HomeMy WebLinkAboutM103178Octobs~ 31, 1978
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
SS.
COUNTY OF BUTTE: )
The 3nc~rd'feconvened at 9:00 a.in. pursuant to adjournment.
Present: Supervisors Lemke, Madigan, Moseley, Richter and Chairman
Winston o CfUlfke Pyeatt, Asst. Administrative Officer; Dan Blackstoc!<,
County Counsel, and Clark A. Nelson, County Clerk, by Margie Catt,
Asst. Clerk of the Board.
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag ot` the United States of America..
Invocation by Supervisor Moseley
78-2062 APPROVAL OF MENUTE5
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Madigan
and unanimously carried, the minutes of October 24, 1978 were approved
as mailed .
78-2063 WAIVE FIRST READING OF SALARY ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and
unanimously carried, the.. first reading of the salary ordinance amendment that
corrects the date that the Sheriff will take over the duties of the Marshal was
waived o
78-2064 APPROVE PLANS & SPECS: REROOFING OF COUNTY BUILDINGS
Plans and specifications have been prepared for the reroofing of the
Chico Memorial Hall and the ceiling of the roof at Superior Court,
On motion of Supervisor Moseley, secondedel~y Supervisor Lemke and
unanimously carried, plans and specifications were approved and call for bids to be
opened in the Purchasing Office at 2:30 p.m. November 15, 1978 authorized.
78-2065 ACCEPT DONATION OF FURNITURE FOR SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Region C California Council on Criminal Justice has offered various items
of surplus furniture to the Sheriff's Office.
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and
unanimously carried, donated furniture items far the Sheriff's Office accepted.
78-2066 AUTHORIZE TRANSFER FOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING PROJECT EXTRA HELP
The constroction'project has progressed to a point where extra help is
needed.
On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Lemke, and
unanimously carried, a transfer of $15,000 from the Administration Building
contingencies to Administration Building project extra help was authorized for
a professional inspector and for a clerk on a #emporary basis.
Page 403.
October 31, 1978
______________~~~~1~~~===_~~~===T====___
78-2067 APPROVE AMENDED CONTRACT: FEATHER RIVER SENIOR CITIZENS
ASSOCIATION CONTRACT
An amended contract has been prepared with the Senior Citizens
Association for the allocation of $20,000 as part of the district allocation
program (revenue sharing).
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and
unanimously carried, amended contract with the Feather River Senior Citizens
Association was approved and the Chairman authorized to. sign.
78-2068 APPROVE BID PACKAGE: RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT CENTFi2 MEALS
A bid package has been prepared to seek a more competitive price on meal service
for the Residential Treatment Center in Chico.
On motion of Supervisor Richter, seconded by Supervisor Lemke and
unanimously carried, bid package for- Residential Treatment Center meals was
approved and call for bids to be opened at the Purchasigg Office, November 22,
f978 at 2:30 p.m. authorized.
78-2069 AUTHORIZE COSTS FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA ELECTION FROM
GENERAL FUND-
Board acfion is necessary to absorb election costs for county service areas
that were incurred at the March 7, 1978 ctax .a,~nliide el~st+iu~,,.
On motion of Supervisor Richter, seconded by Supervisor Lemke and
unanimously carried, costs for County Service area election costs were authorized
to be charged to the general fund.
78-2070 DISCUSS]ON: RECONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS ON THE LIVESTOCK
INDEMNITY FUND
The Auditor has determined that funding is not available from within
the Livestock Indemnity Fund to cover the claims previously approved by the
Board for Ross H. Smith and Doris M. Martin.
Mrs. Martin was present and she asked what had happened to the money
that was in the fund at the end of September, She felt that an ar~,aver was needed
to this question. She. stated that she was against .what Mr. Nickelson was trying
to do. Chairman Winston told her that the. Administrative Officer and the Auditor
would explain the situation to her. She will meet with themin Administration
Office . No action taken at -this time .
Supervisor Madigan stated that the Board had received a memo from
Mr. Nickelson about the trappers and the discontinuance of this service.
This will be placed back on the agenda in two weeks, alou^ig with
the payment of the claims on the Livestock indemnity fund.
78-2071 REPORT ON VETERAN SERVICE OFFICER'S REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL
STAFFING
Chairman Winston stated there were two memos from the Administrative
Officer concerning the Veteran Service Officer's request for additional staffing.
Page 404.
October 31, 1978
Mike Pyeatt, Asst. Administrative Officer, commented on these memos. The
Administrative Officer is not recommending the funding for the additional position
as requested; it was suggested that the Board look into the CETA program and the
use of volunteer workers.
Harold Penn, Veteran Service Officer, explained how he was handling the
work load, The Board, has taken action to remove this position from his office; he
has sent the Board a memo to reinstate this position in this office. Explained the needs
of the office in meeting the requirements of a new reporting system. If the cards are
not sent in, then the people will lose their pensions.
He said there was no way-that he could handle the work load. Explained
how the forms were filled out, stating that each card had a set of instructions to
follow. Most of the individuals that have to complete the cards do not understand
how they should be filled aut.
Discussed the, use of volunteer help in this office. Supervisor Lemke felt
the Veteran organizations should get back to the source of the problem. These
directives are coming down.from the Federal Government. k Federal funds should be
obtained to help carry this program. Mr, Penn stated that there are five work study students
that are taken care of by the; Federal funds.
Supervisor Madigan reported that representatives from this County met
with two Supervisors from Glenn County; they have discontinued this program in
th:a#County. One of the Supervisors will bring this matter up today at that
County's Board of Supervisors meeting and request that the program be reinstated
in fhtat County. The veterans from Glenn County have added to the workload
in this Veteran Service. Office.
Mr. Penn stated i{ih.~t'~ reporting requirements has changed office procedures.
In addition to that workload, they have lost the Veteran representative on the Chico
campus. Cal Vet loans have increased the workload, also.
Glen Halsey, 142 Worthy, Oroville, stated that each Veteran organization
elects a representative each year to help the veterans. They are all volunteer workers.
They cannot keep up with the cards and the other requirements. Most of the people
that Eoose their pensions are on limited funds. Mr. Halsey explained th'e need for
additional help in the Veteran Service Office.
Chairman Winston stated that it is up to the Veterans Service Officer
to give the help needed to these people. Mr. Halsey stated that they need a
Veteran Service representative in Oroville at all times.
