Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM071382July 13, 1982 OI+' CAI.IFORN7A ) 3S. OF BUPTE ) 82 a 1120 1121 The The Board of Supervisors met at 9.:00 a.m. pursuant to recess. Present: Supervisors Moseley, Saraceni and Vice. Chair Dolan. Mike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer; Del Siemsen, county counsel: and Eleanor M. Becker, county clerk, by Cathy Pitts, assistant clerk to the Board. Absent: Supervisors- Fulton and Chairman Wheeler Pledge of allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America Invocation by Supervisor Moseley SUPERVISORS FULTON AND CHAIRMAN WHEELER EXCUSED FROM THE MEETING Supervisors Fulton andChairman Wheeler were excused from the meeting because they were out of town. ADDITIONAL ITEMS FROM BOARD MEMBERS TO BE ADDRESSED AT THE END OF THE DAY Supervisor Saraceni advised that he would like to discuss the Fish and Game Commission meeting that was held last night. ADOPT RESOLUTION 82-113: APPROVE CONSENT, AGENDA The following items were pulled from the consent agenda at this time: Request for relief from hiring freeze for Air Pollution Control Office, Yelief . from hiring freeze for Juvenile Hall, modification to Title IV Youth Employment and Training Program for CETA, and sale price for 1982-83 proposed budget document. On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and carried, the following action was t$king regarding the consent agenda: 1. Approved fire following budget transfers: B-258 - Building and Subdivision Ins~ecti-on. Transfers $3,500 from salaries and wages to transportation and travel to cover a deficiency caused by the increase in costs of fuel and vehicle maintenance (1981-82). B--259 - Board of Supervisors. Transfers $1,000 from salaries and wages to office expense, $422 and professional and specialized services, $578 to cover deficiencies as a result of increased costs and expanded activities. 2. Approved certification of primary election by County Clerk 3. Approved the concept of the Special District Augmentation Fund Committee to recommend criteria to the Board for the distribution of the available monies and designated Supervisor Dolan as the representative from the Board and the County Administrative Officer to serve on the committee. 4. Authorized the Director to submit the response to the Department of Labor assessment of the CETA Program for the quarter ending March 31, 1982. 5. Adopted Resolution 82-113 authorizing grant application for third year funding of the Victim/Witness Program in the amount of $40,000 to the Office of Criminal Justice Planning and the Chairman authorized to sign. 6. Approved agreement between Department of Food and Agriculture {Standard Agreement No. 4127) and Butte County for pesticide use enforcement regulations under AB 3765 for fiscal year 1982-83 in the amount of $32,575 and the Chairman authorized to sign. 7. Approved agreement between the County of Butte and California Department of Food and Agriculture for a salary agreement relative to the Agricultural Commissioner for fiscal year 1982-83 in the amount of $6,600 (Agreement No. 4065) and the Chaxtnan authorized to sign. Page 193. July 13, 1982 82- 3 1122 1123 1124 ____ _Ju1~13z1982__~___i__________ 8.- Accepted grant award for $740. in conjunction with. the Head Start Program from the, California Department of Education and authorized expenditure from the General Fund pending reimbursement froiq grantor. 9. Authorize the renewl of the least agreement between the CAA and the County of Butte for the Senior Nutrition Program in the Gridley area during fiscal year 1982-83 and the County Admin~.strative Officer authorized to sign. 10. Accepted the third quarter grant award in the amount of $32,860 which provides for the central administration of the Community Action Agency. 11. Approved the budget transfer for Housing and Community Development for program amendment for grant year 1981-82 for the CDBG Program and the Chairman authorized to sign the necessary documents to close the 1978-79 grant, to close the 1980-81 grant and to approve budget~~amendment 1981-82. 12. Approved right-of-way contract on Skyway Project FAS Y742(3) No. 51260-80-1 for Burnett A. and Ethel M. Griggs, 3.92 acres, property exhenage, no improvements, no costs and the Chairman authorized to sign. 13. Authorized the Chairman to sign the amended conveyance of development rights and open area easement to comply with condition of approval of use permit for Kenneth Hansen for AP 40-17-141 and 142. 