HomeMy WebLinkAboutNorthern California Water Association - Sacramento Valley Groundwater AssessmentTo advance the economic, social and environmental sustainability of Northern California
by enhancing and preserving the water rights, supplies and water quality.
July 31, 2014
Supervisor Doug Teeter
Butte County Board of Supervisors
25 County Center Dr.
Oroville, CA 95968
Re: Preserving our Precious Groundwater for the Future: Assessing the Sacramento Valley's Groundwater
Resources
U
Dear Sup 6t°sa�r"1`eeter:
The third consecutive dry year in Northern California has illuminated the pressures on the Sacramento Valley's
water resources and the challenges we face in providing reliable water supplies for various beneficial purposes in
the Valley. Groundwater resources are critical, with groundwater providing nearly 30% of the region's water
supplies, with this percentage greatly increasing during dry years and during sustained droughts. Recent reports and
maps show that the groundwater resources in the Sacramento Valley are being actively managed and monitored
(see e.g., CASGEM website at: www.water.ca.gov/--roundwater/cas2em/).
The preservation of Northern California's groundwater resources is critical to the economic, social and
environmental fabric of the region. As part of ongoing efforts to achieve sustainability, water leaders, through the
Northern California Water Association (NCWA), have made a concerted effort over the past several years to assess
Sacramento Valley groundwater resources, both for groundwater levels and quality. Our objective is to help bring
the region together to actively manage our water resources—both surface and groundwater—to assure sustainable
water supplies for cities and rural communities, farms, fish, birds and recreation.
While we are pursuing efforts for sustainability, the Governor in his California Water Action Plan expressed his
commitment to "work with the Legislature to ensure that local and regional agencies have the incentives, tools,
authority and guidance to develop and enforce local and regional management plans that protect groundwater
elevations, quality and surface water -groundwater interactions." There are now legislative deliberations on
groundwater management in which we are fully engaged that may shape future groundwater management in the
region.
The Sacramento Valley and its groundwater resources are unique. To build a strong, objective platform for
sustainable management and to better prepare for the public policy discussions in Sacramento, NCWA has
convened a robust series of technical reports that include:
Sacramento Valley Groundwater Assessment. Macaulay Water Resources, Davids Engineering, and
West Yost Associates prepared a Sacramento Valley Groundwater Assessment, which provides an
overview of the Sacramento Valley's groundwater resources and the evolving efforts to better understand
and actively manage the resources to provide sustainable benefits for the Sacramento Valley. The report
provides a discussion on the historical development of land and water resources; the ongoing efforts for
sustainable groundwater management; the effects of increasing use of groundwater; and recommendations
for the future. Most importantly, the report summarizes long-term trends within the Sacramento Valley that
affect our groundwater resources. Although groundwater levels in the Sacramento Valley have been
enerally consistent --draw down during dry years and then recovery in wet years --we are starting to see
C�` Q�
certain areas where groundwater levels are not recovering as they have in the past. While we cannot yet
distinguish between the impacts of the ongoing drought and what may be longer-term changes to the
Sacramento Valley water balance, the lack of surface supplies and the expanding and intensifying use of
groundwater in the Sacramento Valley are contributing to this dynamic. There have also been reports by the
California Water Foundation that suggest subsidence may be occurring in certain parts of the Valley,
particularly in areas where there are no surface supplies available.
The Sacramento Valley Groundwater Assessment and the technical supplement are available at
www norcalwater org/efficient-water-management/groundwater-management/. The California Water
Foundation report is available at: www.califomiawaterfoundation.org/uploads/1397858208-Subsiden
FullReyort Final.pdf.
Groundwater Quality Assessment. CH2M HILL has developed a Groundwater Quality Assessment
Report (GAR) for the Sacramento Valley, which will provide water resources managers and the leaders in
the water quality coalitions with a current assessment of groundwater quality in the region. The GAR
provides a rigorous review of regional settings of irrigated farmlands in the Sacramento River watershed,
including agriculture practices, soils and hydrogeology, and existing groundwater monitoring networks and
data. In this manner, the GAR serves as an initial framework that establishes the technical basis of the
groundwater quality monitoring and implementation program. This report identifies areas of low and high
vulnerability to water quality impacts from irrigated agriculture, and areas having data gaps that indicate
the need for further evaluation. The GAR supports the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control
Board's Waste Discharge Requirements for the Long -Term Irrigated Lands Program and informs the
Central Valley SALTS Basin Plan process.
The Sacramento Valley generally has high quality groundwater, although there are areas with water quality
concerns that need to be addressed. The goal is to preserve these high quality groundwater resources in the
Valley for future generations, while continuing to support economic and environmental uses in the Valley.
The report is available at www.norcalwater.org/groundwater-quality-rel)o .
Together, these comprehensive reports pose the question: are we at a tipping point on the sustainability of our
groundwater resources in certain parts of the Sacramento Valley? The conclusion in both reports is clear --the
Sacramento Valley must improve our efforts to ensure sustainable groundwater management. We should also be
collectively exploring the efforts necessary to maintain a balanced water system, including both the supply and
demand parts of the equation. This will require all water users in the Sacramento Valley working together toward
this common goal. It is our intent through these reports to better understand this invisible resource, to bring greater
awareness to its vulnerability, to paint a picture of the real challenges we face in preserving our groundwater
resources, and to provide more sophisticated tools to actively manage our water and land resources for all the
beneficial purposes described above. Most importantly, we encourage the leaders in the Sacramento Valley to snake
a conscious and concerted effort to better understand the surface and groundwater resources in their area and to
work together to assure that we have the appropriate technical, institutional and legal knowledge and tools to define
and measure sustainability and support local groundwater management. We also need to work together to expand
our ability to store our surface water resources, such as Sites reservoir, for critical times of need. We must assure
sustainability of our water resources going forward.
We look forward to working with you in preserving our precious groundwater resources. For more information,
please visit www.norcalwater.org.
Sincerely,
Bryce Lundberg
Chair, Board of Directors
Fritz Durst
Chair, Water Management Task Force
Call to Action
HE NORTHERN CALIPORNIA WATER ASSOCIATION
(NCWA) developed this assessment of current
groundwater conditions in the Sacramento
Valley as part of its continuing effort to address issues
regarding sustainability of the Valley's water supplies.
This year we face unprecedented drought conditions,
following a decade of relatively dry years and increased
demands on our groundwater resources. These in-
creased demands have two principal causes. The reduced
availability of surface water during dry years brings a
predictable shift towards greater use of groundwater.
The second is expanding and intensifying agricultural
land use within the Sacramento Valley, together with
increasing urban water demands, leading to increased
reliance on groundwater even in "normal" years.
As addressed in NCWAs July zoic report, Efficient
Water Management for Regional Sustainability in the
Sacramento Valley, the essential indicators of sustain-
ability are a vibrant and growing economy, reliable
high-quality surface water and groundwater supplies,
stable groundwater levels to protect water supplies and
stream ecological values, preservation and enhance-
ment of fish and wildlife habitat, and the preservation
of agricultural productivity. The Zoll Sustainability
Report concluded that all our water use efficiency ini-
tiatives need to contribute to maintaining or improving
these indicators of sustainability, and started an im-
portant dialogue within the Sacramento Valley on what
measures should be considered to assure the long-term
sustainability of our economy and environment.
The water supply and environmental stresses of
the current drought are focusing more attention on
groundwater, our essential drought reserve when
surface supplies are limited. We summarize on the
following pages what appear to be important long-term
trends going on within the Sacramento Valley that
affect our groundwater resources. It is not yet possible
to separate out such trends from the impacts of the cur-
rent drought. Real-time monitoring alone does not tell
the full story since groundwater responses to changes
in use are slow to appear. No matter what the com-
bined impacts of these trends and the increased use of
groundwater during drought times, the current stresses
on our groundwater reserves need to be addressed.
