Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLetter from Pamela Posey 09.01.08 - Doe Mill Pamela Posey September 1, 2008 5342 La Playa Court (Butte Creek Canyon) Chico, CA 95928 To the Butte County Board of Supervisors: You have been presented with a plan for the Doe Mill/ Honey Run Study Area 9 of proposed development that is quite seductive. You the board of supervisors, Chico City Council members, and planning commissioners, have been taken on ATV rides, given a glossy, colorful booklet full of plans, maps, photos, and have heard the flattering talk, full of all the politically correct buzz words regarding `good' development. Schuster and Brouhard have done their homework well. However, as you already know, there is so much more at stake than the pretty picture these developers have painted. I realize that you have already voted on your recommendation for Study Area 9, but I ask you this: do the proposed plans of Steven Schuster that would affect currently existing homes, access, and viewshed include good planning principles for: • a sustainable climate including reduced greenhouse gas emissions due to increased traffic, • watershed protection and groundwater recharge (Tuscan formation,), • wildlife corridor,urban runoff into wetland corridors, • protections of endangered species (plants, animals, fish), • fire danger/protection (in the path of wildland fire storms), • police protection, • septic/sewage issues (lava cap), • quality of life (the rural attractiveness of Chico and Butte County), • leapfrog development (the adjacent Schmidbauer property cannot be developed), • retail activities (Doe Mill Ridge development has unfulfilled retail plans), • the actual need for single family homes (there are several incomplete developments in existence, as well as the recently approved Tuscan Village and Meriam Park subdivisions), • the lack of projected population growth • the acknowledgment of the 1994 Chico General Plan has not yet met the 1994 projections (with the emphasis on the `infill' of existing neighborhoods) • the realization of the financial situation of the city of Chico and Butte County • And finally who's going to guarantee that the parks, greenways, Mt. bike courses, etc. will be built by the developer who buys this land from Schuster once he gets the zoning changes he's after? In addition to the above question, Schuster's seduction also runs contrary to the important issues identified by the residents of Chico as conducted in surveys by the City of Chico. These issues relate to public safety, growth and development, and the environment. Most frequently mentioned as the "most important issues" were the growth of housing and traffic congestion, the environment , and the management of growth and development as a higher priority than encouraging additionai growth and development. Among tie "relatively most important issues" were reducing traffic congestion, preventing the loss of farm and ranch land and preserving open spaces. In contrast, among the "least important" issues were developing single family homes, and additional retail businesses and restaurants. Put the seductive voice of Steve Schuster aside and listen to the voice of the people of the Butte Creek Canyon, the voice of the people of Chico and of Butte County, and the voice of facts that speak for themselves. Keep this beautiful, wild, and pristine land in its virginal state. Thank you, Pamela Posey