Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEmail from Jim Brobeck with AquaAlliance - Sites DEIR Public Meeting in Maxwell Menchaca, Clarissa From: Bennett, Robin Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 10:41 AM To: Menchaca, Clarissa Cc: McCracken, Shari Subject: BOS Correspondence Attachments: Sites DEIR Public Meeting in Maxwell Please see the attached letter and reports from Jim Brobeck, of AquAlliance, regarding comments on the Sites Reservoir proposed project. Robin Bennett, E I xecti.tive Assistant (530) 872-6304, y jjt .nel-- 131ilte coltfa.y sttperz'4801-'s Office Stter'visol- Dott e P 1", eter, Board of Supei-visors, Disti-ict 5 747 Elliott Ro(.z(.1 T'ai-adise, CA 95969 Menchaca, Clarissa From: jimb@aqualliance.net Sent: Saturday, December 9, 2017 3:30 PM To: Connelly, Bill;Wahl, Larry; Kirk, Maureen; BOS District 4; BCWater;Teeter, Doug Subject: Sites DEIR Public Meeting in Maxwell Attachments: Boles, water quality.pdf, BrobeckReportSitesJPAPublicMeetingl207l7wSummary.pdf Dear Supervisors, You probably know that AquAlliance opposed spending taxpayer money to plan, study, build or operate Sites Reservoir. The project has been considered since the middle of last century and has never moved forward because it is not feasible economically, environmentally, technically or financially. But dry years inspire hope in leaders and the public that "new water" can be found in the Sacramento Valley Watershed to meet the demand from the San Joaquin Valley. We have been studying the DBIS/EIR and Feasibility Studies for the Sites Project and found numerous flaws and omissions that the consultants must be aware of. We attended the meeting last week in Maxwell to provide verbal comments and to assess the opinions that Maxwell area residents have about the project. A rancher named lames Murphy (530 476 2004) who owns thousands of acres in the footprint of the proposed reservoir was, like two other residents, too shy to speak out in public. But after hearing my comments approached me to express their dismay over the eminent domain action that threatens their way of life. My take away impression of the project is that the consultants and the high-payed employees of the Sites JPA are milking taxpayers to prolong the planning phase of the project in spite of the in-feasibility. I will attach my report of the meeting and, more importantly, the written comments of Jerry Boles, former Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section of the Northern District of DWR in Red Bluff. Jim Brobeck, water policy analyst, AquAlliance 1 4314 Tuiiyani Drive Chico, CA 95973 October 1, 2017 AquaAlllance Barbara Vlamis, Executive Director P.O. Box 4024 Chico, CA 95927 Since your organization has expressed interest in the proposed Sites Reservoir project west of Maxwell, California, I am providing to you the comments that I have submitted in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Sites Reservoir Project, State Clearinghouse #2001112009. The draft EIR/EIS fails to discuss the high concentrations of a number of metals in the source waters to the proposed project, and, even more important, does not discuss water quality in the proposed reservoir. Water quality in the proposed reservoir will mimic that of the source waters, and hence the reservoir will have concentrations of a large number of metals that exceed many water quality criteria and standards. The high concentrations of metals likeiy !:c occur in the proposed reservoir will impact most, if not all, beneficial uses of the proposC.>.d project, including agricultural water supply, wildlife and fisheries, and drinking water suppiies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River, making the project potentially infeasible. am qualified to provide these comments since my background is in water quality, as former Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section of the Northern District of DWR in Red Rlufff. If you have any questions, please contact me via email at chicojerry@yahoo.corn. Sincerely, Jerry Boles 4314 Tuliyani Drive Chico, CA 95973 November 17, 2017 Bureau of Reclamation Sites Project Office Attn: Michael Dietle Attn: Rob Thomson Draft EIR/EES Comments Draft EIR/EIS Comments 2800 Cottage Way, W-2830 P.O. Box 517 Sacramento, CA 95825 Maxwell, CA 95955 1 am providing to you my comments in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Sites Reservoir Project, State Clearinghouse #2001112009. The draft EIR/EIS fails to discuss the high concentrations of a number of metals in the source waters to the proposed project, and,even more important,does not discuss water quality in the proposed reservoir. Water quality in the proposed reservoir will mimic that of the source wzM rs. and hence the reservoir will have concentrations of a large number of metals that exceed rriun� water quality criteria and standards. The high concentrations of metals likely to occur in the proposed reservoir will impact most, if not all, beneficial uses of the proposed pro.;ect, includ)':.;: agricultural water supply, wildlife and fisheries, and drinking water supplies for communitiLs that divert water from the Sacramento River; making the project potentially infeasible. The water quality section(Chapter 7) must be completely rewritten with an objective anal%,is ref' the data and potential adverse impacts to water quality both within the reservoir and to downstream resources in the Sacramento River. Subsequently,the aquatic biological resourc s (chapter 12), terrestrial biological resources(chapter 14),recreation resources (chapter 21), public health and environmental hazards (chapter 28),and cumulative impacts (chapter 35) sections of the draft EIR/ElS must reassess impacts from the adverse water quality expected from the proposed project. hollowing these re-analyses, re-circulation of the draft EIREIS is necessary with appropriate disclosure information about the potential impacts from metals to water quality and its effects on agricultural water supply, wildlife and fisheries, and drinkin- water supplies. I am qualified to provide these comments since my background is in water quality, as former Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section of the Northern District of DWR in Red BILIff. If you have any questions, please contact me via email at chicojerry@yat�oo.C&Tl. Sincerely, Jerry Boles Comments on Draft EIR Sites Reservoir Project: Chapter 7 Surface Water Quality An EIR is supposed to be a disclosure document that provides information on the benefits as well as potential impacts from a proposed project. Section 7 - Surface Water Quality does not disclose potential significant adverse issues which have serious ramifications for the viability of the proposed project, but rather ignores or misconstrues available data and reports to incorrectly conclude that there are no significant water quality impacts associated with the proposed project. The EIR claims to have evaluated post-project impacts to the Sacramento River, but there are no analyses provided that indicate that this was done. It is apparent that the preparers of the EIR failed to examine or simply ignored the available data that would show potential significant adverse impacts from the proposed project. The analyses in Section 7 completely left out any evaluation or projection of water quality that may result in Sites Reservoir from diverting high winter flows from the Sacramento River. The EIR fails to point out that due to metals loads in the various source waters, water in the proposed reservoir may not be suitable for the beneficial uses stated for the proposed project, including enhanced water management flexibility, agricultural and urban water supply, water quality improvement, and ecosystem improvement for fish protection, habitat management, and other environmental creeds. A factual evaluation of the available data is presented below, which shows significant potential adverse impacts associated with the proposed project. Some cornments on specific sections of Chapter 7 of the EIR are also presented. Available Data The EIR cites the DWR Water Data Library (WDL) online database as the source for water quality data used to determine impacts from the proposed project. However, very limited data from the WDL are available for evaluating water quality in source waters for the proposed project. The major source water for the proposed project is the Sacramento River, with potential diversion occurring at the Tehama-Colusa Canal, Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District Main Canal, and at Moulton Weir. The Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam monitoring station of DWR provides information on the quality of water that would be diverted to the proposed project through the Tehama-Colusa Canal. Metals data are available in the WDL for the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam beginning in February 2006 (Table 1). However, only 33 samples have been collected since 2006, and only nine of these were from the months in which higher flows most typically occur (December through March) and from which diversions to the proposed project would occur. Cottonwood Creek contributes the most significant input to the Sacramento River during high runoff events. The Chico-Enterprise Record in an editorial published December 28, 2016 underscored the impact of tributaries on water quality in the Sacramento River, The newspaper stated that of the 100,000 cfs flowing in the river earlier in the month, only 5,000 cfs was coming from Keswick Dam below Shasta Dam —the rest of the 100,000 cfs (95,000 cfs) was coming from tributaries downstream from Keswick Dam, of which Cottonwood Creek provides the dominant flows. Data from Cottonwood Creek near Cottonwood are even more sporadic than those for the Sacramento River. Data are available for this station in WDL beginning in October 2004, with only seven samples collected from the Cottonwood Creek monitoring station since 2006, and only four of which were collected during the months of expected higher flows of December through March (Table 2). Data available in the WDL show that only one sample was collected (March 2006) during the same period from both Cottonwood Creek and the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam since 2006. This one sample shows that metal loads in the Sacramento River are similar to those found in Cottonwood Creek. showing that Cottonwood Creek significantly affects water quality in the Sacramento River. Water quality in Cottonwood Creek will have a significant impact on diversions to the proposed reservoir and water quality data from Cottonwood Creek can be used to approximate and supplement data from the Sacramento River, though the total number of samples from both sites combined are still exceptionally low for a project of this magnitude and potential for adverse effects. The water quality monitoring station on the Sacramento River at Hamilton City is just downstream from the GCID Main Canal. Data from the WDL is somewhat more extensive at the Hamilton City monitoring site, with metals data available in the WDL beginning in late 2003 to early 2017, though still sporadic with only 78 samples collected in the span of a little more than 13 years (159 months), and only 23 of those collected sometime during the months of expected higher flows of December through Murch (Table 3). Samples were collected in each of these months only twice, with the rest of the samples during these months only collected in February months each year since 2008. The WDL shows that metals data are available for the Sacramento River opposite Moulton Weir monitoring station from mid 2003 to early 2011, for a total of 80 samples, with 27 of those from the expected higher flow months (Table 4). Water quality sampling during the expected months of higher flows of December through March did not target high flow periods (the periods during which diversions to the proposed project would occur) but were based on a rigid and fixed monthly or semi- monthly schedule. Monitoring did not provide any information on the variation in concentrations of metals over the runoff hydrograph. Even higher concentrations of metals would likely occur during the higher flow periods during these months, but were not targeted by the limited monitoring. The relatively low number of samples and lack of samples targeting critical flows (i.e., high runoff events) are nonetheless sufficient to indicate potential significant adverse water quality impacts with the proposed project. These data illustrate the need to collect additional data during appropriate time periods (i.e., during the high flow periods when diversions from the Sacramento River would be occurring) and re-evaluate the potential adverse water quality impacts from the proposed project. 2 Data Analyses Some of the analytical results shown in the WDL for metals are reported as "dissolved" and other results as "total" (or total recoverable). "Total" concentrations, which include both dissolved and particulate forms of an analyte, are probably a better representation for the concentrations of metals that will affect water quality in the proposed reservoir. As well, the State Water Resources Control Board makes no distinction between dissolved or total recoverable concentrations when considering whether a criterion is exceeded (SWRCB 2011). The proposed reservoir will thermally stratify and will also be biologically productive due to nutrients brought in from source waters. This in-situ productivity, as well as organic material brought in with the source waters, will result In anoxic conditions (i.e., lack of oxygen) in the hypolimnion (i.e., bottom water layer). While dissolved forms of metals are generally the most bioavailable, the particulate fraction of total recoverable forms will undergo chemical transformation to dissolved forms under the anoxic conditions expected in the hypolimnion of the proposed reservoir. Transformed metals will be mixed throughout the reservoir water column during turnover events, or released downstream with anoxic water from the lower depths during the summer months. Data from the WDL (Table 1) show that aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, and mercury in water samples from the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam exceed various criteria and standards established to protect beneficial uses, including drinking water, public health, taste and odor for agriculture, and freshwater organisms, which includes fish. Maximum concentrations of some of these metals are many times higher than the corresponding criteria or standard. For example, aluminum, in addition to exceeding the SWRCB Basin Plan Primary Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)for drinking water by one and half times, also exceeds the secondary drinking water standard in the Basin Plan by seven times and the US Environmental Protection Agency Secondary MCL by 30 times. Even the minimum concentration of arsenic reported in WDL exceeds by more than 10 times nearly all the criteria and standards for protection of human health. The least reported concentration of cadmium from river water samples exceed by five times the incremental cancer risit for drinking water. The least concentration of chromium reported in WDL exceeds the California Public Health Goal by 16 times and incremental cancer risk for drinking water by five times. The maximum concentration of iron that was reported in WDL exceeds the secondary drinking water maximum concentration level in the Basin Plan, as well as National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for taste and odor or welfare by nearly three times. The maximum concentration of lead that was reported exceeds the California Public Health Goal and California Proposition 65 maximum allowable dose level for reproductive toxicity by over four times. The maximum reported concentration of manganese exceeds the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for taste and odor or welfare by one and a half times. The maximum concentration reported for mercury exceeds the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Aquatic Life Continuous Concentration by nearly four times, and the Freshwater Aquatic Life Maximum Concentration by two times. An additional concern with these metals is that some metals are taken up by crops (such as arsenic by rice), making the crops 3 potentially unsuitable for consumption. Plant uptake of metals in the water supply not only affect crops grown for human consumption, but also plants grown for support of wildlife, such as in refuges. Similarly, data from the WDL for Cottonwood Creek near Cottonwood show that aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, iron, lead, manganese, and nickel exceed various criteria and standards established to protect beneficial uses (Table 2). Similar to the Sacramento River, maximum concentrations of some of these metals are many times higher than the corresponding criteria or standards. Aluminum concentrations exceed the Basin Plan drinking water primary standard MCL by 14 times, the secondary drinking water secondary standard MCL by 70 times, the California Public Health Goal by over 20 times, the National Academy of Sciences Health Advisory and Agriculture Water Quality Goals for taste and odor threshold by nearly three times, the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for human health and welfare for water and fish consumption by nearly 30 times, and the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria -for freshwater aquatic life maximum concentration by 20 times. As with the Sacramento River, even the minimum concentration of arsenic reported in WDL exceeds nearly all the criteria and standards for protection of human health by up to 167 times. The minimum concentration of cadmium reported exceeds the incremental cancer risk for drinking water by over three times, while the maximum concentration is over twice as high as the California Public Health Goal. As with the Sacramento River, the California Public Health Goal is exceeded by the least concentration of chromium reported by 16 times and the incremental cancer risk for drinking water by five times. Iron exceeds the Basin Plan drinking water standard secondary MCL by over five