Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc. Resolutions Part 1•00.0~ I~~C ~ ~ -~ ," ' ~ ) RESOLUTION NOo 35073 ~'~~ ~~ € I `~' k. -.. County Administration Building CL„~.C /-1 iA; E_ ~ c ~^ p.: Santa Rosas California 6111 I ~ `; 0. Ci..:~'i November 290 1971 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SONOMAs STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN SUP- PORT OF THE WATSON INITIATIVE LIMITING PROPER- TY TAX TO 1075% OF MARKET VALUE WHEREAS° the Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma can no longer support property taxation as it is now imposed because of state laws and that no meaningful state legislation on Property Tax Reform has occurreds and WHEREAS, this Board of Supervisors believes that our State Legis- lature is not providing more equitable ways of taxations and WHEREAS, by lack of tax reform by the State Legislature people in California are being forced out of their homes and off of their propertys and WHEREASs the Watson Initiative will remove welfare from property tax responsibility and limit education taxes .to $2000 per $100000 of assessed valuation and stipulate replacement of those revenues at the state level, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that this Board of Supervisors goes on record and asks all Boards of Supervisors and Cities in California by resolution to support the Watson Initiative which limits property taxation to 1075 of market value per yearm The foregoing resolution was introduced by Supervisor Joerger0 who moved its° adoptions seconded by Supervisor Thiellers and adopted on roll pall by the following votes Supervisor Joerger Aye Supervisor Nordyke Aye Supervisor Theiller Aye Supervisor Vella Aye Ayes: 5 Noess 0 Absent or not votings 0 WHEREUPON9 the Chairman declared the above resolution adopted9 and SO ORDEREDo STATE CAPITOL ~- `g T{L{~HOH[: ~~6-361F SACRAMENTO, CALIF. 8581b 1 ~~ JAMES D. DRISCOLL CHEEF CLERK November 29, 1971 TO: Chairman, Board of Supervisors, each county of the State of California, and Mayor, each city, and city and county of the State of California I have been directed to invite your attention to Assembly Concurrent kZesolution No. 11A~, relative to local contingency plans to deal with spills of oil and other hazardous material, which has been adopted by the California Zegislature. Accordingly, Tam enclosing a copy of this resolution for your information. Very truly yours, G 'ef Clerk Enclosure ___ _ ,~ AssemUly Concurrcnt'Resohction No. lY4 RE~~)I~L`TT~IN l'FI~P~'I:11 '1. ~,~rr f~i.~l (;nf.C~Pi.Y 'F ~;f `14 f~OY'. ~~ .~~~-F'1<7'`7;r Ln IpOt7~ i'I~f Gt7; if ~U i.4 Stef!EP( ll. /~ ~/~ 'I. f G~~ ¢'i~ Oh.r7 li r.,^,ii)-ci- [FI3 ~-~.~7 ~ I 1 -ecsakn~ -~.T ~ ^'blicr I,1PSi.I ~ ~ ~. ' ~<<'rii".a s, l',~.ri ~.,i~--etir .ilspill ,:}Iirltl t~i_ hid ~~ :a~troue ..,,n quan , ~= iu ~or i. is ,a i5 n~ th tci;r lr yr rl;~n u~ ,tratc.i tt« need for th- pr [ r.;,l inn ni '.oe~.l contin '~~rt'~~I: n trr riFal ^.th s~~il7 ,f uil t*t 1 oa;rf ii .~i~rtl~ a il2tri ~1.,; tinil ?:I1T.a>;,?; Tre roost ian~~url~~.ni, 1 ~iurut~ f gy'}_ ,i ~~~~.,w r.rr tfir~ duo- 1 ;-trai.~n of a I,.,~u- o~ ia~ii~ ~ ~itl-iorit nil >;n _ :1'erntt` ~l:r~ ~~rerall e`, irtr: ~~f ,Ifn I. ~~„ I ula~;,r ptl , t,; ruea: oh I ti_~:~ns. zn~l L}r hr,~:irlinJ f ~~,t ^ ~~!~.rsnn~,,itt f.},„ ei _horirt' 1.. ~~i~t, tSr :a_~T ~Lt ~-at -hc~ p ~ryur~:oi anrl' {uip_t:evt u_°.del r~r Sncu nE~ ratra~s: and ~ra~a~ ~,e :1 ~ t u,i'ul~~ '.I I,~ ;~:~-: i sh utd h . pi•;i~.~i .r~? ru ~.i~e' li:~~T o~ t .1`.n2_~tttu~r~r~.;, by wu+h ~~1:_n. 1 ~ ~i~tnL_'~b' ct t7:r~ h.~•inuhi ~f' aL~flteiara_ ~ i i,_-irn; i .~ LPL ~~f rg-rn 7 i c -_ ~ - T 1_ ti,. ,~ nnl r_. ,r all em ~~`rn'v ~ i~ ~~.~ ;tua ~ arI u; n;'m'r -~ offi _ah ~ u~ u~,.~ui ,r'~.cm~ -rn~~~i •~ il,l~~~ i~~~ ~~1°~~,: in lb ~_YU~~r,~i Apr aticv ~~,n~l ~.rEr:. ti ;, Th. ln~;nl n n~rn.-~ pLtrl ,'mule t~,l'r~'.~r: the ~u ra r•r. ulin.aor n~ „~I ~ ~ urine., i'_; t}:'- hn psi tlci~~~:~ r,f ~~~1';ilt rni:_ P naL1x,`._i.~, ~~~uJil~; Cunt ~ }?„~,i,~r3s ~~r i7~~. hlatr l)r~utrtni~ut of ~~r,ii r F;+:~~r i°~~,~>. tl ~ tiianz~_r .r~ ~cliir'o cnnka~u_,rmi ~ s'~~;~'a ba di~nr.~-~_i ?,f un~l r~i~~~ i e_ t ~r~~.l~, u;,l,, ~n~~r';:1 hail ni iii ind V`."ut~L ., T- i . 7 ir.a L tl:aT 1r 'til n~an 1 ~. ta~~L,ie : To i ~r- t 1 `_ ;Y ~fi~,unii ~ ~ ,E;i-.l t n i tt ~ 1U L Lr~ rn i n th t [ atticul.rlo~~~l t i~.;}i i 1 u,}:-t ~~it„-, ~ i~,~ain~ ;'1 and ~a~ oti._a.i ar<„ ;rr s^~Slr ~~~.~i h I~h CrS ;r _iui: _~ ~ i -~=-hicl~ f ii,~nft il, 'n hu ~r i mind r~ "dri i i T~ s nn~~or__ i I }~:~~ ail : rt:r_¢e~~ ~ ;,h a-. lie. ~h «tn 1 ~:~ e{fh .~ fun°ti ~t it ~'.e?mf rL~-~11;, nr io ]ilr } :,r~,m_Liy~ nxo~tl 1,If,~ nr11 di;i~ster ~„n a ~~~n~~~. i i.i:~?trfu. if _ ti-,e~"cd, ~r into I ~ 1~~d;: ~ ~ 1 :=1 il! of -.rn ~ctuc~, ui h-~i.ticm; rcr!~~ t~l_rc0` r r^~>~. Ll,~~l 1~. L=~~tslau° L fl ~,;Llr i I:~IJ~ ';Yi;t 1r~es zrr ei-} r ili.ts, rnd ~if~- 'n I anal r nl' 1]ii~ t h~ ~ ~n•tuiilzb_ 'n.Cir_~r,I, ~. ~~I;:i i. ~i e3 nn t~ir .r'~n•r_ inFn~:~~ied facers'n ~3 ~a7 ~~°~'ili p 7's iil' iii' ';w~~ut~her haz2r~ ;u~; ~tu_t r_~1~: an3 b~ i~ furth,~r T.. ~ ~.cd,_Tliat eha ~~Yeef '(1 .r!: ~~1' t} r As.~ia~blr truisrait r-tr~~i~ , it 'h.. re.~Ps-i~~n ie-th ~n 'sGtlr F~ Luyl~, t ~~:ch ~~.it~:,~ ogni~lv,nt~.d it;-,iY_il .017nt_c,~t -hl ''cite,. ,~ o or =ape o Np~w NS :mak ' sJ, ~ 12-15-71 $ ~/1~~\\ r _ . - ~ t RE.7®~VT~®N N®•....608-71 v^F iir~E r3t'i~',RD Cyr Si~PER'VISORS OF THE COUNTY OF EI. DORADO- WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of El Dorado County can no longer support property taxation as it is now imposed because of state. law, and` ' that no meaningful state legislation on Property Tax Reform. has occurred;. - and WHEREAS, this Board of Supervisors believes'that our State hegisla® tore is not providing more equitable ways of 'taxation; and WHEREAS, by lack of tax reform by the State Legislature people in . California are being forced out of their homes and off of their property; . ,and _ WHEREAS, the Watson Initiative will remove 'welfare from property tax responsibility and limit education taxes to $2.00 per $100.00 of ~~°, assessed valuation and stipulate replacement of those revenues at the state level, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that this Board of Supervisors goes` on record and asks all Boards of Supervisors `and Cities in California by resolution to .support the Watson Initiative which limits. property taxation to 1..75% of market value per year< PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of EI Dorado at a regular meeting of said Board, held on the _.___._~4th_____ day of ._.....___~?ecember________ 19.:71__, ---- ---- by the following vote of said Board• Ayes: William V.D. Johnson, John M.` Caswell, ' Thomas Ni. Goodlae, Jr., Raymond E. Lawyer, Thomas L. Stewart ATTEST: - '. CARL A. KELLY, County Clerk and ex•oiflcio-_ - goes: None ~ - -- Clerk of the eoo~d of Supervisors - - - ' Absent: _ None By .. __'3i-11e Mitc~el',_,.,_--_---- Willa.am V D Johnson Deputy Clerk Chairman, Board of Supervises 1 CERTIF!' THAT: - ?HF fU!~E DING 11JSTRE/MENT IS A CORRECT COPY OE THE ORIGINAL ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE. - - - SATE - __ - -O~-i ---~.~.~~ - ~ ATTEST: CARL A. KELLY, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the $oord of 56pervisors of she Coun~y of EI Dorado, State of.- ~y ~.~~ -- . ...... .................. Deputy Clerk~v~ .` _ \ :; / oo . o~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUN`T'Y OF YUBA ITT RE : ) RESOLUTION URGING GOVER,'~IMENT INTERVENTION ) RESOLUTION N0. 1971-189 TO SETTLE THE STRIKE OF PACIFIC CJAST ) LONGSHOREi~?,AN' S UNION ) WHEREAS, for more than ten weeks the Pacific Coast Longshoreman`s Union has been engaged in a strike which has tied up all shipping on the West Coast; and, WHEREAS, the strike has prevented much needed goods from entering the ports located on the West Coast and has prevented the shipping of products from said pots; and, WHEREAS, the production of agricultural crops and lumber is a major element in the economy of Yuba County and is a significant element in the economy of the West Coast States and of the United States; and, ~•7F-IEREAS, the agricultural crops and lumber, as well as industrial goods, produced in Yuba County are produced for export to other countries; and, WHEREAS, as a direct result of the strilce which has prevented the export of agricultural crops, lumber, and industrial goods produced in 'Yuba County and in the State of California, the economy of Yuba County and of the State of California has suffered catastrophic losses; and, WHEREAS, procedures to settle said stxilce through voluntary agreement have been exrausted and further bargaining to reach agreement appears futile; and, WHEREAS, continuation of the strike will cause additional disas- trous losses to the producers of agricultur.al~'c'rops, lumber, and indus- ~;, trial goods; 4 ~1 ,. ,~ C , •~ `.. x~~ _, ~ - S . -1- e+-. __-_ --__. -.... _.. .. ,// NOG•1, THEREI'ORE, }3E IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors j urge the President and the Congress of the United States and the Gover- nor and Legislature of the State of California to take ail appropriate measures forthwith to intervene in said strike with the objective of achieving its termination so as to permit the full flow of exports and imports through the ports of the West Coast States. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of the resolution be transmitted to: RICp7ARD NF. NIXON, President of the United States ALAN CRANSTON, United States Senator from California JOHN V. TUNNEY, United States Senator from California ROBERT L. LEGGETT, Congressman, Fourth Congressional District, California RONALD REAGAN, Governor of the State of California BRED MARLER, State Senator, Second Senatorial District, California EUGENE CRAPPIE, Assemblyman, Sixth Assembly District, California PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Super- visors of the County of Yuba, State of California, on the 14th day of September 1871, by the following vote: Ronald E. Leri, Harold J. Sperbeck, AYES: SUPERVISORS: peter A. Reis and Roy G. Lenderman NOES: SUPERVISORS: Hone ABSENT: SUPERVISORS: Charles L. Dean r .~ ~ ~ Chairman ATTEST: --rte ~. 7 ,, ~~~ ~ ~ ~, t,~ -. • .~ ~ couect cony o1 the it ,. t ~ ~ z ~ ,~ ics ~ ~! ~~L ~ C . Go~eNf' '~ri ~~~~ O~ o~ ,ct r._ ler[t oY fhe ~.i !A of a,;Pe.i~;•isbrs of thu County q$ ~ ~lir l~iute oY C l ~ a ifornia. De ty Clerk -~- ~. ds ~' +TH WARNKEN ~~~j50~~ Telephone 543-1550, ExT. 231 ~ Cosmty Clerk ~y' ~...~.. COUNTY CLER~tG ZO ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ Courthouse Axnex R~C~~Y~~ SAN LUIS OBiSPO, CALIFORNIA - iJ}A~IARK ~ ~ELS OItl August 19, 1971 BUTTE CO. CLERK Mr. ,here E. Reynolds, Chairman Board of Supervisors, Butte County Oroville, California 95965 Dear Mr. Reynolds: On Monday August 16, 1971, the County Board of Supervisors, at their regular session, adopted the attached resolution titled "Resolution Oppas~ing •Assemb•ly °Bi11 No. 515 & -Other Bills Creating Mandatory Multi-County Planning Organizations", aid have requested that a copy of same be directed to your attention. Very truly yours, RUTH WARNKEN, County Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Y Deputy Clerk frp Encl. r.iaaxa+.~Aiy ~.v v..: i.-:.:a.u c..ia,y ..v u.... -. ~.. _. Planning NAR:ah VA-lA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISI'0, STATE OIL CALII'ORNIA ----Mon_ day ------ Augns t_ 16------~ 19 ~ ~ -- PRESENT: Supervisors M. Roland Gates, Howard D. Hankins, Hans Hellmann Chairman John V. Freeman• ~p o c~ ABSENT: Supervisor Elston L. Kidwell ~ p ~ a ~~ ~ RESOLUTION N0. 71-379 " v ~ ~' O ~ G N ~ri,m RESOLUTION OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL N0. 515 t'- ~ ~ 'u & OTHER BILLS CREATING MANDATORY t~ O MULTI-COUNTX PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS F Z The following Resalution is now offered and read: WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. 515 along with other Bills have been introduced in the current session of the State Legislature which would mandate the establishment of Multi-County Planning Organizations in many parts of the State, and WHEREAS, With the need for greater decentralization and increased local control of government, the passage of these Bills will create a further handicap for the effectiveness of democracy, in that popular control over decision-making will be one step further removed from the electoral process, and WHEREAS, The creation of additional agencies will prove to be uneconomical and prevent efficient governmental action in that Counties will be restricted unduly in the undertaking of the solution of the problems to which this legislation is aimed, and WHEREAS, The Area of Planning Jurisdiction of the San Luis Obispo County and Cities Area Planning Coordinating Council will also be adversely affected by the creation of a Multi-County Agency in that such a Multi-County Agency will not be as well equipped to deal with the various planning problems and that an additional loss of local governmental control will create new problems and barriers to effective government by this Council. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Supervisors of San Luis Obispo County, State of California, as follows: 1. 'That Assembly Bill No. 515 be and it is hereby strongly opposed. 2. That all State or Assembly Bills being introduced which seek to create mandatory Multi-County Agencies be and is hereby strongly opposed. 3. That copies of this Resolution be sent to the Honorable Ronald Reagan, Governor of the State of California, Assemblyman Don MacGillivray, Assemblyman William M. Ketchum, Senator Donald Grunsky, each and every California County, and the San Luis Obispo County and Cities Area Planning Coordinating Council. Planning NAR:ah PA•}g ~, ,. ~tIC ~~ ~ ~i2 ~!1~i'•7 ~ RECEIVEQ CLARK A. MELS~N BUTTE CO. CLERK Upon motion o£ Supervisor Heilmann, seconded by Supervisor Gates, and on the following roll call vote, to-gait; AYES: Supervisors Heilmann, Gates, Mankins, Chairman Freeman NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Kidwell - the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted. C airman o t e Soar o Supervisors ATTEST: C er o t e Boar o Supervisors STATE Oh' CALIf'ORl\7IA, County of San Luis Obispo, } ss. RUTH 6~7ARNKE4d _________~___.___~_______- County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, in and for the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, do hereby certify the fore;oin~ to be a full, true and correct copy of an order made by the Board of Supervisors, as the same appears spread upon their minute book. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said Board of Supervisors, affixed this _____l~t~?________ day of___Au~ust--------------, 19~~' __. RUTH WAftIVIiEN County Clerk and Ex-0£ficio Clerk of the Board (SEAT) of Spup~e/rvJisors ~~.,sQ:~L.~LO__,CJ._.._~_ ____ Deputy Clerk. CD-3'16 n /U~19,.d 3 hfunicipa/ly ~7 R I D L E Y ~ Owned ~irova[:e Utilities a ., ~.. -- 685 KENTUCKY STREET, GRIDLEY, CALIFORNIA 95948 ~~ CC.I'lE~~ ~3UT1'C ~~, CL~'i=i~i August 3, 1971 1905 Butte County Board of Supervisors Courthouse Oroville~ Ca. 95965 Gentlemen; Attached please find a certified copy of City of Gridley. Resolution #31-1971 Series establishing the Tax Rate for the Fiscal Year 1971-72, as follows: General Fund - - - -$1.00 Retirement - - - .40 Total - _ - _$1.40 Yours very truly CITY OF GRIDLEY LPNDR ~ CITY CLERK.. AJM:g Encl. Notification to: Butte County Auditor _ _.~ --- mcli"drng rhe,7d~" P - - ~rna1 of rocee'dings of the -City Couacih do hereby CERTIFY: - - Resolution That [he annexed paper is a true and co[rect copy of ~R7~I'SD&at7E NO. 31-19 7l approved and passed by the Council oFThe Ci[y of. Grid ley ac the r,~~yj~„ __ meeting held on [hQp.~..~day of ~}~~~$1= 19.~z WITNESS ~ a.~ city clerk. -' ~,' ~.r RESOLUTION N0. 31 (1971 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRIDLEY ESTABLISHING THE TAX RATE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR. 1971-1972. BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the City Tax for the City of Gridley be, and the same is herebyf established at the rate of $ 1.40 per $100.00 assessed valuation, for the fiscal year 1971-1972. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that said rate is deter- mined from the total of these Tax .Fund Components: FUNDS RATE General $ 1.0.0 Retirement ,40 $ 1.4D BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the City Clerk of the City of Gridley be and he is directed to notify the Board of Supervisors and the County Auditor of the County of Butte that t the City Tax Rete for-the City of Gridley is so established. ~,P, ;000 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above a~sd foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly :.ntroduced and passed and adopted by the City- Council of the'City of Gridley at a re ular meeting ther_eof_ r3~il-, }~,n~;t r,n tt-:o ~_~, a,U~~.. ~.._..,.~ Sca« of < ~l~:uiina~ Coeur, t I i.u~ _.~. A'C'I~E.~'l~~ll'1O'' ~~".a,t~u~~9,~'%I ~ IT`r lit ~_h1I11,EY~ ~ b2~,- ~.x ur i icn!-d, rrc :.~~p i.u[e.l Cic, ~-cl~~'~ims .h~, iouia >t ~~o-.__ d ._ of 'I..r=: rf ~hr t'i r.~- .,r ~3rid1 ~, _~a,l a I. ... r.;r = r6r ~-.`c.: ,r,~i,:. rn, ~~~•, ~.. cil, ~ .. 1--_e'uv ~: f•.It 1~1r1": _ ASG~t_it:].O~1 Thnc nc~ n u .,_.-I L,t~.rr is :~ ¢ uc .:nd :. , - rr._~ ~_ ~,~~e. oI rSR~7}~~b'r+{x. iJi), ~ ~_- ~_ ~ 7 ~_ r~ r,~:<,I , ui r _eiisz hl~ . _~~ ~ 1=,; ~h^ C._ .n (. r.L il~.._- ~-~~~ ,.r .~f _ _ Thc~ Girv ,f i_~idluy~ ~i r5c rA Hurl ar ~ a - ~- 1_ - ir.}~ clcr.; ~ ~ RESOLUTION N0, 31 C1971 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRIDLEY ESTABLISHING TH£ TAX RATE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR. 1971-1972. BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the City Tax for the City of Gridley be, and the same is hereby, established at the rate of $ 1.40 per $100,00 assessed valuation, for-the fiscal year 1971_1972. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that said rate is deter_ mined from the total of these Tax Fund Components: FUNDS RATE ' General $ 1.00 Retirement ,40 $ 1.40 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the City Clerk of the City of Gridley be and he is directed to notify the Board of Supervisors and -the County Auditor of the County of Butte that the City Tax Rite for the City of Gridley is so established. (; 00 0 y. .. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly :.ntroduced and passed and adopted by the City Council of the'City of Gridley at a regular meeting thereof, duly held on the 2nd day of August ,- ~ 1971, by the following vote: AYES; COUNCILMEN DAVIS HUGHES, SPURGEQN, SQUIRE AND SHIFFLET ~, NOES; COUNCILMEN NON£ ' ABSENT: COUNCILMENNONE ~: ATTEST; ~~~ . ~~~ - -~fi CL9~RK ~:~ ~ ~ ~~; IOU , o S' ~e ore the ~oarcl o Su ~rvisors f f ~ Coun~j o f Kern, S~a~e o f Cali f orni~ 22-2.1 In the matter of QPPOSITZO;`t TO ASSE2~3LY RILL 515 AND OT'ri1;R RILLS CREA~I~IG MA'~tDAT(3RX MULTI-COUNTY PZ.~13~II1`1G C1iGt1NZZATICli,1S Resolution No. 71-x+93 Minute Boo 2$5 age~__'._........ Resolution Bool~~__~____._.__Page_.__.._.-.........._ I, VERA K. GIBSON, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Kern, State of California, do hereby certify that the following resolution, proposed by Supervisor Webb ,seconded by Supervisor HQad ,seas duly passed and adopted by said Board of Supervisors at an official meeting hereof this~~~.~._.day of J~e_..._...._..._......, 19 7~.., by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Jackson, ~ Head, Xoung, Webb, Milker ~ ~ ~ <~~'ZiL'. NOES: l~on.e ~~~' ~~ ABSENT; lQpne Glerk of the Board of Supervisors, County of I{ern, State o£ Ca]i£ornia nESOLUTton Section 1. WHEREAS: (a) Assembly Bill No. 5l5 along 'w~.th other wills L 8Ve been introduced in the currant session of the State Legislature which would mandate the establishment of multi-county Area Planning Organizations in many parts of the State; and; (b) With the need for greater decentralization and increased local control of government, the passage of these bills will create a further handicap for the effectiveness of democracy, in that popular control over decision-making will be one step further removed from the electoral process; and (c) The creation of additional agencies will prove to be uneconomical-and prevent efficient governmental action in that counties will be restricted unduly in the undertaking of the solution of the problems to which this legislation is aimed;: and (d) The Area of Planning 3urisdiction of the Kern County Coup- ~~", cil of Governments wi11 also~'be adversely affected by the creation of a multi-county agency in that such ;a;utult=`county agency will not be as well equipped to deal with i:he various planninv problems and that an adds- tional loss of local governmental control will create new .problems and barriers. to effective government by this Council; Section 2. NO'~i, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors c+f the County of Kern, Sate of California, as follows: 1. That Assembly Bill 515 be and it is hereby strongly opposed. 2. That all Senate or Assembly bills being introduced which seek to create mandatory multi-county agencies be and are hereby strongly opposed. 3. That copies of this resolution be sent to the Honorable Ronald Reagan, Governor of the State of California, Assemblyman Kent H. Stacey, Assemblyrea.n William M. Ketchum, Senator Walter W. Stiern, each and every California county, and the i~exn County Council of Governments, /dD.Cr.S 1711: 11(1, Ilih (3I% SIIPF,fi I'1.~,~3R5 J~L `~ ~ 33 ~~~ ~~ Courtly of liit~ers(rlc, Grlifonua. RECEIVEC CLARK A. NELSON ~ s s n r.. Tr ~ :~ a ~ BUTTE CO. CLI=RK Z;rIII~Rl;?1S, there are twenty milI.ion Americans over the age of 65, many of whom are still desirous of utilizing their acquired talents and skills for productive efforts, and FIIIEREAS, by continuing to serve their ennununity, senior citizens gain in self--esteem by engaging in i~leaningful activity, and ATIII;REAS, the matching of senior citizens'' knowledge and s}tills to the needs of the conununity results in the community's gain in terms of an experienced work force, ahd 5~7I-iERP.AS, in 1968 a group of businessmen, industrialists and business officials met with a group of retirees in the City of: iiemet, which meeting resulted in the organizaL-ion ]mown as Experience, Incorporated, and Z4f3EREAS, Experience Incorporated has become nationally known and recognised for its success in providing meaningful part-time, and occasional full-time, employment of senior citizens, and 44t•IEREAS, the 6Vhite diouse Conference on Aging is scheduled to be held in t~7ashington, D.C., in November, 1971, and one of the primary recommendations to the White I-rouse Conference arising from recent County and State conferences on aging is the encouragement of the expansion of the Experience, Incorporated philosophy to State and Nation-~.l levels; no~•r, therefore BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, in regular session assembled on .7uiy 6, 1971, that the Board endorses the basic philosophy of utilitizing the talents and skills of senior. citizens in every Bray possible and encourages each county to take advantage of the full range of experience and knowledge possessed by its senior citizens. The foregoing is certified to (Seal} be a true copy of a resolution duly adopted by said Board of Supervisors on the date therein set forth, DONALD D. SULLIVAN,CIerk of said F3oard By `~,,_~D e pu ty / OO.UJ~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF FRESN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 l~ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 .._ 22.1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN Testa MATTER OF RECIPROCAL ) AGREEMENTS WITH OTHER COUNTIES ) FOR HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL SER- ) VICES FOR INDIGENTS } o JAN ZB ~ $~ ~~ ,T~ Rk c~iy gVa~ A. NE O T7-~ OG OLD ON RESOLUTION TERMINATING~k SUCH AGREEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1475 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, the County of Fresno has hcrcto- fore entered into Reciprocal Agreements with the hereinafter designated counties for medical care and treatment of an ~liF;i_hlc indigent resident of the other County and waiving the provisions of Section 1475 of the Health and Safety Code authorizing the charge 'therefore to the County of residence; and WHEREAS, this Board is in receipt of a report of the Acting County Administrative Officer recommending the termination of said reciprocal agreements as a means of reducing County costs of Health Care Services; and WHEREAS, it appears that the recommendation should be 'approved; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Reciprocal Agree- meats heretofore referred to be and the same hereby are terminated effective August 1, 1971, with the Counties having such reciprocal agreements with the County of Fresno and which are hereby terminat as aforesaid as follows: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO ss, I, J. L. BROWN, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk-of the Hoard of Supervisors of said Fresno County, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of the original _.__Resnluti~.,~e~miln~ati>~ i~eci~rQeal__Qgreement~g_with other Counties..___ now of record in my office. lh WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said Board of Supervisors. this - 24th day of June is ~~ . J. L. BROWN, COUNTY CLERK and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Fresno County, California. Deputy Clerk ii z 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 I4 15 16 i do.v~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS { OF THE COUNTY OF FRESNO ~~N1B ~ SS A~ ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA R~O~ ,~' IN Ti-IE MATTER OF RECIPROCAL ) AGREEMENTS WITH OTHER COUNTIES ) FOR HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL SER- ) '.VICES FOR INDIGENTS ) K ~v ~LqR A Ep 8~~j.~ coN ~~ o~ RESOLUTION TERMINATINGRK SUCH AGREEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1475 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, the County of Fresno has hereko- fore entered into Reciprocal Agreements with the hereinaL-tcr designated counties for medical care and treatment of an e1i~;i_hlc indigent resident of the other County and waiving the provisions of Section 1475 of the Health and Safety Code authorizing the charge therefore to the County of residence; and WHEREAS, this Board is in receipt of a report of the Acting', County Administrative Officer recommending the termination of said reciprocal agreements as a means of reducing County costs of Health Care Services; and WHEREAS, it appears that the recommendation should hc~ 17~approved; ~. 's ,_ ~'-a '%3 „?!~ '; 18 NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Reciprocal Agree- 19 means heretofore referred to be and the same hereby are terminated 20 effective August 1, 1971, with the Counties having such reciprocal 21 agreements raith the County of Fresno and which are hereby terminate 22 as aforesaid as follows: 23 Alameda Mendocino San Luis Obispo 24 Butte Merced Shasta Humboldt Napa Stanislaus 25 Imperial Placer Sutter ', Kern Plumas Tulare 26 .Kings Santa Barbara Ventura Los Angeles San Bernardino Yuba 27 Madera San Joaquin 28 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Cleric forthwith forward a Certified Copy of this resolution to the '~oard of Supervisors of 29 each of the said named counties, 30 ADOPTED by the Fresno County Board of Supervisors this 22nd 31 day of June, 1971, by t'he following-vote, to-wit: 32 AYES: Supervisors Craven, Cassidy, Reich, Krebs, Ventura NOES: None ABSENT: None IrO pplw ' - - c - - Pfi?,".. ~:: y~, 4; c~~~ o~ oA~~ ~oo~ ~a~ . ~~M~~ ~ ssA~ ~1- CITY HALL 561 MAIN STREET REC~~V~© HALF MOON BAY,CALIFOliN1A94019 ~~~~~.Q N~~.SO~ • ~~ C~ • Teleplione (415) ~K6 Flom The Office of June 24, 1971 Honorable Mayor and City Council: On June 7, 1971, the City Council of Half Moon Bay passed Resolution 33-71 supporting coastal legislation i.n the form of Senate Bill #1354 authored by Senator James Wedworth and co-authored by Assemblyman Arnett. .The City Council has taken this action only after careful review of the various Assembly. and Senate bills on the subject of coastal controls. Senate Biil #1354 is the only bill that considers tb.e crucial role of local government in the plan- ning and permit process and also provides reasonable controls for the conser- vation and development of the coastline. Specifically, the bill includes the following items which other bills do not: • 1, Provides for adequate conservation guidelinesr 2. Provides for the integrity of local .government in the planning and permit process. 3. Provides for relief to local governments from tax losses due to the bill. 4. Provides financial assistance to Iocal government to undertake the planning necessary to comply with the bill.. None of the other bills consider all of these factors, especially the fiscal impact of the legislation on local governments. The City of Half Moon Bay, therefore, requests that you join us in actively sup- porting Senate Bili #1354. Sinc ear ely, /~/f~ ~ ~~/l'ti" ~ -'~~l ~~ Albert J. :Adreveno Mayor RESOLUTION 33-73 JUNE 7, 1971 WHEREAS California's coastal area is the state's most distinctive and valuable natural resource, and W1iEREAS planning and management of the coastal area is primarily the responsibility of local government, and WHEREAS local government can be effectively assisted by develop- ment and conservation guidelines established jointly by Iocal govern- ment and the state, and Wl-IEREAS the integrity of local government in the planning and permit process must be maintained, and WHEREAS relief for local government from tax losses due to coastal legislation must be forthcoming, and WHEREAS financial assistance to Iocai government to undertake the planning necessary to comply with coastal legislation must be provided, be it hereby RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of lIalf Moon Bay, California that Senate Bill 1354, as amended in the. Senate May 20, 1971, sets forth adequate criteria, guidelines, and assistance while maintaining the in- tegrity of local government in the planning and permit process, thereby effecting balanced coastal area planning and be it hereby further RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, California respectfully request the enactment of Senate Bill 1354 as amended. .