Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM081076~- August 10, 197b r. RECONVENED: The Board reconvened at 9:00 a.m. Present: Supervisors Ladd, Madigan, Mc Kiilop,Richter, and Chairman Cameron. Clif Mickelson, Administrative Officer, Dan Blackstock, County Counsel and Clark A. Nelson, County Clark, by Margie Catt, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Q~' ~ a e. Pledge of allegiance to the Flag of the IInited States of America Oa motion of Supervisor McKillop, seconded by Supervisor Ladd and unanimously carried, the minutes of July 29, 1976 and August 3, 1975 were approved as mailed. -1358 cnrsroNrCATxoxs Request for withdrawal from proposed Resources Conservation District. Requests for withdrawal have been received Pram 7.eae and Shirley Aldrich, Catherine and Genevieve Hovey, A.E. and Marlene Myers, Joseph and Eileen Camenzind, David and Janice Hayes, Fred A. Huntington, Fred T. I Huntington, OMA13K-KCBs Inc., Butte County Almond Hull Association, Gerald and Cornelia Dixon, Rey and Marguirite Nystrom, and Enrico and Diva Merlo , Refer M County Counsel. City of Chico. The City requests all property in the ownership of the City of Chico and property within the corporate limits of the City be exciueded from the proposed Resources Conservation District. Refer to County Counsel. .Tim V. McCusker, Chico. Mr. McCusker submits application petitioning for variance to provisions of Sections 19-10 and/or 19-12 of the Butte County Code for the placement of a mobile home at Route 4, Box 479 (Cana Pine Creek Road), Chico. Set for hearing vn August 24, 1976 at 10;30 a.m. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District. The District forwards resolutions setting 6 C. S 7 tax rates and authorizing the addition to the tax rolls of delinquent accounts. Refer to County Auditor. ~ ao.s~ 3oa.o j 03~ ~r 3.oa la3. ~~Q•0' Xuba County water District. The District submits a list of Yuba Covnty water y availability or stand-by charges which are delinquent sad asks that I these be made apart of the annual tax levied upon lands. Refer to County Auditor and Treasurer. State Department of Health. The Department writes concerning licensed residential ~ care homes for six or fewer mentally handicapped persons ox dependent and neglected children. Infer to Welfare Director and Planning pin:ctor. Robert A. Jones, Monager, Butte County Employees "Association. Writes concerning the employment of Ed Brown. Read and discussed. Supervisor Richter stated that four people had passed the examination; Mr. Mickelson had the descretion to ~ pick anyone he wanted from the list submitted. Mr. !ones said he was requesting that Mr. Brown be assigned to the position being vacated by the resignation of Scot Tandy. Time spent discussing the hiring of an Administrative Analyst. See motion following Communications. Albert Chabot. Appeal Butte County Planning Commission decision regarding AP 65-09-Oe. To be held until Mr. Lawson is present. Butte County Employees Association. Putting Robert Ferguson, Zoning Investigator in ~ r Planning Department, on one-half time basis. Read and discussed. Mr. Jones explained Mr. Ferguson's position. Board will take a look at the position prior io taking action. Marold T. (Bizz) Johnson, Member of Congress. Sends copy of latter to Interstate ~ Page 77, August 10, 1976 f ~~ ~"' / 00 . August 1©} 1976 m a¢ a m a m e o s m d v m m m n s s s s s s s s s e s¢ s s a s a se .e s .e Commerce about uses of right-of-way regarding the abandoned railroad in Stirling City. Read and discussed. No action. ~} Rio Bonito Ranch. Reques# for exclusion from the proposed Resources Conservation 1 District. Referred to County Counsel. 7b-1359 SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'S HIRING OF ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYSTS On motion of Supervisor Richter, seconded by Supervisor McKillop and unanimously carried, the Board expressed their support of Clif Mickelson, administrative officer, in the hiring of the Administrptive Analyst and the method that was used in this hiring. 76-1360 APPROVE GRANT APPLICATION FOR TITLE II, C.f.T.A. EXTENSION T e Grant app ication as en prepared to provide For t e extension of the Public Service Employment Program. The grant in the amount of $477,580 will enable the continuance of 243 jobs to approximately April, 1477. On motion of Supervisor MclCillop, seconded by Supervisor Richter and unanimously carried, the grant application for extension of Title II, C.E. T. A. +- was approved and the Manpower Director was authorized to sign. 76136! AUTHORIZE THE INSTALLATION OF AUTOMATIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SWITCHING SYSTEM Agreement as been reached with the State and Telephone Company to join their ATSS with no installation cost and no obligation to remain on the system. If approved by the Board, the County can be 'bn line " by September 13. On motion of Supervisor Ladd, seconded by Supervisor Richter and unanimously carried, installation of the AT55 System into the County Centrex System was authorized. 76-1362 APPROVE ADDEIrDUM TO AGREEMENT WITH FOX, MC FARREN & TARMAN ARCHITECTS pprove o t`-}-ie design of the single level roof for future second floor in the new administration building was given on July 6, 1976. An addendum has been prepared that will include the increased costs of this concept into the agreement with the architects. Addendum discussed. Supervisor Richter stated that a large portion of this increase goes to the engineers. On motion of Supervisor McKillop, seconded by Supervisor Ladd and unanimously carried, addendum to agreement with Fox, McFarren and Turman, architects, was approved and Chairman authorized to sign, setting the payment to the architects on the some percentage basis as the rest of the building. 76-1363 SET MINIMUM PRICE FOR TAX DEEDED PROPERTY IN GRIDLEY e Treasurer recommen s a min mum amount o taxes and $25 advertising) be placed upon AP 21-28-25 in which the City of Gridley. is interested in obtaining For the orderly extension of Laurel Street. On motion of Supervisor McKillop, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and unanimously carried, a minimum price for cox deeded property was set at X50 for AP 21-28-25, in the City of Gridley. 76-1364 APPROVE GRIDLEY LIBRARY PLANS AGREEMENT Pu is Wor as s Board apprava o t e agreement pro~+iding for plans for Gridley Library; EDA paperwork and applications, $1,500; plans and specs, $6,000; and contract adm ni~8rgeio~8nspect~ons and pay estimates, $4,000. August 10, 1976 (~ !'. August 10, 1976 r s s m r a m a m m r s r s m m m a m m r a r r m m a m r s s e m m s m m r m On motion of Supervisor McKillop, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and unanimously carried, the agreement for the Gridley Library plans between County of Butte and Cook Associates was approved and the Chairman authorized to sign. 76-13b5 ADOPT RESOLUTION 76-136 AUTHORIZING ABANDONMENT OF PORTION OF OROVILLE-QUINCY HIGHWAY AND CHAfRMAN AUTHORIZED TO SIGN QUIT CLAIM DEED A portion o Oroville-Quincy Highway is no longer needed for road purposes and public works recommends conveying that portion not needed for roadway purposes to Lucille Roberts as a condition right of way acquisition on the Orovilie-Quincy Highway project. On motion of Supervisor McKillop, seconded by Supervisor Ladd and unanimously carried, Resolution 76-136 authorizing abandonment of a portion of Oroville-Quinsy Highway was adopted, Chairman authorized to sign quit claim deed and to sign said resolution. 