We have actively invested in and managed our sur-
face water resources for many years, and the collective
efforts of our water managers are models for effective
stewardship. The Sacramento Valley is a highly man-
aged system, with flows in the Sacramento River and
its tributaries regulated by upstream reservoirs - a
mix of local agency facilities and those developed by
the federal and state governments. As to groundwater,
many efforts throughout the Valley in recent years have
focused more attention on groundwater management at
the county and irrigation district level. We have many
ongoing successes at the local level, made possible
through the development of additional water supplies,
more efficient water use, and development of new water
delivery and management infrastructure. However, a
more comprehensive approach to managing groundwa-
ter in conjunction with our surface supplies will need
to consider the Valley as a whole. More aggressive,
proactive conjunctive water management supported
by local and regional leaders should be pursued. The
interdependence of groundwater and surface water is
an essential factor related to sustainability. Compre-
hensive water management cannot be fully realized
until water users in the areas within water districts and
the non -district areas work together toward common
objectives.
This new report relies on extensive technical infor-
mation collected by local agencies, the California De-
partment of Water Resources (DWR), and other sourc-
es. Our report comes at a time when there is far more
attention to groundwater management, particularly as
it relates to potential new legislation. In January 2014
the State released its California Water Action Plan, high-
lighting the importance of groundwater management at
the local level. In March the Legislative Analyst's Office
released its report, Improving Management of the State's
Groundwater Resources, setting forth its suggestions for
State legislation. In April the Association of California
Water Agencies released ACWA Recommendations for
Achieving Groundwater Sustainability, a suite of recom-
mendations for improving management of groundwa-
ter basins throughout California. Also in April DWR
released their Report to the Governor's Drought Task
Force -Groundwater Basins with Potential Shortages
and Gaps in Groundwater Monitoring. In early May,
the independent California Water Foundation released
PAGE 2 1 SACRAMENTO VALLEY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
its report, Recommendations for Sustainable Ground-
water Management, developed through a stakeholder
process at the request of the Brown Administration
and containing specific recommendations essentially
aimed at new State legislation. The Nature Conser-
vancy is putting substantial technical resources into a
general evaluation of the potential impacts of declining
groundwater levels on local stream flow, which could
have significant impacts on stream resources.
In addition, CH?MHill (for NCWA) has developed
a Groundwater Quality Assessment Report (GAR) in
anticipation of pending requirements of the Central
Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board's Irrigat-
ed Lands Program (ILP). This report is a regional -level
analysis designed to aid in the initial prioritization of
water quality monitoring and implementation activities,
and provides the foundation and framework for the
long-term program of monitoring and implementation
that is required under the ILP. The GAR is posted to the
NCWA web site at norcalwateror- roundwater-quali-
ort.
The following pages summarize detailed technical
information and analyses set forth in a separate NCWA
Technical Supplement, available through our web site
(norcalwater org(groundwater-technicalsunplement .
Our new report raises important questions and issues:
Can we arrive at a shared understanding of
sustainability for the Sacramento Valley?
Are we close to or at a tipping point on the
sustainability of our groundwater resources
in many areas of the Sacramento Valley?
• Do we have adequate technical, institutional
and legal tools to measure the components of
sustainability and support local groundwater
management?
The Northern California Water
Association (NCWA) is committed
to advance the economic, social, and
environmental sustainability of the
Sacramento Valley by enhancing and
preserving its surface and groundwa-
ter rights, supplies, and water quality
for the rich mosaic of farmlands, cities
and rural communities, refuges and
managed wetlands, and meandering
rivers that support fisheries and wild-
life. NCWA was formed in 1992 to
present a unified voice to ensure that
this region has reliable and affordable
water supplies — both now and into
the future. For more information,
please visit the NCWA website at
www.norcalwater.ora.
We encourage active engagement in these issues from
surface and groundwater users as well as local govern-
ment This is a region -wide challenge. Public outreach
will be important to tell the story and get fuller engage-
ment. Our strong local leadership and our extensive
water management experience will be essential for the
future of the Sacramento Valley. As we engage in these
issues, it will be important to consider (i) increasing data
collection, monitoring and modeling, (a) augmenting
water supplies, (3) improving water management activ-
ities, and (4) addressing land use. Overall management
of our water resources require that we look at all factors
affecting the water balance - both supply and demand.
David J. Guy, President
Northern California Water Association
Northern California Mater Association I PAGE 3
Introduction
HE STUDY AREA OF THIS REPORT is the Sacramento Valley. The principal focus of this report is on the
area overlying groundwater aquifers. The study area is shown in Figure i.
This report is organized into four sections:
i. Historic Development of Land and Water Resources Figure 1. Study Area
z. Sustainable Groundwater
Management
3. Effects of Increasing Use of
Groundwater
4. Conclusions
The technical, institutional
and policy information in this
short report summarizes more
detailed information contained
in a Technical Supplement,
available through NCWAs web
site (norcalwater.org).
PAGE 4 1 SACRAMENTO VALLEY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
Historic Development of Sacramento
Valley Land and Water Resources
ALIFORNIAS CENTRAL VALLEY RANGES FROM 40
to 6o miles wide and 45o miles north to south.
The Sacramento Valley occupies the northern
portion of the Central Valley, stretching about 150
miles from the City of Sacramento northward to the
City of Redding. The Sacramento Valley lies within
the Sacramento River Hydrologic Region, a 17.4 million
acre area drained by the Sacramento River and its
tributaries. The Sacramento River enters the Valley at
its northern end while major tributaries – the Feather,
Bear, Yuba and American Rivers – flow from the Sierra
Nevada on the Valley's east side. Tributaries from the
Coast Range enter the Valley on the west side. With the
notable exceptions of Cottonwood, Stony, Cache and
Putah Creeks, the west side tributaries are mostly small
and ephemeral. The Sacramento River system has an
average unimpaired flow of about 22 million acre-feet
(MAF) (DWR, 2oo7), representing roughly one-third
of California's total annual runoff and the dominant
source of inflow to the San Francisco Bay -Delta. The
Valley's productive soils combined with reliable water
supplies and Mediterranean climate snake the Sacra-
mento Valley among the most productive agricultural
regions in the world. Continued changes in crop
mix and irrigated acreage are expected to continue to
respond to market forces, including commodity prices
and other factors.
Sacramento Valley agriculture began in earnest in
the mid 1800s, shortly after and as a result of the Cali-
fornia Gold Rush. Initial efforts addressed identifying
crops and cultural practices suitable for the region, as
well as land clearing and preparation. The most notable
efforts were to drain and protect the land from flooding,
and to deliver reliable water supplies for irrigation (Ol-
msted and Rhode, 1997) during the long, dry summer
growing season. Huge, mostly private investments
were made in water control infrastructure to achieve
these functions. The initial irrigation water source was
almost exclusively surface water, resulting in most of
the irrigated land being located adjacent to and under
gravity flow from rivers and creeks. Later, beginning
in the early 19oos, the advent of efficient groundwater
pumps and the expansion of rural electrical energy
supplies enabled irrigation of lands more distant from
and at higher elevations than surface water supply
sources. Today, roughly 40 percent of the Valley's
irrigated areas lie outside of organized surface water
supplier service areas and primarily use groundwater
(USBR 2003, 2oo9; DE 2o14). The remaining 6o percent
use mostly surface water with groundwater serving as a
supplemental supply.
The progression of Sacramento Valley irrigated area
over the past several decades is illustrated in Figure 2,
including trends derived from three sources. Because
these sources rely on somewhat different methods and
relate to somewhat different periods and areas, the lines
on Figure z do not agree exactly. Nevertheless Figure 2
gives a good indication of recent historical trends. The
lower trace in Figure 2 represents data extracted from
DWR's current historical California Central Valley
Simulation (C2VSim) model'. It shows the Sacramento
Valley irrigated area increasing from about 1.23 million
Northern California Water Association PAGE 5
I
titi��>titi�tit�t#t♦�t%t♦
�t•��R��iv1l.Ntt//ti■tit•
,;
.-���tt��.titi�i��titi�titi�
®�i�t�'itrtr➢��ilii®�
NEW
=a
—00
=111111101
am mama
mmmWmmmmm
1985 1970 1975
1980 1985. 1890 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 =
Yaar
Northern California Water Association PAGE 5
I
titi��>titi�tit�t#t♦�t%t♦
�t•��R��iv1l.Ntt//ti■tit•
,;
.-���tt��.titi�i��titi�titi�
®�i�t�'itrtr➢��ilii®�
Figure 2. Estimated Irrigated Area in the Sacramento
Valley
C2VSim is an integrated surface and groundwater hydrology
model maintained by the California Department of Water Resources.
