Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Water Commission Agenda Packet for January 2018
Menchaca, Clarissa From: BCWater Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 10:56 AM: To: BCWater Subject: Water Commission Agenda Packet for January 2,018 The following are available on the Butte County Water and Resource Conservation website: Water Commission Agenda Water Commission Packet Correspondence WaterSol'utions Newsletter You can access the documents by clicking on the corresponding hyperlink. If you are unable to access the information please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Butte-aunty Water and Resource Conservation Administrative Analyst,Associate 308 Nelson Ave.,Oroville,CA 95965, Office:530.552.3594,Fax:530.538,3807 "COUNTY OF BUTTE E-MAIL DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain private,confidential,and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review,copying,or distribution of this e-mail(or any attachments thereto)by other than the County of Butte or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are NOT the intended recipient,please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto. WATER AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION 308 Nelson Avenue,Oroville,CA 95965 Telephone:(530)538-4343 Fax:(530)538-3807 www.buttecouniy.net/waterandresource Butte County bcwater@buttecounty.net Paul Gosselin,Director NYSfF.B f�&$GUR�'CQMS�MA'tK1N December 27, 2017 TO: Butte County Water Commission FROM: Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation SUBJECT: Meeting Agenda Date: January 3, 2018 Time: 1:30 p.m. Place: 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 AGENDA ITEMS 1) Roll call. 2) *Approval of minutes for the November I, 2017 meeting. (Chair Skinner) 3) Election of Chair and Vice Chair. (Chair Skinner) 4) Public members wishing to address the Commission on items not listed on the agenda. (The Water Commission is prohibited by State law from taking action on any item presented if it is not listed on the agenda. Comments will be limited to five minutes per person) 5) Presentation on the Evaluation of Restoration and Recharge Potential within the Groundwater Basins of Butte County Project. (Mark Williamson, GEI and Byron Clark, Davids Engineering). 6) Update on activities associated with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). (Water and Resource Conservation staff) a. Update on Groundwater Sustainability Plan development and governance. b. Update regarding the Groundwater Pumpers Advisory Committee (GPAC). c. Update on the outreach strategy to private well users. 7) *Update on the proposed North of Delta Storage Project(Sites Reservoir). (Paul Gosselin, Water and Resource Conservation) 1 8) Update on the activities of the Northern Sacramento Valley Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Board (NSV Board) comprised of representatives of the Counties of Butte, Colusa, Glenn, Tehama, Sutter and Shasta. (Christina Buck, Water and Resource Conservation) 9) Reports from Water Commissioners and staff on issues of interest. a. Report on Water Advisory Committee, Technical Advisory Committee and general groundwater issues. (Christina Buck, Water and Resource Conservation) b. Update on Delta Issues. (Paul Gosselin, Water and Resource Conservation) c. Report on water related activities of the Board of Supervisors. (Paul Gosselin, Water and Resource Conservation) d. Other issues. 10) Future meeting dates and locations: February 7, 2018 Board of Supervisors Chambers 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 96965 l l) Commissioners wishing to address items not listed on the agenda. (The Water Commission is prohibited by state law from taking action on any item presented if it is not listed on the agenda) 12) *Communications received and referred. (Copies of all communications are available in the Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation, 308 Nelson Avenue, Oroville, California) 13)Adjournment. *Materials attached cc: Water Commission Mailing List Window Posting 2 WATER AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION 308 Nelson Avenue,Oroville,CA 95965 - Telephone: (530)538-4343 Fax:(530)538-3807 www.buttecounty.net/waterandresource bewater@butLecoun!y.net Paul Gosselin,Director WATEk 8 afstauf�CCMSE44'WVIOW December 27, 2017 TO: Butte County Water Commission FROM: Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation SUBJECT: Meeting Agenda Date: January 3,2018 Time: 1:30 p.m. Place: 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 AGENDA ITEMS 1) Roll call. 2) *Approval of minutes for the November 1, 2017 meeting. (Chair Skinner) 3) Election of Chair and Vice Chair. (Chair Skinner) 4) Public members wishing to address the Commission on items not listed on the agenda. (The Water Commission is prohibited by State law from taking action on any item presented if it is not listed on the agenda. Comments will be limited to five minutes per person) 5) Presentation on the Evaluation of Restoration and Recharge Potential within the Groundwater Basins of Butte County Project. (Mark Williamson, GE1 and Byron Clark, Davids Engineering). 6) Update on activities associated with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). (Water and Resource Conservation staff) a. Update on Groundwater Sustainability Plan development and governance. b. Update regarding the Groundwater Pumpers Advisory Committee (GPAC). c. Update on the outreach strategy to private well users. 7) *Update on the proposed North of Delta Storage Project(Sites Reservoir). (Paul Gosselin, Water and Resource Conservation) 1 8) Update on the activities of the Northern Sacramento Valley Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Board (NSV Board)comprised of representatives of the Counties of Butte, Colusa, Glenn, Tehama, Sutter and Shasta. (Christina Buck, Water and Resource Conservation) 9) Reports from Water Commissioners and staff on issues of interest. a. Report on Water Advisory Committee, Technical Advisory Committee and general groundwater issues. (Christina Buck, Water and Resource Conservation) b. Update on Delta Issues. (Paul Gosselin, Water and Resource Conservation) c. Report on water related activities of the Board of Supervisors. (Paul Gosselin, Water and Resource Conservation) d. Other issues. 10) Future meeting dates and locations: February 7, 2018 Board of Supervisors Chambers 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 96965 11)Commissioners wishing to address items not listed on the agenda. (The Water Commission is prohibited by state law from taking action on any item presented if it is not listed on the agenda) 12) *Communications received and referred. (Copies of all communications are available in the Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation, 308 Nelson Avenue, Oroville, California) 13) Adjournment. *Materials attached cc: Water Commission Mailing List Window Posting 2 Agenda Item #2 MINUTES OF THE BUTTE COUNTY WATER COMMISSION November 1, 2017 Board of Supervisors Chambers 25 County Center Drive OrovilIe, CA 95965 1. Roll call. Commissioners present: Commissioners Chance, Grover, Jones, Kimmelshue, Roethler, Skinner, Tennis & Washington. Commissioners absent: Commissioner Schohr. 2. Approval of minutes for the October 4, 2017 meeting. Motion by Commissioner Kimmelshue, second by Commissioner Chance to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried 8-0 with no abstentions. 3. Public members wishing to address the Commission on items not listed on the agenda. None. 4. Update on activities associated with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). a. Update on Groundwater Sustainability Plan development and governance. Information only, no action. b. Update regarding the Groundwater Pumpers Advisory Committee(GPAC), which is advisory to the Board of Supervisors and staff regarding SGMA. Information only, no action. 5. Discussion and possible recommendation to appoint a subcommittee to assist in the development of a strategy to provide outreach to private well users. John Scott addressed the Commission. Paul Behr addressed the Commission. Information only, no action. 6. *Discussion and possible recommendation on the 2018 Butte County State and Federal Legislative Platform. (Paul Gosselin, Water and Resource Conservation) John Scott addressed the Commission. Information only. A motion was made by Tennis to recommend that the Board of Supervisors add support of Sites Reservoir to the legislative platform. The motion failed for a lack of a second. 7. Update on the activities of the Northern Sacramento Valley Integrated Regional Water Management PIan Board (NSV Board) comprised of representatives of the Counties of Butte, Colusa, Glenn, Tehama, Sutter and Shasta. Information only, no action. 8. Reports from Water Commissioners and staff on issues of interest. a. Report on Water Advisory Committee, Technical Advisory Committee and general groundwater issues. Information only, no action. b. *Update on Delta Issues. Information only, no action. c. Report on water related activities of the Board of Supervisors. Information only, no action. d. Other issues. None. 9. Future meeting dates and locations: December 6, 2017, 1:30 pm Board of Supervisors Chambers 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 10. Commissioners wishing to address items not listed on the agenda. Commissioner Tennis addressed the Commission. 11. *Communications received and referred. Information only, no action. 12. Adjournment. Agenda Item #7 August 14,2017 Sites is an innovative, environmentally sound solution to California's toughest water challenges. O)JO Sites With broad statewide support, the Sites Project fulfills the SITES PROJECT.ORG clear Proposition 1 mandate from the People of California, who overwhelmingly said the state needs public benefits from new water storage. Sites Project CaliforniaThis document summarizes how the Sites Project Authority (Authority) has addressed the • •n's requirements of - Water Storage investment Program (WSIP), to provide water supply and eligible public benefits. The Sites Project will make California's water system more efficient, flexible The Sites and reliable, which will provide Ibcal, statewide and national benefits.' The project: • Hells achieve tl�e objectives of the California V�later Action Plan • Reflects file innovative CapproC�ch r�iandated by the pe�nple qF Califgrnia under Propositson 1 • Provides a substantial sullly of I�igh-quality water to suplort the econorrty , and e,�hance the environrnenk, particularly 'in the face of cliii�ake chanq� • Better captures. skores and ��rovides waken For fhe'environment, the economy and quality of life for families, farms and businesses • Is beim developed in accordance with the beneficiary_pays-principle Project offers the State of •rnia a significant supplyof • improve conditions for • and smelt and to comply with the will of • voters. The Sites Reservoir Drio3�inglh?ager lrricjation Clin?ateChcingFResiliency EnhancedV?aterQcrality Delivers about 441,000 acre- feet The time is NOW Califomi�'s�+rater system For... J.,.�,.� `� \err R¢�cr�atipnal flood hi3a�clerrrent ,...,,,y:ac;...,r�:ri:°_ix;e^ts �tene;:ahlc Entry, oPAprE.uuii�s fal€'fla:vs for;:al•non in ex�s;n.c�res?rvpir5 laFer to tf}=Yo€o,ByE��s's to antl n�anagecl:vetiar,ds i�prlh incl into the sirn;mer n�pnths in f)ene€it Smell south of the Dei[� imE�row�ccattiilions fpr saln�On _ ._ T _ to implement •• • and strategic water storage options, • •- environment,to capture and deliver water for use where and when it's needed most for the - and businesses. By investing in Sites, the California Water Commission has a unique opportunity to invest in the ecological health of the Sacramento River and Sacramento- San Joaquin delta (Delta) and fulfill the will of California Voters. Sites Works for California and Goes Above and Beyond California Water Commission Scoring Criteria in Four Essential Ways Plublic Benefit to Cost Pat, alld Sites is Cost Effective r Project Benefits proposition t-Eligiblo Benefits J k $317 Million 5122 Million Shasta Lake a- e fal I flows for salmon I Sacrame to River `ruoN Reservoir Capacity Ecosystem Benefits �• r - _ 1.82 MAF 0.71 MAF ater in existing reservoirs : . _ °_..�-1..._.into tile surnmer months to . ° ;� eatce Oravllf_espawning and rearing ...__.._J improve conditions for VAIMOn Sites 1 # Folsom Lake; O 0 Yolo Bypassto the Yolo Bypass to -' -N\ _ i ..� \ g Environmental benefit smalL ■water Supply e !Recreato/Fo otl� Damage Reduction forrOugesnorthand south of the Delta Learn more about the project's ecosystem benefits an page I\ r S Sites provides t;ubstant�al Sijcn� The projec,inClki(IC-s several critical (h,�changing needs of the The proj�,ct r1leets 11L,CL)1;fOI'11i,1 environmental enhancements Sacram'entG watershed and II Delta, ant�dlxlted future Z�ill;lte cc )od environmental feasibility. Em,lonwenzal Viluv-,on i),19c 15. 0111 P 17. Fc,sibilitv Report independently validitcs Sites is a critical surface storage project that combines the Why Sites? public benefits of water storage with the ecosystem benefits of increased environmental flows in the Sacramento River. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Overview California has grappled with serious water supply to invest in the Sites Project,which would strengthen reliability and ecosystem challenges for decades.Voters and enhance the state's investment,The federal level overwhelmingly approved Proposition 1 in anticipation of of participation will only be determined after the more frequent drought conditions,a smaller snowpack, Authority has received a decision on the Water heavier rain and flashier storms,aging water infrastructure Commission's level of investment, and declining ecosystem conditions.The Sites Project offers the best opportunity for meeting the will of the Projected Net Shasta Storage and Juvenile Salmon Production voters by providing a reliable source of high-quality water to benefit the ecosystem and provide needed ani water storage. The Sites Project Authority(Authority)proposes to S5� 33% provide the state with 710,000 acre-feet(40%)of the usable capacity in Sites Reservoir for ecosystem n benefits.When this water is managed according to 5• California Water Commission requirements,the resulting "` 7% long-terra annualized water deliveries would provide: M xmo xara u vems rrsr.x in 5n,�t>SecieMarr kor�le Prop6sed 2030676AVera6e ■ve.cn<+er noesxma,r..M1.,,n�y rwerv:r Cnnx�5irmon e Chinook Salmon 190,000 125,000 Saes Project Authority Delta Smelt 29,000 39.000 Sites is being developed by several Northern California Level Refuge Supplies 19,000 33,000 public agencies who are motivated to sustainably build a local water management project that helps the state The proposed operations intentionally provide meet its overall water system needs.The Authority substantial carry-over storage.This produces larger was formed on August 26,2010 and is governed by a ecosystem benefits in dry and critical years. 12-member Board of Directors representing Sacramento Additional benefits for the Water Commission's Valley leadership in government and water management, consideration include: The Authority's Board of Directors is the lead agency • Flexibility:Should future hydrologic and/or working with regional stakeholders and water agencies environmental conditions result in a need to provide statewide to advance the construction of the Sites different benefits than have been assumed in Project.In January 2017,the Authority assumed lead today's Relative Environmental Values(REVS), agency responsibilities for ensuring compliance with state's resource managers could reallocate the the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and water to align with new priorities. is working with Reclamation,the federal lead agency, to ensure compliance with the National Environmental • Partnership:Through an effective partnership Policy Act(NEPA). between the Authority and the state resource agencies managing the state's investment,even greater benefits Together,the Authority,Reclamation and the California Department of Water Resources(DWR)are working in can be achieved. partnership to improve the operation of the state's • Management:The Sites Project is being developed in interdependent water system. accordance with the beneficiary-pays principle,which enables the state to retain management control over Should the state or federal government elect to invest in its investment for the life of the Sites Reservoir. the project's construction,in exchange for acquiring water which they would manage for environmental benefits, • Federal Participation:The Bureau of Reclamation the Authority intends that the appropriate state and/or (Reclamation)has been preparing Studies to advance federal resource agency would become a partner.This the Sites Reservoir.Their congressionally-mandated agency would then have the same or equivalent status as Draft Feasibility Report demonstrates a strong interest the water agencies who participate and fund their share of the project's costs to improve their water supplies. 4 SITES PROJECT go s kavwwns amin:ax3 sasn Ee!os;auaq;JoddnS 0; ((j)(Z)(o)9009 2100) aagwa;das 46nojg1 aunt woj;nmol;;no egaq sap!Aoad pue s;inpe a;la(]aq;;o sasn lep!;auaq ao;;uawa6euew �A�$ o;u!ain;ew Aaq;se uop puao pue g3MOA6 slaws Pala(]OAOjdw!03 ja;em 6u1noadw1 pue galeaq lRD!6olnoa saomos poo;aseasoui o;ssedAg oloA aq;o;ui smog aslnd sap!Aoad 6ulJo;saa40 SOA!;oafgo wJa;-6uol ay;saoueApv 'saue;nq!j;a;la(]ul suos;elndod qsy snowapeue s;!;auaq sa;!S anpewaale;oafoid ou ail;o;paiedwoo ((3)(Z)(o)9009)2100)suola!puoo Aa!lenb uagm All epadsa'suo!;elndod uowles joou!40 saseamt sa;!S jaaem pue wa;SAsoaa ul;uawan0adw!aau sap!AaJd sau!101306 dISM bussn uagm S-t?o;['Z woj;sa6uej oiled s;!;auag ((d)(Z)(o)90091100) ollgnd aql's;!;auaq ollgnd aq;sanIPA a;e3s aqg Moq uodn bu!puadaa (l<ospei ysoo;yauaq)anlInAD aso0 ap!noJp u1 06eao;s w)(Z)(o)9009 2le4S lagwa;daS;o 3y 000'65 pue a;segs a�lej w�a;em;o 3d 000'£8 ;uawanoldwl wa;sAS ja;eM a;e;S 86Paane UP sppe as;em asealaJ o;sa;!S;o u0!;ejado aqa'0£OZ JeaA ul 1K e;la(]aq;g6noaq;a;ej6!w go!gm;o Auew ((a)(Z)(o)9009 2100) '(ealap aqa o;Aje;nq!j;;sa6jel Qq;)aaA!a o;uauumeS aq;ul gsl; a;lap aq;o;saue;nq!a;aq;o;jo wa;sAsooa ' jo;s;!;auaq mol;pue ain;ejadwa;algemseaw Sap!Aoid sa;!S 2118©aqa o;s;uawanoadwl algejnseaw sap!Aoad s;!;auaq ollgnd elgi6!la-f uo!a!sodOJd (£)(v){1)(0)9009 21:0) 1P;O;aq;;o%06<aje saa!S;o s;!;auaq wa;sAsooa;o enleA aq;, %OS<s;gauag waasAsoo3 paz!;auoW ueld;uawa6eueW aa;epr,palekalul 40112A (Z(H)(i)(e)£009:M:)ueld;uawa6euew aalem o;uaweinS aqa u!Alpoud leuo!6aj wia;-6uol a se pay!auap!si sa;!S leuo!6aa pa;ei6aaui ue u!uo!snpui s,;oafotd aql ;soo le;!deo;oafoid le;o;aq;;o (Z(V)(t)(0)9009 2800) %Z£sl saa?S a0;aaegs 6u!pun;dlSM pasodoid aql %OS>asegS;sa3 weJ6oad dISM %os plogsajq;aoue!idwao az!s aq;;aaw;eq; (0)(1)(2)£109 2137)Weld;uawa6eueW siallddns as;em bu!;edp!aied lie ao;sueld pa;;!wgns seq sa;!S ja;eM uegjrl pue lean;lnou6v q;sm;ua;s!suo0 � sjaA!a 0!uaos Ao pl!m pa;eu6!sap aaedw!;ou ll!m;oafoad sa;lS ag., ((b')(Z)(0)9009 2100) JBA18 o!uaoS pue pl!M pa;eu6!sap e;0aJye ION i � ((2)15[6[0M0)uo!spa(];o pio0a2l(]331tl:0002 agl u! �OV pa!;guap!spefoid aeejo;s aoe;ins aq;;o auo s!>;aa[aJd sa;!S 9141 ((g1(v)(l)(0)9009 2100?adA) ;oafoad alq!6!13 Q H (6SL6L 0M0);oafojd sa;!S aqa 01MC10 pue (el(v)(1)(0)9009 8::)adAl;ueo!lddy alq!6113 a6euew'wanoH'umo Il!m A;uoq;nb slamod;u!or y juaWaimbad 'auawanoadwi wa;sAson pue A;!pge!laj Alddns ja)em jo sleo6 lenba-o7 s,e!u.foj!le:) S@A01gDe pue 6u1pun)dISM JOJ sauawaimbaa Ajq q!6!la Ile ya!m sa!!dwoo aoafad sa;!g aqj buipun 1 uog!sod0Jd job Aj!jig1B1I3 SO4!S "Sites Reservoir offers a remarkable opportunity to reoperate California's longest and largest river,the Sacramento.to provide mulGble benefits for fish.farms 90(1 cities in an innovative Manner:Ey partnering with the Sites Project Authority in the development of the • • - • + Reservoir,the State would acCruire tvater"stor,?ge •• • •• capacity and have management control over the . • . !'i?slllf711�releases to ensure erwil'or)!))B!)tal lJelrefrts - •_ -• • •• • • are dchieveCC" - - .•• • 1 - • a • —Senator Dianne Feinstein • • • • ".North and South.tutal incl urinan,Republican ami 0ernocrat.California's leaders agree on one thing:our state needs to invest it?Sites Reser voir to rneet the water supply chattenges of lorlay and the future.Sites provides more water per dollar irwested than any ' ' • • ' • •' ' other proposed project in the state.enough to supply •' millions of Californians for at)entire year, while also creatine environmental benefits and allo=wing smart + recapture and reuse of released from other reservoirs.Investing in Sites will fulfill the will of the 3 %` 67?�of Cahforniaris who supported Proposition 7 funding for water storage infrastructure.and I hope � the California Ei4)ter Commission recoenlzes the projects diverse benefits." 1 -^•Congressman LaMaifa ............... .., .....-.......-..,,... . ... 'Sites Reservoir is one of the most useful.cost-effective water infrastructure projects California could build !t is � �t ., ;. c a�K.• at)ideal projert that car)provide water for aerictrlttu'e. frj1 , 14 urban uses and the environment. Tile support for y I tile Sites Project from a majority of the California Congressional delegation speaks to the statewide J4 benefits of the project." --Congressm3i�Gdr'artten(li "Fns I'vater and e1witolmental managers have been • - • . - forced to operate undera constant regulatory threat. ' •' "' ' + ' Sites Reservoir will pr oxide a critical tool for them • • • '•. - to solve California's toughest water problems • • ' collaboratively and productively." • • '• • ••- -Senator NQIs^n • •. • . _ • . "Sites is an incra(iibly important project for the State of Cali+forrua that n)eets many of the pubic benefits - required by the bvarereon(l." • ' • • '• - —AsseEnbiy�rleEnber Gallagher "6uildine Sites Reservoir is an imperative part of tine solution to help California meet our water supply challenges of today and the future. Tile operational flexibility pro-sided by the unique project offers reliable,long-teem assistance to California's Complex watersystom." —Assemblymember Dahle . 1■ Sites Statewide Project Participation Sites is locally-led in partnership with the state and federal government, and is widely supported by water agencies and stakeholders from across the state. Organization and Amount of Sites Water Requested i Board Members Water Agencies Colusa County Z Colusa County Water District REPRESENTED w Glenn-colusa I"gahon District 4M Water District � Oriand•Arfols water District Cortina Water District Pralta,W Water ® r AUClama[ion DistDriistrict UaVS WneWC,Wnct l0Ct riDunnlgaatrater District REDDING I Western Canal Water Dist LaGrande water Distract WTI As de water District F Glenn County City of American Canyon Maxwell Irrigation District Carter MWC i Placer County Water Garden Highway MWC o ° i Agency 6 Coy of Roseville Tehama{olusa Canal Authority a° Tows lar 5eeranlamP VaYey W.I.Ag"., 173,911 AF PP°° P P • SACRAMENTO■I P Antelope ValloyEast Kern WA a• California Water Service" w a j Castalc Lake Water Agency i w Coachella Valley Water District Z Desert Water Agency SAN FRANCISCON Metropolitan Water District ° CR K Pacific Resources MWC ° < San Bernardino Valley Municipal WD z 3 San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency °z Santa Clara Valley Water District Whee$er Ridge•Maricopa WSD FRESNO 0 Zone 7 Water Agency TatmforHon-SaamrwntaWmu,Ayar I. 230,500 AF •• ,411 Total authar}tad to patticipata as of 7/71/17 a 32 •'Also pray{da}watw to Sxramsnto Vallay comrnuntttes The Tao-teat is being used to Ppttartion the study costs ass 'ate4 ° with praparinp the prupoW for potential stata's particrpatlpn In accordance with Proposition 1.Chapter 8(WSIP) ° Sacramento Valley Hydrologic Region Boundary ° e e LOS ANGELESA ° 0 Water managers from across the state are participating in the planning of Sites Reservoir.The Authority proposes to give the state the first right to up to 710,000 AF of storage e SAN DIEGO capacity to be used to achieve Proposition 3-eligible public benefits.The Authority has established a waiting list from its participants which would be used to finance the project should the state and federal investment level be lower than the 40%proposed. ® EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 Sites Project Facilities Sites is the modern infrastructure upgrade California needs to meet 21st century water challenges O 3h o z l-_ I LEGEND Sufe In Mdn •xcrq c..w r,nvvy v..m nom Erg 777 ea,•ry�e Pa,..,n. V �1 ; re.,rW Hw TPO ap.uw Sb a...�.•A.c.,..,.v„va.., it O 4 _ __ ____________ _________ ------- ---------- ------ 2a _---2a fi O i O 5h O Sites Creates Jobs and will Enhance Region-Wide Economic Growth and Stability As an offstream reservoir,Sites avoids pprox ma environmental impacts to aquatic species Short Term Employment common with in-stream dam construction. Direct Jobs:Construction 115 Sites combines the public benefits of water indirect and Induced Jobs:Construction 390 storage with the ecosystem benefits of Total Direct,Indirect,and Induced Employment 505 increased environmental flows in the Long-Term Employment:Direct Jobs Sacramento River during droughts,when operations and Maintenance 30 water for the environment has the highest value.It ensures cold water is available Recreation 15 during the late summer months to benefit Total Direct Jobs 45 fish.With the construction of Sites Reservoir, Long-Term Employment:Indirect and Induced Jobs the combined storage capacity of large operations and Maintenance 10 reservoirs in the Sacramento Valley Recreation 2 increases by about 15%. Total Long-Term Indirect and Induced Jobs 12 Long-Term Total Direct,Indirect and Induced Employment 57 8 SITES PROJECT go Sites Sites Project Facilities Water managers have long acknowledged that by creating a new source of water and adding. more flexibility in the system,Sites can help California succeed in implementing 21st century water solutions—to meet human AND environmental needs.To achieve this,the project includes the following Facilities: O sites Reservoir O` sites Pumping/Generating Plant Tile 1.8 MAF offstrearn reservoir will require - This fatality wilt have a capacity of 5,900 cubic- two maim clans(Sites and Golden Gate)and feet per second to fill Sites Reservoir.Water nine saddle clams.The resulting reservoir rovers released from tite reservoir;•rill floai in the 14,200 acres.This reservoir will also improve reverse direction through t1)e plartl and venerate local flood protection as witnessed by the seasonal hydropower incl claily pumped-storage Fehmary 18,2017 storm event that flooded part to conlrihute 10 the state's renewable enerciy goals. of Maxwell and temporarily closecl Interstate 5. � 0 Regulating Reservoirs Conveyance Mater from Sites can be delivered throughout muck 2a. Holthouse is an expansion of the existing Funks of California.Releases from Sites include the following: Reservoir.v:hictt provides fIO'N equalization for the Tehama-Colusa Canal,Holthouse Reservoir is sized 5a.The,existing Tehama-Colusa Canal conveys water to allow pump-storage operations to generate from the Red Bluff Diversion to HOlthcnise and renewable energy.Water ertterhtg Holthousedeliver releases from Sites to local users south Reservoir will be pumr)ed into Sins. - - of the reservoir. 2b.The Terimna1 Regulating Reservoir v;ill be 5b.The existing Glern-Colusa Canal convoys water front constructed at the Glean-Colusa Irrigation the Hamilton City Diversior:to the Terminal Regulating District Canal for flow ectualization with flows Reservoir and deliver releases from Sites to local pumped into Holttwuse, users south of the rciervair. 5c.The new 13.5 mile Delcvan Pipeline connects the new O Diversions Sacramento River intake with Holthouse to convey viater in either direction. Water from the Sacramento River will be. diverted for conveyance to SitP.s Reservoir 5ci.To the Colusa Basin Drain and either to the From three locations: Sacramento River or oto lite Yolo Bypass tftroogh Knights Landing Ridgct Cut. 3a. The existing Red Bluff Puinimig Plant will Integrating localinfrastructure reduces costs and divert water and convLey it through tate - - ensures the protect cont;)IeTttent5 the Sacramento Tehe.nta-Colusa Canal Vallev water system. :51).The existing Giertn-Cohisa lrrgatior District Pumping Plant will dwerC water and convey O Recreation Areas it through the G1=^it-Colusa Canal. The project rill rnciucle the constra+ction of tv:o 3r., A ne,v Delevan intake l",intping!Generaling Plant new recreation areas on tate shore of Sites Reservoir v:ill(Evert v)iter into a nor:pipeline that will convey for carnping,pirnicking.hiking,horsehack riding. water into HQIthousc-!Reservoir, boating and fishing,among ocher activities. Both the Glenn-Colusa and Tehama-Colusa dlver5lOnS A separate boat ramp will also be includedt currently wdiix.e stata-ol-the-art fish screens and the Delevan lntake rill include state-of-the-art NO screens O Powerlines to ensure fish friendly drmrsions. Overhead powerlines v:ill coilnect tite three pumping/generating plants loratC(l at:1-101thouse (Sites;,the Terminal Regulating Reservoir,and Delcvan to the slate's electrical grief, Sites Project Operations Sites Reservoir will be filled by diverting excess Diversion of excess Sacramento River flows to Sites Sacramento River flows originating from unregulated Reservoir will only take place when flow monitoring upstream tributaries.Diversions can potentially occur indicates that sufficient bypass flows are present in any month or water year type,but would be greatest in the Sacramento River due to storm event€lows, in the winter months with an emphasis on capturing flows from storm events.If Sites existed during 2017's rainy Sites will capture high, excess runoff spring,and had been completely empty,1.8 million acre-feet(AF)of water could have been stored as of in a future with less snowpack and May 3,2017(DWR). higher temperatures. Approximately 210,000 AF of Sites water will be The Sites Project will operate in cooperation with Central available annually for environmental Valley Project(CVP)and State Water Project(SWP) system facilities to produce a wide range of public and Use a5 a longterm average Supply. ecosystem benefits that can be flexibly managed to adapt to future changes,depending on need and priority.Up to 710,000 AF of capacity supports the storage and then Sites Benefits release of critical water supplies dedicated to to Salmon and Smelt environmental needs. Sites Reservoir will provide water benefits through two Sites Ensures Climate Change Resiliency primary mechanisms:(1)water stored in Sites Reservoir Sites promotes salmon outmigration,enhances can be released directly to the Colusa Basin Drain and habitat,and improves summer/fall water Sacramento River,and(2)water stored in Sites Reservoir temperatures,as well as water volumes and could be exchanged for water stored in Shasta Lake, food for Delta smelt. Folsom Lake,or Lake Oroville and Clair Engle Lake(Trinity). Exchange with Sites Reservoir conserves Shasta Had Sites been operational during the the storage(about 70,000 AF)for Coldwater pool and augments the flow 2017 rainy spring season, an additional to support migrating salmonids, 1.8 million acre-feet of water could have July-November been stored as of May 3, 2017. Sites Reservoir can be used to reduce releases and Releases for Salmon increase storage in other reservoirs with downstreamJuly-November�► Sites o habitat critical to fish,while still meeting requirements m for minimum instream flow objectives,Sacramento River m temperature requirements,and Delta salinity control VJ „ Releases for Smelt assigned to the SWP and CVP.Through this reduction `o Late summer/Fall in releases,storage can be conserved in Trinity Lake, Shasta Lake, Lake Oroville and Folsom Lake to o Yolo L Bypass significantly increase regional and system-wide w cu operational flexibility. Sites provides significant environmental benefits during dry and critical water year types, and especially during Delivers 40.000 AF of water from Sites Reservoir to the Delta extended drought periods, to benefit Yolo Bypass toe drain,which coldwater releases for salmon. This has been shown to enhance the Cache Slough/Delta benefit also applies to Folsom and foodweb for Delta smelt Oroville coldwater pools. 10 SITES PROJECT 49 Sites will be operated to provide a variety of Sites Reservoir water will also be used to supplement environmental benefits that will be managed by existing municipal and agricultural supplies for use in the state to provide water for ecosystem and water the Sacramento Valley and south of the Delta.These quality purposes.This pool of dedicated water will be operations will be conducted in cooperation with CVP managed to improve coldwater conservation storage, and SWP operations, augment river flows during critical periods for fish migration,increase flows through certain watercourses Sites is particularly beneficial during dry and/or facilities(such as the Yolo Bypass),improve water quality and/or enhance habitat restoration.Collectively, and critical years and extended drought the state and the Authority will manage a sizable supply periods, increasing overall water supplies of water to address real-time needs and achieve both despite climate change impacts. intermediate and long-term goals. During droughts,Sacramento Valley reservoir Sites Project Can tribution socombined Shasta,Fat9am and OraviIle Storage in a=tremeiy orYcandltions operations become severely constrained when combined storage levels of Shasta,Folsom and Oroville are reduced to approximately 3 MAF,The addition of Sites Reservoir adds 9100 — x approximately 15%additional storage for the € rars" Sacramento Valley.Using the 2030 WSIP hydrology,when drought conditions occur, Sites Reservoir would provide relief during FM that year for both listed native fish species 100° and for water agencies.Approximately 700,000 acre-feet of the Sites water would a carry over into the next year should drought lRa l9]9 S9St l9kk 193a 5919 ]991 1991 S9]i 199] Nia ]m1 conditions continue. Sites Reservoir Provides Water for Public and Non-Proposition 3-Eligible Public Benefits in All Water Year Types Sites Reservoir Increase in Water Supply 800 700 LL 600 t— 500 'LD a Z3 400 0 300 c ti] 200 c u 100 0 Long-term Dry Critical Long-term Dry Critical average average 2030 Projection 2070 Projection North of Delta South of Delta Ecosystem and Water Quality(Proposition 1-eligible) 4P EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 Ecosystem Improvements K The Authority will partner with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife(CDFW)and State Water Resources Control Board(SWRCB) _ to deliver an annual supply of water that would be directed to meet the highest priority water needs in the state. OThe greatest ecosystem benefit vAll be intoroved temperatures and flows.in the Sacramento River br ',veers Keswick Dam an(l Bend Midge,This portion of the SdCrantCnto River is critical habitat for Cftirtook salmon (Irldudinn the endangered Winter Run)and Steelhead. Water releasee:from Site,;Reservoir will meet existing SWP and CVP obligations to enable additional colClv;ater ? S[orige at Shasta and Oroville at;Uve critical fist hafa;taC. �^c This SLOI'age;:ill provide better temperature control and suppierttentul flows to support fish migration and reduce egg mortality{i.e.redcls). Osites/.,ill allo;v for increased colcfavater poo]storage levels ©and more reliable coErf+•.ater pool storane in existing reservoirs later into the summer months.irnpr'oving . conditions for native fish in several ways: Increased Shasta Lake storage levels prove;in additional coldwaler pool storage in bolo!normal,dry.and critical+^.user-year types. Imp-ovetl%tater temperature suitability in Lake Oroville © ■- for Juvenile steelhead and spring-run Chinook salmon �u��►► over-summer rearing and fail-run Chinook salmon ! Spawning in the!o ver Feather River and auc;mentcd flows in the lover Feather R:ver to minimiz^raid dc,vatcring.juvenile stranding and isolation of anadromaus salmonids. • Additional coldrrater pool storage in Folsom Lake berlefiis luvf^ile stcelitcad surnmer rearing and fail-run Ciunook salmon spawning ht the iot•:er American River. O !it a diSlillCtly UrNglle(-.Cosystem aCUUI).Sites R-SQrVOlr ;':iter!till enhance ecosystem$for hird nopulations roll provide tyre pulse flo:•rs of at le_tst-too a11,1C fee'per utilizing the Pa[ahC Ft;/Way Cluring annual migration periods. second over a two to three::eek period into the Yolo Acirlitionally,up to 50.000 AF of.eater will be provided to P3ypass.These pulses;vitt be adaptively managed by the assist in meeling incremental Leve!4 w ldlife refuc.e:rater needs north and south of the Delta.This wafer will improv e states designated resUurcr agencies to pusft water high in phytoplanktnn and zooptankton dircrtiy into the habitat conditions for a number of Species.includmq giant Cache slough area.lha only pl:tee in the:Della;;here the garter snake,tricolored blackbiid.and migrating.vaterfu.fl. c!ndancgered Delta smelt population IS,increasing.The resulting inLrea5e m Clesirablc food sources should improve Delta 5melZ gross Cn anti populations as they mature 010 adults. Additional Ecosystem Improvements Colusa County and temporarily closed Interstate 5,which (not monetized) is a critical artery for commerce. The Sites Project will provide additional benefits that Emergency Response(not monetized).The Authority have not been monetized due to lack of sufficient, is committed to working with state and federal water tangible data and generally-accepted models that could managers and emergency personnel to provide water to reasonably estimate benefits to specific species.The support emergency events such as,but not limited to, benefits for Chinook Salmon in the Sacramento River firefighting,drought relief and Delta levee failures.Instead watershed between Keswick Dam and Red Bluff(the of dedicating a volume of water that may not be called area captured in SALMOD models)were monetized,but upon by the state until at least a one in ten-year event(or benefits to salmonids in the Feather River and American longer)occurs,the Authority proposes that should water River were not monetized.Coldwater and additional flows from Sites Reservoir be used to aid in responding to or made possible by Sites will also benefit other species recovery from an emergency,that repayment would of fish in the Sacramento River watershed,including occur through a mutually-acceptable exchange or transfer steelhead and sturgeon.Therefore,the net environmental of water.As such,this benefit was not monetized and benefits Sites can provide are even greater than those the Authority is not requesting Proposition t funding provided in the WSIP application criteria. for this purpose. Additional Proposition 1-Eligible Recreation.Two new recreation areas and a boat ramp Public Benefits will be created on the shore of Sites Reservoir.These areas will provide opportunities for boating,camping, Water Quality(Not Monetized).The Sites Project meets hiking and equestrian use and have been monetized. SWRCB water quality priorities by providing improved Sites Reservoir will also improve water levels in existing temperature and groundwater conditions.The project will reservoirs(e.g.Shasta,Oroville and Folsom)to support also provide additional water supply to agencies serving water-based recreational activities,but these benefits disadvantaged communities.These benefits have not have not been monetized. been monetized as water quality benefits.However,the temperature improvements benefit anadromous fish and Additional Considerations are included in our analysis of coldwater pool benefits. Operational Flexibility(not monetized).Sites Reservoir Further,participants in Sites Reservoir are expected can be operated to achieve a wide variety of environmental to use their water to address the undesirable effects and water quality objectives by operating to different by complying with the Sustainable Groundwater strategies or priorities.This application proposes an Management Act(SGMA),but the magnitude of operational strategy that aligns with the Water these improvements is still being defined. Commission's regulations by focusing on specific ecologic Flood.The local area downstream from the project is improvements in the Delta by providing benefits to native prone to floods,including portions of Maxwell,Williams anadromous fish and in-Delta fish species.In the future, and Colusa.Even though these are seasonal streams,the this operational strategy may be changed to reflect new Funks Creek and Stone Corral Creek watersheds are a key or higher priorities. source of flooding during major storms.Construction of Further,Sites reservoir will increase today's storage the Sites and Golden Gate Dams will reduce the frequency capacity in the largest reservoirs in the Sacramento Valley of flooding,reduce river levels to avoid flood events and by 15%.Once the reservoir is operable,the state's water relieve pressure on local levees.Had Sites been operational managers have the ability to operate differently-for during the 2017 spring rainy season,runoff from local both environmental and human uses-knowing there creeks and streams could have been captured and stored, is additional capacity in the system.The ability to reducing high flows,preventing overtopping and avoiding adaptively manage the reservoir releases to achieve flood waters that caused significant economic damage in different benefits and the benefits associated with the increase in system-wide storage capacity have The Sites Project advances California's not been monetized. objectives of restoring ecological health in the Delta and improving water management for beneficial uses. go EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 State's Operational Control(not monetized).The Public Benefit Ratio Using Two Different Authority proposes that the agencies with delegated Benefit Monetization Methods authority to manage the state's investment would also have management control.This would be in the planning The higher range PBRs reflects the high cost and scarcity and also in the day-to-day releases needed to adapt to of feasible major infrastructure development projects to current and forecast conditions. obtain new water supplies.The alternative cost method also does not fully account for potential economies of scale Net Benefits.The resulting ecosystem benefits were benefits that large-scale and multi-purpose storage developed using the Ca1Sim-II model as provided by the projects such as Sites can achieve.Using more conservative Water Commission for use in preparing this application, adjusted WSIP unit benefit values(based on the water This model incorporates environmental,water quality, transfer market)the resulting PBRs are correspondingly and water rights compliance obligations.Further,the lower.Neither of these methods included the non- Authority has added a simulated pulse flow criterion to monetized benefits,some of which are significant, be more protective of migrating juvenile salmonids and a criterion to ensure in-Delta water quality compliancennua • ... requirements are achieved. The benefits presented in this application represent the difference between the Ecosystem Improvement $111 "with project"from the"without project"to reflect the project's net benefits. Water Quality N/A Sites Economic Benefits Recreation $7 Benefit-Cost Ratio:The Sites Project has been evaluated Flood Damage Reduction $4 using two different and independent perspectives in A\ Emergency Response N/A conformity with the Water Commission's WSIP regulations o s and in accordance with Reclamation's federal procedures a required for congressional authorizations.Their resulting Water Supply $175 Benefit-Cost Ratios are 1.52 and 1.72,respectively,which Hydropower S19 are both well above the minimum 1.0 threshold used as the conventional investment decision-making criterion.The Total Monetized Benefit Annually $317 difference is attributable to their different future climate PU BLI BEN EFIT• . . . change scenarios and use of different unit benefit values reflecting different value propositions. Beneficiary-Pays-Principle: Each participant pays their Public Benefit Ratio(PBR):The state's investment in the proportionate cost-share based on their assigned share of Sites Project has been evaluated using two different WISP the reservoir's capacity over the project's life using their regulation approved monetization approaches-the storage.Each participant decides how to use their storage alternative cost method and adjusted WISP provided unit -hold it,release it and/or exchange it-within the benefit values.Each approach was applied to only the parameters established by Agreements,To accomplish this: project's readily monetizable benefits under both"with" and"without"federal participation scenarios.Their The benefits of the Sites Project far corresponding resulting PBRs results are provided in the fallowing figure: outweigh the G05t5. Sites is projected to cost $4.7 billion (2015 dollars), with Range of Public Benefit Ratio Results an estimated $317 million in benefits 1.5 no federal funds 3.2 no federal funds as an annual return on investment. 2.1"IG'leder Break r°ads 4,5 with federal lands Even 17 Continues on page 16 u WUPUMValue I Method drab•WSIP 1.0 rlrh Unit WWe Melh•d, 14 SITES PROJECT 111111111 Relative Environmental Values Benefits delivered by the Sites Project address the Ecosystem and Water Quality Priorities identified by CDFW and the SWRCB.Summary of Priorities: 11>�� 3 Cold water for salmonid eggs and fry Improved temperature downstream at Shasta,Oroville and Folsom Z Provide flow for rearing Additional water from Shasta and Oroville to be released PC:Dpd and Juvenile migration formigrating Juveniles Avoid dewatering redds Release flows from additional storage In Shasta,Orovllle and Folsom and stranding Juveniles to stabilize flows and preserve redds O4 Improve ecosystem water quality Provide colder water temperatures In the Sacramento,Feather and American Rivers ® 5 Improve dissolved oxygen Provides colder water in the Sacramento,Feather and American Rivers and colder water 6 Increase attraction flows during migration Not Included,but operaftns could be reprioritized for this purpose fl� 7 increase Della outflow Not monetized.June to October Delta outflow increased by 496 under 2030 conditions. 8 Maintain or restore groundwater The current groundwater to surface water interconnection will not change with operation of Sites and surface water Interconnection Reservoir 9 Enhance flow regimes for riparian Release of water to the Yolo Bypass wlll Improve riparian habitat-Augmented flows to and floodplain habitat preserve redds will lead to seasonal improvement In floodplain habitat. 10 improve floodpialn Inundation Benefits additional flow to Yolo Bypass 11 Enhance diversity of habitat for fish Enhanced habitat In the Sacramento River,Delta,and wildlife refuges and wildlffa 12 Eliminate barriers to migration As an offstream reservoir.Sites does not create or remove a oarrier to fish migration 13 Remediate inadequately screened diversions State-of-the-art fish screens were previously installed on the Sacramento River at the Tehama-Colusa f1Canal and Glenn-Colusa Canal 14 Provide water to State and Federal Up to 50 TAF/yr to refuges and privately managed wetlands \yam Wildlife Refuges E -Crp 15 Implement invasive species management Not monetized.Mitigation areas will manage/control Invasive species. Habitat for commercial,educational, Enhanced habitat for waterfowl and gamefish(salmon,steelhead,sturgeon) etc.specles Water Quality Priorlties r c Operation of Sites Reservoir with the CVP/SWP In the Sacramento,Feather, JIVt 1 Temperature and American Rivers will Increase the volume of coldwater that can be released to benefit fish 2 Dissolved oxygen Operation of Sites Reservoir does not Improve dissolved oxygen in water bodies deemed to be impaired by the State Water Resources Control Board 3 Nutrients operation of Sites Reservoir does not change the amounts of nitrogen introduced into the waterways 4 Mercury Construction and operation of Sites Reservoir does not change the amount of mercury in the Sacramento,Feather or American Rivers Q Not monetized.If Sites were operable In 2015,benefits could be provided. (f_�J 5 Salinity However,based on the WSIP requirements,any benefits will erode by 2070 due to effects of climate change. e6 Groundwater Sites Reservoir will reduce undesirable results In groundwater Operation of Sites Reservoir will not provide flows that resemble natural hydrograph 7 Delta Tributary Flows patterns.However,It will provide increased flows,especially in dry and critical water year types,as well as provide pulse flows for benefits In Yolo Bypass. 8 improve required water self-reliance Sites Reservoir incrementally improves regional wales self-reliance by helping reduce demand on the Delta watershed by deveioping local supplies in the west side of the Sacramento Vatley. 9 Basic Human Needs Water from Sites will be provided to disadvantaged communities Bald type=Public benefits offered by the Sites Project 6P EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 Beneficiary-Pays-Principle(con't) Economic Feasibility:The annualized benefits provided by the project significantly exceed the annualized total •Capital costs:The participating water agencies will project costs-even when only those benefits that could Finance their proportionate shares of capacity and be monetized are included and even when conservative Proposition 1 funds will cover the state's share of estimates of unit values are applied(refer to the initis[capital. economics section). •Annual Costs(Operations,Maintenance and Financial Feasibility:There are currently 32 water Replacement):The participating water agencies will pay agencies throughout the state that are participating their proportionate share based on releases either at in the development of the Sites Project.Of this,28 Holthouse or Delevan as appropriate.The state's share of these costs can be provided from revenues generated agencies have requested#o participate a#a level that would allow them to receive water supply benefits. from at least two sources:(1)after water has been For planning purposes,the Authority has been using released from a reservoir to provide at least one 500,000 acre-feet as the average long-term annualized Proposition 1-eligible benefit,a small portion of this volume the Sites Reservoir could produce.To date,these water could be recaptured and then sold under a long-term contract and/or(2)the state's share of participants have requested 404,411 acre-feet(80%). Should the state elect to participate in the 710,000 water stored in the reservoir could be used to generate acre-feet of reservoir capacity(40°x6),the participant's electricity for third annual party sales through the requests will be reduced proportionately(i.e.currently, pumped-storage operations.Should the state's revenue there is a waiting list to receive water supply benefits). exceed the applicable annual costs,the surplus could be used to provide additional public benefits within the Congress has authorized federal participation in up Sacramento Valley and/or Delta. to 50%of a locally-sponsored water storage project in exchange for acquiring water benefits for the Implementation Risk environment and water quality.Reclamation's Draft The implementation risk of the Sites Project has been Feasibility Report,determines there is a federal interest characterized in accordance with the WSIP methodology in participation for up to 14%of the project's cost.A in this application.Further,an independent analysis of the water storage project,having local,state,and federal Project's feasibility using federal guidelines is available in participation demonstrates a strong level of financial the Draft NODOS f=easibility Report.Although the federal backing and solid financial feasibility. methodology differs from the WSIP methodology(e.g., different climate change assumptions),the results of the Operational flexibility and adaptive two studies are generally consistent.This independent management are key components analysis of the project by Reclamation found the project of the Sites Project, contributing to be feasible based on available information. to environmental benefits and Sites offers essential benefits under ecosystem protection. future conditions. Environmental Feasibility:When Filled,Sites Reservoir Technical Feasibility:Reclamation,DWR and the will convert what has predominately been lands used for Authority have independently reviewed the engineering livestock grazing to create a new aquatic ecosystem. for the Sites Project facilities and considered them Sites will provide a significant new source of water to all feasible for construction.The development of support existing and struggling aquatic and riparian cooperative operations that cause"no harm"to SWP ecosystems,conserve existing Coldwater pools in or CVP operations or senior water rights is currently upstream reservoirs for salmon and increase plankton underway in a collaborative process.The operations for native estuarine fish,The Sites Project will minimally modeled in this application are restricted to the diversion impact existing rivers and channels and where of excess Sacramento River flows.Additional protection environmental impacts do exist a scientifically-based for migrating salmonids that restricts diversions during adaptive management program and mitigation and pulse flow periods are also included in the modeling to monitoring strategy will be implemented to protect ensure that the public benefits result in net ecosystem the ecosystem. improvement. 16 SITES PROJECT OR As the CEQA and NEPA lead agencies,respectively, requirements,One of the most beneficial features of the Authority and Reclamation released a Draft Sites is that A provides dedicated storage of water for Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact environmental purposes that can be repurposed for the Statement(EIR/EIS)that describes the impacts to highest priority public benefit as future conditions change, environmental and cultural resources that would be reasonably expected to occur with the development of the The benefits to anadromous fish from the Sites Project Sites Project.Impacts that are significant and unavoidable become even more valuable over time.Without Sites, are described within the EIR/EIS,While the project creates the population of Chinook salmon would decline drastically substantial ecosystem benefits,some significant and due to climate change.Modeling results for Sites Reservoir unavoidable impacts will remain after mitigation.These demonstrate the ability of the project to offset some impacts include impacts to the community of Sites, of the decline in population due to rising temperatures, existing golden eagle habitat,historical and cultural improving the resiliency of salmon populations in the resources,disturbance of a dedicated cemetery,and face of climate change. conversion of prime farmland and native rangeland. Integration with the State's Water System The Authority is working with landowners,communities, Tribes,and government agencies to develop relocation The Authority is working with Reclamation and DWR to and mitigation plans to mitigate these impacts. develop cooperative operations between Sites Reservoir, the SWP and the CVP that will improve water supply Sites creates and protects aquatic and reliability throughout the state's integrated water system. riparian habitat, improves ecosystem The operational scenarios are designed to concurrently: conditions, provides additional flows • maximize water supply reliability during critical periods for fish, and • improve Delta water quality secures Water for consumptive use. • provide seasonal flexible hydropower storage Sustainable Groundwater Management and daily pumped-storage • increase survival of anadromous fish that migrate In the DWR SGMA Program's Water Available for through the Delta.Provide seasonal nutrient-rich Replenishment Report(2017),it is estimated that 48%of food for Delta smelt, the water that could be used to replenish California's groundwater will need to come out of the Sacramento Sites Reservoir is also an important regional initiative and River. Both the storage and the conveyance systems was identified as a long-term regional priority in the associated with Sites Reservoir are well suited to staging Sacramento Valley Integrated Water Management Plan due and conveying water to areas where groundwater to its water supply reliability and flood protection benefits. depletion is producing undesirable effects.Providing surface water at a controlled rate and in seasons where Finally,the Sites Project will also increase the value of the opportunity for in lieu of use and infiltration can be projects that may be implemented in the future.One maximized is essential to SGMA compliance.In addition, example is the River Arc Project on the American River Sites participants include agencies that are deeply under consideration by Authority members Placer County invested in groundwater management in the Sacramento Water Agency and the City of Roseville,incoordination Valley.Bay Area,Central Valley,and Southern California. with the Sacramento County Water Agency and City a# For example,Colusa County is investing in 10 TAF/year Sacramento.The River Arc Project will improve water specifically to support SGMA compliance. supply reliability and groundwater quality in the lower American River watershed.Constructing Sites Reservoir Resiliency can considerably enhance the potential benefits of this project and other future groundwater storage projects Because of climate change,some public benefits decline that improve groundwater sustainability in the slightly and others increase between 2030 and 2070 for Sacramento Valley. the operations modeled under current WSIP application tp EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17 Potential for Expansion Engineered for Growth, The Sites Project can be expanded to provide additional Flexibility, and Reliability public and non-Proposition 1 eligible benefits,The most likely near-term expansion includes the ability to divert ••••••••••• ••• Storage ••••••••• • .••••• Floodwaters into storage from the Colusa Basin Drain. Potential expansions of the Sites This will provide water managers with the ability to divert storage and delivery infrastructure will an additional 40 TAF annually of excess river flows. The Draft NODOS Feasibility Report,which evaluated the development of the"Colusa Basin Complex"could include Add [+ =-� raising the Sites Reservoir dams and constructing dams 1.2 t° For a with Sites Reservoir to increase storage in existing SWP MAF total of and CVP reservoirs and also improve the conditionsr<, 3 MAF downstream from these reservoirs for fish, of water for the oa + 0 0 0 0 0 0 environment and human use. Sites is a smart water • .• "" investment for California'sw California WaterCommission has an opportunity to improve the Delta ecosystem, enhance the flexible operation of our state's water system and fulfill the will of • voters. WATER FORTHE ENVIRONMENT, ANDSites BUSINESSES 18 SITES PROJECT Sites Project Schedule 2017 YOVAOCHCRL 2018 2019 2020 2022 2029 TRACKS: CALIFORNIA WATER prepara Watercommisslon ro COMMISSIDN, PInEllal Funding _ - PROP FUNDING Posel :�DCC15I9n .. •... PLANNING& Draft SIR/S Final EIR/S� I�.� �. .