HomeMy WebLinkAboutM012677r"~ ~
January 2b, (47j'
r~
10. Marjorie Coxr.Nagalie, Ms. Cox stated that she Was against '~
the TP zoning.
11. Otto Hanson, Oroville. Mr. Hanson stated that he would like
to see the 3 acre restriction for mining taken off.
12. Robert F. Duffy, Stirling City. Mr. Duffy skated that he
was opposed to the TP zoning.
Hearisag closed to the public and confined to the Board.
On motion of Supervisor Winston, seconded by Supervisor Lemke
ead unanimously carried, the TP-150 zoning matter is referred back to
the Planning Commission to study the 'f6l~pwfdg3e Qemliatible use is any
use which does not significantly detract from the use of the property
for, or inhibit, growing ead harvesting timber, and shall include, but
not be limited to, the following, unless in a specific instance such a use
would be contrary to the preceeding definition of compatible use:
(1) Management of wateraheQ;
(2) Management for fish and wildlife habitat or hunting end
fishing;
(3) A use integrally related to the growing, harvesting end
processing o£ £crest products, including but not limited to roads, log
landings, ead log storage areas;
(4) The erection, conatructioa, alteration, or maintenance of
gas, electric, water, or communication trsnsmissioa facilities ax
(5) Grazing
and report back to the Board oa Tuesday, February 1, 1977.
RECESS: The Board recessed at 3635 p.m. to•reconvene~at 9500 a.m. on ,
January 26, 1977. A..____ .... .
r~r : r t. i t t~ M~
$8fi
January 26, 1977
RECONVENED: The Board reconvened at 9:00 a.m. Present: Supervi:ors Lemke,
Madigan, Moseley, Winston and Chairman Richter.
Clif Mickelson, Administrative Officer, Dan Blackstock, County
Counsel, and Clark A. Nelson, County Clerk, by Margie Catt,
Clerk of the Board.
T-202 MEETING WITH DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE FOUR CITIES, PLUS
OTHER KEY PEOPLE CONCERNING THE CONFIGURATION OF BUTTE COUNTY
. PLANNING COMMISSION: ACCEPT RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEE FOR
A 5-MAN COMMISSION
Discussion wit esignated represenlafives of the four cities, plus
other key people concerning the configuration of the Butte County Planning Commission,
and with the newly appointed MAC from Paradise held at this time. Chairman Richter
set out the ground rules for this discussion.
Hearing opened to the public at this time. Appearing:
i. Claude Willis, Forest Ranch, who read a prepared statement in
Favor of the proposed 5-man Commission.
_ _..__._~ 2. Priscilla_HanFord, member of,the„Piannin Commission, who read a
Page 452.
January 26, 1977
f'~ f"1
~~~_T---_~__===~~L~'L~t~D ________________
prepared statement. She said she spoke not as the Chairman of the Planning
Commission but as an interested citizenT stating that reduction of the members of
the Planning Commission will not help matters as procedures are mandated and certain
procedures must be followed.
3. Mr. Ron Stewart, Mayor of Chico. He strongly urged the Board
not to reduce the size of the Planning Commission, by the elimination of the city
representatives on the Planning Commission.
4. Gene Sylva, Mayor of City of Oroville. He read a prepared
statement in opposition to the deletion of the city representatives on the Planning
Commission.
5. Mrs. Eunice Smith, representing the City of Biggs Council, spoke
in opposition to the deletion of city representation on the Planning Commission.
6. Mr. Warren Humbert, Chairman of newly formed MAC of Paradise,
said the only opinion of this Commission is that an in-depth study of this problem
should be under taken.
7. Mr. Sprugeon, vice-mayor of Gridley, spoke in opposition to
the reorganization of the Planning Commission; felF that the city representatives
should be retained.
8. Moe Balken, member of MAC , stated that this CoanacJ:$eltithe
matter should be studied and they were sure that the Board of Supervisors would
make a good decision.
9. Mr. Bill Murphy, member of the Chico City Council, requested
that the Board take another look at this matter of reorganization and not to move
too quickly.
10. Willard Skinner, speaking as a citizen of the Upper Ridge area,
urged that the Board give this matter deep thought prior to taking action.
II. Orrin Stratton, Chico, President of Butte County Taxpayers Association,
spoke in favor of the rerorganization of the Planning Commission, and the deletion of
the City representatives.
i2. Leonard Loyd, resident of Paradise, said he was not speaking for
or against the proposed reorganization of tha Planning Commission; he wants the
best representation possible for the County of Butte.
13. Jim Lynch, Chamber of Commerce-Chico, stated that the Planning
Commission should be a cooperative venture between the cities and the County and that
the City should have aquas representation on the Planning Commission.
14D~/ere Pace, Chico. Spoke in favor of the 5-man proposal For the
Planning Commission.
15. Vic Porker, Mayor of Gridley, spoke in opposition to the 5-man Commission._
Page 453.
January 2 ~ (977
~ r'*~~
16. Wayne Turner, Peoples Action Committee of Butte County, spoke
in opposition to the reorganization of the Planning Commission; felt it should
remain as it is at present.
