HomeMy WebLinkAboutM033082March 30, 1982
: STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
SS.
', COUNTY OF BUTTE )
82 ' The Board of Supervisors met at 9:00 a.m. pursuant to adjaurnment.
~ resent: Supervisors Dolan, Fulton, BAoseley, Saraceni and Chairman S3heeler.
ike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer; .Del Siemsen. county counsel; and
lark A. Nelson, county clerk-recorder, by Nancy Wilson, deputy clerk.
', ledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United_States of America
nvocation by Supervisor Moseley
'551 ONTINUE TO APRIL 6, 1982 - APPROVAL•OF MINUTES
Continued to April 6, 1982 approval of the minutes of March 23,
982.
'552 DDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS {BOARD MEMBERS) TO BE ADDRESSED AT THE END OF THE DAY
Supervisor Saraceni stated that he would respond on the memo.
553 CONTINUE TO APRIL 6, 1982 - CONSIDERATION OF DRAINAGE AISTRICT NO. 1 AUDIT
ROCEDURE
', Discussion was held regarding Drainage District No. 1 - audit
rocedure from a report from the Auditor--Controller at this time.
Mike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer, stated the Auditor
as not in the audience. He had submitted a memo regarding the communication
eceived from Drainage District No. 1 several weeks ago. He questioned if
he Board wanted to pursue the length of time an audit was conducted. Mr.
ohanson suggested bi-annual which would be every two years. He felt the
tem could be done by minute order. As there could be many requests, they
hould be done on an individual basis.
Supervisor Moseley questioned if there had been a response from
r. Millington. She asked that it be held over one week to allow time for
response.
The matter was continued to April 6, 1982.
554 DOPT ORDINANCE 2276 - CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCING ACT
On motion of Supervisor Saraceni, seconded by Supervisor Dolan and
nanimously carried, t~}e second .reading of an ordinance for participation in
he California Industrial Development Financing Act Program was waived; Qrdinance
276 was adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign.
555 UBLIC HEARING DATE SET
A public hearing date of April 20, 1982 at 10:00 a.m. was set for
onsideration of Vera Buckley petition for variance to Sections 19-10 and/or
9-12 of the Butte County Code for placement of a mobile home on AP 26-8-53,
', 4, 7079 Irwin Avenue, Palermo area, zoning: "A-2".
556 PPROVE PUBLIC HEALTH ITEMS
', On motion of Supervisor Saraceni, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and
nanimously carried, the following Public Health items were approved:
1. Approved renewal of variance to Sections 19-10 and/or 19-12
', f the Butte County Code for placement of a mobile home on AP 25-17-48, Cox
ane, Palermo area, zoning: "A-5" for t4yral Daffron.
2. Approved renewal of variance to Sections 19-10 and/or 19-12
f the Butte County Code for placement of a mobile home on AP 72-46-002, 9199
', ld Olive Highway, Oroville area, zoning: "A-2" for Billy J. and Joan Krouse.
Page 339.
March 30, 1982
8 2-
a
557
558
559
560
•---____=-==_March=30,=1982 __________________
3. Approved-renewal of variance to Sections 19-10 and/or 19-12
of the Butte County Code fox placement of a mobile home on AP 26-02-006,
6545 Lincoln Boulevard, Oroville area, zoning: "A-2" for Bernice P. Melvin.
AUTHORIZE CANCELLATION OF TAXES, PENALTIES AND COSTS ON AP 040-02-032 AND
AP 046-36-022 - TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni
and unanimously carried, the cancellation of taxes, penalties and costs in
accordance with Revenue and. Taxation Code Section 4946, on AP 040-02-032
and AP 046-36-022 was authorized.
CONTINUE TO LATER IN THE MEETING CONSIDERATION OF HOUSING AND~COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT AUDIT REQUEST
Consideration of audit proposals for the Housing and Community
Development and selection of a firm to conduct the audit was continued to
later in the meeting to allow Connerly and Associates to be present.