76-1366 ACCEPT••iORD FERRY ROAD BRIDGES AND ACCEPT FOOTHILL BLVD. & OROVILLE-QUINCY HIGHWAY PROJECT On motion o Supervisor McKi op, seconded by Supervisor Richter and unanimously carried, the following action was taken: I. Ord Ferry Road Bridges at Perkins Creek and branch of Edgar Slough, County contract No. 42071-75-1, work by R. M. Harris Company was accepted, Chairman authorized to sign the Notice of Completion and Clerk instructed to record said Notice of Completion wi#h County ,{tec~bF'der, 2. Accepted the work of Robinson Construction Company far reconstruction of Foothill Boulevard from 0.5 miles south of Oroville-Bangor Highway to 150' south of Fairhill Drive and Oroville-Quincy Highway from 100° east of Oroville Dam Boulevard to Foothill Boulevard ;. Chairman was authorized to sign the Notice of Completion and Clerk instructed to record said t+btice of Completion with County Recorder. 76-1367 AWARD OF BID FOR HUMBOLD7 ROAD BRIDGE C ay Caste rry, Director o Pu c o s, reported that the low bidder for the Humboldt Road Bridge was Jerome Bollender, Ghico, in the amount of $74,623. He recommended the award of said bid at this time. On motion of Supervisor McKillop, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and unanimously carried, bid for Humboldt Pnad Bridge was awarded to Jerome Bollender, Chico, in the amount of $74,623, and the Chairman was authorized to sign said con tract . 76-13b8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON REFUSE DISPOSAL COMMITTEE MEETING Clay Castleberry, Director of public Works, reported on fhe recommendations set out by the Infuse Disposal Committee. Mr. Castleberry requested Board direction or approval regarding the recommendations. Copies of his report has been given to Board members. Item !. Suggested the approval of the fee schedule and suggest setting a date for the fees to become effective. Fee schedule discussed. Fees suggested; Cars .50 Pickups without side boards 1.00 Page 79. August 10, 1976 ~. August 10, 1976 z a s n c m e m g s~ a m s a a n a e s c e m a o m m c ro s a m u m s c m o Pickups with side boards $1.50 Garbage compactors .60 cubic yard Trucks 2.00 I~ ton truck 6.00 Semi truck 10.00 Commercial rates I ton 2.00 Anything over one ton or by 6.00 compactors Drop boxes G.00 Rates discussed; Supervisor Richter felt the County should proceed with these fees. Supervisor Ladd set out the matter of demolition material . He asked if this would only relate to actual demolition material. He was told that it would not apply to private individuals that might haul a broken toilet or other items of debri to the disposal area. On motion of Supervisor Richter, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and unanimously carried, fee schedule was adopted as recommend by FLblic Works Department, with the change to .30 for loose material placed in drop boxes, (per cubic yarc said fees to become effective Plovember I, 1976. Item 2. Nbuntain transfer stations. Mr. Morris was present to discuss the proposed agreement for the hauling from the mountain stations. The people in the mountain areas should pay and the station would be operated only two days a week. The Sheriffrcould help the County in keeping the stations tidy. Each site would be fenced. It is proposed that the Stirling City and the Lake Madrone sites be opened one weekend day and one other week day each week; this would only be on a trial basis. Costs for operating the mountain stations set out -nnd discussed. The fees would be the same as those for other areas. ' Mr. Castleberry will prepare the propose! in legal form. On motion of Supervisor Madigan, seconded by Supervisor Richter and unanimously carried, PublicWarks Director was authorized to prepare a contract for mountain site and Ord ranch for Board review. Item 3. Ord Station. A similar contract at Ord Station is proposed. Mr. Castleberry will work with County Counsel to assure the County that Mr. Morris has the proper inwrance. Fee schedule discussed. Mr. Castleberry will clarify the wording of the contract and be more specific about the fees. the County Ikm~~l. Land fill operation. Costs set out. It was felt/should get this off the fax rolls. It was stated that it costs the County about $65,000 per year to haul the refuse from the Oroville station to the Neal Rood site. Mr. Castleberry wg~ested that o franchise agreement be prepared~or the southern part of the County. This was the only way that Mr. Castleberry knew of to get this operation off the tax rote. Franchise suggestion discussed. Supervisor Ladd obtected to the franchise proposal. Page 80. August Z0, 1976 ~ r"~ August 10, 1976 w m. s w m w w w w w w w w w m w w w e: w: w w m c m a c m w a c m w w m c It was moved by Supervisor Richter, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and unanimously carried that Mr. Castleberry bring back a proposed contract franchise for the southern part of the County for the Board's consideration, to cover a period of one year. AYES: Supervisors Madigan, McK311op, Richter.and Chairman Cameron NOES: Supervisor Ladd 76-13b8(b) CONFIRM INTENT FOR ADDITIONAL $100 PER MONTH PAYMENT TO ~It~15P.ECTAR AT JUVENILE HALL At t e request a t Director of Publ is Works, the Board confirmed their intent of additiongl;$Ip0 per month for Phil Bojarski, inspector at Juvenile Hall, for 2 month RECESS: 10:45 RECONVENED: 11:00 76-1364 BID OPENING-COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 26 BONDS: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS 76-137 & 76-138, SALE OF BONDS ~ LOAN RESOLUTION an ac stoc , unty Counse ,reports tat on y one i a en received for the sale of County Service Area No. 26 bonds. The bid was received from United States Department of Agriculture, Farmers Home Administration. On motion of Supervisor Ladd, seconded by Supervisor McKillop and unaninwusly carried, Resolution 76-137 selling the Butte County Service Area No. 26 1975 sewer Bond, Series C, to United States of America, Farmers Home Administration, was adopted; Resolution 76-138 loan resolution was adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign. On motion of Supervisor McKillop, seconded by Supervisor Ladd and unanimously carried, County Counsel was directed to deliver the $89,000 bond to the Treasurer-Tax Collector. 76-1370 CONTINUATION OF REFUSE OPERATION DISCUSSION Ron Jo neon, C ico, state a opposest a ranc ise proposal for the so~~them part of the county. He feels it should be a license type thing issued- to the present operotors. Matter of licenses far Chico area explained. Collection of refuse in Chico area discussed. It was felt that the operators should measure what they are hauling by weight or by meawre. Bob Johnson, Ghico, spoke concerning the garbage trucks in Chico. Weight of drop boxes discussed. Transfer tn.rcks dump 10 tan s at $10.00 a load. Refuse operation discussed. Mr. Castleberry stated that the Committee had recommended a licensing ordinance. The committee also recommended that the number of licenses be limited. It was stated that if there was not to be a franchise, then the County should not limit the number of licenses. Mr. Castleberry was requested fo bring back a proposal to the Board. Neal Road land fill site discussed. It was felt the County should see if the private enterprise could operate the site more efficiently. I~placement site is being negotiated. Mr. Castlebery stated that the people on the committee mclw-xvorked on the refuse questions donated a lot of their time to the problem and he felt the Board should thank them for their help on this pretty tough subject. On motion of Supervisor McKillop, seconded by Supervisor Ladd and unanimously carried, a letter of appreciation was requested to be written to those .people who gave many hours of work on the refuse subject. Page 81, August 10. 