For purposes here, irrigated acreage, surface water diversion
and groundwater pumping data were extracted from the current
calibrated version of the model representing historical conditions, for
the portions of the model representing the Sacramento Valley, As
with all models of complex natural systems, C2VSim data is subject
to a certain degree of uncertainty. Nevertheless, the data provide a
consistent and useful means of understanding development trends in
the Sacramento Valley (and other regions of the Central Valley).
acres in 1970 to about 1.48 million acres in 2008. The
upper trace is derived from a recent remote sensing
analysis of Landsat satellite data, showing a 400,000 -
acre increase in the irrigated area in 1985 of 1.6 million
acres to z million acres in 2013. The middle trace dis-
plays a mostly flat trend at - 1.6 million acres from the
early 198os through the late 2000s, and then a sudden
increase in 2012 (when available data ends). This data
is from a compilation of primarily ground-based data
reported by county agricultural commissioners; among
The consumptive use of water on the irrigated area
is currently estimated at 3 acre-feet per acre annually
(West Yost Associates, 2014) or on the order of 6 MAF
valley -wide, with the bulk of that derived from applied
irrigation water (rainfall and accumulated soil moisture
also contribute to meeting this consumptive use).
Based on DWWs C2VSim historical model data,
agricultural and urban diversions of surface water have
both increased over time in the Sacramento Valley
(Brush et al., 2013, DWR 2014). Urban and agricultural
diversions have increased substantially over
the past 90 years with urban diversions
increasing from approximately 41 thousand
acre feet (TAF) per year in the ig2os to 286
TAF per year in the 2000s (a seven -fold
increase, mostly in the Sacramento met-
ropolitan area) and agricultural diversions
increasing from approximately 1,700 TAF to
4,200 TAF (more than a two -fold increase)
over the same period. Thus, total diversions
increased from approximately 1,750 TAF in
the 1920s to 4,500 TAF in the 20oos. Annual
estimates of irrigation and urban diversions
are provided in Figure 3. In the last 40
years, following the development of the
federal Central Valley Project (CVP) and
the California State Water Project (SWP), decreases in
diversions are particularly apparent in the dry years
Of 1977, 1991, and 1992. Estimated average annual
diversions by decade are shown in Figure 4, reflecting
long-term trends in diversions resulting from increased
agricultural development and urban growth, made
possible through increased surface water storage.
and Urban Use in the Sacramento Valley
the three sources this information is regarded as the
most reliable. However, such information is at the
county level and may include some acreage above the
floor of the Sacramento Valley. Despite the differences
in the records and the fact that none of these data sets
is a perfect estimate of irrigated area in the Sacramento
Valley, it is reasonable to conclude that the current
irrigated area in the Sacramento Valley is
somewhere between 1.8 and 2.0 million acres. �s,000
In addition to the expansion of Sacra- I n
mento Valley irrigated area, recent remote
a 4,000
sensing analyses indicate that the density of
o 4.000
crop vegetation on the land is also increas-
2 4,000
ing. Over the past three decades, vegetation
o
_ 2,500
density has increased by about zo percent,
3 2,000
reflecting a trend toward plantings of higher
water use crops, particularly permanent tree
.1,500crops
(discussed below) and also improved
< 000'
farming and irrigation practices. The in
500
crease in vegetation density is supported by
°r
appreciable increases in crop yields over the
Figure 4.�
same three -decade period, as reported by
county agricultural commissioners.
Urban Use by Decade in the Sacramento
PAGE 6 1 SACRAMENTO VALLEY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
and
Agricultural and urban groundwater pumping has
increased over time (Brush et at., 2o13, DWR 2014). Ur-
ban pumping increased from approximately 18 TAF in
the 19205 to 314 TAF in the 2000s (a 17 -fold increase) and
agricultural pumping increased from approximately
433 TAF to 1.939 TAF (more than a four -fold increase)
over the same period. Thus, total pumping increased
from approximately 45o TAF in the 19zos to 2,25o TAF
in the 2000s. Annual estimates of agricultural, urban,
and total pumping are provided in Figure 5. Increases
3,000
0
1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 iE
Year
and Urban Use
in agricultural pumping are particularly apparent in
the dry years of 1976, 1977, 1981, 1991, 1994, 2004, 2007,
20o8, and 2oo9, when groundwater was relied on to
meet water demands under conditions of limited sur-
face supplies. Noteworthy is the fact that groundwater
pumping since around 2005 appears to be consistently
greater than the one year "spike' in pumping during
1977. Estimated average annual pumping
by decade is shown in Figure 6, reflecting
long-term trends in pumping resulting
from increased agricultural development
and urban growth and most recently in part
due to dry or drought conditions.
For agricultural and urban purposes
under land and water use conditions that
existed during the z000s, it is estimated
that about 2.25 MAF of groundwater were
pumped annually in the Sacramento Valley,
representing about one third of the com-
bined total agricultural and urban water
supply. Not reflected in these values is
the additional groundwater pumping (and
surface water diversions) associated with
the ongoing expansion of irrigated area that began in
the past decade. As shown earlier in Figure z, both the
middle and upper traces indicate that irrigated area
has increased by about zoo,000 acres from zoo8 to
date. Spatial analysis indicates more than half of this
expansion has occurred outside of surface water sup-
plier service areas (USSR 2003, 2oo9; DE 2014). Thus,
based on an estimated demand of 3 acre-feet per acre,
an additional 3oo,000 acre-feet will be pumped to meet
agricultural demands (once crops on the newly devel-
600_ oped lands mature within a few years of
planting), bringing average annual pump -
500 -" ing to an estimated 2.55 MAF.
Finally, two additional trends related to
400 Sacramento Valley agriculture merit atten-
tion. First is the ongoing rapid expansion
300 E of permanent tree crops such as almonds,
olives and walnuts, in response to currently
200 favorable market conditions. In most cases,
100 such crops are being planted on land that
has historically grown annual crops, and
0 in some cases on previously undeveloped
zoio rangeland. This in part results in an in-
crease and hardening of water demands, the
Irrigation latter because tree and vine crops cannot be
idled. The increases in water demand are
a function in part of the previous water uses on such
lands, which have not been analyzed in this report.
Second, and driven in part by the expansion of tree
and vine crops is the increasing use of pressurized
irrigation systems. Farmers are increasingly using sub-
surface drip systems for row crops such as processing
tomatoes, as well as surface or subsurface drip systems
2.500
❑ Uroen
a Agncukural
r 2.000 277
1,500 n9
m J91:
0
1,000 ss
how
231
500 18 25
0 1920x. 19306 1940s.. 1950s: `1960s a970s 1980s .1990s 2000.
Decade
Figure 6. Estimated Annual Groundwater Pumping for Irrigation
and Urban Use by Decade in the Sacramento Valley
Northern California Water Association I PAGE 7
and micro -sprinkler systems for tree crops. Although
these pressurized systems are typically more efficient
than traditional surface irrigation systems that would
otherwise be used, their increased use is not strongly
associated with water conservation. Rather, farmers
are adopting pressurized systems due to the many crop
production advantages those systems provide (includ-
ing water and fertilizer distribution tailored to crop
needs and production). Farmers irrigate to optimize
their crop production systems, using the quantity of
water that maximizes their yield, crop quality and farm
revenues.
From the standpoint of groundwater management,
adoption of high -efficiency pressurized systems has
a desirable effect in areas irrigated with groundwater
because less groundwater pumping is needed to meet
water demands. However, in surface water areas,
the more uniform and efficient application of water
achieved with pressurized systems results in reduced
deep percolation (recharge) to the groundwater system.
Furthermore, some growers elect to use groundwater
to supply pressurized systems even when surface water
is available. This is addressed further in the Technical
Supplement. Conversion to groundwater supplies even
when surface water is available will have some impact
on the groundwater balance due to the increase in
groundwater pumping and the reduction of deep per-
colation of applied surface water. The increasing use
of pressurized irrigation systems using groundwater
is likely to be an increasingly important factor in the
overall management of groundwater and surface water
in the Sacramento Valley as a whole, particularly as
such systems displace the use of available surface water.
