvfl Liability Order R5-2012-0070 (State Water Board File
Number To Be Assigned)
CENTRAL VALLEY REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
MEETING PROCEDURES
GENERAL MEETING RULES
The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Central Valley Water Board, or Board) and staff welcome
information on issues and matters within the Board's jurisdiction, but comments and submittals at the meeting should be
concise and direc#ed to specifics of the item under discussion to enable the Board to be fully informed and take
appropriate action.
Persons wishing to speak at the meeting are asked to complete an attendance card and provide it to staff. Although filling
out the attendance card is voluntary, we do appreciate receiving a card from all persons in attendance.
Any person planning to make a presentation to the Board that requires the use of visual aids (such as overheads, slides,
or video projector) should contact the assigned staff person to make arrangements before the meeting date in order to
avoid unnecessary delays during the meeting.
If the Meeting Procedures in this agenda conflict with a specific Notice of Public Hearing or Hearing Procedures
for a specific item, the Notice of Public Hearing or specific Hearing Procedures will control.
Ail interested persons may speak at the Board meeting, and are expected to orally summarize their written submittals.
Testimony and policy statements should be presented in writing prior to the meeting and only a summary of pertinent
points presented orally. Oral presentations {e.g., direct testimony, policy comments, cross examination and closing
statements) will be limited in time by the Board Chair. A timer may be used and speakers are expected to honor the time
limits. Oral presentations must be relevant. Where speakers can be grouped by affiliation or interest, such groups will be
expected to select a spokesperson and not be repetitive. The Board will accommodate spokespersons by granting
additional time if other group members will not also bespeaking.
Any person may submit comments in writing on any agenda item. Written comments shall not be read into the record
unless allowed by the Board Chair. Persons who want to submit written materials for any agenda item must provide such
written documents to the Board office in advance of the meeting, which must be by the date and time specified in the
applicable Notice of Public Hearing andlar Hearing Procedures. Materials received by the deadline and in compliance
with the Notice of Public Hearing andlor Hearing. Procedures will be included in the administrative record. Staff may
provide written responses to comments. Late written materials will no# be provided to Board members or included in the
administrative record, unless the Chair allows the late submission. A party requesting to submit late materials must
demonstrate good cause for the late submission, and the Chair must find that the late submission would not prejudice the
Central Valley Water Board or any designated party. The Chair may modify this rule if a party shows severe hardship.
Late submissions that consist of evidence {as opposed to policy statements) will generally be deemed prejudicial unless
all designated parties and Board staff have time to consider the evidence before the meeting. Written materials or other
documents submitted at the Board meeting must be provided first to Board counsel who will advise the Board regarding
acceptance into the, record.. .. _, .
PROCEDURE FOR UNCONTESTED (CONSENT} AGENDA ITEMS (see also 23 CCR 647.2(f))
Uncontested or consent agenda items are items for which there appears to be no controversy and which can be acted
upon by the Board with limited or no discussion. Such items have been properly noticed and all interested parties consent
to the staff recommendation. The Board Chair will recognize late revisions submitted by staff and will then call for a
motion and vote by the Board.
If any Board member or member of the public raises a question or issue regarding the item that requires Board
discussion, the item may be removed from the consent calendar and considered in its numerical order on the agenda, or
in an order determined by the Board Chair. Anyone wishing to contest a consent item on the agenda must appear in
person at the Board meeting and explain to the Board the reason the item is contested.
PROCEDURE FOR INFORMATION ITEMS (see also 23 CCR 649 a#seq.}
Information items are items presented to the Board for discussion only and for which no Board action or vote is taken.
The Board may, however, provide direction to staff. The Board usually will hear a~ presentation by staff, and comments by
Meeting Procedures 1 Updated November, 20'[2
interested persons shall also be allowed. Members of the public wishing to address the Board on the topic under
discussion should submit an attendance card beforehand indicating their request to speak to the Board. Time limits may
be imposed on interested persons.
PROCEDURE FOR ACTION ITEMS (see also 23 CCR 649 et.seq.)
Contested agenda items are items to which the parties involved have not consented and the staff recommendation is in
dispute. The procedure #hat applies to such items depends on the nature of the matter. Masters before fhe Board may be
quasi-legislative orquasi-judicial (adjudicative proceedings). Such items may require a public hearing and all interested
persons will be provided an opportunity to make comments.