1976 r•., r., August 10, 1976 0 'L C S v C v R 1F v p a v p p p s v p v v C v v v! C v O S C v i i t v a G 76-1371 APPEARANCE: EVERD MC CAIN-PRO PERTY•REQUESTED TO BE DIVIDED IN CHICO AREA Ever cCain stated he represented the subdivider in the Chico area that has a problem concerning relocation of utilities; this might be causing a problem. Relocation of underground utilities discussed, This sometimes costs the subdividers thousands of dollars. On the property in question a power pole has to be relocated. It was requested that the Board continue the past policy of requiring utilities to be relocated at the expense of the utility company. Mr. Castleberry suggested that the Board not act on this request today. Mr. McCain was invited to attend the next Butte Utility Council meeting that is held once a month. Rules do have to be established. Mr. Castleberry stated he mould be happy to work with the utilities and with Mr. McCain. 76-1372 SIGNS PASTED ON COUNTY SIGNS Supervisor Madigan stated t at in certain parts of Chico, public signs have been plastered with a paper sign. He asked if there was a penalty for placing these signs on public signs. It is illegal to place signs on utility poles and public signs. Discussed; no action taken. 76-1373 PUBLIC HEARINGS SET: PLANNING MATTERS Pu is arings were set or August 3 , 976 at 2:00 p.m. on the following : I. Gordon Williamson, et al-environmental impact report and rezoning from "A-2" {general) to "C-2" (general commercial) property located on the east side of Esplanade, approximately b30 feet north of Shasta Avenue, identified as Ap 44-43-08, Chico. 2. Glen Shirley, Spencer Clark, and Dan Forman-rezone From "A-2" (general) to "R-3" (medium density residential) for property located 300 feet east of Norseman Avenue, approximately 950 feat north of Lassen Avenue, Chico. 76-1374 APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPS On motion o Supervisor NtcKi op, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and carried, the following tentative parcel maps recommended for approval were approved, subject to the conditions, with the findings that they are consistent with the General Plan and negative declarations have been filed with the County Clerk: Zoned C-2 A. John Nlerlo, Ak' 44-43-n1, 2 lots, east side of G.P. 1-4 du/ac Esplanade, north o£ Commercial Ave., Chico. Engineer: !Michael ('aprealian Pursarant to the require:aents of Section 20.3 of the Butte County Code, the ''entative parcel :yap of the abo'-e idontified,property has been re- viewed by the.Butte Caun:y Subdivision Committee and the Planning Commission The subdivision Committee and the Planning Commission recommend apprgval of. the tentative map, subiect to the fo11o~~~inR conditions: 1. (locate a well an Parcel 1 to the satisfaction of the fIealth [lept. 2. Construct full street improvements, i.e., curb, gutter, and sidewalks ~n Esplanade frontage. 3, lYerify legal parcel. August 10, 1976 ~1 August 16, 1976 4. ubmit drainage plans to the Dept. of Public t~rorks for approval and nstali requixad facilities, including drainage easterly to the reeway right-of-way. 5. Indicate a 55 £t. building setback from the centerline of. I'.splanade, 6. l;how all easements of record on the final map, 7. casements to he reserved in deeds per Cotu~ty ordinance. 8. ~ioad names and house numbering to he reviewed and approved by the ept. of Public 19orks prior to recordation of final map. 9. Pay a drainage deposit of 54200 per acre far the commercial use of ghat property to be used for mobile home sales. A Ne~ative Declaration Regarding T•.nvironmental Impact was filed with the Coup y Clerk on July 6, 1976, finding the proposal is in conformance with existing uses an the parcel. Zoned ASR Calvin Fichardson, III, AP 54-23-64, Z lots, south G.F. 1-4 du/ac of Feather River Place, east of. Pentz-MaFalia' FFVry., Paradise. Surveyor: .John tiV, Ilamby Piirsuant to the requirements of Section 20, 3 of the T3utte County Code, the tentative parcel map of the above identified rro..perty has been re- viewed by the Ziutte County 5ubdivssion Committee and the Planning Commission. The Subdivision Committee and the Planning; Commission recommend approval of the tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 1. 'erify legal parcel. 2. l'erify le~!al access. 3. rovide traversable access. 4, ndicate a 20 ft. building setback westerly of the west easement ine, S. Show all easements of record on the final man. 6. rovide a road maintenance agreement. 7, Access easements to he reserved. in deeds per Co~.m ty ordinance. 8. (Road names and house numbering to be re viewed and approved by the Aept. Hof Publie jVorks prior to recordation of final man, A Negative Declaration Regarding Environmental Impact was filed with the county Clerk on July 6, 1976, finding the proposal is in conformance with the Rutte County General Plan, Toning on the property, and uses in --,...,,._tl-e urrounding area. .~_. ,,,...-,___,_--• .. _ - 7.a~ ed A-R Clarence Schreur, AP 53-15-138, 3 lots, west side ~; CaP. 5-8 du/ac of Sawmill Road, south of Bille Road, Paradise. Surveyor: Lippincott Surveying P~irsuant to the requirements of Section 20.3 of the Butte County Code, thee'tentative parcel map of the above identified property has been re- vi~ewed by the Butte County Subdivision Committee and the Planning Codmission. The Subdivision Committee and the Planning Commission recommend ap royal of the tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 1. Aeed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-of-way from the centerline of Sawmill Road. --- ---~--•--~~----~---~-~ -~ August IE3, 1976 r,, ~ r"~ 2• 3. 4. Na August 10, 1476 c a m c¢¢ c c c¢¢ c¢ a¢¢ a a a a a s a c a a c m x a c m c¢ a~ a c Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of Sawmill Road. Show all easements of record on the Final man. Road names and house numbering to be reviewed a.nd approved by the Dept. of. Public Plonks prior to recordation of final map. te: Tliis is a further parceling of Parcel 4 of a parcel map filed necember 7, 197:1, in Aook 4R, Page fi7. i A ~fegative Declaration Regarding Environmental Impact was filed with the County Clerk on .Iuly fi, 197fi, finr?ing the nxonosal is in confar- ma~nce with the 1;utte County General _T'lan, zoning on the n mperty, and ____ ____uses in the surrounding area. ._._.,.____,. ...._._ .. Zoned A-2 Jade Mt. Educational Pro;ect, AP 27-2Q-12 and AP G.P. 5-8 du/ac 27-24-01, 4 lots, north side of Alice Ave., west of Palermo-(ioncut Hwy., south of. Palermo. Engineer: Graves, Geddis F, Itriscoll Pursuant to the requirements• of Section 20.E of the Butte Gnatnty Code, the tentative parcel map of the above identified property has been re- view~ed•by the Butte County Subdivision Committee and the Planning Cnmr~~ s s ion . The 5t~hdivision Cammittee and the Planning Commission recommend app~oval of the tentative man, subject to the following conditions: 1. Verify legal access. 