Sustainable Groundwater
Management
HE SACRAMENTO VALLEY has a number of
DWR-approved groundwater management
plans (GWMP). These plans have been devel-
oped and are administered by local entities, including
individual counties and water districts. The boundaries
of these plans are shown in Figure 7.
In addition, a number of counties in the Sacramento
Valley have adopted ordinances that are intended to
exert some level of control over discrete groundwater
activities. Much of this was in response to concerns
raised in the State Drought Water Banks in 1991, 1992
and 1994• More details on the GWMPs and county
ordinances are in the Technical Supplement. The
degree of active engagement in managing groundwater
varies throughout the region, and is associated with a
variety of factors including sub -regional groundwater
challenges, the nature of county ordinances, and other
factors. In general, county ordinances have been put
in place to react to new events (for example, short-term
water transfers) and may not necessarily call for active
year-to-year management activities in the absence of
new events.
The Technical Supplement also contains information
on the various integrated regional water management
plans (IRWMPs) that have been adopted or are being
developed within the Sacramento Valley. Such plans
are collaborative efforts of local decision-making orga-
nizations, and give an indication of the future potential
for addressing region -wide water resource management
issues.
NCWAs 2oo6 Sacramento Valley IRWMP included
the following description of the Sacramento Valley in
terms of long-term water uses:
PAGE 8 1 SACRAMENTO VALLEY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
The Sacramento Valley is a rich mosaic of farm-
lands, cities and rural communities, refuges and
managed wetlands for waterfowl and shorebird
habitat, and meandering rivers and streams
that support numerous fisheries and wildlife.
The natural and working landscape between
the foothills of the Sierra Nevada and the Coast
Range is dependent on the fertile lands of the
Sacramento Valley floor, water supplies from
rivers, streams, and the underlying groundwa-
ter basins to support and sustain a healthy and
vibrant local economy and environment.
This set forth an initial marker for sustain-
able water uses in the Sacramento Valley
that explicitly addresses both economic and
environmental values. Following up on the
theme of sustainability, NCWX& eon report,
"Efficient Water Management for Regional
Sustainability in the Sacramento Valley"
addressed the topic of sustainability in
more depth. This paralleled the emerging
focus over the past decade throughout Cal-
ifornia on both water supply reliability and
the broader theme of "sustainability". In its
December 2013 comments to the SWRCB
concerning the SWRCB's "Groundwater
Workplan Concept Paper", NCWA referred
to the classic "three pillars of sustainability':
the economy, environmental stewardship,
and social and community well-being. Each
of these relies heavily on reliable, long-term
water supplies for the Sacramento Valley.
This short report (supported by the Tech-
nical Supplement) begins with a discussion
of sustainability from NCWAs perspective.
There is broad recognition of the contrib-
uting factors to water sustainability. Those
include, but are not limited to:
. Surface water hydrology (variability)
• Interaction between surface water and
ground water (as described above)
• Long-term balance of groundwater re-
sources, including changes in storage
and quality
Water demands, both consumptive
and non -consumptive (variability)
• Water infrastructure, for both storage and
regulation of water supplies, and those facili-
ties needed for treatment and distribution
• Regulatory restrictions
• Economic, social and environmental goals
Some of these can be measured, others can be con-
trolled, and some are difficult to assess. We do know
that most of these factors continue to change, posing
significant challenges to characterizing the overall
water balance of the Sacramento Valley. It is not only
Hydrologic Region (primarily the Sacramento Valley)
Northern California Water Association I PAGE 9
the weather, which gives us wet, dry and drought years.
Urban and agricultural land uses continue to change,
and this is affecting groundwater use and likely the
effects on streamflow. As noted earlier, groundwater
changes can take many years to become apparent, and
we have not yet been able to measure with certainty the
long-term impacts of the current level of groundwater
use as it affects our measures of sustainability. And of
course regulatory pressures continue, with some degree
of uncertainty regarding the need for the Sacramento
Valley — and other areas where most of California's
water supplies originate — to contribute to downstream
water demands. It is an extremely complex mix of legal,
technical and policy issues, and NCWA remains dili-
gent in protecting the Valley's water resources.
Despite this complexity, there are basic physical indi-
cators that signal when groundwater use is or may not
be sustainable, and there are water balance principles
that define the realm of solutions. Persistently declin-
ing groundwater levels in many areas of the Sacramento
Valley over the past decade reveal that groundwater
discharge exceeds recharge. Simply put: if the objective
is to stem or reverse the trend, the groundwater balance
South Sutter Water District
The South Sutter Water District (SSWD) is located in southern
Sutter and western Placer counties. The District was formed in
1954 to develop, store and distribute surface water supplies,
Today SSWD encompasses a gross area of nearly 64,000
acres, including 57,000 acres authorized to receive surface
water. In recent years, due to urban encroachment and other
factors, fewer than 36,000 acres in SSWD are irrigated using
a combination of surface and groundwater supplies. The
dominant crop is rice, accounting for more than 80 percent of
the irrigated area.
The primary driving factor for forming the district was to
develop and distribute supplemental surface water supplies
to replenish over -drafted groundwater aquifers. This was
accomplished by constructing the enlarged New Camp Far
West Dam and Reservoir on the Bear River, These facilities
were completed in 1964 creating 104,400 AF of additional
storage capacity.
Water is released from New Camp Far West Reservoir
into the Bear River and is diverted for irrigation 1.25 miles
downstream, about 15 miles above the confluence with the
Feather River. The diversion dam and distribution facilities
originally had a capacity of 380 cfs, but this was increased to
480 cfs in the 2000s. The enlarged capacity enables more
flexible release and diversion operations, so that SSWD can
continue to meet a sufficient part of its irrigation demands
with surface water while also meeting certain obligations to
make reservoir releases for Delta water quality maintenance.
must be adjusted either by putting more water into the
ground or taking less out.
Recent droughts indicate that the Sacramento Valley's
water supplies are vulnerable. Even so, the Sacramento
Valley has a number of dramatic groundwater manage-
ment successes, several summarized below. More de-
tails on these successful programs are provided in the
Technical Supplement. While representing a relatively
small percentage of the land area of the Sacramento
Valley overlying groundwater aquifers, they provide im-
portant examples of how long-term problems with de-
clining groundwater levels were successfully addressed.
These successes are a credit to local water resource
managers, and share the common feature that recovery
and maintenance of groundwater systems has been
accomplished through conjunctive management with
surface water supplies. It is essential to note that every
subregion within the Sacramento Valley is different
from a number of standpoints — hydrogeology, access
to surface water, water infrastructure, soils suitable for
irrigation, urban development and water management
institutions — such that successful solutions at the sub -
regional level need to account for local conditions.
With the delivery of surface water beginning in 1964,
groundwater pumping decreased and groundwater levels
immediately began recovering. On average, enough surface
water has been delivered such that groundwater levels have
recovered and appear to have stabilized more or less at pre -de-
velopment levels. This pattern of steady decline before 1964
and recovery afterward is illustrated by the groundwater well
hydrograph shown in Figure S.
PAGE 10 1 SACRAMENTO VALLEY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
Groundwater Well Showing Recovery of
Groundwater Levels with Increased Surface
Water Deliveries Beginning in 1964
so
xeroiNe:
61q 9.1
8
aeunaw rl.v.la
46
sM'
ea
26
-16
cenaMe,�e ame
M
26
19a
1.456 19W 1616 19Cr 1996. `.% 2667
Y r
Figure 8.
Water Levels in�a South Sutter Water District
PAGE 10 1 SACRAMENTO VALLEY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
Groundwater Well Showing Recovery of
Groundwater Levels with Increased Surface
Water Deliveries Beginning in 1964
Yuba County Water Agency
The Agency's early achievement was construction of New
Bullards Bar Dam and Reservoir, completed in 1970, to reduce
Yuba River peak flood flows and store water for beneficial use.
