HomeMy WebLinkAboutEmail from Eddy - SB 54 Menchaca, Clarissa
From: Eddy.N@verizon.net
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 7:41 AM
To: Clerk of the Board
Subject: SB54
Dear Butte Supervisors:
The people demand the County to follow Newport Beach, Orange, Westminster, Escondido, San Diego County,
Aliso Viejo, Fountain Valley, Mission Viejo, San Juan Capistrano, Huntington Beach, Yorba Linda to defy
California's totally unconstitutional "sanctuary state"laws, after Los Alamitos and Orange County. We don't
feel safe with criminal illegal aliens because they may rape our women and children, transmit diseases,kill us as
drunk drivers, rob, steal, caused accidents with no insurance, commit other crimes or kill cops
https://www.inguisitr.com/1566388/illegal-immigrant-accused-of-killing-two-califomia-deputies/ . Los
Alamitosap ssed an ordinance to defy SB 54, the state's main sanctuary law that bars local authorities from
honoring Immigration and Customs Enforcement(ICE) detainers. Newport Beach voted 7-0, Orange County's
Board of Supervisors voted to join the Trump administration's lawsuit challenging California's three sanctuary
state laws and condemn the state's"sanctuary city" law. We are on the right side of history because even the
Governor knew SB 54 is a lost cause and caved in to local revolts and federal pressure by sending 400 National
Guard troops to the border.
l
1
fff'
You are 10
times more
likely to be I�
murdered by
an illegal alien
than be killed
by a rifle.
s Rau
iiiYd��aA'!r Ix•�1Y�Y a�}C
��r7�J"faYt^f.Y'..y1hV`.9A'91�Fl T�Jtr}.�7
S 451M Y-iM!AvlY!EMEfO'R:M
�I�Jrw.wn vY.tf�fw+.tTYl Y.Q:pM
?^ff
' Consider this:
Escondido voted 4-1 authorized the city's filing of a legal brief in support of the Trump administration's lawsuit
challenging California's three sanctuary city laws for violating the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.
Escondido is the first city in San Diego County to defy the state's "sanctuary" laws, and San Diego County and
other counties are joining the anti-sanctuary revolt.
2
j:
E�At,
N o ss-S4 cop- mit p�t�K
11 1�tLLED
N No WISVIES Ht HAD
TUARY NCTUAR MDSE lof ICERS
�t STATS 2018 4 BY Bft1AN A�iDirFtSO
SA
i
WITH KI1NlA"G, B.LEBALS HELD IN ARRESTED I ALEN ARRESTED P
RMB A 12-YUR-OLD BRUTAL SAX RAPE IN ALLMY Ips, MOND CHILD WIT
RAPING 13-YEAR-OLD IDICTTAPE,DKIO
IMMIE�lPS�is„1.1rOAl.
BAAl1T AIVIESTEO
FOR UNNO.
IMPRIUATU 12-
YEA In
3 SALVADW ILLEGAL ILLEGRARRESTED�LIIRIIHI USDEPDRTS R.LEOAL
ALIENS CHARGED IN 1I OMAN INTO ALIENWANTEDFO1 SAI ALIEN ALL
RAK
OO RAPE Of a YOIA� 'II�FEAT R TYT�
RRAPIA TI R'ALiE11Ea1Y
II>E�ttlD11APP4
4 MEN AUEBEIMY AAPS
k.
K•YfAR-fR.O MIII�E ��
MOTHER SMOKED MEIN
Cities and counties must join the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) who is fighting California's
dangerous and unconstitutional sanctuary laws by filing amicus or friend-of-the-court briefs in support of the
federal government's lawsuit. The lawsuit, U.S. v. California, claims that three California state laws, "The
California Values Act" (SB54), "The Immigrant Worker Protection Act" (AB450), and Assembly Bill 103
(AB 103) unconstitutionally obstruct the federal government's ability to enforce immigration laws. IRLI takes
aim at SB54 and AB450 in the brief it filed. This brief shows that SB54 and AB450 directly interfere with
federal enforcement of immigration law, even in ways that invite armed confrontations between state and
federal officers. The brief also shows that authority to pass these laws is not reserved to the states in the Tenth
Amendment, and that S1354, in which California decides for itself which categories of aliens get to stay in the
United States, usurps the federal government's exclusive authority over foreign relations.
3
Viefims Of ' ' a Alien Crime
a-,m
1.11 4�61
r �
5 tl 1'
MEN� .
