HomeMy WebLinkAboutM020282r^ebruary 2, 1982
OF CAT,IFORNTA )
SS.
OF $UTTE )
82 -
The Board of Supervisors met at 9:00 a.m. pursuant to adjournment.
?resent: Supervisors Do7:an, Moseley, Saraceni and Chairman Wheeler. Mike
Pyeatt, interim administrative officer; Del Siemsen, county counsel; and
Clark A. Nelson, county clerk-recorder, by Nancy Wilson, deputy clerk.
196
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America
Invocation by Supervisor Moseley
CONTINUE TO FEBRUARY 9, 1982 -- APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Continued to February 9, 1982 approval of the minutes of January 6,
12, 13, 19, 20 and 26, 1982.
197 (ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS {BOARD MEMBERS) TO BE ADDRESSED AT THE END OF THE DAY
Chairman Wheeler stated she had two resolutions she would like support
on. One has to do with spouses of ex-military personnel and their pay. She
will give copies at a later time. Anothe~item is federal legislature regarding
SB 1840 and the deductions within households.
19$ AUTHORIZE RELIEF FROM ACCOUNTABILITY
On motion of Supervisor Saraceni, seconded by Supervisor Dolan and
carried, the relief from accountability, the destruction of revolver, serial
#901808/county #15350 was authorized.
199ADOPT RESOLUTION 82-20 - SB 1336 THE RULE OF JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILIT3
Mike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer, set out the background
on the proposal. Law suits were brought into court and the county suffered.
This legislation is to correct the problem. It would place the judgement
on the defendant depending on equal value.
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and
carried, Resolution 82-20 supporting SB 1336 pertaining to the rule of joint
and several liability'was adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign.
200 (ADOPT FIRE STANDARDS
Discussion of proposed fire standards was held at this time.
William Teie, fire warden, set out the background on the proposed
fire standards. They were before the Land Development Committee for recommend-
ation. On same they are in agreement, others they are not. They have asked
the Board for a guideline so they can put together a conclusion and into an
ordinance. It will have long term effects. They are broken down into six
or seven categories.
Fire Separations
Mr. Teie stated what they are asking for is not a larger difference.
They support the Commission recommendation to change the R-1 square footage
from 5,000 to 6,000 and the remainder from 10,000 to 12,000 square footage.
The fire separations are beneficial in large industrial structures in order to
limit loss in the event of a fire. He felt the three items should be placed
back in, it is not that costly to large developments. He suggested they
adopt the recommendation by the Commission.
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and
carried, the Butte County Code and Uniform Building Code be amended as
recommended by staff was approved.
Page 148.
February 2, 1982
February 2, 1982
8 2-
Smoke and Heat. Detectors
fdr. Teie stated they recommend considerably more so they could get.
more detection. The Commission feels if there was a heating unit in the
attic yes it should be adopted. Nothing beyond the building code. The
quicker a fire is detected the quicker they can get it put out. Tt is
complicated as it would require a unit at the station. They recommend that
they be put in. They will support the amendment of the Commission. Ih
a multi family residence they would require one smoke detector per bedroom
or access to the bedrocm.
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and
carried, to make amendments to the Fire Standards for heat detectors per
the Land Development Commission was authorized per Fire Department proposal.
Roofs
for. Teie stated they strongly recommend the adoption of an ordinance
restricting the use of flammable roof covering in the extreme and high hazard
fire zones of the county. The Commission felt this was infringing on the
rights of people. N,r. Teie felt they should have such a restriction in this
county.
Supervisor Dolan stated as a taxpayer she felt it was setting up
the framework in the high fire hazard area. -This is where it is very costly
in terms of equipment and personnel.
i4r. Teie stated shake shingle roofs spread rapidly when on fire.
It is like an atomic reaction. There recorunendation is mainly in the brush
and timber area.
Supervisor Saraceni felt it should be an individual decision. He
respected N,r. Teie's guidance.:and protection. On the other: hand there are
some things that have to be decided on by the people when they build.
Supervisor Dolan felt they were free to limit the freedom of service.
There could be a problem with high fire hazards because of minimum circumst-:.
antes. They will have to accept the consequences. It is up tb~the fire
department to protect the public and put the fire out
Chairman Wheeler stated she would support what Mr. Teie is suggesting
on this particular issue. They are going to see a tremendous influx in the
wildlife area. This would be the beginning step to eliminate a lot of problems
in the future.
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervior Moseley and
carried, to adopt the amendment as approved by the Fire Department and the
accepted proposal of staff was authorized.
AYES: Supervisors Dolan, I~foseley and Chairman Wheeler NOES: Supervisor
Saraceni
Access to Structures
@9r. Teie indicated this requirement would 6e for structures or
buildings located within 150 feet of an access road and the road shall be
a mimimum width of 16 feet or 12 feet if a one-way loop street and it should
support a mimimum load of 40,000 pounds and have an all weather surface.
They feel access is a real problem. They cannot effectively work beyond
the 150 feet. They ask that the Board adopt the recommended position in
the ordinance and within the Building Code and subdivision ordinance. The
Board has used the 150 feet factor before regarding access over bridges.
Page 149.
February 2, 1982
8 2-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ February_ 2, 19_82 _ _ _ _ _
Supervisor Saraceni felt-again it was a situation where he agrees-
with what Mr. Teie is saying, but some controls will have to be put onto the
people.
Mr. Teie stated if the Board feels uncomfortable with the issue of
150 feet, he would recommend they go with the revision as proposed. They
have already agreed. They could chose to take no action or rejecting it.
It was moved by Supervisor Saraceni to go with the Commission's
recommendation.
Chairman Wheeler suggested they could leave iE as it was..
Motion withdrawn at this time. No action taken.
Swimming Fools
P4r. Teie stated he has worked on this issue and he does not
recommend it. It is-too complicated. Some pools are vinyl and fiberglass.
One method would be to pre-plumb the swimming pools. ,
No action taken on requirements £or swimming pools.
High Rise Buildings
Mr. Teie stated this would be if a building exceeds 36 feet in
height.
On motion of Supervisor Dolan. seconded by Supervisor Saraceni
and carried, the recommendation of the Commission and Fire Warden regarding
high rise buildings was authorized.
Subdivision.Water Requirements _
On motion -of Supervisor Saraceni, seconded by Supervisor Dolan and
carried, the subdivision water requirements are to be brought back in the
subdivision ordinace and were accepted as submitted.
201_
AUTHORIZE ES.TABLISHMFNT.OF'VOLUNTEER FIRE,COMFANIES IN BUTTE MEADOWS AND
BUTTE COLLEGE/FENTZ ROAD AREAS
William Teie, fire warden, stated he had discussed the issue of
establishing volunteer fire companies in the Butte Meadows and Butte College/
Pentz Road areas over the past few months. He needs to know yes or no from
the Board. He has acquired the apparatus free. There will be little or no
cost. He recommends Board approval.
