HomeMy WebLinkAboutDurham Unified School District - Adoption Notice of Proposal to Implement Developer Fees BUTMCOUNTY
AhC NUNISTF4A'i'6t7N
NOV 2 0 20Ve
OROVILLE.CALtFORNIA
Lloyd welsh, Superintendent
lwebbdurhamunified.org
November 17, 2417
Butte County Board of Supervisors
25 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Re: Adoption Notice of Proposal to Implement Developer Fees
Dear Board Members:
A public hearing was held by the Governing Board of the Durham Unified School District at
its regular meeting of November 15, 2417, in which the Board adopted the proposed
resolution, #18-46, implementing school facilities fees in accordance with Education Code
Section 17624. The meeting was held at 7:.44 p.m. in the Board Room of the district offices,
located at 9424 Putney Drive, Durham, California. Further information on the costs of
school services and facilities and on other available revenue, including the general fund,
was available at the District office as of November 3, 2417.
If you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Ron Sherrod, Business Manager
Durham Unified School District
9420 Putney Drive, P4 Box 300, Durham, Ca 95938
Phone: (530-895-4675 x227 FAX: (530) 895«4692
DURHAM UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Board Meeting Date: November 15, 2017
SUBJECT : Approve the Increase in School Facilities Fees
PREPARER: Ron Sherrod
RECOMMENDATION: Z Approve 0 Do Not Approve
0 Accept 0 Discuss
0 Information Only
BACKGROUND:
On February 24, 2016 the State Allocation Board approved the maximum fee
authorized by Education Code Section 17620 to $3.48 per square foot of residential
construction and $0.56 per square foot against commercial and industrial
construction. The mini-storage category of commercial/industrial justification has
less impact than the statutory $0.56 per square foot commercial/industrial
justification and should be collected at the justified rate of$0.08 per square foot.
These rates have not been updated for the district since April 10, 2010 and have
been set as follows:
Residential: $2.97 per square foot
Commercial/Industrial: $0.47 per square foot
Mini-Storage: $0.07 per square foot
New rates will be increased as follows if approved:
Residential: $3.48 per square foot
CommerciaUlndustrial: $0.56 per square foot
Mini-Storage: $0.08 per square foot
.................................... ............ .................................................
RESOLUTION NO. 418-06 (November 15, 2017, Regular Meeting)
A RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE
DURHAM UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
INCREASING SCHOOL FACILITIES FEES AS AUTHORIZED BY
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65995 (b) 3
WHEREAS, Statute AB 2926 (Chapter 887/Statutes of 1986) authorizes the governing board of any school
district to levy a fee, charge, dedication or other form of requirement against any development project for the
reconstruction of school facilities; and,
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65995 establishes a maximum amount of fee that may be charged
against such development projects and authorizes the maximum amount set forth in said section to be adjusted for
inflation every two years as set forth in the state-wide cost index for Class B construction as determined by the State
Allocation Board at its January meeting;and,
WHEREAS, at its February 24, 2016, meeting, the State Allocation Board approved the maximum fee
authorized by Education Code Section 17620 to $3.48 per square foot of residential construction described in
Government Code Section 65995(b)(1) and $0.56 per square foot against commercial and industrial construction
described in Government Code Section 65995(b)(2);and,
WHEREAS,the purpose of this Resolution is to approve and adopt fees on residential projects in the amount
of$3.48 per square foot as authorized by Education Code Section 17620; and,
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to approve and adopt fees on commercial and industrial
development projects in the amount of$0.56 per square foot as described in Government Code Section 65995(b)(2).
The mini-storage category of commercial industrial justification has less impact than the statutory$0.56 per square
foot commercial/industrial justification and should be collected at the justified rate of$0.08 per square foot.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Governing Board of the Durham Unified School
District as follows:
1. Procedure. This Board hereby finds that prior to the adoption of this Resolution, the Board conducted a public
hearing at which oral and written presentations were made, as part of the Board's regularly scheduled November
15,2017, meeting. Notice of the time and place of the meeting, including a general explanation of the matter to
be considered, has been published twice in a newspaper in accordance with Government Code Section 66016,
and a notice,including a statement that the data required by Government Code Section 66016 was available,was
mailed at least 14 days prior to the meeting to any interested party who had filed a written request with the District
for mailed notice of the meeting on new fees or service charges within the period specified by law. Additionally,
at least 10 days prior to the meeting, the District made available to the public,data indicating the amount of the
cost,or estimated cost,required to provide the service for which the fee or service charge is to be adjusted pursuant
to this Resolution, and the revenue sources anticipated to provide this service. By way of such public meeting,
the Board received oral and written presentations by District staff which are summarized and contained in the
District's Developer Fee Implementation Study dated November 10,2016,(hereinafter referred to as the "Plan")
and which formed the basis for the action taken pursuant to this Resolution.
2. Findings, The Board has reviewed the Plan as it relates to proposed and potential development, the resulting
school facilities needs, the cost thereof, and the available sources of revenue including the fees provided by this
Resolution, and based thereon and upon all other written and oral presentations to the Board, hereby makes the
following findings:
A. Additional development projects within the District, whether new residential construction or residential
reconstruction involving increases in assessable area greater than 500 square feet, or new commercial or
industrial construction will increase the need for reconstruction of school facilities.
............................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................
B. Without reconstruction of present school facilities, any further residential development projects or
commercial or industrial development projects within the District will result in a significant decrease in the
quality of education presently offered by the District;
C. The fees proposed in the Plan and the fees implemented pursuant to this Resolution are for the purposes of
providing adequate school facilities to maintain the quality of education offered by the District;
D. The fees proposed in the Plan and implemented pursuant to this Resolution will be used for the reconstruction
of school facilities as identified in the Plan;
E. The uses of the fees proposed in the Plan and implemented pursuant to this Resolution are reasonably related
to the types of development projects on which the fees are imposed;
F. The fees proposed in the Plan and implemented pursuant to this Resolution bear a reasonable relationship to
the need for reconstructed school facilities created by the types of development projects on which the fees
are imposed;
G. The fees proposed in the Plan and implemented pursuant to this Resolution do not exceed the estimated
amount required to provide funding for the reconstruction of school facilities for which the fees are levied;
and in making this finding, the Board declares that it has considered the availability of revenue sources
anticipated to provide such facilities, including general fund revenues,
H. The fees imposed on commercial or industrial development bear a reasonable relationship and are limited to
the needs of the community for schools and are reasonably related and limited to the need for reconstructed
school facilities caused by the development;
I. The fees will be collected for school facilities for which an account has been established and funds
appropriated and for which the district has adopted a reconstruction schedule and/or to reimburse the District
for expenditures previously made.