17. AI Appleman, Thermalito, spoke in favor of the reorganization to
a 5-man Planning Commission.
113. Gary Kenyon, Berry Creek, representing the Butte County
property Owners Association, spoke in favor of the reorganization.
19. Mr. H. Heindenger, Thersaniito, spoke in favor of the
reorganization.
20. Bob Brambrage, member of Oroville City Council, spoke in
opposition to the reorganization, stating that the City's representatives should
remain on the Planning Commission.
21. Dick Ryan, resident of the County, spoke in opposition to the
reorganization .
22. Dallas:. Lewis, Butte Creek hock District general manager,
recommended that the Board approve the 5-man Planning Commission.
23. Ran Drake, developer in the county and the City of Chico,
spoke in favor of the reorganization.
24. Don Bloke, representing the Butte Property Association, spoke
in favor of the reorganization.
25. Gladys Greer, Chico, realtor, spoke in favor of the reorganization.
26. Frank Bennett, dentist in Chico and cattle ranch operator north
of Chico, urged the Board M streamline the Planning Commission and approve
the 5-man Planning Commission concept.
RECESS: 10;20 _
RECO iWE hIE D : 10:25
Gene Sylva spoke in rebuttal of the above statements made by the
public. He again urged the Board to retain the City representatives on the
Planning Commission,
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board.
Supervisor Madigan presented a letter from the Cohasset Community
Association, Ina. which urged the Board to delay action in this matter.
Supervisor Winston said he heard Mrs. Hanford state she had been
introduced to her replacement. He askod when she had been replaced; it
takes a 4/5 vote to replace a member of the Planning Commission. It nppeared
to him that this action was not proper and he resents this type government as a
citizen. Page 454.
January 46, 1977
~"` ~
Supervisor Winston spoke against some of the statements made this
morning. hie felt the County needs knowledgeable people serving on the
Planning Commission. Fie said he hoped that there were no other members of
the Planning Commission being asked to be replaced.
Supervisor Lemke said he had told Mrs. Hanford that he had someone
in mind to appoint to the Planning Commission; when he gets ready, he will make
a motion to replace Mrs. Hanford. This has nothing to do with the recommendation
to restructure the Planning Commission.
Chairman Richter stated that the policy in this County has been the
tradition that the planning Commission resigns or tenders his resignation when new
Board members are elected.
Supervisor Winston asked Chairman Richter if there had been
any telephone calls made to the other Board members regarding the restructuring of
the Planning Commission.
Chairman Richter said he would not respond to these remarks.
Supervisor Winsron said that many of the statements made this morning
involved administrative procedures. Fie suggested that the Board undertake a
truly objective study of the entire'Planning structure. i-ie urged that no action be made on
the composition of the Planning Commission until such time as the City and the County
have the General Plans in conformity. He recommended that members of this
Board sit down with representatives from the cities and MAC and other interested
groups and further discuss this matter.
Supervisor Lemke said that Supervisor Winston was speaking of
two problems; the Planning Department and the Planning Commission.
He has had calls on both sides. If there is a problem, then it should be investigated.
He felt that one Planning Commissioner from each district could represent the people
as well as one 5upervisor-., from each District.
On motion ofSupervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Ahoseley,
and corned, the Board accepted the committee report of January I8, 19T7 with
the following recommendations set out by the committee:
1. Reduce County Planning Commission to five members
2. Each Supervisor to appoint one member from within his district
3. Planning Commissioner's term to run concurrent with the Supervisor's #enn
4. Four cities allowed direct input at Planning Commission meetings from
staff table.
City representative allowed no vote, nor receive County pay unless
authorized by the hoard of Supervisors.
5. Raise County Planning Commission renumeration to $30 per meeting.
' 6. Board of Zoning Adjustment be comprised of three persons not represented
on the planning Commission.
This motion is with the intent for County Counsel to prepare an ordinance to amend
the present Ordinance relating to Planning Commission and its composition .
AYES: Supervisors: Lemke, Madigp~r~M~,f~ley and Chairman Richter
NOES: Supervisor Winston. January, 2a, 1977
Page 455.
~'' ~",
-------------- Januar~%26~,1977------ ----
--- --~-- - -- --- - - - ~ ~...- ~ -- C--.~- -- C-
77-203 MATTER PRESENTED BY SUPERVISOR MADIGAN: SALE OF ENTITLEMENT WATi:R
Supervisor Madigan said he would like to suggest that County Counsel
contact Mr. Craneek, attorney at law, in Sacramento; he represents Kern County.
Would like to have County Counsel see if any of Mr. Craneck's clients would like to
buy some of County's water. Caunty Counsel will follow through on this.
ADJOURNMENT:
There ing nothing further before the Board at this time, the meeting
was adjourned at 11:00 a.m. to reconvene on Tuesday, February 1, 1977 at 9:00 a.m.
ATTEST: CLARK A. NELSON, COUNTY CLERK
y , ~ .~~~
By:~/ C airman oft Board
C er o t and
Page 456.
January 26, 1977