It was moved by Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni
that the County Fire Warden proceed with the establishment of volunteer fire
companies in the Butte College/Pentz Road area and in Butte Meadows be
authorized.
Supervisor Dolan was concerned about alternate funding and the
continued funding of the present level of service the county now enjoys as
fire protection. There is a lack of resources and the budget is in deficit.
It is a real problem and then to expand service, training and equipment.
She could not support it. She questioned where the trucks and equipment would
be housed.
Chairman Wheeler stated she was working with ah:: organization
which has not formally been formed. She has met with a representative of
Chappie's office and in the process of negotiating a place for a vehicle
Page 150.
February 2, 1982
8 2-
_ Febr_uary_2, 1982 _ __ __ __ _ _ __ __ _ ~_ _
that has been acquired at the federal facility that is there. There is room
for the apparatus. An individual has already donated property from within
their own community. The reason to form this is to provide and'pay for their
own service. That is what they. are looking for and asking for.
Supervisor Dolan stated she was aware of certain resources that
the .volunteers put into the county. It amounts to a lot of dollars. She
knows that and supports that. Even if they requested $2,000 they could not
do it.
Chairman Wheeler stated she felt people understand that. This is
the message they are sending out. They want volunteers and their services.
It was formed over the concern of snow plowing. There is not going to be
money for that next year. If they go back to Proposition 13, they go back
to volunteerism.
Mr. Teie indicated an old ranch'-house will be used at one of the
facilities. They plan to use a 30 x 60 structure to house the apparatus.
There will be no cost for fuel. They will be relying on the volunteer more
in the future. ,
Supervisor Saraceni felt the investment of training would more
than pay in the long run. He was supportive of the fire companies.
Supervisor Moseley stated she also was supportive of :+the volunteer.
Supervisor Dolan stated the volunteers do not cost as much as
the California Division of Forestry or staff. She could not go for any
expansion of services right now.
vote on motion:
AYES: Supervisors Moseley, Saraceni and Chairman Wheeler NOES:
Supervisor Dolan
Motion carried.
202
AUTHORIZE'FIRE WARDEN TO PROCEED WITH REPORT TO ALTERNATIVE FUNDING - FIRE
DEPARTMENT
William Teie, fire warden, stated he had prepared an alternative
funding source for fire protection services. This is to be used if the
Board feels they have to figure additional funds from the electorate. This
is the method they recommend. It was prepared with the help of the Admin-
istrative Office and Auditor. The problem is maintaining the present level
of services. Taxes are not the only source of funding. Inflation is effect-
ing the economics now. Forty percent of the fire protection expenses are
being funded by the General Fund. The existing law allows it. The govern-
ment code indicates where there is water shed protection there can be fee
collection.
Del Siemsen, county counsel, felt if there was a fee it would be
in a specific area to those benefited and not county wide.
Mr. Teie indicated those effected would be the 40 percent in the
unincorporated areas who are 5 to 7 miles from one of the 12 county stations.
He could go back and prepare a documentand package at so much per structure
and. size which are both related. It would require a two-thirds vote of the
people. It must be completed for the hallot by March 12, 1982.
Mike Pyeatt, assistant administrative officer, stated 20 percent
of the property taxes would be discretionary revenue. There are a lot of
funds within that which are Page 151.- not necessarily property taxes.
February 2, 1982
8 2-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Fe_br__ua_ry, 2,_1982_ _ _ _ _ __ __ - _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ -
Fire protection is a less than county wide schedule. There is a separate fund.
or activity for fire protection and there is presently no property taxes fund-
ing that. The forty percent is a direct benefit of assessments:- They used
the area of the valley floor to the west and to Paradise Pines. There is
not a significant amount of money with volunteer fire companies as within the
twelve paid call stations.
Mr. Teie felt it would cost $50 per house. The assessor's office
gave them a figure which was how many living units and how big were the
commercial manufactures. They will have to draw some of the information
out of the computer.
Discussion was held. regarding budget cuts, department cuts and
the county financial situation at this time.
Mr. Teie indicated AB 934 would be tested in the courts as it was
hastily adopted. He did not feel they were jeopardizing the whole system
by seeking additional funds to help with the maintenance. They cannot
hold. the public hearing until the information is compiled. They would need
to establish a rate:.
Supervisor Dolan wanted to indicate this does not mean there has
been direction by the Board to cut the level of service. There have been no
drastic cuts within the Fire Department.
Mr. Siemsen stated there was a question i£ a hearing would be held.
A hearing is only required if you are going to have a stand=by charge. They
are not required to hold a hearing, but they could certainly do that.
Supervisor Dolan felt it would be a good idea to hold one. Opinions
could be voiced to the Board rather than in editorials to the newspapers.
She felt they had an obligation to proceed. They would be able to answer the
questions of homeowners and have the information for budget time.
It was moved by Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni
to give direction to the Fire Warden in cooperation with the County Admin-
instrative Office, Auditor and Assessor to proceed with gathering information
on going to direct benefits for the Fire Department at 40 percent be approved.
Supervisor Dolan stated based an the report it is really the western
one-third of the county. She felt it should be done in two steps. Give
direction to staff and what the assessments will be without the direction.
It is not a call for the election, just ins-case they want to do it, And to
set a public hearing even though it is not required.
Vote on motion:
AYES: Supervisors Dolan, Moseley,rSaraceni and Chairman Wheeler
Motion carried.
203
RECESS: 10:08 a.m.
RECONVENE: 10:13 a.m.
PUBLIC HEARING: BUDGET TRANSFER-130 -- COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAt4
The public hearing on Budget Transfer-130 - Community Action Program.
This budget transfer establishes a budget for the Community Action Agency 1982
Emergency Crisis Intervention Program as approved by the State Office of
Economic Opportunity in the amount of $25,000. The budget appropriation is
as follows: salaries and wages, $2,685; fringe benefits, $436, consultant
services, $475; travel, $338; consumable supplies, $484; and other costs,
Page 152.
February 2, 1982
6 2-
'1J
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and
carried, Budget transfer-130 - Community Action Program. This budget transfer
establishes a budget for the Communs~y Action Agency 1982 Emergency Crisis
Intervention Program as approved by the State Office of Economic Opportunity
in the amount of $25,000. The budget appropriation is as follows: salaries
and wages, $2,685; fringe benefits, $436, consultant services, $475; travel,
$338; consumable supplies, $484; and other costs $20,582. Funding is from
unanticipated revenue, state aid, State Office of Economic Opportunity was
approved.
Hearing open to the public. Appearing: No one.
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board.
204
_ rr^ebruary 2, 1982 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
$20,582. Funding is from unanticipated revenue - state aid - State Office of
Economic Opportunity was held as advertised.