3. Fee. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Board hereby increases the previously levied fee to the amount of
$3.48 per square foot for assessable space for new residential construction and for residential reconstruction to
the extent of the resulting increase in assessable areas; and to the amount of$0.56 per square foot for new
commercial or industrial construction. The mini-storage category of commercial/industrial justification has less
impact than the statutory$0.56 per square foot commercial/industrial justification and should be collected at the
justified rate of$0.08 per square foot.
4. Fee Adjustments and Limitation. The fees adjusted herewith shall be subject to the following:
A.The amount of the District's fees as authorized by Education Code Section 17620 shall be reviewed every two
years to determine if a fee increase according to the adjustment for inflation set forth in the statewide cost
index for Class B construction as determined by the State Allocation Board is justified.
B. Any development project for which a final map was approved and construction had commenced on or before
September 1, 1986, is subject only to the fee,charge,dedication or other form of requirement in existence on
that date and applicable to the project.
C. The term"development project" as used herein is as defined by Section 65928 of the Goverriment Code.
5. Additional Mitigation Methods. The policies set forth in this Resolution are not exclusive and the Board reserves
the authority to under-take other or additional methods to finance school facilities including but not limited to the
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982(Government Code Section 5331 I,et seq.)and such other funding
mechanisms. This Board reserves the authority to substitute the dedication of land or other property or other form
of requirement in lieu of the fees levied by way of this Resolution at its discretion,so long as the reasonable value
of land to be dedicated does not exceed the maximum fee amounts contained herein or modified pursuant hereto.
6. Implementation. For residential,commercial or industrial projects within the District,the Superintendent,or the
Superintendent's designee, is authorized to issue Certificates of Compliance upon the payment of any fee levied
under the authority of this Resolution.
7. California Environmental Quality Act. The Board hereby finds that the implementation of Developer Fees is
exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA).
8. Commencement Date. The effective date of this Resolution shall be January 16,2018 which is 60 days following
its adoption by the Board.
9. Notification of Local Agencies. The Secretary of the Board is hereby directed to forward copies of this
Resolution and a Map of the District to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors of Butte County.
10. Severability. If any portion of this Resolution is found by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
finding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The Board hereby declares its
intent to adopt this Resolution irrespective of the fact that one or more of its provisions may be declared invalid
subsequent hereto.
APPROVED,PASSED and ADOPTED by the Governing Board of the Durham Unified School District this 15'day
of November,2017,by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
AB STAIN:
U t
President overning Board
Durham Unified School District
ATTEST:
S re retary,Governing Board
Durham Unified School District
Lloyd Webb, Superintendent
lwebb@durhamunified.org
DECLARATION OF POSTING AGENDA
I, Tina Blenn, District Secretary, declare that I posted the attached "Notice of Public Hearing
and of Proposal for Implementing School Facilities Fees," and the Agenda for the District's
Governing Board's regular November, 2017, meeting, on November 10, 2017, in the
following locations.
1. Durham Recreation and Park District
1847 Durham-Dayton Hwy, Durham CA 95938
2. Durham Veteran's Hall
9319 Midway, Durham, CA 95938
3. Durham Unified School District Office
9420 Putney Drive, Durham, CA 95938
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct.
Executed on November 10, 2017, at Durham, California.
4
r
Tina Blenn, District Secretary
Durham Unified School District
9420 Putney Drive, PO Box 300, Durham, Ca 95938
Phone: (530-895-4675 x227 FAX: (530) 895-4692
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND OF PROPOSAL FOR
IMPLEMENTING
SCHOOL FACILITIES FEES AS AUTHORIZED BY
EDUCATION CODE SECTION 517620 AND GOVERNMENT
CODES 65995
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that immediately follow-
ing a public hearing on the matter, a proposed
resolution(s)will be considered by the Governing Board
of Durham Unified School District at its regular meeting
on November 15,2017,at 7:00 p.m.,which if adopted by
the Board will Implement development fees established
by the District against residential construction and re-
construction at$3.48 per square foot and against new
commercial or industrial construction at$0.56 a square
foot. Education Code Section 17620 and Government
Code Section 65995 authorize the proposed fees. Data
pertaining to the cost of school facilities is available for
inspection during regular business hours atthe Dlstricrs
administrative offices. The fee,if approved by the Gov-
erning Board,will become effective on January 15.2018.
which is 60 days after the proposed adoption of the reso-
lution levying such fee by the Governing Board.
Publish: October 31 and.November 7,2017
BUTTE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS
(2006 ASSESSMENT)
I)URIIAM UNIFIED
InSchool District
MWby CMU,2"Pl V' CcvbC;rmytiicwl�ritwreruutluu 4ulter.
UR LiAYT47N I�il^,�'
n W
URrAMP, wTzRrs -,
4':K'euNtl•MD RD �. I
l�
57 D.,hm
l
LL
,r
n�tl
t9n.r,?Pl fi"GYi
Level I Developer Fee Study
for
Durham Unified
School District
November 10, 2016
Len Foreman, Superintendent
Board of Trustees
Ed McLaughlin, President
Lance Smith, Clerk
Bob Bultema, Member
Mark Kimmelshue, Member
Todd Southam, Member
Prepared by:
Jack Schreder & Associates, Inc.
2230 K Street
Sacramento, CA 95816
916-441-0986
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................ 1
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................3
SECTION 1: DEVELOPER FEE JUSTIFICATION................................................................... 6
Modernization and Reconstruction.............................................. ...............................6
ModernizationNeed ............................................................................................................... 6
Residential Development and Fee Projections ....................................................................9
Commercial/Industrial Development and Fee Projections.............................................10
Summary.................................................................................................................................14
SECTION I1: BACKGROUND OF DEVELOPER FEE LEGISLATION.............................15
SECTION III: REQUIREMENTS OF AB 1600....................................................................... 19
SECTION IV: REVENUE SOURCES FOR FUNDING FACILITIES..................................22
State Sources...................................................................................................... ...22
..................
LocalSources.......................................................................................................................... 22
SECTION V: ESTABLISHING THE COST, BENEFIT AND BURDEN NEXUS.............. 24
SECTION VI: FACILITY FUNDING ALTERNATIVES...................................................... 25
STATEMENT TO IDENTIFY PURPOSE OF FEE..................................................................26
ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPECIAL ACCOUNT................................................................... 26
RECOMMENDATION.............................................................................................................. 26
SOURCES....................................................................................................................................27
APPENDIX A: CONSTRUCTION COSTS......................................................................APP 1
APPENDIX B: PER PUPIL GRANT AMOUNTS ..........................................................APP 2
LIST OF TABLES
gZe
Table 1: Construction Costs................................. P 8
Table 2: 20 Year Modernization Need.......................................................................................9
Table 3: Facilities Cost per SF from Proposed Residential Construction........................... 10
Table 4: Commercial and Industrial Generation Factors.....................................................11
Table 5: Projected Commercial/Industrial Fee Square Footage .........................................12
Table 6: Projected Employees/District Households from Commercial/Industrial
Development...................................................................................................................... 13
Table 7: Facilities Cost per SF from Proposed Commercial/Industrial Construction.....14
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Education Code Section 17620 authorizes school districts to levy a fee, charge,
dedication or other form of requirement against any development project for
the construction or modernization of school facilities provided the District
can show justification for levying of fees.
