Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM021082February 10, 1982 82- 278 279 280 28I .ECONVENE: The Board of Supervisors reconvened at 2:00 p.m. pursuant to recess. Present: Supervisors Dolan, rSoseley, Saraceni and Chairman Wheeler. Clark A. Nelson, county clerk-recorder, by Nancy Wilson, deputy clerk. IEETING REGARDING SOUTHEAST SE~i3ER DISTRICT Chairman Wheeler apologized for the delay of the meeting. Supervisor )olan and herself were at a meeting regarding the bonding for the southeast sewer district.' She felt they should be active participants. The Public Works )irector was also in attendance. APPROVE AUCTIONEER BOND On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and tarried, the auctioneer license and bond for Lyle E. Story was approved. JORRECT MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 2, 1982 On motion Of Supervisor Dolan, Seconded by Supervisor Moseley grid parried, the minutes of February 2, 1982 were corrected to include the :onditions on tentative parcel map for Phillip Engelbert, AP 42-21-01, two ?arcels, property located approximately 1,100 feet north of Oak Park and Rose 9venue intersection in the Chico area, to reflect: 1. Provide two-way traversable access as per Section 20-136 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance. 2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for dedication on the final map. 3. Show 10 ft. building setback line measured from edge of access easement. 4. Provide road maintenance agreement. 5. Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-of-way from the centerline of Rose Avenue. 6. Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of Rose Avenue. 7. Show all easements of record on the final map. 8. Provide permanent solution for drainage. 9. Pay off any assessments. 10. Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or existing, and construct to county standards. 11. Pay any delinquent taxes. 12. Show building free turning area on Parcel 1 as required by Code Section 20-136 on final map. CONTINUE TO FEBRUARY 24, 1982 AT 1:30 P.M. - DISCUSSION: BUDGET INFORPSATION AND REVIE64 OF DISCRETIONARY FUND EXPENDITURES Discussion of budget information and review of discretionary fund expenditures was held at this time. t4ike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer, stated Mr. Johansen Ihas presented a memo outlining the amount of discretionary revenues which 'fund the various budgets within the county. It is a follow-up to his budget presentation of last week. The main point is to show the Board of the $6 million just what is available from within the various county departments and discretion- ary revenues that are available. Chairman Wheeler commented that in talking with department heads,' individuals and administrative Staff, there is only about $30 million that they i 9zge 217. February 10, 1982 8 2- V _~_____~_=___Februa~ 10, 19_82____________________ say is discretionary funds. Of all the figures, maybe there is $12.million^ that they can control. Jim Johansen, auditor-controller, stated that is what the report will show. They will be showing the attachment figures of the memo on a slide projector for viewing. He has asked ~'fr. Puelicher to go through some of the major items. This is mainly an educational session. The Board is extremely limited in what they can do. There is only about hal£ of the $60 million they can deal with. If you take the $6 million deficit this limits even more what they can handle. Some of the funds have strings attached. Others have certain mandates and requirements which the Board has to face in dealing with that revenue. The service and insurances are .redistributed to other budgets. The support services may be duplicated but the ratio they are talking about and impact of the report in actual dollars is about the same. Tt will not effect the outcome of the report. In some areas where they indicate the substantial, moderate or little or no controllability is judgemental on their part. Tt is not a legal requirement of the Board. Some departments depend highly on fees. If the fees are generated by staff and you cut the fees, it is moderate control. The Welfare money is regulated by state and federal laws. And the Board has. little control. There is $4,129,770 money of little Board control; $12,987,522 with moderate Board control; and $15,826,298 with substantial Board control. This gives a total of $32,943,750. He felt they were soft peddling the problem. Dick Puelicher set out the amounts of discretionary funds by various departments at this time via the slide projector. The charts showed the budget units, percentage of discretionary funding, amount of discretionary funds and the controllability estimate of the Board. Mr. Johansen stated the various department heads may question the controllability or judgemental factors of their varicus departments. They are free to comment if they wish when they submit their budget packets. Mr. Pyeatt stated the next session will be held on Wednesday, February 24, 1982 at 1:30 p.m. There will be several different budgetary items they would like to bring before the Board. They will be submitting information to the Board about the concerns of several departments. They will have two or three departments reviewed at the next meeting. Chairman Wheeler asked staff to make sure department heads who were not present at the meeting receive copies of for. Johansen's memo. The department heads should be encouraged to be available for the next sessions. This is part of the education process. Tt is open to the public. Supervisor Saraceni stated their job is cut out for them. They will need. all the help they can get. Continued the budget session. to February 24, 1982 at 1:30 p.m. RECESS: The Board recessed at 2:57 p.m. to reconvene on Tuesday, February 23, 1982 at 9:00 a.m. Page 218. February 10, 1982