14. Puhlic hearing date of August 3, 1982 at 10:00 a.m. was set for consideration of Sun Meadows PA-C appeal of environmental impactc.report requirement. AUTHORIZE FILLING OF POSITION FOR AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICE On motion of Supervisor Saraceni, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and carried, the request for relief from hiring freeze to filh, a vacant Deputy Air Pollution Control Officer position was authorized. AUTHORIZE':.FILLING OF TWO JUVENILE HALL COUNSELOR POSITIONS On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and carried, the request for relief from hiring freeze to fill two Juveni.ie Hall Counselor positions was authorized. APPROVE CETA MODIFICATION: AUTHORIZE SUBMISSION OF PRELIMINARY PLAN: AND AUTHORIZE MAKING INFORMAli:DISCUSSION WITH CONTRACT COUNTIES Jim Rackerby, personnel director, set out the background of the recent CETAC meeting. The modification £or the youth program is an adjust- ment to the statistics to conform to the requirements the Federal Government have placed on the program and there were 90 to 116 youth approved by CETAC, which takes the Board's concurrence. He also reported on the future of CETA for the next year. The Senate adopted a new Manpower Legislation Bill. There will be no CETA program continuance and there will be a phase-out year. He anticipated that the House would be acting on their version of the Bill within a week or two. There have been substantial changes in the program and a great deal of private sector OJT. He was anxious to see what the new Legislation would be. In the revision there will be a change in the prime sponsor. He has been in contact with. surrounding counties discussing the concept of a regional center. CETAC made three recommendations to the Board: 1) to approve the modification to the CETA youth program; 2) submit the proposed plan for CETA for next year similar to what they are doing now, which is a phase-out plan because they are operating on about 78 percent funding, and the plan 'does not include money for OEDPbecause they axe specifying in the preliminary proposal for next year that there will be clear intefacing with economic development and expansion of development of the private sector; and 3) that the Board representative informally start contacting Boards and Page 194. July ~13, 1982 ~~ ~- _ July 13, 1982 - _______________ 82- plCs and staff in the surrounding counties to discuss future Manpower services b ' with. the idea Butte County could be the central distribution cent ex. The other counties. are balance of state. They showed interest in participating. On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and carried, the following action". was taken: 1. Approved the modification to Title TV Youth Employment and Ironing Program (YETP~ that has been prepared showing the increased activities in the Youth Program this year concurring with CETAC and authorized the Director to sign. 2. Concur wv.th;'CETAC and authorize submission of preliminary plsn for CETA for next year 3. Concur with CETAC and authorize committee to make informal contract with contiguous counties to discuss future manpower services in the counties. APPROVE SALE PRICE FOR 1982-83 PROPOSED BUDGET DOCUMENT . Vine~-Chair Dolan advised there was a new precedent for EIRs for trying to recover labor costs also. She felt that if the county made enough copies of the proposed budget available for the libraries it would not exclude anyone for see the budget, but this is a thick document and the county should recover more than the ink and paper. Mike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer, advised that in the past this matter had been debated. To what extent that would discourage people from purchasing the documents if the labor costs were included he did not know. They could try to :mhintain statistics as far as the budgets sold and report back at a later date. Jim Johansen, auditor, stated that the cost is $8.60 with a total of $9.12 with taxes for pro~3ucing the budget. On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and carried, the sale price for the 1982-83 proposed budget document was set at $3.29 to reimburse the cost of materials. 1126 AUTHORIZE OUT-OF-COUNTY WEATHERIZATION PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR BUTTER COUNTY IN THIS INSTANCE ONLY Bi11 Thompson, interim executive director of CAA, spoke regarding the application for out-of-county weatherizatipn program as requested by . the State Office of Economic Opportunity. He set out the memo that had been submitted to the Board. He suggested that because of the distance involved in servicing Colusa County that the Board only consider out--of-county for Sutter County. This could be handled from the south county area and would not involve the same amount of travel and transportation and would not necessitate the purchase of another vehicle. On motion of Supervisor Saraceni, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and carried, out-of-county weatherization program application for Sutter County in this instance only was authorized. 