HomeMy WebLinkAboutM091780September 17~ 1980
80-
the charges will be a different type than there is for the zones of
benefit. The cost would be the same for those receiving less benefits
as for those receiving more benefit. He wondered if the Board could use
two different formulas for charges.
Dan Blackstock, county counsel, stated there was a provision
in the Government Code that allows for certain charges. They are to
be based on the benefit to the particular parcel. In computing these staff
determined the benefit to the parcels. If these charges were not made,
there would not be money to properly maintain the Mud Creek diversion
and they would be looking at the eye of possible flooding that would
effect everyone within any of the zones of benefit.
Mr. Hockett felt the Board was taxiing two different ways. He
lives on East Avenue and he gets no benefit from Mud Creek district.
Supervisor Dolan stated that another way to look at the service
charge was for the administration of the district.
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board.
On motion of Supervisor Winston, seconded by Supervisor Dolan
and unanimously carried, the following per parcel service charges were
establihhed:
CSA 1, Lindo Manor (lighting) $ 5.06
CSA 11, Zone 1, Durham (lighting) 1.66
CSA 14, East Chico (lighting) 2.26
CSA 15, East Chico (lighting) 2.88
CSA 21, Oakridge (sewer)
The Mesa Restaurant 284.28
Houses 83.94
Vacant parcels 17.18
CSA 22, North Chico (drainage) 1.14
CSA 23, Pleasant Valley (drainage) .78
CSA 24, Mud Creek (drainage) 1.48
CSA 25, Shasta Union (drainage) 5.68
CSA 30, Vallombrosa (lighting) 6.56
CSA 39, Chico Rancheria (lighting) 13.20
CSA 40, Ramada (lighting) 9.40
CSA 47, East & Guynn (drainage & lighting) 4.88
CSA 59, Park Vista (lighting) 18.16
1470
ADOPT RESOLUTION 80-202: PUBLIC HEARING: 1980-81 BUDGET AND REVENUE
SHARING FINAL USE HEARING
The public hearing on the 1980-81 budget and revenue sharing
final use hearing was held as continued.
Jim Johansen, auditor, stated that in response to the Board's
action on September 16, 1980 he had presented a revised budget resolution
and detailed changes. He set out the changes at this time. The $24,000
membership for Northern California Emergency Medical Care Council was
placed in the Board of Supervisors' budget. The rents and leases in the
amount of $6,000 was added to Counsel's budget. The additional amount for
data grocessing was added ~n-page 4. Tie.Work;~Refaxra~-s~~ogram~was added.
The amount for Richvale Volunteer Fire Department was added on page 8.
Page 13 is a summary of the changes to the appropriation for contingency.
Hearing open to the public. Appearing: No one.
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board.
Page 238.
September 17, 1980
September 17, 19_80 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
It-:-was moved by Supervisor Wheeler, seconded by Supervisor Moseley
that the detailed list of changes as per the Auditors memo dated September ib,
1980 be approved.
80--
b
Supervisor Winston stated he could not be supportative of the
motion. The net result has been the reduction to the reserve for
contingencies. He is supportative of certain changes.
Mr. Johansen stated the appropriation?.'for contingencies is
$3,028,424, which includes $942,000 set aside for the Sheriff and the
jail, leaving a net resulted appropriation of $2,086,000,
Fote on motion:
AYES: Supervisors Dolan, Moseley, Wheeler and Chairman Lemke
NOES: Supervisor Winston
Motion carried.
**
On motion of Supervisor Wheeler, seconded by Supervisor Dolan
and carried, Resolution 80-202 adopting the budget for the fiscal year
1980-81 with a total budget of $58,063,579 was adopted and the Chairman
authorized to sign. AYES: Supervisors Dolan, Moseley, Wheeler and
Chairman Lemke. NOES: Supervisor Winston.
YUCRSS: 10:40 a.m.
RECONVENE: 10:54 a.m.
CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDTNG CHAPTERS 20 & 24 OF THE BUTTE COUNTY
CODE REGARDING REGULATTONS AND CONTROL OF SUBDIVISIONS AND TO ZONING
REQUIREMENTS
Consideration of waiving the second reading and ordinance
amending Chapters 20 and 24 of the Butte County Code regarding regulations
and control of subdivisions and to zoning requirements held at this time.
1471
Del Siemsen, deputy county counsel, set out the background of
the ordinance. This is amending Chapter 20 the subdivision ordinance.
This probably could not go into effect until around November 1, 1980.
There are some changes that will: be coming down in the State Map`°Act
that could have an effect on this ordinance. He did not know what the
changes would be. He suggested that the Board go through and consider
the ordinance and hold off adoption of the ordinance until the changes
are made in the State Map Act.