2. Provide traversable access. '~. Deed to the County of Rutte 30 ft. right-af-way from the centerline of Italy Ave., Alice Ave„ and Palermo-Honcut I?tay, as the subject varcel fronts on these streets. 4. 5'. 6. 7, R. Indicate a SO ft. building setback .front the centerline of naly Ave . , Alice .Ave. , Pod Palermo-tioncut !•lwy . Show all easements of record on the final man. Prnvicie b5 ft. frontage on I'nrcel 2. Provide proof of water or nlacc t'~e statement on the man as required by the Ardinance. !?aad names and house numbering to be reviewed and approved by the Wept. of Puh]ic 1Vorks prior to recordation of final man. A Negative 1eclaration Regarding Environmental Tmnact lass filed with the(County Cleri: on ,TUIy (i, 197fi, finding the nropasal is in confor-. mange with the Rutte County General Plan and uses in the surrounding area -~.~.._._.__..._~.___,... Zo G. Pu th vi Ca d A-2 P,oy Stewart, hP 4d-45-02, 2 Tats, north siAo of 1-d du/ac Raton P.oad, between i`torseman .Ave. F, F.urnap Ave, , Chico. Surveyor: 'fax Albert uant to the requirements of Section Z0.3 of the Rutte County Code, tentative parcel man of the above identified nronerty has been re- ed by the Rutte County' Subdivision Committee and the Planning ~issian . Page B4. August 10, 1976 ~`1 August 10, 1976 i i i C s- a C z m a i c !1 m 6 7t L i 6 Y L C i 'S. ® 6 9C S= 1! a tl C L a a Th~ Subdivision Committee and the Planning Commission recommend •aP royal of the tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 1. Specify location of wolls on each parcel with a 100 ft. septic tank froe setback around said tcells. 2. ?ndicate a 59 ft. building setback from .the centerline of the access easement. 3. Show all easements of record on~the final map. 4. Provido a road maintenance agreement. ' 5. Access easements to he reserved in rleerls per f'rnFnty ordinance. 6. Indicate a 55 ft. handing setback from the centerline of t?aton Road. 7. Road names and house numbering to he reviewed and approved by the Dept. of Puh] is Nlorks prior to retardation of fi.nal~ mop. A negative Declaration Regarding rnvirc~nmcntal Tmnact ryas filet} with thg County (:lerk on July 6, 197fi, finding the proposal is in confor- ma~tce Zvith the Butts County General Plan and the Present zoning covering i th Property. Note: This is a {arther parcolinr of a parcel man filed on .Tana-~ _]2r 1976,_.,1 Rook 55, Page 37. TonCr? SR-1 .Tack IT. Retz, nn 55-19-02, ~ lots, hest side of C.PL 1-S ac/~Iu flnrl~ ^oa~a, soi.ith of Easy Street, "ara~I.ase. Surveyor: Lippincott Surveying Pursuant to the regcxirements of. .Section ?~A.3 of the I~uttc County Code, thetentativc: Harrel map of the above identified property has been re- vie~drrcd l,y the Rutte County Sul>clivision fommittee ~n+I~ fh': Planning Cor~~tis s ion . TheSubclivision Committee and the Planninr ('nmmission retnr~r.+enA approval of the tentative man, stthiect to the fo].io~:in~ conditions 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Fi . 7. 8. 9. 1~erify legal access. Provide traversable access. ?leer] to the ~ottnty of. Tiuttc en ft. ric,~ht-of-way frnT~ the conterline o£ New Clar}: Poad. (_nny ttiror}: on improvement of connection to (lark '?oad must obtain encroachment Hermit from Cal-Trnns) Indicate a SO ft. building sethxck from the centerline of ~l~t dark Road and the cul-de-sac street: and a 55 ft, hui]din? setback from the centerline of New ('lark no1d. Show all easements of. record on the final r+an. Provide a road maintenance a~*reoment. ,lccess easements to he reserved in creeds per ~oanty ordinance. Road names ancI douse nTinherinn to be reviewed an+~ a^nrc~~ec~ by the Dept. of Public tdorks prior to recordation of Final mar. Pa.rccls to r+cot the ninir+itm rep+,tirements ar tote zone exclusive of •.~ Ti~I1L5-A'F-Wav, _ _ ___-~_.-._... '~ age 85. August l0, 197fi L0. Avgust 10, 1976 if revision of lots i.s necessnr~~, a17. lots mast meet the minin?vn requirements of the Snhciivision ordinance. A *iegative ]lecla.ration >7egardin!* i:nvironmental Impact ~~::+s fi].eA z+ith theCounty Clerk on •Iuiv I2, 1P7G, finding the proposal is in confor- man a with the Butte Crninty Cenerai Plan, the znninR covering the pro~ierty, and uses in the s~trrounciin~* area. TneGeneral Plan indicates two cntei;ories aF open space in non-urban areas:. 1) multiple use Wren space and ?) permanent oxen space. !Vi.t}~in the multiple use oven space, land in which the slope is generally less than 25~ but w!?ich are not coverorl with v:sluable stands of timber, the~Ceneral Plan states that there is not expected to he anv suhstan- tie demand for urhani.zation of this lane? ~?ue to its location, lTSes for whi.eh it may he suitable include, but are not ]imiteA to: lvatcrshed Erosion control '~;ilc~life ]zahitat Rid~.nr stables gazing Scenzc easements Tree crops `ii.ner~] extraction Piclc~ crops Private outrlnor xecreatic+n Plant n??rserics Plond control ~rcon belts Zoned 'd-R C, ~P. 1'S ac/du A. P. Dickerson, AP 72-33-53 R fit, 4 lots, north of Swedes Plat P,aac1, east of 4ohinson `till Poacl. Engineer: braves, (;eddis F nriscoll Pursuant to the reclni.rements of Section 2D .3 of the R=.ttte County ('ode, the tentative parcel map of the above ic?entified nroncrty has been re- viewed by the Butte Corm ty Subdivision ordinance Ind the Planning C mmission. T~e Subdivision Committee and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the tentative man, s?zhlect to the following conditions: 1 Proof of water or place the statement on the nap as renuired by the Qrdinance. 2. Indicate a 1'10 ft. septic tank free setha.cl- on the itp-hill side of the nR~II] ditch travc'xsine Pnrcol 2, 3, F ~.. 3 Indicate a 25 •Ft. se•~tic tank free seth:~e}: on the dn?~n-hill side of the Qi4I11 ditch traversing Parcel 2, 3, F ~.. 4 Parcel 2 to meet the minimum rc rn~irements of the S~~bdivision ()rd in anc e . 5 1'erify legal rareel. 6 verify let.*.al access. 71 Provide traversable A.CCOSS to nSR 1.111 stanclarc?, R. Indicate a 50 ft. 1>>iitding SethACl~ from the centerline of a]1 easements. g Show all easements of record on the final mstn. 10. Provide a road maintenance agreemant. li. Acee9s easements to he reserved in rlaeds per ~nunty ordinance. 1 i . Road names and lio?i5e nurn:?cring to be reviewed and nnrroved by the Dopt. of Public i~'or}:s prior to recordation oc' final m:tn. Page ~i~ , eug~8t lo, 1976 ~ ~; August 10, 1976 c s m c s a m c m a a s c a a a s a e s= a s c sr = e e s e e s e m e c e e e A~ Negative neclaration ?teFardinr Invironmental Innact was filed with t~e County Clerk on ,lulu 1?, ]^7F, findinn this pnrticnl.ar project Poses no significant arlvnrse environmental efFects, brit anv Possible i~tpacts have been snnl:en to in the rnssitc~r s Sehrerken~aust T'IR, however, tlt.e cnntimied downnarcolinR of this area ray have a si;+nifi- c~ant cumulative e~feet. e General Plan inciicates two categories of nnen spec a in non-t+rhan eas: 1) multinl~ use nnen s7acc incl. 2) permanent np~n space. thin the multiple use oT+en snacP, Iand in T,~?tic'~ the slnne is nenerally less than 25~. bttt which arc nRt Covered with va].t+ahle stands o~ ~irthcr, the CcneFal Plan states th~.t there is not expected to he any s+ilsstantial demin+t for nrhs+*tization of this tancl d+ie to its location. l)ses~ for which it may be sttitahle include, but are not limited tn: hlate'rshed >±rosion control ?