ADDITIONAL MATTER BY CHAIRMAN WHEELER
Chairman Wheeler stated she had been in contact with Mr. Leo
Trombatore and he would speak before the Board on April 13, 1982 at 11:30 a.m.
regarding the cut backs on funding for Caltrans in Butte County. There is
to be a_meeting in Sacramento on April 16, 1982 with the State Department of
Transportation Commission about their concerns for lack of funding. She
suggested the Board members be prepared with questions.
ADOPT RESOLUTION 82-54 - PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR CONSIDERATION OF
INTENTION TO RENAME A PRIVATE ROAD TN BUTTE COUNTY
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and
unanimously carried, Resolution 82-54 setting a public hearing date of May 4,
1982 at 10:00 a.m. for consideration of intention to rename a private road
in Butte County on the following was adopted and the Chairman authorized to
sign:
Existing Name Termini Proposed Name
McCutcheon Drive Hillcrest Avenue to end Town View Drive
s6l
APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMBINED EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADVISORX COUNCIL
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Fulton and
unanimously carried, the following appointments to the Combined Employment and
Training Advisory Council were approved:
Maria Gonzalez, youth representative
Merlene Danner, youth representative
562
APPOINTMENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - DISTRICT 4
On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni
and unanimously carried, the appointment of Otto Behunin to the Planning
Commission - District 4 was approved.
Supervisor Moseley introduced Mr. Behunin at this time.
563
Mr. Behunin stated he was very please be here this morning. He
had met with Mrs. Moseley and has lived in Butte County since 1978. He was
a retired Air Force officer. After his retirement he purchased a small farm.
They are growing kiwis and walnuts.
CONTINUE TO LATER LN THE MEETING DISCUSSION OF REORGANIZATION OF THE NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA E~~?ERGENCY MEDICAL CARE COUNCIL
Discussion regarding reorganization of the Northern California
Emergency Medical-Care Council continued to later in the meeting.
Page 340.
March 30, 1982
March 30, 1982
82- 564
~}
565
566
567
568
CONTINUE TO LATER IN THE MEETING -- CONSIDERATION OF AB 3035 REGARDING SECURITY
REQUIREP7ENTS FOR BANKS AND SAV-TNGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
Continued to later in the meeting consideration of AB 3035
regarding security requirements for banks and savings and loan associations
when Mr. Bosworth was present.
CONTINUE TO APRIL 6, 1982 - GREAT CALIFORNIA RESOURCE RALLY
Discussion was held regarding the Great California Resource Rally
at this time.
Chairman Wheeler indicated California generates 46 million tons
of solid waste. We are running out of places to put the waste. It is felt
more should be recycled.
Supervisor Dolan questioned if there were any specific activities
in the communities, Thera are service clubs talking about community Clean-up
Days. She would like more information.
subject.
Supervisor Fulton stated he did not have any information on this
Continued to April 6, 1982 the Great California Resource Rally
to allow each supervisor to determine the activities which take place within
their districts.
COMi~7T.TNICATiONS
Butte County Employees Association. BCEA Local 916 requests a meet and confer
session regarding the content of Sutte County Personnel Rules.
Referred to County Counsel, Personnel Director, Mr. Avery and
Administrative Office.
Butte County Housing Authority. John G. Bowling, executive director, provides
information regarding the terms of the tenant commissioners.
See motion following communications.
Butte County Housing Authority. John G. Bowling, executive director, requests
time before the Board of Supervisors to provide an opportunity to
explain the Housing Authority function and operation. To be
considered on April 20, 1982 at 11:00 a.m.
Rape Crisis Intervention. Pamela T. Bowen, executive director, requests the
Board of Supervisors proclaim the week of April 19th Victims
Rights Week. Continued to April 6, 1982 to allow Chairman
[dheeler to do research.
APPOINTMENTS TO BUTTE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD
On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni
and unanimously carried, the following reappointments to the Butte County
Housing Authority Board were approved:
Jeanne M. White, tenant
Gerald C. Banyard, tenant
AUTHORIZE-CONDUCT OF AUDIT FOR HOIISING.:AND COMMUNIT?~~-DEVELOPMENT
Pat Osborn, Connerly and Associates, set out the background on
the proposals to conduct the Community Development Block Grant audit at this
time. An audit is required every two years. In accordance with Board
direction they contacted accountant firms requesting proposals. There is a
difference from the last audit. The propsals are at least $5,000. There is
no alternative but to go because there are requirements by HUD which must be
met. They received formal proposals from Slower, Roster and Johnson for
Page 341.