• In February 2016, the State Allocation Board's biennial inflation adjustment
changed the fee to $3.48 per square foot for residential construction and $0.56
per square foot for commercial/industrial construction.
• The Durham Unified School District is justified in collecting $3.48 per square
foot for residential construction and $0.56 per square foot of
commercial/industrial construction with the exception of mini storage. The
muni storage category of construction should be collected at a rate of$0.08 per
square foot.
• In general, it is fiscally more prudent to extend the useful life of an existing
facility than to construct new facilities when possible. The cost to modernize
facilities is approximately 41.1 percent of the cost to construct new facilities.
• The residential justification is based on the Durham Unified School District's
projected modernization need of $22,194,325 for students generated from
residential development over the next 20 years and the projected residential
square footage of 4,612,098.
• Based on the modernization need for students generated from projected
residential development and the projected residential square footage, each
square foot of residential construction will create a school facilities cost of at
least $4.81 ($22,194,325/4,612,098).
• Tlne commercial/industrial justification is based on the Durham Unified
School District's projected modernization need of $1,342,545 for students
Jack Schreder&Associates, hrc.
Durharx Lluified School District-Developer Fee Study/November 2016 Page 1
generated from commercial/industrial development over the next 20 years
and the projected commercial/industrial square footage of 230,605.
• Based on the modernization need for students generated from projected
commercial/industrial development and the projected commercial/industrial
square footage, each square foot of commercial/industrial construction will
create a school facilities cost of at least $5.82 ($1,342,545 / 230,605) with the
exception of mini storage. The mind storage category of construction will
create a school facilities cost of$0.08 per square foot.
lack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
Durham Unifed School District-Developer Fee Study/November 2016 Page 2
INTRODUCTION
In September, 1986, the Governor signed into law Assembly Bill 2926 (Chapter
887/Statutes 1986) which granted school district governing boards the authority to
impose developer fees. This authority is codified in Education Code Section 17620
which states in part "...the governing board of any school district is authorized to levy a
fee, charge, dedication or other form of requirement against any development project
for the construction or modernization of school facilities."
The Level I fee that can be levied is adjusted every two years according to the
inflation rate, as listed by the state-wide index for Class B construction set by the State
Allocation Board. In January of 1992, the State Allocation Board increased the Level 1
fee to $1.65 per square foot for residential construction and $.27 per square foot for
commercial and industrial construction.
Senate Bill 1287 (Chapter 1354/Statutes of 1992) effective January 1, 1993,
affected the facility mitigation requirements a school district could impose on
developers. Senate Bill 1287 allowed school districts to levy an additional $1.00 per
square foot of residential construction (Goverrunent Code Section 65995.3). The
authority to levy the additional$1.00 was rescinded by the failure of Proposition 170 on
the November 1993 ballot.
In January 1994, the State Allocation Boar'd's biennial inflation adjustment
changed the fee to $1.72 per square foot for residential construction and $.28 per square
foot for commercial/industrial construction.
In January 1996, the State Allocation Board's biennial inflation adjustment
changed the fee to $1.84 per square foot for residential construction and $.30 per square
foot for commercial/industrial construction.
In January 1998, the State Allocation Board's biennial inflation adjustment
changed the fee to $1.93 per square foot for residential construction and $.31 per square
foot for commercial/industrial construction.
Jack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
Drrrhaam Unified School District-Developer Fee Study/November 2016 Page 3
In January 2000, the State Allocation Board's biennial inflation adjustment
changed the fee to $2.05 per square foot for residential construction and $0.33 per
square foot for commercial/industrial construction.
In January 2002, the State Allocation Board's biennial inflation adjustment
changed the fee to $2.14 per square foot for residential construction and $0.34 per
square foot for commercial/industrial construction.
In January 2004, the State Allocation Board's biennial inflation adjustment
changed the fee to $2.24 per square foot for residential construction and $0.36 per
square foot for commercial/industrial construction.
In January 2006, the State Allocation Board's biennial inflation adjustment
changed the fee to $2.63 per square foot for residential construction and $0.42 per
square foot for commercial/industrial construction.
In January 2008, the State Allocation Board's biennial inflation adjustment
changed the fee to $2.97 per square foot for residential construction and $0.47 per
square foot for commercial/industrial construction.
In January 2010, the State AIlocation Board's biennial inflation adjustment
maintained the fee at $2.97 per square foot for residential construction and $0.47 per
square foot for commercial/industrial construction.
In January 2012, the State Allocation Board's biennial inflation adjustment
changed the fee to $3.20 per square foot for residential construction and $0.51 per
square foot for commercial/industrial construction.
In January 2014, the State Allocation Board's biennial inflation adjustment
changed the fee to $3.36 per square foot for residential construction and $0.54 per
square foot for commercial/industrial construction.
In February 2016, the State Allocation Board's biennial inflation adjustment
changed the fee to $3.45 per square foot for residential construction and $0.56 per
square foot for commercial/industrial construction.
Jack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
Dw,ham Lhjifred School District-Developer Fee Shidy/November 2016 Page 4
The next adjustment to the fee will occur at the January 2018 State Allocation
Board meeting.
In order to levy a fee, a district must make a finding that the fee to be paid bears
a reasonable relationship and be limited to the needs of the community for elementary
or high school facilities and be reasonably related to the need for schools caused by the
development. Fees are different from taxes and do not require a vote of the electorate.
Fees may be used only for specific purposes and there must be a reasonable relationship
between the levying of fees and the impact created by development.
In accordance with the recent decision in the Cresta Bella LP v. POWay Unified
School District (2013 WL 3942961) court Case, school districts are now required to
demonstrate that reconstruction projects will generate an increase in the student
population thereby creating an impact on the school district's facilities. School districts
must establish a reasonable relationship between an increase in student facilities needs
and the reconstruction project in order to levy developer fees.
Purpose of Study
This study will demonstrate the relationship between residential, commercial
and industrial growth and the need for the modernization of school facilities in the
Durham Unified School District.
Jack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
Durham Unified School District-Dweloper Fee Stndy/Noziewber 2016 Page 5
SECTION I: DEVELOPER FEE JUSTIFICATION
Developer fee law requires that before fees can be levied a district must find that
justification exists for the fee. Government Code Section 66001 (g) states that a fee shall
not include the costs attributable to existing deficiencies in public facilities, but may
include the costs attributable to the increased demand for public facilities reasonably
related to the development project it order to refurbish existing facilities to maintain
the existing level of service or achieve an adopted level of service that is consistent with
a general plan. This section of the study will show that justification does exist for
levying developer fees in the Durham Unified School District.