~lildilife habitat Grazing Treed crops Field crops Scenic casements Zongcl A-R C.P., 5-8 dulac Ptineral Fxtrnctinn Colf canrscs Privnte out{lnnr rocreatinn °idini* stables Plant nurseries FTonrl contrcl Creep ~~el is Thomas J. T?nI*ers, AP 34-50-1~, 4 lots, north side of !hive IIwy., sout?~ of fleritage Pnacl, east of. Riverview, Ornville. Fnfiinoer: Craves, Ceddis F '~riscoll Pursuant to the requirements of Section 2Q.3 of the Butte !'ountr rode, the tentative parcel map of the above identified I+ranerty has been re- vieved by the I3utte County Suhrtivision Committee anA the Planning Commission. T1te ~S+ihdivisinn committee an~1 the Planning Cnmmissinn recommenr? approval of the tentative *nap, si+bject to the fotl~*vinT* conditions: I. 2. 3. 4. 5. G. 7. $. 9. 10. roviclP a ]otter frot^. the 'forth R+trhank Prth?ic l'tilities nistrict hat they will provide community sewers to the parcels. rovicle a letter from the mroville-1~'yanc?otte Irrigation nistxict hat they trill serve domestic water to the parcels. rovide traversable access, and obtain an encroaehnent Permit. ccess to he constructed to P.53 T,TII standard, eed to the County of Butte 3~ ft. riCht-n~-way front the centerline £ Iferital!e Roac?. ndicate a 50 ft. huilclinl* setback from the centerline of ??eritarc oad, and the acCeSS caser+ent. how all easements of recorc nn the final man. de a road maintenance agreement. ess easements to ho reserved in needs Per County ordinance. d names and hotlse nur~hering ro he revictved and an Proved by the t. of Public iPnrl;s prior to recorclntinn of final man. Install a fire hyArant at the intersection of IlnritaBe Road and ivervicw nrive., page ~-j- august 10, 1976 . /'"^ ~ August 10, 1976 c s c a a a a a a a s a a a a s a c a a m s a a m m a a m a c a a a c s s s s ?4inimum fire flow of l,n~n Rrm. . Claw Catalina ~8 or equal. 4 'Iei?~3tive T)ecla.ratinn negaxrting finvironr~nnta] Impact was riled with the County Clerk nn .July ]2, ]97fi, finc?init the pronnsal is in conformance with the Butte County General Plan, the zoning cnverinn the nr.operty, and uses in the surrounding area. Zoned Awl ~, S-H T. F. Saladin, AP 72-2t1-25, 26, 29, 30 F, 31, 4 G.P. -4 du/ac lots, south side o£ 41ive Hwy.; Forbestown Road, west of lVyandotte Lace, Engineor: Kendall Engineering Pursus~nt to the requirements of Section 20.3 of the Butte County Code, the tentative parcel map of the above identified property has been re» viewed by the Butte County Subdivision Committee and the Planning Commission. The Subdivision Committee and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the tentative map, subject to the follotvinR conditions: 1. Pioof of water or place th'e statement on the map as required by the Orjd in an ce . 2. P ovide the Butte County Health T?ept. with additional soil tests that show that existing parcels meet the minimum requirements of t~e Ordinance or redesign parcel's to meet the minimum requirements o ~ the Ordinance . 3. Verify legal access. 4. Provide traversable access, and obtain an eneroechment permit on P reel 1 . 5. T-e,ed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-o.f-way from the centerline o~ Forbestown Road. 6. Indicate a 50 ft. huildinF setback .from the centerline of. Forbestown Road, and the access easement. 7. Show all easements of record on the final man. S. Provide a road maintenance agreement. 9. A~cess easements to he reserved in deeds per County ordinance. 10. I~di.cate a 50 ft. leach field free sethn.ck from both sides of any ma~7or drainage swales. 11. Road names and house numbering to he reviewed anc] approved by the ilejpt, of Public Works prior to recordation of final man. A Negaltive Ileeiaration Regardinl* Environmental Impact was filed with the Count Clerk on July 12, 197F, finning the propose} is in conformance with t~e Butte County General Plan and it poses no significant adverse enviro m,W-~ ental_effects. ABSTAINING: Supervisor Ladd 76-1375 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPS NOT CONSISTENT WITH GENERAL PLAN: WHIPP.LE MAP REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING-DIXON HARD CHROME MAP -CONTiNI'JED ONE WEEK Tentative parce maps not consistent, with the General plan designation of orchard and Held crops discussed. Everd McCain spoke concaming the Whipple parcel map and requested tf~petgte 68p be' approved: Supervisor Madigan said he ; August 10, •].476 ~'`: ~", August 10, 197fi '2 C OC tY C C c i' a Cf Q o CS a .C m m C i i v b C~~ C m C i~ Y Y C a m s 6 m~ could not see how Planning Commission could consider this agricultural land. Jim Lawson, Planning Director, stated that the interpretation Is that this is in the orchard and field crop area of the General Plan. This parcel is not consistent with the General Plan. Supervisor Richter stated he would vote against the parcel as it is not consistent with the General Plan; he felt the General Plan should be modified to show the use in this area. Dan Blackstock, County Counsel, stated that the Board must make an affirmative finding that this is consistent with the General Plan, or deny the map. Both maps discussed at this time. It was moved by Supervisor Richter, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and unanimously carried that the Thomas Whipple parcel map be sent back to the Planning Commission, and ask them for an explanation as to how it could be consistent with the General Plan and if not, they should look at the Code. Dixon Hard Chrome parcel map discussed. This is in the area of the afterbay. They have been growing hay on the property. Supervisor Ladd said he could find that this is in conformance with the General Plan. !t was moved by Supervisor Ladd that the Dixon Ward Chrome tentative parcel map map be approved, with the finding that it is in conformance with the General Plan. Motion died for lack of a second. Map put over one week to go out and look at the parcel . 7anled A-5 Robinson Timber F,mployees Profit Sharing 7"rust, r.,P. Tinher x AP 71-02-31, Q lots, east sirle of Ponderosa i;ay, •~~ t't. Terrain south of. Ralct pack Raacl. Engineer: ~ranmer iinpinee rin P 76-1.76 APPROVE PARCEL MAPS DESIGNATED AS TIMBER-MOUNTAIN IN GENERAL PLAN On motion o Supervisor McKi op, seconded y Supervisor La d an carried, the following parcel maps designated as timber-mountain in the General Plan were approved, subject to the conditions, with the findings that they are consistent with the General Plan and that negative declarations have been filed with the County Clerk: Pu 'sunnt to the requirements of Section 2f1.3 of the Butte County Cade, the tentative parcel >"ap of the above identified ttiaperty has Keen rew vied ed by the Butte County Subdivision Committee and the Planning Cor.~mission. They Subdivision Committee and the Planning Commission recommend aon,roval of the tentative maP, subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. Proof of water ar place the statement on the map as required by the ordinance. lrerify legal access. Provide traversable access. Heed to the fbunty of Butte 60 ft. right-af-way From centerline of Rocker£eller ??oad. 89. August 10, 1976 ~..• ~'", ____..____= ~Au~s'st1Q119Z1~====_______ ___ =_= ___ 5. lndic~ete a 50 ft. building setback From the_ centerline of rocker- •Feller Road, and tite access easement. (,. Show all easements of record on the Einal man. 7. Provide a road maintenance agreement, R. Easements to he reserved in deeds per bounty ordinance. 