VOIAC.OKG
1 '
3,170
583
M
Drug Related
ObsVwWq '•
0 Theft
n Burglary
Weaporks Possession
Sexual Assau"
Robtiery
Crime Victims of Illegal Aliens
Shown below.110 jug a handful Of OW hiAny 11110UWAS of Innocent Airnftkans wbO
have been murdered,raped,kidnapped,robbed or otherwhe vin*Wharmed by
forelgrom with no aght to be in this couirtiry.The high Imarceratim rate of 111"alt
shows that many do rat come to work but to commft viriwL
A FUbWMUMP AMNESTY,Ike"McrAJn-KQnnedy UP,wit pwA mm dairigmus
fo"mrs to crodorg"ostrfamld3es,fneirlds and Ir"htom
-AF
T,
Jim,
Travis Sokh VkTINIS C*ftt& DOE Tavel
The 19-mr-c4d cafk-gestudent kmnv was found bmuOy raped The Deftsw polo Offiolm.
from W*mk Art"ni,mat truck acrd murdered in 1wf lia"W n%lirned and lhe 130wo of two,
and Wed in his car by an Aumn hom The accused was shot and Wed by an d6gal
Ok-WI aIWM drmng a load 04 Wof,eadw earned Gil a child alien who wfA*d In 4 reiu>
irkwi,to rrmiytvanu.iie irokCCe.KW bc"pt9l"w-d rani owtK-4 by.ft<Kyli Wym
Wet rewvH a icntmce OF by tare c"Is lk-gal chess Domer his de facto ssfxLwry
or 6113 Vim's in Pirlsolk undwry Poky polky Yhkh Invites prinewiibic-
tman 4kr On cm.
71
EVA
Y.
Maly Witiple leyetoaryss Seen Cardeer
the laomplidwd wwavift A trLs*m cd KI)ftk-BwcN The North Cam1na icodsitf,
MGM of Rockland<*imty N(-W South Carolina,Joyce 0419aft 140fier Of Mw and<Nlrd,
York W&L raped and muj*ced was Wed as ere of; + her dcacois%iiis lilstel by a d lunk
In tw h(-DV W an Orgol Allm irmej ri,isft»x by 4 dug-romq drivitiq AL-qjil AlmN woLb"%"a?
hired to do horse Painting. IA-gal 4mnaqw who attended prior arrests.
the Powl high schad
Me"Isfammt6m at
IRLI addresses all 3 state laws in a separate brief on behalf of a coalition of California municipalities and
elected officials, including the cities of Escondido, Mission Viejo and Yorba Linda, and U.S. Rep. Dana
Rohrabacher(CA-48). These municipalities and officials have grave concerns that the challenged state laws not
only violate federal supremacy, but will make cities and local officials criminally liable. The brief shows that by
restricting the ability of local governments and private businesses to cooperate with federal immigration
officers, AB450 and SB54 compel them to commit the federal crime 8 USC 1324 of concealing, harboring, or
shielding illegal aliens. The brief also demonstrates that contacting and working with governmental
enforcement authorities is protected First Amendment free speech activity that California cannot
constitutionally prohibit. The federal government and the Constitution speak for Californians on immigration.
This is a textbook application of the Supremacy Clause, and laws like SB54 and AB450 are not only flagrantly
unconstitutional but extremely dangerous—to both the safety of ALL Californians and the integrity of our
federal republic.
3
NCi 1 l
.eMrK �; •
r•
-e c��now't
3�.
r � f
In Orange County, Mission Viejo supports Los Alamitos' ordinance while Buena Park, Aliso Viejo, Fountain
Valley, San Juan Capistrano, Yorba Linda, Barstow, Hesperia filed or joined amicus briefs. Aliso Viejo voted
4-1 to join Trump DoJ lawsuit against California, along with officials from West Covina, San Marcos, San
Dimas. Huntington Beach voted 6-1 to sue California to seek relief from the SB54 mandates because
California's "sanctuary" laws represent a threat to public safety and city lawmakers have been exploring options
to ensure the safety of its citizens and "maintain local control, while at the same time, fulfill our oath of
upholding the Constitution." Butte must stay ahead of the curve to protect its residents, rally other cities,join
Trump lawsuit with amicus brief, pass ordinance to exempt itself and allow ICE cooperation because the wall is
-being built right now by the Army Corps of Engineers National Guard troops are being sent to the border,and
it is not a wise move for California to defy the US government headed by Trump, because he is doing the right
thing to secure our borders to keep us safe from the alien invasion.
This message and any attached document is sent privately in the public interest and may contain candid,open, and
truthful advice, recommendations, opinions, proposals, and information that is privileged, proprietary, non-public and
exempt from disclosure, confidential or otherwise protected by law, and may be subject to executive, diplomatic,
judicial, clerical,deliberative process or other privilege and is intended solely for the recipient and not for disclosure or
distribution. If you are not the intended recipient,or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that you are prohibited from reviewing, retransmitting, printing, copying,
scanning, disseminating, uploading or otherwise using in any manner this email or any attachments to it. Please notify
the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system.
Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, modified,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, manipulated, incomplete, arrive late or contain viruses.The sender therefore does not
accept liability for any errors, revisions or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of email
transmission or unauthorized disclosure or distribution.
6