ADOPT ORDINANCE 2266 - PUBLIC HEARING: TOM DAUTERA7AN PROPOSED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND REZONE FROM "C-2" (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) TO "M-2" (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL), PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE
OF STATE HIGHWAY 32, APPROXIMATEIY 500 FEET NORTH OF WEST BTH AVENUE,
IDENTIFIED AS AP 4z~-14-5, 6 AND 93, CHICO
The public hearing on the Tom Dauterman proposed negative declar-
ation regarding environmental impact and rezone from "C-2" (general commercial)
to "M-2" (heavy industrial), property located on the east side of State
Highway 32, approximately 500 feet north of West 8th Avenue, identified as
AP 42-14-5, 6 and 93, Chico was held as advertised.
Bettye Blair, planning director, stated they had received the
Planning Commission's favorable recommendation and it is in conformance
with the General Flan. A motion has been prepared for their use. They
have staff recommendations and minutes.
Hearing open to the public. Appearing: No one.
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board.
20 5
On motion of Supervisor Saraceni, seconded by Supervisor P4oseley
and carried, 'noting. that the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act have been complied with, a negative declaration was adopted;
finding that the proposed rezone from "C-2" (general commercial) to "M-2"
(heavy industrial), property located on the east side of State Highway 32,
approximately 500 feet north of West 8th Avenue, identified as Ap 42-14-5,
6 and 93, Chico; further finding that the proposed rezone is consistent with
the policies of the Butte County General Plan; Ordinance 2266 was adopted:-and
the Chairman authorized to sign.
REVTEW JUVENILE HALL ANNUAL INSPECTION
Review of the annual inspection of Juvenile Ha11 submitted by the
Superior Court with findings was held at this time.
Supervisor Dolan stated she had reviewed the report. Tf there is
a problem the Juvenile Justice Commission will come back to the Board. The
staffing problem has been pointed out before. This is just review and
information.
Mike Pyeatt, assistant administrative officer, stated they are
aware of the problems the Hall is facing and the concerns. You have to
decide on a priority.
Information, no action taken.
Page 153.
February 2, 1982
82- 20fi
20 7
208
;209
210
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _FQb~u;3r~ ~, X1982 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
APPROVE/DENY PENALTY-ABATEMENT RE(ZUESTS - CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP R
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor
carried, the following penalty abatement requests - change of o
were approved and denied:,
Denied:
1. Sunderhaus & Leigh Properties, AP 043-18-0-053-0
2. Yung Soon Kim, AP 048-OL-0-024-0 and 048-01-0-026
3. Jeffrey C. Cusick, AP 051-02-0-100-0
4. Alice Crawford, AP 035-22-3-011-0"
5. Jeffrey L. Allen, AF 005-15-1-006-0
6. P1r. & Mrs. Doug Wurlitzer, AP 044-45-0-046-0
7_ Paul A. Bean, AP 012-07-3-011-0
8. idr. & NIrs. Bradford K. Long, AP 005-07-7-029-0
9. Vernon M. Lovelace, AP 058-19-0-103-0
10. James W. Keenan, AP 026-24-2-027-0
PORTS
Moseley and
nership reports
1. Mr. & Mrs. Mike Danilov, AP 052-19-2-003-0 and 052-19-2-011-0
APPROVE BUDGET TRANSFERS
On motion of Supervisor fdoseley, seconded by Supervisor Dolan and
carried, the following budget. transfers were approved:
1. B-117 - Buildings and Grounds ISF. Transfers $19 from small
tools 'and equipment. to equipment in order to cover a deficiency in fixed
assets.
PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET
A public hearing date. of February 23, 1982 at 10:00 a.m. was set
for the Tinker J. Wilson petitionfor variance to Sections 19-1Q and/or 19--12
of the Butte County Code for placement of a mobile home on AP 27-24-43,
7795 Citrus Avenue, Oroville area, zoning: "A-5".
PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET
A public hearing date of February 23, 1982 at 10:00 a.m. was set
for Richard Higby petitionfor variance to Sections 19-10 and/or 19-12 of
the Butte County Code for placement of a mobile home on AP 43-20-25, 1140
Columbus Avenue, Chico area, zoning: "C-1".
APPROVE VARIANCE RENE4IALS - MARGARET DTETZ AND, DANIEL L. CODY
On motion of Supervisor '.Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni
and carried, the following variance zenewals were approved:
1. Approved variance renewal for Margaret Dietz for a variance
to Sections 19-10 and/or 19=12 of the Butte County Code for placement of a
mobile home on AP 40-30-64, 2392 Blossom Lane, Durham area, zoning: "A-5".
2. Approved variance renewal for Daniel L. Cody foc a variance
to Sections 19-10 and/or 19-12 of the Butte County Code for placement of a
mobile home on AP 63-09-22, Cody Lane, Forest Ranch area, zoning: "TM-5"
Page 154.
February 2, 1982
8 2- 211
212
213
214.
215
216
February 2,_1982 __ ______________~
APPROVE DEED OF CONVEYANCE - EASTRIDGE ASSESShSENT DISTRICT
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and
carried, the deed of conveyance for underground electric distribution and
street lighting facilities. from County of Butte to Pacific Gas and Electric
Company for Eastridge Assessment District was approved and the Chairman
authorized to sign.
ADOPT RESOLUTIOP7 82-21 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PROGRAI'+I SUPPLEMENTS N0. 25
iaND N0. 26 - SKYWAY FAS PROJECT 1V0. RS Y 742 (3) AND SKYwVAY FAU PROJECT N0.
M-Y742(1)
On•motion of Supervisor Saraceni, seconded by Supervisor Dolan and
carried, Resolution 82-21 authorizing execution of Program Supplements No. 25
and No. 26 re: Skyway FAS Project No. RS=Y'J42(3) and Skyway FAU Project No.
M=Y742(1) oras adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign.
PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET
A public hearing date of P4arch 9, 1982 at 10:00 a.rn. was set for
consideration of intention to rename a private road: Phantom Drive (Yankee
Hill Road to end) to :Yankee Vista Drive.
ADDITIONAL ITEM BY.CHAIRI.7AN WHEELER
Chairman LVheeler stated Supervisor Lemke was very active and
supportive of the Skyway projects which were just approved. She felt they
should look seriously about erecting a memorial for Supervisor Lemke on
that stretch of highway.
DIRECT COUNTY COUNSEL TO BRING BACK ORDINANCE ON THERMALITO DRAINAGE CAPITAL
OUTL.~Y DEVELOPIdE1dT FEE ON FEBRUARY 9, 1982
Clay Castleberry, public works director, stated this proposal was
very similar to one. submitted by the residents of Thermalito. Geddis, Driscoll
and Associates had indicated there would be a $900 per parcel fee for all
divisions of land. The Thermalito proposal was to lower the fee on four parcel
splits to make up the difference for building permit fees. The proposal
would not have left enough money to spend. A building permit fee is on new
homes on existing parcels. An ordinance will have to be brought back to
enact this. proposal. It is a big change, it is fair. There are presently
some Thermalito parcel maps waiting in that area. The original plan was
for $450 per acre for a four parcel split. And then a $250 building permit.