� ... .._.. PERMITTING Permits Draft Public Final Feasablllty Report Preaminary Design ENGINEERING Feastblllty Review ,. Report Rldffi and CONSTRUCTION 6 COM144SUONING 'v> OPERATIONS - ' } r�! WSIP Application Reference Guide Eligibility for Proposition 1 Funding Eligibility Tab and Program Requirements Tab Letters of Support Eligibility Tab-Attachment A6E Support Letters Project Facilities Eligibility Tab-Attachment A3 Project Description and Attachment A4 drawing Package Project Operations Benefit Calculation,Monetization and Resiliency Tab-Attachment A2 Operations Pian Benefits Benefit Calculation,Monetization and Resiliency Tab-Attachment A3 Physical and Monetized Benefits and Attachment AS Documentation Costs Benefit Calculation,Monetization and Resiliency Tab-Attachment A8 Basis of Estimate Report Public Benefit Ratio and Benefit Cost Ratio Benefit Calculation,Monetization and Resiliency Tab-Attachment A9 Benefit Cost Ratio Physical Public Benefits Tab-Attachment Al and A2 Ecosystem Priorities Ecosystem Improvements Benefit Calculation,Monetization and Resiliency Tab-Attachment A3 Physical and Monetized Benefits Other Proposition 1 Benefits Physical Public Benefits Tab Unmonetized Benefits Benefit Calculation,Monetization and Resiliency Tab-A7 Non-Monetized Benefits Relative Environmental Values Physical Public Benefits Tab-Attachment At and A2 Ecosystem Priorities, Attachment Al and A2 Water Quality Feasibility and implementation Risk Tab Implementation Risk Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement: http://sitesproject.org/information/DraftEIR-EIS Feasibility Report:https://www.sitesproject.org/information/FeaslbilityReport Sustainable Groundwater Management Eligibility Tab-Attachment A6C Groundwater Resiliency Benefit Calculation,Monetization and Resiliency Tab-Attachment Al2 Uncertainty Analysis Integration with State Water System Benefit Calculation,Monetization and Resiliency Tab-Attachment A2 Operations Plan Schedule Eligibility Tab-Attachment 3 Schedule Qr EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 19 Sites Works for California by providing a solid return on the investment of public dollars for both the state to produce environmental benefits beyond what is achievable today and for public water agencies seeking to improve their water supply reliability. Sites Reservoir will give California its first major reservoir that dedicates a significant capacity(710,000 acre-feet or 4095)to ensure the Proposition 1-eligible benefits that were approved by the voters are achieved.This innovative new partnershil7 Will ensure that water for environmental purposes is directed to the most critical needs Incl Highest prior ides-00111)today 111(1010 an uncertain future. sites: • Is a feasible and cosl-Cffechve project that will advance the Iolig-term objectives of restoring ecological health and imr)rov111g vrater management for beneficial uses of the Delta. • Is resilient by providing loner-term operational flexibility for Doth environmental and water supply reliability purposes.that Will IISQ improve thu,overall up ration of the state's:nater systern, • Will be operated to provide additional%vater during droughts by diverting storm- generated runoff in the Sacramento Rivet. :,,hon there is minimal impact to the Unvironment,to then provide t�eservoir releases into the Sacramento.l=eather and Loner American Rivers at times that aro Critical to the survival of native fish species. Project Benefits li3i if}:;❑r,���i Pi:1_ EiE:-;<I�';I��iV s'�1;i�Of1 f1N:�1rL•I r�;�5r; 'S ttp p;V r- ;:b[Ili`; Tlip � �ti:h.SC�:,.. i'_.-4�:.,ti,i1C,, C_•!7 Fi', i1 tJl. v.. ..FCf,.'.l Ei`•1i Sf"f}(1rn;i n�3l L•f:i'.; C'f}['1'CI,r r."O(IIC+'� Cif?r;i),"ttlnitE�`.� p� o Agenda Item #112 COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED AND REFERRED BUTTE COUNTY WATER COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 3,2017 Copies of all communications are available at the Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation 308 Nelson Avenue Oroville, CA 95965 1. *California Water Plan eNews, Wednesday's Update, November 29, 2017 2. *Article from Chico Enterprise Record, December 1, 2017, State says water contractor wille�pereent 3. *California Water Plan eNews, Wednesday's Update, December 6, 2017 4. *Email from Jim Brobeck ofAquAlliance, December 11, 2017, Re: Bales water quality, Sites JPA public meeting discussing the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report 5. *Article from Chico Enterprise Record, December 12, 2017, Statewide water savings down to single digits in October 6. *California Water Plan eNews, Wednesday's Update, December 13, 2017 7. *Article from Chico Enterprise Record, December 17, 2017, Habitat grants mean millions for north valley projects 8. *California Water Plan eNews, Wednesday's Update, December 20, 2017 9. *Article from Maven's Notebook, December 20, 2017, SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management criteria 1 e Wednesday Update 1*1Nov. 29, 2017 This weekly electronic newsletter is designed to keep you current on California Water Plan news. We welcome comments,suggestions,and any news tips that may be of interest to water planners. a , . Exploring the point where A symposium exploring the relationship between homelessness and homelessness and water water management will be held Thursday, Dec.7, in Fullerton.The event will focus on the Santa Ana Watershed.The agenda includes a management intersect panel discussion on creating partnerships between water managers and homelessness agencies. Silicon Valley event to With Microsoft serving promote the benefits Of as the host, Sustainable =s. STAIMAB L Silicon Valley has No Drop Leff Behind organized a water J '�- " strategies event titled No Drop Left Behind. It wilf feature speakers from water districts,public utilities,tech companies,and more. The topics will cover water projects that range from small-scale installations to large municipal systems.The event will be Tuesday, Dec.5, in Mountain View. Webinar will look at the Save the date for an Alliance for Water Efficiency(AWE)webinar benefits generated by water on the economic benefits of water conservation programs.It will be Thursday,Dec. 14.The agenda includes a report that examines the conservation programs jobs,income,and savings generated by water efficiency investments. Webinar details will be posted on the AWE website. Guide and toolkit released to The Union of Concerned Scientists has put together a guide and help develop groundwater online toolkit to help with the development of a local groundwater sustainability plans.The plans are a requirement under California's sustainability plans Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.The guide is also available in Spanish. How a geological A geologic mapping project in the Great Lakes region will be presented during a Webinar on Mdnesday,Dec.6.'The'prdject has mapping project can help developed 3D rnaps;that can provide.informatioh:fo[environmental;:. With planning decisions:' decision and;rnfras#ructure profects;<Less than one=thlrc!4the U S`., has} een;ma Aped at,that level of cfetall 1`Our-day. orNihOp w' 'll The_California Water and Eny onrrterat tOYlel'neW features of a Fo �!s presenting a foul day- work o #o present the new ifeatures of the tJ S �`;y"� �zbydiolagl�e}f1oW model: GeoinglcaLfSe�rvey's` ne ! ow-.';�, �, , a � ! S G CORRESPONDENCE ChiCOER.com # State says water contractors will get 15 percent By Staff Reports,December 1,2017 State Water Project contractors were told this week that they could expect 15 percent of the water they want in 2018. While the Dec.1 allocation is always quite low,it usually rises as the water supply picture becomes more settled as the rainy season goes on. Last year,DWR's initial allocation was 20 percent of what the water contractors wanted. By the end of the water year it had been raised to 85 percent. But whether that will happen this year with the Lake Oroville water level drawn down for flood control isn't clear.When asked that ques- tion during Thursday's media tali on spillway construction,a Depart- ment of Water Resources spokeswoman said it was too early in the season to say. The recent storms have brought the lake level above 700 feet,up from a low of 689.48 feet on Nov. 15.It was 702 feet as 5 p.m.Fri- day. But DWR has an aggressive release schedule planned this winter to keep the water level low so that the repaired main spillway doesn't need to be used.It has set target levels where releases will be stepped up from the current level,which has been about 3,000 cubic feet per second. For December,if the water rises to the 725-foot level,the releases will be increased to 10,000 cis.If the water gets to 800 feet,the re- leases will increase to 14,700 cis,the maximum possible through the Hyatt Powerhouse with five of the six turbines operational. Lake Oroville is the primary water source for the State Water Project. It currently holds 1.27 million acre-feet or water.That's just 59 per- cent of its historical average for the start of November,and just 35 percent of capacity. Most of the other reservoirs in the state are above their seasonal averages and nearly full.Shasta Lake is 71 percent full,which is 119 percent of what's normal for this time of year.New Melones on the Stanislaus River is 83 percent full,which is 148 percent of average. However precipitation in DWRs Southern and Central Sierra regions is below normal,according to the DWR website.The Northern re- gion,which drains into lake Oroville and Shasta and Trinity lakes is just above normal. "It's hard to know what Mother Nature will have In store for us this year,but it's safe to say California is in a better place than we were during the recent drought,"DWR Director Grant Davis said in a press release. "Planning for the year and providing more accurate early estimates for water managers so they can better plan for the year is just one of the many reasons the state needs to improve our forecasting ability." a ® a aWednesday Update tt�� tie 6, This weekly electronic newsletter is designed to keep you current on California Water Plan news. We welcome comments,suggestions,and any news tips that may be of interest to water planners. Sustainable management DWR will hold three public meetings to introduce its best management practices(BMPs)for fulfilling the requirements of BMPs will be introduced the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act(SGMA).The draft ® at three public meetings Sustainable Management Criteria also describes BMPs for meeting ® groundwater sustainability plan regulations.The meetings will be Dec. 11, in Rancho Cordova; Dec. 12,in Visalia;and Dec. 13,in Santa Ana.The comment deadline is,Jan.9 Conservation board approves The Wildlife Conservation Board has approved approximately $2.6 million in funding for $2.6 million in funding for fish and wildlife habitat projects throughout California.The funding comes from voter-approved bond measures fish and wildlife projects to preserve and protect Califomia's natural resources. Funding available for Project proposals are being accepted by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for funding ,a , watershed project proposals under a watershed restoration program.The ; E submitted to Reclamation funding is available to projects for developing, designing,or completing watershed-related activities.Selected projects can receive as much as$50,000 per year for two years. Proposals must be submitted by Jan.31. California Water Commission A two-day Meets for the California Water Commission is set for sets two-day meeting for Dec. 13 and 14, in Sacramento.On the first day,commissioners will hear presentations from applicants to the Water Storage Investment next week in Sacramento Program. Day two will include an update on SGMA. Online survey will help The California Pne CoMmission is developing a roadmap for advancing technologies in the identify electricity-Saying state's industrial,agricultural,and water sectors. `' technologies for.California Part of that process is an;online survex to 'n evaluate el6ctricity,saving technologies for Gelifomia's water sector The survey includes a section to suggest technologies#or consideration ti4 Y A ,posted rv Vl�ater fedemfion pasts fact by the ro m F fEon;explains sheet aW benefits of the benefits of using the VAco u n I Infra` r c r R tin �rrr to evaluate water�nfrastructuYe projects The sysfem takes ` �7�nfrels�Iructure�raNng systeml r sacEei,economic,and envll'onmental crltena i'nta account When 's�� n'..a"�y�u. �•''R3 7fi�'��.-r h-�"ty Y-f`"t ,LSF�.� ti 7-� i ti 6 �. . �rF > r 4 �. '�. ;�� ���%'�, � �. . ,�3.: cop I enngapra3ect, .The fact sheet includes�ase;�stuc��es of�,f r � ; r'���" x.+ `y.J� � ,�,e-"" .,s 'y-,� �y�y�� t�ry�'�-�-�,�.�i Y��u",..rr.�`,8•�.�h4ir F '�",��R- ,; t Thomas, Autum rv'f From: BCWater Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 8:35 AM To: Gosselin, Paul Subject: FW:Sites DFIR Public Meeting in Maxwell Attachments: Boles,water quality.pdf, BrobeckReportSitesJPAPublicMeeting120717wSummary.pdf From:jimb@aqualliance.net [mailto:jimb@aqualliance.net] Sent:Saturday, December 09,2017 3:30 PM To:Connelly, Bill<BCo n nel ly @butte cou nty.n et>;Wahl, Larry<LWahl@buttecounty.net>; Kirk, Maureen <MKirk@buttecounty.net>; BOS District 4<District4@ b utteco unty.net>; BCWater <BCWaterFrontDeskHG@buttecounty.net>;Teeter, Doug<DTeeter@buttecounty.net> Subject:Sites DFIR Public Meeting in Maxwell Dear Supervisors, You probably know that AquAlliance opposed spending taxpayer money to plan, study, build or operate Sites Reservoir. The project has been considered since the middle of last century and has never moved forward because it is not feasible economically, environmentally, technically or financially. But dry years inspire hope in leaders and the public that "new water" can be found in the Sacramento Valley Watershed to meet the demand from the San Joaquin Valley. We have been studying the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Studies for the Sites Project and found numerous flaws and omissions that the consultants must be aware of. We attended the meeting last week in Maxwell to provide verbal comments and to assess the opinions that Maxwell area residents have about the project. A rancher named James Murphy (530 476 2004) who owns thousands of acres in the footprint of the proposed reservoir was, like two other residents, too shy to speak out in public. But after hearing my comments approached me to express their dismay over the eminent domain action that threatens their way of life. My take away impression of the project is that the consultants and the high-payed employees of the Sites JPA are milking taxpayers to prolong the planning phase of the project in spite of the in-feasibility. I will attach my report of the meeting and, more importantly, the written comments of Jerry Soles, former Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section of the ]Northern District of DWR in Red Bluff. Jim Brobeck, grater policy analyst, AquAlliance 1 HANCE DEFENDING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WATERS Sites JPA public meeting discussing the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report Maxwell, CA - December 7, 2017 Summary The Sites Reservoir project's Draft EIS/EIR was the focus of an evening meeting in Maxwell on 1217/17. It was sparsely attended,with about 15 people not connected to the project. The most significant issues raised were that the DEIS/EIR failed to: • Provide flow parameters for the proposed project's source waters: the Sacramento River and its tributaries. • Mention the native plants that would be destroyed by the project and that the subject was not easily found in the body of the documents, if a botanical analysis existed at all. • Disclose the heavy metals and salts expected during the high flow months of winter when diversions would occur for the proposed reservoir, which would create a toxic hazard. Report The meeting venue had a sign-in table at the entrance and consultant stations set up on 3 walls of the JPA office. The consultants were well versed in their version of the benefits of the project but were unable to form cogent responses to AquAlliance's questions on water quality and landscape conversion in the inundation footprint. After '/ hour of isolated consultant interviews the hosts called the meeting to order. They introduced a court reporter that would be taking notes on the comments from the public. James Watson,JPA manager($325K/year salary) took the floor and used a PowerPoint presentation to praise the project benefits to the environment and the economy. The audience consisted of JPA employees, Sites consultants, approximately 10 elderly local residents, Butte County Water Conservation Director Paul Gosselin, and four vocal citizens. Steve Evans (Friends of the River) thanked the presenters for taking public comments and testified about the inadequacy of the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report in that it provided no hard river flow parameters. Evans stated that the project relied on outdated Biological Opinions and ignored the new Water Board delta/bay inflow/outflow requirements that include the tributaries that the Sites proponents plan to capture. Dr. Glen Holstein, Sacramento Valley Calif.Native Plant Society Chapter Botanist,described his knowledge that remote coast range valleys are known to contain rare native plant communities that deserve extra efforts to preserve. Dr. Holstein expressed his dissatisfaction that the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report summary made no mention of the native plants that would be destroyed by the project and frustration that the subject was not easily found in the body of the documents if botanical analysis existed at all. Lucas RossMerz, Executive Director of the Sacramento River Preservation Trust, addressed the meeting to describe the history of success in managing river land use by collaborating with land- owners and agencies to enhance riparian values. RossMerz expressed his appreciation with the Sites proponents' decision to extend the comment period to give the public more time to digest the giant DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Reports but made clear his dissatisfaction with the adequacy of the documents. He closed his comments by expressing his willingness to meet with the JPA, the USBR,and the consultants to improve the project. Jim Brobeck,water policy analyst for AquAlliance,launched into his comments on the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report and without hesitation challenged the feasibility of the project on the grounds that the reservoir water would be tainted with pollutants.Brobeck cited the November 17, 2017 comment letter sent to the JPA/USBR by Jerry Boles, former Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section of the Northern District of DWR;"High concentrations of metals that exceed water quality criteria exist in source waters to the proposed project."Mr. Boles provides data from the DWR Water Data Library that show high concentrations of toxic metals can be expected during the high flow months of winter when diversions would be occurring to the proposed reservoir. The high concentrations of metals in the source water will adversely impact Sites Reservoir water quality for most, if not all,the proposed beneficial uses of the stored water.AquAlliance has been pestering the Sites team for years to reveal the toxic mineral leaching potential that is only mentioned in passing by the Sites consultants.Brobeck is particularly incensed about the failure of the Sites planners to take seriously the presence of salt springs and terminal Salt Lake that would be in the reservoir."They fail to imagine how much more active the saline springs would be if the reservoir was inundated.Proponents are willing to admit the saline damage is worth investing money and effort into grouting the salt springs that fill the Salt Lake but they admit their efforts may be ineffective." Brobeck was also disturbed about the lackadaisical attitude proponents have about exposed soils in the denuded acres of inundation.This DEIS/EIR mentions that the vegetated landscape would be converted without disclosing the obvious:there will be an intentional and total elimination of vegetation that currently serves to reduce storm runoff erosion.He demanded that they disclose the inevitable increase in erosion of soils that are exposed during the filling and re-filling of the reservoir.The DEIS/EIR failed to disclose the toxic mineral contents of soils in the footprint of the reservoir that will be exposed to repeated and unmitigated storm runoff erosion and will be concentrated by cumulative evaporative enrichment. After receiving comments the Sites hosts did not take questions but thanked the public for coming and offered the audience an opportunity to break into individual discussion groups at the numerous information stations around the room.Before the host finished describing the well- known meeting tactic, Brobeck stood to protest this strategy of preventing the public from hearing questions and answers as a group.The host smiled benevolently and explained,"That is not how we organize these meetings." a 4314 Tuliyani Drive Chico, CA 95973 October 1,2017 AquaAlliance Barbara Vlamis, Executive Director P.O. Box 4024 Chico, CA 95927 Since your organization has expressed interest in the proposed Sites Reservoir project west of Maxwell,California, I am providing to you the comments that l have submitted in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Sites Reservoir Project,State Clearinghouse#2001112009. The draft EIR/EIS fails to discuss the high concentrations of a number of metals in the source waters to the proposed project,and,even more important,does not discuss water quality in the proposed reservoir. Water quality in the proposed reservoir will mimic that of the source waters, and hence the reservoir will have concentrations of a large number of metals that exceed many water quality criteria and standards. The high concentrations of metals likely to occur in the proposed reservoir will impact most, if not all, beneficial uses of the proposed project,including agricultural water supply,wildlife and fisheries,and drinking Nater supplies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River, making the project potentially infeasible. I am qualified to provide these comments since my background is in water quality, as former Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section of the Northern District of DWR in Red Sluff. If you have any questions, please contact me via email at chicojerry@yahoo.com. Sincerely, )—. -'e—n pa�� Jerry Boles 4314Tuliyani Drive Chico,CA 95973 November 17, 2017 Bureau of Reclamation Sites Project Office Attn: Michael Dietle Attn: Rob Thomson Draft EIR/EIS Comments Draft EIR/EIS Comments 2800 Cottage Way,W-2830 P.O. Box 517 Sacramento,CA 95825 Maxwell,CA 95955 t am providing to you my comments in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Sites Reservoir Project,State Clearinghouse #2001112009. The draft EIR/EIS fails to discuss the high concentrations of a number of metals in the source waters to the proposed project,and,even more important,does not discuss water quality in the proposed reservoir. Water quality in the proposed reservoir will mimic that of the source waters. and hence the reservoir will have concentrations of a large number of metals that exceed rnan\ water quality criteria and standards. The high concentrations of metals likely to occur in the proposed reservoir will impact most,if not all,beneficial uses of the proposed prpject, incli di ng agricultural water supply,wildlife and fisheries,and drinking water supplies for commtmities that divert water from the Sacramento River,making the project potentially infeasible. The water quality section(Chapter 7)must be completely rewritten with an objective analysis of the data and potential adverse impacts to water quality both within the reservoir and to downstream resources in the Sacramento River. Subsequently,the aquatic biological resources- (chapter esources(chapter 12),terrestrial biological resources(chapter 14),recreation resources(chapter 21), public health and environmental hazards(chapter 28),and cumulative impacts(chapter 35) sections of the draft EIRIEIS must reassess impacts from the adverse water quality expected from the proposed project. Following these re-analyses,re-circulation of the draft EIR/EIS is necessary with appropriate disclosure information about the potential impacts from metals to water quality and its effects on agricultural water supply,wildlife and ffshmies,and drinking water supplies. I am qualified to provide these comments since my background is in water quality,as former Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section of the Northern District of DWR in Red Bluff If you have any questions, please contact me via email at chicojerry..@..y.al,00.com Sincerely, Jerry Boles Comments on Draft EIR Sites Reservoir Project: Chapter 7 Surface Water Quality An EIR is supposed to be a disclosure document that provides information on the benefits as well as potential impacts from a proposed project. Section 7 - Surface Water Quality does not disclose potential significant adverse issues which have serious ramifications for the viability of the proposed project, but rather ignores or misconstrues available data and reports to incorrectly conclude that there are no significant water quality impacts associated with the proposed project. The EIR claims to have evaluated post-project impacts to the Sacramento River, but there are no analyses provided that indicate that this was done. It Is apparent that the preparers of the EIR failed to examine or simply ignored the available data that would show potential significant adverse impacts from the proposed project. The analyses in Section 7 completely left out any evaluation or projection of water quality that may result in Sites Reservoir from diverting high winter flows from the Sacramento River. The EIR fails to point out that due to metals loads in the various source waters, water in the proposed reservoir may not be suitable for the beneficial uses stated for the proposed project, including enhanced water management flexibility, agricultural and urban water supply, water quality improvement, and ecosystem improvement for fish protection, habitat management, and other environmental needs. A factual evaluation of the available data is presented below, which shows significant potential adverse impacts associated with the proposed project. Some comments on specific sections of Chapter 7 of the EIR are also presented. Available Data The EIR cites the DWR Water Data Library (WDL) online database as the source for water quality data used to determine impacts from the proposed project. However, very limited data from the WDL are available for evaluating water quality in source waters for the proposed project. The major source water for the proposed project is the Sacramento River, with potential diversion occurring at the Tehama-Colusa Canal, Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District Main Canal, and at Moulton Weir. The Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam monitoring station of DWR provides information on the quality of water that would be diverted to the proposed project through the Tehama-Colusa Canal. Metals data are available in the WDL for the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam beginning in February 2006 (Table 1). However, only 33 samples have been collected since 2006, and only nine of these were from the months in which higher flows most typically occur(December through March) and from which diversions to the proposed project would occur. Cottonwood Creek contributes the most significant input to the Sacramento River during high runoff events. The Chico-Enterprise Record in an editorial published December 28, 2016 underscored the impact of tributaries on water quality in the Sacramento River. The newspaper stated that of the 900,000 cis flowing in the river earlier in the month, 1 only 5,000 cis was coming from Keswick Dam below Shasta Dam—the rest of the 100,000 cis(95,000 cfs)was coming from tributaries downstream from Keswick Dam, of which Cottonwood Creek provides the dominant flows. Data from Cottonwood Creek near Cottonwood are even more sporadic than those for the Sacramento River. Data are available for this station in WDL beginning in October 2004, with only seven samples collected from the Cottonwood Creek monitoring station since 2006, and only four of which were collected during the months of expected higher flows of December through March (Table 2). Data available in the WDL show that only one sample was collected (March 2006)during the same period from both Cottonwood Creek and the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam since 2006. This one sample shows that metal loads In the Sacramento River are similar to those found in Cottonwood Creek, showing that Cottonwood Creek significantly affects water quality in the Sacramento River. Water quality in Cottonwood Creek will have a significant impact on diversions to the proposed reservoir and water quality data from Cottonwood Creek can be used to approximate and supplement data from the Sacramento River, though the total number of samples from both sites combined are still exceptionally low for a project of this magnitude and potential for adverse effects. The water quality monitoring station on the Sacramento River at Hamilton City is just downstream from the GCID Main Canal. Data from the WDL is somewhat more extensive at the Hamilton City monitoring site, with metals data available in the WDL beginning in late 2003 to early 2017, though still sporadic with only 78 samples collected in the span of a little more than 13 years(159 months), and only 23 of those collected sometime during the months of expected higher flows of December through March (Table 3). Samples were collected in each of these months only twice, with the rest of the samples during these months only collected in February months each year since 2008. The WDL shows that metals data are available for the Sacramento River opposite Moulton Weir monitoring station from mid 2003 to early 2011,for a total of 80 samples, with 27 of those from the expected higher flow months (Table 4). Water quality sampling during the expected months of higher flows of December through March did not target high flow periods (the periods during which diversions to the proposed project would occur) but were based on a rigid and fixed monthly or semi- monthly schedule. Monitoring did not provide any information on the variation in concentrations of metals over the runoff hydrograph. Even higher concentrations of metals would likely occur during the higher flow periods during these months, but were not targeted by the limited monitoring. The relatively low number of samples and lack of samples targeting critical flows (i.e., high runoff events) are nonetheless sufficient to indicate potential significant adverse water quality impacts with the proposed project. These data illustrate the need to collect additional data during appropriate time periods (i.e., during the high flow periods when diversions from the Sacramento River would be occurring)and re-evaluate the potential adverse water quality impacts from the proposed project. 2 Data_Analyses Some of the analytical results shown in the WDL for metals are reported as"dissolved" and other results as"total" (or total recoverable). 'Total"concentrations, which include both dissolved and particulate forms of an analyte, are probably a better representation for the concentrations of metals that will affect water quality in the proposed reservoir. As well, the State Water Resources Control Board makes no distinction between dissolved or total recoverable concentrations when considering whether a criterion is exceeded (SWRCB 2011). The proposed reservoir will thermally stratify and will also be biologically productive due to nutrients brought in from source waters. This in-situ productivity, as well as organic material brought in with the source waters, will result in anoxic conditions (i.e., lack of oxygen) in the hypolimnion (i.e., bottom water layer). While dissolved forms of metals are generally the most bioavailable, the particulate fraction of total recoverable forms will undergo chemical transformation to dissolved forms under the anoxic conditions expected in the hypolimnion of the proposed reservoir. Transformed metals will be mixed throughout the reservoir water column during turnover events, or released downstream with anoxic waxer from the lower depths during the summer months. Data from the WDL(Table 1)show that aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, and mercury in water samples from the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam exceed various criteria and standards established to protect beneficial uses, including drinking water, public health, taste and odor for agriculture, and freshwater organisms, which includes fish. Maximum concentrations of some of these metals are many times higher than the corresponding criteria or standard. For example, aluminum, in addition to exceeding the SWRCB Basin Plan Primary Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)for drinking water by one and half times, also exceeds the secondary drinking water standard in the Basin Plan by seven times and the US Environmental Protection Agency Secondary MCL by 30 times. Even the minimum concentration of arsenic reported in WDL exceeds by more than 10 times nearly all the criteria and standards for protection of human health. The least reported concentration of cadmium from river water samples exceed by five times the incremental cancer risk for drinking water. The least concentration of chromium reported in WDL exceeds the California Public Health Goal by 16 times and incremental cancer risk for drinking water by five times. The maximum concentration of iron that was reported in WDL exceeds the secondary drinking water maximum concentration level in the Basin Plan, as well as National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for taste and odor or welfare by nearly three times. The maximum concentration of lead that was reported exceeds the California Public Health Goal and California Proposition 65 maximum allowable dose level for reproductive toxicity by over four times. The maximum reported concentration of manganese exceeds the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for taste and odor or welfare by one and a half times. The maximum concentration reported for mercury exceeds the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Aquatic Life Continuous Concentration by nearly four times, and the Freshwater Aquatic Life Maximum Concentration by two times. An additional concern with these metals is that some metals are taken up by crops (such as arsenic by rice), making the crops 3 potentially unsuitable for consumption. Plant uptake of metals in the water supply not only affect crops grown for human consumption, but also plants grown for support of wildlife, such as in refuges. Similarly, data from the WDL for Cottonwood Creek near Cottonwood show that aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, iron, lead, manganese, and nickel exceed various criteria and standards established to protect beneficial uses (Table 2). Similar to the Sacramento River, maximum concentrations of some of these metals are many times higher than the corresponding criteria or standards. Aluminum concentrations exceed the Basin Plan drinking water primary standard MCL by 14 times,the secondary drinking water secondary standard MCL by 70 times, the California Public Health Goal by over 20 times, the National Academy of Sciences Health Advisory and Agriculture Water Quality Goals for taste and odor threshold by nearly three times, the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for human health and welfare for water and fish consumption by nearly 30 times, and the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for freshwater aquatic life maximum concentration by 20 times. As with the Sacramento River, even the minimum concentration of arsenic reported in WDL exceeds nearly all the criteria and standards for protection of human heaith by up to 167 times. The minimum concentration of cadmium reported exceeds the incremental cancer risk for drinking water by over three times, while the maximum concentration is over twice as high as the California Public Health Goal. As with the Sacramento River, the California Public Health Goal is exceeded by the least concentration of chromium reported by 16 times and the incremental cancer risk for drinking water by five times. Iron exceeds the Basin Plan drinking water standard secondary MCL by over five times, the Agricultural Water Quality Goals for taste and odor threshold by nearly five times, the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for taste and odor or welfare by 78 times, and the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for freshwater aquatic life maximum concentration by over 23 times. Reported lead concentrations are two and a half times higher than the California Public Health Goal, up to twice as high as the California Proposition 65 maximum allowable dose level for reproductive toxicity, and almost twice as high as the incremental cancer risk estimate for drinking water. Manganese concentrations reported from Cottonwood Creek exceed the Basin Plan Drinking Water Standards secondary MCL by a factor of 10, are nearly twice as high as the USEPA Health Advisory for drinking water, three times as high as the Agricultural Water Quality Goals for taste and odor threshold,and over 10 times higher than the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for taste and odor or welfare. Reported maximum mercury concentrations exceed the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Aquatic Life Continuous Concentration by nearly two times, while even the lowest reported concentration is nearly equal to the recommended criterion. Nickel exceeds the California Public Health Goal by nearly five times. The GCID Main Canal intake is slightly upstream from the Sacramento River at Hamilton City water quality monitoring station. Therefore, water quality in the GCID Main Canal will be similar to that found at the Sacramento River at Hamilton City monitoring station. Metals data for this monitoring station can be found in the WDL from November 2003 to February 2017. Similar to the upstream monitoring station on the 4 Sacramento River below Red Bluff, the Sacramento River at Hamilton City water quality monitoring station has been identified to contain high levels of aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc(Table 3),which exceed a large number of criteria and standards similar to those upstream at the monitoring station below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam. High levels of metals have also been identified at the water quality monitoring station opposite the Moulton Weir, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, Iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc(Table 4). As with the water quality monitoring station on the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam, concentrations of metals from the Sacramento River monitoring station at the Moulton Weir exceed a large number of water quality criteria designed to protect beneficial uses. As discussed earlier, Cottonwood Creek is the major source of water to the Sacramento River during higher flow periods, but other tributaries also contribute high levels of metals to the Sacramento River. In addition, local creeks directly tributary to the proposed reservoir, such as Funks Creek and Stone Corral Creek, also carry metals concentrations that will contribute to the metals loading. Leaching from soils beneath the reservoir will also contribute additional metals, as well as nutrients. The Basin Plan lists other chemicals that adversely affect water quality in the Sacramento River, including chlorpyrifos and diazinon. The California State Water Resources Control Board lists a number of other"constituents of concern" in the study area, including chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs, and dieldrin. In addition, sewer outfalls from the cities of Redding and Red Bluff contribute other contaminants, such as pharmaceuticals, to the Sacramento River. No information is provided in the EER about effects to the proposed project from these chemical contaminants. Discussion The data in the WDL for the Sacramento River and Cottonwood Creek demonstrate that high concentrations of metals can be expected during the high flow months of winter (December through March)when diversions would be occurring to the proposed Sites Reservoir. Higher concentrations of metals are likely during the higher flows that can occur during these months. Such higher flows were not targeted by the limited sampling effort presented in the WDL. The high concentrations of metals in the source water will adversely impact water quality in the proposed reservoir for most, if not all, the proposed beneficial uses of the stored water. Some metals from both the Sacramento River and Cottonwood Creek, whose concentrations did not exceed criteria in the limited sampling effort, had concentrations that nearly exceed the criteria and standards. These and other metals whose concentrations did not exceed the criteria may have higher concentrations during the higher flow periods that the proposed project would be diverting. Again, these higher flow periods were not targeted during the limited sampling effort. 5 Even some of the minimum concentrations of metals found in the source waters exceed criteria and standards, which means that the source waters never meet these goals and standards--the criteria are always exceeded and the water is never suitable for the beneficial use or uses the criteria or standards were designed to protect. Water quality in the proposed reservoir for these parameters will exceed the criteria and standards all the time. Since water quality in the proposed reservoir will reflect that of the source waters, the reservoir will have concentrations of numerous metals, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc, that exceed a number of criteria and standards developed to protect beneficial uses. In addition, other metals that may not exceed criteria and standards in the source waters may adversely affect reservoir water quality due to synergistic effects. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB 2011)states that"when multiple constituents have been found together in groundwater or surface waters, their combined toxicity should be evaluated" and that"theoretical risks from chemicals found together in a water body shall be considered additive for all chemicals raving similar toxicologic effects or having carcinogenic effects." Thus,the adverse effects from the metals delivered to the proposed reservoir from the source waters may have an even greater adverse impact and pose an unacceptable level of risk. Beneficial uses potentially impacted by metals in the proposed reservoir include agricultural water supply(direct toxicity or uptake by crops making the crops unsuitable for use), wildlife (such as fish- eating birds), fisheries, recreation (including sport fishing and water contact activities such as swimming), and drinking water supplies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River. Releases from the proposed reservoir would occur during the summer when metals concentrations in the Sacramento River are much lower due to the majority of flow being from Shasta Reservoir, with much better water quality, though still carrying a metals load. High metals concentrations in the proposed reservoir releases could adversely affect water quality in the Sacramento River during the summer months by increasing metals loads beyond acceptable limits and adversely impact beneficial uses. Though high concentrations of metals that exceed water quality criteria exist in source waters to the proposed project, they cannot be regulated by governmental entities since they are natural occurrences. However, once contained artificially in a reservoir, they are subject to jurisdictional control by regulatory agencies. Any releases of water from the proposed reservoir will likely be subject to review by water quality regulatory agencies to ensure that such releases do not adversely affect downstream resources due to the heavy metals loads in the releases. The SWRCB has an antidegradation policy that prohibits discharges that would degrade water quality to a level below water quality objectives because no capacity would exist for degradation that will be caused by the next downstream or downgradient uses—the ability to beneficially use the water would have been impaired, even though water quality objectives would not yet have been exceeded (SWRCB 2011). The contribution of additional metal loads from releases from the proposed Sites Reservoir during the summer could cause 6 concentrations of metals in the Sacramento River to exceed criteria and standards or at least be subject to the antidegradation policy due to an incremental increase in metals in the Sacramento River from the proposed project. Thus, the proposed project may face prohibition of releases if stored water does not meet water quality criteria or standards or if releases can cause criteria or standards to be exceeded by downstream inputs (i.e., antidegradation poicy). During dry years, the adverse impacts associated with the project can be expected to be even greater. Flows in the Sacramento River from upstream reservoirs on the Sacramento River(i.e., Shasta Reservoir, Whiskeytown Reservoir) will be minimized during the winter months in an effort to restore water storage levels in those reservoirs. Likewise, during wet or even normal runoff years, releases from the upstream reservoirs during the winter will be curtailed during high runoff periods to prevent downstream flooding. In any of these scenarios, tributary influences, such as Cottonwood Creek, on water quality in the Sacramento River will be much greater. The proposed project would still attempt to capture as much runoff from the Sacramento River as possible, but the water diverted to the proposed project will have even greater concentrations of metals due to the majority of flow being from tributary streams (e.g., Cottonwood Creek) during dry and possibly even wet or normal runoff years. Similarly, during the summer in dry years, releases from upstream reservoirs (i.e., Shasta Reservoir, Whiskeytown Reservoir)will be minimized. Releases to the Sacramento River from the proposed project will have a greater impact on water quality in the Sacramento River due to less dilution being available due to curtailed flows in the river from upstream reservoirs (i.e., Shasta and Whiskeytown reservoirs). Conclusion The proposed project is, at best, premature. Little or no data have been collected to determine the metals loads in the higher flows of the Sacramento River that would be diverted to the proposed reservoir. An extremely small amount of data have been collected during the months in which higher flows can be expected (December through March), but higher flows during these months were not targeted in the water quality sampling. None the less, the limited data presented in the WDL show high concentrations of a number of metals which exceed numerous water quality criteria and standards in the source waters for the proposed reservoir. Extremely high concentrations of metals are present in the small streams in the reservoir footprint, which occur due to the nature of the soils in the area of the proposed reservoir. Sites Reservoir would inundate these soils resulting in leaching of metals and further incremental loading of metals to the proposed reservoir. There is no discussion in the EIR about the potential impacts of metals leaching from the soils that would be inundated by the proposed reservoir. Prior to moving forward with the project, much additional data are needed during the high flow periods in which diversions would occur from the Sacramento River, metals loading from the smaller tributaries that flow directly into the proposed reservoir, and effects from leaching of metals from soils inundated by the proposed reservoir. 7 The limited data that are available are sufficient to show that water quality in the proposed reservoir will have concentrations of a large number of metals that exceed many water quality criteria and standards, including those established for the protection of agricultural water supply,wildlife and fisheries, and drinking water. Metals bioaccumulation in the reservoir food web could produce adverse impacts to fish-eating birds and other animals, as well as humans, and adversely affect any potential recreational benefit from the project. Releases from the proposed reservoir could adversely affect downstream resources, including agricultural water supply,wildlife and fisheries, and drinking water supplies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River. Also, the EIR does not discuss the physical conditions that can be expected to occur in the proposed reservoir. Like other nearby reservoirs, the proposed reservoir will thermally stratify during the summer months, with a warm upper water layer and a cooler lower water layer. The proposed reservoir will also be biologically productive due to nutrients brought in with source waters. The biological productivity will lead to anoxic conditions (i.e., lack of oxygen) in the hypolimnion (i.e., bottom water layer). Depending on the depth from which downstream releases are made from the proposed reservoir, water released will either be warm and unsupportive of cold water fisheries in the Sacramento River (i.e., migrating salmon)or cooler but devoid of oxygen. As releases from the reservoir progress during the summer, or in years in which the reservoir is not completely filled, the reservoir will be warm from surface to bottom as the cooler lower water strata is depleted from releases or wind mixing of the upper warm water layer. Under these conditions, only warm water would be available for release from the proposed reservoir, which would not be supportive of the cold water fishery in the Sacramento River, An EIR is a disclosure document meant to disclose pertinent project information to planners, regulatory agencies, and other interested parties and the public. This EIR did not disclose the potential impacts from metals, other contaminants, nor the physical conditions likely to exist in the proposed reservoir. The little analyses presented in the EIR misconstrues, misinterprets, and ignores water quality data that amply demonstrate significant potential adverse impacts from the proposed project. The water quality section (Chapter 7) must be completely rewritten with an objective analysis of the data and potential adverse impacts to water quality both within the reservoir and to downstream resources in the Sacramento River. Subsequently,the aquatic biological resources(chapter 12), terrestrial biological resources (chapter 14), recreation resources (chapter 21), public health and environmental hazards (chapter 28), and cumulative impacts (chapter 35)sections of the EIR must reassess impacts from the adverse water quality expected from the proposed project. Whether any of the projected beneficial uses from the proposed project can be realized, and its feasibility to meet project objectives, purpose, and need, also needs to be reconsidered in light of the potential significant adverse water quality impacts from metals. Following these re- analyses, re-circulation of the EIR is necessary with appropriate disclosure information about the potential impacts from metals to water quality and its effects on agricultural 8 water supply, wildlife and fisheries, and drinking water supplies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River. EIR Needs: • Obtain additional metals data from source waters targeting high flows from which diversions would occur • Provide information on the water quality impacts from other chemical contaminants that adversely affect water quality in the Sacramento River (including chlorpyrifos, diazinon, chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs, and dieldrin) and contaminants in sewer outfalls (such as pharmaceuticals)and other discharges (such as industrial discharges) • Evaluate the contributions of metals from local tributaries (i.e., Funks Creek and Stone Corral Creek)to the proposed reservoir • Provide information on the contribution from leaching of metals from the inundation area of the proposed reservoir • Evaluate effects of metals to beneficial uses within the proposed reservoir o fisheries, o wildlife (including state and federal species listed as threatened or endangered), o recreation • Evaluate effects of metals to beneficial uses due to releases from the reservoir o agricultural supply water, o effects of metals on crops including incorporation of metals by crops (e.g., arsenic uptake in rice), o effects of metals on plants grown for support of wildlife (such as in wildlife refuges), o drinking water supplies, o fisheries, o wildlife (including state and federal species listed as threatened or endangered), • Evaluate combined toxicity of multiple metals • Evaluate contributions of metals In reservoir releases related to the SWRCB antidegradation policy • Evaluate impacts from mercury bioaccumulation in aquatic life (especially fish) in the proposed reservoir, and effects to wildlife that feed on fish from the reservoir and recreational opportunities(i.e., sport fishing) • Evaluate physical conditions expected in the reservoir, including thermal stratification and hypolimnetic anoxia, and effects on reservoir and downstream aquatic resources • Conduct re-analysis of impacts due to metals, other contaminants, and physical conditions in the proposed reservoir on: o water quality (chapter 7), o aquatic biological resources (chapter 12), o terrestrial biological resources (chapter 14), o recreation resources (chapter 21), 9 o public health and environmental hazards (chapter 28), and o cumulative impacts (chapter 35). Comments on Specific Sections of ElR 7.2.1.5 Other Heavy Metals "In addition to mercury and selenium, other heavy metals, including cadmium,copper, and zinc, impair beneficial uses of water bodies. Cadmium, copper,and zinc enter the water bodies with the sediment from eroded soils and discharges from abandoned mines, and in stormwater runof,�'from municipal areas (,SWR('B. 2011 a). rhe primary source in the Central valley appears to be tailing piles located at 0handoned mine sires. Many of these mines are located upstream of reservoirs;therefore, the sediment Owl iuclrrdes the heavy metal constituents is generally captured upstream of the dam.Heavy metals appear to cause health concerns in aquatic resources and in humans that consume the fish from these icaier bodies." Abandoned mines, which contribute heavy metals to area streams, are also found downstream from Shasta and Keswick dams. In addition, natural erosion and soil leaching also contribute to metals loads found in area streams, such as Cottonwood Creek, which make up the bulk of the flow In the Sacramento River during high runoff events during which Mows would be diverted to the proposed reservoir. It is not that "heavy metals appear to cause health concerns in aquatic resources and humans," it is well known that they do. 7.2.4 Primary Study Area 7.2.4.1 Overview and Methodology "D IFR began monthly sampling of streams in the Primary Study Area in 1997, including physical parameters, nutrients,minerals,and metals in the water column(DWR, 2012),as well as mercury analysis of sport fish tissues collected from nearby existing reservoirs, including East Park, Stony Gorge, and Black Butte(DWR, 2007a).Routine water quality monitoring by DWR was periodically suspended chic-up.liurding limitations during portions of 2008 and 2009,and ended following the January 2010 nionitoring run. Sampling,results were then compared to Central Valley Basin Plan water quality criteria (('17 JfVC'B, 2011)(Appendix 7A California State Water Resources Control Board Constituents of Concern ref Water Bodies in the Study Area)and USEPA ambient water quality criteria to prevent nuisance algal growth in streams(USEPA, 2001b)." DWR does not indicate any data for metals in its Water Data Library until 2006 for the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Darn, and 2003 for the Sacramento River at Hamilton City and opposite the Moulton Weir, as well as Stone Corral Creek. Funding for water quality monitoring by DWR was curtailed shortly after the 1997 date indicated in the EIR, after the project manager in the Red Bluff office was informed of potential adverse impacts from metals by the then Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section. If additional data are available, that data should be made available in the WDL so that reviewers of this EIR can verify claims about lack of water quality issues made in the EIR. However,the data that are in the WDL adequately demonstrate significant adverse water quality issues with the proposed project. Any additional data that has not been shared will just confirm these issues. 10 Appendix 7A- California State Water Resources Control Board Constituents of Concern of Water Bodies in the Study Area— lists a large number of parameters for which no information is contained in this EIR. For example, chlorpyrifos, diazinon, chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs, and dieldrin are constituents of concern from Keswick Dam to the Delta. The EIR should assess how these constituents will impact water quality in the proposed reservoir. 7.2.4.2 East Park and Stony Gorge Reservoirs "East Park and Stony Gorge reservoirs were sampled during the summer of 2000 to evaluate the extent Y?f mercury contamination in fish because these reservoirs are representative of conditions that could he expected in the proposed Sites Reservoir. DWR analyses of total recoverable mercrn y indicate than le re./s in samples collected near the bottom of the water column at Stony Gorge and Black Butte reservoirs. exceeded the California Toxics Rule for protection of human health. Fish tissue samples were collected by DWR from East Park and Stony Gorge reservoirs during 2000 to 2001.Neither catfish nor bass composites collected from East Park Reservoir exceeded the OEHIIA screening value or USEPA criterion, although mercury levels in the small sized bass approached these values, and a very large channel catfish that was analyzed individually contained tissur mercury at over- twice the level of the screening value and criterion limits. Mercury concentrations in tissues of hannel catfish collected from Stony Gorge Reservoir contained levels less than the screening value and criterion (DWR, 2007a)." Mercury sampling in fish from East Park and Stony Gorge reservoirs was conducted to contribute to the knowledge of mercury contamination in a number of northern California lakes and reservoirs, not simply because these reservoirs are representative of conditions that could be expected in the proposed Sites Reservoir, though they well might. As noted,the bass from East Park Reservoir that were used for the composite analysis were small in size (about one foot long), yet approached the screening value and criterion. Larger fish can be expected to exceed these values since mercury is accumulated and magnified in fish tissues. The large catfish which contained mercury at over twice the screening value and criterion is probably representative of mercury concentrations that can be found in this species. The EIR fails to mention that mercury contamination exceeded the screening value and criterion in a relatively small largemouth bass collected from Stony Gorge Reservoir. Though the catfish analyzed from Stony Gorge Reservoir did not exceed the screening value and criterion, the cited report states that"larger channel catfish from Stony Gorge Reservoir, therefore, may be expected to contain mercury concentrations that exceed the screening value and criterion." Since mercury contamination in excess of criteria occurs in lakes that the EIR states are representative of conditions that could be expected in the proposed Sites Reservoir, the EIR should discuss the probability of mercury contamination in the proposed reservoir and ramifications to recreational fishing and wildlife that would consume fish from the reservoir. lI 7.2.4.3 Salt Lake Salin i!water has been observed to.seep from underground salt springs in the vicinity of the Salt Lake bruit ulrrrtg the slopes above the valley and along the valley floor within the proposed inundation area of .Situs Itcservoir. These areas are generally located in the Funks Creek watershed. The water from the undurgr•ornrd springs accumulates along the trough of the valley and forms Salt Lake(USGS, 1915). The sit' Lake and adjacent seasonal brackish wetlands varies with time. The wetted area appears to vcrr-)- •om 0 to 30 acres. The deeper water appears to be approximately 15 acres based on observations in ul117. The depth of the water has not been monitored. .Cul! Lake was only sampled on a few occasions from 1997 to 1998. In Augist 1997, the Salt Lake was rlri-. 