times, the Agricultural Water Quality Goals for taste and odor threshold by nearly five times, the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for taste and odor or welfare by 78 times, and the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for freshwater aquatic life maximum concentration by over 23 times. Reported lead concentrations are two and a half times higher than the California Public Health Goal, up to twice as high as the California Preposition 65 maximum allowable dose level for reproductive toxicity, and almost twice as high as the incremental cancer risk estimate for drinking water. Manganese concentrations reported from Cottonwood Creek exceed the Basin Plan Drinking Water Standards secondary MCL by a factor of 10, are nearly twice as high as the USEPA Health Advisory for drinking water, three times as high as the Agricultural Water Quality Goals for taste and odor threshold, and over 10 times higher than the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for taste and odor or welfare. Reported maximum mercury concentrations exceed the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Aquatic Life Continuous Concentration by nearly two times, while even the lowest reported concentration is nearly equal to the recommended criterion. Nickel exceeds the California Public Health Goal by nearly five times. The GCID Main Canal intake is slightly upstream from the Sacramento River at Hamilton City water quality monitoring station. Therefore, water quality in the GOD Main Canal will be similar to that found at the Sacramento River at Hamilton City monitoring station. Metals data for this monitoring station can be found in the WDL from November 2003 to February 2017. Similar to the upstream monitoring station on the 4 Sacramento River below Red Bluff, the Sacramento River at Hamilton City water,quaiity monitoring station has been identified to contain high levels of aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc (Table 3), which exceed a large number of criteria and standards similar to those upstream at the monitoring station below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam. High levels of metals have also been identified at the water quality monitoring station opposite the Moulton Weir, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc (Table 4). As with the water quality monitoring station on the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam, concentrations of metals from the Sacramento River monitoring station at the Moulton Weir exceed a large number of water quality criteria designed to protect beneficial uses. As discussed earlier, Cottonwood Creek is the major source of water to the Sacramento River during higher flow periods, but other tributaries also contribute high levels of metals to the Sacramento River. In addition, local creeks directly tributary to the proposed reservoir, such as Funks Creek and Stone Corral Creek, also carry metals concentrations that will contribute to the metals loading. Leaching from soils beneath the reservoir will also contribute additional metals, as well as nutrients. The Basin Plan lists other chemicals that adversely affect water quality in the Sacramento River, including chlorpyrifos and diazinon. The California State Water Resources Control Board lists a number of other"constituents of concern" in the study area, including chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs, and dieldrin. In addition, sewer outfalls from the cities of Redding and Red Bluff contribute other contaminants, such as pharmaceuticals, to the Sacramento River. No information is provided in the EIR about effects to the proposed project from these chemical contaminants. Discussion The data in the WDL for the Sacramento River and Cottonwood Creek demonstrate that high concentrations of metals can be expected during the high flow months of winter (December through March)when diversions would be occurring to the proposed Sites Reservoir. Higher concentrations of metals are likely during the higher flows that can occur during these months. Such higher flows were not targeted by the limited sampling effort presented in the WDL. The high concentrations of metals in the source water will adversely impact water quality in the proposed reservoir for most, if not all, the proposed beneficial uses of the stored water. Some metals from both the Sacramento River and Cottonwood Creek, whose concentrations did not exceed criteria in the limited sampling effort, had concentrations that nearly exceed the criteria and standards. These and other metals whose concentrations did not exceed the criteria may have higher concentrations during the higher flow periods that the proposed project would be diverting. Again, these higher flow periods were not targeted during the limited sampling effort. 5 Even some of the minimum concentrations of metals found in the source waters exceed criteria and standards, which means that the source waters never meet these goals and standards--the criteria are always exceeded and the water is never suitable for the beneficial use or uses the criteria or standards were designed to protect. Water quality in the proposed reservoir for these parameters will exceed the criteria and standards all the time. Since water quality in the proposed reservoir will reflect that of the source waters, the reservoir will have concentrations of numerous metals, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc, that exceed a number of criteria and standards developed to protect beneficial uses. In addition, other metals that may not exceed criteria and standards in the source waters may adversely affect reservoir water quality due to synergistic effects. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB 2011) states that "when multiple constituents have been found together in groundwater or surface waters, their combined toxicity should be evaluated" and that"theoretical risks from chemicals found together in a water body shall be considered additive for all chemicals having similar toxicologic effects or having carcinogenic effects." Thus, the adverse effects from the metals delivered to the proposed reservoir from the source waters may have an even greater adverse impact and pose an unacceptable level of risk. Beneficial uses potentially impacted by metals in the proposed reservoir include agricultural water supply (direct toxicity or uptake by crops making the crops unsuitable for use), wildlife (such as fish- eating birds), fisheries, recreation (inciuding sport fishing and water contact activities such as swimming), and drinking water supplies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River. Releases from the proposed reservoir would occur during the summer when metals concentrations in the Sacramento River are much lower due to the majority of flow being from Shasta Reservoir, with much better water quality, though still carrying a metals load. High metals concentrations in the proposed reservoir releases could adversely affect water quality in the Sacramento River during the summer months by increasing metals loads beyond acceptable limits and adversely impact beneficial uses. Though high concentrations of metals that exceed water quality criteria exist in source waters to the proposed project, they cannot be regulated by governmental entities since they are natural occurrences. However, once contained artificially in a reservoir, they are subject to jurisdictional control by regulatory agencies. Any releases of water from the proposed reservoir will likely be subject to review by water quality regulatory agencies to ensure that such releases do not adversely affect downstream resources due to the heavy metals loads in the releases. The SWRCB has an antidegradation policy that prohibits discharges that would degrade water quality to a level below water quality objectives because no capacity would exist for degradation that will be caused by the next downstream or downgradient uses ---the ability to beneficially use the water would have been impaired, even though water quality objectives would not yet have been exceeded (SWRCB 2011). The contribution of additional metal loads from releases from the proposed Sites Reservoir during the summer could cause 6 concentrations of metals in the Sacramento River to exceed criteria and standards or at least be subject to the antidegradation policy due to an incremental increase in metals in the Sacramento River from the proposed project. Thus, the proposed project may face prohibition of releases if stored water does not meet water quality criteria or standards or if releases can cause criteria or standards to be exceeded by downstream inputs (i.e., antidegradation poicy). During dry years, the adverse impacts associated with the project can be expected to be even greater. Flows in the Sacramento River from upstream reservoirs on the Sacramento River (i.e., Shasta Reservoir, Whiskeytown Reservoir) will be minimized during the winter months in an effort to restore water storage levels in those reservoirs. Likewise, during wet or even normal runoff years, releases from the upstream reservoirs during the winter will be curtailed during high runoff periods to prevent downstream flooding. In any of these scenarios, tributary influences, such as Cottonwood Creek, on water quality in the Sacramento River will be much greater. The proposed project would still attempt to capture as much runoff from the Sacramento River as possible, but the water diverted to the proposed project will have even greater concentrations of metals due to the majority of flow being from tributary streams (e.g., Cottonwood Creek) during dry and possibly even wet or normal runoff years. Similarly, during the summer in dry years, releases from upstream reservoirs (i.e., Shasta Reservoir, Whiskeytown Reservoir) will be minimized. Releases to the Sacramento River from the proposed project will have a greater impact on water quality in the Sacramento River due to less dilution being available due to curtailed flows in the river from upstream reservoirs (i.e., Shasta and Whiskeytown reservoirs). Conclusion The proposed project is, at best, premature. Little or no data have been collected to determine the metals loads in the higher flows of the Sacramento River that would be diverted to the proposed reservoir. An extremely small amount of data have been collected during the months in which higher flows can be expected (December through March), but higher flows during these months were not targeted in the water quality sampling. None the less, the limited data presented in the WDL show high concentrations of a number of metals which exceed numerous water quality criteria and standards in the source waters for the proposed reservoir. Extremely high concentrations of metals are present in the small streams in the reservoir footprint, which occur due to the nature of the soils in the area of the proposed reservoir. Sites Reservoir would inundate these soils resulting in leaching of metals and further incremental loading of metals to the proposed reservoir. There is no discussion in the EER about the potential impacts of metals leaching from the soils that would be inundated by the proposed reservoir. Prior to moving forward with the project, much additional data are needed during the high flow periods in which diversions would occur from the Sacramento River, metals loading from the smaller tributaries that flow directly into the proposed reservoir, and effects from leaching of metals from soils inundated by the proposed reservoir. 7 The limited data that are available are sufficient to snow that water quality in the proposed reservoir will have concentrations of a large number of metals that exceed many water quality criteria and standards, including those established for the protection of agricultural water supply, wildlife and fisheries, and drinking water. Metals bioaccumulation in the reservoir food web could produce adverse impacts to fish-eating birds and other animals, as well as humans, and adversely affect any potential recreational benefit from the project. Releases from the proposed reservoir could adversely affect downstream resources, including agricultural water supply, wildlife and fisheries, and drinking water supplies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River. Also, the EIR does not discuss the physical conditions that can be expected to occur in the proposed reservoir. Like other nearby reservoirs, the proposed reservoir will thermally stratify during the summer months, with a warm upper water layer and a cooler lower water layer. The proposed reservoir will also be biologically productive due to nutrients brought in with source waters. The biological productivity will lead to anoxic conditions (i.e., lack of oxygen) in the hypolimnion (i.e., bottom water layer). Depending on the depth from which downstream releases are made from the proposed reservoir, water released will either be warm and unsupportive of cold water fisheries in the Sacramento River (i.e., migrating salmon) or cooler but devoid of oxygen. As releases from the reservoir progress during the summer, or in years in which the reservoir is not completely filled, the reservoir will be warm from surface to bottom as the cooler lower water strata is depleted from releases or wind mixing of the upper warm water layer. Under these conditions, only warm water would be available for release from the proposed reservoir, which would not be supportive of the cold water fishery in the Sacramento River. An EER is a disclosure document meant to disclose pertinent project information to planners, regulatory agencies, and other interested parties and the public. This EER did not disclose the potential impacts from metals, other contaminants, nor the physical conditions likely to exist in the proposed reservoir. The little analyses presented in the EiR misconstrues, misinterprets, and ignores water quality data that amply demonstrate significant potential adverse impacts from the proposed project. The water quality section (Chapter 7) must be completely rewritten with an objective analysis of the data and potential adverse impacts to water quality both within the reservoir and to downstream resources in the Sacramento River. Subsequently, the aquatic biological resources (chapter 12), terrestrial biological resources (chapter 14), recreation resources (chapter 21), public health and environmental hazards (chapter 28), and cumulative impacts (chapter 35) sections of the EIR must reassess impacts from the adverse water quality expected from the proposed project. Whether any of the projected beneficial uses from the proposed project can be realized, and its feasibility to meet project objectives, purpose, and need, also needs to be reconsidered in light of the potential significant adverse water quality impacts from metals. Following these re- analyses, re-circulation of the EIR is necessary with appropriate disclosure information about the potential impacts from metals to water quality and its effects on agricultural 8 water supply, wildlife and fisheries, and drinking water supplies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River. EIR Needs: • Obtain additional metals data from source waters targeting high flows from which diversions would occur • Provide information on the water quality impacts from other chemical contaminants that adversely affect water quality in the Sacramento River (including chlorpyrifos, diazinon, chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs, and dieldrin) and contaminants in sewer outfalls (such as pharmaceuticals) and other discharges (such as industrial discharges) • Evaluate the contributions of metals from local tributaries (i.e., Funks Creak and Stone Corral Creek) to the proposed reservoir • Provide information on the contribution from leaching of metals from the inundation area of the proposed reservoir • Evaluate effects of metals to beneficial uses within the proposed reservoir o fisheries, o wildlife (including state and federal species listed as threatened or endangered), o recreation • Evaluate effects of metals to beneficial uses due to releases from the reservoir o agricultural supply water, o effects of metals on crops including incorporation of metals by crops (e.g., arsenic uptake in rice), o effects of metals on plants grown for support of wildlife (such as in wildlife refuges), o drinking water supplies, o fisheries, o wildlife (including state and federal species listed as threatened or endangered), • Evaluate combined toxicity of multiple metals • Evaluate contributions of metals in reservoir releases related to the SWRCB antidegradation policy • Evaluate impacts from mercury bioaccumulation in aquatic life (especially fish) in the proposed reservoir, and effects to wildlife that feed on fish from the reservoir and recreational opportunities (i.e., sport fishing) • Evaluate physical conditions expected in the reservoir, including thermal stratification and hypolimnetic anoxia, and effects on reservoir and downstream aquatic resources • Conduct re-analysis of impacts due to metals, other contaminants, and physical conditions in the proposed reservoir on: o water quality (chapter 7), o aquatic biological resources (chapter 12), o terrestrial biological resources (chapter 14), o recreation resources (chapter 21), 9 o public health and environmental hazards (chapter 28), and o cumulative impacts (chapter 35). Conirnents on Specific Sections of EIR 7.2.1.5 Other Heavy Metals ".117 addition to mercury and selenium, other heavy metals, including cadmium, copper, and zinc, impair bcrnelicial uses ul-water bodies. Cadmium, copper, and zinc enter the water bodies with the sediment from eroded soils and discharges,from abandoned mines, and in stormwater runoff from municipal areas (.S WRC'B, 20110). The primary source in the Central Valley appears to be tailing piles located at ctbomloned mine sites. Mvnrr ,of these mines are located upstream ofreservoirs; therefore, the sediment Ili rt Wc:ludes the heavy nwial constituents is generally captured upstream of the dam. Heavy metals al-,pcur to cause health concerns in aquatic resources and in humans that consume the fish from these water bodies." Abandoned mines, which contribute heavy metals to area streams, are also found downstream from Shasta and Keswick dams. In addition, natural erosion and soil leaching also contribute to metals loads found in area streams, such as Cottonwood Creek, which make up the bulk of the flow in the Sacramento River during high runoff events during which flows would be diverted to the proposed reservoir. It is not that "heavy metals appear to cause health concerns in aquatic resources and humans," it is well known that they do. 7.7.,4 Primary Study Area 7.7.4.1 Overview and Methodology "D f4'1l h(fgan monthly suppling of streams in the Primaty Study Area in 1997, including physical 1)arumeters, nutrients, minerals, and metals in the water column (DWR, 2012), as well as mercury analysis of sport fish tissues collected from nearby existing reservoirs, including East Park, Stony Gorge, and Black Butte (L)WR, .1007a). Routine water quality monitoring by DWR was periodically suspended dne ?o h.vieling limitations during portions of 2005 and 2009, and ended following the January 2010 rnr07it0ri17P run. Samplinz l results were then compared to Central Valley Basin Plan water quality criteria ((TR IFOC`B, 2011) (Appendix 7A California State Water Resources Control Board Constituents of 0,11(-•cra 1'r1'W01cT Bodies in the Study Area)and USEPA ambient water quality criteria to prevent noisanc•e algal growth in streams (USEPA, 2001b). " DWR does not indicate any data for metals in its Water Data Library until 2606 for the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam, and 2003 for the Sacramento River at Hamilton City and opposite the Moulton Weir, as well as Stone Corral Creek. Funding for water quality monitoring by DWR was curtailed shortly after the 1997 date indicated in the EIR, after the project manager in the Red Bluff office was informed of potential adverse impacts from metals by the then Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section. If additional data are available, that data should be made available in the WDL so that reviewers of this EIR can verify claims about lack of water quality issues made in the EIR. However, the data that are in the WDL adequately demonstrate significant adverse water quality issues with the proposed project. Any additional data that has not been shared will just confirm these issues. 