Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM083078August 30, 1978 RECONVENED: The Board reconvened at 7:00 p.m. pursuant to recess, Present: Supervisors Lemke, Moseley,"Richter and Chairman Winston. Clif Nickelson, administrative officer; William R. Lawrence, auditor; and Clark A. Nelson, county clerk, by Cathy Pitts, assistant clerk to the Board. ASSENT: Supervisor Madigan 78-1699 BTJDGET HEARINGS The budget hearings were held as continued, Discussion of surplus money Mr. Nickelson stated that the county has more money than they anticipated, They still do not know whether the county will receive antirecession allocations. The funds are. available through the frugality of the department heads and the Board, The county could be in a position of being penalized next year.q The county must levy the full amount as far as a tax rate. The State in SB 154 said that the counties will have a $4 tax rate state widen This cannot be exceeded. There is a report out that the Board will receive an additional $288,000. This can be used either for distribution for the districts or to the Board to use as they see fito Mr. Nickelson stated that the report regarding road funds does not differ from the Auditor's figures with the exception there was $113,000 that the Administrative Officer and the Auditor missed. This was because of the HCD program that just last week processed the reimburse- , meet to the road budget. The figures are in agreement with what the Auditor put on the board, They are referred to as uncommitted funds. There was talk regarding the $350,000 regular road reserve fox contingencies. There are fund balances of $105,000 special road fund. Chairman Winston asked assuming that the Board has sufficient funds to finance the entire budget as presented would they be in favor of funding the budget on the basis of service? Supervisor Richter felt the Library budget should be restored if this were the caseo The Library had been cut because the Board could cut serviceso There is a big state surplus. There was sufficient money to make up for the amount of property tax cuts. The Board has raised feeso Many of the services have not been provided. Chairman Winston stated that the Library had been cut $200,000 which was about 20%. The Veterans budget was reduced 21%. The Development Commission was reduced 100%o He felt that the people said they wanted a reduction of service. He felt that Proposition 13 meant reduce govern- meet spending. Mr. Nickelson stated that the Board was probably in a position to fund the budgeto There are certain things in the budget that should have been taken out. The Board has taken some of those out. He is in agreement in changing the method of operation as to the industrial development. He cautioned the Board about ending up with too large a reserve or balances because of the liberal funding from the general fund. Possibly the Board would like to place the reserve in a couple of restricted funds. The reserve should be looked at as insurance against the disaster situation that might develop next year and not go out and build roads because the county has the money. He felt that maybe now is the time to have a healthy road reserve. Supervisor Lemke felt that 100% funding of the budget this year would create a problem next year. The Board had better go down the line and make serious adjustments in the budget as can be made and be prepared to go further next year. Page 248. August 30, 1978 August 30, 1978 Mro Mickelson explained why Butte County is unique, Del Norte and Plumas Counties have oast forest lands. There was a county tax rate last year of $2.152, It is one of the lowest tax rates in the whole State of Californian Butte County had a Welfare rate of $.575. Medical was $.356. Mandated social services programs totaled $.931 of the $2,15 rate< When the state came in to help the counties with Welfare and Medical, the county ended up with money from the $4 rate. Mr, Lawrence stated that the other reason the county is in this position is that they have uncommitted revenue sharing money. The county has been very wise in their expenditures, They have spent less than they have. If necessary adjustments were made the Board could have a budget that could be funded with available finances, There is a strong possibility that the assessment roll will have to be done over again, In SB2223 Gregerio, which would provide additional revenue for special districts, there has been an amendment that would require Assessors to redo the 1978-79 assessment rolls in order to factor with improper re-evaluatian of property taxes to the 1975-76 level. The legislation intended for the assessor to pull back to 1975-76 level and make an adjustment ratio to 25%, In Butte County we: were at 21,4% as opposed to 25%. He did not know what the Assessor has done in this ', county. Mr, Lawrence set out the way that the 21.4% is brought up to 25%, He set out the differences, Mr. Mickelson ..recommended that the Board go through the budget and say tentative approval on the individual budgets and then hold open until the very last week. Mro