1127 REPORT ON THE JACK VANELLA REQUEST FOR A BUILDING PERMIT TO EXPAND HIS AGRICULTURAL CHENII CAL OPERATION ON DAYTON ROAD CHICO Vice Chair Dolan advised that the Public Works Director had met with Mr. and 'Mrs. Lord and/or their attorney representative and Mr. Vanella. On Friday she discussed the proposed agreement with Mr. Castleberry and the moving of the bulk loader. Mr. Castleberry is out of town and she has been unable to determine what happened during the meeting. Page 195. July 73, 1982 _ July 13, 1982 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -- _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ = T = - _ _ _ _ _ - Mrs. Lord read a letter from 2'ir'. Lord setting forth his feels about having to sit through. an entire Board meeting. The Public Ldorks Director did come out to their property and advised that the operator did not accept their proposal but he would move the tank to the other side and put in a turn valve soutb.of them and would not build 500 feet south of them. The operator was planning to fill the tank only once for five months and would move the tank in sips to eight months. ~Ir. Lord spent three days. in the hospital and it appeared to have been from the extreme stress of the Board meeting. They authorized their attorney to arrange a meeting with the Pub-tic Works Director and tkie operator to discuss this matter. The operator refused any meetings. They were against the expansion of the business. The huller process is for nuts grown on the ground and the fertilizer is manufactured elsewhere and should be kept at the ground level and not flying through the air. They knave a right to nonpolluted air on their property. There should be no building or expansion allowed 100 feet from their property line and well. Residences are not allowed to be built near chemical plants but this business came in on the residences. After the last rain the area smelled like an open gas line. The Public Works Director made mention to them of the high speed aces dangers. Last weekend there were two near fatal accidents with people trying to enter their drive.• There are different stories from Mr. Vanella as to what he wants to do with this expansion. Supervisor Saraceni was told it was to cover his machinery and the Public Works Director was told he wants to add 1,500 feet to the building. They have also heard he wanted to add .;~ big truck scales. What else is he planning on putting on the property. Vice Chair Dolan was at a loss as to what to do since the Public Works Director did not leave any word on the meeting. She did not think the Board meeting was the appropriate forum. She understood the situation to be that when Mr. Lord read his letter and made an offer on June 29, 1982, the Public Works Director took this offer to the operator who countered the offer. The matters under contention appear to be when and where to move the storage tank. Mrs. Lord stated that P4r. Lord made an offer which was immediately turned down and then the operator came back with a counter proposal to add 1,500 feet to the back of the building. The Public Works Director mentioned to them he did not think the access roads were wide enough or easy enough to enter by. They have refused to sign a document that they would not harass or sue Mr. Vanella. The Public Works Director advised them that the area between the property line and the house should not be used and the present road should possibly be widened for a new entrance on the far side of the business. No action taken. 1128 COMMUNICATIONS David td. Lantis, Chico. Mr. Lands provides information regarding the greenline. Information to the considered at the time of the hearings. D. R. Roper, engineer, Chico. The engineer, on behalf of James E. Bremner, appeals condition 13 on tentative parcel mpa, four parcels, on Cussick Avenue, approximately 4,000-feet north of Bell Road, north Chico, AP 4201-70 and 71. Set for hearing August 3, 1982 at 10:15 a.m. Scott Ambulance, Inc., Oroville. Bill Scott offers his resignation from the Butte County Emergency Medical Care Committee. Administrative Officer to post and letter to be sent to him. Page 196. July '13, 19.82 8 2- 3'' 1129 1130 _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ .7u1.y 133 1982_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DeVere Pace, Chico. klr. Face suggests the Board of Supervisors invoke a gun ordinance requir-ing all Butte County residents to_arm themselves and learn how to use. the. arms. Information no action taken. Ralph. W. Carlson, 'Richvale. Mr. Carlson offers- comments regarding the Board's action on acceptance