There is no permit fee for additional parcels. A one acre lot would not need
the fee. If they wish to proceed, it will take an ordinance and resolution.
A public hearing will be necessary for the ordinance.
Del Siemsen, county counsel, stated he was not aware of this. He
would like to look at the code. They will have to bring back an ordinance
to be adopted.
On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni
and carried, directed County Counsel and staff to prepare an ordinance to
bring back on February 9, 1982 for Board approval.
PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET
A public hearing date of February 23, 1982 at 10:45 a.m. was set
for consideration of the Butte County Planning Commission, Upper Paradise
Ridge, Lime Saddle area rezone {item on which an environmental impact report
has previously been certified) from "A-2" (general), "A-2 Ltd.," "AR-NIH-3"
(agricultural residential mobile home - 3 acre parcels), "FR-40" (foothill
recreational - 40 acre parcels), "R-1" {single family residential), "S-H"
(scenic highway) and "TM-20" {timber mountain - 20 acre parcels) to zoning
consistent with the General Plan for those sites and including "A-5" through
R60,n nA-R," ieAR-I~IH", "H-C", "T+IHPn, nl,~-R", "N-C", "R-1", "R-lA & C'r, irR.I-1°,
"RT-lA°, "R-2°, "R-3u, uR-4'r, ~rR-Cn~ ~rR-MH", "S-Hu, us-R°, "SR-.5°, °SR-1",
"SR-5" and "TM-1 through 160".Page 155.
February 2, 1982
82- 217
218
• --------=====February 2,'1982 =__-_______ --___
APPROVE LAND CONSERVATION ACT AGREFS~lENT - FRANCIS L. CARMICHAEL
Cn motion of Supervisor Saraceni, seconded by Supervisor Moseley
and carried, the Land Conservation Act', agreements for Francis L. Carmichael
were approved and the Chairman authorized to sign.
PUBLIC HEARING: DOMINION ENTERPRISES
AGENCY FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FI
DELL-HAVEN ESTATES, AP 24-09-62, LOCA
OF HIGHWAY 99 AND ~TIELSON AVENUE
The public hearing on the D
from the Advisory Agency for an exten
the subdivision for De11-Haven Estate
at the intersection of Highway 99 and
APPEAL OF DENIAL FROM THE ADVISORY
A FINAL MAP ON THE SUBDIVISION FOR
i SOUTH OF GRIDLEY AT THE INTERSECTION
inion Enterprises appeal of denial
on of time to £ile a final map on
AP 24-09-62, located south of Gridley
ielson Avenue was held as advertised.
Clay Castleberry, public wo
on the proposed project. The tentati
does not allow for granting an extens
Counsel.
Del Siemsen, county counsel
did not make a request prior to the e
does not allow them to hear the reque
Supervisor Dolan stated th
This is the obligation of the people
s director, set out the background
parcel map did expire. The ordinance
n at this time. He would defer to
stated the tentative map applicant
ension of time and the ordinance
can make a request within 18 months.
o are developing.
Hearing open to the public.',. Appearing:
1. Fred Girth, Gridley, s
City Council. The project is larger
letter from the City of Gridley.
Chairman wheeler read the 1
the record at this time. They rogues
2.. Don Saltine, M & H Engi
economics had a change of ownership.
they askec for an extension of time.
spent. An entire EIR was writte!i. T
They would like to finish the project
ted it was brought up before the Gridley
han when proposed. He presented a
r from the City of Gridley into
the appeal of time extension be denied.
Bering, Marysville, stated because of
There was~a problem with the project and
A great deal of money has already been
ey will work with the City. of Gti&.ley.
Supervisor Mosel.Fy quest.i-coed if the applicant coul.ci reapply #o
the County and city. There hands are ', tied because of state laws. They
must deny the appeal. ',
Mr. Saltine qu.estior.ed i.f
prepared be acceptable.
reapp'_ir-_d would the EIR that was
Mr. Siemsen stated. they will look at the EIF. and it would. be up
to Planning if i.t was acceptable cr.a',new one would. be required. He was
not sure if it was still valid or would need updating.
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board.
On motion of Supervisor Mos
carried, the appeal of Dominion Enter
for an extension of time tc file a fi
Estates, AP 24-09-62, located south o
99 and Nielson Avenue was denied and
ey, seconded by Supervisar Dolan and
ises of denial from the Advisory Agency
1 map on the subdivision for Dell-Haven
Gridley at the intersection of Highway
held the Advisory Agency decision.
Page 156.
February 2, 1982
February 2, 1982
82- 2i9 APPOINTMENTS TO THE OROVILLE l'dEhiORIAL HALL COMMITTEE AND PARADISE MEMORIAL
~j ~ce HALL COMMITTEE
On motion of Segercisor Saraceni, seconded by Supervisor Moseley
and carried, the followirq appoi.ntmerts were aggrc~ed:
Orovilie Memorial Hall Committee
Ed McQuean, Veterans of Foreign War
Jimmy Chastain, alternate, Veterans of Foreign War
Charles Dustin, Veterans of World War I
Frank Thomas, alternate, Veterans of World War I
Paradise Memorial Hall Committee
Marvin L. Johnson, American Legion, Faradise Post No. 259
Harvey A. G+7allace, alternate,• American Legion, Paradise Post No. 259
R. G. "Mac" McLintock, Sr.r Vietnam Veterans of America
Jerry Boston, alternate, Vietnam Veterans of America
Donovan Montgomery, Veterans of World War I
Reynolds M. Griffin, alternate, Veterans of World P7ar I
Supervisor Moseley questioned the two communication items from
Gene Wilson submitting nominations for. both the Orogille and Durham halls.
She would like some clarification.
Clay Castleberry, public works director, stated they hold their
meetings in Oraville and the social functions in the Durham hail.
220 APPOINTP~IENT TO THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA HEALTH SYSTEMS AGENCY
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and
carried, the appointment of Madge E. Haynes to the Northern California Health
Systems Agency was approved.
221 APPOINTMENT TO THE BUTTE COUNTY HEALTH PLANNING .COUNCIL
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and
carried, the appointment of tQeredith A. Buchanan to the Butte County Health
Planning Council was approved.
222 (CONTINUE TO FEBRUARY 9, 1982 - APPOINTMENTS
Continued to February 9, 1982 appointments to the Butte County
Housing Authority - District 2.
223
Continued to February 9, 1982 appointments to the Mental Health
Advisory Board.
PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET ON DON PRIDE APPEAL OF CONDITION ON TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP, NORTH CHICO AREA
Consideration of Bachman and Associates letter concerning late appeal
of Don Pride appealing Condition No. 7 (pe•rmanent solution for drainage) on a
tentative parcel map, AP 47-34-11 and 12, three parcels, property located on
the north side of Keefer Road, west of Hicks Lane, north Chico area was held
at this time.
Clay Castleberry, public works director, stated based on the con-
sistency of previous action he would recommend they allow the appeal. The
request was made within the one year period.