1n September 1997, the springs were bubbling and the EC was 194,100 micromhos per centimeter llrmhoslein)as compared to 3.490 ymhos/cm for the nearby Stone Corral Creek. In Januar} 1998, there ►rus less than 1 cfs of flow from the springs, and the EC was 7,2001cmhos/cm as compared to 540 lemho leen far the nearbv Stone Corral Creek. From these samples, if was found that waters from this locution are extremely high in minerals. The EC value on one occasion reached 194,100 micromhos per centimeter. The TDS measurement at this time was 258,000 mg/L. EC. TDS,sodium, and boron exceeded rill Central Valley Barin Plan criteria.A few metals also were noted at very high concentrations (ah nrinum, iron. and rrrur.ganese)and exceeded all criteria, and a few others exceeded some criteria tur:senic, copper. lead and nickel). Levels of ammonia and orthophosphate also were noted at high levels and execeded criteria. Temperatures from this site were variable, and probably depend on seasonal (•n,aditions. Concentrations present in water from this site likely depend on the season and flow." Though the EIR states that water quality data used in the analyses are available in the WDL, data for Salt Lake could not be found. However,the EIR states that several metals (aluminum, iron, and manganese)were found in concentrations that exceed all Basin Plan criteria, while others(arsenic, copper, lead, and nickel)exceed some criteria. These metals from the springs feeding Salt Lake will add to the metals load in the proposed reservoir. 7.2.4.4 Funks Creek -Vanks Creek originates at approximately 850 feet elevation in the foothills west of Antelope Valley. The breaks of this intermittent stream are heavily eroded and the gravel bed is highly disturbed and compacted by cattle.Along the north end ofAntelope Valley, Funks Creek receives underground drainage from Salt Lake. Funks Creek widens as it cuts through Logan Ridge and enters the western side of the Sacramento Vallcv. although flows are still intermittent.Approximately l mile downstream of Logan Ridge, Funks Creek is impounded by Funks Reservoir. This reservoir is fed mainly from waters of the Tehama-Colusa Cana/. Downstream of ffiv reservoir, Funks Creek is bordered by agricultural lands, and much of this rcuc•h is channelized befcire emptying into Stone Corral Creek. This portion of Funks Creek likely has same flow year round,due to leakage from the dam at Funks Reservoir. DWR observed aluminum. arsenic, copper, iron, manganese, mercury, nickel, and phosphorus in Funks C'r•c ek tit the Glenn-Colasa Irrigation District(GCID)Main Canal station during intermittent water cluali(v sampling. The concentrations appeared to be higher during and immediately following storm r-,•e•rrrs... 12 As with Salt Lake, data for Funks Creek could not be found in the WDL. The data used in the analyses in the EIR must be made available for review. It is likely that the reported metals exceed various criteria, as with Salt Lake, and thus add to the metals load in the proposed reservoir. 7.2.4.5 Stone Corral Creek "Stone Corral Creek originates at approximately 700feet elevation in the foothills west al'Antelope Valley. As the intermittent stream,Jlows into the grasslands of Antelope Valley, the channel is narrow and the banks eroded. The much larger Antelope Creek,llows into Stone Corral Creak from the south near the town of Sites. Stone Corral CreekJlows through the gap in the foothills and into the western Sacramento Valley. DWR observed aluminum,arsenic,copper, iron, manganese, nickel, and phosphorus during intermittcnl sampling in Stone Corral Creek near Sites station during intermittent water qualitt'sampling The concentrations appeared to be higher during and immediately following storm events. " Data for Stone Corral Creek are available in the WDL. These data show that not only are high concentrations of aluminum, arsenic, copper, iron, manganese, and nickel present, as reported in the EIR, but also cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, silver, and zinc, as well as boron (Table 5). The EIR does not disclose the fact that, not only are the concentrations higher during and immediately following storm events, the resulting metals concentration in Stone Coral Creek exceed a large number of criteria and standards including those to protect drinking water, public health, freshwater aquatic life, and agricultural uses. These metals will also contribute to the metals load in the proposed reservoir. The metals concentrations found in Stone Corral Creek, Salt Lake, and Funks Creek are a result of leaching from the soils through which these water bodies flow. Inundation of these soils by the proposed reservoir will result in an additional metals load to the reservoir. 7.2.4.6 Tehama-Colusa Canal "The intake for the Tehama-Colusa Canal occurs at the southeast end of the Cit) of Red Bluff at River Mile(RM)243.The intake occurs downstream of the mouth of Red Bank Creek.The Tehama-Colusa Canal is approximately I 1 I miles long and extends from Red Bluff in Tehama County to downstream of Dunnigan in Yolo County. Funks Reservoir is approximately 66 canal miles downstream of the intake at the Sacramento River. DWR observed aluminum,arsenic,cadmium,and iron during intermittent sampling in the Tehama- Colusa Canal downstream of the siphon under Stony Creek during intermittent water quality sampling." The intake for the Tehama-Colusa Canal is at the Sacramento River below Red Bluff Diversion Dam water quality monitoring station. Therefore,water quality in the Tehama- Colusa Canal will be exactly that found at the Sacramento River below Red Bluff Diversion Dam monitoring station. Data for this monitoring station can be found in the WDL. 13 This is another example where the EIR is less than forthcoming. Not only are aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, and iron present in water diverted from the river into the canal, but, as discussed earlier, so are chromium, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, and zinc(Table 1). The highest concentrations were found during the higher flow months (December through March). As discussed earlier, many of these metals exceed a large number of criteria and standards, including those developed to protect drinking water, public health, freshwater aquatic life. and agricultural uses. Water quality in the proposed reservoir will reflect that in the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam and other source waters, and exceed many of the criteria developed to protect beneficial uses of the water. 7.2.4.7 Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District Main Canal "The intake for the GCID Main Canal is on a side channel off the Sacramento River at RM 205.5,north or the town of Hamilton City.GCID's Hamilton City pump station,located at the intake,diverts water into the GCID Main Canal from the Sacramento River for distribution within the GCID service area.The canal is an unlined earthen channel that stretches approximately 65 miles from the system diversion point near Flamilton City to its downstream southern terminus at the CBD near Williams,in Colusa County. DWR observed aluminum,arsenic,cadmium,copper,iron,mercury,manganese,and phosphorus during intermittent sampling in the GCID Main Canal intake during intermittent water quality sampling." The intake for the GCID Main Canal is slightly upstream from the Sacramento River at Hamilton City water quality monitoring station. Therefore, water quality in the GCID Main Canal will be similar to that found at the Sacramento River at Hamilton City monitoring station. Data for this monitoring station can be found in the WDL. Not only are aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, copper, iron, manganese, and mercury present in the Sacramento River in the vicinity of the diversion into the GCID Main Canal, but so are chromium, lead, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc(Table 3). Aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, and nickel are present in concentrations that exceed various criteria and standards. The highest concentrations are generally found during the higher flow months of December through March, when the proposed project may be diverting water from this area of the Sacramento River. 7.2.4.9 Sacramento River Opposite Moulton Weir "DIl'R monitored water duality at the Sacramento River along the western bank opposite Moulton Weir .vlarion ftom 2000 w 20111. The water quality samples included aluminum,arsenic,copper, iron,mercury, mangenaes4. lead. and phosphorus. Total aluminum levels in the Sacramento River at this location frequently exceeded aquatic life criteria during associated high flow conditions in the river,but rarely exceeded drinking water criteria and the agricultural goal.Arsenic levels exceeded human toxicity rhix�vholds in all samples collected,and the criterion for protection of aquatic life for cadmium was occasionally exceeded. Copper levels frequently exceeded hardness-dependent aquatic life protection criteria during high flow conditions in the river, and iron levels frequently exceeded drinking water and aquatic life protection criteria, as well as the agricultural goal during the same river conditions. Dissolved iron levels exceeded the Central Valley Basin Plan level occasionally.Mercury levels approached, but did not erceed, the CTR criterion during the highest flows in the river. Manganese levels 14 occasionally exceeded drinking water standards and the agricultural goal, and lead levels rarely exceeded drinking water criteria.All samples contained total phosphorus at levels at or above rhe recommended criteria range to prevent nuisance algal growth in streams." Monitored metals also included cadmium, chromium, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc (Table 4). Contrary to the statement in the EIR, aluminum concentrations frequently exceed drinking water criteria and on several occasions the agricultural goal during the high flow months of December through March. With reported concentrations up to 38 ug/L, mercury not only approached but greatly exceeded the California Toxics Rule (CTR)criterion (0.05 ug/L)for sources of drinking water as well as the National Recommended Water Quality for freshwater aquatic life continuous concentration (0.77 ug/L)and maximum concentration (1.8 ug/L). Reported lead concentrations frequently exceed the California Public Health Goal of 0.02 ug/L, and had a median value of 0.058 ug/L. Reported nickel concentrations also exceed the California Public Health Goal. Environmental Impacts/Environmental Consequences 7.3.1 Section 303 Evaluation Criteria and Signiffeance Thresholds "Significance criteria represent the thresholds that were used to identify whether cin impuct would he potentially significant.Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines suggests the following evaluation crileriaJenr water quality: Would the Project: • Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? • Create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources ofpolluted runoff? • Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? The evaluation criteria used for this impact analysis represent a combination of the Appendix G criteria and professional judgment that considers current regulations, standards.and/or consultation with agencies, knowledge of the area, and the context and inlensitr uj'!he environmental effects, as required pursuant to NEPA. For the purposes of This analysis. an alternative would result in a potentially significant impact if it would cause the following: A violation of any water quality standard or waste discharge requirement, or otherwise substantialh- degrade water quality If a water quality constituent declines under the action alternatives as compared to the Existing Conditions/No Project/No Action Condition, the changes are not considered to he adverse. 15 Qualitative Analysis of Constituents The qualitative analysis of changes in other constituents(e.g.,mercury,selenium,nutrients)was based upon an analysis of potential changes in loadings from sources of the constituent and related changes in flews that would occur from implementation of the Project as compared to the Existing Conditions/ No 11'roject/No Action Condition.For example,the qualitative analysis of changes in mercury is based upon changes in flow patterns from the major sources of mercury in the Sacramento River watershed (e.g., tributaries to the Sacramento River)." What the heck does this last paragraph mean? It makes absolutely no sense. The analysis of potential impacts should be based on an assessment of the expected water quality in the proposed reservoir, whether that water quality exceeds any criteria or standards, and the adverse effects that would occur if criteria or standards are exceeded, both within the reservoir and in downstream areas subject to releases from the reservoir. 7.3.4 Section 303 Impacts Associated with Alternative A Shasta Lake and Sacramento River from Shasta Lake and Keswick Reservoir to Freeport Innlxnrt SW Qual-1:A Violation of Any Water Quality Standard or Waste Discharge Requirement,or Otherwise Substantially Degrade Surface Water Quality Mercury and Other Heavy Metals "As&NCrihed in Section 7.2,the sources of mercury and other heavy metals in Shasta Lake are located upstrWID of the lake and accumulate within Shasta Lake.Mercury in the Sacramento River downstream of Keswick Reservoir is generated along the tributaries to the Sacramento River.The generation rate and the accumulation rates of mercury and other heavy metals in Shasta Lake or along the Sacramento River would not be affected by implementation of Alternative A because there would be no new facilities constructed upstream of Shasta Lake or along the tributaries.Operations of Shasta Lake under Alternative A,as reflected by end-of-month Shasta Lake storage, would be similar to conditions under the [I-xisting C.onditionslNo 1'rojectlNo Action Condition,as described in Chapter 6 Surface Water Resources." Accumulation of mercury would indeed be affected by Alternative A(and all the other alternatives) since water from the Sacramento River, containing mercury concentrations in excess of various criteria,would be diverted into the proposed reservoir. Releases from the reservoir could adversely affect downstream resources and beneficial uses due to the mercury contained in the reservoir. In addition,fisheries, wildlife, and recreation that utilize the reservoir could be adversely affected from mercury accumulation in the reservoir food web. Summary "Concentrations of mercury,other heavy metals,and salinity would be similar in the Sacramento River under Alternative A as compared to the Existing Conditions/No Project/No Action Condition;therefore, there »°ould be no impact related to these constituents." 16 Again, there are potential very significant adverse impacts associated with diverting water from the Sacramento River during higher flow periods to the proposed reservoir. The Sacramento River contains concentrations of a large number of metals, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, and mercury, that significantly exceed various criteria and standards designed to protect beneficial uses. Water in the reservoir will reflect that of the water diverted from the Sacramento River, and will also exceed a number of criteria developed to protect beneficial uses. The metals may adversely affect aquatic resources in the reservoir and terrestrial resources that may utilize the reservoir(such as fish-eating birds), as well as reservoir recreation. The metals in releases from the reservoir may adversely affect downstream resources, including drinking water supply, agricultural supply, wildlife, and fisheries, and may violate the SWRCB antidegradation policy. These are definite "impacts related to these constituents," contrary to what is stated above in this EIR. All the alternatives suffer from the exact same significant adverse impacts due to metals in the source waters. 7.4 Mitigation Measures "Because no potentially significant direct water quality impacts were identified,no mitigation is inquired or recommended." The EIR failed to identify any impacts, though significant potential adverse impacts are painfully obvious. The EIR completely ignores any assessment of the proposed project —Sites Reservoir, as well as any assessment of the adverse impacts the reservoir may pose to beneficial uses within the reservoir (i.e., fisheries, wildlife, recreation) and those adverse impacts attributable to releases from the reservoir(i.e., drinking water supply, agricultural water supply,fisheries, wildlife, recreation). As shown throughout this discussion, a number of metals significantly exceed water quality criteria and standards in the water sources to the proposed reservoir. The EIR completely ignores potential chemical contaminants (such as chlorpyrifos, diazinon, chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs, and dieldrin). Water quality in the reservoir will reflect that of the source waters. Therefore, the reservoir will contain a number of metals, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, and mercury, and possibly other chemical contaminants that exceed a number of water quality criteria designed to protect beneficial uses. Both water resources within the reservoir and downstream resources that receive reservoir releases may be adversely affected by the metals and chemical contaminants. The EIR also fails to address the physical properties that will exist in the reservoir(such as thermal stratification and hypollmnetic anoxia), and how they will affect both reservoir and downstream resources. The EIR needs to address how these significant adverse impacts are going to be mitigated. References SWRCB 2011. State Water Resources Control Board. A Compilation of Water Quality Goals, 16'Edition. April 2411. 17 4i fA: pi P. a 1XI N:m-f4i gH A j"i cc N1 'A lo� m,u!' m;"I cal ml I -FA Am AM N.; r�4; .:"nj� Do NO M. rt n N conl 'M Eg,!4. : CR At d 4nd ' cr 1i d!d: N D M m c� di d A �i A!-4t-;i d'.i:'4! Cr q LT 41 • P 7b ul c� P: d' o j 44, rimN v ;ul e Ln n o I'Ll g vs d 6 ., 0, o o a d.o r� cn A Lp Zq q tj q.1:m tn d. ri 8 2 m d�Qx j r LA ij N jj'j!ff ji V!4V;1!9 9: w v C d a cv! 6 d v v v v v _El _j M Q, d 6 1 6 d I'd:f I'cvl:6:al v IV, 4 �1 v v v v v v v v;v I v r, v N1 to;in�"I N! 1N (n 'o N CI 14 w., 1• N,N, q Lq m IR,Lq: N WI di •W' Ni r' d 6 co od o o P4 xG <�o rp Lt m > c P 12 m',4j,; 01. 0O. .4 Mi of o 4'1 d Lft D o g! j!ai cq. 1% %.Nr r,, m.Ln ta ev N q i 'Go T 4n:m.N: A m M, w, o e4j v E r4,on! aa lq�Nil#I Lni • , " , i . O.1. !' Ln N 51 w. A : I!, z � m: . 14 M ch LAI 6 A:e,[.Q. %6!vi! ch ft��r in ii v v c�, In.N,F� v o'O'1A %n q� e4l a!m''.1' ole j c, to W� Ol gig, rj Ei: DRi Q_ 4z P'le I FRE "D A! N: , 1 2: !z 4 ;; _ . ZL Ni zvg": Zn '21 � z K m Ul q 4C i E El t C):a ffir m: coc ta: c.W Im Lt it Q 00 coo 43:o:Q 0,a-0 o a -jgiL B ->,;, �i a;>_;Z:`A:?:a >: > > > >:� > >,>;>,;t, �>j�!j> .&S-0jr] 0.5,oiolo-o 8.5 a 3 5,5 0 13 5,6 31 S Z,Z o: : !0.0! tt! 0 cr c Cr a tt:Jt: t,Lti M t!ti (L pp �'i m 3 31 3 4•di M:m,m:M cm: w,cd w.,c—D�fo, co co cc i4c w': a. :c.,Q;, w :x;8''98131 .0.00 O:jm.ola o� t.- o C' WI c vci:iWc (.r �cr IW= cWc W G•r st r- cc .2 ai aa ; j , 1 i '' - m. cd i�n; i� do I'm w, ig-21.w':'mj cv)m In In-ca.col en. ;ca.m!mi to.w; E'E E m: cc a: W is cc iz,a tc:cc w1cow-w-cc cclirfac-cr. E E- v'r: E cc M.;j;g 1: I 13, 000 00,0 0'0.00i0!0j0� nj 1: s 0 0.0!0,0,0! -Z co; 1Z Xw .11 Hill!, • u ca fel u a M ii m R-2 14;%:v1 K a A a: u u z 3 X RAj u% W. 61 ,m j vi a A a 5 w 'a1 N;W�m!W a1;NIN.4D hlN.m'p]?tp W•N n N•e; 1N w171�1 1pImm'n' ^I�. N, In{'n m . C :9q,Mi cq•1% rq +1L'N'a?IW •,°. fJw.�-II N..'. Ni V:M VII VO/:NIINM lYfj M, " Q f9:N'N'IrI N:Q ,Di Rl.1.1'Ni QNS MS QI�I N'M; eWi1�1,7� i 1 ' I._' 1I__,_• wW7wimmY1N .�`M' i I I$ s O n1'� fl,' `l11 N Vl:h- a1!(•A.0; m,m °+; 4; R w,v•11;d d;.1;.ii.i;o ltin M,d.o;o,.I o; to dnaIdld .1 4:.i.n W:.;.c°d:dl c'd ci I1�11 YV�I f'DV N�(Q•!'N�1Q'i N Nj Nr NifV,NIN NI N'N N�N�N:N N NN:fltfn1 Nr N:N N � - µ d:d.Q B<+;;Biolaio Slo d P/ d;d'B4dfB 8 8'8:dIcidi8'(B vId.8: /I ;d d d I i m .Oi ! I i t V' � AI IlLrOjl Oi O� i � sLM 1 �B ;� d � � oG{a � 0 dvQBi N N 01 n' ! .�{: Nif+/• $-� ry o,N•"vS °.r 1.1 4 q•a �._�.° ` .r`"�i.i.a+ m:o11a°�'1�`.$� i"p';�,I,{ Iv, n 1 _ Z .r m N .1 ,ri,nF'ry e.i,ry W I W'd d OI.i .i, Cl .3? t o o .i o o W. ,D•ol!nj W. oL .ri•n•nao: m.n In 3 ',i'ei..i'.i:""i'"I.�`+ii.i '+•d .a d'd'd:dld .i:OiO:d ol.,!old ja'dl,d•.i,.4 .a,d'SS :ei z i my mI€ I yyii11 n h'0 ;CI� N�'�: `.\Z Z 7a 9d V ^ ~ r z:m;z,z za•+;d Y1�d,dldil lol"' z'dld;zld;4i^ z z zlztd�Z z;x z z:x z {^1•d'd d Nl ni m'�i M•m-M n}i m' N h'h m. V)i r1'17!4,q,w 1111a 61'N m`W CI ,A. i°L•r' tr A n m g O a1 r,�miiN al m' M:rf OS Oi in v 11114p'n.N:p,. ID.M N h N n N C ul•nlw n.n W:mIr1;1O•IAI M.r.i Q-Ni N!{� a Ri. I�:V rl NilOj ih OI 611"IM mle iI- .. EI 01 J� '}�f 61!Q QI!SIII �.y� In.w:n+.•1'°I-Y'f fy M.m: IN1 1 ItD%m ml n:M� ��1pq'N N N. !IR ca , b .rn• ;a; '� +o'°eli,Oi" -+'I:q1,N!n ,nrlt.a,^i."'.°.� ,.{;1:.tI1.Lt`V ry irle,v Ep.M In' ',•°:" d - , 'r•i' a w.+'+1d,0'Oi«i'O'Oi01 �o O ^1 IW. i .O In �i�. �:�'`�'•[�-O n• W : ioil; o a:0:ai i0 V O!O,V•v-OVI VI Oi di O: ,O?vl0 V[6:VS - : I I • ! : I N ,. .._....._... ,.....,.. ,-..._I-__4__�._1.__—.}_...1.,..1-i-.rte.;_..'_.i.-.__._.i_.i i '.. i '..�3 i •._.._.w.j ....-.. _ ,O r a ,g n.o 8188 ���i5'i dr 8jo1`3 `3:9,@'�"?'4'rd�B;B•livil4if'o B P,.ffV. aia.d j 3 a I l i ( t i I I I i � j i ?-.; 1 ._L...»-i---r•....:- -._.-.._. ... I ! I kI ip 1 1{{k1�p 0 rte. ' N•0 47 I'm{G.N,m14.O'V1i Ns Oi OS d•I Vi • Vi+Dl 4'Df4'N:Nf aly[g,y�I n,l/llp'U1 -N' S; e-$�+� '�,.a:Iv.1� 1:L!T'4'6I.,/1 ,T,, +Er c1 A: .b.N.CI'10'd EO'N.L` +.,•i}i.fVi bib O;�iDI b,N1a'W,W1�•Q:ti:l�l'M:/1I:VI QI Q'dl.,fi w .li _.•I� w W W, W w ,.1. I.-/ N,W,W W.W E r 1 O, n n 94' I $x o d o, L''o;oJ<;o; '� �°d;�iS EL i `1+.«l:w,i0,1v!^IIV. 17;o1m•`.�n � Lhs``ryry:�; 1'd"I .I`f. ��n:Qn �; .� I I E- N.�:N�: .+,�V rv.w.��L�•� N �I' N,�:N tV:N.1fti'fl� ��j 1 '. C E' 0„ '`!T�Q'Y�f1� p _ ..._I.��i_i_.I kmF imr--!- I- :_ I�QE I•�n�-'al :~;. �.irra� ins �1�._~'. ...i... . :. I I m o i { 1 , ; [ I ' I I i E j I I I I # • : : I�' ,v b a ! I i ; 1 i i i I i 1 � I I � i f j I ! I i � I I r4�'•an � h o c 3 3 i'•j"F� I oloi i� 2 2rar2 p o q ` 0;n a I is 0IQ.Oja,a a; io:a,olal 'dl m Y;Y ? iii° a a of a:n!olol ;a,o!c;a.,a:alo`o•ola o:o aib'a;ai�+o:o 0.0:010. ! r A,yo.�. s E - •� � W:LL1�iIl. Y.:i4.V.•14•LL:LL:LL-LL-LL Y...LL!LL.1�:LL'LLj LLI LLitL;LL'LLi�.LL'u LL.LL.4>.; T 7 W .� d " U V V V LLl LL:LL:LL V.'LL.LLLL,LL.LL,.LL. :µ I IL:Y,.W:W;LL:LLLL•LL �':�10:�:�'•a:a.� ?I�i 7i W',J J'�. Z!=.�'�i W.7 it,i'WI it id 0, ?•e'J.W,r 4 I c c ,y: •C a l7 �d d O ,mym m:mlm-m!mi m;ml ml mlm m m m_al'I mlm m m'�.�`;if'i m;m m•� m m m-m'.m,m ( .1T � C IC ,.°• umi �� � � � y O a'a'a O ai a:a.alc 6 O G ala n''O a s--O! •aI L1'O,O a•a a,Ola 0:0:0 f E w O m = a d y W1.2;We WIw W:W;W IW W W�;WIW WI W W•W; WI W: W,W W W,W' t x.a m.x.x sL ,m sla « m'm:a :'a eti �e,m �a''ad` m:ac12,=:a W;'V'I'd`.°c.m;'1 a e� ed'=.° o:�� z c c J[JI J'J 'J• J.J}JIJ J: J:J 1J •f J J:J J M!"D i'm.mli 1, �:mim:m;m,�'�,mtm:m;m:m m,mJ;m:ml�,m io,m m'm;m m �' cc: W;* X,de a:m;xixfmia mlm:ac oc;m:ee. + .a,Q ¢,w!E .° A > E E ciae' oGx 1 , 1 IQ'0 01, O:p�O4giC,Gial IO: ,O.a;OLO'6 of ? a•cls ciG''$3 3 ° E :2: wl Wywlwl WIWI Mi. w;W; �w;w; ''�wS wC.w'W,w W w,w,w, w w wc;w,w,w- 1 ar ul I +�Q•aSI i i .5! i a� 'cZl � eG• IIS'S� ,�! t i ' Vi { U _ , I aC.w w._w:W n a a n e 4V.N• IUI VI ., v 6f N,14 LJ,U �I ,..._I I N� i ,Vf Vf tail I I Wi ! , ;,N. (Ifl ui tlf Vi Yi'YI.VS N L i N.V a:G'g 7 �i Q 2 2 :L ��_ I ! L... ...._ _ . 1 -� _. ..••�r_ � �I~i"� 1 i....'_._l. '. �--;—•i------'��-lr.��.,._ .....:...x_......3_._....._.4_ .... i..•. �_. . . yC J E V'N W m'e,T W"o Ci e,r` N1 NI rvI Mfe tniN 1� •P1 O al t0 N N N w sn N N M N1'to'1�.w n'M i I 1!�� (1Di QD T M N:� N'N A �4 ted.10 W n N 01 (4, ;wl p� ` •'.: ++ 7. iNIN 1N:01.w` wll�'m M'm,rt:wWli N�W11 IIA�M�tdpNl ry:�leN 'y .Idp'NItD S I : ' ! -` �.V:w ,nn M n N'V v N?Ni Q'i y'•+;.n�t!w;n M �r MI :,n1'N L m n:NI !r,'M' St:V4't* 174 all�al Nfn.�N:,mi 'rfI''Qp1N!-` 'tY:WI.••t' # ! i '' I ' ! aCh Q lf1 � to OO tD m V{• -rv'tD ! i td ° a a d o.d .� o'c o M o o c:.'i';c,t0vN• dto-.-i ri+.3'o;0 0 v � s i i i -i •.I t ry °-~' G ' a '`i$•'rv.-i'M 'n N7 .r v °�F ^ Ti ry1o`.•^ Inu OcOIO GOO O d0ci I I Mtil C' C I �i EJ W ' tp�'f1•..M'd rvI tTP•,vNi�1� M:�' :N1� Ca). N:NI��UIt M!7Di.e��Dt� M1 M' .'/,e4' 4' .-fM'rl O wiJ i wl dl0,.-1!N�.e:tt!d'Oi N1 N: 'ml wj.Ol 'D 1 ! mrw M:`^ 64 W n' ml wl 'w m•v'mr mi tD N M1 O..o O a1 n'Q n!a o+;m:C3 n N!w T m.v,M; �g,4 m) I I .-i ri w O C: '00� �aC : .^ b �, O .•;:i.i .•: .; ., rf G .'.€€ :.+,.-i ;.:�G•O,C..ti' .;; ? J M1p iq'n'%0 w, 'N }GD71 tDT IriM m k M1 I^ p O oO:d tow t]�'� w �'tl'w, ' 0 .•t N w.rliw .'.�.'tI ,rM•.I E { [ ! ; E m n. o 0 o n Q a o !d'. Ind dl o: o.Pi o; 'a d'`�' tk1 I[! i ; •o x c 0.0 0 0'© 0 0 oio,oieio'aidldvlPi v_ �v, c_ci�d �! irrjr s I y .+ a�I N;.•+i.-I M'N'CO;at w. I T1 tlt tJl i I W I I e i I m ; l '.O• I 1 7 J r1' :''I,w;.d fn N,en' .N. I!pi ei.w .•1 .'fd a u t7 d.d d © 0 0 0 0, Q,oov Q g'ao�$,9Ig c,djd' I I ao'M'N'G1!I+'co ''i�r N ry ,om 0.1. '•' L uii w M1 to M K C C.C7 Q_T IR nfA V: :Q'w•t0,t7Pj r z Ci 0 0 0 4 0 0 `� C a'O1 C!C G!CC`wi O!O.C7,G101 M�� G� f` j i I y u O I sWr:n.wn'IGai�� .M-t tMn,tA eNo�u�i:n44 iN+i,V:Q �IO�i�O.�.MIT1 �pmp: IM� O �' nod to tP .n to M.Q' d OO � tO'CD nl n ,nim :M.n.e. :e O'O:CG 1?,C3 O 0.0 C-G-CI;C C�C7-d:C`GIC m •.-1 sn N�T,W'l'`:1D V' w,•'t OtINN o11N;0=TI�'„�IW'n!N:T! 'c m A Ienm ^ m00 tagN.TeMi � `ii .tltmm. ;Nn:tultNn' 'tnI 1 I i v E }1-� } -I I I i y = .••I 00!N,aa'.•I!n-N'CQ LItI fA!Y5:N.all N7 W'NI •'q•aQl ppj tRf !m,4n C �p N tlt p! e O to M N toi d.Nr�. M di M'tf1 QI Iffl: N E 3 N MI Ih't`I aO.T V .My tD N !V•.-tl.-. M!C:N.�I ie7I N:QI Vt 7 7 1 I I I 1 � m a'o.o M.d, ,p o•d�u, to a- rn d� Mi !tr►'n to I � � � ] I eQn• .•l a1:•, W'. oi.".,,G1M o, •L+' r•I N'd' M M OG W -t'ri tp•N., m alM .tii : ' �I• Q .-I .-t-.-e, ry .w r-I ,y erj Mltt//�� M. .Ol .•tl eil ytpl�wl I 3� , ,S, � i � N a.C:d � N en W N M Mier1!al O'a!Q:t�!t�,t�:Q•�=n tqpI , :a`1 �.� d n d., 1t Olrl�tn:_I •l;y Ln'�.� rf y N N p M O:.w;N ti•ry 1!;44: O .a .•r'. ,m en. m�Oli.•t e•s .�. 'eI W i w..•ej � I ! ; Ik • :•a . �°' O to m 'a;$ :_� ` { Itag iRI I . ! ' I } �C'C � d:W Y'biC�d d C i � i � I I Irl I�, �•m:� r Q. tu:��x p,w:,i d tl;tl:0 A A A'tl O�G{O.C�C ntG?O;OIC tl A tl�tl i .tnle�n m �m 3 mltarn: t o y 0 0:0 0 0 0 0 O O p O OIpp.O:p:C pp O'Oi0'pp pp `m �i'u, ski aa.00 �'ro ~'.°'� .m. E m a; N O'O;O 0 O O.O O'D OHO?O'O'0i0 0.O:0'0,,0 Df0 1 1 a. I I— m ojm, •:^ M .. ij 's �:3 3 ? 3 3 3,3;3;3;3 3i 3;$I3j3 3 3 3j's� �i c = c.�. 2 2 z z z z 2:Z Z Z,2,Z-Z z z z x ziz.x Z Z i :3.3 3. -CI +v u-u V u a Iu .� '�' ��° d �`a o LS O Oi0 0 0.0 0:0,0 O:o,om0 040!0401OIO�.•:Q OjOI I oco R. ,ciroi m c Oi3 3 c;}j 3 o GGGi± GGK G:G'GPG-GI 4:i r-; I=1E* :-V ° u'°u'o'u:°ju u u u u'u'c°�Iu,u'co�:cVi V'°v!u;U1!uu; �' C` �- � 'w '213'1' ' 3 celcc!o 1= w m;ra.oeix I..K?oclrrla a mlac a a,a!oc1de1 I [] tS?_�u1= e I a;;'wa C z>Z!Z z z'z-z;z z z-z1;Z'Z'Z 21z'z'z:Z!Z:Z' I I j I, ,, :�';rl !A s, t0! m! 4, m: ai m u'U'u•U u:u.u'u'u U`U'u�u'ui tj U.u'u•u;Vi Wr U: 1 2 E:.ym,•: ' Q`q�.4 tl'O'4 O'tl'GI0�0,0!altlltl'L]ItlIa-i3r iolQ! � ,a:'ald'1°'S: � � m'm' m' E� E Ta' E E 0 m o.O o'o 0-0 O;0.0 010f0;0-0;01010;0;010;01 I : c, c'_ ?qW 3! 0� 0 3'a o E p.O.Q p,O.D O:O O Oo,OO:O'O�QOiO:d.Olo ! �. i.u} ,d: to,a ' �i m �'� ¢ 3.3;3I '3`3.3t$13}3 313;31 m'm;° , i t mt,a m}dl. _:_ o.CE m _ z'Z. a x"z' z z'a z Z•z'z;z z;7Cr Li z•z: i 2' �i io;«. c c v c O 000 00 00 0 0 0.0;0'0 OIO:D,o;D;o'0!Oj ;u,vtIL,dla Q'`O 1}}O'G;a GGGGKGGI= � E=•G.G'GG1G`G'GG��;Ir=�� C) 8'8!. i :33• MI n uu'uuuuvuvuuuuuuvuuuu v• tnw; os�•Ou � z �'zZaxz -, IN p� yf ,O•nI M n! to:N,M;n;N�tn' :MS e !O:O i8 M f+.� Yf N•M,.-r�,�1,(11 irtl-V T m n:O•ai w> 1 n O I iV io:Oj Odin O;O,Oj M1iv;oto l-vc 0.1? e'e -•'iQiO .i eti .-ir i -O ' u ;ol•er;,ni.ri,n.N:w' ^:�!!aTl ;..f•atm;v ..• In:.e MU a,o'o;o?oi ,» 6 ic•dFoIYI� p ,d;c�i+rlc oj8joiolmeoio .,;.. -i^I _iv r, .a. .m`• +N;w rn!�iM1. .'•1`M NI .•ilSAlaf'm'mt Ii,,,f m S�!,n,ygl o..'i. ,c.. o,.oJ..o.o alV. ooioV: V '8i8Gffp, po "ov"allop in _ `l - _j �:�y OI al r M ! IO O of OHO T m:m ; o Ev;819;8,8,8�?r{o:8.© 8�`1:rG'!�'kssi'� v;al8,j` Io�ol! o ;o: ? wer CO`Nty Cf'Ifi n'N O,'Cr!Cw0'a,•m {n N. imlea-.••r� 3r•1`N•�n 1 I . �en iV'm'.-f.M V'm'M ,•1 N,.•e-r.el..i%N•N'pt,m a %a 6!%n m d cd o a d c: c'c ra ri'o'o�o,a c!c;oio o3ci { %n _ ii { Yi � � E ! 'm •N t Nf 3 p� tl� M1 In i q, S ��wt �'.+:m•,•,•n`:N N 11'x:,r�`; N W -mN m TT N -I � N - rZvrr•:mP °p'w u1' V`W�W ;n m +•i < < - j i 1 T. ap!w N:M1 w tn'Go-Vela:O,! NI n'a.,o :O,-y} rc � j+D 1�'{�.v,n:'rtf W:O','�.R.,rr R m � � T ni ry:,a �°°. ; r 3 N.� fV%Nla•i;,•I,VI "i1 q�e•1 N ,-11 wl w.e�l N �-i;,-1 r, r/ :In, j:0 ,-iw,niar .+,m''ar'.m'w!m:af'ai m!n'wa-rr,;Inl.r �jm n w In• !w t1�7.CQ p,{fl.v�N!m;m:,al.�;n MI T''IT:vim-M,V1.tM!IA:m �m rw 3 rR,C .•i ei;N .•i O%m'41 G'G .-1-w I M.A �'1:f`i A Al rl d;,01-.- M1 t az { i ! I f t aaaaaaa'at-4C do='Nr ;r4- w �, z.z;z Z.ziz,z•x;z:2;z,z.z.zixiz;z z; l'"i '"`Q,o o " I i C r M w:P 10 ew ti'n M-m!.-I ci "t A; 3M1'Go,m e•t,ni<!kn' :M. wleerr�� O,cccnnn'�:i I',O'mi0 ;.C' fN. M. : , I .N CR .e �aflfi.lAt eilNey'Nj ;N;."r. ;Inl Ni aritl b;N ZA c -+ m.L w rn.n 179 a,'.'eiwln;N•1n w M•CC•ai ts, em m n rn; (ca n �; $a.n m n:m n.v;M'o n.af'n n .. 2. . .r:mlMM. M:n'C !N evi p-W:N Q..'I CO{m10;•••I:O;r11.••Ira1wi{t'1 N,-1 Nr N[ 'M{{.M 0. oIMP a r f 'amp:ry,11 MA w:n:m!o'..,min gQ tp ,n pI fe4 w .� w �q IopiC Oir•!,Qi G:Pi N!q1�;0 N.Q10.32 N�54 ;.p0� GO :1.t:' .F S, I VtOj Gia QI Ci 'V'G'040�0 TOi G:.r,O.�' V'V V, 'n'O o: ! , ~'t N'4f,M1 iM N{6%N 1 W' m'Wl�� Csyf '� ro [ 'C?i.•q: .,� wl n'o a� `Olij� Id17 0"41t O. ' N aN = -6 $'� �to.&:. ,x;91 .�; , 1aso� >v'ald o�c188 8_cia�o'ci�c!a,a1$ B $i8; josCj ol oi0 NiLn:c:oro;Lnj5j t ?entry,' mISE�rr� .r!ney!'I'Q-1ti-i rilQ'r' ,f o P.? 'e?iv 3.•i=.r"e�.o•I;M1•T!r••I,CD':ri!ni w!.~ii.�.4 ch di:ei!Q�y'I� aj 0 to rn: bo M1 Lo `g. _ �._ E C_7:NI N!N!r�O.N:.'�"i wrl •�:C' I�!��� •IC.�' _, U . , U d w '.�- Ovr, tc..,,..', N:` v•�-wrn'� C•.r1r� ,� T.L" .-e N:N. i� L n 3 3 O , t,�?.•f, iaojmi.�i..�..�i C C ii iy 1 1 I 1 O N Y Q 4 O ! ! j i ! ; Ii •a rn v. ro o e x m A d ' E f I � f I { t ' I ' 1 i } I � 1 f :-roa'•o � c d � X 'S m � j m a ! 1 I � 1O,r � at Ia v a!a;o; ra;a;a Pj© O,G. ara a'a:a-a, +n ,n d 3 0- ;101,0 w to: 10;0 0 �d' qq a,o�o:o p 0:8'&O O'0 010 Os ~'Y W- !O. 10, j0'O;DIOrO:O'O 0 O'0;0i0,o'0 01OiO.0 ' , jg: £ c' m tai 3' 3 3t3 3' 3 3, i z 2Pj ? �zSxlx;�'�Iz.aja'���I�'� t I 1 620' pC C`t C1 07 0 0 (( O; 0 0}O O'D O�O'O:O'Oi0 O�O'0,0 0 I a ev �, , re a u try ' I i� kiE=: E=: � ;CEG;� i '�'� E j.'L, a.� 3 1 3 3: uiu� uis;`+�riv;sls Qi a o.Okn:a;aio u o•o,o�$ I 1 ;Q'a a.oeiae oe oe ae a a-�y!dfoe:aioe.m' oc ocroc ae!aelac.a' ; d o 0 O. x,x .� .�IZS�Z' Z;Z 2;2;2r2iz: ,�I,�p.Z zj21�,2 I ; I 'C: c 'I� �2; M y u n°i w a m ,uiuipu uIu cs!u u;uiu.0 v�u a w.0 ufu'u{u u!u j to c '. Z - E I E E E E n'of ;a alEEatq o d? a aia!aro!a a a' I f 1 1 1 rasa c /4 a y d ro E E E E m• OI rS no;0i poi p;O:OS(p�! 'OI E 0i 3jt��CIO, 0 O OjOICIC]!04O{OjO�D�O � ill � j 1 :intw +.�•u b, n. tf 8 d d w a 41: _�' 1{]��0•• O,PI PIO[iD�.D'O;OIO• CIO O,O; •O 0: �0'yO. I � 1,u �j a �,� o � a Y o a o �'i 'Y. 1 i•'.• S [���t ,(fit ,r,� I `1 mu [Y W'W ' Y a j p r 1V !�'t�! I�• lo' �j O.$,fl.;�, !.O_. - ? ... :......... ..,... i °�2 z 2 2 Table 3.Surameato R"r at Ha"It9R Part 1 Df 3 ' O1srdNd. 7a1N 0177A7r44 Taiul 0llsahlcd 70111 011sahcd T04A 6aWw6' 7nSa, fm>etw•d TW_I Al-i- Ak..hWm Arlel14 I An40ic Cadmium CadMk_ fh:a,Nbm Ch-... CopWr ':-vp- w u:n S..-P Date _1'}n Y6/L_ ..y,8ll„ Iy11. __!' -- {�JL 1416 H671 VWL 1'Yll vdA IK't • ,_ I.Y3,., -NIA 4005 NIA U.i I N1A 1 Jn H!•• l:a SAVEAMENTO RAHMSIITON CYIV '.11fLS(G3.9:1a �.N/A IIA If/A .... IJ,A H10. t'/i SACIIfJAfNTORANAMILTOx CITY_ 3�EJW .3-,f7A_.. _.!�A._ .... �_. MM..,.. ._iM. NIA MA .Nln WWI" I-_VA-. ..x _ _..N A...: _1.61......_.. A •_0.0[t NlA 041 111A _•.»•�' ! 1.36 I7/A61. N/A Q7i A 1,4L 1+14 771 SA[MMENTO RgNAMIITDN tl1'T__.. ._........ _. . 612[0!3670 ,!±(!L._ .199 pi N!!L .. .. - SAZA,IMFNTf1RAFIAM5l70NCm _..�....1 (Of SODS- t13_.: L3 �_--1.l2•.___�A71 _:0;400 11.9 SA[MMLNTO RANAMILTOx CITY,_ _ _:1119f04 1 _ 236„-;- 36.3.,•:_-_1!9.-,m -SACAAMFUYO RANAMl1TON CIIY ...._ -!l.0 ... �_3,T,.5 ..! 21k 254 .x0;012 0.034 O.Se u51 0.39 L0.IS .. .. ...... 2.45 22; Ia: SACAAMENTO RAxAMlLTON aT► . .. .-...• 1J1C186]1p1 : 357 4L3 3.A8 155 N.013 x,007 1.06 IA•1 3.90 .SrICRAMFNYq RAIfAMiLTONCm...,__... ...... .... 3&)OS7d5775_. _ IM :..._!.}] „_ .351, m_O1L 41066 1.57 LEA IS3 ,1.73 3.3 173 ----�' �,"7.03 - 1A6 41.033 m.01S 129 139 3A3 137 <3.31 118 SACMM[71T0 RANAMtLTOx GTY ..lLIOfD57:10......!]�_ ;?g:7 .. -,,. ...__..., .__ ._..... SSL .SACRAMFNTq RANAMIITONCm -., - ...-.. ... .. I(bpfp5,12-0D,1 15.9 1 39.3. 1.99 lA9 10.022 X009 1.02 1.02 1.33 - 7.73 14.1 SACRAMENTO RANMLttTax[lYY` ».._.. -'..._.._. _..... ._,•.„ 3J391059'.30__- 7S_-' 6666 i... 1:44....4.. _317 ;0.630 .0.076 269 1A.7 _ 3.71. ,767 5AC4nA1EM0 RAHAM#T011 CITY 6(28(65715.i_ 106 1 321 L37_ ]SR mOQ9 41012 052 1.1 1.75 1.2 114 la: '7 1145' 3.65 331, -- 1.11 354 „YO.IY]1 OAOI o,61 047 0.73 081 •1.41 T'!R - -- _II7-•• a0A09 OQ16 04b V.611 0.1.4 l i3 ' SACMIAENYO Rw%AAULTON CRY - f03;410 27.7 9731 .,'_-L54 1.!! '6007- QOSS 054 6.64 0.15 L 1 174 . SIICRAMSMO 6AfiAMQTOM QII' 10(25 12%0:. 30.9 eL6 1.SA 136 _ ..1 04 , m.009 063 0.74 ] 11 1'7 ei+' SACMMLNT0114 NAAtRTON CIIY 11�13(OS 0.01 019�L-00i•-368__ 192 mA09 0.614 079 Q.E7 I.W. 177 2•+ 11'7 SACW{4iFMO 0.1l17AA1QTONCm ,?7J14f4S.11?4 ,_6.67 : 36.1,.-r L91 2] @009_ OAaO 60'J Jd•1 2.6 5' 1t 1 .. .�.........-._._...------_-... ---•--_...-----' ... "}' � ...i.61 '' 1,35 ' D.011 0.092 2.f] 9.7.1 7A7 112 569 .71r SACAAMtNr'OQ-A- IITON CRY., ..... - .. .... _. _,I l�-.'_.._,-.. ..... . V.. . viz 54CRAMENtO RA!EiI1lRY011 CJY7 _.... .. _ ._,._..___. �?! + .•. -- - _..'_...3_41__, „7A_3... 0fl11. OA42 151 23. 7.b2 - MA 21.1 '111 . ._ _ .._.....__ 179 214 1.32 7.Tb -134 9T1 SACMMEMqukAM11TON CITY. •, 2pi/4L IT4S 212., ._733..._. 13 „_1.l> 0A14 "•_•'• .. 4455 ,_1.36 125 0021 •OA07 4.99 511A.13 4x6 113 ,1773 +,114 SAC0.M4WTORAHAMIRONCm_ _... _.. .. 3111067:30,.,,0.1773-., ._._._. SACPAMFN1oAAxAMILSONCm -„ _Afl7/066�0 914 1.06 � 1A7 AI e0.] 369 5.11 251 i.W1 510 71'1 SAC0.AMlNID.RAHAMILTO!1Cm ..,._ _. Sfl7p6tiA0_-1e9 2Bf.,.,....341„ ._.157.. _aR1._-...+03, 059 01.1 ,_]•25 ,.1.71 114 iSE ShCMMFNI0AA1iAM1l7tlHCm -„ - _617,(06630 100 3BE127. .A +RI _ +A;3 674 7.26 IA9 1.49 3&8 246 S"UMENtO R A IIILTO3I C[T',l.._ _ _.... .., 7f75/065AQ 235 ! _370 -LX. _131.. HA2... •x0.1 01-N 1.W. 6 I.J.I.I+ 1. b5.1 AM L32, „1.19 1_41.7 • 40.1 0.67 amt SA9, 1.41 110 7'hi _..- 9gW6:3o-.,_-591.. ._557-...1... S.i7, ;,._123.._ ..$1 A.1 061 1.li lAl l.Es 01< SACRAM W YO R A HAMILTON CRY, _ -_- _ 10f14/46 7'00 }6B 201 O B99 056 0 E3 0.73 1 fi3 .SACRAMENfORANAMR7ON[RY_._-� _.--. - _._. -1 ? - 18I 901 -.,194 , ,7.33 401 tai 052 73 _11'1 1. fI ._.. ....... i . SAtRAR1CNT0RANAMILTOHCm.._. '--3/GI0771Is 0.6G 06'1 0.5 1111 Ae4 x11.: _. ----- - SACRAM�NTO R A HA141L7ON Cm, - .:-7�M�f07~14:00 _ 112. _�1.. .m.l L El 1.9: ].93 4 9 591 91�. SACRAMENTO RA WIMIITON pfY_.,,,• ,,,-„ -,'_3/lQJD76'.Sa _153 916_ 277, •,-,236, . -m1_ _�0.1 4.67 0.71 1]1 1.51 266 I 314CAAM[NYO0.AINI1llTON C1IY ...._�. A1t7/G77.9-0 12,8, 52... __193 l'9't._...__s61_ -m] 643 a.SS -1.54 L1a 1i_4 658 SAC0.AM[ NTt1 R Al1AMIlTON Cm _„ -_ •. 12as -..1.53 ,37.2 SA• .„143 _41 _<0:1 O.S] 0.7: 1.77 L 65 4 Ill- LlC#AfA[tiTO 11 A&tR1[L70N UTY,.__...._._._..____.. __.,.. __6,!}• 561.._..._ 16. ._.IA7. __ ?_ 'W.1 692 6,75 _ I2.07nl 7377 2 7 1.39 .4 172 SACAAMW70 RA HAAIS[TON CITY ,_,, ••7r1E1077A0 308 1I4 [ 162 ,lfi�„ _163 .1 Oa7 0.EJ I,1S . ..3.53 67 131 EJ78j077 .. ,492 '._..7137.. ..SSE __163 143 OAS 0.6 0.9] L77 6.2 652 'SACtuM[NT00.ANAMILTON tl1Y .•-_,�_._9755_.216._ ',„37y9,. --.L47«_ -- 155 m.1 41;3 045 O.S4 663 oR3 5.7 SALMMFNT00.AxAMSlTON CRY •- _•1117f07 10A0: 0.8} 30.5 -1.96.,_- tab Y0,1 40.1 41 O.Ji 3.6•1 . ._. .. ....__..._ ---._ •-'-•--ii-u s.62 45.9 iii 297 _taa _<o.l o+o SACMMEN/O RAIfAM11TONCm ,,,, -_..SImI�.__•..- - - - ' SACRAMFNTO0.AxAM1iTOletm__, _. ' 3(6/0633jO5 2•�. 653._ -214, 116 60.1 W.1 0.15 0.7d 1.07 I.24 7 s '• 041 O.S1 O.9d 1 Tl Io:. 1•f1 L4CMMEN700.Af4AM1LTONCITY .^___._....-.�.___.1 3115jOH7.7D 1G7-_;.. 95;6..,_.2A6,_,. 2.17 �.] �.1 _ 031 0.51 Lao 1.5s8JI IO.7 1.411 ._ ._.__.__...____...___.... I _. SACMALENTO RANAAOLTINi CfTY. .. -. ..- .... ...-..,.2f25f0l 70:W�•,S1.i 3710 ... .161 A,07, <6]... <a.1 0,4Y IOI .1.0f N,2T frE.4 1:10 1.1, ,,-R'-x x.6.1 27.i a.0 .SACMI4 q%Y ?sNAM1LTtlNCJiY 18!331096.40 I 1.75 351 1.37 735 +0.1 441 0 .3 6 O.+G OAR 1.05 .SRCRAMWTO RANAMILTONCm - 31(3l09TSO 1 i91 47 l�6T•- -_L94_- -_m1_ -c0.1 0!9 0.4•! .. 1.75 10d W.B SA[MMEN%6t1nMI1TDN CHI' _. ____ .. •.. BVS_�--....13.. .�_..�0 ,1.77_ 1,{3.... �0.1. ._�.1, R. 1.04 --1.76. 3.65 171 393 -SACIUM]NTORA HAMRT[IN CRY ....._...__. _Sl4,�IO,h4S .34,2 . 160. '....i.f1 .. _-S6S,• _„ 1.. _-al 0.47 0.90 156 1.3 12.1 73fi .._!v SACRAMWrOAA HAAOITOM CR'l 1!700 i.S3 _, __lwf _1At _ +61, Op O.SH 3,79 135 10.4 51.3 _. 4.[6 1.27 . . 135 isE 153 130 SAauNLEXfO,A AXAMIITOY.f11Y........ _.._._ .._. _._.__ 87A .1...197 2.06 ..m1 -41.1 ..... , L9 7.91.• W.1 -40.1 643 0.5•, 1.x4 1;41 32 .. 59v SACRAM1HiQ A,A N!1M47tl11 sY!'r ...._. _._ li1lu?30_-._5.73_ _}3,6 .,.._. .. ._�_. SA[RAhelxtU#A3UMILTONCm ._ '.,5lj111835 3,.- 24.6, ,-L6 - ].73_ 16]Im ... 065 0.54 Sp 139 4 3:•1 .SACRAMENTO#AIUlM1L70N CRIT 0[2f110:1G 316•.. 359.-.-_.-IAI x,3.45-_ tD.1-•...�:1 065 U.7ri 1;11 7.?6 07.4 M. sACMM�yroaa�uwlamxem. -._....- 111�si�as.;_-ss. ... ,9a5... _??S. ._. . .... mx.. .m.� 664 0.7,: 031 Lp 41 M. 'SACIIAM[MOAAXA3AM1TaN C11T .. .-._ -. s 3/!1/13$, ..:..,.376 27i_ 1A1_, _..7.3, ..-161 .-_<0.1 052 0& 1 - 1.13 •]4.F Int .-. ...... .. - - - 167 .44 SACRAALENTO11,A 141Y413T01{Cm, _. .. ....... :.SJE/17 B3P. .8a_] 125..: .111 I 2.W m3 10.1 0.3 64: 1.f. S0.CAJIMlNIORA/1AI46TON CRY ___.._ - '. d[2I=?11M__. 10•». -,m6-- 195„ _126 •_ A.3 107 039 0.4 0.67 905 a 11; 1117312&35.,:__316, 325_ 3.17 m1 A.1 a+6 0,8d _ 2.1 Om 346 a, SA[AAMIXrb R A NANIRTON Cm3. .._. _._ - 7-09 - ' 119:15 ., .-3;6 -117 1.98 1 a6] 60.3 037 O S F 1.1 1,J7 127. :.'.4 I. SACRAa4GJTO RA1WAtl70N[ITY .... .. .. .. .. .•.•'�..._. ,SACMMEMORAHAl1R7gN17�1_„._.. .. _..... -........._ �'_`....:._19:3._.:_. .5,•,. ].7A...-„ln-. .-.s_a1_,,,-.�.} OS! 031 lA7 1.95 324 bS1 --••• t61 ;_,•tD.1 ,ai5 0.6ri _053 0-M +.3 301 ».....___V6MI30 '-_105 ..1..-2D_ }, 1.0 _. tA9 ___ ;5/4CMM[NrA R4H44tlTON,J.TTY_.��•.�� .1 3133Ia „LfiB, . 21.4 2A6 1.17„. sA1. .N.L 439 0.4d 0.3 6.12 70.4 552 SACMMMTO RANAMaTONQt'f ........... ..�-7 .., 2JR . _•10.1___ W1 0.51 1.31 0.72 2.03 6.2 7R.! 'S4CRAMEIITD RAxAMRTON CTYI��.'•�-__ �:3«...:....�7.1....i... 1.95 ...._?3.._.._-10.1.. .• .3 037 OAIi IAO 2;Oa 10.b 7+S _. .......__._...--..___._.__.._...__..... _.. «. . 'SACRAMEUf00.ANAMRMNCRY18.7,... 1.93.. ,_•`2;37,„•... 0.5: •6.72 4m 13 36.1 jSACRFAE"TOR31 HAM11TON Qi1' ._.-.._ i1�SJ1AB -2.57 614 3A3 _112 �:] <01_ 0,10 ll.r OJ: 4.07 331 7f•1 SACRAM[N70 RAHAMRTON OST 1110(15490 Iii WeU 1 _ _1.iA s61 mt 0.33 S.. 146 R 03.. -IOI'. is 2L9 47.A 176 121 <0.1 _ W I C S 0.6x 3.7 2.24 SACRAMENTO RAfIM1RlON CITY ,Sf11f ,Itk00 .,. ..-.. LKRAMExfO RA HAMILTON 41TY. •,5( 753 Oi 13.1 327-. 1.65 1.72 +41 ta,l 033 QSI 090 1.14 ,71.3 4'• 12.6 .:.. 179 2A3__ 2.6L _ 1-, X0.1 0+3 0.3'1 0.77 1 D.9: ?].f 11.1 SACPAMENTO_RA NAMIL7G,x CRY ._ 'U• 6. � 39.7 - -353._ ..L26• •iA9 -417 At9.l 04� i./! 1.15 2:14 42.6 147 SACRAMFMTgRANA1WlTON CRY 5/,5/161215 425 163 205 --130-,• !0.7 ta.l 641 _ 1.11 1.73 3 45.J fYn 111[MM[NTORANAMIl70N CRT E(W76 a3S 6,,,,, 1W_I _131 -, LAI__ 81 ms3 643 0.55 396 ]SS Ods 12O SACRAMElItORAHAWL70xCETY., .. --,. _.. .,I]SF1l1611.0035.7 7E1 I97 _.1 � q 1 _ .1 s0.1 605 1.06 329 x9.6 :'R3 736 1020 .._. ....._. 1.36 I•, 167 s47_ I,«t0.1 O5] 11i 1.79 5.7E 739 1100 SACIIAMINTO II,A HAMILTON CM '.](6/1713K70 - ..: _ 1681 6666 7.T ..AA7 602] OA97, 4.99 IE,9 1773 30051 ..... _._..__.___-__._.....-....... ...........--' MAdmWO_ .._... __._ ...... _ tdagWU ' I6 915 1.6LS n 1171 6031 OA16 OSi 0.74 1.375 l49 15.1 117 .._ 4. IANtnufll.. _039 .6.0.3 s 6759 ifs-.. 617 G 0_OW al 0.tl a5 6.71 ].i 7.1 SWPCtl 94Sn 9f1n.D�b37nEWAlaY5taldMN-�Xll'0t1!h!1� _.......... _...,-.._.:.-___•��. ... .. '... ..... .'. _._.. _•_ 3LP 1WAC0Biln Plul•OfmYc6]B wie4r5tJtlWFdT 3eoxQNY4..__.._ ..:. ..-__..._.._.........ano .._...:..-.......:.. .... .. _ .... ... .. . 007 .... . •CN FIA/O[XNA•CA4fwIf:4 WNICFf4iIMGra1,_,. .. - .,I,. 700 Q'404, ..... _ AgEPASTL-nd VIAC; ._._r__..__."+«0. .......0.: s._.,. .._ ._.- CIA ........ .fPA.OnolnOmOn inaemenhl ancaf rhR OnWelw dA,!W{IE Ie+7a:_____.-...- ._._ ..•....-.--A07_. .__.. _ - .. .. .... '713[VA Hdalth Ad+rlorYtOf dfpddllE�alef _ - I i •- I OMpAIRR4t0fLK71Ce baflDllNUR9W�f NsAIN AdrllaflEa _ .. - _ 2.1 CNlramaVrtluo110an6SSATcl4Lr0E1 LaraT•Ma.Atlunahletb101cxltw - t6pfmu[11Wtmdelly, .. __..._...... _. ..__ ___' _. ..... ..._........... .. .... __._. ._.. __6AS._...-.._.. ..._.. .. •plrwllwc W�lp!QuJil)W+ISislte�pd,odm WluAold. _._..._.... ._._:._..._..�..-. ....:.,-_ _ ..j..._-...-__..__ ...._. ... .... . _. _ .. 30L'G ,CaRUrNi Tcata 34x3 54YIt�L•of ary149{WA7YY .__ _._.-___._....t-..._. ...... .. ......- .._.. 'NHia+alAadmryMSdenee10rM1271kWa>Ar M.a{thAdNwrNt_..._ f 5006 �__..,___.___._..._..__._....-_...... - x�1gIY1RrcMnt71e116tA H[4[Umrla•74tle A11d Od0rtNWallx9 _ .._.._...._,..!_.--.._...__..-. :,- _. ..: .._... .._._ _ __ - .-...__._-_.-_._.-._-. N.tQnJ NtcenmldlQeC W60M1eY /AmVONNHhand WdlMe OlQfx lOn• s QO7E XAT,oeM Aemrnmud�6 WQOfuM-iltshlwur Atrya0e 4fitenlhrraln 0onoxetr3Hwf. ,.«6? --._..., ._ . .. . .. ... . 7aInaWAemmm�rndeeW4Gti4!�:.faft,.!a[er.Aqu+!lculaMal:mumConcmlr.mn...._...' 754 . ?... . _.....:.. •- - 22 'fablo J.S1cramonto R;verat MaMillon,City,Part Z of Z. Olrldrad� rout OTIwlr4d- rnW I 7ea1 •dn9Aad Teal .r7LnaMd: Tow .311oeN4a; Topp :ahTON.d xoeel y Larl d ,_ Imd 'h pRmj hAxwrj 4 w=r geid T8 1 SdH[Irll jS414r41an: sawS71v , 2111e 7sse SYfIRn Nrv7 3amD19, we .. MA W1L._ ..p4A mA t9R, ; M%. ' l'fn .EVIL WJL .l VIA. IIIIA KA PsA .1,3/2M39:10• ... '.ACPMlfN70RA1rAlA1l3lW[Itt .._._. _...-: 718�04f3A0,.N/A-:SII A__1.....fy.A�r --wA-.»• W�_.L � ._ A M/A_.. A.. A.. .N��....:29A_ .Ma__0.O1T .i WA:-.-6U._...-WA-- -.At E31__I.I.�I Q37. ..._WA._. �D•03{ L.MfA., .?•5>I..i SACRAr ttXfURA HAMIliON CfIY .___.__ ......_....�.i :_Aq _.1VjA __6af_.., •Ylf -NLA-.! ;4!-...,.aA 0.76_ !1(A�•--0141 N/A _ SACRAMENTO R AIfMIfIfON CITY_...__ ......_.., .___.. SdJS�D4IAA'�_.408 OD67 ,__i1] 131 IJl ---i•115__,_,IA2-;_4aiN 413;04•--<Q.17�,; x,9.054 '._ _ .._..._ 1ACAAMWICIBAIIANRTON CITY ... L!/9/M 71:39,. GODS aD74_._._�..'._._ SA2 NJw LS! __,137 ,1•„-0349 QZS A9�6_ AA67 -Qu._. _�..' X167- 1 0.70••' rgmi•. _4881. ,QTS_ 444,-,� «- -- .. 1 NIA : 1.19_. __-96 OA r dS{_ - aliD07,; A.09R LS4 3.1 ::h11WATIl7OR�IrAIWl10NOTY - I/10/�5.1235 •606{ 6161! ._7.0_. �_. . . 11OIAMCNIORA HAMIlT9HCnY ...... •.• .-.'.•71Y05T,7i 0.009 OD04 7.41 1110 ,• WA L07, 137 i x-212 0.77 1 4001 4601. �- ..1.96 I \af.RFl-tfNTOA CHAIUI TONr:7Y .._ 7/j�11S7:3Q_ .GDOS ,0-0+19•_ ._447 6.l7 HSA_„I,ao7_....1.24 ALI�5.-: 4474 [ Omi a0.0l6 ' 0.36 3.96. i '.PCIW.IkNlO RAtlM1l+n T9N C'TY 17-00 0.05 OD?7 3.17 6.0T WA. ,AM _0.9�_. ,0.14 ' 47d 40.007_ .D,00$• �441'� 0.75 .._4� __._ __....�... a vCRAu'BrOnA W:MmN nfY Sl19fG3930 ,-0241_..._314 - 7.17- 772 .WM_..._M _- _10.7 ��.l99 �51>� QOlO OD71�1..4 f6 '3S - ,AL4,V.t1'rf0RFr1:rM!If'N['IYd/7QIVS«7:15. +D.OG9 cMW_'_.4.71 5;17 WA 641 L41 A.1! m.7M .*001 -0.O27 *0 3.65 '. 4er IIAT,11 N7O RA HAUITON OTY ..._.__. . . Tnb,(OS.}_7115_ ,-0-019 I,•A.063 0.16 AR ,•-!1/A_� 9M- _._ A p3m.._@176 40.007 <Ui0!_. .9m ads. �.._. ......_.._ r'FCA+MIrI;EIn A,rA.\h1�lHI C:Y'f ...-•-- _.. _.. iY27R11Y3d• 8061 O.Wd 456,•_: ,S.3S WA_: A!1 316 : -0.227 R79 mm1 dkD°l_ _017 1.119 .,.. _ - . - •'.rrLVMEN7tlRA/WW„gIIONLTIY ... 9117/03,7000• �LDI Qq7_ 051_ {.5t ,NIA .999 ---L35 421 4a1m7 40.00,7 430, L56•• '.tCAAMINI0AA11ANtlrONCm _ ... ._ 1 MIR 9D1L 6977! l7fA- lad A L33 •1.72 411 077 AWI eII9a7 652 S.?3 Iilt5�0311:q-0.64 _.,6017_,_._A40..: _�• ._-._ �'._ .._. � @756 ;1E6, 4QD,17 504 • 056 MOM R m A NAMLTONC .. W1410511:15• _OAW OD]] 6.57 417- NTA .�._, lag 49.749 41S 10.901 40.9M OS• SA _ 497 :ACRAh1LNTORA HFA4:LTONGTY. _ _.. _ 670... 0.19E 1.89_ 4.75 - 33�,,,. A Z67 - _15.4 A.1tl I 672 AOOI 0617_ ..711 -10.0 ; u�. SACRAAIfrIrnRA117allraxCm 1/21196TSa„ 6061 -0706 9.2{ 3LI _r{fA .� Sad -312 F-0.166 -..GIL9 AOM 449m 1.65 L94 .IIrmworo R A rrlw•I ION CIn .. ._. _ 7Ity663ii5. 0.0W.-• 4799 l,,,Sa7 27'S riM„ 197 -AM f m.L44 0.7 46009 � 1 7.9a - uCRM7unOAAIIAMnffH7CIIY ___ _ _ _ yU ,7;-?0..: .0.,61D_�_.?•a.:._A17_:....3 _. -..�y...�.-.L''7 { 41 0.19 ADO'D_• -0.009_ 5.79 _777..,: SAtinAA1LNY0AAHAAfLiW[Cm _ r...� ......_• ,Y39106690._Q _: __..-.!M-.,...70.9 _ NTA '_111•!_ 602 L._ _.. . :. !a?0 237_. _123_,: •.,CItn11LHT9nAH<tiI:l70N UlY -. 3I17j96l:46 490{ 0.l 21 161-_ ' M(A L17 346-! A.7_ 40,7 i Am 4QI- 087 1.70-_, cre.nA',1,i7rOR411ur1 r0NrITY .. 6/27f0663O �.W •4079 T...0.59 _0.67 .H/A .• L19.. .-.1.67 YA.7 l..dl� �� 0.0AA�. 'OA1 t71 ?AC Rr.M`N1uRr.IlMaltun lltY T 1:40 A.04 OA94 < IA3 9.75 L6_ -L7 - -x$ A= +,6? 40.0 • ADI _0.77 704 Sr•C11M:CN7O rl A H(AALTOV CITY 8[t7I066:W +694 0-077 1.6 7.36 + O.B4 17 .731 ' _0.15 0.7'a� 4040 AW YDI 19�__ •A[Rr141141ORAH&MI IO,11.V - �2.%W _'dD A ' 9.111 7A1 ' 14.7 1.1 367 276 ' 013 016_ m 4007 0� 4.79 ' S•sC11A111Y76It.71IAA711.TONCITY _. ... ... .1[lf1A/0l 700 40.04 -0070 687 _.^944 Q7d 701 207 0.15 Q74 Am .DDI 0.]6 31 T_..-_._....._.... . ._. _ .......,......-......_ .._ ?......... ._. \ACRAMCNTfIRAHM14T9NalY, IAO 9.71 1 OM 1.75 675 -.479 -� 40.07 A.97 .nly.. _4.77 .._.--...mm .._»_...• iSA 0.63 T-]Al .._LOBw.r..-4xA-.. 441 1..mot-.-lOm; 0.64 2.37 SACRAMMO RA HMt1_TOHdTY 1 77:15 ail.W '. A.04 Zu SAC114hIPWORAHAMRIONCIlY 3n6IW 14-00 420. ' 9.56t__10.1 _ 70.0 _7A St7 799, '4.7 *17 YACMME'ITAA 41fAMILTaF1 U3Y .. .. ._... _.. y?4N>kS6 •m81••�•-0.956, _ 2°L 0.23 1S_.-.ODy 1_L77 . ... ..A.l_' 40.90 +OD]_ .pi. '.ACRAYIfV10 R A IJAMILIUH UTY ._. •. V17/WT30 - .499I ADI ••A•44 _.d.78� 1 ._.m _:.-u9 •6:i... .617 j 4m 1 4000 04 -LWAM[N14it.-1AN7tT91ICITY _ ...... Sn414737_Ls:.AOI : *6u 0.3G 5.99. NA.-, f� 191 441_ 612 40.07..... +4m _ 0.55 2.136 °ACr,ltif[VMAn HAMIITONCOY _ _ .. . ... .M4G'11?]0 4lW 4066 i 7.57 719 °S4 49 , _311._,_40.2 Q7L .0.m A.°I °.77 .3.31 ♦%CRAMLNTOflr 11Als170MC!lY .,7/SBrOl 790 mD1 Q°7 ' 9.7E 7,47 1_'1 QTd _1•Y7 1_A2 A7 4Q01 A43 OS Id7 -' AI 1:-:tAi.NTORA•IA+.6119N{TtY -. _ ,... 4f16f077AS _A.04, mD{_,__.OA6� 11!-.:. -... L32 A.7.. _ 607.' X00 •wI I.19 SM,IWAINIORAIra\1110HCiY _.__.. 9�t3/i0!795,._4.)JP4 aOS.S 09!_� 4.66-_� 1.7_.._Cm lA¢.i-_.412_.:..INT 4.4097 ALM_L..436 <0.1 ;ALRr•MItIiGRA H4A1t7aNfJIY t1/Tp7107G: Aa ALY OA6 !Dl O]2 0.55 '..gat_:., tQ1_ 40.7_ �G3 1401,_ 0.17 ,ACRMALHTJ A A W&XIVON MY -• ..,L7.O�Qd t7r11 .Om 404E � 0.7 els /f�A_. ode __ C-45_ ;_ 40;7 � 0.77_ x.91_. AST _671 7.71 .. _ _. .. SA.NMtN(fiRAHF\L110NCITY Ssd19 ADI ' -6061 0.» 0.70, WA L L12 , mt-- 467_ ADI_ 4407 422 171 ....� ... - . .- __-... - I SA[R•TA1[N70AAICAIALTUNCItt-__.. .._ ..._ _.. .. __. Y.YDBg�_.. ..ma -m..V:...L� _o-' _�..-.A4.._�?:-_�_. !D�.. .��_. .645 7A3 _.. h 4ti IfMINNO RA Ha+J.1t7uNCIYY .. _' 3y51M T2q_ _mDL__-_O.m_ 2-035_. ..10.4... 111-0_.,_1.77 ..-, 1,5-«•;..m2_^m2__•4403 _ A07 0.97 .351_. __.._.. tiACMMFNIURAHAMIIfO!7Cm -- ......._. 7/1_yV],I040_ .iOD� 7,17 ... _hIJA 1_.z4- _._?�-.:. � ... G75.. '50;�.. :9QU1_ 0.57 54.3 :ACRAMrHr4RAHAN1lfONCI7T - -� • _1/3109 GSC ,. 0.94 0389_ 657 17.7_ fr�A,.,•_48S 1.76 W.7 ��2 4007, •!OA7_„ 3-d7, 0.71 ;.Ar RAMf11TOAAl1MNl Tf1Nf11Y_ - ... ......._. 4/17ZOD i•IL_ 'jqo..AAS_.:...077._ X36 N/A 0,74 _9.M.__W7._.:_ 2• NDT., _N�3-. ..QIS_ ,716 t1[77m 7:50.. n.s71 4a7t_ -„6.16_., 739_. ..NIA.....-O.7a.. ..0.91 d•7 .. ._. �°DI •+d00__ _663 _ 3Ae... e0D3 WD7 3.39 ••5:17 - 4AYfLt11(NT9 R'A HAMrlY9NCIri ....-, 7fa13od,45„ 4004 0.168 IDL _ 17.1 NIA__, LTd-.. ._1 Of _ 4A7 403 ..-...... . ::.L RnSN!V:ORAHFI,yI fONCtfY .. SI4If0.7:{S 40.04• 0.17_. QS=• 1C„ N%A -.0.79 L32 Al ;..w.2....�D] .em 0.62 7.91 '-:•C^+'A•\rCl11.11u'.Rl f(IN C.n B/3/l9 Lt:00 @04 NDi 461 4.13 MIA„ OaS 111 _ X9.7 sLl?. 4907 4QO7 I Gal 751 "MS.A•AINfO 1:�11AAP�.i0.Y:7rY .. I 101[•!0 A:04 494 ' 677 !23 N/A 1.73 1.6! 401 0.226 . ADO, 4607 332_ 3.17 ,xR�MiMNAA HASCLfONCnY _ _. 11990 A.04 ` ADI 0.67 61 _ _ A c.-Rri-.:...0-9 _�•?... m�._' .!Gm �.0#_ ..0.76, ._2bA..... JH RAMIMG R AHA'19LTONO IY ... 111131 P.�- 44W A04 649 • ,SOS„.. IIfA_ a5, OAS 1 41.2 467 AAD mm 910, 6.53 "AfnAMFNTORAHA_v,I,TCiNC`tt - .. d/7n16.10 .0im 1 406E L47 6.76 U(AL1 LAY I467 " 467 Am ADI 0.77 1.67 .+LRAM(H10RA5IRY.II.TONCIfY 11(1(13 B%4,.44DI �• 464 ,I.µ... A!___� .!11.4.._ >9t. 4. L.. 1_: 1?... AD! ,40,OI 0.59,. ..9.11 uT167Mu4rannrwwlr6Nuiir _ ..... --- --. -'IS3u;2e�s_ ma 4o.°i_:...s.n 4.se .f+L..;_ os�..'--.iii._• 4*2 m2 !uui_. .LIZ. X37 •.MRAMFNTORAHAA9L79NQ7Y .-_. .. ._..._ ....5/11111 R30.- 40-04 46aI .. S:7S_ 7.97 WA _0.64 .. 0.79 ? d1...�.AD7. _ 1.79 1ACRMUNfo R4HANl:TONCIh - Uply mem m131 40.°1 641 IAl,•. Oa. 679,.._ '_._�.,.m...... m7._. Am_ A.O7 443 _181 ... _ ._1- ____..., 1 :AflIAM[NrO RAIMAGETOHOtt __- _ 11/d1179:15 m01 4901 ...... :. L71 SA O% 1DB I 40.3 462 4997 4447 6671.34 SAJCMMCNfa RA11AMILTGN C11Y _ y6I7D 9:LS 40.04 ADI QTS._.... 5.45- lA QM Oa5•w. I.,_ A1_. Am Am 697 LO_ r.AC1ulM!M0RAH.YAfi ItlNCf1Y _.. ..:_- 30.91 A.a{ � 460E 17 •311 ,•-, 09 089 391 A.2 __402 X693_, 4°m637_ L11 , ,Aflfr•MrNrnxAHMnlTON CITY 17/4173710_• iQw mw---.as7_..• lA • a6_ 117 743 s0.7.?.m1- 4a9s �m.. w.t "iDv . •.rfl•.wMTNr°R:HFAuITnN:Iri '1i75ru9:io ' 44.44 mai oss AsA' AS 716 9La4 m7 m2 4aln �.tb aa6 _1.16 "I'IASI:Nit)A A116NIM9N CCtt - � _714l1�4A3_. A•a ��..:...�_ 217 �_ Qll 0.91 �� _�;>:___.0.0 : +IIW dm 0.11 0.97 S.Irtgammfann•IFf.YL(oM r,:TY ... .. _. S/Nl{e:AO, 464 • mDI ' Gti Gf57 t.5 0.17 _0.7 .m.2 ml f.aOIIh• _4aA3 9_Si; _i2a'- ... .. ... . .. ...,r .. ._ 'S[.r,nl.HfflRn.Alt lf..N C.tt _ : E/1]�t49LiD A.E1L m96-, - 499 7a2 11/A, Q76 0.04 462 A.I 4*A3 .Q3T 0.74 %Ari.y,N 1 n R A I IA rA:L fr IN L:I V 1 11/3/6{0:50 !O.W 0177. 0.79 915 WA AM, 712 40.2 A3 .44.0.1... .am,am ..*57 34 iFI1tAMfNr0n-MAKkLTiiNCrTY,_,._,_ 4Q04 I -1S?_:-_4.96 594 79.1 3.38 480 -016...:_G•S3 s mW, n037 C:38 _1}9 f 7A1:%E[h1:N14 Rl.,IAM:f.rrJN CIM -. .. I 151490• ADI l 0.018 i7S 0.15_ 1 L1.. - 697 ;,.-117 A.2 ' _442 sOD3 - Aa3 _0.6? SACAAMWOOAHAA4t DONCiTY__._._.•._._ _. -__•... - BISV1316_M40.4 : AD4 0.41 121- ,4A 084 mm AD3 - 461 - «. ......« :SCA » . SACRAIA1NTORANAIALIONCITV »•••••- - SII 1Sl/d7_' 40-01.. 44(1{ L15 767 091 40.7 _' 467 4407 X63_.. 0.5, tffi_: SAtO.AMtNTOnr.sNh0ONgtt -_.�...1I1617:10 40.61 0.104 0.61--, 17.7... ]5 116 1+L7 4]3,_ .0.78•,_ 4403 4407 673 198 SACRaMLN10RANAM'LTUNf]lY ..-..... ..___ 5/9L1617�13.. AAI 6146_! .111 i6.d_ h{fA_ 1-04_... 1-73i 462 ; 402-- � A61•�'•_I1A9 7.45 ' SAl1rAMSNfV%AHAAAL16rr C1IT' ...__ .. _._. „-A/0J160IS N.00 0.t34fi-.,.-.0,14• {.75 NIA 1.29 ..1.63-�,m7-.1,•422 +0.07_ A07 RO! .j_4�__ 11[RAMfNTORAHAM:T N'N CItt .. 11%J/161t9D.• 4601 4604 R{S i9l '111-0-� _1.22 1.76_' _�.2 462_ 49DS ADl G75 1!4 ..- _ .. .u..... __._ ... ._._ .. .. 0.16 0.37 Am 4661 am 9.15 ;ArR,J.IrvrO A A IIArAIC rON uLY -- - 7fe1i711'06 �W .LL943• !17, 47 MIA- 101 53 6 -• • I Tit 772 x9.1 469 567 476 0.n O.OtB 211. MCCLup.„' D.Oaa q9m : 0.07 .A!_. LI 649'' 137 0.14 O.td 06k 0439 0.575 7.1 hoa rwm 0.007, OA" Om L61 478 914 039 411 r 0.11 0.042 9oD7 416 0.4 •.Y.11'Ist4:n l'f?n IYYAlA7 Yr:.rrrLrrdrrdf•Prr•TIrI.NICE... - ' ......1•J•... - .. _._..... ._._ :V!`Ld drvnlyn V1u0.n.A tValmil.Hldudl-Saamlory MU i CArl'Afa1NIN-6bllrrrA pwin.HI.4kciipp °?.^-_-�-- -_.'._•_ ___...__'_-._�....-_._u'___._...._..- ._....._.,-..... _ .... __ tJSIPA6n nl•kwy,MC1 ....._.. .. ___.__ __._..__...rl...-.� .-.._-_ ____ ___ _........._..__r,. _. .. _.... CMEV.T aflo ln:l lnllw1lnurmMllAi GOtirrSfRLYtIlY13r[fflfdRAEMIS•YYiflf .--. --,_-_I�«.. C4kh4r4,.fn gleullrn f.51.4r11arborlrwl•IAar.AApAYhtn dotr level fOf •• � ' I , 1 : . I r 1 r Aplru]nrlt Nlllv'[Ir+dqY CW.IA YalHlandrldar lSfYNfpld i_'__'.••••..'••' Q' .' ___.. ..._,___...__....�_,........i--....__..L___....._y.__.._ ..._.-. -..__, C„dirrr..74lhf R.0.-%..Ims 0 DIIAli'mwaim 1 .. ....._I.. 11Here..lA(arlmryl ne S.I.•nlm 4rlrlilp Watrr HO14h w1slwlfn ...,... � .. ..' ..�•. - - 1 uRpe.uA 4rCa•1••mrvleL•I MTTrrllhrrr•Taf2e alldtWw.xWdkro -„-, ,,,,7_,•„.___..�:,_._..___1_..._... -�.___..__.i,._....•............ . ._.._._..._.. -_...:.____J...._. _.. ..._-. ... 'MI.O1.a11Ntunlr'4'1dld Wn'hrtl•1 •rtllrlrlflNllh fid Wrlrirr prr.lr411on.I , } � � i - n��et•Nlrh,llrl4,<ImI�111M1 I,IiwullNwl4a *d W4lidnr Treshlratrs Aqulll[IJlf C9ntwwuT CCIfWl111WO/1 •• ... 0.77, •.-f,_ _. .. li.11lerul RrtomnllYuk•1l urfl CrlbrGl Frnhramr Aqu4tle31fe 6fAtlnnnn COA4rMr41br1 .. 1._..-..-....�.._..___1._._ :.�-.---_-.-•-_-_.._i....._.....1-�.._-:..-.».� ._._._.. .. . 23 A Table 4. Sacramento River Op Mbrt ultan WeEr,Pa1.42..'.' ... - - .. .. . DI.. ,. .... awNM TBtsa aS OhNed rawbIIgNCd1 Total OIunWCd Tela] Wifelrrd IaPt W '.. t.4tl ,AlaAll ;Ahu lnum Arw Nc Arwdc-C4dmWm C4dmlu :Chf0d,IM Lhr %Wpn, COPPO rO13 Irnn Iron 3t4114n Namc--- _. B4m OPala ' _ ,'_..t'? _.._p0A -.J1Pn �_!!9 .. _Pln, .,.re« ._!9[h.•. uRJI PBJt Iq[/t _..__..._. ...__N_..._. ...1!B/L- _ SACMME7RORP??H[OI7LTON INR ..,,• - 5714/031a;u; 17.6 584 fA6 3.47 - PD1 OD78 731 2.:5 0.93 3.17 4.J 8id SACMMftiIONOPP lNOU1TON WR ,,,•,,_, 6)l9Al 9,00-1- -35.8 180 189 I.88 N.OJ} atlA31 064 0.91 071 x.'i1 +;.06 21i SIIrJIAM[NfOROFA MDIlLTON WA .._„r- .>/ 482 736 138 L60, 5Q031 50D09 0.03 0.X7 1,19 1.3 17f JA SAC+IAMEMOROPA MOE74YON M7R �17(07,1}yLS: �A] ]1S kA5 7.5 MDD4 <O.W9 077 .0.78 .d79 3aS •2 as ll: SACRAM[M1ROR OP?M017L7O71111R .. 9!)/O1.77:M ' ,5.91 361 '..183 353 W.O3 @OS....O1J S,d2 1.13 7.14 ,1 i i.l•1 SArJiAMfNfOROPP_M_017LTON YY71 ,.,-_,.,•._,,, 1 SZMO: 33.5 ,11T_ 0879 !3_- aO,OJ1 _Qa09 D37 _0�(O3____. _«• ..•e0_D2 .0.001 _ _SACELlMFt6Ib ROPP MOULTON WR 1 3;19D'- 64 731 SA7 <O 13B 7,) 4.00 165:1 r SALRAINE1470ROPP MOULTON N'R 1]/S/0310cIS_:.•,_1193 I 3448 1A! 7_54 OAS9 alts' 2.73 ...s.:S �...14 1..1 1:•'J 11.11 SACtuMENfO A OPP MOt1L7ON WA-. ..- _7,/6(04 4-70 162 1218... 2 73 1.3.7 50.008 0.043 1.6t. _ .14 ].:I 19! 71.ti SACI4CNIIN7O R GPP M0VL70N 14R -, ]/alD417:20 ' 1674 3980 1M YA4 50.011 DA77 1.17 5.13 3.p h.17 1541 774:1 _66 ._...___..._..___.-__.......^... -__666_6. -.__. . SACAAN1tNfb p OPP MOULTON Yff1 --._..,,,,",�..' 7704 x790. 7571.,,_8733 13F _3.8 x0.015 0331 9.17 24 8 _7.64 77.7 lDlrr 11vJ] __-_, .,___. ., ---' SACRAMEN10 R OPP MOULTONWR 37519471:x0 184 pga 1A4 LM - ODil ,ODs] u.8 4.W 1.93 n.144 175 7131 SACRAMENfOR OPP MOULIOl6 I11R _-. {.9:45 26.9 I- xfiD_,:_391, 3.74 ,_D.009- y0D3�..; 054 1.16 1.4G 3v9 Is.6 11! _ 'LICRAIN✓:NYO.R OPP MOULYON IYR - ,_Sfs(041k•00_ 0.(4 787 7177.•, 193 0.004 QA37, x.74 _ 1.9 0.7d 7.x7 1173 3'X. •SA[RAME71IT3R OPP MOIJLTON WA _,•_ N9104?O'0C�€ 189„-' 3D2 _ 775 :_1186 0.03] Ot11] titi 1153 �1.85 2.43 _113 lav s/!C1wM[NTbR OPP MOULYON Nl11 ..____.-.-_6666-_-___-.. 97041040 100 + 15} '_L4 3_49 '_0805- O-cm. ,0.87 - ,O.vi ..2.,00 1.74 � 52 192 -SACMIN[19TOR OPP MOULTON IYA 1780 14,3 89 1.22 ;x1.34 e[l0}1 .0.8[18 3„11 '7A 1:6 SALR7wE OROPP •�.YMA>,Z�p,'•.-..3A •._.?2-6 .. 1.346"_3A .0.008 WA07 Os _1.13 A33 ...._.....�.6666-._ �. _ .. ,._ .}A B1b - 2.25 7.17 x0.011 WD34 1 d6 1:).1 0.89 1 m +as l l t 459, x759.,,, Yf6 lbs0.D11 7 7.81 3.�1 1,41 a9li ;0.1 lex: SACRMIEMOR OPP MOl147OW WA „777JOs]3:75_' 170 SBl }31 138 W011 806066 771 7'.:•5 7.7 3.21 lai rC'� .._. ..._-»---:- .. L1Ctu1MtNT0 ROPP MOULTON WR _,.•- �9/10/0574x5 1D3 ,._,.193,,, IJIl }_97 a0.f17Y <OD77 1.52 1.74 ^2.17 1.41 13 2.. .........__. 6666_.. -. .,..-._.. a. _666.6_. _...-_. _ -___6666 SALRAMENTa ROPP MOULTON WN,_.-.-.«.__66_66. _6666_. .. .'.!nN051430 j,. ,10.7,,,'-, .=?a•. ;,•,39>„ 7.07.•v,5"s <D:Da9 308 flit ,1,16 w.q 196 1111 SACAAMEm!'O ROPPMOULTCN WR ,.._ -,,, r 5h9J8513:1ii 358 5976 3.34 .3w•d'7 .0.058 .0.01 337 .1 1;B3 1,31 1;. x11.4 .___... __... _._.�.05. -,... SfCM 9ttfb R Opp MOVLTOXf" :,6(38N51595 107 128 YA7 1.65 x0.009 ab.012 0.6] 1.1 1.31 1.3a 943 14R ..____ .._ .. _ _ _666,6___._._ .-_.. 6__666 ..-_._.. - . I�1c"rofNTOR OPP MOM-1c"WR 712"1190 7.14 � 397 11} 7.48 0.007 "14 0 aB 0-48 Om 1.4'2 17.27 ;'70 5AC7vJNLHTOA OPP MOUL707F WR ,6(2 AS4.30 L" 54.1 137 }37 ap,m9 aD-009 4.Y _0.57 0.8. 1,48 +8610 135 5A[RAMELIrb R GOPMOI3Lj"W8. -_ - _ -_9,(?Jl�OS&I6_...17.3 p25--.._ AS_ - 1.46 DD07 .._¢017 -1 .4-31 0.08 126 175 66_66 ..-__.. - _ -PpQT- '.SACRAMENTO ROPP 840UL70N WA 10lrifis3030, 791 ° 190,.,` 1,S 131 ' 0.013 0.019 057 SDS ~30G 1,.59 Il.d 17N SnCAnMLNTO ROPP MOUITON WA 77JI4Jf¢1i90 183_ 797 _ - T.93 _1_18 DA11 0.037 u.79 1.15_ 3,;27 x.24 ISA 2 314 SACRAAtLMOR bPP MOULTON WA -W34(OS 7Jri0 _-9,4 , 778 I,&1 2.W OA1 OD37 0.77 1.07 0.87 1.x1 S.7 Jla .. _.-._.. . __.__.. .. .._. .-.__.. .._.-__.___.666_6. _._-_.-_a - 5AC11A WIRR OPP MNvaOf2 Wli...._- �!/681,M_40 2779 48!15 !bl ,_L53 ••OD3A -0.096 091 }A 1 5.27 1•I.J 11•'70 f.W� .- 6___6_6.6._.-_... _6.66__6.._...«_...� ...,..--.._-. .1-__.._.._.- .. SACRAMEWOROPP MOLILTONWR 1(2!10615_SO• 417 ••.1139 =A5 LOS.?,0.013 0.081 153 453 1.77 5.61 7N! AIM _ __ -e�-. .•177 1.58 - OD18 . OAS 1 76 ,71M 1.15 3.79 116 11x9 SRCRRAIE7liO ROPP MOUL70H W8 _ 1117JD031:40'... 163 -., .__._.- ..... _0.105 Gal })1 5.76 la.r: SACMM[FIrO ROPP MOLILYON L9A 3/}lOfi 1T]6 4357 6371 ,. 158 L99 0.MI - - SACR/JN1NrbROPPMOULTONWA - ,-- 171770612:78, 1771 2212 _ IDfi 138 <D.1 W.1 7,13 S.fa _1.73 71M 7i7 ]3v7 ...__-.� ' SA[RAtdEMOR OPP MOULTON WA J1710fi Y]g35' 129, 517,,,,_1A8_� 081 1.:4 7.78 :3: '4..9 nm. ,SACMMEMOROPP M01xTOM WlR•,• fi/17(007735„a,_-p.7 �_, 677- 1137 3;67 <0.1 RS 1,J] 1.ns - Lw 16TH 9.9 392 SACRAMENTOROPP MOLILTON WA .. ..._. _6666...._ 6666..6666-.. y(?��?0._._078 783 __138__ O,S� 401 Alb 51iCMMIN70 R OPP MOULTON WA .� _ _.. S/moa,.k030 157 272 . 71 1.16 I, _50.1 _!0.1 061 09l .•1.11 1.44 111 171 _. _.__. ._ -. , .yam 2-35 ... W3 O.SS 1.27 L29 .5 54.5 2x0 SACMM[MOR OPP aAONLTON IAm .4110(1101]:35: 357 417 .-_-._ .-___- - ... - ..,,,. ... --..MOMT..-.... ._......_._-6__666__..- -.. ..._.__.__. 3lICRAMENKIR OPP h10ULT17N If01 71OJ74/0631.:u _ ]3.7 276 7.77_ LN x.0.1 m.1 0.06 3.09 2-79 1.55 ;B.7 108 SACRld.1EHIOR OPP MOULTON WR 17f7L06,1?:7S'.,�7G3 ..1580 ...7.8 7.71 <0.1 . x0.3 049 3.15 L44 l.flb - 13! 593 r k _._ _._ -. <0.1 I••ab.l 1.66 3.=1 1-01 .C, 55.9 1x7 .SACRnMENIOROPP Marc7ON117A__-_-'_---- ,1(8/071390 ,S1A,_,'.,,,]5!1•_,,;,.„1.97 2.37- '--"•--- .___.�...,.. '. _�_.. --- - .SACRAMWfOROPPMOUL7O/1VV8 _571 383 2.97 l.G2 <u4 si SACRAMlHTOR OPP MOUITON WA l 3/29•,(•D737yu�..17_6„ 96.9_ .-1•Ss L3S ,0.49 tl.7] 1618 1.59, !f 7 Tse. -6_666. ... 'SACAAMtMOR OPP Wbl1LT17N WR 14S�S 07]0:15' 3fi.0 1 6.108-_ 1.9._..,•7•�4A ;r-�,1 __W.1 045 0.70 Y.57'..,7.13 15.1 137 .. ._...,.....__..�.__......__6_666-.._.__.................- ._.__ I.A;,..� SACfV1NWfbR17P►MOc1aTON WR .. -• 7079:00, _]A] ,��44� 1D7 ].12-; �.7 _N:1..-. � It:: 0.71 3.0 >.IY] n? 11•I __.__ .._ SAQV•MtMOROPP MOULTON WA 1•._- 890 1 535 '- 170 -7.86, L75,. x0.1 J x0.1 l:'. O.SS 1.09 k 1.5 •' 1' ._.._ .-. ..6666 r SlicgAhlEN1DR OPP MbV17'ON WR „_•771 7095 6.46 307 ' 1.77 183 �.1 ,r_,m_l. 0.41 2 .• 04 1D3 1.49 A4 1� SA[paMEMOROPP MOIILTON WR __. Bh1ui(a170•!P��_LO� 343 L•..lw,69__ 1._71 r ..K51 '-<9y7. Oil 0..59 0.8ti I.UI .1 S:q ,$l1[p]aM7N70ROPP MOVL70N IAIR 9/23M 31:40_.....7.77...'6._31)5,- lA4 2.61 a4.} cO.I OAS 0'+7 0.81 DNX 'A 411 .. . SACPAME,NTOA OPP-MLIULTON WR._._._-6_,_66 6. _._ ,XCMh4INRDR Of7 MOLtL70H WR ,�„»•_,•,,,� 13( /W .. ,6. . 7,737.1 Wh11071of9 , 18 _111x78 27u: 1330 r, 097 178 ___?.k7 x_44 m.1 M.1 O.aB D,54 OTA U9 SACRANI1Nib,R OPP MfWL7d/Wlt_ __.__..-___.-.1,,7(fM 12:40 39 74 1;03_ 2.75..:...iQi},, =0.]., 054 7.47 376 1.59 S,3 173 SACPAAYEHTOR OPP MOUITON WR ..... Sh7lOB atr30 .„1086 1710...'..7D6 _L73 x0.3 .0.1 041 GAS 1.06 .0 4,9 12) SAdulNetNTOR OfW HWI7LTON11711 ..s[16.f•0610.10 7 !„3G,.?,_ ;,,_2.sT 2.16 _�D.1 N.] 047 0-73 1.16 7.41 4J 111 5 SUCiKkll!+7na Op?+AOVLrwi Wi] _._�....._....._._..!!-2. �D;30:-�.s9„� li1• '_4.7�:_].2 '_6'911.... 1_. 9.x3 O:tlB ...1,35 7-95, s9e - ---- SAC]WHEfifQiiOPpAWVLYWIWR ,707 528 las 176•,• m.}, r0,1 0.41 OG 307 _ 1.25 5,1 9:.9 Sa[RAMINTOR OPP N[011LTON wR--.___ _. .�_4f1770911 30 l 3 B9 1__efi 2 •_,7 34.. 219 1_-40.3_. _44b 0.le a-;8 1.67 7.11 - :0.1 '!a A _. .__- ..__ .