Lawrence stated that the Board could make reductions right up until the last week. The Board cannot increase the budget after closing of the public hearing. Tf anticipated revenue is lost then the Board could reduce the budget during this time. The Board can reduce the budget any time during the year, The assessed value came out higher than last year, He did not know what the impact would be. This could reduce the overall income the county had available. It could put the county in a position of getting some state block grant bail out monies. He felt the Board should take the approach to the budget that it could be funded under normal circumstances. Looking at the budget in grant total right now with the adjustments the Board has made already the county would have $823,555 more than we need, based on the assessed roll as prepared and without considering that the county might receive $288,000. The Board has made total cuts in the budget of $729,718. This resulted in reductions of revenue by $13,8900 This made a reduction of $615,828, Some of the funds are in the restricted funds. It can be transferred, Mr. Lawrence set out the road budget at this time. Any road in Sutte County can be funded from the regular road fund, It has been a Board policy that the work on the local access road would be done with special road fund monieso It is a Board policy that can be changedo Gerald Lively had made suggestions that some of the funds can be shifted to the regular road fund, Revenue consideration of new sales tax and $362,000 balance makes $1,283,000 revenueo There is $175,809 that has not yet been appropriated in SB 325 monies. The Board has authorized Public Works to go with projects and they have obtained BCAG approval. 78-1700 BUDGET REVTE41 Budget review was held at this time, A riculture De artment Pa a K0. Account 43. This account has been reduced $1,200. Auditor to make necessary ad;~.ustments according to policy. Account 33. Delete $75, Page 249. August 30, 1978 August 30, 1978 Joe Carlisle, agriculture department, stated that they propose to tradein one 1964 Ford pickup that teas 100,000 miles on it, Discussion of whether cars could be used in place of pickups held at this time. Nr. Carlisle stated that they could use cars if necessary. They would rather have pickups. There is a problem with carrying equipment in the cars. Many times the department has to pick up pesticides: If these are carried in a car there will be an odor. 78=1701. POTrICY'o ~RE~~COUNT~Ya GARS Mr. Nickelson stated that his office has started to remove cars from department heads other than the Sheriff, public Works and Administrative Officer. The problem is where we are also requiring all employees and department heads to park at a county site and not take home. For example, an Agriculture Inspector who lives in Gridley and takes his car home then goes out in the morning from home to the job, Mr. Mickelson~. stated that he is asking for clarification regarding this matter. Mr. Nickelson stated that there had been concern about vandalismo He is not concerned but the question did come upo the cars. Supervisor Richter felt that was not an argument far keeping Mr. Nickelson stated that the Farm Advisor had asked that a car be given to Bruce Campbell, 4-H youth advisoro There would be a serious draw back to him if he were to have to park at Oroville. The Board could say drive his own vehicle and charge mileage. It is probably pretty well a washout one way or the other, Mr, Nickelson stated that the county employees donate to the County far more than they have to in extra time. He felt that if the Board carries this concept to far they could damage the erit:h~usa=sm of some of the employees that have donated time. Jim Cook, BCEA, stated that he had five raad foremen quit the Association because their trucks were taken away. Tf the Board sticks with the policy of no cars to be taken home at night, the Association's position is that when a person gets a call at home he is on overtime and will charge for mileage and overtime. The road foremen have been donating time to the County. Mr. Lawrence stated that ahis issue has come up many times. His office made a cost analysis about eight years ago of what it would cost the county in order to provide storage yards and the cost of employees bringing the vehicles in and parking them. It was more beneficial for the county to have the employees take the vehicles home. Supervisor Richter agreed that if a person needed the truck or vehicle to go out in the middle of the night they should have it. Chairman Winston stated that the department heads know the Board's policy on the frivolQUS~ use of cars. He wondered if the Board can say they are concerned with this and it will be left up to their disgression. Administrative Office was instructed to query department heads instructing them the Board does not want frivolous use of vehicles, They are to evaluate the use of county vehicles and substantiate their need to the Administrative Officer and if there are any problems he will bring them to the Boardo Mr, Lawrence stated that the Board does not have in their travel resolution provisions for use of county vehicles be used by county employees. This should be brought up into the travel resolution. Page 250. August 30, 1978 ', August 30, 1978 RECESS: 8:25 p.m. RECONVENE: 8:36 p.m, Chairman Winston stated that the Board had discussed county vehicles except for department heads. The Board has already issued instructed to all department heads except the Sheriff, Public Works Director and the Administrative Officer, The matter of department head cars to be Ieft as it is until after the management group meeting. 