9. Food names and house numbering to he reviewed and approved by the nept, of Public SVorks prior to recordation of final map. n egative Declaration Regardint* Environmental Impact was filed. with the ('ounty Clerk nn ,)nIy 12, 197h, finding the project poses no sig- nificant adverse environmental effects. The timber mountain classification is intended far those areas which ha~•e value as timber producing areas, watershed. areas, scenic areas, recreational areas and areas which by their character and particular topography require special treatment and Protection to mitigate pv- tontial damage. Residential development in these areas should be cofifined to areas where the topography of the land will allow a minimum amount of damage by way of erosion, siltation, surface and ground hater pollution or the destruction of scenic and historical areas. Density should he considered on the basis of these factors nn~ neighed against alternate f.~se nr the areas for timber produc- ti~sn, recreation and watershed protection. --r---- ~ -- - - Zoned T'd-5 f . P. LeFee, A_P 71-05-15, 2~ lots, on both sides of G.P. Timber $ Lumpkin Road, aprros. 1/4 mile west of Feather Att. Terrain Falls. Engineer: Kendall Engineering Pursuant to the requirements of Section 20.3 of the Butte County Code, the tentative parcel map of the above identified property has been re- viel,red by the Butte County Subdivision Committee and the Planning Commis Sion . Tile Subdivision Committee and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the tentative map, subject to the follolaing conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Indicate a 100 ft. leach field free setback on~both sides of t?te stream traversing Parcel 1, and a ].00 ft. leech field fxee setback from the irrigation ditch traversing Parcel 2. Indicate a 100 ft. septic tank free setback around the spring located on the southwesterly portion of Parcel 2. Proof of water or place the statement on the map as required by the Ordinances. Provide traversable access to Parcel 2, and obtain an encroachment permit . Deed~~to the County of RuG.te 40 ft. right-of-way from tho centerline of Lumpkin Road. Indicate a 55 ft. building setback from the centerline of Lumpkin Road. all easements of record on the final map. August 10, 1976 ~ ~ __ _---_---==1~~ustl0$19Z1i=__==_______ ___ 8, Access easements to be reserved in deeds per County_ordinance. 4. Provide a road maintenance agreement. 10 Road names and pause numbering to he reviewed and approved b~ the Dept. of Public Works prior to recordation of final. map. A degative ?teclaration Regarding Environmental Impact was filed with the G inty C1err on July 12, 1976, finding the proposal is in conformance with the Butte County General Plan F, the zonini; covering the property, and is a logical separation of a parcel lying on two sides of a road. The timber mountain classification is intended for those areas which hake value as timber producing areas, watershed areas, scenic areas, recreational areas and areas which by their character and particular topography require special treatment and protection to mitigate po- tential damage. Fesidential development in these areas should be confined to areas where the damage by way o.t° erosion, siltation, surface and ground water pollution or the destruction of scenic and historical areas. Density should be considered on the basis of these ' factors and weighed against alternate use of the areas for timber pro- duction, recreation and tiv:~tershed protection. AYE5: Supervisors Ladd, AAadigan, McKiilop and Chairmon Cameron i NOES: Supervisor Richter. 76~I377 RAY VOLTA TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SENT BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION I Tentat ve parts map o y G. ta,. - , 4 ots, gout I side of W. Ilth Ave., across from Zuni Avenue, Chico, discussed. Clay Castleberry, Director of Public Works, explained the' pro~alempf the•poor lot design. The property is in the City's primary sphere.. Discussed whether there was any other way the lots could be re-designed. Mr. C~stleberryshowed a rough sketch of bow the lots could be designed. Mr. Volta requested Board's consideration of the redesigning of the parcel. ' On motion of Supervisor Madigan, seconded by Supervisor Richter and carried, the Ray Volta tentative parcet map was referred back to the Planning Commission 'arid saggest that the lot design be made so it Is not defective. AYES: Supervisors Madigan, MclCillop; Richter and Chairman Cameron NOES: Supervisor Ladd 76-1378 REFER TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION ORO HILLS SUBDIVISION T Oro Hi s su ivaion tentative map, 15 lots, south side of Grubbs Road, east of Reservoir. Read, Palermo discussed.' Supervisor McKillop asked Mr. Lawson if he had gone out arad looked at the property. This map is not consistent with t•he Orchard and Field trrops designation of the Genera! Plan. Supervisor McK~llop;felt that Mr, Lawson should;go ou#.and look at the property; he felt the General Plan should be amended to show the actual use for the property. ~ . On motion of Supervisor Madigan, seconded by Supervisor Richter and carried, the Oro Hills subdivision tentative map was sent back to the Planning Commission far their consideration. RECESS: 12:1'5 Page 91. • August 10, 1976 ~ r'~, - - - August 10, 1976 Reconvene: 1:30 p.m. _...----------------------_....--- 379 PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED RESOURCES CONSERVATION DISTRICT The public hearing on the pzogosed resources Conservation District was held as advertised. Dan Hlackstock set out what the Conservation District was and how it would be set up.Mr. Blackstock also read Public Resources Code Sections 9402 through 9413 which pertains to the Resources Conservation District. Hearing open to the Public: Appearing: 1. john CotJ.uhd -~•, Adams Ranch, Durham. Mr. GotluntlicG asked that the matter be continued so that he could get the necessary material together. 2. Harold Dawson, Lime Saddle District. Mr. Dawson asked what the date foz having the exclueian papezs is was. Mr. Blackstook stated that ordinarily the time would run at the end of the meeting unless the Board changed the time. Supervisor Richter stated that he was certain the Board would extend the time. 3. Representative from the Tharmalito Irrigation District, The representative from the Thermalito Irrigation District stated that the District had asked to be excluded and would like to know if they were excluded. 4. Mr. Disney, Property owner. Mr. Disney stated that he had just heard of the public hearing and would like to have the matter continued so that he could obtain the legal data Chat he needs. 5. Robert Millington, representing fear different districts. Mr. Millington stated that he hoped that the district would be excluded from the Conservation District. Mr. Blackatock stated that the people who wanted to be excluded would be. 6. John Hart, Chico. Mr. Hart stated that he supported the Resources Conservation District. Mr, Hart ie the Assistant Professor o£ Soils at Chico State University. He stated that the Resources Conservation District would help Butte County in many wepa. 7. ;Soixya Mandowsky, State Reaouzce Conservation Commiasioa. Ms. Maridow'sky read parts of a letter that had been sent to the Board. She set out how the Conservation District had been working around the State. She also stated that the only way that a person is effected is if they want to be effected. 