HomeMy WebLinkAboutGPAC Agenda Packet Menchaca, Clarissa
From: BCWater
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 201'8 1:58 PM
To: BCWater
Subject: GPAC Agenda Packet for March 19, 2018 meeting
The Groundwater Pumpers Advisory Committee (GPAC) meeting will be held as follows:
March 19, 2018, 8:30 am
Chico State University Farm
311 Nicholas C. Shouten Ln., Room A009 &A010
C�hico, CA 95928
The agenda packet is available on the Butte County Water and Resource Conservation website.
You can access the document by clicking on the corresponding hyperlink. If you are unable to access the information
please feel free to contact me.
Thank you,
Butte'--oupty
Water and Resource Conservation
Administrative Analyst,Associate
308 Nelson Ave.,Oroville,CA 95965
Office:530,552,3594,Fax:530.538.3807
"COUNTY OF BUTTE E-MAIL DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain private,confidential,and privileged material far the
sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying,or distribution of this e-mail(or any attachments thereto)by other than the County of Butte
or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. if you are NOT the intended recipient,please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete
the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto."
a,Jif; J,1%19 1 Water and Resource Conservation Paul Gosselin, (Director
308 N6son Avenue T; 5M538.4343 I buttecounty.netfwaterresourceconservatiori
Oroville, Caiufornia 95965 i=; 5M538.3807 bcwater@buttecounty.net
WATER&RESOURa CONSERVATION
Butte County
Groundwater Pumpers Advisory Committee
Meeting Agenda
M'eetinq Late; March 19, 2018
Time: 8:30AM
Place: Chico State University Farm, 311 Nicholas C. Shouten Lane, Room A009 &.
0010, Chico, CA
Agenda Items
1. Welcome— Chair Heringer
2. Doll Call — Chair Heringer
3. Flection of Chair and Vice Chair
4. *Review and approval of the January 16, 2018 GPAC minutes
6. Overview and discussion of the agenda (Paul Gosselin, Water and Resource
Conservation)
6. Update on Statewide SGMA Issues (Debbie Spangler, DWR)
7. Update on the Groundwater Sustainability Grant (Christina Buck„ Water and
Resource Conservation)
8. Status and schedule of facilitated governance discussions (Paul Gosseliin, Water
and Resource Conservation)
9. *Presentation and possible recommendation on governance (Paul Gosselin,
Water and Resource Conservation)
10. `Presentation and possible recommendation on basin boundary modifications
(Christina Buck, Water and Resource Conservation)
11.*Discussion and possible recommendation regarding guiding principles (Paul
Gosselin, Water and Resource Conservation)
12.Update of other SGMA issues —Staff& GPAC
13.GPAC members wishing to address items not listed on the agenda. (The GPAC
is prohibited by state law from taking action on any item presented if it is not
listed on the agenda).
14.Public members wishing to address the Commission on items not listed on the
agenda. (The GPAC is prohibited by State law from taking action on any item
presented if it is not listed on the agenda. Comments will be limited to five
minutes per person)
15.Next meeting -- May 21, 2018, 8:30AM, CSU Chico Farm.
16.Adjournment
*Materials attached
Agenda Item
Water and Resource Conservation Paul Gosselin, Director 4
308 Nelsen,Avenue T: 530.538.4343 � buttecounty.netlwaterresourceconservation
Oroville, California 95965 F: 530.538.3807 bcwater@buttecounty.net
WATER RESCURC:G:.CONSERVAdY N
Butte County
Groundwater Pumpers Advisory Committee
Meeting Minutes
January 16, 2018
Time: 8:30AM
Place: Chico State University Farm, 3111 Nicholas C. Shouten Lane, Room A909 &
0019, Chico, CA
Agenda Items
1. Welcome— Chair Heringer
2. Roll Call
Members Present: Heringer, Edgar, Rice, Schooling, Cole, Sohnrey,
Strachan
3. Review and approval of the November 30, 2017 GPAC minutes
Motion by Rice, seconded by Strachan. Passed 7-0
4. Overview and discussion of the agenda
Paul Gosselin gave an overview of the agenda
5. Update on the private well outreach strategy
Paul Gosselin and Susan Strachan described the approach to create a
mailing list of parcels not served by a water purveyor. The department is
developing a mailing list for each subbasin.