Modernization and Reconstruction
Extending the useful life of a school is a cost effective and prudent way to house
students generated from future development. The state of California recognizes the
need to extend the life of existing schools and provides modernization funding through
the State School Facility Program. For the purpose of this report, modernization and
reconstruction are used interchangeably since many of the improvements are common
to both programs, i.e. roofing, plumbing, heating, cooling, dry rot repair, infrastructure
improvement, etc. Developer fees may not be used for regular maintenance, routine
repair of school buildings and facilities or deferred maintenance. The authorization to
justify modernization and modernization of school facilities and extend the useful life of
existing schools is contained in Education Code Section 17620 and Governnnent Code
Section 66001 (g).
Modernization Need
As new students are generated by new development, the need to increase the
useful life of school facilities will be necessary. In order to calculate the District's
estimated modernization need generated by students from new development, it is
necessary to determine the following factors: the number of units included in proposed
developments, the District student yield factor, and the per pupil cost to modernize
facilities.
Jack Schroder&Associates, Inc.
Durham Unified School District-Dezleloper Fee Study/November 2016 Page 6
Proposed Development
According to the Butte County Planning department, there are an estimated 2,622
undeveloped residential lots which may be developed in the District over the next 20
years. The School Facility Program allows districts to apply for modernization funding
for classrooms over 20 years old, meaning that school facilities are presumed to be
eligible for, and therefore need, modernization after that time period. It is therefore
generally presumed that school facilities have a useful life span of 20 years before
modernization is needed in order to maintain the same level of service as previously
existed. The same would be true for modernization of buildings 20 years after their
initial modernization. Therefore, the District's modernization needs are considered
over a 20 year period, and a 20 year projection has been included in the Study when
considering the homes that will generate students for the facilities in question.
Student Yield
To identify the number of students anticipated to be generated by new residential
development, a student yield factor of 0.7 has been utilized for the Durham Unified
School District. The yield factor is based on State wide student yield averages
calculated by the Office of Public School Construction.
Construction Cost
The construction cost per K-12 pupil is $29,429 (Appendix A). Table 1 shows the
weighted average to construct facilities per K-12 pupil.
jack Schreder&Associates, lac.
Durham Unified School District-Developer Fee Stffdy/November 2016 Page 7
Table 1:
Construction Costs
Gracie Level Construction Costs
K-6 $26,165
7-8 $30,027
9-12 $34,843
Weighted Average = $29,429
Sotirce: California DeparMici t of Edazcatim, Jack Schreder&Associates.
Modernization Cost
The cost to modernize facilities is 41.1 percent of new construction costs. The
percentage is based on the comparison of the State per pupil modernization grant
(including 3% for Americans with Disabilities and Fire, Life Safety improvements) and
the State per pupil new construction grant. For example, the State provides $10,634 per
K-6 pupil to construct new facilities and $4,049 to modernize facilities, which is 38.1
percent ($4,049 / $10,634) of the new construction grant amount. In addition, the State
provides a minimum of three percent for ADA/FLS improvements which are required
by the Department of State Architect's (DSA) office. Based on the per pupil grant
amounts and the ADA/FLS costs, the estimated cost to modernize facilities is 41.1
percent of the cost to construct facilities. The School Facility Program per pupil grant
amounts are included in Appendix B.
The construction cost per K-12 pupil is $29,429 and is outlined in Table 1 and included
in Appendix A. Therefore, the per pupil cost to modernize facilities per K-12 pupil is
$12,095 ($29,429 x .411).
Jack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
Durham Unified School District-Dezieloper Fee Study/November 2016 Page 8
20 Year Modernization Need
The District's estimated modernization need generated by students generated from
new residential development is $22,194,325. The calculation is included in Table 2.
Table 2:
20 Year Modernization Need
Proposed Development 2,622
Student Yield x .7
Students Generated 1,835
Per Pupil Modernization Cost $12,095
Students Generated x 1,835
Modernization Need $22,194,325
Sotirce: Dtcrlimri i.lnified School District, Office of Piiblic Scliool Colistrtictim, Jack Sclireder &
Associates, Btitte Cotaffij Plaivibig Departnterit.
Residential Development and Fee Projections
To show a reasonable relationship exists between the construction of new
housing units and the need for modernized school facilities, it will be shown that
residential construction will create a school facility cost impact on the Durham Unified
School District by students generated from new development.
According to the Butte County Plam-Ling department, there are an estimated
2,622 vacant residential lots which may be developed in the District over the next 20
years. According to developer fee collection records, the average square footage of
residential units is 1,759 square feet. Based on information provided by the Planning
Department and the average square footage, approximately 2,622 housing units,
totaling 4,612,098 square feet (2,622 x 1,759) may be constructed in the District over the
next 20 years. The amount of residential fees to be collected can be estimated based on
the housing unit projections.
lack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
Durham Uuifred School District-Developer Fee Study/Notwitrber 2016 Page 9
Based on the District's modernization need of $22,194,325 generated by
students from residential construction and the total projected residential square
footage of 4,612,098 residential construction will create a facilities cost of $4.81 per
square foot. The calculation is included in Table 3. However, the statutory Level I fee
for residential construction is $3.48 per square foot. Therefore, the District is justified
to collect$3.48 per square foot of residential construction.
Table 3:
Facilities Cost per SF from Proposed Residential Construction
Modernization Need Total Square Footage Facilities Cost
$22,194,325 /4,612,098 $4.81
Soacrce: Diii-hanr Unified School District, lack Schreder & Associates, Office of Public School
Construction.
CommerciaVindustrial Development and Fee Projections
In order to Ievy developer fees on commercial and industrial development,
Assembly Bill 181 provides that a district "... must determine the impact of the increased
number of employees anticipated to result from commercial and industrial
development upon the cost of providing school facilities within the district. For the
purposes of making this determination, the [developer fee justification] study shall
utilize employee generation estimates that are based on commercial and industrial
factors within the district, as calculated on either an individual project or categorical
basis". The passage of Assembly Bill AB 530 (Chapter 633/Statutes 1990) modified the
requirements of AB 181 by allowing the use of a set of state-wide employee generation
factors. Assembly Bill 530 allows the use of the employee generation factors identified
in the San Diego Association of Govermnents report entitled, San Diego Traffic
Generators. This study, which was completed in January of 1990, identifies the number
of employees generated for every 1,000 square feet of floor area for several
development categories. These generation factors are shown in Table 4.
jack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
Durham Unified School District-Developer Fee Sfndy1 Noz)eurber 2016 Page 10
Table 4 indicates the number of employees generated for every 1,000 square feet
of development and the number of district households generated for every employee in
11 categories of commercial and industrial development. The number of district
households is calculated by adjusting the number of employees for the percentage of
employees that live in the district and are heads of households.