- ~~ ~ i v v. os The Public Lands and. Public Protection Committee, Frank Burks, Chairman, suggests that each county take action on the sample resolution below and if their action is favorable. please send. copies for P1r, C.R. Hull, P. O. Box 1120, Redding, California 96001, and. Ralph Hollinger, Secretary, NCCSA, 16670 China Gulch i7rive, Anderson, California 96007 RESOLUTION FOA THE RECOGNITION OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ~'LANNING BOARD WHEREAS, the Board. of Supervisors r©cognizes the need for ong range p arming, and. mprovement in the criminal justice system; and WHEREAS, the California Council has established a multi county Criminal Justice Planning Body= and, WHEREAS, the planning and. administrative funds for this Body are provided under the provisions of the Omnibus Crime Control sZ,1d Safe Streets Act through. the Califorz~,ia Council on Criminal Justice; NOG], TI~EREFORE BE zT RESOLVER the Board, of Supervisors recognizes the Re $i on TT Cr m na Jus ce P ann ng Board. as the official Planning Agency for the criminal justice system= BE IT FURTHER $ LVED, the Board of Supervisors reserves the right to xev euT, a .. o or .e e e any portion of any plan that pertains to that particular unit of government: <. ti=, ~~~ Page 10 CtlIINCILM EN W M. H. THEBADH. MAYOP KARLTHOMPSON ROY E. PRITD HARD WILLIAM D. CARSON BEN L. PRIJDEN ~/~~~yy ~~~ ~T~ ~~~~~ ~~~yL~iere t~se Quad own f~e eG ~'g~L and ~Lllafer' Biggs, ~alifarnia 85Ji7 June 16, 1971 The Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Butte Courthouse Oroville, California 95965 Gentlemen: ~ ~. os PHONE-OITY HALL 06[3-6436 UTILITY DEPT. 060-5420 P. O. BOX 307 1 hereby respectfully submit a certified copy of Resolution Number 10, 1971 Series, approved by the City Council of the City of Biggs, establishing the tax rate for the year ending June 30, 1872• ours very truly, T~Irs. Luella A. Tamagni Director of F'inance- Deputy City Clerk LAT:ms Encl . cc: F. H. Seely, Jr., Auditor-Controller RESOLUTION N0. 10 (1971`Series] RESOLUTION OF' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BIGGS ESTRBLISHING THE TAX RATE. BE IT RESOLVED RND ORDERED that the City tax rate for the City of Biggs be, and the. same is hereby established at the rate of $1.00 on each X100.00 assessed valuation and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that said sum is determined from the total funds from which the same is broken down as follows: FUNDS &ATE eneral Fund ~~0 BE IT FURTHr~R RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the total amount of money required to run the City Government of the City of Biggs for the year ending June 30, 1972, is hereby established as follows: FUNDS AMQUNT eneral Fund (unknown amount) ......................:...........•.•...e...ee. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Biggs at a regular meeting thereof duly held at $:00 o~clock p.m. on tine ].Lath day of June, 1971, by the following vote, to wit: AYES• COUNCILMEN Pritchard, Pruden and Thebach NOES: COUNCILMEN. None ABSENT• COUNCILMEN Thompson and Carson ~: ~( ~: ( ++ APPROVED : . ," ~' ~ ~ 7 j ~ ,~ , • ATTEST- : .~' CHARLES RUNCHEY \\~` ~ ~ ~~~ ~~. ~ - - ~~ Lt. - _... !}~ . O(J Board of Supervisors Butte County Courthouse Oroville, California 95965 "~ ~ ,: .:,:ayr~:: COUNTY CF NAPA ~~L° "~'J"~= ~ El~,~~1~~~,A'~~iG AND ROAD DEPARTMENT ~ ROFO ~ DD '486 POLK HTREET • P. O. BOX 690 , 11,,y ~~ ~ HARRY D. HAMkLTON DIRLOTCR OF PuBL10 WOR K>r 1i„~ ^ /~C y. NAPA, CALIFORNIA 94668 Q.~„VC~~~E ~ON eauNrr eNO1HCeR oQUHn aunvcroR ~ ~• ~r `~~R~~(A+•^ C~~~K June 14, 1971 fl WALTiR G. TAMADNI ~`~.rT~ C ' 1 ~ ROAD CCM MIf PIONLR V A cotr Enclosed herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 71-58 of the Napa County Board of Supervisors which takes a position of opposition to any legislation which has been introduced with the goal of further restricting the use of "force account" methods of constructing county facilities, including roads and buildings. T have been asked by the Napa County Board of Supervisors to transmit this resolution to you along with their request that you join with them in opposing these bills. ,~ Most of these bills, as written and revised to date, would seriously "ham string" the operations of most county road departments and county building maintenance operations, statewide. We feet that the taxpayers, under existing legislation,~are getting much more for their tax dollar in miles of road constructed and in roads and buildings maintained and in efficient use of county employees than wou7.d be possible under more restrictive force account legislation. It is also important to realize that the more binding and restrictive that this type of legislation becomes, the more administrative type work is required with resulting fewer funds available for the actual performance of the work. Again, may we request your active opposition to these bills and wish you success in that opposition. Very rely yo , HARRY HAMI N, P - Direct of Public Works and County Engineer Encl. HDH/ft WHEREAS, these bills, if enacted would make more difficult and expensive the proper .maintenance and repair of county owned buildings and other structures; and- WHEREAS, these bills, i£ enacted, would have an adverse effect on the efficient and proper utilization of County employees; and WHEREAS, California's counties have performed efficiently and in the best interests of the counties and the State while working with the currently existing legislation dealing with contracting and force account. for all types of construction and maintenance; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by this Board that it takes a position in opposition•:to those bills introduced. to make more restrictive curre~it "Force Account" law or to enact new "Force Account" law and urges other counties and State Legislators to also.take such a position particularly with respect to the concept contained in such b311s as those hereinafter listed. AB 1209 (Townsend) aAB 1886 {Cullen) ': SB 3.161 (Collier) Signed and'.agprovgd this 8 day of .7une , 19 71 • AYES and in favor of said resolution; SUPERVISORS: SEARS . PEATMAN WIGGER BERNARD ANBERSEN SUPERVISORS: NONE ABSENT SUPERVISORS: NONE SFAL . ATTEST FLORENCE W, CUNNY County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of said Board ~• „ . + . t _ .-~1, / d 0 , OS"! ~ ~•T oisraa, w:~: 5 -~5=7i ~~~n.,~ cirrk `~ Alt'n/. y Fin. I', Plan. DPV! v Pol i<c F~r~ ~~ it Park I Airport (I 3d, !_ . ~' E'(r~llu Irnrr/ --j- ~ ~ ~s (~i ,~, c r F; u, ~.I c rr Juts j , y P.ESOLi~TION No. Zs~ ~o-~i . r~"~'"1~ P~ESOLUTION ADOPTING GtARRANTS FOR i'~cAFFIC CC~T:ROL , sUl-.[_ ~~ 4< DEVICES AND TECiL~TIQUES NEAR SCY~GGLS ~ ~''~. {Vehicle Code 21372, et ser.i WHEP.EAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21372, et seq. of the Vehicle Coda of the State of California, this Council directed the City of Chico Traffic Coma-nittee to unde-rtai<e a study, prepare a~:.survey and promulgate warrants and tec~~niques to be used as guidelines for the placement of traffic control devices near schools fo-r the purpose of protecting students going to and from school, and WHEREAS, said committee has completed cba study, and has submitted to this Council for adoption, proposed warrants, anc WHEREAS, said proposed warrants have here;:ofore been approved and adopted by the Board of Education of the C::ico Unified School District on march 10, 1971, and the Board of Super- visors of the County of Butte on March 16, 1971, and WHEREAS, this Council has fully considerac the -report of said committee .and the proposed warrants, and fi:>,ds the same ought to be approved and adoptea; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THF. CGUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHICG, AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT; 1. That this Council do,'and it .does hereby, adopt and establish warrants to be hereafter used as guidelines for the ?lacement of traffic control devices and techniques in the open-'' ation thereof, pursuant to the provisions of Sections 21372, et seq. of the Vehicle Code of ,the State of California, ail as set gut in detaia in Exhibits A.-and B attached hereto and by reference nade apart hereof. li The foregoing resolution was adopted at an adjourned regular .meeting of the Council of^the City of Chico, held on the 13th day of May 1971,, by the following vote: I~ -1- fi . ~ , ~I it ~~~ ` AYES: CouncilmenggcGowan, Pziel, Rinael, Ruff, Stewart ,and- ~~ Nichols. ~~ \OES : :None i aABSE,NT: Councilman Bathen. '~ s/ Ti~7ILLIAM Do NICHOLS ~i ~ ~ 112.y0 t i' ' ~' ATTEST: ' ' s/.BARBARA A. EVANS City Clerk AP~I.OVEn: s / GRAYS ON P12I CE City A.~tor-ney I i I, Barbara A. Evans, City Clerk of the City of Chico, do hereby certify that this.is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. X3`1 X0`7/ i adopted by the Council of the City of Chico at regular meeting held on'the ~~ 19 ~ . r ~ ~~ z~ i City Clerk ' °}' .r~r a .. `... ~F,4,~'1~?s~l~r:t~ :`v~LL.i~,S i;i~; "S f.F~'~ x1~S1tS0a~."~ CtSe~[hixT?`5~:~", :'S.Fni'~"T ~OUTb 'C4 SG?i001. I1~~~ a"`, t1Yv~~ "SlU1d5 .:~.IE~ %iA&Ks~d~:5'. " 1. Safety Advisaxy Committee Reeamrneasdattans, . Ja., .`sae crarr~rttittee reeaa~mends th~ak tkr.exe be established within the fzamewortt +~f t~;r; reec:nkxy xeconsfiituted Chico Area Safety Council, as a salbp committee, a Sal~ool Ss¢~ Advisory Committee, ltepa;eseaatation oss the Committee siaould include CUSS, City o£ Chiao Tra¢fic Committee, the Couaity caf watt®, ~~nd•the PTe1, the coaauraigCee shaaald taave the £'ofloeaiaa~ ssanc~.ion;~e ~ ' lA R:evia~ :~aad "r~aabaai+k xecemvnendations t® th~a rappropriate govexnma:nkai , `sgexa~y ~elsa~;ing to aesaool s~af~•t;y vt~>abl~a~e, bokh ta^af£is and ekhes, . oaa era isxban $B^ea b.erdis. ~~. Pa~r:~.•~:ta aria} raubmia~ re;.oarmendaati®zas ~e1~;8:£ng to specific school safety ~ra;b~.e®+.s st an in~i•aMdual ac'eaool ®x sek~ools to the. appropa°iate ~,ovexnaaantal aagenay. S> The :committee ,~eeommends thtat thexe be added to the City of Clnieo 'I's~£gie ComrnittEe a'epgesentskion fxnm the CUS~J Adra3.niatration at saac3a .kiades as the Comasai.ttee toasaid¢xs z~ch'®ol traf¢iG aa¢e:y pxoblems, In additi®n, in cases wlaege a gpeci¢ic sckaooll or schools are involveda sdaiitic~ssal rep;^eseaatation sah~oaald be solkcaeed ¢~~ e~ae scFaasol pxiaacigaal' ux his ~3esi$a,ate seed ties saclaoa~.' PT~I, .~, "5a£est 4ioure ~a ~cZaool ~lmaa~'D r.:, 7"~ae Committee xeec~samaends klar~t't~°.ere be estet~lis9aAd ¢aa; ,sash elementar,~ scYaocl ~, taithiaZ CUaA a "Safe€ag Route tai raffiool" plan. .Ea~:h p~,aaa sFaoiald b~ developed ,~rsiaatly by ~°a=preeevad:~atives cs£ ghe CUSfa Admiaaistxstiaxi xind the paa^ticaalax schao'l. Ttae ~nlaan s~aoasld then be aevieeaed by~ the '1~•s,££ie Committee prior Co adoptir3~n. A¢tex ade~ptiern e~aexy aue,~a1N ava~iZable shoaxld be exercised by . rtes schnral pr.ineipal end tl-a~ mchool :4bTA 'ter iaifoa°aa and edaacaS:e stsadeaata q:o astilize the."Sg£eat ltoent~s to at'haaa~'l1° for thse tachaol. :~~. Sens ana3 `P~t~s~m.:ki.,m,~$ ~ . ,~. Sigate e Ceaae~al All tra£fiic signs used ag scho~sls, :~aehoal c,ossingaa, ox exossiaags aas~d by $c~xaol ehildra:n shali~ ~a€ of .pa'xmanent Hype and in coa;.toiauca,race arikh . tae design spa:€i£icaki®ns o£ Ciae l~Ppartment of Fublic &1ox~Ca, State . of Caliaaxsaid, se, p~sbl;tshed in tb.e State o¢ C.slifaxaais Division of . I3igh€aays ° a Ze:aning I~saa~taala @axt #E m 'Tra£¢ie. ~io>g abni¢o>^rr, sigzas are . proti.iNited and shatg aaot use i$a€~tal:t,r=s~. ~sa~taabZe sigasa axn ra~vt ~,~:xmi~ted with£n tae roada<ray at easy tiaa~~, exeapi: gar :a$aad signs sat-,flized b;~ . schooR. safres•,y pstzasls ox adult c~-a~asing gaa<~earda iaa the ;rexEoa.^s~aabce as£ . tl;eir dutia'a, S+Tiaeaaevea a divialec3 aaigYaway hsz~a a eenkex~se~3isn of ., aaxaf$.s£~.~^et a~iel~.h~ ai~as ah®aald br bocr~teri ixa kEae v~~dian as well as ~ _. a=a tt,a; t~t$ht. ~~e ~N~~'o ~J~ ~~Q~ " r"i.e Stanuax~ci 5;~~;ssc 1. Schov2 Xing Sara r 61~ib• aa3 S;~eed ~n~c Sign s. Folzsy 24esy l+e 3a,3t:®lled at achoAl crassawal3ts ~t uns:os~tr®lipd intex- • saectirasas e~hich sate used predarsinautly ly s~:hooi chiideeu going t® end k'xram echo~l. b. L~tseatiosa Erect; in arlvaac,e c£ the croaa~ik . . ~. 1.'aeemes2t R~asi~in~s t~neszal Paveroetat a~ax~kings• cosaeist ®£ cscosaswalks, anal legesxd®. ~. , Cxoc awe iks . ~xosswalks shall tie eutauliadaed oaby wtaere necess.~xy to safs],y ck~anaelixe psdesatrians ~sssd shall consist. o£ L'~?o parallel. 12-i.ach • wide stripes c~~mpletely seross the roadway, formally, these stxipes should ~~e s minimum of t~:n £eet: apaxt. . . Crossvarzllcs shcauld ba marked at all intessactiotis an established "Safest itoutes fio School" where thex¢ ie ~eatuoriak conflict between vehic3:ea axed' cras®i€tg by 1c9.ndes~~arten end eZer~entary students; or where studealta ar~z pegaaitt~d at mid~hlaack locations; ox where they eould xaot othea~ise recognizo the prsspex place to ~,..r cxoss. a, Oxosrawalks Riaar Schools The color of aeharsl crosswalks stnal~, hQ yel~,nvr w~rer~ conti;uoa~s . to school gr.€aunds ssd vaay be yellow if r~ithin I~aGQ feet of the school ~raussds, s® provided by the ~lifaxa~.~ Vehi,ale CotBe, b. tither Oro$swralkffi ~. `Tkse color ®f other marked ped€aizisrs czo~+swalks shaA;! has white. . , Pedestrian cross~aal~rs tan bo est~blisired rseax schocal® fox student training guxposoa. Z. I.egend$ • "&7caw Schoasl 3Cis4~gsr F.e~end . '~h~s naweeaExst sr~srking ltegensl ".SI.{yW SC& aCZt36" is xequixesi fa ad~aar~ce ~£ all school aro$awrsik~, axtept in advatace af.~ ~eop aiSaa yia~id aZgn, or Lrafti~ signal. ~hn !~$+snd st~t~l be ire each epgzosch iatag or lanes, a~ad tt-e word "~$i~oo shall h® ~t least 100 feet £roxa th® s crasawel3c. . _• i •~ ~ , ~ OD, oS STATE OF CALIFORNIA-RESOURCES AGENCY RONALD REAGAN, Governor AIR RESOiJRCES BOA1tD 1108 FOURTEENTH STREET SACRAMENTO 95814 June 2, 1971 County Board of Supervisors Butte County Courthouse Orovil.le, Califarnia 95965 Gentlemen: . ® Hoard Mam6ers A. ]. HAAGEN-SMIT, Ph,D „ Chairman JOSEPH F. BOYLE, M.D. MRS. CHARLES EDWARD CHAPEL ROBERT C. COZENS JERRY W. FIELDER JOHN G. HOLMES WILLARD F. LIBBY, Ph.D. JOHN G. MILES FRED F. PERELLI•MINETTI LOUIS F. SAYLOR, M.D. WALTER R. SCHMID GERALD A, SHEARIN JAMES G. SYEARNS HAROLD SULLIVAN Execofive Officer JOHN A. MAGA In 1970, the Legislature added Chapter IO !'Burning" to Part 1 of Division 26 of the State Health and Safety Code. This Chapter prohibits, after December 31, 1971, the use of open fires for the purpose of disposal of combustible or flammable solid or liquid wastes.- The law, however, provides that the Board shall, upon the findings of sparse population and economic and technical difficulties, permit cities and counties to continue to operate their open burning dumps for a limited time only. In accordance with these provisons,._cities and. counties having appropriate reasons to continue their open burning dumps may apply to the Board for permission. The Board's policy on submitting these applications is stated in the ~;at~ached resolution adopted at its May 19, 1971 meeting ~- ~rri'=Eureka. ~ s ~~ n i ~: ~ 1,1 ;~ ~~ + ~'d3}f~ A. Malta `s' cu~tive Officer ~. ~ ~ ,~ ~~ j ~ ~ v . ZF ~ -~.. , Georgq/J~ayl~r ~ . Chief,..A'' Sa`*.iitation Attachment STATE OF CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD RESOLUTION 71-31 May 19, 1971 WHEREAS, Section 395 fires for the purpose tires, tar, trees, w' liquid waste, or for December 31, 1971; and WHEREAS, Section 39297.x+ of the Health and Safety Code directs the Air Resources Board to permit a city, city and county, or county to use open outdoor fires for a limited time only, in its operation of a solid waste dump, upon the finding that because of sparse population in the geographi- cal area and economic and technical difficulties, the solid waste dump should be so operated; and WHEREAS, there are approximately three hundred and seventy nine city and county dumps using open burning as a means of solid waste disposal; N0t1, R4~Rg'ORE, BE iT RESOLVEb, That the Air Resources Board's policy far allowing limited time extensions to cities and counties to continue t0 use open fires for the purpose of disposal of solid waste is: Cities and counties wishing to operate their open burning dumps beyond the December 31, 1971 deadline shall apply to the Board for permission before November 1, 1971. The application shall be do a form of a resolution from the city council or county board of supervisors, and shall be accompanied with information on: 1. Geographical location of each open burning dump and population density within a ten mile radius. 2. Number of people and area that each open burning dump serves. 3. Amount of waste disposed of at each open burning dump. 4. Unavailability of other methods of disposal. 5. A plan and timetable to phase out each open burning dump. 96 of the Health and Safety Code prohibits use of open of disposal of petroleum wastes, demolition debris, ood waste, or other combustible or flammable solid as metal salvage or burning of automobile bodies sfter / Off. o s- ' pF UPp '. R a°~1~ +~ ~ ~~s ' °~~ ~ p . m ~ '~s °1 ~ n 4. MEMBERS DF THE 9CARD ¢ y,} JOSEPH E. SH EEDY Z PATRICK E. MELARKEY, D.D.S. z ~ ~~ #0 ~~ ~~a JAMES PH ELAN EUGENE T. GIJA LCD p * PV '4CRA MENt E. HENRY KLCSB BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO EUGENE T. GUALC^ N 827 SEVENTH STREET / SACRAMENTO. CALIFORNfA 958f4 CHAIRMA 9DARD Cf 5LIPERVIS CRS 2 June 1971 The Honorable Jere E. Reynolds, Chairman Butte County Board of Supervisors Courthouse Oroville, California 95965 Dear Supervisor Reynolds: Recently I asked your upport to help neutralize political pressures being exerted to place a $1 billion apace contract in Southern California. The enclosed releases give '.evidence that these political pressures are mounting. This award should be based strictly on merit! In the nexC ten years million to our economy; th substantial impact through these Sobs are lost simply to convey the impression t By working together we Can merits of the various prop necessary. the engine award can mean 7,500 jobs and $750 e jobs and this purchasing power will have a t Northern California. It would be tragic if ecause Southern California politicans manage work is needed more in the South than North. nsure the contract award is made strictly on the ve Sending the enclosed resolution to Dr. Arthur Fletcher, the NASA Administrator, other appropriate public officials and public media will help neutralize political pressures. Suggest you word your resolution: Resolved that the (yoour name) urges NASA to give strong consideration to the economic needs',of the people of Northern California in awarding the development and production contract for the Space Shuttle Main Engine. Please support my efforts to neutralize the blatant attempts of Southern California officials to secure this award on the employment issue. ', Very truly yours, ~ Bug T. Gualco, Chairman Board of Supervisors ETG:ftg '', f'` ~"~~Illi ~~Ii,~_ ~E'3~ II ° < < ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~.: ,, ~~ . 121 L®ng~o~h ~o~se D~~~ce ~uz~~i~g, ~asfiEOg~oo, D. ~. 2D515 . ~. • FOR IMI•SEDIATE RELEASE GOLD:~ATFR SAYS ROCI{ETDYNE May 6, 1971 HEST P05SIBLE SPACE SFIU2'TLE ENGINE CONTRACTOR Congressman Barry Goldwater, Jr. said taday that Rocketdyne of Canoga Park is the best possible contractor ' for the NASA Space Shuttle engines. ~ In a letter to President Nixon and NASA Administrator S t James Fletcher, Goldwater declared, "...we should have the- . best possible project contractor so as to insure that the program will be completed on time... at the lowest possible cost. I write you to urge strong consideration of Rocketdyne's contract application to build the space shuttle engines." Goldwater cited the firm's outstanding performance record with the Nation's first TCBD1, IRBM, and the manned space booster systems. Rocketdyne also built all the "engines that have lifted U.S, astronauts skyward; additionally, the firm has built 2,745 engines for the NASA, Army and Air Force. Due to the great similarities between the Saturn V _ engines (Rocketdyne-produced} and the Space Shuttle engine requirements, Goldwater expressed hopes that Rocketdyne would get the nod for the engine contract. Aerospace unemployment in southern California continues to rise; at the present time, 160,000 workers are without jobs. Tf the Rocketdyne bid is successful, the ailing California economy would receive a badly-needed shot. in the arm. -30- ROO)1 8003 '- - FDUCAT{ON STAT^CAVITaL _ - GOYERN7AENTAL ORCANiTATION SA CfiAMENTO, CA LIFO RlIIA 8307k - URHAN DEVELOPMENT ANO 7EL.1 918/443.7878 p7sTRler orvlce 8333 TOGAN~A CANYON HLVp, HOUSING sh ~ ~ ~ (7 ~ { /b~`• .d LL-`` •••itt~~~ ~~ii-- 6UITG 418 WOODLAND HILLS. CALIF. H1984 TCL.t af)/)t7-alas (?~(1' y ')' ` /1 Q~~ 1~ . ((( + y~ . ~~•• • -' ~ J ~~{{ ~y ( - ~ ''~ ~ t $ S a ~{ i 9 ~ ] ~ ~ ROBRR7 C. Ci,INE ASSEMBLYMAN, SIXTY-FOURTH DISTRICT VICE GHAIR.ugN, CONSTITUTIONAL AM1IENDMENTS May 14, 1971 T0: All Southern California Legislators FROM: Robert C. Cline , Ttocketdyne Division of North American Rockwell Company, a major bidder for the Space Shuttle con-. tract, invite you .to be their guest at lunch on Wednesday, May 26. It will be held in the back room at Posey`s at 11:45 a.m. . •Please reserve this date for an important briefing and explanation of the value of having ,this con- tract awarded to a California company. They will brief us on the Space Shuttle and explain its im- portance to and employment impact crn California. Rocketdyne's main office is in my district, and I would consider it a favor if you could attend. RSVP 5-7676 /'" ''tom-~ E. C+d+~~~ ~i.t•„BL~® ~~ di °. . n ~ • ~ Locally owned and operated•for ii4 years ~ , 'r~ ~ ~t`>1 ' JAMES McCLATCHY, founder, editor, 1857 X883 4 _ ~c .,,s- C. K. DZaCLATCHY, editor, president, 1883-IJ36 9 'Vol. 228-ATO. 37,354 Wednesday, D•Iay 26, 197J. Editorials Publisked weekday afternoons and Saturday and Sund¢y nioruinpa by McCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS ELEANOR McCLATCHY, president WALTER P. JONES, editor C. K. McCLATCHY, executive editor Merit AI~~~ l~a~es A~rojet Thy Pri~s~ C~n~~~der For Space Shu~tl~ Eni~~ There is no question but that government con- tracts in the contemplated 1510 billion Space Shuttle program should be awarded on the basis of merit. Contractors should be able to deliver as promised on a fixed cost basis. From that standpoint, the Aerojet Liquid Rocket Co. of Sacramento is eminently qualified to develop and produce the main engine of the Space Shuttle. Its engines in the moonshot program performed without flaw. Its research in other aerospace pro- grams, -such as the NERVA nuclear engine, give Aerojet impressive engineering and technical stat- ure. Aerojet officiais, confident of tt~e company's cre- dentials, have urged that the contract awards in the Space Shuttle program be kept fi•ee of political influence. They believe that judged strictly on the merits, (heirs is the superior company to develop the main engine. However, two other contractors are bidding on the engine and Aerojet finds itself • up against strong political campaigns on- behalf of its competi- tors. These have rallied congressmen and others to support their bids. The contract for the $1 billion engine program is to be awarded this summer. It is unfortunate political pressures should be- come involved. In other programs this has contrib- uted to expensive cost over-runs pica{ed ttp by the taxpayer. Aerojet's record of delivering on its con- tracts within stated costs is exemplary. pn merit alone, Aerojet deserves prime consider- ation. Even political and economic consideration should favor Aerojet.. The Space Shuttle main engine, which is but a tenth of the overall program, is the only component which could be developed in Northern California. The competitors for the engine are headquartered in Southern California and Flori- da. Southern California firms wili gain major con- tracts for other components of the shuttle pro- gram. Politically and economically, then, Aerojet stands. as the only contractor which could give Northern California a piece of the program. It would mean up to 5,5DD new jobs and subcontracts throughout the region and the bay area. To repeat: The deciding Factor should be merit. But if political considerations are involved, North- ern California deserves a share of the program, too. Aerojet is the logical contender from both stand- points. SUGGESTED RESOLUTION WHEREAS, jobs in Plorthern California have failed to keep pace ~,aith the region's growth; 41HEREAS, the economy in many Northern California cou:~munities, particularly those in ~•rhich contractors and supn7iers to the spare industry are located; is in des;erate need of a stimulus; WHEREAS, the general economic slo~•rdown has resulted in the layoff of thousands of professional and craft employees rrho are willing and anxious to work; WHEREAS, America's space technology is a vibrant force that provides many economic and social spin-offs that benefit ^.m~ric,.'s ..,.....nmy ..nd pres}i;e; WHEREAS, the Space Shuttle, designed to put men and materials into space with reusable vehicles, effecting billions of do1lars'of savings when compared frith the expendable space vehicles, has top priority in America's space program; . WHEREAS, wank on'the Space Shuttle 14ain Engine grill bring $500 million in jobs, goods and services that will provide purchasing pourer to boost the Northern California economy; WHEREAS, the required cadre of space engineers and scientists, manufacturing and test facilities, necessary to do a high performance, cost effective program are located in ibrthern Calir"ornia; WHEP,EP.S, other areas of the country are actively comoating for production of the Shuttle vehicle and launch site facilities, work on tha Spaca Shuttle Main Engine provides the only opportunity {or Northern California to gain a proportional share of the jobs and economic benefits accruing from the Space Shuttle program; AND 'dHEREAS, when all other factors appear eeual, it is federal procurement practice to take economic conditions into consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The urges the, citizens of ~ County to provide a71 possible support to assure the work on the Space Shuttle '^ain Engine be done in Northern California. ATTEST: CLERK 6U_ O,g-- :. ,?~% ~'1 _,:.'', i ~. ;.int.,, L; L;Is~~Y [E L",iiL., '.ii,'',TI. if~ ;;iiL!;~ii;;ll; .._:~i}UJ'fI`:~ I:;i T'Iii. c;Ll;ti?i) GF- L:~'FI~~tVL:OF~'i l.;F TH:.: 4~'Cii'TY r 't..,~'~_ 'I'.,,_: L.F v:LIFC:iu~IJ,, ;iii r,~.;aa',~_ i;1. F~. U: '.. i E ..,., .__ ., _,.,;T~ _:iLL 33', (~; _ „4Tt,i~ :JIU_S) _.L„-fI~,G i;_i ...:.,.. _ti__,.::ii ,~If~i)Ii;1i .,R,,=Tn,:TI[;P: ' .. ...., ili~r f7 _• ., -- - - ~ ,,. :'.:= ~a Q:~ iL. , tJ I ;;'. T'l 118.`, 1, :Erl _;1:...?", _ u -~i~:' w .... _ ` iis.~ ~. .7~.J it£1:: :::.,..:rl .:U4:.:.ii :.,,..L; TC ::I'Ei. ~. ..; .L g.. :,U;'!Z C!r .vii., .,,,., _.: „i' .. _... ._t ~. - ~~d ~l :'iir .°..~ Nl-i C. }i ... ....'vii ~. ~i1 y ,.: i".. i;'..i v`. ~. ii1 ... ~i ~...:.. J.r:. ~. . ' :, .... ::i~._.: .... _.i iC: i_.i;f J.ii", ._,, .,y :a'8 i:. Li r} IJ;`~ri i;f i~~ ~.iV•:-.3~ ti i1J:J .; ._:. ,.J L i~ ~!'...;i - ., ~,.... 'Fi _..,._t'L~Jn 1,J ...,. _., ...~ .ffi:.. ,,ti ,':n''....un ~~7.~ 3".., .. LJ!GI'.1i1 4; i-ii~ ^iTJaii C'; i,{ ~!:,_ i..~...r.i ~.~ ,~lt~i"•'"rVii;!3P.., ~.., tiL_;h .;L!..,. CGf_Ir':`'~ .:Ct[_ F ,._. ._ y ~. .. 'I. .~~i... "L'ai7?r. r't ..~ ~i;._ r_ _.~. _. ... =lrt_, ..._ !t ., .. I 1.. Li:_.Fl it ~+ -; E' i-..... ,.. .,i it': 1: .!. L•`:I ~ ~ r. ,_., ., t u iC -Ci.i. `-i ~..., .a s. It i.. iL:.. .:( wt:.. _ ....._ ''i ,t `~ .=V:..;G'~ : 'i Lrl~ .~.-V': I` ...... _. ..... ._. ,li ~~'17. f. ..i t?i'a ~. ~_, 1., J-' yn .., .. ..a J ...,,, i.ii' „il~. CGU}l%1~. Jy ia~~ ,. '..~._. !al;.'e-.... ._: I' ~ !.;, ~, _...c,! :, ,.. :.t ..~..,g ,., i.. J.1 r;,_.ii1L: .?.i ur ;; 1~}. G;~ .,':i ;.l '.t if ~'F. :.'V :.: Li.i :. ,J1~ ~ , ._,,u,~lt ._I' L ,'il:.. "I:.'!'t :: L'I]. ~ i~f „ ;r, ~!C; L ., ., lf~: :i ~ i~l . -. -_i:.-1 ~ .;1~i ....~, .,i'~'ii J.f; ..:1."',~.~ v"+ ~ ~Jz?::1;'1C l;lli.;{U ,t (: :',ilf tii 1'". .,.. f} ;..~ }Ji (}Ji ~~, _:,. i ~~. ., ... ..:..~ ~i) r.r u..: .J 1'-3 iJ, I I :.... _.i ~i.ii;li-i(~ii :(L..,...;Lb'._C) 1' ;4f ~ 1 r ~! ,h3~~ 'c! CC7i. li' i.[1.L~:J rf]i;L] LlE1~,P 17 C•; C~i}rill"i C; i.,,;i 'i;EJ ._....'.ll']CIr ~.~ilrlGt_t.LCih u;J! '.~.E!i :SP.(a %':3:.}L'LAhi}f°E~;SI fi3tf c~a ~C)i3nL;C1r}, ::nd `C?i3'I; cc.c~i .i!_I'„~"I ,. 6', r77`P r..:';i~is:; ~i:.'u'd!: ii i~ "C.El£: t: f; EJn'l;}f Lli LC, 1<~ ~ 3 unCOLlf L; iTC C1 i/D ~t0 ~}OS ~? SLJ^Fl - 4 ~' f3_ IT (-I;iiTN~_;? s.__,GLUi_~ ~;11i}'~ E7 ~r,:y !;i i.lt=~, F'o=lo=utiC'!~ i . r r L]E? CiAiJit] CIA,., .-„E f:ESr; .~!~i7ly[t1.;n Jcf~n r;nrJ::, ,.<~ri;Jl:nr u:L~.lE'y ~t1c: Cr,uncl, stir,f~z'~.r.t,q_, .,_;:,oria-- i ti.E_n i} C' ~11E: ;:;i;::t:~ ::1' ~r}2.ircrnirl and to till c},h~~r C,nurliy f:ic,.;rd~ aF ~iul~er.- j viors in $t1f ~:~}'•,:cs in' t,c;i.i.t'n~•n.i7. I~ I Thir.~ i;We;cl.u'l:inn !d:~::, [~~ ..,s~~d h:,~ i;h~ !3i}~,~1 c° 5>.Jt!;~rv'_:;ox:. ni' i;h,: i a ~~~~ ~•,,~i?,illlil$y GT L:.?1<~ ~,,, 'd TLi";U..;r hlaLl;~.n,~ `lr~T'i.C,l° [Jn ,,:,_. 2i~'i,k1 ~1`i4~ ~T - " .. if I '' r- ,rt a ~ S'U.FJG'x"`t~.u0i fS i'T''lEE1C?1~ Tim Y''1;'CriGI.~.'iy [~F;Y111C.v.'9 1~~]..~.C~9 { 'iYL i • a ; ;: ~_ ~ _ I ;r, .~i ~ j'io ; `~ ;~. f:` ' ~= ~ m 1,. [ Sup^;cv~.sor LaEapsrn r, .,,_,:ii" Gri ...-"1 1'c I Ii4iE.i; i 1~ r, „ c. ' n r,, Mn ~ ~• ~ ~:A 41P~ 4:.C1" l; o i:~ .1.