Mrs. Norman Waters, Chico, a member of the American Gold Star Mothers,
stated that if volunteer help was needed for a short period of time, she could help.
She could not work full time, but would be willing to help on a temporary basis only.
Lura O'Bryan, Chico, formerly with the Chico Veteran Service Office,
stated that Chairman Winston's son , as a representative of the San Francisco Veterans
Office, had, trained them in the filling out of the cards.
Page 405.
October 31, 1978
_ .October 31~, 1978 _ _,_
Supervisor Richter suggested that maybe the Personnel Officer could make
a study and see what is needed. Mr. Rackerby stated that the classification of
Veteran Representative is in the salary ordinance; the question is whether the Board
is going to be allowed to hire someone on an extra help basis. Suggested that
help could be hired through extra help now and next budget time, this position
could then be considered.
Supervisor Richter said the Board had agreed to .fund the Probation Department
posiltioru~s., thus there would 6e slots available in CETA. The County could,~s~=extra
help to help the Veteran Service Office, then when a slot is available in CETA, ^
CETA worker could 6e placed in the office. Mr. Penn agreed that he could get along
fora couple of weeks with extra help, then he could take a CETA worker when it
is available. Mr. Rackerby stated this would be a PSE position, under CETA.
He will make such a position available. to the Veteran Service Officer.
RECESS: 9:45
RECONVENED : 9:55
78-2072 BUDGET TRANSFERS APPROVED.
On motion .of Supervisor Richter, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and
unanimously carried, the following budget transfers were approved:
B-20 Building and Grounds Maintenance. Transfers $3,$00 from the reserve
to major maintenance in order to provide the necessary appropriation for hooking
up the Chico CMP Building to the City of Chico sewer system.
B-21 Butte Association of Governments. Transfers $5,5:50 from the reserve
to professional and specialized services in order to establish an appropriation
for the county's share of the air quality consultant contract between Earth
Metrics, lnc. and BCAG. This contract was approved by the Board of Supervisors
on July 19, 1978.
B-22 Refuse Disposal. Transfers $1,300 from transportation and travel to
professional services to provide an appropriation to cover the purchase order for
contour maps pursuant to Board meeting of October. 10, 1978; Minute Order 78-I'?50-4.
B-23 Public Health-County Medical Services. Transfers $10,622.38 from
the reserve to support and care of persons to provide an appropriation to cover
the cost of indigent medical billings approved by the Board of Supervisors on
October l7,-1978; Minute Order 78-1985.
B-24 Development Commission. Transfers $6,550 from the reserve to special
departmental expense to provide an appropriation for contributions to the various
chamber of commerces for services provided last fiscal year.
78-2073 ADOPT RESOLIE'~~ION 78-f84 RE PROPERTY ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION:
3466 Columbia, Oroville
Praposed is the acquisition and redisposition of the sbbject propertyo
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Richter and
Page 406.
October 31, 1978
____ October31~1978 ________
unanimously carried, acceptance of a grant deed in lieu of foreclosure authorized;
payment of $500 from the MCA program income to the mortgage company to bring the
loan curren# authorized; authorized redisposition in accordance with adopted
HCD program guidelines;~•na adopted Resolution 78-184 and authorized Chairman to
sign.
78-2074 AUTHORIZE LEASE.RENEWAL-HEAD START CENTRAL OFFICE
l# is requested that authorization be granted to exercise the option to
renew the lease agreement for the office located at 341 Broadway, Suite 400,
Chico from January I, 1979 through December 31 ,. 1979 at a monthly rental rate
of $250 per month.
On motion of Supervisor Richter, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and
unanimously carried, Executive Director was authorized `to exercise lease renewal
option .
78-2075 SET PUBLIC HEARINGS: PETITIONS FOR VARIANCE TO SECTIONS 19-10
and/or 19/12 OF COUNTY CODE FOR PLACEMENT OF MOBILE HOMES
Publix hearings were set for November 218 at 0:00 a.me on the
following petitions for variance to Sections 19-10 and/or 19-12 of the Butte
County Code -for placement of mobile homes:
1. Robert La Forrest for placement of mobile home on Northwood Drive,
Paradise, AP 65-30-44. Zoning: RT-1.
2. Barbara Jagoe for placement of mobile home at Route I Box 1339,
Giistrap Avenue, Gridley, AP 24-01-88. Zoning: A-2.
78-20;6 PUBLIC HEARING: NANCY L. BATHA-APPEAL OF CONDITION #I
ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, SOUTH SIDE OF MC ANARLIN AVENUE, DURHAM
The public hearing on the Nancy L. Botha appeal of condition Ion
tentative parcel map, AP 39-24-64, two parcels, south side of McAnarlin Avenue,
1,000 feet east of Dayton-Durham Highway, Durham, held at this time.
Clay Castleberry, Director of Public Works, set out the background of this appeal.
The zoning for this area requires one-acre minimum, exclusive of easements.
Developer would like to have a 30' easement to the back lot, rather than the
60' easement set out askondition of the map. The Board has the jurisdiction to
grant the exception to the subdivision ordinance,
Bettye Blair, Planning Director, explained the matter of the easement
requirement. She stated that in this case, they would be willing to count the
area in the easement as pert of the lot area.
Hearing opened to the public.. Appearing: No one. Supervisor Madigan
stated that Mrs. Baths had called him and stated that she would be present.
It was felt the Board cauld act on this appeal without Mrs. Botha being present.
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board.
On motion of Supervisor Richter, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and
unanimously carried, the appeal of Nancy L. Botha of condition #I on tentative parcel
map, AP 39-24- two parcels, Durham was upheld on the grounds that it is legal and
that the actual usable portion of ,,#'hee0c~rs,.legal.
Page 407. October 31, 1978
_________===Qc~tob~r_31~19Z~====_______ =______
78-20T1 PUBLIC HEARING: BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS'-PROPOSED
AMENDM7=NT TO THE BUTTE COUNTY CORE, CHAPTER 24 AMENDING THE
FOLLOWING ZONING DISTRICTS TO ALLOW MOBILE HOMES: A-R, AR-5,
A-$R, H-C, R-I, R-2, R-3, R-4, S-R, SR-I/~2, SR-I and R-N
The public hearing on the Butte County Board of Supervisors' proposed
amendment to the Butte County Code, Chapter 24 amending the following zoning.
districts to allow mobile.. homes: A-R (agricultural residential), AR-5 (agricultural
residential, A-SR (agricultural-suburban residential), H-C (highway commercial},
R-I (single family residential,. R-2 (duplex residential), R-3 (minimum density
residential}, R-4 (maximum density residential, restricted service), S-R {suburban
residential), SR-I/2 {suburban residential), SR-I (suburban residential), R-N
(residential-nonconforming} was held as advertised;
Bettye Blair, Planning Director, set out the background of this hearing;
stating that it is the result of the Board and public request to allow mobile homes
an other zoned areas. The amendment has been published in the papers.
