Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFish & Game Notice 07-11-08 - Commercial Herring Regs COMMISSIONERS Richard Rogers,President ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JOHN CARLSON,JR. Carpinteria EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Cindy GostdwnVice President 1416 Ninth Street Box 944209 Tahoe City Sa=wnfo,CA 94244-2090 Jim Kellogg,Member (916)653-4899 Concord (916)653-5040 Fax Mcbsel Sutton,Member4P Monterey Governor fgc@fgc.c&gov Daniel W.Richards,McmW Upland STATE OF CALIFORNIA '30-4RO Op sup'E� Fish and Game Commission /Sor ith .. 11 July 11, 2008 080V/tt" ?048 CA UPORNIA TO ALL AFFECTED AND INTERESTED PARTIES: This is to provide you with a copy of the notice of proposed regulatory action relating to commercial herring regulations, which will appear in the California Regulatory Notice Register on July 18, 2008. Mr. John Mello, Marine Region, Department of Fish and Game, phone (707) 441- 5766, has been designated to respond to questions on the substance of the proposed regulations. Please note the date of the public hearing related to this matter and associated deadlines for receipt of written comments. Sincerely, `SSheri'TieCma�n/n Staff Services Analyst Attachment BUT[F ,COW" ADWNISTRXrION JUL 15 OR0V%MCp,LjT0RNlA TITLE 14. Fish and Game Commission Notice of Proposed Changes in Regulations NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Fish and Game Commission (Commission), pursuant to the authority vested by sections 1050, 5510, 8550, 8552.1, 8553 and 8555 of the Fish and Game Code and to implement, interpret or make specific sections 713, 8043, 8550, 8552, 8552.6, 8553, 8554, 8555, 8556, 8557 and 8559, of said Code, proposes to amend sections 163 and 164, Title 14, California Code of Regulations, relating to the Commercial Herring Fishery. Informative Dinest/Policy Statement Overview Under existing law, herring may be taken for commercial purposes only under a revocable permit, subject to such regulations as the Fish and Game Commission shall prescribe. Current regulations specify: permittee qualifications; permit application procedures and requirements; permit limitations; permit areas; vessel identification requirements; fishing quotas;seasons; gear restrictions; quotas; and landing and monitoring requirements. The proposed regulations would establish the fishing quota and season dates and times that fishing operations are allowed for the 2008-09 season in San Francisco Bay and season dates and times for fishing operations for the 2008-09 season in Tomales Bay. The following is a summary of the proposed changes in Sections 163, and 164, Title.14, CCR: The proposed regulations would establish the fishing quota for San Francisco Bay for the 2008-09 herring fishing season, based on the most recent biomass assessments of spawning populations of herring. The Department is providing the Commission the option to consider a quota within the range of 0 to 10 percent of the 2007-08 spawning biomass estimate of 11,183 tons. The Department is recommending the San Francisco Bay quota be set at 1,118 tons,which represents 10 percent of the 2007-08 spawning biomass estimate. If the Commission were to adopt this option, a 1,118 ton quota would result in a 1.9 ton individual quota for a "CH"gillnet permittee and a 1.1 ton individual quota for a non-"CH"gillnet permittee participating in the HEOK fishery. • There are no quota changes proposed for Crescent City Harbor, Humboldt or Tornales bays for the 2008-09 herring season. • Proposed regulations would allow fishing in San Francisco Bay from 5:00 p.m. on Monday, December 1, 2008, until noon on Friday, December 19, 2008 ("DH" gill net platoon only). Recommended dates for the odd and even platoons are from 5:00 p.m. on Sunday, January 4, 2009, until noon on Friday, March 20, 2009. • The proposed regulations would set the dates of the roe herring fishery in Tornales Bay from noon on Friday, December 26, 2008; until noon on Friday, February 27, 2009. Following are minor changes proposed to clarify and simplify the regulations: • The proposed regulations would correct the Limited Entry Pacific Herring permit application number revision date in subsection 163(b)(1) and Herring Eggs on Kelp Tomales Bay, Humboldt Bay, and Crescent City Harbor. However, the greatest economic benefit is derived from herring activities in San Francisco Bay, which typically generates about 90 percent of the total average annual revenue for this California fishery. In real dollars, San Francisco Bay herring revenue has averaged about$2.7 million out of$3.0 million for the State, since 2004. All the herring fishermen and herring processing plants are small businesses as defined under Government Code Section 11342.610. Since the proposed quota of 10 percent spawning biomass will result in a 2.1 percent increase in allowable harvest compared to last season, there are no adverse economic impacts associated with the proposed regulation. (b) Impact on the Creation or Elimination of Jobs Within the State, the Creation of New Businesses or the Elimination of Existing Businesses, or the Expansion of Businesses in California: None (c) Cost Impacts on a Representative Private Person or Business: The agency is not aware of any cost impacts that a representative private person or business would necessarily incur in reasonable compliance with the proposed action. There are no new fees or reporting requirements stipulated under the proposed regulations. (d) Costs or Savings to State Agencies or Costs/Savings in Federal Funding to the State: None (e) Nondiscretionary Costs/Savings to Local Agencies: None (f) Programs mandated on Local Agencies or School Districts: None (g) Costs Imposed on Any Local Agency or School District that is required to be Reimbursed Under Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4: None (h) Effect on Housing Costs: None Effect on Small Business It has been determined that the adoption of these regulations may affect small business. Consideration of Alternatives The Commission must determine that no reasonable alternative considered by the Commission, or that has otherwise been identified and brought to the attention of the Commission, would be more effective in carrying out the purpose for which the action is proposed or would be as effective and less burdensome to affected private persons than the proposed action. FISH AND GAME COMMISSION John Carlson, Jr. Dated: July 1, 2008 Executive Director 3