(I`u I ~ ~ ~._~.. T ,j ~~ `~ Cni:irrl~in ri' s;1id IJ[Y~TCI ;f/ JT V . O RESOLUTION SUPPORTING SAN DIEGO COUNTX'S RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA MENTAL HEALTH ACT OF 1968. ti~7HEREASy pursuant to the California Mental Health Act of 1965 (6delfare and Institutions Code Section 5650) the Counties are required to submit by October 1st of each year the County Short-Doyle Plan for the subsequent fiscal year; and t•]HEREAS, the Counties'must receive notification of approved programs prior to adoption of their budget; and' L1HEP.EAS, approval, by the State Department of Mental Hygiene and the Legislature, has been after the adoption of the budget by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the County of San Diego has passed a Resolution urging the legislature to (1) accept the responsibility for seeing that adequate funds are approved by April 1st of each :year; and (2) make an amendment to the G7elfare and Institutions Code executing April 1st as the date for notification to the Counties as to State program approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Siskiyou,-State of California, that said board supports the position of the County of San Diego as enunciated in the above mentioned Resolution dated March, ,1971. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be transmitted to the State Legislators, the County Supervisors Association of Califarnia and to all counties in the State. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors this 28th day of April, 1971, by the following vote• AYES: Supervisors Wacker, Ager, Belcastro and Mattos. NOES: None.. ABSENT: None. ~',I ~ airman, oar o upervisors ATTEST: .r;~ • ~~~ ~~~ er , oar o upervxsors RL•SOi.UTi~~tS ~o... 3~:_....._........ ~~o~.~ .._..~......_.... ALAN CRANSTON CALIFORNIA / O d. 0S` `~JCrrrfe~ .`.~ifafe~ ,~iexxafe s WASHINGTON, D.C. 20910 {,~ f.`/ ~~ N~ ~ ~'~. ,.. P4r. Jere E. Reynolds, Chairman Butte County Board of Supervisors Courthouse Oroville, California 95965 Dear ~~r. Reynolds: I appreciated receiving a copy of Resolution No. 71-94 adopted by the Butte County Board of Supervisors at their regular meeting on Tuesday, P~Iay 4 , 19 71. This resolution is in support of H.R. 1399, a bill introduced on January 22, 1871, by Congressman Harold T. Johnson to authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to cooperate with the States and subdivisions in the enforcement of State and local laws, rules and regulations within the National Forest system. Be assured of my support for this legislation in the event that it comes before the Senate. With kind regards, S~yn-cerely, !''~1l/ Alan Cranston i~.]`~.l.11+11U~' .^,UO~ _ __:.\i:~ Tr~~t..`i~i.: .~~i ~ li_C _.. -._ ~ _~ ~. v.~. ..Lw!r .. (V~ -~c~ Coc~2 21'%2 ~t ~;r• _ __ 7Li;~-al l .. ~ 6~::,::v?: J, ~~UrSI:.~:1:~ i:G .-i1C i~"LOV1SiG~:;,' G"~ :.~~~~.~.. !_ CL Sc:Ej. Ol t11:: V~.L«1CIe CG4e v..: l.h:: .`~~a~L' vi l.ai:_i.G~i_..._ ..._ES r.Oi1:.011 Gi1'~9Ctt?~ i:Il.°. ~,'il=y G C1iCv i._~..~: C LO~~ i~.i='c .=G ..:~~i:i::_ ~..:..Gi: ;i StUay, prepay, a .SU"LVey Cl«il ~'CC:.I"il~~c'.L~: Wc:'~~a:l'i:,~'i ...::G ~~ i:.:.- ut: ~O .... i1SCCi aS ~llid~?,,11.2S 10r ..:t1: ~~.SCG~i::Gll'~-, .7i ...~c,,.~."~L: C::~..C"~G~ d@V1Ct9S 1.C'a£' SC~tOO1S Or -~.i«:: ~L'r~]OSc^. 01 ~YGtGCtia" ;;i::_Ci`'',_~.,, ~O~no to and from sctloal, a~ d ~Ji;1~1tEi~,c,, Sa1Ci CG~~.1w.CC@e .Zc:3 CO:C:~iC-'GGG ~:_.. S"~ Gy "- :tas subritt4d to this C - ~ - ' ~- GSw~. ~vt.r u-. and Oii1'.C :.i ~v'L GOp'CyOP , .G1' ~ "~,' ~ I Wr",lv',AS, SaiG ~~Yv?vS~G WaLYdi,=S it2.VG 1«::}:..~.viv_~: v::c::l a~~-~ovo.d and ado"oted 'u -- '~~ - - -- -- f t~_,. ~.,.~d .. Y of :LducaL~o. Gi ,.__., C:~co ,~'i i.+'T11iiC~d SCi1001 1~iSi.Yi.Ct Gn :~ii'~.YCi« .L17~ ZJ~? , c C ..:Li: :i0,":"G .i:. Si:~~.r- V1SOiS OL the L'Oii17Ly OL J~U%Le On 1123iCt1 LJ, iJ'i, a u 6~Tr:~p~E~S, this Cou~.c~_ izas iul'~.y consid.~~c t:... ~,~_~ t j G~ OZ Said GOL'1R11ttC'i'_ and L:~«L ~rG~vSOtj Waii:ai.iiS, uT:d iy. -r 7u5 4-;..d 55..:;3 ought to bo ap~rcved ~.::d~dopt~d~, ~CG,7 Tt"liRPO~:, iiij '=T iti:iCa~]~i~ ',3a' ~.i. CCu:\i.I?~ v:^ rig CIT`I OE CHiCO, AS rOLLC4~'S., ~u 4t~~li .:-rxa: ~I 1. lha't ti11S CGl11.tC-i... dv, an C :..:= CiO.''.S ~:'2"L'Jy, ,..::C:~'~ and ..,,: ..~_ !_ it 2 c~_,,.:~~ CSi=a'D11SR Warrc^.ritS t0 I]G R%re,._~t3r liSeC aS`".~'-L'1Gc.i..-~ :25 iv-~ Ci.~: .; /' c i'I eE;,A~_` ~ ~ ~aCement Oi t'l8i:iC CO1Zt~G' CieV1CeS a17C1 .:.G-'CYIi:iCli~?S iri ,....c Jp2=. ~~ ;~~. `~ '~ G.tlOil ther00',~., ~ Li:CSU.aI"I"% t0 tIl:: p"L'OViS1.GYt5, OT JCCtiG:,.3 _1j ]?, „~ ~~~.. ~~ s~.q. of the Vehicle Cody of the Sta•4e of Caii~Grn-.~ :~~~ as sot ,~~~,« ~I''' ' ~.- - out in detail in E_' - ' - - -• z%C311~1t5 n and il a%'i;4C112d it~tet0 a1.:. i;y ..~.:.c:~c":i1Cc rade apart hereof. .~ , '- ~ iLle u.Ott°g011Zg '~2SGi~~iG11 GTaS u~d0~~'~SC Si. :%, r ~~~„iu~ m~etino of the ~G'u~.Cy~ o= ~Le city o: C:ico ..ofd G t-"-e _.`h day of j'ay , ~9%w, by t.e~ollowi•:zg vota: -- j .E I I Ii ~' ~ ~' AYLS: COili1C3.1;1G''.iP.T.;~p~;;:^;y, i~~,~,~7, girgel~ i2UiL~ S~CWul'L' ,end ~', ~ iJici~ots . it .. q .. ~ \Oi:.~: Nave. I! ~~ADSENT: Councilman ~athen. i ;j '~ s/ WILLIAM D~ NIC~iOLS i lc'1.?~0:. ~i .`-~ 11 i~ 5 :.: ~ - s/ BARBARla A. EVANS . II, City Clerk i APPi~OVED: I' s/ GRAY50N PRICK ~i~ City Atca-raeq ~; !~ ii l Ii i;l I, Barbara A. Evans, City Clerk of the City of Ci;ico, do hereby certify lthat this is a true and correct copy o€ R~sa;ulbn Pdo. y ~ ~l ~~' ~~ F - li a~~d~~o~~p//ted 6y the Council ei the City of Chi::o et.~~'~4 _ ~ i G=CZ~ "~ ~ ~-?4 '' ~ reggular meair:, hold on the ~~ ~` day of 1 a. C ~_. ,L l` ,, City Clerk -2- . _.: __ _ _ _ __ _ ._ ____ __ _LL _ _ ___ _ --____._ ___ __ _ ____ ____ ___ __ 1_ l ,,~ -. ~ - y~::},~ .~ - ~+~~;rrr-; ~ ~ ti ~ rat,. S .;.~,r,. - - '!.tF.COMt•:F.NI)ED ,7LICIES dig: "SA&7s`S'Y R`1I:VTSOR7C Ct~A1t~iY'LTEIiS", "SAF'FST ROUTC T4 SCHOOL I'I~rI5°`, Air'Ls "51CNS ,~NI) MAFiCTti%S." 1. Safety Adviaorv Committee Recommendations ~`~:' Ae. 2fie committee recommends that there be established within Che framework of thy: rQCently recorst£tuted.Chfca Area Safety, Council, as a sub committee, a school SafeLV Advisory Committee, liep;eaentation oar the Committee shosald include CUSD, City of Chicn Traffic Committee, the Couaity of ~utte~.and•the PTA, Ttao committee should have the follawin~ 1, "Revietir:sx~d ~muba~it recommendations to the appra~priate'governmental :agency relating, to aehaal safety lxo'blecus, both' traf£ie and other, , x~n an isrbtrn area basis. . 2~ R~vi~:w sad. submi6: racorrmendat:~o'nta rela,t:ing to specific school nefety ~+re~blee~s a2 an indi~a~.r3ua~. achuoi or mcd:ools to the. appropriate povernmengal agency. ' B. Tlae committee reaommanda tkaat there be added to the City of Chico 'I`ra#gic Committee repressentatian fgom the CUSD Ad~vinistration at such .times as, the Comm3ttee.ponaidexa ackiool tg+sffic ssf~ty problem3. In addition, ' in cases where a apeci#ic sc;hool or schools are involved, additional ' repr•.•esentAtion talaould be eol$cStad from .the school principal or ~iia desi$7ate and the achool'.PTAs •: `. 2.''Safest 4loute ~0 School L'lanm11 Tlae Committee reccztuv~aends that~tt•.ere be eatabliehad for oath elementary school "~L within CUSD :< "safest ktoutQ to 9ciaool" plan. .Each plan should be developed jointly by represeLSa:atives of tla~ CId,aD Administration and the particular " •school; The pl.ar should then be xeviewed bythe Traffic Conunittee prior to adopti,~n, After adoption e~iery meanw available should be exorcised by . the sch+yrl pz3.ncipal aaad.the school X'TA "to inform and educate. students to. utilise the "Safest ldoute to school!' foz 3:hat sebool. ~. Signs..,_sn~3„•M~rkinsts . A. Signs. ~ General "-" ...All traffic signs used at aachoolg, sschova. c~;ossfngs, or crosatsags ua~d ~ " by schocil eiaildren shaall~ be of parmaneatt typo and in confarmr~nca witda the design:specificationa or L•he Department of Public Wozka, SCate of.Califiornia, ae paxbliah~±d°in the State•nf C.aalifoxnia Division of . Highways' Pianr,ing Manualx 1?art S a Traffic. No~~ unifoxm ~ignsare .' prol2ibited and shall soot be installazd. &ariable-signs are not permitted ~, within. ehe roadway at any. timQ,'except: for.'raand signs utili:.sd by schodL xafaty patxola or-adult croabing gaard~a:in the laerfoa.^manca of their: duties.. Whenever g divided ;aighway hrm ra centermedian of auffic.ient ~aidmhi signo should be located in the median ea well as .. --. on they riglat. :_ .; .. `1- ~5~~'l~a~ ~~~~~ .; T D T D SCHOC Warr DESCRIPTION T =Traffic Technique Requ ~ n Traffic Device Bond A. SCHOOL SArETY PATROL (Elementary School Only) ALL (1) School--age pedestrians per hour, one hour each AIvI & one hour each Pt' {2) 85th percentile speed is LESS than {3) Traveled lanes in each direction -- maxi » number (4) Vehicle time gap equal to or exceeding pedestrian crossing time each minute during an average 5 minute period in the peak school pedestrian hour FIrLSHING SIGP7l.T,S {Advanced warning only - not to be used for control) B . (1) h?inimum distance from nearest existing controlled crossing ALI (2). School-age pedestrians for each of arty 2 hours (3) Vehicle per any hour while children are going to or from school {1~) a) Critical speed more than or b) Visability is permanently restricted C~ 30 mph to less than C 40 mph n u u L 50 mph u o rr C. ADULT CROSSItdG GUARD (Elementary School Only) Uncontrolled Crossing (l) Piinimum distance from nearest. existing controlled crossing 1, (2) School-age pedestrian for' each of arty 2 hours & (3) Vehicular volume for sane 2 hours Notes When critical approach speeds exceed 40 mph use rural warrants Controlled Crosses ~ (4) Stop sign controlled on undivided roadways of b or more lanes while school-- 2 8 age pedestrians are going to or from school ~ (5) Signal controlled crossings - turning movements through crosswalk while 2 8 edestrians are going to or from school school-age ~ p {6 Signal controlled crossings with extenuating circumstances 2 D. TRAFFIC SIGNALS (League of California Cities Recommendation) (1) Minimum distance from nearest existing controlled crossing 1 ~ (2) a) School-age pedestrians during each of any 2 hours going to or from < school 1 ~ b) Vehicles per hour during same 2 hours {3) a) School age pedestrians during entire day b) Vehicles per hour for each of any 2 hours while school-age pedestrians are. .going to or from school Mote; Critical approach speed exceeds !c0 mph or appreach visibilit; is less -than the required safe stopping distance for prevailing critical speed -- Use rural warrants TRFFF'IC SIGNALS (Current City of Chico Warrant -- intersections) E . (1) Pedestrians per hour for any 2 hours crossing major street AL: (2) Vehicles per hour for same 2 hours on major street (3) t7inimum distance to a traffic signal eed exceeds 40 mph -- Use 70% of (1) & (2) above tile of s h B p percen 5t Note: k F Mid-bloc ~~ 99 Jl!1fr11 n. _._.....1..11 _ __ - _ COL CROSSING ' JVARRANTS -TRAP .=1C DEVICES 8~ TE xrant- L_C.C. RECOMMENDATIONS TRAFFIC COM. RECOMMENDATIONS squired URBAN RURAL URBAN RURAL ondition ALL AM 20 ped/hr 20 ped hr 75 Ped/hr 75 pedfhr d hr Pbf 20 ed hr mh 20 d hr mh 7 ed hr mh 75 35mh 2 lanes 2 lanes 2 lanes 2 lanes _ a s d 5 ped gaps 5 min 5 ped gaps 5 min 3 ped gaps 5 min p g 3 pe 5 min Ayi, 6 f 600 ft DNA 600 ft 1 2 0 ed hr 0 ed hr 200 veh hr 0 d hr 0 ed hr 0 veh hr ~~ d hr ~-~ d ~ 300 veh hr 35 m h 35 m h DNA 35 mph 2 f DNA 200 ft 2 ft 2 ft DNA 275 ft 35o ft 350 ft DNA 35 ft 2 1 600 ft 600 ft 600 ft b00 ft , , & 3 1 2 40 ed hr 0 ed hr 30 ed hr 0 d r 150 d hr 150 ed hr J25 ped hr 125 e hr 1 2 0 veh hr 0 veh hr 00 veh hr 00 veh hr 00 veh hr 00 veh hr 3_ veh r A veh hr or 2 & 1~ or 500 veh r 500 veh r b00 veh hr 500 veh~hr 2&5 or 00 veh r 00 veh hr DNA DNA 2~6 1 & 2 600 ft 600 ft DNA DNA or 1 100 ed hr 0 d hr DP]A DNA 1 & 3 2 100 ed hr 0 ed hr [1A DNA 1 00 veh hr 0 veh hr DNA DNA 2 00 veh hr 50 veh r DIdA DNA 00 ed da 0 ed da DNA DNA 1 00 veh hr 0 veh hr DI3A DNA 2 00 veh hr 0 veh hr DNA DPdA per DNA DNA 250 ed hr 250 ped~hr , , 2 DNA DNA 250 ed hr 250 ped hr 1 DNA DNA DNA DNA 00 veh hr ~ 600 veh hr ~ ve r 00 veh hr DNA DNA 1000 ft 1.000 ft DNA DNA 800 veh/hr ~' 800 veh~hr .. C .~ 4'v. V y y ~e~Qr~ t~~ ~~~rc~ a~ S~p~,avis©rs 2 ~ac~nt~ of ~~aeer9 Stag o~ ~a~~~~~°~ia .... ~ - In the matter of: _...__...- Resol. No:.----.-~I°'1~~..._.-.....-.-.. ' 4 ?? ~5OLU'TSOI~' OPPOSING PASShG.C Off' Ala ] 161 (i~YAN) PROHIt~I'TIl`lG 'C.~-i1T~IC Ord. No-------- ----------------- ---._... OF l~LANIvLf~LS 13Y M.~TA~,-,7A1' 'l.'i.<I~1'S 5 ~' ? ~..-_... 6 7 -- . ___.: .. ~ ~- i2esolutzon - was dul assed b~ the Board of Supervisors the following __ Y.P ~ 3 1 9 of the County of Placer at a regular meeting- held ___._~_~ _~~.~- 'l' y '__'_• , 1Q - , by the following vote on roll call: 11 Ages: `''~`-.. :[, ~,:rf .. ~i ~ •c; r[, 1, .[:~ ,°~ ;r,*'_nl 12 IQoes: , . 13 Absent: '<iltid. _ . ~. II Srgned and approved by me ~t'ter its p~,s<<[~e. ~ ~r ~ ~~ ~ 16 Attest: MAU1tII1ka I. DOBBAS %`' ~hu[rmuu;-r3ou ~d ~c si.F ~isurs Clerk of said Board By: -. 18 n~~~~y. 19 ~V1-i1/1ZIJ.AS, p~.~ctat~r}r animals (Lix.~.rnrz•_als) Bava lon.r. i~~r..n a ~;oxu•ce of 2U damage to tlxe .~~grictzltu.zalis5- anu rancxers ixi Culifaxrxs.a; axxcl. 21 14rc1EIL~~1S, tl.:e conti.r.o.l oz tl~c: p;•euawoa•y a*xim~1 i.~ cssenfial L-o ttae ccononiic wc;ll-being of f:lx.e g~~~ricxzltxxrali.at ,cud raxxcBer; a.r_d 22 tiVIIL•:R1:.FxS, Ll,.ese same Preci;t~tory <~riiro.al.s (rnarxzzxnals) iaa~e lxeen 23 ?crown to carry rabies. a serious c?isez;.se t;n rrxa,l as' wrail as <<^~nixxx:;is; r~nc? 24 1V1TI;P.;rla.5, it is ner,essary t:,iat sucix r~2tnxnals b~ subject.' fo control by public emDloyce Bunters/tral~pezs for t,.i.e. ;~ublx.c.wclf~re~; and - 25 ' 1'~I3NItL:AS, there taas not yet bccn cl~velof,ed a sat.isf.actory sul:~::titute 2fi frir the n7.eLa1-jawed i:raps curreni:ly exnploycci; and 27 Zarlli~rt7;'AS, banxiing t:b.e use of n-x::tal~j<^_wcd f:xape~ l,y Ex~.~.t,lic cin_,.loyee trapi~er~ ~~~ill ;;really irnpc:CC~ his t..l.~ilit:y to c~>t!Grol .,rtid"~,1.x?x~ile ~u~u will ~ ?..$ ullrcly Call:: i.` atirx.Cllit:lit'it11~t r and 1'c7.ixC:i.xFrb` t0 c:inploy tt'ii; Enl'115CS'tl":111':.=t C' I.tSC'. of poison •~vith its cielct~rious effc:ct3< - .. NOl~, T1xr1:2.1;FORi:, I37~ IT I.2~SOLVEn t:1~di: the So~,rtl of Supervisors of the County of 1'1acc:x e.rongl.y opposes ti.e passage of Assembly Sill ilbl and urges its d.ef-eat; and B~ IT FURTIfr'R RL:SC1LiT~ D Yav.t copies v;. this l:ecc~lution l,e ccr~s, to Senator Tealc, 1lesemblyrr_a;-~ Ci-iapi>ie, Cou*_ity St.p~rvi.sors />ssuciatio~r of Cala..fornia, anti the Ch~,irrnc-n of the Soarus of .`.iupervisc-rc tlirout;l~out California. i v v - G77> O ._) ti .;'~~ 740 Lockwood Lane = ' cn ~ Santa Gruz, gal. "`~ `; f ~` 95050 ~pri1,15,1971 Cal 't.; C_% ~~ i '~ ~'-~ ~ ~ Boa off' Supervisors ~~sut~~~~nty `~rovi~.~, Cal. ~entS-~~n: Attached copy of aesolution Pao. 121-71, passed and adopted by Board of Supervisors of Santa Cruz Gounty, is the result of my letter to them dated March,'?9,1971, apae.glinc for their support of my efforts toward OMBUDS,~IAN for Galiforria. This citizens effort is not to change government but to make it more viable within the present system, not to infringe on the province of those elected but to as3lst them. Assemblyman Murphy 1s sponsoring an OMEUDSM.4I~ for penal inmates an9, the Senate appointed a director of Consumer Affairs. My premise is to funnel ILL complaints to one point. If your inclination is that of my Supervisors - it is requested that your board adapt a sic~ilar resolution. T am retired and no~v feel that I must be effective in areas of government where I sense there may be a vacuum. I, belong to na organization -- this is a solo eff"ort. I am hopeful my Senator Grunsky will carry the bill. May I hear from you? Sincerely, ~' ~/ O.A.B~org 0 Lockwood Lane -~ Sa~ita Cruz, California 95060 March 29, 1971 To: Board of Supervisors, Santa Cruz County. From: Bjorgan, O.A. Subject: Ombudsman. 1. Attached Reference Papers No. 143 are a summary of the law pertaining to the office in Norway. 2. Ombudsman is an effective arm of government in Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Hawaii. Oregon, Nebraska, University of Michigan and two countries in Africa. 3. These Ombudsman institutions have a number of unusual features which, in combination, make them unique among grievance-handling, appeal and investigating bodies. Ombudsman is an officer of the legislature - an impartial investigator and politically independent. 4. A key characteristic of the Ombudsman is his accessibility to the public. Anyone may file a complaint simply by writing a letter. This privilege is especially important to those who have been deprived of their freedom in jails and sanatoria. 5. Another aspect of the office is - the governed may have difficulty penetrating the defenses set up between them and government, the Ombudsman then establishes liaison. 6. The end result could be a renaissance of what is,now an apparent declining socio-political system. 7. Conceivably, if Campuses would have had Ombudsman a few years ago, there would have been less rioting and turmoil. Perhaps the loss of lives and property would have financed 1000 Ombudsman. 8. Obviously, there is no wisdom in budgeting $7000 for riot gear and not seek out what causes a riot. 9. Your consideration toward the above with attendant interest therein is solicited - to the extent and effect, The Board adopt a resolution supporting this citizens effort thru the legislature. Respectfully submitted, _ G V ti0 G ~~ vi 7~ y y 0 :~ L N G V O R abJ d O X I~ ., N r» V 0~ 0"' ~. p. N O ~ b m N ~ . E'^ C [tl Q ~ ~ ti O p ~ ~ c6 O G N ^C ^~ ^D ~ ~Q N ~ ~yOca~ Vaa H w.Q `°~.o ca O a- ` ~ .°`~~ o T .~ ~yN oE c.~ °a p C4 ~~~ ^ ... E d O a~ W cc d 7 p Fl C0 ~ ~C N , C O ~A O O ~ O Q O O~ F O ~ ~ ' of -~ y 'a O ..~. iC ~ t Q Q ~ ..O ~ 1] E G ~ ._V. ~'G h ,p L+ ' - V i...0+ C N _ O C h .- ~'.... C+U~'~NC~~7v N~~4. L+~ ~ o. v ~ x ... O ~..-~Tr+ ~ °' O ~'c cv < m y U O ~N W% s tC E bA ~V„ w 9 .~ ctS .~ Q`. ~ ~ N O N c o ~ O. O C..~... ~'' ~~c~l ~V w 1 'ORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVIb., -_S OF THE COL..~'Y OF SANTA CRUZ, STATE OF ~LIFORNIA RESOLUTION N0. 121-71 On the motion of Supervisor Forbus duly seconded by Supervisor Mello the following resolution is adopted: RESOLUTION ENDORSING ASSEMBLY SILL bl4 ESTABLISHING THE OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN WHEREAS, it appears to this Board that there is a need for the establishment of an independent office or agency to hear and investigate complaints made by citizens regarding pub- lic offices or procedures, and WEIEREAS, Assembly Biil 614 has been introduced in the Legislature establishing the office of Ombudsman, which office would have functions and duties similar to the office of Ombudsman which has been established in Norway and other European countries; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND ORDERED that this Board supports the establishment of an independent Office of Ombudsman which would have similar functions and duties to those of the office set forth. in Assembly Bill 614. The Clerk of this Board is directed to forward copies of this resolution to the legislative representatives of the County of Santa Cruz in the State Legislature. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Cruz, State of California, this 13th day of April, 1971, by the following vote: , AYES: SUPERVISORS Forbus, Mello, Harry, Cress, Chairman Sanson NOES: SUPERVISORS None ABSENT: SUPERVISORS None . RALPH SANSON C airman o sai Boar ATTEST: TOM M. KELLEY Clerk o sai Boar Appxoved as to form: C. A. CARLSON County Counse STATE. OF C,AI.T>rORN~,A. ~ COUNTY OF SANTA GItUZ , I. TOM M. KELLEY, Gonnty G~ and esofficio Clerk of the Board of Snpervioote of tbs County of °antn Cruz, State of California, do hereby certify that rt:~ foregoing is n true and eorrecf copy of a resolution ga:;s.:d and adopted by nn3 enteral In the mlauten of tM:c said I3card. - -• - Ia Wit:_csa whereof 1 have hereuuto eat my hand end affixed the seal o! ffie said Board, on _ .~h tw /~ ,19~~ "" TOM M. KELLEY, Conaty Clerk B~ ~ . ,,~,~~. ~ ;4 ... ~ . ~ Deputy II THE, BALLS a~ ATxz ~~ At Atri in Abruzzo, a small town Of ancient Roman date, but scant renown, One of those little places that have run Half up the hill, beneath a blazing sun, And then sat down to rest, as if to say, " T climb no farther upward, come what may, „ The Re Giovanni, nova unknown to fame, 5o many monarchs since have born the name, Had a great bell hung in the market- place Beneath a roof, projecting some smal l space, By way of shelter from the sun and rain. Then rode he through the streets with all his train, And with the blast of trumpets loud and long, Made proclamation, that whenever wrong Was done to any man, he should but ring The great bell in the square, and he, the King, Would cause the Syndic to decide thereon.. Such was the proclamation of King John. ' How swift the happy days in Atri sped, What wrongs were righted, need not here be said. Suffice it that, as all things must decay, The hempen rope at length was worn away, Unravelled at the end, and, strand by strand, Loosened and wasted in the ringer's hand, Ti11 one, who noted this in passing by, Mended the rope with braids of briony, So that the leaves and tendrils of the vine Hung like a votive garland at a shrine. Longfellow wrote the above and continues Writing about the starving horse •. With exposed ribs and sinews. No shape of human form of woman born, But a poor steed dejected and forlorn, Who with uplifted head and eager eye Was tugging at the vines of briony. He calls for justice, being sore distressed, And pleads his cause as loudly as the ' best. THE BELLS OF ATE-_ engender the philosophicG ,approach toward consideration of the office of OMBUDSMAN for California. Tn this undeveloped area of government-citizen relationship, thought pro- cesses must emanate from philosophy and on to reality. Our laws extend back to the time of Moses (Mosaic Law) and progress inexorably northward thru Europe. Eventually the Danes introduced the 12 man jury and, now Norway has a workable OMBUDSMAN, worthy of emu- lation as it applies to California. The interpretation of OMBUDSMAN is - ' one who carries a prayer (request) '. This citizen strongly senses his individual responsibility toward improvement of his government with resulting benefit for a11. He is adequately perceptive to observe and sense the frame of mind of the public generally - some discontent and much apathy - a 'you can't 'lick city hall ' syndrome, as though government is an enemy. Much of this attitude has been generated by lack of rapport between govern- ment and governed. This layman's plea for OMBUDSMAN for California is submitted to lawmakers in Sacramento for consideration of adoption - that it not be funded the first year so that it may mature before implementation What is OMBUDSMAN? On occasion, the press mentions OMBUDSMAN, but does not clarify the function of the office. To fill the void, six pages, printed both sides, are herewith submitted for evaluation and consideration. .They are entitled, Reference Papers, Number 1~,3. Why an OMBUDSMAN? Did you ever have a complaint and nowhere to lodge it? Would you not have liked the opportunity to 'tug at the vines of briony' - to ring the bell so that youFplaint would be heard? Lawmakers in Sacramento now have the unique and fortunate position to be able to glean the best of these reference papers, to promulgate this community of experience - to translate ideas into action. The office of OMBUDSi~'fAN can be extended in function so that it becomes a 'suggestion box' - people must be given a sense of participation) We are all aware of the activity, growth and accomplishments of Consumer Affairs, developed by active citizens. The viability of this effort is now a part of several local governments. A Bill has been proposed for OMBUDSMAN for residents of penal institutions. The proponent was aware of the need, it. should be given consideration. Tf there is need for OMBUDSMAN in Scandinavia, Hawaii and Nebraska, ~~it obviates the need in California. If the above two paragraphs are considered, it appears reasonable the office of OMBUDSMAN should encompass - (1) Consumer Affairs {2) The Public Generally , {3) Penal Inmates (1~) Military (state) , (5 ) Campus _ , Respectfully submitted, , 0. A. Bjorgan 7~.0 Lockwood Lane Santa Cruz, Ca. 95460 I~U7 H \+IrAIiL\'~ N "" G, ._. ~ ~ ? [!J C~ •=J O U ~ U ~ut~~ ti CC~f- ~ ~ F- u.. ~.1 ~ na U m sr,~t€ulso~;t~~ ~._ fem. COUNTY CLERK Courthouse Aruzex Snrr Luis Onrsvo, CALIFORNIA - 93401 April 19, 1971 1 ~ 0 J-U _ ~ .~ Mr. Jere E. Reynolds, Chairman Board of Supervisors Butte County Courthouse Oroville, California 95965 Dear Mr. Reynolds: Enclosed is a coy of our Resolution No: 71-177, supporting San Diego County s Resolui:ion Pertaining to Amendment to the California Mental Health Act of 1963. 43e would appreciate your support in urging the State Legislature t;~ t~nn.ciricer ~t;e ~nrlll2.St fOr an Apra ~ nOtZflCatl0n 1P_ place O~ the present later date. Very truly yours, ' RUTH tid.4RNKEN, County Clern/k r •~/ Deputy Clerk frp .. encl. Iakt;IRitYtnV EU f1i'i~i~'llf~r.Pdt itt Ir1r. VF.~Irvr~irl++ 7'IG)Yln4. HEnLTH Acs OF iaG3 The following resolution is now offered and read: ~1HEE;EAS, pursuant to the Ca1lfnrnis Mental lieaith Act of 1968 (Welfare and Institutions Code Section ~Ei70) the Counties are required to su!<tnit by October 1st of etach year the County Shart- Doyle Plan for the subsequent fiscal year; and ' WHEREAS. the Counties must receive notification of approved programs pr for to adopt ion of, the I r budget; tsnd ~lt1EREAS, approval, by the State Department of Ment~~l Hygiene and the Legislature. has been after the adoption of-the budget by t;... W:~s... ~f 5u;~r_rvlsors; ~~;fd Sti'NE;EAS, tt~ County of San Diego h~~s passed ~ Resolution urging the legislature to (1) accept the responsibliity for seciny thzt adequate funds are approved by April 1st of eiaeh year; .and (2) make an 2mendment to the k`elfAre ~~nd Institutions Coda executing April 1st i3s the date for r~otlftcatlon to the Counties aY to St-ate prngrarn approval• t~pyl, THCR~EFGRE EE 1T RE50l+VEp by the Goa rd of Supervisors of the County of Scan Luis Obispo, State oi~ California, that said board. supports the position of the County of San'Diego us enun- elated in the above mentioned Resolution dated March, 1971• EE IT fURTFkE;ft RESGLUED that a copy of tk~is Resolution be transrr.ltted to the State Legislature, thw.County Supervisors nssaclatiort of California t3nd to all Countlos !n the State• Upon moc (cn of Supervisor ~sanka.YZ3 seconds d by Supcrv i sor 1:~=~1~`~an~ fend on tfi--a falla+~~ing roll oUll vote to wit: CD-9t - - - ATTEST: Ruth Warnken Clark of the Hoard o Sup~rvlsors t s~ ~~>/ o~ c ~Llrolz.z\TI ~, County of San Luis Obispo, ss. RUT~i Cd.FiR1JiZ);N ______._.___.__ Count Clerl: and ex-officio Clerl: Io ------------------------------------------ ~ y' of the Board of Supervisors, in and for the County' of San Luis Obispo, State of California, do hereb}= certify the foregoing to be a full, true nzul correct copy of an order made by the Boar<l of Supervisors, as the same appears spread upon their minute book: - Z~ITNESS my hand and the seal of said Board. of Supervisors, affixed this _____15th _______ day of___-- April ____..__-___.-_, 19_~~_. ' Rlrrti Wt'tP.r~^:irl Count Clerk and lix-Officio Clerk of the Hoard (SEAL) of Supervis i /) ~; I)cl+uty Clcrlc. ... 1 RONALD REAGA N, Governor ~STA~E OF CALIFORFYkh-RESOU_P.CES:AGENCY ~ - __ -__- '-- - T DEPARTMENT OF CONSERV~ib~N ~'~; ~ STATE SOII.v;~O~USERI~ATION COMMISSION ~' 1416 NINTH STREET, ROO~i~.~c_~.354 SACRAMENTO, CALI#~RNi3844•-? - Soil Conservation CommJi sion~ ,~ ~~. FRANK 5lEFER1MN, Ch~llman cj, 1-~ CALVAN H. COSTA, VlcKCFairman,J ~, ~ ~ ALFRED R. ANGELINO-~; (.~J00.i - JUDGE JAlAES M. BUCHER J. M. SMAX} VJ[LSON ROBERT L. GOODIER, Secretory Aldo J. Sansoni Peter N. Belcastro April 19, 1971 T0: ALL COUNTX BOARDS OF SUPERVISORS Gentlemen: I am pleased to transmit to you the enclosed Resolution No. 71-699 adopted by the State Soil Conservation Commission on March 23, 1971. S' ~ ~el , ~~~ ~ . ,* .lf ,Cr ~"~ ROBERT D. GOODIER .Secretary Enclosure ca: Mr. Norman B. Livermore, Jr. Mr. James G. Stearns Mr. Francis C.~Lindsay Reso tion No. 71-699 RESOLUTION OF THE STATE SOIL CONSERVATION CONIMTSSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Re: COMPLETING THE FORMATION OF SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS IN CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, Division 9 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California declares that the conservation of the soil is of fundamental importance to the prosperity and well-being of the people of this State; and WHEREAS, soil conservation districts are instrumental in the development and maintenance of a favorable environment; and WHEREAS, seventy-two percent of the State is now included in the 157 operating soil conservation districts; and WHEREAS, inclusion of all the lands of the State in soil con- servation districts will enable local governments to utilize the services available through soil conservation districts in making land use decisions and in implementing the developments identified in city and county general plans as being needed to preserve the environment for better living and greater prosperity; and WHEREAS, the Summary of its Policies, approved by the State Soil Conservation Commission on August 25, 1970, cites one of its objectives that ". all lands within the State are (to be in- cluded) in soil conservation districts."; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the State Soil Conserva- tion Commission urges all units of county government .to support the formation of soil conservation districts and inclusion of lands therein towards the end that all the lands of the State may be in-- eluded in soil conservation districts; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a cogy of this resolution be transmitted to: the Secretary of the Resources Agency, State of California; the Director of the Department of Conservation, State of California; each of the County Boards of Supervisors in California; and the President of the California Association of Soil Conservation. Districts. ~. ~ FRANK SIE~'ERi9AN, Chairman State Soil Cons rvation Commission ~~._ - 2 - Resolution No. 71-699 I, Robert D. Goodier, Secretary of the State Soil Conservation Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the State Soil Conserva- tion Commission at a meeting held in Sacramento, California on March 23, 1971. ..,.i OBE T U. GOODIER, Secretary State Soil Conservation Commission DATED: March 23, 1971 ~vv• - ~ -~ r, .