HomeMy WebLinkAboutF & GCOMhiiSS[OlvtlicS
UanieE W. Richards, President EUI14U1~D G. BROWN, JR. Sonke 111astrup
Upland , '_ EXECt.3TIVE DIRECTOR
Michael Sutton, Vice President ,, f
•~: '-
~'' ~T!+ I~11bNierih Sireet• Room 1320
Box 94 F
209
Monterey r.. _. .
Jim Kellogg, Member - Sacramento, CR 94134-1090
discovery Bay ' s.~,~•" (916J 653-9849
{9I6J 653-5040 Fcar
Richard Rogers, Member
Santa Barbara Governor fgcC?fgaca.gov
Jack Baylis, Member
Las Angeles
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Fish and Game Commission
13QRRE~ OF sU~
February 24, 2012 F~ ~ ~ 112
OROVIkt,E, CALIFOR~p-
TO ALL INTERSESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES: ,
This is to provide you' with a copy of the notice of proposed regulatory action relative to
Section 7.50, Title 14, California Code of Regulations, relating to Klamath-Trinity Rivers
salmon sport fishing, which will be published in the California Regulatory Notice
Register on February 24, 2012.
Please note the dates of the public hearings related to this matter and associated
deadlines for receipt of written comments.
Mr. Curtis Milliron, Department of Fish and Game, Northern Region, phone
(530) 225-2280, has been designated to respond to questions on the substance of
the proposed regulations.
Sincerely,
Sherrie Fonbuena
Associate Governmental Program Analyst
Attachment
TITLE 14. Fish and Game Commission
Notice of Proposed Changes in Regulations
NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN that the Fish and Game Commission {Commission), pursuant to
the authority vested by sections 200, 202, 205, 215, 220, 240, 315 and 316.5, of the Fish and
Game Code and to implement, interpret or make specific 200, 202, 205, 206, 215 and 316.5 of
said Code, proposes to amend Section 7.50, Title 14, California Code of Regulations, relating to
Klamath-Trinity Rivers salmon sport fishing.
Informative Dic~estJPoli~ Statement Overr-iew
The Klamath River System, which consists of the Klamath River and Trinity River basins, is
managed through a cooperative system of State, Federal, and Tribal management agencies.
Salmonid regulations are designed to meet natural and hatchery escapement needs for
salmanid stocks, while providing equitable harvest opportunities for ocean recreational, ocean
commercial, river recreationa! and Tribal fisheries.
The Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC} is responsible for adopting recommendations
for the management of recreational and commercial ocean salmon fisheries in the Exclusive
Economic Zone {three to 200 mites offshore) off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and
California. When approved by the Secretary of Commerce, these recommendations are
implemented as ocean salmon fshing regulations by the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS).
The California Fish and Game Commission (Commission) adopts regulations for the ocean
salmon recreationa[-{inside three miles) and the Klamath River System recreational fisheries
which are consistent with federal fishery management goals.
Klamath River Fall-Run Chinook
Klamath River fall-run Chinook salmon {KRFC) harvest allocations and natural spawning
escapement goals are established by the PFMC. The KRFC harvest allocation between Tribal
and non-Tribal fisheries is based on court decisions and allocation agreements between the
various fishery representatives.
The 2012 KRFC in-river recreational fishery allocation recommended by the PFMC is currently
unknown. AEI proposed closures for adult KRFC are designed to ensure sufficient spawning
escapement in the Klamath basin and equitably distribute harvest while operating within annual
allocations.
Klamath River Spring-Run Chinook
The Klamath River System also supports Klamath River spring-run Chinook salmon {KRSC).
NaturaEly produced KRSC are both temporally and spatially separated from KRFC in most cases.
Presently, KRSC stocks are not managed or allocated by the PFMC. The in-river recreational
fishery is managed by general basin seasons, daily bag limit and possession (Emit regulations.
KRFC Allocation Management
The 2011 allocation for the Klamath River System recreational harvest was 7,900 adult KRFC.
Preseason stock projections of 2012 adult KRFC abundance will not be available from the
PFMC until March 2092. The 2012 basin allocation will be recommended by the PFMC in April
2012 and presented to the Commission for adoption prior to its April 2012 meeting.