10 Appendix 7A- California State Water Resources Control Board Constituents of Concern of Water Bodies in the Study Area — lists a large number of parameters for which no information is contained in this EIR. For example, chlorpyrifos, diazinon, chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs, and dieldrin are constituents of concern from Keswick Dam to the Delta. The EIR should assess how these constituents will impact water quality in the proposed reservoir. 7.2.4.2 East Park and Stony Gorge Reservoirs "East Park and.Stony Gorge reservoirs were sampled during the summer of'2000 to evaluate the extew-of mercury contamination in fish because these reservoirs are representative of conditions that could he expected in the proposed Sites Reservoir. DWR analyses of total recoverable mer culy indicate that/CrIVlc in samples collected near the bottom of the water column at,Stony Gorge and.Blick Burte reser Wiry, exceeded the California Toxics Rule for protection of'human health. Fish tissue samples were collected by DWR fi•onr East Park and Stony Gorge reservoirs during 2000 to 2001. Neither catfish nor bass composites collectedfrom East Park Reservoir exceeded the UEHHA screening value or USEPA criterion, although mercury levels in the small-sized bass approached 117cs(, values, and a very large channel caosh that was analyzed individually contained tissue rnercur).•ul o}cr twice the level of the screening value and criterion limits. Mercury concentrathms in tissves of chary wi, catfish collected from Stony Gorge Reservoir contained levels less than the screening valrrc and criierion (DWR, 2007a). " Mercury sampling in fish from East Park and Stony Gorge reservoirs was conducted to contribute to the knowledge of mercury contamination in a number of northern California lakes and reservoirs, not simply because these reservoirs are representative of conditions that could be expected in the proposed Sites Reservoir, though they well might. As noted, the bass from East Park Reservoir that were used for the composite analysis were small in size (about one foot long), yet approached the screening value and criterion. Larger fish can be expected to exceed these values since mercury is accumulated and magnified in fish tissues. The large catfish which contained mercury at over twice the screening value and criterion is probably representative of mercury concentrations that can be found in this species. The EIR fails to mention that mercury contamination exceeded the screening value and criterion in a relatively small largemouth bass collected from Stony Gorge Reservoir. Though the catfish analyzed from Stony Gorge Reservoir did not exceed the screening value and criterion, the cited report states that "larger channel catfish from Stony Gorge Reservoir, therefore, may be expected to contain mercury concentrations that exceed the screening value and criterion." Since mercury contamination in excess of criteria occurs in lakes that the EIR states are representative of conditions that could be expected in the proposed Sites Reservoir, the EIR should discuss the probability of mercury contamination in the proposed reservoir and ramifications to recreational fishing and wildlife that would consume fish from the reservoir. 11 7.2.4.3 Salt Lake 'Sol ine water has been observed to seep from underground salt springs in the vicinity of the Salt Lake Xcath along the slopes abi rve the valley and along the valley floor within the proposed inundation area of Silcs Reservoir, these erre as erre generally located in the Funks Creek watershed. The waler,from the t ader,�rourrd springs accumulates along the trough of the valley and forms Salt Lake (USGS, 191.5). The si_e rr/'.S'alt Luke and adjavent seasonal brackish wetlands varies with time. The wetted area appears to +crrvJrorlr 0 to 30 acres. The deeper water appears to he approximately 15 acres based on observations in )17. the depth cf'the water has not been monitored. sr.rlr Lake was onlysalnplcul on a few occasions.fr•om 1997 to 1998. In August 1997, the Salt Lake was h:.4c ptembcrr 1997. fire.springs were bubbling and the BC'was 194,100 micromhos per centimeter lurrrhos:crrrl as c•oulpar•ed to 3,490lrmhos%cm for the nearby Stone Corral Creek. In January 1998, there iru.s less Than 1 4,1. of flow ftom the springs, and the EC was 7,200 pmhoslem as compared to 540 ,un hosicor for the nearhv.~tone Corral Creek. From these.samples, it was./bund that waters from this lewalion are extremely]rid=lr in minerals. The EC value on one occasion reached 194,100 micromhos per ccv11in7vier, The IDS measurement at this time was 258,000 mg/L. EC. TDS, .sodium, and boron exceeded rill C'c'111rul VallcY Basin flan criteria. A few rnetols also were noted at very high concentrations i,Iill .,P111117, 1.1.017. WO mar-ganese)and exceeded all criteria, and a few others exceeded some criteria Iil!'sc'7r1C, copper, lead, and nickel). Levels ol'ammonia and orthophosphate also were,noted at high levels and r.Vvecded criteria. Temperatures from this site were variable, and probably depend on seasonal COWlitions. Concentrations present in water from this site likely depend on the season and flow. " Though the EIR states that water quality data used in the analyses are available in the WDL, data for Salt Lake could not be found. However, the EIR states that several metals (alumir1um, iron, and manganese) were found in concentrations that exceed all Basin Plan criteria, while others (arsenic, copper, lead, and nickel) exceed some criteria. These metals from the springs feeding Salt Lake will add to the metals load in the proposed reservoir. 7.2.4.4 Funks Creek -1'rrrrks Creek originates al approximately 850 feet elevation in the foothills west of Antelope Vallev. The hunk.,; o/'this internailtent stream are heavily eroded and the gravel bed is highly disturbed and compacted bY cattle.Along rhe north end of Antelope Valley, Funks Creek receives underground drainage.from Salt Luke. Funks Creek widens as it cuts through Logan Ridge and enters the western side of the Sacramento 1'crllcrv. although flows art,still intermittent.Approximately I mile downstream of Logan Ridge, Funks Creek i.s impounded bye Prinks Reservoir. This reservoir is fed mainly from waters of the Tehama-Colusa C'anul. Downstream of the reservoir, Funks Creek is bordered by agricultural lands, and much of this rectrh ischannelized befrlre emptying into Stone Corral Creek. This portion offunks Creek likely has sonre.flow year round, chie to leakage from the dam at Funks Reservoir. Dffl?observed aluminum. arsenic, copper, iron, manganese, mercury, nickel, andphosphorus in Funks Creek al the Glenn-C'olusa Irrigation District(GCID) Main Canal station during intermittent water quality.sampling. The concentrations appeared to be higher during and immediately following storm 12 As with Salt Lake, data for Funks Creek could not be found in the WDL. The data used in the analyses in the EIR must be made available for review. It is likely that the reported metals exceed various criteria, as with Salt Lake, and thus add to the metals load in the proposed reservoir. 7.2.4.5 Stone Corral Creek Stone Corral Creek originates at approximately 700 feet elevation in the./bothills west of'Anielope Valley. As the intermittent stream flows into the grasslands of Antelope Valley, the char:ncl is narrow rrrn:r the banks eroded. The much larger Antelope Creek flows into Stone Corral Creak from the soulh nctur the town of Sites. Stone Corral Creek flows through the gap in the foothills and into the western Sacrume+rto Galley. DYbR observed aluminum, arsenic, copper, iron, manganese, nickel, and phosphorus during internriilertt sampling in Stone Corral Creek near Sites station during intermittent water qua itv.sun?pinng. The concentrations appeared to be higher during and immediately following storm events. " Data for Stone Corral Creek are available in the WDL. These data show that not only are high concentrations of aluminum, arsenic, copper, iron, manganese, and nickel present, as reported in the EIR, but also cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, silver, and zinc, as well as boron (Table 5). The EIR does not disclose the fact that, not only are the concentrations higher during and immediately following storm events, the resulting metals concentration in Stone Corral Creek exceed a large number of criteria, and standards including those to protect drinking water, public heaith, freshwater aquatic life, and agricultural uses. These metals will also contribute to the metals load in the proposed reservoir. The metals concentrations found in Stone Corral Creek, Salt Lake, and Funks Creek are a result of leaching from the soils through which these water bodies flow. Inundation of these soils by the proposed reservoir will result in an additional metals load to the reservoir. 7.2.4.6 Tehama-Colusa Canal "The intake for the Tehama-Colusa Canal occurs at the southeast end of the City of Red Bluff at River Mile(RM)243. The intake occurs downstream of the mouth of Red Bank Creek. The Tchama-Coluss Canal is approximately I I I miles long and extends from Red Bluff in Tehama County o downstrenin res Dunnigan in Yolo County. Funks Reservoir is approximately 66 canal miles downstream of the intake al the Sacramento River. DWR observed aluminum,arsenic,cadmium, and iron during intermittent sampling in the Tehama- Colusa Canal downstream of the siphon under Stony Creek during intermittent N�'ater quality sarnphng,.- The ,."The intake for the Tehama-Colusa Canal is at the Sacramento River below Red Bluff Diversion Dam water quality monitoring station. Therefore, water quality in the Teharna- Colusa Canal will be exactly that found at the Sacramento River below Red Bluff Diversion Dam monitoring station. Data for this monitoring station can be found in the WDL. 13 This is another example where the EIR is less than forthcoming. Not only are aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, and iron present in water diverted from the river into the canal, but, as discussed earlier, so are chromium, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, seleniun7, and zinc (Table 1). The highest concentrations were found during the higher flow months (December through March). As discussed earlier, many of these metals exceed a large number of criteria and standards, including those developed to protect drinking water, public health, freshwater aquatic life, and agricultural uses. Water quality in the proposed reservoir will reflect that in the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam and other source waters, and exceed many of the criteria developed to protect beneficial uses of the water. 7.2.4.7 Glenn-Colusa irrigation District Main Canal "The intake for the GCID Main Canal is on a side channel off the Sacramento River at RM 205.5, north of€he town of Hamilton City. GCID's Hamilton City pump station, located at the intake, diverts water into the GCID Main Canal from the Sacramento River for distribution within the GCID service area.The curial is an unlin�ad earthc-A channel that stretches approximately 65 miles from the system diversion point near I lamilton City to its downstream southern terminus at the CBD near Williams, in Colusa County. t)WR observed aluminum, arsenic, cadmium,copper, iron, mercury, manganese,and phosphorus during intermiltent sampling in the GCID Main Canal intake during intermittent water quality sampling." The intake for the GCID Main Canal is slightly upstream from the Sacramento River at Hamilton City water duality monitoring station. Therefore, water quality in the GCID Main Canal will be sinnilar to that found at the Sacramento River at Hamilton City monitoring station. Data for this monitoring station can be found in the WDL. Not only are aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, copper, iron, manganese, and mercury present in the Sacramento River in the vicinity of the diversion into the GCID Main Canal, but so are chromium, lead, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc (Table 3). Aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, and nickel are present in concentrations that exceed various criteria and standards. The highest concentrations are generally found daring the higher flow months of December through March, when the proposed project may be diverting water from this area of the Sacramento River. 7.2.4.9 Sacramento River Opposite Moulton Weir "1>1•i'R monitored mater quality at the Sacramento River along the western bank opposite Moulton Weir slution wont 2000 ro 2010. The water quality samples included aluminum, arsenic, copper, iron, mercury, 111mi uuese, lead. and phosphorus. Total aluminum levels in the Sacramento River at this location fi•equently exceeded aquatic life criteria during associated high flow conditions in the river, but rarely exceeded drinking water criteria and the agricultural goal. Arsenic levels exceeded human toxicity thresholds in all samples collected, and the criterion.for protection of aquatic life for cadmium was occasionally exceeded. Copper levels frequently exceeded hardness-dependent aquatic life protection criteria during high flozv conditions in the river, and iron levels frequently exceeded drinking water and wluulec-lite protaclion criteria, as well as the agricultural goal during the same river conditions. Dis.Yalred iron levels exc(reded the Central Valley Basin Plan level occasionally. Mercury levels apj)roached, but did not exceed, the CTR criterion during the highest flows in the river. Manganese levels 14 occasionally exceeded drinking water standards and the agricultural goal, and i�ad levels rarely exceeded drinking water criteria. All samples contained total phosphorus at levels at or above true recommended criteria range to prevent nuisance algal growth in streams. " Monitored metals also included cadmium, chromium, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc (Table 4). Contrary to the statement in the EIR, aluminum concentrations frequently exceed drinking water criteria and on several occasions the agricultural goal during the high flow months of December through March. With reported concentrations up to 38 ug/L, mercury not only approached but greatly exceeded the California Toxics Rule (CTR) criterion (0.05 ug/L) for sources of drinking water as well as the National Recommended Water Quality for freshwater aquatic life continuous concentration (0.77 ug/L) and maximum concentration (1.8 ug/L). Reported lead concentrations frequently exceed the California Public Health Goal of 0.02 ug/L, and had a median value of 0.058 ug/L. Reported nickel concentrations also exceed the California Public Health Goal. Environmental Impacts/Environmental Consequences 7.3.9 Section 303 Evaluation Criteria and Significance Thresholds "Signflicance criteria represent the thresholds that were used to identify whefhe;,an inrDact would hr potentially significant. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines suggests the following e vobtution criteria if))' water quality.