~ ~ _ " - BUTTE COUNTY COMML?NTTY H0.4_ iTAL ~ BORRD OF TRUSTEES RESOLUTION NO. 71-1 ! 4 t RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO BUTTE COUNTY ~ CREDIT BUREAU CONTRACT BE IT RESOLVED that the Butte County Community Hospital Board of Trustees hereby approve amending-the Butte County Credit Bureau Contract dated February l6th,'1971, by adding "on ali non-skips" on Line 11, Page 2, after:. the word "service". PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Trustees of the Butte County Community Hospital this 14th day of April, 1971, ' by the following vote: "~~ AYES: Chairman Dingfelder, Trustees Gre11, Johnson, Morgan, Morgans, Oliver and Silva, NOES: None i i RESOLUTION /OO.S L . ~ c~ _ mss-. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE PARADISE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PETITIONING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE TO EXCLUDE ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SAID PARADTSE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT TN THE COUNTY PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 25643. WHEREAS, the County of Butte does now, and for'many years prior hereto has levied a Gounty tax each fiscal year upon property within the County, including property within the boundaries of the Paradise Fire Protection District, assessed for tax purposes, to provide County funds for structural fire protection of areas in the County, and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 25643 provides that the Board of Supervisors shall exclude from such tax levy property within the boundaries of a legally organized fire protection district having an organized fire department in operation and existence and providing adequate structural fire protection within such organized fire protection district, and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors finds that the Paradise Fire Protection District does now have, and for many-years prior hereto has had, an organized fire department in operation and existence, which is at this time providing adequate structural fire protection to all property within the boundaries of said District, and that no additional benefit in fire pro- tection is received or required by said property from structural fire protection given by the County of Butte, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DTRECTORS OF THE PARADISE FIRE~PROTECTION DISTRICT A5 FOLLOWS, TO WIT: 1. That this Board do, and it hereby does, petition the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, pursuant to the provisions of Section 25643 of the Government Code of the State of California, to exclude all property within the boundaries of the Paradise Fire Protection District, including all property which may hereafter be annexed to said District prior to a tax levy being made thereupon, from a tax levy to provide County funds for structural fire protection of areas in the County of Butte. 2. The Board Secretary is hereby directed to certify and forward prior to 1 July 1971, to the Board of Supervisors o£ the County o£ Butte, a copy o£ this Resolution which. shall be deemed to be the petition supported by Resolution as. requested by and ixi accordance with the provisions of Section 25643, as amended, of the Government Code. The foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors o£ the Paradise Fire Protection District held 14 April 1971 by the following vote: AYES: Directors Aiken 'Plumb, Ross, Royer, & Scofield NOES: Directors ABSENT: Directors '~1~ / I %~~1. ..',., .. David R. Ross, Board President- ATTEST: I, Paul R. Scofield, Board Secretary o£ the Paradise Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that-the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Paradise Fire Protection District at a regular meeting held 14 April 1971. c Paul R. Scofie Board Secretary 'OG.OS RUTH ~~tt~I3NKFiV Goanty CIer1i Sd~IUIS0D!59t1 ,r.Y,vC;yii{ ' t~Ufd'[y COUN'~Y CLERK Coxrdcotose Annex SAN LUIS CSSSPO, CALIFORNIA - 93401 April 8, 1971 Telephone 543-1550, Exr. 231 ~~ Mr. Jere E. Reynolds, Chairman Board of Supervisors Butte County Courthouse Oroville, California 95965 • Dear Supervisor Reynolds: This Board of_ Supervisors, on April 5, 1971, adopted the attached resolution titled "Resolution Supporting Establish- ment of the Space Shuttle Pr.,v}^ar.+ ,+~ +-lL c Cr`Le Of C~~.'~Oi:lla, i and have reGaested that a C(~lry ui 5aitte be directed to your attention. We would appreciate any help you may be able to give us in regard to this matter, RUTII WARNIZEN, County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Beard of Supervisors B y ~.~`'.~ ~ ' ~~' Deputy Clerk drm encl. `~ ~ - _ _ - .. _ .. - . A.. - - - - ~~ ~r~~ Bo~.~n o~ suP~R~so~s COUNTY OF SAN LUIS ORISPO, STATE OI' C.ALII'ORNL4 ' ___ Mon - d$Y ------April -5--------19_71 _ PRESENT: Supervisors M. Roland Gates, Elston L. Kidwell, Howard D. Mankins Hans Heilmann, and Chairman Jahn V. Freeman, ABSENT: None RESOLUTION NO. 71-164 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SPACE SHUTTLE PROGRAM IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA _ The following resolution is now offered and read: WHEREAS, the United States of America has funded preliminary- studies of concepts and locations for the launching of the American Space Shuttle Program in the 1970'x, and these studies are expected to result in the determination of a launch site during mid 1971; and WHEREAS, 40,000 primary jobs are expected to be created within the aerospace industry in the state where the launch site is selected, and the State of California has the largest number of trained personnel and appropri-.ate physical facilities for this program; and WHEREAS, relocation of these personnel and facilities would result in tremendous costs to the American taxpayer and would be a great loss to the economy of~the State of California; NOW, THEREFORE, BE [T RESOLVED AND ORDERED by 'the Board of Super- visors of the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, that we support the County of Santa Barbara in its attempts to secure the Space. Shuttle Program for the State of California. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors be directed to send copies of this resolution to the County Supervisors Association of California and the Board of Supervisors of all, California counties. ---__.____.____..__ .__~_.._ ........:....::._T.._ •. Upon motion of Supervisor Heilmann seconded by Super- visor Kidwell and on the following roll call vote, Ito-wit: AYES: Supervisors- Heilmann, Kidwell, Gates, Mankins, Chairman Freeman NOES:: ; None .. ;_, , ,, ~;: , .: - _ _---_ ---- -- ABSENT: None ~ .r:~- ~,,; - v the foregoing resolution i s hereby adopted.- `' ' -` " ' _ ' ~ ' CD 84 - - i .. ~. -STATE OF CALII'.ORA'IA' ss. ~ ' County of San Luis Obispo, } I t~ ~~ ~~~ ~'~~ ~`~~ ~~ _________~_________.___, County Clerk and ea-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, in and for the County of San Lllls Obispo, State o£ California, do hereby certifp the foregoing to be a foil, true and. correct copy of an order made by the Board of Supervisors, as the same appears spread upon their minute book. WITNESS my hand and the seal of said Board of Supervisors, affixed this __~ ____________ day of--- -----, 3.9Z~_. County Clerk and Ex-Ofticio Clerk o£ the Board W~- (SEALj of Supervisors - Deputy Clerk. ~ Q ~ . Qs Approved as to Form rtEr•~,_~ r rNrAGE v~C~7i'~}~s~'irrT~ - ft~.chard ~T. i~oore, County Counsel g j~ BY----------------------------------------------------Deputy THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA On 3notion of Supervisor---------------------~~~4~9_-----°------..-...._.--, Seconded by Supervisor..-•-----•--Bort,••_••-_--•---•-•--............._....> aad approved by the following vote, Ayes: Supervisors_-____ .......................~ort,_•R~zeto.and__Ch~irman-Haniion__-_ - Noes: Supervisors ................................None•_•__••____...---..._.._ Excused orA~iserrt: Supervisors_..-__._..Cooper_qnd-_Murphy__-__2_______________ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED: NUMBER___~__~___7__8__?._ 5 SPACE SHUTTZ,E PROGRAM r7I;REAS, the i3rited States of America has funded preliminary studies of con- cepts and locations for the launching of the American Space Shuttle in the 1970s, and these-studies are-expected to result in the-determination-of a launch site during mid 171; and WI~REAS, i+OD00 primary jobs are expected to be created within the aerospace industry in the state where the launch site is selected, and the State of California has the largest reservoir of research, development, information, and operational personnel and equipment prepared to enter into this project; and 47H'tIREAS, the physical requirements of the program appear to be best adapted vv w~.a ~r wLi v.v ~. ~~uv .i.. a~... .rw ra.v as rw~.a r-v-vu •~.r vaa.ra+ v.av /vtr vv yr vv.+..ia va iaiw, waav_ w-IIERFAS, the selection of a site outside the State of California for this program wculd result in the American taxpayer absorbing the tremendous costs of re-establishment and relocation of California aerospace facilities and manpotirer; and WHEREAS, the logistics involved. in the provision of fuels, communications, data processing and other required functions are readily available to the Space Shuttle Program in Southern California; and WHEREAS, Vandenberg Air Force Base has recently achieved its 1000th successful aerospace launch with the personnel and equipment now present at that facility; N041, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Alameda that we urge every concerned leader of the State of California who has the well-being of this State`s economy in his charge to give maximum personal support to the securing of the Space Shuttle Program for the State of~California; and BE IT F`URTELER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be sent to the County Supervisors Association of California and to the Boards of Supervisors of all ~ Re~~lution No. 1 3 7$ 2 5 Page 2 California Counties to the end that these entities consider the adoption of similar resolutions supporting the location of the Space Shuttle Program in the Southern California Area. f 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOWG IS A COR- RECT COPY OF A RESOLUT!OPi ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ALAMEDA FEB 2 3 197] COUNTY. CALIFO.RNIA ......................... -•-°--.. +: ATTEST: . -.- ~_~ ~: R...2..`.~.- ] 971..-...., . JACK K. POOL, CLERK OF TFiE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS i _.._._. I_ .s gr ty ~~~ tvh .;p,±~ j~~., . ~q COIIF.~~ ~ ~' a,- :~ is ...~ _.,~ G3 .d~~,:, ~ _- _1° .. ~~ ~~E ~~~Pa ~~ ~~€~~~~~5~~~ L3~ TAE. ~~~~Y ®F ~€~`J~«.~,~ RESOLU'T'ION IN THE MATTER OF SUPPORTING LOCATION OF SPACE SHUT"7'LE PROGJ2AM 1N SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA, WHEREAS, this Board of Supervisors has received Tieso7_ution No. 71-95 of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors; and W17EFtEA5, this Board of Supervisors concur in said Resolution wl~9.ch is set forth as follows; and WHEREAS, the United States of America has funded preliminary studies of concepts and locations for the launch- ing of the American Space Shuttle in the 1970s, and these studies are expected to result in the determination of a launch site during mid 1971; and WHEREAS, 40,000 primary jobs are expected to be created within the aerospace industry in the State where the launch site is se1_ected, and the State of California has the largest reservoir of research, development, information, and operational personnel and equipment prepared to enter into this project; and WHEREAS, the physical requirements of the program appear to be best adapted to aerospace test and launch facil- ities within the State of California; and WHEREAS, the selection of a site outside the State of California for this program would result in the American taxpayzr absorbing the tremendous costs of re-establishric,r:t and relocation of California aerospace facilities and man- power; and . WHEREAS, the logistics involved in the provision of fuels, communications, data processing and other required functions-are readily available to the Space Shuttle Program in Southern California; and WIiEREAS, Vandenberg Air Force Base has recently achieved its 1000th successful aerospace launch with the personnel and equipment note present at that facility. NOLJ, THEREFORE, BE IT RI:.SOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Nevada that we urge every con- corned leader of the State of Galifornia teho has the we11- being of this State's economy in his charge to give maximum personal support to the securing of the Space Shuttle Program for the State of California. T3E XT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this 12esalu- tion be sent to the County Supervisors Association of Cali- fornia and to the Boards of Supervisors of all California Counties to the end that these entities consider the adoption of similar Resolutions supporting the location of the Space Shuttle Program in the Southern California area. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Nevada at a reguli:r meeting of said Board, held on the 16th day of March , 19 71 , by the fol]owing vote of said Board: ATTEST; 7HE0. A. ICGHLER, Jr. County Clerk and Hoes: ex•oificio Cle(r~k~ of the i3oard of Super is rs Absent: Deputy Clerk TiiE FORE=GOIN& IfaSTREJPFENT IS :A J-t~ CORRECT COPT' OF THE ORIGINAL ON FILE IW TrilS GFPo~. ATTEST: ~fl'.~ St I J 171 CocntY Clerk and r: `¢ia LWi:4 [lo.;d of Su?, r- Hy ~'~~ ~."L~~""~""'. U9Ai1Fj Ayes: Supervisors Rnlph Buchanan, Dean Lawrence, Robert W. Long, Lawrence Filer, William F. Curran. Chairman T~UTI-I WARNKEN ~ G Tele hone 543-1550, Exr. 231 ~pj.U1S0~jgpp P ` Covncy Clerk :_..~.,, . ., .,'~~ COUNTY CLJERK ~'~~ 16 ~ 41 ~~y'7! Courthmcse Annex R~~~~~[~ SnN Lvzs Os¢sro, CAx,IFOANIA - 93401 S(J~RK ,q, N~1 S©~ March 15, 1971 T~ CC' C[-~:F?fC Chairman County Board of Supervisors Butte'County Oroville, California Dear Sir: This Board o= Supervisors, ou inarch a, 1571, adopted the attached resolution titled "Resolution Supporting Assembly Bi11 No. 6S" and have requested that a copy of same be directed to your attention. Your help in this mattex would be sincerely appreciated, Very truly yours, ' RUTH WARNKEN, County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervnisors By ~` ~ r~` Beputy C1er1: drm encl.. __~~~ ~:: ABSENT: None RESOLUTION P~fl. 71~I.38 RESOE.ilTIQ11 S1~PPE?RTIP:C ASSfhHLY EIl.L tVO. 6P ldHEREP.S, State Assambly dill wo. 58, as introduced into the 1871 California Legislature, provides for the State of Galifornia to ream- • bursa local agencies for the loss of revenue due to a decrease in assessed valuation of open-space land made subject to the Galifornia Land Conservation Act of 1805; and ldHEREAS, The San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors strongly supports the intent and purposes of Assambly Bi11 Pio. 6F3 and seeks the support of others in this regard. Py0ld, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED AtlD ORDERED by the Board of Super- visors of the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, that the Board of Directors of the County Supervisors Association of California and each County Board of Supervisors in the State of California endorse Assembly Bill Pdo. 68 and actively strive far its enactment. BE IT FURT}i£R RESOEVED that the Cleric of this Board is directed to send copies of this Resolution to: The board of Directors of the County Supervisors Association of Califarr,ia, each County Board of ~~ Supervisors in the State of California, State Senator Donald Grunsky, f,ssemblyman Y!i i 11 am KPtehum, and Assemblyman Donald ttacGi 11 ivray. Upon motion of Supervisor I:idta~ll seconded by Supervisor ~~i-~'~~ and on the fo11 owi ng ro71 cai l vote, to-rai t AYES: Szxpe~~risaxs ~i.d~aell, Hei.lmenn; Gages,- P~anl;irns, Gt~aix~an ~~CeemB~ P~OES : None o~ ;;-,.,, r :,.,;.:, ABSEPlT: None ~_.: ._.__._._. _'....____.__. ._. ABSTAIPIIPlG"....Nan~.._._._.... _: _ . the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted: ~~~~ .r ~ .. ..~ /s/ Ru1:h Warnken er o the foar a taperv scrsr ADbjI"F. f}FF. _ - CtiUN'IY Or' SaN L'uIS ui3i51'O) ss ~ STATE OC GAI_fFORhIIA ) I,, RUTN WAR~fI(EN, Gounfy Clerk of the above entithc' County, and Ex-Officio Clorls of the Board of Supervisor; thereof, do hereby certify the foregoing to 6e a full. . true and correct copy of an order entered in the minutes of said Board of Supervisors, and now remaining of ~ ,_. __ . rocord in my office. , Witness, my hand and sealro~f.,saiii Board of Super• ~~ , ~ ., 1- r , .. .~uisor~s~~his,~.,.;-~,.,~~Y4f~1~~..`;•~~~`~i-.--~' i' ~; ,~ . _ _ z:~ f:. - _ '~; ,.., .. . . ' , '°RUTt{'WARNffEN r. c; ;r .,.: - ..,. , ", „f _ c County Clerk snd Fx-Officio Clerls of the ;_ ~ ~:: ~ .~-Board of Supervisors oep~ ~ cl~rrt . , . __ . ._ .. _. °?i'~ ~ ov . o s No . 97 BAR i~ ~~ 2E A~~ !~ ~ On motion. of Supervisor Boney , seconded by S~~~rE~~~pr Craven the following resolution is adopted: CLARK A. NELSON Bl}TTE CO. CLERK WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Mental Health Act of 19b8 (Welfare and Institutions Code Section 5650? the Counties are required to submit by October lst of each year the County Short-Doyle Plan for the subsequent fiscal year and WHEREAS, approval by the State Department of Mental Hygiene. and the .legislature has been after the County's Mental Health Budget has been adopted by the; Board of Supervisors and WHEREAS, the Counties must receive notification of program approval before its budget is adopted in order to effectively plan its mental health program, and CvriFRr,AS,.San Diego LOUnty has, in the past, budgeted in good faith, pn information that programs would be approved only to .learn later they were not, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED 1. That the legislature be urged to accept the .responsibili+-y for seeing that adequate funds are. approved by April 1st of each year. 2. That the legislature by amendment to the Welfare and Institutions Code insert the date of April 1 for the notification of Counties as to State program approval. IT,IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Chief Administrative Officer shall make every effort to seek implementation of the above resolved actions through all Counties in the State; San Diego County's representation in Sacramento, California; State Legislators; and the County Supervisors Association of California. °~ ~~ PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County o,f.San Diego, State of California, this 9th day of March , 1971 by the following vote: AXES: Supervisors Walsh, Boney, Scheidle, Bear and Craven NOES: Supervisors None ABSENT: Supervisors None STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ss. County of San Diego) I, PORTER D. CREMANS, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County. of San Diego, State of California, hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original resolution passed and adopted by said Board, at a regular meeting the*-eof, at the time and by the vote therein stated, which original resolution is now on file in my office; that the same contains a full, true and correct transcript therefrom ~~nd of the whole thereof. Witness my hand and the seal of said Board of Supervisors this 11th day of March, 1971. PORTER D. CREMANS Clerk of the Soard of Supervisors (.SEAL) By Lenelle Do 1 .~ ~'~9. ~l'' Deputy ~dft _~ ~ ~~ ~H'1 ~ R£CEIVEf} CLARK A. NELSON BUTTE CO. CLERK RESOLUTION N0. 71_4 • WHEREAS, this Board of Supervisors has received Resolution 71-95 of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, this Board of Supervisors concur in said resolution which is set forth as follows; and WHEREAS, the United States of America has funded preliminary studies•of concepts and locations for the launching of the American Space Shuttle in the 1g70s, and these studies are expected to result in the determination of a launch site Suring mid 1971; and WHEREAS, 40,000 primary jobs are expected to be created within the aerospace industry in the state where the launch site is selected, and the State of California has the largest reservoir of research, development, information, and operational personnel and equipment prepared to enter into this project; and WHEREAS, the physical requirements of the program appear to be best adapted to aerospace test and launch facilities within the State of California; and WHEREAS, the selection of a site outside the State of California for this program i~rould result in the American taxpayer absorbing the tremendous costs of re-establishment and relocation of California aerospace facilities and man- power; and -l- WHEREAS, the logistics involved in the provision of fuels, communications, data processing and other required functions are readily available to the Space Shuttle Program in Southern California; and WHEREAS, Vandenberg Air Force Base has recently achieved its 1000th successful aerospece launch with the personnel and equipment now present at that facility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Inyo that we urge every concerned leader of the State of California who has the well-being of this State's economy in his charge to give maximum personal support to the securing of the Space Shuttle Program for the State of California. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be sent to the County Supervisors Association of California and to the Boards of Supervisors of all California Counties to the end that these entities consider the adoption of similar resolutions supporting the location of the Space Shuttle Program in the Southern California Area. Passed and approved this 1st day of Maxch , 1971. ATTEST: Daniel T. Bromley, Clerk `~Fhe fcre_roing Res~!uti:-n- 7/-/ was dvfy posed 7 ar;. c-pked ~~ t5e : ,, .. ., • ~o^rd of Supervi,o:•s a~ a $y i ~ ~, Deputy }9L F ..~, _ L. Perez„ ~ ; ~~FS~L~r~,~~'V/~.E':~!`/~ i, / ~~~ Dep. Gerk -2- i e,pS ~G District No. 1 WM. C. REIMERS P. O. Box 143 Or]and District No. 2 C. E. POLZIN P. O. Box 304 Orland District No. 3 RALPH COLBERT Elk Creek COUNTY OF GLENN STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~Mx~ ~ ~S~t~tBZ~t~Dx~ Telephone (916} 934-3834 Courthouse, 526 West Sycomore Street WILLOWS, CALIFORNIA 95988 District No. 4 HOWARD R. "Pete" HOLVEK 216 North Plumas W it lows District No. 5 TOWN F. FIACK RFD I, Box 430 Glenn County Clerk MILTON E. WALKER Court House Willows February 25, 1971 Board of Supervisors County of Butte Courthouse Oroville, California Gentlemen: 95965 On January 20, 1970, this Board of Supervisors passed a resolution recommending repeal of the Field Act. For your in- formation and reference, a copy of that resolution is enclosed. The tragic earthquake of February 9, 1971, in the San Fernando Valley has given rise in some quarters to demands for more rigid implementation of the Field Act. and even for the enactment of similar legislation as to the construction of hospitals and all public buildings. Our feelings are decidedly to the contrary. We believe more firmly than ever that the Field Act should be repealed. In our opinion, the San Fernando calamity illustrates, most vividly, that it is not possible to build "earthquake-proof" buildings. If it is possible, certainly the cost of such con- struction would be so astronomical as to be prohibitive. If structures such as freeway overpasses and modern buildings such as Olive View Medical Center could not withstand what seismolo- gists referred to as a "moderate earthquake", certainly school buildings and other public buildings, including those built to Field Act standards, could not withstand the shock of a similar or more severe earthquake. We ask that you join with us in requesting the State Legis- lature to immediately institute an investigation and commence hearings which will lead to a more sensible construction code for all public buildings in California in the light of sound economical structural engineering -and seismologic facto rather than in the emotional climate oflthe unfortunate tragedy on February 9th. YouQr~s sincerely, p~~ ' 7 ~~i'! Howard R. "Pete" Holvik, Chairman Glenn County Board of Supervisors l.tll'-:UDR /-.L 1-21-70 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 3 10 I1 12 13 14 r 1.5 16 17 18 is 20 21 22 23 24 25 28 27 28 2S 3C 31 3`c co~~.,N co~~Tr WILLOW 9, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, GLENN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 70-4 * * ~ RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING REPEAT OF THE FIELD ACT * ~ AS A BASIS AND PREMISE for this Resolution, the Board finds: 1. School Districts throughout California are faced with critical financial disaster because of the increased costs of building construction, educational materials, supplies, books and services as well as having to pay deserved but higher cast of living salaries to school administrators, teachers and other e employees. 2. More school buildings are urgently needed in the State and existing ones are sorely in need of repair, replace- ment and expansion, but bond proposals to provide the necessary bonds for such needed improvements have been repeatedly rejected by school district electorates during the past decade. 3. One reason for the rejection of such bond proposals by voters is the enormous cost of construction of school puild- ings,as compared with the cost of other public and private build- ings,necessitated by compliance with the stringent construction standards required by the Field Act (Education Code, §15451 to 15466). 4. Under the Field Act, the unreasonably high standards set for school building construction is, ostensibly, to insure against student injuries from calamaties such as earthquakes, v.h~reas the exposure of students to the risks of physical dancer from such catastropha.es is no greater, and, indeed, is probably much less, during school hours than when children are at home or at play. 5. Certainly there is no basis for believing that Page One. 1 2 3 4 5 6 '7 8 9 10 I1 12 13 14 15 16 17 ~ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2II 29 30 31 32 Ctl ~cHw Couu'rv 'WkG.F.G1Ws. CAI;k ~'4RNIA school buildings are more susceptible to damage by earthquake and calamity than are other public or private buildings. 6. This high cost of construction is,far out of pro- portion to the student safety factor achieved by earthquake proof buildings, particularly in areas where the incidence of earthquake is relatively small; and even in areas such as Long Beach, Santa Barbara, San Francisco and Santa Rosa, such high costs may well be disproportionate to the degree of risk to the students. 7. particularly is, this evident when one considers, by comparison, the irreparable physical, mental and psychological damage and injury suffered by hundreds of students and teachers each shoot day from school bus accidents, criminal assaults on school grounds, drug abuse, hard-core pornography and other violen experiences. 8. It is apparent that school funds should be better spent for a better education for our children by curing the ills so rampant on our public school grounds and in our public school buildings than upon extravagant monumental structures of concrete and steel which serve no better purpose than to withstand the possible shock of an occasional earthquake. 9. The "Chicken Little" philosophy of impending dis- aster exemplified by the Field Act has no validity when children are otherwise deprived of the benefits of a better education, at less cost to the taxpayer, simply for the sake of their being assembled in classrooms that will withstand every conceivable danger, few, if any, of which, will probably ever happen. '1']1LRL1'012,1, ;1:'].' :1:5 P.i~SO.i~V1~D ~l-.`ha~: 1. The Legislature of the State of California be, and it is hereby urged to repeal the Field Act or so modify its pro- visions and the rules and regulations of the Department of General Services, that much needed classrooms can be constructed by Page Two. V . 1 California school districts at a reasonable cost and thereby per-- 2 mit some of the tax money thus saved to be utilized to much better 3 advantage in providing our children with a better education and 4 in solving the classroom problems that face every student, teacher ` 5 and school administrator. 6 2. The Clerk of this Board shall forward copies of 7 this Resolution to the State Senator and Assemblyman from this 8 District, the Governor, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, 9 the County Supervisors Association of California, the California 10 Teachers Association, the California School. Trustees Association, 11 the California Taxpayers Association and other interested persons 12 and organizationse ' 13 14 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of January, 1970, by 15 the following vote: 1B AYES: HOLVIK, POLZIN, FIACKP COLBERT.and REIMERS 17 ~ Nays: NaN~ 18~ ABSENT: NONE 19 COUNTY OF GLENN 7~.~ CHAIRMAN,. Board of Supervisors,~~ - 21 Glenn County, California 22 ATTEST• 23 COUNTY C 'RK and ex officio Clerk, 24 Board o Supervisors, Glenn County, California_ 25 26 ~ '' 27. . ' 88 29 30 31 32 courvrr ~d~„n~~ - P-age Three . - ~LdM Cnurvtr _ WILLOWS. CALIFORNIA CALIFOR NEA 94301 Office of the City Clerk All Mayors and County Clerks in Counties of the State of California Gentlemen: February 1 i, 1971 Enclosed for your information is a copy of our ResolutionNo.4429 entitled "Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Aito Urging the League of California Cities and the County Supervisoxs' Association of California to Seek Action to Alleviate the Pro- blem of Litter and Waste Disposal Created by the Sale of Bev- erages in Disposable, Non-Returnable Containers." This reso- lution was adopted by our City Council on Monday, February 1, 1971. Very truly yours, ~CZ.