Memo from Mrs. Blair stating that there could possibly be a conflict of the
General Plan if this request was approved discussed. Memo from Lynn Van Hart
discussed.
Supervisor Richter stated that it was his understanding that it would be
extremely unlikely that density request would be violated. In the Chico area,
a mobile home could not be placed on certain to#s due to the location of the
homes and the backyard and sideyard requirements.
Hearing. opened #o the public, Appearing:
I. Ward Cameron, 1837 Merrill Road, Paradise; spoke on behalf of
himself and for people requesting him .to represent them. He stated, that the only
way he would support this was if the people in the neighborhoods would come
out and support this. If this were to 6e approved, there would be numerous requests
for the placement of mobile homes in residential areas. It is a problem to police these
matters. In the past, the Board has tried to zone areas in the way the people wanted
it zoned.
2. Mso Adele Perry, Chairman of the Paradise Board of Realtors;
spoke in opposition to this amendment.
3. Mrs, Kedma Utt, Paradise, filed her written opposition_to this
amendment with the Clerk.
4. Mr. Paul Ager, Dunstera Drive, Paradise, stated he was concerned
about this amendment. He is in an A-R district and his neighborhood is in the
process of circulating petitions to rezone his area from A-R to R-1. MAC is
also recommending that this area be zoned R-i. He spoke in opposition to the
amendment o
5. Mrs. Katherine Harris, Valley View Drive, Paradise, spoke in
opposition .
Page 408.
October 31, 1978
_________________~to~~~l~~9~~===______________=
6. Mrs. Naomi Culley spoke in favor of the amendment.
7. Mr. Jardin, Oroville, stated he would like to help his parents.
He felt the people of Oroville should be allowed to place these mobile homes
on their property to take care of their aged parents.
8. John Schuck, 5800 Fickett Lane,. Paradise, stated iFpeople did
not need to place mobile homes on their propertyto take care of their parents.
Long before mobile homes were created, children -took care of their aged
parents in their own homes. Spoke in opposition to the amendment.
9. Mrs.. Jackie WoodcaEK, Paradise, spoke in opposition.
Chairman Winston stated that a pe~fiitfon signed by 114 people was
filed in protest of this amendment.
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board.
Supervisor Lemke had questions about the amendment. There are
na provisions within the amendment to state the size of fhe mobile home,
age or condition. He asked about the deposit amount to be filed for the
removal of the home. '
Supervisor Richter asked County Counsel if the amendment could be
approved with the deletion of the R-I areas. Mr. Blackstock stated that
this could be done. Supervisor Richter felt that the old people should not
be warehoused and out of sight. The purpose of these mobile homes is to
provide a temporary dwelling for alder people. The home has to be removed
when it is no longer neededo
Chairman. Winston stated that the people that warehouse their parents
now, will continue to warehouse them. He took care of his aging grandmother
and he did not need a mobile home placed on his property. There has been no
pressure brought on this Board to allow "Aunt Minnie"homes in these zoned
areas. He does not know what has brought this to the Board's attention.
Supervisor Madigan stated that in his neighborhood, residents would
be allowed to place a mobile home in the front yard of their parcel or in
backyard. He would vote against this amendment,
Supervisor Lemke stated that it seems to him that tle majority of the
opposition-comes from the Paradise area. The implication is that a mobile home
is a terrible thing and that they do not belong where there are other homes.
That is an unfair assumption.
It was moved by Supervisor Richter, and seconded by Supervisor
Lemke that this amendment be sent back to the Planning Commission with the
recommendation that the R-) areas be deleted from the amendment, and that
the Planning Commission direct themselves to the criteria of need, size, age
and condition of the home and that they bring back their recommendation to this
Board for Board consideration,
Chairman 31Vinston spoke in opposition to the motion. He submitted
that al( the oratory today about the warehousing of the elderly will still
continue even if this amendment is approved.
Page 409.
October 31, 1978
_____ October 311197$ _______________`~___
Supervisor Richter said he appreciated the sincerety of Chairman Winston.
He felt that if the neighborhood concurs with the request, then the mobile home should
be allowed.9 The people shoul=1 be given the opportunity to protest on their own
if they do not want the mobile home in their neighborhood. They should be allowed to make
their own decision.
VOTE ON MOTION:
AYES: Supervisors Lemke, Moseley and Richter
NOES: Supervisor Madigan and Chairman Winstono
tEiere
Chairman Winston asked if~would be'any objection to having another public
hearing on the amendment following Planning Commission's recommendation. It was
stated there would be no object to such a hearing.
RECESS: II:10
RECONVENED:
!079 PUBIIIC HEARING: FEATHER RIVER HOSPITAL-APPEAL OF PROPOSED NEGATIVE
DEC LA RATION'(NO EIR REQUIRED) & U5E PERMIT TO PROVIDE PARKING FACILITIES
FORAN EXISTING HOSPITAL ON PROPERTY ZONED RI A &C (MINIMUM 37ENSITY
RESIDENTIAL-ARTS & CRAl=1'S) LOCATED ON EAST SIDE OF PENTZ-MAGALIA HIGHWAY APPR
700 FT. NORTH OF FICKETT LANE, PARADISE
The public hearing on the Feather River Hospital appeal of proposed negative
declaration (no EIR required) and use permit to provide parking facilities for an
existing hospital on property zoned Rl A & C (minimum density residential-arts and crafts)
located on the east side of Pentz-Magalia Highway a~roxima#ely 700 feet north of
Pickett Lane, identified as AP 53-271-10, Paradise, was held as advertised.
Earl Nelson, Environmental Review Director, set out the background. of this
appeal. There is a need to add parking space to the hospital. The request is to take
property to the north of the hospital to construct a.parking lof that would accommodate
43 cars. There were several areas of concern; change of character and appearance of the
area and it will increase the drainage and run off. His department has talked. with
Public Works and it was felt that it would be possible to mitigate the concerns. The.
drainage water could be channeled to relieve the situation along Pentz Road. Conditi~+is
explained 6y Mr. Nelson; a conditional negative declaration is recommended.