Funding limitations delayed the construction of distribution
facilities to deliver surface water to areas that had groundwater
levels that had declined dramatically since the early 1940s. In
1983 water deliveries to a portion of the Agency's service area
began and the immediate recovery of the groundwater basin
commenced,
Figure 9 shows the dramatic recovery of groundwater levels
due to surface water deliveries from this project. Because of the
replenishment of the basin, which today is near pre -pumping
levels notseen over the last 100 years, this important subregion
of the Sacramento Valley has restored its groundwater condi-
tions to sustainable levels. Separate Agency programs have
also promoted environmental stewardship. Finally, farmers in
the Agency's service area have implemented a conjunctive use
program that provides groundwater substitution transfers to
water short areas of California, including transfers to south -of -
Delta water users.
Figure 9, Water Levels in Typical South Yuba Subbasin
Groundwater Well
Yolo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
The District serves surface water supplies to irrigated lands in
western Yolo County. These supplies supplement groundwater
use throughout the region. Prior to 1977, groundwater levels
had been steadily declining throughout most of the District's
service area. In 1977 the District completed construction of
Indian Valley Reservoir in the Cache Creek watershed. This sur-
face storage has added an annual average of 80,000 acre-feet
to the District's historic surface water supplies from Clear Lake.
Since Indian Valley Reservoir began operations, groundwater
levels have steadily recovered, due to the increased in -lieu
recharge made possible by the increased surface water supply.
The recovery of groundwater levels was made possible by a
combination of delivery of additional surface water to farmers
who would otherwise pump groundwater, together with the
direct recharge of surface water in the District's unlined ca-
nals. In an average year, more than 25 percent of the surface
water diverted from Cache Creek for irrigation goes directly
to groundwater recharge. Figure 10 shows the recovery of
groundwater levels since Indian Valley Reservoir began oper-
ation.
The District recognizes that adequate management warrants
the development of reliable monitoring data. The District mea-
sures almost four hundred wells per year: once in the spring
before the irrigation season, and then again in the fall after the
irrigation season is finished. This monitoring program has been
in place for over fifty years and serves as a valuable continuous
record of groundwater level through multiple cycles of drought
and high water years. This data has all been put into an elec-
tronic database that is accessible to the public. The District
participates in a multi -agency Yolo County -wide subsidence
monitoring program that serves as an early warning of potential
problems with the groundwater aquifer's ability to store water.
Facilities alone are not enough. The District has initiated a
number of policies, programs and tools to enhance its ability to
conjunctively manage groundwater and surface water supplies
for the benefit of its customers. In 2007 the District initiated a
pump -incentive program, which links the District's water deliv-
ery system with the region's privately managed well network
in such a way as to maximize the effectiveness of both systems.
More recently, the District adopted a water rate structure that
encourages surface water use in wet years and groundwater
use in dry years, while helping to stabilize the District's surface
water sales revenues through wet and dry cycles. Finally, the
District commissioned and maintains an integrated hydrologic
computer model of its surface and groundwater systems that
enables evaluation of possible future changes in water sup-
plies, cropping patterns, irrigation practices and other factors.
69
—'
I Gr9untlwaNr UsaO ly;
I sl.adnr GacOmng�
..-_ ___
j
—-crsu�(avurert� '
e9
lnaian Valby Reserv91r C9mPlaretl;
I - ----
49
�
e
8urta9elVyarer Geiiyerea
so19gMM18uInL
�
Grounawner Levare
easeYdraa�neraaAlka
_
60
'ENvatlona
I
40
- 10
2a
s
9
9
V
-00
.29
itie7 w Gare:
v`
40
a0
1956 1966 1976 1986 1990
Y«r
s9
-00
1&0 1958 1968 1978 ` 1880 `1098 2008 l
year
Figure 9, Water Levels in Typical South Yuba Subbasin
Groundwater Well
Yolo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
The District serves surface water supplies to irrigated lands in
western Yolo County. These supplies supplement groundwater
use throughout the region. Prior to 1977, groundwater levels
had been steadily declining throughout most of the District's
service area. In 1977 the District completed construction of
Indian Valley Reservoir in the Cache Creek watershed. This sur-
face storage has added an annual average of 80,000 acre-feet
to the District's historic surface water supplies from Clear Lake.
Since Indian Valley Reservoir began operations, groundwater
levels have steadily recovered, due to the increased in -lieu
recharge made possible by the increased surface water supply.
The recovery of groundwater levels was made possible by a
combination of delivery of additional surface water to farmers
who would otherwise pump groundwater, together with the
direct recharge of surface water in the District's unlined ca-
nals. In an average year, more than 25 percent of the surface
water diverted from Cache Creek for irrigation goes directly
to groundwater recharge. Figure 10 shows the recovery of
groundwater levels since Indian Valley Reservoir began oper-
ation.
The District recognizes that adequate management warrants
the development of reliable monitoring data. The District mea-
sures almost four hundred wells per year: once in the spring
before the irrigation season, and then again in the fall after the
irrigation season is finished. This monitoring program has been
in place for over fifty years and serves as a valuable continuous
record of groundwater level through multiple cycles of drought
and high water years. This data has all been put into an elec-
tronic database that is accessible to the public. The District
participates in a multi -agency Yolo County -wide subsidence
monitoring program that serves as an early warning of potential
problems with the groundwater aquifer's ability to store water.
Facilities alone are not enough. The District has initiated a
number of policies, programs and tools to enhance its ability to
conjunctively manage groundwater and surface water supplies
for the benefit of its customers. In 2007 the District initiated a
pump -incentive program, which links the District's water deliv-
ery system with the region's privately managed well network
in such a way as to maximize the effectiveness of both systems.
More recently, the District adopted a water rate structure that
encourages surface water use in wet years and groundwater
use in dry years, while helping to stabilize the District's surface
water sales revenues through wet and dry cycles. Finally, the
District commissioned and maintains an integrated hydrologic
computer model of its surface and groundwater systems that
enables evaluation of possible future changes in water sup-
plies, cropping patterns, irrigation practices and other factors.
_1A4A.to_fABI
—'
I Gr9untlwaNr UsaO ly;
I sl.adnr GacOmng�
..-_ ___
j
—-crsu�(avurert� '
lnaian Valby Reserv91r C9mPlaretl;
I - ----
49
�
— — r—.
_
8urta9elVyarer Geiiyerea
so19gMM18uInL
�
Grounawner Levare
easeYdraa�neraaAlka
_
60
'ENvatlona
I
Figure 9, Water Levels in Typical South Yuba Subbasin
Groundwater Well
Yolo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
The District serves surface water supplies to irrigated lands in
western Yolo County. These supplies supplement groundwater
use throughout the region. Prior to 1977, groundwater levels
had been steadily declining throughout most of the District's
service area. In 1977 the District completed construction of
Indian Valley Reservoir in the Cache Creek watershed. This sur-
face storage has added an annual average of 80,000 acre-feet
to the District's historic surface water supplies from Clear Lake.
Since Indian Valley Reservoir began operations, groundwater
levels have steadily recovered, due to the increased in -lieu
recharge made possible by the increased surface water supply.
The recovery of groundwater levels was made possible by a
combination of delivery of additional surface water to farmers
who would otherwise pump groundwater, together with the
direct recharge of surface water in the District's unlined ca-
nals. In an average year, more than 25 percent of the surface
water diverted from Cache Creek for irrigation goes directly
to groundwater recharge. Figure 10 shows the recovery of
groundwater levels since Indian Valley Reservoir began oper-
ation.
The District recognizes that adequate management warrants
the development of reliable monitoring data. The District mea-
sures almost four hundred wells per year: once in the spring
before the irrigation season, and then again in the fall after the
irrigation season is finished. This monitoring program has been
in place for over fifty years and serves as a valuable continuous
record of groundwater level through multiple cycles of drought
and high water years. This data has all been put into an elec-
tronic database that is accessible to the public. The District
participates in a multi -agency Yolo County -wide subsidence
monitoring program that serves as an early warning of potential
problems with the groundwater aquifer's ability to store water.
Facilities alone are not enough. The District has initiated a
number of policies, programs and tools to enhance its ability to
conjunctively manage groundwater and surface water supplies
for the benefit of its customers. In 2007 the District initiated a
pump -incentive program, which links the District's water deliv-
ery system with the region's privately managed well network
in such a way as to maximize the effectiveness of both systems.