On motion of Supervisor Wheeler, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and
carried, the appeal of Don Pride appealing Condition No. 7 (permanent solution
for drainage) on a tentative parcel map, AP 47-34-11 and 12, three parcels,
property located on the north side of Keefer Road, west of Hicks Lane, north
Chico area was allowed to be heard public hearing date was set for. February
23, 1982 at 11:30 a.m,
AYES: Supervisors Moseley, Saraceni and Chairman Wheeler NOES: Supervisor
!Dolan Page 157.
February 2, 1982
8 2-
b
224
___-_ _===--Februa~=21982=-_ ________-_-_-__-_-__
Chairman_Wheeler felt until that drainage study goes in and is
adopted she felt they would be setting a precident. There are extenuating
circumstances which the individual does not need.. She will have a meeting
with Mr. Castleberry on this issue.
PUBLIC HEARING: MR. AND MRS. PHILLIP ENGELBERT APPEAL THE PROPOSED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND THE ADVI5O13' AGENCY'S DENIAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AP
42-21-01, TWO PARCELS, PROFERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET NORTH OF
OAK PARK AND ROSE AVENUE INTERSECTION, IN THE CHICO AREA
The public hearing on P4r. and P4rs. Phillip Engelbert appeal of the
proposed negative declaration and the Advisory Agency's denial of tentative
parcel map, AP 42-21-01, two parcels, property located approximately 1,100
feet north of Oak Park and Rose Avenue intersection, in the Chico area was
held as advertised.
hynn Vanhart, environment health director, set out the background
on the appeal. The Advisory Agency denied the project because both sewage
and subdivison ordinances indicate 100 foot set back from the creek and fields.
There is a copy of the map on the wall. There is no space for a sewage
disposal system. In the past the Board has granted variances where some
space was available. Meeting within all the legal requirements, there is
no space available on parcel 1 for such an installation. The applicant
requested a variance for 50 feet set back between Big Chico Creek. There
was a change in 1974 to come into compliance with State requirements and
Water Quality. It must be 100 feet from wells and the creek. If they were
to provide a 50-foot set back there would be room to install the-`•system,
but no room for 6000~square foot. There was an irrigation well installed
nearby left not enough room for the sewage system. The one problem that
was allowed in Paradise was due to lack of communication.
Supervisor Dolan questioned if everyone on the street was on Calif-
ornia Water would there be a problem.
Mr. Vanhart stated there would be plenty of room and no problem.
If California Water is available, so is sewer available.
Hearing open to the public. Appearing:
1. Mark Risso, McCain and Associates, representing the applicant,
stated there was no agriculture well that went through. Prior to that there
was enough set back area. He needs about 100 lenial feet for a leach field.
He felt there would be good percolation. Big Chico Creek is dry part of the
summer months. They have asked for a 50 foot set back as a possible solution.
There is adequate leach area in parcel 2. He questioned if they could have an
easement for the leach field in parcel 2.
Chairman L7heeler stated it would be written as a condition on the
map.
Mr. Vanhart stated it could possibly be done. In parcel 2 there is
useable room which does not require they are going to 6,000 square feet as
required for parcel 2. They have agreed to abandon that area. They would
be making two lots meet the requirements of one. He felt it was a poor way
to go. They place him in a position to enforce the ordinance.- The 6,000
square feet is more than they need to install a leach line.
Mr. Risso indicated this would allow a two acre parcel in a one
acre zone. Because of all the set backs on the site they would only use
up 6,000 feet of useable area and they only need about 3,000 for each lot.
Supervisor Dolan stated she knew there would be no further division
of this parcel. It complies wi:th,e99 percent of what is on Oak Park. She
would not want the 50 feet within Big Chico Creek.
Page 158.
February 2, 1982
6 2-
______________Februa~ 21982=====--_______-_
Hearing closed^to the public and confined to the Board.
Chairman wheeler felt an easement of record could be placed on the map.
Supervisor Dolan agreed there was a negative impact on the environment.
Mr. Vanhart stated he felt to do so would be setting a dangerous
prescident. Individuals Lots should stand on their own. If this is granted,
they are opening it wide open to say yes in one case and no in another. It
does not comply with the ordinance in any way, shape or form.
Supervisor Saraceni stated there was a sewer line going through the
property.
On motion of Supervisor Aolan, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni
fi~iding that the requirements of CEQA were met and should be filed, a negative
declaration was recommended; the appeal of the denied tentative parcel map,
AP 42-21-01, two parcels, property located approximately 1,100 feet north of
Oak Park and Rose Avenue intersection, in the Chico area was upheld; approved
the granting of an easement for parcel 1 leach field onto parcel 2 and the
project is in conformance with the General Plan.
Del Siemsen, county counsel, stated it would be a private easement,
it would be a note easement granted to house each piece of property.
Vote on motion:
AYES: Supervisors Dolan, Moseley, Saraceni and Chairman wheeler
I4otion carried.
DISCUSSION: COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE HOURS
Discussion regarding County Clerk's office hours held at this time.
225
Clark Nelson, county clerk-recorder, recapped what had happened to
arrive at the present position to close his ,office for four hours each day.
Back in 1975 the Board let it be known to place CETA personnel into positions
rather than take from the General Fund. He hired his first in 1975 who is
still with him. They have trained 30 CETA people and they helped keep the
office open. Two years ago he discussed with (dike Pyeatt when they were
reviewing his budget, that it may be necessary to recommend the level of
service be cut. He asked for three additional people as the CETA were not
being retained. He did keep one CETA on. as extra help. The budget hit
and there was a serious problem, he lost three positions he had requested.
There was a memo from Mr. Pyeatt discussing the different areas to cut.
He had stated "hopefully the reduction of office hours would help." So he
lost his three positions. It takes one month. or more to effect an ordinance
and the change of office hours. Since they did not have CETA or new personnel,
and he found three days mail unopened by staff, he closed the office. He
received quite a bit of static. He felt it was necessary in order to k@ep
solvent. Nothing has changed. The union signed the agreement that every
15 days an employee has a day off, so the closure did not realize that much.
He personally feels the Board voted for the budget and they had an agreement
at budget time. He questioned if the Board had read the memo from the court.
There was a letter from Mr. Travers on his behalf also. He is not trying to
use scare tactics. The Judicial Council was up two weeks ago. He received
a letter back dated. January 26th indicating they recommended staffing of 28
people in the office including himself. They have made a new study and they
were 25 percent high, so this left him about 5'~ to 6 people short. He will
.gladly stay open to 5 p.m. daily, if they grant the extra positions
Page 159.
February 2, 1982
8 2-
_ _February 2, 1982
Chairman Wheeler stated she understood what he was saying and she
concurred. Chairman Wheeler read a letter from Judge Watt into .the record
at this time. They asked that the Clerk's office remain closed.
Mr. Nelson stated they have. tried to work with the DBA's by placing
them at elections during the hours they are closed. They have a drop slot
for attorney's and. emergency numbers for them.