Bettye Blair set o.ut the recommendations of the Planning Commission. This
will expland the use by the hospital..
Hearing opened to the publico Appearing:
I . Jerry Hermanson, Attorney at Law, representing the applicant. Diagram
of the area set out showing the existing facility and the proposed parking lot. The
hospital has purchased the property for this parking space. The existing dwelling
is tis~ant . There are 190 permanent employees at the hospital. It is felt that this
parking lot would alleviate the parking problem for the employees and visitors to the
hospital.
Mr. Hermanson filed a letter from the ambulance service and a letter from the
Page 410.
October 31, 1978
=Q~tQb~r~1 ~97$
owner of the property. He requested that the Board uphold the appeal of the hospital.
Justification for approval set out.
2. Phil Mace, attorney at law, representing a number of landowners
surrounding the hospital. He summarized the information in the E.I. R, check [isto
A transcript of the previous discussion about the need for an E.I.R. presented by
Mr. Mace. He felt there should be a finding that there is ansignificant impact
from this use. Expansion plans and impact on the neighborhood explained. The
Board should be aware that the Planning Commission did deny a request for a PAC
rezone in the area. The Planning Commission was concerned with the General Plan.
They felt the rezone would be out of conformity with the area and the people that
live there. The parking lot would present the same problems as the denied rezone.
He felt that it seems clearly indicated that there is a need for an E.I.R. because of
the cumulative aspects.
Mr. Mace said there is evidence that the hospital has expanded the bed capacity
at the hospital, the emergency room, X-ray facilities and other functions of the
hospital. He asked if the hospital could expand their facility without a use permit.
He felt that the expanded ,use would compel the hospital to apply for a use permit,
He felt that this ties in with the need for a E.I.R. The County has a need to
investigate and see if the activities at the hospital complies with the law. He feels
that the .hospital wants to move the parking lot to the north so the hospital can be
expanded. Mr. Mace urged the Board to consider the denial of the use permit and
to ask County Counsel or the Plannigg staff to look into the hit and miss method of
expansion by the hospital.
3. Mrs. Lucy Flood, Pentz Road. She stated that about f0 years ago
the area was told to come up with a zoning proposal for the Area, The zoning was accomplished
by approval of a R-I A&C district. Dr. Sonntag came up with a proposal to place
professional offices on his property; this was defeated. He again submitted his proposal
and because there were no residents present at the hearing, his proposal was approved.
This was in defiance of the zoning approved for the area. She requested that this
proposal be denied.
4. Mr. Roy Home, Pentz Read. Filed a letter with the Board protesting
the issuance of the use permit. Feeling of the community set out, The residents.
do not want the area commercialized. It was his feeling that the denial of the use
permit would do no harm to the hospital. At this time there are many-empty parking
places at the hospital.
5. Mr. John Schuck, Fickett Lane. He stated that it was the duty of the
Board to uphold zoning ordinances and variances should only be allowed in severe
hardship cases, He felt the hospital should file their long range plan for the hospital.
Mr. Hermanson spoke in rebuttal., He stated that the hospital was not asking that
the zoning be changed; the proposal is combatible with the Toning. This proposal
is to make the parking lot look be#ter than it does at present, This parking lot
is merely to take care of the present parking problem,
Supervisor Richter asked Mr. Hermanson if his clients would object to the
planting and screening of the parking lot. Mr. Hermanson stated that there would
be no objection to this plantin~ignd screening of the parking lot.
Page 411.
October 31, 1978
_~-~_______====9srQb~~~7c147~___________________
Mr. Home, Mrs,. Flood and Mr, Schuck spoke in rebuttal.
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Board.
Supervisor Lemke stated he had a hard time justifying the changes of the
zone. The neighbors had been told to get the zoning to protect the area. He lives
in this area and goes up and down this road. He felt that the complex of Dr. Sonntag
was a good thing for the area. He stated that the hospital could have removed the
many trees and paved the whole area surrounding the hospital, Aesthetically it .would
look better to further land scope the area and allow them to have the parking area.
A use permit would be necessary to put in the parking on the present site. The
hospital does give top service to the .community and there is no one in this room that
could question the need for these services.
Chairman Winston spode on the need for a E, I. R.; these reports. are very
important to legislative bodies in making decisions.. There is .a need for this facility;
at present time there is a helter-skelter parking p1cHa. It is not a pleasaat~alan~..
He state~a he had difficulty in turning his back on the argument of the necessity of an
over-all plan for the hospital, The hospital is going to have to expand to serve
the needs of the_ community. In the beck of his mind, he has the feeling that now is the
time to take a look at the over-all needs of the hospital so the County will not be
faced with a number of hearings . The hospital is needed and it will have to expand.
He has been in the hospital and has personal knowledge of the services provided
at this hospital. The hospital should be interested in presenting a plan so they can
expand in the future without holding hearings.' They can present a general plan
of their own for the use of the property in the future.
Supervisor Lemke agreed with Chairman Winston's statements. The proper
approach would bean over-all view of the entire situation, if this parking lot is
part of the over-all view, then. he could seethe need for it.
It was moved by Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Richter and
carried, that the appeal of pthe use p~rmi~f #o liro~idetperrking facilities for an
existing hospital on property zoned RI A&C (minimum density residential -arts.
and crafts} located on the east side of Pentz-Magalia Highway approximately
700 feet north of Fickett Lane, identified as AP 53-271-10', Paradise was upheld.
AYES: Supervisors Lemke, Richter and Chairman Winston NOES: Supervisors Madigan and
RECESS: 12:35 Moseley
RECONVENED: 12:40
78-2080 PUBLIC HEARING: BEN AND MABEL RINGER- PETITION FOR VARIANCE TO
SECTIONS i9-10 and/or 19-12 OF COUNTY CODE FOR PLACEMENT OF MOBILE HOME
The. pu is Baring on t e Ben and Ma a Ringer petition for variance to
Sections 19-10 and/or 19-12 of the Butte County Code for placement of a mobile home
at Route I, Box 765 (Rodeo Avenue) Chico, AP 42-05-14 was held as advertised.
Lynn Van Hart set out the background of this petition. He stated that
every thing seems to be in order and the petition should be approved.
Hearing opened to the public. Appearing: no one. Hearing closed
to the public and confined to the Board.
Page 412.