More recently, the District adopted a water rate structure that
encourages surface water use in wet years and groundwater
use in dry years, while helping to stabilize the District's surface
water sales revenues through wet and dry cycles. Finally, the
District commissioned and maintains an integrated hydrologic
computer model of its surface and groundwater systems that
enables evaluation of possible future changes in water sup-
plies, cropping patterns, irrigation practices and other factors.
18$6191916:
Groundwater Use Only;
0
—'
lnaian Valby Reserv91r C9mPlaretl;
I - ----
49
—0 l 9 Gam-
vo
uaa6 I
_
60
vlt20
- 10
s
9
V
-00
.29
a0
1956 1966 1976 1986 1990
Y«r
18$6191916:
Groundwater Use Only;
'.
—'
lnaian Valby Reserv91r C9mPlaretl;
I - ----
KeSovary`ana-8G5tlY �dwdter
uaa6 I
Figure l0. Water Levels in Yolo County Well Showing
Recovery of Groundwater Levels
Northern California Water Association I PAGE 11
Northern Sacramento County
I n April 2000, some 40 stakeholder interests (urban water pur-
veyors, environmental groups and business interests) entered
into the Water Forum Agreement (WFA). The WFA is a nation-
ally recognized collaborative process that resulted in a plan to
provide a safe and reliable water supply for planned growth
in the region to 2030 and preserving the environment of the
lower American River. Urban water purveyors were concerned
about how they could meet their long-term water needs.
Environmental conditions (in particular, flow and temperature)
were problematic for a number of fish species including the
endangered fall -run Chinook salmon and steelhead. While
the WFA required nearly seven years of careful negotiation to
complete, it resolved several decades of conflict concerning
water supply and the environment.
The WFA has seven required implementation elements. One
of those is effective groundwater management. In particular,
a sustainable groundwater basin was needed for dry years, so
that urban water suppliers could reduce their surface water
to Water Management Actions (well
located near main cone of depression,
north of former McClellan Air Force Base.
Data from DWR's Water Data Library at
waterca gov/watgrdatallbruyJ
diversions to provide additional water for the environmental
resources on the lower American River.
The water purveyors that eventually signed the WFA agreed
in 1998 to form the Sacramento Groundwater Authority
(SGA), created "...for the purposes of protecting, preserving,
and enhancing, for current and future beneficial uses, the
groundwater resources in the North Area Groundwater Basin,
in Sacramento County, north of the American River..." (SGA
Groundwater Management Plan available at soah2o.ora>. The
SGA was formed under a joint powers agreement (JPA), with
a governing board of directors with representatives of the
JPA members and other water users within their jurisdiction.
The SGA developed an initial groundwater management plan
(GMP) in 2003, setting forth management objectives for man-
aging the groundwater basin. The SGA agreed that it would
conduct a comprehensive review and update of its GMP every
five years, with a revised GMP adopted in December 2008. A
third GMP revision is currently in progress.
The SGA has made remarkable accomplishments in the
15 years since it was formed. Conjunctive use of surface
and ground water has been promoted, as has the banking
of water to meet future needs. An early SGA activity was
to facilitate an exchange of previously -banked water to the
State's Environmental Water Account to aid in environmental
protection downstream in the Delta, which proved the viability
of such exchanges from the region. In 2010, SGA adopted a
Water Accounting Framework, which established policies and
procedures to promote greater conjunctive use in the region.
Overall, groundwater levels in the basin have reversed a sig-
nificant downward historical trend (as noted in the long-term
hydrograph shown in Figure 11) through the actions of SGA
members to construct facilities to shift to more surface water
supply in wetter years to achieve in -lieu groundwater recharge.
Through its many management actions, SGA has put in place
the institutional and technical means to accomplish long-term
sustainable management of its groundwater basin.
PAGE 12 1 SACRAMENTO VALLEY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
Effects of Increasing Use of
Groundwater
WIDELY HELD PERCEPTION based on histor- how much of this is due to the ongoing drought and the
ical observations is that Sacramento Valley resulting decrease in surface water supplies. These are
groundwater is drawn down seasonally due to typically areas near the edges of Valley that have been
irrigation pumping, but generally recovers each year. developed for irrigation and are completely or predom-
On an annual basis, groundwater pumping and other inantly dependent on groundwater as a supply source
groundwater discharges are matched by groundwater (see Figures 14 and 15 presented later in this section).
recharge from deep percolation of applied water and 'These downward trends are exacerbated by the current
precipitation, leakage from canals and streams, and oth- drought.
er recharge sources. However, in recent years, ground- Groundwater is not a distinct water supply source;
water level monitoring performed by DWR reveals that rather, it originates as surface water. In the same way
groundwater levels in some areas of the Sacramento that natural lakes store surface water, groundwater is
Valley do not fully recover, although it is not yet known simply the accumulation over time of surface water
GAINING STREAM
Flow direction
y
--
- nsatura-�?gTzon__
Water table
Shallowaquifer
quifer /
Gaining streams receive water from the ,groundwater
system.
LOSING STREAM
Flow direction
�w
Water table---------Unsaturate j
.-- ✓ 8 Skzone----- -
Losing streams lose water to the groundwater system.
DISCONNECTED STREAM
Flow direction
r w
Unsaturated
zone Water table
- - -----_--1----------
Disconnected streams are separated from the ground
water system by an unsaturated zone. For disconnect-
ed streams, losses are independent of the groundwater
level.
BANK STORAGE
Flow direction .rw •may
atertable at '
y high stage
Hi h sta e ;
—r=--- sc
-------- - ---
ring tabl Bank storage j
during base?low
If stream levels ride higher than adjacent groundwater
levels, stream water moves into the streambanks as
bank storage.
Figure 12. Conceptual Diagram, Groundwater/Surface Water Interactions
Northern California Water Association I PAGE 13
that has seeped into the ground by the force of gravi-
ty. The typical types of interactions between surface
and groundwater systems are illustrated in Figure 12.
Streams interact with groundwater in two basic ways:
streams gain water from inflow of groundwater through
the streambed (gaining stream) or they lose water to
groundwater by leakage through the streambed (losing
stream). If a stream is connected to the groundwater
system (it is in physical contact with the groundwater
system), the rates of flow gains and losses depend on
the stage of the stream, the groundwater level, and the
streambed permeability. If the stream is disconnected
from the groundwater system (the stream is separated
from the groundwater system by an unsaturated zone),
the stream loss is dependent on streambed permeability
only and not on the groundwater level. As stream levels
rise above groundwater levels, such as during rainfall
events, water is put into bank storage, which might flow
back into the stream when stream levels recede. Typ-
ically, the pattern of stream gains and losses changes
with time depending on hydrologic conditions and
location, with most streams gaining in some reaches
and losing in others at any given time.
When surface water and groundwater systems
are connected, any change in one inevitably affects
the other. In particular, fundamental physics tell us
that the lowering of groundwater levels attendant to
groundwater pumping leads to depletion of streamflow
and groundwater storage (as well as potential induced
groundwater recharge). Depending on when stream -
flow depletion occurs, it can potentially reduce supplies
for human and environmental surface water uses. The
interactions between groundwater and
streams in the Sacramento Valley are highly
complex, but these fundamental relation-
ships are undeniable. In the Sacramento
Valley (and all hydrologically similar sys-
tems), all groundwater pumping ultimately
comes from streams, preceded by reduction
of water stored in the aquifer system. These
relationships are accounted for in DWWs
C2VSim model, which indicates that Sac-
ramento Valley stream accretions (taking
the Sacramento Valley as a whole, but not
accounting for regional differences) from
groundwater gradually declined from an
average of about t MAP per year in the 19205
to -0.4 MAP per year in the 2000s (Figure 13).
The stream system went from net gaining to
net losing between the 19gos and t99os.
An adequate understanding of the complex and
dynamic interactions between groundwater and
surface water is essential for effective water resource
management, both to achieve sustainable development
of water resources, and to avoid unintended environ-
mental harm. It is essential to recognize the interaction
between the two systems and how management actions
applied to one system will affect the other. However,
this complexity also represents opportunity because a
connected system has the greater range of management
options. In contrast, disconnected systems are simple
because there are no groundwater management options
that affect stream flow so long as groundwater levels
stay below the threshold that reconnects the system.