March 30, 1982
rlarch 30 , 1982
$5,650 and one from Matson & Isom Accountancy Corporation in the amount of
$5,300. They recommend the lower proposal. They did the audit last year
and are familiar with the program.
It was moved by Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor
Saraceni, after reviewing the proposals, the firm of P4atson & Isom Accountancy
Corporation be authorized to conduct the audit in the amount of $5.300; and
the Chairman authorized to sign the approved agreement with the audit firm.
Amended motion:
Subject to County Counsel and Auditor approval.
Supervisor Fulton stated the proposal indicates a 250 percent
increase. Has HUD increased? They are going from $2,000 to $5,000 in a
two year period.
Ms. Osborn stated actually the cost last year exceeded the
contract amount of $2,000. :Two years ago the accountant firm came back
and requested more money. Tt did cost more than $2,000 two years ago. She
was not sure if the standards were increased or lowered. HUD has indicated.
they should have the audit done for $2,000.
Mike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer, indicated it has
to do with time. The annual accountancy firm cost is~much greater than
the contract they have.
Vote on motion:
AYES: Supervisors Dolan, Fulton, idoseley, Saraceni and
Chairman Wheeler
NOES: None
Motion carried.
RECESS: 9:26 a.m.
RECONVENE: 9:51 a.m.
569 IN OPPOSITION TO AB 3035 REGARDING SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR BANKS AND
SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS ~ AUTHORLZE LETTERS BE SENT TO LEGISLATURE
AND APPROPRIATE .COMMITTEE
Discussion was .held on consideration of AB 3035 regarding security
requirements for banks and savings and loan associations at this time.
Ev Bosworth, treasurer--tax collector, stated he forwarded a memo
to the Administrative Office voicing his opposition to AB 3035. He hoped
they would appose this legislation. The treasurers do not like the consider-
able amount of reduction of collateral on investments they make.
At the present time they are certain of the amount of deposit in a commercial
institution and savings must be 110 percent. With the bill it would be
lowered to 50 percent. The Treasurer .Tax Collectors Association is opposed
and he is very much against it. They would have funds spread all over the
state. He would be muck more restrictive on where he put any of the collateral
if it was only 50 percent. He recently invested money in a new bank in Butte
County which was insured up to $130,OOOwith collateral on the balance. He
could not make that type of investment should it be changed. It should stay
at 110 percent or 150 percent depending on what type of collateral was
required.
Chairman Wheeler stated Mr. Bosworth is asking them to write to
the Senators stating they are definitely against this particular piece of
legislation. Page 342.
r4arch '30, 1982
8 2'-
^ft
570
571
1572
March 30, 1982
~ a c o e e ----- o e e o- J. ~~ .. o~ e o c e
On motion ofTSupervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Fulton and
manimously carried, a letter in opposition to AB 3035 .regarding security
requirements for ,banks and .savings and loan associations to be sent to
legislators and committee handling the .bill ,was authorized.
Chairman Wheeler stated a letter should be send to the committee
end each individual on that committee.
CONTINUE TO APRIL 6, 1982 - COP9MENTS ON THE CHICO PdUNICIPAL AIRFORT REDEVELOP-
MENT PROJECT
Continued to April 6, 1982 comments on the Chico Municipal Airport
Redevelopment Project until Mr. Lively was present.
Supervisor Saraceni stated the county will have a financial impact
with this RDA.
ADDITIONAL MATTER BY, BOARD MEMBER
Chairman Wheeler indicated there was a letter from the Department
of Transportation and she had requested Public Works respond later in the
meeting to the Gianella Bridge.
RECESS: 9:58 a.m.
RECONVENE: 10:01 a.m.