Contested agenda items that are adjudicative, not quasi legislative, are governed by the rules for adjudicative
proceedings. The regulations setting forth the procedures for adjudicative proceedings are codifed in Title 23 California
Cade of Regulations Division 3. Adjudicative proceedings before the Central Valley Water Board are governed by these
regulations as authorized by chapter 4.5 of the Administrative Procedure Act {commencing with section 11400 of the
Government Code). The regulations provide that, with certain exceptions, adjudicative proceedings will be conducted in
accordance with sections $00-$05 of the Evidence Code and section 11513 of Chapter 5 of the Government Cade. {Other
provisions of chapter 5 do not apply}. A copy of those regulations and chapter 4.5 of the Administrative Procedure Act,
section 11513 of the Government Cade, and sections 801-805 of the Evidence Code can be found at
httpa/www.waterboards raaovhaws regulations/
An ad;udicative proceeding is a hearing to receive evidence far determination of facts pursuant to which the Board
formulates and issues a decision. A decision determines a legal right, duty, privilege, immunity, or other legal interest of a
particular person or persons. Examples of adjudicative proceedings include hearings to receive evidence concerning the
issuance of waste discharge requirements or National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits;
concerning cease and desist orders; and concerning orders setting administrative civil liability. Adjudicative hearings are
not conducted according to the technical rules of evidence, and the Board will accept any evidence or testimony that is
reasonably relevant. The Notice of Public Hearing will set for the process for the hearing.
All persons testifying must state their name, address, affiliation, and whether they have taken the oath before testifying.
PROCEDURE FOR CONTESTEb HEARINGS IN AD.IUDICATIV6 MATTERS (WASTE DISCHARGE OR WATER
RECYCLING REQUIREMENTS, NPDES PERMITS, AND CERTAIN INVESTIGAT#ON OR ENFORCEMENT ORDERS
[Wat. Code, §§ 13267, 13268, 13300, 13301, 13304, 13350, 13383, and 13385])
All persons interested in a specific item should consult the Hearing Procedure issued far that item to see if any of the
following information is inapplicable. Contact Board staff if you do not know whether there is a Hearing Procedure far the
item or if you need a copy. If the following conflicts with a specific Notice of Public Hearing or Hearing Procedure, the
Notice of Public Hearing or specific Hearing Procedure will control. All administrative civil liability orders are subject to
specific Hearing Procedures. _
Designated parties may request these procedures: to call and examine witnesses; to have witnesses testify under oath; to
receive a witness list from other designated parties; to introduce exhibits; to cross-examine opposing.witnesses; to
impeach any witness; to rebut the evidence against him or her; to make or oppose evidentiary objections; to make
opening or closing statements; or to have a prehearing conference with the Board's advisors. A request For these hearing
procedures must be received by the Executive Officer at least fve working days before the hearing, and must specify the
procedures the designated party is requesting.
Designated parties are any persons named in the proposed order. All other persons wishing to address the Board ar
provide comments are interested persons and not designated parties. Such interested persons may request status as a
designated party for purposes of an item by submitting such request in writing to staff assigned to the matter, no later than
two weeks after the draft order is available for public comment. The request must explain the basis for status as a
designated party and, in particular, how the person is directly affected by the discharge.
Central Valley Water Board staff will designate a prosecution team to serve as a designated party far prosecutorial
matters, such as the prosecution of administrative civil liability orders. Advisory staff in prosecutorial matters, and all staff
in non-prosecutorial matters, are not designated parties but are present to assist the Board.
The order of testimony far adjudicative hearings generally will be as follows, unless modified by the Board Chair:
• Testimony (and cross-examination, if provided) of Board staff
Meeting Procedures 2 Updated November, 2012
• Testimony {and cross-examination, if provided} of discharger
• Testimony {and cross-examination, if provided} of other designated parties
Statements of interested persons
• Closing statement by designated parties other than discharger
• Closing statement by discharger
Closing statement by staff
Recommendation by Executive Officer (as appropriate)
• Close hearing
Deliberation and voting by Board
Closing statements shall be for the purpose of summarize#ion and rebuttal, and are not to be used to introduce new
evidence or testimony, or to restate direct testimony. After considering evidence, testimony, and comments, the Board
may choose to adapt an order regarding a proposed agenda item. Persons wishing to introduce exhibits (i.e., maps,
charts, photographs) must leave them with the Board's Assistant Executive Officer. If you plan to use visual aids such as
PowerPaint slides, contact staff prior to the meeting to arrange for equipment set-up. You must provide a printed or
electronic copy of any visual aids. Photographs or slides of large exhibits are acceptable.
