HomeMy WebLinkAboutf&G~~~
Title 14, De artment of Fish and Game ./(/
Pubpshed July 27, 2012 ~OV L 3 ~ 2Dlz
~'
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING
The Department of Fish and Game (Department) proposed to adopt the
proposed regulations described below after considering all comments,
objections, and recommendations regarding the proposed action.
PUBLIC HEARING
The Department will hold a public hearing meeting on September 10, 2012, at
the address of 1416 9th Street, Sacramento, California, from 1:30-3:30 PM in the
first floor auditorium. The auditorium is wheelchair accessible. At the public
hearing, any person may present statements or arguments orally or in writing
relevant to the proposed action described in the informative Digest. The
Department requests but does not require that the persons who make oral
comments at the hearing also submit a written copy of their testimony at the
hearing.
WRITTEN COMMENT PERIOD
Any interested person, or his or her authorized representative, may submit
written comments relevant to the proposed regulatory action to the Department.
All written comments must be received by the Department at this office no later
than 5:00 p.m. on September 10th. All written comments must include the true
name and mailing address of the commenter.
Written comments may be submitted by mail, fax, ore-mai[, as follows:
Department of Fish and Game
Nicole Carion
601 Locust Street
Redding, CA 95811
Fax: (530) 357-3478
Email: ncarion a%f7dfg.ca.gov
AUTHORITY AND REFERENCE
Fish and Game Code Section 2150.2 authorizes the Department to adopt these
proposed regulations., The proposed regulations implement, interpret, and make
specific Sections 2150-2195 of the Fish and Game Code.
~~a (~~uc ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~
~c ~~ f . 7
~:. -
`}~' ~~ ` INFORMATIVE DIGESTIPOLICY STATEMENT OVERVIEW
,~.>..
Fish and Game Cade Section 29 5Q.2 authorizes the department to establish fees
for permits, permit applications, and facility inspections in amounts sufFicient to
cover the costs of administering, implementing and enforcing this chapter.
Existing regulations specify the conditions under which an individual or entity can
lawfully possess restricted species in California. The proposed regulatory
change provides for inspection and cost recovery. The fee for inspections would
be based on the number of enclosures that a facility has, using actual inspection
information that the Department gained from limited testing of the method on
permitted facilities.
Additionally, there is a provision in regulation that essentially delegated
Department authority for facility inspections to veterinarians and resulted in
waived fees to permit holders. The Department has determined that the authority
needs to be with the Department in order to properly campiy with state law; and
that the Department still had incurred costslexpenses even when a veterinarian
exercised the approval. Consequently, the Department has not been recovering
costs of the program as is specified in current statute.
The Department is not aware of any specific benefits that the adoption of this
regulation would have pertaining to California worker safety. The department
believes the adoption of the regulation benefits the health and welfare of
California residents by ensuring captive wild animal regulations are complied
with. By the department conducting the Restricted Species Facilities Inspections
there will be a more consistent inspection process conducted by more
appropriate personnel, law enforcement officers.
The Department is unaware of any inconsistencies or incompatibilities with state
regulations.
DISCLOSURES REGARDING THE PROPOSED ACTION
The department has made the following initial determinations:
Mandate on local agencies or school districts: None.
Costs or savings to any state agency: None.
Cost to any local agency or school district which must be reimbursed in
accordance with Government Code sections 17500 through 17630: None.
Other nondiscretionary cost or savings imposed on local agencies: None.
Costs or savings in federal funding to the state: None.
Significant, statewide adverse economic impact directly affecting business,
including the ability of California businesses to compete with businesses
in other states:
The proposed action will not have a significant statewide adverse economic
impact directly affecting business, including the ability of California businesses to
compete with businesses in other states. Considering the small number of
permits issued over the entire state, this proposal is economically neutral to
business and applies evenly to resident and nonresident permittees.
Cost impacts on a representative private person or business:
As the number of permitted persons for alb Restricted Species permits is small
(approximately 300 permittees statewide} the impacts are not consequential to
the State. However, there will be cost impacts that a representative private
person or business who is among the 300 permittees would necessarily incur in
reasonable compliance with this proposed action. Fish and Game Code Section
2150.2 states the Department "shall establish fees... in amounts sufficient to
cover the costs..." The reason that costslperson will increase is that previously,
the Department did nod inspect all facilities, which it must now do, or must now
enfier into an agreement to do. There is a high amount of Department staff time
needed for reviewing/approving applications andlor conducting inspections. The
inspection fees created by this mandated regulatory package will range from
$22'1.27 - $2994.77 depending on the number of enclosures a permittee has.