- Would uality:Would the Project: • Violate anv water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? • Create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage.systems or provide substantial additional sources ofpolluted runoff' • Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? The evaluation criteria used./or this impact analysis represent a comhinution of"the Appendix c; criteria and professional judgment that considers current regulations, ,srcrrzclar-cis. arrdior consultation with agencies, knowledge of the area, and the context and intensity:of the environmental effects, as required pursuant to NEPA. For the purposes.?f this aa y�sis, an alternative would result in a potentially significant impact if it would cause the,161lowing. * A violation of any water quality standard or waste discharge requirement, or otherwise substantially degrade water quality tfa water quality constituent declines under the action alternatives as comparec,`Ju the E''%isting Conditions/No Project/No Action Condition, the changes are not considered to be adver.ye. 15 Qualitative Analysis of Constituents The qualitative analysis of changes in other constituents(e.g.,mercury,selenium,nutrients)was based upon an analysis of potential changes in loadings from sources of the constituent and related changes in (lows that would occur from implementation of the Project as compared to the Existing Conditions/ No 11roiect/No Action Condition. For example,the qualitative analysis of changes in mercury is based upoll changes in flow patterns from the major sources of mercury in the Sacramento River watershed (e.g., tributaries to the Sacramento River)." What the heck does this last paragraph mean? It makes absolutely no sense. The analysis of potential impacts should be based on an assessment of the expected water quality in the proposed reservoir, whether that water quality exceeds any criteria or standards, and the adverse effects that would occur if criteria or standards are exceeded, both within the reservoir and in downstream areas subject to releases from the reservoir. 7.3.4 Section 343 Impacts Associated with Alternative A Shasta Lake and Sacramento River from Shasta Lake and Keswick Reservoir to Freeport Impact SW Qual-1:A Violation of Any Water Quality Standard or Waste Discharge Requirement, or Offiernvise Substantially Degrade Surface Water Quality} Mercury and Other Heavy Metals -, Jc•scrihed in Section -1.2,the sources of mercury and other heavy metals in Shasta Lake are located upstrc:un of the lake and ,accumulate within Shasta Lake. Mercury in the Sacramento River downstream of Keswick Reservoir is generated along the tributaries to the Sacramento River. The generation rate and the accumulation rates of mercury and other heavy metals in Shasta Lake or along the Sacramento River would not be affected by implementation of Alternative A because there would be no new facilities constructed upstream of Shasta Lake or along the tributaries.Operations of Shasta Lake under Alternative A, as reflected by end-of-month Shasta Lake storage, would be similar to conditions under the F:.xisihig Conditions/No I'roject/No Action Condition, as described in Chapter 6 Surface Water kc .,uFLeS.', Acct.imulation of Mercury would indeed be affected by Alternative A (and all the other alternatives) since water from the Sacramento River, containing mercury concentrations in excess of various criteria, would be diverted into the proposed reservoir. Releases from the reservoir could adversely affect downstream resources and beneficial uses due to the mercury contained in the reservoir. In addition, fisheries, wildlife, and recreation that utilize the reservoir could be adversely affected from mercury accumulation in the reservoir food web. Summary "Concentr.3tions oi'mercury,other heavy metals,and salinity would be similar in the Sacramento River �.mder Ilernative A as compared to the Existing Conditions/No Project/No Action Condition;therefore, areae would be no impact related to these constituents." 16 Again, there are potential very significant adverse impacts associated with diverting water from the Sacramento River during higher flow periods to the proposed reservoir. The Sacramento River contains concentrations of a large number of metals, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, and mercury, that significantly exceed various criteria and standards designed to protect beneficial uses. Water in the reservoir will reflect that of the water diverted from the Sacramento River. and will also exceed a number of criteria developed to protect beneficial uses. The metals may adversely affect aquatic resources in the reservoir and terrestrial resources that may utilize the reservoir (such as fish-eating birds), as well as reservoir recreation. The metals in releases from the reservoir may adversely affect downstream resources, including drinking water supply, agricultural supply, wildlife, and fisheries, and may violate the SWRCB antidegradation policy. These are definite "impacts related to these constituents," contrary to what is stated above in this EIR. All the alternatives suffer from the exact same significant adverse impacts due to metals in the source waters. 7,4 Mitigation Measures "Because no potentially significant direct water quality impacts were identified, no mitigation is required or recommended." The EIR failed to identify any impacts, though significant potential adverse impacts are painfully obvious. The EIR completely ignores any assessment of the proposed project — Sites Reservoir, as well as any assessment of the adverse impacts the reservoir may pose to beneficial uses within the reservoir (i.e., fisheries, wildlife, recreation) and those adverse impacts attributable to releases from the reservoir (i.e., drinking water supply, agricultural water supply, fisheries, wildlife, recreation). As shown throughout this discussion, a number of metals significantly exceed water quality criteria and standards in the water sources to the proposed reservoir. The EIR completely ignores potential chemical contaminants (such as chlorpyrifos, diazinon, chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs, and dieldrin). Water quality in the reservoir will reflect that of the source waters. Therefore, the reservoir will contain a number of metals, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, and mercury, and possibly other chemical contaminants that exceed a number of water quality criteria designed to protect beneficial uses_ Both water resources within the reservoir and downstream resources that receive reservoir releases may be adversely affected by the metals and chemical contaminants. The EIR also fails to address the physical properties that will exist in the reservoir (such as thermal stratification and hypolimnetic anoxia), and how they will affect both reservoir and downstream resources. The EIR needs to address how these significant adverse impacts are going to be mitigated. References SWRCB 2011. State Water Resources Control Board. A Compilation of Water Quality Goals, 16`h Edition. April 2011. 17 z z z z D n C n C n N N W N N Vf N w w d w w q -� d - v N cl *. D D ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ A D D y b A D b A b D-D D b g D D b D Y Y A A Y > b D ^� = m sn :n n n n n n n n n n nn n nn-n n n.n n n n n n n n n n n r. n n O O ro O P ^ O O v m v m � F .n .•a A v m A n'A h � n n h }7 n n r, n r' y y a C c 3 ➢_-A D y-m j nm _D D D D D D A'➢:D:D ➢ D D.D A D D ➢ A D ➢ D A ➢ b D D b A D ➢ ? + �s z_a °1 m O I cmi m m rn m m rn:m m'm'm m m m m, rn m $ m m m m m m z N m -i Z"z M .z z •-I .y z z z -1 -1 -0-1,0 I Z z z z Z z 2 z Y 2"z z 2 z Z P � m � x ' �, X0.0, 3 aa:0000000'oo00000Oo,000 0OO000OOo0 G 3 3 -x a�a'm ,D'.m w - 70 71..'t1:Xl z.b 9P��'.A.A 7J A'A M -X:W A ;13.W A W A A A W A N M 'M X 7U :L• a r' W:W mem CO M'Q]'W W m W'm M.W W W m.W.W m m m m W 01 Ot tiP 0� 6+ 'V k:• > > a m A' o - a °r - - C m m_d --e 7 O n O:❑ -w m m-A.b'.m b 76 x1 T 7i x,70-� ASA A:P:A A A m m A P a7 J] A 7� w w m .7 :m m -m:m'm ',m im m M.M,M m m m .r m m M n m m 1 rl !11 ti c = Q•Z P r -j j - ❑ O P G P-❑`p G O 0 0.0 00 0 ❑-❑;❑ 0 0 0 0 ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ U N:O _� m W m:m m,m.W W W m W W'W m m D7 W m m m W m m W :p W m m OI c: W U= } ,Q ,p J,�f,} C-C C�C C C C'C C C C C C C E c C C C c C: C C G C C C P d ro M. � zl'T 'Ti T1 T- m T T T 'f1 T T'T T m T T T T ilk T T T T �+ -7i r n n n n > ryC T T T T T TT m T 'rl T- 'T T T:T '�l m -+ -� ❑ `^ T x: 3 .d. m : : iO.❑ O O 0:0 V 0 0 O ❑ O ❑ Q O O ❑ ❑,O ❑ 0 U, ❑ ❑ ❑ 7 ❑ ❑.❑ C, C% C7 P < C C C,C-C CC t C'C'C-<;G <:< G.<:<.< G G G G G < G G G < < .' < ai a' of a 6 f 'w A din_^ O-p ❑ ❑ O © ❑_❑'Q'❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O 0 0'0'0 ❑ ❑ ❑ '1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O O ❑ ❑ ❑ o IDw z s 9— ^ - - m a y CL w m N o m - � - :Y V N W.���� � W W �0_O V A W t= .� a✓ O .O �) V = J+ ` "'+ -W N W N N•V W V Y m 7 Y m x._ \\\ O0 d;0 O O O--\- �O O O d w $,m D m m m W W',00 W:Q 0 V .I .I o o 1 v WW�W-W W W 'W :W w N M Y •-' - -' :1 m tp O N O WHO'-O P v 40 N J W OD 4 O` 41 i3 3 . W W p 4, w, W W N A A A Y A A W W A V N y N O L N •� N .N d w V'g q.O;O.V1.W O O:.n O 0 O W,W O.O N J1 O �•+ . ,W W A V,Q N ID N N 6,'N A N.� 01 W N qNq WA O, V1 W N 4D N A N a N 10 FW-+ N W C w W J b N.A M.Y W p.IW;w 0 0 N N.M 0%: N.N V N W w N V W W O A.W,p W',N l W � C W N W I m I"' m CO W W W N W .N N 411 H W -D �' N 'J N V W .01,T'.lD d A tO W CO W A'N O,.O Q1 W A N N O .a] J 10 W C] .W W d'. �'CM1 A W N-I`; h N'G1 t6 A N 0-. 1L oc W w A N Y A N N.V-~ N W V W 10 W W W 01 W 9+ W A N •P W r C7 00 C O N {I K• C, P4 ;-: :N Y.m: A l 05 W:M.V W:V1 m Y.IWp W m N A;N W.10 CO W:W W N V V ^D a W A vl a1 V N 1n N W OJ N, O P p Li m:N lm'N W.V nWj M w ASID;N;W I, I N a, N r N i n id tl: A A A A A A A:A A A A A A A A A n A A n n n t n .A h r n n /. I O'O:p' O O P-p.p p.p:p p O p 0 0 0 O O O O P D a -:1 q o . iW.N:V' Y M:{+.F+:S+:i•+'i-+,W W W.W W'W:W WW N.w M W .+ Y_M �r 1 W'.W r- 1- � W � C N n ,A A A A A 'A:A A A A A AVA A A'A A A A A A A A n n A ,A r G r 'O � p q poo O p p.o p O o.O-G.o-o O,O O.00 O O O O O p g q = u �:V1'VN1 w.w Y M.W Y.W,Y Y'Y Y W M M YAWY:W-N W F+ W.Y W N W W.W N w V': G; f' PIP'O,O-O O O O O O'O.O-d�q O.O O:O O W p O P O �, O C'+ 9 : w V Ns ya A lF1 W W j�aa A A w W A A�� tiP W'A A N p1 m s w T V• i.7 J w, co 1D 1D W.ab.10,A,W N w W W'N-N�V'4^�,N'W-N A N N H W +!1 " �} V' V1 l•� J r f' �. ... �O -.O .. .. 1 ..... ... ..:. ., .... -. I _ - p O tll. O'O.O O.00:O.O•'O O N Wd O,dO O'DOO O - 9 •.�;[fs F+' '.T W,A ID .4 Ul:O :; -ilS-ttD.ln N;M 1N11 m N.A:1N0-CW9 N N � 01 W 10+ V IWID' 00 OC J 1-• w C. v 3 c p W N: Y•Y O- W Y.N O W Y W W.p:O p O R;- W.W Y N J Nt, J W W Qe N:W N d �➢ M-W N:N O+ -40 A.Of W M 00 N'-I A to :0 N •'3 :7 W W L 4+ ' : �. 'V ;Q1:W q N.W N:0 O w:W.Y Y Y N W W W .+ + N-W F• 4+ C` O.V1'V 4D V- W O.W 0'10- 00:1D N:A N l0 V Cp w w m on''Z w D.` 4. Q t -- iNA,A.W 00 N.A.N;V W.: W.W'A V,1/, W 2- N V :d W W.N m.J•W V ID V.A ;p N M,W'90 .N A W Y d A W N N W W T 01 V W �3 = j O (i O i N m N. Do- V V- N O) M.V UI J N W N W V V.W W 00 ly 'n m N N A'.w LO 4-•O-,N 'D .m..W 10 O W'W,A:A 61 N O 1D '.C+ 00 A.N,N i-+ W U, W.Y OS •a '.D W W 9naJv' fora� Nno Nva L- n�aT� Ia,xm�'nj•' �O'1-:-'CmN�qa 0_rz1. o,n!:. Nm 1nnNpm -nn nn nnnn'nnnnN'�mn.,'.'nn nnnnr)nnnnnn n z Z Z'ZZz:2 22am mI ' ! 2- -2I ZiZ Z,:�z z -4:-j '0 '0 -DOO,O.O O�O;O,OZO2'ZOOO OOO - NTz..:1 ' O Qs a 9 ',�'n -z-x'� � sl z z'z:m z ;D ;a M M:a:x-xl`.a� A A-a;z'; W''�o A M 0 7 3 3 3 `� W' a.v '.2 > > w m'm m m w m m.m,m m w m'.m' w m m m M M ao,m-m colm:m m'm m mr'm m. N I� J ; ; r r-r r:r r 3":n Q G' .'a'm_z � A w A �'p_A A z A'A � m A'A:� a'x m z''.Xf p A a0- A z:m A- mm m rn_m�m m m mm m.m rn:m m m. m rn m mm-m m m O O O v Q 01 O O 0',0 O v v 0 fD m',W m'm W W m'm m � W W W m t'L m:m m m W W m:m ccw m'm m'W m m m ,may a i (l 4 r r rr r r r r r r r,r O B p O a `''.nom u .� a w G.G C C r rrCi C:T.T'.0 CC c CC c-C:C c c C C'�C'C C C-C C C c-G C C ;l n y1 n N '� -� ,p _� Ci - T T T-� T T T •ri Y1 T T T T T T 'Til •n T T TT T T,T `Til"Tri T'T;T T T F 3' D:v a 0- v_'v_ 2:2;!2.2 rD -g'0- v v v;g0-_, 0- 0 2_ 0- '0- v o v 2' :0-:0- v v_;v v v, C-G C C C GC C;C'C G-CC'C-G < CC'C C C'C C < 0 0'0 O.O:v 0.0:0 0:0 0 0 0'0;D 0 o 0 0:0,0 0 0 0:0'2 v p 0.0 0 O rr � T y a - a '� 3.333333.3-333 3:33:3.3.3 3'333 3:33:3;3 33'3.3:33 tD o 0 M rD CL o C L T O C4-•2 ! : C n - � I o N 0 W - ` 1M 'V O1.Ul'= ]b !N YF• p m,V- -_ W N HW 00: Cl 1V !N N m p�p- .� ='.�:= Q p q -�'0 4�0 0 -O P O O p o o T O n 10➢_1d9.1tlD tp-ID-.6 aOD W W WI,.Ip'� �.v.J`J 0 Pl N m.01 m m- O ,N A A A.lwil:w . O W p O iu'P O O O-N tD W V W W p-IT l0'�-` F.3 M '� C 't: M 00 1C '- m.Y Y t» to. - Vk VI p p.lu.lJ 111.N N.A A -A'-F.• A A'UJ 4i:A IJ tN W SJ W tl O N OQoNNV1p A. OD N O N O.O,O A AP.A:A P,P A A d A pA QIO'O A P.GjG'0p-O O p'.pP;O pO'pO pO A 6p 0.O d P eyp f0 O A;A S P;A A'o b A A S A A-S S.S:S S-A A -N 'O 'OAA O A,A '.O AOA O' Otl'O,AAO A .O I O O O.O;O O -I O O F, .O 4 O p O O Q O 0 p Op W_P_C �.p pOp p Op p p Op p Op P O O:O:nI Y d uZo O S m M _QVi S A W A S W S'N A_Om0 w.WN 00 ? A-W:AA b A S'Ul W N-N N N ,Vit.LV' W lA0 a — l P.'O'.O p FW:O O O 010:P O,O 'm d N N A 01 V W.Y' fu A W J v � y.tp r m 01ia G1 tD w Oa = C _ AVt':'O11N Y A:A AJ�NN- M W'�. -m �INY rl'V .1,j r N 1a/ W D)-A Y w N �l m: W A'N IG:O A.O H m N'to.�'WOO.W N H w N:V.A m N u N A_Lo W m m V V.VS m �;N W Ol m m-J N W cn w r ,0 O n o N z 22�Z Z Z1Z O Z°z Z 2Y Zw'p NIO`O O ",.P .Z'Z�2 Z z m o �• i ii i°0- °1 D D D.D D n� w h Y b N-oAo oma:n w a �.i.i �n m,+Nn'a Go A�r�o >>'D n' c d Z 41 . ['] W N: ON l0 in 1q m N V W P'ln P:t-!.10..� J 00'00 ... ..... -. - _. ''P O H O O N:NY 00 W W.N l0 to Ot.V-N,V A A.V w m.W A W m A W A W T n P H m� W'H H W W O O Y O'O: OW 'M W w OO 4 W WN N N NW'N Y !V'm W pFp f+ 9 V N N O'H N N 0.10 w N m iD'W O ID;iv H O !J_tel J b A-io �- Ott N O W Of H A N Ol W A;W W m W- 'A'W N Ol N V,tD N,N_tD N {/t.W L+ A A V r N of �} P' n n n n p n�A n O.A'A A n n n n n n n �A n n n A n n n n n p O O >= o jV O O p O N Opp O N-O p 0 P. ptl'O 0 0 0 P:0- 0 O.p p P 4= ' N' N N N N W N N (n.IU N N-N'.N N N•N N N IU N N'N N A lb0-lo, r 3 ti O P O 'n n A P'A-A 'n O'O O,A n•n n ;p1A p'0-:A p O AO O p p-Ap`O C-n0'O Op bio o Ny N W p'.O.p-O N O O O -w N.O O O P P N N P IJ N N W Y W tAjt Y' N:N !V'IV J IJ.N N DI N',Y;N N N N W N;N W N N_m N A'O1 A N Of N N W Ol N g d I'OtlY W`O�d O O O SPO wO'N O W Y'Y O P:N AW oLp t'J p L: l0 A t0 01 m N N .G Q:tn,i+ pp.ID W r luL SO W O V.p Ol.W:N tl A.lp A A L C ` L• b t0 A-W Y N m V Y Y,:A'J W A Y N' 1p:Y coOO: -w-J tp co .N N',l0 N Ip O1 A NW N-N'W A W N N.!.... ' 1 L '.l0 A N i W�A Y N Y Y p1tl= PJ O. V N W' .H �IOIO NDN IO m AY (b10 V1'I-+ lLt N W W Od N T00 F+ W l0 1V:W YrV 00.Wm -� co J.N: N tp'V ttl J m a1-V'J M:Vt'wo w N:A N J.N 01.w D. N'J ch N':,N-tp m N ID tli z z *0 z z a z n n c n c n,� N n.n n n n n ri n n n n.n n n n n n n n n n r� v. a w w m as m d -M a to m O{ p,0--11 O-O O'O:fl 0 01:0 O 00 U Q O O -0 O O O o, O" O Ib O o .O `L OT ro m M rn A z, - --I I A 1:0 0 1 -1�1 � � 1 � --i n > > m n 0 0-0 0 000 O,O O O Q O 0 0 0 U p O o 0 �� L a a s d _5. x N �' z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 2 z z z z � x 3 z z L .n m '2 rmr p m:m * �{ �'� � �: �L.rL �.� �{ �{ g g a 'J ID n n 11 m 'a °• -v a—+'b'D S`� O O O:O O O O O 0:0;0 O O O O.O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 {` n o s',lo ',a a-° O O 0!0 O 0.0.0 010.0:0: O O O O Q 0 0 0 0 0 O 3- n ti V:0:o v o 0 Ono.0.0OO 0 n d 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 m 3 m N 'u;w 7 '� n n:n n n.n n n n;n n n n n n n n n n n n n CD c ' s z'z z z z z'z z z z z z z z z.z zzz Q L s 'n 'n ¢ 0 w °a 0 '3' n:° •v v z,a�.z z'z z a z x:�:z a sJ `z'z a s M z O m m a m@ m N ° -'r o �. � n:n.n'n n n;n n rin n n n n n n n n n n n n CL CL a CL n ' N . 'o ' _ 0 -� O O O 0.0--1 O.O--II -p-{{ p O-{{:o--II O d Q O O O Q O_{{ O d 0 p ni °n w7 7 ;zzzzzzzzzzzzzzA A A A nN n ua z O O z z z z , • ' z (^ N .'D ;T `m n .� :m - -O;O O.O p-p`p�p 0 O 0 O O 0O O Q O 0 C aw -0 0.0'0 0 O'.O'O.O did d.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.00 0 � n+' N" a s ni m M o w 'ID ;to.N' - O:O O O.0.0 0 0:0 Oro O O O Q 0 O U O O 77- m m 3 c :3c x m a °'.° ':a m 3 a.v, n. xCL E m °0O F: n m O a D- 0 =. a! .o3 I O. N F, tD 00 V Ql �h n W `J W w F-r ;n m:X p DOl'O T.T m O G.O 0 N'U 4 O In O A a I C 3 :L: V w Ol Y-w lD N Sn Ln:. �,.. N Ul w In Y F. .Jl W w w 111 '� W lD N O'I� ID W W co Y w al V ti, W W W V O w w o to C;) �w " a cMr o:o NO w U .0 0 O 0 O v o',o o ° F jW w:NJS. NY W'N N:A In w WN w Ol H A W CO N V W In L j H �.� w. til A A..iD'�Ut.W'.O w Ja.N'O to In uu.w 0 A V O p iD N no -, 0 w. :x,00 00 M W'.w.N 00: SSA:w.Ln.In:tO OO N +1 W+ CO N,M _ C . to tot,n .... ..... 'O _ _. _ _ ... CD m 1 i O1 p Ln M V N''M W W-Y'W A w W V Co 4- tD J:. W G1 11 T: 'C Os w N,� Sfl O,N V co O r V N N'in.61 W �n l.] A Y_A A ran =. r - 'N A A 'W N'.J.Oo VI M �J CD-W N0 1= in iP C7 O.0 O;O O.00 O O O O P P O O O U O O 0 O = 0'N 1)0 O A A N,W 00 W US V:-1 Ql Cr, .C. CA A A W In N C( N �i �y t} - 'W. co W W Or 4 SD'co A W O:V'fn W N'C, lO w N co m C f ,N.tD :0' -4,UJ:A.SD;N.W-V.U1;SD.-4 N W .� M V A A N I CD 00 to i ! I O G w. P o o O P w p 0 0 0:O P d o l„ O O CJ W m [] W:Ln v1 Oo to �, a A 0 V-- V M Ja O G a'W w O:Dl D1 fT W V O SD SD N Ol Do M I.+ T. W NCLI A,{n .A i w A m.t° .A,SD 00 Sn W N J+ 00 `,J W N W 00 ' i�. — ti n n n n n .n n n n r, A n A A O O P -A '.A A -n 'n O:O O•P Q O.d O O O O O p O o . , L c: O'Q O: -O-O 0 0 0 g,$ Q:c,O S G O OO O O O O O-o O n ;O.O O 'w . 'w r. O C7 O O Y t7 lI1N w w w r O Y c .O: ;w SD SD 'tP 1tD.LA:W IO W 1lD Y tD 00 N W F+ W N','00 w D rCl n -A !A :A A A A A /'. A A A P :A A 'A A A P P-P P'O P:O O O V O O C? .O:.O O O O.O O O C]'.O:O O O M M O r7 O O O t? O�SO W 'i--�;w w'Y i--. N: ' O O:O Y O:O w �' O Y 0 O W<w v jlD tD :lD;JJ N;�_lp w G1 -4 �+ V 00 3 e OG P O O Y .r r p O:�-- f., O �, w _- W J? U1 WN N;+[ N C V lD O O V O Ln 6n 'W'00. OO;tn.A-W W_. w.A :W -4 ;Ji N CO w P.f-a {n r C O Y:ty w:w:Q O.A w N ►+ O:P i..- O W w rj w �-+ s-„ N r O o O 0 II j-+ .n' in On !-r W V Ol w [n;00.to -w A-C0,tJ1 M j!D1 J� W j[O'y'•' 00 00 A M N w J. W In i 1 :G:O'AO OO,O.O-W O,O O;ON O O O I O O n lrt L,..In'.V jn f.'t U cn ? i� m `. O ' 'W U) .-4 'N WN Y V;W r00 N 4, N W::O Ol 00 O O W O O P Cn:,M o N rI N-O O O Y O-P P w 0 0 0 f - !O Sb N D1 Ol A N [n In :A lD w Cn M cN V In ? N 00,A N cn " SD J.U1 J V'N 00 N r 1 W A ,w N A A N W N Y yl _ A W - 1 W Ol V ,In :_j V W 1 �m � O: .N,F+ A NDN�O:W FN+ 100'N �.w w C. W �5 1� V Sn.� N r D f p O V -. V lD ... .. O pp O .. _ .. - _ .. ._. W N tO N N w N:00 N V 0+ W w W i.� cJr A N W 00 00 G w.41 SD W v Y V Ol.W ID N 1 V+.A W 4 - - ... .,... ..... .. .. z z _ an cdc.n n nD,n o no� r 0 m m m v m m; '.O.O o',a'O'O O O O O'O O O: •� r~ — Z t \ m.p0: Z.Z { z'•z 2.2 2 2 2;Z 2 2C:ZC z''2. Z m w c�'rL G rL•rL'rL':G ' 'L ,rL:`{''r{'r�:r�,�C C�C �'�� y 'Oo rn rhoA °r a a m p = �,� ',. t ` O'A.0 0O O O O'O O'O 010.0;0'0.0'0 OIC O 0= 3 0 0 0 0 a o T m- a. y 0'O O O o.0 O O 0 0:0,0'ro'o o;n;0}O'OO O;O •m d 3 w m N G a = m y 'n''O' :p'0 D O 00;0 0 0'.,0'0 Do-b 0:010 10:0,0 n'nln'n n:nrn n n.n njn:n n n:n n n1 Oh n Z'Z''Z'Z z'Z:Z',2-Z',z:z;Z 2 2 2 21Z;Z:z;Z z-z( c z a u c = n -• C7 0: A;7o.a =.W:= z ; ;o �,�;z:zrz;b>=,M,, a a — r Rin n"�n nnn n r):r)-n n.n'A'n�n+n'n n n n'. ZE 2 CL '1 2 a;a-a'n.n O O O O'O O O O'O OO.O a- 0'O' O r r r r •c m D ? x o- n w w r 010'010 Q'O O 0 O O,O 0,0:0-0.0.0 0:0;0.o CL J5 A 4 ` Z'z'z,Z z z 2 z zZ:z 2'2.2 2.Z:2 z Z-.z z Z� f"1 m 00 O O O O O'D O O O?O O O:o O 0,0:(:):o; O'' 00000.0.000Oro OD,o 000,o,aa.o:o, m m v n w - m to �'': 1 0:0 0.0,0 0 0 o a 00 a,0,0 0;0.0 b;n-n'O ni d 0 0 ? mt m n x, c d m fC'i e=-1 Q n . .. I ..i,N �.Wi r •� W WN W,Q...