Management of connected surface and groundwater
systems is challenging for several reasons. First, the
duration of streamflow depletions caused by pumping
depends on the spatial scale: in general (depending on
soil conditions and strata) the greater the distance or
depth between groundwater pumping and an affected
stream, the lower the magnitude but the longer the
timescale of depletions. As a consequence, the ulti-
mate effects of pumping can occur significantly after
pumping starts, or even after pumping has ceased. The
timescales involved in aquifer responses to pumping
and other stresses can be on the order of decades,
making it difficult to associate cause with effect. As
such, monitoring must account for this lag in impacts.
In general, the longer the timeframe for effects to be
observed at a given monitoring point once they become
evident, the longer those effects will persist, even if the
Streams and Rivers as Simulated by C2VSim
PAGE 14 1 SACRAMENTO VALLEY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
pumping causing the effects is halted immediately.
This means that typical adaptive management ap-
proaches (modification of management decisions based
on observed current effects in the aquifer system) will
not necessarily ensure that adverse outcomes will be
avoided. Instead, it may be necessary to anticipate or
forecast management outcomes, using appropriate tools,
which may include documented case studies with simi-
lar characteristics, mathematical
models of the hydrologic system,
and economic forecasting mod-
els utilizing "what -if" scenarios
that account for lagging impacts
to conduct cost -benefit analysis
of water management scenarios.
Included here are two
graphics from DWR that show
recent trends in groundwater
levels. The first figure, Figure
14, is taken from the draft 2013
Update to the California Water
Plan (at the time our report
was prepared, the final 2od3
Update along with final figures
had not been released). This
figure shows the changes in
groundwater levels within the
Sacramento Valley from Spring
2005 to Spring 2010. A number
of areas within the Sacramento
Valley show groundwater levels
declining during this period,
although data is unclear how
much of this was related to dry
conditions and how much asso-
ciated with long-term increases
in groundwater use.
Figure 15 is from the DWR
April 2014 report, Report to the
Governor's Drought Task Force
Groundwater Basins with
Potential Shortages and Gaps in
Groundwater Monitoring. This
figure shows statewide changes
in groundwater levels from
Spring 2oro through Spring
2014. While a figure showing
only the Sacramento Valley is
not available, it is clear from
this figure that groundwater levels in many areas of the
Sacramento Valley have continued to decline during
the ongoing drought.
Finally, there are a number of important unknowns
as to future changes in land and water use. These
include future changes related to market factors, the
hardening of demand for tree and vine crops that may
affect overall water supply reliability during droughts,
Figure 14. Spring 2005 -Spring 2010 Changes in
Groundwater Levels, Sacramento valley
r�.rAST4 '
�a
-.— NydrolCgro region � • �;` Go bvGrvebpmmccnmoBt puunaam,awaam
boundary s e,.� .� "' more rspremn�taadmmre>mppundxma
i lavaem hehueen brommsmmm�peraea. Pmlwa
- CGuntyboundary '� p � manegsaaamngen9m�mda'amrd«aavnipreemre
is z, ,_.. — `z �asp«w innaaaewtleawmtyammrNxlwaY
Central VaAey rPL„y ¢ � oekeen to 6YemmibMepaloda.Im sta>oam
. ... grountlwater nastn ''..`d� .,AY, i :.. rk Auuaeemsamwno mmmreai. eaaanmdmiva
•`fid• d�+'�,..a / i'-� „�•. CASmmGEU MaNm 9Emi5ea nunn9lFum�tlngnmms of
«mom 8 200 "� +-,s .._ to vaasM1aen. RamnmweaneeMee fium
&Piin92D70 f Y' ! nmiAMnauWhM1Mn9aMpt and areenM ma val
a0 Change in v. � kn ng -a'` matmma to ni d a Wuppwpsa�abw
Z groundwater.'' '+ ayuex syslau.aw peamBruhmc:Wimumm�fimd
�� � Y, y`. aquilrwnditlans Grwna+wdwahmeare
u eievegoa (Po .�; .� / remreamaimmmueuslawadny t.whuui
f,�y-w�^���y �.,.,+=/ ! GweeAc Ve@ualON,m 198BM�881
o � wawrq. ?��., .,�:.r R '�f i`" -a � ewwu,�mndreom: xaawad�mamadww
n ,,v - elwadm conmurexe atxma M1yanumAea+amNec
�.; .,� �J�s� z ammag a»wmmamddhtamaama�p
i + a-. w. ,( }� !'� ,r mmimmg.r�a mmMM9xW umrvuabm,Wmgnln '
aWdereon6time mndsudaaempapr�hy and
mt iiii Wu mNbob ch., ii gm nrthaW e n -
�Y's'tx+,,,�+ e'Ny+ .�-10AWp - a a caniwa iha0a1ere9mNwMMw dshaeMhe
`oi inn M�edapPm^^�+. LaW prauna+a�scmaihona _
}GI� a� i-��T� Du4 Gp AraaeWN'n te9�+ndaaWbedn nd
.l ,+ � � s tleearm nC,Aim cmbure
meWint...
9409a;iui"
,, .>j � � � penonb cnmgaln pmnham,aerehpn
! r- p� 1.,� 1,f rri, to m4ednWewseertaz
r,
� s �
N
fi r
a
W�j sa
Y 1
N �}wa
A �
11p=: n �y6 5n1a
Northern California Water Association I PAGE 15
and changes in irrigation efficiency to increase crop
production.
There are a number of important challenges to man-
aging all aspects of the water balance. One is that a
substantial amount of groundwater withdrawals are
outside water district, irrigation district or municipal
boundaries. Such areas, with access only to groundwa-
ter, do not have the institutional capability at present
to work together towards common management goals,
such as are made possible
through groundwater man-
agement plans. Further, the
lack of access of these areas to
surface water, combined with
the physical circumstances of
how groundwater is replenished,
means that the reliability of
their groundwater supplies is
greatly aided by the distribution
of surface water supplies by
adjacent irrigation and water
districts. Comprehensive water
management cannot be fully
realized until water users in
the areas within water districts
and the non -district areas work
together.
A further challenge to more
comprehensive groundwater
management is the lag time in
groundwater responses. As not-
ed earlier, management actions
cannot rely solely on real-time
monitoring. The impacts of
increased groundwater pump-
ing during the current severe
drought might not be fully seen
for many years, particularly as
they may impact flows in the
Valley's rivers and streams. It is
easiest to take action in response
to what can be measured today,
but other credible, technical
tools will be needed to convince
water managers regarding what
actions to be taken now to ad-
dress impacts likely to be seen
in future years. Such tools could
include better predictive model -
Sm Fnndr
sanw cra
ing, coupled with an appropriate level of monitoring
support.
The management challenges are great in order to
assure the Sacramento Valley will continue to meet
its sustainability goals. Each of the variables — water
diversions, groundwater recharge and land use — has its
controversies, and there are not yet obvious solutions.
Groundwater Level Chanc
Increase >10 feet
Increase 1010 2.5 feet
Change -A 2.5 feat
I Decrease 2.5 to 10 feat
I Decrease> 10 feet
xL"'a Groundwater Basin
Hydrologic Region Boundary
- - - - County Boundary
-- Major Highway
Major Canal
Figure 1S. Spring 2010—Spring 2014 Statewide
Changes in Groundwater Levels
(Ongoing drought conditions)
F
a Is 20 4o ro ro 1. M
*Groundwater level change determined from water level measurements in wells. Map and chart based on available data
from the DWR Water Data library as of04/15/2014. Document Name: DOTMAP S2010 52014 Updated: 04/21/2014
Data subject to change without notice.
PAGE 16 1 SACRAMENTO VALLEY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
Conclusions
UBSTANTIAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION —
groundwater level monitoring, land use changes,
long-term water use trends - are indicators that
the Sacramento Valley is approaching an important
point in water development and use. We are enjoying
high levels of agricultural production based on an ex-
pansion of irrigated lands, a shift to higher value and
higher water use crops and generally increased crop
yields. All of these factors result in increased water use.