For public notice requirements, the Department recommends the Commission consider an
allocation range~af 0 - 40,000 adult KRFC in the Klamath River basin for the river recreational
fshery.
Current Recreational Fishery Management
The KRFC in-river recreational harvest allocation is divided into geographic areas and harvest is
monitored under real time sub-quota management. KRSC in-river recreational harvest is
managed by general season, daily bag limit and possession limit regulations.
The daily bag and possession limits apply to both stocks within the same sub-area and time
period.
Proposed Changes
The Department is proposing the following changes to current regulations:
No changes are proposed for the general (KRSC} opening and closing season dates.
KRFC Season Ba Limit and Possession Limit
For public notice requirements, a range of KRFC bag and possession limits are proposed until
the 2012 basin quota is adopted. As in previous years, no retention of adult KRFC salmon is
proposed for the following areas, once the sub quota has been met.
The proposed open seasons and range of bag limits for KRFC salmon stocks are as follows:
9 . Klamath River -August 15 to December 31
2. Trinity River -September 1 to December 31
3. Bag Limit - [0-4] Chinook salmon -only [0-3] fish over 22 inches total length until sub
quota is met, then 0 fish over 22 inches total length.
The possession limit is proposed as a range of [0-9] Chinook salmon of which [0-6] over 22
inches total length may be retained when the take of salmon over 22 inches total length is
allowed.
The benefits of the proposed regulations are concurrence with Federal law, sustainable
management of Klamath River basin salmon resources, and promotion of businesses that rely
on recreational salmon fishing in the Klamath River basin.
The Commission does not anticipate non-monetary benefits to the. protection of public health
and safety, worker safety, the prevention of discrimination, the promotion of fairness or social
equity and the increase in openness and transparency in business and government.
The proposed regulations are neither inconsistent nor incompatible with existing State
regulations. No other State agency has the authority to promulgate sport fishing regulations.
2
NOTICE IS GIVEN that any person interested may present statements, orally or in writing,
relevant to this action at a hearing to be held in the Mission Inn Hotel, 3649 Mission Inn Avenue,
Riverside, California, on Wednesday, March 7, 2012 at 5:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the
matter may be heard.
NOTICE IS AE.SO GIVEN that any person interested may present statements, orally or in writing,
relevant to this ac#ion at a hearing to be held in the Red Lion Hotel, 1929 4`" Street, Eureka,
California, on Wednesday, April 11, 2012, at 5:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may
be heard. It is requested, but not required, that written comments be submitted on or before
April 6, 2012 at the address given below, or by fax at {916) 653-5040, or by a-mail to
FGC aC~.fgc.ca.gov. Written comments mailed, faxed or e-mailed to the Commission office, must
be received before 5:00 p.m. on April 10, 2012. Ali comments must be received no later than
April 11, 2012, at the hearing in Eureka, CA. if you would like copies of any modifications #o this
proposal, please include your name and mailing address.
The regulations as proposed in strikeout-underline format, as well as an initial statement of
reasons, including environmental considerations and all information upon which the proposal is
based (rulemaking file), are on file and available far public review from the agency
representative, Sonke Mastrup, Executive Director, Fish and Game Commission, 1416 Ninth
Street, Box 944209, Sacramento, California 94244-2090, phone (916},653-4899. Please direct
requests for the above mentioned documents and inquiries concerning the regulatory process to
Sonke Mastrup or Sherrie l=onbuena at the preceding address or phone number. Mr, Curtis
Milliron, Department of Fish and Game, Northern Region, telephone (530) 225-228Q, has
been designated to respond to questions on the substance of the proposed regulations,
Copies of the Initial Statement of Reasons, including the regulatory language, may be obtained
from the address above. Notice of the proposed action shall be posted on the Fish and Game
Commission website at httpalwww.fgc.ca.gov.
Availability of Modified Text
If the regulations adopted by the Commission differ from but are sufficiently related to the action
proposed, they vtirill be available to the public for at feast 15 days prior to the date of adoption.