~Ci~ (/ ~ ~~ KATHRYN T. FARI5H City Clerk KTF/pl /vo.o~' tie ~s s ~$ A~ ~~i RECEIVED CLARK A. NELSON BUTTE CO. CLERK Enclosure R1+'.gOT.iTTT01~ r,0_ ag?a RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO URGING THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANp THE COUNTY SUPERVISORS' ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA TO SEEK ACTION TO ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEM OF LITTER AND WASTE DISPOSAL CREATED BY THE SALE OF BEVERAGES IN DISPOSABLE, NON-RETURNABLE CONTAINERS WHEREAS, the sale of malt, carbonated and non-carbonated beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers is producing ` ~ an adverse effect upon the environment which is injurious to the health, safety and welfare of the residents of Palo Alto, and the entire State of California; and WHEREAS, the problems created by the sale of such beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers cannot be solved on a. local level, but must be dealt with on at least the State level; PdOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Palo Alto that it urges the League of California Cities ano'. the County Supervisors' Association of California to seek the following actions by the State Legislature to alleviate the problems of litter and waste disposal created by the sale of such beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers: (a) Require a deposit on all containers used for the sale of such beverages; (b) Promote, encourage and support research by the beverage and container industries in the field of bio-degradable con- tainers; _ (c) Develop, encourage and support programs aimed at encouraging tine citizens of the State of California to take a more responsible attitude toward the disposal of such beverage containers, including recycling; and (d} Consideration of legislation which would result in the eventual prohibition of sale and distribution of non-returnable containers. - 1 - BE IT FURTf?ER RESOLVED that the City of Palo Alto hereby requests all of the cities and counties in California to take similar action urging the League of California Cities and the County Supervisors` Association of California to seek action by the State Legislature which will alleviate the problems of litter and waste disposal created by the sale of such beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to send copies of this resolution to the League of California Cities, the County Supervisors' Association of California, all of the cities and counties in the State of California, Governor of the State of California, President Pro-Tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the Assembly. INTRODUCED A1VD PASSED: February 1, 1971. AYES: Arnold, Beahrs, Berwald, Clark, Comstock, Dias, Gallagher, Norton, Pearson, Spaeth, Y7heatley. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ Kathryn T. Farish /s/ Jack R. Wheatl City Clerk i•~ayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: /s/ Peter G. Stone City Attorney - 2 - RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE MATTER OF SUPPORTING LOCATION OF SPACE SHUTTLE RESOLUTION N0. 71-95 PROGRAM IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ) AREA ) WHEREAS, the United States of America has funded preliminary studies of concepts and locations for the launching of the American Space Shuttle in the 1970s, and these studies are expected to result in the determination of a launch site during mid 1971; and WHEREAS, 40,000 primary jobs are expected to be created within the aerospace industry in the state where the launch site is selected, and the State of California has the largest reservoir of research, development, information, and operational personnel and equipment prepared to enter into this project; and WHEREAS, the physical requirements of the program appear to be best adapted to aerospace test and launch facilities within the State of California; and WHEREAS, the selection of a site outside the State of California for this program would result in the American taxpayer absorbing the tremendous costs of re-establishment and relocation of California aerospace facilities and manpower; and WHEREAS, the logistics involved in the provision of fuels, communications, data processing and other required functions are readily available to the Space Shuttle Program in Southern California; and WHEREAS, Vandenberg Air Force Base has recently achieved. its 1000th successful aerospace launch with the personnel and equipment now present at that facility. NOW, THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara that we urge every concerned leader of the State of California who has the well-being of this State's economy in his charge to give maximum personal support to the securing of the Space Shuttle Program for the State of California. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be sent to the County Supervisors Association of Califarnia and to the Boards of Supervisors of all California Counties to the end that these entities consider the adoption of similar resolutions supporting the location of the Space Shuttle Program in the Southern California Area. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, this 8th day of February, 1971, by .the following vote: AYES: George H. Clyde, Charles F. Catterlin, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H, Beattie and Curtis Tunnell NOES: None .~ ASSENT: None ~ ' l i -' `,.i G airman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: ~~ 7. .,.,, L ~~ Assistant' County ~Clerlr ~" .-~ loo oS' COUNTY aF S11N 1Y111T~~ MARVIN CHURCH COUNTY CLERK•RECORDER OFFICE OF THE CLERK o£ the BUARD OF SUPERVISORS ,~~~ ~ ~ ~{ ~'~ ''~ ~ A. J. DAVANCENS ABBISTANT COUNTY CLERK - HALL OF JUSTICE AND RECORDS REDWOOD C1TY ~CALIFORNlA 8A089 ~~~"~`. ~~~~ JUNE M. LYNCH 969.1441.E%T. 2867 ~~~7! /{~.. }~ttp;~_~,~~~ DEPUTY OLERK OR THE BOARO ~~ ~~1T?E 'Y V. #.. LL. i y73 ..February 2, 1971 Hon. Board of Supervisors County of Butte Courthouse Oroville,~California 959b5 .Gentlemen: ................................................................._._. The Board or Supervisors at its February 2, -1971 mee~Eing adopted its.•~resolution asking assist- ance to alleviate tk~e;:.;problem€;;qf ,~~:i:tter and waste disposal created,by the sa3;e of 'kxeverages in dispos- able, non-retur~i:able Goritaihers, ,.'and"is,; transmitting certified copy wig±-r the members' hope flat favorable attention wi11 be~„liven this vital m_at`er~. 3 -.. ,~r~RV~r: cxuRCx t- 2 3.;, T £ ~_» 2Qarvin Church . _ ~y /~ `<~ > > C1e oi' the a ~ ~~ /~ t MC~p ~ enuty ; .. Enc. Y `'~ .. ". litter our streets and parxs ana sucn cost must be oorne oy the taxpayers; an a. WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable that the problems created by the sale of beverages in disposable, nonreturnable containers be dealt with on the state level; and WHEREAS, this Board of Supervisors has been requested by several cities within the County of San Mateo to urge the League of California Cities and the County Supervisors' Association of California to seek certain action by the s+.ate legislature as hereinafter set forth: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AND DETERMINED as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors shall, and does hereby, request the follow- ing actions by the state legislature to alleviate the problems of litter and waste disposal created by the ,sale of beverages in disposable, nonreturnable containers: a. To investigate the feasibility of a deposit on all containers used for the sale of beverages; b. To promote, encourage, and support research by the beverage and container industries in the field of biodegradable containers; and c. To develop, encourage, and support programs aimed at encouraging the cities and counties of the State of California to develop effective programs for the disposal of beverage containers, including recycling. 2. That this Board of Supervisors shall, and does hereby, request the assistance from the various-cities of the County of San Mateo in developing a program, in consultation with the County's legislative representatives., to alleviate the problems hereinabave referred to. 3. That the Clerk of this Board of Supervisors be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to send certified copies of this resolution to the League of California Cities,'the Peninsula Division of the League of California Cities, the County Supervisors' Association of California, and all the cities of the County of San Mateo. Regularly passed and adopted this 2nd day of Februa:•y, 1971. AYES and in favor of said resolution: Supervisors: JAMES V. FITZGERALD ROBERT ST. CLAIR GERALD F. DAY NOES and against said resolution: Supervisors: Absent Supervisors: JEAN FASSLER NONE W. M. WERDER JAMES V. FITZGERALD ATTEST: Chairman, Board of Supervisors (SEAL) MARVIN CHURCH County of San Mateo Clerk of sai Board of State of California Supervisors (ENDORSED) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS F 1' L E D FE$ 2 1971 MARVIN CHURCH, County Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. County of San Mateo ) MARVIN CHURCH, County Clerk of the County of San Mateo, State of California, and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors thereof, does kaereby certify that the above an d, foregoing is a full, true and correr_t copy of Resolution No. .28o'4O entered in the minutes of said board. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of said Board this 2nd day of February, 1971. i~AR N CHURCH, le k By Deputy F_ --- JdD,DS . ,, Hof ore rho ~oarc~ of Su~orvisors Coun~~y o f Korn, S~a~o of California ~i~~ In the matter of: ITS S€T1?F~11~T OF' ACTSOt~ TD EI:.IP~IIIQATE DISP05A)3I.E, ItiON1tE~'UI:r~A13LE CONTAINERS Resolution No.__ ~~'~r~_..~.._....._._......._ Minute Book_.-.._.__~~0.....W.:....._.__._.Page..__.._.~.._........ r, Resolution Boo1~..-_....3__-__~._...Page....__..._ .............. I, VERA K. GIBBON, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Kern, State of California, do hereby certify that the following resolution, proposed by Supervisor ~'ouz~g ,seconded by Supervisor Regd. ,was duly passed and adopted by said Board of Supervisors at an official meeting hereof this._.:.._~6~h.day of_W ~~u~'.g°3r._ .................. 19 .~; by the following vote, to wit: '`;~~ ,. ;~' AYES: Jc~c2cson, Head, Yol~zag, Wet~b, Mil~.ex~ NOES: None ~~~, ~ ~ f ABSENT: t+1022~` Clerk of the ~oayc~ of Supervisors,: County of Kern, :: F r',9tata of Ealifgrnia• t,~ 0 rz~soLU~r~®n °~t Section 1. WHEREAS: (a) The use of disposable, nonreturnable containers in the sale of i~ealt and carbonated beverages is creating an adverse effect upon the enviroa>aent in California and Kem County; and (b) This sitlaation is caused by the fact thst consumers discard the containers in a manner that. litters the public way, and because these containers are not easily degradable, the health, safety and welfare of the local and state residents is threatened; and (c) This problem cannot be solved on any local level, but rather regional and stgte-wide efforts must be made in order.to effect a.completa solution;, SQCtion Z. NflW, Tt~REFQRE, IT IS HEREBY R~SOL~ by the Eoard of Supervisors of the County of Kern, that it urges the County. Supervisors Association of California and the League of California.Cities to seek. the foilawing actions by the State, Legislature to alleviate the problems ~~~ of litter and wast® disposal created by the use of disposable, non- - returnable containers in the sale of 'malt and carbonated bevexagest (a) Require a deposit on ail containers presently used for the.sale of malt and carbonated beverages. TnA .L ' ~x -- (b) Promote, encourage and support research by the 'beverage rand container industries, or any other _._ .__ _ ~""~~apable research organization, in order to develop for general sales and€.consumer use, a bia~ degradable container. (c) Develop, encourage and support programs aimed at encouraging the citizens of the State of California to take a mots responsible attitude - toward the d~,sposal of beverage cantainers, in- cludiaag recycling. Section 3. ~3? Z~. ~1JRi`giE~ RE50~,~ED by this board Chat all of the cities and counties of California ta~:e similar action by likewise urging the County Supervisors Association and the J,eague of Ca.liforn3.a Cities to seek action by the State lLegiglature which ~ril.l alleviate the problem of litter and ~raste disposal created by the sale of malt and carbonated beverages ixa disposable, nonreturnable containers.' Section 4. BE 7~1 F`i3z~Tlf~R R~S~iLVEi3 that the Clerk of this Board transmit copies of this resolution to the County Supervisors Association of California, the League of California Cities, each county in the Stag of California and all cities located in Kern Co~snty. ..; ~p r05 ;~~~s>~1,~~;'.~-a~:~ ~ 1•ak.~. '?? -- 13 w `~Ak t'B ~ 13 ~~ ~r~ • n R~~l:'IAAV~pCC rw,"1' 7 - r~ ~.rr „ r ~t r,+ ~, r-- ~• ~3 r. r C~~~~ C rtl ~~~7,0 ~. ~nni.~tt~;t~~,1.r•.3si:..a`:?~t~,,3..f>T,~t{~..,~~`tiA`~z 3~'a:~:..a C:[i.~~JA£~Ai~.~'rrS~.*~J-.. ~.yT'_~p~C~p~~'-- ~. CL (~ - - 1''rEr`%J~L~rt r. ~:.J;.T, ~1~ ~~.j.,,E., .~^.~1J}~: i.:.~€?3 ;:}k'; ~.,~ 1~3-~`.e Lzi Ka LY tJ.r,:+ ~.~ ~~~\ - - ~i^ '"~~~ ax,': C'as>>;F~~,Y•,r, -5 f y"r~.-.rr,.i~ A iT~ ( (, Ghr".~,.~ ~^~.~r'~.`~`~r j sz~fa .r q -.5.. -a-di' ~' 2.Jt ~ ~. .~s4t .w ..}. ~p !~'f'S r.Jf~..~'.r 2.:~ya.r`~.5-a..t:J.cF ra. . - ~ri~~.C`,?:tA^.3. Z.1. ~.3 ~.JA~! ~ ~YgS'r ~~-1:-~y~ .L ~G~ ~~.:.-sY^~: L~n'-,~Lffi~ya ~i 2Hi ~~c;'"i3° - ~V=7.,"f .~`•~ ~a i'a~A:i"Fi~.~.'a ~ 4)i+: ~1K it6.n~ L..~JiV ri .E~~al~.l'+.~u y. ~i\r~i~A~:t}:s.~ii, ~3~ .Sz~~.G t7i I:~Q~Y ~.aa:i Cc3ski€3P~'~E;,`:~ p3wV~`s A~yc? y Ana di~~~~?:?e, ar~~a••r~;i~xrna~?~ cc?~i~7or~ iN p~odue3.~~ wn ~~,c-er~~ efaea:~ ~~£3?3 ~`i2Z:f.'€.t~7~Y'x3~Et_.'C-`~':1~ S'I'~~~.~~R 3E3 ~.Yk~i2A ~FJt34'+ $43 4~+c'~ ~c^~~,~Yl~ E~"uf€-:~~" ~-ti2C~ ~roi~'~.~4 t~f ifz^ z'~~,~a~tere~t~ of ~I3o C~.z.~a~y o~ ~r-,Z 1`eC~r~t3, ~.r_~ tlio ~:aia.^+~ ~e~s~ of ~'~;3.i.io~n.ia; a;~~ L`J~-i~~'',.3~.A~, ~1~~ ~,x~ob?err~ cxc~.?`ed b~ i:~a~ ~~3,e of X~k~rle ~.r,:,3 . Ki.'1z'x1~1.7~.~€w`'. }3Ci,T6'I'ct.bw~ ?;;1 C:~S.~)~a"313b1~1~u, l3:Dl3^1""£?$I2.-F3-"~~sl~' GQ3~~:=?L23y.^~ Cc3~a:°±SJ'~ ~e wr,~.v~~ cs ~ a i~a~~I is~r~~., dui ~.3~;~i ~~ u~~i~ ~'Y~t}z am ~;~ l~:u~~ ~.~~ 4t~ie hovel; 14TH?;;r, 'i'Iik~~"'~F'~ie~, ~~ 1~'' a ~~~~piJtr~S,~ }~y 2?~~ ~:5es~,a°d ~f ~~s~~~ .. el~ot s of tlao ~trtr~~;;~ v~ l'?41 s~e~~te that: i~ u~~~? t~_e Co~arty ~u~ex~z i~'o~°~' .€iv~o:.i~~~n z~~ ~alsfox~~:.~ ~.r.xz~ ~lZ~ ~~~,~ of C:~lifc~~ r~,~ ~It?cs Asa ~vels ~'cF~; fol;~t~Kair~u ~.~;tiot~~ 1~y'ct:e ;~ua~~ I.~e~i~3.~t~aro t~ eliesrf~t~ t~~o ~x•ss~?ti~r.~as of ~fite~ a~s~ ~~~~ce tlk:~~,a~~l c~~~t~~ t~~ f:~ ti o~.l~ of ~~~It ~t~~ :;~fxon:~~e~ b~vex~€~;~~e ~z ~€;~tiat31~, nog-xc~ar;au9~1~ e~orit~ir~~c°s: (P~ ~~r~~~~ ~ dWlsosit ore ~~1. co~t•_i,~e:s LL~ed €t~~~ t~~.~ u~1e ok .al$ ~o~ ear. CJ~i3£3'~{'Ct t;e~r~rrt~o~. (.°~~ ~sifl:.ls~)4~, ~[tCt7~~'~~~ r~-..E3t1 €~i~?3.1~Y'fi 2°r3~€',22'G'f) ~3~' tta~ Y~~tifvt'~~~ a;~~ cfl~~~.w»~2r t~.eti~,7tzf~~ iza tla~ . 5 1'ielcl ~.t l~ir~f.~~~~a~~~?€ ~cr~•z~.?<bat°~. .. ~a`~l r.~~~rQ~.f:t_S., P.33[:C3'~3,;'c'L~~„';° c`:22~ €3t~???~i??"~ ~J.i"Gk~''?"c1i.:1J ~'3.~3i.~~3 ~.E @s3G:t7li.i ac~~~ t~lk.' Qi~i.ia''~::d~ C?~ t:13ti ~~~.oE' Q~ ~ t ?k^ fti:+j?x~ tfJ t_3i:v 2 33;t7i'c: x'C~~C~h~i~al~o c^.~1'Ci;;?s'' tO'~~'~S`Ct ~L~1w C~LiS~3~'_'>ec'?.~ Eii Z?k'i'fi'Fz ~vT CQ?'f~c71~^c%"Fs ~=]ti,~'f7C~'3.flu X'~C,~ ~.~iE;,~. ~~b ~.-i "'• ~~'^~ 'sJ:kti rs ~..._~j`i ?:~~:.~~~~!-~„e'i:.t ~~' rl"s?1 L:4`k a. 4?%?, r~Cz Gx ~5 u'. ~d'S.G r,, ~~s',•3 f.'.S d't"1:: ., i:~~?~`s dr f3a~. '~':G'.L ~~'~,?~ e:~ i';i.`Ari?• y.`-;t~„4:Fa c'i~ { 63{ ~.~: S ~1. •7 {.~'r,-~ ~3 - t ",-, • bx.>.:n Si* s9 ,. i.3 t, '13k'ytj;:fc,° ~`.'?~` ~ G?.~.ili~;y' ~>hi~.~~;a 6~?17f;Mist R~~::'sF,-'.SiC%'° f.:c~F.ii..i::da=1 '~[,3 w ~~,. E~.a.l:Tc_;H c:,k.4 [' Fi~fl~~ Cv~~"c'._'s.~.r[?"~a F3`kT;.' Cit1 ~:^ ~~vfw~;.:±i~ ~,'~ ~.ui~'~#7S':F~~ S.,%r~ulu~ ~~ ~iu4a{ ~~t;l:~€.~-~a ~~ ~1~~ ~S~i'3~~ adS:~~~t~ %~'~'::~'t! ~a,. e~;M~X l~~~I ~3k~.vVt,^,,<~ `'i?.C3 L " ~s?'' at•. ~f~: u ~:1'ti;~ ~ ~,do~w%' u ",Si ah~n&,'. ~!t>>~ ~tp~ C:~'sl~ ~ ~~ ttef ~;; .~)fi i' 2 ~~ 'Y 5 ; y~ ~- ~ -Yt GR~ ~ t, , ~ ~ ff ~.~ ~s;~ r.~:x : ~~ ~ ~ tic:;,>o~ ~-~~~ ~t3 €~.~.~3_~~ria3.33~8a a:3E3^B'e.'t`,L:I"f"cj})~~ t:~ af;~.:~EI~ ~s clzak ' ~~ ~ ~`~K-~dra~n~ ka$r~`•;r-: ~.e~~/'F.~i~ ~~~z`:G ~l~c'a,. ~.~Ll?i"6'.7`a~E36 `L'~'3,~. .~7 t~^+Y.o".~=t~ ~fi ~2~?x~'~,~ :.3~..-~° ~ E~3 A:'a~. ~a•~ ~.~"~ f?d a;i:~~a }:~.4;c~c:.z['Si-~.~a' ~``] ~£:"~~ ~~i'3~::.~c.,y s.7~o?'a`~'. [~ a " V.~.-~~rUt o-'4 •~ ~?~"so&~:€.b~'4s~ Ct~'~i2~txv^.~e." ~;'ba ~~IL ~et?~i.~;%~ t3~ ~~:w1.~d~~n Ails ~S~~G€3~ ~.wt'~ m31 ~rY ~:~e ~~~~.3~e~ a~a`4„c ~~~~2~ o~ try:.i£cs8•s?.i,~. ` , . __ ~'2 L'Yv~~J:'i:: ,st:~di~ Xs% ~~'~.~ns3,3 ~`'A.~ ~idk' ~2'.+~.x°Cq +C3~ e1Z?~'i:5.~-"tif~:S3X'~~`• 4T.~ ~~t„: ~Q'a#J.~?v~` 4I ~ SCI %f?.x.'L~+ f~"lz' 4t vY ~j t7~ ~' ~)F u~%.L.,z'~/ ~. v~~. ~,~;~ ~:~ f~;s*~ % 'L ^r'i'; r a ~.~Ci F3 ~' jl.,s... .~3~1k: Supervisors I4cClendon, Fraser, Hight, Del Ponte, Chairman Aici7amara. ~~'i A ~~: None =:~,`sl'i~is1"; None ~~'~'~~`1'' The foregoing is a correct copy of the original on file in this office. Dated: January 25, 1971 ATTEST: DOROTHY SIi1CLAI12__ (SEAL) DOROTI3Y SINCLIaIIt ~~,:x~~o~oA ~,;~;„ lc~;=d ~~~'~'County Clerk and ex--officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, County of Del idorte, State of California De ty w~~ BOARD OF SUPE_ SOBS, COUNTY OF LAKE;, STATE Ok II,IFORNIA RESOLUPION N0. 71-5 URGING THE COUNTY SUPERVISORS ASSOCL4TIOTd OF CALIFORNIA AND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES TO SEEK ACTION TO ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEti OF LITTER AND GlASTE DISPOSAL CREATED BY THE SALE OF BEVERAGES IN DISPOSABLE, NON-RETURNABLE CONTAINERS. WHEREAS, the sale of malt and carbonated beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers is producing an adverse effect upon the environment which is injurious to the health, safety and vrelfare of the residents of the County of Lake and the entire State.of California; and L~lHEREAS, the problems created by the sale of malt and carbonated beverages in dis- posable, non-returnable containers cannot be solved on a local level but must be dealt with on at least the State level; N04J, THERE'.r'ORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Lake that it urges the County Supervisors~Association of California and the League of California Cities to seek the follo~•ring actions by the State Legislature to alleviate the problems of litter and waste disposal created by the sale of malt and carbonated beverages in disposable, . non-returnable containers: 1. Require a deposit on all containers used for the sale of malt and carbonated beverages. 2. Promote, encourage and support research by the beverage and container indus- tries in the field of biodegradable containers. 3. Develop, encourage and support programs aimed at encouraging the citizens of the State of California to take a more responsible attitude toyrard the disposal of beverage containers, including recycling. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all of the counties and cities in California take similar action urging the County Supervisors Association of California and the League of California Cities to seek action by the State Legislature which i:ill alleviate the problems of litter and i-caste disposal created by the~sale of malt and carbonated beverages in dis- posable, non-returnable containers. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to send copies of this Resolution to the County Supervisors Association of California, the League of California Cities and all of the Counties in the State of California. This Resolution 1•ras passed and adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Lalse, State of California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of January, 1971, by the following vote r AYES: Supervisors Wrieden, Denner, Martinelli, Lampson, Wildso NOES: None. ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None. /s/ Junior C. [dilds ATTEST: JAP9ES L. SHINN Chairman of said Board Clerk of said Board -- /s/ Adah L Berens ~ . BY: , Depot Clerk y the within instrument is a c•:rrxc a~y~~ •-'of tho onglnal an file In tSla o4fico- '<;' ~ ATYEST: ~ JAN i~ X971 ~•,t ~ . Cvuncy Cicrlc <.: d e:o-c`'"r"ata Ct.,,•!c o4 lie • Y s of _ - bog rd-, or - 3 - ,.•vie,.; : cf~ : Yu - - ~Calttor ila~ln -+-•cfJ4or L:~a "•` ~~~h Y ~T Via!<o•- sy ~/c1G iKV_e./.~c.rvcc-a/_ . CwPU2Y Clerk l o a, os Office of CHIEF OF POLICE CH[CO, CALIFORNIA 95926 December 31, 1970 Honorable Donald Maxom Butte County Board of Supervisors 5590 Feather River P1„ Paradise, Ca, Re: Resolution No, 70-202 County of Butte, State of California Resolution in Appreciaticn of ' ,TAMES R, EVANS Dear Don: I would greatly appreciate you conveying to the Honorable Butte County Board of Supervisors my deepest and most sincere appreci= ation for their commendation to me on the occasion of my retire- ment, Tt is a tribute to our system of government and the men who manage the affairs of State, that a police Officer from a small community may be honored, As you and I have discussed, the developments of an effective-- police agency today depends upon mutual and equal share of re- spect, dignity, and personal understanding by and for the men -- and women representing the department, The measure of coopera- tion with and by County and other cities within the jurisdiction, greatly enhance the image of law enforcement, May I add my County service as Undersheriff, a staff member with the late Sheriff Herb Forward 1943 to 1947,-set the stage and assisted greatly in the successful years of my administration, I want you to know how much I personally appreciate the splen- did support and cooperation the many members of the Honorable Board, past and present, has given to me during my tenure of 01 ice, an_ d ~ ank you for your kind personal attention. Respectfully and~~rely yours, >< ,' ~W -., a.~ o~ ao Ns:m$~ Jai l8 ~ os ~~''1` 1-4-71 ~ ~h R~c~iv~o ~o~ CLARK A.,~~~SOPJ Gr Ti-iE BOARD OF SUPERi01SORS OF THE COUNTY OF E~. DQRADO '' YIHEREA3, the sale of malt.and carbonated beverages im disposable, non-returnable containers is producing an adverse eFfect upon the environment which is injurious to the health, safety snd welfare of: the residents of the County of El Dorado-.and the entire State of Cal- fornia; and WHEREAS, the problems created by the sale of malt and carbonated,: beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers cannot be solved on' a local level, but must be dealt with on at least the State level; N(}W, THEREF01~, BE IT iiE50LVED by the Board of Supervisors of t~ Gounty of E1 Dorado that it urges the County Supervisors' Association of Ca~.i- a'~ fornia and the League of California Cities to seek the following actions. by the State Legislature'ta alleviate the problems of litter and waste disposal created by the sale o£ malt and carbonated beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers: (a) require a deposit ors all containers used for the sale of malt and carbonated beverages; (b) promote, encourage and support research by the beverage and container industries in the field of biodegradable coritaine~s; and (c) devei.op, encourage and support programs aimed at encouraging the citizens of the State of California to take a more responsible attitude toward the disposal of beverage containers, including recycling. SE YT FURTHER ftE50LVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of E1 Dorado hereby requests all of the counties an:d cities in California to take similar action urging the County Supervisors' Association of California and the League of California'Cities to seek action by the'... STATE OF CALIFORNIA IZa~p~i I~uc~anan, fsf Qisfricf u dean Lowrence, 2nd ~isfrid ~6C ~~ - ~ 1~~ ~11 i~0 Ro6erf W. Long, Ord ~isirict ~a Wi~~iam E. ~{~omas, 4f6 ~isfricf ,R s-c4 '~L~v~~ _ Wi~~iam Curran, 51h Disfricf ~31.ARK ~„ N~~,~bN Theo. A. Kal,ler, Jr. ~~~°~" G'~. fe~..RK^ Ez-Ollido C~er~C of f6e Board ~~~~ ~~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS of sur[sv~so R ~:.ysP `~ mr~'~~'~ ~~~ \F• ry~~J q~4 COUII~ 2oi Cf,urc6 Sercit NEVADA CITY, CALIFORNIA- 95959 Phea<, Ar« C.d< g,6-z65-~4G4 Eze. sio / D o, o S- December 24, 1970 T0: BOARDS OF SUPERVISORS OF ALL CALIFORNIA COUNTIES Transmitted herewith, please find one certified copy of Nevada County Board of Supervisors Resolution 70-315, a Resolution requesting an amendment to Section 25124 of the Government Code to delete the requirement of publishing long, lengthy Ordinances such as Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. Sincerely, THEO. A. KOHLER, JR. County Clerk & Ex-Officio Clerk Nevada County Board of Supervisors ' Deputy Clerk to the Board ew Enc. RESOLUTTON REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 25124 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE TO DELETE THE REQUIREMENT OF PUBLISHING LONG, LENGTHY ORDINANCES SUCH AS ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES. WHEREAS, all of the counties throughout the State of California are experiencing a rapid growth in population which is requiring the adoption of extensive zoning and subdivision ordinances, and WHEREAS, Section 25124 of the Govexnment Code requires the publication of these,ordinances at a great expense to the taxpayers of the individual counties, and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Nevada County have found that very few people take the time or are interested in reading the published ordinance, and , WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors find that it would be in • the best interests of the taxpayers if the money expended for Che publication of long, lengthy ordinances was spent in furnishing descriptive disglay ads, and making the text of the ordinance available through the usual County channels, such as County~Clerk, Planning Office and Director of Public Works. NOW, THEREFORE,-THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF COUNTY OF NEVADA, RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Board requests the Legislature, o£ the State of California to amend Section 25124 of the Government Code to provide that the Board may use descriptive disglay ads in place of publishing ordinances in full when the Board finds that descriptive display ads are more practical and educational for the taxpayers. 2. The Clerk of the Board is instructed to send a copy of this resolution to Senator Stephen Tea le and Assemblyman Eugene Chappie. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Nevada at a regular meeting of said Board, held on the 22nd day Of December 7.970 , by the following vote of said Board: Ayes: Supervisors Ralph Buchanan, Dean Lavirence, Rabert W. Lang, William E. Thomas, William F. Curran. ATTEST; THEO. A. KOHLER, 1r. County Clerk and Noes: /, "~ / ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Absen4: „// ___ - / ~ q~ • i s lr6~C.~ ..C,, 4dC_e~I~t1i ~ iij<<.~i;~; r.' : ~ ~.c ,_-_-:~ v By _-..._._ 1L.~ .- ~....T--- - --- ---------~- Dapvey Clerk ~ - Chairman - THE FORCGOIN6 IPdSTRJPfENT IS :~ -~Q~/~ CORRECT COPY OF THE ORI6INAI. t~.~to?9 ON FILE IN THIS OFF~G ATTEST: DE~.2 ~-1Q7Q TH~O A. KOHLEt?, dF2. Coanty Clark and n:.-:--.:ifuw i:ieri~, 6oatA f gup...,..:gOrS C'tMCOUN OF.,,.pt7.VA~DA Br .-.. :~.~.......... Deputy 3 a. d , v~ J~ City o u gton Beach ~ P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 RECEIVED CLARK A. NELSON 8tlTCE CO. CLERK December 22,1970 TO ALL COUNTY BOARDS OF SUPERVISORS STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gentlemen: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, December 21, 1970, adopted Resolution No. 3271 requesting that action be taken to eliminate the litter and health hazards caused by the sale of beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers. Enclosed is a certified copy of said resolution. We urge your support to seek action to alleviate the litter and waste problem. Sincerely yours, ~~ ~ ~~ Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ: aw: pm Enclosure RESOLUTION N0. ='~'~ A ?tESOLUTION OF THE CITY rCUNC%L 0?~` THE f' ~':`l Ol+' HUNTINGTON BEACH URGING THE I.:EAC3UE ~~E' CALI- FORNIA CITIES AND THE COUNTY SUPERVIS'i;S' ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA 'I'0 SEEK AC'I'I~~P•, :'C ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEM OF LITTER AND WASTE DIS- POSAL CREATED BY THE SALE OF BEVERAGES IN DIS- POSABLE, NONRETURNABLE CONTAINERS 4dHEREAS, the sale of malt and carbonated oevPrages in di:;- E~,~;;ahle, nonreturnable containers is producing an adverse effec~. ~.apon tt3e environment which is injurious to the health, safety ,end welfare of the residents of Huntington Beach, and the entir•? ;M ate of California; and 7`t~,e problems created by the sale of malt and carbonated bevE=raE;es :in disposable, nonreturnable containers cannot Le :>olved nn a Local level, but :rust he dealt with on at Least ':he 5t3te level, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE50LVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that it urges the League of California Cities and the County Supervisors' Association of California to seek the following actions by the state legislature to al- leviate the problems of litter and waste disposal created by J the .sale of malt and carbonated beverages in disposable, nonre- /1 turnable containers: (a) Require a deposit on ail containers used for the sale of malt and carbonated beverages; (b) Promote, encourage and support research by the beverage and container industries, in the field of biodegradable containers; and (c ) D~fgelop.,,~ encourage and support programs aimed at encoura in the+.~'~° g g ctzens::of.;the State of California to take a more responsibleatit~it~ud~e~-toward the disposal of beverage con- tainers, includ~~;.~ig-'re~cy.cling:;~ 1. / -. BF IT FURTHER RESOLVED the the City of Huntington Beach re- quests all of the cities and counties in California to take simi- lar action, urging the League of California Cities and the Ccunty Supervisors' Association of California to seek action by tY;e state legislature which will alleviate the problems of litter and waste disposal created by the sale of malt and carbonated bev- erages in disposable, nonreturnable containers. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to send copies of this resolution to the League of California Cities, the County Supervisors` Association of California, and all of the cities in Orange County and each county in the State of California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Hunt- ington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day cf ~~ December, 1970. ~r'~ICJ r `u"' " ~ ~ c Mayo r r;'~'TEST City C r APPROVED AS TO FORM: ,- / ~.. •~"y~ ~. C ty Attorne 2. Res. No. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, PAUL C. JONES, the duly elected, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex- officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of December 1970 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: McCracken~_Bartlett, Gibbs, Coen, Matney~ Green, Shipley NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None city l;lerK ana e~ffacio [:lerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California 'CHE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT I5 A CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGaVAL ON FILE M THLS OFFICE ATFFAT• December 22, Iq 70• PAUL C. JONES C;ty C1eck and F•s•oBsaa (~ek of the City Council of f3ae~, h ~ ~ l~ n ~ 7~ ''p''S S ~l ~ ~ ~ 8 ^~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ Al L. ~ .. .. STATE OF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ' Ra~p~ ducEianan, lst ~isfricl u 3AA (Jean Lawrence, 2~Q~~s1~id ~ ~6 ~I7 ~~U f SOPE$VjSO e°I~ iy y~ 9s Ra6ert W. (_onq, 3rd Oistridl'' Wi~~iam ~'. Thomas, 4th, ~c~'~L~V~.fl a ~ r~,~- ~a /~~-~„~- 9 ~~;'•\F~~ ~~+ p i iam urran, W11• C 5fDL~'i~iQ A. NEL50N ~4Oq coui~~~.° J~.UTTE CO. CL<=RK Theo. A. Ko61~r - , ~x-~ffic7o Ger~C of t~e (~oard zw C6urc6 $ereet NEVADA CITY, CALIFORNIA g5ggg P6oo~: A~.e Cod. g~6 • a65 • xg6i E,m, a3o December I8, 1970 T0: BOARDS OF SUPERVISORS OF ALL CALIFORNIA COUNTIES Transmitted herewith, please find one certified copy of Nevada County Board of Supervisors Resolution 70-312, a Resolution urging the County Supervisors Association of California and the League of California Cities to seek action to alleviate the problem of litter and waste disposal created by the sale of beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers. ' Sincerely, THEO. A. KOHLER, JR. County Clerk & Ex-Officio Clerk 'Nevada County Board of Supervisors By., ~1~~.,~.Q~ ~,. ,~~~~.~ Deputy Clerk to the Board cw Enc. Vh 11`iC fdU/~IClJ Vi' Jui"CI`V ~avei~ yr ~ r~~. ~.vv~~ i ~ ~~ ~ a~ • •-•~•~-• RESOLUTION URGING THE COUNTY SUPERVISORS` ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA AND THE LEAGUE - OF CALIFORNIA CITIES TO SEEK ACTION TO ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEM OF LITTER AND WASTE DISPOSAL CREATED BY THE SALE OF BEVERAGES TN DISPOSABLE, NON-RETURNABLE CONTAINERS.. WHEREAS, the sale of malt and carbonated beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers is producing an adverse effect upon the environment which is injurious to the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the Gounty of Nevada, and the entire State of California, and WHEREAS, the problems created by the sale of malt and carbonated beverages in disposable, non-returnable con- tainers cannot be solved on a.local level, but must be dealt with on at least the State level, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Nevada, that it urges the County Supervisors` Association of California and the League of California Cities to seek the following actions by the State Legislature to alleviate the problems of litter and caaste disposal created by the sale of malt and carbonated beverages in disposable, non-returnable containers: {a) Require a deposit on all containers used for the sale of-malt and carbonated beverages. (b) Promote, encourage and support research by the beverage and container industries in the field of biodegrad- able containers. +' 7 (c) Develop, encourage and, support programs aimed at encouraging the citizens of the''State of California to take a more responsible attitude' toward `the,°,',d'isposal of beverage containers, including recycling. ,;~ n,: ,..~ urging the County Supervisors' Association of California and the League of California Cities to seek action by the State Legislature which will alleviate the problems of litter and waste disposal created by the sale of malt and carbonated beverages in disposable, non-returnable contain- ers. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to send copies of this Resolution to the County Supervisorst Association of California, the League of California Cities, and all of the counties in the State of California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Nevada at a regular meeting of said Board, held on the 15th day of December 19 70 , by the following vote of said Board: Ayes: Supervisors Ralph Buchanan, Dean Lawrence, Robert W. Long, William E. Thomas, William F. Curran. ATTEST; THEO. A. IGOHLER, 1r. County Clerk and tdoes: None ex-officio Clerk of the BoarQd ~o_f -Supervisors Absent: sy -~(~-~~~;lt~~~~ ~. 41iRSC~5.'.S?~~ __- ~ ~ ~,~;:~i7;. c.K-r~Z ~ Deputy Clerk - ~ _ Chairman THE fOREG011VG INSTRUhhENT IS ~ ~rQ~~~~ CORRECT COPT` OF THE pRIGINAL l~~a~~ ON FILE I!~ THIS OFF~i;_ ATTEST: D~~ i 8197© Cocnty Cmrir Intl e;;.tticm nary fitl~rd of Sup,:: ~tses ~,1~ pF t _ DA -~b~, OS 7 MODESTO CITY COUNCIT, RESOLUTION N0. 70- 118 A RESOLUTION URGING THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES AND THE COUNTY SUPERVISORS'ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORN'I'A TO SEEK ACTION.TO ALLEVIATE THE - ', PROBLEM OF LITTER AND WASTE DISPOSAL CREATED ~+ BY THE SALE OF. BEVERAGES IN DISPOSABLE, NON- - RETURNABLE CONTAINERS., . WE~REA5, the sale of malt and carbonated beverages in disposable, non--returnable containers is producing an adverse effect upon- the environment which is injurious to the health, safety-and welfare of the residents of Modesto, and the entire. S "State' of California, and ' WHEREAS, the problems created by the sale of malt `'and carbonated beverages in disposable, non--returnable containers- .. cannot be solved on a local level, but must be dealt with on at least the State level, . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Modesto that it urges the League of California Cities -and the County Supervisors' Association of California to seek the following actions by the State Legislature to alleviate the ~+ problems of litter and waste disposal created by the sale of ,. malt and carbonated beverages in disposable, non-returnable,- containers:,: (a) Require a deposit on all containers used _ ,. for'the sale of malt and carbonated beverages; (b) Promote, encourage and support research by the beverage and container industries in the field of biodegradable !~ containers; and (c) Develop, encourage and support programs aimed at encouraging the citizens of the State of California to take ~a more responsible attitude toward the disposal of beverage- containers9 including recycling. SE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Modesto hereby ' requests all of the cities and counties in California to take similar action .urging the League of California Cities and the County Supervisors' Association of California to seek action by the State Legislature which will alleviate the problems of litter ' and waste disposal created by the sale of malt and carbonated _1- __ 1 Cu ~!tK .~. , .. ~ .. . 6y unp~.fy r, r;sc~vc~~c~r~~rJ rig RE~r rt~c~tT~s~czrrc~ ~~. r,f;vz~,~w) Ri'.~r~t,u!'xfJPJ ~,E~. ~~o-Fti O?:' TFi"s~ i~;>au:i~i]:AICi k.'R~.C'S':ICF:;i CF' '1'fiL•' ) `~F~`~"~"'"°"° :~'X'r'l'.l'~ fiOAft) OF' i:;Qfir~L,]:lP.'i'7:OM ?~V'S`i'}i ) R1;i~f::Rc:fl::.~: 'L'U S'I`r\~'t: A5aL5:iLU PRCP~F.TX ) ;uf.::: ~~.'~5, :~c~.ction1%~ of ,~rLicl.e :C:L'IT of thy: Con~• titu•trian of the State o~ Ca7.ifors~ia requires -that all nropez~ty assessed by the State C~aard of '~qualiJ,ation shalx rye subject Ea ta;cntic~n tc the same nxten.t and in the scsmo manner as other pro~aerty; and ,d~fc.IZE_~S, there: a.ppea.rs to be 4 wide variance bet~rnan the local valuation ax:d asse•ss;aeilt of pr•apert~r and that of the 5 t~.t: ::=boar. d oz ~;quali~ at .an; and ~dHi',RSAa, r~cod gotaernmant requires that all taxpayers Ssi +~1:~ r; ttae State of California be equitably assessed so thai: no unjust tax burden fall. on any particular group, industry, carporatian ar pe.~sons; and tdil!:Rc,A.sy the report made to the Joint Committee on Assessment practices pursuant to Senate Concurrent Resolution Rio. 6~ (199) is not Comprehensive enough ba establish the Corr%ctness of assessing practices of the State Board of '~ ~, ' Equali~atian relating to the assessment of utility properties. ~` I~QGd, '3'H;:R;:FOR~, IT z5 H~RSBY RESQLVEL~ by the Baird of Supez^visors of the County of Alpine State of California, that the Legislature of the State of California is hereby requested to mal;~e further s,nd all nECessary appropriations to permit a Joint lnteri.nt Cam~rittee to make a deta3.led, th~rou~,h, and complete .study and analysis of assessment practices as conducted by the State Board of Squalixation, with reference to public utility properties, and to determine if there is any variance between the assessment pract~.ces of the State Board of ;ai~ualization and the practices of county assessors on other property, and make recommendations to correct inequities, if a.ny be found. i /; ~' i"' ` i3;, T7' 1';??t`.f'?.i1;R it;SOx,V n that uY~t:i3, such ti1nF} a., siaid report may be m~'?i~L', a. detailed and i temired assc,swtnent rill showinc7 t.hca f~sll market value of they ~:.ssc~ssed vwlues ;~r all utility x,ron~~r.~tic~e within the respective counties be turnishc~d to County Assessors and to the Floards of 5upervisnxs ref the respective counties by the State Board of ~qualiz~.tian, together iai};.h a full anG complete set of ruses and regulat9..azrs o:~ t:1e State Board of ~:r;uali;~atic~n shar,rinc~ the m~:thod and nrerr,~dures :~o7.3.awad ~~r srLi~! roar;; :ire arriving az the mar3ce',-. aad a,ss;~.~sed vat u3.tian of ~r~~.~.ity grnperties within each caunf:y. A~~?~ nL TIC .r iJftT:4ICZ 2~;5dLVFD that collies of this resolution be sent t:a all t3aards of Supervisors within the St~.tP oz California, all County Assessors, aenator Tea1e anc~ Assar.~t~lym~~n t:happie, memkar~rs a-f the State Board of ~qualizatian, County Supzrvisnrs~r~sscciation ai' California, California Taxpayers .=tissociat3.o:x, and tha Joint Conmi.ttee nn AsseQSment k'ract3ces. sassed txnd Adapted on the ~ /~" day of October, 1970, :~y the fo3.los~ring vote ilY'ES: Supervisors Chain, Egger, Doyal, Collard & Bruns NO%S: Supervisors ' ~S;~NI': Supervisors ~~~,~_~ ...J .. ~ r',3 ~ Cho rman ~of the Board of 3uperv cars `" of the County of Alpine, State of California. . .. .. ~ _ s;'~TuST ~,, , LTNCGI,N C. CQVTNGTON~ County Clerk and ex=officio Clerk of the Board of Saips3rvisors of the County of R1pit~e', State of California. ,~ 7 2. _~::~ ;c~rlc INSrRUMFNi IS A COR25CT G°Y OP fai ORIGINAL ON PILE !h{ 7}!15 G F=.,. `. ., Aii:: ;-._------~C -~--_~.. 19 Ill <:. .. Jif.:i~ Cla;k of fhe - ~ r.Is~ ;, Counfy of Alp3no, .~-FE~,~~V(pi~ ,DEPUTY, ' lid, ii, A'(1:~."'~ !11)J•Il`.l':L:1'~' ~O ~ O. ~ - . fl'I.'r I;ASS~i Ci~~"1'~Z 1 ~f i).l;)r`tI_i37,y>;Igr? l;I~~,i~1:L'11; JIJ~Z:1l;a ice' ~ Ilra• d.JL/~ti 3~~~3 :'d'':1 • 1.z.t',c~ili?f .=7V 11.CS CViJii A.L ' ry ~ ,., n „_ ti << 7 , r 1~1llI71'I:L~, C:''SJl"•.i''. 96D01 ~Aa~ral~.:c ~_*:L~ oy ~u~ ~~.v~,aoz: COUfI`?T.~ Ca'u~:'t' ]IO~iS~'; ~ ~ ~'~.~ - 7 ~ ~~~~~~J~ GA&TP'. GI;Id f.Cr~~. ~~4I~ I'•T ; J, C ~~ cj77r"1'i,p;} T-(r! ~ -:1-~+1T}'f~';' ZS :f s ~ (('''']7 ~~ '~T }cS 1p'J , q r vyT'.,7 7 1"x',1 ', ryl~'~ ~ }. ^`r':• 71~ ~"f `~'S ~~'~ :~tl ~ ~'-~ I •i i3.J~ lilt L 'I ~lliJx E,yj'JW L3..h~]. l.L Vi-., ~ `T:1~iJl, yll l~. ~~.' ~:L~.! ii.l i~l.':1~1-.1_a, l~ 3.LJ ~ 1::, $1J YJ~i:l-i...u 11.J !~. J.'.~il~ 7y rt lr~j iC r[?` zl~ T 3~. f~:~• t- t t.. h •.s-' 7y t l '~s --:~5`~t~.~~C,i~l C,LI::}ixal~V,~ ~_' SUI'~ ail']?s~,Oi:Z:L.s~li .t£Z,~~ Ui.`• 1~U:.~L~.izl:e'~i G::7:,1.~c,>,?sir:':( ~i]a~idU~ i~A~~~U::~-~A } A i ~rt'h._} ~- c'+-- t 1 [' l s-.. ti ,:~ :11~-1Si' r't; '~ 'r+"j? ,' 1 ~.~q •;:T;.qr~ t rl• s-, i~ j.,, ,il j r:,]r. ~',,Lxl,.a~':I•v ;Ulat']:.C~,.?J U~ (QUO) :~.LV.J 1%[JI•a?]l:_.,J) -JLJJI~, ~..r~ Ii:~,,l} :1.,.J 1}.lx'Ixla!_,L:sy I:3~1`1 xJ E:.1V_, Uutx.A ~~ iiJ~~.Z.tx,l, G{}xSx~~.CTC~!s3]~ ~I•d;14 iaFJl=J1~ ',~i~~ at)1''t'C1x?'i.' U:~~ 1~'?Y :~~IJ) ~=~,5~ Ct~L€;i`~~~ UI~~~:1:C'~~i.~ 0~~ ~~ts'COL~;:I`arJ:~S '~:~~i'~` t:Cii.tJ} '3?J T' 1 r• 5 r i+* rl. f t~ :'ri "' .t•r-t`7 ~7 rti }~J 1 '.T: 'rr ;._• i,l ..-r. •-~, .. r,s., S1 ~tV,sl) ~3"~. tL iIUai'"~:!:~~4J uJ,,:I !'~~ ~.E~;S3 £'LUanc=i:E~t~.~~~3l:rl~ rfu! i O'_z`I. iTLSJ Cs1I i~<iJ~,;:l ~.',:ZUi'I O~~II~~:Z J.,:;z:,:i:i,::3a~I] ai~.~l~i1~~2_t~L~dtiJ~ rJ~~V:I 11U ~J1~}~.~I''JLJ,~ i~?',:~.rl~~'i~ U~s.l..: La:.I.r~.1~.lr~VJ.~9 u•1Vr ~ ~~us.~?.L~a l[i~ ~it'>_t-i ~L7~Ylif!r ~i;•i rltl~:i ~J'.~ii•~.t~. :, C ~T ! ~ , = t' z r•r - e' t r r t l [ r4F.'(- [, n = t•-^ jl-- r - r+1Y t ] Sa ~ r., a?~t r!~ZV"3.:;iJ~i~ G! J.rl:;`~~'J COI;i•'Is..C~~;J~ vllli,=i:l.1~,~ I.s?:1.:'T.tY~ ~i~)~i::rE ~ ~'U1~J., ;;.ii17 a!_5.,11U"sJ~ x•'i~'.Z kal~~::~? r~i,3 t?L~.. r„ ,~ 7-, t.~, -'[ rn•+ rvv;t•,i,.~: r-I.i... C- 7~l z~ri raj ~-i T Y~ r~i;:i r ~~ l'L'Fi 7.r t. i -}•-' r s.-.,~, l'+,l,~,tfTO~ CG:J.~:Zva.:, 4+Ui3IJI) S,Y:~~ yu iJJi~~.:x,:~~,.? ~,1,,_S ,~~J_.:O.L1 1J =.~,~., Cdr ,.,H_r i'i~} .k. _llZ:v i.,.1IJ1:a U'r~iLt 1~II~] li.u ~~VU ~I3.~-'J.'~•F V~ 1I~;~~ COui~l S'r.JS ~t~r~:fl'~F 'P.Il,r1` ~~~ I•~.}.l:ii~ ~: s.i•~ :.5~~?~..1'If: 1 C'_~. •LCiTI~i Iu~1:U Y~}U CJL~ '~'~ -~1;~'i'J:Z~~ ! i);:i . n [~ [+'I j n +A , z?. t • nt• it .h rs- •( I.Y•^ 'S 'i+ tt sl 71° ~. 1•~~ ~ r :~•5 xl ~,~ i'i0rir.i :~'~~~~~~ ..I~i:)I?,'~iTO%:. ~ ;~?~ J~t3G~Hlr~~-.•.;r :_ ;.,.;~54J.1J.ia.~`,i I'.~;)Sl D ~ '1:?" .awrI_~~., Ct.~~'[)_~.l , J " tG' (~~r ny,^' T51 7[ n r 4C t1is-~1,. hrll/1 ~7T"! C. ,s-,•• i f.Y•/'y r --)^ (z r.--, ~•~• /yY ;r •rn .y •r-,'7 ~ C,'JV.~'~t11 Ui)x -.~riLY~.J~} :s,7 1L.Ii./1J4~=tL iJ. l3ai .~ Al VVJ.V-J.J;~ 4•x'~ ~ ~,J J,~ f:.~J:~~J +: iL:J~L;:_''l.J ~..4 V:i ~~!LI?J:a.J ~~_l V~,: ~111~L~~ ~.:-1:L IJL' rl ~ 1~ _ ~ ~" •] rT .} <' 1'• .-l'; „!'1r'! 1 [`~ "I~ r fl' G`l~'7S , 'l•Y I - 7~ 7 [ (7 7T~' 1 f --11 (f't4 q~•l P. ~ , ;.~ s !1 i. 1r i i r~ 1 I 'C !~~ f ZII!J x1~. 4?:L}.Z.1J?'riJ :~`:{~u i,.~ 1,. L~.¢ V:i 1.J_[s-•r~, l.7p '~J J l.~.JU ~~i J._•, 13,1 [,7 ~, :~~ 11:1.1 ~~`r v'~ }J ~:.'., Vi.l ~~L~J .S1tllJ ~11A tiJ-.,-Ll r. IJ ~J ~~_..I~. =',;,' rF ' ``r tTt'(~ T~~' ~~ n C flY [', ,l ±,: C'r+•1 ", T ''fl ~T' T' r'1'~•'+ Y, \:.•,l .,. - r' _,,.. i i Ii ~ A J_., Cam'. .. -' s.1.=JiL~..S. lJx i'.Y L.~iJ ~ S fir' ] 1 _!~ ~y (~ •5 ~~~, ~7 II ~' ~~ ~ 1 (~ 1 Ci ilL) I. f:_, YpI' •~•/• ~~l'1.:.,iI.L L: µ'i JJ~~,'.r~. L~i.~ .'L`i~ .L:~_ Y:_=~. i.:. 1.i i~~J. ll.:' it v_„IJ:~ tis~.1.L ~ ~ .l S. ,~...iiJS,is .~._L,c V14 ll ~~ !!t[ 7T ~~ ~Tr~r] //r - iJsJI•i•°.f Qrr~l:il~. }~1lJ.1.~'~'>.V;' U~' iJ~VL1 ViL•~` .~iJ i'l~a.A1 ~~~ Ur~a :~i.~.i~C~~•JVI~.rJ..l).~t ~i.A.:.A1J Li~~ S.I.~I~~J~~i:.irl~ _Sjiiitii~_L:S (F:J J'',A}~11. tl,.'~ l" r l,+r-r }'r ±rY c•~ '~~57 rt •` K ] ~ ::,c.r Y.] ~-.~ ,r.,:~ ,,.,.,z ,~. Cl~~.r.l:~'. CUi:V=J:! ~.Uxi ~i'I ~fLi~. ~ .r. =~__C,:~uf:,;.I.~O, n 7x;;G `~I[ ~ IC=.,:~:?~,`;: iI:E~E~ ~.(: ~,I:f GLi: ~,,, ~]3.:'0:'~, i~~•.l i~=1:;~.:~_,'~ q]•.! 1 r; ~. niri, Yy r. :']r•r' ..I!•• r•e i~ ^r"1 :'7El [ r,- 1A1.•( ,• ry l I, ~ ;•i ( „•..~ }•-"; s-:^r•- ~>,1'J!.,I~TG.~I~i Vi,,1.~.,.,~alL; 1.;~,.lJ:Olrf_l, f,~~;,I.'::i`S0~'y ::.i i):J1AlUx~, I'LCs,~i.x.u. ~:,.~ J11JJr. ,JI:, 1~•~~,!) :'...EA.1.J fnr., iux3?~~.1`,11.t /h,„~ c11:7':7^'lhl;l .i l_,~:'1 . s -i:'t r ~ ] ~lnl?'.~ •,F ;:~~I>;~~,,T[1r1''''l :Lti~ Jlf> r• t,Jxa.; k~i~ V'L14 :slJl s ~~t)l~fL i~l~r i~ 1~L6.~. ~~,}.,L...f I.1.' % JJ~~:-f.. 1J.J. _. _t+.'_•~i...-_,,.- ... F . s G7,_!s I.aJ,,JJ_ ~i r~1,=''77 ~ i 7 ' ~.1LY_L~l 'ti,f• A'V;~JJ h...V U]J:li (~~~?. LJ ~:L. 71~ I'l.L~. I1.hi%:~Jl.ue LEL13.~r~!~1L ~ 2U ~1~.~. L:4L7.`S. 'u~1L1~'1'l~~. jjr 1 2V Dr~~aV• D;~t'~}.'• ~i~ tl.~~ s r~~oLU'g.c~~ ~ ~. ~~~~tR~'1 1D~~A~IBIl.IEI~ ~~~a ~~~~;~, '~'''`sy r~ ~~~~I'IEI"`.~,~~ ADi''!l.Idl.S`.~~-~'I'O~:i (3~7 V:s.~~.tlCITS ~_r~h 1' ~S 1'~~SIIi?~1G'I'Oi?, ~7. C. rtESOLIT'r1:0'~i f~•~77L~TA siilftlTfUI1CDhi~.`1i7rSz)C~1T~IfD+D~7V~t.S"-I'7I~{j:~~C13,S I~OftNYG~AII~Z,4TTT1EIi~I(SIAYOTF I~~ ~{IjO~i~'(1l'i!'~i~I tC_~L1.x~'~'0~F1T~At~~'iRy l~?~/i-~~',~t;~lrtil i?i~0..,V(~~7~.. ,LI![il .. J.I'~J Y3=sL1-.'1.L1.LLlt~ J11.J,'1.1.lY J.J'.~'11t-sll-l~L~ JIiQ~+l,i~ Vt1.V~ J ].1~ 1]!'~ 111/1'iJ J.E4 V'V~.1~J11 J.Si ~1.2~4 :1171~:'I.~/.~f L~1L~1:J 1:Jt ~~F: l/J.• I<O;~ ti~,i~~'b G1~L~.x'0:~T1'L' 4~ $ i~il~7.~CAT, :i05~ S`I.'s1L 0~ F`~'V'1; i~i;t=ID:Z,~D 1S:'D:i~ ,1"7 ."~~~ira ~'.t~~iC~, ~~:~~_~?3i~1':~ V1sl ~u-ITS 0~ ?'I~ rOLL'J`F~:IG COui1`Z`xD,;i. aI-I~S'"~s~ L~SS;~1, ItOi`kCC~ D~ I'.Ipi~'i`;;,? 3xaI'7::~JUs 'ire:CII%~~'~ ; ~4~.~':s G ~~~;'IZ, 1LIill~i:'~, IIU;?I~(}LT, 1'LUI'y~.S Al~ill LH~ SO€',1i~tti'd {}i'i.D10I ~t~l. JI~'t'uAS: ~i ~~' :tJ' C4Ui~I~T1<i I7~~V~ !~ LP.RG% 1~uUfS~"1~~ UI~'. `~:'1D ~1~SS, I'_s'':Y 0~ i'~2r0~•! ~ D1.S!1~J ~'i.I"!J UI~t;LI"aA `~"0 iKi~.~TL'a LOi7G ll~S:~''?~~IC!~~S ~~Ot~ 3:~D1..Cr7.L _~~~k"I~i`I'E~i? ;~~IO IliVi~ ilt~'~ .rte a:I ~:~;j~wtr~'.i'a::Ls S:htV;aD ~Y 'i'ti?, tt. ~".. HOSP1.'1'~'~LS .t.I'? `!'F~~~ .r~1Y a1~ii ~:'~. I°ri'~'!i:k:E`iS: lkra I1.t~.'~.lt~a~ V~'.~',:~!#i'IS Ai~~:~:i';1S`.l~s~~~.tO~I IiOSi~~:~~>zr lU 1~ D.~U`i'~~lC~; G~ >>C~ii; l~'~iU ~2} Q~t ~.'i~`tL~ (3) i~`l3I'•IL1:ZE)] I~i1.~,vS I.{'tt(}II I•TU5`i' QI,, 'i'i'i~:St; V;:.~.'.~_t.:~ui~ ixui'w~~, 'ii~.I.I~:~5: T't V':~~~ x^~I'I P70''}}77~'s~7,Erx'i'~Olsd Oi' 1'T`m iIO~.~i(yl':TC:I C~1.i.,,,:k:~'Oi3tTIL~ C~J::iI/`.'~~}I'~/S~ Ii~~~~/l_ii`C.t'~:~:~,:;~ lix`1 Cfl~`~"rII(Jr:i -~~} 7:I;C~~'~'!~,a Ll/~J '.4Q 'A'iiL ~lT1~1~TS}~ Q~~ i~.iJ'~r~r6~I~V ~J:31' 3.~i~ir~.~4~ 1L~'«7Lf~f 1/.~.i.:~..!-L .CL~~4=1iL1~. j~r~~ r~~ ~ : :~ I~~ ~~ ~~ o~ .° i~15 ~ ; ,co~~~.~ ;a..~~~~: 1~ L ~ C 'JL ~ ~ ~ ti~J s:~u,~ {~o ~3 a i~~~~ ,~ s :~~~T.~.~,a:z..'~':~o:r 4;~ o~ ~~~r a ; ro ff TT ~~ 1~ ++ ?;; ~7TT ~~yy-- y ~~++~ tt , 7 ~, 7 T T 7 r ~ ~lJr .~~ 1'~'~ SJ.LUlilt'iUr '11 Lrk.1 Sif15 ~1} J.~"i t>i''!~ E:I~'?_~V~I r~} .1~ V ;~y y R l ~J!a ~fi.:LV:~J~~1/ f3i,'I~ ~.I->j ^r~ r Y ~ r t4 TY .rl~.l,:~i;..a1.~~.r'~'.'+_ f..~~`' ;:i I~~3 .i.J-'1 J.:'ri V r t f ~ ~~. LIVJZ~.1- 1<i~n~ ~; ~L1r'~ L~".4~~r ~i+'..'.,' ~i • . ,~,~I'~ ~:~ LIiS: Tir ~X± 5l ~~'dC~, 0? ~ i?i7~C:'~i~ SCiiQ:}~r ixs~ ~ C'!1J,3~; t'~O~L?~ x~ '~'0 `"I ~, 1~-t;'~ Q~ n ~'~)''US-~'J) , - TT /~r~t~'".n L, r.r.~ _ isr~ ~ n 'r: rff~~TT'-~ r~: 1r?:~ 1 r . ~• 11oJi.,i. ~l~~.r S.J~1.-+~ r]f~iVil.il, I~IO ~- li:-r li'Li V~L~, .t :~i ~rl -~ ~rv5 7-~ 'F' ~•., _.-~-•, 4 r. r U;.r i:~~1L.-i1.L ~]_LLl:'.7 .~i ~ • :i. 1?~;aj'~ .in .S. ~.,.~~ y, ..r t~ij,la A:i~ GS', J..~~ 7~rr~ CC~~ ,1:..~,~.:1 c~_TS~V~r n, rr' ~ i'i T 1. s ~s r s ~'' JiauVZr~ .[]:.s .Eli<a I'~:.,.'.f!}:? ~~.~ 1:~.~;Zi.r ~: '13« 'S ~ T ,~}~..~]1i._U.,."r.l} »1..r.~~lvi]. ~- V r 1 a ~11~ LCJS'L•`i~i~'~~~:u f .~, ! _. 1=L'%GL-C~_IJL~-r..~i?T..(~/ V ~~- i-1~~c-,,..~ ~'~.FJ. ~ V.~~J, COl"i'u3.T'iDia1~.~~~Cr_ ~,i~ r~ ti ~~/~r' r'-~ Ai'~~^v~.Id LiXr~{,?1 C'JIB'LllI~ii3'1.ri_-,~~~.•~'-f.'~t~~/~% . ! l,'-!y~ ,~~t:Af~ - ,:~' , . ., ~ .~f(/ `'-'r~~....-. / :i- yy n/~~~r}7~ ~j7,T { T ~} ~y ~y~s/.~T, 7 T~~y r 'c ,t q~ n ~7 ~7r~T y~ l ?7'. ~~+ n ~ y n i`ilJL1. J. 1'Li~.~W'i ~;1S~i'Qi4.l~~11 VVV~i ~.1~J JV{"~,_~V.La~1LJ ITdJJ 4J'.I.: ~Z VlJ `.1: ~7~J. ~~~i.'1~~~~.aJ' .`:"J ~'~~..i.E, ~i~ ~~::: _.'~.~ V~y} . 11 V'i~~'~~i~ahulS 5]~~~ITSi u:'.l'ZOi3 IIOSI'~T1~.I, Ti~i `I!is 170:Rii::~iu1 C~iS~z~~'U~tiI7.~'~ "=.IdD SQT,3'~:::~x~a Ot.`:ti;r'Ji.'; !>!tt:~. ne n~ !~ ~ ... .. _ ~ ~. Nor~Tx~nr cl~zxmr~xA coul'~TY svpl~Vx~o~~ I~ssoczl~Tr.ol~ - Route 2p Hax 5355P ly.nd.ersony C~.la.farn:i.a g~qQ'~ ~i:~,SOI~UTIpI~Y 3~TQ,A --? ~~~ • ~ ALSOLUTIC~I URGING '.~.Y,,.F'.1L~TS~:O~T OF V.~,T~!~N5 IL7:H CAx?1; 51.121~IC~5 FDA? 3tlRl~, AFB+,15 i'dH~.EI~S~ it has been brought to tl~y ~,ttr~nt_ion of NCCSI~. that there are inadequate in•-iaa~I:ient and. out--1~at~.E;nt med..cal facilit~.es for veterans in rur~.l .a~'cas of Californ:i.a; a.nd. - T•?=ARILS, many veterans seel~in~ a physlc~,1 e~am~.n~~.t~.of~. in ax~,sta.zif~ tac~.1.:}_i;aos ;gust m~.lie ~!Y1 as~3~aintmeni; fG~;" SUCIl S~;rvicr; s::~l~ montk~s in advance; ; and. ~. itl?~Fl~.l?Ll1S, the ;sCCSA heartily su~~l~orts thy: constzuctioza of ne~,~ me~i`~a~.~. and. surgical, f'~zci~.~.t:l_es at Univc;rs~.t~T of` Ca7.iforn~_4! ~.t Dav~.s; ri~;'trerthe less, such facili~i;ios .ci~.l naU re~7~ed.1r trze: nac:cl. Y"a~~ in-T~afient, auj,--~~~.t:i.ent fac~.l.ities in the: reruote rural. azad. ~zoun~Uw:~.n areas o.~' Calif a1~r,:k~~ ~ and NO?•ly T~uREFOAE 13~~ IT PFSOLV~ bsr tl~e )'dCCS.!~. in sess~.on ~sL Chicot tiz,is 10th d.a;T of October :1.90,. as fa:~.lovrs~ ~l} That our Coi~~~•ressm~n be recluc~stecl. to 'c~,l~e the necc;~s~,ry stel.~s to authorise and. cl.a.rect thy; Ve:teran;; I~G~~.3.i~.7.~-trr.t:~oi~ to ;~zov~.d.e su.ola, f'ac~.lxties in tl~e .rival ~~.xeas af' C~t:l_i:~'o~°y:~:~a; (2} 't'hat consid.ers-Ll.orx be liven ~o e;:~'c~:b:L:~sl~i.xz~ such f~~c~,1it~.es in such cen~•rally loc~.teG. ru~•~.l o.nd. ~maurit~,~.n ao.~.v~i't;a.es as Ped.d.:l.n~; ax' Chf.co; ~3? That COj3~.eS of this .resolut~.ax~: be; fort~:~.rcl.ed, to Ser~ato~- Cranstans Senator I~~Ivrl~hy, Con~res.,~,}=gin Jah;~sar~F ~.nd. to tl~e Veter~:n,s Ad.~~in~_strat:~an; a:J.so Jche Cow.~'iy Su1~erv.isars Assoc~i at~_on of Calif arr~it~., PASS:~II .I'1v`1] 1~.3~I'T:~~ by tl~.e Northern Ca.lii ornia County S~z~erv~,sars Assc~c:~ation on the ltith d~.y of Octabe;rp ~.970a • ~ - •- -- • GF,ORCr~ !;•i1;.CI~:;:E3, ~~1.C;C:•-k~i'E:Si[~.i:33.t Narth~:rn Ca'liforn~:r~ County Supervisors. Assaciat~.on. ' 1tk~,I~~3 lOLL:iI~G~;it, S~ ~ ~t~~ .. .. . ;i `V ,. ~a4. 4 . ~ ~1 ~ 1 - RE50LUTION N0. 161-70 ~..~: ~ ' L • ~. ~..~ M -`'y' Ci RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUP~ViSORS ~ r~N~x •~,~ OF THE COUNTY OF TRINITY OPPOSxNG.THE METHODS AND MANN%,RS E1~IPLOYF.D BY THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE 1,N EVALU- ATING -MxNING CLAIMS. - ~ . WHEREAS, the County of Trinity, State~of California, has approximately 76% of its total land area in public ownership.; and t+THERF~AS, historically Trinity County has provided a wealth of gold and other valuable minerals; and " WHIIZF•~45, there presently exists and has existed fora con- siderable period of time numerous mining claims throughout the County ~of Trinity; and WfiEREI~S~ the United States Forest Serlrice is active~.y engaged in~reviewing said mining claims and assessing their pre- sent validity; and . ~~THEREAS, no specific provisions are set forth i.n the United States Mining Laws requiring re-assessment of any mining claim following its initial discovery; and 4~HFREAS, the action of the United States Forest Service in reviewing said mining claims and assessing their validity is a purely administrative policy decision; and ' i~`HF.REAS, no official guidelines have been adopted by United States Congress or~the United States Forest Service far Rssass~.ng the validity of a m~.ning claim; and WHEREAS, the present methods and procedures being employed by ~:he Unified States Forest Service in reviewing the validity of mining c3.aims creates an undue hardship and burden on the residents rd. f'a~'p~.ye~s of T1'ini~:y Countyo ;, -1- C NOW THEEtEFORE BE IT R-ESOLVBD tha~C the Beard of Supervisors of the County of Trinity hereby protests the action of the United States Forest Service in unilaterally reviewing the value and vali- dity of mining claims in the absence of any provisions set forth . in the Taws of these United States. BE IT FURTH~t RESOLVED that said unilateral action by the United States Forest Service is, in the absence of legally adopt- ed spec3.~ia m3nf.mum prov~.s~.ans to establish va~,idi~y, condemned as an~unlawful condemnation and seizure of private property wi.th- out due process of law. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be sent to United States Secretary of the Interior.;~ United States Secretary of Agriculture; Corigr.essn~an Harold T. "Bizx " Johnson; . Hon. Ronald Reagan, Governor of the State of California; State Senator Randolph Collier; and Assemblywa-nan Pauline Davis. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors ~of the County of Trinity, State of .California, held on the 12th day of September, 197n, by the following vote: . ASS: Supe~viso-rs Durham, Harrison and Burks NOESt None ABSENT: Supervisors Loomis and Wil~.burn. ~~ k ~. - Boar or Superv~.sor s a t o County of Tr~.nity, State- of Californ~.a. ATTEST: HELEN J . S~IITH • County Clerk and E~-Ot icio Cher o the Board of Supervisors o~ the~County of Trinity, State of California. . lle y /o6,6s~ COUiVTY ©F PLACER C7FFICE DF BOARD ^F SUPERVISDRS tipARD MEMBERS ~, E. WIl.I.IAMS, County Executive RAY S. THOMPSON, Chairman District 3 i~¢' a " ' ' F- (I. £~ ~ ~ G0111~[Y '+ADM~]ST A ~~ E CENTER, AUBURN, CALIF. 95G03 TELEPHONE 885-7711 ROBERT P_ MAHAN J. B. PA~ ~ !`.~ u i-l District i Distritt ROBERT RADOVICH W14~. 5. $ ~' ~~~~ District 2 District 5 ~~~1' ~ __v. ~~~I~ti ~y. 1~L~Jur~, .,,,~,iiy [;IoFl~ ~. ~~-September 3, 1970 TQ: All Baards of Supervisors All County Assessors Enclosed ~s a copy of Resolution 70-430 Requesting a Review of the Assessing ~=radices of the State Board of Equalisation i_n Reference to State Assessed a Fraperty which was adapted by the Placer County Board of Supervisors at a regular meeting on September 1, lg~o~. We urgently request each of you to adopt a similar resolution with similar distribution. PLACER COUNTY BOARD CF SUFERV ISCRS BY _`~ _ ~ ~ ` (MS's . ~Jt`hy~.ZlS Harris Deputy Clerk enc . 1 ~efare the hoard of S~~ervisors 2 ~ou~t~r of Pacer, State of Ca~if~rnia 3 In the matter of: RESOLUTION RE UESTING A 4 Resol. No:.7Q------4~~------------------------ 4 REVIEW OF THE ASSESSING PRACTICES 4F ;.:~°;: ~.~,- THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALISATION IN -~ ~-:"~~'r':r-;.prd., No :...............................•-- •--• 5 REFERENCE TQ STATE ASSESSED PROPERTY4 _ ~~F s hY, Y ~ , , ~ ~ M P // 3 ~ ,~ 5 S '*y~c' T \ t f 1 i The following ' ` ` RESQLUTI;ON ~,~:i ' ~ ~ ` ~~ -~.,~....... ., as duly passed by the Board of Supervisors ~ of th$ County of ,Placer at ayregul~rVmeetiri~rheld ~Se ~teailber'~ lr 1.970, 10 .s, 'r I by the following vote on roI1 call _ s 1 $ ,ys~,~L~ $~ ~ ~' ~ ~ t Ayes: 't~ak:~.~, ~:adc~~.c~,' grir~er &;..'S`~om~;son ;',_; `~ ~ 1 ~ 9.2 ~, ~'` Noes: l~To~~e .t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,i ',' '~; Absent: Par~3.~.ni ~ ?- - _ Signed and approved by me after, ats -passae. . 15 .',,~ti -~- ~ E, _ 16 Attest: MAURINE I. DOBBA~ `mod ''> - ~ 'man, Boas of ~t~,sors Clerk of said Board ~~"`~.-w.-~-_._ ° . - A 17 By: Deputy. ~~ 19 ~ WHEREAS, Section 14 of Article XI11 of the Constitution of the 20 State of California requires that all property assessed by the State Board of Equalization sha11 be subject to taxation to the 21 same extent and in the same manner as othe~° property; and 22 WHEREAS, studies heretofore have been made indicating a vari- ance in assessing practices between the Counties and the State, 23 and between the fiscal year 1958-59 and 197Q-71, the valuation of the property upon the Secured Roll of the County of Placer has 24 increased, and during said period the valuation of the Public ~~ Utility Ro11 assessed by the State Board of Equalization has 25 decreased; and 26 WHEREAS, there appears to be no acceptable explanation as to the-wide variance between the 1oca1 valuation and assessment of 27 Property and that of the State Board of Equalization; and WHEREAS, no satisfactory explanation of such variance and dis- 28 I crepancy has been forthcoming from those charged with the valuation - 1 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 IO it 12 ~J 14 15 x6 17 18 I9 20 21 22 23 24 25 2fi 27 28 and preparation of the respective rolls; and WHEREAS, during said period of time, inflation and appreciat- ion of values has been consistently upward; and WHEREAS, good government requires that all taxpayers within the State of California be equitably assessed so that no unjust tax burden fall on any particular group, industry, corporation or persons; and WHEREAS, Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 65 (1969) relating to the creation of the Joint Committee on Assessment Practices sets forth reasons why the assessment practices of local Assessors and the State Board of Equalization and appraisal practices of the State Board of Equalization should be studied and analyzed; and WHEREAS, a report has been made to the Committee established pursuant to Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 65; and WHEREAS, said report is not comprehensive enough to establish the correctness of assessing practices as such practices relate to assessment of utility properties. NOW, THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED, that the Legislature be requested to make further .and all necessary appropriations to permit a Joint Interim Committee to make a detailed, thorough, and complete study and analysis of assessment practices as conducted by the local Assessors and the State-Board of Equalization, with reference to public utility properties, and to determine if there is any variance between the assessment practices of the State Board of Equalization and the practices of local Assessors, and to make the necessary and proper recommendations to adjust and correc any inequities, if any be found. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that until such time as a report may be made by the said Joint Interim Committee that a detailed and itemized assessment roil showing the full market value and the assessed values for the utility properties within the respective Counties be furnished by County Assessors and the Board of Super- visors of the respective Counties, together with a full and complete set of Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Equalization showing the method and procedures adopted by said Board in arriving at said market and assessed valuation of utility properties within each County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this Resolution be sent to all County Supervisors within the State of California, all County Assessors, Senator Stephen Teale, Assemblyman Eugene Chappi Governor Ronald Reagan, John Lynch, member of the Board of Equal ization, County Supervisors Association of California, California Taxpayers Association, and. the Joint Committee on Assessment Practices. RESOLUTION N0. 