6. Update on Statewide SOMA Issues
Debbie Spangler, DR, gave an overview of statewide SGM,A
implementation issues.
7. Overview of the Groundwater Sustainability Grant Application
Christina luck gave a presentation on the tasks in the GSP grant.
8. Update on GSA Formation Process
Paul Gosselin described the processes in the four subbasins.
9. Update of other SGMA issues
None.
10.GPAC members wishing to address items not listed on the agenda. (The GPAC
is prohibited by state law from taking action on any item presented if it is not
listed on the agenda).
11.Public members wishing to address the Commission on items not listed on the
agenda. (The GPAC is prohibited by State law from taking action on any item
presented if it is not listed on the agenda. Comments will be limited to five
minutes per person)
12.Next meeting — March 19, 2018, 8:30AM, CSU Chico Farm.
13.Adjournment
lAgenda 6t rn
9
w
(r
r °i
3/14/2018
,
rr
P
2
3/14/2718
-.r
t �
'NET a6MTfi,��
F
I
flt�(�Fp�AMCMM 'v mrMWlMf b� 4 �,�i ..P^
A�u,a
vf"f
r '
A
�,
A� l„
ly
"iWr� U � �m4iy .R Rom I`
m �
m Us
T � U
y
3
3/14/2018
wFImAb4Ym"�xA;"FfTaIW4+mh�ry
i
aan�m+,l'��!gJYwm4San..mfn I
4
3/14/2018
IN
II IPV
5
3/14/2018
■ ± - � ~
6
3/14/2418
a
7
3/14/2018
m m m m
8
3/14/2018
,
W p v��"eFAWuxa'm.
uar a �t basin oundat°fes x urnn,tary,AgpaIrr0Mr
VINA S,,xx
r
G � ri/p �/r lwat6l`C�i/ or
REEK
,n ra1e�
9
3/14/2018
wxuJ/d+rd Ng .Xtiirelo'ry
hg Yuma rerdx y
'�Y 1 �,JMd9414q�f'rmuwwx
Ar
e�znu
�9f
YINia
Nor /i wwdr
p
MAI& IN
her /r/��BUrIT��//�J/i% �"�;� � �ir��✓ii�/i/ri//!/� ��/�f iur� �w�,
ANCAG.7 B 11°
1YUBA
u,ew.a✓Mw�x�.www..
10
3/14/2018
i0%lrr�rI(J1f���
:v:-asea:na�u-o'v,�mrvww�e..
Undesirable Results
11
3/14/2018
R",-F,
kp
'flk�kC<A� *t���wMU
rxr hY aa..
�rt4 FN
�«J,Wiwrvm,+rowed �r
liom7%/����/Y91y/1J/ll
ft r
� � d
'�� �� u
Stolltil
ZviJ
ru
N
�c J
J4 „
(Ic
� J
m�
12
Agenda Item
10
vxulkMUX.'#NMr;.X f�uaifNriw'n':re.
i
r rrN
a
r
Current;Subbasin Boundaries \ Boundary Adjustments
#1 New Boundary
Existing Modified
VINh,
VIINA M
a
#5 ,
sir IIff SIUfiTS A/� t4d�C- r I
E
ND
E,;, sAN
Af� n �r rP
cREEKfS
i� /i/ i
"NORTH it �✓ ��� #7 N�k W
i i l WUB1 i
I � r YUfi,�t .
3/14/2018
+' Proposed New Boundary Boundary Adjustments
'x�m�,,�v c.n„,�d,,xw a:wannro-, Xt1 New Boundary
Existing,Modrfied
wuNA
4
\42"
�w
�r/�/�� ✓/f�/% ���i Jif,� �� � � ��i� �
YUSA4 i
Y llllNlnia ff������ff
2
Agenda Item.
#11
Draft Guiding Principles
• GSAs intend to work together in mutual cooperation to develop and implement a
GSP for the Vina subbasin in compliance with SGMA;
• GSAs affirm a commitment to establlishiing an equitable representation of all
GSAs-7
• Agricultural groundwater pumpers should have representative on the governing
board and consideration should be given to other groundwater users such as a
domestic well users.
• GSAs are mutually responsible for the sustainability of the basin, however,
landowners in one area will not be responsible to remedy the problems that
occurring in other areas;
• As is consistent with Water Code section 10720.5(b), SGIVIA does not determine
or alter surface water rights or groundwater rights under common law or any
provision of law that determines or grants surface water rights.