-._.6666 ._- A _. ;SACRAMEN'fOR OPPMOS1L70N WR,_ 5r3Sf0l17:151 2,79 86.6 ' 1.89 L97 a9.Y_ 1„ � 0.13 0.,1 _1.83 1.1 A4 51P �SACRAMFHTOn pPPMtkJL7ON 18111 _ - _ _ -.3.77 .:.x„101.. 6666 1-.r_I3.-�.L51 ;_V.1 I-40;,1 036 _ U.;.] 1.d7 1.7 u_t 3ta -SAC"MtHfO R OPP MCP4TON WR -�.» •_• - _ ,7118(0910:301 7,77 _3�2 3.79,. ss3 d•1 •0eu .1 Oap O.e9 S.D7 JACRAhttN7pAOPP MOIILTON WR ... ___...._ ._•. � 9_D I _1.66 _x..30.7, .._..1.9- }_1A _V.; W.1 0.l7 0.x6 O.BB IIN 1 ?Y.7 7,110-Mh7AlNTOROPP MOVLTON WR.,• .., -.._-. ?,q9 2!34_ 359.. _.7.]I_ ._}_36:.•<0.1_. .-6.063 D1,�, 0.x7 0.% 1[.•. 4Y 4n7 SACW.MENIpA OOLTO pP MON WN ._. fOh770911:W 5.11,_ .,,,963, .,„27G • 1.85 au.t 50.1 0J9 O.t/ aJ SAt21I1M1NTOl10FP hWllL70N Wil. .-. .___.._. 71hE/0911_70-,,,.2,5.6 i.._. ._..a'•N.. _3_34 afl.7 m;l 11.4 O7 0.98 145 H ]t3 SA[:1NMEN'fOBOPO MOULTON WR _ 12%9/09 E:19,.,••„1.71_ '-,758 233 2.64 ,.+0.7 - <0_l, 041 os7 ,0.92 F.d] 7.1 s17 _....- SACRAMFNTOROPP.MOULTONWA„ •- _ ._-_ t/261JD BA5 877 3963 L7 283 .0.2 0144 - 059 14.7 385 20.2 114 4700 SACRAMUAOROPPMOULTONVA _ - - - •5/2h01Y135.`_is.9 795 135 L5a x0.1-! <0.1 0.]9 3.19 3.56 a.1 rns 9x7 3ACRAM1147b ROPP M0111TCIN WR, -666_6.. 3(2!(107.70_• _193.-,I,__54_8__ 3.72 ,.116 i_<O_7, m,1 053 0.65 0.95 1.29 S.C. 91.2 SACRWEMO R OMIh CV t1v11, .'_!/.111'107-00 767 750-, ._.SAS 7618 m_t_.-_=0.1..I,- p.a6,- _ y47 _145 3.93 83 1015 6666._.__ _6666.. SACRAWNTO R OPPATOULTGNWR, 5/2Gh07;00:,.3.46 49.6 17 Ssfi i _x0.1 aG_1 O.a 0.',4 L67 3.75 3.a G9.7 . . .. .. .._ 6666__.__. 3 SAC"VffORIWP AIOVL7074 WA ._, ...,„_-..1_ hDT-0D _ 0,01 524._:_ f�6, w7.16 50,1- -_�3 0]S Oa3 _LST tn6 71? , .._-._.. ..__.. SACRRMtNfOROPPMOULTOH WA. _ 1 7h87106:40 i5, ..-..,,?9-• SA_ _185 -+L•1, a0_i _ 041 _ RA 1.93 345 .1.R fX.tl SACRAMLNIOROPP MOl1L7OH WR _ _8(lSf1010:10 0.25•, 347.._. 1.27. 734 <OyY -01 017 0.a 1.19 3W, - .,. .. _ SACAMENTOR OPP M044'1"W6 6666... 6666_.,_,._.-.._.},bf26�1O6 [I ,_179. ...,0117 .-ISS 3.#9 W.1 oat 3x7 }.79 34r 2,.V ItiW SACRAMEMOROPP MQILLTON wA 33/10/208:58 x.11 483 -,_1.07_ 1.99 . x0.1 X0,7, O+a 0.77 1.19 1.29 GD 7x.1 _6666... ._._-.._..__.___.L- --._-_:___6__666._._-6666-_ •-•_--..._ 5A6*"%f!T0!kpTM IJLTOl4WR--_ •,72If1(JO Y11b: Y.7}_' 93.3 iA6 L52 ap.}. W,3. 041 - 0.91 3.11 1.46 v.l -At 'SACRAMW70 ROPP MOUL70N WR ah�3110'4S: 0.17 _•500- 188 3'6..7N.3 aD;>. 047 - 1B .. Las 7.]7 1.3 •a .. 6666.. 6666 -- . ........ _. _. _. .._6_66____6_-_... ...____"_•__ _....- . I A44atmum Iri7 87]] 1.07 1684 '-0.019 i 0.231 _ 9217:,A . .. .... ... .. . ._ ... 66_66 ._.-_-..- _' ... _ .. _.... 6_666.. _,_ 6666.. ..._._.__._.__....�.....Med1!n1.._.'..-14.1 3ae.S ,_(SOS__.1.735�_-OD3l :.,0841 OSS 1.0:15 }.SBS, ],e:7 SS.4 1•JX ..... ... ... ..... �...-6666. _. ._.. - Mlnlmum„_ .,,087 7576 Os75_ 115.1_,06004-�, 0.009 - 0.17 0.45 0.71 08G 14 7a.J 6__666_.._._ SwRCe asln PLn-6dn1[nB WnerSl4nd.n6..Prbelary MCL, SOW ;Cai,EPA/OWNA_CAAfam4 ppgfcHmRh OP41 ..a.._,_ .- .- ._.. - .._ 6666.»6-666 ._._.__�..-_ _.._._._..-1..- _. _._�.._. -�_._•__-6666_ ....____.w.._- �OS4PASacandaryA�...- - :4:01LPA-010n4n�81an Erreeertlenlal cnrcw rlJl[mUm4t[lo7 _ .. - USEPAF441th }o7Ed lvafdAs _66-.__.-•"-....4..-..-.__ .. .. .. igRlard4 Anp011V0n 655afa H4160rlaac1•Msa.0411ow45la dOa<1av41; 1 ,Aylwlwrc WatBrQwflNr¢d11•Tauopn6odArlhrml�Wd.-_.•-•_ _._.__ 3n00. _,__ .. _..__.6666,._.. •,M_-- .-.. ..._-. . N4t"I ACldfn_W,eT 2chfKlf OriN�r!B W4tM RR4Rh AdYbWI?�_.. .- �_,.---.--66:"66,_ _B000_�. _._. .. __._.. 6__666_... .-.. 66_66 .._____ 300 �Nniuml Apcpmnwnd<d MlQfwkEr4•iaalnarYl OEOfM W4�7e _._.-_.-�.6666.-:�.'...._..._.__-6666.[.. 6666_.:..._ _. ..-6666 .. _. .--- .. ••. lla19"IRecon vc I dWQCrhe7l4�HYA14n Hedth4na WCaare ' I M1 i prot<afOn w114r arIA.161+cnruvmpaan.. .. s _ 1 .0.018.._.. ... .. N411prolRCCW!lmendad WG011aeN.PretMvalnrwgrl4detJMConunSl�,ua taneenua7f9el.....N- ..e7_.__..-�. 6666,.._. _...__.�_....,_.' _........ -_66.6.6........_ ._. .. 6666.. N4tlon4l fl,-Matde WCII""IT; 24 3ahle 4.Sarnrncnto River Op Moulton Weir,Fal 2 OF 2, 0[ndrdd' Tad 1 Oh10h44: TMW 1 Tow IDusched, TIAw Whu*rd; Tow 'ofFlawdl -rw oh.F d� T-w t4Wad jPAWV-0W,R1411pPM1 Mdriry Md. N%*M sPknk10I.>S4knbm 9hm o 50IIW 2Lif Z6ln ua•kx•hi'nr _--.,.__ - ..... -, s'^.'Pk.G!1!._..J!6R__: YAA ..__F!0&_- IWJL- _F!�__. 1?i11.....,1'i(\.., Hf�!. fI AMAMIO 4 CPP MOULT04%R .-....._........___ •5/1{/073{:15 aOd75 x199 ..9.77 247 WA 0.55,. ,.537 all._ _DZ W.075,� W273 nA 4,5 'Ni RAhbN104•JPI`rOULTON WR •, !E/10(0]l.00. a0A17• -t1r1d8.,-_O:1{-.1_._7,1;, Wn,,,• 032 L]8 0.1L I.m.2%' WA01 W2s3 ,G3_ -.11,. .. _. _.. .__..u. ... �A(PA..nhrnRlJPr'MOOu9N WA -i/iapl iirio. aoli L aosrs_:_ ids s-�- ►fit _ a9t__ Lxe :os?9 9.17 m.nu .4.129 ass ].s - -- \11RArdFf:llTRIxPMOVl111NWR _ _ _ A/17/a1 u1_.-AYR ail{ ___23 ae8' :3s :.M;AAMIMII)ROPP MOULION WR, __.._...- _.. ... .9/3/Dl l2:lo a0,p07•„ 081,- 0.4• _ 3L6.., WA•,..,11 � .7;39,- 9921 __ Q26� m1V1 _0_i{4 OAL �7.1e,. _ '10rAjM 1L40 0.415 I •0.af'.f ;••+1Ss 93 WA 116 •_i6! 'Q3 d.t6] ' WAI X121 062 147 uimM(rnnRaPrneasl7ONwR - SACRAMlNtOROPPMOIICTONWR 11b0. 9929 ' 0.077 + 8,8 BA! WA_� 1.]I i 161- 0:17 R2= m.02- .4..011_ 0.A 13 vtRAM]NTO ROpPMw�LTON WR.._____ _ .-_a11RM]I&S' 0365•! 2.9]�� Sd . 21E_.._MAI N:.�.3.3V.i-it.T •- Q12 .Olt,__0.011• 0.W9 tOJ Y•fRAM[MTPA{IP�MOUL70N WR .__ _ _,_._ ___3/81TM9a0 _aDa 0377u „-,!.6,1_, - 579_.:. Pt(A- -.135 .__7.8,2 C.3__' dn2U„,�P001•, m[>:la_ 49._••.309 _ 9AfPAMFNTORORP MOUIiON W4 i 2/{1"12:20 0.308_.... Ll 113 - 83.1 a-,WA.. .316, L71 0.13,. � 99292 4tIA1S 0.926 4,09 144 Yn(Rnn[[NrORbPr nrOlfITON WR y17fD41290 9577 t 413 ]12_ 7A1 A s 991 ' H6 W.721 _0_28• 41104 998_ 75], Sfi3 iA•:RAM[NTUROI'PAlOUITONIYR _ I/IVP411a10 9054 Od47 •]di_ 59.7 WA•• ]2t _7.92 GL7, 0.31 tlD1_ 401765 1 I,M 1[)d AI13� QSi 901 '.SfCArALNi(4RfY"'\tPYLfON WR. __-....- 4/71011:45. ..-�, ,t•909-. ...7:0�-. __?�..__..._ _ _ ._.. ]AfMM[/iTORr1PP AtWI MN7YR - 515/0111:00 W.007, 015.. 356, 12.3 j M/A, OM tis biTtd 927 +n001 ,QoM 919 217 .. .. _ i_�,13fi_ 20.614 ,WABL; 1.17•• 2.3a •AfRMIL'H70RL1PP:LIOVITON SYR. ..__.- .. ..._-. - - _ CNf041000. 0.082.'.-0.1L2µ',._'. _ .20-?_...�_..!��..-..?:3».:_1.99•• 99131 - -.AI:RnMikroRrR'rAf4/7LTONlYR ._- ...... 7/;9flJ'134 0..�17_.__OD59.. ,_SBS... .�.4L._.�._.. ... SAI , 3A6. 615 0.77_..!0.006',40367 OA7 1,11 - •.r<kn41!N7nR('PP;1WL7UN KR _.J-:10%5/0413AC -0.011_,OA/i_ 3A4 --.7.72 ' N(w 1118 1.4{ �4L1i_a0.7D4_ 46071 �1 -- n{5 J]DB t,ALRAMIN10 A OPP 4OUr WR WR 11/9/041]DO' 0.006 OdA _ 1b9 LIR A 1 3A9 ' 124 /U14f 0.!9 WD08 At001,!•208- :0�., %ALAI SLf41U R ORP nvlln tt'N LYR17/T ]o-10 AOl 0054 ^46! 71_9_ WA 0.61 I._,i _ -aim .-_0.71 Wd11 _ 4Ddi• �.__... . .....-.-. _ _. . JKRA M77NIl7ROPP hlOVl101R WR « - � 1N0(OS ISAO 0.097 i 0150! �7a4 _ 412 A L79_�,RS! ,. 971 0.48 0.906 901 _Ll7- 7.9] cu.RAf3HttlgOPrAeaO[7ONwR__-_-._ .. Zf2(OS,12:75, c-fla?..; ?•?m..:_,ori._ _ _. SJ('RAh1[MOROPI!NIOUf TONWA - __.-.. ..___'_._. ._..,1/10165 U�5- 0.011 ,DAB!_.:-_Q7a••.' 7.t7 .20[!1,..:.0.8! _L8._. -a2{S •..._019_.: NA01 Wa36: a2� _>:?� - WRAIdNTOROPP MOULTONWR '4PWO 10;" ,ag14,.,I -009 1..2.71 146 ry1A 0.6-..; ;AA .. 0.7]� 026 W,o01. WA03 X016 137 SA[RAMIN7U R PPP MOu7TDN WA ..._. SN9f0311178 065 f_ AM,_:-..7.71,._:.. Ifi! _ .WA,.-..136 71.i N>o9...}-m717 (CAW I a09_,..LI4 ]DA Sr•:WWe[Hrf1ROPI'MOVLTON wR.___.. ....6f]8/OS 425. !4AW 7 OM! -_135• _ {AS :•_NM-- •0.7i_.. _L38_.. 0.]1 ,636 eb3d! .... _..._ . . 49737 �A33�Ae7... 0.SS_ ^SA6 W.918 ._Cd7P .467.-...,..715 ..:..NJ�! 4GA___LS3_.... 1,:......... v�CRnx4N(OA OAP M6ULI'OH 1YA 6!�]/OS9•-30 mDD1 AM45 9A8 9.73_ _WA CLq_: 1.31 4QrY 40277 0001 X9.903 - 0.14 ad8 �'PA%VF1iORLVP1tOULTONWR 9138NSt'10 mml Od1t OAS„ S' A.7S WA, 428, L71 936 012 WAOf 49.001 0.13 L71 _..' _ 1-' I'46fU2 •.51'A.VAFN If)ROPP N.f7VLTt]N 11R10/25/O17C3O•• 0.021 1 4.11% „_t2a _198 N(A � _SdA_I-LT7 m00S 0_18- �. Tnf 7JwN,r11nRIVhyIriVLnik W0. _ ',11(14(0!•12:00' 0.037 Q212 1]7_ 76.9 !1[A SA!•,T_f.76„ 49166_ aQ158 W.O�� 012 3Z2.. 71.1._ ,ni 7nrtln7ClRrmf•h10U1 TfIN WR 1 1 12:/0 0.008 0417 bila all WA 1.01 L]3 96!49 � D.19 40.00] -m.007 0.66 _3.7R, •.iLNAMrH109Ul'P ALOIIIi[7NLYR •_._..-. 1lM061O;A0 aem " 2,k -.- _ _ _-__... .;�..•..-.�_..;.,W0._' 3.91•',72.7 :9L3a0 !_0.15 4011- 8 4-68 snl.w.ti'LNTUROrP11GwTrH WR t/14/p83710 0.lte-:, 9719 17.8 ' WA 77A 0.73 928.. W3f6;_O,flUA205 _1511• 9.49.. 60.] -....�. ..._... Y••:Rw4NLU RpPP t.SOV1TON WR _ - _ L27/OG 1,f:A0 8057 tl.518 968_ 491 .:.-_A - 1.Y 4d1 - 916 413)nl m= m�d9 �A� Odl 5.72 PnAflrllU R l:l'P YOut70N W A- .__ 3/1/0617:30 • OAST LS 75.6 707 : NSA�...6 N �-19d. [Q149 _Q] ....... .......__.-..�-._- a� %niRAMENIOR07PA1f7Ni7OkWR :4/17/061130 0271 1.27 1]d ,813 WA.,', 388 996-, Wl.• -022 Wil �MO3 039. 123 .•1rxA41fNTOR WPMWLTON WR, -,-,_ S117/Lb1135 •WD• 0.781 731 1L3 WA -1 1.09 _ 215 r 42i_}„0.76 aO.01_�_W.W 0.39„ -753 41(RHMLN7OR[VP.11OulION WR - �37 3033 A.0{ 0.111 012 318 i -• A -i 3de W2 •02 <0 7 � OD66 I 0.19 7,06 SACRAMENYONOPPMOUI7ONWR AC RAMCNTOA CPP MOULT4N WR•�~ .-.- -. .. '817 2/0 6 10 6 0' -am Om! lag �I»•~�•OB�•~ 1?6 ;AS! CL'n 026 *V 4aco [ISS ]S 3ACRAMLH _. TO 0 OPP WR ..., _ __. 9/70/063f�S _WDI,_...OA%'-_]A5 I14. -._3.'3. ._ _' __ .1A2..+_226--•. -D2_i Lat. ' mA7_. .<a07 034 203 %M kM/LN IOA UPP MfY,1PTON WN -4141 _0165 _2.1 123 OJ9lAS 2d7 4D.2_: Q21 ry .O.o7 <40'� 038_ _311_ SMRAf.ILN1r1A M%XkATnv WN .77/WOG17:35 -WA1,_ _$ ,•I__33�_,,,_.-.?=..x_15...- .i11....__ __ A2 „;0.2„:. WD3_�.40.03 1.65 •- :n:7Mir11r[IAOPPMfA:l7I'.7WR 119/47,11-00 NAD7_ Am 7.75,. - !1 35 IA9 161 +0.� m.t Wal -V.O7_ ' 037 7,05- . ,..--�..__ ...._._.. :•'uaS.l.N(r.R•iPS,sarLTr>.N WR...- t/2fA171OD0 OSS4 0301 7[1_7•• 343_ 0.93 - 331_ 7Al _ N.7_ __m2 �m X05 117 _ 725 .._ . .. _......._. ... ..... ....... 1.7_.•. OS5 _721_...-02 ' 0.3_1_ cant�..m03 0.26 -178 420-PAMLh IrIR f1PR f.4:1VLTDV\YA _ ]/7 17:15 AG4 (IL7l � 2A3 996 _ � __.4aI �.OS X414 ._ .: :J.1 Maq HIAR bI•f•TtOus IOx WR _. {/)0-{071033 W.04 3D78 339 111 I ].S _ x11 RrA,loil t1ROpp Nl ulllry WO .. ... .-. .'.51301079.00.,.�A!_; RkA7 . OAS 0.75 LS2-' N2 40.f mM •s9Qi 0.7 3.C�.. iA[FAA<LN10AUrr M4Ve tON W4 6/27/076-00A.04__1 Q,092, SS,, 717 1.1 : 971-i«•1.19 m;2 d,41 .4007 nA9 1{ 1AlINM1NTURd'7•iTCNrI If].Y WR __ 7119/0710D5 eDD4 OD66 421 LS6 0.98__ 036 1 ..]-7 A•2•_' ._�•7.' 46D3 �RO - 429 22 1-V.RAMIh TOAP7PMM/17[1N WR _ _ ....«- O/26/D73Oa/0 _s4AY ' 4!'1 WA O,R9 lA1 A.2 _ 40A1 011 SACRASfLhTOA 07PAWUl70HWR ... . . •- -9/}]/G711AW x,0.1• .4051 ._.02?_- ' 414.. 09 �O.y1. ,�0.55 902_ 402. .!OD! W_Ol GAB- •7A4• MCRAMCHTO R OPP MOUITONWR ..30/21(075053' mbl aOS4 Q71... 0.41 0.77 1A9 1.2 m,2 - NI NDS �+OA2 all 2.42 SAC RAMF.HTOA OPPMOUL1l)NWH .. ]I/Z7/0117:50'-40A1 i OABi_ 011- 537_ : a7S i 039 ' 0.92 W2 <0;1, cm 4b.41 029 237 ..._...._...-. ..___-.._.,.. V.CaAMLNTU R ORP MOULTON WR................_,__.___,_._._.1n � 0 _90.01.3 0.W 0. _ 363 Z M/A._....7.17 1A9 •,�7--_•_.X0.7 40;013_m03•. _0.77'._ ,AcnAMENTOROPPMO11k7ONWR ..•.. _• �.••.••..•......'.2/�•7flffi1000 W34 ar979 0.75, ._._._._' _:.-9L7•,-„ T20,1Ax7,:98-,..8.1], 4]2 :_ 0145_ WD! ';0.07 -0.!0„ kl-, 11rR.1M(NTOR OPP r.1p111T0N WR ..._... .. .. .... .. ..3pffOt lO;ltl r4a170.061 '-0.83 iL7 WA 1 7.31 �.. 0.29 401U 4420 a7 lag �.iIPMtR1U%UPPrXWLTNN WR ..- ._..._.. . 4/SA/0a 10'10_.4/A4 1 0r1A5,,,,.,.3.21 ••'. Lu. ir/A ...0.92-1 136 W2 925 ;OAS-..[0.M_ _Qde- 347 -_. .. P. i,.f 141MLN1OA M•rhYldl10r1 SYR - - 7/14108.11:15„ ,;ac Odie 028_ ' SAI 18 665 am 0,74,_-- 0.20, AA3 40-W,• 0.3__ _257 ':JLL'PA7Al.N7UR(+PI'>.t0t1Li0Y WR 4/77(op 11'34,,,man. ' OLDS? ' 017 •..,9,17 ~,t(fA.`O.tt2 ' 497 @2 ' 0.7] +019 40.03 0.78 2_68 .... .. ._ MOUl11>r1 wA }17Ef0➢12Or� A7 Rtl61 941 71B er(A••_,G7E`i•Qe9'.•-, �A] W2-._ II1 4961 OiSI_- _27:2 1M4f MLNFCIRLY•RM�IILri7N wA _ - 6/15/054I5 4nA{ 0094 0.77 T 4.95 _ .Wi\... .0.97, ,_1:18 I 973 025 90A3.I .0.0 O.W 4}4 '-WFANU kill OVIPP 4f00N wR 7/74A7310:30 m,04 036'7 1,39 )1 ,M(ALD7 LDO .-v?._- 40.2., dL07 4Q03 OA'1 _272 w1(nnLRNIOa CVP r.[nuLT[NI KR 8/77/079:30 WA{ WPL 316 _261 t4tA 976 0.96 W3 <0.2, !OM .Aa0 0,37 �i.* 1 SMAAM[NIO40►P MO11l 10N WA .. .• 9/ti/O1450.._.mil!..!-.mom.--...��.-�....{.98�-'...1!/A.-..0.6A•,: _0.9b �2 90-3. 90II1�� @Q7 037 L99, SMMMlNlORnPP 1WVLfUN W0. 70177/oA luLO mW 9717 - i25 32.7 WA 0.41 1.q 4.1. ;, 441 441 : �Cxm 057 2s3 'MPJ.MFNIO KOPP MOULTON WR IIADJ0611:30 d3Ai 942 0.44 7A7 WA I 019 am 497 0.32- 239. .. s\(RnrfIYrUROPP nlpUllOr{WR, •••••. _ _ 12�9J0f 11S �40A4 !Glp1- 012_... 7.17.- OLM .._357 0.71 W. : 40.2 _WA3...-46Q7 ,0.5 ,2A1 GICRJ,nIrNTU RUPI•MGVITON WR '� ' 112,6/!0 kI3 LL9T7,�'.!)9,_ ]92 ..•...7?! _W�..._?�._+ 75.6 .. Q23 ! 0.24 -OA] i O,Orl, 0.19 75,9-„ LACRRMfNLOROPP MULnTON WA _ - 312/1077:15 dD1 6.60{ D9e. - 45,5 WA733 1.77 Q24 027 W93 40.43 Od1 7.57 V1.A1.1.1Ln70R0PPMf-11110NWR ! {/IOTIII•,• A111•-_�...435 CSM ria I @•T 493-,- -11 14q - 923 V9 _.._._ ......._ ._.._...._..._ruA__ .-9.n--t_.0.e_... SALRAN[h[U ROPP AIVVI TON WR - - - - 4/1U1c?:aa 9317 OS6 0-44 . 37.7 WA 0.72 {.T4 992;, 0.1; .A �' 199% 034- 7.17 /26'1107�D �RP!t bA] 0�2 � 4.b1 .•,ft[A-,-S- 0.6_i _0.77_ A2 442� WAS :..m(?l.. ..O.at ..2.Y1 . S,CF.1N:rr[nP(fl•1•h10Uli[W K'R 107A0 Ad-�'W.DL L1.2A 331• '__A_ 0>1 t OE7A__ -p: A2 :a0.! - '50M,_' W. L17- '-.r PnLU r.rnP•rPP VOkIi['r,KR _ 7f2N10L-W 40D4 OA680.35 ..SAl„r CM I=_ m2 •� e9OD] aa00 .9:m. A2? 1�[nn V(kn•R:.pr fab!til`N 1vR -"� tpl/1010:10, WD4 k, 6043 0.5 630 I-N/A 96-- 7A4••� m2_ m2 mm_, .m01• 041_ 199 w nAMlkrrlR%wPMIluouNWq - 14h5(f06A0 _mA�-�__as55- I 225 - -21 WA_• 2l5 _lA6 - 4L.7„i 977-i :paA Aaf 13 _687 r•,[W.I.tIhrORAPR MOULICW WR _-„�-, •.•- -37(70!10 t60'„AA4_„-R04fi -038 _ 6.61 1 Ir�A_:_LIS T ]3T 90.3 W2 _ .0A3_ !OA] 1.35 A,Ai xt[x}NSIktUR WPn10Ut10N 1VR '17/13/101120 dD1 ,Q[{9 _ '- - T --_ ...___.. 0.6- IL3 WA OA7,;„1 m7• 40.7 4043 s445 ail 2A9 cnCaAMfhTOROPPMOU1TGNWR l/10./1116.�5 X444 0340 0111 1 212 s M/A CA6 : 7Al 0.2=.�.WA3 9462 7:03 487. ..___ IY14sItIxRI1 4657 ' ' 38- 0.1] 415 __ [ ea!_ 031 J 0518 2. LOA SO Rlddtlln 4058_ 0.095 25313 197.,_.:.. 1,1. - 3A1--, ]S7 0.216 ' Q25 O.OISS 0447 0.513 3.(A •NxCOLL'rn PLT".h+dR1P W.IMI:ulWrdl•P,imi'Y MCI � .. .___. _.__..�.__...^«_....-,-..._................ _ -. . _.. SWR[tl W,rn Plan W'nYu'0 Wa1r15l4Mwd1-Srdp•d4Iy 204 �.. •I. .,,. . SD � ... _ ... 'r:.,1•n,.YPnnYY MLI I ..._ .._:,.ti..,,-' .,.- .... �- - - f rdrnn nnr.R•„1'11120 InrrM1lwPla/UKdf rNl W.Milr lardlNhnA WR[4r_ 4.l ..�„-r....___ -.............j_,.•_..' _-_._�.__. .:_�_...L��.�_�__...___-.__-.-.._. Utii Pn n,•.lnn ron+-LrY!'r d""Ylry'wtrr_..,. _ .-. .. .., .. __ -_-.__...-�-_,-.._.___3?O _ _._ _.._. .._.� :MPA UZI:,F.`-: W4[H Nllah A[rvi(pIR _, - ........ Lam. :.�••••• _.._._-. ..___i.-__-, .__.-. - .. .. ... ...... i 1',J4.�rru PIPPP•r1wn 4:1aIr llalbvr LPve!•M4a M.xrahbdac]t-aCl - IM lmlty rrp1udIx" k .. Id ARrinxlwr W4MrQwkty(aah7aliP4Pilar lhRdwld �-•_-Y00 -_j__ ••.-_.-_ ter.__»w..�. .« _ . ra[hn T1AkA RPts%uf;"ulDrinkknt WRvn 11:1,e"d Arslirny Rt S[4MIIl•1 L1rIn11P6 W66r HPd0lAtlTli/1rk1 .. I 3 ... ._. ., Nandnll RYwmrneRdM w]t'xm7•TAfg4M Ude,nrwMTlre - :. SO __.._._......:--_..__.... ..........,. -- .... ._ rLrrm.:l lkrPrtewnMr[[tV1l Clkn4 rlrrwM Nra[lh t'q W4NIrr ... - � ._.,. .. ... i.-_.._. 1 i I I 111e•rrcr'r7•I vraur,m'!rnnrelnwgwrnn_ - 1 L 1 - _ _ ._.. . Ary'Ntk!110 Cdnrdwall Cavdnkrmldn i 0.77 T __._ __ N�1,I,nPl Nr,sNn•nnnAvl .. .. .._.._...___...,..._._..�......_._.'.._•__-__, ...___ .�_....�•�--r,�..--.-r-��.I.,--,... _.___..... __._.t _ .. 25 70h1e S.Stone Carral[nr 51,Flit 3¢!2 Fpp.Wd vow -Da h d TmA DI WhVd -DIIra15Nd T.W D-j- Tax :AwINM 1- D-Id tp A I .Alanknnn AkA Atm* An Berm Caw*m C&dmM tllo•lrl•.1'I LIaRPIANn Tappro Cryw. 'c u, St4NOAMiIMr .. La"[Lda ' [ -_yell WR, _MGM1 wA. � ..^loll. _1y/{_ -.� x VeJ 4%A 41Jt PIA yG4i C>:11 .STONE CORR41[N1L S1 .. _ ...-. ...__...-.3LrJu ...,WA, OA x/F-..,. WA WA WA WM, WA w4 STONE CORPAtCN8 S7 315p115:4.5...__.7:1%0. ..WA, IIIA.... ..,MIA_ -�G l_ -f1/A WA WA WA WA .NfA. ,NIA NIA WA �STONC C011MtCN0.51. .._._ Veln19S0. k/,A ....Nf�.. .._MfA -N(A.._.-_a6 .. ..WA, k%A „ WA WA_ 11/0 rjjWA NIA TVA �A--.' 0_4.._ .. NIA.. .-..WA. WA WA WF. .'..WA NN lUi STOItI T53RW1tCNIL i! _ _,. --W ...WAWF ..,_lUA DS WA W► WA WA WA MIA NIA 7L'A -RON[CORRASCNRS ...-.,_..._._.___..-.--. 11I14fO211:TC• HLA«... WA � WA WA p5-_ MIA WA i WA _ WA WA H!A N/A N:A HLA_. .wA_._i.._ _I!I�,. ..?b.....„IA., wL!. ..WA WA WA.. .NIA WA WA STCHE COIWLCNR 3t ..-. C2 „S/!lII1z k W!! MIA WA NIA a) WA WA„ WA WA WA RIA 1:1,5 I!'a •. .STpkCCORRAL[NRSI .. .. -........_l(1!I¢11S:LS WA WA WA ...WA- .:.,_ . i. ,11/0, „WA ,WA WA WA PVA Ntn 110 STOI7[CORRAtLF(R,11 _ .._....._. ......._..._-...-W1�T:35._...1!l�..i._.W1t.. ....W.A .. _..;...-03...--..t!f.A_...._WA. N/x WA W?._ eTtn IrM WA 370k[C¢RMLCNR SI.. _,. .1f].1I037OS0.: ..WA.. ..WA_. ...W+..... WA .-....GI.. .._...NL!.. _ NLA.-....WA WA .WA.... .NIA IIIA. .. MIA 'STOH3 CORAALCIfR P. .. ._. ,,...�.._2L111�3 ._ W!!.. ....!KA. .f.,W-"..._..IIIA 0.9 _ NfF..... NIA,. . Wh WA WA N:A NN WA *TOPS C¢IIMLL H¢SI »-.«._ ........._. �37.�5.. .NJA... ...1UA ._MSA.... ...WA OS _WA WA -_ WA .. WA N!A- HIA 11.0 tlTx 3TONCCOIWStCNRSI.,_ .. _ ...-. ••..,.,...,,____. 3j17J0311}IS WA .. -W/1,- .,WA H1A Q7... NIA_ WA.., WA WA, WIL N1A I{I. W7 ST671C CGRRAI[NRL .. L--SW- A'1'1' WA ylk ..ItLA. -.,IIJA - DS WA - WA WA WA WA WA 1111 3i= WA .STONE ocglam C HAS' 4/76N131�0,.: NIS..... .WA.. .:._v6 . MlA_,�. 08... ...WA• WA WA 1. WA,.,_ .. 69 )31IIIA 9 R07S,CORAAiCNR 31, .,..... ..�4 mq. _S_6 - SL9 '_1.41... -23�_• ,_g.6 ...nC19 0.03 6a 3.51' 4.36 _ 419 •W1 531 STOW LOWULCIIRSI � ------ - 7Am.%I:SO 143 -'1S?•••. �1J 1.43 lit !POPS :•�'au � 3.4 361 7.75 3211 x3 4Sl STONECORWLCNX$i ?MAI S3A0 3399 2065,. 1.7a 106., - X0.2 01011, Gold 270 146 4.71 - 475 1297 14M GL6657A It, Lg.., .[i9 9i5 lam _........__-._-_ 6719.._ 0.97 0.5 ..0.006-_, "23 .S10NE COeAAtC113L -- ' . _ __......_. ....,....-,.....1+L4'I.u_nS •N.S-, SS:S. .._.._ .. t,87 198 1.56 SAS L77.. ...4a_ p000S_ mm 36 S61 236 :17. - 51'OM CORAAlCl/L71 SJS10117i0 7,75 -3.,71 -{..171,_- ,1.75 ¢6 � OA13 0.021 60: 803 3.18 i.;4 1:1a1% FIJA WA, _ MIA WA__.NJA _WA X/A lKA„ MIA WA WA WA N11• W1 �_ .7 737 !•� I:G$ :.i.5 471 STOWCORMCN831 _1.8�_.• 9.56 1 -.0.3B7,• 4195 !TONE fbRMlCNR 74 ;176m2ii15 219_ _ m.. '...143.-.„._S2 G6 0.176 „6]6 5.97 TLA3 175 AS5 t:n i7S ....-..»_'".��1 ..] 10 `::ise 13ds LOi _I-�.p_ a].. Od35 _m77 27A 367 2.72 314 .111 i`55 ,STONE COIIWLCI¢131 -.. -_.l/le]705 _„ _._..._ ...._.r .. ...ZfAM LGAS 171 782 i LIt _.1;10_ 03 _; 0.70E 0524 2]: 787 190 213 33 '} 'ROM CORRALCIOIL 3/1¢Ii0513A0 4.5 736 L19 Ell ml 0.082 a13 3.11, 177 1.58 2.21 •1e4 3:1 STONE CO@!IAL r!M S! .. .,.. _ ,41{9J06�:70 424 _496 �. L7S..__._iJ6_•-65,,,-,-_Gate e1Dlt 43 a97 179.. :.SG h"r .351. ..�?11tl64e`'?. 416 193, 1a7 rA.S3 1:.7 1�[]lJ66]5:311 Q976LL¢%..,',. 093 - AA 7.21 31 10.5 171 lTOMlCORR!iCI01 SI_.•_ ....... 71/14AfCOAC,.,•y_. 5LA - ..NLA ...NLA. _. !�_-kWA__.,-._wA.,.... ...NJ.A._ MIA TKA PVA- WA WA WA . N,'A NIA I VA S[oNECOR11A1LMAx_^.._ _ RYM-9AG.,k NA. Nl�.,.!.._!+J_A._....q -r_NA .:._WA .' W� NL! NJA WA_ NIA... _.__WA..__ WA.. ..WA. WA NIA, WA WA Leis ' ... ._.. _ .-.�.-.......-.- -.. M.n wa -S70M LA�RALC101 SI,. .10I.t�NsUt? WA ., ..- A -.N{A _(....WF, .WA.. WA...: .NJA WA NIA LVA Jn ItJ14 4.15 127 .:...2.66, 832 6.66 aP .. ;0.009- „37f. lRJ !, 013 16.7 -SSGNECGM1il C✓IR_v. _„1�uln5,vnls -••,>,a 3.12 .,d59- ..7.1�„.� ¢.> Goff.....?'014 St7- S.65 1.69 'ale 117 it S70!¢tORRALCMIIv .. - .,_LSA401{xS 73.1 ,�. ail ...1.76,., L.61 !-Qi. e0002 e01001. 5.4: SLS 18S 7]G :a-. 4.• ...-' 1.4 ' ¢L d10G3, 00.009 T9l .-1111 7.39.«. :-J3 3.1 70.$ SIONE mmut[Me Si.. RAS-...7.OS„_,•r..,909_...-3. _ _ _ _ »- _ hi7 eTt 7.P: .-._ -b--.. ;S70N[CTl70?IL CLLR SI,- 3J1L06}? ,._: 799E 236e _LIl ..:.L49_-.' p2_ ¢n11 .._ 1105 } ..... __.--_...__• 106990 L!5_ A/ 3.06 Ir. ....... ... .+_ _ Aa-7 0.W_ ICL 765 a77 0`.77a !^0.2 m 1 eo 1 1.13 _LA7 1..16 1.e6 SCl 7. 'Simer;IMBAICMISI 17 : 237 4.01 L7S LY01 ¢A - mi .OS Gat A]6 1.76 ... .-...._. A- --- -- � -- 'ROM[fdMALCMISI »- -3.53 t 06-- :g .*.l L05 IA& I. 100 77.1 /0! WA _ WA _N{F.. Tl�A,.. K/F .....NIA NLA WA _ W,A MIA XIG WA IMA WA W-A .....M/A_ __WA _ -WA WA WA WA... WA Nts W. 57oA[mARA1CWt 51 _... ..__..-_. WUJGt lo-to f3S SCR, 4L)4.. ...0.96_ tse �.1 A.l 51 9¢5 4�7 _ 61 5!2 22: .57O11ECORRALCIniv _.. .... _ ,..i 314W U= .111 .741 ..itl- S•7 ,117 m1 X0.1 a 4m LR7 ].x 177 pT STONI[OMAlt1[ASI �.2xJi7;3D CA..6 _ 30.9 901 3.eei - OE �1 -.1 G9A 7.69 39 3.76 57.5 611 $7ON![ORIUICFtll77 .-....._-__ -5.74 _>*._'-.7A9, 117 _A;1,_ d1.1 QG. 39! LS 135 A:7 t15 ...-_......... .......__ C7:i STL7MmAl1A1CNA51 .. ._.. - RLIR,LD,7i - -;♦M - .Im .-..}39--_.3.>° .. D.T m.l - m.l..._V9L a97 06! ,OL1 d7} BONE m1Wa C NA St, _ - N-(A. -WA ..._-ML1l. ..._WA...'•_•WA_.. _WA' _ W1 NPA WA WA WA NIA k"A IVA..;._!ILA._.. �A-_....WA, ...x10 l7/A NIT. MIA NIA ISA M:•: IL ,...WA .. ..WA. 1yA..,.._Ifl_A -IIIA ,HLA •••NIA WA MIA i{'A uA 41,'? STONE mPAMCNA51. . ... ......_ ___.. ....?. 3L?7m?6. _ �..._.>fT1A _ ..xJA __!I!A_.:__..NLA.. :._xfA_ WA NN WA WA„ WA x1.1 _.9.77 -7310 ..,fAl _2,3J-• Q1_ �.l oma D43 dd9 5.11 u.e •4. 44T .�_A]_ A.1 D71 _ 40 2.49 3.S 21 -W6 . _..._. ._...... _ .... ..- 083 7.97 201 T./ 4!.7 STONE SDRBµ.[l1Rv - 3(at110A9:ID 0.94 ARS 7.57 .7.16„ __¢A _ ml A.1 STOFACOAAAICNRSI - ....-.-. !/19fDi9S0, ...1.70 50.6 a93.. ,7.47•_ 0.6.. �.L 4.1 QA3 OSS ].32 !116 79 77.1 ---_. _..-._.__.. ..7,CZ3L� _!K":......_W�..-.' .!KA.....�J�_.:-_NCA- ^N ....N1A-. NM N/A ,xl►..' 1410 NIA /1!a _......NNE_ WA i MIx WA N/A_, WF NIA NIA Al WA M/A - 1VA NIA HA ----& ��.�I�._..,_...6SIi..__wA...:_.NIA WA ... 1UA IUA NIA HA WA. WA.._-N1A.__�- A._.,..-.W+... ._K!A ..WA. .. WA MIA WA... WA NIA _ .K(A ;STONE[9RAAlC IIAN, ... ._. ...-. -_. _ /O9 __ .11_, - .r••-._-. WAIATA__--._.HLF._. ...NIA MIA WA WA,.. WF ITI1. .. - ...._..,..,...__. __ N/ Tyr} R(A :...,!9A. .'....W_A..,....�A..,._1...WA 1'3%0 ,_M/A WA NIA NIA A 74la .5TOMECDRIWCMR A' _11(1!/09.Q00 WA, .!.U.A-. ,..WA .. WF .i WF. `.....NIA WA WA MIA NIA LVA NPA 4;A IKA WA _ HLA. .NLA WP MIA N!A INA L,A MIs SlO3SOWIRAIC ttIL}I_-._ ...-'_-- .3C?6J.101O,IS• „771„ ,•-•;,1,40 .0.Q.Q2__ .»ti'?__.'..._0.1....q.l^ ,40.1. . O7? 7.31 Sol Y.1s 1: !'+A 1l.S 2,45 02 m.l A.7., O7: 7.]9 Sss ?r• > tl, .57GM[CMRAI CMR Sf_ -.....-..._._ ...___._�.3 /W .. O.ei6, d66 i_5 1.17.. 0.•-... .-.x0.1_. d,l, ¢4.: 0.A] 2.31 7.5: I t'1: dTON1 COaRALCkii}i_.. .. 4�2U109�-- ,.�:6},•.. 17A .0961.- : 112 '•-Cd.. Ai -.6 u.N. 0.73 ]21 174 !A 22} -- - .'.---- i 'aoi 1.17 Oa_._ -'-di A.S 062 066. .?4 2.39 IA SI f10N[OONRIEt.CNRL,••, ..... SJ]N10Ai0-,,,,1,!5, L46 ---- - - -RONEOMRAt CIW 31 _ SIRS%SODAO.._-W+i, ,WA .'- _AY.A ... .MLA WA.. �..... WA, NIA WA .WA IVA WA WA STONr00RRAtCkR L.. ._.. _ __-i 1J31/SDOAO 7iIA WA WA xlA_ _WA-_ H/A •. WA WA WA NIA WA NIA WA . .. ... T-'--'-OAp NIA - STOMCOAMICNRSI 1N7e/11,. «_.... WA...• 1110 _ W�,. '._AKF._ ..WA ._WA _ WA WA NJA m WA w ......_. .._ ._ 23S ,b), 6.11 ....f.74 ..Od .l _ A.1 I 2 t 2,40 7.79 31f1 9!• 491 fTCAO00RAAtcNRp .- .. __ ]1L30I10 710x(mAMlCNA51 .._.u.. Saw, 30, 7�.1 2.25 ..L,• 6.72 G7 A.1 AJ 333 77! 0.17 - 427 SZ LS.G 11175 ,_-l.9� ,ld'S, _ 107 .. i:1 a, --.4A„_ m],. eV.i � DH 09: SIOMCORMt CNAL- .. .._. .. SIISI.l.u..- ..-_..._ .__._ .«_.. 6149.. __L61. .!!6 _•-1-..•_..aM �•�pJrN_. d1 :3 !a6 - SL9 ___.-^.._.._,_...._.___.-_Maduel_ ,__a•A6_. SQ06 :_3.715_._.,7.075 0.3.. '.GOSSl..- C?3!. 21t 3.493 709 's An ,17: 73.S Fpy{� O.Sd y/6._.l_6661_, 4774 0.,3 ..n096, _ROU-,,,,Ot: OA] a.fB _ f•d1 Swn[e SNn Nrn-TANtiyWm4StIl1drd7 S!me1dY�!1Ad 2¢0 _. :........�...... - - . OItPA/O[XNA�CAkI01nY AA3.0 IIIISM¢Ax _ .. ... .64n tiSEPf y.1RAAaewly hMaYdtn6�,ln '--'-----. ._.-.'o'---...._._..:.?� �-'-- ,. - -'-•--.. .. .. .. ._..._ -_._. .. _GIi7Mw[d:[1111Aa Fy5hr4E�_AYSk ISN AW,+dlmltaMalmLennmretlou•.^_____..._.:._.--..., ._._._._. -....-._.-T-_._... ^.... _. ........ _ .. ....._...___._.._.. .. .. .:_.._a7..._.__.... � .,. .. .. .. ._._ fi4iolrlallotlfaatkn 115x9•.03!NMi.WRI..... _ ..___..__ ..._.s ..,1__ ...._.... ......... ... - NMbn.11r4d[xr7dLfrivrNeIAbA*b 7ar0YlilAe W41tl,. ..._. .5006. _ ... {. . 115rPA TI4S14TNNw[b4 pM1OeWN4r IMxdlA�h'mY.. _.. .. - .. •. S;, Mnlim.IRwMa.,eMfdWI]_CrltwY•T{5rnandplyrnrxhdarR MgLuW IN{eldna{AN W4CId Tui�lAalNn HaOl+od Wei aieP�1I6^ _.__.._ -._.._ - ftAk.A M[w ...drdtV6[d1aNa•FIPtlw�adr AgWi[1A6ConW.POI!rfolarerWOA 67 I[a14rnJ ft---d.0 WO[Wi i,•FndnOW.Al7.pM1HR-MW!�Im 26 Table S.Stone Corral C nr Sl,pari 2 of 2 pludHRd Tow alelorRd real tool wn4h[etl rad Olrw#wd Tela 171ntl7Rd[ TnY DIyLW.ed Tact I4,a 144d MWPp 11n,6PIRp'RIf71r17 M Ad fe" 3rh"- 14MINeRr Om 9IA9r Zoe Dx WAR... Irdh.. -- - -.'._^Oh...:_L'bL+..._.y6lb_.. .l'fA 41R...Rdl-.: 1,6[L {q!!.. (rdl 4LJr:f'1RRAI C SR N -'_ ......._ 5%I7jg1.1p}p wA [ NLr<,_,...NJ.A- __ _NLA,...{-J'J A...•_WM !S��_:__N-j°-..f..,Lq�_:..lq!�.:....-�!L►_ WA _..._- I •.•Oh::C•RRAICNAJI __.. ..- - J/SN1,75;g_. L!/A... .NIA_.._ .wA..._. . ulANIA._ . ._j_,9LA.... ��.. I!/A...... • rILA _1 WA r•„Yi r.(MIRAICYA i1 .-,.... +i9Lo1 ss0,_ _K--A---:_ NA... .!fGA_.__._.NLA_.. ..LI f lC'AAAI C`JR Jt .. 712LIf02113D-. .1!LA.�. MIA_, ._ �._.. � .N-I� .._L!L!R .WA�.....WA-� A._..... --.•..IyA_ .7VA_. A.. -rakLfrrrPA CAAu _ 3PN7} MIA :JD WA.. 1. MIA P0. WA NfA_ WA.. .NIA_ WA. J. M14- M/A...� WA..: • y+. 'AN 5I A A A.. NM,.,.; WA A NIA_.' -WA... A._, .J!/A -WA i. WA WA ... 3/fy02171? W ...!W. ._LS! !!/.. I r..N/. SlCri LONNA C MR$I -•_ _ V10N21&43,.- NIA_ � .NIA- i .. !!LA...,i _ LVA_ WA. i NIA,..' WA.. WA•-, tWA_.._ .!WA WA. ,.WA.. MIA STPNI CORMLCNY S, S111IO2A+-If•.r. W�-.-:.M/A..�WA WA_ N A_� _NJA_�._+LL't fjlAµ.�WA--•1•-W...a....-NIS F_. _.. WA.. STOW CORPALC fit S1 ...... ... ...._ _- 11(MtA1.1S.t61. ww _I..wA- K1A N!A -_ _.KLA .!rIA._.I..N!AL.- A_' FVA_j WA .HIA_. ..N.LA__ .,!IA 9rONf[AAMICNR 51 _ .__._._. ...,.,._.._...._. N711gi_... We...,.,.NjA_ WA WA -.WA_...ICA_J•17/A, NJA. ICA WA_ WA WA... WA 4JOHL COAAAL C NR 51 . .,. ?1].'...1&.60 : M/A,...,. LLIA,.(.. �!4....., ..CWS_. .._!!IA_.;_WA...'..wA.. ...!SLA.... .�!L�..I.,!!LA. '-NIL'- .WA _"WA :LPN(CrNWLC NR Se � NIA .kL.A._:....W!l.. N/A ::Ov[IrJAM:c Nr 51 .. .Vl1pl 14 i3 r• MLA I -Wei- MIA KLA.._I._..L�A__.._NLA. .,,S�1A !_NLAL.jAyk ...!W!L.:. ql WA - N/A IIIA %rnNr.CCORAI C IIR U - - 3I771W 1115_ A WA WA._-'.. A MfA A .. _ _tW.. _...._.._ L!L -_�.. .iLL_._:_WA,._....WA WA wt1 WA ...NAI WA %1"rC0HhAICNR51 ••_ 41d1oy1}•10 . .,IIIA_ .WA_ ,,,,_.LC1A__ Ww WA WA,-1_W.A_:_LLA W4 NIA_ WA NIA WA 1`CINL r11PRAI C N R V _ ..• _.- .. �n 1L� N.1A_,.� .,h1IA. KIA _.._. A.._•. .. ..:_ A...�..» A_.[MWA .!KA-.: .•nht,.nAMI C NR'. _ .... 6g4A131a:!D, ,-GD66_...GDI1_. 217_-_I•Qm WA-_737 3.Y_._..7�_._. .._««.... _._ _.. .._. .�_...»..._- '.Tr'kcC.ONRALCfit v ......... .. ._. LI61-11130,.-QQS4•�I, PIk .. 9!W,•,-_,;«.479 WA i}! Srl•kt tcmnAI C NAv .. ...._....._ 1/4/D!1l�D.i._0.296 '_O.Sa7 1.75 _eQG1S .1611[WARM[C NR71 ... ,tp7/W 1k7a„_4.701,, G_.L91_. 78.1 7D3_„_, +TOACCOitAALCNR1t .._ ... .. ... .1NJO11ltA5 2009... ml., f.66., 397 WA. 7.11 2.73_ J.iI_.. ?3b.. .4051,•• 0.49 0!7 IDS .1UNL SOARAICNRiI Mpll0.y OAS Om4. LIS., 44-. MIA ' 14• 758.». .,4.76., IAI,., 097.. <�71 1.1 1.65 STONC fMRAlCNR 51 S)S I1t 1130 ` 0.W.{' v D;HS�.._.OA} -'._.2A1 ._� _WA�, ��_ IiS ..�R.I..^._ __.__ _. 4.:... s.. _. _.._.�.._.... _. ...__._. WA A- A..._.. A� IUA - _ LI._ N1. {TONG fARMI[NRS1 1[a5I0I14::b WA .....WA.1 �N A._._.KLA-_. _WA......:T�.�.' A A<�...... �. . VOW(UPUICNR51 [7/6101930 Qm9_. 6142. 772__.. .Ax.. .NIA_ .495 1.71_ .. 10 }P4 _0.947 osDl•? 178 Lail SJOl.f.CMPAtCNRv _... •. _-..T 1217/M led •0.1M L,0793,• LO7.-�. ..,74_6. .WA..-l .24, ...A±19 103.- _1Y.0.6 _....DOS.. 46ffi 0.9➢, 1.M '10AY CCAn4LC NII 51 .. _ f/tOlm l;:9& nss1 0.41% 7-bi : 91 WA 774_ 2.Y iq 1.M PAR! m13 I.I6 461, _..._._ ......_._.._.__..._ :,[wlr00.NnLCNAst .____. .__......__ 717/061&:{5 OAri Q117 ?.35 19.E _ .."14._ _L15 .. x67 x}T Qad PD07 0.W 7A6 SIMHC W-VIA1 C NA v Y7[4fm L190 - PAS _._..._.._. Qm] :_L17 _ 62l iUA _LY! _ 719 7 3_ ePAM +n016 _0.7J J EG 4 W LvaU:C Na!e ._ _._...__ 4/1 730 0.Q41 0.747_. 14{«. 301 .. ._ A• 712 '7_75- x.72 ..SPb OAI_ 0.W .j_..-J•.• -. •i 7D9 401 4.46 m.00o PC71 QT 0.74 '.t.'Nr 111RReC C% v - S%1'Jjm 930 0.006 OAl6 Q73 217 A 1.43 •.C.\f fr14NA:C h9 a1 ....,. _..._. 6t"M 11130 .649��:.a"..: .7•�_.. ._.. ..�l� a•9F... 2+A! .. _._!..`'.� OG'f .-..017]..1.._Qf[_.. 1.ii. 'I^Ni it7,IP.1ICNAH 777{105 P4D WA._x..- .., IMA.._1.._!WA_. _uNLA..:.»-W _....W.6..._.L!IA�- WA N/l•_•. RCMNIA +rrw'UIRMlCNR11 -. ..., .4177/050OD, ' .IV's._l_..!:LIA.. .LIA_-. ..RIA_. HLA._..__!LLA_..: N�A_. ...NIA-- WA WA i IClA ..MLA._...lWA. w,(ORNAICI:AsI . . .---.. ._ .,'L[73I -?an - .._. Wit WA., R/A... A ._WA. !Y.A. WA... WA, WA.._:_7.I!!..-..,.SIA_.-.- WA_.. �A.-...__W.2-.w•LSL�...-?ILA__ WA.._. S:nrrC CnRRAIC NA:I f0/24C&S OAO WA ,M/A_ WA � l!/A NLA. N/ _., WA SVA WA,. WA cTnH.'CONRAS CNAiI 1V1fp643S 0.(107 ' OM 20.7 I 272 WA, 7.73 ,- 627 _ 30.6 a0.? 'MOO+aOM,' 135p7 STnHt CORNwlCNF 51 -. LZAAMI0FAF_ non PAls.! 17.1 111 A W+!. 1 am. 77-1 -PIM -,ODII 7DI lad rratt000RRALCNA51 - _ 1174IIfikk4S• _OOtl,., OAal„•, 79A_-I 775 WA ,,.•!3f 3.9 ,r !67 a9L005 _0.071 ms _ 0bJ :TONG COROAI C-4411 ._. ...___-.-.... Vim i 191 469 WA !ST __7.17 671 7GS AA09_ A.009 1 101 . .....___- nom..--- ,...__...__...__.._----• -, _.... _. _ +rCWLifN(MI CMR 51 .. - I lP610-a 2.536 4.79 3.SS _ P6 I.G6_ ' 0.099 +nOm 6�A7 7.11" •rOYr CGPRAI('110.51 .. - .... UITl9683P O.OSt 0.064 9.99 .....-14,1 _. WA .. 3;m 117 L75 ' 1.99 KODI - AW 7.77 s61 ,•nN[tPRMlf NR 11 - _ _,- Y17/a610A6 .On4 eOaR L85 1.73 A L99 193 : 5.1E L93 X07 X097 0.9 _ C93 :rga'cPR'IAI CN4 i1 ....._ _.. _.. _(:R7f0690P•_.••<DD�• � ADI � 577 19A WA ,.-.?:13...: 1R8 � _�6.__I .„7.97 OID7 R.T_d [ _0A _ P" STI,ki.IOL RAI C NR 51 _ 7Afir960A1 I N%A WA NIA NLA........_N1A .._-MIA _ ._ A___._N1A_ :..•.Y«^..... MLA .N/A_ ..,..._ __WA .._._........! .._-._.._ ___. ,,C•:<t I,IRT.V r III 1r ._.• .•• 10I7tif06QIIO •„-WA.• -AWA_ _ NA..__.. pA__, KIA .._CLIA__. NJA._: ._SA_._L WA.- .wt_.. YA tirki:,lRonlCNN11 ..... .._ l7/17A1d 1tr16...AA4 0.171 _ ILS 7IJ__ ...NLS. 437 647 :'L•\!l.II:A'.LCNR II .. V4g711m 0.7..-,._R717_�. 37.6,...-. SRP] w, _0.79�. ]A7-_ 7]7 �..1Y6..F. 70'6�< <0.�__�M17_._. �._ .�•- t:rr.C:ONNUCHR1[ 7/27JM E:SD „9.05- O.lal .._7d._.... �' ft/k-...r ._ 779... .475_ 117 _, �4II!,_ •<6m - 1s7__ lfri_ '14'N:fOrPA,CN9:I .. ...._.. 7170/07930 <064 1 0,961 153 �� d92_ La _. iAl_- , 67 716 _ A.DI .623_._ 6!7 219 ' 4U a! '_U 1.16, - SrOn!LCISRIILCNRLI .. .. .. 4jJy0T6O0 0.G6 OA46 7>:E..... 3.77 .� 3.93.. •0.06 AAS 1.W 7.47 •,:UNC[PRAAL[NR St vgm7,om IIA_ !WA.. WA.,, WA NIA, _. WA WA_ MIA WA., WA WA , AuA WA ICINLCORRALCNRV 6/1umoo0 WA NIA 1(IA,_., 06. WA t WA WA NLA• i, WA WA AWA WA, WA 'rnR:f t040.µ No SI --......_ _ _.._ .9/1JR04111 WA..••, „L!IA_.. _.'kL- ...WA.. !IR _."IA.... NL,A_ ..!!I+t-. _KLA...--W! .WA...,-. WA- WA .10NC CCRYAI C alt l001I07460. IUA WA, WA ....RMI.. WA 11 _ MIA_- WA-;. MIA WA WA- .. �MIAA r<WRALCNRv 1"1!2617:20 0.96 -....._•• --.- .... - [ 7AI_, x41 ..'.. 5x6.,:....!UA 143... .929_ �...-� O9 .,Q�_ e.03 ..LLS'- Ifil 11f,AL LnRfIAIf NRw 7/77N476ns <" .. -&,2i3•,...__0.5(_ ...'�._ _Wok J.u._. >�_ 7A_..}...as_ .Llm- ma3..- aeI _ +dd :.L,INt raRAal tNR 51 3126!&84:[0 AW•�i Qa4 M,3 ,779 N/A 7.17 it ].61_ 4.02 ADI [9D3 Ol xfa .._. _._..._._.____.. _ .-._ _.t..___.._. _ 1111,V1 iORRA,.t Not ... _.. ..... _ M!]/OE 930 QPC6 [ QOS9 677 �...,19.1 _.:...Mlf. 3.77 146 -.:Cdl[LCINAALCNRSI 7/}!lOBf13D._; IA NIL—_...L!LA.-a...JI/A WR,... WA_'._ '-. WA_....:...°LA_:..._NL_......rLLA.. •rpNr(LI43IALC IIhL .•_._ .. ._.._..... .. - .41171090DC_ WA .•.Mfl . ..171AN/A ._.`._WA ..N.1A__i...LILA__ NIA .IL'Nf[021uL[VR:' _ aID A L_NLA- ['._ttLA__ .KIA_ L�A _..A�A., !�A..--__f!!!!._._NM..r...i?!�-_�.lA !JC+_.. WA s+nNLrnleOm iAlty _ _ .. ODD WA-._MIA _•_,._N1.A__ _._IVB,__, MlA_ .!SLS..,N1AA.•.__.MLA._.[_ WA..___NJ14-..'...!!LA !IA. .rGNCLMiMLC NN 51 - 7I76/090.(q_: STONr. ......__,-. , . .. _ _ IA. ._N ..k ' wA-I /A - _ !4A -. . .: _ 1WA. »_I (OARAI CNRi1 _NA .. - NIA._ SrnNf CORAALCNR9 9124/f A.1R WA.. ,WA..f NIA WA. NM. WA... NLA., NA ..!WA. NIA.,_, IW. NIA . WA r10Nf CMRAL CNJ LI 19171/09¢&& NLA, I WA• 1 WA RIA,,,, .MIA. ; NIA WA NIA ,.MM' N !(IA ,WA WA S10N1[ORAAI CNR 11 31/1".292 WA I NIA.. i ..NIA. !IIA_._. SIM... WA WA •. NIA MIR... WA 1VA WA WA .17I9109m.. NIA... NIA... ...NIA ..,.W!� .WL!-.. WA--t.MLA.. . .NLA.._. WA MIR _!VA_.. ...WA WA. \!(rte(IORRM.C NR SI S/7N1010.45 ! - .DDI 1.97 . 151 L06 WA „4JA,. 617. _ 459_.: ,.0.67 AP3 <DGa 056 16.1 KrtNf•In4RA1CYP11 .._ ...._,._ 7/L3017:10 - _ .-.. .. ._' ___ _ .DA4 DAR ..069_. rlb,b WA 7.39 797 3A7 7.54 Kass A03. L.s 540. :!elNr CPNIIAI-r NPS! tCA1 _.1_7.!11+_ ..... _ •.'07+C row:VIA .. - - a m9m A�1_ OM7 L64 IWA 191 1.96 -,=w4f..: 1. --Am KOD) _ JA6_ 7.7 ".1,14!100."1 i N9 SI S!?�W 83G _s9D1•..'-�9DI 0.]1 1.34 NLA_... 7 _7.06 RGS' NOi_` ..1.65 _ ESJ ..nNt cr.PRAL[NP9 - - -- fJ79f 10,nm .NIP. I NIA_ -_NM_-!_-NIA_»_...NIA .. --W±!-._Nh. _ ..:-...W�. .:CIA ..NIA_.._.NIA.. WA - -._ =t t•:a:r:oNrl[NR 11 _.. ,Wilfl9.4.00 I WA...' WA MIA IIIA MIA WA WA_ NIA NlA•_., NLAA •WA NM SrUkL rllRf:.,C NR:1 ._. tGI76II0(k0 . .WA.. __KALA. ._ PSLA.._. .._LICA_.-. _HIA M/0.-I..WA.. MIA .....wA. '11 .MLA._ .WA WA _.._ :Inrrt'nRMI CNR SI ............ 11/aW101070_ +ODI» S..NA1 El4 1__n9_ MIA-.'..7'Ot... .2.1...1.76 L42 _K9107 NW 27 7.76 �-e,Lr;l(urrrAef NR31 17111/1010,.10 KDDI WO4 279 - u WA Imm ! -t_r >_x __!.66- L OD19 %A.. 24? 73 . _. ...._. _. .._... u..... ___....._...__.- 'WOW CORRAL r4 SI ..._. ».._._ 11!6/1117.75 � ADf OAS! 767 I AE A 175 i„ vD6i•'• ' ._..,. .„. .____._._.._._..NL...___ _..LTA- L13__ __�.. M447wm 0.702 x91 filr{ _ 197 23 � � I51 7& 50.4 6731 OJS/7 647 M9 . MedlaL am � PD98S S� 786••_�• 0.9x .I 7.70G x17• a14S 4A.. DOSS 49161 - 7.47 ., ., AIYiNF,q 0.006 O.ODS ! QI4 111 1..079 L7 1.75 Q7C I 0.36 0001 - 0.007 0.46 064 M,•Sini Wlln r,atRa+w•P�,r.,ry AQ.-- I �- � 'knrR w•,s+,lrgnLxu Warr G,dMEs•Stu Ien ltlCf _ _._.. . ._.... .. . . .-. -._. -_- --•.-._ _.. ._ C,.1fVAr:CJNNi-I.A,h,..f. .ri(1�1urnM.0,0.•.i. -.-- - � I �»...�-_.�«..._.__._�__ _... C'3 l:'h nR1•A•.r v:1[•iglrh„w Rnl,iflMlfelhl QT 11410(dr,ntl R W__.. .. .: .-___..�...'-_....... - rKinA[ N..NH A,:r[v[T r.,,,I[I•.Ln6 rNrr1 .... ._ i l 4An,v.PogN•rlrN.f.'.VI.r:.6+i.lwl MAlc Alb1.s01Hd4LR kvr[fAr rRpfR@wM-1m 0.25 I -,_»..-_„y„..._�_._.._._.- ____ _ -_�._-_._i. .._. .._„ r,n,h+Ire a-.q.7uN•[r+.lnrsln C;R414P411.-4.6 F.0„wLrr'r - Ag11+14:LEh RotrabnAW41!wn Censa,oraluH..... I _......s�-...-.-•_.___..._.._�, ..J.....' m .___.._..___. ...»-_.L.._-._.. AI,Ir.:ISN[Ir WilRe(N[alrlYfN*'If•TA�IP IIW o6or,lNrrd+dP..,_.__... __....._.. __._.. ..-»-..-.�...-____._.__.___ .__.___..:«.._.......i.... _.. t+Wwr�•AOVfrGlNn lr+W.glrRJnE Wda _ .. .... ., j .- ..-....___.._._,-. _..... _. - k.r.eaafAueermrol5n.nrnl VSiPA[RrS NrrwrlRr D.•1r U.Nnu16W+tR/HaLPt AtlMwry. _ .. _ .. .. ._. � - N:[rw,ARna[r+v.RR•d WP CMrNA•T3Lq NnNrn>1Anrrn.n•nAlnr VfU r�RRrN•CNfmmIInR64rtl YleNarL•prrx.aLer.•w1nw0 ' i_,_.__!___.__._'__.____.;.._ ..'.... �_____. ..._._.__..._____ .._ .._._...._... _ N'•Aywtl.rrx[n.n.�,['XO frpnN•ryRLALg7RCAp4HPf IiN4[uaa.rw W,g7[t;ROen - .. .....-. _.. ._. .. H,AgtHr V•+lM4rn+N'r'45TLff.IM�•flrfJ„RN.I PAPLr Ni y.„IylOinY�n toer(4rRraL+eA [ ' «w.....•z� ---- 27 CORRESPONDENCE icoChEH.com # Statewide water savings down to single digits in October By Staff Reports,December 12,2017 Sacramento>>Water conservation statewide dipped into single dig- its during October according to a report Issued last week by the State Water Resources Control Board. The water board said on average Californians used 8.5 percent less water than in October 2013,the benchmark pre-drought year. Mandatory water conservation targets and penalties for excessive use were dropped this spring,and the conservation numbers have declined pretty steadily since then. The water board stressed the state still used 48,381 acre-feet less water in October 2017 than 2026,but the number was the lowest since March 2015,when savings were Just 3.9 percent. Locally,conservation was generally somewhat better than average. The Del Oro Water Co.led the way on conservation,trimming usage 16.3 percent in October compared to the same month in 2013,fol- lowed by Chico at 14.8 percent,Oroville at 12.9 percent,Willows at 8.6 percent and Paradise at 6.1 percent. Oroville still had the lowest water usage per person per day at 65 gallons,followed by Del Oro at 84 gallons,Willows at 114 gallons, Chico at 141 gallons and Paradise at 166 gallons. Average statewide water use is 101.9 gallons per person per day. Conservation is the Sacramento River drainage was lower than statewide at 7.2 percent.That was better than the South Coast(6.9 percent)but worse than the Bay Area(11.2 percent). The water board said 40 agencies reported using more water in Oc- tober o-tober than in 2013,with Redding the worst in the state with a 41.2 percent increase,from 146 gallons per person per day in 2013 to 205 gallons in 2017. Red Bluff's conservation rate was 7.8 percent,Marysville was 9.3 percent and Yuba City was 6.1 percent. Wednesday Updatea . Doe, 13, 2017 This weekly electronic newsletter is designed to keep you current on California Water Plan news. We welcome comments,suggestions,and any news tips that may be of interest to water planners. Workshop for two chapters A workshoo covering Chapters 4 and 5 of , California Water Plan Update 2018 will be held i ® of Update 201$Set for the Thursday,Jan.4,in Sacramento.Chapter 4 p ® first Week of the new year details plans for investing in water resources sustainability;Chapter 5 is the funding and implementation plan.The workshop will cover f proposed funding scenarios,along with thesu� ��' priorities and schedule for implementation. RS sae ue e Strategic Growth Council Almost$34 million in grants has been awgr edd by the Strategic awards$34 million in grants Growth Council's Sustainable Agricultural Lands_Conggrvation (SALC)Program.The funding will be split among 27 projects that for land conservation projects protect agricultural land from development and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.In its first two years,the SALC Program has provided $42 million in funding. Dozens of watershed The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)has awarded funding to 39 watershed_ i i• 1 " restoration projects receive restoration_projects.The awards total$39.7 million, funding from CDFW with approximately$8 million going to projects that ° directly benefit the Delta.Most of the funding was made available through the CDFW's Proposition 1 Restoration Grant Programs. Science board seeking The Delta Independent Science Board(ISB)is accepting public comments an two draft documents.One covers the development public comments an and use of science in estimating ater supply li 'I' or the two Delta documents:. Delta.The other is a review of the Interagignpy Ecological Pr Comments can be emailed;the deadline is noorf on Friday;Jbn 12 There will'also he'ari opportunity to submit comments during an (SB=mee#ir c on Thursday and Friday,Jan;4 ands;An Sacramenio. y Annual Walter law The 4 h n I C" i r L �u 'wig be Saturday, M tWlll focus onl Jan 2Q,in Berkeley It will focus ori the wt-.. of the state's water f tnfraiftct, The panel discussions will include infrastructure ms z Caldolrnq S�n#rlrsructl� e inittaWes far urban areas udi�zing watertransfers to recharge .sgroundwater 6asirts,and how a degrading,infrasfructure Impacts t t r^ r r- �'Tf 7��� -N'fi ti '' r ♦ »"S dnnk�ngatert a`s > tis "`'' }F ..``Lis -%r; '� e+C•,rt S a5t n^4 3 t s z 1��, atta�s � � 3 -Cal 1, E 9 CORRESPONDENCE ChicoER.com # 7 1 Habitat grants mean millions for north valley projects By Steve Schoonover,December 17,2017 A new round of state and federal environmental grants have been released Trout Unlimited also received a planning grant of$346,000 to figure out a recently,and a number of area projects have been among those funded to solution for the Bend Water Users Association diversion on Paynes Creek. the tune of millions of dollars. Clifford said the current screens are a way down a ditch from the creek, Several of the state grants are aimed at assisting rare fish species in local which can confuse fish. streams,but a mix of state and federal funds are also going to upgrade bird The Western Shasta Resource Conservation District was given$419,000 to habitat on a ranch in Honcut. plan a fish screen at a diversion on Little Cow Creek,and the Maidu Summit Deer Creek Consortium and Conservancy got$95,130 to pian restoration of Tasmam Koj6m.That's a meadow in the Humbug Valley that will be restored to a The biggest single grant is$2.2 million to Improve fish passage at an Irriga- condition where traditional practices can be conducted. tion dam on Deer Creek In eastern Tehama County. Pintail ranch It is one of three projects underway to improve the chances for threatened Grants totalling$384,300 from sources other than Proposition 1 were wild spring-run chinook salmon to reach the deep pools farther up Deer awarded to the California Waterfowl Association to Improve habitat on a Creek Canyon.That stream has the second largest population of the spring- Butte County ranch. run after Butte Creek,where millions have already been spent to aid the fish In reaching the cool water where they spend the summer before spawning in Most of the 507-acre Pintail Ranch in Floncut Is already under a conservation fall. easement held by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife,although The grant to Trout Unlimited comes from Proposition 1,and will pay for 190- about 60 acres is still used to grow organic rice. foot long"roughened rock ramp"at the dam diverting water for the Deer It is described as being part of a wildlife corridor encompassing 3,400 acres Creek Irrigation District. across nine different properties. Trout Unlimited attorney Matt Clifford described the ramp as a modern ver- The Pintail Ranch includes two seasonal wetlands,128 acres In the northern slon of a fish ladder.He said there's a ladder at the dam now,but this would part of the property and 23 acres In the south.There are about 300 acres of provide a more permanent solution to help fish over the barrier. uplands,which provide nesting habitat for waterfowl. The project is part of a broader project to help the spring-run chinook in The northern part of the property was restored by a grant In 2001.The new Deer Creek. grants focus on the southern part,and improving the efficiency of the water Farther up the canyon,a new fish ladder around Lower Deer Creek Falls is delivery system. essentially complete,according to U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service biologist A$310,000 grant was awarded Nov.30 by the state Wildlife Conservation Trisha Parker. Board,which is coupled with$74,300 of a$1 million grant awarded Sept.6 The$2 million project,reported in this newspaper In August 2017,required by the federal Migratory Bird Conservation Commission.The landowners a redesign after excavations at the location showed the foundation rock have also put$51,000 toward the project. wouldn't support the initial plan. The 23 acres of wetlands in the southern part will Increase to 88 acres,and The new ladder replaced an old structure that rose more than 15 feet in 164 acres of the upland property will be planted with perennial grasses fa- seven steps over the course of about 15 yards,which was too steep for vored by ground-nesting birds. many of the fish. The largest part of the grants will go toward increasing the efficiency of the The new ladder has 15 steps and is about three times as long. water delivery system for the entire property. The cost was being split between the federal Bureau of Reclamation's Cen- It currently relies on three shallow wells that deliver water through a series tral Valley Project Improvement Act funds and drought aid money from the of ditches.The wetlands are just low areas surrounded by levees.They are filled with water in winter,but there s no way to move the water around to governor's office,according to Parker. allow for changing conditions or to support plant growth. There is a third major diversion on Deer Creek by the Stanford-Viva Ranch The new system will have a deeper,more reliable well,and a lift pump.with Irrigation Co.and Clifford said Trout Unlimited has a grant and is working new ditches and pipes,that will allow the water to be moved from one wet- with the dam owners to plan passage around that dam. land to another,and allow for water to be managed more efficiently Other grants throughout the property. Other north valley projects were also part of the$39.7 million in Proposition The property is managed by the landowners,according to Chadd Santerre 1 grants awarded Dec.6 by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. with the Waterfowl Association. There were 39 grants awarded statewide all told. "It's super expensive to maintain habitat,"he said.The new system will be Two construction grants went to the Family Water Alliance to build a fish easier,provide better results and allows for more water conservation.That screens on water diversion. will all save the landowners money. One,for$210,000,will build a new screen on a diversion In Butte Creek Can- The owners are willing spend the money to be able to hunt on the property, yon.The site is located along the stretch of creek where the Butte Creek he said. Canyon Ecological Reserve is located. All told,the Wildlife Conservation Board funded 12 projects totalling approx The second,for$1.16 million,will improve the screens of the Garden High- €mately$2.6 million In grants on Nov.30. way Mutual Water Co.Intakes on the Feather River downstream from Yuba The Migratory Bird Conservation Commission approved$21.9 million In City. grants in 16 states on Sept.6. ® 1 a Dec. 20, 2017 Wednesday Update h ci. This weekly electronic newsletter is designed to keep you current on California Water Plan news. We welcome comments,suggestions,and any news tips that may be of interest to water planners. e ' " Day-long welwthon Regisration is open for a day-long webinar will preview all five that will preview all five chapters of California e Water Plan Update 2018.The webinar will he o chapters of Update 2018 an opportunity to provide input on any area of s i concern in Update 2018.The session will begin at 9 a.m.on Tuesday,January 9.Also, RSVPs are still being accepted for an Update 2098 workshaa'on T irs"ay, Jan.4. It will cover Chapter 4(plans for investing in water resources sustainability)and Chapter 6(funding and implementation). Panel discussion transcript A panel discussion transcript from the recent Update 2018 plenary from Update 2018 plenary meeting has been posted online.Panel members talked about issues and benefits of connecting integrated regional water management meeting now available with the implementation of the Sustainable gEgundwater Management Act.The Ina meetingmeetiag was held in September. Discount registration rates Save the dates for the 16th Biennial Sy_mpggium on Managed ftuifw Recharge. It will be March 6 and 7,in San Diego.Along available for managed with information on the latest groundwater recharge techniques, aquifer recharge symposium there will be an optional field trip to the Carlsbad Desalination Elan Discounted registration ratea are available through Sunday,Jan.21. New resource to be launched After the New Year, a new resource will be launched to help.local governments learn more about climate action plans and"policies need month will provide climate beingimplemented throughout Caftmia.The Climate Action_P_—ol al action plan iillftlrmation Mme'(CAP-Map)will provide a database of strategies:A in r to fatinch and,,demonstrate;the Map.vrill beheld Thursday,,Jan.11 i Central Valley Landscape The next Cant !V I!e l_an s C n on Pro ec vvorksha x wdIbe Feb Z6 and 27 in Sacramento I#will focus an':developing Conservat�an Prolett sets t plans for:landscape scale adaptation actions he workshop a 3, t 4"k y fyS 3 a tT -. u tam datBs dor Inez worksIlDpInc ludes-in forrnattonon pire workshop web inars - � �'.r�� {c e 1 '•r.L.,nr�:tF.:S r,Sa,�.-XA a .s.. .,1 = `a 11�� !� al�` o.,pro�ote safe,�a�oCdable,and n n4 .q SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 1 of 19 r'�ir^tiy."t—^ 0`1 - About Contact FAO Donate FRONT PAGE LATEST POSTS NEWS BY CATEGORY CA WATER 101 WATER MANAGEMENT TOOLBOX RESOURCE PAGES CALENDAR ABOUT DONATE SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases W DONATE draft BMP for Sustainable management Gliro.mWs!nd,rmdcut A const tn:slyd 3oumr furwater news and inrurmatlon criteria iz znlysupporml by�L-u :aldpi and by donulone rmm rcaricn Ilk'ynn. CLICK HERE TO MAKE A d December 20,2017 eb Maven Zw Meetings TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION NOW ONLINE f0 Njornwil"11 .: arsrnn0•uj 't � ,r�� � i,�,� , ', �� :. ��m�c.C,�11't>rerLil5rarl•.nci Public comments due by January 8 Recently,the Department of Water Resources Sustainable Groundwater Management Program released a draft Best Management Practice(BMP)docurnent that focuses on Sustainable Management Criteria(SMC)for public comment. This BMP characterizes the relationship between the different sustainable management criteria and describes best management practices for SEARCH THE NOTEE009 developing these criteria as part of a Groundwater Sustainability Plan(GSP).This BMP does not impose new requirements,but Enter your search term describes best management practices for satisfying the here to search all posts: requirements of SGMA and the GSP Regulations. A series of public meetings was held across the state in early December:Department staff provided an overview of the draft document,answered questions,and took public comment. DWR staff also discussed the development of a new online tool for GSP Browse posts,filtering notifications,and provided information on points of contact in by category and/or tag: DWR's regional offices. https:Hmavensnotebook.com/2017112/20/sglna-implementation-dwr--releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 2 of 19 THE DRAFT BMP ON SUSTAINABLE AI ategones MANAGEMENT CRITERIA All5gs Trevor Joseph,Senior Engineering Geologist with the Department of Submit Water Resources,began the meeting With an overview of the draft best management practice document. SIGNPrior to SGMA,groundwater management was volunta and more WEE UP FOR IL SE I g 9 rY WEEKLY EMAIL SERVICE of a carrot approach, meaning that those who produced groundwater management plans were eligible for state grants and Sign up for free email other opportunities. he said, However,it was only semi-effective as service and enjoy the convenience of receiving many plans didn't cover the entire groundwater basin or subbasins, all the Notebook's news in and there was various€eve€s of implementation of plans.The your inbox.Daily emails Sustaiarrive by gam;Weekly �> emails are delivered noble Fridays at 10am. By Group SGMA Overview 17-1 subscribing to Maven's Notebook,you'll always be dwater � ,� > �v one of the first to know! indicates required Mona v: _ � ��"�� "t�,��'.��a .3; ��, ,a;-�,o � .�5'-t�� . r�i ement t�^ Ematl Address h DWR ActAqwy e l0.yulprayrrekiu{nq t ' passe rO x �r ��� �r ��� SS r r -�.+r �,� x ?5. i � "• i: ubscribers d in Q"b fSls� ctpTt�tf� a 1 �',,• ❑Daily Ematls: Full khatr� eixk SWRCB GSA the fallfiCnCp ` `"'� Service(B days+ of c ' Breaking News) 1 . 2014 ' � d El Daily Emails:Monday and through Friday only,no becam breaking news e effective January 15t,2015;the Act set out a specific set of ❑Weekly emails from requirements for sustainable groundwater management to avoid Maven's Notebook State Water Board intervention in high and medium priority basins. Email Format The Act assigned new authorities to Groundwater Sustainability O html Agencies,and gave the new agencies 20 years to reach Otext sustainability. The Act identifies four entities for implementation: Sign me up! 1. The tocal agencies or Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs).which need to develop Groundwater Sustainability Plans(DSPs)to avoid undesirable results and achieve SIGN UP FOR INSTANT EMAIL SERVICE sustainability within 20 years. 2. The Department of Water Resources will evaluate the Want your news sooner groundwater sustainability plans and provide assistance to the than gam?Enter your emait address for this GSRs, list and you'd receive an 3. The State Board is the enforcing agency who wilt intervene email instantly,every time there's a new posti in the event that local agencies are unable to reach Enter your email addre sustainability. 4. Stakeholders are referenced specifically in the Act,which Sign me up! includes requirements for a stakeholder process throughout the development of the GSPs https://mavensnotebook.corn/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 3 of 19 High and SGMA"Dvenmedia le °, . . . '�,•vY3. Eit rior P Y basins 4w j. ice;^ must UPCOMING CALENDAR EVENTS Genm4natn Mrte1_ , y with sut+arawleneed ' JAS pelta Independent: the 44 Jan—05 Jan @ A THU Sustal � �9+-vuWt►ma�+`a5ic a..�;;' �� " s� DROWN SAG SEMI nable .iiia _. 1 +$ ?' 04 Jan @ 01:30 pm Groun JAN [lwater 5 BROWN BAG SEMI FRI n 05 Jan @ 12:00 pm Management Act in order to avoid State Board intervention, JANSustainable Viticuli identified on the map as those basins shown in yellow and orange. g TUE 49 Jan C AIE•day Mr.Joseph Likened sustainable groundwater management to a Assembly Committ pyramid. "Sustainability is really a complicated set ofdeflnitions in n 09 Jan @ 09:00 am the Act"he said. `The pyramid shows the core requirement of State Water Resoui 221 D9 Jan @ 09:30 am avoiding undesirable results and is material to achieving sustainability.'then achieving the sustainable yield in the system. JAN Assembly Committ !.110 t0 Jan{✓iu 09:30 am completing and achieving sustainable groundwatermanagement, and ultimatelyachieving the sustainabilitygoal. It's this description 1 is Silicon Valley As of these components that's really the focus of the Sustainable THV ,111 Jan @ 06:30 pm Groundwater Management Criteria draft Best Management Practice JAN California Water Cc document" WED 17 Jan @ All-day U.S.Federal Fire ar Mr. } ha _17 Jan @ 12:44 pm Josep B!1/[Ps vs `GSp`Regu[ations . f% $ Delta Protection Cc ,, T8 18Jan C05:30pm HU noted • Role of BMPs to provide clarification,technlcal assistance,and JAN CV-Salts Workshop an examples to help GSAs develop elements of GSPs 19 — 9 Jan @ All-day• BMPs(technical assistance)vs.GSP Regulations(reclufrements) FW • GSP Regulations amp M e,�..r�< �: Southern California ant 19 Jan @ 12 00 pm • Sac-352.2(Monitnring distinc Protocols) sAr1 impal•MortModna 'bA3h - - - California Water La tion protocoh,5pndards mod ShasJY 'z tq �' �� 20 Jan @ 06'00 am betwe Sec.352.4(Installation TuPcsrmt �.t95i of Monitaringsetm) JA WEBINAR:Californ dela t en the (gMpax-Menlmring MDQ 7.2 Jan @ 11 DO am networks and td.hUfkatlon GSP fcwkveto#-z 4 of Dap Gaps) rQ ; reg Ula - @ ' .. - ,.. JAN 3 State Water Resour 2 tions TUE -!�23 Jan @ 09:34 am and Best Management Practices. The GSP regulations Lay out the JAN Delta Stewardship l specific requirements for the information that the Department HU !..125 Jan—26 Jan @ A needs to see in the GSPs for evaluating whether or not a basin is JAIV Central Valley Floor sustainable:these requirements are not optional. However.the Best 26 26 Jan @ 09:40 am Management Practices(BMPs)are technical assistance:they are Changing Channels n 26 Jan @ 07:00 pm https://mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 4 of 19 optional. The GSAs can choose to use these BMPs if they Want, but they do not have to. Click here to view the There is somewhat of an exception with respect to monitoring of complete calendar. groundwater basins. Mr.Joseph noted that there is a requirement in the GSP regulations that with respect to monitoring,a GSA must either have their own BMP or they must adopt the Department's MORE WAYS TO STAY IN BMP. Accordingly,the Department completed two BMPs last year. TOUCH one on monitoring protocols and the other on monitoring networks. The Department has already produced five technical best 1 in f management practices as well as other guidance documents, including information on water budgets,modeling.and stakeholder engagement. To access those documents.click here. Sustainable management criteria TODAY'S MOST POPULAR POST The sustainable management criteria is described in sub-article 3 of Chapter g of the Groundwater Sustainability Regulations.which describes all the requirements that local agencies or GSAs need to address in their groundwater sustainability plans. There are four DAILY DI, terms discussed in sub-article 3:sustainability goal,undesirable results,minimum thresholds.and measurable objectives. ;_, ALIFO NIA`' Mr. OMRQUIt Urdes%��b1e�Resu(ts and , . � < �l; Josep DAILY DIGEST:Friant Sustainability Indicators rJ " Water Authority:'Valley in crisis'from .A ChnoniclowortngofgroundwaterltvetsindicatingasignM'nntand u=oatomblo presen Water imbalance:A depJe=ion of supply ri con.lnued averthe plann,nz and tmpitmeniauon hort;on.... ted a rainy 2017 benefited a S,gnifKant and unreason Wo reduction of greendwe,e.storage the San Joaquin River's slide salmon, but full s. SigNhf nt and unroasenable seawattr a! . intrusion MZ'Ll' :'s: listing restoration is yet to come:Officials quietly 1 SognlSaaso nt and unronahle degraded °Q the solicit contracts on water qualflV.Induding the migration of , contaminant piumwthai Im air wamr - •a....n etrba.:- undesl 'twin tunnels' project p despite lawsuits,lack :e vre: a ..G>. µ. rable rt . of permits,and more- aa Ssgnlhcant and unreasonableland sq -�- results subtidenct chat sutx".tially interferes wAh December 21,2017 3 21) surface lord um, .es Dtpletlom of Interconnected surface waterthat haves signfficant and unreasonable ad,,"fmtsactsorfwti9/'KlxYusMo[the iurficawatar -;;-: ,.._. .-� chroni c lowering of groundwater levels,reduction of groundwater storage. MOST POPULAR POSTS LAST 7 DAYS seawater intrusion,degraded water quality, land subsidence,and the depletions of interconnected surface water. He reminded that the pyramid concept is a way to think about those requirements and { the avoidance of undesirable results. Avoiding the six undesirable results are a key requirement in SGMA to show sustainability in a basin. mom. Sustainability indicator is a term used in the GSP regulations. It is defined as any of the effects caused by groundwater conditions DAILY DIGEST. occurring throughout the basin that are considered significant and weekend edition: Lawmakers ask Interior https:Hmavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 5 of 19 unreasonable and that cause undesirable results. "Thekeyhereis Department to recover misspent'funds on Cal that sustainabilityindicatorsare those effects caused by Water Fix;California groundlwaterindicators-theyare only undesirable results when it's Supreme Court fails to resolve significant and unreasonable,"he said. groundwaterict fees,ef charges;Scientist says Assessing Sustainability Indicators California only has stim chance of normal The draft BMP document is organized into three sections. First,it rainfall this Winter;and identifies some preliminary activities,such as understanding the more- basin setting,inventorying Existing monitoring programs,and December 17.2017(687) engagement with interested parties in the basin. Next. jg..r7p xxr DAILY D I 1 the Assess Susta�na ,illfy draft indicators - ,. BMP Q-AL-IFOl3NIA)i • Start by assessing all six sustainability indicators discus i]efauh position should be that all six apply Se5 individual sustainability indicators can be removed from consideration only DAILY DIGEST' Kings atter demonstrating that they do not exist and are not likely to occur assess • For each indicator,consider the conditions that would represent agencies slam one significant and unreasonable storage project and ing Local decision based on local conditions and concerns hail another; sustain later,these will be translated into quantitative undesirable results Restoration work in the • Consider the use of management areas(optional) Delta could be key to ability addressing state's • Develop initial representative monitoring sites indlcat • Asubset ofall monkaringsites inabasin where minimum threshoidsand Water and climate measunbleobiectiveswill beset challenges; Is ors. California headed back All six : .