100 A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE BUTTE CUUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO CONSOLIDATE THE BALLUT FOR ELECTION OF FEATHER RIVER REC- . REATION & PARK DISTRICT BOARD MEMBERS WITH TI-U; GENERAL COUNTY BALLOT IN NOVEMBER 1970 WHEREAS, Public Resources Code 5783.6 requires that an election be held within the territory of the Feather River Recreation and Park District at the time of the General Election on November 3, 1970, for the election of two members of the Board of Directors of this District, and ~,ffiEREAS, a statewide election will be held within Butte County on the same day. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Feather River Recreation and Park District requests that the election in this District on Povember 3, 1970, for two members of the Board of Directors of this District be consolidated with the statewide General Election to be held in this County on the same date. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the election precincts, polling places, voting booths, and election officials in each of the precincts shall be the same as provided for the statewide election on said date. BL TT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Butte County is hereby authorized. and instructed to canvass the returns of said election for the office of members of the Board of Directors of I'eather- River Recreation and Park District and is requested to immediately advise this District as to the results of said consolidated election. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the following vote on July 7, 1970. YES: N0: ABSENT: CERTIFIED AS TRUE DOPY OF Resolution No. 100 Jate /~C~ertified ~~~ Superintendent, Fe ther Dunn, Harrison and Vaughn None Brandt and Co Chairman of tha Boar of Directors /J ~~ ~ J a' ~.; ~~r''''r t". ~, f J ,: .. O ~ ~ ~ __ / • COM MIT THHB IOT OF F1CE 352 YA LLOM HROSA AYENVH - RULES AO R1cO~TURa c NICO. CALIFORNIA 95828 ~CYHRNMHNTAI„ (B18) 343.8686 OHOANIZATION sA 55 ~ ~ STATE CAPITOL ~ ~ ~ ~ . (916) 445.8343 - T RAY E. JOHNSON MEMBER OF CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE FOURTH ASSEMBLY D15TRICT M EM SER. JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBER, JOINT LEGISLATIVE ORGANISATION COMMITTEE July 6, 1970 Clark A. Nelson, County Clerk Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Butte County -Courthouse Oroville, California 95965 Dear Mr. Nelson: This is to acknowledge receipt of the copies of the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Resolution $~ 70-88. Please advise the Board that this bill will receive my most serious consideration when it is presented in its final form before the Assembly for vote. Very tru you s, i~dl2 RAY' E . JO 5017 REJ:dao UISTRIOT OFFICE 392: ALLOM BR OBA AV£N UE CRICO, CALIFOR NIA 95926 {BIB) 343-8666 5 MENTO AOO aES6 A STATE CAPITOL (916) 449.8349 ~j ~`~s 7a COMM]TTEEe RV LE6 AGRICULTURE GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION C~~Z~~~~~~~ ~.e~~~z~~~~~ RAY E. JOHNSON MEMBER OF CALIFORNIA LEGISLATU R£ FOURTH ASSEMBLY ~ISTRIGT MEMBER, JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBER. JOINT LEGISLATIVE ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE May 21, 1970 Mr. Clark A. Nelson, County Clerk Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Butte County - Courthouse Oroville, California 95965 Dear Mr. Nelson: This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Butte County Board of Supervisors` Resolution No. 70-71. As you know, T appreciate learning the board's feel- ings on all legislative matters. V truly y rs i RAY E . J S'ON REJ:dao c®~~ ~~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA fZalpli f3uchannn, lsi ~isfrici ©ean ~..awrence, 2nd ~isirid ~oUePi W. Long, 3rd f~istrici William E. Thomas, ~ih Disiriei William Curran; 51h f]isfrid Theo. ~. Kohler, cl v. Ex-Offi~ro Chr!< of 16e I3oar~ BOARD OF SUPERVIS~jt~ f~ ~ ~ ~y of SUPeRVisog er ,` /~,t ~~~5 ,~~~~ o .x~}t,1.s /,~ mt k.. ~t~j~, ,E°..~ e e,.. "Y gF, ~ f~,~~~ 4~.r ~ ~a (~Yl~g~ p9 pq tAC9~UHty Ay~l' _ -'T 201 Ckusci, $trect NEVADA CITY, CAr,CF0121\'IA 95959 P6o..c: AK. Codes pi6-269-2g6c ~+. Rio February 25~ 1970 Honorable Board of Supervisors Courthouse Oroville~ California Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith please find. one certified copy of the Board of Supervisors Resolution 70-35, (Resolution declaring a Public Policy on preservation of prime agricultural lands and urging County State and Federal Governr:ents to adopt similar policies). Sincerely THFO . A . KOHZER ~ ~Ft . County Clerlt & Ex-Officio C12rk Neva(d~a} County\ Bogard of Supervisors cd Enclosure 1 Depu y Clerk to the Board cc : Fresidant I~Tixon Governor F.eagen Zeague of California Cities All Board of Supervisors within the State of Calif. O F ~s ~ . ~ ~ ~ 190 m,~~t ~~~ CLARK A, t~til,.y~.: v, jaunty Clark y<2~ e~~ W, ' ~P 9~A C09~ By ~,r,.~ .._... _ _~:.",:..w DoYury S53A OF THE SOAR® OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUi~9TY OF t~l~VADA RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC POLICY ON PRESERVATION OF PRTME AGRICULTURAL LANDS AND URGING COUNTY, STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS TO ADOPT SIMILAR POLICIES. WHEREAS, the prime agricultural lands in California and throughout the Nation are being consumed at a rapid rate in the urbanization program; and WHEREAS, these irreplaceable agricultural lands are being diminished each month in our State at an alarming rate by the construction of subdivisions, public roads, public build- ings, huge airports and both public and private facilities on valuable agricultural land; and I WHEREAS, the population explosion in California as well as in the Nation and the World dictates .that an increase in the production of vital food and fiber is needed to sustain life itself; and WHEREAS, National, State and Local Public Officials must be alerted to this serious trend which can be disastrous to the public health and welfare unless action is taken now by good land use planning and practices to reverse this trend be- fore it becomes irreversible; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Nevada County Board of Supervisors does recognize these serious implications in the misuse of fertile agricultural- lands for non-agricultural purposes and does recognize its public responsibility to .alert the people and to take whatever action it can to halt this dangerous trend; and BF. IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors does adopt and publish the following as its Statement of Public Policy:. That all prime agricultural lands must be preserved for agricultural uses and they must not be consumed in the construction of freeways, roads, airports and public or pri- vate structures not directly related to agricultural use; and BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED that this "Public Policy" should be adopted by governing boards and planning bodies of all levels as well as in the private sector, if the objectives expressed herein are to be achieved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted to President Richard Dixon, Governor Ronald Reagan, County Supervisors Association of California, League of California Cities, and the Boards of Supervisors throughout ,• California, in order to receive the widest possible dissemina- tion to all public agencies. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Nevada at a regular meeting of said Board, held on the 24th day. of February 19 70 , by the-following vote of said Board: ATTEST; THEO. A. KOHLER, Jr. County Clerk and ex-ofQfic~io Clerk of the Boardgo~f Supervisors Deputy Clerk Ayes: Supervisors Ralph Bvchonan, Denn Lawrence, Robert W. Long, WiEliam E. Thomas, WilEiam F. Curran. Noes: N one Absent: THE FOREGOING fNSTR1J(v;ENT I A CORRECT COPY DF THE OR[6iNAL ~~a~7o 3d` ON FILE hY THIS OFF~r ATTEST: F~ ~ 2 ~ t~~ T~~O A. KOHLE.=?, ,i,;, Poc;:y Clsrk cnd ez-~;,Yla~a Ciariy 6aartl of Su^ : ass ~NNF O ' ~^NAD^p1 . ey "a'Skn ePUiy RC~,P:kl. R1:SOLU1'ION N0. 70-75 RESOLUTION OF TF[E I30ARD OF SUPERV.ESURS OF Tk[E COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO SUPPURTING TIIE RI>CLAMATIUN BOARIJ OF THE STATE OF CALTFORNIA, OPPOSING ANY PROPOSAL TO TRANSFER ITS STAFF AND FUNCTIONS '.CO THE DEPARTMENT OF [4ATER RESOURCES, AND URGING THE PASSAGE OF ASSEMBLY RILL N0. 32 WI{EREAS, Item 276.5 of Chapter 355, Statutes of 1969, appropriated funds for the Central Valley Flood Control Program to the Secretary of the Resources Agency and directed him to allocate the funds appropriated by this item to the Reclamation Board and the Department of Water Resources to achieve as nearly as is legally possible an integrated, statewide flood control program administered and executed by the Department of Water Resources; and tdl{EREAS, on October 22, 1969, the Secretary of the Resources Agency issued a directive effective October 31, 1969, which transferred all work and personnel of the Reclamation Board, with some exceptions, to the Depart- ment of Water Resources and which also allocated the funds remaining on October 31, 1969, in Item 276.5 of Chapter 355 of the Statutes of 1969 to the Department of Water Resources; and 6dHEREAS, the State Legislature has not changed or diminished the statu- tory powers and responsibilities of the Reclamation Board; and L9HEREAS, since its creation in 1911, the Reclamation Board has effi- ciently fulfilled a continuing need in developing, supporting, coordinating, and administering a complex and very effective flood control program in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley basin; and WHEREAS, although extensive major flood control works have been enn- structed and are operating, many mere major state-federal flood control projects remain to be built before the capital investment program for flood control in the great Sacramento-San Joaquin basin is completed; and till{EREAS, the major flood control program still ahead makes it imperative that the State Reciamation Board be continued as a regional state agency dedicated to flood control and responsive to the needs of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley watersheds; and ~ . tai}{CI2);AS, flood control on the Sacramento and San Joaquin }fivers and their tributaries should not be subordinated to the development of water supply projects which are the prime concern of the Department of Slater Resources. The present and growing demands of the State for water supplies and the projects built and being planned to meet tl~ese demands can be ad- verse to valley-cvide flood control unless a State Board concerned with flood control is continued; and• WHEREAS, the weakening or abolition of the Reclamation Board and the transfer of its functions and responsibilities to the Department of tauter Resources would result in the further centralization of government too far removed from the people who are to be served; and WHEREAS, Assemblyman Robert Managan has introduced in the ]_970 Session of the California Legislature Assembly $ill No. 32 which would, if passed, supersede the directive of the Secretary of the Resources Agency and refund and restaff the Reclamation Board, and such Assembly Bill No. 32 is co-authored by Assemblymen Ray E. Johnson, Leroy F. Greene, Ernest N. Mobley, Clare L. Berryhill, Eugene A. Chappie, Pauline Davis, James W. Dent, John F. Dunlap, Carley V. Porter, tdalter P1. Powers, Edwin L. Z'berg, George N. 7enovich, Senator Fred W. Marler, Jr., Senator Albert S. Rodda, and Senator Alan Short; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE54LVED AND AFFIRMED that the Board of Super- visors of Sacramento County is opposed to the elimination of the State Reclamation Board, or the transfer of any portion of the functions of the Reclamation Board to the State Department of tauter Resources, or any other. action which will reduce the Board's effectiveness in furthering the flood control needs of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys; and BE IT FURTI{ER RESOLVED that the Reclamation Board~of the State of California should be continued in existence and should continue to exercise and have all its powers, duties, purposes, and jurisdiction and that it be .. 2- given adequ;rta f'undt; and personnel under i.ts direct control. to carry otrL its howcr:;, duties, and jur:i.sdiction; anc] BE Il' ]'IJR'1'llhR RLSC)LVED th,rt the Lehi s] :tt:ure n:P the Slate of Calii'orni.a is urf;ecl to pa:-;s and aclnpt Assembly 13i1I Nn. 32; and 13l. IT FI1R'fl[I:R P.rSO3~VF.D that copies nF tl~i.s resolution, duly certi.£:i.ed by the Cl.erl: oS~ tlt:i.s I3o:~rd , sha] L be f'ortttt:~ith -transmitted to the Governor of the State of Calafnrni.a; the Li.euten~_uit Governor of tyre State of California; the Secret~.try of the Resources Agency; the Director. of the Department of 6dater Resources; the Reclamation IIoard of t}re State of California; the Chairman and all 1.9embers of: the Assembly Committee on w'at'er; the Chairman of the Senate Committee on water, 14ildlife and Natural Resources; all authors and co--authors of Assembly J3i1.1 No. 32; the California Central Valleys Flood Control Association; the County Supervisor, Association of California; the ]Irrigation Districts Association of California; the California grater Resources Association; the boards of supervisors of the courtics of California; the California State Chamber of Commerce; and tl~e California Farm Bureau Federation. PASSED AND RDO1'TFD by the Board of Supervisors of the County o£ Sacramento, State of California, this rttlt day of February, 1970, by the fol].ocving vote, to wit; AYES: Supervisors, GUAI,CO, O'BRTE}d, PI-(ELAN, lv'OOII, KTASS NOES: Supervisors, NONE ADSL'NT: Supervisors, NONI; (SEA>1} ATTL-'S'~: ~,. Cl cork o f' the )]oard of Super. vi.scsrs r .,~ ~~ ~ ; ~ `~1 ~ • o ~ ,, 3C ~ ,~ Chairman of the Ilo r' cl o.E 5u erti~i.snrs P oi' Sacramento 'County, California The foregoing is 'a norrect copy of a • resolution adopted by the Doerd of Supervisors, Sacramento Count„ Ca(1- fornia ~-~8 ~ 1970 on..---------...._.....~ Dated _...._S~`.~ __.,x,1914------~....~ Clsrk of said Boar~I of /.- Sup rvlsors . t f~ /~ Deputy ~f - 11 - IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ian January 19 70 -----day -------------------------, is----- PRESENT: Supervisors M. Roland Gates, llston L. llidwell, Joi~.n V. Freeman Chairman Bans Hellmann .ABSENT: Supervisor T~yle ~'. Carpenter In the Matter of Transfer of Staff and Functions to Department of Water Resources: Upon motion of Supervisor Kidwell, seconded by Supervisor Freeman, and unanimously carried, in tale absence of Supervisor Carpenter, the latter from Butte County transmitting resolution supporting the Reclamation Board of tha State and apposing any proposal to transfer its staff and functions to the Department of Water Resources is received and ordered filed. cc: Buie County 1-22-70 drm STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San Luia Obispo, } as' 17.1JTH WAR~KSN _________.___.__- Count Clerk and ez-officio Clerk h ---------•----------------------..______ ~ y of the Board of Supervisors, in and for the County of San LiliB Obispo, State of California, do hereb}~ certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of an order made by the Board of Supervisors, as the same appears spread upon their minute book. .WITNESS my hand and the seal of said Board of Supervisors, affixed this ..___22nd__--____ day of_____--January __-----_,19~~ _-• ------RIJ'C'H WARNKEN ____________________..-- County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of tha Board {SEAL) (oi Supervisors Deputy Clerk. n1l.AA RUTH WARNKEN County Clerk U?~ A7U~ COUNTY CLERK Courthouse Annex SAN LuI6 OBt6Pp, ('ALIFOItNIA 43401 January 19, 1970 Telephone 543-155Q Exr. 231 Mr. Jack J. McKillop, Chairman Board of Supervisors Butte County OYOVil1e, California 95965 Uear Mr. McKillop: . On January 12, 1970, the County Board of Supervisors adopted the attached resolution titled "Resolution Requesting Legislation of the State of California to Provide for Effective Relief and Tax Reform. for the Property Owners of the State of California", and have requested a copy of same to be directed to your attention. RUTH WARNKEN, County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By p,_~ Q . Deputy Clerk drm enc 1. ABSENT: None Resolution No. 7G-1.9 RESOLUTION PEOU>STING LEGISLATION fJl= THE STATE OF CAi_IFCRNIA TO pRCVIC'" FCR EFFECTIVE RELIEF AND TAX REFt1F.M FCR 7HE €'R~?ERTY Ok'NCRS OF TtIF. STATE CF GAL I FCt&~ A The following resolution is now offered and read: bti-tfREAS, the State of California, since thz turn of the century, has been the recipient of a greater influx of population than any other state of the nation; ar~d WHEREAS, the various levels of local government absorbed this population increase without any reduction in the level or quality of services rendered; and 1~lHEREAS, the San Luis Ohispo County [3oard of Supervisors recog- nizes the great increase in governmental services and that the cost of these has been absorbed by the property taxpayers of the State of Cal iforni•a; and WHEREAS, said Board of Supervisors is deeply concerned and anxious to assist in efforts to bring fcrth some type of ~~roperty tax rel€ef, and Y~'iiSREAS, passage of proposition 1-A and Asse~e~'bl y ^ i l 1 80 were piecemeal attempts, in conn~_ct€on with real prope~~-ty, to solve the problem of tax inequities without a meanin•-ful re-analysis and exam- ination of the entire tax structure within the State of California; _. and WHEREAS, the State of California, through itst legislature, has sought to abrogate its obligation in connection w~lth payment for the education of children of this State by forcing local school districts to resort to the property tax, which inequitably f'~orces one group of CD•84 inequities ~2tween ~ocae scnoor a~sLrtccs,ana; 1•iHEP~EAS, it is the duty aF the State Legislature to see that meaningful tax proposals are adopted whereby those citizens who own rear ~raperty In the State of California are nat discrimina€ed against in the Field of property taxation, and; r~HEP,EAS, the mayor source of revenue to strppor€ gavernmen€ is the property tax, the tncame tax, and the safes tax; 1.1HE'RcAS, there has been no significant tax reform itt the State of Cailfornia for the past 35 years, and; lirNER.EAS, San Luis Ct~tsao County ;oard of supervl~ars supports the suggest inns of thQ Cr~unty of ~,'apa resat ive to an eclai tai~ie method of property tax ref ief. fJOy,~', TtiEREFOFE, Rti 1T RcSULVEf3 by the ~3oard of Supervisors,. .County of San Lei i y D5 i sn,~, S#:ata of Cai'i fat•n i a, that the Leq i s i aturQ of the State of Caiifornia should consider increa,as in State levied taxes including but not ii~x~ited to the safes tax and the income tax with such increased rev4nrle to be returntid to local government for re:i ie.f of the overburdened pror~erty taxpayer. It is recognized tht~t .the sales tax is a burden an the sow income e~-ernc:r and the income tax on the higher income earner; therefore, thi°s approach aouiu ap}x=ar equitaole to the various segments of our saciaty. t3E iT FURTHER R[SOLVEi7 that the Clerk of this C;card is heweby directed to transmit capfes of this resoiut(on to the Honorable Ronald f;eagan, CoUernor of the State of Gai ifornia, Senator i3onald !.. Grunsky, Asse'Ytbl yman ';~ i l i lam H. Y.etchum, the L`ounty Supervisors Association of California and all other counties 'sn the State of Caiifornta. .. r i~r the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted. /s/ Hans Halmann Chairman of the. Coa rd of Superv i sors ATTEST; /s/ Ruth Warnken Clerk of the hoard of Supervisors ADMIM1I. OFFICE 31~tC STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San Luis Obispo, } ss. __ RUTIi WARNIC>~N __, County Clerk and eg-officio Clerk , --__--- of the Board of Supervisors, in and for the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of an order made by the Board of Supervisors, as the same appears spread upon their minute book. WITNESS my hand and the seas of said Board of Supervisors, affixed this .___ 16th------ day of____-- January-------_-, 19_-70 ___-- RUTH WARNKEN _______________________ County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Boerd (SEAL) of Supervisors ~ ~~ ~ 1 Deputy Clerk. RESOLUTION NO, 69-99 RESOLUTION OF T.EIE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUN`T'Y OF GLk,DTiA SUPPORTING THL RECLAMATION BOARD OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND OPPOSING TEE TRANSFER OF ITS STAFr AND FUNCTIONS TO TiTG DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES -000- tiVHEREAS, Item 276.5 of Chapter 355, Statutes of 1959, appropriated funds for -the Central Valley Flood Control Program to the Secretary of the Resources"Agency and directed him to allocate the funds appropri- ated by this item to the Reclamation Board and the Department of vdater Resources to achieve as nearly as is legally possible an integrated, StateCVide flood control program administered and executed by the Department of Water Resources; and -- Gv~REAS, on October 22, 1969, the Secretary of tine Resources Agency issued a directive effective October 31, 1969, which transferred all wark and personnel of .the Reclamation Board, with some e~cceptions, to the.: Department of Water Resources and which also.. allocated the funds remaining on October 31, 1969, in Ttem 276.5 of Chapter 355 of the Statutes of 1969 to the Department of Water Resources; and ?rJFiEREAS, the State Legislature has not changed or diminished the statutory powers and responsibilities of the Reclamation Board; and • 4tiFLERLA5, the Reclamation Board cannot effectively and expeditiously carry out the powers and responsibilities conferred on it by the Legislature while practically all of its staff and funds have been transferred to the Department of Water Resources; and ~.THEREAS, Sacramento and San ~7oaquin,,Drainage District was organ- ?ed in 1911. This area, comprising approximately 1,750,000 acres of valley lands in 14 counties is administered by the Board. The Board has broad powers with respect to projects and over-the years has accumulated and now holds extensive property interests which. have been acquired part with state funds and in part with funds raised by assessments on lands in the district, In addition to such assessments landowners have contributed approximately 5100,000,000 since 1911 in building levees and flood control works which are now incorporated as portions of the project under the jurisdiction of the State Board. At least at this extent the landowners have vested interest in the project and in the Board as a state agency. To abolish the Board or limit its effectiveness would be unjust to the landowners, districts, counties and cities in the district; and w~iER:SAS, since its creation in 1911, the Reclamation Board has efficiently fulfilled a continiaing_.,need in developing, supporting, coordinating, and administering a complex of very effective flood control program in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley basin; and ' 19HEREAS, major flood control works have been constructed and are operating; mang.more major state-federal flood control projects remain to be built before the capital investment program for flood control,in the great Sacramento - San Joaquin basin is completed; and V,~idRBAS, the major flood control program still ahead makes it imperative that the State Reclamation Board be continued as a state agency dedicated to flood control and needs to the Sacramento - San Joaquin Valley watersheds; and ' GVT~EREAS, flood control in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries should not be subordinated to the development of water supply projects which are the prime concern of the Department of .Water Resources. The present and growing demands of the State for water a - supplies and the projects built and being planned to meet these dem~nds can be adverse to valley-side flood control unless a-State _2.. Board concerned with flood control is continued;.-and ~1HF.REAS, the weakening of the Reclamation Board and the transfer of its functions and. responsibilities to the Department of Water Resources would result in the further centralization of government too ' far removed from the people who are to be served; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND AFFIRMED that the Board of Supervisors of Glenn County is opposed to the transfer of any portion of the functions of the Reclamation Board to the State Department of water Resources, or any other action which will reduce the Board's effectiveness. in furthering the flood control needs of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Reclamation Board of the State of California should be continued in existence and should continue to exercise and have all its powers, duties,. purposes, and jurisdiction and that it be given adequate funds and 'personnel under ,its direct control to carry out its powers, duties, and jurisdiction. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution, duly ' certified by the Clerk of this Board, sha11 be transmitted to the Governor of the State of California; the Lieutenant Governor of the State of California; the Secretary of the Resources Agency; the Director of the Department of water Resources; the Reclamation Board of the State of California; the Members of the California Legislature; the California Central Valleys Flood Control Association; the County Supervisors Association:;of::California; the Irrigation Districts Association of California; the California water Resources Association; the boards of supervisors of the counties of California; the California State Chamber of Commerce; and the California Farm Bureau Federation; -3 - Pt?SSD ANA AnOP~ED by the Loard of Supervisors of i:hE County of Glenn, Scate of California; this 23rd day o:~ December , 1969, by. the Following vote, to w5.t: AYES: SY7PERVI50RS HOLVIK, POLZIN, FIACK, COLBERT and REIME.'2S NOLB: NONE . ABSENT: NONE dy a%YI" ® ~ $ ~ Chairman of the Board of Supervisors ' ~ os Glenn County, California • {SE~1L) ,y Cle k"o£-the Board of - _ Supervisors - 5 i. ,` f • ~ . ~•.. -A• - - ' .~ ~~~ 1,v - ~ ~~soL~rl!~r~ N0. 28 U~.G ~IJeRK A, N~LSc~ly, County Clerk ~y ,....._..,..,........._..s..,e.. Gapufy RESOLUi`IGN OF 'PFL CITY COUNCIL OF' TRI: CITY' OF 4~ILLI~:^fi~ CEJIvI1'dI:i~DING LT. BENJAitiIN JT~`+1ENT+~7~ OF` TIiF; BUTTE COUNTY SIiF£~TFF` ~5 4FF'ICE yJii~REAS, Lt. Benjamin Jimenez of the Fiutte Cour_ty Sheriff4s Office recently spent many hours in an undercover narcotics investigation in the City fa '~illiam5 and County of Colusa; and VdHEREAS, Lt. Ben~aim Jimenez and his diluent work in the investiga- tion resulted the arrest of six su,apects on charges of selling dangerous drugs and/or narifuana and ®ight additional suspects on lesser narcotics charges; and 4VIiE'fiEf~S, this investigation and resulting arrests have helped the community to combat tine narcotic problem by appreh®ncling thes® suspects, etad demonstrating to the citizens the extent and seriousness of the probleres; and 4yHEF.EAS, this City Council is grateful for the s®rvices rendered by Lt..Jimenez to our Gity; €VQl'~ TF3EREF'ORE BE I7~ RESc7LVED by the City Council of the City of UUilliams that said Council commends Lt. Benjamin Jimenez for his splendid work in recent narcotics investigation in the City of ~~illia and County of Colusa; and Be it further resolved, this Council ®acpress®s ita appreciation to the Board of Supervisors-and 'the Sheriff of Butte County making it possible for Lt. Ben~amgn Jimenez to participate in the narcotics investigation in our City. .~~//k~ ay ~~a-inn '~- riA~~ Log N ~ ~1- ~. _. i~~P BOARD OF SUPERVISOR S COUNTY OF LOS ANGELS S 38.3 HALL OF ADMINISTRATION /LOS ANGELES~CALIFO RNIA 90012 JAMES $. MIZE, EXECUTIVE OFFICER ~~~~ ~. ~v~~s~,,, ~ou:7ty clerk ~~ MEMBERS OF THE BOARD ERNEST E. OEBS CHAIRMAN FRANK G. BONELLI KENNETH HAHN BV RTON W.CHACE WARREN M. DORN 154 On motion of Supervisor Dorn, unanimously carried, it is ordered that the following resolution be and it is hereby adopted: WHEREAS, the California Teachers Association has proposed a tax reform initiative; and WHEREAS, the County Supervisors Association of California has supported said State-wide initiative measure, as it has included therein the essential elements of the Association's four-point tax reform plan; and WHEREAS, said measure, when adopted, will prohibit the expenditure of more than ten percent of property tax funds for social welfare pro- grams, thus requiring the Legislature to afford relief to the property taxpayers of the State; and WHEREAS, said initiative measure, in further aid of the property taxpayers and the stated program endorsed by the Association, will prohibit the Legislature from imposing new, additional or increased services on counties without providing for revenue sources other than property taxes to finance and carry out said programs; and WHEREAS, said initiative measure will provide tax relief to county Property taxpayers throughout California in the approximate amount of $545,000,000.00; and WHEREAS, each county has established a Property Tax Reduction Fund and the purpose of said initiative is to affect a reduction in the property tax burden of the citizens of California: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles as follows: (1) That all funds received from the State or from non-property tax sources by counties as a result of the adoption of the said initiative measure shall be deposited in the County's Property Tax Reduction P'und and expended in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the use of said monies in such funds; (2) That all counties be urged to support this resolution and make known to the citizens of each county that the funds so received shall be deposited in said Property Tax Reduction Fund; and C3) That each county's Board of Supervisors take such action as may be necessary to assure that all funds so received shall be appropriated to the Property Tax Reduction Fund. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. County of Los Angeles ) T, JAMES S. MIZE, Executive Officer and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, do hereby certify that the attached is a full, true and correct copy of the Original Minutes of Board Order No. 16~+ of December 9, 1969 on file in the office of the Board of Supervisors of the Cvunty of Los Angeles, and ex officio the governing body of all other special assessment and taxing districts for which said Board so acts. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Los Angeles this 11th day of December, 1968 JAMES S. MIZE, Executive Officer and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles By tt Deputy iov. cis ghe fol3o~ria:g~ resolut~,,xt eras intrsaduced by S~pervi$o~° a..lio ~Chiappel3.i: iiBStlLUTitDPT OF TH3 Bo~°d of 9upervisores of the Cictxaty of Tuoluma~e t~~S, fol7.owieg the discaverY og gold at Qoloma oa- Jaxf ~• 1$48. and ~r nearly a century after that momentous discovery, gold miaictg was tree e¢an~aic cornerstone of Tuolumne County. sad all coucnties in tits Motherr Lode; aa~r3 ~121lS, historically, gold ~• is Tuolum~- Countg_°has produced. many millions of dollars in xevenue and resources to our: citisemy; apd ~i.s, einc6 1934 c~rtaia reStrictians Of the i'r,Bas~try of the United States have been places upon the private owrtersbip of gold, Making such cwaership 3.llegal far aititexns of the United States:. with certain eacep~ tioas; acrd 6, that since 193~t, the Treasury o~ the United States has fixed the price- of geld at $3~.4U as .ounce. actti is as record as opP~i~ ~Y increase i.n prime, while prises on a1,1 other cdities ham rises' tiraiously since 1934; $nd' F~~, StTCit restrictions acxl priaefixing base 'worked- great' acrd utbdue hardships upon the gold mining;-industry of Tuolumne aunty, and all cv~.u~ties in-the Mother Lode.; and ~, SIICff RTRIC~I()NS have contributed to the idleness oi* numerous mines, and bFive contributed to depressed economy-~ ciitions: and high unemployment in i"~zolna"ste Conntg; and WI3~E~kS, ixt previ~s periods of b~ts~.ness depression, the prctduc~tion of Bold dial provide for adequate employment as~i sustaiated general business conditions in 9t"uoleta+as Cournty, g(3W,. THEftF~'t7.~E, ~ IT RF.SOLVE~3 that the Board of Stiipervisors of Tuolumne County respec~fitillY toss that the Treasury of the iTnited States xeview and reconsider ~its:~cies, with a view toward en3~ a13. xe- strictions on the private ovr~rship of gold, and alloecing the price of Bald. to fi.ricl its o~*n level au the free markets eveiyrT3ser®, ~ IT' P~1RTI~ Ri~(7LVEl7 that .copies of this Resoluton° be Beni to Gongress- matz,Harold T. "$izz" Johnson, Senetor Alan Creston, Senator John b". Tua~ney, Honoratx~,e Ronald Reagaat, c3overnar o8 the State og Gall forni:a, tine I~soci.ation of Ca].ifvrnia Boards Qf Superv3.soxs, -sad to the several }3sjarc3s of 5upervisor$ of ~tot,ter Lode Cotuttles iri Califr>rnia, i ~'. . BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CALAVERAS STATE OF CALIFORNIA November 24, 1969 ~~ ~~ =~j~ ~1`'i (~ (~ z~ F Y I~~y~etI RESOLUTION WHEREAS, this Board is in receipt of Re~alution No. 1849'of` NO. 69-440 Amador County, Ga2ifornia, entitled'°'''~Resolu.ttozi .Requesting -=. ' A Review of the Assessing Pract~,c'?~~,,, of~~the State Board of ;`, Equalization in Reference to State Assessed Prop'e~aty„ 'and ~:.. r. ., WHEREAS,~the valuation of property upon the secured-roll of the County of. Calaveras between the lien da'te`''bf195'9' and -the lien date of 1969 has increased from .the sum of $18,035,550 to $62,682,455, and during said period the valuation of the Public Utility Roll, assessed by the State Board of Equalization has increased only from the sum of $7,524,500 to $8,187,910. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of. the County of Calaveras, State of California, that it extends full support to the Amador County resolution requesting a review of the assessing practices of the State 'Board of Equalization with reference to State Assessed property. . BE IT FURTHER. RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be sent to each County .Board o£ Supervisors within the State of California, Governor Ronald.Rp~ .Senator Stephen P. Teale; Assemblyman Eugene A. Chappie; John Lynch, Chairman, State Board of Equalization; County Super- vfsora Association of California; California Tax payers Association; and to the State Senate Committee on Revenue and Taxation. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Calaveras, at its regular. meeting held on November. 24, 1969, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Cuneo, Fischer, Bernasconi and Minto. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor Boles. STAPE OF CA.I.IF'©~:NiA ) . SS Caugty of Calavex~nr ) C. E?p 5IL ~. ESRIOND, County Clerk ~zntl Ex- Officio ~C!!~"]z hf the Board ox' SuPet'visors of the. Co;;rty of !:'...^.la.~er3s, do her^b-Y cEtrtify that the fore- roi':i^. i:: atrac and corzect co~?y d: anortion of the ,i:'n::tr,G of =~ m~etinn of t!ie Boaxd of Supervisors of sei l r;nnr,ty iN ~-^JTmN^~^~ ~.slfiER?~ OP, I have l~^.~~eunto seC_ ^~s Izancl aid c..:ES"~ed the Seal of sa'-d I'o=rc€~t Tr~l rezy pf /~f~.7,.. ' a.ffix~~~l this ~-__ - - Basil ~. Esmond, County Clerlr ~t,~puty ~;.; ._. ~J~GLL4 ~- ;? __ _ ___ D [yj~~l~~~ ~ D R.E,S'J.L.UTION NO. 69-903 ~~~f; A. I~ELSIna, ~.ounfy ~J@~ Rl•SOT_,iJTION OF TI-]F• BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THI: COUI~7'Y_.~?.k _ Dap~tY f "f~ SACRAIv~EN'TO SUPPORTING THE RECLAMATION BOARD OF THE STA'1']i' OF CALIFORNIA AND OPPOSING ANY YFOPOSAI,'10 TRANSFER, ITS STAFF AND FUNCTIONS TO THE DEPAR.TIv~ENT OF WATER RESOURCF,S -000- WHEREAS, Item 276.5' of Chapter 355, Statutes of 1969, appropriated funds for the Central Valley Flood Controt Program to the Secretary of the Resources Agency and directed him to allocate the Funds appropriated by this item to the Reclamation Board and the Department of Water Resources to achieve as nearly as is legally possible an integrated, statewide flood control program administered and executed by the Department of Water Resources; and WHEREAS, on October 22, 1969, the Secretary of the Resources Agency issued a directive effective October 31, 1969, which transferred all work and personnel of the Reclamation Board, with some exceptions, to the Department of Water Resources and which also allocated the funds remaining on October 31, 1969, in Item 276.5 of Chapter 355 of the Statutes of 1969 to the Department of Water Resources; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature has not changed or dixxxinished the state- . tory powers and responsibilities of the Reclamation Board; and , WHEREA5,`:the Reclamation Board cannot effectively and expeditiously carry out the powers and responsibilities conferred on it by the Legislature while , practically all of its staff and-funds have been transferred to the Department of Water Resources; and WHEREAS, Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District was organized in 191I. This area, comprising approxirraately 1, 750, 000 acres of valley lands in 14 counties is administered by the Board. The Board has broad powers with respect to the projects and over the years has accumulated and now holds exten- sive property interests which have l~ecn acquired in part witl: State funds asul in part with funds raised by assessments on the. lands of the district. In addition to such assessments, landowners have contributed approximately $100, 000, 000 since 1911 in building levees and flood control works which are now incorporated i ___ __ _-_ ___ _ _ - as portions of the project under the jurisdiction of this State ~3oarcI. 1\t least to this extent the landowners have a vested interest iu the project and in the Board as a state agency. To abolish the 3oard or limit its effectiveness would be unjust to the landowners, districts, counties, and cities in the district; and WHEREAS, since its creation in 1911, the Reclamation Board-has efficiently '.... fulfilled a continuing need in developing, supporting, coordinating, and adminis- feting a complex and very effective flood control.pragram in the Sacramento- San Joaquin Valley basin; and WHEREAS, although"extensive major flood control works have been con- structed and are operating, many more major state-federal flood control projects remain to be built before the capital investment program fox flood control in the great Sacramento -San Joaquin basin is completed; and WHEREAS, the major flood control program still ahead makes it impera- tive that the State Reclamation Board be continued as a regional state agency dedicated to flood control and responsive to'the needs of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley watersheds; and WHEREAS, flood control on the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivexs and .their tributaries should not be subordinated to.the development of water supply projects which are the prime concern of the Department"of Water Resources. The present and growing demands of the State for water supplies and the projects built and being planned to meet these demands can be adverse to valley-wide flood control unless a State 3oard concerned with flood control is continued; and WHEREAS, the weakening or abolition of the Reclamation Board and the transfer of its functions and responsibilities to the .Department of Water Resources would result in the further centralization of government too far xemoved from the people who are to be served; and WHEREAS, the Sacramento County 3oard of Supervisors 1>reviously adopted Resolution No. 69-41 on January 15, 19b8, opposing the recommendation originally made by State Resources Agency to abolish the State Reclamation Board; NOW, Tl-3'EREFORE, BE IT R.ES07~VED AND AFFIRMED that the .',3oard .' of Sul,c:rvisoa•s of Sac.- ,ncnto Gottn[y is o]>pos;cd to LI14 L7.a'nitlatlUn pit t]at: 5tatc Reclamation Board, or the trant.[ca• of any portioal of Lhc^ Eunci:ions of the J+ec]sL- oration 13oaxd to Lhc ;;fate Departmc:n[ of Water Rasourr.es, or any other action which will reduce thc.: Board's rfir,caiveness in furthr.ring t]lc: flood r.onlseil teecrl: of tlic Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys; and }3E 1T FL3RT'Ilr'R RESOLVED that the Reclamation Board of th(: St.cic of .California should be continued in existence and should continue to exercise and have all its powers, duties, purposes, and jurisdiction and that it be l;iveu ' adequate funds and personnel under its direct control to carry out its powers, - duties, and jurisdiction. ' BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies. of this resolution, duly certified by the Clerk of this Board, shall be forthwith transmitted to the Governor of ':the State of California; the Lieutenant Governor of the State of California; the .~ Secretary of the Resources Agency; the Director of the Department of Water Resources; the Reclamation Board of the State of California; the Members of the California Legislature; the California Central Valleys FloodControl Association; the County Supervisors Association of California; the Irrigation Districts Associa_ ;'tion of California; the California Water Resources Association; the boards of supervisors of the counties of California; the California State Chamber of Com- " .: coerce; and then California Farm Bureau Federation; ~ - PASSED AND ADOPTED by the 3oard of Supervisors of the County of .: Sacramento, State of California; this . Lst day of December 1969, lip the following vote, to wit: ~ ' ' ',AYES: ~ Supervisors, GUALCO, KLOSS, PHI±LAN, 1VOOD, O'BRIEN NOES: Supervisors, NONE ABSENT: Supervisors, -NONE '. '.. ~ `;.fC .. Chairman of tllc '3oard. of Supervisors of Sacramento t:ounty, ~gl~{~ is a correct Copy of 8 resolution adopted by the Board of (SI:,A L.) , ~ Supervisors, 5acramen;o bounty, Cali- :.. ~/ ~ ~ forma qEC _ 1. 1969 ' ~ -... ~~~; DEC 1959. Clerk of~ the a3oa`r of .napcrvisoi s ~ate~ .....................................~._.___ Clerk of said 6nard of L• ~ $up~rvisors ~~:" P°wp y0,~.C~G 2. N: :. :< :~ _. -.-/ ;, CQGiFOR~~P RICHARD W. DIGKENSON COUNTY CO VN9EL OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN COV RTHO USE 222 EAST WEBER AVENUE STOCKTO N, CALIFORNIA 95202 TELEPHONE 944-961 {AReA Gooe 209) November 19, 1969 Honorable Board of Supervisors Butte County County Courthowse Qroville, California Gentlemen: ROBLEY E. GEORGE ASEIST~NT ca uNTY couNSel GERALD A. EHERWIN oePUTr co uxrr couNEEL HARHARU H. FOY UEP Yr couNYV COUNSEL RAY MO EPNU H. LUCAS Y CoVUiY cO UNeeL JERRY D. HALL DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL JOHN F. CHEA OLE OePUTr coUNTY counsel THOMAS M. YUCKERMl~N O EPUTV COUNTY COUN9e4 SFEPH EN M. OIETRICH, JR. O¢PUTT ca uNYV COUNSEL I enclose for you certified copy of Resolution R-69-2000 entitled "Resolution of the Board of Super- visors of the County of San Joaquin Supporting the Rec- lamation Board of the State of California and Oppos~,ng Any Proposal to Transfer its Staff and Functions to the Department of Vdater Resources" which was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on November 18, 1969. It is res,~ectfully requested that you give favorable consid- eration to the resolution. Very truly yours, .~ ~o~ R1CFiARD V~, DICICENSON County Counsel RCn1D/pm encl. JOA~UIN SUPPORTING THE RECLAMATION 330ARD OF THE STATE OF cALS- FORNIA AND OPPOSING ANY PROPOSAL TO TRANSFER ITS STAFF AND FUNCTIONS TO THE DEPARTt~T OF WATER RESOURCES -o0a- WHEREAS, Item 276,5 of Chapter 355, Statutes of 1969, ap- propriated funds for the Central Valley Flood Control Program to the Secretary of the Resources Agency and directed him to allocate the funds appropriated by this item to the Reclamation Board and the Department of Water Resources to achieve as nearly as is legally possible an integrated, statewide flood control program administered and executed by the Department of Water Resources; and tn713EREAS, on October 22, 1969, the Secretary of the Re- sources Agency issued a directive effective October 31, 19691 which transferred all work and personnel of the Reclamation Board, with some exceptions, to the Department of Water Resources and which also allocated the funds remaining on October 31, 1969, in Item 276.5 of Chapter 355 of the Statutes of 1969 to the Depart- ment of Water Resources; and Vd73EREAS, 'the State Legislature has not changed or dimin-~ fished the statutory powers and responsibilities of the Reclamation Beard, and WHEREAS, the Reclamation Board cannot effectively and expeditiously carry out the powers and responsibilities conferred on it by the Legislature while practically all of its staff and funds have been transferred to the Department of Water Resources; and V~IEREAS, the Reclamation Board of the State of California was created during the first term of office of Governor Hiram E~~E~ ~t~~~ NOV 18 1969 ~~ R4EPH !'1. EPP~,gSQiV, Clar;T ~® Bp o~PUnr WHEREAS, the Reclamation Board has during the 58 years of its existence supplied the need to maintain a state body having powers over the development of federal-state levee projects and in administering and resolving problems of districts and land- owners with respect to land acquisition, the formation of and budgets far maintenance areas, levee encroachments, and require- ments for levee maintenance; and LVHEREAS, the Reclamation Board of the State of California has carried out its duties and responsibilities in a most efficient, economical and commendable manner; and WHEREAS, the Reclamation Board provides, among other things, an open forum where all interests may express their views on the many complex problems connected with flood control; and WI3EREA5, the great Central Valley of the State of California with its two great rivers and their tributaries embraces an area of over one-third of the State and is an area of great economic importance to the State as a whole and it is therefore necessary that there be an autonomous state board in preserving, policing, and supporting levee and channel improvements in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys because of the unique and peculiar flood problems in the area; and WHEREAS, the weakening or abolition of the Reclamation Board and the transfer of its functions and responsibilities to the Department of Water Resources would result in the further centralization of government too far removed from the people who are to be served-an unsalutary trend which was condemned by Honorable Ronald Reagan, Governor of Californian in an address on September 22, 1969; - 2 - continue to exercise and have ail its powers, duties, purposes, and jurisdiction and that it be given adequate funds and personnel under its direct control to carry out its powers, duties and jurisdiction. BE zT FURTI3ER RESOLVED that all officers, emp],oyees, and representatives of the County of San Joaquin and particularly the County Counsel, the County mater Consultant, and the Director of Public Works, be, and they hereby are, directed and instructed to take any and all appropriate steps to support the Reclamation Board of the State of California in any efforts to preserve its autonomy and jurisdiction and to have restored to it full control of the staff and funds which were transferred by the Secretary of the Resources Agency to the Department of Water Reso urces by the above-mentioned directive of October 22, 1969. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution, duly certified by the Glerk of this Board, shall be forthwith transmitted to the Governor of the State of California; the Lieutenant Governor of the State of California; the Secretary of the Resources Agency; the Director of the Department of Water Re- sources; the Reclamation Board o£ the State of California; the Members of the California Legislature; the California Central Valleys Flood Control Association; the County Supervisors Associ- ation of California; the Irrigation Districts Association of California; the California Water Resources Association; Angus ~IOrman Murray, San Joaquin County 1Jater Consultant; Charles B. 6Vong, Director of Public Gdorks of San Joaquin County; the Members of the Advisory Water Commission of the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; the boards of supervisors of the .. 3 .. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1969, by the following irote of the Board of Supervisors, to wit: AYES: HOYT P~RlNO WISDOM WILER LEHMAN NOES; -dUfVk ABSENm: NON ~~~~~ VERNON F. LEHMAN, Chairman Board of Supervisors County of San Joaquin State of California ATTEST: RALPH L4. EPPERSON County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Super- visors of the County of San Joaquin, State of California By~~ (SEAL) Depu ,~ Clerk THE FOR6G0lAEG IS A CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGI~fAL ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE ATTEST ~ QV I $ ~~69 19 COIfN7Y CLERI( i:NO CLFRN OF T4E BOARD RALFH W. EFP I SOIL OF SUPERV ORS OF TRF COI tiT'! OF SAN 10A GV, STA'E OF CA'_II'On'IVIA 8Y DePUh' 4 - i ~C---~~ C~~ ~€:: ._~:.€SC'..;, vD'u~ i.ti vi'' ~~dla:i'~ ~~_, ~} ~:~L_ ~ ~~:.r:ll i' ~ -. 2 s ~ k t ~i 5 6 7 8 9 2 .'Oi? ~ ., ., 1,;~ :i01.LL) ., _,_ D.'La 0`x.'1_; ,';li;J.L.ii...:S ,_`~ . ,., ili:Y,_., I ,..._.'. .W~il~JUiiC;;J C(1!''i~i '.liv ~JLT11ia7c ~:1:•'_l~'l.:;y t11G StatC ~'atCr ~C3OilI^CCF, COntrO1. iiO:.ird 7JrC7USC;i 'i;0 CnaC~ ?]. j i ~~ CCra.CS Of fi11R fCGu fOr t11C installat;.on alld "~'~Odif'1C.''.,tiCn Oi nriVa"i:@ and _ ~ nui>~ic sel•ra;e and solid ?•raste disposal facilities; and s' ' ,rsli'~~ .~. ~ .._ _ ,_S, she proposed levies trould discriminate ~-ai nst the crnstruc-- i lien o= septic tar_'~c installa',;ions and ?rol',ld also imrose subs Cant ial assessr:ents ~Unon tt2C Cour_ty' Oi Tk,.i{e for 1.tS C0l7Tlt~r-:^,~',].ntalriCd 50.1.1.d i~i.'_S'i,C C'llii~l7 c,C3.17.t;LCu~ ~ i .and 7.0 >>..-.~-.~.~9 the County o~ al:e ;, n econo:;~i calf depressed area ?•r'.licil s ]_~, ~i l.i d@.:;CP!dvYil`, r01" EC0Y10t:t:iC SLirV? V,:i~ On a lir,?ited :000T'Cai:lOri^1'C~S~ CjE;n'i;7_~27, ^r Ot~7tlly ~! i2 j~?:': ~].CII dB VC lO~Tttent i 5 On?y Casible ?•7t(1 lndi'Cr! C',11a1 ge1J"ti C 'i;aniC 5?rS tCl:;:;~ ?-T'ni Ci7 13 i!S~IS';,Cr;S are *;vnerally ased ioT' Only a rG~1'i;iVGly Sf1Ort pCY'ioCi O~ t:18 '`jCaT; anCt ' ~' ~ k ].,~ ~~' '.~+__.:~:.._~~ ti1C COi:nty Of ..,a1fE adYfl1.11~.StT'atiVL-' sta?'f 1;aS ~~ rlld 15 UCr~O~.Yli1.ll~- 15 ~"orou~;n ~.nci co potent ;;oU of controllin; and operaL'il:~;Taste disposal. s;,',,telr,C i lg ;for the ou;;?mt;r;: bonei'it of all t e people L:*'no are iniluenccd by tine meat ,•ra-€;e'r ~I i ~7 ire50l:;rCCS ~enErateCt 7.n ti1G' COl:nt`T Oi I,s1CCy i~ii'i7.C11 services ?•rould be serf ol;.slf 18 IitC1S'eatCIlCd CCCnOii':1.CC.l~;yr by one pr0_D0Sed 1.CV].f.S; and ~ j ~ ~ ~+, lg ?:LL~Rr~,.=S, 'tne net ef~"ect of i;ne "_orolaosed filing; gees laould ire io irl_:iosc '3 _ i 20 ~Eserio~~.s ha,-d,,?li7 OCl L!?C C~SOY't~ OT VT1C C0L111~f 01 1~`'_C to crCBiiC' 8 V1dDlC .3110 7 ~) I 22 !.';1'U?-iin'; CCOrOT~:fy 3S ;•rell as-fll?"`ihe1' (;rOdC t11C E'~.~CCi;iVCT1CD8 Oj' local COIltr01 02 i 22 `:ou-r i~::r:Cd:tate needs; 23 ii c;C:, `i':_~.~~'Oi~'., 13z 1`i 1?,SOl,1rD -that one Soard of Su:J::rvi„o r ~' ~'~' rs o ~ tl~e '~~' '~C:Ctinty Oi _,_':CJ Jta2 0=° California as ti.G T}Il'CSl7.C OOCi'r ~O:;t C1i2'CCj;7.y 2Gj .7.C fO:^ l'.^.C Ca)_~tl ~?,21C3 S~',;'Ctf C~ 'i.11G' ~°51QCni:S 2,ild V]..^, 7.G0rS 7_?'; '~;i?C CO, ~ ln' :.' o` 20 a{cy f,' .. r f'1.^GrO1:.~l~T 0b~CCt3 tO and VCi'1GmC ~ ~. ntly oppose;: -~hc: r *ar;c ;:nc't ~=o~.a~: i 27 - ...,tc <:.._ s~osal 7_n~, ics gronoseci ;o ~c ].lr. ;osed ,, ~,,.,_. _! _ t: e c, ,,, ~c '"~~ i;cr .... ~ ou. ^cc.. ~~on ta'o.~ 23 .O~: d~ .. ...,?CG ., 1C.^_ ClU p~7_Cai:7.n" ~CV:LCti i•T'.1.7.7_ d1_ C0Lru;C lIC 2t.i.'l:Ry ally aCC SS..~- jF ~iQFF l.il 2~ ~ ~ ._..• ti•... ;`Jy CIC'?:Y"'iC i.hC r', Cl)nt;~r Of T+8}LC O:i 012C 0., i"~;,i _CaS.~.., uC}li.rC0;3 O.f '~t7C ~_T?4 nB oY ;jJ --».~...~ ._., :.O Sll'.~Y)O'!'"t ~, hC rC::7_dCnt an(t l~li^?C LY'1n51C:1i: rOCY'CatlOi:a~_ yO fi ~ o~ t~ ~~ "t;io'n d;, .._:-1 ...:..._.~„ Wrota t'~lis co>;-nty':, reso'~~:rccU; and '_~.;, CJUf'TY ~,O;L. ~ Or 5u :•l~lr~-~© ~? L':Sv~L l 2 k 4 I 3 4 i 5 6 7~ 8 9 10 I~ 11 12 13 ~ 1~ 15 f I6 j I 17 la i 19 ! i 20 ~ 1 21 ~; i~ 22 `~ ~i 23 ~~ i( 24 !~ .. i'• 25 !~ !~ 26 ~~ 27 ~[ i' 2II ii jj 29 I' 30 i.. 31 '' I~ 32 i! ;I 1I i - j~ ~ i i' U~~i'liJ:,Z ?'?:,50LV ~~ tll~.t t't'?C L01.12T~y i~l era; 1.i C:l'P. CCLed t0 fll i•7arCl .^.; COp~J 01 t?11.5 rOSOlll'`i.10n tO L hG GozrerllOr Ds. ~ by J'~ia :C OA Ca7_i ~~Or!11~1.~ thG' ?=.:{ecu~ive Cziicer of •c..e State 'dater :resources Control Board, the 3oa~ds of 3 Supervisors of each County of 'che Mate of Oali~ornia, and eac?1 nt~%la_cly (,'~GC'tCL'1 -.cii2tiC O.~.i1C1.a~ rG'1~Y`C'SC:1i:in~~ i.Ilfl' L'Olin'~'j Ol ~c't.?LC, `Ch'..S iiE3501L'.~'10ri ida5 paused and adop'.;ed oy ~!le }A~rd 0~ ~ill'.)C?'cIj.SOY'S E~ Oi the U'OllntSr OZ lxti{Cy jta':.0 D:C ~311~°.Ornia, Fl..t a rcular tneetin~= t.1~rDO.T held E on the 17th dayr o' idovem%er 1969 by the io3.l.o.•rin~ vote: i E ' '.~~: Ult.pOrVi50r5 T'Ira.eden, Lisn7lGrs :~lzrr~jy I2!?1t;SOn, ':111(X5, € hfC~s: 1`~Olleo i ( A;,S'~iT 0~: I~OT VOTIIG: Pionen I - 1~~1a3-rT~'!~n 03. So,'14~J0~1.?'Cl ~lT^LFSF: 3r^L=isS 1., 3~:~'tTi~ Cler': o.u said hoard i n'y . ~ , 1' vz ~ JJeputy ACS cr?{ The within Instrument is s correct Copy of tha original on flla to ffils-of41e& A]TcST: ~Q~( ~ 8 1969 ~ATA~S C. SP-itrl~P County Clerk and ex-officFo Clerk of the Board or Supervisors oY 4he State of California in and for Oho Couniy of taka. By ZdG~2~ Deq Cler$ f BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF BUTTER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA _ \ RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A°j[ADOR COUNTY ) 1~~ ~~L~~~ \ REQUEST FOR A,REVIE~^I OF ASSESSING T('[~~ . m ~ U L I ~ 4 ~J~-ii PRACTICES OF SATE BOARD~OF EQUALIZATION ) IN REFEPENCE TO STATE ASSESSED PROPERTY CLHf~~ A. 1~6_~~..,. ",,,un+y O~Qrk ~y -_..._ 'WHEREAS, this Board is in receipt of copy of Resolution No. 1849 . of Amador County, entitled "RESOLUTION REQUESTING A REVIEW OF THE . ASSESSING PRACTICES OF THE STAIR BOARD OF EQUALIZATION IN REFERENCE TO STATE ASSESSED PROPERTY"; and ' WHEREAS, the valuation of the property upon the Secured Roll of the County of Sutter between the fiscal year of 1959-b0 and 1959-70 has increased from the sum of $56,1$2,0?.0 to $133,354,330, and during said period the valuation of the Public Utility Ro11 assessed by the State Board_of Equalization has increased only from the sum of $10,519,110 to $13.,350,550. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOAPD OF SUPEPVISORS OF BUTTER COUNTY, • CALIFORNIA, that they extend full support of the Amador County - resolution requesting a review of the assessing practices of the State Board of Equalization in reference to State Assessed property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLC~ED that conies of this Resolution be sent to each County Supervisor *.aithin the State of_ California; Senator Fred Marler, 3r.; Assemblyman Ray Johnson; Governor P,onald Reagan; John Lynch Chairman, State Board of Equalization; County Supervisors Association of California; California Taxpayers Association; and Senate Com_Mittee on Revenue and Taxation. The foregoing resolution was duly passed and adapted on this 14th day of October, 1969, by the following vote: AYES.: Supervisors Ike Norred, Robert Paillex,Thomas S. r4i11er, Eber F.Beilb: NOES: Nane ABSENT: Supervisors J. A. Bagley f ATTEST: County Clerk and Ex-officio //! Clerk of the 3oard i Chair:~an, Board of S~isors, Sutter County, California Rm et csnierax ~ td! Eoma9 e! Dotter 4 ~~aa~aa awl. east Hat3 aca ¢c•rt~ ~" b 8rlyd e! Saaanimw of thi Oaonlr d trttei, 81vto 07 dr+Nan~a, 6~ Maw9y esrtty t@s faegoleC tm !a ~ hrt, trag taN aanw ropy d a ReaoluNas n i~uia 6tr:x e+aLa bg tool DearB wma appeaea at nasan? ~ ID'Gr . tm Lo~L- - aaa 6(1 s 6Da! NCH Qmoed ci•BaeY~'tY / . ~_.. - - eaa G~ a4ftEta ~ .. Cafh aT Sncer;.on a! ('~uMp a! Soma ~~ 685 Kentucky Street, FROM THE OFFICE OF: City CZerk and Director of Finance AU G 6196 ~~~~ h. iViw~J~ <, vOUnty ~.191'~C By ._..... _ ~ .~,..~. Deputy Board of Supervisors County of Butte Oroville~ Ca. 95965 Gentlemen: August 6~ 1969 A certified copy of the following Resolution is enclosed for your record: Resolution No. 22-1969 - City Council of the City of Gridley establishing the Tax Rate for the Fiscal Xear 1969-1970. ES:g Encl. Municipally Owned Udilities Incorporated 1905 Xours very truly HNC CLERK. RESOLUTION N0. 22 (1969 Sexies) A RE5OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRIDLEY ESTABLISHING THE TAX RATE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1969-1970. BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the City Tax for the City of Gridley be, and the same is hereby, established at the rate of $ 1.20 per $,100.00' assessed valuation,`for the fiscal year 1969=1970. BE IT FURTHER RE50LVED AND ORDERED that said rate is':deter- :mined from the total of these tax fund components: ,;......FUNDS` RATE ' __ __ - General $.7S Retirement . ~+~ .$1.20 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the City Clerk of ' the City of Gridley be aild she is directed to notify the Board of Supervisors and the County Auditor of-the County of Butte that the City Tax Rate for the City of Gridley is so established. a 0 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and, regularly introduced and passed, and adopted by the City .Council of the City of Gridley at a regular meeting thereof, duly •held on the- ~+th -day of August, 1969, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN HAMMAN, HUGHES, SQUIRE ANA McMURTRY NOES: COUNCILMEN NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEN SHIFFLET __ -._ ~~ - •~]aIa 6:za SSHNI.IA1 a u a `dm aam 69 6i ASR nd )0 6sP 9r o PI y .a ~ZBl•Tl~2~I ayr >e eCa1Pr~r~ }o Rn~ ayy ~o ~Tauno~ ay~~~'pardope pue pano.rdde '0[3 NOI3.CI'IDSff~I 30 .Sdoo ~aa»oo pyre ann a si jaded paxauue ayr reyy 696T-Z~ ;x3I.L2I3~ 6garay op'~TOUno~ 6~i~ ayr;o sSurpaaoo~d Io teumo[ aye SuTpnlam 'spso~a~ .tn7 aqr 30 ~adaar~ aye pus '.tajprrr~ Io Rrr~ ayr ;a rl~ai~ 6~r~ paiurodde ayr 'pau8tssapun aye 'I arep ~ 1i~"IQI~IJ-30 A,LID 696T 9 ~.sn ny ~ NOI.LV.LSBI..LV •s•s ~ a]mg }0 6]unoD ETi7]0~TIE~ 30 a]E]g _~; -- ---~ w°- ~ - .' .~-'~• ' GCUNCILM EN'~ PHON E-CITY HALL B 6 0-54 3 6 JIM L. SHACO. MAYOR _ UTILITY DEPT. 860-5420 WM. 7HEBACH KARL THDMPSCN ~p RDY E. PRITC HARD P. D. BOX 3LI7 'ryy ~q~'111Y n}y~.p ~~ E [IGENE NEWTON ~ ~ Illl1/LL ~l1l..llll Wlf~ JIG11! ILII ~V/L~ie•eytl e~m[~e own CC3~e oL~ig~fe and `L!/alrtr Q.~ ~i33~135~ ~d~iIIIT]Tld ur7~7 June 2b, 1969 ~ ~~~~~1~ JUNL~1~ ARK A. N~ISON, CaunW CIN# BY ......_........----._W... The Board of Supervisors •• -~~--•••• aP„iy County of Butte Courthouse Oroville, California 95965 Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of Resolution No. 6, 1969 Series, passed and adopted at the regular meeting of June 9,.1969, establishing the tax rate far the year ending June 30, 1970. Sinc.. er,n,e,n,l\\y, ~{.(,2~~ - I ~3 Luella A. Tamagni ~MrS.} Director of Finance LAT:kj Encl. cc: F. H. Seely, Jr., Auditor-Controller R~SULU~'ICtV NC. 6 (1969 Seriesa 1t;;~OLUTIOrd ~~' TtjrJ c1TY couNCZ:~ or~' Txx CITY CF i~.iGGS L.~,T;.BLIS'rii1G Ti~i:c Tr~~ itt`STi. IT izl:aO~Elu;i=i .:ie~ Cii~;~r~r~~ that the City tax rate for the C#,ty ;s be, and the same is hereby established at the rate of tip1.00 on each .~s100.00 assessed valuation and ~iL 1:T ~Ueilki~>~ ~t=;>~Lu_.:u idL' UitrJ~~ii_,I) that said sum is determined from the total funds from ~<rhich the same is broken down as follows: A UiiDS LiP:'PL C~enera.l :r and :;1.00 t:~ LT I.''L~1 ,i.:~it; Il.: `.JUL ~-",L ..i', 11 UiLJiii.u• '"'` ~'~ that the total amount of money required to run the City Government of the City of'r~iggs for the ye.r ending June 30, 19'70, is hereby estGblished as f'olloivs: r Uiti 0~ ili'+IOUc1T Genes al fund • • • e. . • • s a s . e 0 . e 0 e . a o o e • p I H~~t~:isBY C~icT:~~'Y that the farebcing resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed and adoptad by the City Council of the City of 13i~;gs at a. regular greeting thereof' duly held on the 9th day of June ' 1969, by the following vote, to oit: :~YrS: COUi`;CiLi~~i~b ire=nrton., Pritchard, Thebach, Thompson- and 5hadd N01~: CiUIvC1Lt~;Pa ivone :f~EiVT: CCUP;CIt,~'ii?:rv None C' y Glerlc iii~Y LtOvLi~: - P~ or .,_.._.._.....~ ..~,._ 'R t