October 31, 1978
________________October3ll 1978 =______,= _________
On motion of Supervisar Richter, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and
unanimously carried, the petition for variance to Sections 19-10 and~or 19-I2 of the
Butte County Code for plbcement of anoai=Lehome at Roufie i, Box 765 (Rodeo Avenue)
Chico, AP 42-05-14, was approved for Ben and Mabe! Ringer.
78-2081 PUBLIC HEARING: STONESON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION-PROPOSED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND REZONE FROM "A-2" LIMITED" TO
"PA-C ", PARADISE: ADOPT ORDINANCE 1973
The public hearing on the Stoneson Development Corporation proposed
environmental impact report and rezone from "A-2"limited"(limited general)
to "PA-C " (planned area-cluster) fora 120 unit residential development property .
located approximately 400 feet west of Clark .Road at Nunneley Road, identified
as AP 53-12-45 (portion) and 54-04-82 (portion), containing 25 acres, mare or
Tess, Paradise, was held as advertised.
Earl Nelson set out the background of the proposed E.I, R.; This project
has been before the Board before; it has a history of several years. Concerns
were raised during the previous hearings; the applicant has modified the
application and specified the exact density. There will be a population increase to
the area; there will also be an increase to the storm drainage. The previous "
objectionswaere to the density and this has been reduced. Drainage and traffic
can be controlled through mitigation measures. These mitigating measures will
be attached if the project is approved.
Chairman Winsfon had a question about the maps. The developer has
submitted a map showing the area that will be used for septic disposal. If sewers
come in, then the property will be converted#o use,
Bettye Blair stated that this was submitted to the Subdivision Committee;
their report has been submitted. They recommend approval with the finding
that it conforms with, the General Plan. Landscape plan has been submitted.
Hearing opened to the public. Appearing:
1. Robert Guth, Stoneson representative today, and engineer for the project.
This is going to be a 120-unit-single story development. These will be. individually._
owned units with"detached garages. There will be double wall construction between
the units.. All owners will share in the common area. Sewage proposal has been
presented with the proposal,
2. Ward Cameron, Merrill Road, Paradise. " He said he was not here to
speak for or against the development. Present because of the drainage problem.
He felt that something should be done to solve the additional water that will be
taken care of by the ditch. The ditch cannot accommodate that water without
flooding of the property along the way> The property owners would be willing
to dedicate an easement so the county could go in and clear out the ditch sa the
water can flow through properly. He spoke to Condition #17 regarding downstream
drainage facilities.
Supervisor Lemke stated he was going to support Mr, Cameron's statement.
Last winter the property owners stood by with shovels waiting far the overflow of water.
Page 413.
October 31, (978
_______________October3l, 1978
If there is an offer of dedication of easements, the County should accept them
and get the ditch cleaned out. It is a problem area. He suggested that Mr.
Castleberry set up a meeting with the property owners; Mr. Cameron could
get ttiq~epgaf~~~~s to the meeting.
Chairman Winsfon stated he was going to recess this meeting until
after Lunch so that Mr. Castleberry could be present to participate in the discussion.
Hearing recessed until 2:f.5.
78-2082 PUBLIC HEARING: COUNTY SERVICE AREA #21, ESTABLISHMENT OF RATES
The pu lic hearing on the County Service Area 2 estab ishment of rates
held at this time. Mike Pyeatt stated a report had been given to the Board as
directed by the Board. Rates on the parcels varied. Rates set out by Mr. Pyeatt.
The question that has come up is that the Board has already provided the
'Bail Out"funds for this areao The Board could establish the rates and if the
'bai I rout funds "cannot be used, then there wou ]d be funds that could be used
by these established rates.
Hearing opened to the public. Appearing: no one. Hearing closed
to the public and confined to the Board,
On motion.of Supervisor Madigan, seconded by Supervisor Richter and
unanimously carried, rates were established for County Service Area #21 as set out
in the memo from Administrative Officer dated October 24, 1978 (Oakridge Sewer).
RECESS: 1:10
RECONVENED: 2:15
78-2083 CONTINUATION OF HEARING: STONESON DEVELOPMI_NT CORPORATION
The hearing on the Stone~on Development Corporation proposed environmental
impact report and rezone was held as continued prior to the lunch recess. Clay
Castleberry present at this time. It was stated that Mr, Guth said it was his
understanding that they would be responsible for downstream drainage to Pearson
Road. Mr, Castleberry said they were responsible for-drainage down to Bushman.
There is an existing natural drain from Pearson to Buschman. He suggested that
the culvert at Buschman Read should be looked at; it would also be an advantage to have th
easements offered by Mr. Cameron and the people he represents. As far as he was
concerned, it would be the requirement that the Stoneson Development Corporation
would be responsible for the drainage to Buschman.
Acceptance of the drainage easements discusseda The matter of the
easements would be clarified at the time the final map is approved. Under
Condition #17, should add "As specified 6y Public Works Department'; the
County would then have a handle on the drainage problem.
It was felt that the developer should provide a permanent drainage
solution dawn to Buschman Road as set out by Public Works. Mr. Guth stated
that the map has not even been prepared at this time; they will not prepare
it until the zoning matter has been approved.
Hearing cbsed to the public ~~agd~onfimec~o the Board.
Page 414. .October 31, 1978
J mcition of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Super
_______October 31,_!978_____
It was moved 6y Supervisor Lemke,. seconded by Supervisor Madigan and
unanimously carried, that because the Board has reviewed the contents of the
draft environmental impact report, the comments received thereon, and the responses
to those comments, it was moved that the Board certify that the final environmental
impact report has been completed incompliance with the Cplifornia Environmental
Quality Aet, the State EIR Guidelines and the Butte County Environmental
Review Guidelines.
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and
unanimously carried, based on the Board's knowledge and research and on
information presented to the Board concerning this project, including the
environmental impact report which was considered in arriving at a decision, the
Board finds that the project could have a significant effect on the environment
but will not in this case because of the adopted mitigation measures attached
hereto and by this reference made a-part hereof, subject to the conditions
set out below; it was further moved that the project be approved, with the
finding that it confarmsto the General Plan and will conform to the development
in the area; Ordinance 1973 was adopted and the Chairman authorized to
sign, subject to the following conditions:
I. Sewage system installation shall meet the Butte County Code requirements and
requirements of the Water Quality Control Board,
2. Letter from Paradise Irrigation District stating that water will be provided
to the PA-C . "
3, Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for
approval and install the required facilities,
4, Intersection at loop roads A and B with Nunneley Road to be a standard
driveway approach. .