8. Lauren Trumpchamp, Santa Clara, Vice President, State Association of Resources Conservation District. Ms. Trumpchampc~tated that he was in favor of having a Resources Conservation District. He cited the benefits from sash a District. 9. Robert F. Ray, Palermo-Honcut, Mr, Ray stated that the people in his area were is need o£ a District of this kind. He hoped that it would be possible to form the Resources Conservation District. 10. Red Madcliff. Mr. Madcl3ff wanted clarification ae to what type of control the Federal Government would have on the property owner. 11. Norman Front, Farmer. Mr. Frost stated that he personally was in favor of the DiatricC. 12. Edward Burger, Durham. Mr. Burger stated that he was in favor of the formation of a Reaourcas Conservation District. The hearing was left apes to the public and continued until August 24, 1976 at 2:00 p.m. 76-1380 PUBLIC HEARING: ADOLPH 8. SIEBENEICHER - APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A DUPLEX ON PROPERTY ZONED "TM-5" LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF VILAS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1 NILE NORTH OF COHASSET ROAD, SOUT[i OF COHASSET The public hearing on the Adolph E. Siebeaeicher appeal of Plamaing Commission's denial of a use permit to allow a duplex on property zoned "PM-5" located on the west aide of Vilas Road, epprozimately 1 mile north of Coheaeet Road, south of Cohasset was held as advertised. Page 92. August 10, 1976 ~~ ~ __________=Au~stlOli476 =________________=__ The Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to deny the use permit. 5vpervisor Richter questioned whether this was is conformity with the General Plan. Daa Blecketock stated that this was a "TM-5" zone and would be permitted with a use permit. Hearing open to the public: Appearing: 1. Adolph Siebeneicher, Property Owner. Mr. Siebeneicher eat out what he planned to do if the vsa permit ware granted, He is in favor of the use permit. 2. Charles E. White, Property owner, representing Cohasset Community Association. Mr. White stated that there were approximately 146 people is the Association. The Association is opposed to the use permit. 3. Jack Marchicano, Yresideat of Cohasset Community Association. Mr. Marchicano stated that he is opposed to th a use permit. Hearing closed to public and confined to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Madigan, seconded by Supervisor Richter and unamimously carried the Board sustained the Planning Co®isaion's denial of a vas permit. RECESS: 3:25 p.m. REC4NVENEO: 3:35 p.m. 13$1, PUBLIC HEARING: JOHN DRAM - ENVIB(9NMEN'TAZ FACT REPORT AND REZONING FROM "INTERIM S-R-1" (SUBURBAN-RESIDENTIAL) TO "PA-C" (PLANNED AREA CLUSTER) PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF CUSSICR AVENUE, aEFWEEN LASSEN & HENSHAW A~N,~TB,~,,,C[{ICO. ADOPT ORDINANCE 1743. The public hearing 'on John Drake z Eavironmeatal Tmgact Report and rezoning from "Iater3.m S-R-1" (suburban-residential) to "PA-C" (planned area cluster) groperty on the east side of Cussick Avenue, between Lassen and Renshaw Avenue, Chico was held as advertised. The Planning Commission voted k to 3. Hearing open the public: Appearing: 1. Fred W. Hignell III, representing Mr. Drake. Mr. Hignell showed elides of the proposed Northwood Commons Coadamini:an.project. Mr. Hignell stated that the property was 19.X3 acres and that 11.3 acres would be in open space. He discussed the landscaping and 'recreational areas. Mr. Hignell stated that this hearing was for the purpose of the rezone and that there would have to be a Subdivision Committee°hearing on the Condominium project if the rezone war a approved. 2. Dan Drake, Chico. Mr. Drake stated that he was is favor of the rezoning. Supervisor McRillop~asked how the~sa:xitation Facilities war being taken care of. tir. Drake stated that ~.t would be septic. 3. Jack Bolbush, property owner. Mr. Ito~.bush stated that he wsa opposed to the rezoning. 4." Joe Elliagstoa, property owner. Mr. Ellingston stated that he was opposed to the rezone. Mr. Ellingston stated that;"How can we the people of the area be heard whoa our elected officials are representing special iateraet groups." Supervisor Madigan asked Mr. Ellingaton if he would enlighten the $oard as to what he was talking about. Mr. Elliagston then stated that Richter had received money from Drake during his campaign and did not feel that he stnuld vote on this matter.- Page ;93. August 10, 1976 ~ ~ ______ ====a==r=A~~'~t1Q~197~__________________ The clerk was directed to read a note that Supervisor Richter had written to Supervisor Madigan one half hour before the statement Lad been made. "Jack, I'm going to abstain on this vote and decision because I received a $500.00 donation from Dan Drake. It ie unfortunate to take this position but with the people who oppose me on many land use questions, my voting would play right into their hands. I have the legal right to vote, but the press would try to destroy my actions." Supervisor Ladd stated that he was concerned about many of the pxoblems that the people opposing the rezone were concerned about. He also stated that he did not thick that any of the Board member would sell their votes fox any amount. Supervisor Madigan stated he thought•the statement.about Si~perviebr,Richtei was^a~theap shot. 5. Leslie Jones, property owner. Mr. Jones stated that he opposed the rezoning. Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board. 6n motion~.of Supervisor Madigan, seconded by Supervisor Ladd sad carried the rezone was grante3~from "interim S-R-1" to "PA-C". The Environmental Impact Report was approved with the findings that this would not be inconsistent with the Opan 6pace element as it relates back to the open apace plan. Also, it Las been the Board's determination that the economic factors are being met based upon the testimony that has been heard bare @oday. The Board finds that relating to any adverse conditions due to this being prime agricultural land the economic consequences are such that the Board would want to override this due to the shortage of housing. With regards to the increase in traffic and traffic•noise the Board finds thaC the increase would be insubstantial. The Board finds that protection services of this portion of the project would not~be such that there would be a need for additienal services. The Board finds that when you build a project you do use certain supplies, but that the area ie in dire need of creating employment and additional housing. The Board also finds that the reserve of energy supplies would not be of any substantial nature. Ordinance 1743 was adopted end the Chairman authorized to sign. AYES: Supervisors, Ladd, Madigan, McKiliop, and Chairman Cameron. ABSTAINING: Supervisor Richter. T_ b-!1~8 i. ADOPT ORDINANCES 1744, 1745, 7746: PUBLIC REARING: BUTTE COUt4'FY PLANNING COMMISSION - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT f31D REZONING FROM "INTER72i A-2 LTD" TO "C-2" (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) "P-Q" (PUBLIC-QtJASI- PUBLIC) AND '"M-2" (HF.