Circumstances beyond the control of the Commission {e.g., timing of Federal regulation
adoption, timing of resource data collection, timelines do not allow, etc.) or changes made to be
responsive to public recommendation and comments during the regulatory process may
preclude full compliance with the 15-day comment period, and the Commission will exercise its
powers under Section 202 of the Fish and Game Code. Regulations adopted pursuant to this
section are not subject to the time periods-for adoption, amendment or repeal of regulations
prescribed in Sec#ions 11343.4, 11346.4 and 11346.5 of the Government Code. Any person
interested may obtain a copy of said regulations prior to the date of adoption by contacting the
agency representative named herein.
If the regulatory proposal is adopted, the final statement of reasons may be obtained from the
address above when it has been received from the agency program staff.
Im act of Re ulato Action
The potential for significant statewide adverse economic impacts that might result from the
proposed regulatory action has been assessed, and the foElowing initial determinations relative
to the required statutory categories have been made:
(a} Significant Statewide Adverse Economic Impact Directly Affecting Businesses, Including
the Ability of California Businesses to Compete with Businesses in Other States:
The proposed action will not have a significant statewide adverse economic impact
directly affecting business, including the ability of California businesses to compete with
businesses in other states. -The proposed regulations are projected have an unknown
impact on the net revenues to businesses servicing sport fishermen. This is not likely to
affect the ability of Cali#ornia businesses to compete with businesses in other states.
The preservation of Klamath River salmon stocks is necessary for the success of lower
and upper Klamath River Basin businesses which provide goods and services related to
fishing. The proposed changes are necessary for the continued preservation of the
resource and #herefore the prevention of adverse economic impacts.
(b) Impact on the Creation or Elimination of Jobs Within the State, the Creation of New
Businesses or the Elimination of Existing Businesses, or the Expansion of Businesses in
California; Benefts of the Regulation to the Health and Welfare of California Residents,
Worker Safety, and the State's Environment:
The Commission does not anticipate any impacts an the creation or elimination of jobs,
the creation of new business, the elimination of existing businesses or the expansion of
businesses in California. The proposed regulations range from no salmon fishing on
adult Chinvak salmon (~22 inches} in 2012 to a normal Klamath River Basin salmon
season; therefore, the potential impacts range from 0 to 47 jobs. However, due to the
fact that sport fishing far Chinook salmon will be allowed for grilse faH Chinook salmon,
impacts to businesses will be less severe than under a complete closure of fishing. The
impacted businesses are generally small businesses employing few individuals and, like
aEl small businesses, are subject to failure far a variety of causes. Additionally, the long-
term intent of the proposed action is to increase sustainability in fishable salmon stocks
and, subsequently, the promotion and long-term viability of these same small
businesses.
The Commission anticipates benefits to the health and welfare of California residents.
Providing opportunities for a salmon sport fishery encourages consumption of a nutritious
food.
The Commission does not anticipate any non-monetary benefits to worker safety.
The Commission anticipates benefits to the environment by the sustainable management
of California's salmon resources.
4
(c) Cost Impacts on a Representative Private Person or Business:
The agency is not aware of any cost impacts that a representative private person or
business would necessarily incur in reasonable compliance with the proposed action.
(d) Casts or Savings to State Agencies or CostslSavings in Federal Funding to the State:
None.
(e} Nondiscre#ionary CostslSavings to Local Agencies:
None.
(f) Programs Mandated on Local Agencies or School Districts:
None.
(g} Costs Imposed on Any Local Agency or School District that is Required to be
Reimbursed Under Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4, Government
Code:
None.
(h) Effect on Housing Casts:
None.
Effect on Small Business
It has been determined that the adoption of these regulations may affect small business. The
Commission has drafted the regulations in Plain English pursuant to Government Code sections
11342.580 and 11346.2(x)(1}.
Consideration of Alternatives
The Commission must determine that no reasonable alternative considered by the Commission,
or that has otherwise been identified and brought to the attention of the Commission, would be
more effective in carrying out the purpose for which the action is proposed, would be as effective
and less burdensome to affected private persons than the proposed action, or would be mare
cost-effective to the affected private persons and equally effective in implementing the statutory
policy or other provision of law.
FISH AND GAME COMMISSION
Sonke Mastrup
Dated: February 14, 2012 Executive Director