Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLetter to Jim Nielsen - AB 658BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ADMINISTRATION CENTER 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 200 - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7631 BILL CONNELLY First District LARRY WAHL Second District MAUREEN KIRK, ~ce Chair Third District STEVE LAMBERT, Chair Fourth ..District .................... KIM K. YAMAGUCHI Fifth District August 21, 2012 The Honorable Jiro W. Nielsen California State Assembly State Capitol Room 6031 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Assemblyman Nielsen: The County of Butte requests your "Aye" vote on AB 658 (Calderon}. This measure makes a declaration of existing law that when goods are delivered from out of state by common carrier, title passes out of state. AB 658 will maintain the current system of allocating use tax revenues from out of state shipments to county pools of the customer's place of business rather than the location of in-state order desks. The result maintains the current broader distribution of the revenue among local governments. The provisions in AB 658 restate California's Bradley-Burns sales and use tax law which has been in effect since January 1, 1956. Recently, a Superior Court case Statement of Decision ruled that sales tax rather than use tax, should be applied to out of state shipments so that the Bradley-Bums portion of the tax is allocated to the location of in-state order desks and/or retailer administrative offices {even if such a location does not participate in the individual sale) rather than shared via the county allocation pools. The result of this ruling is twofold: 1. It upends 56 years of state sales and use tax law redistributing those revenues to just a few cities in the state without any legislative review or action. 2. Bradley-Burns revenues shift away from 90 percent of California's local entities to just about 10 percent of the state's local entities. Proponents of this court decision were rejected in previous efforts during mass appeals by the Board of Equalization (BOE) staff, by the BOE Board, and as far back as 1994 in the Legislature. If proponents wanted to shift these revenues away from the overwhelming majority of local entities to just a few winners, they should have gone through the Legislative process in the first place. The negative ruling in this case will change existing law without legislative review and could shift more than $10 million in local use tax each year prospectively among counties and cities. We request your Aye vote on AB b58 (Calderon). - -- ~r~cere y, o~ Steve Lambert Chair of the Board of Supervisors County of Butte cc: Supervisor Bill Connelly, District 1 Supervisor Larry Wahl, District 2 Supervisor Maureen Kirk, District 3 Supervisor Steve Lambert, District 4 Supervisor Kim Yamaguchi, District 5 Paul Yoder, Shaw-Yoder 2