< s into drought?:Test sustain results:Oro Loma horizontal levee;and ability indicators need to be assessed unless information can be more- provided that demonstrates why a specific indicator does not apply. December 15,2017(S16) An example of that might be seawater intrusion:if the basin does not have coastal access or the ability for saline water to intrude into the basin,than that sustainability indicator would not apply. He noted that there is a responsibility for the GSA to describe or DAILY { demonstrate why a sustainability indicator doesn't apply in a given A wt;; basin. AL.IF'O NIX%' The next step is to consider the conditions for each indicator that DAILY DIGEST:Don't Would represent significant and unreasonable. This is a locally force us to pay for driven process,and ultimately the GSA is responsible for describing Delta tunnels,farmers significant and unreasonable in their GSP. say:cannabis Legal knot, what is si g cannabis takes a toll on NorCal watersheds; "it's a local decision based on local conditions and concern,"he Friant-Kern canal said. "This is where that stakeholder engagement andinvolvement continues to sink;price tag could rise; weighs In heavilyin terms of defining what constitutes potential Deploying drones to significant and unreasonable conditions in a basin' follow the water: Interior to revise ESA A GSA might want to consider the use of management areas,which Listing rules:and more is an option for local agencies to define areas of their basin December 1g,2017(515) differently,as there may be different considerations or different https://rnavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 6 of 19 Ways to set up monitoring. The use of management areas is DAILY DI, optional. s Then develop initial representative monitoring sites. "The thought AL1F10f1NIA twas that there should be some acknowledgement of what �1RC�T1C monitoring you have upfront in order to define what causes DAILY DIGEST:Who undesirable results or significant and unreasonable conditions in controls the Water supply?The answer your basin,so it's imperative that you understandyour existing involves a long history monitoring sites up front for the purposes ofdefrning sustainability." of political strife;CA Attorney General opposes Trump Minimum thresholds Administration's attempt to suspend the Next Clean Water Rule; Fish step is IVlnirrlum Th'es�© t to benefit if large dams tor. adopt neve operating deter ' Quantitative value_representing conditions at a monitoring site approach;and more- that,when exceeded individually or in combination with other December 18.2017(447) mine minimum thresholds,may cause an undesirable result in the basin minim Set for each representative monitoring site y, • Set for each sustainability indicator um ! i thresh i ' € ; 5�.laknablGty � 4nrn-r idmrm L�.rrn � Mq�4N la+.l i $u!�nr.'.*n yah-n olds. [ndk.mrV LW ln�r sl5axr.TM Mrnw I C�iq I LbW— f D.W.. _ i I i A M.uwr., tr:�.n„? .Sxd .ni�sr •wp�r� •ate ad ! .v��.n o.hr.0 in �,Or�nne 3 YJ.r.. csnuaumn nwu+ ! rk�d ; w•q minim R.yS.ra.. 3 i '�+R'Chr4t i LWI—i tlw� ,KVJ ! meq° ,;:•,. um �, WATER STORAGE thresh i INVESTMENT PGM: old is New water storage projects showcased at defined as a quantitative value at a given monitoring site that may the California Water cause undesirable results in the basin. Mr.Joseph explained that Commission undesirable results(or tack thereof)are what identifies sustainable December 19,2017(352) conditions in the basin,and the tool that is used to define undesirable results is minimum thresholds. The GSP regulations describes specifically each of the six IMP!4%!1—M—x sustainability indicators and the specific metrics that are required to be used to quantify the minimum threshold requirements: car>`rc€terjnbs.org ■ Groundwater levels:groundwater elevation ■ Reduction of storage:total volume ■ Seawater intrusion:chloric concentration isocontour. MAVEN'S PHOTO LIBRARY dN FLICRR ■ Degraded quality:migration of plumes,number of supply wells.volume or location of the isocontour. ■ Land subsidence:rate and extent of land subsidence. ■ Surface water depletion:the volume or rate of surface water depletion. The GSP regulations list the specific information required when setting minimum thresholds: Click here to visit Maven's photo library on flickr. https://mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 7 of 19 1. The information criteria that was used to set those minimum thresholds. 2. The relationship between the minimum thresholds for each sustainability indicator. 3. How the minimum threshold potentially aids in avoiding causing undesirable results in adjacent basins. 4. The effects to interested parties or beneficial users and uses of groundwater or land uses and property interests when setting that minimum threshold. 5. How the minimum threshold relate to state,federal,or local standards.Mr.Joseph noted that it does not need to match state,local,or federal standards:GSAs can decide to use a different threshold.but they would need to include a description on how that relates to the applicable state,Local, and federal standards. 6. The minimum threshold must be quantitatively measured and consistent with the monitoring network requirements An example of a sustainability indicator Mr.Joseph then went through an example using the sustainability indicator of chronic declining groundwater levels. He presented a diagram of a hypothetical basin(below,left)that shows the minimum threshold for one representative monitoring site in the basin. He noted that on the diagram,the groundwater level dips below minimum threshold in 2022,but then comes back up. Minirrium Threshaltl �✓ f oweriri 'bf Grourtlwater Declining Groundwater Levels Levels i} ••• — t ocerrtW mun N,kfM.S V�^<rx..,n.Fm[,,..n.vn xet3 .,_.,...... —.—..................,.,,....,... x.et,c.e.oJv..A..r..e...m.,,nr.rn.,.ut.r,wv_ m yr The draft BMP document identifies a series of things to be considered and discussed with stakeholders when setting up minimum thresholds. For groundwater levels(above,right),those include historic groundwater conditions,screen intervals for wells. and the average.minimum,and maximum depths of wells. , ��ii� Wa � IUaiIOnSS�S'c" m Josep PDXy h noted • Groundwater elevation can be used as a proxy metric �[ ^' _ ,•• that for any sustainability grown indicator ! " in https.,//inavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SOMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 8 of 19 • GSP must demonstrate — `,, dwater significant correlation between groundwater elevati elevation and the other metric '� �»�»• ons can be used as a o, proxy for other metrics when setting up sustainability indicator minimum thresholds.however in doing so,the GSP must demonstrate the significant correlation between groundwater elements and other metrics. "We feel this is something we're likely to see a lot of in groundwater sustainability plans"he said. "A lot of agencies may not have necessarily all of monitoring equipment to use for some of the other metrics,and so early on, we anticipate that a lot of the agencies may use groundwater elevations to help identify minimum thresholds in the basin for those other sustainability indicators." Measurable objectives and interim milestones Measurable objectives and interim milestones are also addressed in the draft BMP document. Measurable objectives are somewhat similar to minimum thresholds in that it is a quantitative value at a specific site, he said. "Like minimum thresholds for the chronic lowering ofgroundtwater levels at a representative monitoring site, there should be a corresponding measurable objective,"he said. "That measurable objective refers to really the goal and maintaining or improving the conditions at that given site' The measurable objective is above the minimum threshold and establishes a margin of operational flexibility. "ey setting measurable objectives this is really the goal that you want to hit,"he said. "You don't want to operate the basin ata minimum threshold at a given site;you�e hoping to operate it at the measurable objective." Mr. J°Sep 'Measurable C}bjec#ves< nd h Interim Milestones noted that GSAs [ won't be enali 7 p https://mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 9 of 19 zed for not .�. 3 achievi ,. . .> ng the measurable objective, because the measurable objective is not what defines undesirable results in the basin;undesirable results are defined by minimum thresholds. Interim milestones are progress points at five-year intervals that represent the measurable groundwater conditions that the GSA hopes to achieve during the 20 year implementation period. In the hypothetical example(above),the GSA recognized that groundwater levels might go louver for a period of time on their interim milestones,but ultimately the GSA hopes to meet the measurable objective,which in this case is after 20 years,the measurable objective is for groundwater levels to be roughly equal to what they were on the date the GSP was adopted. Paths to sustainability There are i � differe Paths to .`.�. rnt Sustainability ._ .. ... ... .. .. ._ .. .. • Defined locally -._._-_ - ;,� paths • Wit]vary based on local that canditinnsand values ; ..._.__...._....... _-__-- c....•- ��� can be --_...�....._ _ taken to s sustain ability. Mr. Josep h said, presenting a slide with three graphs depicting groundwater elevation. In path A,groundwater levels decline over time through the 20 year period following GSP submission,and actually the measurable objective in terms of where those groundwater levels end up after 20 years of implementation is tower than when the plan was adopted in 2020. "That's ok,"he said. "IC's showing that you're still obviously above that minimum threshold. This is for illustration purposes this may not be okay in a given basin that you•re involved in. But from a theoretical standpoint, this is an okay scenario" In path B.groundwater Levels in this example were Well below the measurable objective When the plan was adopted,but the GSA has https:Hmavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementati on-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 10 of 19 made incremental progress in an almost step-wise fashion to achieve that measurable objective over time. "That's okay.-the key here being that it's always above the mininwm threshold,"he said. In path C.groundwater Levels decline beyond lois.but remain above the minimum threshold before eventually rising by the end of the 20 year period. "The point here is that each of these examples may be okay in your basin,depending on horn the measurable objective relates to the minimum threshold" Undesl rable results Undesirable Resulf'° occur • Occurs when any of the six sustainability indicators become When significant and unreasonable,as defined locally any of • Based on a combination of minimum threshold exceedances the six Must be eliminated within 20 years of GSP implementation • Some basins will eaperien[e undesirable results within the implementation sustain period • ability Must be coordinated for the entire basin indicat ars becom es signific ant and unreasonable,as defined locally. "The key todetinrng undesirable results is a combination ofminimum threshold exceedances"Mr.Joseph said. "Undesirable results mustbe eliminated w1thin zo years of GSP implementation. Some basins can experience undesirable results within the implementation period and that's ok--as long as they are making progress towards avoiding undesirable results over that 20 year implementation period. It must be coordinated for the entire basin." The sustainability goal culminates in the absence of undesirable results within the 20 year period,he said. In the draft sustainable management criteria BMP,there is a description of the sustainability goal and the information that should be included in the plan, including the information that Was used to establish the goal,a discussion of the measures that will be implemented,and an explanation of how the goal will be achieved within 20 years of the GSP imptementation. Minimum thresholds, undesirable results, measurable objectives:A more detailed example Mr. Josep h then example Description _ ' https://zxaavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 11 of 19 gave a A hypothetical basin sets more minimum thresholds,interim milestones,and measurable detaile objectives at eight representative monitoring sites nr"bL d For simplification,assume the °^ criteria are the same at each 3 $ examp representative monitoring site i le, Further,the GSA(s)has determined that minimum empha threshold exceedances at three or "" "" "" "` more sites is a significant and sizing unreasonable condition,and is, that therefore,an undesirable result this examp le is to articulate the relationship between minimum thresholds, undesirable results,and sustainable management:it is hypothetical and intentionally simplified. In this example,there are eight representative monitoring sites,but this Will vary by basin:it is up to the local agencies to define the appropriate number of representative monitoring points needed,as Well as the minimum thresholds and a description of undesirable results. In the example,there are eight representative monitoring sites:the hypothetical GSA has defined undesirable results as the exceedance of minimum thresholds at three of their representative monitoring sites. Mr. Josep _....__. . . r h then presen teda slide showi ng the : t eight .. repres entativ i,r.srnnvkl f_ri Of"(•j ar J'r.e.-r e • -L'1 tl.Xnwl nlHn.n.yyn., monito -.....PRM,.. ring sites. In the first scenario.groundwater levels at one of the Wells goes below the minimum threshold for a period of time,shown in red below that pink line. However,this is consistent With the plan interim milestones. In this example,the GSA has identified undesirable results in the basin as the exceedance of three minimum thresholds,and so even though the one well is below the minimum threshold,there are no undesirable results at any point in time in this example. 14 https.//mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/2.0/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s,.. 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 12 of 19 c -- - � ---------------- � In the 1 i 1 secon 1 _i d 1 � scenar \I l0. _ a three r wells do go -- --- -.__..-- — below �1 ,:,,,.:,,1> •,>rl,::Il, .w,l ., minim - sirn rcr rcvnn um ir.d...ee•...rlr :crw:nrt.r�sl... z'a.,;rs1 MM2vs�'M*Wm� thresh old in the period between 2020 and 2030. In this hypothetical scenario, the GSA has determined that the exceedance of minimum thresholds at three monitoring locations is an undesirable result; however,it's between 202o and 2030,but it's consistent With the plan interim milestones and consistent with the Way the GSP document was designed and so there are no undesirable results in this example at the end of the 20 year implementation period. M,(�k In the l ..M third scenar there are undesi rable 1 results as . �r,.r.+1.a.;—k.rrsf�rrrrcrrF*:wrl:[e3cw_ i define d by-.S !"erJ•a:le,-,J•.hn:^:n:�ro+L' +r earl el n.w:]Y,r T;�� n4lpxu.l.t �, G,. �.:;.. ..:��,.,�. .:~.- three minim um threshold exceedances. ]however.in this scenario,the undesirable results have continued to exceed the minimum threshold throughout the implementation period,so by the end of the 20 year implementation period,undesirable results essentially occurred right after the plan was adopted and continued to occur until the end of the 20 year implementation period. "In this Basin, there are undesirable results occurring" Mr.Joseph said. "This basin is not completing its obiigations to do sustainable groundwater management,operating to a sustainable yield,and achieving its sustainabilitygoal in this instance because of the https://mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION:DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 13 of 19 occurrence of undesirable results after the 20 year implementation Period' The key is maintaining an outcome based approach to these groundwater sustainabitity plans,Mr.Joseph said. "777e outcomes all need to be defined and the variables quantified in the groundwatersustamabilitypfans"he said. "It's absolutely key so that the Department can potentiallyapprove these plans Without addressing this the Department is not going to be able to approve groundwater sustainability plans" Mr.Joseph noted that there is a description in the groundwater sustainabiLity plan regulations that articulates how GSAs can potentially adjust these measurable objectives,minimum thresholds,and description of undesirable results. "There is a process so local agencies aren't necessarily locked in forever in terms ofhow they set these up,but we do require that in these first plans,local agencies describe these conditions and quantify sustainability in their basin.' QUESTION AND ANSWERS Question: For the larger groundwater basins,there may be 20 or more representative monitoring sites. With five of the different sustainabiLity indicators.minimum thresholds,measurable objectives,and describing your undesirable results times the amount of information-it starts to add up to a very,very Large chapter in an already large complicated document"so what level of detail are you expecting? Trevor Joseph acknowledged that they've done the math as well. and it is a lot of content "Frankly iN;Just something you'regoing to have to manage in writing these plans Maybe the use of groundwater elevations as a proxy to hit on multiple sustainability indicators if that's appropriate and it can be used in the basins you're working in. The description of those sixitems to support the minimum thresholds-it's possible that the description on some of those items applies to all the minimum thresholds in the same way so maybe that could be explained once and it addresses all the representative monitoring sites in yourbasin. We have looked at that,and those are my of the cuffanswers But you?e right,its a consideration that will need to be made is how complicated do you want to make it in your given basin.' Question:I appreciate where DWR is coming from because of variability on not being prescriptive,but in advising clients,one of my issues is how do we evaluate what is going to be adequate without further guidance? How does the Department set itself up https://mavensnotebook.com/2017112/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 14 of 19 for not being called arbitrary when the groundwater sustainability plans are evaluated? "Ifyou meet the GSPregulation requirements you've met the requirements.and so We're looking to maintain that local control," Mr.Jones said. "It's imperative to us that we receive complete groundwater sustainability plans We're not looking to be prescriptive or even describe how these should be advised or addressed specifically ill terms of a quantitative value in your basin. That being said, there are other state agencies and maybe a stakeholder in a given basin that the sustainable groundwater management group, the group herewe're not looking to pro vide and can't provide you specifcguidance on how to set up those requirements." Follow up question: Looking out into the future then,you're showing future conditions,how would you advise clients to try to envision those future conditions and test their thresholds and limits and operating assumptions without actually modeling a water budget? Can you do this without a model in forecasting out into the future? "It becomes challenging and a Water budget is a requirement in the GSP regulations"said Trevor Joseph. "What you saw here today. completing the sustainable management criteria. in and of itself doesn't pro vide you with a complete plan. .../didn't go into any of the detail on the other plan requirements which again,are necessary to pro vide the Department so you ha ve a complete plan. It gets challenging to forecast that measurable objective or that final outcome without doing some modeling in some cases numerical or even using an analytical tool. The Department understands that adaptive management plays a role here in that some of the projection is more speculative than others and there is uncertainty and data gaps which can lead to obviously speculation in terms of how you projected those conditions and that's a fact of where we're at. We also describe in the GSP regulations that folks need to identify the uncertainty and look to All significant data gaps but up front we recognize that those outcome objectives whether measurable objective or minimum thresholds may change over time." GSP INITIAL NOTIFICATION SYSTEM AND OTHER ONLINE TOOLS Steven Springhorn then gave an overview of the Groundwater Sustainability Plan(GSP)Initial Notification System that the Department is developing. https://mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SOMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management e... Page 15 of 19 DWR's uVV si %; ytypH Nona ..,. L . httn/fsc�n:�water.ca.aav��a��1i SGMA portal iII • Clearinghouse for SGMA s the Information: clearin rGSA and Local Agency ghous submitted Information efor �Public Access and Comments c_.-..:......, - all the report Developing additional features - .. ..... ed GSP initial Notificaiion inform ation - receiv ed related to SGMA. All the information received from Groundwater Sustainability Agencies and other related entities are available here: the public can also review documents received and comment on those documents. There is also information on Basin Boundary Modifications.Adjudicated Reporting,Alternative Information,and GSA Formation. The website is being expanded to include GSP Initial Notifications,and eventually submission of GSPs as well. Per the legislation.GSA$are required to notify DWR in writing prior to initiating the development of a groundwater sustainabitity pian: the notice needs to include general information about the GSA's process for developing the GSP and how interested parties may contact the GSA and participate in the development and implementation of that plan. The GSP initial notification also initiates public comments as required by the Act.as well as other requirements such as establishing and maintaining a List of interested persons in the development of the GSP and providing a written statement to the legislative body of any city or county Within the GSP's boundaries. So far.25 GSAs have already submitted GSP notifications to the Department. 22 GSAs have been submitted for 17 basins or subbasins: Mr.Springhorn said the difference in the numbers is due to multiple submissions for the same basin where multiple plans are going to be developed. DWR will be working with those GSAs who have already submitted their notifications to transfer over to the new system. Once the Department receives the notification,the notice must be posted online within 20 days. For the public.the tool will provide a List of all initial notifications received:the ability to comment wilL be provided. A notification of public comment will be emailed to the Department as well as to the GSAs that submitted the initial notification so they will be made aware of the public comments that https://mavensiiotebook.con,Y2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 16 of 19 are received. There is a map showing where all these notifications are being submitted. To submit a notification.a login will be required.because only GSRs are required to submit initial notifications. There will be a short form that will include questions such as is the GSP planned for the whole basin or muttiple GSPs,which GSAs will be part of those plans, boundaries of GSPs,points of contact,point of contact, information how other local agencies and stakeholders can get involved in the GSP preparation,and a link to the website where that GSP information for that basin will be posted. A FAQ is being developed and an instructional webinar planned:the system will be live in January. Existing notifications will be transferred over and that will allow for public comments to be attached to those notifications. Mr.Springhorn noted that there isn't a public comment period per se on the notifications and so those wit[remain open:however,once the GSP is adopted and the plan is submitted to the Department,there wilt be a 60-day comment period that wilt be initiated once an adopted plan is submitted to the Department. DWR POINTS OF CONTACT The Department of Water Resources has set up specific points of contact at its regional offices that will be available to answer questions related to setting up these requirements. Trevor Joseph noted that they won't be able to tell you what point or value to set minimum thresholds and measurable objectives, but they can help people further understand these requirements and explain the BMP document or the GSP regulations. The contact will coordinate DWR's local assistance and engagement programs,handle day to day correspondence,answer general questions regarding SGMA requirements,and assist with technical support and assistance. As the GSP development progresses,when basins have more complicated questions,the Department wilt bring subject management experts to meeting to address a basin's unique issues. DWR staff will help with technical support,facilitation support,regulatory issues and informing them of requirements and grant opportunities. The points of contact will also attend board meetings and technical advisory groups for the basins,and they will efficiently route questions to appropriate managers and experts. For a PDF of the points of contact at DWR's regional offices,click here. https://mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr--releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMF for sustainable management c... Page 17 of 19 HOW TO COMMENT ON THE DRAFT BMP ... Public comments on the draft document are due by January 8th, and can be emailed to:sgmps`water.ca.gov Subject:Comments on Draft SMC BMP,or comment by US Postal Service to P.O.Box 942836 Sacramento,California 94236-000s Attn:Lauren Hersh, Rm 201.Any comments received wilt be posted on DWR's Public Comments- Best Management Practices webpage. FOR MORE INFORMATION - ■ For the draft BMP document on Sustainable Management Criteria.click here, To access all BMPs and guidance documents,ctick here. ■ For DWR's Sustainable Groundwater Management Program webpage,click here. ■ To learn more about groundwater.visit the Notebook's groundwater page. Sign up for daily email service and you'll never WAb miss a post! iy "� Sign up for daily emails and get all the E Notebook's aggregated and original f Water news content delivered to your email box by gAM,Breaking news alerts, too.Sign me up! (Visited 264 times,28 visits today) Share this: Tweet 0. submit ®Email Print Leave a comment ® Department of Water Resources,groundwater, skierbox,Sustainable GrOLindwater Management Act Leave a Reply Enter your comment here... LIKE MAVEN ON tnstagram Feed TAGS FACESOOK https://niavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementati on-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 18 of 19 ACWA Hoy-Delle o Pixi FOLLOW MAVEN ONBay Delta TWITTER Conservation Plan u:•y Tweets t,y Scilanf;r- BLIFe,11-1 Of @fvlavensNotebook CaLifornia Wator f0aven Relweeted A Be the first of your friends to like Commission IN California Water J_ Ryan Sabalow Fix 4 CaliforniaPoliticians to Trump:Don't relicense Orovi4e Dam Maven water until we know why spillway 21 hours ago failed,My story loday� news Catifow[L) Series Con tr�.ij Valley Project ciim.ao changE,,L)Nm)belt-- iZ� Delta PIJr Delta Politicians to Tru... Stewardship Elected officials an V COUncit Delta WL tunnels Embed V!ew aii Twmer Department of V Water Resources drought c.,ncI,)ngcrc,cI specic,.s federal,tegi5lation groundwater(I LIE?St UlocIcier habitat restoration l)VdTo1r)y !;Avsuits and legal rulings tegist�jive hearings Metropolitan Water DiSt;JCt Orovitk,D,)ni SpiUWly Public Policy c,,,,rnor,science state tegist.ition State Water Project State Water Resources Control Board SLIStZlinablc- GMUncky/ater Management Act urban v/ater consE-:rvaticn w,ao: er bond lJoc�at!e)ns\�v,-it water policy ,s,aLer C;L01ity :Iqhts Wafer"Lorage and climate https://mavensnotebook.con-d20l7/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 19 of 19 MAVEN'S NOTEBOOK The diary ofa confessed obsessive-compulsive California water newsjunkie This website was developed,built.and implemented by Chris Austin(Maven)using the Smarttine theme by Theme Zee.C� Maven's Notebook,2017 Thank you for visiting! scroll to top https://mavensnoteboo k.com/2 017112120/sgma-implementation-dwr-rel eases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 Agenda Item #112 COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED AND REFERRED BUTTE COUNTY WATER COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 3,2017 Copies of all communications are available at the Butte County Department of Water and Resource Conservation 308 Nelson Avenue Oroville, CA 95965 1. *California Water Plan eNews, Wednesday's Update, November 29, 2017 2. *Article from Chico Enterprise Record, December 1, 2017, State says water contractor willeg t 15 percent 3. *California Water Plan eNews, Wednesday's Update, December 6, 2017 4. *Email from Jim Brobeck ofAguAlliance, December 11, 2017, Re: Boles water quality, Sites JPA Public meeting discussing the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report 5. *Article from Chico Enterprise Record, December 12, 2017, Statewide water savings down to singlegits in October 6. *California Water Plan eNews, Wednesday's Update, December 13, 2017 7. *Article from Chico Enterprise Record, December 17, 2017, Habitat grants mean millions for north valley projects 8. *California Water Plan eNews, Wednesday's Update, December 20, 2017 9. *Article from Maven's Notebook, December 20, 2017, SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management criteria i g ��4 u:Wednesday Update o v 29, 2017 This weekly electronic newsletter is designed to keep you current on California Water Flan news. We welcome comments,suggestions,and any news tips that may be of interest to water planners. o , . Exploring the point where A sym _op sium exploring the relationship between homelessness and ter management will be held Thursday, Dec.7, in Fullerton.The homelessness and water wa event will focus on the Santa Ana Watershed.The agenda includes a ® management intersect panel discussion on creating partnerships between water managers and homelessness agencies. Silicon Valley event to with Microsoft serving promote the benefits of as the host,Sustainable .E Silicon Valley has " 3 r F No Drop Left Behind organized a water :i -L strategies event titled No Dray heft Behind.It will feature speakers from water districts,public utilities,tech companies,and more. The topics will cover water projects that range from small-scale installations to large municipal systems.The event will be Tuesday, Dec.5,in Mountain View. Webinar will look at the Save the date for an Alliance for Water Efficiency(AWE)webinar benefits generated by water on the economic benefits of water conservation programs. It will be Thursday,Dec. 14.The agenda includes a report that examines the conservation programs jobs,income,and savings generated by water efficiency investments. Webinar details will be posted on the AWE website. Guide and toolkit released to The Union of Concerned Scientists has put together a guide and help develop groundwater online toolkit to help with the development of a local groundwater sustainability plans.The plans are a requirement under California's sustainability plans Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.The guide is also available in Spanish. How a geological A geologic mapping project in the Great Lakes region will be presented during a webinar on Wednesday, Dec.6.The project has elp mapping project ca>h.hdeveloped 3D maps that can provide information for environmental Wit!pltlllning decisions;. decision and infrastructure projects. Less than one-#hird of the U.S. has been mapped at that level of detail. Our.day Wor1CShOp will The 1 ornia er and Envirgnmental, covey new featuires of °d$lina Farum Ispresent<ng a aur_d warK o to present the new features of thl}e S h drologrr flOW model Geaingrcal Survey's One y r Hydrologic F6 �� ; r�.,Nn���r��� ,� z�. If err be useri to analyze the confunehve �tsen susalrRab�l►ty afwater resources .T;S; � •��1c`�u�otKs�,}to'��Wt11�6e+DeG.5�8=tnMaGlellarl.,, �1��5�'�`F,. -' CORRESPONDENCE ChicoER-com # State says water contractors will get 1S percent By Staff Reports,December 1,2017 State Water Project contractors were told this week that they could expect 15 percent of the water they want in 2018. While the Dec.1 allocation is always quite low,it usually rises as the water supply picture becomes more settled as the rainy season goes on. Last year,DWR's initial allocation was 20 percent of what the water contractors wanted.By the end of the water year it had been raised to 85 percent. But whether that will happen this year with the Lake Oroville water level drawn down for flood control isn't clear.When asked that ques- tion during Thursday's media call on spillway construction,a Depart- ment of Water Resources spokeswoman said it was too early in the season to say. The recent storms have brought the lake level above 700 feet,up from a low of 689.48 feet on Nov.15.It was 702 feet as 5 p.m.Fri- day. But DWR has an aggressive release schedule planned this winter to keep the water level low so that the repaired main spillway doesn't need to be used.It has set target levels where releases will be stepped up from the current level,which has been about 3,000 cubic feet per second. For December,if the water rises to the 725-foot level,the releases will be increased to 10,000 cfs.If the water gets to 800 feet,the re- leases will increase to 14,700 ds,the maximum possible through the Hyatt Powerhouse with five of the six turbines operational. Lake Oroville is the primary water source for the State Water Project. It currently holds 1.27 million acre-feet or water.That's just 59 per- cent of its historical average for the start of November,and just 35 percent of capacity. Most of the other reservoirs in the state are above their seasonal averages and nearly full.Shasta Lake is 71 percent full,which is 119 percent of what's normal for this time of year.New Melones on the Stanislaus River is 83 percent full,which is 148 percent of average. However precipitation in DWRs Southern and Central Sierra regions is below normal,according to the DWR website.The Northern re- gion,which drains into Lake Oroville and Shasta and Trinity lakes is just above normal. "It's hard to know what Mother Nature will have in store for us this year,but its safe to say California is in a better place than we were during the recent drought,"DWR Director Grant Davis said in a press release. "Planning for the year and providing more accurate early estimates for water managers so they can better plan for the year is just one of the many reasons the state needs to improve our forecasting ability." J A Wednesday Update Dec, 6, 2017 This weekly electronic newsletter is designed to keep you current on California Water Plan news. We welcome comments,suggestions,and any news tips that may be of interest to water planners. Sustainable management DWR will hold three public meetings to introduce its best ' management practices(BMPs)for fulfilling the requirements of BMPs will be introduced the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act(SGMA).The draft ® at three public meetings Sustainable Management Criterie also describes BMPs for meeting e groundwater sustainability plan regulations.The meetings will be Dec. 11, in Rancho Cordova; Dec. 12, in Visalia;and Dec. 13,in Santa Ana.The comment deadline is Jan.9 Conservation board approves The Wildlife Conservation Board has approved approximately $2.6 million in funding for $2.6 million in funding for fish and wildlife habitat projects throughout California.The funding comes from voter-approved bond measures fish and wildlife projects to preserve and protect Califomia's natural resources. Funding available for Project proposals are being accepted by aceN}I�!?uFng, watershed project proposals the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for funding under a watershed restoration program.The submitted to Reclamation funding is available to projects for developing designing,or completing watershed-related activities.Selected projects can receive as much as$54,000per year for two years. Proposals roust be submitted by Jan.31. California Water Commission A two-day meeting for the California Water Commission is set for sets two-day meeting for Dec. 13 and 14, in Sacramento.On the first day,commissioners will hear presentations'from applicants to the Water Storage Investment next week in Sacramento Program.Day two will include an update on SGMA. Online survey will Help The California Energy Commsaion is developing a roadmap far advancing technologies in the identify electricity-saving state's industrial,agricultural, and water sectors. technologies for California. Part of that process is an online survey to evaluate electricit�c saving technologies for California's-water seetoi:The"survey includes a �" ':" section to sta est technola ies"for considerat♦on.":. Water federation posts fact; A Ams ti t posted the Water Environment Ferfer�t czn,explains sheet on benefits of the benefits of usEng,the s n Sus aE fi�l f tr cture R En to evaluate water Infrastructure projects The system takes 7 "Y'h•°'++c...H f-,( fY hR' Y W^•' t� R ^i e•' �+ IIfSl#'UC�urB rating s](stem saaai,economic,and envircfnmerifal critena into accour t vVkten you �.�;�; ,������ , n �;- � , �,� considering a,pro�ectvTne fact sheet ilnclttdes casestudles�o`f , li ai3i�ged �!]�rats sfe c �y fef' xS; ` ,dt y �{ a usej� re • , Sl i � �Fa — is Tap��t .. •. .. _ Thomas, Autum -,t From: BCWater Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 8:35 AM To: Gosselin, Paul Subject: FW: Sites DEIR Public Meeting in Maxwell Attachments: Bales,water quality.pdf; BrobeckReportSitesJPAPublicMeeting120717wSummary.pdf A nttiln From:limb@aqualliance.net [mailto:jimb@aqualliance.net] Sent:Saturday, December 09,2017 3:30 PM To:Connelly, Bill<BConnelly@buttecounty.net>; Wahl, Larry<LWahl@buttecounty.net>; Kirk, Maureen <M Kirk@ butte county.n et>; BOS District 4<District4@buttecounty.net>; BCWater <BCWaterFrontDeskHG@buttecounty.net>;Teeter, Doug<DTeeter@ butteco unty.net> Subject:Sites DEIR Public Meeting in Maxwell Dear Supervisors, You probably know that AquAlliance opposed spending taxpayer money to plan, study, build or operate Sites Reservoir. The project has been considered since the middle of last century and has never moved forward because it is not feasible economically, environmentally, technically or financially. But dry years inspire hope in leaders and the public that "new water" can be found in the Sacramento Valley Watershed to meet the demand from the San Joaquin Valley. We have been studying the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Studies for the Sites Project and found numerous flaws and omissions that the consultants must be aware of. We attended the meeting last week in Maxwell to provide verbal comments and to assess the opinions that Maxwell area residents have about the project. A rancher named James Murphy (530 476 2004) who owns thousands of acres in the footprint of the proposed reservoir was, like two other residents, too shy to speak out in public. But after hearing my comments approached me to express their dismay over the eminent domain action that threatens their way of life. My take away impression of the project is that the consultants and the high-payed employees of the Sites JPA are milking taxpayers to prolong the planning phase of the project in spite of the in-feasibility. I will attach my report of the meeting and, more importantly, the written comments of Jerry Boles, former Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section of the Northern District of DWR in Red Bluff. Jim Brobeck, water policy analyst, AquAlliance 1 A LLIANCE DEFENDING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WATERS Sites JPA public meeting discussing the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report Maxwell, CA - December 7, 2017 Summary The Sites Reservoir project's Draft EIS/EIR was the focus of an evening meeting in Maxwell on 12/7/17. It was sparsely attended, with about 15 people not connected to the project. The most significant issues raised were that the DEIS/EIR failed to: • Provide flow parameters for the proposed project's source waters: the Sacramento River and its tributaries. • Mention the native plants that would be destroyed by the project and that the subject was not easily found in the body of the documents, if a botanical analysis existed at all. • Disclose the heavy metals and salts expected during the high flow months of winter when diversions would occur for the proposed reservoir, which would create a toxic hazard. Report The meeting venue had a sign-in table at the entrance and consultant stations set up on 3 walls of the JPA office. The consultants were well versed in their version of the benefits of the project but were unable to form cogent responses to AquAlliance's questions on water quality and landscape conversion in the inundation footprint. After % hour of isolated consultant interviews the hosts called the meeting to order. They introduced a court reporter that would be taking notes on the comments from the public.James Watson, JPA manager($325K/year salary) took the floor and used a PowerPoint presentation to praise the project benefits to the environment and the economy. The audience consisted of JPA employees, Sites consultants, approximately 10 elderly local residents, Butte County Water Conservation Director Paul Gosselin, and four vocal citizens. Steve Evans (Friends of the River) thanked the presenters for taking public comments and testified about the inadequacy of the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report in that it provided no hard river flow parameters. Evans stated that the project relied on outdated Biological Opinions and ignored the new Water Board delta/bay inflow/outflow requirements that include the tributaries that the Sites proponents plan to capture. Dr. Glen Holstein, Sacramento Valley Calif.Native Plant Society Chapter Botanist, described his knowledge that remote coast range valleys are known to contain rare native plant communities that deserve extra efforts to preserve. Dr. Holstein expressed his dissatisfaction that the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report summary made no mention of the native plants that would be destroyed by the project and frustration that the subject was not easily found in the body of the documents if botanical analysis existed at all. Lucas RossMerz, Executive Director of the Sacramento River Preservation Trust, addressed the meeting to describe the history of success in managing river land use by collaborating with land- owners and agencies to enhance riparian values. RossMerz expressed his appreciation with the Sites proponents' decision to extend the comment period to give the public more time to digest the giant DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Reports but made clear his dissatisfaction with the adequacy of the documents. He closed his comments by expressing his willingness to meet with the JPA, the USBR,and the consultants to improve the project. Jim Brobeck,water policy analyst for AquAlliance,launched into his comments on the DEIS/EIR and Feasibility Report and without hesitation challenged the feasibility of the project on the grounds that the reservoir water would be tainted with pollutants.Brobeck cited the November 17,2417 comment letter sent to the JPA/USBR by Jerry Boles, former Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section of the Northern District of DWR;"High concentrations of metals that exceed water quality criteria exist in source waters to the proposed project."Mr. Boles provides data from the DWR Water Data Library that show high concentrations of toxic metals can be expected during the high flow months of winter when diversions would be occurring to the proposed reservoir. The high concentrations of metals in the source wafer will adversely impact Sites Reservoir water duality for most, if not all,the proposed beneficial uses of the stored water.AquAlliance has been pestering the Sites team for years to reveal the toxic mineral leaching potential that is only mentioned in passing by the Sites consultants.Brobeck is particularly incensed about the failure of the Sites planners to take seriously the presence of salt springs and terminal Salt Lake that would be in the reservoir. "They fail to imagine how much more active the saline springs would be if the reservoir was inundated.Proponents are willing to admit the saline damage is worth investing money and effort into grouting the salt springs that fill the Salt Lake but they admit their efforts may be ineffective." Brobeck was also disturbed about the lackadaisical attitude proponents have about exposed soils in the denuded acres of inundation.This DEIS/EIR mentions that the vegetated landscape would be converted without disclosing the obvious:there will be an intentional and total elimination of vegetation that currently serves to reduce storm runoff erosion. He demanded that they disclose the inevitable increase in erosion of soils that are exposed during the filling and re-filling of the reservoir.The DEIS/EIR failed to disclose the toxic mineral contents of soils in the footprint of the reservoir that will be exposed to repeated and unmitigated storm runoff erosion and will be concentrated by cumulative evaporative enrichment. After receiving comments the Sites hosts did not take questions but thanked the public for coming and offered the audience an opportunity to break into individual discussion groups at the numerous information stations around the room. Before the host finished describing the well- known meeting tactic, Brobeck stood to protest this strategy of preventing the public from hearing questions and answers as a group.The host smiled benevolently and explained,"That is not how we organize these meetings." 4314 Tuliyani Drive Chico, CA 95973 October 1, 2017 AquaAlliance Barbara Vlamis, Executive Director P.O. Box 4024 Chico,CA 95927 Since your organization has expressed interest in the proposed Sites Reservoir project west of Maxwell,California, I am providing to you the comments that I have submitted in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental impact Statement for the Sites Reservoir Project,State Clearinghouse#2001112009. The draft EIR/EIS fails to discuss the high concentrations of a number of metals in the source waters to the proposed project,and,even more important,does not discuss water quality in the proposed reservoir. Water quality in the proposed reservoir will mimic that of the source waters,and hence the reservoir will have concentrations of a large number of metals that exceed many water quality criteria and standards. The high concentrations of metals likely to occur in the proposed reservoir will impact most, if not all, beneficial uses of the proposed project,including agricultural water supply,wildlife and fisheries,and drinking water supplies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River, making the project potentially infeasible. I am qualified to provide these comments since my background is in water quality,as former Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section of the Northern District of DWR in Red Bluff. If you have any questions, please contact me via email at chicojerry@yahoo.com. Sincerely, ?-- -, 6-#-. Jerry Boles 4314 Tullyani Drive Chico, CA 95973 November 17,2017 Bureau of Reclamation Sites Project Office Attn: Michael Dietle Attn: Rob Thomson Draft EIR/EIS Comments Draft EIR/EIS Comments 2800 Cottage Way,W-2830 P.O. Box 517 Sacramento,CA 95825 Maxwell,CA 95955 1 am providing to you my comments in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for the Sites Reservoir Project, State Clearinghouse #2001112009. The draft EIRMS fails to discuss the high concentrations of a number of metals in the source waters to the proposed project,and,even more important,does not discuss water duality in the proposed reservoir. Water quality in the proposed reservoir will mimic that of the source waters. and hence the reservoir will have concentrations of a large number of metals that exceed many water quality criteria and standards. The high concentrations of metals likely to occur in the proposed reservoir will impact most,if not all,beneficial uses of the proposed project,including agricultural water supply,wildlife and fisheries,and drinking water supplies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River,making the project potentially infeasible. The water quality section(Chapter 7)must be completely rewritten with an objective analysis of the data and potential adverse impacts to water quality both within the reservoir and to downstream resources in the Sacramento River. Subsequently,the aquatic biological resources (chapter 12),terrestrial biological resources(chapter 14),recreation resources(chapter 21), public health and environmental hazards(chapter 28),and cumulative impacts(chapter 35) sections of the draft EIR/EIS must reassess impacts from the adverse water quality expected from the proposed project. Following these re-analyses,re-circulation of the draft EIR/EIS is necessary with appropriate disclosure information about the potential impacts from metals to water quality and its effects on agricultural water supply,wildlife and fisheries,and drinking water supplies. I am qualified to provide these comments since my background is in water quality,as former Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section of the Northern District oi'DWR in Red Bluff: If you have any questions, please contact me via email at chico'err ahoo.com. Sincerely, Jerry Boles Comments on Draft EIR Sites Reservoir Project: Chapter 7 Surface Water Quality An EIR is supposed to be a disclosure document that provides information on the benefits as well as potential impacts from a proposed project. Section 7 - Surface Water Quality does not disclose potential significant adverse issues which have serious ramifications for the viability of the proposed project, but rather ignores or misconstrues available data and reports to incorrectly conclude that there are no significant water quality impacts associated with the proposed project. The EIR claims to have evaluated post-project impacts to the Sacramento River, but there are no analyses provided that indicate that this was done. It is apparent that the preparers of the EIR failed to examine or simply ignored the available data that would show potential significant adverse impacts from the proposed project. The analyses in Section 7 completely left out any evaluation or projection of water quality that may result in Sites Reservoir from diverting high winter flows from the Sacramento River. The EIR fails to point out that due to metals loads in the various source waters,water in the proposed reservoir may not be suitable for the beneficial uses stated for the proposed project, including enhanced water management flexibility, agricultural and urban water supply, water quality improvement, and ecosystem improvement for fish protection, habitat management, and other environmental needs. A factual evaluation of the available data is presented below, which shows significant potential adverse impacts associated with the proposed project. Some comments on specific sections of Chapter 7 of the EIR are also presented. Available Data The EIR cites the DWR Water Data Library (WDL)online database as the source for water quality data used to determine impacts from the proposed project. However, very limited data from the WDL are available for evaluating water quality in source waters for the proposed project. The major source water for the proposed project is the Sacramento River, with potential diversion occurring at the Tehama-Colusa Canal, Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District Main Canal, and at Moulton Weir. The Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam monitoring station of DWR provides information on the quality of water that would be diverted to the proposed project through the Tehama-Colusa Canal. Metals data are available in the WDL for the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam beginning in February 2006 (Table 1). However, only 33 samples have been collected since 2006, and only nine of these were from the months in which higher flows most typically occur(December through March)and from which diversions to the proposed project would occur. Cottonwood Creek contributes the most significant input to the Sacramento River during high runoff events. The Chico-Enterprise Record in an editorial published december 28, 2016 underscored the impact of tributaries on water quality in the Sacramento River. The newspaper stated that of the 900,000 cis flowing in the river earlier in the month, 1 only 5,000 cfs was coming from Keswick Dam below Shasta Dam—the rest of the 100,000 cis(95,000 cfs)was coming from tributaries downstream from Keswick Dam, of which Cottonwood Creek provides the dominant flows. Data from Cottonwood Creek near Cottonwood are even more sporadic than those for the Sacramento River. Data are available for this station in WDL beginning in October 2004, with only seven samples collected from the Cottonwood Creek monitoring station since 2006, and only four of which were collected during the months of expected higher flows of December through March (Table 2). Data available in the WDL show that only one sample was collected (March 2006)during the same period from both Cottonwood Creek and the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam since 2006. This one sample shows that metal loads in the Sacramento River are similar to those found in Cottonwood Creek, showing that Cottonwood Creek significantly affects water quality in the Sacramento River. Water quality in Cottonwood Creek will have a significant impact on diversions to the proposed reservoir and water quality data from Cottonwood Creek can be used to approximate and supplement data from the Sacramento River, though the total number of samples from both sites combined are still exceptionally low for a project of this magnitude and potential for adverse effects. The water quality monitoring station on the Sacramento River at Hamilton City is just downstream from the GCID Main Canal. Data from the WDL is somewhat more extensive at the Hamilton City monitoring site, with metals data available in the WDL beginning in late 2003 to early 2017, though still sporadic with only 78 samples collected in the span of a little more than 13 years (159 months), and only 23 of those collected sometime during the months of expected higher flows of December through March (Table 3). Samples were collected in each of these months only twice, with the rest of the samples daring these months only collected in February months each year since 2008. The WDL shows that metals data are available for the Sacramento River opposite Moulton Weir monitoring station from mid 2003 to early 2011,for a total of 80 samples, with 27 of those from the expected higher flow months (Table 4). Water quality sampling during the expected months of higher flows of December through March did not target high flow periods (the periods during which diversions to the proposed project would occur) but were based on a rigid and fixed monthly or semi- monthly schedule. Monitoring did not provide any information on the variation in concentrations of metals over the runoff hydrograph. Even higher concentrations of metals would likely occur during the higher flow periods during these months, but were not targeted by the limited monitoring. The relatively low number of samples and lack of samples targeting critical flows (i.e., high runoff events)are nonetheless sufficient to indicate potential significant adverse water quality impacts with the proposed project. These data illustrate the need to collect additional data during appropriate time periods (i.e., during the high flow periods when diversions from the Sacramento River would be occurring)and re-evaluate the potential adverse water quality impacts from the proposed project. 