PUBLIC HEARING: BUDGET TRANSFER B-168 - COUNTY SERVICE AREA N0. 31 (BIGGS
SWIMMING POOL)
The public hearing nn Budget Transfer B-168 - County Service Area
No. 31 (Biggs Swimming Pool). Transfers $250 from the appropriation for
contingencies to general insurance in order to cover the additional costs of
insurance premiums for the swimming pool district.
Mike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer, stated a point of
clarification was the funds were from the contingencies out of the district,
not out of the contingencies of the General Fund.
Hearing open to the public. Appearing: No one.
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board.
', 573
On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni
and unanimously carried, Budget Transfer B-168 - County Service Area No. 31
(Biggs Swimming Pool), transfers $250 from the appropriation for contingencies
to general insurance in order to cover the additional costs of insurance
premiums for the swimming pool district was approved.
ADOPT RESOLUTION 82-55 - PUBLIC HEARING: PETER FOX ABANDONMENT OF PUBLIC
UTILITIES AND RECREATIONAL EASEMENT, PARADISE PINES COUNTRY CLUB, UNIT 4,
LOT 118
The public hearing on the Peter Fox abandonment of public utilities
and recreational easement, Paradise Pines Country Club, Unit 4, Lot 118 was
held as advertised.
Hearing open to the public. Appearing: No one.
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board.
On motion of Supervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor Fulton and
unanimously carried, Resolution 82-55 abandonment of public utilities and
recreational easement, Paradise Pines Country Club, Unit 4, Lot 118 for
Peter Fox was adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign.
Page 393.
March 30, 1982
8 2_
~ 7
_ March 30, 7.982 _ _ _ _ _
Chairman Wheeler_stated they have attempted in the past to
coordinate and organize the abandonments.
574
DISCUSSION: REORGANIZATION OF THE N
COUNCIL
Discussion regarding the
Emergency Medical Care Council was h
CALIFORNIA Eb:ERGENCY MEDICAL CARE
rganization of the Northern California
at this time.
1. Gary Rapaport, executive director, Chico Community Memorial
Hospital, representing the hospital aid Valley Conference of Administrators.
They held a meeting March 26, 1982. Mr. Rapaport presented a letter to the
Board at this time after reading it into the record.
Chairman Wheeler felt the: letter indicated the Board should main-
tain the communication system and the involvement in that. They should look
closely at the reorganization of NCEiICC.
tir. Rapaport stated there; was discussion regarding the organization.
They do not feel they will solve the problems. The original intent was to
provide and maintain this system. Then they got involved in other things such
as training emergency medical care people. The pay station is in Redding and
these outside activities are taken care of in other matters, it should be
maintenance and care of the communications. A Iot of employees are doing
other things. They urged that the Board representative make all efforts
to see that the ,€unds are placed into!the operation of the system and obtain
other grants to continue the operation of the other items.
Supervisor Saraceni sta
with the users and other administra
was represented at the meeting were
t+9r. Rapaport indicated
was at the meeting. He felt they d
Supervisor Saraceni stat
have funded the $12,000 which is 50
outlying counties use the radios for
some counties the system is very vit
our Sheriff and Fire Department in B
County putting in the $24,000, but t
Sheriff and Fire Department. They a
had hoped to obtain 50 percent of th
Mr. Rapaport felt it lie
used for other purposes. It sounds
the county does not use it then ask
Board to look at where their dollars
the system more, they should pay a p
bring in patronage to Butte County.
place a user fee to people that do n
all maintenance in the hospitals. P
business and reconstitute what is st
one time the hospital contributed $2
do not feel it makes Bence.
about three weeks ago he made contact
s. At that time every hospital that
help with contributions.
every hospital or ambulance service
not have the funds.
they are facing a fiscal crisis. They
rcent of what was requested. The other
heir Sheriff and Fire Departments. To
We have our own radio systems for
to County. It goes back to Butte
y do not utilize the system for the
stuck with the system. The Board
funding from the users.
in the eGUity system because it is
gical to ask the hospital that because
e hospital. That is why they urge the
re going. If other counties are using
portional higher share. The system does
t does not seem appropriate to them to
access the system. They take care of ,
sibly the organization should go out of
ctly a maintenance of the system. At
00 to the Council, but presently they
Supervisor Dolan stated i~t is an important issue. All of that
money is being interrelated. These are short terms and the County of Butte
was asked to contribute $24,000. They made a motion to contribute $12,000
and underwrite the balance. They attempted to obtain contributions. She
felt they should ask the Council to give them more information. To ask what
happens if they do not fund the balance. Plould they go out of business.