5. indicate a 50-foot building setback line from the centerline of Nunneley
Road and 33-foot setback line from interior loop roads A and B.
6. Streefi signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections
per County requirementso (Submit five alternate street names for each
street to the County address coordinator for approval of street names~~. .
7. Deed 30 feet from either side of the centerline of Nunneley Road extension.
to the County of Butte.
8. Construct full street section on Nunneley .Road to RS-2 Major geometric
standardo Minimum structural section to be 2"AC and 8" AB, SC 250 prime
and fog seal and 95°l° relative compaction. Submit design to County
Department of Public Works for .approval . "R"value determinations and
other data may be required to support section design.
9. Construct loop roads A and B to typdcal section shown on revised plan sheet
two of two. Structural section to be 2"of AC and 6"of aggregate base.
loo Provide monumentation as required by the Department of Public Works in
accordance with accepted standards.
II, Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte County ordinances,
design resolution and other accepted engineering standardso
l2o Provide Homeowner's Agreement.
13. All records of easement to be shown on final, map.
14. Meet requirements of Butte County Fire Department or other responsible agencyo
i5o Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requirements
accepted design criteria and recommendations of PG&E,
Page 415.
October 3f, 1978
October 31, 1978
16. Submit site grading plans to Department of Public Warks for approval at the
same time as storm drainage plans are submitted for approval.
17. Provide a permanent drainage solution for drainage including necessary
downstream drainage facilities as specified by the Public Works
Department.
18. Developer to provide letter to County of Butte stating that he will not
oppose formation of an assessment district to extend Nunneley Road to the
west of his westerly property line to Pearson Road and that he will become
a part of this assessment district and will pay his share for construction
of Nunneley Road extension.
14, Developer will deposit with the County of Butte his pro-rata share for the
future installation of traffic signals at Nunneley Road and Clark Road.
Developers pro-rata share at the intersection shall be approved by Department
of Public Works,
20. Landscape plan and interior lighting plan will become apart ofldEVelopment
plan.
21 . Obtain permit to cross Nunneley Road with sewer linen
22. Homeowner`s agreement should include maintenance of sewage system.
23. That a tentative and final subdivision map be filed which will provide a permanent
drainage solution for drainage including necessary downstream drainage
facilities as specified by the Public Works Department,
78-2082 APPEARANCE: DON BLAKE, OROVILLE RE COAL FIRE PLANT
Don Blake, Oroville, spoke concerning Supervisor Lemke's report
regarding the proposed coal fire plant. He referred to Supervisor' Lemkes'
conversation with Mr. Gerth. at Centralia. Mr. Blake read aloud portions of
this report. He explained his thinking about the inversion at the site of the
plant.
Supervisor Lemke stated that this was not his report particulprly; the
information it contains is from other people. He stated that Mr. Blake was
quoting out of context from the report.
Supervisor Madigan asked Mr. Blake if he had read the article in the
Sacramento Bee about the air pollution, which was written by a qualified expert.
Chairman Winston stated he had written back to the Oklahoma Gas & Electric
about the matter of combustion, which Mr, Blake had brought to the Board's attention.
at a previous meeting. He stated that when Mr. Blake had called the Board's attention
to the possibility of fire, then he took the matter to heart. Exerpts from a reply letter
from the Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company were read by Chairman Winston. The"
letter states that if the coal is packed tightly, it can be stored for long periods of
time without danger of combustion.
Mrs..Jolene Blake set out pictures taken at the Oklahoma coal fire plant.
78-2083 ADOPT RESOLUTION78-185, SALE OF TAX DEEDED PROPERTY
A resolution has een prepared giving notice of intention to sell
three parcels of property at a minimum price of $10,000, Assessor's Parcels
71-01-68, 70 and 84.
Page 416.
October 31, 1478
October 31, 1978
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and
unanimously carried, Resolution 78-185 was adopted and the Chairman authorized
to sign.
78-2084 APPROVE NOTICE OF COMPLETION, PEARSON ROAD: RELEASED MAINTENANCE
BOND & ACCEPT ROADS FOR EL MON~'c1-~1EIGHTS SUBD. UNIT NO. 2; and
APPROVE AGREEMENTFOR SALE, SKYWAY
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Moseley and
unanimously carried, the following action was taken: ~
1. Accepted the work of Robinson Construction Co., Inc. -for the reconstruction
of Pearson Road from O.i8 mile west of Sawmill RnsSd #o Pentz-Magalia Highway;
authorized the Chairman to sign the Notice of Completion and instructed the Clerk
to record said Notice with the County Recorder.
2. Authorized release of maintenance bond for the EI Monte Heights
Subdivision Unit No. 2, road and drainage impnns+ements; and accepted roads in
subdivision for maintenance.
3, Approved agreement for sale, authorized the Chairman to sign and.
authorized Auditor to issue warrant upon demand of county's escrow agent on
following right-of-way acquisition:
Skyway 51261-77-I
R, Whiting et ux 0,028 acre $182 No Impr. $182.
78-2085 AUTHORIZE SIGNING OF GRANT DEED CONVEYING SURPLUS LAND TO EDWARD
OPATRNY (DAYTON ROAD REALIGNMENT)
On motion of Supervisor Madigan, seconded by Supervisor Lemke and
unanimously carried, the Chairman was authorized to sign the grant deed conveying
a parcel .of surplus land to Edward Opatmy et ux as q condition of agreement for
sale.
78-2086 APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF SURPLUS LAND: ADOPTED RESOLUTION
78-186 FOR SUMMARY ABANDONMENT KENNEDY AVE. @ EAST AVENUE: AND
AUTHORIZED SIGNING OF QUIT CLAIM DEED
On motion of Supervisor Madigan, seconded by Supervisor Lemke and
unanimously carried, the following action was taken:
1. Approved agreement for sale of surplus land to Jack R. Thompson et ux,
at a price of $100 and Chairman authorized to sign,
2. Adopted Resolution 78-186 for summary abandonment fdredc~fiizhjon}~
of~K~nnedyyAvenue at East Avenue no longer needed for road purposes, and
authorized Chairman to sign
3. Authorized Chairman to sign quit-claim deed conveying a portion
of Kennedy Avenue to Jack R. Thorrrpson et ux.