• All groundwater users in the Vina subbasin have an equal stake for sustainability
in the basin.
• The intent of governance in the Vina subbasin is to seek a cost effective,
practicable approach to SGIVIA implementation that takes advantage of
economies of scale.
• Neither a GSA nor a JPA will have the authority to limit or interfere with the
respective GSA rights and authorities over their own internal matters, including,
but not limited to, a GSA's legal rights to surface water supplies and assets,
groundwater supplies and assets, facilities, operations, water management and
water supply matters.
• By entering into a JPA, GSAs make no commitments to share or otherwise
contribute their water supply assets as part of the development or implementation
of a G,SP.
• The JPA will not have authority to modify or limit a GSAs' police powers, land use
authorities, or any other authority.
• Each GSA shall be individually responsible for its own covenants, obligations, and
liabilities.
• No GSA shall be under the control of or shall be deemed to control any other GSA.
• No GSA shall not be precluded from independently pursuing any of the activities
contemplated in the JPA.
• No GSA shall be the agent or have the right or power to bind any other GSA.
June 9, 2017
TO: Groundwater Pumpers Advisory Committee
FM: Susan Strachan, Environmental Representative
RE: Proposed revisions to guiding principles
Following for consideration by the GPAC are some suggestions for changes to the draft guiding
principles that have been presented at the last few GPAC meetings. The changes are tracked
and a short rationale is provided for each proposed change. Following the list of proposed
changes is the original language from the May 2, 2016 document titled Assessment of
Stakeholder Perspectives: Options for Implementing the Sustainable Groundwater Management
Act in Butte County. Thank you for your consideration of these changes.
Guiding Principles for SGIVIIA Governance
9 Maximize value of familiar and effective structures and relationships
o Rationale: original language from stakeholder assessment report
e A_ckn-9�edge_ f4keyAddress interests of eligible local agencies-
for irate ration efficiency, and cost-effectiveness
Rationale: "address" indicates identifying, analyzing, and implementing actions
concerning "interests". Remainder of language from stakeholder assessment report.
0 Respect legally recognized rights of all stakeholders.
o Rationale: water issues raise legal rights of many stakeholders.
a Anticipate GSP requirements
Utilize SGIVIA's tools that address geographic
variation when supported by science and stakeholders.
c Rationale: SGMA provides management areas and basin boundary adjustments as
tools and both should be utilized when appropriate.
Comply with SGIVIA and regulations
lde-Rt-ify-op-po4luRitie-s-t�Ensure public participation and address interest of non-GSA
stakeholders.
c Rationale: "identify opportunities" is not the appropriate action.
* Distribute costs equitably and avoid fees if possible.
0 Respect mutual interests in maintaining independent decision making,
0
Provide flexibility to adapt to future circumstances
L-LlRationale: original language from stakeholder assessment report.
e Use science-based information/research to monitor and understand gEggndwater.
-*,,nRationale: Butte County monitoring program is critical to implement SGIVIA.
0 Plan for a sustainable future bv employing conservation efforts and innovative Solutions.
Rationale: conservation, can address shortages and sustain the environment;
innovation (e.g. hybrid surface-groundwater for orchards) will be necessary to
address our challenges.
Excerpt beginning page 28
PRELIMINARY CRITERIA FOR GSA FORMATION
The following are preliminary criteria identified through the assessment interviews that could
inform discussions and decision-making about a GSA structure involving one or more GSAs.
1. Maximize the value of familiar and effective regional structures and relationships
2. Acknowledge all key interests of eligible local agencies related to SGMA
implementation to promote opportunities for integration, efficiency, and cost-
effectiveness
3. Respect legally recognized rights, including water rights, and interests in protecting
those rights
4. Anticipate and integrate GSP requirements into decision making
5. Make use of basin boundary adjustments and address service area overlaps
6. Comply with SGMA and regulations
7. Provide flexibility to adapt to future circumstances
8. Identify opportunities to address interests of non-GSA stakeholders
9. Ensure that any costs are distributed equitably and avoid fees if at all possible
10. Respect mutual interests in maintaining independent decision making that reflects
expertise and experience, both agricultural and urban, to the greatest extent
possible.
Memo to GPAC Page 2