Table 4:
Commercial and Industrial Generation Factors
Type of Employees Per District Households
Development 1,000 Sq. Ft.* Per Employee**
Medical Offices 4.27 .2
Corporate Offices 2.68 .2
Commercial Offices 4.78 .2
Lodging 1.55 .3
Scientific R&D 3.04 .2
Industrial Parks 1.68 .2
Industrial/Business Parks 2.21 .2
Neighborhood Shopping Centers 3.62 .3
Community Shopping Centers 1.09 .3
Banks 2.82 .3
Agriculture .31 .51
Average 2.55 .27
Source: San Diego Association of Govertitrtertts.
*" Source: jack Schreder aizd Associates.
Based on data available for the purpose of determining the impact of mini-
storage construction on the Durham Unified School District, it has been determined that
mini storage construction has significantly less impact than other
commercial/industrial construction. Mini storage construction generates .06 employees
per 1,000 square feet of school construction. This information was provided by the San
Jack Sclrreder&Associates, Inc.
Durham Unified School District-Developer•Fee Sludy/NoVcruber 2016 Page 11
Diego Association of Governments, Traffic Generators, January 1990, and is cited for
use in Education Code Section 17621(e)(1)(B).
The generation of .06 employees per 1,000 square feet and the utilization of the
student generation rate per household, yields an impact of $0.08 per square foot of
mini-storage construction. It is recommended that the Durham Unified School District
levy a fee for mini-storage not to exceed $0.08 per square foot.
Historical data shows that commercial/industrial square footage represents
approximately five percent of residential square footage. District residential projections
indicate that 4,672,098 (Table 3) square feet of residential space will be constructed in
the next 20 years. The five percent ratio represents 230,605 square feet of commercial
and industrial development. Table 5 illustrates this calculation.
Table 5:
Projected Commercial/Industrial Fee Square Footage
Ratio Residential SF Commercial SF
.05 x 4,612,098 sf = 230,605 sf
Soctrce: Ditrharn Unified School District, lack Schreder&Associates, original research.
According to the average employee generation factors in Table 4, commercial
and industrial development will yield 588 new employees and 159 new district
households over the next 20 years. Table 6 illustrates this calculation.
Jack Schreder&Associates, hic.
Drrrham Unified School District-Developer Fee Study/November 2016 Page I2
Table 6:
Projected Eznplotes/District Households
from
Commercial/Industrial Development
Commercial/ Average Employees New New
Industrial SF Per 1,000 SF Employees Households
230,605/1,000 x 2.55 = 588 x .27
Number of Households = 159
Source : Saiz Diego Association of GovertuueWs, Durharai Lbiified School District, lack Schreder &
Associates.
The addition of 159 new households created by commercial and industrial
development will impact Durham Unified School District with an estimated 111 (159 x
.7) additional students. Based on the per pupil K-12 modernization cost of$12,095, the
estimated cost to house 111 students generated from commercial/industrial
construction is$1,342,545 ($12,095 x 111).
Based on the District's modernization need of $1,342,545, generated by stridents
from commercial/h idustrial construction and the total projected square footage of
230,605, commercial/industrial construction will create a facilities cost of $5.82 per
square foot with the exception of mini storage. However, the statutory Level I fee for
commercial/industrial construction is $0.56 per square foot. Therefore, the District is
justified to collect $0.56 per square foot of commercial/industrial construction with the
exception of mini storage. The mind storage category should be collected at a rate of
$0.08 per square foot. The commercial/industrial calculation is included in Table 7.
]ack Schrader&Associates, Inc.
Duo-haw Unified School District-Developer Fee Stadyl Noziearher 2016 Page 13
Table 7:
Facilities Cost per SF from Proposed Commercial/Industrial Construction
Modernization Need Total Square Footage Level I Fee
$1,342,545 / 230,605 = $5.82
Source: Dtirliaru Llnifred School District, Jack Schreder & Associates, Office of Public School
Cornstrtictior2.
Summary
Based on the District's modernization need of $22,194,325 generated by students
from residential construction and the total projected residential square footage of
4,612,098, residential construction will create a facilities cost of $4.81 per square foot.
However, the statutory Level I fee for residential construction is $3.48 per square foot.
Therefore, the District is justified to collect $3.48 per square foot of residential
construction.
Based on the District's modernization need of $1,342,545 generated by students
from commercial/industrial construction and the total projected square footage of
230,605, commercial/industrial construction will create a facilities cost of $5.82 per
square foot with the exception of muni storage. However, the statutory Level I fee for
commercial/industrial construction is $0.56 per square foot. Therefore, the District is
justified to collect $0.56 per square foot of commercial/industrial construction with the
exception of mini storage. The mini storage category should be collected at a rate of
$0.08 per square foot.
Jack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
Durham Unified School District-Developer Fee SludylNOVCmber 2016 Page 14
SECTION II: BACKGROUND OF DEVELOPER FEE
LEGISLATION
Initially, the allowable developer fee was limited by Government Code Section
65995 to $1.50 per square foot of covered or enclosed space for residential development
and $.25 per square foot of covered or enclosed space of commercial or industrial
development. Tlne Level 1 fee that can be levied is adjusted every two years, according
to the inflation rate as listed by the state-wide index for Class B construction set by the
State Allocation Board. In February of 2016, the State Allocation Board changed the
Level I fee to $3.48 per square foot of residential construction and $0.56 per square foot
of commercial and industrial construction.
The fees collected are to be used by the school district for the construction or
modernization of school facilities and may be used by the district to pay bonds, notes,
loans, Ieases or other installment agreements for temporary as well as permanent
facilities.
Assembly Bill 3228 (Chapter 1602/Statutes of 1990) added Government Code
Section 66016 requiring districts adopting or increasing any fee to first hold a public
hearing as part of a regularly scheduled meeting and publish notice of this meeting
twice, with the first notice published at least ten days prior to the meeting.
Assembly Bill 3980 (Chapter 418/Statutes of 1988) added Government Code
Section 66006 to require segregation of school facilities fees into a separate capital
facilities account or fund and specifies that those fees and the interest earned on those
fees can only be expended for the purposes for which they were collected.
Senate Bill 519 (Chapter 1346/Statutes of 1987) added Section 17625 to the
Education Code. It provides that a school district can charge a fee on manufactured or
mobile homes only in compliance with all of the following:
1. The fee, charge, dedication, or other form of requirement is applied to the
initial location, installation, or occupancy of the manufactured home or
mobile home within the school district.
jack Schrerler&Associates, Inc.