\t\'- O C 0. ID N v j O S N _. O N,N,w C3 gy m �'1p = \-0 � ) m o x i • Q-.'Q Q tl \ � �:� o tl � � Q � o d \;o 0 or, a ro m' 3 w 3 : -1 rn rn rn m.rn N - u1 w �Q u1 w �n M N A A A a ni c r u, W - �° w °? w�!u j NO N Q'Q O 1n.0 Y+'O W N A � w0 N 0:Q.�.? N'W: CDN '� - O-U1 O V1 .O O [J5 Q Q' d.d w :tl. I o N O Q10' n •n -n En •Q o d!d 0 o,pG nO inO:p-0,010 0 OHO Q Q-�'' a 0Op pOp pQp 4 O ,Iw;C b;O�G O;Q'O014.�'Q'p,0; y O . D1.W P. A':A A:A AiW.W 00.01 -[VIt'lMl1:Otl0 V 00 N 8:CD; V1 - A`1D W- t Y. d fr Y N t 'n n n n ydy, F-, d d O d;G nlQ rp-V O O O O!O O:0. C3 ,nh. N'_ .O'Gri a A w A O �.wOi./ ON,tl 0.",'W ?!w -[.Qi dQ C y 00.A tl. .A A',A A AA W rn co -1•ao W,A:y�j v � A A:W 6+ 06 00:v r n � m Q•M'Wt 'N fA W N WX61-tl W W O'M'O W 00 W'O"t N Y O WAN; W �D !Z) . 'to it`i70 i-• CS i-a V V zG V O:W A V in'V OO A Q Ln a N N m': 'In N W 01 00 lD %D 00 W Cn l!1 N V M;W W V 1D D1 M.00- r� N CL. �U1•A M to�A M N U1 'N Y'N WU In:A-V'W cif ?�W Op to iD T -U1'A'tl A o.W,� Cn W N'A W:cn iD 01 Q:V tD.N G W-µ. W W w w V A V W 00 m V W In A W -4:— W W V Y Y (n-W"M W D Ol r tD ,J o Q olr. _ •�. Z Z.`p'�Z 2Z2.zz2 222 2'22.Z.z;Z'Z Z m n H �.ia 'u p y rVq q q:D D n n-n n a a a 9.D .. .. .. .. .... - - _ O M•V 'O O r WW V-r:'W'W' Y O- O.O w.Q W 'W 00 N Y-w W:Io A W w W V A'G) W to ,A un b 00'W 01 V D1". . W.In W V CC .1D W'D1 m,00 CO'Y ID'V In JA 'Y' fD fC0 CL Z -� Q Ln Y Y tl'N'W Y M M p 00 �. Gl'N �!'w O:W A IN-A W 0 00: V AM 1D (n to W N UD M A V N W:lD 00 00 00 W M.V N O1 lD V A W M N W-A r m N t o'o c' QiQ Q'Q Q o o'd a n tl o o ^o o 0010 o'no'o o' a=a m o W W 4; ,W W N A;N-W N W W W W N'W 1,y W W1.r, fn W.m N W � W 01 Co W'.V V N A lWD:W:,�:N:A w W C*: r G N i - 3 0. 0 0 of o:o Qim o prQ o . . Q . p a''o clQ olo tllo o' m o. N'W 00' Vt 111 �' lal,Y'N N'Y N W AI w W W.?:W W 00 N L- 2 (D W Ol N V1 00 LD.00 W W V -4'A'W-A'N OD:— mGln.A 1\" C d 3 0 0;o n n n n n n nln n n 'n n ,n :n Q`A A 'A (A 'A n n : O:O Q,0 o Q'Q:d Q d o 0 o d -d o 0 n o Q O: t w w;w, 0'0'0'0 0 o,o'a pp pp po o o,w o 0 0 0 0 0 0, �° o lD-fibiw W.W.W W w O O d'� d.d w'n o tlO W O V' r C . N, W' w:w'm V, a O O An n A'n A A -A A n 'n rA A 'n d n 'n n nAIA n ' 0 0 n 0'O O O O O d:0 OO O o_O �O u1 Q. 0.0'Q'i, iP O O.� O O O:O b.0.�'Q 4 iD b d d' .� w -01 1Wf1 M WW W W W W,w al lWD'.N W " A ti'Y:N Owl N OI W.6 A r 0 O O`W O,O n O O w-O'O 010 Q Q'Q'Q'W'_0_Q'd Otl d O: N k - Q W O1r Y'-J w A D1:A W WrW'00 1--1'n—:W N M N In W O.M Q D :Ln W A: 00 'D A V A W:V_-�D 00 00 A Y, Ol N in In W r n G V w: m CL •O�O VW N Y Q:A Y w Q Q�d W: NO1'Q O V W W;ia W V A 4D In WW N [n A'V V1;in OA O to W V1 N V WN,OS A --1.- 00V'Ol'VI.01 W :p W 00.1n lD N Y^ t7 — Takla 3. Sacramento River at Hamilton City,Part l,of 2 - - oiswtvud Tot,]' Oi-lved Total Diatalved Total Oi;snived Tor.II D-.1-1 Sr.cll IN-11'-d At4 intim Al.ra;- Arsenic AlSC.. Cada,- t:.ldraium rrl:omium Ch-1--;R1 CPPP" �"PP-" I- '. St."—H.-, - 5RA1DiC Oa1C WVL PAIL _ 09/1. /W 1. Witt. H6/L P';il 14'l: PR/i. !'I:,L .. ..... - SAC III AMENTtlRAHAMILTON CITY 1}/25/039:10 NIA 12,8 _ N/A I.93 N/A 10,005 NJA II.61 N/A ]ltl Ni'' 3+'. SACRAMENTO A A HAMILTON CITY _ -, 3/SJ0413;00 N/A N/A VA.. N/A N/A ,NIA NIA NiA WA Y.:A Ni SACRAMENTO RA HAMILTON CITY5/!0105 15:00 NIA 110 N/A 2.81 NIA .011 NIA O.d�6 :1 ]..-.: i.fL ,11 . .. ..0 N, SACMMENip AAHAMILTON CITY - -- 8!17/0410:20 N/A 189 NIA 2.36 N/A 0.014 N/A 13.1•, N/.: ]1,:• r•i - <0.008 6,9 0.91 0.72 3-.Ii 5A[RAMFNTORA HAMILTON CITY �10fS/0410:05 14.5 133 1.3 1.32 .13.0[1 SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTON CITY _ 13/9/04 13:40 23.4 _ 36.1 - 2.49 2.52 .0.008 <0 5%17 1 SACRAMEN/URA HAMILTON CITY _ _ [2!7/0410:40 2.54 12.5 2.36 2.54 <0.01x 0,034 0.54 oYd 035 U.1i •.4: •.- SACRAMENTORAHAMILTONCITY S/10/ds 12:15 352 413 1.48 1.55 .0.011 .0.007 106 1.4: 1.93 SACRAMENTO A A HAMILTON CITY 2!7/057:35 77.5 163 1.42 3.51 .0.011 .0.066 167 1.68 1.53 3.73 71.5 SACRAMENTO flA HAMRTON CITY _ 3!!0/057:30 11 _ 79.7 2.03 2.08 .0.033 .0.611 129 1.39 1.133 ]i% SACRAMENTO R6 HAMILTON CITY 4/20/05 12:00 15.9 39.3 1.99 2.09 .0.022 .0.009 192 I.0? 1.1; 3.71 34.1 SACRAMENTO A AHAMILTON CITY 5/19)059:30 1075 - 6686 166 3.17 0,058 0.076 269 18.9 3.11 AS 725 lllil'! SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTON CITY _ _ 6128/05 7:15 106 171 _ 1.37 1 S8 .0.999 <D.017 052. 1.1 1.31 1; 11 SACBAMEN TURA kA MILTON CITY 7/26/0512:45 I.65 31.4 1.31 1.34 .0.011 0.007 0.63 U.6*6 6.73 0.;l1.., SACRAMENTO AA kAMILTON CRY 8173/0511:20 14.1 44.8 1.39_ 2A7 [q P99 0036 046 7.6.ti 0.8:1 1 SACRAMENTO R 0.HAMILTON CITY _ 9/27/DS 10.00 27.7 - 98.9 1.43 1.43 0007 0.033 054 0.6' G.R1 SACRAMENTO RA HAMILTON CITY _19125165 i2:6p', 30.9 61.6 1.54. 1.56 .0.007 .19 COD 063 0.77 ] 1: _%: .,_ SACMMEN7OAAkAMILTON CITY :]]/36/R511:Iq 30.R 67.6_ _--_ 1.84.,,. ]92 ...V.039 0.016 0.79 9.8!. ].OJ .,.: ... ! .... ... .... ..... ........ ...... .. . 1 _ ..... _ SArflAMENIOR0.HAMILTON CITY _ _ _ X12/14/0511:45 6.67 _ 34.7 1.94 2.1 <p,OpS 0.008 059 0.8" U.:Il .!Gl SACRAMENTO RAHAMILT074 CITY 1/47067:30 '_ 866 3462 1.61 2,35. 0.014 0.042 2 6 9.11 217 .._. •175:' . .. . yA[MMEN TU RAHAMILTON CITY 1126/067:30 359 709 1,41 1,49 0.011 0.042 151 2:1 1.02 1!32 11.1 •!!1 SACRAMENTO RA.UAMKTON CITY _ 2121/0612:45 222 733 1.3 147 0011 0.029 ]is Lai 1.12 _.SS 11. ill; SACRAMENTO R0.HAMIL7ON CNY 3)1/067:30 2887 4955 1,36 1.85 0:021 0.087 4.49 11.2 4.26 11.5 1173 ',11th SACRAMENTO A A HAMILTON CITY 4/17106 G;D0 914 2219 1,06 1,47 0.1 <01 169 �.I' 2.51 6-S 3$4 SACRA M E"TO R A kA MILTON C ITT 91171066.00 163 285 1.42 _1.S7 .0.1 IG.L 059 0.7.3 1.25 1.73 lit nE SA[RAMENTO AA HAMILTON CITY 0)27/666:30 200 398 1.2714 <0,1 <O.L 974 ].7'i 1.09 1.43 19 r, .'iG SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTON CITY - - 7/25/065:40 255 - 570 1,24 1,32 <01 <DA - 092 1,13: 1,}.! 1'J:, 66.1 SAC RAM ENTO R A HAMILTON CRY 8122/066:40 195 298 1-22 _1.15 <Ol <),l 0.67 0,83 1.09 I.A. 13'1 "'• SACRAMENTO R A HAMILYONCITY _ 9120/066:30 591 897 1.12 1.23 <O.l .131 Gel 1.1'6 1.07 3 1,1: SACRAMENTO AAI7AMILTON CNY 10/24/06700 36.8 201 0.859 1.37 ID 1' <0.1 DS6 0..47 0.7, SACRAMENTO A A HAMILTON CITY 12112/066:40 181 _905 1.98 2.33 <0,1 <O1 057 1.]: SACRANSLNTORAHAMILTON CITY ., „_?/9/077:15 616 23R 2.0$ 2.23 O119.1 064 SACRAMENTO RA HAMIIL'ONCITY _-- - 2/2610714;00 011 -657 1.31 1.42 _.%l <0.1 I81 15. 7.v'4 SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTONCITY 3/20/076:50 16,1 91.6 „2.17 2.36 <O.k 4.1 0.43 0.7: 1.21 1-il 1x 63 SACRAMENTO A A HAMILTON CITY 4/9-/0711 12.8 _ 7. ]:9 4.94 <0.1 _c0.1 043 OS3 }.',4 Ii: 17 }.%, SACRAMENTO R 4 HAMILTON CITY - _-- 5/29/0712:36 3.21 37.2 1.9 2.11 cO.I <0.1 052 0 7 1.2[1 11,5 4 :3'i SACRAMENTO A A HAMILTON CITY 6/26/0712:30 6.11 50.1 1-6 567 -.<0.1 <0.1 0.52 0.75 1.07 1.39 11. -':' SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTON CITY _ _7/3fl/077:00 10.8 114 1.62 1.69 0.1 <0.1 []41 0.X4 1.15 1-53 G.: :3• SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTON CITY _ R/28/)177:05 JRA 49.2 1.37 1.58 <0.1 10.1 0.45 0.6 0.92 3.12 6.7 6',2 SACMMENTOAA HAMILTON CITY 9(13f077;55 2.26 37,9 1.47 1.55 •c01 <0.1 OAS P5� 0.G3 0.83 5.7 46b SACRAMENTO'A HAMILTON CITY 1117/0710:30 0.93 30.5 196__� 7013 401 <p.l GA 11.4. SA[IIAN5ENIOAAHAMILTON CRY 2/20/6812:15 S.G2 � 85.6 2.04 7.27 e0.1 c0.1 0.49 0.71 ].0'/ SACRAMCNTOAA HAMILTON CITY 5(6/0613:05 - 2.94 85.3 2.34 1,16 N.1 <0.1 0.35 0.6T ]A3 1.N7 701 1!` SACRAMENTO'A HAMILTON CITY 8!6/68940 „2.82 70 1.6 Lg8 10.1 <0.1 047 x.51 0.9.3 1-�1 to s6.+ SACRAMENTO AAHAMILTON CITY : 11/5!087:20 L0.2 95.6 _ _2.06 217._ � c0.] cO.L 03L 4.Y1 ].a'1 .. .. - SACRAMENTO RAHAMILTON CITY :2/2410910:40 51.1 3110 1.62 6,07 - <0.1 <0,1 0.47 iU' 2.111 X71 ..'- SACRAMENTO A A HAMILTONCITY _ 5/5/098:50 L4.7 419_ 1.83 2.05 <0.1 Ql.l 0.35 ll, }./a il.l SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTONCITY 8/1LIOE40 2.75 35_L 1.31 135 _ '0.1 <O,1 0.36 U-16 O.RR 1.:5 =1 Id s SACRAMENTOftAHAMILTON CfTY _ _ � 11!31097:50 2.94 47 1.87 1.94 <01 <p.t p38 0.49 1.1.1 1-,5 10.; •=G .,... .... ... ... ... ... SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTON CITY 2/2/108:45 12 34P 1,37 1.43 <0.1 <D.S 9.36 1,101,74 .7.65 17 7 3,3 SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTUN CIT[' - 5/4/107:45 10.2 160 3.31 3.85 c9.1 •r0.1 0.47 1.9,; 1.56 .13 17,1 2i. SA[RAMENTp RA HAMILTON COY _ _ 8!3!1011:00 7.55 _ 24 7-4 1.47 _ <D.1 <0.3 6.47 OSM 1.29 13:1 10•S 5:3 SACRAMENTO kA HAMILTON CITY 1 Lf2/108:30 4.63 67.4 , ,1.97 2.06 D1 <0.1 P6G 127 1.35 ].!;Y. ]5.3 1::I' SACRAMENTO'A HAMILTON CITY, - _ .,,,, 211/119:30 5173 53.6 1.9 1.96 61 9.1 0.43 U.i', 1.2'1 3,I 12 5't, SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTON CRY - 5/3!118'55 3 _ 24.6 16 1.73_ <Ok <0.1 045 o.S.! 1,4 l:S L SACRAMENTO R 0.HAMILTON CITY , , 8/2/L79:10 116 159 141 145 „<O,1 _:0.1 D65 U.lh 1.11 t.:i• I.7G t+! SACRAMENTO R A HAMILYONCETY 1111/118:45 55 91..5 1.21 158 sfO ,,,,<O.1 C.54 X7'6 _ 0.9� - 1 li a'l SACRAMENTORAHAMR.TONCITY - 1/31/L28:2G 176 2762Z4 2.2 <0.1 <O.t 052 01. 1 SACRAMENTO R A IIAMILTON CRY - 5/8/12 9:311 88,3 125 _2.11 2.64 ,04 <6.1 C.3 15.4", 1.1• 10 :1', •-- SACRPMENTO R A H0.MIl7ON ClIY _ __ 8/7[128'.00 1D 28.6 1.25 „_ 1.2E <0.] <O1 039 0.! O.li: ..,... ... ... .. 9.. ..... .... SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTON CITY - F1l6li29:35 _11.6 12.5 3.09 2.17 10.1 <0-1 048 U.8' O.Gi Jhl 31.1 t: .. ... .. SACRAMENTO AAHAMILTON tfTY 2/6/139:15 3.4 127 1.98 2 <0.1 <0.1 032 J.7-, 1.1 SACRAMENTO AAHAMILTON CITY .,... 5/7/13 R605 19.2 29.5 1,74 _ 1.77 <0.1 <0.1 053 0SS 1.07 ii 12:, 6.•I -SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTON CfTY 8/6/33 7:30 1.05 2O 3.I9 148 <6.1 W.1 045 61.4, 0,53 U 86 4.f 4:7 1 SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTON CITY : 11/5/}3910 1.69 744 2.06 2.17 <0.1 <0.1 U.39 0A6 D.S 5ACHAMENTO R A HAMILTON CRY 214!149:05 0.19 6.63 2.7 _2,08 <0.1 <0.1 0.52 1.31 072 U-A, SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTON CITY S/6l148:30 4.3 37.2 2,36 2.5 <0.1 <DA 0.17 D,A;' 1!1:! 703 10<. 7-:5 SACRAMENTO RA HAMILTON CITY _ -. 8/22/149:50 1.91 19.7 1,93 7.12 c0.1 <OI 0.44 0,52 0.72 0.37 FF .... SACRAMEN TO R A HAMILTON CITY 11/55%148.50 2.57 _ 62.4 205 2.12 <0.1 <0.1 R,48 11.7 OF A.3 34 . ', SACRAMENTO R A 7IAMILTON CITY 1/101159:30 21.2 1960 1 2.14 10.1 s0.1 0,33 $..- 1,R': S !1 SACRAMEN tO R A HAMILTONCHY - _ 5/11/1510.00: 71,9 42.4 PIS 1,8L <O.l - <0.1 CS 3,61 1,` ;.;A :'S'•. SACRAh1ENTORAHAMRTONCIT'/ R/]1%1510:20 13.4 312 1.65 172 C.1 _<0.1 0,33 142 0.9:1 i 1.' ,. 1�" SACRAMENTORAHAMtLTONCITY 11/411 511:.2.7 12..6 18.9 L43 - 2.6] _ Ol <0.1 643 .'.5'1 0.'/ ..... ... . l SACRAM[NTOfl AHAM!LTON CRY _ -- -- 2/3)1612:30 � 39.7 352 1.26 3.49 10.1 <0.1 044 1.11 1.1'1 i3 :_i.i; 111 SACRAMENTO R 4 HAMILTON CRY 5/9116]x:15 42.5 103 205 238 .94 <!1.1 0.41 fall 1.75 } 45 l3> i SACRAMEN TO R A HAMILTON CITY _ 9[5[168:15 45 200 3.37 1.42 <0-1 <O.3 0.43 D.SS SACRAMENTO RANAMRFONCITY x]3/7/1611:00 35.7 78 1.97 2..1 10.1 .,10.3 0.41 0.5 1.06 1.'.ri SACRAMENTO R A HAMILTON CITY 21GIL713:00 "IS 1020 ].16- 1.67 <0.1 <D.1 052 3.81 1.71 "./S 13!1 ',!.hl Ma8lmam 2887 _6686 2.7 4._67 0.021 0.092 A.99 10.9 - -4)h 7X7 177'5 14:1:57. Metltam ..,16 91.5 _ },615 _ 1,91 11.014 0.056 051 0.41 3.355 1.4? 253 112 ' Minimum 0-19 6.03 0.8.59 1.15 6.007 0.007 0.3 0.41 0.5 _ 0,73 SWR(b Has'n PIP" Orinking W4terM-dards-Pflmery MCL - SWRCReas,n Pian-Drinking Water Standards-Secondary MCL 100 _ -- - - - -Cal EPAJOEHHA CAlif0rm4 Public Hnalth Goal 600 - 0,004 0.02 USEPA S4+4ondary MCL -. _ So- Cal EPA-O,tp 0CalEPA-OnP inP tillo.ln4remental cancer risk F,LImAtO for dinkmg wAtnr -._. 0.023 00033 0,07 USEPA Heath Advi-V t-drinYIng watvf _._ 0.02 USLPA IRIS R,Iefence Dose Ddr$ang water Health Advisodas 2.1 [alllarn�a Prapa]Itran 6S Safc Harbaf lrvCl-MDX.AlIDW441e dD5l'ICVCI Tur ' renreau 1 t XicuY 0.65 _ . .. .. ... Agri tO a Witcr Q.uallty Gaols-Ypsl and tido,lllr-told spl -- _ sow SGV. rrlfiwnia Turin R410 Sources 4f Drinklg W4tar '- NaeiunaIAcademyPTSaoncosDriRkingW t t Hnalth Advisarfes 5000 -- - _ N'atlu-1 Re ptnwende4 wC1 Crhmia-Taste and Odor or Welfare Notional ita-- ended WQ Criwia Human 14anith and Welfare P"[1e J14h - walcrandlfslsCDnsumPnan National R.commnnded wU CritaTia-Freshwater A9uatic kDF Continuous Concenllativi 87 6i Na1,Onal R-Al-ndgd Wq Crirvri.-Ereshwme/Aq.;Hle HTe Maslmum[anL'Chlydtl4rl- _ 750 22 f abl0 J. S3crarmmilo fovev at Hamilton City.Part 2 of.2 Dlm9lwd Tot Ois3nlvcd Intal Tatal PIs501vad TPmI 0i5:9Ncd- 70161 Ois+nlvbdTotal Dis-hed T4I31 Lcatl L.d MSng9n6se;Mangan rcur t, M.-try Nkkel Nickel Sclrnum iSol9nlum: "- silver n 2,n[ I , >cr•ir..t:,•.r.. Sample Datr pdL r NVL IIWL WL' .&h. - 4WL P31S ."A µ3/l , 09/L. 1'WL will w'/L :lr,tt:.L'tVIc�R,l l!:i+,Sf]N I:1'Y _ !7)1$1039:10 N/A 0118_ NIA...., Lb N/A., ,N/A 3,26_ 114A 00.{)61_ N/A 00.912 ACR.iV-WTO R A HAMIL 3L1N CITY _ 3/81041300.. NIA.... Nlik N/A N/A_ N/A--.,. N/A......N/A........ ,NIA N/A N/A N/A _NIA N/A .... - .. .. CnC't}i,Sf.SJTo I F!n61IlTO.'1 CITY 512010415:00 NIA 0.027 WA 6.14 N/A._._ NIA .-0.034 NIA 1,53. 1.31 N/A � 0.12 ..N/A._. _ ::At R•,:.I=-511[1<A HAN.I[TOk CITY -- 8/32/0410:20 N/A OAB NIA 6,88 N/A _NIA 1.89 NIn 0.28 NJA 00,145 N/A 2.07 SACR-IUEWOI A Hr,t•INFCNCITY 10/51Q410:0.9 O.OLB 0.067 1,136.34 N/A 1.15 762 .9,144 -0.204 6077 00,054 0,48 356 : :: A[RAL13IO',3A Vih1/ILTU7I CITY - -- 11/9/0711'Ap 0004 0.024 -1.55 5.42 NIA•�� 1.31 1.33 00.149 0.15 0006 -04063 0.52 0.98 ::At RASBNTO 1AHAMILr0N CITY 11/7/0.110:40 0001 C.M. 03 1.8 N/A U57 0.59 09.163 0,28 0001X <O.D9 0.35 044 LAf,Rl,.i1!IICRh]inlv!ICIDPI I:ITY 1/4010512:15 0.064 0.168 2.22 17.4 N/A _3.37 1.98 0.3 - 0.34 -0.003 !0,002_ 1.54 31 ti:frl,;;!ullOaAr'ASI.LIONCt Y - 2/2/057:35 OA29 O.D84 2241 10.6 NIA 1.02 1.53 <112R 0.27 0.002 0.003 0.95 1,96 tine a:�.;s NIT,R 1.Ii AMP,fOa CrIv _ 3IJD/057:30 O.D08 0049 0.96 637 NIA 0,67 _ 1,24„_ 01745 06.19 <G.001 00.036 DAG 1.76 rlrl:il N to R.l 1:AI1.4 TON 07y 4/20/0.512:00 0.01 O.D23 3,22 6.03 WA 0.76 0.94 0,14 0.35 06,094 <0,005 0.41_ 0.75 I'_•:-•::.t!'•!r(:''.+,SH:/LL1<Itrfy 51191459:30 6162 3.26 7.33 272 WA 2.75 - 30.7 00,399 00.317 0.018 U04 : 2,46 35 "n:["Y 6128/057:15, 0Q.009 00.027 4.71 5,17 N/A 0.951.41 00.14 00,354 <12m3 00.017 0.8 3C+S '•1[il::.;'Nri rt fi,,m%IIf7N f,.'fY _ 7/26/0512:45 -0934 -0063 GAG 2.07 �„N/A.,., 0.65 0,95 00145 00.176 <O.091 00.94 0.36 0.35 srf.t+\]V11T:i n:r,;sl:tlON l''xy 81231(51120 -0.009 0.046 658 3.38 7r/A 0,61 1.16 00317 0.29 0.001 10.001 D.27 1.09 1 •.IEN1U 4n`I'I,I!LTO?1 CLx _ 9I70510;00 <Q,004 0.097 0.51 4-61 N/A 0.99 1.39 0,23 - 0.23 000} s00p3 _0,38 1.56 'AC'Er^4I(NTC R A I IAWXM CITY 1012510512:40 ODki 09_26 0.69 - 28R ,NIA, 1.13 1,22 0.13 0.23 00.092 40,002 0,52 1.93 WIW,lf'N TO R A HAMR TON CITY 1111510511:00 RO!1 _0047 . 0.98„ „4.81 N/A 302, 1,24 <0,186 00186 cQ.009 0009 0,56 1.75 1ACRAWNTO R A HAMILTON CITY 12/14/05X1:45 0.003 0.023 D.53 4,17 N/q 91 'a 0.15 '0.001 00-03 0,$ 0,93 `.ACR-'MENV1 rT n H1,M:LTCfICITY - 114/067:30 0,191 L.89 : 9.75134 N/A 2.G7 15A 00.149 - 0,22 00401 0071 2.24 20.1 - 1ACRA%I(1.1:1RAIIAM%WNCITY... ....... - 1124/067:30 0.052 0.306 9.24 32.4 N/A 1.68 331 00786 0,19 00.005 10.005 1,55 4-71 .AI'RWINfO A A•WPL W PICIfY 2121/061245 0.045 0.299 5.83 27.5 VIA 2.53 3,32 40.249 113 00.009 10.009 1 3.)4 ',nfRA•,R'Srm RnIIAM.P TON CITY 3/21067:30 0.648204 _23.1 X46 N1A..,., .,4:69 157 <O.ld9 0.29 00009 , 01794 5,79 21.7 TAiir,:llf!I;OhnrIALI:L;O:'t!t7Y 6117/066,0 0.188 1.01_ 9.56 - 70.9 N/A ,2,31 8.02 0.23 03] !0.03 003 157- 12,5_ _. .... -,.. -_-. _ _ _.. •.:!:`,1\:: I TO R-,,I,.!,I;t ro SJ C I r Y 51171060:40 '004 0.1 2.1 30,1 N/A 1.12 1.46 .0.2. '0.r2 00,03 <0.03 0,67 218 .:C RIOA. frN.;rY 6/27/066:30 0016.1 09,93,04 0.073 0.69 887 N/A 1.29 1.87 00.2 � ? ' . D.o6a M413.71 :zt,:r.•.I.-.Pt;R v'I%mt:J7t CITY 7125/065:40 -004 _ 1309.4 1.01, 9.351.8�� ..,? N.1 _T... 2.5 , <G.2 :0.03 0,03 )1,77 2.13 Y TO It A III I fc',i try 8/77/066:40 <0.04 4077 16 7.18 D,89 1.7 _ 2,61 0,25 0.26 <0.D3 1003 1.02 1.96 'ar R?;!I ry.'n 3Ps!n:,':3frll r;Y 912D/066;30 -0.04 0.111 2.01 14.2 3.5 1.67 3.76 0,23 0.26 00.03 _00.93 _0.65 4.79 . -. _ _ .,., ...2.. -. 4 ... .. .... ':.f.r[.\AImm R A IIAMI:.TON CITY 30/24/06700 0.04_ 0074 0.87 _ _9.44 0,28_ 1.01 2,02 025 0.28 'a G3 0903 O,L6 3.3 ':',l't•J,!CNTIJRh11A\+..:CN CITY - -- _- 32!12/06 6;60_ <D.Od O.1B6 304 16.9 0,72 - 096 1.75 _ 0,25 0.29 0003 -00,93 0.55 4.77 ... ..... ....._ _..,... - ...... ..... ___ _. .. LACRA%!FNIU RA•m.MctUN(:TY _ 5!94077:15 OAd 0004 2.22 5,26 0,68. ).D1 _ 1.08 002 00.2 003 0043 _0.64_ 2.51 SACRhh1.NTO It AHAMlk fort CrTV 2/26/071400 0.262 0.583 10.3 28,8 7.8 2.12 2.99 00.1 0.23 003 <D 03_ 3.68 R.39 fi.f.RA1:ENTfJO:.NA:.1I:.TON Cr'fY _ _ - X3120(076:50 '0.96 0.056 Z01 8.22 1.6 085 122 003 06,2_ 06.03 40,03 0.31 2:62 .ACA.ta;rNloft AHAh!IUO\[in 6/171077:30 00.06 4001 3.44 8.78 1 OS 0.4 036 - 0.33 - 00.03 -0.113 04 2.59 ;ACr\\;t.N ll)Jrr;IAMIyTCIN CITY 5/29!07 L2:L5 -0.04 0.044 0.36 5.99 N/p, 0.8 1,04 00.2 0.22 00.03 00.03 O,SS 2.46 'ALA::=.Ii NI(I R A1:r,:.+ri TCN C:n - - - -- 6/261D722:30 0.64 ' 0.066 2.52 7.39 0.590.9,,. 112 - 002 0.21 <G.03 0003 0.73. 3.38 .."%v. 7/181077:00 <0,04 Mot 0.21 7.42 1.3 0.88 1.27 _. '• 00.1 00.2 00,03 003 0.3 3.67 .. - -. .,_.. ... .. ., _ C.,ITC,�Iln ft A•Hr•.h.rf,N CRY 8/28!077;65 00.04 � 00.69 0.46 5,33 N/0. _ 1.07 1.72 00.2 00.2 00.03 09.03 ��3 2.19 '•tflli Id,NIO TWIAIIAMNC!JY 9/131077:55 00.04 PASS _0.33 4.46 L7 0.119 301 I 19.2 - 40,2 <0.03 111 R36 <0I _ '�P,r,%v NII•R A W-II TCN CIfV _ 71/7/0710:30 0004 !009 D.OB 3.01 032 0.58_ 0,82 '92 0,2 003 <0,03 0.17 7.09 .41 .. .. ......_. .2.... _.... .r.C.i t4.1-NTII fIhrIAnIILTC,rt PITY _- - .2/20/08 22:15 00.04 0.061 0.7 8.15 N/A 0_.88__ 0.95 <02 � tl77 0003 011 _0.713.33 '0,04 0.061 027 - _8.38 N/A 1 1,22 00.2 00.2 N.03 40,D3 022 3.M Nxf,R,\vll.l r,I ION CITY 5/6it(19:(9 _ _ ICRn HAt4:_Tr!