2 Data Analyses Some of the analytical results shown in the WDL for metals are reported as"dissolved" and other results as"total" (or total recoverable). "Total'concentrations, which include both dissolved and particulate forms of an analyte, are probably a better representation for the concentrations of metals that will affect water quality in the proposed reservoir. As well, the State Water Resources Control Board makes no distinction between dissolved or total recoverable concentrations when considering whether a criterion is exceeded (SWRCB 2011). The proposed reservoir will thermally stratify and will also be biologically productive due to nutrients brought in from source waters. This in-situ productivity, as well as organic material brought in with the source waters, will result its anoxic conditions (i.e., lack of oxygen)in the hypolimnion (i.e., bottom water layer). While dissolved forms of metals are generally the most bioavailable, the particulate fraction of total recoverable forms will undergo chemical transformation to dissolved forms under the anoxic conditions expected in the hypolimnion of the proposed reservoir. Transformed metals will be mixed throughout the reservoir water column during turnover events, or released downstream with anoxic water from the lower depths during the summer months. Data from the WDL(Table 1)show that aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, and mercury in water samples from the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam exceed various criteria and standards established to protect beneficial uses, including drinking water, public health, taste and odor for agriculture, and freshwater organisms, which includes fish. Maximum concentrations of some of these metals are many times higher than the corresponding criteria or standard. For example, aluminum, in addition to exceeding the SWRCB Basin Plan Primary Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)for drinking water by one and half times, also exceeds the secondary drinking water standard in the Basin Plan by seven times and the US Environmental Protection Agency Secondary MCL by 30 times. Even the minimum concentration of arsenic reported in WDL exceeds by more than 10 times nearly all the criteria and standards for protection of human health. The least reported concentration of cadmium from river water samples exceed by five times the incremental cancer risk for drinking water. The least concentration of chromium reported in WDL exceeds the Califomia Public Health Goal by 16 times and incremental cancer risk for drinking water by five times. The maximum concentration of iron that was reported in WDL exceeds the secondary drinking water maximum concentration level in the Basin Plan, as well as National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for taste and odor or welfare by nearly three times. The maximum concentration of lead that was reported exceeds the California Public Health Goal and California Proposition 65 maximum allowable dose level for reproductive toxicity by over four times. The maximum reported concentration of manganese exceeds the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for taste and odor or welfare by one and a half times. The maximum concentration reported for mercury exceeds the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Aquatic Life Continuous Concentration by nearly four times, and the Freshwater Aquatic Life Maximum Concentration by two times. An additional concern with these metals is that some metals are taken up by crops (such as arsenic by rice), making the crops 3 potentially unsuitable for consumption. Plant uptake of metals in the water supply not only affect crops grown for human consumption, but also plants grown for support of wildlife, such as in refuges. Similarly, data from the WDL for Cottonwood Creek near Cottonwood show that aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, iron, lead, manganese, and nickel exceed various criteria and standards established to protect beneficial uses (Table 2). Similar to the Sacramento River, maximum concentrations of some of these metals are many times higher than the corresponding criteria or standards. Aluminum concentrations exceed the Basin Plan drinking water primary standard MCL by 14 times,the secondary drinking water secondary standard MCL by 70 times, the California Public Health Goal by over 20 times, the National Academy of Sciences Health Advisory and Agriculture Water Quality Goals for taste and odor threshold by nearly three times, the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for human health and welfare for water and fish consumption by nearly 30 times, and the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for freshwater aquatic life maximum concentration by 20 times. As with the Sacramento River, even the minimum concentration of arsenic reported in WDL exceeds nearly all the criteria and standards for protection of human health by up to 167 times. The minimum concentration of cadmium reported exceeds the incremental cancer risk for drinking water by over three times, while the maximum concentration is over twice as high as the California Public Health Goal. As with the Sacramento River, the California Public Health Goal is exceeded by the least concentration of chromium reported by 16 times and the incremental cancer risk for drinking water by five times. Iron exceeds the Basin Plan drinking water standard secondary MCL by over five times, the Agricultural Water Quality Goals for taste and odor threshold by nearly five times, the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for taste and odor or welfare by 78 Times, and the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for freshwater aquatic life maximum concentration by over 23 times. Reported lead concentrations are two and a half times higher than the California Public Health Goal, up to twice as high as the California Proposition 65 maximum allowable dose level for reproductive toxicity, and almost twice as high as the incremental cancer risk estimate for drinking water. Manganese concentrations reported from Cottonwood Creek exceed the Basin Plan Drinking Water Standards secondary MCL by a factor of 10, are nearly twice as high as the USEPA Health Advisory for drinking water, three times as high as the Agricultural Water Quality Goals for taste and odor threshold, and over 10 times higher than the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for taste and odor or welfare. Reported maximum mercury concentrations exceed the National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Freshwater Aquatic Life Continuous Concentration by nearly two times, while even the lowest reported concentration is nearly equal to the recommended criterion. Nickel exceeds the California Public Health Goal by nearly five times. The GC€D Main Canal intake is slightly upstream from the Sacramento River at Hamilton City water quality monitoring station. Therefore, water quality in the GCID Main Canal will be similar to that found at the Sacramento River at Hamilton City monitoring station. Metals data for this monitoring station can be found in the WDL from November 2003 to February 2017. Similar to the upstream monitoring station on the 4 Sacramento River below Red Bluff,the Sacramento River at Hamilton City water quality monitoring station has been identified to contain high levels of aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc(Table 3),which exceed a large number of criteria and standards similar to those upstream at the monitoring station below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam. High levels of metals have also been identified at the water quality monitoring station opposite the Moulton Weir, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc (Table 4). As with the water quality monitoring station on the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam, concentrations of metals from the Sacramento River monitoring station at the Moulton Weir exceed a large number of water quality criteria designed to protect beneficial uses. As discussed earlier, Cottonwood Creek is the major source of water to the Sacramento River during higher flow periods, but other tributaries also contribute high levels of metals to the Sacramento River. In addition, local creeks directly tributary to the proposed reservoir, such as Funks Creek and Stone Corral Creek, also carry metals concentrations that will contribute to the metals loading. Leaching from soils beneath the reservoir will also contribute additional metals, as well as nutrients. The Basin Plan lists other chemicals that adversely affect water quality in the Sacramento River, including chlorpyrifos and diazinon. The California State Water Resources Control Board lists a number of other"constituents of concern" in the study area, including chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs, and dieldrin_ In addition, sewer outfalls from the cities of Redding and Red Bluff contribute other contaminants, such as pharmaceuticals, to the Sacramento River. No information is provided in the EIR about effects to the proposed project from these chemical contaminants. Discussion The data in the WDL for the Sacramento River and Cottonwood Creek demonstrate that high concentrations of metals can be expected during the high flow months of winter (December through March)when diversions would be occurring to the proposed Sites Reservoir. Higher concentrations of metals are likely during the higher flows that can occur during these months. Such higher flows were not targeted by the limited sampling effort presented in the WDL. The high concentrations of metals in the source water will adversely impact water quality in the proposed reservoir for most, if not all, the proposed beneficial uses of the stored water. Some metals from both the Sacramento River and Cottonwood Creek, whose concentrations did not exceed criteria in the limited sampling effort, had concentrations that nearly exceed the criteria and standards. These and other metals whose concentrations did not exceed the criteria may have higher concentrations during the higher flow periods that the proposed project would be diverting. Again, these higher flow periods were not targeted during the limited sampling effort. 5 Even some of the minimum concentrations of metals found in the source waters exceed criteria and standards, which means that the source waters never meet these goals and standards—the criteria are always exceeded and the water is never suitable for the beneficial use or uses the criteria or standards were designed to protect. Water quality in the proposed reservoir for these parameters will exceed the criteria and standards all the time. Since water quality in the proposed reservoir will reflect that of the source waters, the reservoir will have concentrations of numerous metals, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc, that exceed a number of criteria and standards developed to protect beneficial uses. in addition, other metals that may not exceed criteria and standards in the source waters may adversely affect reservoir water quality due to synergistic effects. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB 2011)states that`When multiple constituents have been found together in groundwater or surface waters, their combined toxicity should be evaluated"and that"theoretical risks from chemicals found together in a water body shall be considered additive for all chemicals having similar toxicologic effects or having carcinogenic effects." Thus,the adverse effects from the metals delivered to the proposed reservoir from the source waters may have an even greater adverse impact and pose an unacceptable level of risk. Beneficial uses potentially impacted by metals in the proposed reservoir include agricultural water supply(direct toxicity or uptake by crops making the crops unsuitable for use), wildlife (such as fish- eating birds), fisheries, recreation (including sport fishing and water contact activities such as swimming), and drinking water supplies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River. Releases from the proposed reservoir would occur during the summer when metals concentrations in the Sacramento River are much lower due to the majority of flow being from Shasta Reservoir, with much better water quality, though still carrying a metals load. High metals concentrations in the proposed reservoir releases could adversely affect water quality in the Sacramento River during the summer months by increasing metals loads beyond acceptable limits and adversely impact beneficial uses. Though high Concentrations of metals that exceed water quality criteria exist in source waters to the proposed project, they cannot be regulated by governmental entities since they are natural occurrences. However, once contained artificially in a reservoir, they are subject to jurisdictional control by regulatory agencies. Any releases of water from the proposed reservoir will likely be subject to review by water quality regulatory agencies to ensure that such releases do not adversely affect downstream resources due to the heavy metals loads in the releases. The SWRCB has an antidegradation policy that prohibits discharges that would degrade water quality to a level below water quality objectives because no capacity would exist for degradation that will be caused by the next downstream or downgradient uses—the ability to beneficially use the water would have been impaired, even though water quality objectives would not yet have been exceeded (SWRCB 2011). The contribution of additional metal loads from releases from the proposed Sites Reservoir during the summer could cause 6 concentrations of metals in the Sacramento River to exceed criteria and standards or at least be subject to the antidegradation policy due to an incremental increase in metals in the Sacramento River from the proposed project. Thus, the proposed project may face prohibition of releases if stored water does not meet water quality criteria or standards or if releases can cause criteria or standards to be exceeded by downstream inputs (i.e., antidegradation poicy). During dry years, the adverse impacts associated with the project can be expected to be even greater. Flows in the Sacramento River from upstream reservoirs on the Sacramento River(i.e., Shasta Reservoir, Whiskeytown Reservoir) will be minimized during the winter months in an effort to restore water storage levels in those reservoirs. Likewise, during wet or even normal runoff years, releases from the upstream reservoirs during the winter will be curtailed during high runoff periods to prevent downstream flooding. In any of these scenarios, tributary influences, such as Cottonwood Creek, on water quality in the Sacramento River will be much greater. The proposed project would still attempt to capture as much runoff from the Sacramento River as possible, but the water diverted to the proposed project will have even greater concentrations of metals due to the majority of flow being from tributary streams (e.g., Cottonwood Creek) during dry and possibly even wet or normal runoff years. Similarly, during the summer in dry years, releases from upstream reservoirs (i.e., Shasta Reservoir,Whiskeytown Reservoir)will be minimized. Releases to the Sacramento River from the proposed project will have a greater impact on water quality in the Sacramento River due to less dilution being available due to curtailed flows in the river from upstream reservoirs (i.e., Shasta and Whiskeytown reservoirs). Conclusion The proposed project is, at best, premature. Little or no data have been collected to determine the metals loads in the higher flows of the Sacramento River that would be diverted to the proposed reservoir. An extremely small amount of data have been collected during the months in which higher flows can be expected (December through March), but higher flows during these months were not targeted in the water quality sampling. None the less, the limited data presented in the WDL show high concentrations of a number of metals which exceed numerous water quality criteria and standards in the source waters for the proposed reservoir. Extremely high concentrations of metals are present in the small streams in the reservoir footprint, which occur due to the nature of the soils in the area of the proposed reservoir. Sites Reservoir would inundate these soils resulting in leaching of metals and further incremental loading of metals to the proposed reservoir. There is no discussion in the EIR about the potential impacts of metals leaching from the soils that would be inundated by the proposed reservoir. Prior to moving forward with the project, much additional data are needed during the high flow periods in which diversions would occur from the Sacramento River, metals loading from the smaller tributaries that flow directly into the proposed reservoir, and effects from leaching of metals from soils inundated by the proposed reservoir. 7 The limited data that are available are sufficient to show that water quality in the proposed reservoir will have concentrations of a large number of metals that exceed many water quality criteria and standards, including those established for the protection of agricultural water supply,wildlife and fisheries, and drinking water. Metals bioaccumulation in the reservoir food web could produce adverse impacts to fish-eating birds and other animals, as well as humans, and adversely affect any potential recreational benefit from the project. Releases from the proposed reservoir could adversely affect downstream resources, including agricultural water supply,wildlife and fisheries, and drinking water supplies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River. Also, the EIR does not discuss the physical conditions that can be expected to occur in the proposed reservoir. Like other nearby reservoirs, the proposed reservoir will thermally stratify during the summer months, with a warm upper water layer and a cooler lower water layer. The proposed reservoir will also be biologically productive due to nutrients brought in with source waters. The biological productivity will lead to anoxic conditions (i.e., lack of oxygen) in the hypollmnion (i.e., bottom water layer). Depending on the depth from which downstream releases are made from the proposed reservoir, water released will either be warm and unsupportive of cold water fisheries in the Sacramento River(i.e., migrating salmon)or cooler but devoid of oxygen. As releases from the reservoir progress during the summer, or in years in which the reservoir is not completely filled, the reservoir will be warm from surface to bottom as the cooler lower water strata is depleted from releases or wind mixing of the upper warm water layer. Under these conditions, only warm water would be available for release from the proposed reservoir, which would not be supportive of the cold water fishery in the Sacramento River. An EIR is a disclosure document meant to disclose pertinent project information to planners, regulatory agencies, and other interested parties and the public. This EIR did not disclose the potential impacts from metals, other contaminants, nor the physical conditions likely to exist in the proposed reservoir. The little analyses presented in the EIR misconstrues, misinterprets, and ignores water quality data that amply demonstrate significant potential adverse impacts from the proposed project. The water quality section (Chapter 7) must be completely rewritten with an objective analysis of the data and potential adverse impacts to water quality both within the reservoir and to downstream resources in the Sacramento River. Subsequently,the aquatic biological resources(chapter 12), terrestrial biological resources(chapter 14), recreation resources (chapter 21), public health and environmental hazards (chapter 28), and cumulative impacts (chapter 35)sections of the EIR must reassess impacts from the adverse water quality expected from the proposed project. Whether any of the projected beneficial uses from the proposed project can be realized, and its feasibility to meet project objectives, purpose, and need, also needs to be reconsidered in light of the potential significant adverse water quality impacts from metals. Following these re- analyses, re-circulation of the EIR is necessary with appropriate disclosure information about the potential impacts from metals to water quality and its effects on agricultural 8 water supply, wildlife and fisheries, and drinking water supplies for communities that divert water from the Sacramento River. EIR Needs: • Obtain additional metals data from source waters targeting high flows from which diversions would occur • Provide information on the water quality impacts from other chemical contaminants that adversely affect water quality in the Sacramento River (including chlorpyrifos, diazinon, chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs, and dieldrin) and contaminants in sewer outfalls (such as pharmaceuticals)and other discharges(such as industrial discharges) • Evaluate the contributions of metals from local tributaries (i.e., Funks Creek and Stone Corral Creek)to the proposed reservoir • Provide information on the contribution from leaching of metals from the inundation area of the proposed reservoir • Evaluate effects of metals to beneficial uses within the proposed reservoir o fisheries, o wildlife (including state and federal species listed as threatened or endangered), o recreation • Evaluate effects of metals to beneficial uses due to releases from the reservoir o agricultural supply water, o effects of metals on crops including incorporation of metals by crops (e.g., arsenic uptake in rice), o effects of metals on plants grown for support of wildlife (such as in wildlife refuges), o drinking water supplies, o fisheries, o wildlife (including state and federal species listed as threatened or endangered), • Evaluate combined toxicity of multiple metals • Evaluate contributions of metals in reservoir releases related to the SWRCB antidegradation policy • Evaluate impacts from mercury bioaccumulation in aquatic life (especially fish) in the proposed reservoir, and effects to wildlife that feed on fish from the reservoir and recreational opportunities (i.e., sport fishing) • Evaluate physical conditions expected in the reservoir, including thermal stratification and hypolimnetic anoxia, and effects on reservoir and downstream aquatic resources • Conduct re-analysis of impacts due to metals, other contaminants, and physical conditions in the proposed reservoir on: o water quality(chapter T), o aquatic biological resources (chapter 12), v terrestrial biological resources (chapter 14), o recreation resources (chapter 21), 9 o public health and environmental hazards(chapter 28), and o cumulative impacts (chapter 35). Comments on Specific Sections of EIR 7.2.9.5 Other Heavy Metals "In addition to mercury and selenium, other heavy metals, including cadmium, copper, and zinc, impair beneficial uses Uf water bodies. Cadmium, copper, and zinc enter the water bodies with the sediment from crocled soils and discharges from abandoned mines, and in stormwater runofffrom municipal areas (S'I.1`R(T. 2011a). The primary source in the Central Valley appears to be tailing piles located at ahandoned mince sites. Merny of these mines are located upstream of reservoirs;therefore, the sediment that includes the heave metal constituents is generally captured upstream of the dam.Heavy metals appear to cause health concerns in aquatic resources and in humans that consume the fish from these crater bodies." Abandoned mines, which contribute heavy metals to area streams, are also found downstream from Shasta and Keswick dams. In addition, natural erosion and soil leaching also contribute to metals loads found in area streams, such as Cottonwood Creels, which make up the bulk of the flow in the Sacramento River during high runoff events during which flows would be diverted to the proposed reservoir. It is not that "heavy metals appear to cause health concerns in aquatic resources and humans," it is well known that they do. 7.2.4 Primary Study Area 7.2.4.1 Overview and Methodology "U 1YR began monthly sampling of streams in the Primary Study Area in 1997, including physical parameters.nutrients, minerals,and metals in the water column(DWR, 2011), as well as mercury analysis of sport,Tsh tissues collected from nearby existing reservoirs, including East Park Stony Gorge, and Black Butte(DWR, 2007a).Routine water quality monitoring by DWR was periodically suspended due ir,.lii,rding lintitation.v during portions of 2008 and 2009, and ended following the January 1010 ,m)rrrtoring run.,5etmplin,results were then compared to Central Valley Basin Plan water quality criteria ((" R1VOC'B, 1011) (Appendix 7A California State Water Resources Control Board Constituents of ('ancon ref Water Bodies in the Study Area)and USEPA ambient water quality criteria to prevent nuisance algal growth in streams(USEPA, 2001b)." DWR does not indicate any data for metals in its Water Data Library until 2008 for the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Darn, and 2003 for the Sacramento River at Hamilton City and opposite the Moulton Weir, as well as Stone Corral Creek. Funding for water quality monitoring by DWR was curtailed shortly after the 1997 date indicated in the EIR, after the project manager in the Red Bluff office was informed of potential adverse impacts from metals by the then Chief of the Water Quality and Biology Section. If additional data are available, that data should be made available in the WDL so that reviewers of this EIR can verify claims about lack of water quality issues made in the EIR. However,the data that are in the WDL adequately demonstrate significant adverse water quality issues with the proposed project. Any additional data that has not been shared will just confirm these issues. 10 Appendix 7A- California State Water Resources Control Board Constituents of Concern of Water Bodies in the Study Area—lists a large number of parameters for which no information is contained in this EIR. For example, chlorpyrifos, diazinon, chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs, and dieldrin are constituents of concern from Keswick Dam to the Delta. The EIR should assess how these constituents will impact water quality in the proposed reservoir. 7.2.4.2 East Park and Stony Gorge Reservoirs "East Park and Stony Gorge reservoirs were sampled during the summer of 2000 to evaluate the extent t?f mercury contamination in fish because these reservoirs are representative of conditions that could he expected in the proposed Sites Reservoir. DWR analyses oftotal recoverable mercury indicate that lere.Is in samples collected near the bottom of the water column at Stony Gorge and Black Butte reservoirs. exceeded the California Toxics Rule for protection of human health. Fish tissue samples were collected by DWR from East Park and Stony Gorge reservoirs during 2001 to 2001.Neither caesh nor bass composites collected from East Park Reservoir exceeded the DEHHA screening value or USEPA criterion, although mercury levels in the small-sized bass approached these values, and a very large channel cash that was analyzed individually contained tissue mercury at over twice the level of the screening value and criterion limits. Mercury concentrations in tissues ofehann l cat fish collected from Stony Gorge Reservoir contained levels less than the screening vuhee and criterion (DWR, 2007a)." Mercury sampling in fish from East Park and Stony Gorge reservoirs was conducted to contribute to the knowledge of mercury contamination in a number of northern California lakes and reservoirs, not simply because these reservoirs are representative of conditions that could be expected in the proposed Sites Reservoir, though they well might. As noted, the bass from East Park Reservoir that were used for the composite analysis were small in size (about one foot long), yet approached the screening value and criterion. Larger fish can be expected to exceed these values since mercury is accumulated and magnified in fish tissues. The large catfish which contained mercury at over twice the screening value and criterion is probably representative of mercury concentrations that can be found in this species. The EIR fails to mention that mercury contamination exceeded the screening value and criterion in a relatively small largemouth bass collected from Stony Gorge Reservoir. Though the catfish analyzed from Stony Gorge Reservoir did not exceed the screening value and criterion, the cited report states that"larger channel catfish from Stony Gorge Reservoir, therefore, may be expected to contain mercury concentrations that exceed the screening value and criterion." Since mercury contamination in excess of criteria occurs in lakes that the EIR states are representative of conditions that could be expected in the proposed Sites Reservoir, the EIR should discuss the probability of mercury contamination in the proposed reservoir and ramifications to recreational fishing and wildlife that would consume fish from the reservoir. 11 7.2.4.3 Salt Lake "';f dine water has been observed to.seep from underground salt springs in the vicinity of the Salt Lake tindt abingY the slopes above the valley and along the valley floor within the proposed inundation area of .Siivs Reservoir. These ureas are generally located in the Funks Creek watershed, The water from the underground springs accumulates along the trough of the valley and forms Salt Lake(USGS, 1915). The sire c?I'Nalf Lake and adjacent seasonal brackish wetlands varies with time. The wetted area appears to vur),ftom 0 to 30 acres. The deeper water appears to be approximately 15 acres based on observations in 1017. The depth of'the water has not been monitored. Suli Lake i+gas only samph?d on a few occasions from 1997 to 1998. In August 1997, the Salt Lake was ch-v. In September 1997, the springs were bubbling and the EC was 194,100 micromhos per centimeter lurnhoslcrn)as compared to 3.490 pmhos/cm for the nearby Stone Corral Creek. In January 1998, there ii-as less than I cfs of flotir from the springs, and the EC was 7,200,umhos/cm as compared to 540 Ernrlroslcm for the nearby Stone Corral Creek. From these samples, it was found that waters from this loc•crlion are extremely high in minerals, The EC value on one occasion reached 194,100 micromhos per evniiineter. The TUSmeasurement at this time was 258,000 mg& EC. TDS,sodium, and boron exceeded all Central Vallee Basin flan criteria.A few metals also were noted at very high concentrations (alun inure, iron. and manganese)and exceeded all criteria, and a few others exceeded some criteria torr senic,copper, lead, and nickel). Levels of ammonia and orthophosphate also were noted at high levels and exceeded criteria. Temperatures from this site were variable, and probably depend on seasonal conditions. Concentrations present in water from this site likely depend on the season and flow." Though the EIR states that water quality data used in the analyses are available in the WDL, data for Salt Lake could not be found. However, the EIR states that several metals (aluminum, iron, and manganese)were found in concentrations that exceed all Basin Plan criteria, while others (arsenic, copper, lead, and nickel)exceed some criteria. These metals from the springs feeding Salt Lake will add to the metals load in the proposed reservoir. 7.2.4.4 Funks Creek "Funks Creek originates cit approximately 850 feet elevation in the foothills west ofAntelope Valley. The bank v of this inferinittent.►tream are heavily eroded and the gravel bed is highly disturbed and compacted hj,cattle.Along the north end ofAntelope Valley, Funks Creek receives underground drainage from Salt Lake. Funks Creek widens as it cuts through Logan Ridge and enters the western side of the Sacramento f/allev.althougli flows are still intermittent.Approximately i mile downstream of Logan Ridge, Funks Creek is impounded by.Fitnks Reservoir. This reservoir is fed mainly from waters of the Tehama-Colusa Canal. Downstream of the reservoir, Funks Creek is bordered by agricultural lands, and much of this reach is channelized before emptying into Stone Corral Creek. This portion of Funks Creek likely has sonre flow year round,date to leakage from the dam at Funks Reservoir. DWR observed aluminum, arsenic,copper, iron, manganese, mercury, nickel,and phosphorus in Funks O-eek at the Glean-Colusa Irrigation District(GCID)Main Canal station during intermittent water yualitY sampling: The concentrations appeared to be higher during and immediately followingstorm carr•+1tc, .. 12 As with Salt Lake, data for Funks Creek could not be found in the WDL. The data used in the analyses in the EIR must be made available for review. It is likely that the reported metals exceed various criteria, as with Salt Lake, and thus add to the metals load in the proposed reservoir. 7.2.4.5 Stone Conal Creek "Stone Corral Creek originates at approximately 700 feet elevation in the foothills west o/'Antelope Valley. As the intermittent stream flows into the grasslands of Antelope Valley, the channel is narraiv unci the banks eroded The much larger Antelope Creekflows into Stone Corral Creek from the south near dir town of Sites.Stone Corral Creek flows through the gap in the foothills and into rhe western Sacramento Valley. DWR observed aluminum,arsenic,copper, iron, manganese. nickel, and phosphorus during intermitlent sampling in Stone Corral Creek near Sites station during intermittent water gualitt'.sampling. The concentrations appeared to be higher during and immediately following storm events." Data for Stone Corral Creek are available in the WDL. These data show that not only are high concentrations of aluminum, arsenic, copper, iron, manganese, and nickel present, as reported in the EIR, but also cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, silver, and zinc, as well as boron (Table 5). The EIR does not disclose the fact that, not only are the concentrations higher during and immediately following storm events, the resulting metals concentration in Stone Corral Creek exceed a large number of criteria and standards including those to protect drinking water, public health, freshwater aquatic life, and agricultural uses. These metals will also contribute to the metals load in the proposed reservoir. The metals concentrations found in Stone Corral Creek, Salt Lake, and Funks Creek are a result of leaching from the soils through which these water bodies flow. Inundation of these soils by the proposed reservoir will result in an additional metals load to the reservoir. 7.2.4.6 Tehama-Colusa Canal "The intake for the Tehama Colusa Canal occurs at the southeast end of the City or Red Bluff at River Mile(RM)243.The intake occurs downstream of the mouth of Red Bank Creek.The Tchama-Colusa Canal is approximately I l l miles long and extends from Red Bluff in Tehama County to downstreain of Dunnigan in Yolo County.Funks Reservoir is approximately 66 canal miles downstream of the intake at the Sacramento River. DWR observed aluminum,arsenic,cadmium,and iron during intermittent sampling in the Tehama- Colusa Canal downstream of the siphon under Stony Creek during intermittent water quality sampling." The intake for the Tehama-Colusa Canal is at the Sacramento River below Red Bluff Diversion Dam water quality monitoring station. Therefore, water quality in the Tehama- Colusa Canal will be exactly that found at the Sacramento River below Red Bluff Diversion Dam monitoring station. Data for this monitoring station can be found in the WDL. 13 This is another example where the EIR is less than forthcoming. Not only are aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, and iron present in water diverted from the river into the canal, but, as discussed earlier, so are chromium, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, and zinc(Table 1). The highest concentrations were found during the higher flow months (December through March). As discussed earlier, many of these metals exceed a large number of criteria and standards, including those developed to protect drinking water, public health,freshwater aquatic life, and agricultural uses. Water quality in the proposed reservoir will reflect that in the Sacramento River below the Red Bluff Diversion Dam and other source waters, and exceed many of the criteria developed to protect beneficial uses of the water. 7.2.4.7 Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District Maim Canal "The intake for the GCID Main Canal is on a side channel off the Sacramento River at RM 205.5,north of the town of Hamilton City.GC1D's Hamilton City pump station,located at the intake,diverts water into the GCID Main Canal from the Sacramento River for distribution within the GCID service area.The canal is an unlined earthen channel that stretches approximately 65 miles from the system diversion point near Hamilton City to its downstream southern terminus at the CBD near Williams,in Colusa County. DW It observed alaminum,arsenic,cadmium,copper,iron,mercury,manganese,and phosphorus during intermittent sampling in the GCID Main Canal intake during intermittent water quality sampling." The intake for the GCID Main Canal is slightly upstream from the Sacramento River at Hamilton City water quality monitoring station. Therefore, water quality in the GCID Main Canal will be similar to that found at the Sacramento River at Hamilton City monitoring station. Data for this monitoring station can be found in the WDL. Not only are aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, copper, iron, manganese, and mercury present in the Sacramento River in the vicinity of the diversion into the GCID Main Canal, but so are chromium, lead, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc(Table 3). Aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, and nickel are present in concentrations that exceed various criteria and standards. The highest concentrations are generally found during the higher flow months of December through March, when the proposed project may be diverting water from this area of the Sacramento River. 7.2.4.9 Sacramento River Opposite Moulton Weir "L71I'R monitored water quality at the Sacramento River along the western bank opposite Moulton Weir station.f•arm 1000 to 2010. The water quality samples included aluminum,arsenic,copper, iron,mercury, manganese, lead. and phosphorus. Total aluminum levels in the Sacramento River at this location frequently exceeded aquatic life criteria during associated high flow conditions in the river, but rarely exceedej drinking water criteria and the agricultural goal.Arsenic levels exceeded human toxicity thresholds in all samples collected,and the criterion for protection of aquatic life for cadmium was oc•cca lanally exceeded. Copper levels frequently exceeded hardness-dependent aquatic life protection criteria during high flow conditions in the river, and iron levels frequently exceeded drinking water and uilauat is life protection criteria, as well as the agricultural goal during the same river conditions. Dissolved iron lovels exceeded the Central Valley Basin Plan level occasionally.Mercury levels upprvuched, but did not arceed, the CTR criterion during the highest flows in the river. Manganese levels 14 occasionally exceeded drinking water standards and the agricultural goal, and lead levels rarely, exceeded drinking water criteria.All samples contained total phosphorus at levels at or above rhe recommended criteria range to prevent nuisance algal growth in streams." Monitored metals also included cadmium, chromium, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc (Table 4). Contrary to the statement in the EIR, aluminum concentrations frequently exceed drinking water criteria and on several occasions the agricultural goal during the high flow months of December through March. With reported concentrations up to 38 ug/L, mercury not only approached but greatly exceeded the California Toxics Rule (CTR)criterion (0.05 ug/L)for sources of drinking water as well as the National Recommended Water Quality for freshwater aquatic life continuous concentration (0.77 ug1L)and maximum concentration (1.8 ug/L). Reported lead concentrations frequently exceed the California Public Health Goal of 0.02 ug/L, and had a median value of 0.058 ug1L. Reported nickel concentrations also exceed the California Public Health Goal. Environmental Impacts/Environmental Consequences 7.3.1 Section 303 Evaluation Criteria and Significance Thresholds "Significance criteria represent the thresholds that were used to identify whethc;r cin impact would he potentially significant. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines suggests the following evairation criteria.n- water quality: Would the Project: • Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? • Create or contribute runoffwater that would exceed lite capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runo f' • Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? The evaluation criteria used for this impact analysis represent a combination of the Appendix G criteria and professional judgment that considers current regulations, standards.and/or consultation with agencies,knowledge of the area,and the context and intensity of the environmental effects, as required pursuant to NEPA. For the purposes gf'lhis analysis, an alternative would result in a potentially significant impact if it would cause the,following: * A violation of any water quality standard or waste discharge requirement, or otherwise substantially degrade water quality If a water quality constituent declines under the action alternatives as compared to the Existing; Condition&Wo Projec&Wo Action Condition, the changes are not considered to he adverse. 15 Qualitative Analysis of Constituents The qualitative analysis of changes in other constituents(e.g.,mercury,selenium,nutrients)was based upon an analysis of potential changes in loadings from sources of the constituent and related changes in Iknvs that would occur from implementation of the Project as compared to the Existing Conditions/ No 111roject/No Action Condition.For example,the qualitative analysis of changes in mercury is based upon changes in flow patterns from the major sources of mercury in the Sacramento River watershed (e.g., tributaries to the Sacramento River)." What the heck does this last paragraph mean? It makes absolutely no sense. The analysis of potential impacts should be based on an assessment of the expected water quality in the proposed reservoir,whether that water quality exceeds any criteria or standards, and the adverse effects that would occur if criteria or standards are exceeded, both within the reservoir and in downstream areas subject to releases from the reservoir. 7.3.4 Section 303 Impacts Associated with Alternative A Shasta Lake and Sacramento River from Shasta Lake and Keswick Reservoir to Freeport Impact.SW Qua/1:A Violation of Any Water Quality Standard or Waste Discharge Requirement,or Otherprise Substantially Degrade Surface Water Quallly Mercury and Other Heavy Metals '-As described in Section 7.2,the sources of mercury and other heavy metals in Shasta Lake are located upstrea n of the lake and accumulate within Shasta Lake.Mercury in the Sacramento River downstream of Keswick Reservoir is generated along the tributaries to the Sacramento River.The generation rate and the accumulation rates of mercury and other heavy metals in Shasta Lake or along the Sacramento River would not be affected by implementation of Alternative A because there would be no new facilities constructed upstream of Shasta Lake or along the tributaries.Operations of Shasta Lake under Alternative A,as reflected by end-of-month Shasta Lake storage, would be similar to conditions under the laxisting Conditions/No ProjectlNo Action Condition,as described in Chapter 6 Surface Water Resources." Accumulation of mercury would indeed be affected by Alternative A(arid all the other alternatives) since water from the Sacramento River, containing mercury concentrations in excess of various criteria, would be diverted into the proposed reservoir. Releases from the reservoir could adversely affect downstream resources and beneficial uses due to the mercury contained in the reservoir. In addition,fisheries, wildlife, and recreation that utilize the reservoir could be adversely affected from mercury accumulation in the reservoir food web. Summary "Coucciltrations of mercury,other heavy metals,and salinity would be similar in the Sacramento River under Allernative A as compared to the Existing Conditions/No ProjectlNo Action Condition;therefore, there wvould be no impact related to these constituents." 16 Again, there are potential very significant adverse impacts associated with diverting water from the Sacramento River during higher flow periods to the proposed reservoir. The Sacramento River contains concentrations of a large number of metals, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, and mercury, that significantly exceed various criteria and standards designed to protect beneficial uses. Water in the reservoir will reflect that of the water diverted from the Sacramento River, and will also exceed a number of criteria developed to protect beneficial uses. The metals may adversely affect aquatic resources in the reservoir and terrestrial resources that may utilize the reservoir(such as fish-eating birds), as well as reservoir recreation. The metals in releases from the reservoir may adversely affect downstream resources, including drinking water supply, agricultural supply, wildlife, and fisheries, and may violate the SWRCB antidegradation policy. These are definite "impacts related to these constituents," contrary to what is stated above in this EIR. All the alternatives suffer from the exact same significant adverse impacts due to metals in the source waters. 7.4 Mitigation Measures "Because no potentially significant direct water quality impacts were identified, no mitigation is mquired or recommended." The EIR failed to identify any impacts, though significant potential adverse impacts are painfully obvious. The EIR completely ignores any assessment of the proposed project —Sites Reservoir, as well as any assessment of the adverse impacts the reservoir may pose to beneficial uses within the reservoir(i.e.,fisheries, wildlife, recreation)and those adverse impacts attributable to releases from the reservoir(i.e., drinking water supply, agricultural water supply,fisheries,wildlife, recreation). As shown throughout this discussion, a number of metals significantly exceed water quality criteria and standards in the water sources to the proposed reservoir. The OR completely ignores potential chemical contaminants (such as chlorpyrifos, diazinon, chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs, and dieldrin). Water quality in the reservoir will reflect that of the source waters. Therefore, the reservoir will contain a number of metals, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, and mercury, and possibly other chemical contaminants that exceed a number of water quality criteria designed to protect beneficial uses. Both water resources within the reservoir and downstream resources that receive reservoir releases may be adversely affected by the metals and chemical contaminants. The EIR also fails to address the physical properties that will exist in the reservoir(such as thermal stratification and hypolimnetic anoxia), and how they will affect both reservoir and downstream resources. The EIR needs to address how these significant adverse impacts are going to be mitigated. References SWRCB 2011. State Water Resources Control Board. A Compilation.of Water Quality Goals, 16''Edition. April 2011. 17 OD M Lb Ln N!WO!qv Wj Ol in'c� R mi. !toNi •to hl -M 1` 1 , ; L 4A m, 1 ao it- +IDmi cc %Q kn:17� m r4 Lfj C6 Wjr-4;Lj;%A�W! . ;,x ka .61 FA;-t n =L f-4 -W M14 'q, m '41 ml m!♦,L M'r4!141 i W ul, N_j 1 -1 MM 'i j rt;a! tq! .4 tP 09", N l ,:"� :r4'tn. Q C, '0`M m C'D r4s 44 -6 7�i tr! e? i "i c Ir Cijo: LO. �; c:rpl: C4 A 'i M 4 L ul to,m m, M t Ln M LD 'q q 015 PI to in' k 1LA, '. LFI: -o d'.4:,VQ;QiQ; d d c;! o 0 Ln Ln Ln Ln H r4 am, I" m mi ql M :%n to;to I '!d N of LAI op, i Z c v v v v v v v Zv d�5 S T) a v, o _v Tv ev ov ovL V !V; !T: -1 c 4 . G cs 10 V �dljd o j mil A en kn; ull m: ei C' ini q:K! mi Lni". 1�, i tM cs dw. 4i Amlp ,q aj c, 1, ;z m m "I tn' at!m Ln 'n ca Or! O. g � PHIQ 4 9: 4 w �4j,4 'A P! dl t 00 ry ip'cq. M I'd N .1 Ln w!o'%6� 14 6 tn m m:0 3:-l;"-.., rl I,'A r 1.rj: n, 14! ca.r� rl A: cc) eq -41 q t m: ft!ur i:It' 14 .5 rl E Z Ln:ot,Lo� N:X ta t�A rlz%6� 0 oR:ro� oa AIR WN �legq*Z'A'tg;o-lrolil gg c, P, !7:� r M f S t E r m u 91 iF-84 t El G! r E- 2'2 2' 2 2 2:2 2 2 212.E 2!2 xl�42;2!2:21 2 a 0 0 0 Q Q Q 0 to in a 13 Qimf >:a > > > >: 'i 1p W > o a QQ ZZ-0 a Q 2z a M 1, W LU -"I& LL M) i&. tt . -3 '3 E'l 3'31 Bi B �ts:3: 3 3: 9 e.3 cc tB W 0 (D lai 1,0:CO,W.,W;ml Co m,in wi mt, w;Q2, ENE-1: cio e a a rM W W il x %. ul W �v 2`u�u - 'o cc =,m Ir U- E -mi W,I Ji J:in.Intl Go,m.Ca U! q r= g wl 11 co IV tw w x m =,a w w;w W,cc-W:�jjIwjixi mim::w1ml wide:cc xkwjfvx�w: ep.W 'r I p_j_;;_:_ J"Er: F E a. A. 13 Ln co Q at E 3 2 Rl�R..R, r ±::.6 m Ml us� wl p.cc cc uj w w:w w L9cg ¢SygL LLI Vt it 36 24. 1 z Vi X J' mN .-1.ab:W R;NIN.Ip h!N im: H N h 'OI1 w;nll� ��pp m•h "% p� Nti 'N n m Q '�' .+I :T cl h ry 1 wI V1.w;Ni vlm .II}� O1' VJ'R! TI Ki,VlIn;N N �:N'Q SG f'1.TI'NIR 13fM dtr! NJ 11l. rl T W I t J '_ _ ...I 11 I_:. , 1 l I-I• i •; i 1 !- : l I s...j I l.. 1. l : +i0'q1 vQ -4rio;WiS m a,ol .4 0' .4.ri Al d l WT ! 1 jp W kp:w N'N IO N,Q'.D.V r4 'N• 'MIN m N'NI N:N;wivl IP!#4 N: •w tl YI i N H m N N,N •N �? 1� 1V .n N' !N d N Ti IT,N ~ - , d o.6:d.8 8;d;8,� d'd 8+d;p:8rd;a'8'QIB B 8'Bd'cId18,8 v?o.8:8'8,,,; o d d 'a I II I i I i k IN. N Ifl� Ni N�N' N IVI N J vIN.,"�3 $ $' IN.E ;v' g;$Iq'BE.S B'`3 0l� 9 E''oI 8"$;8: 'o a c a :•" a d I d dl I o' pk I 8 J ry d i I{ i j I J I t o rn 'sZ ` riiN '` ° ^ Nn i ° , I 4N:m. try l° IVT• 'p ID'InM' , Qm0Otry A'-wY'.+IO,.Qm. .: ad N19 M; N N hOci d 1; 4, , d .i IdFd],.i.o ' a 'T. �.�I I 'Irl�n•o,�'r'In:nimlwm.Nl Wlw'wiNJ�i�iWiW �.m..+!n :e.rl r .4 �'.I..w °4•m .4 .4 01 .4 Ci'd m,r .4,m:?IId 0lj�'!•h'n ,y'a: 01 w0 a' -m.p N . .';'ri,d .•! ""'"I,-i..il«f w•d .i d'G?d:did .i.C,p.d Q!.ald}o _ r . a ja`aZ:0.Z:�'�' r° d z ziz 2,Z=Wall^IC:dld;^'IpI"Iy;dl of Zl pj p!'"i z:2l z�zldi Zl Z;�.zl2:x.2 I"I d d ; d .. 'p C •i R:16'In NIf�;Wlf�i.Y1.W cm;rl • `Inr,n'm 4OlM R-�'N?11710'ul'N mlw 7•!� R. i01' N E ' . n n m.o„m R �•aJ a! ai .•lp10! M TI,n'n N:m:,-1. n; •la•m{m,wla.w.Nln n '^ a.a w N'w ,n v viIN,T Itiivla ;n ui N. I - J: 11 � I � m m'.O1jN Ml eqE m% ml nl.m ro .M m:aJ �'q:m a°S,a! .a ^!!n.l+3 v, p l e1 ••e,.•1 R,r`_'41�''� ry YJ Q o T'aR Y1' 1^� rl � c ' •NI.•< N,W. iW�.i!".-iJO T'wj ml Wi';.O,/n' O'ai 6jfo C;p'Ol W'o o:d -4�d N- .w d. �• . .��. m tl1 ~ �•!� N N:d C w {CI-M � pip. •'GIO d,Nin `my Oi MF �!QO• Nlpl$ d;w:w?o . o o:did d . lo•of o:c oJe p'4r d' Ci,d'd dld• jf':vl O! IvCV O'VIv didJ G; IOp Vi ti d:v. ;Gi v' +d; t ° Io.p 818�8j :81E;d18 0'8 8 818'B"+3 41:8;8 8 8 8;8 8 Bi8t8 E'9i819, 'oio "- y j ; w i j_.t._ .I 4 , j ;- ;.p! r l '_.i..l_ I.I 1 S f I• I O N Ric n:ln•Q p•1nI y1'Ol Ol�ls}I$ P snj m'p a; b T N'C1!IIN::V-b b �; SIN•c.Ei:m Ioj~ �;N:1Ni•vl��4V:N.� A' d ri.Irtn Blf' r w• I {w .+ olia'..•1,-�'ti:w w,ad .•� ni .� W .�.... bi:dlj '�' O. w: rwr W .�, 'rl n�n m m �!�• e� {php X10 `� Arl n,rl n '�. �•�:O.a!�F ro 'O �Q \ :Or l0• 1=` p Ia.0 81 1 �: 1 1e•v�I C _ tic ♦2 r�`+I m �.�N�1 1e,\�. 'G.Q� W.1'�I C \y N!�In �ry\��i�1Vf..Ty f0 m �. - Eq ,•'I-.�.s: bi Ni e+'�. .1•:OI W;'�'..r.1.`� .mqi Ni�irR�N N1 N'..N`^�:N.N'_`\�''+�i �i .2'�'' 4 IA rv: � �I �'.��I�' �yl ,Qi\I�\.p;��i'•m 101.4. _ S ,� o N 1 1 mI'Qimlm3rj0oim�^f l I I� al I jj^i°°I°1.�„I.w ,Nf Ivinl�,en;m�n� 1.....�1 1 i 1 3 �o + �S Q ' E ! 11 I [ I I ! T R V .—mac m � o - J � ! c ro ro O l I � I I I � I I I '• s j I ! i j � II I I I � ! I I � ;,�'.g s' � � � roi' i N L �:�I�I`�I• i im 0100 QA, jm:S S f,0;1310 g!o -,010. 0 0' ago a n of al n,o�a. a;o!nl o�ta;ra; Q!pl a,a- oo y .0 .c ._ ._ y zr;'I� -�.�.?i?!y Z'� a.}>>i} Z;Z �,?:> �f ! > a.2 �` z I I lyld €, c d n © © ola c10r0�0!a;n.OIO;P._0:0j0:0.pin d:a 121 0:oJ0 � n;a o a;�;n• ro.a.a. E Sc = N .- .� �'LLLLWiLL K.4�.�4.W. .LLY'{L. :LL•W:LL'LLiyy,, iL11L1�L;-4.•LL'�,yy 1►-1L yu. "LLIW I �j 1 p V U U V .M..it LL'K:wtk:LL LL:LL,I{.•LLJW W:4i LL 16•K:K I ap 1C a- •P CCy CI CY 7:7'0:7:7.7:7.7 717:y'7t7 SIM, 7.77;77.7;7 7.7.0 J 7.7 7�7: J:id;a!!J J•J SJ.J J J•J.J'.J!J JI J'J J J J'J, g A I C w W 1 s r mlmtm.m?m;m:mpmim{m'm'm Jm�almSmm,m,�.�';�Im'm m.�' m.m In.cm,m:m' l a x C y o a -O 0 0 o:d;n.�'o:o?a'a al a:o'o;o a'.0 870;of a:a a•a O;nsn 0t0°Q o 2 m m d a u W W; W1411W! WIW: W,W W_W W W,WI I J�� •d':aC:aCi aC:Y'GC:ae:alac;mem{m.x•rc;ra;'o�;W'V�.x�m!m id xi W, ad ac:xi¢.mp m.'o�' s �n a :2 £' g `o_ d c c d ,Jt JI J�J Jr J• J• J,J:J•J3-J}••JJiJ IJ J:J IJ'J�J .-I.J.J.J- , _ m,m.m.m;mim!m'� ml m;m;m! rm?m mj�:m �; ;m_m!�.m m,m m m,m m :6.s. -fit ? E E u m a'a a,aC:Ix;an!c•Clmlae;(C;aC:aC aC:e a.Klmla lac aelxraeleClaCiK m!aC:a:oc:lle:a; ! .4;0. a.a!E ro E E E E y; ? pi I ' , 1 I O10'O Oi pi 0'01010 O?Oi 0?O:0,D.0i050 0 RI a' - g' 1 I r I C•.C: E, . !> I � . ; W :o ¢ daIr ro: WI WiW WIW WI WJW Wi WIW W W,W W:W.W W,W W W.W'W; W! ! m d. d b w _ — — re 111 Sa I '_�:$a �I�1 egg! I�{SSaa 5 q. �i24a12' i t m `� a s75 c II>Cj Uli Hill ```••• a� «ii v V d x v�i�, f�I w = ,J Olim fyNl mm!V r0�t0�`fiQ!n�N{Nk Nl m!rl wi N'nI�[^nl m'01ta� O N H N rl IIIN /Y.QI'm'1C'A.'4•A'Wi p� �!M, I !m� d M NrV m rJ W .••1 1,7 1p m°A.N:mI NI N_fril�.W,N:OI.N m'nl W I � f .I1 V1I � � H. Ip � I iO,y}r M1 i -� •----:OI, I ,W } C J N'�!In'.A W n'M l co;�.pl;N!00 Irl MI 'a. .p+ m,v'."" .nrr W N,� co; V V'N'WI m: Y.^;NI Win �;wlry0jy 1J •NI IA'yyn d1!N'lO N! •I m�OAi Ni ml m� 'wle1 tNi `N!ppE w:' 1 I 1 i S � '•r`..{.. .•. G m -A;n lO 00=10 N e ln'>VwN m rD I e,N'1p:10:0' '10; .di Ftl- o Y G O'p ti O:O Q m G G'© .•i;O,G!d'ti'l f r4'0'O'O O' •m.G!O' U ! ,r n v `I$ ra'c'lmo to 7 s f4 {k v!'pjmjm'v`n'nrm'n:uli;l^;Iin N a. p p. G r O 1 Gi O� 4 O O W:O O .Ri` .o:C, O• !m Wle m AE Im• pFw+ u! ul I ^I I .N. . . vtM N rn a m;mi,�> I°rPiim! E n:m'al w l0,LM 'o rl.A ; 4i O!` 10 4 ! r O O-,ti;rV .ti en.'4 p ri, W'C�p•Gl ril W: 'mr.-it Oi I I I i NE J Yl•'.4 W I 'M m Q 1113 m i 'OO I m E to 'n -� O- b m Q -p r H,m tn,e In; G mj N O L O r-i;N H .-i "1 H N N � w ti'O O!.-1 rl'W.W�O O,p..i: ,� rIj _ ro 'giC? N! O•. r0 © O p p C];p C?� W •a CS ©.G 000 4 t7 O C:o! ,pe Oy30i CI GI VI V v. V v� iU:0I0 E M j N:W:W m•N;�'m. i I�' I I I m ? { F. ,1 .•q •.-1,r•e:H M.N.N' .•1: I A W.p1'rl W I �+1 1 ' 0 o:o s n i o d o v v c G p{ v v v v v i c5 v 's f 4,pY 9; 1 I 1 m M!r4'0t m Q to M'tin%m x.41 1 ,` Gls m{ N. �' C tp N W'et H m CO r0 Ql,OI O A: {Or G M y r lW tO n ID N .7 Q 4 Q lO i t A "'I•m,m N W1.m 4- 6 W H 1 U O O G Q p C M 0 CS d O i on I pI y •C �' �V.A3 m:mi mm'm N; o`b rv.rl rn• .a mire m m.n o m?v 00r c1 o m m ml m Im 1 ep'm rn m m:? •T m e m ca nlA In:A Q:oOi lain v;W,py .np. a d 5:0 0 0 0 0 o ri n a c;d ol0 4; oio o;o, J, 'Ln i.•'I•W I iN,p]�N'. IOI�uIIm m C n r4 m.m'n':W m Q' T N. p,mr ! I 7:r.i v vl V1 *0 m �p m eq,mi A.W•0.m:n,C' 1 O Irl.IR,nj i M 1 .•1 ID-m.Kr'..1 dl 00 A mi^''a .+'w:m,m;Cy}N Nr IC1 to r; m! ! { i i i , cc I l • '�' 3 I I�s m C ••+ Wl1V.m'H1n rj!m Clt lrl?Yl!N�01l N}OOi rvj m!,..I'W ml mj vll , -1,n ry.o! 4 a 1: e c m M In•lol6,rir� `"' ; I IN.QIa, 'In:oijI € ! E � N m'n'ry m.m O y m .i Neil ! I r M'rvin ' to ,P.o.m-1r•� [Qr`1FmM.'C3- r! �eWA•.eoNl'r GNoNir�mp kk�'r�N �Wl,:m�mlI0.p..iii•.pC�.l�Oe;`N�j°'o�eml:i{ --ry E�: « H .Y " ' chi W4 W 1 9: �-IjeIt CL 0 Ln OI 'LnR:0 n -1• u -L.i =' * vt Q rn.. i m oll.� W W ;e 00jw.W; Z Yro o C = xo 8�, ',t pi m r __j1j o U' I ! t F I ! .v N �I G jm` m tDr c 4 xi`y,=r gin. 3 m a' c'2�I— j R. :.,, « Q� m; -.•S G:ti:l;. 3 old:tz'o n c a a a�c!o c�©,nln!nini0 o a c�a' n 0:0 o o a o o x o:o o:o?a= a'a o' e' ma kik-,w!: £ ro o a;o a o o o a'n n o!� c�s`c o=ar$:a'ak� n + r; o dt 'aI! °: ° 3 3:3 3 3 3 3,3:3',3;3 3;3;3:3;3 3'3 3 3 jam, c i+ x z z Z z z �:r Z z z z:z z z z•z z{z'z 21z �, �� ��= $ c1 a 3;ty G 000ao.obO•o000ro00'a;o�nlxoolo ; ro' Q- � �''33 X33 O O.� O'O n o O o o 0 o•olo n.n olo;oio ;O'n' I _' =r 0 �i m '! ems; u.u:u:u uiu u.0 u u u;V:u.0 u'u urV:u u:V!V �' IE �'� -2 �tro. a. ro; w °1' CC•OC:w-'w w4 a:miw W.cc 14W ati d"j d'':d'l a•<L^ c�.i cc ce aC] ; Ifl� ��{ui--; c I �;ro;Sl C c v 0 'Z•Z;Z Z Z'z•2;2 Z Z-Z'Z�Z'Z'Z.,ziz'z�z:z!ziZ; le m!'};�im d 1p�eCi a V V V'u u;V-V u'u u u'u u u'Vru.viv,u:ulu%u i ro:�: +' S 1 i Q`ro• c: m'm' ro' E Etc' E E ©-p.A•0'o 0 o'O nln nrA�A10.q'o.C,C•C1 01=I0; :o,.:al.! a o o.O<o°o•o o;o. of$.o,of of a;$1 # c; ,�'z c{C,•s;2 §! 3; 8; 3 E 3 33'0�y'0 3 3 3 3'x3`331313;3 3'33i c %�l8io• m; of Z + I } r im'm; 'i a'a Z. z'z:Z z'a z' z;z'z;z nc;z,zi a•a; I M.m'a 4 z E m.G'=' c{ c e c wO Oro D O a O,O �,a O.O:o O oio.0ioia O O'Oi_'...'_.�_..�_iT'3w La1 _d{Iu a 000'o'oa000000 on:n;ono -- n u u V u u u u u u V u c� v u u u V u.0 u u• u INj�1 'm rsl ��o' 1D•n� W� 1D;N m•n.ry-N. 'm "2iN P",4 e -N N:m, ;N.o•°.�inrw im m'n:o•oIW' e� o=cic3., ciri o ..[w 'v oi.r;Nj.;, [oio i _. .-. .., 01:M.W I ln�1`r`10 .�,mJ m mr'•1!011 A:T, ..j��_..=.I_'I_^.._.�.w...L..l.. .. ... i I WIN mfw o,w m,ml n4;.r:v,�;v w• In;-+ lw M.o� N i3 fold o n,t� cS 'p 6. 6i0 o,oloiclMl©too'o miojo ! I I nf; N' N! 'n 'w'm NI ',1.Nid1• i I } !N. I , t ' o cic` o n•g.o gip`olo 4�:p; 01 a'a a;a r N' : in Fi'iovi$IpjoY!oYloY>� $:8,$Fov�8r,8j8 avi`�ri8!$ '' 3c[doi I rV N w.m'NI '4:Ln! f "S" ol25rE:i IS: B'8;8 8 818' �Q oloi":�l Mo�c" S i 4 p. p p p p p p p p p ' f V:V� Vj$�QVI V�V�m V-VI V�V YI V'V�41 Y•Y'Yi VI V V O[QI Q....._i._.. 1 E"-+- --•------•-"."_.[ [ i -��}}• Inn 3 'N,CO;wr m N{Q do t A'N in:Gf m!C1 m tr� N. en Ch t'•1: w N N; m N m'ri.M O'm'm N N,w w l w•N;N i m to i N!Irf' tm M e w: . h s �g;o4c;a=c c c [iso `?;a'd'o{did16.6o:a c,o Id 6I6E 4 � I � f ij . _- - - - .... • --._ ....--- ; Ln '._mN..•.M_.•,._�, L.VW NiI '_i,N ,noIoa-og!0.0.9 Old. 0' .,...'{ ;1 ry is 'd�M ,n:Im W!r4:n to •m: '00'�Ol: N!n!a.'Io :Cl rN. . �n;u[ e4.m ^ .11m;o "t. .M m:c.°4 m n N rlm t+ ,71:m. ;cm: • 4I 1d!Nf.-7�04.•i•N ri N m tiIW ri e•ii fir,r+•+;a: . C7 -✓<= ..�et i N'n'Ch..4 m!m Wl m=Gf'rl min 14:Ni Nt.•4 V.10'n;1D Y1•�:W ' 0 y ^2!°4 girR4-qIN.mirq iD[v:n n! .�;m v P:•rn 'rl:.+•N,olo: ftM:ln'p. N Z -W.p.w w�rrIrl1a-m.C7:c',o w wir-{•.•i re:r'i.•,,.-i r l.5 + ' I C, •Z Z ;Elz.zlk z�zkzjz:z,Zlz xjz{zixlzlolz'z, I lois: o C1 It N•m:n'mim 141 r-, ln' :M.M w 1 N:NI d1 N. , ! i ! h rl:N'N',w a},N �p I • N �umi'Oi a:ry'� n:M{nl Vl m'O A`Om,'R•A +N's.mid .-Vcgq� IIM C4 .N, ��,�I i? , - G !N m`C7:'r'i:hl OE.4 ad c; C:wiJ ri:G Io�r�e'ri;.sl a=C-4 1MiA G. m�m1W m'g �:��m!.y',wi m:n FM1e -,• i Id{ 'N{g! t W :c ,nlNiol"$:o �'C:C. ;N o� alolc oloalc;c.d o 0 1y!c $ Pi{vj8, {^ afo Ip 1��`p4i.Nw:ppp;MrgpD'mifnl8'mIap apo ppp4"'I ,rmr�!aWi[g1 �'O[�, jw'emn'�ppr �81a G O!s5#O.sl:gG.Cfl C10f [Q cVr;o�o 010 a`o;o� o� o �;r�;ro,o:�3,©,a,g��j�j$; �o,d4oi Nrin.o-o o;Ln m O! 4 k m Ira'1`N �.mI;�I1�M!r1! ti ryir�i lv '°j:Y !Ri4 '..IIa'n 4 pjs:r'!;45 v E I.W.It rW.i.`d'/;n: !ei•.o0 ,w•1', �I�,1a�O1 10�f1101't7i, �!. i00 ' 7. a• Dt f ;_ m NI y� N Ni O 4 G: ql n 9: G: �06N I�Ip1p`�I�.�iq„�,,;W�,m„I Ni N:raii Wl d'e•Ir 0 vl. la"~ :•W.N:�Q-�W,n"'�.0•w:r� , m.L" •,.N:N. { S j� 3 U U O. ww.wj I el m�w .•11 i f ? 1 O �. =7 . M E c o 'Ci m o iI E I o iu N -c •� - r a b 1% x' LL � °= '. IQ , !I1j! 3 Ij j vlin Cr0O O,QO. QO o 0:0 !in 0:0 [0 ?00 h 0'0,01 j 310;0;0'0 O O'OIO;D 0'o'010:a 0 3!3i I3'3{3' 3j . g -r: m 'uCrd` v o u IX auIza z! . ' . 231 ;o{ a a lsc! . i 0 OJig O Q 0;010 OO:o'O4uuuu-u 0•00 g e r ,o a W ocG u, 3' �oc eC'sx m as a� e:m1a=�'oe!ac;oc;ockoclx cc!mlm s. 1 Q a " g o _41.1 "a 0' �z+zla�z{z z[ �z: ziz!z;zjz.zfz(z{z ztz xiz i i m d } E E E E lulu u ulu,u!u u;uiu u utu'u u.0 u,u!u�u�uSu I 1, ., 6 .Q'QI Qi A p� O OSp �y d Qi b�OI O!4't] Q'Q]i I [ { 1a:6 a 'a C,a' 4 M ro O O 0 O O` m' AO{ '&O'l Q¢ O;O1Opp1p OIo o p tp j( 1 l e c = c: d:t. ( 0 3 o;OI 3G3i 033133'8 9i Oi o�0i 33I OtO O'Oi$[`b',D '$.6i�� + [ i I ; 'a w' u n A 4 �' a a w a 71: iii]]] � L. �•• {O� �O•I�0:• yO•�,gyp••l 'Ca 2 o o c o i 1 l -p� 1"• "F' '. r �'_._ ...............��,� W.� 10 m m 0 • L p o $ z M: m wz4 ,0 zzzz Table 3.Sa[rafnen _ tofk"ratHzwfiltan ,PaF11D(2 . .Oi1.N d. Tat.$ Ob-twid Too OD1Wed Tout 017LdWd TaLll Dh,.K,.d Tmar Ck WFid Taal 'Aluminwa AkdnbWM Ant,* I Aa4nlc :Cadmium rAdmkl rw9mt4m Chi-m ro wt 61OWr kp+ Il:r Wn. -A '-.pafL. ,0671, _:.-- --. y8/l 3127E will 44)L Iw, Pd7L 1,64 SIa1nA INr11e •_„_ - SACRAMENTO R A"1M1170NC1E1'.......- 193.. rUA.. ,eQOal N!A P.44 NIA 17N Nln SACRAMIN7O RA11AMLLTON[11Y _ ILB�pi 7�d16 +_,.NIA... -..1-rfA... _.�1L!L.._ '_....SLA_. ..NI,A�,_ ,.9X0.0.. XM A NrA N!A /'J+ .84 W Y! 110 _ _.,rJ1A 9999 JBl_,--,,;._.SYA_ _0.017 NIA 0.61 N/a 1.67 N1A 1:.: - --•- 1 20.7u' MIA 194 •N/A ? 1.36 NIA 0016 NIA 0.7.i WA 3.6: up% 171 SA[RAMIN70RAHAMILTON CRT 9999. .-. _ _. 99_99 .'.0/TIDI J_..... ._ 9999. . - _ SACRAMENTO RA.NAMILTONCITY ,000[041005 l45 115 13 -,1.53,,,_,;-_D.011 a9ADB 0.4 .'r2 J.af 9.i 171 ...-999__9__._.------- 9_99_9. _. _ SACRAMW7011.�HM31lTON CITY .••. _S1Hf6171�'IO - 735..-;.,,361.....�2i4. „752_ :40112 N.o,0,7 1 1 -,ass � 1.77 35.5 1074 _......__._....__..__.._..�-_..999_9. -. Ll[RAM[NTO RANAMIITON COY_. _9999.--.9999 ._ ._.._. -37J71M?0•.10. .-.250_�,..37.5 � „7.3l, .. ..2951 �_e0.012 ._,0.034 -, DSO u.41 0.55 O.r3 {4,Y � )� SA[RAMENFORANAMILTONCRY 1/[01,0572:75; 352 413 3.4$ 1S3 .0.031 � .0.007 1.06 I.a. 148 Lai 135 44; SACRAMFNTORAHAMILTON CITY - ,,,, ,, __--„,. ,. 2-x..?3+_----773_- AGA :_,_I_/]__,; ]51 _ �.Ol!-. mO65 1,67 _ LRA 1.53 ,7-73 715 7){ ].29 1..3•J 34A 1-37 .3.34 7LA SACRAMFMO RANAMILTOM COI' !010105 7:30 13 79.7 _. _. ._ - :._-....«1. .. .SACRAMENTO RAHAMRTON COY 1{30!05,!200+ ]S9 39.3 1.99 299 m022 m009 3.67 1.03 1.13 1.25 11.1 SSu . ..•... .-. . 6666 3.66 _ 5.11_ .167 71G 100'1 SACMMIMN R,A NI1M1tT0N CITY.....__.. .. .... ...............51=79/049,30_�1177} ..-._...:.., 7.17 m.OS6 5LOt 219 IPA 9999... _... SACAAMEN70 RAXl140lTON CRY r____ -�•,,; 6•__7:8 i_106 _3 323-.,- 037 � 136 a0.0P9 @Ot2 D52 1.1 1,15 1.t 13a 14: F999_9. - SACRAMFMO R A NAMLLTONCRY '7�26�DS 12:M_- 465 j_..71d 1.71, 134 KO.D31, ,0.907 0.61 -tl 69 0.73 0,81 .t.s l 178 9999.-.-.. _ .._J _... 0.•. w.. SACRAMlN70IIANAMLLTON 4T1' ...-.. O/7�[OS 11-M' 14.2 •..u;6_.._iJ9 ,-_ 1107. ,?0.009, ,0.016 046 0eA OAA 1:3 ._.__ .....-__...7 -. 511[AAMINFO RA NAMIL70N 00Y - 9�17JC334.W: 27.7 . 986 013 iw3 _ 0.007_ ODl1 OS< D.a 0,65 ____....._.........-.,_-_._ 1.+ WILAMEMO RAHAMRTON CRY ;1065 .- if19_' GLs ]34 156 -m009 m.009 063 0.71 .1 ]1 771 . ._.._......._......._....._.__...--99_99_....�... -_9999_.. _._-'-- "'__"_ - ... SILCIW!FMOIIAHr11+!,LLTON C111r •11(JS(0511�'�90i•�308__ -67.6 , 081 352.--md09_,_,0.01! 079 O.6)_ 1,07 l.7 7.. :C7 _.....J...._-__.._.._._. ..._...__....r... -.:..LW_ Z. _ W.OGG _0906 079 ae) 0.91. 4d.f 2.6 51] S3.CR�ILIENFO GAHII,A!RTOII.C_IIY,_-'--'---... !12L351?�.1u65 .b,57._.D__ 36.7 , OA34 0.092 7.F! 9.7.1 2107 112 i6'F :753 SAUUMlN70 RA NAMIITON CRY _. _.i 3141067.10 666 .1 3167 i,.. 1.61 735 .. 709... 1x47 ,DDll, 0D12 351 ]a 61 7.y3 11.1 9)3 1A[RAll!FNrp RILNMu1TON 01... .• 9 999.... 9999.._ ... 2/22/0612:{5_:-. 227 733...+_. 13. !-,_lA7 .._0@!_ DA24 ]1B 27a 1.13 2.53 -e75 971 ___ LICRAMENTOAAHJIMRTON CRY _ ,,,._ __•_.. - 511/06730 3687 1955 .:__1.3fi 1.65 •0.071._ .0.!187 4.99 105 1.16 11.5 ]77! +.110 7ACRAMlN10aANM11LTON CJIY .,,• - 4/171066100 ,,-931 : 2119 005 110 �. 7 1 e0 54 S.7 ,1 ] F ,731 &4R SSG 7 m ..9999 .. .. SA[RAMlN70AAHAMILTOU CRY •,_,_ 5/1.7,(O6,k4G�-16]_,- ,.?65.......1.41 157 _ ,ml.-__,-m1 074 J.2i ,.1.75 ,1.49 111 256 .. .. 9999.._�. .-...,-_--.... _. .-.......... _ 9999 , SACMMFNTORAXAMILTON COY..____...9999_. ,9999 _ 6f17.(D_66:30.i...2m _346 __ 31T 1� X9.1 <0.1 0.72 J.25 1.09 1.49 bs.A 746 T/,3s/%S!m.,,.=!5 1 576 j 7.01. _1.37... 3 "m.1 0.92 JA: IA 7.66 jar) A& _.,177. ;,_�,S.15 ' �m1_. m.1 0.67 0.71 004 1,51 710 TM 3ACMMFNTORAMnM0.76NCITY. __...._...__,. 9999.. _._ ,..0�1'�6;�____1�. ?� _ I 6.30 591 ._067„„j, ,177 ;. IsS-,- -,.�1, W.1 061 t.ii lAl ].Fd 11c e7a SA[MMEMO RAHAMNTONCITY___.�_.--...• -,f1110/�_:. _ I .._..__. LTO 9999... SACMMINSO RAIIMIRTQN CRI' _ Jg20(067='_ ]fiB, ,20E ..0,659 537 m1 ,_m.l 056 D2.1 0.75 069 .SACPAMENFO lQi. 10.1 052 s9 7]Y =" ... _. .. 61_l .SA[RAMEF1rORAHAMILTOXCrtY 7/RS077:15 i 6 17$ '., 205 _7.73 _ ..m1 ,x .0.1 0966 ns•I WD.'i 101 adz r!:.. _9999 . .._ -_•-- 9999._9999 99__99_ ._____. SACRAMEN70 RAN10�I1LTON CITY „• _ .._ 3 717 610 7 14.00-�,!7$•, - 657 1.11_ _ _ift _sRl 44.1 A41 1.9: 1.41 34 597 5P• .. .. _._. -....,. ...•__-.. ._...... 9999 .' _ . -9L6� �-2.17 736 407-� •@.1 0.41 0.71 111 1955 16 j. 1.'•I 311CRJDAFNTO RANIIIUItIfOH CRY - __. .. _.___. „3170!0>630 : 16.1 „ _ .'.._. SACRAMENTO RANAMILTON[fTY.__9999 ._ _._ 9999 i1lT�D17:3D_E,�-12.8 97... 193 19a. ..