78-2087 APPROVE AGREEMENT FORSALE (JOHN H'. COVERSTON): ADOPTED
RESOLUTION 78-187 FOR SUMMARY ABANDOtf~iYiENT OF PORTION OF OLD SKYWAY
RIGHT OF WAY: AUTHORIZE QUIT CLAIM FOR PORTION OF-OLD SKYWAY
On motion of Supervisor Mose~4e~,~~eonded by Supervisor Lemke qnd
Page 417. October 31, 1978
_____________Octaber3l, 1978_ W=-~WW______
unanimously carried, the following action was taken:
I. Approved agreement for sale of surplus land to John- H. Coverston et ux,
in the amount of $50. and authorized Chairman to sign,
2. Adopted Resolution 78-187 for summary abandonment for a portion of
aid Skyway right-of-way na longer needed and authorized the Chairman to sign.
3. Authorized the Chairman to sign quit claim deed conveying a portion
of the old Skyway rightrof-way to John H. Coverston et ux.
78-2088 APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF SURPLUS LAND TO JOHN KRANZ ET UX
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded y Supervisor Madigan and
unanimously carried; approved agreement for sale of surplus land to John Kranz et ux,
East Avenue @ Highway 32, for the amount of $25.00.
78-2089 AUTHORIZE SIGNING OF GRANT DEED CONVENYING SURPLUS LAND
TO JOHN KRANZ ET UX
On motion of Supervisor Lem e, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and
unanimously carried, the Chairman was authorized to sign grant deed conveying
a parcel of surplus land to John Kranz et, ux.
78-2090 AUTHORIZE SIGNING OF QUIT CLAIM DEED, W. R. WHITING
On motion of 5upervisar Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Lemke and
:='sa ..
unanimously carried, the Chairman was authorized to sign a quit claim deed con.veyi~n`g s~r~lus
land to W. R. Whiting et al as a condition of agreement for sale. (Dayton Road` '?
~ SR 32 rea} ignment). + ?_~ `
78-2091 APPROVE RECOMMENDATION: KNESS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIAN~I„ 4PPEA1,
RECONSIDERATION (AP 73-22-54) CLIPPER MILLS
Pu lic Works advises it has confirmed long time use of access (non.d~~ited
or recorded) and recommends 60 foot access. requirement be waived on eondifiori',that
no further divisions be allowed without establishment of 60 feat rigFfi}'~~Fwwc~y. `
Applicant is third .party owner and dwelling will replace on~~at-l~urnt:clourn,~
Clay C,~stleberry, Director of Public Works, after verifying that (Fie radd Ftt~sb~een
used ,recommends that this condition be eliminated and that they;~e divers thee`
Certificate of Compliance. This recommendation should have been given t4 Fhe;:.
Board at the time the Board considerit before,
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor l~osele~ and
unanimously carried, recommendation of Public Worfcs approved, ;ofrd pfevl~us pGtign
relating to the 60` right-of-way be rescinded and that use of the~n.e5n~ept)~~1 y~pce~s
be approved, providing that there be no further division of the I~lrtt~«~ '
78-2092 AUTHORIZE R1=TURN OF DEVELOPMENT FEE, SWEDES FL~{`~.~J~~/~~,
BAL5TAD PARCEL MAP ,^~ `, :'
Counsel for Balstad and Covnty Counsel concur in a requ+~Y~~,~~5i t'e,t~rn
of $750 per parcel development fee since map was started prio&,t~~~ ~d~~`adoptianT
Public Works requests Board direction in returning the $750 per, pfdl`~~v~v~e~es
Flat improvement fee. Dan Blackstock, County Counsel, set out t a a~Fgr~~nd A)'
the decision to refund the fee. There are provisions within the lavj~at golclit~~trjgf
conditions cannot be added to a map offer it had been approved. ~' ;,'~
,, .
;.,;'..
Page 418..
~, ~
~~
^,_.~,
~r
~ _
,~;
October31~1978 _______T_________
On motion of Supervisor Moseley, seconded by Supervisor Lemke and
unanimously carried, return of $750 development fee per parcel was authorized
to Balstad, for parcel map in the Swedes Flat area.
78-2093 DISCUSSION: MEMO REGARDING REC15510N OF FREEWAY AGREEMENT,
HIGHWAY 99 FROM GARNER LANE NORTHERLY TO TEHAMA COUNTY LINE
Memo to t e Board regarding recission of freeway agreement, Hig way 99
from Gamer Lane northerly to Tehama c9unty line discussed. This agreement has,
been in effect since 1961. It was suggested that the County hold off on action
on this agreement until the Highway Commission is ready to do the work, Tehema
County dais said that they will hold up action until further study. Mr. Castleberry
stated that there are traffic needs that are not being met. It was felt that the
State should be contacted to determine what they will do to handle the traffic
problems. Mr. Castleberry will write the State, setting out the Board's views-in
the matter and will report back to the Board when he has received a reply.
78-2094 CENTEX AGGREGATE, INC. -USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A PORTABLE AGGREGATE
PLANT ON PROPERTY ZONED "A-2 ", NO!RlTHEAST OF GRIDLEY: PUT OVER ONE WEEK
Action on Centex Aggregate Inc. -use permit to allow a ports a aggregate
plant on property zoned "A-2"(general) located on the north side of Vance Avenue,
east of Sacramento-Northern rightrof-way, identified as AP 25-042-12,.
northeast of Gridley was continued one week,
78-2095 DISCUSSION WITH REPRESENTATIVES.FROM LOCAL HOSPITALS & AGENCIES
CONCERNING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE CO.UNCIL'S
REQUEST FOR FUNDING ASSISTANCE
Chairman Winston stated that there was no one present to discuss the Northern
California Emergency Medical Care. Council's request for funding assistance, He
stated he was going to attend -the meeting in Redding on November 6th. Discussion
on this matter h~J over to Tuesday, November 7, 1978. _
78-2096 DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED STILES RANCH RAW LAND SUBDIVISION, CHICO
Discussion of proposed Stiles Ranch raw land subdivision, Chico, held at this
timed Chairman Winston and County Counsel agree on this. Attorney General's
letters set out and discussed. The letters state that this cannot be done. Dan Blackstock,
County Counsel, asked if the Board would like to see him go in the direction of amending
the subdivision map. Chairman Winston suggested that copies of the Attorney
General's letters be sent to Burt Lowen. County Counsel will send said opinion to
Mr. Lowen,
78-2097 APPROVE APPOINTMENTS TO DURHAM MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT
On motion of Supervisor Mose ey, seconded- y Supervisor digan and
unanimously carried, the following were appointed to Durham Mosquito Abatement
District, for two year terms, commencing January I, 1979:
Charles Pooler
John Houghten
78-2098 APPROVE APPOINTMENTS TO CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON DRUG
ABUSE/ALCOHOL ADVISORY BOARD
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and
unanimously carried,. the following were appointed to the Citizens Advisory Committee
on Drug Abuse/Alcohol Advisory Board:
Page 499.