The majority of the permittees have less than 100 animals listed on their
invenfiory of animals submitted to the Department placing them in a category
where the maximum inspection fee would be $512.22 annually. The annual
increase in fees for the majority of the permittees will be almost $600.00
annually. The facilities with the largest number of enclosures are mostly larger
zoos or businesses.
Significant effect on housing costs: None.
Effect on Small Business
It has been determined that the adoption of these regulations may affect small
business. The Commission has drafted the regulations in Plain English pursuant
to Government Code sections 11342.58D and 11346.2(a)(1).
RESULTS OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Amendment of these regulations wil not:
(1) Create or eliminate jabs within California;
(2) Create new businesses or eliminate existing businesses within California; or
(3) Affect the expansion of businesses currently doing business within California
The Department is not aware of any specific benefits that the adoption of this
regulation would have pertaining to California worker safety. The department
believes the adoption of the regulation benefits the health and welfare of
California residents by ensuring captive wild animal regulations are complied
with. By the department conducting the Restricted Species Facilities Inspections
there will be a more consistent inspection process conducted by more
appropria#e personnel, law enforcement officers.
CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES
The department must determine that no reasonable alternative it considered or
that has otherwise been identified and brought to its attention would be more
effective in carrying out the purpose for which the action proposed, would be as
effective and Tess burdensome to affected private persons than the proposed
action, or would be more cost effective to affected private persons and equally
effective in implementing the statutory policy or other provision of the law.
The Department invites interested persons to present statements or arguments
with respect to alternatives to the regulations at the scheduled hearing ar during
the written comment period.
CONTACT PERSONS
Inquiries or comments. concerning the proposed rulemaking action may be
addressed to:
Name:
Address
Telephone No.:
Fax No..
E-Mail Address
Nicole Carion
601 Locust Street
Redding, CA 96001
530-357-3956
916-357-3478
ncarion@dfg.ca.gov
The backup contact person is:
Name:
Address:
Telephone No.:
Fax No..
E-Mail Address:
Eric Loft
1812 Ninth Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
916-445-3553
916-445-4045
eloft _dfa.ca.gov
Website Access: Materials regarding this proposal can be found at:
www.df .ca. ovlnews/ ubnotice .
Please direct requests for copies of the proposed text .(the "express terms") of the
regulations, the initial statement of reasons, the modified text of the regulations, if
any, or other information upon which the rulemaking is based to Ms. Carion at
the above address.
AVAILABILITY OF THE STATEMENT OF REASONS, TEXT OF PROPOSED
REGULATIONS, AND RULEMAKING FILE
The Department will have the entire rulemaking file available for inspection and
copying throughout the rulemaking process at its office at 1$12 Ninth Street,
Sacramento, CA 95811. As of the date this notice is published, the rulemaking
file consists of this notice, the proposed text of the regulations, and the initial
statement of reasons. Copies may be obtained by contacting Mr Eric Loft.
AVAILABILITY OF CHANGED OR MODIFIED TEXT
After holding the hearing and considering all timely and relevant comments
received, the Department may adopt the proposed regulations substantially as
described in this notice. If the Department makes modifications which are
sufficiently related to the originally proposed text, it will make the modified text
with the changes clearly indicated) mailable to the public for at least 15 days
before the Department adopts the regulations as revised. Please send requests
for copies of any modified regulations to the attention of Mr. Eric Loft at the
address indicated above. The Department will accept written comments on the
modified regulations for 15 days after the date on which they are made mailable.
AVAILABLITY OF THE FINAL STATEMENT OF REA50NS
Upon its completion, copies of the Final Statement of Reasons may be obtained
by contacting Mr. Eric Loft at the above address.
AVAILABILITY OF DOCUMENTS ON THE INTERNET
Copies of the Notice of Proposed Action, the Initial Statement of Reasons, and
the text of the regulations in underline and strikeout can be accessed through our
website at: www.dfg.ca.ao~/newslpubnotice .