Supervisor Saraceni stated some of the people who come in between
1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. cannot utilize the drop slot which the attorney's use.
He did not know the total operation but questioned if one person could man
the counter from the 1 to 5 time period.
Mr. Nelson stated they could not stay a little bit open. He did not
know how he could open to one person at the counter. He felt they should
either be open or closed, not a little bit of each.
Mike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer, stated i4r. Nelson is
providing a mandate. service to the public. Anything from the normal you will
have to adjust. It will take time for the County and public to adjust to the
time. Over a period of time they will adjust. It will not happen overnight.
At the other end of the mandated function that he has to perform within a
certain capability is expecting a person to perform after you are left with
diminished resources. There was a compromise reached with P4r. Nelson at budget
time last year.
Chairman Wheeler indicated Mr. Nelson felt it should be considered
at budget time and ~e is inclined to agree. "
Supervisor Dolan stated people that were on CETA were useful and
then they were cut back. The public and staff were reduced. It is not business
as usual. Chairman Wheeler is right the minutes of budget time reflected they
wanted department heads to be innovative. She felt they had to stand by their
previous decision. The public is being served, they did not add staff.
Supervisor Saraceni stated they could discuss it at budget time.
They are going to be short of funds this year. They are going to be subject
to more closure in more departments. He knows it is going to be rough. Maybe
they all have to work a little harder and give a little more effort.
No action was taken. To be reconsidered at budget time.
226 ADOPT RESOLUTION $2-22 - PROPOSED LEGISLATION ON JURISDICTION EFFECTING
Discussion of proposed legislation on jurisdiction effecting ground
ter was held at this time.
Chairman Wheeler had copies of SB 1319 for the Board. It was Sierra
alley Basin Act to protest the jurisdiction without implemention the legis-
ation. Senator Johnson is carrying the bill for Sierra County. This Board
as gone on record. Mr. Jack Madigan supports this and is their official
epresentative. Senator Johnson has asked that they submit a letter of support
o they can work on legislation.
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and
arried, Resolution 82-22 in support of proposed legislation .on jurisdiction
ffecting ground water was adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign; with
copy to Senator Johnson's office in support of ground water.
227
.S: NATE WHITE
Nate White, Box 1816, Chico, stated he asked to be placed on the
Page 160.
February 2, 1982
8 2-
228
229
230
February 2, 1982 _ _ _
agenda, but was told to be-present at this time. He would like to call their
attention to concerns in the Oroville community of the harrassment of the
Sheriff's Department. There is unfair treatment on the crimes being committed
and South Oroville is being blamed. They don't want their people being called
"boys". The Sheriff's Department has been unfair about this.
Mr. White called their attention tc the appointments on Commissions.
Remember they have a southern community of blacks and they are not included.
The library being built does not employee minorities. When a contract is
let by Public P7orks it should include the minority people. Last year he
wrote a letter about 22 positions. A deputy was employeed at the Sheriff's
office, 2 individuals were given jailers positions and were let go within 60
days. For 10 years he has been talking to the county about the frustrations
of the back community. The deputy hired in the Sheriff's Department received
Nazi- literature. The Board sets on record being opposed to racism. They
need an affirmative action plan and hiring policy.
Supervisor Dolan stated she was not aware of the specific harrass-
ment in the Sheriff's Department. There~is a work shop being held. She
recognizes the problem of having parity. They cannot promise to hire when
they are going to do the opposite when they get to budget session.
Mike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer, stated Mr. White has
met with Mr.Rackerby. Regarding the harrassment they will investigate the
problem.
Mr. White felt they should use the selective _ certification method
of hiring. Recruitment should be done within the county. He has been trying
to negotiate and work these things out.
Chairman Wheeler stated they would consider the five points he has
discussed. They will send him a response.
APPEARANCES: LEON WOODSON, OROVILLE
Leon Woodson, Greenville Street, Oroville, voiced his concerns about
the racism and bigotry in the county. The black community, pays their taxes.
They support their families. He has been stopped and harrassed by the police.
He just has to read the newspaper to know where the racism is. They are not
harboring the people in the black area. He is an angry citizen. They do
not know how the blacks feel degraded and dehuman.
CONTINUE TO FEBRUARY 9, 1982 - CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING POLICX AND PROCEDURE
MANUAL SECTION 1.10 CONCERNTNG CHAIRMAN/VICE-CHAIRMAN SELECTION
Continued to February 9, 1982 consideration of amending the Policy
and Procedure Manual Section 1.10 concerning Chairman/Vice-Chairman selection.
COMMUNICATTONS
Armin Speckert, Sr., Marysville. Mr. Speckert requests that two parcels,
AP 56-21-056 and AP 56-21-057, be deleted from the Agriculture
Preserve Contract. Letter to be sent; referred to Land
Conservation Committee.
Max H. Doner, Challenge. Mr. Doner writes expressing concern about the status
of the closure of Bean-Clipper Road in the vicinity of Clipper Mills.
Referred to Public Works to send letter.
Jerry R. Bechhold, Chico. Mr. Bechhold submits a claim for $1,000,000 alleging
violations of civil rights. See motion following communications.
Gene Willson, commander, VFW Post 9602. Mr. Willson submits a nomination for
the Durham Memorial Ha11 Committee. Referred to Public Works..
Page 161.
February 2, 1982
8 2-
a
-____-__ J~Y__February2, 1982==-_=_-_i_______-
Gene Willson, commander, VFW Post 9602. Mr. Willson submits a nomination for
the Oroville Memorial Hall Committee. Referred to Public Works.
Donald R. Travers, attorney at law. The attorney supplies information regard-
ing the operating hours of the County Clerk's Office. Information;
handled earlier.
Reginald M. Watt, presiding judge, Superior Court. The judge submits infor-
mation regarding the operating hours of the County Clerk's Office.
Information; handled earlier.
City of Gridley. The City Clerk supplies information regarding the Gridley-
Biggs rezone of the Gridley ultimate sphere of influence. Infor-
mation; no action taken.
Everett L. Fuller, Gridley. Mr. Fuller requests information regarding the
proper jurisdictions for rezoning the ultimate sphere of influence
in the City of Gridley. 2nformation; reply to come from Board.
Dennis Corp, claims manager. The State Compensation Insurance Fund offers
certain services to public agencies who are self insured. Referred
to Risk Management Coordinator.
Department of Housing and Urban Development. Elizabeth M. Tapscott, program
manager, provides information regarding the requirement for Butte
County as grantee to maintain grant records and source documents.
Information; no action taken.
Grayson Price, attorney at law.. The attorney, on behalf of Nancy Hosler and
Michael Nugent, as executors of the estate of Vera Stolp Nugent
Hollenberg, appeal this Advisory Agency's denial of Application for
Waiver of the sewage disposal requirements for AP 38-22-07 and
AP 38-12-06. Nelson area. Set for public hearing on February 23,
1982 at 11:15 a.m.