Page 1344.
i March 30, 1982
8 2-
v'
575
Supervisor Saraceni stated the ambulance operators are going to
buy their own radios. They have indicated .they will put their own in.
tdarch 30, 1982
Possibly some of the activities could be dropped.
Mr. Rapaport felt there were grants available to replace older
equipment. They do not need a staff of l5 to 20 people.
Supervisor Dolan felt they need a specific answer to some
questions. They know the $12,000 is necessary to keep the Council going.
They do not need to fund everything for the Council. She would like some
direct answers from the Council.
Mike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer, stated perhaps
they should continue this matter to later in the meeting. He has given
direction to Mr. Struthers to do some research.
Supervisor Saraceni stated he would like to know to what extent
the Sheriff utilized the equipment. Do they use the repeaters.
The matter was continued to later in the meeting.
ADOPT ORDINANCE 2277 - PUBLIC HEARING: BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
DENIER (ITEM DETERb1INED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEI~4PT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL,REVIE"vd)
BUTTE COUNTYcCODE AMENDMENT (REF. SENATE BILL 1160) TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY
ZONING DISTRICTS WHICH INCLUDE "A-2 LTD.", "A-5", "A-10", "A-20", "A-40",
"A-160", "A-R", "AR-MH", "AR-MH-1", "AR-MH-3°, "A-SR", "FR-2", "FR-5".
"FR-10", "FR-20", "FR-40", "FR-160", "H-C", "M-R", "N-C", "R-1", nR-1 A&C",
"R-N°, °RT-1", °RT-1-An, "S-R", "SR ~", "SR-1", °SR-3", nSR-5°, °TM-1°,
"TM-2", "TM-2~", "TM-3", "TM-5", "TM-10", "TM-20", "TM-40", "TM-160", TO
ALLOW ONE ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNIT TO BE CONSTRUCTED
The public hearing on the Butte County Planning Commission denied
(item determined to ba categorically exempt from environmental review) Butte
County Cade Amendment (Ref. Senate Bi11 1160) to the single-family zoning
Districts which include "A-2 ltd.", "A-5", "A-10", "A-20", "A-40", "A-160",
"A-R", "AR-MH", "AR-'/iH-1", "AR-MH-3", "A-SR", "FR-2", "FR-5", "FR-10", "FR-20",
"FR-40", "FR-160", "H-C", "M-R", "N-C°, "R-1", "R-1 A&C", "R-N", "RT-1",
nRT-1-A°, "S-R", nSR ~", °SR-1°, "SR-e°, "SR-5", "TM-1", 'rTM-2", nTM-2~te~
"TM-3", "TM-5", "TM-10", "TM-20", "TM-40", "TM-160", to allow one additional
dwelling unit to be constructed was held as advertised.
Bettye Blair, planning director, stated they had received the
staff report on the proposed code amendment. It was denied by the Planning
Commission_ The Board opted to hear the matter.
Supervisor Dolan stated this is in accordance with Senate Bill
1160 which allows 640 feet for a second dwelling unit. She questioned if
a dwelling were 750 feet.
Ms. Blair stated it would not meet the intent of the law. It
could not exceed 640 feet, be 60 years of age or older. The administration
of this bill after the first occupancy was up for grable. There will be
problems. Many counties do not allow "Aunt Pdinnies" such as Butte County
has.
Del Siemsen, county counsel, stated should the Board go with the
bill, they would be bound by those restrictions. It is a specific amount which
is 640 square feet.
Supervisor Fulton questioned how this would impact the county
services. There would be a difference in density.
Page 345.
