Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEmail from Dianna Wright regarding the marijuana ordinance and the 111213 BOS Meeting BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Sweeney, Kathleen NOV 15 2013 From: Admin Front Desk OROVILLE,CALIFORIM Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 12:23 PM To: Sweeney, Kathleen Subject: FW: THANK YOU Board of Supervisors: Mtg 11/12/13...Ame.r1,-Et ` J 2013 ofwv,,,i,worts From: Dianna Wright [mailto:diannawright3453©gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 12:22 PM To: Connelly, Bill; Teeter, Doug; BOS District 4; Kirk, Maureen; Wahl, Larry; Admin Front Desk Subject: Re: THANK YOU Board of Supervisors: Mtg 11/12/13...Amendment B approved ..YUP...doug is good, in fact, All Sups are GOOD. If you are in public service at your level you are up there with other great servants of our time, as it is a tough job. It is only for those with really BROAD SHOULDERS as someone is undoubtedly expecting MORE of you. Decisiveness & great communication skills are prerequisites. My feeling is that doug is an inexperienced leader, easily intimidated by bullies & detached from the gravity of the desperately dangerous impact the commercialization of pot is having on Butte County residents. These virtues are not a good combination when facing grave issues, such as the one at hand. My apologies if anyone has taken offense at the manner in which I presented my opinion. On balance, know that I am in the fight of my life which is shared by many other voters in our county. Again, due to our pot grower neighbor problems, it is only a matter of When a mishap occurs to me or one of my fellow suffering voters, not IF. And for that, All you GOOD people will equally share the credit. Yes, I too am eagerly looking forward to January & your prompt action to the enact Amendment A. In the meantime, I wish you all a safe and joyous holiday season. Merry Christmas & Happy New Year. Best regards, dianna wright, a frightened grammy On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Connelly, Bill <BConnelly(y;buttecountv.net> wrote: DOUG IS A GOOD PERSON JUST BE A LITTLE PATIENT.. JAN. IS NOT FAR AWAY. BILL Sent from my Samsung EpicTM 4G ��c , C 005 i Gnott Dianna Wright<diannawri_ht3453 a) =mail.com> wrote: I lost sleep last night over the pot ordinance revisions & know you probably did too. Again, I say thank you for attempting to understand the depth of angst suffered by your constituents & the need to provide relief now. There were no winners yesterday. When folks suffer, we all suffer. May you be encouraged as you move forward to enact the public's right to file complaints against pot growers under the nuisance ordinance. Pot growers cannot continue to enjoy "protected class" status. This is a clear violation of voter's civil rights. I feel D. Teeter threw me under the bus yesterday. I was offended deeply when he stated that my problem, with a major pot grower on an adjoining property, was a neighbor-to-neighbor problem. I wasn't alone in taking offense. Of course, his statement applies to all voters who made similar complaints about their neighbors yesterday too. When you consider Teeter represents Paradise (the largest town in his district) where even the number of chickens on a property are permitted, that comment just doesn't make sense. He has yet to accept my invitation to visit my property to see & smell my "neighbor problem" for himself. Perhaps if he saw: the charging pit-bull at my fence; the brilliant lights in the evening sky&the music with the filthiest words being blasted into my backyard; and smelled the stench of the ongoing crop that remains inches from the propery line, long after harvest; maybe then, he would consider that nuisance abatement may be a nice option for neighbors to have. Chickens I can take, but a pot grow that grievously interferes with the enjoyment of my property, crosses the line. Don't I deserve to be protected? Attached is my reflection of yesterday's board meeting. I too will choose to be encouraged as we move forward in the fight to remove the element of fear from rural neighborhoods. Best regards, dianna wright 2