AEl Board files, exhibits, and agenda material pertaining to adjudicative proceedings onjthe agenda are hereby made a
part of the record.
OTHER INFORMATION
Quasi-legislative matters include rulemaking and some informational proceedings. These matters may include hearings
for the adoption or amendment of regulations; water quality control plans or state policy for water quality control and
hearings to gather information to assist the Board in formulating policy far future action. They are not adjudicative
proceedings and are subject to different procedures. (See PROCEDURE FOR ACTION ITEMS, above, and Cal. Code
Regs., title 23, § 649 et. Seq.)
Any person affected adversely by certain actions ar failures to act of the Board may petition the State Water Resources
Control Board (state Water Board) according to California Water Code section 13320 and Title 23 California Code of
Regulations section 2050 et seq. The petition should be addressed to the Office of Chief Counsel at the State Water
Board The State Water Board must receive the petition within 30 days of the date of the Board meeting at which the
Board acted or failed to act. Copies of the law and regulations applicable for filing petitions (and cited above) will be
provided upon request and are available at http:/lwww.waterboards.ca.govllaws regulations
Any questions or comments regarding these procedures may be directed to:
Kiran Lanfranchi-Rizzardi, Administrative Assistant
11020 Sun Center Drive, #200
Rancho Cordova, CA 956T0
Telephone (916) 464-4839
e-mail: klanfranchi waterboards.ca. ov
Meeting Procedures 3 Updated November, 2012
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
CENTRAL VALLEY REGION
The primary duty of the Board is to protec# the,cluality of the waters within the Region for all benefcial uses. This
duty is implemented by formulating and adopting water quality plans far specific ground or surface water basins
and by prescribing and enforcing requirements on all agricultural, domestic and industrial waste discharges.
Specific responsibilities and procedures of the Boards and the State Water Resources Control Board are
contained in the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act.
BOARD MEMBERS
Karl E. Longley
Jon Costantino
Jennifer Lester Moffitt
Carmen L. Ramirez*
Sandra Meraz
Robert Schneider
CITY OF RESIDENCE
Fresno
Grass Valley
Davis
Atwater
A[paugh
Davis
~~~ ~""°~~~~ "~ - "~ ~`Publici~emE;erirfaccordance~withWaterCoc[esectioi~ T3201(c) -~
Pamela C. Creedon, Executive Officer
Kiran Lanfranchi-Rizzardi, Adminisfrafive Assistant
David Coupe, Sr.Sfaff Counsel
Patrick Pulupa, 5faff Counsel
Alex Mayer, Staff Counsel
SACRAMENTO OFFICE
11020 Sun Center Drive, Suite 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6114
Teiephone: (916) 464-3291
Fax: (916) 464-4758
Assistant Executive Officers;
Kenneth Landau
Richard Loncaravich
Supervisors:
Brian Newman
Diana C. Messina
Jerry Bruns
Duncan Austin
Joe Karkoski
Linda Bracamonte
Robert Busby
Wendy Wyels
Seniors•
Anne Olson
Rudy Schnagl
Brett Stevens .
Charlene Herbst
Cori Condon
Dan Radulescu
Daniel McClure
Elizabeth Lee
Gayleen Perreira
Gerald Djuth
James Munch
Jeanne Chilcott
Patrick Morris
Steven Meeks
Sue McConnell
Steve Rosenbaum
Susan Fregien
Victor Izzo
Jim Marshall
Joe Mello
Marie McCrink
FRESNO OFFICE
1685 E Street
Fresno, CA 93706
Telephone: {559} 445-5116
Fax: (559) 445-5910
Assistant Executive Officer:
Clay Rodgers
Supervisors:
Lonnie Wass
Doug Patteson
Seniors:
Dale Essary
Shelton Gray
Warren Gross
Dale Harvey
Daniel Car{son
TERM EXPIRES
913 012 0 1 3
9/30/2015
9/30/2016
9/30/2013
9/30/2014 .
9/30/2014
Dane Johnson
David Sholes
Matt Scraggins
Russell Walls
REDDING OFFICE
364 Knollcrest Drive, Suite 205
Redding, CA 96002
Telephone: {530) 224-4845
Fax: (530} 224-4857
Assistant Executive Officer:
Vacant
Supervisor:
Bryan Smith
Seniors•
Angela Wilson Greg Cash
George Day Clint Snyder
Updated December 2012
.'li~ .~
< ... .. ..ti.P ~.