Dnrlram Llnifrerl School District-Dei)eloper Fee Stridyl Noz?ewber 2016 Page 15
2. The manufactured home or mobile home is to be located, installed, or
occupied on a space or site on which no other manufactured home or
mobile home was previously located, installed, or occupied.
3. The manufactured home or mobile home is to be located, installed, or
occupied on a space in a mobile home park, on which the construction of
the pad or foundation system commenced after September 1, 1986.
Senate Bill 1151 (Chapter 1037/Statutes of 1987) concerns agricultural buildings
and adds Section 17622 to the Education Code. It provides that no school fee may be
imposed and collected on a greenhouse or other space covered or enclosed for
agricultural purposes unless the school district has made findings supported by
substantial evidence as follows:
1. The amount of the fees bears a reasonable relationship and is limited to
the needs for school facilities created by the greenhouse or other space
covered or enclosed for agricultural purposes.
2. The amount of the fee does not exceed the estimated reasonable costs of
the school facilities necessitated by the structures as to which the fees are
to be collected.
3. In determining the amount of the fees, the school district shall consider
the relationship between the proposed increase in the number of
employees, if any, the size and specific use of the structure, as well as the
cost of construction.
In order to Ievy developer fees, a Study is required to assess the impact of new
growth and the ability of the local school district to accommodate that growth. The
need for new school construction and modernization must be determined along with
the costs involved. The sources of revenue need to be evaluated to determine if the
district can fund the new construction and modernization. Finally, a relationship
between needs and funding raised by the fee must be quantified.
Jack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
Drrrhaur ilrrified School District-Developer Fee Strrdy/Noz2ewber2026 Page 16
Assembly Bill 181 (Chapter 1109/Statutes of 1989) which became effective
October 2, 1989, was enacted to clarify several areas of developer fee law. Assembly Bill
181 provisions include the following:
1. Exempts residential remodels of less than 500 square feet from fees.
2. Prohibits the use of developer fee revenue for routine maintenance and
repair, most asbestos work, and deferred maintenance.
3. Allows the fees to be used to pay for the cost of performing developer fee
justification studies.
4. States that fees are to be collected at the time of occupancy, unless the
district can justify earlier collection. The fees can be collected at the time
the building permit is issued if the district has established a developer fee
account and funds have been appropriated for which the district has
adopted a proposed construction schedule or plan prior to the issuance of
the certificate of occupancy.
5. Clarifies that the establishment or increase of fees is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act.
6. Clarifies that the impact of commercial and industrial development may
be analyzed by categories of development as well as an individual project-
by-project basis. An appeal process for individual projects would be
required if analysis was done by categories.
7. Changes the frequency of the annual inflation adjustment on the Level I
fee to every two years.
8. Exempts from fees - development used exclusively for religious purposes,
private schools, and government-owned development.
Jack Schroder&Associates, Mc.
Durham Lluifred School District-Developer Fee Study/November 2016 Page 17
9. Expands the definition of senior housing, which is limited to the
commercial/industrial fee and requires the conversion from senior
housing to be approved by the city/county after notification of the school
district.
10. Extends the commercial/industrial fee to mobile home parks Iimited to
older persons.
Jack Schroder&Associates, Inc.
Dni-haw Unified School District-Detleloper Fee Stttdy/November 2016 Page 18
SECTION III: REQUIREMENTS OF AB 1600
Assembly Bill 1600 (Chapter 927/Statutes of 1987) adds Section 66000 through
66003 to the Government Code:
Section 66000 defines various terms used in AB 1600:
"Fee" is defined as monetary exaction (except a tax or a special assessment) which
is charged by a local agency to the applicant in connection with the approval of a
development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the costs of public
facilities related to the development project.
"Development project" is defined broadly to mean any project undertaken for
purposes of development. This would include residential, commercial, or industrial
projects.
"Public facilities" is defined to include public improvements, public services, and
community amenities.
Section 66001 (a) sets forth the requirements for establishing, increasing or
imposing fees. Local agencies are required to do the following:
1. Identify the purpose of the fee.
2. Identify the use to which the fee is to be put.
3. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use
and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
4. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the
public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is
imposed.
jack Schreder&Associates, 1uc.
Durham Unified School District-Developer Fee Study November 2016 Page 19
Section 66001 (c) requires that any fee subject to AB 1600 be deposited in an
account established pursuant to Government Code Section 66006. Section 66006
requires that development fees be deposited in a capital facilities account or fund. To
avoid any commingling of the fees with other revenues and funds of the local agency,
the fees can only be expended for the purpose for which they were collected. Any
income earned on the fees should be deposited in the account and expended only for
the purposes for which the fee was collected.
Section 66001 (d) as amended by Senate Bill 1693 (Monteith/Statutes of 1996,
Chapter 569), requires that for the fifth year following the first deposit into a developer
fee fund, and for every five years thereafter, a school district must make certain findings
as to such funds. These findings are required regardless of whether the funds are
committed or uncommitted. Formerly only remaining unexpended or uncommitted
fees were subject to the mandatory findings and potential refund process. Under this
section as amended, relating to unexpended fee revenue, two specific findings must be
made as a part of the public information required to be formulated and made available
to the public. These findings are:
1. Identification of all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to
provide adequate revenue to complete any incomplete improvements
identified pursuant to the requirements of Section 66001 (a)(2).
2. A designation of the approximate date upon which the anticipated
funding will be received by the school district to complete the identified
but as yet, incomplete improvements.
If the two findings are not made, a school district must refund the developer fee
revenue on account in the manner provided in Section 66001 (e).
Section 66001 (e) provides that the Iocal agency shall refund to the current record
owners of the development project or projects on a prorated basis the unexpended or
uncommitted portion of the fees and any accrued interest for which the local agency is
unable to make the findings required by Section 66001 (d) that it still needs the fees.
Jack Schreder&/Associates, hic.
Durhmrt Unified School District-DeVeloper Fee Study/Nominber2016 Page 20
Section 66002 provides that any local agency which levies a development fee
subject to Section 66001 may adopt a capital improvement plan which shall be updated
annually and which shall indicate the approximate location, size, time of availability
and estimates of cost for all facilities or improvements to be financed by the fees.
Assembly Bill 1600 and the fits tifica tion for Levying Developer Fees
Effective January 1, 1989, Assembly Bill 1600 requires that any school district
which establishes, increases or imposes a fee as a condition of approval of development
shall make specific fundings as follows:
1. A cost nexus must be established. A cost nexus means that the amount of
the fee cannot exceed the cost of providing adequate school facilities for
students generated by development. Essentially, it prohibits a school
district from charging a fee greater than their cost to construct or
modernize facilities for use by students generated by development.