March 30, 1982
March 30, 1982 '
Ms. Blair stated where this. would occur would effect the police and
`ire portection of all people and other oriented services, snow plowing and
:oad repair. She felt it would be an administrative monster. The first
occupancy would be tied in.with the building permit.
Supervisor Dolan stated they keep a handle on the "Aunt Minnie's"
~y annual renewal.
Ms. Blair indicated these residents would not be temporary.
Hearing open to the public. Appearing: No one.
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board.
Supervisor Dolan stated she had received three calls in support
of this. She was asked to consider it.
Chairman Wheeler indicated one community association reviewed it
and was against it. This was through the Planning Commission hearings. She
agreed with the Planning Commission.
Supervisor Dolan stated she knew it had a potential to change
residential areas to "R-2's". She was aware there would be enforcement
problems. She questioned how could you deny a family who wanted to house
their parents on their property. She did not feel it should be subject to
a use permit and hearing.
Supervisor Moseley stated the Board was aware of her feelings.
She has no objections, she would like it to become a law. She did not feel
one year limit was a good time limit.
It was moved by Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni
finding that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA;
further finding that the Butte County Code be amended (ref. Senate Bill 1160)
to the single-family zoning districts which include °A-2 Ltd.", "A-5", "A-10",
"A-20°, "A-40", °A-160", "A-R", "AR-MH", "AR-MH-1", "AR-MH-3", "A-SR", "FR-2"r
"FR-5", "FR-10", "FR-20", "FR-40", "FR-1G0", "H-C", "M-R", "N-C", "R-1", "R-1
A&C", "R-N", "RT-1"r "RT-1-A", "S-R", "SR '~", "SR-1", "SR-3", "SR-5", "TM-1",
"TM-2", "TM-2'~", "TM-3", "TM-5", "TM-10", "TM-20", "TM-40", "TM-160", to
allow one additional dwelling unit to be constructed as an "Allowed Use"
subject to an Affidavit of Compliance with age requirement and number of
persons as provided in Government Code Section b5852.1 being submitted with
the building permit application; Ordinance 2277 be adopted and the Chairman
authorized to sign.
Lynn Vanhart, environmental health director, felt they could
enter into a conflict with the sewage ordinance. As each dwelling must have
a separate unit. They will need adequate disposal area of 8125 square feet.
He would like it clear there could be a problem. if they wish a special
variance like the "Aunt Minnie", it would have to be taken care of.
Supervisor Saraceni stated they would still have to meet the
requirements of the sewage department.
Del Siemsen, county counsel, stated they would have to come back
with an amendment of the ordinance if they are acceptable.
Vote on motion:
AYES: Supervisors Dolan, Moseley and Saraceni
NOES: Supervisor Fulton and Chairman Wheeler
Motion carried.
Page346.
March 30, 1982
82- 576
._______===-_M_ar_ch_3_0,_1_98_2 J _--________ ________
PUBLIC HEARING: CONTINUE - JOHN D. DRAKE AND HOWARD ISOM DRAFT EIR AND
SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE LOCATION AND REGULATION OF LAND USESi, BUILDINGS, ROADS,
WATER SUPPLY, WASTE DISPOSAL, CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES, AND OPEN
SPACE - ALLO6diNG A RESIDEiITTAL DEVELOPMENT OF 109 PARCELS OF T%2 TO 3 ACRES,
INCLUDING COMMON OPEN SPACE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES TO BE MAINTAINED BY A
COUNTY'SERVICE AREA (CSA) ON APPROXIMATELY 1,0.50 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 32 AND HUMBOLDT ROAD. APPROXIMATELY FIVE MILES NORTH-
EAST OF CHICO, IDENTIFIED AS AP 46-71-17, 46-71-18 (PORTION), 46-35-4 AND
46-35-23, NORTHEAST OF GHICO - CONTINUE TO APRIL 13,.1982 AT 10:30 A.M.