231
232
REJECT CLAIM - JERRY R.~BECHHOLD
On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni
and carried, the claim of Jerry R. Bechhold, Chico, for X1,000,000 alleging
violations of ,civ.il.rights was rejected and referred to County Counsel and
Risk Management Coordinator.
DISCUSSION: REGARDTNG PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS - JOINT MEETING WITH
PLANNING COMMTSSION AND BOARD _
Chairman Wheeler stated she has concerns about the project of
Isom and Hall which was heard by the Planning Commission and continued for
a three months period. If they cannot make a decision, maybe they should send
it forward to the Board. There seemed to be difficulty with open space.
She felt it aras wrong to hold up a project for that period of time. She did
not like to interfere.
Supervisor Dolan stated on January 19th they held a joint meeting
with Planning Commission and felt it was discussed and resolved at that time.
Given what they know they could not require and consider taking it and PA-C
zone. The projects will stand on their own or they will not. In a PA-C
you cannot place that position. They have a state law that says they can.
They can accept an easem~t that is offered. If you want to change the state
law it takes approximately two years.
Supervisor Saraceni felt it was another issue which caused the delay.
There were service district concerns. There is a question of service districts
and serving a number of lots going into the area. Maybe there should be a
joint meeting. Page 162.
February 2, 1982
- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - FgbruarY 2_. X282_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Nina Lambert, chairman, planning commission, stated they received a
request from LAFCo. She did not agree with the delay. She felt it should be
denied so it could come forward to the Board.
B 2-
a
Del Siemsen, county counsel, stated it was up to the Board. The
Board could specifically require that Planning Commission make a decision.
Maybe they could request time to proceed with the application request for
decision on way or another.
Mrs. Lambert stated abcut five people from the Stilson Canyon area
request sewer systems. They were concerned about water ,, prior to that there
were no people present. '
Supervisor Saraceni felt if a system was build it needed to be
addressed who would pay for this cost, bare lots or with no property. The
property association does not have the legal function to make those charges.'
Chairman Wheeler stated they would have a joint meeting, but at the
same time they will know the Board's concerns. in that area. She felt they
should send them a memo inviting them to a joint meeting:
Supervisor Dolan stated she would like to discuss the issues not
a specific project.
Administrative Office will contact Bettye Blair to set a date for
the joint meeting.
233 (ADDITIONAL MATTER BY BOARD MEMBER
Chairman Wheeler indicated there is correspondence from Sacramento
County asking that the Board support their resolution.
RECESS: 12:08 p.m.
RECONVENE: 1:32 p.m.
~~~
234 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S 1982-83 FINANCIAL PRO-
JECTIONS AND BUDGETING PROCEDURES
The presentation and discussion of the Auditor-Controller's 1982-83
financial projections and budgeting procedures was held at this time.
Jim Johansen, auditor, stated the Board had received a copy of
the projections together with charts and graphs. He would only be hitting
the highlights in the discussion at this time. He set out the report
that was presented to the Board on January 19, 1982 in minute order 82-118.
This included the forecast that the available financing for the 1982-83
budget will be approximately $6 million less than the budgetary requirements
projected. He set out the assumptions made by his department. He summarized
the expenditures and the anticipated revenue. He set out the charts and
gave a brief explanation. On page V of the report there was the recommenda-
tion to enable the Administrative Office and departments to put together
a balanced budget by June 30. They recommended there be some sort of budget.
process as soon as possible to get the difficult decisions made in a timely
but deliberate manner so the department heads can be involved along with
the public and the Board in this process. The statistics from the Board
of Equalization that show the $1.00 tax rate between city, county and
schools show that Butte County receives $.21 of the $1.00. The state
average as far as county government is concerned is $.33. Butte County
is the third lowest share from the bottom of the chart. Only Orange and
San Benito Counties receive a smaller cut. This is maybe part of the
reason Butte County is having problems while there are other counties that
are not.
Page 163.
February 2, 1982
8 2-
3
- - - - - - _ _ _ _ _Februar~ 2, -19_82_ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _
- - Mike ~yeatt, interim administrative officer, .set out the proposed
schedule for handling.the Budgetary problems,at.this time. He felt .the
most important issues was that the expenditures would have to.b.e balanced
with anticipated revenues'. He suggested that the Board also be involved in
the budget review process. There are a number of actions the Board can take
in evaluating the entire county between now and June 30, 1982. Any reduction
taking place in dealing with reorganization of the county is going to equate
into a higher fund balance on June 30, 1982. He set out how the Administrative
Office had reviewed departmental budgets in past years and submittal to the
Auditor. What the Board has received in the past is~the preliminary budget.
He was asking that the Board make the commitment to get involved in the
budget process concurrently with the Administrative Office. They hope to
conclude the budget review sessions before May 30, 1982. This will give the
Auditor time to do the necessary computations prior to final budget hearings.
Those would be held some time in late June or early July. There are departments
such as Welfare, Public Health and Mental Health, who have not received their
state or federal allocations. They are asking those departments to contact
the state or federal agencies for a general idea of what the funding will be.
After the adoption of the final budget there will be the requirements to
follow SB 361 for publication of hearings on any budget •transfers of additional
appropriations of over or under realized funding.
The budget preparation schedule will include the sending of
budget instructions to departments on January 29, 1982. February 29, 1982
is the first deadline for the 15F budget. On March 1, 1982 every other
department will submit their budget to the Auditor. On March 8, 1982, the
Administrative Office will review the budgets. Once the review is started,
they will be making recommendations and meeting with departments and bringing
the recommendations back to the Board. They hoped to involve not only the
Board but department heads and the public in this process. There are going
to be some ramifications in finding the $6 million. He felt it was absolutely
necessary to prepare the departmental Budgets at the present levels, identifying
functional uruias within the budget. There are many of the departments who
are fulfilling mandated functions required by law. He felt that everyone
needed to know what the requirements are. They are asking the departments
to develop priorities having incremental levels of service reduction to
zero. This portion would indicate consequences of the particular actions
that could be taken. Not all departments can be taken to zero. Once the
mandated services are identified, perhaps there can be some incremental
levels or discretionary services performed. The purpose of this is to
assist the Board in setting priorities in determining the future of the
county. This would also hopefully avoid across the board cuts and depletion
of resources with static levels of services. Mr. Nelson spoke to the Board
this morning relative to the cutback in staffing and the closure of his
office after the last budget session. He is still performing the same basic
levels of services but is not going to be available to the public.
This proposal would also allow the financing of programs without expenditures
from the reserves, revenue sharing or insurance reserves as in the past.
The other reason for following the decision-package fis to maintain credibility
with the public as to the revenue projections and needs of departments for
maintain operations.
The overall goal for next fiscal year is to have expenditures
equal to revenues. There will be a budget workshop on Monday for the
department heads or the deputies involved in budget preparation, the
Auditor, the Administrative Office to provide more insight into this
matter. There is a $67 million budget and only about $30 million of
discretionary funding to get the $6 million deficit. He suggested
that the Board meet next week on the budget. Many of the county programs
are subvented and it is not possible to just cut a certain amount from
these budgets. His office will prepare a list of departments to show
Page 164.