2. A benefit nexus must be established. A benefit nexus is established if the
fee is used to construct or modernize school facilities benefiting students
to be generated from development projects.
3. A burden nexus must be established. A burden nexus is established if a
project, by the generation of students, creates a need for additional
facilities or a need to modernize existing facilities.
Jack Schroder&Associates, lnc.
Drarhaua Unified School District-Deoeloper Fee Sindy/No-oollber 2016 Page 21
SECTION IV: REVENUE SOURCES FOR FUNDING FACILITIES
Two general sources exist for funding facility construction and modernization -
state sources and local sources. The District has considered the following available
sources:
State Sources
State School Facility Prograin
Senate Bill 50 reformed the State School Building Lease-Purchase Program in
August of 1998. The new program, entitled the School Facility Program, provides
funding under a "grant" program once a school district establishes eligibility. Funding
required from districts will be a 50/50 match for construction projects and 60/40
(District/State) match for modernization projects. Districts may levy the current
statutory developer fee as long as a district can justify collecting that fee. If a district
desires to collect more than the statutory fee (Level 2 or Level 3), that district must meet
certain requirements outlined in the law, as well as conduct a needs assessment to
enable a higher fee to be calculated.
Local Sources
Mello-Roos Communihj Facilities Act
The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 allows school districts to
establish a community facilities district in order to impose a special tax to raise funds to
finance the construction of school facilities.
1. The voter approved tax Ievy requires a two-thirds vote by the voters of
the proposed Mello-Roos district.
2. If a Mello-Roos district is established in an area in which fewer than
twelve registered voters reside, the property owners may elect to establish
a Mello-Roos district.
Jack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
Drrrllflin Unified School District-Developer Fee Study/No72ember 2016 Page 22
Developer Fees
The District's developer fees are dedicated to the current needs related directly to
modernization and new construction of school facilities.
General Obligation Bonds
General Obligation (GO) bonds may be issued by any school district for the
purposes of purchasing real property or constructing or purchasing buildings or
equipment "of a permanent nature." Because GO bonds are secured by an ad valorem
tax levied on all taxable property in the district, their issuance is subject to two-thirds
voter approval or 55% majority vote under Proposition 39 in an election. School
districts are obligated, in the event of delinquent payments on the part of the property
owners, to raise the amount of tax levied against the non-delinquent properties to a
level sufficient to pay the principal and interest coming due on the bonds.
School District General Funds
The district's general funds are needed by the district to provide for the
operation of its instructional program.
Expendittcre of Lottery Funds
Government Code Section 8880.5 states: "It is the intent of this chapter that all
funds allocated from the California State Lottery Education Fund shall be used
exclusively for the education of pupils and students and no funds shall be spent for
acquisition of real property, construction of facilities, financing research, or any other
non-instructional purpose."
Jack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
D uhnzn Unified School District-Developer Fee Stzzdy/Noz>ember 2016 Page 23
SECTION V: ESTABLISHING THE COST, BENEFIT AND BURDEN
NEXUS
In accordance with Government Code Section 66001, the District has established
a cost nexus and identified the purpose of the fee, established a benefit nexus, and a
burden nexus:
Establishment_o_f_a_Cost Nexus &Identify Purpose of the Fee
The Durham Unified School District chooses to construct and/or modernize
facilities for the additional students created by development in the district and the cost
for providing new and/or modernized facilities exceeds the amount of developer fees
to be collected. It is clear that when educational facilities are provided for students
generated by new residential, commercial and industrial development that the cost of
new facilities exceeds developer fee generation, thereby establishing a cost nexus.
Establishment of a Benefit Nexus
Students generated by new residential, commercial and industrial development
will be attending district schools. Housing District students in new and/or modernized
facilities will directly benefit those students from the new development projects upon
which the fee is imposed, therefore, a benefit nexus is established.
Establishment of a Burden Nexus
The generation of new students by development will create a need for additional
and/or modernized school facilities. The District must carry the burden of constructing
new facilities required by the students generated by future developments and the need
for facilities will be, in part, satisfied by the levying of developer fees, therefore, a
burden nexus is established.
Jack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
D irliant Unified School District-Developer Fee Study November 2016 Page 24
SECTION VI: FACILITY FUNDING ALTERNATIVES
The District does not currently have funds to provide for the shortfall in
modernization costs. We suggest the District continue to consider the following
possible funding alternatives:
1. Participate irk the State School Facility Program.
2. Explore voter approved General Obligation Bond election.
lack Schreder&Associates, Inc.
Durham Unified School District-Developer fee Study/November 2016 Page 25
STATEMENT TO IDENTIFY PURPOSE OF FEE
It is a requirement of AB 1600 that the District identify the purpose of the fee.
The purpose of fees being levied shall be used for the construction and/or
modernization of school facilities. The District will provide for the construction and/or
modernization of school facilities, in part,with developer fees.
ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPECIAL ACCOUNT
Pursuant to Government Code section 66006, the District has established a
special account in which fees for capital facilities are deposited. The fees collected in
this account will be expended only for the purpose for which they were collected. Any
interest income earned on the fees that are deposited in such an account must remain
with the principal. The school district must make specific information available to the
public within 180 days of the end of each fiscal year pertaining to each developer fee
fund. The information required to be made available to the public by Section 66006 (b)
(1) was amended by SB 1693 and includes specific information on fees expended and
refunds made during the year.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the fee justification provided in this report, it is recommended that the
Durham Unified School District levy residential development fees and
commercial/industrial fees up to the statutory fee for which justification has been
determined.
Jack Schr'eder&Associates, h¢c.
Durham Unified School District-Developer Fee Study/November 2016 Page 26
SOURCES
California Basic Educational Data System. California State Department of Education.
October Enrollments, 2012.2015.
California State Department of Education. California Public School Directory,
2010.
Collard,Gary. Lead Housing Analyst for Southern California. California State
Department of Housing and Community Development.
Foreman, Len. Superintendent, Durham Unified School District.
Office of Public School Construction. Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act,
1998.
San Diego Association of Governments. Traffic Generators,January 1990.
Schreder,Jack and Associates. Original research.
Sherrod, Ron. Chief Business Official, Durham Unified School District.
Weems,Tristan. Plamier, Butte County Planning Department.
Jack Schreder&Associates, bic.
Durhatrr Unified School District-Developer Fee Study/Nmember 2016 Page 27
APPENDIX A
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Elementary School Facility Construction Costs
I.Allowable Building Area
A.Total Student Capacity
B. Building Area —
600 students @ 71 sflstudent 42,600
Speech/Resource Specialist 600
Total 43,200
II.Site Requirements
A_Purchase Price of Property(10 Acres)
Cost per Acre _$0 $0
—�B...A....p.prai.. ...sa...ls. $0
.. . ..