78-1702 BUDGET REVIEW CONTINUED Budget review was continued at this time. Agriculture Services Poison Sales, page 164. No changes made. Recorder, page 166. Account 33. Delete $75. Account 43. Auditor to figure necessary adjustments. The remainder of the budget to be computed by Auditor. Planning Commission, page 170. Account 33. Delete $110. ', Account 43. Auditor to figure necessary adjustments. ', Position formally held by interim Planning Director to be deleted. A salary ordinance should be prepared, Animal Control, page 174. Hold over until after report from committee meeting, ', Public Guardian, page 178. ', ~ Account 33, Delete $25, Account 43. Auditor to figure necessary adjustments. Local Agencv Formation Commission, page 180. No changes made. Fish and Game Commission, page 182. This budget is totally funded by fines. No changes made. Public Works= Department__of Tra_nsporCation Summary by Sub-Depto, page 1840 Clay Castleberry, public works director, stated that the road budget includes SB 325 money. The Board has revised the SB 325 provisions. The Board has approved $366,000 of revised claims in the amount of $316,000 of that and BCAG had approved that change. The budget would not come down. It is part of $1,200,000. Supervisor Richter stated that the total county allocation under SB 325 is about $1,089,000 with the total funding including the cities $1,400,000. If the Butte County Legal Services in their lobby gets the total allocation of SB 325 money for public transportation it will be reducing by $1 million per year or 33% the budgeto Chairman Winston went over the memo from August 25, 1978: Unencumbered fund balances Regular Road fund $608,000 Special Road fund 198,500 SB 325 363,000 Page 251. August 30, 1978 August 30, 1978 Nr. Lawrence stated that the $363,000 is not available. It had to revert back to SB 325 trust £und. It does not have to be given to the county. In the budget where revenue was anticipated for the new year the $363,000 is included in that figure of $921,000 of new revenue. There was $362,000 carry over. The rules for disbursement of SB 325 monies has changed, Prior to this year the county could keep the funds. The unused balances revert back to the trust fund for BCAG. Mr. Lawrence set out the SB 325 budget at this time: There is $921,000 available to the county. There is $362,000 lefit over, This makes a total o£ $1,283,000. The figure of $1,351,616 is arrived at by adding the $1,283,000 plus the monies from the cities. There is $1,283,000 from the SB 325 trust fund and $362,000 from the prior year. The county will get $83,000 from Chico and Oroville for transportation. The $362,000 is already committed to the total budget. Out of $446,61b only $163,500 is county SB 325 money. The rest is made up of contributions from Oroville and Chicoo There is also fair box revenue of $120,000. By adding $163,500 to the $905,000 road budget proposed the total is $1,068,500 allocation of 325 money. By having fund balances available and adding to the $921,000 the total is $1,283,000. Add this other revenue and the total revenue of $1,486,500. There is only $1,351,000 appropriated to date. Nr. Lawrence set out the ', surplus at this time: F-30 Regular road fund $ 643,912 F-120 Special Road fund 311,843 F-130 SB 325 funds 175,809 Total road fund surplus $1,131,564 which is reflected in budget. Mr. Lawrence urged the Board to use caution in where they want to maintain excess money. The regularFroad fund dndntheespecial road fund do not enter into taxes for state aid. The Board could Leave the reserve in any one of the funds and can be out of the general fund. If the funds are left in the regular road fund the monies cannot be taken out. The Board must also consider revenue sharing and antirecession funds. The balances in revenue sharing killed the county off this year. Nx. Lawrence stated that Mr. Nickelson is concerned that if the road department has too large a reserve for contingencies there is a tendancy to use it. The Board should put so much in the contingencies and the balance in the general reserve where it can be used in emergencies. A reasonable reserve should be 10%. ', Nr. Castleberry stated that he had submitted the reflected change BCAG has approved for SB 325 and the revised public transportation claims. The Board approved a reserve last year and carried over a substantial amount of money to negotiate for the Stirling City right-of-way. The county should still carry a reserve or right--of-way acquisition for