The public hearing on John D. Drake and Howard Isom draft EIR and
specific plan for the location and regulation of land uses, buildings, roads,
water supply, waste disposal, conservation of natural resources, and open
space - allowing a residential development of 109 parcels of 1/2 to 3 acres,
including common open space and public facilities to be maintained by a
county service area (CSA) on approximately 1,050 acres located on the east
side of State Highway 32 and Humboldt Road, approximately five miles
northeast of Chico, identified as AP 46-71-17, 46-71•-18 (portion), 46-35-4 and
46--35-23, northeast of Chico was held as continued.
Del Siemsen, county counsel, stated this hearing was also for
the draft EIR consideration.
Bettye Blair, planning director, stated the hearing was continued
for the draft impact report and to allow time for LAFCo to respond to the
impact report. On the first of April the Planning Commission will be
reviewing the county service area and will provide their comments. This will
allow time to formulate the comments on the impact report to a future time.
When you have extended hearing afford staff as much time as possible to
respond to comments made. '
Chairman Wheeler submitted letters from Bruce Burke of Chico
requesting a delay of action until the economic and engineering concerns
were brought into clearer focus and a letter from Jimmer Witt of Chico
asking delay on the proposal to allow further study into the record at
this time.
1. Louis Camenzind, Jr .,Oroville-Chico Highway, Durham, spoke
concerning the conservation of natural resources. State and local governments
include conservation in the General Plan. He feels the mining resources
should be protected. The foothills have tremendous potential. He felt it
was the duty of the state geologist to review the property and make comments.
2. Kelly Meagher, Honeyrun Road, spoke to the EIR. James
Snowden is in the process of writing a letter to the Planning Director on
his comments. There is concern regarding the Bidwell Heights project and
this project. The Department of Fish and Game axe concerned about the wild-
life habitat of the deer. There were concerns domestic animals would be a
detriment to the deer. There will be increased road circulation. Mr. Tony
Lando from Regional Quality Board has not received a response from the
developer regarding inspection report on sewage. He could not make a
recommendation until he hears from the developer. There were concerns about
the location, the composition of the material and walls of the ponds. The
sprinkler system would be detrimental to bath wildlife and the fish in
Chico Creek. It is felt should the project go forward they would need a
new fire station in the area. He was concerned regarding the accumulative
impact of the project.
3. Harry Codaz, Filbert Avenue, Chico, spoke representing
Chico 2000, about the concerns of increased population. There would be
an increase of 1,000 people with the two proposed projects. He felt
development of that area should be slowed down and look at the impacts.
Page 347.
March 30, 1982
8 2'-
~''
~*
_ _March 30, _1982 _
They should look at the economics. They are-facing a record-deficit. They
should look at Doe Mi11 Ridge-area and the fiscal impact. They were not
sure the sewage ponds would be effective. It is a marshy area five to six
times during the year. He was concerned about the strata. If there are
cracks in the peremiter it would effect water quality down stream.
4. Evan Cotto, Stilson Canyon, talked about water quality.
Many present residents have shallow wells and dry periods. There is debris
in the water during rainy periods. They have filed a law suit against the
Water Quality Board. She would like them to consider this very strongly
on the water system and supply and sewage system that would go into the
water supply.
5. Pat Burke, Stilson Canyon, brought her concerns before the
State Water Resources Board about two years ago by petition. They understood
their concerns and would like to investigate and monitor, but could not do
so because of no man power. Should a CSA be formed who would be responsible
for maintenance and financing it.
Del Siemsen, county counsel, stated the County of Butte would
be responsible since it is a county service area. He assumed the CSA would
have funds by way of fees charged by the people and handled by Public Works
Director. The fee would be placed on their tax bill.
Lynn Vanhart, environmental health director, stated the water
quality would be monitored by his department as well as water quality control.
He felt Sure it would be done.
6. Dana Wallace, Lazy S Lane, Stilson Canyon area, spoke regarding
water control. For 1'~ years because of fecal in the water they transported
water into their homes. No one could help them, so they drilled a new well.
She was concerned about sewage disposal. They are property owners in Doe
Mill Ridge. She would like all of the concerns answered.
Chairman Wheeler stated staff had indicated the Board should not
make a decision until they receive a response from LAFCo.
The open hearing was continued to April 13, 1982 at 10:30 a.m.