As addressed in the Technical Supplement, much of
the increased water use in recent years has come from
groundwater. In addition, as addressed in more detail
in the Technical Supplement, the increased frequency
of drought and associated decrease in reliable surface
water supplies in the past several decades as compared
to the prior 6o+ years during which most of our water
systems were developed, has put greater pressures on
our groundwater supplies.
Our success stories have been made possible by local
leadership, the development and careful management
of surface water supplies, and critical water delivery
infrastructure. Every success story recognized that
augmentation of water supplies was necessary, and that
active conjunctive management of surface and ground
water supplies was essential. Groundwater management
plans have made an important "down payment" on the
stewardship of our groundwater resources. However,
we remain vulnerable as Sacramento Valley water use
continues to increase and as pressures continue on our
water resources to meet water demands within and
outside the Sacramento Valley.
In addition, there are many differences between the
historically driest year of record in 1977 and current
conditions:
California's population has nearly doubled;
. The Endangered Species Act and other laws
have been implemented in the Bay -Delta for
various fish, placing restraints on water op-
erations and reducing flexibility in meeting
various beneficial purposes;
• California agriculture has evolved, with
changes in cropping patterns and significant
new plantings (particularly in trees), many of
which require water in all years;
• The SWRCB has updated its Bay -Delta Water
Quality Control Plan, which has generally led
to less water available in storage in dry years;
Significant water conservation and efficiency
in urban and agricultural water use through-
out the state has tightened the water system.
This is generally positive, but it also means
that there is much less flexibility in managing
local water supplies in dry years.
We have seen many new water demands since 1977,
malting California - and the Sacramento Valley - more
vulnerable to drought than in the past. Regulatory
changes have also greatly increased the vulnerability to
drought in meeting all water needs. At the same time
we may be facing drought conditions (coupled with
increased water uses) that are potentially more severe
than we have seen in past droughts. This reinforces the
need for a long-term view. Time and time again the
Sacramento Valley has learned the lesson that the range
and frequency of historic conditions (wet and dry) are
not necessarily a predictor of future hydrology. Vul-
nerability of water uses will continue to be influenced
by changes in land use, many driven by economic and
commodity market conditions.
We reach the following conclusions, supported by
additional information in the Technical Supplement:
Our water supplies are under far more stress
than ever before. Groundwater levels have
declined in some areas because increases in
groundwater Ilse, coupled with recent dry con-
ditions, have resulted in greater groundwater
withdrawals than groundwater recharge.
2. The full impact - particularly on stream flow
- of past and current groundwater pumping
from the Sacramento Valley's aquifers may
not be apparent for many years, because of
the large volume of water in storage and the
slow rate of groundwater movement.
Northern California Water Association I PAce 17
3. In areas that rely wholly or predominantly
on groundwater, only a portion of the water
pumped percolates back to the groundwater
system, resulting in net extraction of ground-
water where groundwater pumping (in part due
to recent dry conditions) has exceeded recharge.
4. The Sacramento Valley's surface water and
groundwater systems are coupled in many
locations, meaning that streams are in phys-
ical contact with the groundwater system.
Stream gains and losses at any particular
location and time depend on the stage of
the stream, the groundwater level, and the
streambed permeability. Even small changes
in groundwater levels can affect stream flow
by reducing discharge to streams or by induc-
ing leakage from streams.
Groundwater management plans cover much of
the Sacramento Valley and there are a number
of successful subregional comprehensive water
management programs that have been imple-
mented This has been possible through leader-
ship instituted within existing institutions, with
the exception of the Sacramento area where
there is broad support for a new overall water
management structure for more than a decade
to accomplish broad goals within that subre-
gion. But there is no integration of the more
than 35 individual groundwater management
plans for the Valley as a whole, although these
plans cover 3/ of the lands above our groundwa-
ter aquifers. This points to a potential benefit of
coordinating such plans Valley -wide.
Where does all this lead? The introduction to this short
report asks for engagement in three questions: (t) Can
we arrive at a shared understanding of sustainability for
the Sacramento Valley? (z) Are we close to or at a tipping
point on sustainability of our groundwater resources in
many areas of the Sacramento Valley? and (3) Do we
have adequate technical, institutional and legal tools to
measure the components of sustainability and support
local groundwater management? Assuming water lead-
ers in the Valley come to agreement on a common sus-
tainability vision, the second and third questions lead
to issues that can be objectively addressed. It is clear
and been suggested for years that more comprehensive
monitoring and groundwater modeling is warranted.
These tools would be helpful/valuable to inform decision
makers as to potential future water management actions
needed to have a positive impact on the overall water
balance. But technical tools alone would not be enough.
This short report does not suggest specific actions;
rather it concludes that engagement in the issues raised
by the report is essential to long-term water resources
management within the Valley. We believe that such
engagement should consider the following topics:
Increase data collection, monitoring and
modeling. Increase the frequency of ground-
based land use surveys and investigate options
for remote sensing. Develop groundwater
models to better assess future groundwater
levels and quality.
Improve water management activities. Devel-
op a shared understanding of sustainability
for the Sacramento Valley. This will require
active engagement by surface and ground-
water users as well as local government on
common objectives, and is a region -wide
challenge.
Augment water supplies. Additional storage,
such as the proposed Sites Reservoir, could
add valuable water supplies and water man-
agement operational flexibility. These needs
are particularly important to meet critical
water needs during drought conditions.
Address land use. Long-term sustainability
of the Sacramento Valley's water supplies will
need to account for continuing changes in
land use, where decisions are currently dis-
tributed among cities, counties, local water
district and landowners. While there are no
clear solutions, a frank and open dialogue
regarding future land use is essential. "Busi-
ness as usual" threatens our future.
More information on each of these topics is included in
the Technical Supplement (norcalwaterorg/groundwa-
ter-technicalsup len ment). NCWA intends to continue
its engagement in our water resources future. Updated
information across all water resources topics can be
found on the NCWA web site: norcalwatecore.
PAGE 18 1 SACRAMENTO VALLEY GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
References
Brush, C. F. et al. 2013. Development and Calibration of the California Central Valley Groundwater -Surface
Water Simulation Model (C2VSim) Version 3.02 -CG. California Department of Water Resources.
Sacramento, CA.
California Department of Water Resources (DWR) 2oo7. California Central Valley Unimpaired Flow
Data, Fourth Edition, Draft.
DWR 2014. C2VSim: California Central Valley Groundwater -Surface Water Simulation Model. Accessed at:
baydeltaoffice water ca.gov/modeling/-hydrology/C2VSim/index C2VSIM cfm.
Davids Engineering, Inc. (DF,) 2014. Changing Sacramento Valley Land and Water Use. Presentation to
the Northern California Water Association (NCWA) Annual Meeting, March 14, 2014, Chico, California.
Olmstead, A. L. and Rhode, P. W. 1997. The Evolution of California Agriculture, Overview of the History
of California.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) 2003. Private Water Districts of California, 1:24,000 Scale. ESRI
shapefile. USBR Mid -Pacific Region MPGIS Service Center, Sacramento, California. Accessed at www.
at as ca gov/download htmlu/casil/boundaries.
USBR zoo9. Federal Water Contractors - Mid -Pacific. ESRI personal geodatabase. USBR Mid -Pacific
Region MPGIS Service Center, Sacramento, California. Accessed at www.atlas.ca.govldownload.html#/
casil/boundaries.
West Yost Associates 2014. Northern Sacramento Valley Integrated Water Management Plan, Chapter i -
Governance and Region Description. 2014. Accessed at: www.nsvwaterplan.0rg.
Special thanks to the California Department of Water Resources for Figures 7,14 and 15. These figures came
from the Draft 2013 Update to the California Water Plan, as well as the April 2014 special report to the
Governor's Drought Task Force.
Northern California t Association
Please pass this report along or recycle it again.
455 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 335
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
(916) 442-8333
WWW.NORCALWATER.ORG
Northern California Water Association I PAGE 19
Rice is grown on dense clay soil which
prevents seepage and ensures water is
available for reuse downstream