-t[rrY 8/6)089:60 00.04 0096 0.39 4.90 N/A _ 1.01 12„ N3 00.2 00.03 1003 OdS 113 sati rrnra:.N[0 R A•A:•:J4IUN CIT! - 11)51087:70 004 OD9 0:35 394 N/A 1.?,3 .1,6 .001 00.2 -0.03 00.03 093 3.51 -W A HAS%lI'LUN CITY - 2/24/9910:40 00.09 LA? PIT __101 NfA 2.57 11 0.2 0.25 00.03 40,03 092 14.3 ',Cr R A HAM:,kCN L!7y 5/5/948:50 <O.W 0.289 0.53 177 N/A 0.85 176 00.1 00,2 00.03 10.61 I.D7 622 .. .. - -- .. ._. _ ._ ,Af II+.rf'JTO NA,u,.mt TON I'TY R/11/098.40 0(.04 10.04 022 2.36 N/A- 0.74 084 00.2 003 10.03 10.03 D,4$ 2.26 .A•.'r.,1.•J;.�'If•R A HA.WP,Tnrl CITY 1113ID97:50 1002 0.071 0,38 7.29 N/A 0.74 0.93. '02 102 00,03 _tO03_ 0.65 3.L r.,,fR:\;FVTCJ R a r 1,1tiIP.TON fITY 2/7/108:45_._ 00.04 DARV ]T31 37.1 N/A 1,'78 2.08 1G.2 003 1003 _.0,03I.P. 1+.•13 . .65 .._.._. .0.. ... - .,.. - !0.03 0.62 2.91 ...II'�1\I:+l;f,rthtl,��.Ir',;rr;3l:f5' 5/4/307 -0.04 .11 0.52 - la WA 0.77 1.32 002 003 -0.03 „ y .It�(i7:J!''r5 a/311811:60 80.06 !9,04 0.52 4.15 NJA_ 0.05 1.17 00.1 10.1 00.03 00.03 0.62 2.51 •4,.:.11;0,:It,r:,.4141',ION:,•.V ]L/ZI1D8:30 .004 : 0.09 0.73 12.5_ N/A 1.34 1.82 .00.2 0228 -0,03 00,03_ 2.32 3.33 - ._.. ........ ....2 HAOrI•CI::I fY - - - 2/11129:30 004 000d 067 GA N/A 0.71 D9 -.11.-v..,l:.'r,.:; ....09.2 0G 01196 •AI I+All:+Il[,R A.IAIIII lulu fY 5131118;59 13.(54 r, -11U 0.49 5.05 NIR a6 O,GS N.1 m3 00.03 1003 0.28 MI. rinlsn,,!I:rn11III'Iv 8/71118:10 00.04 0.061 1.47 6.38 N/A 1.1 1.37 00.1 10.2 09.03 00.03 077 L(+3 .I$AAM!"410 It A'in'_11I.IUN CI rY X1/11118:45 006 10.04 1" 4.4 N/A L1.37 1.68L 00.1 _ .0.2 00.03 _00.03 O.S9 2.33 SAf.RAR1ENTOR•111AVILIUN CH Y' 1131/128:25 DOd cD Od __ X117 9.58 N/A. 8.68 111 .02 00,2 00.03 -0.03 1.17 2.32 ..if HA\tl 170 RA HANILTOr9 CITY 5/8/128:30_ 0.06 06.09 5.73 7.97 N/A 9.68 0.79 00.1 003 00.03 00.03 OAB 379 3Ar.l AhIL V'1R R-HAW TCI?J CITY - 8/7/128:00 00.06 10.69 0.41 2.61 0.8 0,74 1.36 401 00.2 00.03 00.03 0.43 1.83 ., .,.. .... . ......... ... ....... .-. '.ACrl lhtr VT00 A I I.:'.IILTON CITY _11161129:35 904 00.04 __2.19 3.12 3.4 9.96 108 N2_. 00.2 00.03 00.03 0.67 1.39 .. ... .. _. ,_.,._ _ .... :.YC;1M11VrORnH4\11:7Or:CITY 2/6/134:15 696 � 00.04 0.35 5.65 1.3 9.44 0.65 00.1 00.2 00.03 N.03 0.43 1.45 . .. ... - _.- 0 ,.r,l!,n11'Nln rr 11.!,.•,44;9111 rIrY : 5171138:05 06.04 00.04 1.2 '- 3.1d 0.9 685 1.03 m.2 -' N.3 00.03 0.03 0.52 1,12 <D.04- 00.04 0.12 2.4 0.6 1.27 1.53 80.2 10.2 •..'.f Cl.til'VIO i:.l!!11!11,;rOfl I'ry 816/137:30 00.03 00,03 00.1 1,09 -0.04 0.58 3.53 <p5 0.6 0.19 00.2 ..,IAh61Vr!1 n.'.v Vf.\11!TrJII"TY 13/51139:30 10.[M 00.2 .0.03 00.03 0.45 1.16 ','I IA41 N III It A l!"i0h WN C TY 2/4/14 9:05 00.04 00 04 0.35 2.17 0,8 054 0.69 00:2 _0.21 00.03 :0.03 0.21 9.97 ;!:•,;,r,!.Wr)(1-1 r:1.1[)1:6;l,;rY 5161148:30 -0.04- !004 0.74 6.62 ].5 047 07 <02 10.2 10.03 00.03 G.38 3,24 I',i',.. Pu:r Nf IS 8113!149:50 -D.04 10.04 0.99 2.82 N/A 0.76 0.114 00.2 00.2 .0.03 -0.03 0.37 0,74 •:fi,:.ht.'i 1',-'R,::Ii:,x,l if rJl:f1' 11/51148:50 409 0.173 0.79 9.25 N/A 156 7.22 10.2 00.2 00.03 -0.03 0.37 34 v:[,ulnA%Ct! rj Llry _ 7/10/159:30 e.D.04- 1.52 0.96 59.6 29.1 : 1.36 _688 0.26 D,31 10.03 0.037 0.38 139 NMI':,:A.::.1::10rt CITY - 5/11/1510:00 0004 0.048 1.15 6115 1,] 093 377 N2 03 10.93_ 00.03 0.63 137 :ACRA'A NTORAIN�hi ION CITY 811111510.20, 0.04 0I) 0.92 333 4.4 0.88 L36 0.36 035 <0.03 06.03 <O.L 0.4 Sip.q:ad:1130RnriI[trY 2]/6/151187 00.06 06.96 1.16 267 00.5 0.66 � 0.92 02 1104 0083 1D 03 - D.5 196 _ $hCRh"A r:VTI]l4,;•'.:.0.114 TONCITY _ _ 2/3/k612:10 00.09_' 0,204 9.62 17.7 3,S 1,75 297 ,: 6.31 038, 4.03 00.03 0.75 2.48 .._.. ... snf R<.41f VrOOnHA11d TON CITY 51911612:13 0006 0196 2.28 16.8 NCA 1.05 l78 09.2 <0.1 19.03 00.03 '_ 0.49 3.45 6/8/1515 00.96 0.0660.19 4.35 NIA 1.29 l6i �. 0.21. 00.03 -6.03 � 0.84 1,98 SAIIiArd+N;O:IA[IAM[LION C!fY 6: 10.2 ... . ......... .. ... .. 4,i f:hl.t:N IO,I A IMM It WN I'TY 351711611:00 10.04 10.04 0.41_ 2.91 NlA 1.12 146 00,7 00.2 0043 -0.03 075 1.36 '4?'A Rnr1A5,nT'f!I+ICITY 2/6(1713:00 00.04 0.945 3,35 43 N/A 1.(I S.3G 436 0.37 .9.03 00.03 0.66 9.16 .-...,.. .. ._..- _. _ ., r --.., ...._. ........ - Moximum 0.648 326 13.2 172 394 4.59 307 036 0.37 0A18 2.11 5.79 35 Mcdiom 0043 0.0795 0.97_ 6.4 S.T 0.995 k 37 0.71 9,76 0,01 0,039 0575 2,1 - .. .. Minimum 9,003 0011 0.08 1.61 0.18 0.44 0.59 0_21 0.12 0.602, 0003 0.15 0.4 •.•1:f6 w Ln.Plnn :!,r At,vl.let';r:I,idardL.Pri,n)WL _ .. .. ... E'fl:a_A 3.lin Plon cu.v'.If IVAIVr titnntlalds SLlarro.:rYrACI _ ..„ 50 I _ _', _ ... .,, . C Ii f J'A'C1CH11A Cah[arnra P.&I.,H-:!I,Gall - -. -. -02 :I.Eal.'.I.tnnrir MCS '_ ... .. C;d CPAU.clnatmlLno inll..,•rn4al cancerriskrslm+atr)131611114+n water 0.7 ........ ..,.... .. -. ...... ........ II•i:.'A,Ii,A,i,Ad-.:I,lar df knit vr.It,, - -. - ',_.-.......... ... ., ......... .... .,. :ltr'A:R'SP,-I,C......_'ut..Or king WAtrr Health Adirl:wirs � ...._ _,., .. .. [,dul. .,.r rlrn�ilil.Ill.r:},,r.•HI,,.txrlr4Cl.Ma<,nit0«a64rtlOtr lrv.l For •rfr,::vtr..1,.rP_r7 ' 4.25 � r r _ -_.._- -__.__ . Ar:,::.:r n.1'..:P t1...Any 1.u.Il. 7­t.•andodc-Ii ,,old -- - -. ..... 200 _-._ - .--........ ...,. .,..... ..._. ,•.a!nnnx,n8 W-, .. .. . ...D,OS. ...... .. - ... ... ..... .... I.:9'81111.lu+r�It .� � I a•t:,..,dp,,aarnq ld'a irme:_TPo3mI;W41[r Mc'i Slt/elnitlflCs _ - .. :,.r.,,...r trrl:r^M.•rllr.•I,+.Lkt nfPll^-16041 and Ll.hn)r WrlfarC .50 I t•,r.n,.:.1"I.1V'I.1IId;,,k,i-Il...., .t11-Hit;.II-'.d tvPiftlr P^Ilvrlpn : Ii..t1•n.i:I;.:t r•,Inond.il1•!0 Cu[rna srnihwumr Ann.In<ldPCo tli,ntnen Cnnrnnlr0116d 9.77 tI.InI.....I A.f1n1I1,C.u11 wCl Critcnu Fr[Thy<alrr nqu.:Iic lilt M.Tvinlurt144n1rn[r<li0n : 1.4 _-_ ............... .. ......... 23 Table 4. Sacramento River Op Moulton Weir,Part 1 of Ol.dWed Total Olssowcd Total OISSOivad Total U1,111 eel Total Rhsnivrd lalai [:ii,:rt.�•.r! S.ii.rr Aluminum Aluminum Arsenic Arsenic Cadmium Cadmium Caloa,iuns Chl-P,aa Copperor]Pcr Ir nn lien r. Stallurl Name 5amplt?.If, "A 1ig/L µ8/L WL ye/l. P8/L PA/L . IigiL wil"A tµ1/; !IY•!I .. .. 1111. _ . SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON Will 5/]A/0314:1S 22.6 584 lAb 1.67 0.01 O.Q7R 134 2.25 0.93 3,I1 4.1 311.1 SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON Wit _ 6/10/039:00 15.8 180 1.83 1.88 - -0031 -0.031 084 0.71 0.71 1.:.'. SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR -- 40 7/10/0330. 36.4 116158 169 -0.031 -0.009 06:: nn3 1.29 3,3 111 2'•/ .. ... .. 111 ,.. 1. .- .. -.. SACRAMENTO R OPP.MOULTON WR8/13/433 II;A5 4.42 „215 I,AS 15 <O.Q04 <O.f]49 017 V.75 0.79 ]a:+ •2°= �I; 1111. 11.11.,__ .. ... 1,111 _. _. ._ SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 9/3/0312:30 5.91 304 1.43 1.51 -0101 -0.01 013 1tir2 1.73 2,11 SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 39/8/0332:90 _33,5 717 0.879 1,3 -0.011 0,009 Oil 0.:0 0.97 13.' •-•: - ............. 1111. ... 1111_ .. ... .. L SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR _ _ 11/5/0311:00 64 132 147 -,t_63_ -6102 10.004 r,92u!r 11 I.OF 3'.'1 £•!s• :ii - - _._.. 1.111.. ._.. . 5ACRAMENrO R OPP MOULTON WK 12/8/03.10:45 1193 3448 1.63 2.84 0.019 0.175 2.73 9..s 4.25 2:1,4 4'•« ',:::�'] SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR _ 116/R443:30 1252 1248 1.73 231 <0..COP 0.045 1.Vl a.•;1• J..)1 1,:1 - .,- 111 . OXAS .. SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 2/4/04 12:20 1614 195[) 1.04 1.41 -0,011 0.037 2.17 5.:1 3.82 A.L/ 1[161'. -- - - -2521 $733 1,59 _2.8 -0.015 _0.232 !111 l4 N _7.111 2711 :is l!, 1!,:15: SACflAMENYO R OPP MOULTON WR 3/1]/04 32:00 _ SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR - - - - 3/8/04 11;40 184 3478 IA4 _1.83 0.011 0.053 IM, 4, 21 1.93 h;L? 13a 11'.11 SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR4/7/04 9:45 26.9 160 1.6]_ _1.74 0.0n9 OA33 V 54 1_Ili 3 AG 1.99 lti.ti 7...1+ .. 1111. SACRAMENTO R OPP MOVLTON WR - -- _ _ 5/5/OA 13;00 5,14._ 2119 31712.e3 1.83 0.004 0:027 0.'14 1.:1 D.7$ SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR _ _ 6/9/64 30:00 185 302 1-75 1.84 0.011 0.013 0.1; 1.`.3 1.65 1AA 52.1 S39 SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 7/29/0410:40 100 ]55 1.4 1.43 0.005 0.011 063 0.71 S.OG 1.14 52.1 ]US 1111. ......... .._1111 1111 .... ., ..... '1111 .. _ ._ _ - - SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WA 10/�/0411:00 14.3 89 1,22 1.34 -0011 -0.008 11.11 0::'4 0.73 1.: SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WA 111910413:00� 20 76.2 2 34 � 2,4 �..-0.008 -0.007 1�.!r 0!.=3 0.89 ]13 7,1.!• '='1 _..,.. 1111... .. ....1111 ., . SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON Will -_12/7/04 10:20 3A 82.6 2.25 2.27 -0.013 c0.034 1 SG 1:'.:3 0.89 1 t:. .•i• i 1; SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 1/10)0511:00 459 1259 2-36 1.6 -0.013 -0.007 1 31 3:11 2.41 a'i, :IJz .I:i;• _.. .J. .,.. .5 11,11 .., . SACRANlENTOROPP MOULTON WA _ __ _ _ 12:25 370 582 151 158 O.011 -0.066 2']2 2.:•5 1-7 3..'1 111 ;c:V. .. .-._._ _.._1111 . _. ... SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR _ 3/30/OS 30:45 1U.7 133 _ _1.91 1.97 -0.033 c0.011 1.5: }.:•4 I.17 7.1r: SACR,,mENTO R OPP MOULTON WR _-4/20/05 111:50 20.7 130 2,97 2.07 :0.022 -0.009 1 03 1.,2 1.16 1.-3 31_4 I:s? SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON Wit 5/19/05 11:15 314 5975 7.34 3.07 10058 0.138 1 37 3A 1.82 7.1.1r 2'15 9I ... .-. SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WA 6/28/05 3x:05 303 125 ]A2 1.65 -0.009 :0.012 0.62 1.S 1.32 1..3.1 !IF-3 1.52. ..-. , .-. .. SACRAMENTO R Orr MOULTON WA -7/26 I(05 1:00 7.14 197 705 106 O.DO/ 0.034 0.13 0.99 0.93 3..11 SAC RAMENT0 R 0 P MOTH TON W _ 8/23/C59:30 S.OB _$411 ].52 1.57 - :0.009 -9.009 0-� 0,59 0189 1.[!H •-4.11+ 1 iir .. .. 1111.. 1111 1111 - ., SACRAMENTO R OPP MOUL rON WR _ _ _ 9/29/05 11:36 17.3 132.5 ]31 3.46 0.007 0.1317 1 1.33 _0,88 1 Ali LO.r�_ S'.` SACRAMENTO R OPP MOLL!.rON WR _ 20/25/05]0:30 21.8 290 1.5 1 2 O.tl13 9.019 057 ISM 1.06 1.511 1 l.c ' F ,1,1,11 .. . 1111. .._, PAP .. SACRAMENTO It OPP MOULTON WR _]1/14/05 0 1 .3. 12;08 - 297 93_ 2-35 O.LL12. 0.033 019 ].J5 2.22 2-?•1 15.9 4:1:3 1111 .-. .. _. . 7. _.- _.. 1111 . SACHAry EN r0 H OPP MOULTON WR _ _ 12/14/0511:40 9A 71A � Y.84 2.04 - 0.01 0.017 � 0,77 2.03 0.92 1._'•1 a.2 11: _ 1111. ... .. ... SACnAMENYOR OPP MOULTON WA _ 1/4/0619:46 2779 4345 - 1.$A _7 S3 � 0.074 0.1096 � 6!Il 141 5.21 lb3 lf•%l1 r•rr•r'r 1111 111 SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 1/24/0613:10 413 1419 1.45 1.8.3 0.013 0.062 L 13 4 S:l 1.77 S.b+ ::L.i ?0;G SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WA _ 2/22/0611:40 263 848 3.37 1.68 __OATH 0.0 . 5 ]!6 2,'.'=1 1.15 3�%^ I'!r� .. .- ,. SACRAMENTO R APP M011l TON WA 311/0612:10 4357 6332 1.56 1.99 0.029 0.105 G.i ]'.r.t 5.75 La r• :"•'J''= 1!�:/ 5AcnAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR _ 4117/0611:10. 1232 2222 1.OG 1.56 <0.1 <O.l /1, S,i�n 2-75 %leT .,I. 22' 1 _.. SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON ..ON WR5/17/Ob 11:35 _ 129 -_ 51} 1140 1 fi4 <0.1. -0.1 041 111-1 2.7$ s2 `l;-i 1.:1- ...... .... _ 1111. ... . SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 6/27/06 30:25 47.7 577 1:37 1,67 1011 c9%1 1 22 2 i'S 7.04 1.'IS 111, 392 SArll-1MENTO R OPP MOULTON WA _ _ _ 7/76/06 8:2n 228 793 _ 1.28 1.38 c0.1 -0.1 V.:; I ,, 1.27 2.1 1113.9 471= .. .,. 1111.. .. ... .. .. _.. SAC RAMEfJTO R OPP MOULTON WA _ _ 8/2210610:50 1$7 - 277 1.1 116 :0.3 c0.1 O:iS 0.9) ].11 144 Ili 273 -. ... ... SACRAMENTO OPP MOULTON WR9/20/0611:35 351 � 633 � 1.0 _135 <O.1 . 0,51 1..?3 1.97 :0 51..5 .'.tlC' ... .. 6_ _... 11:0111.. SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WA 30/24/05 12:15 _ 31.7 226 1.23 3.44 -0.1 :0.1 0.6G 7109 3.29 1.55 5:3.7 7118 SACRAMENTO k OPP MOULTON WR __ 12/12/06 12:35 1113 1.A. 2.6 2.74 <Q.7 -0.1 0 49 3->.': 1.44 2.nG 1 7.5 `r•7) ... .. - _ . SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WA 1/9/07 x3:00 81-8 2114 1.93 2.11 <012 40.1 I,L:G .2.74 1.132 1.1 :�;n 7ti1 ... ..._ .. 1111 -, .. .,... .-._ _. _ SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 2/27/0710:00 4`7 - 524 1.27 },38 _<O.] cD.L 1,11 2.C'2 2.93 ]F2 •1h4 ii_! SACflAMENTOROPP MOULTON WA 3/20/071F.25 ]7.6 - 96.4 2.13 2.36 <0,1 <0,2 0.49 0.72 - 1.18 ]*_'? 2r:.T krir: ..... -......... 1 111. ..,.._... lfl. __ .. SACRAMENTO OPP MOULTON WA _ A1111/0710:15 ]6.6 .� 105 1.9 }98 <0.7 eO.L 041 0.7e: 1.53 2,]S 3:I 1-L'i .., .. .. 1111,. .. _ _ .._ . .. .. ... SACR•lMENTOROPP MOULTON WR, ,......... „_,. .,. 5/301079:60 3,42 _-.99 B_, ,._ 2.07 2.22 <0.1 :0.] [i.:1 O:J•1 1.2fl :,1.» n.'1 F"J 1111 1111 .. _.._ .. SACR.:M1tENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 6127/07 11:00 - 5.35 130 - 1.645 1.75 ', <0.2 <0.1 5:.!. 0:5 1.09 1 i1,, `'.4 1!i SAC.HAMENTOR OPP MOULTON wA1111. 7/] 00.05 6AG _ 107 1.77. 1.811. :0.3 <0.1 O.•I l V.1'6 1.02 1 A3 .... V, .,, .. ... ._ 9/71 __ _... SACRAMENTO OPP MOULTON WA _ 8/28/0710:40 __1.tla 34.E 1.69 172 � <0.1 <0-1 OJ2 0.'•9 0.84 111'1 2.i :..: . -._ .. .. - ... , 1111. _111.1. ' SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 9/13/0711;10 1.77 33.6_ 104 1.61 io-3 <0.1 0.33 O.!:7 0.81 D..L:' ... SACRAMENTO OPP MOULTON WR30/31/0710:55 2.0 . 4 41.1 _ 2.19 � 2.23 t0.1 <0.1.,. V..' 0.1111 11.111 1,33 ^.) 112 ... .. 1111. ._. .. .. .. .. SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON Wfl 11/27/07 11;$0 0.87._ 47,R 2.27 - 204 <0.1 <0.1 0.43 0..,44,4 0.78 U 7-3 1;'='1 - , . SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR _ _ _]/23/0812:-0 3.9 218 __. 2 G3 2 75 - <0.] <0.1 054 l.c'1 1.12 ].:s9 .'>.2 . _ ., .. ... _.111,1 . SACRAMENTO ROPP MOULTON WR X2/27/0830:50,; 30.4 1730 : I.O6 173 ; <0.1 <0.1 0.41 6=5 2.06 6.7 7114 )Y.:.2 SACRAMENTOAOPP MOULTON%" 3/26/0$10:10' 2 56.4 2,27 2.36 <0.3 e0.1 042 0.7:1 _ 1.26 361 sJ) 1-'3 . 1111, .. 1111... ..., ..... .. .,, - SACRAMENTU R OPP MOULTON WR _ 4/Z3/0810:30 4,59 121 - 2.14 2.2 <0.1 <CI.1 0.43 O,HB 1.35 1.95 5 1118 ..,..,... 1111 . ... ...... .. ... 1111 .. .. 1111._.. 1111_-. <0.3 - . SACnAMENTOR OPP MOULTON WR 7/74/0811:15 2.02 52.8 ],65_ ].%B 50.1 Oal O.G 3.,,,07 1.25 S.] W.9 SACHAMENLO R OPP MOULTON W" _ _ _ 4722/0911;10_ .,,_3:89. „66.2 -:_. ,2.]4 2.29 <0,1 <0.1 0.33 0.:.9 1.67 2.1: !0A '_1`:I. O 1 111.. 1111 .,... 1111 SACnhMENTO R Orn MOULTON WR 5/28/09]2:15' 2,79 SG.G ].89 ]9J <O.1 <O.1 � 0.4.5 0.:=7 _1,81 ].'r:r It(• 1;s 1111 .,. 11,11 9. ___ .. SACHAMEN[OR OPP MOULTON Wfl 6125/09,9:25 3.27 103 2,43 _.i.,2 <O.1 � <O.1 031 0.•.i 1.3'1 11 111 1. 1111 .-4 .. . SACRi,MENTOROPP MOULTON WR 7/28/0910:30- 7.77 142 1.39 1.53 <0.1 m.x Das 6.19 1.07 1,'i !I.•'• 1-'r• SAC14AME14TO R OPP MOULTON.W11 Wfl _ _8/27/09 9:3D 2.60 30.7 1.19 _1.24 <0.1 c0.1 0.i� 0,-016 0.88 1 l%f• S ?Yi . .. .... .. .. _ 11.11. SACHf.MLfJT4H OPP MOULTON WR 9/24/099:50 2.Q9.,,. 35.9 1.34 ]36 <0.1 <O.1 034 0::5 0.9fi 1..L•'. n 4r5 ... .. 1111 --. .,. .. 1111 _._... .. SACHI.MEIJ 20 H OPP MOULTON WR _ 30/27/0911:4Q 5.31 985 3.75 1.95 <0.1 <0.1 O.33 0:A ICP, .l.', 31.2 SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 11/18/0911'30 2.SG 60 1:94 4:l4 <0.1 _<4.1 V.,; DJ 0.98 1,45L:_i SACHAMENTO R OPP MOULTONWR 12/9/098:35 1.73 25.8 2132.64 <0.1 -0.1 045 0•,'I 0,92 3.'.2_' 3'J SACPAMCN30ROPP MOULTON WR 1/261308:45 87,7 _3953 173 2.43 <U.] Q,114 0.5'] 14.7 3,45 26.2 111.1 a/lid SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 3/2/1013:15 13.9 793 1.15 1-51 <0.1 <0.1 O.J9 1-19 1,56 •3_) 29.5 -1.12 SACRAMENTO R OPP MOUL70N Wfl _ 3/24(307:30 1.83 54.6 1.72 176 <0.1 <0.1 913 0 L 5 0,95 1.19 5.6 94,2 SACRAMkNTO R OPP MOULTCN,WR__ ,. 4/23/307:00, ,3.67,,. 780 3.45 -169 0.3 �;1_ „_ 0.413 307 1.03 3.!13 R.:{ WILL1_111. .-._ _,. _ SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR _ 5/2G/307:00 3.46 4916 1.2 1.26 <O.1 <O4 0.4 0.114 1111 3.75 1.4 G.J.I SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR 6/30/107:00 6,01 52.4 - 1.29 14fi <O,1 <p.T 0.L3 0.11 1.17 1.16 5.' ....1111_ 1111.. .,1111 ..,. ... SACfl0.MENTOR OPP MOULTONWR _ '_712H/308:4V 3.8 29 l.b 145 <0.1 10.1 044 0.'_r. 1.33 !d'e .-•.n [v+,R ... 1111 .. -.. .. _ ., .. SACgI.MEfJ30R ppP MOULTON WR 8131/10 I0;10 6.25 34.7 1.22 .1:24 10.1 <O.1 021 O,-i 1.19 ).:!� 1.:. .;.2 SACRAMENTO OPP MOULTON WN _ _ 30)25/308:00 12.9 682 1.55 3.49 +.0.1 <0.3 0.12 3..'% 1.79 3'1:, 2,_, SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON WR11/30/308:50 4.11 48.3 ...Y.67 ..-1.89 <0.1 <O-I 0'13 O.i] .•2 1,19 L,:!'i L= .. _ .. - SACRAMENTOR.O,PPOULTONwR,, ,. 32113/1033:20_ 2.71 _ 93.3 146 .`.' 0�4 01 1.21 ],'.•ti: '1 •-_• . ..M ...1111 .._.. .. _ _.. .. SACRAMENTO AOPP MOULTON W0. 1118/1I 10:65. 6.13 500 _;Ail 16 0.1 c0.1 0.17 2 3 1.45 2.17 1'.1 r11 4 x733 111 Maximum 4357 - 2.63 3.49 0029 _ 0.232 9lJ 24.H 7150 2':7 ?'.r:i ;u:L; 1111.. ...:.,...., _ 1 Metllam 14.3 146.5 1.505 3.735 O.O9,04.1 055 1.11;111.185 ].r�% 1(.a i•N'. m ., .,--. 1111 l] Minimum 0.87 25.8 Q.R79 1.15 0.004 0.009 D.11 0A5 0.71 C.6[ 2A SH.2 _ SWHCG Oasln Plan-Drinking Water Standards-Primary MCI-- - - 1000 SWRCQ 13-In Pian-Dh.nin8 Water 5[4ntlaidl-Si;wndary MCL _ _ -_- .,200 Cal EPA/O[HHA-Calrfornla Public Hr:allh Goal :. 600 ,,.,, 6.004 p OA 1111 _... - -. .. .-._ USEPA Secondary MCL .,,50 Cal EPA-One.In a migi ircremontal cancer risk ma estite furdrinking water __ 0.023 - n.Q023 lca _- . .. _. 1,111 111.1.. . 1111,, .. USEPI, lth AyhOry nn dlar,lking w lfL: . r _ ,. -.,..0.02 .. .... .., _. 1111 1111 .. _. - .. .. . U5[PA IR15 Referen Ce Dos,Drinking W ter Health AdvlsoriCs Callfa.nra Prnpbsltlon 65 Safe Harbor Level•Max.Allowable do-level for reproductive toxicity O.PS Agncupuli:W,ltrr 011alijy Goals-T a and edorihreshuld 5000 -._. _ _ 50',00 _ .1111 11,11 __. __. .. ., 1111. .. Cadlor Ria Taxl.Rule Sources of Drinking Wnle+ - - Nailnh:llAr drmy of SclPnce3 Qrinking Wafer HCalth AtivVsaries - _ SD00 -. _ -_.-__ _ _ N4noaol Recommended WO Critefia-Taste and Odie-Welfare 3nQ N9tlnrul Re1ommendelf W4 Cdferib Human Hedlih arld Welfdfe p.olcS.tion -te andfishcosSumRdnn 0LOS National r Cr Recommended WO lloia-FresllW:llrr A9UdllC LiteCOndeo-1 C ncentrbllon 87 30031 _11.11 _ .. .,.- _111.1 . ...... __. Narianal Rrcammcnded WOCriteria:Fire,"atcrxqualic Life Maximum Concentration 750 24 l note 1. S wramenlo River op Moulton'Weir,P.rt J o1 2 9N 15<9cd Taro! 010 Nia - Toll.] Total Di­td Total Olswlted Total bissoNedj T¢l41 Dia91vld Total Lead !rad A4}rprn Ma,pres,, Mer< V NI[kM Nickel Seleriwrn enlum SlIv : SINe, 2knc Zinc 5cvi¢n N,unr. SamPle Date W.L. V6/F.:, V8/L.. pg/L ng/L PS/L Y8/L.... VVL Pg/L. VIPA _ pg/L„ A8!L.. .RgJL, 4OPP W').11 Triry WA 5/14/0316:(5 16.025 0.299 0.17 20.7 NIA 0.65 3.17 0.]1 0.7 10.025 10273 0.4 4-5 •n:.P1­F1 IO 4')N'1.0911TON WR 6/10/039:00 10017 O,OGS 0,14 7.15 NJA � 0.52 � 1,38 11....18 [4.296 10.001 14251 Q.3 1.5 ., ... .. ... . . S;C^1.11.1! NIT,III OPT-t,D•Ul7UN 5VP7/10/0310:40 0.012 0.055 2.05 5.66 NJA _0.97 1.2fi 10.179 (1.17 1001 19.123 0.35 _1.5 "..NWA 8113/031L45 10.003 0.124 O.4g ' 9.98_ N/A 095 1.11 10.7fi3 021 [0955 -9,122 0.462,24 '.1L 0r.Mk'N 1, POi•f'Nlrl Ll0NWA 9/3/03,1230111,2} 010146 10.149 0.41 3.16 10.00.7 0.783 0.1 36.6 .. N/A ._,.11 2,29. _ .... .1-..6_... ,.. . '.nl BA?