of wage and salary decisions. Administrative staff to give Mr. Carlson a telephone call on this •matter. Department of Water Resources. The department submits a statement of water charges per a contract for water supply from the State Water Project regarding charges for calendar year 1982. Information; no action taken. Auditor has received a copy. William H. Spruance, attorney. The attorney provides additional information regarding the building permit application by Thermalito Irrigation District. See motion following communications. Joseph Anthony Padai, Oroville. Mr. Padai submits a claim against Butte County in the amount of $200,000 claiming damages from an unlawful assault by a Deputy Sheriff. See motion following communications. Neil H. McCabe, attorney at law. The attorney expresses thanks to the Board of Supervisors and, in particular, the District 2 Supervisor and theDirector of Public Works regarding the negotiations between the State of California and Scotty's Boat Landing operators. Information; no action taken. Elden J. Brown, Special Districts Association. Mr. Brown offers the Associa- tion's support in the formation of a Citizens Water Advisory Committee. To be kept in the file. Darryl R. White, secretary of the Senate. The Senate has directed transmittal of Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 73 which authorizes county commissioners on the California National Guard. Information; no action taken. Department of Transportation. The department provides information on re- linquishment of highway right-of-way for a segment of land generally located on Garner Lane immediately west of the freeway, State Route 99. Refexred to Public Works. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. HUD indicates approval of the revisions submitted by the consultant offered June 9, 1982 for Program B-81-DN-06--0003, Community Development Block Grant. Information; no action taken. Butte County Law Enforcment Officers Association. The association requests that the Board place an initiative on the November ballot. To be considered later in the meeting. AUTHORIZE REFUND OE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FEE BY THERMALTTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and carried, refund of building permit application fee by Thermalito Trrigation District was authorized pursuant to Government Code 53091. REJECT CLAIM - JOSEPH. ANTHONY PADAI On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Saraceni and carried, the claim of Joseph. Anthony Padai in the. amount of $200,000 for alleged damages from an unlawful assault by a Deputy Sheriff was rejected and referred to County Counsel and<-Risk Management Coordinator. Page 197. July 13, 1982 _ July 13, 1982 _ _ _ _ 82-1131 ADDITIONAL ITEMS FROM 'BO RD MEMBERS $ Supervisor Saraceni had information. regard~,ng the Fish and Game Commission meeting. They went into a new agenda that was prepared. This was the last evening for Gene'`Mercer as secretary of the commission. He presented Mr. Mercer with a Certificate of Appreciation. There were two nominees voted on and they will be brought to the Board. ', Appointment to the Fish and Game Commission Secretary continued to July 20, 1982. RECESS: 9:45 a.m. RECONVENE: 10:05 a.m. 1132 ADOPT RESOLUTION 82-114: PUBLIC HEARING: RON MC ELROY, COOK AND ASSOCIATES ABANDONMENT OF PUE ON PARCELS A AND B OF KELLY RIDGE ESTATES, UNIT 4-B The public hearing on Ron McElroy, Cook and Associates, abandonment of the public utilities easement on Parcels A and B of Kelly Ridge Estates, Unit 4-B was held as advertised. ', Hearing open to the public. Appearing: No one. Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Saraceni, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and carried, the abandonment of public utilities easement on Parcels A and ', B of Ke11y Ridge Estates, Unit 4-B for Ron McElroy, Cook and Associates, was approved; Resolution 82-114 was adopted and the Chairman authorized to ', sign. RECESS: 10:08 a.m. RECONVENE: 10:16 a. m. 1133 PUBLIC HEARING: M. W. BALKEN PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATTON AND REZONE The public hearing on M. W. Balken proposed negative declaration and rezone from "TM-5" and "TM-10" (timber mountain - 5 and 10 acre parcels) to "TM-3" (timber mountain - 3 acre parcels), property located an the west side of Coutolenc Road, approximately one-half mile north of Skyway, identified as AP 65-22-4, 65-22-6, 65-23-01, 65-23-05 and 65-23-06, north of Paradise was held as advertised. ', Hearing open to the public. Appearing: No one. The hearing was continued to July 2~, 1982 at 10:15 a. m. RECESS: 10:18 a.m. RECONVENE: 10:31 a.m. 1134 PUBLIC HEARING: ROBERT A. GLUSMAN APPEAL OF ADVISiDRX AGENCY'S CONDITION ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP The public hearing on Robert A. Glusman appeal of Advisory Agency's condition 8 (to provide permanent solution for drainage) on tentative parcel map, AP 42-34-0.0, three parcels, on Cussick Avenue on the south side of Dead End Court, Chico area was held as advertised. Hearing open to thepublic. appearing: No one. ', The hear~.ng was continued to July 22, 1982 at 10:30 a.m. RECESS: 10:32 a.m. RECONVENE: 10:45 a.m. Page 198. ', July '13, 1982 8 22135 $''' July 13, 1982 PUBLIC HEARING: DONALD L LUCAS APPEAL OF EIR REQUIREMENT ON REQUEST FOR ;ANCELLATION OF LAND CONSERVATION ACT AGREEMENT . The public hearing on Donald L. Lucas appeal of EIR xequirement m request for cancellation of the Land Conservation Act Agreement was held ~ advertised. Bettye Kircher, planning director, set out the background of the appeal. This is an application through the window provision for subdivision. The criteria set by the Board requires a development plan. Staff recommended an BIR because of the impacts that could not be mitigated. without more information. She would like an opportunity to review the matter. There are things such as clustering that could be done. Hearing open to the public. Appearing: Bernard C. Richter. Mr. Richter presented a letter from the applicant appointing him as his representative which was presented for the record. Mr. Lucas is not planning on subdividing his property at the present time. When he decided to subdivide he would have to apply for a subdivision and would have to meet the environ- mental requirements at that time. He felt this should be postponed until the subdivision map is considered. Vice Chair Dolan explainted that the issue before the Board is a request for cancellation of a Land Conservation Act agreement under a special provision and state law and subsequently the requirements by the Board require a development plan. She wondered if the Board could even consider this issue without a development plan. Del Siemsen, county counsel, advised that the environmental review would have to be done at this time. The law requires that this be looked at at the earliest possible time. Vice Chair Dolan suggested that during the discussion relative to AB 2074 the requirements did not require the filing of a map but just a development plan. Maybe with new information and being aware of the concept there are some mitigation measures that could be discussed with staff and a conditional negative declaration put forward. Mr. Richter did not see how they could-file a map if they were not going to use it. The environmental impacts would be different depending on the use of the property. He did not feel Mr. Lucas was trying to get out of filing the environmental study, he just didn't know what he wanted to do with the property. This would depend on the economy. Ms. Kircher advised she would be happy to work with Mr. Richter to see what information is available and what would be needed. It might be possible to have a mitigated negative declaration with some conceptual design. The hearing was continued to July 27, 1982 at 11:15 a.m. 1136 1137 APPEARANCE: ELLEN SANDERS Ms. Sanders advised that a number of concerned residents of Little Chico Creek Canyon have sent a letter to the Butte County Grand Jury, Butte County District Attorney, Zoning inspector, land fraud inspector of the California Department of Real Estate over possible collusion between developers in the Little Chico Creek and Butte Creek Canyons. There are possible violation of California and county laws in the area. DISCUSSION OF BUTTE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ASSOC~ITION REQUEST FOR THE BOARD TO PLACE INITIATIVE ON NOVEMBER BALLOT Discussion of the Butte County Law Enformnent Officers Association request for the Board to placean,~nitiative on the Novemfier ballot was held at this time. Pagel99. July 13, 1982 July 13, 1982 8 2- $'' Ken Clausen asked that the Board consider placing a proposed ordinance on the November ballot to set the levels of staffing f.or the Sheriff's Office in the county. The: ordinance. deals: with the patrol division based on the Hughes~Heiss study that was done. He requested action from the Board as to whether-they would be in favor of including this on the ballot. They will be publishing an intent to circulate today and 21 days after that, they will be gathering signatures to place this measure on th e ballot. If the Board cho9.es to place the matter on the ballot then the. initiative would hot occur. The reason they did not place a funding mechanism in the ordinance is because they should not interfer with the legislative power. He did not feel they should be come involved with. where the money should come