that. There is some money that appears a little bit more than what is necessary for a good road program. He ~idid not concur with taking out the miscellaneous small projects. The Board agreed to cooperative program with the City of Biggs. Mr. Lawrence stated that with the additions of the proposed projects and increase in reserve there was still $360,000 of monies in the road fund availalility that could be diverted without touching the road projects. He did not feel that the road budget should be looked at the same way as the operating department budgets. The reason for this is because the work is done by contractors. Maybe the Soard would want to build up the special road budget for two or three years and work on a big project. Page 252. August 30, 1978 August 30, 1978 Mr. Micl~son stated that as of now the county does not have a plan. Public Works Department is working on a five-year plan. The county had to have a plan for SB 325 funds. The Board has never adopted a capital improvement plan. Then the Board could take money that turned up and use for buying of rights~of-way or for the road. Mr. Lawrence felt that this would be a good move. The road budget could be classified as routine maintenance, major maintenance and new construction. The road budget would be much more meaningfull. He felt that half of the budget was in major maintenance. Chairman Winston questioned Mr, Lawrence regarding the statement in the memo stating that should the supervisors wish to do so they could transfer up to $1,282,761 to the general fund and not make any reduction in the 1978-79 road projects. If $362,982 was taken away from the $1,282,761 would that be a true statement? Mro Lawrence stated that some funds were not available, This money might be needed to fund projects being financed out of matching funds. They are subject to z:amendments and transfers. One reason why there is a big balance is because the county received money from two years ago. You could reach into other projects and move then up to the regular road fund to use the $643,912 and then use the $643,912 of the other ffunds. Mr. Nickelson cautioned the Board about transferring too much into the general operating budget since they could be penalized next year. The most that he would recommend would be to put $1/2 million of the money into the insurance retention fund, Mr, Castleberry stated that the Board has approved a five year plan for PAS. There is a three-year plan for PAII. There is a FASOS plan that was &pproved for about two years. There is no five or ten year plan for the small projectso AB 402 requires that there be a plan. His department is working with Planning on that at the present time. He stated that he did not budget for the right-of-way in the budget because his office~s;is negotiating as the Board was advised. He asked for rebudgeting. Some of them are listed. Mr. Lawrence stated that the road reserve is adopted on the basis of the amount of monies available after approval of all projects. That has historically gone into the reserve for contingencies. These minor projects are quite frequently added to the budget because there is no advance notice of money available. Mr. Castleberry stated that he agreed with the Auditor and Administrative Officer as to the money available. If the Board transfers funds they are going to transfer projected that have been approved, If the Board transfers the whole amount it will put the road reserve amazing low. There are some monies that could be ts~ansferred and still do most of the projects and some of the money could be transferred. They are looking for additional sources of revenue. There are transfers that are made from one project to another so that one of the projects can be startedo The federal revenue is operated on a different fiscal ', year. Mr. Lawrence suggested that the Board consider the rest the budget first and determine what will be needed for operations if the Board has sufficient money by not touching the road funds. The Board should get their reserve monies in place where they will have an impact on future possible subventions but are still in the .tax base for legislation to Iook at. This matter to be discussed at a later date. Page 253. of and not August 30, 1978 August 30, 1978 Summar De artment of Public~Health a e 222. Account 33. Delete $730. Account 43. Auditor to make necessary adjustments. Mr. Lawrence stated that part of the Public Health budget reduction cannot be more than the .loss of revenue. At the present time the budget would be setting at ZOl% of 1977-78. Some of the programs are not included in the restrictions. Mental Health, page 2380 The following accounts should read as follows: Account 11. No change. $701,529 Account 12, No changed $13x715 Account i4, No change. $9,000 Account 18. No change, $189,653 Total Salaries and Bmployee benefits: $913,897 Account 22, No change. $2,000 Account 25. Should read $55,070 instead of $40,000. Account 26. Should read $21,220 instead. of $28,520. Account 30. No change. $2,600 Account 31. Should read $5,000 instead o f $7,700. Account 32. No change. $17,500 Account 33. Delete: $525. Account 35. No change. $11,100 Account 36. Should read $645,176 instead of $666,609 Account 38. Should read $71,214 instead of $68,964 Account 39. No change.. $7,440 Account 41. No change, $3,200 Account 43. Should read $12,910 instead of $15,500 Total servic es and supplies: $$54,430 Account 63o Should read $6,745 instead of $6,715 Total fixed assets: $6,745- Budget unit total - direct costs: $1,775,072 Account 71. Should read $69,305 instead of $49,305 Account 74o Should read ($32,913) instead of ($35,329) Total expenditure transfers: $36,392 Adjusted budget unit total: $1,511,464 Number of employees. No change. 