HomeMy WebLinkAboutM042286April. 22, 1986
Call to order - Board of Supervisors room, County Administration
Building, 25 County Center Drive, Orovi7le. Present:
Supervisors Dolan, McInturf and Chairman Pro Tem Fulton.
Martin J. Nichols, chief administrative officer; and Cathy Pitts,
assistant clerk to the Board.
86-240 Joint meeting of Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission.(00)
T. Foothill development policies. (46}
a. Does the Board support the recommendations of the commission
and the Cohasset/Forest Ranch Planning Area Committee?
b. If not, what should be modified?
CHAIRMAN McLAUGHLIN PRESENT AT THIS TIME.
c. Should an interim county policy be adopted for development
in the foothill areas until area plans are adopted?
d. Should the Planning staff prepare an area plan for Planning
Area 2 and other foothill planning areas.
MOTION: TO PROCEED WITH REVISING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, WHICH STANDARDS
THOSE ARE REMAINS TO BE DEFINED; TO INCLUDE FIRE, ROAD, SEWAGE,
WATER, BUT NOT BE LIMITED T0; AND TO REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD
ON JUNE 17, 1986.
S M
VOTE: T Y 2 Y 3 RB 4 Y 5 Y (Motion carried}
e. Does the Board believe that the agricultural-residential
designation is appropriate in the foothills?
2. Agricultural policies on the greenline. (2073) ~*(00)
RECESS: 10:57 a.m.
RECONVENE: 11:07 a.m.
SUPERVISOR FULTON ABSENT AT THIS TIME.
Page 371
April 22, 1986
April 22, 14$6
MOTION: IT I5 CLEAR TO ME NOW AND I APOLOGIZE IF YOU THOUGHT TT SHOULD
HAVE BEEN EARLIER, COMMISSIONERS, AND IT TS CLEAR TO ME NOW
THAT THERE IS AN UNDERSTANDING ON THE PART OF THE COMMISSION
THAT THE GREENLTNE POLICY AS IT EXISTS EITHER CREATES OR
PERPETUATES INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN POLICIES APPLICABLE TO
REZONTNGS AND EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS AND BETWEEN POLICIES
APPLICABLE TO OTHER AREAS OF THE COUNTY DESIGNATED ORCHARD
RND FIELD CROP AND AREAS WITHIN THE CHICO PLANNING AREA ANp
THAT THOSE INCONSISTENCIES ARE A FACT OF LIFE IN THE DYNAMICS
OF PLANNING AND THAT I AM THE LAST PERSON IN THE WORLD THAT
WANTS TO BE PRECEIVED AS SOMEONE WHO TS TRYING TO LOOSEN
THE GREENLINE RND I WOULD MOVE THAT THE BOARD REFERRAL BE
DROPPED THAT TF IT COMES UP NEXT YEAR IN REVIEW OF THE
GREENLTNE SO BE IT AND THAT, THIRD, THE BOARD WISHES THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO REVIEW AND UPDATE THE EXISTING
CONDITIONAL CRITERIA IN THE ORCHARD AND FIELD CROP DESIGNATION.
S M
VOTE: l Y 2 Y 3 AB 4 N 5 AB (Motion failed)
(THE NEXT JOINT MEETING TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR MRY 27, 1986.)
3. "Leapfrog" development: (579}
a. Does the Board support denial of projects, which create
"leapfrog development" into areas lacking support services,
which are not contiguous to normal growth boundaries?
b. Does the Board consider four parcels, ten parcels, a 60~unit
PUD, "leapfrog development?"
SUPERVISOR FULTON PRESENT AT THIS TIME.
4. Zoning code: (1423)
a. Does the Board have specific concerns regarding the zoning
code?
b. Should the livestock minimum square footing requirements be
amended? Upwards, downwards?
SUPERVISOR FULTON ABSENT AT THIS TIME.
(THE OOINT MEETING TO BE CONTINUED TO MAY 27, 1986 AT 9:00 R.M.)
86-247 CSAC alterate director. (2432)
MOTION: TO AUTHORIZE SUPERVISOR HACK McINTURF TO SERVE AS ALTERNATE
CSAC DIRECTOR FOR SUPERVISOR WHEELER AT THE APRIL 24, 1986
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' MEETING.
Page 372
Apri 1 22, 1986
Apra 1 22, 1986
S M
VOTE: 7 Y 2 Y 3 AB 4 Y 5 AB (Motion carried)
ADJOURNMENT: There being nothing further before the Board at this
time, the meeting was adjourned at 12:08 p.m. to reconvene
on Tuesday, May 6, 7986 at 9:00 a.m.
o~, ~c
Chairman, Board of upervisors
ATTEST:
MARTIN J. NICHOLS, Chief Administrative
Officer and Clem of the Board
BY ` •~
4
Page 373
Apri 1 22, 198fi