C. Casts Incurred in Escrow $0
D.Surveys $0
— E. Other Costs, Geo. and Soils Reports N)
Total-Acquisition of Site $0
Ill. Plans
A.Architect's Fee for Plans $909,290
B DSA Plans Check Fee $73,934
C.School Planning, Plans Check Fee _ $6,266
D. Preliminary Tests $4,805
E. Other Costs, Energy Cons. &Advertising 142 187
$1,036,482
IV.Construction Requirements
A. Utility Services _ -- � _ $403,501
B. Off-site Development $605,250
C. Site Development, Service _ _$968,399
D. Site Development, General $645,599
E. New Construction $9,830,960
F. Unconventional Energy Source _ 549 645
Total Construction $13,003,354
Total Items 11, III and IV $14,039,836
—__.—Contingency 10%--- _. $1,403,984_
Construction Tests $149,746
Inspection . $105,261
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $15,698,827
ESTIMATED COST PER STUDENT $26,165
"Source.,California Department of Education,Jack Schreder&Associates.
Middle School Facility Construction Costs
I.Allowable Building Area �— —
---113. Building
Student Capacity — —
-I B. Building Area
1000 students @ 85sflstudent 85,000
Speech/Resource Specialist 1,360
Total 86,360
II.Site Requirements
_ A. Purchase Price of Property(20 Acres) _
Cost per Acre $0 — $0
.. . ... -
B.Appraisals $0
C.Costs Incurred in Escrow $0
_D. Surveys $0
E. Other Costs, Geo. and Soils Reports
Total-Acquisition of Site — $0
Ill. Plans
A.Architect's Fee for Plans — — $1,735,733
-- B, OSA Plans Check Fee _ _ $114,306
C. School Planning, Plans Check Fee $7,194
D. Preliminary TestsW _W $7,993
E. Other Costs, Energy Cons. &Advertising 10 549
$1,926,775
IV,Construction Requirements
A. Utility Services $591,993
B. Off-site Development $666,248
C. Site Development, Service _ ! $1,840,317
D.Site Development, General $1,312,675
E. New Construction ..--- _$19,716,240
_ F. Unconventional Energy Source 940,022
Total Construction -- -- LL $25,067,495
Total Items II, Ill and IV $26,994,270
— _ Contingency $2,699,427_
Construction Tests $210,425
Inspection $122,458
_
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $30,026,580
ESTIMATED COST PER STUDENT $30,027
'Source:Califomia Department of Education,Jack Schreder&Associates.
High School Facility Construction Costs I
1.Allow_ableBuilding Area
— A. Total Student Capacity
_ B. Building Area
1500 students @ 92sf/student __1.38,0_00
Speech/Resource Specialist 4,500
Total142,500
H.Site Requirements
A. Purchase Price of Property(40 Acres)
Cost per Acre $0 $0
B.Appraisals $0
C. Costs Incurred in Escrow $0
D.Surreys_ _ $0
E, Other Costs,Geo. and Soils Reports _ �—o
Total-Acquisition of Site —_ $0
111.PiansA.Architect's Fee for Plans $2,149,690
B, OSA Plans Check Fee _ $202,256
C. School Planning, Plans Check Fee $7,694
D. Preliminary Tests _ $12,458
-.._�-- E Other Costs, Energy Cons. &Advertising 1113 769
$2,485,867
IV.Construction Requirements
A. Utility Services $1,038,244
B. Off-site Development $1,061,842
C.Site Development, Service $3,421,48_9
D.Site Development, General— $2,572,017
_ E. New Construction $34,543,597
_ — F. Unconventional Energy Source _ u $1,859,460
Total Construction $44,496,648
Total Items II, Ili and IV _ $46,982,515
�—Contingency 10°/4 _ W $4,698,252_
Construction Tests _ $378,680
Inspection $205,186
— TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $52,264,633
ESTIMATED COST PER STUDENT $34,843
'Source:Califomia Department of Education,Jack Schreder&Associates.
APPENDIX B
PER PUPIL GRANT AMOUNTS
ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT TO SCHOOL FACILITY PROGRAM GRANTS
State Allocation Board Meeting,February 24,2016
Grant Amount Adiustments
Reg
ulation Current Adjusted Current Adjusted
Section Grant Per Pupil Grant Per Pupil
Effective 1-1-15 Effective 1-1-16
Elementary 1859.71 $10,345 $10,634
Middle 1859.71 $10,942 $11,247
High 1859.71 $13,923 $14,311
Special Day Class-Severe 1859.71.1 $29,070 $29,881
Special Day Class-Non-Severe 1859.71.1 $19,442 $19,984
Automatic Fire Detection/Alarm System-Elementary 1859.71.2 $12 $12
L Automatic Fire Detection/Alarm System-Middle 1859.71.2 $17 $17
CO) Automatic Fire DetectionlAlarm System-High 1859.71.2 $28 $29
C
VAutomatic Fire Detection/Alarm System-Special Day Class-Severe 1859.71.2 $53 $54
Automatic Fire Detection/Alarm System-Special Day Class-Non
1859.71.2 $36 $37
(D Severe
Z Automatic Sprinkler System-Elementary 1859.71.2 $173 $178
Automatic Sprinkler System-Middle 1859.71.2 $206 $212
Automatic Sprinkler System-High 1859.71.2 $214 $220
Automatic Sprinkler System-Special Day Class-Severe 1859.71.2 $548 $563
Automatic Sprinkler System-Special Day Class-Non-Severe 1859.71.2 $368 $378
Elementary 1859.78 $3,939 $4,049
Middle 1859.78 $4,167 $4,283
High 1859.78 $5,455 $5,607
Special Day Class-Severe 1859.78.3 $12,555 $12,905
Special Day Class-Non-Severe 1859.78.3 $8,399 $8,633
State Special School-Severe 1859.78 $20,925 $21,509
O Automatic Fire Detection/Alarm System--Elementary 1859.78.4 $127 $131
O
Automatic Fire DeteclionlAlarm System-Middle 1859.78.4 $127 $131
N Automatic Fire Detection/Alarm System-High1859.78.4 $127 $131
Automatic Fire Detection/Alarm System-Special Day C€ass-Severe 1859.78.4 $352 $362
p Automatic Fire Detection/Alarm System-Special Day Class-Non- 1859.78.4 $235 $242
Severe
Over 50 Years Old-Elementary 1859.78.6 $5,472 $5,625
Over 50 Years Old-Middle 1859.78.6 $5,788 $5,949
Over 50 Years Old-High 1859.78.6 $7,577 $7,788
Over 50 Years Old-Special Day Class-Severe 1859.78.6 $17,442 $17,929
Over 50 Years Old-Special Day Class-Non-Severe 1859.78.6 $11,664 $11,989
Over 50 Years Old-State Special School-Severe 1859.78.6 $29,069 $29,880