�1 .0.3 AI3 0.55 1.Sa _ 1,d4 IJ.a W%s .. 9999__ __�.. .._......_.... SACRAMENTOgAXAMIL7ON CIIY__ ...99_99.. .. 9999_ 5j2970772ai ,_1.71 _37.2 ..•19 711 _90A. .. a1 0,57 6.77 11G 163 a.G 734 SACRAMFN70RANAMIITON CIIY, __--,__,-, ,•,__ 6/M(-07_!230--,611_ Sal___,- 16,.. .67, m1•-, A.1 032 , 0.73 - 1107 1.39 11.4 T71 "-----' .0.3 017 0.W _1;35 _ .1.53 47 JR, SACRAMENTORANAMIL70N QTY,- _ .... ..___. 99_99 . -.,7f]RfO7 TA0 !0.B ]1{ I 3.62 1.69.. _QI _ .. -.-.- 9999 . ._ _ .-. -SACRAMENTO RAHMAIL7lM UTY .. . . _ 9999..... 61Se1D7 i:OG_-_._ ... ,..492 '._..7157.. ...15E• m3 W.1 045 0.5 ...0.97 032 ,raj b52 ._ .-...9_999 .....__......_ _.._ ___.. •MCIGMLNYO pA 1111MILTON CRY -___._.-_.».. 191/!(0710:30: D45 .-n = ,_A . u a Oil. 0,1 ACRAW!NTO a66 13 7 ._. ......_............_._--.._._9999 _ SACq.MENJO RA NAMIL70H CIYY 9999_. __. 32:351 - _ _ - - . ass aAB'._ -IDL 7.77..... m3 me 049 0.}3 3.0.7 A-1e 74 la. I9999. -- ', � .. SAMMENTORA HAMILTON COY....._ .. ... .. ' 6(6/0613:05_._-9256. ...as,3_ ' -234, 2,16 a01 '..N.] o.JS ae7 1101 1.11LA7 tat lJl •SACMMFNrO■ANAMIITONCITY � .8�6•_(069;W,.,! ?: ..s.._Ta 16._ ? ... D47 90.51 11.90 117 1697 Ra �SgCR�MEHTORAHAIMLTON CFTY _ _ 11J3(O67A70"_ 10._2 ! 956 ,,_ ,7.06,-_ 2907 m.1 _ aA1 0.71 0.51 191.0 l_5i 161 „'„' SACRA11LN r0A AHAWITONCfTY•-��--.•---_-- ....�1tA1Q6]0:10'-57.3 3730 1.67 _ ,41137 ea] -W.l 047 7nr 2.W N77 mt.6 LD SACRAMFNTORANAaN174N CRY BSO ..710.7 . .205 __'1093 m.1 0.l5 i.l. 3:11 3909 tL:. 4:r .SA[MMLNFORAHAMIITONCRY 61131D98tO_,-_WS .15.1 ,....137 326 -,--- - t0.1 0.16 0,411 O.RN 1.05 ..73. 1,•..J . ... ....._.._._....___._._.______.�..-...._.r_.__._..._..__._... ._ .. _ 9999__.. 9__999. ., _9_999 .SACIG1d[NTORAH!IIWLmNCfFr..,-.-._...___._.....9999,..9999.. ..'.1 ? _;._.?•9!.__.....4�.., ..�1b1.- .-i:?4... 9_10!9..».�-1 0]6 0.49 9..2.1.1 1AS 171 313 _ JACR!!M1NTq f1AHA1NlTON CRY ...... ._ _ 71?li0 tl_AL5_x._72•,-99_99,3/D '. .fA?_.. 3..9 ...Q:?.. ._m;l. .0: 1.6Y __1:76 3;55 171 363 SIICRAM[N30PANA1RLLTnNa']h'_...__..._.._.... ...__..514110-71/5• }0.7 . 160. '-.,.-3.51 .. _-SdS... ml ml Q47 05'7&SM 1.55 2.3 _ 111 ...730 9999__.. _ - SACRAMEN]ORANIIMILTO31L71Y ..,. L(5Z1fJ 12N0. 7.95 719? 1102 254., Oa7 1:171!S ISA 11.3 ........... . .__-•9999.. ....._. _9_999._. _9_999 9__9_99 .- SACa;AMENTOR NIIEI[TOM__Q�Y•........ _.._._ .._. _._.._ 'MOW.,_!.5!. - 6710 1,..3107 7.06 ._'0.2„9999 ml 096!7 1;77 1.35 1;',E 152 170 9.999 - SACRAMlNTORANAMtkTO71ClIY +3:6 -L9 1.%__ -_tel_ 1091 043 0.5'• SA Lal G 593 111CAAM[NTO PAHAMIL70N COY..-_..._ -9999 9999_' 5/3/11835 -3•�-.._-.-7�_b.,; ..L6. __1.73 _�l _ X0.1 OAS 0.74 ]e 1.;4 n ;a --1--. . :SACMMFMORAt1AMRT0X CITY 6(71_136.10 ;_?16--,- __359,-.:_„_1+�1_•,�__1.yS,,,, m1 --eQ1 065 u.7,p 1.]1 i.?e .1 J'XL _ sarA1111LNTORAHAMJL7ONCIi1' _..-... _9_9_99...__ 411�1f118;0.5.:_. 56. -915-- _-1]3 ._.1SB .....•eIIl� a0.1 06+1 O.Ti ,•0;95 L/f al 1Z• SACAAMLXTORAHAMILN71CR1' _. _ .-..» _, 1,0.031126:759.,_•176 .-,._176. 3.9a. _ t.i._ _.01 ...<D.1 057 01. 1 107 4a.F +1:: SA[RAMlIaTO R,AH/;MATOM,CRI'. .. .. . . 9999.. 518/J763Q .883 725-.: ,242 1 2.104 ml ••.0.1 D.3 0.4'• 1a. 191.7 )lh -SACRnA]LNTO RAMAMIITON CIIY ' 0/7/1?$AD:.. LI--,...2&a._ ,_125, 1.76 •�•_<0.1-. „-.01 Pit9 0!e 0.67 )91 31 IS I SA[AAMEMORAHAMR70N,U1Y .. 31/6!179135 IL$ ]75 IA9„ t _ 2.17 W7 _-0.1 037 0.7: _ ).3 163 ..,...._..... 9999.._. 999_9-____..�_..... sACMMORO RANAMfLTONLRT '„•7151138aS 3.6 177 1.98 7 .al .0.1 037 071 ].1 1102 M. I_1 9999 _...- SALMM[I.RORIIHAAFIITGNCITY_.. _9999_..;._'�l>'0 '....i._.t?:1.. .,?9^.5.-.: L71t. " 'I. 77- .0.1_.�. -A O!! DSI ,_SA7 035 ]2b 'SACRAM[H1'O RAIGMrLTONLIfY -.•... �616/1T 730 LOS .i..,-}O.- i_.11� u$ :_m1 .0.1 .015 061 SOS] 0.86 4.3 101 OA8 O :SA[MMEIirQRAHARiLi'1'GNCITY --- •-...__...•.•I 1715(]59,30 .2,69. 241 2.05 7.17 Al.- 10.1 0.39 S D.A7 1096 YSS W.1 0.52 1.31 ,.0.72 OAS 5.7 16.: MMLNTORwNAMBTON GIY Sf_61L18p3A-,____��_._ 177 „3„ 2!s t9 RLl 00.1 1 0.77 0.2h 1102 ,087 1091 7a6 .. S+ICRM/[NTO 6AHAMRTON 4IY _(Yl A950 091- 18.7 197 ,� 212 m1 _9.] 0.24 D.S, 0.71 OB7 73 7.4 1 1 OT. D 1]1 ra ;SACRAMENTO 1tAHAM�ITON C,RY - .._ .._.„„.._ J?/e:cn 7.57 074 710! - 212 �P.] _M.7 010 1. _ a. 7 - 7 171CRPMLX70 RAHAMl1T'ON C]IY _-- ,7/10(]99:90 111 _ 3960 _ 1 214 ml .07 0.33 5.: 190 5. bl.: :lx SACRAMENTO RA HAMILSONQT'F 151000 209,• ,47.1 076 lal m3 -_W7 c5 0,6N 1.7 I'M 9_999 _.__-......,.._._...--•-•�._._.__......._._..I.;1i�...__ .. 9999.. 99_99. .- *CRAMENTORAXAMRTON 'e_(SI 2530:7.0 i LI.. 3Z2....-. .?:65.__.._1•n.....fix....�•�.1 037 _ 7.a! - 0'18 I.IFi ll.i It... li ..w..... _, .._.__9___999_.._..__-. Y..._..... 51CMMENTQRANANLLTON_CRY 99 9 9.-..-.. .._. -.. ... 111 17,511:27 J_ 17.6 _ 10.9 2.107-, 2.6I mi W.1 943 all 0.77 a u.!4 !2.6 W.r SALRMAEN70RAXAjli:11'ON CRY ._ ». _ ._.. 11311631:10 - 59.1 -_ 352 12s. 7.H 1.15 2la 47.6 fr• . ... _9999._ _.._.--- --_. 5181161215 475 - 363 - ,._105 2.38 �(-1 c0.] 0.41, _ 1.11 - - 5.75 ,3 95.7 I'rl• SACMMENTORAHAMIITON QTY ' ,g181168:15_,;�-SLS,_,,,_ ]D0 I 132 112_ _m1_ m,l O{3 D.SS 176 ].55 485 [lc p SACRAMETerORAHAMILTONCRY. .. 9999 _.. ._111(713611;00.x- 55.3 78 397 1_ 7.1-., _!101_ .0.1 0.11 05 SA0 !:9 5ACMUENTO R A MWILTON CITY ,71411713.6 17s ,10]9,; ,LiG, 167 mf_-]^m.] 057 7,41 1.79 5-78 136 1107 - - ..... ._ _. ...- _._9,999__..__._._ ...«.-. IAnun..• .. .. .. _._._... OW 7;7..-_ SAS.;• OL021, 0.092, 499 149 4.76 ]$.7 25.1 Itlli M601am ° J6 + 915 •„, 1.615,„ ,321 0.034 ',O.Als fI SS _0976 .,1_115 Lag 25.3 Ili .._ -............ .. . .. :._..__.__;�....... + Oss9 .. 0.7E 1.7 7t 8II1 - 1.15,- DAO7 ; .0007 � 0.1 D.0 0S 9999 1 SWRCB amf"PNn-dbsbyw.ur5u.daIC1•Mm!7,MR •SWRCII Baan Pitn•Orlrllbed WrerSundaltls,SecantlnTlVICL,_ _.._ 999:9_.�-- ......_.___.]GO __........_ ._.. .. - - - 'C41 EPA/OEHNA•V6IasAla Wille FfNltA_rJ1W.... .. GOD _ �.. 000x, 0.01 .. - ]1SEPASacatd.ryNt0. 9999 . - - "-• ••- EPA. VIADPuL1O lnerarA4pn1[Ir19LY ritik 4l11rry1a1b7 dANlnB wun ___.. I.... ....._._0073.-...».. T.00019.__ t - 0.97. _.., u5rPAH0anh A&""!brdrlrlklnLw.1A7, . ... ..,.._1 . - 0'M - .. . IREPA 1R6 Roferem 0P3l Orkh111LWaM kl..11h AlMatxlu - 3•l -, _ -[allf4rrw PraoDlR1an65S+Po VlarODr ltwel•Man.A11D+ra66 dastrltnel fd .. ._..._... ...__.. _�..».-.:. ._. 5006. •�$liwltwewalmal�r{J7re.+s-ruw.�+dmmwsneFd........ _.._.�..__.. . .__:..._-._ �.... .-999'9.-- - -.�...__..____.._. 9999_. .. _9999 ..._ . 'XnIDpAl AcadL;•yoiseMeelso'Gde�waa.H.aiurAa61w1FR_.»_„....!.___..__..�.........SO00____.'_-..._.�.�__._.._.-_._...._,,._. . _. .. 'sw1 N�1+OtLi R.wmmer10ed wR emmL�Ta.1..nd_odeww wdfia__.._--- .._ .- 9999-_--!_.-_.._-:._..... .... lr.tr.wt Reaenwnended wO GMWr-mm.an lteagh and WWV Rrwoe+lnn• raLeT rrd fl.hom.wmpu0!1. ._.,._. __AS 2q ..T___. _.__._�.....-.._.__._____.__.�....__ ...___..... 18 . H.TwnM Rllmrnn+47!dadWCt[Iharh�Frphratff AgoaticllhCOn_W!4ao}Cmoallntfen .._e7 - N.ue+W R440mmRM4d 1.000 W14b._Fmhnr.iu AqurtlCilLCMa>amuml:01101RVrtlole•.._..:999_9_9._754 .2. 'tabic-3.SacnimeotD Rivorat Hamilton City,Part2 n[ - .. OIs11.red 7Wr1 Ohraked TIN41 YIrW ,Olclolr[d TIIW .OIcdlYxd: TOW D&Wkxd: TOFF ahsdW Tae( lexd trod ':A"'a°"°k M-P-1 M-MY I0� 16e4i SxLnleh ISe(CtYun; far sorer , 11(Ic inc xrkvw vr•r, I s4rP37e 11.i1S... Pd.L .' .WR. ._W VIAL NA.., 1J4/L. I WVA_ k JAWL. van .8111 Y8/!- 1111.E s Kw,%'ENIO R A n+1.a1TON Op ...._... .. ...11/I R1 Tia;._.."A._'..a�u•--- •`--,....! _. . . A...-' A.-='•I-'�._.!!L^--[ mei..-.W!_: .:.±.N.�• -z.u...' 3/h/0117d1�1. N1A_... Al.-.ry.A_y. .WA_-. tYA .LWT ._ A....:_NSA_.. A .. yA.. aAC1AlAErttOOA WYWeTONCnY ._...-,. ._.. .- ._.. ... 5/715104]59�. _.Ml~ 0027 _'_..WA.....: -WA_.,-..W4_._Lf1_- .....,.417_ ..-- �._. -0.L I../A_. .153.._ yACRAr.15N7URA w1M4T0NCltt ._ .. .-.....__...�i> 7 ...- A +-?Ai_...,..N1A_..__.�_.., _.« Ij6A_ 1.6+1... . 71fA__ ,x30_ NLA_• A.14S Nh z 0&04 MQ .Q01B--i.Rpm-. L?i_ 1 -.A•iV-',.eR?0�_�_!Q97 ... .' .«.•.• QOOt aktta - SSS SAx... WA SI3'A}-' _m.119 0.15 40E6 Aga- RM L ._._-..,..._ , SAUTAMfNTORAt(AMILTUN Ori..._. _ __ >•7f7/A!�trW� <0.01 _',,,UW1,_ -_0.1 A-0 (._WA._.. R57 x39 _60.1 Q]L_' WO1i WAa 435- O.1 :AfltAUl'nYORAkOUA,tTOND1Y -... .... _ ... i119J0'S 12.14'..?•06t-.._.V'766.. u?..-. ,..SIA_-I WA : 1.3.9 398 _E! D,.N_,'_WA01 a0A07 151_' .3.1..1 mc-m%wno R A HAMILTON Cin .. 717/O579Jr. 8079 C.(t0t_..' LSI. ...10.6 WA._ _L07, L53 0.027] 477 0AN O8W 0.95 1.96 I r'rr.AAr."TP R S 11A"I MIN COY .. .. .. 77 7: aD06 OAx9 49! 657 WA,«k..qAT-.._.L24 41x7 A34 r 0.0101 A.416 036 1.06. .; %KRAld6HfPnAnnrtn tuNfm -'- 1100 OM1 0001 lit 603 WA_ 476 0.9< 0.>N 0.M Om .+Rp16.. ..nil X0.75 41701°5-- - -- -'- - i aA!frAM'rsfOAA7L:Nh5Nrrri -__.. ..... 5119/105 F30 0.3W..., 324 7.31 - M_..... N%j.....L71..,�,laz• AnS43 X0537 DA18 OMI 1 . ..15 '••u'•hSll'rfHRA 6!26/05 T:73• 41M09 !00.021- - 6.71 3;17 _IA. 493 1Al _ m,3} sR7S4 4007 A.077 0.6 1.65 SA(RAMI NTO n A 11AYEI tONCrY _-_ 7/S¢j0'j.12. -sAAL4 '.-�O.Ob'�. 416 7.W _.N/A Q_d5_'._�: m•1tS X176 m11G2 �.a! 0.36 QED. - \A(RrhlfNiOnA:rA4Alt1}NCTT. .._._ .. E/NfDj 110•ml!O• 0.61E ._�:.__' 3.1E WA DJ1 L16 4-IY1_'._0410 '_rAC7}•.m�1• '01) 703.. :=f RRMIN}OAA7aA9tTDNC:TV -.._.. . . - 9!x71441000 x0.061 ,O.Wr ask {47 NIT„ IL99 1.15 033 0.11 ? mm1 •.:.CRAMFH7ORANnrxL70H Clri -_... .-. •~• 71jJLUDS I2'AO 0014 _' R61 7.® t1�A� 311 112 all O7]_ 10.002 x0.001 451 101 SA[AAMENlO RAHM4170N L9Y..» .. - _.--..-... 11/15LOS ISAO _0.61_.-0.067_,_._496_-: __+�.-_._�A '. �-.._-L4A....' �SisO_ �afE6 a01W9 A064 - 056 •1.;1_._ _ �. SACAAM[NTORANARgITONCm _... . 17111a1uSS 1L{S• _n006 0013 0.51-_ _x.17._..-. !(M_..,..�_. _..1�_.: -,. 0510`.. ,40.001 60.001.. .Q+"_ . 493, !ACIiehllNronAHAM;L70HCRY _ u. 1(71687:]0.- 0.191 1E9 9.75 131. (�A 7.67._. 1i.�_.. i..Q77 x6001 ,OA --7.7{ .70n �ACAAM(NIORArIAy'lTO1rCIn .. 3121104 T37. .0.062 -OAOb.___.92a^ 171 WA Lm 3.37 A.166 0.19. 0.x605 AOnS 555 4_7A... .Ar7tAMW[UAAHA7I'LIONGTY _ 1)S 7/2110611+17, am 0"9 T. 5.63 _W�,_,LP_ ]]2 x•74! 00➢4 Q7 X0009- 'am 1 3,9itiACRMtlJNOOAlIAM4 T07J PLY _ - N7/OA 1;_SG.. .0-EIE 1 7JPx :..711_i, 1x6 :•,•i,C�A a�64 _75.7 _m7� 0.19 �ME9 5.79 717 SMfwtmro 9 A NAM;LICIN CIn i7 600 0.166 L01 9.56 _749 WA T 7.31 '- -•+ D-71«•• x77 l0ID 4M6 ].4T_ 11.5 ..-•--•-------.--- _ _ •r k RAMLHTo n A 1la:.r.LTON CITY -....� � •.-.._ S/17p66:b- 4.04 0.7 L7 10.1 A 1.17 LA0 L.Al_,i-�0.A1 I.mm.. xJcn•S.,r:r:tnnnllH."IrONrin 6!27!06430 aO.WOQ)9•' 0.69 6.67 W� L74 1�1A.1 0.x2 rCO3 ,6.061 MI �L71 9AWIr.hpHW A+IIAh6NU7tIdTY,4.4.44 ?f1Sf06s: -b�... .0. . 1bt „ L7xs - mi 41 x0.03 Am - - - SACn.1h:TNionAHlJ.'17C14[17Y g�7u6at x.01 0187 t 1-6 7.76 - aE4 L7 2.33 -O.2S O.M�' m01 .a9A1 ].W 196 . . ... .. .._. .. 4444-'- - -."- _- ..» _.._....».._..._ r 'ACROAM:04 A HIWK ION nix ..-.- 6:M @M 0.711 LO! L1A.._:._Ls L6T 2.76 ` 0.21 .026_ 4181 l0A]_I 0.66 4.74 _ 61x!06.._ _ ._.,.-„_. __._. _.. - .. _-... bWtAME47011AHAMIIYONCI7Y .__ '10{24106700. .@.Ox •40,7! _...QS?»: 9A� 0.]6 1111 1702 7125 o.76 mC1 x[003 �. ' 33.. vARWENTO 11 A HW-LI04 CITY,... •- -•.... - 1211901 s %0.@0.i_,A16e;...1D1-• SA4 x71 I 096 ..._i.Is I P.TS_...4!9 , <6.W f _O.SS 4.77 _._ _� !An1AMEH70RA IIAMI•_TONGSV ..... --- --. - JAMMU 4.01 I ead 7.72 m 0.6E 1Ml 3.08 _4-1 IL m87 /0Ma � 0.k_ 757 4444., . ..---. .__-_.�--'---'• --- . .._.._..-_.. ����-..__�..- WflAWWO9AHAMUCINCIT'f 7/M(WUL6, x262 ' O.S6t las ]81 70. 7-11 _ -194. ..7 x71 { . 3• _ 8.19_ .. .. .._.. _.. ....._._..:-------._..__.. ._-.- 4444.........._. fAUTAMENT4 A 4 MWILtON WV ._. ..- .. ]%]4!076,0 „dW .. mum,,__.203_. .B-2x 1b .._LL85......1-??_-_.�'1..-. �Oti.•��.OI NA1 -OA1 ]8,- ' •.ACAA1tIV1URAItAMIl1ONUtt V77107 T96 ,d1O1, 4!Aa 3A4 dib _ 1 QA 49 _a7a CLIPa� 7 i <OyEO �O.W - .6x ul*AS11Y7UR r.IrnRkLinNnri 51IIp7•IS_13,: x001 OAa4 :_-x36-. 4.44 241A 0.l i I.M } @3 x37 A01 m67 _ O.SS 2.96 _.. _ .x11 �AA3 4D7 0.73 3.34 'nC1.N1[4Y6RA N41RlTONC,tt ._ - '6l2tbO11x;S0 A01n666 I 7S; -.-.?39-•"„ 0.3f.:_?9.....,_L32-_�_A.I. __._. UCRAMINTOR n•AM'f76Neri ... 7/14r877MD, x607_.-407.-J__021 7A2 l.7 666 327 1 4.1 42 x0.61 Axl_ 03 3aT e:A"KNTOnA.6u.CL76N211V -' - - ILIUM7795 -aGW ;_6L01_• 0.46 •0.r - WA 391, 3.}2-;,-A'2 d1 907«' .0.W .2 2.79 SACI(�IANI6AAItMLIfONG7Y __!.9/7?'A,1T7JSS x001 aRSS ,...013 ,_x.60•� 1.7-.._ 1.O!..C-.42 60.1 �0'G9 L11_L 0.36 -mi - ... :ALnJ•M(N1P0.A HAM'I TONCflY _ 1117/0710:30' WCl AOE OAO 3JaL_ 0>!._. 6_55. ' 0•E5 A.I- «„0.4?- ___-.. +A[nMAlNYOAA.(AA7ILTONnn _ _ .i 7l1,0l0923:i5 Ad- 0.011 - Q7 _, dls,_ i N/A_ _x89 _ 4% 47- � C-7x d-Ol 4.0.1 x71 9J7 _.._. 5,7CItAwNTr.AA HAIL(ION tIn ...•SJ6�G941AS.. d2M_-..x061.... _6.x7._....636._.. -W�..'..-L-, Lu •_.x17_ 1. . .mal-•_enO7 .0]7., 171 . 9:990 e40/ ....Q_Oi{_.._�_ .��_.&I _31(A�� .I.O� 13-� -A'7 mx <OL3-, 4107_, x45 1.x3 8 -..__.- _._ __.. _ .._ _ ... q3L 54l'[rM1kHIp RA N+udrONQn .._ 1t/4L06770.. .4.04_.'_- _..:._.4715 -iQa_. .NjA_,....S.S7, 7.6_:-.A __mx -4,W AO7 _Q_u ASA.. 59TAAMENIURA NAMitfUN LnY _.._. ..-. .-_.- _. WP .�" _1A7 1,7E 103_-. .MIA 359_. _.tl_•.'_ 02 .0.?5„ 1003 403 O.S7„ .1x3 .'ACOA11fH70 RA NA411i(ON CITY. _•-. -313/?!h50•, A-Ox 4769 451_ 17.7_ E rYrlIA x84 1;76.•_-m.?_ -:1 4A} a9.II1_ LO'7 b77 0,... ..�. . .. t{/A -.0.7AL 0.15 ..136 aJ4(71A11EHICRM1HAM1O;YON ntt It/31g97:S0_ caDx_ OA71 0.16 719_,; A It" 0.47 _�O.l_ 901 4.03 O.Cd 396 W. SMILUIFNTO R'+HAMILTON CI7Y __._ .. - 7I?110,9:14_ __4.44 Sik7B' 17_1 N1A_.. L78 _ _...]RE AL 4L7 ..41.7 . 403 . .. �0M6•- 3.39 _ _ ._•.s.d3 •.:.f P,iltfN:ORAIN.r.YltOti C,IY 510110 fi43 4.04 0.1! 4s; 14WA 0.A LS7 A1- - 4.; 403 0.°W •.:,C^+:.1.h'Tl,ii•rIMA74fOl1 k'�tY - 41.111611.•60 4.W, 410. 067 4.33 WA.. ..015 1.17 _ 642 m] 4W WA3 - 0.67 757 •gr.1,A•.twf6 tl.•II/LSNiT0.Y 17:Y ...- 1 106:30 4.66 am s .a • }1; "� LM� 3m d-z 0.716 900 � 7.3? 371_, 1131_.._..... --.._-...._ _. 7i 461 0,71,.-, O_4 m7 _ • ., G76 26L_ •.un+tili NSIJAh HAAGLlDN f.IYY - _ -•. _ ,Y?Li19:f0 ,_1060.„ AD1 -„ _ fA m,7 4D3 ' :M IIAMkN[IrRAnAtivLTON 47 r'/ ` SNlk B$- 1RIf/, 901 : M4 5.05 WA D!, 0.45 A.R x17.7 1091. 4.07 0.76 031 A:AAM[HIp RAHAv,4[ONnn •.."- ... .. 8/21174:10 ,1QW_! 0.061 IA7 616 MIA 1,L W IT �] m7 eaW x097, 0.77. 157 .ICMAIMIa NAl1A'MITDNCIIY ....._... _ -___.,._. _..__ 11111218:45_•AAi �•x.01_.: .1'µ-. - "� .!yA._: 131- ...1.68._L•, _, +??... 60.00 ..`-�-._.__0-'9r�.. . 711 1.17_. ..�.- `-MRAAr1'MORAHAMIL[4NO'iY .__.. ....?1811]630", mW ' 404 5.73 747 WA 02;8 x79 m1.74 1 SA[RM(CH(ORiH41A1:TONOn ._ ._- 0.79 8!/111690 90011 and 0.41 7R1 da _7.36._+.-m.7•••-" !0.2._, x403. 4II7 DAS•, :MRAM[N(OnA11AA,01701inTY_- - --- _ ..,. 1716)1x9:1! 4106 401 ;, 2.49_ - 3]2 iA 096 1dS•_t�0.R2-„_4L2 903 4.W 467 1.34 , WAAWN(ORA41AMRTONCr1Y .. -...?/61117,.LS•_ .ma_.-:,mW-_! x33 i45 - - - .. 1ACn.LMSN10n A141iAlLtUHC111f « 5(1113 d'OS W.W '.me1_.: V •3,U...- __0_9__• 010 lA3 412 __ A.7- d.Os ,"PIM.- 6.52_ v47aAMiHit7R ANM3176146TY •..••• _ ..618111730 901 /D% 411 2A a6 317 .12577., _42 AOS 4x1 4.7_ 199 :(P,wwo A t NAASn T17N.riT _. - - .11151137 .011410- edM - 0.6!••. 353 - ,s 0.5 0..09.. _4 , 2 � 4L2 *.93 m.D7 MS Lf6 •.r ' 5+4 II&WRIO A A11A%IIU(:NC'i7' ,714(1 454 dl0a m(0. -,a1a_.. 217 _n0._' _OSx_ 0.W _A.:_ a11_: 903_- 0.97 ;..Irlr+r.I(NTORn•IfhtLTONrs1Y .. SIN14630- 4.94 + �.S/' 474 G.67 2.5 1 417_.. »0.7 m-1 - 4I !' 10.03 _AW 03E- -Lt{._. 4 7... '4ti.r.nl.tlrn PL •AV Li.•NC.n 6117,13x930 0.404 4194 494 2217 NfA 476.,._..OSI .;__d'?.._ ;,.1003_ !DAS .^a3Y 1.74 '•Af[J.A11HInRA:ItrA:LloNt:fY ! 77/5,!14630 4271 Q173 - 0.A, _ 9.73 MIA 7.50. !W. A-7 .� +o-W 4.46 0.37 44 Sfl Ma4;Nr11Rn NAhOLmNCnY 717{5!75910 4.tl4 r 157_•_ 0.96 596 791 � 1.16 686 -.0.76 0.11 _ 4093 0.03'/ O;ls _139- sAUE1h7:+YfORArrhnClfNHCITY __ ^.- 111k516M0• 10.0x 1_6010 L15 •„615 1 At" -,032. 117 x41 1 .m,l mW �M7 0.62 lr?7, SACRAM[NTORA NANh[TON[.lY --_-.._._...__. _..9/1711514,;Oa_ ea08 908-T a9l 311 4A � ' IM 0.94 035_ A6! 5A(RMAINTORANAMiLfUN Cftt .. .. - IMAM 1. - : 4108 0.401• .. L16 267 _�;5 ----- 091 A2•_.' A.2 .. !x03, _�3-.:••R5. .lM6-; SAc6AMlNTORA:IAM1cTON ary ._.___.. ...._ 1611101. 1401 O.IW ,-0.4; 177 43 - 156 7AT Gli 0.16 ._ 0.3• 96 9AM! ti73_. 2 WA_: ?�..-.. L76 6091 . _laW _OA4 �.. SAL6AMkN(U IIA NMRIT6N Gtt 416/16 B'1S•: 0.0214 _4016_`..01{ 4.73 WA 1.19_. ... __,-A•2.-j..a71 »... ♦ICPAMn(f01t AHAM:I WINCtt - »-•. ...1117/161IL0• 1x06_ 401 611 ' 7.91 WA _7.72.. ..,1+76_.' _�1 413_ AD3 eAc2.a,lrvrolnnArAU TOY Uri ._.... 7/4!1714.-00 .•dOi, 0.9LS Sai ...�,- .M/A 128 536 016 0.37 4100 mW 0.6G 9.16 -i x646 72{ 732 ` !72 19.3 4.09 SQ7 036_: x77....0118 211- 6.79 .75 61e16.1n_' x:61_3 aa73s I OM- 64 u,^-, 0.4% 3?�_._p14 o.ts_ aot....OAP .x475. 2.1 W RtNrrArrrt aM „: (LOU .• ata id1_.. 028 0.14.... OSB 0.11 ' au x002_ 0001 0.16 0.A '.Y'.11'r/IM:m I7pr1 L`ruiLrtl YJlifr i[etidirdf•Por41n-AKi• :__..____.___�•. ..-.:_._.... _ ..-._ ._ __ ... _ .. • :Y/.LOd.vn I'4n 4hl.biyl LYAer St+edudl Saaan/0.W MCL .. I••--•.-.-...,_. � _.I.-=^•._-'_._......._ __ .. -... ...._ -.. . C 11 Cevot"NA•Cr6rerArA P,"Ic lrc41A69N ___.._...._..._92._..-.-....-_ __.•__-_ _.__...._....._�...-... ___.... __. _.-_...- __ USIPAW-Lw MCt rul ll+n Dna•In.r nilly,lrF,iVMnMNILJIKlrrhhaUhna7c 1e0.dM6nL w�rtl, -_. 112 k,:iPh,k,tth AdWur rex dmi,w%k"tad ..___._e.._.....«�-...._._-.. ....:-__.._.. _ _.._.,.... ..._- ._ .. USEPA MRS Reklvl(e'.4nr•VY %WTI WhbKr Hetdlh Adw"Icnr.• ...... r hhruu.f+.glpp4nn u54,y1.sl„6rYtrYa1•MaV.AItP.vaE7P dlru IlHl(p ! , k I ..'. I t •.wd:SrOeohnroty � 4.16.4---�-._._" .. .. ._..._. .---.. ....._ � ._. . _....-........ . ...._ .... . _- .s..._ 1 ANrrulhnr Vruhrllu.Ydy C-1,7iul.iPd Oder l!yWheld � �._. .._..... ......._.....__�___..._..._.____ __. ._.. ...... .,... C,.W-r.Tnds WJr LMICr}Id QIAIW1Nraor ......_ I ;....__, .._ -.' _.' -.._._..1 .._.:. ._.. I -........ .. . n,6n..ia<ellmwr ul5,larreol Mlrli,p WlterH4YthhMtOrlw ..,.-.. .. -.' .. . '. _. _ _ filRrue.lnr•0.rr+rrr+>aV.I HCt(M1IHW;ixCC urdO.lm urWrllare_ ...... _.,t_�.-.___,.-... !_.__. � .-........ �........_-., ___..-____.J...... ... --.__ ... Y.ualvdll•.wwrcnd.dW6:ntn.. .(umenlfeal,hwd WHhrrp«•rre114A.= I ___..»..; ...--.. i I I w'llr r.wP h.II Irrt:ugl:n.Yr«rlcnGh WUl'IInu fni-IV Aj JAgwMLrr I:vMm vur Ce ib1Iban N.JarwlAntleNraYThsr YYO[N4eHA Fah I fAW tk U*Mledrtrlen Ca MW6tlPlt .. L...........:..._..-__2._.-...5..•_..__.__.. lA .._--.____-_......._.�..-__..._.._-...�...._._ .. --. 23 Table 4. Sacramento River op Moulton Weir,Part I of 2• ,_.• , ` Olawhrd TPfal OhaeNed Taal Oiftohedl •Total 01a+ntvcd 7e1a1 Waron'r'd 1n141 U'lwlvad 1.n,11 Alumfmum:Alum7numArsenic AneNe-Cadmtlm C46mium Chrunrlw Chrondulo. COOM rApper non leen 41A, -„pIY1 ,. ._ __PAS.,�FW/,4„ _.1!9 .. irr/t POJL uN1 .. ._.. SACRAMEtTTOROPP MOULTON WR AnV9371:15 22;6 _550. 1.67 OAS OD78 1.34 1.75 0.91 3.17 4.1 8l] L1CMM![4700.0PP MOULT6TI WIt - ,• •,• _.•,_-•_ 6f311%Q3940 f•__35.8 SBo, :..•397 -LOU. N.471 -<0.031 oKa D31 0.73 ,_7.Y7 .Y.ON 117 SAC.RJIMfNTOAOPP M1ADULTtAI WR _--__�„_.-_ 7/10(0]1PAO', sa•T 116 1.38 1.69 �.,0.0?S .MA09 a.GS D.41 1.79 3.1 371 317 SAf3V1M[IIfG ROPP MOULTOH WR -_--;6[J1JO711145' 4A2 --715,- 1A5 1S 4).000 4]A49•,. 077 b!JS ,D;79 ,343 •r 0.S f.1 SAp1AMENrOROPP,MOl7LTON 13/A 9f1(o!>730 _5.91 704 117 15 x0. 1 02 '_W.Ol Oil k,c+2 1.73 7.14 e!l ad SAI.RAMlNT4 RCIVP MOIILYON IVR 1 ]11:0.0: 33.5 ,117 ,!_.0.874 -Al- 47;011 0A09 011 O.es [1.97 1J] .SACRAMENTOROAP MOULTON WA --; ]1100' &1 271 IA7L-6yi 40.Ir] <0.004 <0709 _1:] TOG 1.'i9 !•1.• 1',I S!ICRAA7114rO ROPP MOUL70N WA •• - _ 17f6f03JIX45.,__1193 � 3448 lA1 2.84 0.019 0.275 2.73 9.Y7 4.75 IRA x:c3 5:ii" A .. '._.1248, 1.77 -7.711, NODB Ads._. 1.04, »-4.56 SACBAM[NfOROPP MOULTOTO WA«....-.__--•-_ 1l-4M_!>�:m;�,151!,- ..19511 _1L4• iM, _±0.011 aA77 7,37 ,5.11 •A.17 1G62 174;4 SACRAMt:NT01ROPP 1A0l1LTO71 YVA ...-•---••• 7A7437-00. 2521 • 87•"33 139 _ZS ~5,035 o.71x 9.37 Sam 7,fA z7.7 TUI:. 1RVI SA[RAME[4tOA OPP MOULTON 111A �^- - y7iJ647}:4a ids 3478 1A1 ,7.61 pAll _011.57 0.14 1,43 1.93 6.89 175 7113 SAC47AMiNTOR OPP 31tC1Ul7ON NIR --_.._ 4/7(W 9:0.5 269 ,I„ 160 391 1.70. 0.009 ,01311,: 054 I.LG 1.46 1.94 16.6 133 'SACRAMFNTOROPP MOUI.TON WA ,-Sf5(D�l al'00_r -&14 284 ].77 L83 OA04 _ 40?7 _D.74_ _ 1.9 X0.78,-_,7-81 149 'SALRAMEN7UR OPP NIWILTON WA .. ....___.__..,_..•_ r-.385�_ .....'.... 1.75..:_1cB4-_, •0.1117. fILYi U.li S:sl ,7_fia - ZA3 171 149 SKRAMIN7OROPP MOVITON WA 0:40. !00 .• 155 L4_ 1..19 OA05 aA31 06] 031 ],a 1.70. 577 Itl) -SALRAMlNTO,R OPP 34OUllON UrA xlm' 221 ffi I.22 }.34 <4a11_ <OA08 P,A 9.94 0.77 ].2F 9R l:4 SACrtAM2r+YOR OPP MOV1rON WA .11 1390...-,ZO .-.782.. 7.30. "_7_0 ;•+O.D08 <OApl W. -C!r3 Can 718 34.S _..--F�_... .._... . _. SaramfVjlNTOR OPPMWLTON IIIR 12/iy4,lo-�D' !A 87.6 2.23 x•77 <amx 3CDJ4 1d6 1.17 A89 107 lis 3ACRAMEfafOROPP MOUL70N NlR- .._ '.3#0/D511�D' 459•. 1 ?:ML. >5 a0•�ll 40.607 1,81 3:11 7;43 AN ami 1111 17'147 SACRMNEIROAOPP lyggqQN 1NA }/2/0531:25 170-,. St12 _ }.y1 ]38 W;411 <p OEB ?01 _2.:0. 1;7 _7-:1 143 JIM �SACIrAMLNTOA OPP MOU1(0N WA _ 3(10MS 14ea51 0.0.2 0.33 191 1_97 : .0.411 <oa11 7.57 1.:4 7.17 1.G7 7.1 Y)7 SACRAMfhTOR OPP MOUL7tlN y9R 41MOS 1030 76.7_ _ 31P, •,?si• ib7 aAD17 WA09 : 108 1.12 ];16 1.n8 11'r IxJ :SACR4MfNT'OA OPP MOUITON 76Iii •-__ _ ., _,,, -,-, :6{19(0511.15, 5936 ,. 1.34. ,107 Na58 A338 137 171 1.81 70.4 191. 971~4 SACRAMENTOR37PP MOUL70N 17rA ;-6(76703]531•' i_0] I76 __IA2. ].RS <a0C9 <0A72 0.51 _ ].l1�2 7.3+ !i G.7 laa SACNAMINTOR OPP MOUITIDN IVR -- - - 712"1109 -7.14 -197 Tay �?A15 �-OLOW -0.014 Gas 0.98 0.93 1.44 0.27 x)70 SACRAMEWC!ROPP 340ULTON WR _-._._. .___...�_ .9(1!/059';3!0 _608 .,-.0.!:1.__...29.7., ]57 41009 4.009 . 0.,S -0.52 Gt14, _1.btl 'A,.IG 3'fu SFCA/1MENT0 R cl!inK ITON WII _.__ 9•(10(0.5-__ _ .____ ... - ..-.___.�, ...- 6:w iia els ,•_•7A:_ 1As :_o.Doi, aon .i -.i.]f •ues 175 fo.t" 17, -,SACRAMFNTOROPP MOI7LTON WA Iaft3(Os loxia 719 ,190__.`-_,a.3� .w15?,'-p.013 _A079 057 1.08 fA6_ •3,50 it.d 750 SACRAMlN70 s1_OPh MOU L70N WR .^ ....-__ _.__. 31(14f071796,__fa3,,, 197-,_ 357.. ,•J 16..,._OAl2 nni7,_ 0.79 ...7,lS. .1,21 2.24 15.K al. SACitAMFNfUROPP•MOUL70ri lt1A 34La611YW:-•OA 77A r 184 104 :_ 0.01 bD17 0.77 3A2 5,87 14j 5.7 ]I0. SACRAMtNTOA OPP 771011LTON IVR .._. 4/pE 10:40 r..7779 »s X815_ -78.1_ _253 .0.0.24 OA96 091 741 _5.27 14.1 281 SWI, .PNPU ._....__. ..__-.,....... ---.._. ti 'SACRAMLNTOROPP MOUL70N WA 1(24/8677:Ib',_!I} •-,1414 '-,7A6 1.85 oa13 tlA67 13'1 457 1.77 S.Gr INS )1475 SA[R7.A43NTOROVP MOIILTON WR -2J217t1671af0', 763 '„8!8-, 1.37 1.68 "IS 095 178 7.w 1.35 7.77 ilii :1x9 SACRAMENTDROPP MOULTOti WR 3f]/06=i0 4357 5132 3.56 199 0.079 •_Axbs G 31 ]]4 5.76 14.R ].''73 :U77 SAGW+1NfNTOROPPMWLTON WR /`}710.611:30, 1232 2271 S.OG_ 156 47.1 _ W.1 7_!1 5.f•8 7.73 _r u9 Ji7 32r:t fAtRAMEN[ONL7PP MOULTON W0. 7/0631:35: 729 517 7A8 1.60 <a1 W-I ONI ].:4 1.18 2]2 :1f„j 4ah fiAfRAMfNTOR0f7 MOI1LTQN IVR -•.,, 6/17(a01tr15.•_-47.7 87r... ] 7.37 1.87 <D.1 m.! 3.11 2.n5 3.04 3..1 4,9 391 ,SACRAMEI?OROPP MaUL70NW0. _-. 7(2FJ06810_ _ c. 276 ...793_ _ 1.28_ -138__•.<D.1. <at 11.E 7.39 1.11 1.] 3LI 271 ]ACRAMENTOROPP MOULTON WR _..„ /!t[Db 1Q30• 157 .'_ 271...-..._1.1 11e I <0.1 _, .1.. Ddl a.9s. ..3.17 J.a4 111 173 SrICMME1a71111 C+PP MOUL70NWR 9170(0111:35 ]53 671_,;•-1A6_ _131 _41.1 WS,- 0.55 1.73 ,L39 1.G x11.5 266 aw SACRAMENTOR OPP MOULTW!WR 50(10.10617:15 37.7_ 775 7.77_ S.M .D.} W.1 0.60 199 LM ..1.55 133 M • CRAMEN70ROPP MOUI.TON WR 17131/0877:�5-10.3 3'!„6,-4_-_'_•,7-6 7.74 41.1 <0.1 0.49 7.75 1.41 3.4 333 5'71 Si3CRAMENIOR OPP Mat7LTONWR 3(9%07 i9A0 819,• 164 ;_•39} 7.11 <0.1 7 .411 7.4G 7.'•0. s.oz 7A S,.A 2x7 _SAC6AMEFITOROVP MOULTON WR _- 2j]7(D73R00• s7 57,4 3.71 iv38 mi'--- ].sl 2.01 297 9.57 4r1a 679 ' - __._.- «•• g x3:15 176 � 96.9 2.17 -,1.36 0,1 K01 0.49 0.7] 118 _ 1S9 21.] 16h SACRAA4ENTO 110PP MOULTON 411A 1 4 7 30:1x' 38.8 I 103 1,^•1.9 3 98 40.2 <01 .045 0.76 ,1.53 7117 - ` 1r9 11.7 SACR4MrlOTORQPP NTWJL7O/(WR_ 9�/079D6. .--S+a2 : 990. 7,iA7 .2.72.:..�.3 ._�_N.1__-.. u.:: O.v4 I 7_111 n:7 SACRAMINI'OR OPP WMLTON WR .. bEty(O�a�91 ».535 .710 :,,,7.66, L7S, 41.1 K0.1 W. C-5l'M A9 145 -••1 111• SACRAMENTO R OPP MOULTON tArR ..._-7�19Jp7 1405 •1.81 ' 41s ,,_ 411 017 O.KO 7.02 1 49 a 157+ 5+0.CRAMFMO R OPV S'TOUL70N WR,-- _ .¢/,7 7IXb 104 11.3 3.69 L72 _<01 -m_I 0. Mae 0.5577 0.83l M.36 Aaa A S4CW,M[HTOR OPP hW[1LTOM WR,- 9/]]/0'711;40. 2.77_, 37]1. --1M ;.61 43,1 -40_1 0. Nr 4~11 . .....'....-. .. - -_ _ - ...'_-• .. u0. DS9 0.81 1.11 OA 9.1 73: fiACMMEMOH OPV 11RattL7ON 47/R, ,10/71M7a4FGrrL�_.10:1, :. 41.1,-- ...1.]6 ,__],13,x' 41:1 _ <a;3_• _. SACRAMC14tOR OPP MOUL7C7N WR }SL27/071550 0.87•• ]7.8. ,•_yai 2_44 ;•40,1 ' ep•3 0.48 o,,0. 0.78 04 0•,7 ........_._.._ ...-........... ..._._ ._ ._ -- _�ti.............. .-. SACAAMFMd R OPP MOt7LT471 tJrR ,y77�OL 11:�0 7.9„ i 730 -�_ 7763 _L75 , ,m3„ _W.1 O S0. 3.47 5.2].99 S.3 2P3 54CAAME7ITOROPP Mol7L7ON[NR .. - ..... 7/27.ps 1450_;..SOA 3710... , 7D6 „L?3 �.} _<0.1 OAl 6.35 1.06 •G.7 704 1Ai SACAAM[NTQ R OPP hSOUIYON t37R _ -•• ..3[2JDL I7lo: 2 1 Sb,e _7.27 ,_2.76 W.1 <O.1 C 41 5,77 1.76 7.Ui 4:l I71 ..... ..._.__..--....-._. ..__._-_. ___..__ ___. ,r SACAMI[a110ROPP MIXi1TON WR af1�10810:O.'. �1�54_i 12I '.,_?:7� _I0._ .-10x1.. . <O.l O.J7, 0.6 ,, 335 3.95 ]88 SACRAMEM¢R OPP MO[7LTO141NA• _.. 7f74%0e 11.111 lir 6Z9 :• 3LS _].76 :, �1 <0,1 0.11 O.G, 3~07 _ x.2'v 5.1 91.9 SACRAMFTITOfl OP4?MOLILTON WR ._-_- .-_ 4f77J0911:1a 1 7.89 662 1.10.- ..-239.7_.�.1_ a0�1.. 0.16 0-:8 L57 7.11 I...»--._..._ SM"WTO R ODA MOIR.TON WR .._5/16fC!1SL3 7.,.2.79 86.6 ' 5,89 L97 Wd f..<a.1 0.1s 0.1.7 181 7!D. x G 5S P .._• 75 9'15 3,77 101 IA3 _ _. :SA('MMENTpROPP AWULTON WR ,-, - �_-(� r S7 _<07 _471 0!6 _ D3•] 3.97 l./ SACRAMlNTOfl OPP MQVLTON WR „-,, 7(lito910:10 i 7.77 S!? 3,79 7.53 41.1 <0.1 Cis 0.49 Mae A 1;G IACRAMEN7OR OPPMWLTON WR - •0(21%09930 1 1.66 ,•�,_3D-7 319 1?�.• �.1 ._W.1 0.13 0.5 Q88 lRE• ! 31.7 5A[Mh1[N70R QVP NtOULTOIreMi„_ ... ___•. ...- ._91?I(099.70 .._2.09-.. ]59 .' 3s7�_ _L76 ••<O.1 •-•<0.3 oil 0.<S 0.96 l.f••. a ti 40) SAC1U•MEl4[OAGPPRagUITONWA -_ _ 30/2710933:W': ..5.51.. -993., .--1_7G _ 3.83 41.1 .. 4VIC7ULTGN WA. .-... 71/18/0913,;]0. SACMMlfi'1'OROPV .. ............. ..._.._ i.._...» ..--. . ills/9:15..'.._ _' 7_5.0 G b7 ,031 7077 1.1 }37 SAC AAATENTOROPP,MC7Lx.TaN WA -.._��__ JAS/109:451J08:45 87.7,-87.7- }95.3• L7.... _7An59 1 <0.1 A1N - 14..7 SAS, 202 iia 47 7 S/ICRAMfNTOROPF MDUL7Oh WA - .--._.._._... p1217b 17'13, 3x.9 799 ass Lsl .95 12 ].C, 90.7 3"IY9 NYO80f9+MOULTON WR ._._._... __.__..__._.x.As?4�>fl7:30 _3;63..;.._54_6..,.:_..1.72». x.78 ,_<0._S-',•,WO;7,-, 051 ,0.55 _0.95. _7.79 s.C,, 94.2 ...__ _....... IAS 2.69 mi 0.0.1 I-. 0,46,- _ 3,•7 _143 1.93 8.2, 10ix SACRAMtMOR4VP MCVL7QN YY71• .., ... '_!(7Af107�0 ' 1.871,,,-�80_. .._.-_._ -.._.... .--__. ._ -_- SACRAAatNTOAOPPMOt71TON WA. 5776!107:00 1.46 49.G 11... _1.16,i_ <6.3 d.3 O3 0.54 L67 I 1.4 G9.7 • .�-�4t).1 015 0.51 -L]! Tab 71.9 SlCM141EMOROpP MOULTON W0. .. ... _6(3o/J07D0 ,..6.01_-...-.57:4........1,76, w1A8 ..�Q:3. __... SaCRAMJNTOAOPPMOULTON WR• 1 7J71f]p 8x0.0-!..-,ill--..,_..79, :. to 1AS _41.1 <a_3 :_ a 1? _ 0.Sr 1.37 1 45 .. . ;: w '*-1,_ 0.:7 0..R 1.19 x ! ..:.. sAcw+niriTnRatiEou�za+wa _ 9ljibxaio axs, 711.~1.._• _ TO 108310 7111, 861 _ .,1ss a a2 3.07 1.79 1.x5 2•..0 n. SACRAMENTO?L OPP MOLrLSON WR .., _.._ _... 10/1§(_.._... ..•- IACAAMEN70ROPPMWdTQNWR 1 10./]a 83x0 4.11 40.3 _1.67_ 0:0 0-YS 1.19 7.19 p!) lY.1 IAC1eAMFWTO ROPP MQUI.YON MIR ;77p1(SQ 114D; 7.71156 L52 •<0.1, -�-} 046 OfJ3 3-11 1.66 .; 154 'WMMWlRF q""LION WR •47.1 _apt D47 -,2s L46 3'7> 1':.3 '••11 I M.almam• 4337 _8771 --7.07 _�.49 0..0.29 :..0.23 917 7a.8 7.54 7'7 7 );7'J I sn t: Med4A?„ ,- 14.1 1385 ,_LSOS 1.795 OA11 ;.,OA03 b 55 }.n::S }.le, f.o-r :.4 S. 0879_• _-L35 1•_0.0116•.,0.009 O.L7 OAS A71 086 74 3N.7 SWrlt8 aa71n PVn.arinkhrA W4TorSaM!rda•vdmary MLL, _ .... 2000 ... ..; - .. . .. ... .. -.,.7.. _ .. ... 3WACli 9a41n Plan.17r1rt4rX Wpe{SundAmts•S6rm+darlr�__,_.._-.•"-_..__.,_. -. ..1DQ.._.__....J___ ..:._....... ..._ .. .. _._. ................. CallPA/OCN/1A�CaPf01R4 Pu49c3!a+hh Goal ' ..... .._. ----------- .0:qqi... ... p ..., ... __ _.. ICal f3A One•In�rrmlldon lnernr+enTal. -_d1A e/7b..�te for d!hWlgWmr•-.-._ _�. -. ..6011 .-.._0.0023.._..- ... .. .. -. USEPk Neold+ for drin3fryry wAt«, - _.r, -•--" �- USEPAII[13 'CaUforrda PIPP43tUon GS Safe Harbor toVai•Ma1L AI19WObW dale 1-4 I I � ._tAOS-- AyiEplwrc WNerQwlMyydh�Tauo l/W odar_ehreuwld-_. _._.__ ?°0O._._.. '.. - 'nerarna Te4tn AUNS9,naes nl 0~/+74'1 Wester .-- NaT+w+al Aridemy.el Srlel•[lS pr71eung Watn 1140.1771 Pd101ar11,,•F_-... __._....--_.___..._ _5000 _..... __.....;.. ..-. ._...... .._.__. .. _.. 3D0 µarfpul Rpcommanded WOCdler4i•Taaln sero D6tlrar VYelare - _._.._.-�........ ._,..._.:._.__....-.i., ...._....._ _. .... .... .. .. I Na[Ia+wl lMcam+rm4mdatlWQGM1eraitYRran Health and We64ra � 1 ' Pra[mlon•water a1W Ihh corrfumPdon, ' .. __._ Nn4d7al Aecommelwad W4CrM1era.Prmhwater AgWOc Ufe Con[InuaVataneeniratlor+. ..67_..•_....;.. . .Q9�........ ....... ........ _...,...... __...._.._.......-_.... ... ., - -. _ .-... Na1h7+a1 AAe0mmandld WQQrRerll;frWMWal9r!4EWSe Ufe MaKAnvm t.l7!leentr4tlanl ..-.?�-_.-. � - .„.:.... ... .. ....1 _ .. .. -_.. .. 100 24 Table A. Sarnrnento F1lverop Moulten WOFr,Port Z o72_• 1 ..._:_.._ ._ _..-.'. ._. _..__, ..____ --- -- - I w..ww! TOW 'OIJLIr[4d: TOM ' TWM ilXndwd. TOUR O mh*d� TODU '9iswM41 Tenl 01'sa.ed TOIII 1414 2474 tM4APRR14;A42MACSrt�NW, r0." NIIA01 LIehWRI!3dw" Ohm ! scW � 21x A. v_n:Gx.Nam. --•__._ _ ..._ ...' simPl�Wt!-----xd!_.' !J .._ H[(L..:_lVIM1. w1,i. ."�_. W GnMfNTOACPr Mn.JliLur W0. •..... 5hIM11A:13 taD75 4199 0.17 19.7 WA 0.6 317 071 • 0.7_...Mon •W 373 0.4 4.5 +nC Rr.4NN10lVPr A!OUliOh WR ... _ 411ary19:00: W.O17 QObs•_,__OS{__S,.7.13-- ' WA _0.531 �.0�1! <93.51 D3 .. 11.'.. lll[L'J.'.UNTl1R1]M MOVL7011 WR ]/l0/411D.!D: 4X911_l .O'DSS-.- 2�S 5.56__ W� 0.92_• _126••.. �i19 1 0.131„_. AAli_Jim0.]3 1.6 tiff RN.NNh7RCxr MOVLIrRY WA �-• •_• ._._ . . - 8!1]/0311:45 _t6 0.174 _ __ 998 WA •_6.95 18 . X167 _0.21�,WA35OAS_ 7?4 :.,l FIAWN I+)R OPP P.MULTON Wit .Mdaq .6111., 0.3. 3kq .. WA_.:_.. 759- [0.21 alb_ 14!E, SAL. O- 1!36... 'JICRAMfNIOgCl14•M011lION WRQ.•.... •� 30JEj0311540 OqM ' 0.011! i••x•96 9.5 IJ1A i, 1�6- ]T..Qn4 [031'1 0).163 '•AAS _�a131- 0,67 1431 _._.. ._.. _-....- -.,. -!A[MM[NTOflO{'P MOULTON WA -� 21/51031190: 0929 . QOST i _86 6A3 N/A L1! i L6l 0.17 423 W.O! 0.0.04_' 0.9 13 v.CpIIMEMOaOPPMOULTON WA»,,�_., __-.... 1(/df0.1 t9>s;' 0385,_'._.2.93 ':.--9X_-.-._21E ,•-N(A_.....3]9 1 15.7 0.12:-„a2s_ 4037 aD49 10A.. •314-- /.CMMLNTOJIf rP"LION lYl1 _. .,... ... S/8/Da9 0 a-!ffi 4!317 4.61 379 NM.,.,.A- _ 04 ` m?76 rQ007 391414 0.9_ 1A.4 _ VIr RAMCNTOR OPP MOULICINWR -. 71"IZ20 0.366 L2 1t.3 83.1 N1A L16., - 877 - 413 tam @GLS OAM 4A9 144 . 1 N3 -q 0.26 M916. ,0.06 731 _568 NCRN.IfNTOROvr MDUITON WR.._._. 1117/D41190 0.677 i Al ..:.-,713 16A- W�.I._0.42.__._..... _._ ... . Sn•:PAMINIOROPfMOUl7aeWR _..._.... >'•%6/W 11:[0. _4051._ ,0341-,. 7G2-_' 59.7 :,-N%A 356 _7_A 0.1.__,. 0.71 ,O.W,,, m4Lsk" _LW. ..1. •.ACRnM[InORfir`e MO\ILrON1Yp .._.._, .. _ ..M �•�• - OZ!•T•-Apt - __�-_-.-_NO....-lit._ _.1.76_ +Glil_:,_03i _ O.t12•_- glmt•1_OS_ J.H. %AC RAM[I:TOR('Pr AIOVIi[INSYR 515/D411A0 m00/, 0.13 336, 12.3 ' WA, 0X7 216, -at" DA WG01 lIOM 0.19 257 .. .. ' _ L99 06,121 : A.216 N.�14.. 4.061 1.73 - i7t •.4f RMI(YTo R VPP 4IUUI TON SVR 1600 _0_.062•'„0.11; 1 - -.AC'RnMiHTORfIpPMOVLTONwR ...._....... -_ 7f29/041960-, 0.017 OA69 181 ,: 4.96 r NfA 1b7 •-L46 11.17 _ 477.x.'t0.90R,' mmT OA7 lai +rfunM�Nln RfMr MOULTON Wq •.,.y_',39/5/W 1190 0.011 • 4049 714 ••722 - .TCRAA!iU1VROrrMQUITONWR 71/9(041390: 0.006 ,._4L7...._ Sb9 ,. ..0.1! _:_.[S/I1.._�..Ib9„•1•,,,3.14-_. 1434!�..Cii9 ., m800.'�.OW!_M6 ,�, \ACRI%t.,%Cn R L17P1Y•IUI TC•N WR lY1�043040 aOAI 0054 A6E - 719 WA 0.61 1-,CRM ra165 S 0.]7 [OA71 m.0�, 93 _ OR9 MOIlL1ONwR .. .. _•.•• •. 1/l�1%1190__OWI i 0.60! __LE6__ 112 N(A ]-.-A-S_Rl! 0.71 „..4� .�'!b1.,.nm..?:11_ .31.47_ -�6A01a• M OU L TON WR .. ..-..._ _.. 7(S(05,1L73•,G SFO p _ _-.._.. C"M61CMOrr M0UL7ONWR b3 .. .._. .__..!/ll1(i6S G3!S, .0?ri ..0 _.�`..0.71__ .�-]?__.:.. A.,.'.O3.C.-. 36145 .-0,?s_; mmi• �GIt: QS4_ sKitivAtN7O ROPP MOULVONWR -.-. '4120M5105? .6023..) 0079 2.74 1" ' ,IyA. ' (!S„,� .SA2 M25� 0]B W,006 W.1M 0.56. L77 SACRAMINTOR OPPMOULTONwR .S/1914711J3S. ..CA4 I •1,75 ..!..?:73.-_:_. __ _ •_7_Si_ )lf.,.: !0.17!„1 7i7 [0.009�--Q�!s,.:..irI�_ _394. -: WA 7/.:RAM[Nrn ROPI'MgIILTON WR,___.._... •• •-• .. 6!7_M73 f3p5, GOB O;d].moi..135 _ IES- _.WA.. ..072 1.1it _Oal., .0.30 00.901 �A27,. _S .. _1?>!..- •.A(RAMLN9DROPrMOULTOIJ7VR ....... .. . ... 7/7C�[OS ISAO b]E _-OL7f .0.87-.....?;13 ..:. !f/A- o.G9-„_.LSS......A.222.:_<Alt2, mDl9 m.G13.. G55_ ,lA6 s1CPNM1H(OROPPAIOULTO'LWR - 6J7 M91.30 �*=4. OMS 0.66 5.73_ _N/A 0.14!_: Lit ra711 <DM7 [0.001 O.M 0.68 Hf RAMfIerORtror xCOUL7UNWR . 9!'28/056:30 AA01•' O.W.. ,..OAS 4.73 r1/A• .Oi6.: 125 0.1! x_032• <OA0- 4wei ,OLD Lit •,11'RAIAFNri1ROPl'h!MILrtY.`I CtA - 10125/OS SO.70_ CG11• 0134 336 tab A 1:94 i LT7 W063 416 .q.n} x.001 031 161,. SAC PIwLI,N P3 R 1V(-.WWL7WJ WA ._ . .. 1290 1 ami-'-0.2t1� Sn,_•_26.0. .•_xLA... 11•-;--.1;316.. 00.168 411R6 mA��•_� _._971 ]L2... •Ai PnMfNty Rrn'P h40UlTl1N WA ...,•__,,.. lt(34/061iI.N a® OA'l9 0.66 0;17, 1L(A Las :,_167}•_- [4149�1 �D.004 m001 0.68 1318„ 'a.NANPN1UpfN'r AIO11L1nN WR 3.14M.P..Aa 0.626,�� 2,it Z4.9• 164 WA_' S9I ff 112•,• [4169 '-AIL.-AAE� L " ' Obl 4.6R 229 --. _ ins Kr.4nNinROCP v<CUCThN WR « ._ .. 14"1140.:'0.195 0749 17.6••.•...6107,_-'.- MM 176 _6_85 � 4X27_ 0.18 _W:p0.S-•� •'••p.49 V..:p.\MFHIII pJ]Pr rAOULTON WR.. L2110611a0 .C:O50_ ..C1•S3!__-�._.'__!a? ..i..?�A....?:Y_�4_6!_.: ai6 4i.1, t0Dm1{ t4901� „Gm s.71 >\1 PnM[NenaLMr vOuIiON WR 311/0617:10,-- N.lA__'... . .__.<6LL9 :._-[ 179 u _[0009- tOGOf 7.67.._ . 4ACRAMEN1n 0.OPP ASrwLTON W0. •1h7M61130 ,4X11 557,__ u8 67.2 7114, m1_."_ 022 .01111P �. !0.07• 299 124 ;•\rRAWN70 A OPP MOULTON Wll. _ 5/17/0613.35 d0L 4181 7X31"__, _MI3.06 0.22_1_ LI26-,. RJ9 1 _4aD! G.39_ _233 1ALfWMtNTO0.OPP MOUtrON WA__-_... .. ... 6/2>f013a2S:_s 4,_y 1.157 :,_0.31 ]).6, -_NSA _-....T. 7•De_ �.,?._<112.... .mA3 �_OA66 �O.IR• 70G WRAMCNTO ROS!P►IVUITON M .. ..}..7/26,106LM_.,_.SO:a.-'_[1.119 -_ LIt 14 1.6 ,_1.i6_�-26 _ _AI .-_[al...a0G! l ta�j .0-62.. .L•79... ;�'l FLAWWOROPOMOULT(INWA -.. •6!!1/061030' mD4 4401 lA »6G3 ~'� 087 1.76 7.69 671 046 lam '+4G3 OSS 1.7 s4CRAMENTOROPPMOULTONWR 9/10/0633.15 _WG4 OD'96.. 3�d,• f3.8 _ ... _ 1.5__;_,1.12 2.76_ �_i 105_• i0.0� !0.49 034 842 •,Mf41V[NrOR O7'P MMnrnN WR ....... t0121%0672!SS W.64 6,104 it !». 12.7~•»4-039 1.45 2.07 !•_ 0.21 r[Ia7_i _<am .Mir 323 SACRnr.+I NIOR CI.1'\gUlrnN wR ._.... ?2112/061x35 AD4 ,0.26,--I-11!-. _ ..2]- ,tnM 1.65 6b2 :A'fy lf.P110$L OPP VOW".4 WR 39/D'7,179D _�M�- OA67 ..7.75 ..� ;r.Iln}16Y1{'R'IPl-x1OIrLTIrN WR -- V27/07 U= 0.754" 0.501 la_7 14:6 _ 0.95 MI 7X7 W.2 [41 WMA_ !Q07 7'33'_-. 775 4+.r_Pn4JrhingUrP sl;+llrrnv Wq �- !AO/0711:AS_--,•<49t. CMI •7 7.33 ! 1.98 S - • 4ES- •�71I_-�..... <0.7 _031_ mGS tO.W 0.78 7.70. :I.1 M111H1C!q[JI'n nlnyr roti WR - 1A PPA. mA4 Ob76 339 ILl _'-SS sALYAMIrnu q arr VIGULIU,.W2 •• � -5 79--00 AA{ 4167 _-_OAS_ 173 A 0-75- LS2_ <07 - W 2 W�G3 3aQ?•,,, 02, 3.f6 137/0.._. -..-... -_ 1.2. �2.1 a7 ._._ SA[FJSIkNI(JR W:MUVe Tnk WR � -• - - 4177AT76:7b mM _ OA92 5X IL7 1.1 0.75 ' 3.39 �2m,2 •+Q6f tam DA9 14•- +AI1NM[YTO R OrJ•ASfn/r ft>•V WR __ _ 7/19/0710G5 @M ' OG66 0.71 0.58 I..4!8 1 056• i L7•• mL2 -. m1 tOG3_•__�00 D.28 17 !•1rAAMEr+EG R OrrMOVI TMJ WR _ 8R6/0710A0 AM..'..mA4 0314 - _ • •• _._._ .._ .. _ ._ _ ..-_._._..._ _.,...�....- �. »�._.._4•P.3_..• WS . .._._.... . WA, Qe .. SAC alSal[hTOR[WPAW UITONWR ... -.. . 9J;]/0717K0__.�,W... -••.•---_ nD67.. _?3�.- ._�._ m.�_.,.. :.Na. �on3.-:_,:a4�_. 9.0.6 '_201 MrA"UNTO R OPPMOUITONw9 '20/31M7103S' A*M 4X434 423_-. 6.41 0.77 in l.x 7/2.- A.2. !0a; aam 071 3.42 ?AC RAMENfOp OPT rM1UlTCrI WR _ .... ...11177%L717:SQ'•X04 1 0.0.87 071._•..ab7...:_0.75 j'OD9 'I 0.92_ m�..._. t0A AF3 <a07 0-19 731 YC0.AMEh'7O ROPP h1OULTOf11YR _.. 1/27f_08_37A0• _WD4 J__aii6 0.,7_ 563,__I�WA '„1.17 149 •:A[nAMEMOR(IPr MOIIlIONWR -.. - ... - '1177J001L70.0. ._.__0979 i O_M,_ 6L7 I 311(4 _98 7 _493- 0.32 •_.OwS_. .0" cRGl 0;16 _11-., 41CAnNtN1ORO1'P:NOIATONWII 3/76%071011[ _W.9{,.,I 0.961 ' Oss --IL7---WA , ! 1.77 0.75 0.29 apl 00.0.7 0.2 3.14 s-iMMCN1Ua(N'Pf.XWLI0C%%R .... 4/27M610.30 [DAt D995 - 4.11 ' 1U1 . N.* 032..-! 1.36 F0.7 0.75 aOLS __......_., _. _ ........ ....._._r. i•IRnlI[NIOR(x'r hN1Ul1(YJ1VR .77.77. • ._•._•• 7114)06,11:77,. MU &1...�..-.�_._ m9_.: aic._.. d-'u mm.. _Ing,: 03 153 'iA1'Ph'.I1.NTORrMI.110ULTp.•/YfR ....-.. - •.« _ - '.4/27(0911•?0, ,mD4,•!_0.057 t2 ..NIA.:.._0./? I_0.97__� fa7 _' 0.21 WA3• _<am 0.76.. ._Z[G v4(:I:.SILhIOR OOI`MOUL111NW0. 5(SO�f9w912�5A4 4?6t CAI 778 0.,S-9_' -. SMFrMfNCOP(Na M)lllfCklWR .._.__-..... .. 6/7S%0l4-L7' WG!1 _ 0094 + 0.77 t 6.95._ P1fA..: ,097 ld6 1 all 016 1407,1 Wm 094 _1,54 +.ACPAAl1 UTDayi'\1CIITlION wlI 7/76M9,16.70+ �,W. - -0�:„_L34_-._-73-__ '...HfA... 1.02 t06 WS__ c02_ 4.93 !0.07 OA7 1.72 `•A[RiV.ILN1ORCOO MOUL7UN 1471 B/77/m 9:59' mAl + rPM r 036 2.6] /. 0.318 ' 0.96- 7/7 ! !0.1 �CIIt [Om 0.]3_ ~1.319 7/2-,7, �.7, D.Il7.�,<LLN. 04 199, LICRAMkMOa OPP MpI'CIVN WR 70(2710731149 t4U� 0117 - 475 - IL7 - WA OM LIS 4L2_ WS 40A) apm D37 283 'A[PAMEN(OROPPMOULTAINWII JVUMAI30 tOAt, OM - O:M I 787 N/A 019 099 lea 7/z +0L3 .4m am 734 7VCAJ1MFYIUR[1rPAfOlfllOytAllj -..... 77AMlrR15 WA4 W.O7_!_032-. ).77 X(A '_037 07x 7/7 <0.7 A.m <0m 0,5 7f1 . ...._.._ i'- SnCRAnvxmp0rrM0UlrOnY(R 197„ 304 _rJ1A,•, 172-�„_25.6_, ,,,Q23 -•L 0_36 �,m ,.,4071•., 0.39. ,35.9_„ W,nAMINf11Rf1PPM0ULT6NWR 3/7%1017:13 AM OA4 446 45.6 WA7.55 1.77 0.74 077 7/.93 ' <407 014 753- '3..a.,M1f1\i!IRC'rP+HC�'N1CrNWR 5/711197•,30,. Sit . .._OGS_ OS6 746 .WA --.«V»7A..�_0.6_... A.2 [0.2 Wb7 7 013 L19 yAC.RAu(A7f)R OrPhY1U1TONWq - 4/117147:00 d33! _0!E YD.66.�. 37.7_ ..WA» 0.317 176 r>u 9.21.. • .._ Am 014_...7.17 `.4C r.nl.+f N1:,ROO1•Mr'Ir11n�WR S 0790 0.W OLZ 077 4b1 A 0.6 I an m7 0.61 tOd.1 - 7/;W -9A2329.. [TCpnM:rr[nP M'f•h59U1TC,Y WR - - - _ 30790 0.084 ° 7/.04 028 „587-.. __A 0.315 „a6r �.2 ? - !41M:.•0M_ A17- •_:JP/.wllr•IrrR•+r:•\'\•:N7['hHR .... 7/Sbf108-t0 NG4__ 0.066 0.17_ f..3.61. NA 9X_6�r _ILS^ •�.l ..[QI_. .:S%.:..gym. _LL73.• X113• (. ... . NIL rJ141CN11•R:.PS•h5!.f[1C'NSYR .•.�•, _ 4/3l/ID1a19.�e0G4, I. 0.043�' G.S i3B I fl/A OX� ]b6 _ A3 [0.1 WL3 i ��, 031- ..L99 .nJ nAMfrJrrlRnrn MUyL14N WR 10/l6f106L0 7/.44_,_0356 2.L4 !< WA SAS 3.60. �1 J 027 i AJ09 [40.7 _ 11 687, ;.ns HFlalnttlp OrP 1AU1fL1UNWR - _..._- 11(10/10850 ,AIM-_ _4046 _036- ___7.6_31 _)_N(q__,_1.17 T 1.37, ,ma lD.2-, WG! f406 _LSS 7 4.5c Y.3A11 NTOp OPP MDULION7/6 '17/11/101130 OG'1 r,0.149 tt 0.6 t 1L3 WA_ 0.62•., 19.31 0.13 289 SA4AAMIhTOROPPMWXT0NWR 3/10/1230•!5,__aG4D799 S _0.81...i...76.7. WA - -01C 2X1 ...-m1 Al? dL9 0.0L2 LA. . ... _.___..._.. . ... .__.._hValmllm_.. Q8S7 .:_46 SSA•_ __361 ,,x._0.6. 611� ,M.5 031 k.,.0.5?-• OP Nialklll QLSl- Mw2777 10,7.... I.I. !AA.'„2.57---i;km 0.26 s01SS DA47 0.515 2A9 R"W! 0.009 OGM 0.1 1.63039„ 037 0.71 al ' -0.15 Q.J 1 OAJ7 0.17 . .011e. .',vxfO W�•n rL 1Ir.ILinp NlJMr ilirldi'ds�vrLry7+ MC'1, _-, ,._�...i.....-_-.i._..._-._. ...... _«.....»_._...i-___._- "_•--•_-- ..... _ _ - _. .. _ S'NR((LU u Pran WY,3410.Waccl Sund616s Sfnlrrluy AlC3 ..., .:._.-., 59 . f.al Yl•AI:4114V..C.11pMnla fVl4K 11M1NDI Ci6Tl OA2 ' - 17 .1.,_.._.__.._.__:_.-_._.....�._....... :r•.,rA,1YMRYTtiiCI r'111rA Mf•n.,m1PM tMfhMPVlfaa06f 451 1111 rA Heyl+l•M:n-+Yy I+Y,hu'YnT' :nTrAtlh•.Prrn+TYn Gmnra:rekir:K W41Rf Nn[RA MnNOn4} ......... .... .' `� Y•L..... .... t'.Irl...rxu rrnP7v1lon G.s.h.[y+lgr 1gJJ/1-M.0.A6Yw4brR dPSC G•YFI., - A+prc,JlwJ•WAMr(11.Jkry r.WIJYny Trrrlu 0.ufe wr'nn.IJYaIImyMwmlt,rY1n23+lswmrpPumA6,If6fN,1 _ ` � _ _....._c�._ .... •--- . ..... .. whbndl Ar4F'IrRnreWetl\V•'21 rq[N•TJRL14r:d L'xAP W WI[l4rR •._.__ sq . wl:m.:l flrrr•mnnµNl WCl Cr4rl,a NY1114n RPJld,JrW W4R4+,r i f , 1 I � 1 1Y1•IrT1uYl w•1[IY.uV•IMPCLIMWPRIxY1 �, ' : .,_, ,_ ,_ ....._ -.. ._. N•I+IIkrJI RN.n'IYIYYYGw wTSli1[MI9 FfL]hw7nf MluRe Ule CPMmuaul[afenn90Sl6n -.__,.' -..-.-r_ ».,......._-4731._....•_•._.•.... ��._ T-_ _.......-.�.... _ .. N?hrelJf R+mmnnnGYl wiLfr11N14 f+dltYitr, •. ..._ .._ .._.. +..._....._.:.._...-.�.. Clilfeo"Laq. 1 _.-1._-._...L 25 MI.5.5toneC.WmlCnrSP,PaR1QL2 ------,.__ -, _ - _._ .. --_.. -- --_•_ .- .. �- � ' Yom-&-d Tour DdWA*d Taut :DIuANed 9I11ekSd Tow D-4- Taal :Aw.MM lma P.,:l„-d 'WA Ahwillwl Ak� Arm* AIYINC &u CAm,,1 I, Cads Chea 0Ae9P - C.PPv, Cq•AH -JqA .WA. _mm. b ...Arlt. _J'J!!_. .J'r11 931S PYA mA Part MIL Cwt . ... ....._ _.... .. ..--- _.c_ _..,. .. l . . _..... SIONL COJRIAI CMA St .. ._ ... ... ,31374-. WA _.V4,_.....WA._...._QA WA WA WF MIA WA RIA N,,+A WA WA- _WIL. .. ...NIA_. .al M%A MJA WA WA WA NM 41%N, NI^, S7ONt COAIULC NA A. _._._-._V?A19L6„�-_?1J•^. .•, WA wk04 __KM_- MIA _ WA .WA WA N/A MIA WA -AONI LQAI6LL[MRA ,.i -.�-...�� WA_..._.MLA.._ _.WA_._.'-0_4 ...KA .«-kra WA WA 14A .'..WA X/A WA S7ON3 CORRAIC iDI Sk. - !�?Ry 130 �IILA , _IrlA M/A DS WA _ IIII WA WA WA NLA HIA NA S70NI COARAI C Nf131 !L]♦VDE 11110 p(A�Y NLA WA ..NM DS WA W► WA WA WA IIIA H/d 11JA /.���� ... ..._.....- _ ....._ -._A - STONLC011!MLCMRSE.,. .... __..._.•...._..._..�..__.__._y!Lu1IWT216.45-_. ._- H!A__._W__IIA �N/A .-�_.,..._WA.. »1.U,A. TUR WA WA,. ,NrA RIA W'A Sioru[ORItAlCN11S1 •'i, J2J02dsLS. :.. WA. WA j WA _M!A a7, WA W[L. NIA WA N/A NM r:1T WA STCM CORRAL C K11 SI IX _ _ .., :1}LI�t1f:L7 WA M/A WA ..WII...'.._107. ... WA. .WA RIA WA WA fIJA N/A W 31IXI[COARALCk11,51 _•.. ,149/00 1;115, _{IIA .. WA. ,.WA ..11lA .. _ WA WA ., NIA WA WA ,ruh v1A WA '.AD!4 CON[d 5"SI _ _ _ _ ____ i/,11L041a30.....NLA.. _.W!�_._:.._K- . ...WR al WA N/A. ...WA WA ,X/A.. Vd. 14A 111A --.5t0NLC77A6ALENRA ._ _..;... J6S 10.90. A-„ ._!{IA. ,:_.,.W4•,,._._WA Q3 WA... 7!/A_ Wh WA _N/A_ HA N/a WA W •+�(,I_m,1-ta MIA,.. ...WA._ ._NIA.. .,NIA...' 0s WA ML WA WA N1A N./A INA NIA STONE CORRALCIM SI - -...-.,. - ,'�17m]I1r15. ... 4 .WA.. ..WA..-..-.WA 102. .. WA...• -WA '..WA WA WA- kUA tl!A WA _._ STON[[ORRAI[1111 A .. - _, A�8{t__i1 L}:10.....N%A,.•• _jq'A ..M/A .....,NIA ...'....p_.S WA WA WA WA MIA IUA H!P IUA .. _"•.•`.... A WA .,. ..-WA WA WA WA WA_.,__.WA NIP WA STONl COAAAI[flaA ..........___`_...__-.V7816111�D MLA_... .wA.. ..._W_- ._. .... sraN[mAxALe>,n lt• ----,3La+1��!?.. _ _. _ses Lib" am9 cai ei 4s3 4.u, ale v lT s3s COMAICNAl1 _ 1llTOa.l1J0 1�3 S&O to 1AS 02 a0A0! cmr116 14 1101 1x5 3.:A 7C7 651 STQN[CQWtCia A yaAx t1mD 1399 tD66 1.34 1!6. 103 _A031 a016 i 74 106 A.73 4" 12" 15a f1gN[COA4ALCN!l A.,. ... 71 1130- 1760 6119.,.�_126_- -.391..._-4[,-_ m61S_..�pms-. $74 11, fi4 9i5 717V .STONE CORAA1CkeA ,}14110:13:at _!1L5Y, JAS. 0.719 0..41 a3 61006., "13 1.4: 1[6 3TONk mARAt[NRA -_- e9.S _ 7.61 _. L27"...-,Q4- ...LLODS ..am 36 362 1-% . '.. .. ST0.NC CORA/Il CIq 31 .... ._..._._.��- W-UP4 N� LT3 ,-3.71 .:.,171._-. ,226.•, Ok a0f1 6021 60: 6A9 1lB ..._ .._..__..__.. __._. +- AA c WA .IIIA WA - -IIIA._• _..NJA _WA - ,_WA -.WA•..•• N!F WA WA _ 1 H1 iTONt[ORRAL[illl A _. _ 11 6/96430.-_6.1E• IAE r W 9.86 1 0.tE7- ,aL93 7 T371,_ 4 L3 2.1 i 671 STONE CORRALCNR A ...._.._ `1717110617iS ??'�. .._> '...}�......53 _y ad 0.176 .....d16 5.97 Sia x.73 304 ill 1:<S .STONE[OA1GlCldl ll --�Llty05[ 70,. ASE 1S(B '..1.106,_. _• .. Q?. .COST 274 367 7.77 314 .111 5 iSTONC CORMLCNA II7/7107lO:lS _171 ,162 1.19 ..,L14„ D3 ..: ata 0174 27; 267 1.86 201 STONE CORAALCNAA -.--.. ..?/510/05.1346 43 236 LIS 126 .R1 a067 all 3.1v 377 STOK'?D AL QM S' STOM COGRAI CNII SI . .-. __ ¢fU/Os93a, !S7 ._, E , Oa 60 367 Ae537 LV 193_ 1.69 N.51 1:.1 _.-•••..••- .-••• _ _ aOA D_7S 4.4 221 ail 10.5 1!1 ... „LA ...NLA- ...I+LA. _„IA._�._..WA...__.._WA.... ..-PJA-_ NIA .WA. k!+!. .WA M,'A W3 NialD]a90 9:100 wl.A -NA, M!A ...WA ......WA ,NIA WA WA WA f4lA -STON[mA1tlLL Caw31 - _ _ �9 76fO5090 11%A _WA ILIA. !SL.A_ ._ WA - If(A. flj, .'. NIA WP, NLA WA N;h WA WA WA. -_N!A NIA I._.IWA. .WA., IILA... .NJA 3M NIA„_ I11A x!A NIA 570111 CDIRAL CNIIA -,,... �11ha(ri643S :..:{'n•... 76.4 OGL4kq" 37A 3A7 4 ., all :A ]6.1 S7ON{CQN61L[aot sl ...1fL1(al 10:15 .. L!! i1 579 7.1� � o.i ---,-..... ..517. �6AE 465 a7f1 -4 Ji STOXC CORM C hatsl.... ..,.- _-_•_-_ -•,_ 7/"m 11.•45 23.1,,, 2¢3 ..176-. 161 al -Dow - .01002. SA7 S.W 166 � 7'IG :.I'. ti• STONE 00 SI .7(x7-f964A5_.._.7.96•_ 9m _ 3.79 1.IIa 0E.._ m.909 N.009 791 6R3 7A9__ :. i-1 70.5 ..--. .__...__._�....._..--___- t_'-- - 6.77 1..16 2:7: ' _ .. .as O7 0911 0.051 ..J 2.' 4.57 5 s7a.t[pfuAlcfull�.--.. 7(?E 1 .... sA;. .- - - .. sTa6[O01glAlcKRA 17113@30-,_ ]OS 113, ,,_„677- 477!.,._1_.3__ .„d.1____„ml_ 1.17 7A2 1Ss 1.16 101 iJl. 'STO/It SOREAL LNASI 37. 1D�0 •_,2.17 a.a -.175 181 OA m.l .._W.1_ i6, A76 I.M. _Lti_.•.7.54, O6_. -b11 4IJ IDS 1A6 MIAI,A IDA ...._..._...... 7Ix3J1_1b_ 6 __INA.. WA _WA AtIA. ..--YWA;,_.._wl... WA.._:_ WA ..WA - WA,._ WA NIA NIA _ - . �`ZVI+Nenm- -_H(A WA - WA WA �...M/?_ __M(A _ WA WA WA MIA WA MIA WA STQ11LmpW CNA 11•- Ly[7/067020 16 •56E "__554_.. 9.% _..-UB.. ._d_1 -,y0.t 11 9.OS AM 61 552 .x: .STONLCRRR cKliA -••••'•..__.__.._...._ TART 330 __P. - .., .._. ...1 1- .ILI ,741 '1.49. •,5.1. ,__0.7 AS 41.1 i 4.82 7.3] 1.94 1,7 SIT S10NFCORRAICNAA _ .?[??/07S1D 3ab 16.9 3.1E S.ib 04 1 �.t O.qe 169 34 3.41 6: ill _ _...7_Ag.;•.„0.7 _ m:E.. .. 41.1 OV. 1.03 L1 513 F:5 711 SYONF CORA►1CNR yi •�...,_._._,:_aL3gl0_7100 -�M-, iS4 _ _a_f4- i.38 ....a7 ml_ _A.l __093 a9/ Od8 0»3 dT3 19:1 f QLD A WA - A WA„-I._.NIA„ NJA WA N!A WA W► HM N;A N!A STONE ODRRAl CN43�- _ _ _ 7- W... _. .. W_..--.-- _ _. ... ftOMC CORA!1LM151 .__.. W?EMMW ...._,WA.. ..Wa. -.._N!A N/.�__._..W�. ..._!Y!!.. .!'(1 WA WA WA_ rl'A ?,'A 1:!5 6710117 mR9Al[NRSI ..... .-. 9/11117/6-d0• :._W/A ..•,y!{ NLA. ...-,WJ< _N11 WA WA N!A WA NIA IEP AIA IAR Sta4C DORLU CWI SI,.. ___.. .....r.. ? _WA._ WA ..WA__ ..NIA_ WA_. INA- WA _ Nil WA 14A„ N!p ir!A /4A (,1L?�J6631:l6 _.9.7! -5[!1 ..,1.A,1.. _?• _.a..P2.. A.1 �A 44: 539 511 10.8 -23 SIm _ .,__ 'DIS 1R7 2A9 15 415 STON1mRRA1CMIx '7/27/108lOt06 ..E;9a _.n0,. 112 _ _ u. .i_,.. ._. _m1, ....�:� - STONLmARAICNASI ... - 7/2i/0691I0 Oso 713 3-57 _1.15 OA 1 .6.1 0.14 OAS 7.97 301 21 7a,l STCRamRAkLekA51 __. y13AY430 ..8.72 50:6 7.63. .._3.47 U6 A:1 m.1 I Dsi a" 31F STm T9 77.1 From caA !;m9,. ., . .... .?L+- _.!+/+.W_. ....W�....' .!+/!_.., ...._..!+Lx_......L!CA__. _JN�_. ..W4 WA .!;I&L ' '4" . ---- STON{CDRRALCNfIA.. .WA, 1 Wf WA, NIA... .IVA .NIA WA 51'Orn/,C mRRALCMIA SL7lIIHC!00- --_WA•„__.!f/A_ .,....WA.. NIA_.:_.J!J.S.. .WA_-_..._..NIA...:_�WA• WI NJA 14A NIA NI WA WA NIR stwxmwu[cw1v.... . 3R+IDl�O -- W�.._,.W�_. ' W�.._-r'19- -L1aA-.' --W�... WA A WA .4104 WA N/A NIA ;110NE GORRAlC1017!• .. 4r17/09Cfl0 _..._.W!�.....-.NL"......_Nle...., yL"._'....Ml!!...L__M1+! ......71A., r..W" ...WA -WA... WA ,PIA Ni4 ,SIONC COR!IAL C. St ., .. ._.. ..,__.............__ 9/.]aN?SnO.. NLS .t...w�...- ._.W�.._..._WA...-.._.W!!..... _. N!h WA. WA... - ILA uf:• ..WA 's1ON[COHR4LCIIR il. _......_. 1W71Ln7O.O7-......_NLA .•'...WA„ .„MJF._...-'SA__..1,...WA__.._._.NLA... WA Wh WA NIA WA IIIA aLr} .._ .....-_._........... ''....WA WA WA WA WA f4IA HVA •iA flP9[CORIIAlCN657 ..._.. .....__ _uL{ OQ•m ..NIA ..MLA ...WA.,. .WA .k It/A. u S10NC CORRAICkAA.._ - ....... 77/0I!f1Dc90 .,.:-iA- NLA _NLA WA....� wA _ WA.. . .WA WF W4 NIR 14`A 1,!f. hs srDirLQgARALcMp1+_. _ ...-•------ ..3GE4J.1O44^a.. ..3?•�.. .._�.Im a6u__ ,_La>!_._' a1-_ +03_ ..9.: ole 7.11 ,sal ena 21, 57ON167pXRA1CNa f1, !2! „ I_. -.960 3.,16.. .LAS 02 TAS„ A.1-, 02': 2.79 US iA 1::. $;ONE5M?ALCN:ISI• ��Sa00.._ 6.60, 586 3.65 .. }!r A.3_ Oa: 0.47 7.34 ]A_ } $9: 112 _C •_'O.1 411 IIA., 673• ,121 - 2.76 STONE mRRAR[N0.31,-., .__.. r76/1d1EY''0,,....US. ..1M ,497.__. �•u.__:__ _.__.. m•3_ 41t „• ,106) 060 SZE 2,16 l i 11 A WA ..-. IUA, WA WA iUA IUA NIA WA A• �S10NF06"c!!RA ...----- .__.....-------------:4r:9I�0o�0..__WA WA .NJA . _,NL_-'.__.k... _7t MIA WA NIA STONECO"CRAL ......... .. .......__..._.-. '•E/31/100AG_ _A WA ...WA -WA _WA- WA Il1A WA Wl WA T___.-_... ...._. _ _ S76NFCOwtcNAA 10VYbl�. .,__.WA .Ww WA KL . WI! ..!±!A ._!UA WA WA WA ..,W► IUA rti+ -ndTfF OORAALCNEA ....._._...... f(i0(Ia 11036 .2.iS 6.7 6.04 4]4 Im 411 42 27 2.N 3.79 !fN 99 4A' 57014E mRMlCN4A __ 3WL"L!kW. _ 321, -7.73 , 6.. 431_ 0.7 _m.i .461 ]SS 373 4.1] 42] 52 17.i STO!IE0DU*CNiSl. _ -`- •- _ _-.-?/Sdflt ltt5„ 3.06 103„ _:07 7-Ia.. ria mi w.l 0]a O7: IID-, :MI 47 :11 14 :l SPS 13.9 1.1'. .. _.._ . XlwRan ata Saar 1.775 7515 - OS - aa3Ss.._ 0676 2TE 3.495 SA9 ifa rfl: 77: oA7. ds9 ar A.. 114-114-wnlrn _w4 Ras SWRLEScn/Yn-DrM51i W4tn SWgPrdt'1!TO^W-1!Ka--- ».___ :.. p ......... 61LPA/OCXNA-Calllerpo N44clWhM4w1. _ UP . _.. . �e.IfvA,.dwm�enlNon-Nr+amngalaker rselTeLrfMsu fardrM��:+gL_,....»...............-..._._.'...6W3. ._�.--....,..:-_.._. - :h9fwna jCYilaPY Eo.W RW3oulod nl Otl�lYMlfNhoe!...._....._•-__-'_---'-_. _ '_'_--- --.-j....... ..:_-'-_1.._-._..,.:..__._....-_ _ ... -.-•"'. . . . _.. :rAR1wn14 TaefaRW,i.n7nut!r Agialkllle PVNtrlonC••••_•••••[a�elnaa0en_ ...........-._. _._._.._�.... ....__._..._�..._.., .. �_....,...._._..-. '.. ._ .,,_,_..__.... .. __.. ... _ONiLorr+a TwasAWA feyl+rAW!.!�nSk Uh honalon laPke,Al��traxm•........»___..._. - _...._ _ .., ., __..___-_-.... .. _ ... . Soo•.__.....__�..43..„_..... .. .. _ ....... .._ .C441wNa Nojnkltlon hr:f._.6K+1!^E W-1 ---..._....,.._,._.. 1 _.._.u._._1__ ..._.._. .. ... --.. 15SCPA'RISAafertroeOme OHNn3w4ur 1kaAllAC.u9ry.. . .. _... .. .. 71 lFtiaWibtammnlA4d Wq Gaen.•fM,man llnM+s11d A1WampagQbll irativul WcwmrdAO WaCW411a•Tn(,Iwim AW,110E lda CtlfnYw!OY.•frniNrttbrr 47 26 Table S.Stone Corrat C nr Sl,Part 2 of 2 ' - Ob.*.d Tvli/ O,af/Rled Tool 7MR4 INUM wd_ TeR11 INx0A7(i ToN1 -61s1oIRRE I Ta1L OILIAIwd ieeAl bw to" AAwWAw+1'A1ld6tl,Alf-RReralry Mewl N kd Sd.*m!Sd..W- Sam 16rwr tee 71N N.II,L,[ry.L,I. '----. _ Sa<R01!One P91Ih.... x......14&..._ 1LA..'._'!-� . ...h111._--Y6L!_.. .!tlh' 1,{/1-...L'lh .: INPL CNIn.. PAIL S/i)AR 1076 WA WA•-...MJ.A��.--1!L_ _NL+�..!_MJA...'-NLA, ML_S__K{A�..�.._. _:..WI!_ -9L+__ NJA '.'nh:iORRAElNR 51 !/5/01 IS;tS,,. W4_-_.�A_.. wA._..�. WA._ k/A �A_ _ ��.. W�-.. .- 4A•1:l.IWRALCYR51 -.-»-•_-.- _.__...._- NA_ .1•L-:_.. �.. _ ?.f.. .A NA •. !��-'•.-WA w CL•R'.tl L,la 51 .-- .. 7/7ryW11m.• N1eM/A ._!yA._..MIA N�fA .-,.-W4..-.:. •.'CWIN •NC CONRFI CNR SI 307)(179:70 KM.. WA WA,_-. .M/a W11 WA .Ir/!_ .NJA, ;-,NL4- W..,-i-WF. Ni lal6,h[CflA tl _ ... y74f071i.70 W4 i A. ' A...'._ Ir/A W,x, .!4A...� ?VA,'I _NIA•,-r,,rNA•_, ..WW! _WA WA i1Cf CLnRRALCNR51 .... ... ... V10/07!&45 M7A. �_ 1 ML4....� _ 11L11_ NL1l..1 W!►. 1V4, I WA._' M/A_.-. WA WA .7UA.... It/A :IaN000RRALCMF% S/l�lp 0.)5-,__WA WA•,l WA.._L'_...IY.A.L,._NL_� _yL���NL 11jA_�wA--'4--.W_.Z...r-NI�F_.�_..�,.. .- -._.. _ -_.._... 1- S7aNCIpRAIIl,ZNRS1 _ __ .._,. 17(Wal 1l IS A .i.,Nlw•_, -WA.-. W3!.. _WA ...N/!!-....N/A...»«WA-! KA-A.- A - .MCA_. !-.. .., SIONr QiRMLCNR 11 7/9 I7rlf WA A WA WA N/• A I NIA WA WA WA WA WA H[iA _ 170Hl CORIULCNRSI .. -•._. 1/7lNS lOSO... lnA.•. .INA. MIA._ ._NIA.....'-_WA -WA... ,,,WA, KLA.... WA -WA .MLA 1 WA L ..NWA ._, .NIA :tnNf lt'RRALC NRSI 7Jl10114A6 WF :«.«. •.�..� WA__.1.._.!A._. N/4 - N(A_ (A-_. _ _._N/A .NLA. .. .WA 1 )AA4(iARALtmNRSI .. -- ]/1!/0!1110 .--WA"I ...-I"'. __.._.!WlA nN1.COnrA[CHR P 7717/0!I14S_-._!yA �...Nl!.:.._WA WA__ !WA ..N14..._:_.WA.._.._.NCA WF x(A _NJ4.» ..!+IA _ MIA 110.4(COHHAt t NP 11 •. ._ U{�a711a0....II(A_, �...MfA -.,-..NrA__.! ••.NIA___,. WA W4 �,__W.4___MJA :._N14_, _,NL_ .tUA• NL4 . S'C1NL 1'OFIUe[HRtI - 4)76)0!13.Q0 IIA_ ,WA. 14A__J..._. •'-_. .WA-.__W7!.»'.«WWLA_.i NIA __.NIA .-1'/A..:__MCS.;..-.HLA.- M!A . :GSI r,f, CNR•+ SI1V 1T:�0,, an6i ..LDII Q57 1 YGi _NJ•-_?57.,,.. ].LI 717 7.77 - 0.11L <6197_:...OA6, 1.i5 t1r�[COYRAtf SIRy - .. ...-.._. .I/b1W 1136.._Q904•!, O.tSA.. 4�6��_-4L9_,,,-,-_WA 732 ' !'J6 3,07. ' 7117 00AW ap071 OAb-.. t.7a :H'\Y L[RIMf C MR SI ....._ 7%yu4p�b_..Q308 L.ya7 11-1-.. 323 - •_• .3X1 171»,.. 6.66 1.15 [a81S_ 6107, _� I 521 i'(•N(COWL CNN 51 .._ ... ., ... __-_.... .211710.41}10„_6761.._L91-_. 30.1 -,.:._.?m_.._._![/A�.,.. _,. -._ .� -:._AO76 OA56 _ 157... 21.9 ♦rOAL CORRAL CNR 51 3/010417AS 0.069... OA9R„ 1.46-. S.S1 WA,. LIN 1!1• . L7/... t36• .O6s1.. 609 6.07 SAS ;r(INCCOARKCNRU 4AA7410(y OAS OAS! L15 4.4 WA 11 734 • 4.74 4.4 __ 0.W c 1 L3 JAS STORC CC)PRAt CNN 51 .S(S�M 1130•'�0.W3 ' QQ17••_,QOf_'� 211 g _ !(!!_r_? ._. .. ...,..»{�.- .-.L.-..._ m..- !1-..1-31 4 STnNC fARRAL CNw 11 __._ .. 10/510!& .- WA.-,...wt1 1/A _ _IVA-.' WA..._!7/A_ W_A_ WA _•__W4_ ----W- -WR..._.!yA. WA __ %TQHC097RALCNRl1 11(419930 0.0.59 0.112 1T! 411 NCA l9{ 9.72 30- SOA 6077 0.IW 1.70 L11 SIf1ALCOPPASCNRy _ --._••_ - I7J'7(0112A3 -Q314 0797_ 107,-� us ,NIA • _,119.... L19- LDS... 7Q4 .-..��. 0;� 0;i4 1.14_ +115Ai Cl,'HniICNw St - - 1/1W4S 11:16. ..6111 OAri •,241 _j. 32.2 __MIA L7A ]AO L99 7.N 6� DAIS _ 1.[0 401 ;u:Nt raaanLCNRW 1/)CC170:Lsn09S -ail?«•» 7.35 79A M(A•_ _S35'• _7m Oa99 1.As .. _.._ ._ .._..-.._.. -. 4057 •L17 ..{23._ X/A 157.• Lit _ i 3 - •-NA07 andt0 _o.» ]16 :IM,C[aanAlCNAv lW1cm law - dm.- _ _ __ _-.....»_. - •••• A 1.77.. .7.IS 422._-. SA6-:.aOAW aGmS oJI.. ..0.03 ':u;7 a+daA:CNRa _. ._ _ 4/790(6710 0.061 6147 �_ 7.i1T 3.07.,-._ ,_Nf. •-r•,N'Lr1RR1r LXR+, S 936 „0.006_-., ]•41._ MR .677._..:.. II(A;•,-, 1.41 � 3A4 407 r 1.46,..' AA09 6071 ' __6-7 R74 . .............. nes...._. -.._ •.('a.[rnaRA:r AA tl .--_. L,Hr[rvlr.IrrHRn �nv6soso W,Q.•._..NL..: ."(� _I...WA N1A -N/A_.. ML.-...!!IAL_.' .W.4 :..SRCA....'_n!x_.....HLA JA ,r(tN'(nANprHRll .T T, (a1NAlCI:R 51 ... _417sWm WA,.--:.-WS(!!_...._h(A.. K/�A._.. ..-NWe—"--Wti.-: 'N1h ._-.�.....--WA.......M/0.-.:.-.A A s:Mr4 LO0.RAL C RtR.r 16/.4!0!.090, WA -NIA_ NCA T..914 WA_ !VA ! NCA•. II/A,-.. ..NfA ..MCI, rR7A W4• Nj• .7111;La0.RA1 CNRtt -- IVIU0.S k36- ..6967 0.007. ,103 1 11.2 WA.. 7.73 0.27 766, 767 _A.069 :<0.469' 155 LS7 SrfINCc6RtlALCHR51 _. 17/14/0510:10' QW{ OA11 I 77.1 1q - NLA 6 {:64 71J iL{ 06.661 -,I1A11 1A1 I.lb ::IOtif CORRAL CUR SI - ._.. _. t174J16,1L•45...6.9i5 4071...... 29.}-..«; 974 _ WJ1 .. ...14.__..6::'u..-.t S.IS._.•m00S , OAIl, ,0;4! OJ!7,_, r6NC tORMI[YR It ... 7!77/064:(3 A.OIS,.I-; .,I.. 4 4a9 WA...,...757 : 334_ - 6!1 -_ 7ym Z:0W 06GD9 L47_.. IA3 Sr(WELfHIRAICNR 11 .. .••..••. -. !711061093 ' 0.936 - 470, S.SS <9La9 +0:007 6.Q 7.71... -iov C6PnAl t'1:Ry 4/17/a64la -,_!L - 0.014 999 11,1 WA 165 -s.71 - L75 - L99 0619 +0.03 117 L61 -- +•OH[[ORNAL[rfAsr <OAI Ld5 L7f MyL�A 354 1.9{ S36 0.92 Am •'-!6W -Q9".._ 0.97 ':r0:17[alTVAI Cr(w♦1 R!l7J064;00�•,t0A4 <a131 a77 __•79A_- __NIIL .._715.--: ],td 1.57 1 7.47 _ME R_7M I__n6___- ALN SfIRL[01(IAItNA SI _, ,7176706OAO _1[%A_ WA • A A- WA A A A ., NJl_; WA_ ,,IIA._ -WA ....� .._. .__�..._...._9L..._.. _.1_.40.._1_-_� �.-_. . '.rl'k(Lrinl l'f1171, - IOC7y660.00-'..._WA.. _.W�..• .«.?[fA..__----VA :If.H::,IRPMCNa:: ...._... 17/3710610-1d•„rOD/ !,6.IL�,-„- 1LS.. 71! ...ML-.. L77... i.97 .14-: 214 _!OA6 X47 a79 A!?l :'L14.[ PM%C NN$I -._».. 179A7f130a3._I._Q71S_ ?7'1......._.n] _- 019 ID7 _ 1.21 , ...la`._ 7n4._� .N.OI-- mai-,_ 7�4- 7.5,1 ".C.f.0 CORNY CNR II 771iI07 SS0, ._0.45__I, D.171, tR_.... A-1_. _WA-._1S9 7.79-.. ..A7S_ 117 *W _gym - 7u 3.01_ rex.CORPA,C rA a - .. . R!>ON79.59„ _,A B?6?... ..u!__.._4�._. _dg3_;_-1-x _-.+3._...? _- ��??_.-.e91_:_.°�?. . 7:79 srrMLCAAALCNAR rj1VD7{00 0.96 • 0,066 73.4 411, 13 LS "0! 3.77 !L" AOm <Q03 1.a1 ]wt ::OAti CIIRAALC HRN 51Sa/,07,006 W+!_ 1lCA.. Wk. NCA .MCA.. i- WA NLA•, - M/A WA. N(11 = WA WA-, WA '.14WL CORRAL CNA y R01y070A0 WA NCA N/A.-.. !IIA WA ,K/4 W4-' MIA F WA 914 !VA WA, WA -TO7.i CORRAL CNR 51 911lp7OA6 WA A A A A WA • NA A A MIA WA_ WA 7L._..�-_._ - ../ !N_...._ ..... ML-_ ....I_._. .W__._.Ml .. xtONC Cf'hYAL CNA II ... w 1a111/OTam. 9!A ..-...W4 WA MIA_. WA, _WA NCA•_' M/A.-�. rl(A• WF_ N%A WA IIIA ♦,,!Nf r(m.AL C Na u - 1/77!9611:10 - n06 I 7.01 ZI} -.. .126 x/• Ll9 9.74 0.H Q9 �.C7_ d67l- .d5 _ ..16.7 _ •i[rN;1:0RAn!C rfR Y 1I77A771O.t4 30.0. WA. L6b .LS4_ 7.7 LS _<607 <Q0.7... Ola 466 S1,1N1 t0mhal f N1 y - l/7r1f069-I0 -09t ! QON L43 179 N/A _A441 it __- 5.9 14.(41,, �.4A <6 - QE 117 •-Iom CORIALC NR u .... ..... .... .VL]N0930 6616 I 0.069 6.17 10.1 INA 0LLm Ad)_ '.:ON([IIRAALLNA tS - 7/77A]{090 WA_-.'_- A WA A WA WA A NIA,-: A WA;- A NIA WA 10A .�A.-�- L__ _ WA ..:.VA __MCA WA Nlf.nliIALLNA S• .. a'�•.'._WA...r_MA..�.._ A _._...f�14 _WA-__..NL_1 .ALA. .WA,_._NCR..I..WA.«.i---N�A_ _.WA SY,N:telh7nLC![a ll9100._.?....W4-._,0W1�..!...!Y,A-- -•-xM._-._K7�_'...WDA..?tL4.. ...MJ.x._.I._!uA____NJA__`...!!LA-'-._KLa_...914. OrI:HC CfINICALC HR}, .. - 7/7tJ09LA0 WA«. ..!.___/A_. !+! .!WCA.. .rUN7 tORRAI.Lnd it .WA LILA^1 WA ItA- M,f[ - ..�A-..IW/N_ .MLA_ !.�S11A- --1A _.-WA 6T[7NCCaRRALCNR Sf ___.... - 9pVa9 RA6. MCA_ ,NLA.-I NCA W4. WA. ,WA.. .INA, N/11 - .-WA- NIA WA MLA WA r10H7 ClINRAS C N1 t1 _ LOh INS qJW. WA. # MCA MIA• W4-... WA NCA M%A If/l1 .MLA.. M/A .WA MCA NTMI(CORRAL C NR ti _ 1111{([19QW- WA ,3 NL4_ i WA, W4• 31/A,_. WA, WA WA- N14 NCA... NIA WA WA N/A Lrnrl:[.ORRAI.CNA51 .. 1714/09CA6... WA wMA A WA W4-_ ,N%A., NCA_ W4... WA WF W4. �_ .. TML...,.. (. x{._• _.. - tHINf tORRAI.f NA 51 ... ipWlO lOrAS ! saA1'.. 1.41 I 1St � 1.06 _� N_!A_ '..,476.. .• 077 � QSB O.fil _<600 X003. ..046 L6.7 tltP-'-(I1.IIfA1 LNfI LI - -- - -- -- - 3p01011-76 _ 00A6 .0,{70- -. p69- !•.•s6.6 WA ].]! 79a- �7.07 L54 md1 <60! ].m S'(R :!11Hf CfIAIGrLr.4941 .. ... - 111U7049S <401- s0A1- „•_266 .-1CA WA 157 L13 447 156.•, �.W 0Op] !AI_ Lf1 •.•nN[remRA:etanSl _ . ... 1p9m t9.W 0m7 LN 17.6 WA 151 t.96 7.9.5 3 ._- sGL1 00.01 1.06 7.7 .rON!ffrARAI C pin SI 0%7 10&50 W.0/ ' .OW 0.767___ 796 431 ,M _.uw <0.f/9_ 7.{S L57 �•,1rR CaPRA,[:tP ti - '....-. N]41100m .A'••1 MCA ��rr,�A WA A N/A rl/A• �,I• !ISA IqA • WA ., ':IC;[I:I:RRRI C NR51 _.... .,...._.._... NCSIIIO-Q00 1. .WA-...'- WA-.. _MCA.. ._K/A.--. ..Mu/'A_.. NW+!_. .N1A_ ,NIA. WA MLA SfnNT llldlinl CNA'I ..-. .. _....,..,.. 10(2y100A0_. .KLA, :..._KC✓!_. ..._MLA.... !M -ryp- WA._�_.Mh_.. �...N/A. •ft WA.. WA N/•., -.InmN ntiMI rNR II _ ._ -.--_---.. 11/?0(1030•.�_ sOW_ :._00'07...._47.4 ..1__..759_ 111A_`..Yd_: tl __136 1.12 N-nH:f 11uRAe a MA$1 (7/1711010.10 mq <0.01 6.29 IAL_ WA__ 197 •� 7.E1 1-H -_1.0E-_C OAS! •. 612 --•t,17„- 7S ::eH[cnRRntcaasl .,---- i/;iyitt2:7s I ma_. oasis•�3e?._.-_..-_7�9,_' • i:7%.. -' M. _' _oath - o3l7 _ Al3 ARrdwAlln O.W. 131 67A _ 709.._' ?! m...'. 50.4 4177 0317 417 24-4 0-0140.0965 5 ..... Lm .. 497 1 7.7061t. 1 .. a1a3- : 4.45_ 0054 ?960 t,0.lS 7.13 1 L7/ ..i 024 1.7 t.l{ 616 ! 0.97 0.001 OAO7 .__6.14 0.64 IVACO A—,PWn-Nh A.q W.I. •Plw., rICA -•« t___. ....._..... ._--__,_ _ .._ _ .._, .... RRf4IM•."P.u• UI'A"R[W.nN'G•R]ard53rllM'li RILL ._._.._. .-__.. y..-_.- _ L"'-:_ _- .,»W...�-�.�....___ C.:rrPliNWlt•[.,ihrrw!•,.IRI,ItrallhneAl .. _ _9.7 I ._,__!._...._. � -.-...J . .' nIr•nn nl:.l,31,(iI ASR Ik6m llf la,lOntll.O ws[n �.�_ .___• -•._1 .ItI UA IH'.4H AavIux S•Iu"Hlx(�6 Rr11r1. .. r__. _...« � L _ _• _ - -. t'llmxU lnlNq.lpl,l.t uH•I,.nbly l-IWI-Mitt A1M1 AW drn1!.vrl(Of ifPM6YLtMiP 675 ^-_,_.-.--..-,.,..ti _. � _-_ •F_- .._.. ruhlurow .,RUL•4x. nl dAM1'n,6 WR1n __. ___.....____-.- � ...-«....-.. 0�..�_..__f_.._._ __-�_- -_... �..-..�.. C,IGlnr.11L•r<,RUM 1,••h-t.A9,H1LMfg 1'iIG11 n,w1,n<,AxM rrrWwMIHAQINIK lt9 ReattlAfbn I,LRRIIe11Y1L L6xL1ALr61kA I--�•�.�....• _._•--•.• • m I -yruulHirr WalerNulA7GW,.Y.,•1�7nd 6dM,lh.ealw.k •_ ... ..--_....,�...._...-..._:_..__..__...._.___..._-__-..».. .. ..-....__..._._,_. _.»_- -_ ..._.. i'wGlurry.•YdGIK<IknlrnlOtlfRlR6Wn6r .. j .- .. � 1 - NnlN.ulAud•mrat 5elr,lmSNr111N AaRlRalt9r 9rlrAiryWria, r .. .. .,.. ._.... .:.. - - OSfrAIR,:RrrnrMrQnrIAkw"ROW WHUM hdNwry, -. I - �' • ._. _'.I, t - - I N.Nxr'.I R.IIIW h,(w12•7Al1A tf.,her,vlRwrrtn•I-rw♦t'II IrfO fAReN•14„AM NttdN fld WNhff'ryM•'R1Rf1�M7Hf id6 I __ .«� __._. .._... _ - N.nnrvlYwllnrrw•'Yr• _. .. ., -•_..1 _,.,....._!__-....._._ ._._..... _�_.w..,..-_� ___•. !ITA,r.ln•r•N�J,wRlw Awwlk I,TA A1a,invM1 Ca„(frRN1UA , , •.. 