October 31, 1978
------------====Y October31~1978 =_______________--
Don Johnson
Gene Denny
Leonard Moseley.
78-2099 APPROVEAPPOINTMENT TO PARADISE MUNICIPAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
On motion of Supervisor Winston, seconded 6y Supervisor Lemke and
unanimously carried, Ed Parker was nominated as.a n;~tnEsar of the Paradise Municipal
Advisory Council.
78-2100 DISCUSSION OF SHASTA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY PROPOSAL
FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED PROJECT FOR-BUTTE COUNTY
Discussion of Shasta County Community Action Agency proposal for
development~8~y disabled project for Butte~County discussed. Chairman Wsnston
will attend the meeting on November 6, 1978; this agenda item was a reminder
to him to attend; no action needed.
78-2101 COMMUNICATIONS _
James Mittag, Paradise. Mr. Mittag writes opposing service charges for street
lighting. No action necessary.
Renee Steiner, Paradise. Ms. Steiner writes indicating that the increased to 65 cents
for bus .tickets is a hardship for senior citizens and- requests that the price
be reduced to 50 cents. Letter acknowledged and referred to Public Works
for answer.
Dorothy L. Subke, Paradise. Mrs. Subke writes asking that Paradise Fire .
Protection District be granted additional state bailout funds. No action;
place in file.
William J. Goolsbee, et al, Paradise. A petition has been received signed by
114 persons protesting the proposed amendment to Chapter 2~4 of the
Butte County Code for use of mabile homes in restricted residential
areas, Action taken earlier in meeting.
Mr. and Mrs. Victor H. Thring, Paradise. Mr. and Mrs. Thring write in
opposition to the proposed Stoneson Development Corporation rezone that would.
allow multiple dwellings. Action taken earlier in meeting.
William N. P. Dolan, Jro, chairman, Juvenile Justice Commission. Mr. Dolan
sends notification that the Juvenile JusticeCommission endorses the
proposed reorganization of the Probation Department. Information.
Region C Regional Criminal Justice Planning Board. The Region submits request
for proposals for Juvenile Justice projects setting forth funding priorities.
Mr. Pyeatt requested that this be referred to Administrative Office and
Probation Department for their recommendation. Howard Casagrande
said he would get together with Administration and will come back with a recom-
mendation to the Board. He advised the Board about the priority list.
He feels that everything is well in hand. He stated he had written to the
Board on October 3rd regarding the re-authorization from Federal
Government about legislation. He had hoped that the Board would take
some position in the matter. There will be a meeting in San Francisco on
November 16th. Chairman Winston asked Mr. Casagrande if this matter
could be placed irn capsule form for the Board's study. He stated he would
do his best to bring this matter back to the. Board in capsule form.
Page 420.
October 31, 1978
-------------October3l~ 1978 -------------_-___
Ken L, Bushman, Sacramento. Mr. Bushman submits a claim in the amount of
$2,500 for alleged injuries resulting in permanent disability,
See motion following communications.
Mart and Ordas, Inc., Attorneys at Law. The attorneys, on behalf of
Francisco Carir~o, Bennedios Carnio andAgueda Ignacio, submit a
claim for damages for personal injuries and wrongful death as the
result of an accident occurring in the Gridley area on July 28,
See motion following communications.
State Department of Transportation. The Department forwards information
conceming the proposed replacement of the Gianella Bridge and
approaches on State Route 32 near Hamilton City and requests comments
conceming the .proposals affect upon agricultural preserve lands.-
. Mr, Castleberry had comments on this prooposed replacement. He felt
that Alternate B would be the best alternate for the community.
As this is in Supervisor Richter's District, the matter. will be placed back
on the agenda for Tuesday, November 7, 1978,
State Department of Transportation. The Department forwards information relating
to interim improvement plans for Highway 99 between Sutter County line and
Highway 162, Chairman Winston stated that this was in answer to his
letter to this department; they will make turn-out lanes on this highway.
Allan F. Ochs, 1,;6189 Park View Lane, Chico. He writes complaining about dog
problems on Madrone Street between Hooker Oak and Oak Vista, which
his little girl has to walk on her was to reach Sierra Vista School.
Referred to Sheriff`s Department for comments.
78-2102 REJECT CLAIM OF KEN L. BUSHMAN, SACRAMENTO
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and
unanimously carried, the claim of Ken L. Bushman, Sacramento, in the amount
of $2,500 for alleged: injuries resulting in permanent disability was rejected on the
basis that it was not timely filed.
78-2103 REJECT CLAIMS OF FRANCISCO C,ARINO, BENNEDIOS CARNIO AND
AGUEDA IGNACIO
On motion of Supervisor Lemke, seconded by Supervisor MVloseley and
unanimously carried, the claim of Francisco Carino, Bennedios Carnio and Agueda
Ignacio for personal injuries and wrongful death as result of an accident occurring
in the Gridley area on July 28 was rejected and. referred to County Counsel and
Insurance Representative.
78-2104 MATTERS PRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN WINSTON
Chairman Winston commented on letter w is complimented Clay
Castleberry on his actions regarding Eden Roc.
Letter from Shop & Save stating that they will contribute to the traffic
signal light to be placed at the intersection of Oliver Street and the Skyway in
Paradise. This offer is in the amount of $10,000.
RECESS: The Board recessed at 3:55 for an executive session.
RECONVENED: The Board reconvened at 4:15 following an executive session.
Chairman Winston stated that litigation matters and one personnel matter
was discussed.
Page 421.
October 31, 1978
October 31, 1978
ADJOURNMENT:
There being nothing further be ore the Board at thi time, the meeting
was adjourned at 4:17 p.m. to recon ene on Tuesday, No tuber 7, 1978 at
9:OO a . m .
ATTEST: CLARK A. NELSON, COU LERK
1 ~ ~ v
By; ~~ -G=am""~ C air an f e Board
Asst. Clerk of the Board.
Page 4220
October 31,.1978