51 Source of_funding Federal grants. Should read $63,500 instead of $65,128 State grants. Should read $1,451,493 instead of $1,588,721 Department feeso Should read $296,471 instead of $41,000 Other. Should read $-0- instead of $111,397 Current budget fundings: $1,811,464 Under Administrative Officer's remarks on page 239 the following changes should be reflected; Professional and S ecialized Services: Children's Home Society-inpatient, $74,508; Children's Home Society-outpatient, $83,720; Family Services Association, $183,792, Chico Community Memorial Hospital emergency room, $77,000; Chico Work Training Center, $90,018; Children's Home Society - Welfare, $27,140; CHS Community Service, $3,OOOo Page 254. August 30, 1978 August 30, 1978 Equipment: 13 Combination Dictation/Transcribers for $2,600 instead of 12 Combination Dictation/Transcribers $2,400; 12 Portable dictation units $1,080 instead of 11 Portable dictation units $990;-0- Water fountain instead of 1 Water fountain $250. Total: $6,745 instead of $6,715, _Tntra Departmental Transfers: Services provided by Mental Health to the Detoxification program total $79,963 (instead of $82,379), for a net transfer to other of $32,913 (instead of $35,329). Department of Mental Health Detoxification, page 242. The following accounts should read as follows: Account 22. Should read $1,000 instead of $1,200 Account 25. Should read $10,000 instead of $12,500 Account 26, No change. $2,500 Account 30. Should read $200 instead of $300 Account 32, Should read $600 instead of $750 Account 33. Delete $30 Account 35. Should read $600 instead of $700 Account 36. No change. $13,595 Account 43. Should read$300 instead of $600 Total services and supplies: $28,795 Account 63. No change. $400 Total fixed assets: $400 Budget unit total: $29,195 Account 71. No change. $17,529 Account 74. Should read $88,954 instead of $90,954 Total expenditure transfers: $106,067 Adjusted budget total: $135,262 i Source of funding Federal Grants. No change. $-0- State Grants. Should read $127,542 instead of $123,995 Department Fees. Should read $7,720 instead of $2,000 Other. Should read $-0- instead of $15,063 Current budget funding: $135,262 Under Administrative Officer`s remarks on page 243 the following changes should be reflected: Expenditure Program Food: Covers the cost of meals from the County_Jail, $7,000 (instead of $5,300); and food commodities from outside vendors, $3,000 (instead of $7,200)0 Intra Departmental Transfers: This account includes the cost of services to this budget unit provided by Mental Health General Services ($79,963) (instead of $82,379) and Public Health General Services ($8,575). Discussion of raisine Sanitation Fees Mr. Mickelson stated that his office has sent a report to the Boardo Counsel is checking on the matter to make sure there are no legal problems. This will be coming before the Board in two weeks. This will be an increase of $150,000 in revenueo Contributions to_Medi-Ca 1. Program,_page 244.0 Reduce budget to $1,977,0000 Page 255. August 30, 1978 August 30, 1978 Refuse Disposal, page 2460 _. Account 33. Delete $15. Account 43. Auditor to make necessary adjustment. Mr, Castleberry stated that this budget is to administer the dump site. This amounts to $13,000 per year. There was a carry over of one employeeo The new dump is two years away, Supervisor Richter stated that it might cost from $1/4 million to $1 million to prepare and turn over to someone to operate. He suggested that when there was some idea of the cost he hoped the Board would want to figure out a way to raise the revenue for that capital expenditure. Mr, Castleberry felt that more revenue could be taken in through the contractor. No action taken on the increase of fees for the new disposal site. Parential Str_ess_Program, page 248. No changes madeo Welfare Administration, pale 250. The following accounts should read as follows: Account Zlo Should read $1,849,546 instead of $2,007,642 Account I2. Should read $708,988 instead of $709,988 ', Account 14, Should read $5,000 instead of $6,300 Account 18. Should read $512,691 instead of $600,522 ,Total salaries and employee benefits: $3,076,225 Account 30. Nooc~iange. $3,850 Account 33. Delete $540 Account 35. Should read $76,200 instead of $80,850 Account 36, Should read $39,700 instead of $62,700 Account 37. No change, $250 Account 39, No change. $9,600 Account 41. No change, $56,000 Account 43. Should read $55,560 instead of $62,000 Account 26. Should read $277 instead of $150 Account 29, No change. x.500 Account 31. Delete $100 Account 38, No change, $11,520 Total services and supplies: $353,457 Account 63. Should read $2,910 instead of $141,120 Total fixed assets: $2,910 Budget unit total - direct costs: $3,332,592 Account 71. No change, $336,239 Account 72, No change, $-0- Account 73, Should read {$23,357) instead of ($21,668) Total expenditure transfers: $312,882 Adjusted budget unit total: $3,645,474 Number of employees 181 Source of funding Federal Grants: Should read $1,936,695 instead of $2,216,716 State Grants: Should read $1,433,971 instead of $1,111,461 Department Fees: No change. $-0- Other: Should read $272,808 instead of $740,026 Current budget funding: <$3645,474 Page 256. August 30, 1978 August 30, 1978 Under Administrative Officer's remarks on page 252 the following changes should be reflected: _Professional and Specialized Services: $39,700 covers the following: Emergency child care, $500; AFDC medical examiniations, $45,000; MNO medical examinations, $1,200; GA medical examinations, $500; special service needs, $3fJ00; direct homemaker service payments, $14,000; emergency shelter, $15,000; and training expenses, $1,000. Equipment: Delete Modular furniture, $12fl,000; Delete carpeting, $19,260; Add 4 executive chairs, $600; Add 6 steno chairs, $450; for a total of $2,910 in equipment. Welfare Aids, page 254. The following accounts should read as follows: Account 50, Aid to Families with Dependent Children. Should read $8,295,834 instead of $9,024,445 Aid to Children in Boarding Homes & Institutions. Should read $549,840. Aid for Adoption of Children. Should read $300 instead of $1,500. Aid to Potentially Self-Supporting Blind. No change. $-0- Aid for Adult Special Needs. No changed $20,000 Indochinese Assistance. Should read $900 instead of $2,500. Account 52, Should read $1.,036,000 instead of $1,179,741. Total other charges. Should read $9;~02;874~ instead of $10,778,026 Budget unit total: $9~;902;$~44 Source. of funding Federal Grants. Should read $4,253,594 instead of $4,612,916 State Grants. Should read $5,52.5,~~6 instead of $3,343,310 Department Fees. No change. $-0- Other: Should read $23,054 instead of $2,821,800 Current budget funding: $9+~~02;$~44 Welfare General Relief. page 255. Bob Crisan, welfare dixe~tor, stated that this budget is totally county funded. Last year there was a 44% increase in the program because of the opening of the Chico office. This is for individuals waiting for payments. There are forms that must be filled out by the job interviewer and signed and returned to the Welfare office for the individuals who are capable of working. Supervisor Lemke stated that there are ten CETA slots :trhat were just allocated for use in this program, If theye are provided a job there is noC need to provide assistance. Mr. Crisan stated that this would probably reduce the assistance> In prior years the number of abled body pdrsons was only about 12 to 15. Now it is reaching 60 persons. Counsel is working on a program with the city to refer individuals for public works programs, The individuals would be required to work four hours per day at a public project. CARD has indicated that they could use individuals, The average payment is $100 per month. This program is for single individuals :~~,who have no funds and individuals waiting eligibility for SSI. The budget should decrease with the job availability. On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Richter and carried, account 50. to read $100,0000 Page 257. August 30, 1978. August 30, 1978 Mr, Crisan stated that there is still the same problem with Title 20 funds, The county is shortchanged by the state. There may be a possibility of new allocations to the state. The county may be entitled to additional Title 20 funds. He would like to bring the level of service back to at least 1975-76 if additional funds are '. available. The following accounts should read as follows: Account 3b. No change. $10,000 Total services and supplies: $10,000 Account 50, Support and Care of Personse Should read $100,000 i SSI/SSP reimbursements. Should read ($6,000) Total other charges: $940000 Budget unit total: $10~i,000 Number of employees: -0- Source of funding ', Federal Grants. No change. $-0- State Grants. No change. $-0- Department Fees. -No changed $-0- ', Other. Should read $104,000 instead of $95,200 Current budget funding: $104,000 78-1703 ADOPT RESOLUTION 78-153 EMERGENCX SITUATION NECESSITATES PURCHASE OF COMPRESSOR ANA MOTOR FOR 20-TON AIR CONDITIONING UNIT FOR CHICO HEALTH DEPARTMENT TN AMOUNT OF $5,000 On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and caxxied, Resolution 78-153 setting forth, an emergency situation which. necessitates the purchase of a compressor and motor for 20-ton air conditioning unit for Chico Health Department in the amount of $5,000 was adopted and the Chairman authorized to sign, RECESS: The Board recessed at 10:50 g,m. to reconvene on Tuesday, ', September 5, 1978 at 9:00 a.m. ;`Page 255. August 30, 1978