John Mendonsa, public works, stated that the committee on land
development processes could come up with recommendations that could also
change the ordinance.
Mr. Siemsen stated that if the Agricultural initiative passes
there could be some ramifications to the changes. With that in mind, he
suggested that the Board proceed with the review. Some of the changes
made reflect a change in Board policy. One of the changes refers to
the allowing of lot splits with 20-foot wide access.
Discussion of the following sections in the ordinance held
at this time:
Section 20-4
Existing development is the only addition to the section.
No changes made to the proposed section.
Page 239.
September 17, 1980
80-
a
___-______= September 173 1980 =___-=====i=-===
W Section 20>8
No changes.
.Section 20-9
No changes.
Section 20-10
No changes
Section 20-32
No changes.
Section 20--35
No changes.
Section 20-37
No changes.
Section 20--38 & Section 20-48
No cfianges.
Section 20-48.2
This section is a new addition. This would give a little bit
of control over division outside the klap Act. No changes.
Section 20-48.5
No cfianges .
Section 20-49
No cfianges.
Section 20-53.5
No changes.
Section 20-54
No changes.
Section 20-60
No changes.
Sections 20-63 & 20-64
No changes.
Section~20-65
No changes.
Section 2065.5
No changes.
Section 20-66
Hold over.
Section 20-67
No changes.
Section 20--67.5
No changes.
Section 20-69
No changes.
Page 240.
September 17, 1980
80-
_______-====September-17,-1980.__________ _ _____
Section 20-69.1
No changes.
Section 20-90
No changes.
Section 20-94
No changes.
Section 20-95
No changes.
SUPERVISOR WTNSTON ABSENT AT THIS TIME
AUTHORIZE COUNSEL TO ENTER INTO LETTER AGREEMENT WITH RICHARD SHIPLEY
FOR PURCHASE OF WATER FROM 'LAKE OROVILLE
Dan Blackstock, county counsel, asked that the Board authorize
him to enter into a letter agreement with Richard Shipley for the purchase
of water from Lake Oroville with a minimum chagge of $50 and for Mr.
Shipley to hold the county harmless. He will be taking 40,000 gallons
of water.
1472
On motion of Supervisor Moseley seconded by Supervisor Lemke
and carried, County Counsel was authorized to enter into a letter agreement
with Richard Shipley far purchase of water from Lake Oroville at a coat
of $50 and providing that Mr. Shipley will hold the county harmless.
SUPERVISOR WTNSTON PRESENT AT THIS TIME
CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 20 & 24 OF THE BUTTE COUNTY
CODE REGARDING REGULATIONS AND CONTROL OF SUBDIVTSTONS AND TO ZONING
REQUTREMEI3T5_
Consideration of waiving the second reading and adoption of
the ordinance amending Chapters 20 and 24 of the Butte County Code
regarding regulations and control of subdivisions and to zoning requirements
held as continued.
1473
Discussion of the following sections in the ordinance:
Section 20-96
No changes.
Section 20-101
No changes
Section 20-102
No changes.
Section 20-103
No changes.
Section 20-103.5
No changes.
Section 20-104
No changes.
Section 20--105
No changes.
Section 20-106
No [:hanges.
Page 241.
September 17, 1980
80-
a
s===--_____= September l7, 1980_________________
Section 20-1x0.1
No changes.
The discussion was continued to September 23, 1980 at 1:30 p.m.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Board recessed at 12:00 p.m. to hold an executive
session regarding litigation.
RECONVENE: The Board reconvened at 12:17 p.m. following an executive
session regarding litigation. No announcements to be made
at this time.
SUPERVISORS DOLAN AND MOSELEY ABSENT
ADOPT RESOLUTION 80-203 OPPOSING HR 7702 RELATIVE TO THE ACREAGE UNDER
CONSIDERATION FOR THE CALIFORNIA WILDERNESS. ACT __
1474
On motion of Supervisor Winston, seconded fiy Supervisor Wheeler
and carried, Resolution 80-203 opposing HR 7702 relative to the acreage
under consideration for the California 'Wilderness Act was adopted and the
Chairman authorized to sign.
ADJOURNkIENT: There being nothing further before the Board at this time,
the meeting was adjourned at 12:18 p.m, to reconvene an
Tuesday, September 23, 1980. at 9:00 a.m.
ATTEST: CLARK A. NELSON, COUNTY CLERK-
RECORDER and ex-officio Clerk
of the Butte County Board of
Supervisors
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
By
Page 242.
September 17, 1980