/I-N Ir'R 0I'1'MOOT TON WA _ 10/8103]2:60 0.028 0.08_5 cm _ 9.5 N/A : _F.16 1;6410.327 [9.162 10.01 10.131 0.62 147 SAC,RAMENT(,R OPP MOULTON WA II/S/0311:00, 0.029 0.057 6.6 8.03 NJA . k33 1,61 0,17 0.22 1002 10.04 0.9 13 :..,6Rh MFNTO R OPP MOULTON WR _ 12/$/0310;45 Q,385 2,93 9 6 313 H/A _319 15.7 1`1.12-- 0,28 0,037 0049 511.4 31.6 '.r,(RANIENTC ROPP MCJII'ONWIl 116/049:30 0.085 0.87.7 4.6251.9 N/A 1.53_ 7.G2 0,1 <0.248 50.DU7 [0.014 0.9 104 '.ACAAhIrNT(T R.,lPn M4ULTI3N 4'JA . 2/4/04 13:70 0.306 1.2 11.3 83.1 NIA 3.16 8.72 0.13 10.282 10.015 O,OBS 4.04 144 Sn PAN11 NTO R OPP'6)911 TUN WR 2/17104 12:00 0,877 4.9 31.3 39L NIA 6.92_ 44.5 K0.]21 0.26 -0.916 0.06 7.53 56.R 5rv.-Fr,M[NIryR01'P:,)nV11ONLVR 3/8lM 11:40 0.054 0541 3.02 59.7 N/A _1.28_ 7.41 D.3 0.31 ,0.94 <O.oGS � 3.07 10.6 .. ... .. ., .. .O .... ..,.. .... .. ':l!;.hN:llrl C'RC"'r',10UEfI1N LVA ___ 6/71069:45 10.032 0.09 705 30 N/A 114 3.76 0.131 0.53 _092 10031 0.5 1.:4 I P h1011!7ON W q 5/5/06 11:00 10.007_ 0.13 1.58 12.3 N/A 1`1,87 2.16 10.565 0.23 0.001 10.044 0.19 2 S7 '.n1 RAAIt1!70 R ol'n:.1010110.v WR G/9/0}10:00 0.082 0,112 4.02_ 10.2 NfA 1,3 ].99 -0.121 10.226 <O.flla ,0.081 1.22 2.:18 r.N1111T0 Rrll'r 4:G1:l,TUNWK - - 7/29/0410:0 0.017 0.059 1.8k 4,98 N/A 1.02 1.46 0.35 0,27 10.008 .0.067 047 :.Al .... ... _ .. ...... .,. +•:P.i,r,lrtisC RLIS'P 1!n Jir�7':V.n -1015/0413,00 0.01] - 0049 2.04 7,22 NIA 1,16 114 <0�144 <11,7M 10.977 1(1.054 0.45 1.09 .. .., ,. .._. ._._. .. ... .. .. _..._ \!,%!AOPP,?:!:TUt M\WR _ 11(9/0413;000.008 0.04 1.69 8.14 NJA : 109 1.24 -0.149 1`1.19 14.006 <0,063_' 0,46 0.49 •.Ai Rr 1IE'r1C F!)I'P:A'M IC'N WR 1217/0410:20 -0.01 0054 0.68 1;9 N/A 061 I 11.84 n,360 3 37 <G Ol1 -0`2' Om ."(1,•r1[154q OnP,VOUITON WP _ _ 111616.5.1.2.,0o _0.091 O.609 2.fi4 63.2 NIA. ,1,79 - 6.19 0.31 0.65 O.DOS O.Ok 1.11 7.93 :1rkr.?.ILNfoR UnP YALLLTUN SVP 212/p$32:75 _0,058 _0.404 2.79 73.2 _ N/A 3.45. 4.05 KD 222 036 0.003 0.007 0.77 4,72. 5ni'IL4Mf NTOR OPPMUMTONWA _ 3/]0/0514:45_ 0.011 _D.094 078 _ 7.17 _ NIA - 1383 1.6 0.265 0,29 10.001 X0.036 0.24, .1 26 snt:nAMrNTO LTOR n OPP MOUrI W4120/0510:50 0,021 8079 2.74 10.8 NIA 0.8 1A2 0.25 02$ 10.001 10.005 036 1.37 5ACPAMENTO R OPP MOOLTON WR 5/19/0511:]5 f04 ! 3.35 2.73 - 2fie N/A 1.38 3:S 0.399 10.317 10.009 . 0045 1.14 394 '✓•;'FAMENTII R()I'1'MUUI KIN WR 61211/0515,05 KDA09 9.041 : 4.35 4.85 NIA 0.72 1.18 0.31 0.38 <O.DO2 16.027 l 1.28 .. .. .... ... ... .. ... ... .. . _. .......,.. '.RC fYA?v1Ct4 rOROPI'MOULTON LVR 7/26/0$11:0(1 10.018 9.039 0.53 7.35 N/A 0.69 ].55 10.2223 _10.322 10,013 <9,013 D.SS 185 .. 1­;r5 NI(IRCpI'nnrl:ll l(Iv-H R/23/05 9730 -0.004 0.045 0.66 5.73 N!A 0.69 ].lk 10.227 10.227 10.00] Q.0131 0.14 0A •!.(F:,1Smm R OPP-M(IUI,cq Wn 7/28/058:30 <QOD4 0,048 0.45 4.75 N/A 0,88 1.25 0.18 0.22 10,003 10,003 0.33 1.13 „1:.1+,•F1.•1`11 R.1PPM1ill TON LYR _ - - - '10/25/05 k0'34 0,0210.114 1.28 10.6 N/A 104 : 1.77 10.0.63 - 0.19 10002 [07002 0.53 18} 1'(:::x:11 11111 rJn 11P1•`r,r'Lq I•,''+Y\R _ - 11!]4/051700 0013 --0.212 1.27_- - 26.9 NlA1.Oa 2.56 10,386_ 10.186 10004 10.009 0.73 3.6.2 '13:3•^lE r:TU R:+I'I'r:lilll11,11.LVR 12114!051]:40 0,008 0,079 0.68 6,17 N/A 11,05 1.33 _ 10.149 0.19 .0003 10.001 O.GG 1.78 .. ._...... _.._, ,. .. l:,:IA,rr r!IAOPP\G(:1141rN WR 1/n/0630:60 0626 2.6e 26.9 166 N/A 5.91 _ 222 [0.369 [1.15 0011 O.D28 6.66 22,9 �n[AJ.'.,lt••in RCPI'Mi.ul Tfery 11!'11 .124/0613:10 0,.185 0.749 13.6 60.3 NM 178 685 0,23 _ [7.28 <0 e0.00 1.54 9A9 .. ., ... . .. .._ . . .. ., .1.1.64 4.63 . ,A:F.:r✓f NI:1 R rIPP 1,'111 UL:UN N'R 7/27/06 31:40 0,059 0.538 6.68 40,1N/A 0.15 ._10.12131 _ 100119 10.009 0.113_ 5.22 1r f:r,?.•rNr;l AOrl•vn,Jt tGv LL'R_ 3/l/0611210 0.852 7.81 35.13207 NJA _6 34 ]9.6 10.349 0.2 10.009 .0.009 7.67 27.7 hnti nr.Mf NIi1ROPP MOULTON WR .,, 6/17/0611:10 (1271 1.27 13.8 83-2 NIA 2.88 4.76 10.2 0.22 19.03 : 10.(13 2.99 12.8 i V iiAMLNTO R OPP MOOLTON WR 5/1710611:3S 10.04 0383 2.83 191 N/Al O8 2.15 0.22 . 0.26 -063 10,03 0.39 233 ".S•'NI MENTO R OPP MOULTON WR _ _ 6/27/0630:25 10.04 _ 0.133 0,32 - _23,5 N/A 1 2.08 10.2 66 0 10.2 Kfl03 0, 0.19 266 ... :^CRAMiNTCROPP NIOvl7ON WR ' 7JSGJ066.19, [004 0.349 1.11 14 3.6 176 2.6 10.2 0.1, 1003903 - 0.6969 2,39 :AS Rn41f NT0 y OPP MOUL'INN WR -8/77/0610:50 10.04 0.081 1.89 8.01 0.67 1.38 2.05 0.21 0.26 10.03 10,03 0.55 1.5 )4:n nMLNTO R OPP m(iu,r4N WR 9/20/0611:35 ,04 106A9G 2.46 11,8 1.S _1.63 2.76 10.3 <Q,2 10.03 40,03 11.54 8<7 . .,. .. •:,[Nr.A:.L NIDA n1'P i!n_N.I ON WR 10/26/0613:15 10.04 0105 2.1 12.3 11.34 115 2.03 10.2 421 10.03 10.03 D.1G 3,21 II1.1I,11.Nr139!'I•P`.In+Jl 10N WR 32/k2/0612:35 <OM 0.366 3.74 72 :.8 2.21 2.82 10.2 -0.2 -0.03 -0,03 Jr" _6.62 -A-t. 1•;Nin-:'111(!!.1':'.LY'< ___ 3/9/0713;00 _[0,04 0067 275 _ _ 11 15 1011 1.61 .0,7 <O.z 10.03. ' 1O 03 032 AXIS_ ;••11 I•:1`+:'P•IPfvu,tr(.♦WR 2/27!0.730;00 0,256 0.50.1 10.7 24.6 0.95 2.31 2.63 10.2 -0.2 10.03_ 10,03 3.33 7.x5 .., . .._.. S.. .. _. .. . ._ ...... .0,03 10,03 0.36... Z 0 "'t_b::I''N111Rr)I't".n.•'I+YI.'N LVR 3/70/071]:15 <O,M 0.071 2.35 � 9.911 1.7 085 1.21 10.2 0.32 „_,_._ „"„_.,, R(IP!'11(NJ'r0`.WR 6!18/0710:15 [0.04 0.078 3.59 11.1 1.3 0.79 1.17 10.7 10.2 10.03 10,03 0.46 3,33 ,... .... _._. .. ..__ _._. 1Y I•nk•,I NI+.q Irl'l?'t:N IL,4IYR 5/30/079:(0 1004 0.147 0.45 12.5 N/A,,. 0.73 1,32 10.2 10.7„ 10.03 10,03 9.2 360 1.v,nr,M1.N 1')11!11;,111(1.'I,'I:c WR 6/271078:00 <O,pa 0.092 S.g 12,7 - 1.1 0.79 1.39 10.2 10.2 10.03 10,63 OA9 3.6 '.0 I:C.MFvrL)gt3P1'•,IUN!ff.,:w0. 7119/07]0:05 [0.04 0.066 0.22 8,58 - 0.98 0.55 1.2 10.2 10.2 10.03_ <13 G3 028 3.2 ll'RAMFNTL1Rl11Pf'.sAOIIISCN WR 11128/0710:40 10.04 1G,M 0.21 4.92 N/A0.89 1.02 -0.2 � 10.7 10.0310,0} � 0.46 1.77 . ... 91 '.Al"nnMENr{)ROPP r.14ULTOn'wR 9/13/0 711:60 .0.04 0051 0..22 a.6a 0.9 0.916.45 10.2 10.2 .0.03 .0 G3 1).4G 2,04 ROP',M0U1 ION,WR SOJ31J0710:55 [0.04 0.054 0.23 811 - 0.77 _ 7.09 11,11 10.2 10.7 10.03 10.01 0.31 2,42 V1CnAMrNTO R ON'MOULTON WR 11/27/0711:50 10,06 - 0.002 0.31 5.57 0.75 0.89 : 0.92 -02 .0.2 10,03 <0,03 0,29 _233 ,:.f NAh9rNTCROPP MOI PITON WR 3/2314812;40 --10.06 0.134 17 766 1 NIA 1.17 - -1.49 <02 <O2 X0,03 10.03 0.77 3,76 Sn:11nME NTC T.OPPMCM TON WR 2/27/0810,56 10.04 0.979 079 61.7 N/A, 1.9B 0.93 0.32 0.45 10.03 .0,03 11,46 1: .v _. _ _ _ , 'IV.r.1CNTO F.UE`n;40llLTON 1 WP 3/35/0810:10 10,06 0061 O.SS 11.3 N/A 1 1.13 0.28 0.29 .0.03 .0.03 0.22 2,"19 C.."FA1NrC R;lrl•f.IOLN.T:1r,'1VR 4723/0810:30 10.04 0.095 4,71 - 14/1 NIA 0,92 1716 10,2 0.25 .0.03 10.03 CLOG 3,67 i.f5'•'.1 L'I:Ifi0.OP.'n;,r1U!I(,N IVR 7/76/0811:15 10,04 1 0.046 028 5.01 - 38 065 0.85 0.24 9.28 [D D30,03 0.3 1:.:TOP.:Ir:•;•:1J_i6NN0. -- --- - _ 617210911:10 10.04 _0.057 0,53 ---- 9.11 N/A 0.82 0.92 .� 102 - 0.23 16.03 10.03 0.28 2.66 •.nr:• M,, 141ut'i"6�UlIriN WR - - -- - 5/28/0912:15 19.M 0.062 041 7.18 NIA 078 9.89 10.2 10.2 10.03 10.03 0,53 2.72 `A'F,rl!.ft)[`P(:P%h:]Ul rI:N WR 6125/094:25' <O,M 0094 0.33 � 6.95 N/0. 093 1.116 6.23 0.26 10.03 0.03 0.96 6156 •.WLAna N7L:991111.1VIIA I ON Wq 7/28/0910:30 4OA4 OA62_ 1,39 7,1 NJA 1.02 1.06 102 10,2 10.03_ 1003 0,47 7,77 ........... .. . ....... .. ...... i - _ 102 <0 03 .0.01 0.33 1.79 '.Al'k•I:'l?Ir(1RL'3'0r.P;'U!.1(.N WR 0/77/09930 1096 _ .O.p4 0,36 - 7.43 N.A.N/A.. .,.0.78 0.86 <D.2 111.1 , s,1CRAM(NTO R OPP MOU11(1N WR - .904/09959 <0 G4 .0.04 D.33 4,99N/A . 0,86 0.96 <O.2 x02 0003 19Ili 0,33_ 1,99 1r1CFANlFti rCIA OFI'M1IOUL:C]N WA 10/27/04]1:40 10,04 0.117 4.35 17.7 NJA 0.99 1.13 111.7 10.2 .0.03 � -0.03 037 2.113 .n!Pi MFN rn R 4PP IAOVt TON WR 11/1810911:30 [1104 1).07 666 7,87 N'/A 0.69 0.99 102 102 10.93 1003_ 9.32 7.59 .. .. - _ x111 lLhnlFNtUPLJPP'•A7Ul7CN N'P 12/9/098'35 10.04 1004 0.32Z 7.77 - NIA 0.57 0.71 102 10,2 10.93 10.03 0.5 2.43 cALR:.r.11'N'r(1 gOpv.1Cliu rON IVR 1/26/10 GAS 0.977 4.39 167 700 N'/M1 362 25.6 0,23 I 0.26 [003 0.071 0.59 35'1 n:,'.1[`:iO A:}nP LtUvi 1'ON'LVR 3f1!]013:L' -O 04 O.G04 0,96 45.5 N/A 253 4.77 - 0.24 0.27 10.03 -' 10.03 9.86 7.53 _I,1 r 11N T r 1 A C I'"MO 11!11:N W R 3/24/107:10 11104 0,05_ 0,53 7.08 N!0._ 0.71 _O.B 0,2 10.2 eP.03 -9,03 023 3.:9 :A•,R.I'.IEATOO OPP AI:II!i'C1 N'WR 4/21/1(17,000.313 0.56 6,44 37,7NJA 072 4.76 02 0..21 [0.03 10.03 024 7.17 5/2G/1(!7:00 0.048 O.OS 0.32 4.64- N/A 6G 0,73 _ _ --... ....._..- _ - e9,7 10.2 10.93 1903 DA? 2.79 .......... ..... .......... .... ...... .. ......... _._ ., ... . _... ,11'.:6',11:-':]1112.10111701,INR 5/30/107:00 10,04 10.04 028 5.87 N/M1 0.13 0.87 .02 - - 111.2 N.03 10.03 0.56 2.17 ..;;Fr3t nA'11'�•:'r"',r1`:�16R !/28/108:40 19,04 0,066 0.33 5.81 N/A O.R6 I.01 10.2 102 10.03 10.03 9.73 223 71vR 8/31/1010:10 19,04 i 0,043 0.5 6.58 r N/A 08 1.06 -0.2 <0_2 10.03 10.03 0.57. -1,99 -i:nHl<r;'f q:]VI'MU:1:14,:,WR ICl/2fi/lO g:00 <O.n4 ` 0.556 2.25 34 N/A 1.45 _3.88 <D.2 027 10.03 10.03 1.3 6.87 R:..Y N.II R,31,C WIT _ _ 11/30/19 8.50 -0,04 0,046 0,58 6.62 N/A _ "k 1,37 P-2 0,2 10,03 10.03 1,15 2A2 1aLN:lS,,F tifll gL]VI'MOLT i<I.N LYR !7/13/1011:30 19,06 - 0.164 0.5 31.3 NJ0. 0.62 1.52 0.2 19.1 10.93 10.03 0.13 Z.P9 }n1`.NAM.£NTO R OPP MOU:TON IVR ]/18/11 LOVS -0.04 0.399 0,83 24,2 N/A O.RB 2.81 <11.2 11.22 10.03 O.C42 1.03 4.83 .. .. ........... .. :. ...... .........._ ..38 ....,....... .... .. .,.5'3 ..,' M1Fdtimym 4.852 A,8 35.8 3H} : 38 632 69.5 0.32 0.53 0.06 0.086 111.6 S6.R Metllam 0.058 0,095 1.335 10.7 1.1 1`.0] 1.52 0.725 0.26 OA355 4.047 0,515 2.69 Minimum O.00H 0,039 0.1 2.G3 030 0.57 0.71 0.1 0.15 0,002 0007 0.13 O.RB P w,4rr Stardams-Pm.l.vy M6L - S.Yl:f,nlia:lnl'I.,'v Stnrdmdi sr[nP,lary Mn! 50 1.,11':V.r MIA 1`.I:Irn nl.,I•.+_NC lln.fllh 60.1 0.02 12 11A cancra riss .,.,, .:,._ : .., ..... _... ....... .. .. .,.... . r.6 r'n rn. 11.In„n................ nai,nmrm.dH�r,�,.WLm. 4.i - - ,P.1`!•n f rJU A•'1'-D ."r Jn,,4t L r,'uMr - - __ 300 IWater hl'.Nr'rrl n \+r 1 .r Y.iny Water Nr311n Ar+lswiCs [..11'•.1..,T'1¢AM,.1.T­r,,.TA,rldrh9r$1[0-Mnh A!IVwahlt'do,.1­0 I.1•"`P'va'ri hvr I9.k i(v 0.025 I :SR'irl.;tl,rrW.1[rr rlwtlltl l'.¢IP.-T4str and¢111¢1 tlnrthnla r'aln„11-.,i.,,t.s OUN.5nur..s e!4n11k'mg Walrr . 0,05 - NaUrr.IIA[.nlrn•y nl Sclrnl r•,ONnking Water Hrnllh Ad Oita ies N.111nrdl I'r[nlluncn.1r11 V4.A Taft!aM 04¢.or V2r11arC ..,... r66nfr.11lr'11,r1u,11r r"Ir1'LY(1(1811116 Humon llr61t1,6n0 Wc1f4rc Inrrr;n;v.. 6.1111:ni'1,-U:c1'•w1lnClmn 46'1:1.,11 krrr.nnn•11•.1,•J 4:r,(.111!,•1 FIlLhW4i[r An„4!4(Life CDr4rlr(, sC0A44nrfat106 N,n„r:l k,•r.:n.�1e.1.•'l Wfl r.rtll:a f2eshwHrrA4lra[k U1C 6666!mrm C¢n[enSrall¢n 25 Table S.Stone Corral C nr 51,Part 1 of.2 Olsc Wv TeLll DC7 IF d T91.1 Di,,.I-d EM-I-d TRIM D"alv+r ro1vl �..I'Nrn 11•aI .. .�4 .... Alumina Alumni Ank A,wi, B-In Cad-. Cadmium ChCh-I- Cnr4nmun 1Cnppe. clv. S:ailar Nalnr 6ample OHe WA WL- R8/., "it In8/L_ IIPlI.. .III Ant, VBlL tWL Pi'/L II, 1,11 mumL CORRAL r NR St __ _ _ 5/27/9819:20._,. NIA NIA N/A NIA 0.4 N/A_ WA Nlr- NIA NIA NJ. If,'A Nil STo ME CORRA'-CNP 51 3)5101 I5:45 NIA N/A N/A N/A <OL NIA N/A Nl!• IJIA NIA `VA r;•'.% MIA STONE CORRAL[NA 51 _ 4/91019:00, N/A. MIA N/A N/A 0.6 WA WA MIA MIA NIA N/A rr'h rJlh STONE CORRAL CNR 51 2/20f0211:30 - NIR N/A MIA NJA_ OA N/A NJA N/F N/R NIA MIA WA >I!/. STONE COARAtCN0.$I . 3/71029:30 MIA. N/A NJA NIA OS MIA NIA N,/l. MIA NIP rrin N'A rl;A STONE CORRAL CNH S1 3/10(0211:20 NIA N/A NIA N/A 05 WA WA INVA NFA N.lA Iain .!,':• ... STONE CORRAL C MR 51 41101021845 _NIA_ H/A - NIA N/A 0.6 N/A WA WI. MIA WA WA li':• No .. -... STONE CORRAL CNP 51 - - 5/13H729A5 NIP MIA N/A NIA 0.7 N/A NIR NI!• N/A NIA M1in ... .. STONE CORRAL[Nfl 51 17/18/0215:15 NIA IIIA N/A NIA 0.2 MIA MIA MIA MIA NIA f.iA rt.-:. :1!1 STONE CORRAL C NR 51 1/9/0312-15 NIA NIA NIA NJA 0.3 NJA WA Wt NIA MIA I," 4i" N)T STUNS CORRAL CNk Si1/23/0310:50 WA NfA O� (A N/A Nl_ N/A NIA N/!- NIA NIA I:+A 1:;A III;,... .... . $TONE CORRAL CNR 51 _ i.3fb/0350',00 N/A NJA - NIA_ N/A _ 03 N/A N/R NII NIA NIA I:.'n I:;} :;ll• STONE[UARAiCNR S! _ _ __ 3J1110314:2$ N/A N/A N/A, N/A 0.5 NIA NJA N/n N/A NIA I;rh U•:• f':: STORE COARALCNR 51 _ 3/I7I0311,45 _ NIA WA _ N/A N/A 0.2 NIA N/p NJ/. MIA N/A I:fA t:':. :;�:� .. .. STUNL COARALCNR 51 4 11!8/0313:30 NIA MIA Wr. _ N/A 0.5 N/A WA NIA N/A N/A I.IA I1,'A 'L-A STEI CORRAL C NRS, 412AI0131-00 NIA NIA NIA N/A 0.6 N/A N/A N/A NIA N/P M1ln u;:• N;:. ST II CORRAL C NR SI SJ3410312A0 3.69 _ 51.9_ 1.94 2.34 0.6 0.079 0-P3 _8.1 6.51 4.46 4.9 x:31 S9S _.. .. .. - .. . _ .. .. .. . STONE CORRAL CNR SI 1/6/0411:30 lea 559 - I.4 1,45 0.2 <O.f1DA +0.016 34 3-6a 2.25 STONE CORRALCNR SI 2/4/0713:00 3399 2055 1.34 1.46 0.2 <0.011 0.016 276 3.D6 4.71 475 1'�^ I'i1.Y STON]CORRAL CNR SI _ __ __ _2f 1]1041310 _,]I.90._,., _.6149 - 1.26 _ 1,91 <0.1 <0.015 0.025 5,7r. it Sc5 lag 4" '..:2 L 57071E CORRAL[NO 51 3/8/0112'.9$ 17.5_ 55.5 0.719 0.91 0.3 0.006 0.013 1.6: 196 1.56 :.'J5 1'1,': `^" STONE CORRAL C MR SI _' 4/7/0710:15 c.1? 495 1.101 1.27 04 <0.005 -IIWG 3.6 3.62 2.31 it1: $170NE CORRALCNR51 _ 5/5/0'1 L1:50 1,75 3.71 2.21_ 225 06 O:OlI 0,023 60 6d9 3.ie 3.:•I •',%:. ]:;'. STONE CORRAL CNR 51 30/510414',30 MIA N/A N/A WA N/A MIA WA., ._ NIA N/A N!R r:;A :III. STOVE CORRAL C MR 51 - --- -- 1510!049:50 5.1Bow_198 : B. P.O. -1 0.187 0.705 7 7.37 3 7.61' '11 C71 .. .. .,.,. --.. ........ .. ... .. .. , STONE CORRAL CUR 51 - :12/7/0412.-45 -21.9 _134 5.05 52 O.d 0.176 0.36 5,9; 6.43 3.75 I'IYI :..h STONE Ct1RRAL C NR 51 %%1/10105 11,31) 458 1369 1./56 1.23 0.2 0.033 0.037 2 7'! 167 2.77 :+-A1 :.1 i:ti': STONE CORRAL CUR 51 2/2/(1510:45 l2/ 182 1.19 1,19 0.3 0.101 0.524 17: 2P] I.Bd _I[I :ii :'i• STONE CORRAL CNR Si 3/30105 I3;00 4.5 23.6 - 1.19 k26 <0.1 0.082 0.13 3.:k 1/2 ].RG -_.. : s STONCCORRAL CNR51 _ _,.,...._,. 4!19/057:20 -4.24 4.96 _1.25 _ 1;36 - 0;5 ,0;028 _0-435 e.9 492 179 =5< •5,•.: .151. _ .... - STOW CORRAL CNRSI S_ _. - _. 5/-491059:50 253 6,37 1.65 I.8 04 0.058 c11015 -_ 347 4.86 193 2,69 ./.51 STONC CORRAL C NR St 6J281 2:30 _ 4 4.44 2.01 2.51 0.7 0.036 0.04_ : 0.9's 4.4 2.21 33 LI)S il.I $TONE CORRAL CNR 51 7/241650.00 N/A NIA WA _,NJA, NJA .,.,.NIA N/A n/]• .N(A Will N:A Sl,r Ni:• STONE CORRALCNR$1., ,,. 8/22/050.00 N/A N/A W4 MIA � NfA N/A N%A tali• WA NJA N;A NIA IU.: _ ._ ... $TONE CORRAL CNA 51 - - _ �9/26/O50'00 NIA 'MIA _,.NIA.,_,._,!//A N/A N/A NIA_ NJl• NIA NIA N/A 1r:n Ni 1. STONE COAAPlCNP 51 10/241050:00 NJA N/A MIA NJ4 N/4 N/A N/A NII' N/A 11/A IIIA '.�+• `+!a STONE CORRA LCNR 51 - 1l/iJ1059:35 2.I7 2.66 „0.32 8.66 6.8.. <0.009 <0.007 371 3,97 4 s13 .. .. .. SfONC CORRAL CNA 51 - X32/14)0510:15 2.94 3,44 6.79 7.14 0.7 tl.tllI 0.014 571. 6f1A 16R c3'! J:�. •:1 SILINI CORRAL C MR 51 1/2410611:45 23.1 28.1 1.76 1,81 04 0.01 <O:0D2 5.4; 5.[5 165 :'1i .: •" STOVE CORRAL CNR SI _ ?I221069.45 7.OR 9.09 179 IIld ; ,05, c0AP7 <0.009 79'I R.93 2-401, r'5 .!' STONLCORRALCNA 51 _._. _._-. - 311/1 _ ,1991 2268 1.41 Sp9 0.2 1 0051 4J: 4.5/ 5 %] :!: :F STUNG COFI MOM 4/1711168:30 708 265 0.77 0.774 D3 QI _- ao.1 I n- 1:52 1.311 l,ab STONE CORPAI CNA 51 S/17/D6 10:00 2.37 4.04_ 1.75 1.81 0.4 cU,l �a;= 10ti 148 1.2G I n• '. I, STONE C09NAL[NH 51 4127/06.900 1.39 3'1 3,08 3.53 0.4 c0,1 9 ?2'I rn� STON[CORRAL[NR 51 7/26/060;00 _ WR MIA NfA _ _N(A N/A _N/A WA _' N!P N/A MIA WA NI.I iJ::. STONE CORRAL C NR SI 10J2•II0G 0.00UPI NIA NIA N/A NIA N/A WII A N . NIA NIA NIA 1i1A R.I....... .. STONE C09RPt[NA 51 ---- 32!72/0530:30. .._ 135 599 6.74 9.96 _. 08 <0,7 N.t 5.1 9,05 1132 •:1 �..`..: 322 STONE C09ML[NA 51 L!9/0717:30 „11.1 74.1 5,49 5.7 0.7 m.l W.1 d 4.83 1.82 I.Y4 41'+ .-• STONE CORRAL CNR SI 2/27!078,30 34,8 36.9 3,42 3.36 - 0.6 c0,3 <G.1 0.9 Y. 1.69 39 3'N+ 57.5 R11 ,STONE CORRAL_CNR 51 3120/0]9:50 5.74 ,64.1 120 3.49 0.7 W1,_ <D.I 061. 1.03 1.7 135 ti:-: «7i }lUH1'LONRAl CNR 514J18/0]8'.00 446 16.4 419 _,. 4.38 0.7 <p,l_ <0.1 1141 0.97 069 r�.91 'l! I:"-[ .... .. .- STON[CORRALCN0.51 _ _ _,.,. ' SJ30I070;00 :_ N/A NIA ,. N.A.-._. NIA N/A NJA NIA N/i NiA MIA WA !-'.: M1'/2. STOVE CORRALCNR51 91201070,00 N/A MIA NIA NIA N/A NIA WA NII. N!A N/A 'E' 1'i• 1.:4 ... .. S10FJE CORPPL CNR 51 - 911)/10 00 ,.-NJA, ...NIA, rf1A _ N/A N/A NJA NIA_ Ili NIA NIA A,'h .r'. STONE CORRAL CNR 51 10/311070.00_ WA NIA _N/A NIA MIA" NIA_ N/A Nil MIA INA_ I- i.''• r:/.7 STOVE COARAI.C NR%I :1/2310811:30 -9.77 -3168 1.41 2.23 0.1 cD l <0.1 _u.;-, S 39 5,11 1'v_F STONE CORRAL CNR 51 _. ....'2/27/0810:05 1.94 ]]0 _ 1,1E ].4 0.2 9,1 <0.1 02; Lal 749 .7.5 J; 65: STOVE f,ORAAL C NR 51 3/26/0-49:10 0.94 33.5 L57 3.15 0.4 <01 <0.1 " .9;ii 049 297 :•1?I STONE CORRAL[NP 51 419 50 1.73 50.6 243 2.97 0.6 <0,1 <G.1 D.S.i 0.55 3.02 331; ]As r'. 5TOVLCORRAICNP.51 7/23106.0:00. WA- NfANIA ..__Njf- NJA„ NA. N/AW ,,... !. NIA MIA IIIA N'A r:;A STOVE CORRAL C NR SI - A/21I090'.00 WA__ NJA„ - 14/A MIA NIA .,..,N/A ....N/A NJI• NIA NIA IIIA VIA NIA STONCC.URPALCNRSI - - - 5/Y/090,07 NIA NIA.. N/A NI NIA ,NJA NIA1 ._., NJA N/A EVA r1/A NIA ujfA ... STONE CORRAL C NR 5! d/25/69 0 0 N/4 _ NJA N/A N/A MIA NIP NIA Nln N/A MIA II/A I'tla N;A STONE CORRALCHA 51 7/28109000 WA 1+f4N/A NIR NIA NIA N/A _ N/a NIA NIA IIIA li,+!• f:/.1 _ . .. STONE CORRAL CNR 51 -- 8/271090'00, _ NJA WA N/P N/A _NJA NIA ... _.N/A NIA MIA N/A N!A N:.: r:fA STONE CORRAL CNR51 - 9/241094'00 N/A NJA MIA NIP N/A NIA_ NIA N/!• N.'M1 INA IIIA I!':. A/:• STONE CORRALCN0.5' 10I21I1YJ.0.00 NIA _ NJA NJA N/A NIA NI N/h _ N•l. N/A r1/A "!A STOW r�. ... S10NL CUXHALCNR S' - 11(16/090:00 W4 WA N/A MIA MIA N/4 WA 4%! NIA r!/A I:In ..i.q 1.,1 STOW CORRAL C NR 51 - L7/9(690',00 NIA NI N/A N/A NIA MIA M(A N// NIA NIA WA 1r/-s STONE CO ARAE C N R S. ..,, 14Mliq 1045 - 27.1 3106 0.682„ ,_3.42 0.,1,. N.] e0.1 Ole 711 70) 11.95 4.+ '35 STOVE CUPNAICNR S: 3/2/3012.20 334 960 1.16 _}45 .02 "q 1. _ .0.1 02: 2.29 S.BS +A 1:: "+•1 STONE CORRAL C MR 51 _ _ - 3129/109'.05 0.66 8.66 1.85 1-97 05 _ <Q.]... Ila; 47.0.1 p, 2.34 :�:. .i i?.:. .. STONE CORPALCNR S' 41.11109'.00 3.G7 175 D.96k 1.12 Q4 <0.1 <0.1 0•t! 0,13 2.27 :.:10 ata !'• STDNE CORRAI[N0.5! 5/2611tl 0',50 145 1.46 4.m 4.12 0.6 ,1 in.1 aC-% 0.68 2.28 2.59 :< 5'. S7r7NF Cf7RRAt LNR 51 612 9110 0 00 NIR N/A NJA N/A N/A NJA NIA N!