February 2, 1982
B2-
_____ February 2~ 1982 _-_-_____~__________
the Board the placement of all discretionary funds. Some departments do not
have discretionary funding and ,others are funded 100 percent discretionary
funding.
Chairman Wheeler directed staff to proceed with the implementation
of the process by first generating the report for the Board. With the
concurrence of the Board, she and Supervisor D"oian will continue to
meet with the Auditor and staff to analyze the budget, scheduling of
meetings and report back. to the Board. The next budget meeting will be
scheduled for February 10, 1982. The budget review, the policy decisions
and everything about the budget will be done at the Board meetings with
the department heads as active participants.
Discussion open to the public. Appearing:
1. Joe Bandy, agricultural commissioner. Mr. Bandy was concerned
about across the board cuts. There was the mention of a 67 percent increase
in protective services. He went through. his budget for 1981-82 and
carried it back to the actual costs in 1979-80. It was interesting to note
that he is three units below the 1979-80 actual expenditures. If there is
an across the Board cut, he will be crippled in his department. There has
been up to a 163 percent increase in some departments. He may lose the
ability to produce revenue and this will compound the problem. With the
30 percent increase in utilities, the only way he will be able to cut that
figure will be by centralizing the department. He was willing to work with
the Board and Administrative Office staff.
2. Clay Castleberry, public works director. Mr. Castleberry
supported the Board's efforts last year. He supported the needs to make
the decisions last year. There was mention of a team effort and for those
that felt the effects there was a small team. He felt to maintain credibility
it would be well if the Board remembered those things. The data processing
charges are going up and apparently, the county has made commitments in that
area. Some of the departments have continued in the meantime to reduce
their staff. He started reducing staff a couple of months ago for next
year. He suggested that the snow plowing be cut down last year and it
was postponed by the Board. He plans to go to Paradise Pines this next
week and would like to say the county will not be plowing the roads next
year. The main roads would be plowed. He would work with the Board. He
has made suggestions and recommendations to the Board. He hoped he would
not be standing alone. Not everyone came forward last year with proposals
for cutting back and reductions in programs.
3. Will Mattly, district attorney. Mr. Mattly stated in looking
at the chart one of the greatest areas of increase is in public protection.
He asked if anyone had been convicted-and required to pay the maximum fine
for the offense. In the consumer 'protection and land fraud areas, his
'.office prosecuted people who did not abide by the state legislation in
.development and settled in civil penalties and this money went into the
',General Fund. There might be some constitutional reasons why a person cannot
', be charged the maximum. He felt that people had a tendency to be too soft.
iIf the Penal Code sets a $5,000 fine then that is what the person should be
fined.
4. Ed Brown, assessor. Mr. Brown stated last year the Assessor's
budget was considered and he felt it was undue on their part. His department
is funded by discretionary funding but the duties are not discretionary.
The assessor is the assessor for every taxing entity in the county even
though the Chico RDA has taken money from the county, the county is not
going to receive any money from the work done in his office for the RDA.
He was trying to receive Counsel's support in not doing the work.
Page 165.
February 2, 1982
82
235
February 2, 1982
RECESS: 2:29 p.~n.
RECONVENE: 2:41 p..c~.
The meeting on the budget was continued to February 10, 1982
at 1:00 p:m.
CLOSED SESSION: The Board recessed at 2:42 p.m. to Bold a closed session
on meet and confer.
RECONVENE: The Board reconvened at 3:23 p:m. after holding a closed session
on meet and confer. They instructed tfie negotiator on how to
proceed on~meet and confer matters.
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION URGING LEGISLATION TO AMEND SECTION 2162 OF
MILTTARY AND VETERANS CODE RE: OPERATION OF MEMORIAL HALLS TO BE PLACED
ON AGENDA FOR FEBRUARY 9 1982
Mike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer, stated that at the
conference held last week during a discussion with one of the legislative
analysts, he indicated they had problems with memorial halls and the
ability to make decisions as it relates to the court cases. He asked
the analyst for flexibility in proceeding with optional operation of the
halls. He has asked that Counsel prepare a resolution for the Board to
consider for submission to CS AC for legislation.
Supervisor Dolan read the proposed resolution at this time.
Chairman Wheeler felt that maybe the resolution was appropriate
at this time. She has heard there maybe pending litigation to correct the
county situation. She felt the resolution was also putting the responsibility
with the state. The county is the one that is paying for the halls.
Supervisor Dolan supported the resolution, but felt it was the
las`thing the Board should consider when the matter had not been placed
on the agenda for consideration. -She would vote for-the resolution whether
anyone was at the meeting or not. The Board is surprising the veterans
and then will change their mind anyway. She knew it was an urgent matter
to be able to get the resolution to the state.
Mr. Pyeatt stated he had had discussions with other counties
as far as operation of the memorial halls and it is surprising the number
of counties who lease the halls to veterans organizations, with Shasta
County being a prime example.
Supervisor Dolan stated she would prefer to lease the halls. To
have a lease agreement there must be two parties willing to enter into
the agreement.
Supervisor Saraceni stated the county just went through court
on this matter. It is the first he has heard of the resolution and before
he would take any action, he wanted to have an opportunity to study the
matter.
Mr. Pyeatt set out why the county would be asking for an
urgency adoption. The laws usually take effect on January 1. The deadline
for submission of legislation is February 12, 1982.
Supervisor Moseley stated she had three memorial halls in her
district and also the Paradise Memorial Hall. Tt seemed like the sky was
falling in on her.
Chairman Wheeler felt it was very sad. and she did not like the
reverberations she was getting. She felt the Board had been more than
Page 166..
February 2, 1982
k'ehruary 2, 1982
82- willing to work with the people as far as the issue is concerned.
b
Mr. Pyeatt stated they .were not asking necessarily £or.the Board
to make a decision on how to proceed on the memorial halls. The resolution
would provide an avenue to have-more alternatives for the Board to consider.
Supervisor Dolan felt that maybe a better level of service could
e provided if the halls were on a lease basis. She was not willing to
ove on the resolution at this time.
Supervisor Moseley stated she would like to have the veterans
notified and come to the Board meeting and have the Board advise them that
they either take over the halls or the Board will close them.
The consideration of the resolution was continued to February 9,
82 with a copy of the resolution to be sent to Clay Castleberry, public
rks director.
236 ADDTTIONAL MATTER PRESENTED BY BOARD MEMBERS.
Chairman Wheeler advised she would be bring back a resolution
in support of the resolution from Sacramento County relative to the
equity issue as it pertains to military spouses retirement.
Chairman Wheeler directed the Administrative Office that if there
is a resolution for consideration that it be placed on the agenda.
RECESS: The Board recessed at 3:33 g.m. to reconvene on [dednesday, February 3,
1982 at 9:00 a.m.
Page 167.
February 2, 1982