57'.
57f
Supervisor Fulton spoke regarding the language in the EIR. He
could see a lot of legal problems. There are a lot of sewage ponds proposed.
There is heavy traffic now on Highway 32, it would be increased 50 percent.
It is in a high fire area. The spray irrigation leaves all kinds of questions.
It will impact schools and the Sheriff. There are a lot of problems with
this project and ones to follow. He did not feel 200 gallons a minute was
going to keep a project of 109 units supplied. He read comments from the
Fire Department. There were concerns about the water table. He was concerned
about the cost of supply services. The Board is facing a large deficit.
APPEARANCES: TOM WILSON
Tom Wilson, Art Commission, recommended the appointment of
Supervisor Fulton to the Butte County Arts Commission to replace Supervisor
Lemke. He has been discussing the State Exhibit with Mr. Lively and Mr.
Johanson. There next meeting would be April 5, 1982 at 10:00 a.m. in the
County Library to elect officers.
APPEARANCES: GEORGE SCHWINAEMAN - STAFF REPORT .BACK ON PERS ON APRIL 6, 1982
George Schwindeman, Kelly Ridge, spoke regarding the recent
legislation on Public Employees' Retirement System. Mr. Schwindeman read
his letter into the record. He would like the Board to send a resolution to
legislative representative and to Governor Brown opposed to the usage of
retirement funds. page 348.
March '30, 1982
8 2-
~'
March 30, 1982
r - J Referred the letter to staff for a report back on April 6, 1982
at which time the Board could take a positipn.
579 APPEARANCES: LOUIS CAMENZ
580
581
Louis Camenzind, Jr. spoke regarding the budget deficit. He
suggested the Board reduce the salaries and benefits by 20 percent of higher
level personnel and reduce by 10 percent salaries and benefits for the other
personnel. If they cannot .live on that amount, let them go out into the
private sector. He recommended the slow down in development and government.
He felt they should abolish the Planning Commission and put the Planning
Department back with Public Works.
ADDITIONAL MATTER BY CHAIRMAN WHEELER
Chairman Wheeler read into the record a letter from the State
Department of Transportation regarding Gianella Bridge. She would like
permission to write a letter before they appear at the hearing in Sacramento.
A copy would be sent to Mr. Trombatorie.
Fred Cavanah, public works, stated a letter should go to the
Commission. The hearing in May is in San Francisco.
Chairman Wheeler indicated there was a letter presented from
the Parrott Ranch Company regarding the Butte County Disposal Site on
Neal Road.
DISCUSSION: REORGANIZATION OF THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY MEDICAL
CARE COUNCIL - CONTINUE TO APRIL 6, 1982 FOR RECOMI+IENDATION FROM STAFF
Discussion regarding the reorganization of the Northern California
Emergency Medical Care Council was held as continued from earlier in the
meeting.
Tom Struthers, purchasing-civil disaster, stated both the Sheriff
dispatcher and CDF have remote radio access. The Sheriff uses it to a minimum
such as critical emergency to contact the hospitals. They have a channel
themselves. He was not able to determine how much CDF used the system. If
they are not using the system, they are not using the repeaters.
Supervisor Dolan would like to ask specific questions. What is
the funding that is minimally necessary to keep the radio communications
necessary to operate? What really does happen if this Council goes out of
business?
Supervisor Saraceni stated the supervisors from other counties
have asked the same questions. He was hoping to get some private support.
He felt the user should pay. No one has been able to figure out the equipment.
They have indicated they would pick up the equipment. There is a joint powers
agreement. People in the community raised $14,060 for a Jaws of Life~rhich
they felt was necessary. How many years has the county been paying the
$24,000? Tehema County made a resolution to pull out. Lassen County indicated
they too would pull out.
Chairman Wheeler felt these questions should be answered. Staff
directed to come back April 6, 1982 with a report and recommendation.
RECESS: There being.no further business before the Board at this time the
Board recessed at 11:56 a.m. to reconvene on Wednesday, March 31,
1982 at 10:00 a.m.
page 349.
March 30, 1982