/• N/A NIA Nin N;.l 1711 .. $TONE CORRAL CUR SI 8131/100-00 NIA N/A _ NIA N/A NJA NIA N/A N/!. MIA N/A Nln WA N(A 51ONE CORRAL C MR SI - - - - 10/2&1100:00 N(A N/A NIA NIA -NIA _ N/A N/A _ N"A NIA NIA NIA M:%. `VA SI ONE CORRAL C NR SI 11/30/1010:30 ..2.35 6.7 ( 1 6.24 08 _ N.t <0.1 22 2!.4 2.71 3.ric 99 Ad.t STONE CORRAL CNR 51 _ .12/13/1070:!1) 1.23 2.25 6 - 6,22 07 -1 Nil. 3.SY 3,73 4.71 422 ,. 141 S70%F CORHAI CNR S! lll3/1112:25 3_O6 105 2.07 2.I4 OJ <P-] O.i � o]t 0.91 287 Maafmum 1991 _6149 9.84 996 3 0.1870.534_ E.? :L 545 1�.9 i,�': it Metllart 4.36 50.05 _1.775 __ 2,025 0.5 0.0355 0.034 2 T!. 105 1.49 �1.1 ._ .._ ..... .. ............._ _ _........_ .......... - MIAImVm 0.66 146 � 0682 O.11b 0.1 0.006 0.0I3 D2: 047 069 C•ti'I !.: r..i 5WRC00el.r AlanOr'mkin8 Water 51aMard7-Prvn4ry MCL __. 1000 5 W AC4 7}17'r-PNn.;s,,Wr,k-IRSCr Standardi,-SmandmY_MCL Cal(PA/OE4NAGUD 0.004 ,0.04. USErA51-dary MCL - Cal EPA-Onnlnami0lPn Mcrementalcrnwf fi7k.41;1-4172 fnrdnrlI water - _0.023 0.0023 - - USEPAHealthAdvifaryfpolkingwater 50 Cakfnrrla p"pmnbn 6SSafe IWbw Level-MRs.Aft-b1 d e1Rvel lur prlsdvctive I-ity 0.05 C4NfnIriA id•i[Y AVIq Sa�rces Rf drinking W4[er ___ - --- _ - - CaXtulnia mlm CAn[enrtalwn - -- [4lifrrnu Tvucc AvIR Fres6walr.Agvatk NIR pr4retsmn M Ag-WI ward Ow hL7 Goal.-Tk7Se a ad ndnr Sh rI Id _ 100 0.) _ '•'r' CAklcrriu NAtilicalan level-0nnkmS WAfer � 1 _ N411wull Aca:fl!n1y u15clrnccs Mrahh Advi4RP/l0r OrinYing Water - 50']0 _ USEPA'RISARIeIMIe One Ortnkmg lVulrr Nrallh Adv'Isdry 2.1 _ T+alinr:l lk4•Pnm411tlad WOC ra•Ta Se and Odordl WOlfarr _ _ - - - T'1' N41•nn:d ilrcwnmmded W[1L •na ifs an ileeilh enc WvEFaec protecil0n , w51 grand 11111[nns4mpL'u'• 7lalim'.0 Necammended WQCdtefiJ.Lra7!'wASlr A9wrc Lne Conslnuu:n Cnncenitatlpn 87 I'I'I /Jwnan.lt Rr-c.11nlnvnued lV(7[ri!enaFrrlhwatcl Aqualst tilR lla3imum Cgncrnmarlon 750, 26 Table S.Stone Corral C nr 51,Part 2 oft 0lssohed 101x1 OIss91Y4d Tovl 7M.1 �:Dissohnd Total Ohs4tved T41ai ONwWed: Tara! Oluduntl i4111 Lead Lead I44n8-- Ma,p-4e Mer[ury NI[Lei NI[knl SeICnIUm SClenlum Siler, sh'., tin[ A,, �.fn....N.n:.- Sdm01C0ai6 Wdl N8/L p6/t. X6/1•__ RgfL _-_IW4 iLBJI N8/t, "BIL ..NB/L..._ "+ t Plot.. NAIL 5127N610:20 NIA NIA.. NIA._._. N/q....... N/A, N/A WA NIA .. WA N/A ..' WA. N(A... h'/A -J5/031565_ NIA :...NIA._ NIA.._...' NJA..- NIA N/A Y/A N/P,,..., NIA _ NJA : NIA N/A N/A [t:RRAtc"R S, 4/9/019.00 .NIA N/A. NIA NIA N/A -.NIA N/A,.-. WA...._ NIA NIA., .WA NIA... NIA •:,v,r fvn'•.:!(•!q 51 7/10!01]I 30 N/A N/4.__ NJA._..,,.. N/A..,. k/A - N/A NIA NJA. HIA NIA, _ NIA N/A 317/027:}0 NIA N/A NIA N/4 N/A NJA. NJA. WA _NIA N/A NIA VIA, NIA .v:;I(':IIIA,Cr+2'•� -/38!0111:20 NIA N/A : NIA NIA N'/A NIA N/A_„ W0. NIA - HJA MIA NIA N/A c'('::':"a"I'At C Pt151 9/101'0216:05NJ4 N/A NIA MIA NJA ' N/A,_,_, N/A N/A a NIA N/A NIA NIA. WA';i,VL•_I)RAAL C'rP 51 _ 5113/018:45 NIA N/A i„ N/A ._,N/A._,. NJA, N!A NJA_ N/A .. MIA N/A N10. N/A . ,. - ,'0012121 CHR SI � _ _ 17/]BIO715:L5 N/A. WA NIA NfAM/A - .,... N/A , ,,,N/A , NJA ,... N/A. N/A NIA. NIA-- 5T6NF Cn3RAL C NR 51 114/0312.15 NJA N/A- N/A N/A NJA NIA N/A MIA., N/A NIA NJA N/A N/A '.7WA CORRAL C NR 51 3123/0310.50 NIA N/A NIA N/A N/p NIA N/A N/A NIA N/A NJA N/A N/A .. .. ':1(+111[nAFAL C Nh51 1/6/0310.00 WA MIA_ N/A N/A ., N(A__ .,,N/A - -NJA N/A WA... N/A WA MIA N/A ... .. .. .. .,. .. NIA N/A MIA..... N/A WA NIA NIA r35:C f,NlnA'C r!P k1 - 311}/0314 15 N/A N/A N/A _- -,_N/A ,. NJA N/A. ... '•:G'�tif.Cf•nn61 CLIP;I -- 3117!0311:46 � N/A NJA_ N/A � NIA N)A NIA _,.,N/A ....N/0._. WA _,. N/A NJA_, NIA N/A .. .. _._ , •.•!5ti(IlFnf.[:Nr,11 � 4IB10313:10 NIA : NJA... N/A_ NJA,.. N/A NIA _N/A N/A - HJp NIA_ NIA NIA MIA I 1F ( 'R`t 4/78/03 11:00 - N/A N/A- N/A _ N/A N A N/A N/A _N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A, N/A :r.\1 11.F I A.C.Ifl'! _ _ 5114!0}12:410. 0.056 6.041 r 0.17 9.03 N/q 2.57 3.14 7.33 7.97 0.131 00.147 0.86 1.25 '.Tr'�[i'.rl'IIrAE.(r:R51 1/610411:30 0,036 0,356 948 � ax.9 N/ _ 232 _ 3.56 302 I.W. 0.007_ 00014 0.46 2.74 -.1;-„n;nAl(£4n c, 714!041300 - 0.266 0,507 131 323 N/A_ 3.27 379 066_ 1.25_. 00.035 0.107 A.24 5.21 -'CN4 f.Olpll C 51 _ _W17/0413:x„0 0.782 .2.91 36.1 _ 703_ V/A,, ...356 15,8 6.26 036,,,,,,,,0616 . 0.056 _4.53 24,9 '.T0mcnRaA((NR5t 31B104 12:6S 0.009 0.044 1.66 3.57 N/A 211 2.32 3.34 2.38 0.054 0.09 0.82 1.05 111!NE(041411L C HI 51 417/0410:15 6.05 anfi5 1.15 4.6 NM 2.4 2.58 4.76 4.49 0.03_ 00:031 1,3 1.65 1101E C(1P-AL C NP 51 5!5/0411:50 - 0.035 _0,038 O�eS .2 4.L -'1 NIA 282 7.65 9�Z 9.72 009 00.6641.38 14 S704L C•4Pnm C NRSI .. ..• _. .10/5/0414:30.. N/A- -- N/A V/A NJ4 NIA - -NJA NJA NJA MIA.. NIA..-.. 'NIA.. N/A.. -N/A 14-F COIRM C N351 1110/049:50 O,OS9 O.ld2 172 43.1 NJA _4.98_ 9.72 30 304- ---OAU OAC17 k.J9 IAL •.:,r1eF(OCRA(C HRN 17/7!0412:45 0.144- 0.293 107 30.6 .N1A. _ 3.29 _ 3A9 _ 10.5 10.6 005 0.096 _ 0.40 1.44_ -1'I;�C LCFnAI(NR 51 _ 1110/0513:30 0,111 6.A?R 2.61 32.1 N/A 37M1 348 1.69 L84 0.009 0.015 1.46 4.64 "C•V:r1]Rv4;(Nil- _ 217/051065 0.095 0.117,,. 7.35 19.8 MIA 2k5 2.G3 4.37 7.87 00040.037 0.99 1.r5 ..:.'•\E r,C4P:.1 C NH S' 3/30!0513:40 - 0.65 � 0,057 1.17 6.11 N/A 1.53 7.29 A. 3 00.001� 00.636' 0.73 3.AG •.',11P•C P.:'.' 4139/05 7:10 0.058 0.147 744 3.02 N/A 2.12 2,15 4.22 5.06 00.003 00085 0.81 6.8fl 5114/059:50 0.606. 0.038 0.73 7.11 NJA, 143. :, 2.69, 4.07,_ : 4.6660 . 404 0.0210.7 0.76 . --__-_ f'JFdA;C f.4'.I - 6/23105 13:30 0,094 0.099 2.4........ 6.88N/A 1.96 7.45 S.6B 5,9 005 O.1'/3 ' 093 1.72 3114Jp50:6n NJA NJA., NJA....,_: N/A,_. NIA N/A ., NIA, N/A NIA N/A NIA N/A WA yi;14 Cn'i,In'(•,R s, 8122/050:00 N/A N/A- WA. .N/A.,,. N/A .,; ._N/A _.,' NIA NJA....._..NJA WA _ N/A MIA NJn nRn:,,Cr;F:1 '112G/050.00,_. N/A :,_,NJA,_, N!A_ NIANfA_, _.NJA, NJA N/A NIA NJA _N/A_ NJA.,. N/.1 ___... _ 5:11'.1 COFF.:•l{.110.'1 - - 10/24/050:00 NIA N/A N/A N/A NIA NJ4 N/A N/A__ .NIA NJA N/A NIA MIA .-,..,Lt1g4A;(NR cI 11/141059:35 0.007 0.008 70.3 2L.2_ N/A 7.73 0,27 2016 70.7 00.009 00.009 1.55 L57 .'r•N[t nRriAL C•+F Sr _ 12/1410S 10:15' 0.0080.014 17,1 19 N/A 8 8.64 2 LA 77.6 c0.001 0.041 1.04 1.36 5 'SI'r+P tOnA1.1 I Nl til _ _ 1/24/0611:45 0,013 O.O2L 29.4 32.6NJA 334 _3.9 5.53 5.63 008(15 0.011 0. 'lOuC I OILPA1 C Y0.51 71121069:45 :6065 : 4)coq Fk% 13.9 N/A 3.57 3.39 6.31 7.05 c0.009 00.003 091 1.03 iL"R.:.f1Hf:.,.I L:JN 51 311/0610:25 0.536 1.36 29.8- 46.9 N/A� 479 ' SSS _0.8 1.06 00.009 <O.W9 6.87 ].It 4117JOG8:30 0.054 0.089 9.99 14.1N/A 265 3.23 1.75 1.99 _,. 003 06.03 1.27 1.61 .. _......,.,0. ....... _ .. ... ... - 00.04 1.G5 1.73 N/A _ 159 1.78 5.38 5.93 i'rJ^I•f(14HnL C 110:.1 $/87/04 10:00 � 40.94 � 00,03_ c603 0.9 0.93 ..., .. ... ,::J•1'lrl:":AI(Nn til - - 6/21/069:00 <4.04 4084 8,27 394 N/4 - 2.15 3.66 3.591.97 0.067 0.165 0.6 O.fW _ :'\L :rlrA_(;6:51 7/16/060:00 N/A._. NIA N/A N/A NJA_--_ N/A NJA YIA.... NJA,.,. NIA N/4 NIA .. .. ..... _.. .. -,.W4. N/A _ N/A . NIA..... NIA.... NIA N/p NIA N/A... NIA !J/A N/A N/A .. .}'.1111;.r 1711216610'30 00.04 0.522 18.5 71.3 N/A- 4.376.92 15.6 _ 11:9 0.03. 06.03 0.19 '. N1.1-W 1: C',x.1t 17910711.30 0.2 0.215 32.6 901 079 307 3.33 19.6. 20.6 0.03 4003 1.04 7.57 .. ....... .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. '.„!,(•;r•:,:-r1C^:F1r - 2127107 12:30 0.05 0.121 28 29.3 N/A _,- 159 3.74 9.15 13.7 00.03 40.03 1.32 3.01 '-,'h F 1 C 1:':::I _- 1/70107 9:50 49.04 _0.062 45Z 89.4 0.92 L.7 144 6.1 _ 7.26 00.03 00.03 0.47 2.19 SrC.�5 C(:RRAL{7JA.I 4/IA4018:00 0,06 0.966 256 ' 41.4 3.3 13 3,36_ 5.73 - 5.93 00.03 .03 1.03 1.42 1:(.'NS r f1RPALCNR51 5!3x/0?o'00 WA IY/A NIA NIA N/A NIA N/A, N/A MIA N/A - NIA N/A NA '.'ntit f[SxnnLCNB v� 8!781070:00 AIA N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA rn5.((ORRAL C 14R 51 9/131070:00 N/A N/A N/A NJA N/A NIA N/A N/A _ N/A N/A N/A NIA NIA - .. .. .. _ . .-. ........ :'L:'.L Lt+',•A.C 1;n 5t - -- lOf31J07000 N/A N/A. N/A NIA,. N/0._ N/A NJA N/A N/4 N/A N!A � NIA N/A .. .. _ •','!.f CIl'r 11hy f NR-,1 1/23/0811'36 0.06 3.06 SA] 92.6 N/4 3,83 9.39 Obs 0.9 40.03 0-433 0.5 15.3 f 9rt 51 2127/08 10.05 W.OA 6.172 0.54_ 30.6 NIA 1.66 2.46 7.7 1.5 00.03 00.43 0.64 4GG ':1;5:1 1;:12?•+i C rIR 51 y/2G1099:19 00.04 0.064 1.63 27.9 MIA 713 313,53 4.02 00.03 40.03 0.8 2.42 '"OV(012481 C Nk11 44231099,54 0.046 0.459 833 - 19.1 N/A 9,77 3.86 9,54 9.75,.,,. 40,03 <O.n3 1.29 2.94 .'(.'.r 14:%PA1C'IR'n. 7/73108 0.00„' N14 N/A�, NIA N/A.,___. N1A N!A_.._ NIA N/p NJA._,.'. NJA....... N/A NIA NJA ';•rc_'., ,x1(7:12`11 4/72169.6,00 NJA MIA N/A _ N/A N/A. - NIA,_.- NIA N/A N/A N/ANJh N/4 NJA ';II:: F/294011114. N/A. N/A.... Nl0. _ N/A- N/A N/A... NIA N/A __ NIA 1'1/8.._.: NJA N/1L..., 141A 00 _._. - - 6/75/090 NIA N/A -' NIA 01p ... NJA . . .NJA .WA WANJA NIA.... NJA...... .NJA.... NJA .... .: ., 7/26/090:00 N/A NJA.,._.; NIANA NJA_ N/A N1A NIA.__ NIA. MIA NIA „N/A MIA r:f((2n:Lal C:[n<t ..._. .. 8/2]/090:00 NIA NfA_.'.. N/A-,....- - N/A.., NJA NIA - N/A _N/A_ ..N/A.. NJA.,.,_ ..NIA NIA N/A 11]NL f(,PP..i C NR'l 9/2A1099:O,O NIA N/A NIA N/A NIA N/A N/A MIA N/A N/A N/A N/A NJA rnhl:nt C,1r[1 10J23lC90',OO - NIA N/A N/A N/A NIA MIA MIA N'/A N/A NIA N/A N/A WA N/A 5'O:.L(OPPAL(-11R%I 31/19J090:00, MIA N/JL, N/A N/A NIA NIA N/A NIA N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A r.+,120x1.(Nk;1 _ 12/9109 600 WA N/A N/A N/A NJA HJA N/A NIA N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A _._ ... .:... ... ... ., _. . .. ....... - r.0.03 0,96 £6.1 5h1:[(1.61281 t Nrt rl 3146/10 FO:nS 00,04 1.91 - 1.52 106 NJA 4.35 8.87 0.59 0.63 +0.03 •-,[n'[lY'rl[nl r.9p`I _ 3/212012:10 00,04 0.438 0.69 46,6 N/A- 2.29. 2.98 2,02 2,54 40.03 c0.03 1,08 STIR •r:+:r.r,r:,!.1I.C4 r 11 3124/109:05 <O.4 <O.OM1 2.65 14.4 NJp 1.57.. . . -1.33 4.97 5.56 0003 x0.03 . D1.06 2.44 '.'i•5L :"0:"C:1n•.I •1/21/109:00 [0.06 _6087 1.66_ 12.G NJA- 151 1.99 1.93 3 .003 00.03 ASW 7.7 .. . .. _ -- 5/2GJ708:50 00.04 40.04 0.14 ].34 N/A 2 -2.46 4.31 44 � ���00:03 00.03�'- 1.85 1-::7 „': --. IC:In•i -. GJ79/100:()0. NIA -.....MI0.,.... N/A NIA N/A_... h/A ..N%A N/A. NIA-- NIA NIA NIA NIA .... .-. .., .... _.._ .. ':':I:rl C:+It 41 P131/AO 6,00 N/A WA NJA, NJAN/4 N;4 N70. N2A NJA_. ,NJ4 N/A NIA MIA •.:��: - Ir_el 1'•:4'I ....., 10I76/100:00.., v/A N/A- NIA NJ8_..... NJA._.... NIA .. :-.N/A,., N/A .. ..,NJA NJA WA N14 WA ';•nYF"c"Mr-L I'in cl 11/3071010'30 00.04 00.04 63,4 75.9 N/A 1,06 2,1 .3.36 _,._._ 3.42 0(103 4083 2.7 3.76 irr1'I:A.f'JR SI 12/1311010.A0 40.04 4084 0.19 36 rf/A _1.93 ' 2.G3 1.74 3.88 0.089_ 0.11 _ 2.L7 2.5 i.(]RRAL[+:R Sr 1/38/1112:25 0006 0,057 38.2 .,. 74A HIA,., 3.25 1.71- 3.43 3.5 0064 0.347 3.42 1.79. ...... .. ... .. .... .., ......_, .._._... ..... .... .....,.... h14[3mv 6.782 2.91 63.4 703 _ 2,3 S. 15.9 30 _ 30,8 _ Alit. 0.347 6.41 74.9 M ndm. 0.054 0.0965 5 _ 18.6 092 2.305 3.12 4.145 4.43 0059 0,086 1035 2.43 M�mmum O.Op6 0,008 0,14 3.34 029 1,2 1.38 0.26 0.39 0.004 0007 0.46 0.64 M.-(`r.1:L1.•i y.!iCl eAl'nlPrdf.nl,t,.uy MCl .. .. 1:114:n...r.•�,. („'•'.,,y'.1.,1n'ltndardlMCL x126 Cwl ...... 0.1 .. .. ...... ........ _....,-. ...._.. _..., k2 ......... 30......... _. 1 'I•: 1'1:1.,.. ,.::.., ,.r.en.n::I.4nw.r dsk n•I,m'tC fOr Jrin Nr II N411•r _r_...- ' __.__. .r,r•. ..11i,Anr:•..,:1..,11.,•,81-1•r ,.. ........ .....,.. ..... .. __.. _. .. '..:•,,.,.,,�I,{n•.n'.1 - .,rr. ,.p.,-LWL4.Mav,Ali.+...64!x6 it Ir. 1 I r rc Pr4dusr tw 0.25 ...... . ........ ....._.. C I,r...,..• rr,'141.,...,nr o,.1,),,06 Watxr. ., nnS ...... ..._.....-.. C,n,nr,.,:..,<.P,x ,.•.+,.,.ux,a4. cuie a,ml•<t a e�,wu�tnnttnuarlon � - _ .. ... _ 5 .- .. ......_-,. .____.. ..__....._ 1:',Lr1.,un lu.¢,Hu,x:r.chw.,tw.Aquah[Llle Prnlrrbnn MawnumL Lnn1r40UN _' __ 20 .-_ .. =%.n,0[uv W:Ro,Ru d,lr 6,+'•> T-te a1d od9,O,r O"'Id -_ _. _.. _....... - -:h•I ,�.YnNhfxlntn tl�,•I.th,nk",g 4Vd[¢r ., _.--.. - _ .. .. zo - `:,,I:xu..IAL<U1'r„1•Ul l,nal:h A-1417 f4,01104/08 Walc, J$fP.Lln+'.k1•Ixr.nrlp..1t'Jr„•L,n%Writer lle4{th.1dNury '. `lnnnl.;IR.:;..,nn nN'•:Wt1 C11141i:,.r_tC and 04ur["W,4fa,0 .... 50 ..-..-... ..... _ ....,-. _ r7e,n,r n,.1 U".I,VII r,,n,lr.'•li,1 4 Hedllh a1dWU1Cr]rid W�Ndh•II 1,..�;. .. ...-..,. - •.... - - - - h,.nn..,I A.,u,.n,,,..1,.,r'VC+C,nr"rd-I-1,11W Aq-11 lrfe Cnnhn,.ati C69[Cnlrali4n _ d-Wil1,.t.r,a.r,rsl,wal4rAll.1',r L1fn 27 A %!DEFENORTHERN CALIFORNIA WATERS Sites JPA public meeting discussing the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report Maxwell, CA - December 7, 2017 Summary The Sites Reservoir project's Draft EIS/EIR was the focus of an evening meeting in Maxwell on 12/7/17. It was sparsely attended, with about 15 people not connected to the project. The most significant issues raised were that the DEIS/EIR failed to: • Provide flow parameters for the proposed project's source waters: the Sacramento River and its tributaries. • Mention the native plants that would be destroyed by the project and that the subject was not easily found in the body of the documents, if a botanical analysis existed at all. • Disclose the heavy metals and salts expected during the high flow months of winter when diversions would occur for the proposed reservoir, which would create a toxic hazard. Report The meeting venue had a sign-in table at the entrance and consultant stations set up on 3 walls of the JPA office. The consultants were well versed in their version of the benefits of the project but were unable to form cogent responses to AquAlliance's questions on water quality and landscape conversion in the inundation footprint. After ''/2 hour of isolated consultant interviews the hosts called the meeting to order. They introduced a court reporter that would be taking notes on the comments from the public. James Watson, JPA manager($325K/year salary) took the floor and used a PowerPoint presentation to praise the project benefits to the environment and the economy. The audience consisted of JPA employees, Sites consultants, approximately 10 elderly local residents, Butte County Water Conservation Director Paul Gosselin, and four vocal citizens. Steve Evans (Friends of the River)thanked the presenters for taking public comments and testified about the inadequacy of the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report in that it provided no hard river flow parameters. Evans stated that the project relied on outdated Biological Opinions and ignored the new Water Board delta/bay inflow/outflow requirements that include the tributaries that the Sites proponents plan to capture. Dr. Glen Holstein, Sacramento Valley Calif.Native Plant Society Chapter Botanist, described his knowledge that remote coast range valleys are known to contain rare native plant communities that deserve extra efforts to preserve. Dr. Holstein expressed his dissatisfaction that the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report summary made no mention of the native plants that would be destroyed by the project and frustration that the subject was not easily found in the body of the documents if botanical analysis existed at all. Lucas RossMerz, Executive Director of the Sacramento River Preservation Trust, addressed the meeting to describe the history of success in managing river land use by collaborating with land- owners and agencies to enhance riparian values. RossMerz expressed his appreciation with the Sites proponents' decision to extend the comment period to give the public more time to digest the giant DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Reports but made clear his dissatisfaction with the adequacy of the documents. He closed his comments by expressing his willingness to meet with the JPA, the USBR, and the consultants to improve the project. Jim Brobeck, water policy analyst for AquAlliance, launched into his comments on the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report and without hesitation challenged the feasibility of the project on the grounds that the reservoir water would be tainted with pollutants. Brobeck cited the November 17, 2017 comment letter sent to the JPA/USBR by Jerry Boles, former Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section of the Northern District of DWR; "High concentrations of metals that exceed water quality criteria exist in source waters to the proposed project."Mr. Boles provides data from the DWR Water Data Library that show high concentrations of toxic metals can be expected during the high flow months of winter when diversions would be occurring to the proposed reservoir. The high concentrations of metals in the source water will adversely impact Sites Reservoir water quality for most, if not all, the proposed beneficial uses of the stored water. AquAlliance has been pestering the Sites team for years to reveal the toxic mineral leaching potential that is only mentioned in passing by the Sites consultants. Brobeck is particularly incensed about the failure of the Sites planners to take seriously the presence of salt springs and terminal Salt Lake that would be in the reservoir. "They fail to imagine how much more active the saline springs would be if the reservoir was inundated. Proponents are willing to admit the saline damage is worth investing money and effort into grouting the salt springs that fill the Salt Lake but they admit their efforts may be ineffective." Brobeck was also disturbed about the lackadaisical attitude proponents have about exposed soils in the denuded acres of inundation. This DEIS/EIR mentions that the vegetated landscape would be converted without disclosing the obvious: there will be an intentional and total elimination of vegetation that currently serves to reduce storm runoff erosion. He demanded that they disclose the inevitable increase in erosion of soils that are exposed during the filling and re-filling of the reservoir. The DEIS/ElR failed to disclose the toxic mineral contents of soils in the footprint of the reservoir that will be exposed to repeated and unmitigated storm runoff erosion and will be concentrated by cumulative evaporative enrichment. After receiving comments the Sites hosts did not take questions but thanked the public for coming and offered the audience an opportunity to break into individual discussion groups at the numerous information stations around the room. Before the host finished describing the well- known meeting tactic, Brobeck stood to protest this strategy of preventing the public from hearing questions and answers as a group. The host smiled benevolently and explained, "That is not how we organize these meetings."