from. If the county wanted a funding measure, perhaps that measure should come from the county and be placed on the ballot. Mike Pyeatt, interim administrative officer, felt this was what e Board had to look at. He felt that a funding mechanism had to be presented. e Board has the final decision on staffing and has to evaluate that staffing th the funding availalile. A funding mechanism cannot be placed on the 11ot due to the time constraints involved. Supervisor Saraceni felt that what was being presented was one-half f a package. When the people decide the number, they there will have to e means for paying for that number. His own feeling was there was no where or the funds to come from without having a Funding mechanism with the rop os a1. Vice Chair Dolan could not vote to place this measure on the ballot. it came forward by initiative, she would not do anything to stop it. She reed._zaith the Administrative Office andSupervisor Saraceni that the staffing scussions must be at the Board level in terms of the county's ability to nance. She has read a report that if the county were to carry through the vel as has been determined, the service levels might or might not mean fective law enforcement. The matter was continued to July 20, 1982 at 11:00 a. m. 1138 EARANCE: ROD WEYAND, BCEA Mr. Weyand again asked that the Board hold evening meetings so t people could attend the meetings. There are not many people attending meeting today. He has not seen anything done about hold an evening ting. Vice Chair Dolan advised that the Board has indicated this was good idea. The Board has held evening meetings and they have been targeted ', o specific issues. There are concerns relative to staff support that must e present at the hearings and the overtime issues. They Board has not ** ', orgotten the request. She had not heard anyone say that they would not ', ave evening meetings. ' Supervisor Saraceni pointed out that the Board members also attend they meetings in the evenings. 1139 ~UBLIC HEARING: MTCHAEZ G. DAWSON PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPLICATION OR CANCELLATION OF LAND CONSERVATION ACT AGREEMENT The public hearing on the Michael G. Dawson proposed negative claration and application for cancellation of Land Conservation Act Agreement s held as advertised. Hearing open to the public. Appearing; No one. The hearing was continued to July 27, 1982 at 31;30 a.m. Page200. July 13, 1982 ~. 82-1140 a 1141 July 13, 1982 ADOPT RESOLUTION 82-115 AUTHORIZING SALE OF TRANS (TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES OF 1982) On motion of Supervisor Saraceni,-seconded by Supervisor Moseley and carried,'Resolution 82-115 awarding bsd,:to First Interstate Bank of California in the amount of $12 mialion at 8.74 (8.73999 percent per annum with a premium of $100 and authorizing sale of Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes of 1982 was- adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign. PUBLIC HEARING: FRIEDA E. HART MARTIN APPEAL OF CONDITION 6 WHICH. REQUIRES A RS-2B STANDARD PE'R PUBLIC WORKS REQUIREMENTS ON COPLEY ACRES UNIT N0. 2 SUBDIVISION, AP 36-54-18, 20 & 21 The public hearing on Frieda E. Hart Martin appeal of condition 6 which requires a RS-2B standard per Public Works requirements on Copley Acres Unit No. 2 Subdivision, AP 36-54-18, 20 and 21 was held as advertised. Hearing open to the public. Appearing: No one. The hearing was continued to July 22, 1982 at 10:45 a.m. 1142 RECESS: 11:35 a.m. RECONVENE: 11:45 a.m. PUBLIC HEARING: FRED GERST APPEAL OF JAWANT SINGH BAINS PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AP 25-21-22, 205 ACRES, MORE OR LESS Thepublic hearing on Fred Gerst appeal of Jawant Singh Bains proposed negative declaration and tentative parcel map, AP 25-21--22,;205 acres, more or less was held as advertised. Hearing open to the public. Appearing: Gordon Mathews, manager of Mathews Ready Mix, Inc. Mr. Mathews advised that the plant is adjacent to the subject property. He wanted to speak on behalf of the project. The hearing was continued to July 20, 1982 at 10:45 a.m. 1143 RECESS; 11:47 a.m. RECONVENE: 1:32 p.m. The Board "recessed at this time to reconvene as an Air Pollution Control 'District. (PUBLIC HEARING: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT PERMIT FEE SYSTEM The public hearing on the Air Pollution Control District permit fee system was held as advertised. Hearing open to the public. Appearing: No one. The hearing was continued to August 3, 1982 at 1:30g.m. The Ai r.Rollution Control District recessed at this time to reconvene as is Board of Supervisors RECESS: The Board recessed at 1:35 p.m. to reconvene on Tuesday, July 20, 1982 at 9:00 a.m. Page 201. July 13, 1982 j.