~,'VY INDUSTRIAL) PROPERTY SOUT[i AND WEST 4F OROVILLE CITY LINBTS, EAST OF 6TATE H47Y 70 AND NORTH OF ORO DAM BLVD., AND ALSO 50UTk1 OF ORO DAM BLVD., EAST OF STATE HW1I 70,.WEST OF FEATHER RIVER BLVD., AND NORTH OF GEORGIA PACIFIC WAY, CONTA1:NiNG 142 ACRES, ~ OR LESS. OROVILLE. The public hearing on Butte County Planning Commission - Environmental Impact Report and rezoning from ;'Interim A-2 Ltd" to "C-2" (general commercial) "P-Q~';(public-quasi-public) and "M-2" (heavy industrial)'•praperty south and:west of Oroville City limits, east of State Hwq. ZO and north of Oro Dam Blvt~.,.and also south of Oro Dam Blvd., east of State Swy~ 70,~west of 17eather liver Blvd., and North of Georgia Paciffc Way, containing 142 acres, more or Less, Oroville was held as advertised. Hearing open to the public: Appearing: No one. __.___, - - ' Page 94. August 10, 1976 FL' ~ r'"• Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board. On motion of Supervisor McKillop, seconded by Supervisor Richter and unanimously carried Ordinances 1744, 1745, 1746 ware adopted end the Chairman authorized to sign., with the findings that the Board has determined that the sewage factor .would not actually create any portion problem. 76-13631 ~LIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL FRAM LAND CONSERVATION AGREII~IT The public hearing for request for withdrawal from Land Conservation Agreement is continued until Tuesday, August 24, 1976 at 2:00 p,m. 76-1384 LIC D D ZdN ORD NANCE CONT'D FROM 8 The public hearing on the proposed Subdivisiaa Ordiance is continued for one week, until August 17, 1976, at 2:00 p.m. 76-1385 t1ATTER PRESENTIrb BY COUNTY COT~NSEL Mr. Blackstock reported on the claim that has been negotiated on two County roads, Roy and Lee Drive. Basically the settlement is for damage to the roads is the amount of $3,500. Mr. Blackatock recommended that the Board accept the settlement. On motion of Supervisor McRillop, seconded by Supervisor Richter and unanimously carried the Board moved to accept the draft presented by County Counsel, accepting The claim setFlement. .. _.^ ( 8acesss 5125 p,m. _ _ _ RECC+NVENED: 7:00 p.m. •1386 MEETING WITH BUTTE COUNTY•EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION CONCERNING PAY AND BENEFIT REQUESTS ' a,Chairman Cameron opened the meeting to the County employees to discuss the pay and benefit requests: Jim Rackerby, Personnel director, set out the background of the pay increases and benefits received by,the ;employees over the pashfew years. In 1973 there was a 5.5 increase; €974 there was a 14.2 increase and €rs 1975 there was acost-of-living increase of 10.2. The result of the adoption of the classification and woge~study gave the employees an average of a 2}% increase' in salpry. ~ Fringe benefits given to employees also set out. The list of 14 items requested by the employees association presented to the Board members. Bob Jones, Manager-Butte County Employees Association ,explained the requests of the employees: A+[eet and confer sessions have been held. lie stated that ti,e employees are nvt~agreeable to accept nothing. Use.of revenue sharing funds suggested. Mr. Jones stated ghat the bounty might also be receiy;ing Public Works funds. ~ ' A quick example of the employee sector set out by Mr. Jones. He felt the employees should be pain time and one-half for oVerFime. Mr. Jones said that at this time the County and the eemployees ore al' an impasse, If if is the position of this Board that there will be no in'c~epses for the employeesr 'then Mr.' Jones requested that the law for the impasse be implemehted. The County tould request medication. Page 95. August 10, 1976 ~ ~'`~ Chairman Cameron opened the meeting to the audience. Appearing: I. Mrs. ,Joan Dowdy, Sheriff's Department, spoke concerning salary requests. 2. James Hanson, Oroviile. Spoke against increases to the employees. 4. Don Bendorf, Probation Officer, spoke in request of the benefits requested by the employees. 5. Rhonda Eaton, SherifF's Department. She spoke in favor of a dental plan for the employees. 6. Jim Eller, minister from Chico. He spoke on behalf of the elderly and the people who cannot afford a tax increase payment. Requests that the Board give consideration to these people. 7. Orrin Stratton, Chico, President of Butte County Taxpayers Association.. He stated that the County Budget bas doublod in the past 10 years. This county has been hit by a tremendous reassessment problem; people on fixed-incomes are being • forced out of their homes because of their tax bills. 8. Elaine Loofbourrow, Probation Department. She stated that increases in salary were not the important issue to her; adequate ataffing to prevent employees from doing the work of two people much more important to her. She hoped that the County would transition the G.E.T.A. employees now at the Probation Department. 9. Dick Wallace, '+J~ealth Department, spoke in favor of increases in benefits to the employees, 10. Ken Soule, Welfare Department. Spoke in favor of increase in benefits to the county employees. H. Clarence Mc{?aniel, Welfare Department. Speaking in favor of the benefits for employees. 12. Dee Smith, Welfare Department, speaking in favor of the employees requests. 13. Roger Cronkright, Sheriff's Department, stating that the employees do pay for their retirement and pay into social socurity. Requests consideration of employees requests, !4. Vince Ballinger, Welfare Department, explained the problem of the low pay and not being able to support his family on what he had been making. He has resigned his position with the County as of yesterday, 15. Robert Sorenson, retired. Spoke fn rebuttal to the statements made by the County employees. I6. Mrs. Regina Ellena, Health Department, suggested that as an alternate the Board might consider a direct property tax robots to the employees instead of a raise. 17. Arthur DeWitt, Public Works employee. Spoke in favor of the granting of the requests of the employees. Board members made statements in response to the remarks set out by the County employees. Supervisor Ladd said the County was very fortunate in having good employees. He stated that inflation has Burt everyone. The employees should look at and recognize the difficult situation that the Board is in; the Board has some difficult decisions to make . Pa a g(,, August 10, 1976 8 { y Supervisor Riehter agreed with Supervisor Ladd's statement. He felt that this County has the finest employees in the State. They should understand the problems that the Board faces. The Board is going to have to find a way to finance the budget within the revenue the County now has. He felt it would be unwise and a bad policy to fund on-going programs with revenue sharing. Supervisor Madigan supported Supervisor Richter's comments. Bill Jones, Auditor's OFfice, asked the Board if they were going to build the Gridley Library. Me asked why the Board had to build the Administration Building and the Gridley Library with revenue sharing funds. Bob Jones asked the Board what they planned to do about the employees requests. Is the Board going to direct~~ the Administrative Officer to go back and negotiate with the employees; just what is the Board's stand in relation to the requests of the employees. it was his feeling that the Board should ask the Administrative Officer ro bargain in good faith with the employees and endeavor to reach an agreement. Supervisor McKillop said the Board will have ro have a meeting, talk ro Administrative Officer and then get back ro the employees. Chairman Cameron stated that the Board will report back ro the employees on their decision regarding their requests on Tuesday, August 24, 1976. RECESS: The Board recessed at 9:00 p.m. to reconvene on Monday, August 16, 1976 at 9:00 a.m. for budget study. Page 97. August t0, 1976