27 Chico .com CORRESPONDENCE # Statewide water savings down to single digits in October By Staff Reports,December 12,2017 Sacramento>>Water conservation statewide dipped into single dig- its during October according to a report issued last week by the State Water Resources Control Board. The water board said on average Californians used 8.5 percent less water than in October 2013,the benchmark pre-drought year. Mandatory water conservation targets and penalties for excessive use were dropped this spring,and the conservation numbers have declined pretty steadily since then. The water board stressed the state still used 48,381 acre-feet less water in October 2017 than 2016,but the number was the lowest since March 2015,when savings were just 3.9 percent. Locally,conservation was generally somewhat better than average. The Del Oro Water Co.fed the way on conservation,trimming usage 16.3 percent in October compared to the same month In 2013,fol- lowed by Chico at 14.8 percent,Oroville at 12.9 percent,Willows at 8.6 percent and Paradise at 6.1 percent. Oroville still had the lowest water usage per person per day at 65 gallons,followed by Del Oro at 84 gallons,Willows at 114 gallons, Chico at 141 gallons and Paradise at 166 gallons. Average statewide water use is 101.9 gallons per person per day. Conservation is the Sacramento River drainage was lower than statewide at 7.2 percent.That was better than the South Coast(6.9 percent)but worse than the Bay Area(11.2 percent). The water board said 40 agencies reported using more water in Oc- tober than in 2013,with Redding the worst in the state with a 41.2 percent Increase,from 146 gallons per person per day in 2013 to 205 gallons in 2017. Red Bluffs conservation rate was 7.8 percent,Marysville was 9.3 percent and Yuba City was 6.1 percent. A Wednesday Update Doe, 13, 2017 This weekly electronic newsletter is designed to keep you current on California Water Plan news. We welcome comments,suggestions,and any news tips that may be of interest to water planners. ` Workshop for two chapters A workshop covering Chapters 4 and 5 of California Water Plan Update 2418 will be held a of Update 2018 set for the Thursday, Jan.4,in Sacramento. Chapter 4 first week of the new year details plans for investing in water resources -F sustainability; Chapter 5 is the funding and - implementation plan.The workshop will cover proposed funding scenarios,along with the "--� '"` •r priorities and schedule for implementation. RSV s"are q 'e Strategic Growth Council Almost$34 million in grants has been awarded by the Strategic awards$34 million in grants Growth Council's Sustainable Agricultural Lands Consgrv_ation {SALC}Program.The funding will be split among 27 projects that for land conservation projects protect agricultural land from development and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In its first two years,the SALC Program has provided $42 million in funding. Dolens of watershed The California Department of Fish and Wildlife restorationro ects receive (CDFW)has awarded funding to 39 watershed • p i restoration ro•ects.The awards total$39.7 million, funding from CDFW with approximately$8 million going to projects that ° directly benefit the Delta. Most of the funding was made available through the CDFW s;Proposition 1 Restoration Grant Programs. Science board seeking The Delta Independent Science Board(ISB)is accepting public public comments on comments on two draft documents.One covers the development p and use of science in estimating water supply reliability for the two Delta documents —eta.The other is a review of t e In ra ncvEcotooicaIPmJrnm. Comments can be emailed;the deadline is noon on Friday,Jan 12. There.will also be an opportunity to submit comments during an ISi3 m edtinq on Thursday and Friday,Jan.4 and 5,in Sacramento. Annual,water law The' th Annual California Water_Law Sympgaium will be Saturday, symposium well focllfs on Jan 20,in Berkeley.;lt will focus-on fle future of the;state s'water infrastructure The panel d�scussiorts will include infrastructure alrfon11W5 Ilifrgstractgr6, Rubiattves for,uliban areas,utilrzmg water transfers to recharge groundwater basins,and ins how a degrading fratructure impacts -Rif S k �; •Old .sh'p�" � er�3uratront:�oundat�ans�e _ •{ i Q 4 CORRESPONDENCE ChiCOER.com 1 # 7 1 Habitat grants mean millions for north valley projects 9y Steve Schoonover,December 17,2017 A new round of state and federal environmental grants have been released Trout Unlimited also received a planning grant of$346,000 to figure out a recently,and a number of area projects have been among those funded to solution for the Bend Water Users Association diversion on Paynes Creek. the tune of millions of dollars. Clifford said the current screens are a way down a ditch from the creek, Several of the state grants are aimed at assisting rare fish species In local which can confuse fish. streams,but a mix of state and federal funds are also going to upgrade bird The Western Shasta Resource Conservation District was given$419,000 to habitat on a ranch in Honcut. plan a fish screen at a diversion on little Cow Creek,and the Maldu Summit Deer Creek Consortium and Conservancy got$95,130 to plan restoration of Tasmam KOjbm.That's a meadow In the Humbug Valley that will be restored to a The biggest single grant is$2.2 million to improve fish passage at an Irriga- condition where traditional practices can be conducted. tion dam on Deer Creek in eastern Tehama County. Pintail ranch It is one of three projects underway to improve the chances for threatened Grants totalling$384,300 from sources other than Proposition i were wild spring-run chinook salmon to reach the deep pools farther up Deer awarded to the California Waterfowl Association to Improve habitat on a Creek Canyon.That stream has the second largest population of the spring- Butte County ranch. run after Butte Creek,where millions have already been spent to aid the fish In reaching the cool water where they spend the summer before spawning In Most of the 507-acre Pintail stanch in Honcut Is already under a conservation fall, easement held by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife,although The grant to Trout Unlimited comes from Proposition 1,and will pay for 190- about 60 acres is still used to grow organic rice. foot long"roughened rock ramp"at the dam diverting water for the Deer It€s described as being part of a wildlife corridor encompassing 3,400 acres Creek Irrigation District. across nine different properties. Trout Unlimited attorney Matt Clifford described the ramp as a modern ver- The Pintail Ranch includes two seasonal wetlands,128 acres in the northern sion of a fish ladder.He said there's a ladder at the dam now,but this would part of the property and 23 acres In the south.There are about 300 acres of provide a more permanent solution to help fish over the barrier. uplands,which provide nesting habitat for waterfowl. The project is part of a broader project to help the spring-run chinook in The northern part of the property was restored by a grant In 2001.The new Deer Creek. grants focus on the southern part,and improving the efficiency of the water Farther up the canyon,a new fish ladder around Lower Deer Creek Falls Is delivery system. essentially complete,according to U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service biologist A$310,000 grant was awarded Nov.30 by the state Wildlife Conservation Trisha Parker. Board,which is coupled with$74,300 of a$1 million grant awarded Sept.6 The$2 million project,reported In this newspaper in August 2017,required by the federal Migratory Bird Conservation Commission.The landowners a redesign after excavations at the location showed the foundation rock have also put$61,000 toward the project. wouldn't support the initial plan. The 23 acres of wetlands in the southern part will increase to 88 acres,and The new ladder replaced an old structure that rose more than 15 feet in 160 acres of the upland property will be planted with perennial grasses fa- seven steps over the course of about 15 yards,which was too steep for vored by ground-nesting birds. many of the fish. The largest part of the grants will go toward increasing the efficiency of the The new ladder has 15 steps and Is about three times as song. water delivery system for the entire property. It currently relies on three shallow wells that deliver water through a series The cost was being split between the federal Bureau of Reclamation's Cen- of ditches.The wetlands are lust saw areas surrounded by levees.They are tra[Valley Project Improvement Act funds and draught aid money from the filled with water in winter,but there's no way to move the water around to governor's office,according to Parker. allow for changing conditions or to support plant growth. There Is a third major diversion on Deer Creek by the Stanford Vina Ranch The new system will have a deeper,more reliable well,and a lift pump.With Irrigation Co.and Clifford said Trout Unlimited has a grant and is working new ditches and pipes,that will allow the water to be moved from one wet- with the dam owners to plan passage around that dam. land to another,and allow for water to be managed more efficiently Other grants throughout the property. Other north valley projects were also part of the$39.7 million in Proposition The property Is managed by the landowners,according to Chadd Santerre 1 grants awarded Dec.6 by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. with the Waterfowl Association. There were 39 grants awarded statewide all told. "It's super expensive to maintain habitat,"he said.The new system will be Two construction grants went to the Family Water Alliance to build a fish easier,provide better results and allows for more water conservation.That screens on water diversion. will all save the landowners money. One,for$210,000,will build a new screen on a diversion in Butte Creek Can- The owners are willing spend the money to be able to hunt on the property, yon.The site Is located along the stretch of creek where the Butte Creek he said. Canyon Ecological Reserve is located. All told,the Wildlife Conservation Board funded 12 projects totalling approx- The second,for$1.16 million,will improve the screens of the Garden High- innately$2.6 million in grants on Nov.30. way Mutual Water Co.intakes on the Feather River downstream from Yuba The Migratory Bird Conservation Commission approved$21.9 million In City• grants in 16 states on Sept.6. Vednesday Update . 20, 1017 This weekly electronic newsletter is designed to keep you current on California Water Plan news. We welcome comments,suggestions,and any news tips that may be of interest to water planners. e - Day-long webothon Registration is open for a day-long webinar will preview all five that will preview all five chapters of California ® AaWr_Plan Update 2018.The we inar will be ;. .. e Chapters of Update 2018 an opportunity to provide input on any area of -. concern in Update 2018.The session will begin _ at 9 a.m.on Tuesday,January 9.Also, RSVPs are still being accepted for an Update 2018 workshop ori T'Urst ay," Jan.4.It will cover Chapter 4(plans for investing in water resources sustainability)and Chapter 5(funding and implementation). Panel discussion transcript A panel discussion1ranscripA from the recent Update 2018 plenary meeting has been posted online. Panel members talked about issues ,from Update 2018 plenary and benefits of connecting integrated regional water management meeting now available with the implementation of the Sustainable Groundw Management Act.The plenaa-meefing was held in September. Discount registration rates Save the dates for the 16th Biennial Symposium on Managed Aquifer Rechar e.It will be March 6 and 7,in San Diego.Along available for managed with information on the latest groundwater recharge techniques, aquifer recharge symposium there will be an optional field trip to the Carlsbad Desalination elant. Discounted registration rates are available through Sunday,Jan.21. New,resour[e to be JoUnChiW After the New Year,a new resource will be launched to help local next month will provide Climate governments[earn more about climate action plans and policies being implemented throughout California.The Climate Action Pac!aL „nCt[Otl plan Infer llfq on Mab..(CAP-Map)Will provideadatabase of strategies.A' bin r to laur3ch grid demoristratethe mapWll"be held Thursday,Jam It Cenhlll'Vnlley Candswpe The next Centra{Vane Land ca e'Cb ervatlon Pro ect works o will be 1=eb 26 and 27,In$aGramertl0 It wl[I#ocus on developing S IvonSerfYatiop Prolett Sets` lans for Iarldsca a scale ada tatian action`s The>jiiorksho p p ' p dates for ne tIw ires Information on pre workshop webinars :MMMRr,�' y� olS',: yY 011 .... t t S i. all;t fo,,promofe safe affvrdabi.. and ``�sli}le::�l'rater�ora113C�1 �� � �me r r� a SOMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 1 of 19 r About Contact FAQ Donate T FRONT PAGE LATEST POSTS NEWS BY CATEGORY CA WATER 101 WATER MANAGEMENT TOOLBOX RESOURCE PAGES CALENDAR ABOUT DONATE SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases DONATE draft BMP for sustainable management GII(ornlo'rindraer.Jrn;&mositustcJ somxe forty trrneverand Information criteria is malnlysuP0orted by slmr sora:J;tt and 8ydonatlons from rr�!c:-s 1lkc yca CLICK HERE TO MAKE A [�Dece1111)(af 20,2g,17 m M,,-)Ven �sr Meetincls TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION NOW ONLINE :t resenrtlr nt 1 Ita *-mss" tnrArfGifrnn,rrinrr ;,� E^s� g S�m��.CA4PaC�rLiUrau'y.l�ct Public comments due by January 8 V Recently.the Department of Water Resources Sustainable Groundwater Management Program released a draft Best Management Practice(BMP)document that focuses on Sustainable Management Criteria(SMC)for public comment. This BMA characterizes the relationship between the different sustainable management criteria and describes best management practices for [SEARCH THE NOTEBOOK developing these criteria as part of a Groundwater Sustainability Plan(GSP).This BMP does not impose new requirements,but Enter your search term describes best management practices for satisfying the here to search all posts: requirements of SGMA and the GSP Regulations. A series of public meetings was held across the state in early u December:Department staff provided an overview of the draft document,answered questions,and took public comment. DWR staff also discussed the development of a new online tool for GSP Browse posts,filtering notifications,and provided information on points of contact in by category and/or tag: DWR's regional offices. https://maven snotebo ok.com/2017/12/20/sgma-i tnp I ementation-dwr-re leases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 2 of 19 THE DRAFT BMP ON SUSTAINABLE AIICategories - vI MANAGEMENT CRITERIAAll7ags Trevor Joseph,Senior Engineering Geologist with the Department of Submit Water Resources,began the meeting with an overview of the draft best management practice document. SIGN UP FOR GAILY OR Prior to SGMA,groundwater management was voluntary and more WEEKLY EMAIL SERVICE of a carrot approach,meaning that those who produced groundwater management plans were eLigibLe for state grants and Sign up for free email other opportunities,he said. However,it was only semi-effective as service and enjoy the convenience of receiving many plans didn't cover the entire groundwater basin or subbasins, all the Notebook's news in and there Was various Levels of implementation of pans.The your inbox. Daily emails 5ustal arrive by gam;Weekly <:. emails are delivered nabLe Fridays at 9oam. By Groan SGMA"OVeNI@W \, subscribing to Maven's Notebook,you'll always be dwater ,�;S " z"M nn- :Y•,is r k;"•_" " one of the first to know! Mona cJ O tO� ax �4 indicales required r „ 2 r a nr4 ement dill °l'I a` Email Address k DWRa z{ Act n ��"ra� � M'ui Wrxg rndAt�asrng 3 K � passeq � eatt �ltes Subscribers d in re'cY,g»ltn th`a � `s El Daily Emails: Full grokndcya ?',maiia�g nre 5F SWRCB GSA the fall 1n:C flfarr� use ' Service(6 days+ of � 4 °I Breaking News) Q0�4 M a" 201 _W. 11 Daily Emails:Monday 7 and i� r y ,� ftp' through Friday only;no becam breaking news e effective January 15=.2015;the Act set out a specific set of ❑Weekly emails from requirements for sustainable groundwater management to avoid Maven's Notebook State Water Board intervention in high and medium priority basins, Email Format The Act assigned new authorities to Groundwater Sustainability O html Agencies,and gave the new agencies 20 years to reach Otext sustainability. The Act identifies four entities for implementation: Sign me up! I. The local agencies or Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs),which need to develop Groundwater Sustainability Plans(GSPs)to avoid undesirable results and achieve SIGN UP FOR INSTANT EMAIL.SERVICE sustainability within 20 years. 2. The Department of Water Resources will evaluate the Want your news sooner groundwater sustainability plans and provide assistance to the than gam?Enter your email address for this GSAs. list and you'll receive an 3. The State Board is the enforcing agency who will intervene email.instantly,every time there's a new post in the event that local agencies are unable to reach Enter your email addre sustainability. 4. Stakeholders are referenced specificatly in the Act,which Sign me up! includes requirements for a stakeholder process throughout the development of the GSPs 11ttps://mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 3 of 19 High and �1h/�f� f li j f SGML bV6r03W 4 rif 13• a i a med iu ., t•c`y',f%�. ^yk,,,;; iy",, ,-:.,2'c�.;;'^r�;;r�t9,✓" �.9``-,�'^ 0.1 m I r t Pr o i y basins ^• - s . '�� � �zi must UPCOMING CALENDAR s naLk cru,; s ;-y compl EVENTS y With the JAN Delta Independent: 7HU 04 Jan--�05 Jan`na A -.-.unde+ml+r/rsults - > Sustal sw•��wcr e�uu. . �> M BROWN BAG SEMI 4 .Rs dvL t;i r eia h ° (n'•able nj 04 Jan @ 01:30 pm �31oun JAN BROWN BAG SEMI dwater FRI -05 Jan @ 12A0 pm Management Act in order to avoid State Board intervention, JAN Sustainable Vlticull identified on the map as those basins shown in yellow and orange. 9 TUE !)09 Jan @ All-day Mr.Joseph likened sustainable groundwater management to a Assembly Committ pyramid. "Sustainability is realty a complicated set of definitions in -09 Jan @ 49:01)am the Act,"he said. *The pyramid shows the core requirement of State water Resoul 09 Jan @ 09:30 am avoiding undesirable results and is material to achieving sustainability.-then achieving the sustainable yield in the system, JAN Assembly Commits WED 10 Jan @ 09:30 am completing and achieving sustainable groundwater management. and ultimatelyachieving the sustainabilitygoaL Its this description JAN 1 Is Silicon Valley As of these components that's really the focus of the Sustainable THu 11 Jan @ 06:30 pm Groundwater Management Criteria draft pest Management Practice JAN California Water cc document" uv o "1 17 Jan @ All-day U.S.Federal Fire ar Mn 17Jan @1Z00pm Josep JAN h BMPs°vs: 'GSP Regu(aion 1t3 Delta Protection Cc THU �18 Jan @ 05:30 pm Hated • Role of BMPs to provide clarification,technical assistance,and JAN CV-Salts WorkshoK an examples to help GSAs develop elements of GSPs. 1$ import BMPs(technical assistance)vs.GSP Regulations(requirements) FRI �19 Jan Ca Ali-day • GSP Regulations Amp or•e� emp cr,r�r Southern California ant :n,:ai ChA' II WL 19 Jan @ 12:00 pm • Sec.352.2(Mondtneinp .� dlStinC Protocols) [" (DMP Ir2-Monitoring BtuS1t JAN California Water La tion pemeeah,Standards,and Slier) BAO 20 Jan @ 08'00 aro betwe Sec.352.4(InsiaMtion nj�tnrut d w ledtaae ofMonitoring Sites) JAN WE$INAR:Californ en the [8MPa2-hsonrtorrngnztxzrnlc 1 22 X22 Jan @ 11'00 am Netrorlu and Identllkatbn GSP fes " n `rz Ykr MON tmverlrret o€ eT Data Gaps) reguta = JAN State Water Resoul 2 E tions P3 23 Jan @ 09:30 am and Best Management Practices, The GSP regulations lay out the JAN Delta Stewardship t specific requirements for the information that the Department TH J 25 Jan—26 Jan @ A needs to see in the GSPs for evaluating whether or not a basin is JAN Central Valley Flao. sustainable:these requirements are not optional. However,the Best 26 t 26 Jan @ 09:00 am Management Practices(BMPs)are technical assistance:they are Changing Channel; ,`_5 26 Jan @ 07:00 pm https:Hmavensnotebookconi/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 4 of 19 optional. The GSAs can choose to use these BMPs if they want,but they do not have to. Click here to view the There is somewhat of an exception with respect to monitoring of complete calendar. groundwater basins. Mr.Joseph noted that there is a requirement in the GSP regulations that with respect to monitoring,a GSA must either have their own BMP or they must adopt the Department's MORE WAYS TO STAY 1N BMP. Accordingly,the Department completed two BMPs last year. TOUCH one on monitoring protocols and the other on monitoring networks. The Department has already produced five technical best 1 in f management practices as well as other guidance documents, including information on water budgets,modeling,and stakeholder engagement. To access those documents,click here. Sustainable management criteria TODAY'S MOST POPULAR POST The sustainable management criteria is described in sub-article 3 of Chapter 5 of the Groundwater Sustainability Regulations,which - describes all the requirements that local agencies or GSAs need to address in their groundwater sustainability plans. There are four DAILY DI, terms discussed in sub-article 3:sustainability goal,undesirable results,minimum thresholds,and measurable objectives. ,rALII='OI lviAN _ Mr. 4MfL�1lC Undesirable;Results and `� Josep DAILY DIGEST:Friant =� Sustainability Indicators h Water Authority: Valley in crisis'from A Chronit lowating of filtoundwatar 1tvch MLnatingas;gniGnntand unraasomWo presen water imbalance:A devittwn of supply:S con:lnued oY,er the Plann,nF and tmplementallon horltan.... rainy 201]benefitedS-gnf,ca nt antl UnredSpnaplp radunlan at ted a gfoundwattr storage the San Joaquin River's slide salmon, but full AL Sl;rificant and on teasomble atawater in7rusWn n listing restoration is yet to come;Officials quietly i SipNAontand un aasanabledagndea T the solicit contracts on water quafly,Ineudmg the migration of 7,w�tmir.ttui undesi 'twin tunnels'project cL laminan:Plume:tha,Impair water supplies ; ;rie: ,' "" rabL@ despite Lawsuits, lack of permits:and more- n StgniScant and unreasamble land -'� �, _.�� subsldaneathatsutetAntlsllyinmAa, Aa,i!w Alresults December 21,2017(321) surface land was ' .a,, thpktbps of Mtareemaanad surFact wafar7hat have sgnNkant and unreasonable advets.aiinpacsianfso-nali;l:lusesalthestutscawatar chroni c lowering of groundwater Levels.reduction of groundwater storage. MOST POPULAR POSTS LAST 7 DAYS seawater intrusion.degraded water quality.Land subsidence,and the depletions of interconnected surface water. He reminded that the pyramid concept is a way to think about those requirements and M }\ 1 'l `a the avoidance of undesirable results. Avoiding the six undesirable results are a key requirement in SGMA to show sustainability in a basin. Y I Sustainability indicator is a term used in the GSP regulations. It is defined as any of the effects caused by groundwater conditions DAILY DIGEST, occurring throughout the basin that are considered significant and weekend edition: Lawmakers ask Interior https://m,avensnotebook.corn/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft SMP for sustainable management crit... Page 5 of 19 unreasonable and that cause undesirable results. "The keyhere is Department to recover that sustainabdity indicators are those effects caused 'misspent'funds on Cal Y Y Water Fix:California groundwater indicators they are only undesirable results when its Supreme Court fails to significant and unreasonable."he said. resolve conflict o of groundcharges;Scientist says Assessing Sustainability Indicators California only has slim chance of normal The draft BMP document is organized into three sections. First,it rainfall this winter;and identifies some preliminary activities,such as understanding the more_. basin setting,inventorying existing monitoring programs.and December 17.2017(687) engagement with interested parties in the basin. Next, DAILY D I they i I Assess;Sustam111 abrC>I draft indicators ��- BMP ALIF05NIA�1, • Start by assessing all six sustainability indicators MARC . discus Wault position should be that all six apply - .Mr .+�� SeS Individual sustainability indicators can be removed from consideration only after demonstrating that they do not exist and ate not likely to occur DAILY DIGEST: Kings assess • For each indicator,consider the conditions that would represent agencies slam one significant and unreasonable storage project and ing • Local decision based onlocal conditions and concerns halt another: sustain ' tater,these will betrainslatedInto quantitative undMitablerotilts Restoration work in the • Consider the use of management areas(optional) Delta could be key to ability . Develop initial representative manitoringshes addressing state's Indicat A subwt of all momoring sizes in a basin where minimum thresholds and Water and climate measurable obiectiveswitlbeset challenges; Is ors. California headed back All six into drought?:Test sustain results:Oro Loma horizontal levee:and ability indicators need to be assessed unless information can be more- provided that demonstrates why a specific indicator does not apply. December 15.2017(516) An example of that might be seawater intrusion:if the basin does not have coastal access or the ability for saline water to intrude into °= ' the basin,than that sustainability indicator would not apply. He noted that there is a responsibility for the GSA to describe or DAILY. AI L.Y YD I demonstrate why a sustainability indicator doesn't apply in a given basin. %ALIFORNWA The next step is to consider the conditions for each indicator that DAILY DIGEST: Don't would represent significant and unreasonable. This is a locally force us to pay for driven process.and ultimately the GSA is responsible for describing Delta tunnels,farmers what is significant and unreasonable in their GSP. say:Legal not, 9 cannabis takes a toil on NorCat watersheds; "It's a local decision based on local conditions and concern,"he Friant-Kern canal said. "This is where that stakeholder engagement andinvolvement continues to sink:price weighs in heavily in terms ofdefinin what constitutes potential tap could rise: 9 Y 9 Deploying drones to signifIcant and unreasonable conditions in a basin." follow the water, Interior to revise ESA A GSA might want to consider the use of management areas,which listing rules;and more is an option for Local agencies to define areas of their basin differently,as there may be different considerations or different December 1g.2017(515) https:Hmavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-impl ementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page b of 19 ways to set up monitoring. The use of management areas is DAILY DI, optional. Then develop initial representative monitoring sites. "The thought AUF0C:aNI1A- lwas that there should be some acknowledgement of what F DM �EQk monitoring you have up front in order to define what causes DAILY DIGEST:Who undesirable results or significant and unreasonable conditions in controls the water supply, The answer your basin,so it"s imperative that you understand your existing involves a Long history monitoring sites up front for the purposes of defining sustainability," of politicaL strife;CA Attorney General opposes Trump Minimum thresholds Administration's attempt to suspend the Next y Clean Water Rule:Fish step isThre �ot 3� to benefit if large dams to r adopt new operating approach:and more- deter • Quantitative value representing conditlons at a monitoring site that,when exceeded individually or in combination with other December 18,2017(447) mine minimum thresholds,may cause an undesirable result in the basin minim • Set for each representative monitoring site • um Set for each sustainability Indicator thresh ! A` � mA Su�uinsAWh } 1.•+r�7 t.>ixt.w Sn.nn [Ny:dMa Lxd S,rran'.a. +..*. to oLd S. Inak.ten GA'Inis ilS+a�r 5nrxn, I tarp Sdadttet �ry4nn f � 3 1 A I.4d4U1 .4anri.rtn i •re.1 •Qiade .UIVICMd .p4lt d ,rdwn oteKa� � Ivry ? ram. trra att�n t,Had E wt,1 minim GSP it:� ria �d wlr. u s� ..rr.,u+nl.a, j �cw,•� um •ru i WATER STORAGE thresh ' ' E INVESTMENT PGM: old is New water storage projects showcased at defined as a quantitative value at a given monitoring site that may the California Water cause undesirable results in the basin, Mr. Joseph explained that Commission undesirable results(or lack thereof)are what identifies sustainable December 19,2017(352) conditions in the basin.and the tool that is used to define undesirable results is minimum thresholds. The GSP regulations describes specifically each of the six 1-151!4%FEE sustainability indicators and the specific metrics that are required to Cawaterjabs.org be used to quantify the minimum threshold requirements: N = Groundwater levels:groundwater elevation ■ Reduction of storage:total volume ■ Seawater intrusion:chtoric concentration isocontour. ON FLICS PllDTD LIBRARY ON I.iCKR = Degraded quality:migration of plumes,number of supply wells,volume or location of the isocontour. o ■ Land subsidence:rate and extent of Land subsidence. ■ Surface water depletion:the volume or rate of surface water depletion. The GSP regulations list the specific information required when setting minimum thresholds: Click here to visit Maven's photo library on flicly. https://mavensnotebook.coin/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 7 of 19 1. The information criteria that was used to set those minimum thresholds. 2. The relationship between the minimum thresholds for each sustainabitity indicator. 3, How the minimum threshold potentially aids in avoiding causing undesirable results in adjacent basins. q. The effects to interested parties or beneficial users and uses of groundwater or land uses and property interests when setting that minimum threshold. 5. How the minimum threshold relate to state.federal,or local standards.Mr.Joseph noted that it does not need to match state,local.or federal standards;GSAs can decide to use a different threshold,but they would need to include a description on how that relates to the applicable state,local, and federal standards. 6. The minimum threshold must be quantitatively measured and consistent with the monitoring network requirements An example of a sustainability indicator Mr.Joseph then went through an example using the sustainability indicator of chronic declining groundwater levels. He presented a diagram of a hypothetical basin(below,left)that shows the minimum threshold for one representative monitoring site in the basin. He noted that on the diagram,the groundwater level dips below minimum threshold in 2022, but then comes back up. Mmirnutrt Threshp{d Ste• LovJeitrig.af Gititiridwafer _> >. Declining droundwaler Levels Levels f�aSaw�«�dw.wh�.wmY!-.� y� . .w'nW lits+• :••w f � ..:',.. ..mN..rvw•.•nv.a rv..-�dT'r,.lvner.a!'J_.a,aC /,�..— \ � rf�lWn•.,rvll-r.n.n N,J.M 1..C'v..v.,M..••v: ��,'L�^may! } eri'CM[rtrnfrexry C'unare.k..w'tnC:W.�.re.. ri..p.rit a.ur•w.rN tom.. .......... ;ish CLW ac...,,.vv+.•..aC rh�f.s...mx.+.yw nu.lU[f The draft BMP document identifies a series of things to be considered and discussed with stakeholders when setting up minimum thresholds. For groundwater levels(above,right).those include historic groundwater conditions•screen intervals for wells, and the average,minimum,and maximum depths of wells. Mr. Groundwaterevalcn as a , ` Josep Proxy h noted • Groundwater elevation can be used as a proxy metric ^!_ that for any sustainability 'z- indicator group .1 Vi htips://maven snotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page S of 19 •GSP must demonstrate �' �� dwater significant correlation —. between groundwater �^^^ ��— elevati elevation and the other metric ons can be used as a proxy for other metrics when setting up sustainability indicator minimum thresholds, however in doing so,the GSP must demonstrate the significant correlation between groundwater elements and other metrics. "We feel this is something we're likely to see a lot of in groundwater sustainabdityplans'he said. "A lot ofagencies may not have necessarily all of monitoring equipment to use for some of the other metrics and so early on, we anticipate that a tot of the agencies may use groundwater elevations to help identify minimum thresholds in the basin for those other sustainability indicators" Measurable objectives and interim milestones Measurable objectives and interim milestones are also addressed in the drat BMP document. Measurable objectives are somewhat similar to minimum thresholds in that it is a quantitative value at a specific site,he said. "Like minimum thresholds for the chronic lowering ofgroundwater levels at a representative monitoring site, there should be a corresponding measurable objective."he said. "That measurable objective refers to really the goal and maintaining or improving the conditions at that given site" The measurable objective is above the minimum threshold and establishes a margin of operational flexibility. "By setting measurable objectives this is really the goal that you want to hit,"he said. "You don't want to operate the basin ata minimum thleshold at a given site.-you i e hoping to operate it at the measurable objective." Mr. _ T "M 5: Josep Measurable Objectives anc h Interim Milestones noted that �3 z GSAs won't i be 4fT PJapHan OLNanr-� penati 3 w.. https://m.avensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management crit... Page 9 of 19 zed For �4 not achievi ng the measurable objective,because the measurable objective is not what defines undesirable results in the basin;undesirable results are defined by minimum thresholds. Interim milestones are progress points at five-year intervals that represent the measurable groundwater conditions that the GSA hopes to achieve during the 20 year implementation period. In the hypothetical example(above),the GSA recognized that groundwater Levels might go louver for a period of time on their interim milestones,but ultimately the GSA hopes to meet the measurable objective,which in this case is after 20 years,the measurable objective is for groundwater levels to be roughly equal to what they were on the date the GSP was adopted. Paths to sustainability There are s differe Paths to ' Y Sustainability .. nt Defined locally_ __ paths • Will vary based on local , that conditions and vakies _- I r'' can be r.:.... taken _�_..._ to - - sustain ._.....__. _..L--------- -... ' ability. Mr. Josep h said, presenting a slide with three graphs depicting groundwater elevation. In path A•groundwater levels decline over time through the 20 year period foLLowing GSP submission,and actually the measurable objective in terms of where those groundwater Levels end up after 20 years of implementation is lower than when the plan was adopted in 2o2o. 'That's ok"he said. "It's showing that you're still obviously above that minimum threshold. This is for illustration purposes;this may not be okay in a given basin that you're involved in. But from a theoretical standpoint, this is an okay scenario." In path B.groundwater Levels in this example were well beLow the measurable objective when the plan was adopted,but the GSA has https://mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 10 of 19 made incremental progress in an almost step-wise fashion to achieve that measurable objective over time. "That's okay.-the key here being that it's always above the minimum threshold,"he said. In path C.groundwater levels decline beyond 2015,but remain above the minimum threshold before eventually rising by the end of the 20 year period. "The point here rs that each of these examples may be okay in your basin,depending on how the measurable objective relates to the minimum threshold" Undess rable results Undesirable Resu t OCCUr Occurs when any of the six sustainabillty indicators become when significant and unreasonable,as defined locally any of Based on a combination of minimum threshold exceedances the six Must be eliminated within 20 years of 5SA implementation • Same basins will experience undesirable resutis within the implernmrarian sustain gef1Od • ability Must be coordinated for the entire basin indicat ars becom signific ant and unreasonable,as defined locally. 'The key to defining undesirable results is a combination of minimum threshold exceedances"Mr.Joseph said. "Undesirable results must be eliminated within 20 years ofGSP implementation. Some basins can experience undesirable results within the implementation period and that's ok-as long as theyare making progress towards avoiding undesirable results over that 20 year implementation period. It must be coordinated for the entire basin" The sustainability goal culminates in the absence of undesirable results within the 20 year period,he said. In the draft sustainable management criteria BMP,there is a description of the sustainability goal and the information that should be included in the plan, including the information that was used to establish the goal,a discussion of the measures that will be implemented,and an explanation of how the goal Will be achieved Within 20 years of the GSP implementation. Minimum thresholds, undesirable results, measurable objectives:A more detailed example Mr. 71 L r aj 7L Josep r h then EXamp1e D4S ``1P i https://mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 11 of 19 gave a A hypothetiui$basin sets more minimum thresholds,interim milestones,and measurable detaile objectives at eight representative monitoring sites • For simplification,assume the criteria are the same at each examp representative monitoring site '.... ; ry wn le, Further,the GSA(,)has determined that minimum - - - empha threshold exceedances at three or more sites is a significant and sizing unreasonable condition,and is, that therefore,an undesirable result this examp Le is to articulate the relationship between minimum thresholds, undesirable results,and sustainable management;it is hypothetical and intentionally simplified. In this example.there are eight representative monitoring sites,but this will vary by basin:it is up to the local agencies to define the appropriate number of representative monitoring points needed,as well as the minimum thresholds and a description of undesirable results. In the example,there are eight representative monitoring sites:the hypothetical GSA has defined undesirable results as the exceedance of minimum thresholds at three of their representative monitoring sites. Mr. 11 No 1111 111111 E ;11111,11 111MR511; Josep d h then I f (( presen ted a slide showi �. ng the � � 1 eight repres entativ i,rv�nxirtfr4rlf.lav Cl.✓.t well,�cr•t,.ixwlM ', ' •n.ntfar.�1]I.rJ pe�NG1l .IL 1 �1 .� i l .wl 4 rJ hl•r w . . N � >;p ° '_'rvrJ[mc+•Ibtln- aJa.l I.. '.� monito ring sites. In the first scenario,groundwater levels at one of the wells goes below the minimum threshold for a period of time,shown in red below that pink line. However,this is consistent with the plan interim milestones" In this example,the GSA has identified undesirable results in the basin as the exceedance of three minimum thresholds.and so even though the one well is below the minimum threshold,there are no undesirable results at any point in time in this example. https://mavensnotebook.corn/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 12 of 19 x = In the r r { s secon scenar ' to, _.. ..__.. J three i = Wells ...... do go below r...,•,rat,.r,..,,mu„e:i:�,..:,.,;�+,nrr.r.,: da^we minim - L.x.,v"cr,.,,z,i•�:ezo N:orc.,�.,,r....:ck:wx.:: um thresh old in the period between 2020 and 2030. In this hypothetical scenario, the GSA has determined that the exceedance of minimum thresholds at three monitoring locations is an undesirable result; however,it's between 2020 and 203o,but it's consistent with the plan interim milestones and consistent with the way the GSP document Was designed and so there are no undesirable results in this example at the end of the 20 year implementation period. In the 1,10#00,1r; M s L� � . . third t scenar I I „• 'E'[',i for .. . .r. ... .. .. .r. �--�- there iI are undesi y rable results as �...��,<,,,:_•,�.�rrs.r.�r:�.t. :gym;. . defind bye • ['•.,rSIP1.C.n:�,',L`,LuAn;}W.UL.'.r.,Lnlw le4.<w:i', u-c<o•s'+<•<cJ:�vm n:nct•.o.pre-,-o vrvr 7x,. c' r .-: �+ ,•rFiana•uF:n:•w:d three ME �.�. minim um threshold exceedances. However,in this scenario,the undesirable results have continued to exceed the minimum threshold throughout the implementation period,so by the end of the 20 year implementation period,undesirable results essentially occurred right after the plan was adopted and continued to occur until the end of the 20 year implementation period. "In this basin, there are undesirable results occurring,"Mr.Joseph said. "This basin is not completing its obligations to do sustainable groundwatermanagement, operating to a sustainable yield,and achieving its sustainability goal in this instance because of the https://mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION:DWR releases draft BUT for sustainable management c... Page 13 of 19 occurrence of undesirable results after the 20 year implementation period.' The key is maintaining an outcome based approach to these groundwater sustainability plans.Mr.Joseph said. '777e outcomes all need to be defined and the variables quantified in the groundwatersustainabilityplans'he said, "lt'sabsolutely keyso that the Department can polentiallyapprove these plans Without addressing this the Department is not going to be able to approve ground water sustainabilityplans' Mr.Joseph noted that there is a description in the groundwater sustainability plan regulations that articulates hove GSAs can potentially adjust these measurable objectives,minimum thresholds,and description of undesirable results. "Thereisa process so local agencies aren l necessarily locked in fore Ver in terms of how they set these up,but we do require that in these first plans local agencies describe these conditions and quantify sustainabRyin their basin.' QUESTION AND ANSWERS Question: For the larger groundwater basins,there may be zo or more representative monitoring sites. With five of the different sustainability indicators.minimum thresholds,measurable objectives,and describing your undesirable results times the amount of information-it starts to add up to a very,very large chapter in an already large complicated document,so what level of detail are you expecting? Trevor Joseph acknowledged that they've done the math as well, and it is a lot of content 'Frankly it'sjust something you?e going to have to manage in writing these plans. Maybe the use of groundwater elevations as a proxy to h/t on multiple sustainability indicators if that's appropriate and it can be used in the basins you're working in The description of those six items to support the minimum thresholds-it's possible that the description on some of those items applies to all the minimum thresholds in the same way. so maybe that could be explained once and it addresses all the representative monitoring sites in yourbasin. We have l000ked at that,and those are myoff the cutfanswers But you're right,it's a consideration that will need to be made is how complicated do you want to make it in your given basin,' Question,I appreciate where DWR is coming from because of variability on not being prescriptive.but in advising clients.one of my issues is how do we evaluate what is going to be adequate without further guidance? How does the Department set itself up https://mavensnotebook.conV2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 14 of 19 for not being called arbitrary when the groundwater sustainability plans are evaluated? "If you meet the GSP regulation requirements you've met the requirements and so we're looking to maintain that local control," Mr.Jones said. "It's imperative to as that we receive complete groundwater sustainability plans. Were not looking to be prescriptive or even describe how these should be advised or addressed specifically in terms of quantitative value in your basin. That being said. there are other state agencies and maybe a stalfeholder in a given basin that the sustainable groundwater management group, the group here, we're not looking to provide and can t provide you specifrc guidance on how to set up those requirements" Follow up question: Looking out into the future then,you're showing future conditions,how would you advise clients to try to envision those future conditions and test their thresholds and Limits and operating assumptions without actually modeling a water budget? Can you do this without a model in forecasting out into the future? "It becomes challenging and a Water budget is a requirement in the GSPregulations:"said Trevor Joseph. "What yousawhere today, completing the sustainable management criteria.in and ofitself doesn't pro vide you with a complete plan. ...I didn t go into any of the detail on the other plan requirements Which again,are necessary to provide the Department so you ha ve a complete plan. It gets challenging to forecast that measurable objective or that final outcome without doing some modeling,in some cases numerical or even using an analytical tool. The Department understands that adaptive management plays a role here in that some of the projection is more speculative than others,and there is uncertainty and data gaps which can lead to obviously speculation in terms of how you projected those conditions and that's a fact of where we're at. We also describe in the GSP regulations that folks need to identify the uncertainty and look to All significant data gaps but up front we recognize that those outcome objectives whether measurable objective or minimum thresholds.may changeover time." GSP INITIAL NOTIFICATION SYSTEM AND OTHER ONLINE TOOLS Steven Springhorn then gave an overview of the Groundwater Sustainabitity Plan(GSP)Initial Notification System that the Department is developing. haps://mavensnotebook.conn/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 15 of 19 DUIR's UV11K'S' C� A �,orra1 � r r I m wale., Ui ri ri SGMA Portal i • Clearinghouse for SGMA s the Information: clearin �GSA and Local Agency ghous submitted Information e for :Public Access and .:ain :ra4.n Comments all the ------ report • Developing additional features ed �GSP Initial Notification inform ation ..... ...._._ receiv ed related to SGMA. All the information received from Groundwater Sustainability Agencies and other related entities are available here; the public can also review documents received and comment on those documents. There is also information on Basin Boundary Modifications.Adjudicated Reporting,Alternative Information.and GSA Formation. The website is being expanded to include GSP Initial Notifications.and eventually submission of GSPs as well. Per the legislation.GSAs are required to notify DWR in writing prior to initiating the development of a groundwater sustainability plan; the notice needs to include general information about the GSA's process for developing the GSP and how interested parties may contact the GSA and participate in the development and implementation of that plan. The GSP initial notification also initiates public comments as required by the Act,as well as other requirements such as establishing and maintaining a list of interested persons in the development of the GSP and providing a written statement to the legislative body of any city or county within the GSP's boundaries. So far,25 GSAs have already submitted GSP notifications to the Department. 22 GSAs have been submitted for 17 basins or subbasins; Mr.Springhorn said the difference in the numbers is due to multiple submissions for the same basin where multiple plans are going to be developed. DWR will be working with those GSAs who have already submitted their notifications to transfer over to the new system. Once the Department receives the notification,the notice must be posted online within 20 days. For the public,the tool will provide a list of alt initial notifications received;the ability to comment will be provided. A notification of public comment will be emailed to the Department as well as to the GSAs that submitted the initial notification so they will be made aware of the public comments that https://niavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page I6 of 19 are received. There is a map showing where all these notifications are being submitted. To submit a notification.a login will be required,because only GSAs are required to submit initial notifications, There will be a short form that will include questions such as is the GSP planned for the Whole basin or multiple GSPs,which GSAs will be part of those plans, boundaries of GSPs,points of contact,point of contact,information how other local agencies and stakeholders can get involved in the GSP preparation,and a Link to the website where that GSP information for that basin will be posted. A FAQ is being developed and an instructional webinar planned;the system will be live in January. Existing notifications will be transferred over and that will allow for public comments to be attached to those notifications. Mr.Springhorn noted that there isn't a public comment period per se on the notifications and so those will remain open;however,once the GSP is adopted and the plan is submitted to the Department,there will be a 60-day comment period that will be initiated once an adopted plan is submitted to the Department. DWR POINTS OF CONTACT The Department of Water Resources has set up specific points of contact at its regional offices that will be available to answer questions related to setting up these requirements. Trevor Joseph noted that they won't be able to tell you what point or value to set minimum thresholds and measurable objectives.but they can help people further understand these requirements and explain the BMP document or the GSP regulations. The contact will coordinate DWR's Local assistance and engagement programs,handle day to day correspondence,answer general questions regarding SGMA requirements,and assist with technical support and assistance. As the GSP development progresses,when basins have more complicated questions,the Department will bring subject management experts to meeting to address a basin's unique issues. DWR staff will help with technical support,facilitation support,regulatory issues and informing them of requirements and grant opportunities. The points of contact wilt also attend board meetings and technical advisory groups for the basins,and they will efficiently route questions to appropriate managers and experts. For a PDF of the points of contact at DWR's regional offices,click here. https://mavensnotebook.conn/2017/12120/sgma-irn plementation-d-,vr-rel eases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMA for sustainable management c... Page 17 of 19 HOW TO COMMENT ON THE DRAFT BMP ... Public comments on the draft document are due by January 8th, and can be emailed to:sgmps,@water ca.gov Subject:Comments on Draft SMC BMP,or comment by US Postal Service to P.O. Box 942836 Sacramento,California 94236-00ol Attn:Lauren Hersh.Rm 20-..Any comments received will be posted on DWR's Public Comments- nest Management Practices webpage. FOR MORE INFORMATION ... ■ For the draft BMP document on Sustainable Management Criteria,click here. ■ To access alt BMPs and guidance documents,ctick here. ■ For DWR's Sustainable Groundwater Management Program webpage.click here. ■ To learn more about groundwater.visit the Notebook's groundwater page. Sign up for daily email service and you'll never kA ,,,� miss a post! `batty Sign up for daily emails and get all the '^j Notebook's aggregated and original `? water news content delivered to your email box by 9AM. Breaking news aterts. too.Sign nye up! (Visited 254 times.28 visits today) Share this: Tweet Share 4 9here 90 0 suUmlt ®Email 15 Print Leave a comment * Department of Water Resources,groundwater, stiderbox.Susiainabte GmUnd%vzAer Management Act . ... .. .............. . . Leave a Reply Enter your comment here... LIKE MAVEN ON lnstagram Feed TAGS FACEBOOK https://mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgrna-i mplementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c_.. Page 18 of 19 r ACWla i3a� f)eIL,Pian FOLLOW MAVEN ON Bay Delta TWITTER " Conservation Li.-,y Tweets by Scion(:,,ennr_,genre. Bureau of @[OavensNctedool; B I�('.Ctdn'ld;lOn GICaffornia V/ater, Maven P.etweeted /\ Be the first of your friends to like ,l Commission California Water' 2 ,,, Ryan Sabalow C7'' U C?RyanSaha;ow tr SIX Politicians to Trump:Don't �a� O31 E�� relicense Qroville Dam Maven water until we know why spillway 21 hours ago news v!c J failed.My story today: Mc, t l e w C E3€crn,� Sarh..v'e!l'.?�i:c#Cu'.^/8t3' l?r�l;er Policy SRrnirl;u Series Central Valtey ProjoCt clinZ,ilc �'_. .. change Ueli:l DeU;l if lows&cuttlDrvs Delta flan nl:,. clel`.a cmr.11 Detta Politicians to Tru... StewardshilD Elected officials an v COUncll Delta tunnels Dep,)rtr hent of Embed View on Twitter pal, V Water- Resources drought endangerecl species te,derat tegistation groundwater c; �-,m blogcu r habitat restoration hydrology ',,{/Suns and lecga; rulings tegislative hearings Metropolitan 1K/pater District Orovitle flan} SPittWay PLII)Or.Policy srllmon science state tegistat€€on State Water Project State Water Resources Control Board sustainable GrQUndwater Management Act urban water conservation -.a1oca6ons viater boncl Water policy �t r c{uality Wcau-r r ghts ,-/aLer storage Cve'dthcn and climate A https://mavensnotebook.com/2O17/12/201 sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 SGMA IMPLEMENTATION: DWR releases draft BMP for sustainable management c... Page 19 of 19 MAVEN'S NOTEBOOK The diary of confessed obsessive-compulsive California water newsjunkie This website was developed.built,and implemented by Chris Austin(Maven)using the Smartline theme by Theme Zee.Cc;Maven's Notebook.2017 Thank you for visiting! Scra11 to tap https://mavensnotebook.com/2017/12/20/sgma-implementation-dwr-releases-draft-bmp-s... 12/21/2017 Butte County Water&Resource Conservation ianuary,2018 votulue'19,Issue l ■ WaterSolutions "To manage and conserve water and other resources for the citizens of Butte County" &, �y Happy New Year ,x S S By Paul Gosselin „ a Although we don't know everything that is in store this year, but if it is anything like last year it will be exciting. The past year was dominated by the continued implementation of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), state ` initiatives (i.e., WaterFix and Bay-Delta Water Quality Plan) and widely variable weather conditions. For many years, we have faced historic drought conditions. Last year, the pendulum swung the opposite way with historic amounts of precipitation resulting in improved groundwater and surface water conditions. But, we cannot assume that drought conditions are a thing of the past. While we appreciate the impressive precipitation in the 2017 water year, history has shown that precipitation patterns are highly variable. The bottom line is while we remain hopeful, we will `L : continue to prepare for continued drought conditions. The drive to implement SGMA resulted in a number of important accomplishments. A r1 major achievement was complying with the June 30, 2017 deadline to have each of ` the four subbasins covered by one or more groundwater sustainability agency (GSA) without any overlapping boundaries. The next phase of SGMA implementation is the development of groundwater sustainability plans (GSP)for each of the four subbasins. In November, a Proposition 1 grant application to develop DSPs for the Vina, West Butte, East Butte, and Wyandotte Creek subbasins was submitted. The grant funding Inside this issue will provide the necessary resources to develop a GSP in each subbasin by 2022. DWR SGMA Update................ 3 expects to make decisions on GSP grant applications in early 2018. In the meantime, Vickie's Retirement....... 3 the GSAs in each of the subbasins are holding facilitated discussions to create governance structures for the purpose of producing and implementing a GSP for each Congratulations Christina........................ 4 subbasin. The Center for Collaborative Policy(California State University,Sacramento) are providing facilitated services through DWR. Lastly, the Groundwater Pumpers New phone number...... 4 Advisory Committee (GPAC) provided an important forum for groundwater users to Water Year 2018........... S learn about SGMA and provide advice to Butte County. The GPAC will meet on Lake Oroville Storage.... 6 January 16th at 8:30AM at the CSU Chico Farm,311 Nicolas C.Shouten Lane, Chico. Lake Oroville Winter NEW YEAR»y Operations Plan............. 6 ::;ttu' '"c•-v :r--r� ..r '=:e:cr .mow' m-u::v��«::N,�--x`sr':a:. ,.c^;o--':;�;•e,a.-:ate.- r,�. •,r,. �-rs�, ,-;r.�:��_.�:•xr'r - a�,. �:�f •.;.....;;^`<aJ �-" ., `"n:"�^'F(=��..,i..a�. „m:D\'s�.,..��; .;r"'-....>........»,,,...._G.Y 7��^c,:ar:�:wc�v>,_-a,�,..i...,��-`,n.,.., ,...A...,is':?�b":�.&2.��"^�"�'� .:� ,nc,. .h.... ^'ice," u >>> New Year (cont.) In 2017,the Department completed a number of projects. Subsidence Monitoring: Butte County joined other regional partners to support data collection for the Department of Water Resources' subsidence monitoring program in the Sacramento Valley. The 2017 subsidence monitoring program measured ground elevations at hundreds of monuments in the Sacramento Valley. The 2017 measurements will be compared to measurements taken in 2008. The data will provide insights on whether subsidence has occurred in areas over this past decade. DWR expects to release the subsidence monitoring report in mid-2018. Stable Isotope Recharge Project: The Stable Isotope Recharge Investigation was completed in the fall of 2017. it improved our understanding of recharge sources and contributions of local precipitation and river water to the groundwater basin from well and creek samples mostly near Butte Creek. The Stable Isotope Recharge Project was made possible from the support of the Butte County Board of Supervisors. Interbasin Groundwater Flow Evaluation Project: In June, the Interbasin Groundwater Flow Evaluation project was completed. The project was funded by the Water Foundation program of the Resource Legacy Fund to advance SGMA implementation. The project was conducted on a regional basis and led by the Northern Sacramento Valley Integrated Region Water Management (NSVIRWM) Technical Advisory Committee. Using the expertise of technical collaborators, the project evaluated local and regional approaches to account for interbasin groundwater flow. The project provided recommendations for GSAs, DWR and USGS. Evaluation of Restoration and Recharge Potential within Groundwater Basins in Butte County: Funded from Proposition 1, the Evaluation of Restoration and Recharge Potential within Groundwater Basins in Butte County project was completed in December. The project assessed groundwater recharge potential throughout the .,N county, evaluated the use of dual (surface and groundwater) systems and identified "P V"LIC conjunctive management opportunities to advance sustainable groundwater management. The project will provide a framework for potential projects and actions WORKSHOPto achieve greater groundwater sustainability. A presentation of the project will be given at the January Water Commission meeting. A public workshop will be held on January 16th from 4-6PM at the Chico Masonic Center, 1110 W.East Ave, Chico. Please join us for a public Although the focus of water activities has been on SGMA, there were a lot of other workshop on important water activities this year. At the state level, the State Water Resources The Evaluation of Control Board (SWRCB) continued to undertake two interrelated regulatory decisions Restoration and that could have profound impacts to Butte County and northern Sacramento Valley region. First, the SWRCB is in the process of considering the permit for the California Recharge Potential WaterFix. The SWRCB is also in the process of preparing the Bay Delta Water Quality within Groundwater Plan. These actions could be devastating for the region including the loss of surface Basins in Butte County water and increased demand on groundwater. January 16, 2018,4-6pm We cannot look back on 2017 with reflecting on the enormous toll to Butte County Chico Masonic Center communities from the Lake Oroville incident, catastrophic fires, and localized flooding. 1110 W. East Ave., Chico Our thoughts go out to those who were affected by these incidents. ;"v✓" �C.:�-.s �Z it �5.f' �..z� f;�,;.w� ��i-,�7u.;.a3-,%5-�����-'•"-^'�,�,F „r.,� �t-:,tT,,.S':: �r:=,;�� �.,.a.;`Y-..•r'-,.N.c.�,.-,_�t:.�-?`�-.`� eNT L > k'. r;� � 4�•;a:�r '4 a ek.-".r,-.T,�;},�•.,,>.�. ,;<.�.-�' .�,, 5.� �., ,,.ods ,.c.,„6!.''r�..'`�:-,�.,N,�rlm ,;;. �.> _a�.52..u,�`0. .�U'N„`.i` ^.'S�!�$ .:;y' 'd• mss., :�: f'T.,..x ,�; .i ,�-,� �. S,5' .,� Z r, i.,:w.� ,>-..,� '�,.1:;c;i Ei�,='.:?- �,C ..> s _ r.?�:^ ,y,z\,�"wc1.G`% � .•?. �Y 7r'"t,:....cs%., :.:.�'..,> ,..r.�n,','.:_y Cr ,sl.f.:tsaa- .<.>, � .;^r' ro,.�h;.xl �,n,,,.•dr--. :f ��".,:^ '--< a,� - ��_�Un �,5���;,tiN- ,�i`s�.. ,.5,..,-�y: r�„ „'��.. :rs✓.'�^:. �� .;�...:., ..:1 �i,.�,•;�. gid,- �"rr..�..14•tip: -.n ,`�., :--�,"x`.z-.r7 -.. \.t ,.=• "}- ,:1• .mss; � r.,�.., ,+;,�.3,., r.;�;,. .3= :� c );:. �l>,. .t .;,.c ¢'' �,•.:''ice, �: ..''i'•`. rxf:.""' '7`, :'�., ,:,}-. 7._ .._,,., .., .. .- ..,�._...dE=;,.._,.,..__.5.w,- _ —nom__ . _._ w.i.,:,v�s.._,:E�G:•z .y_„t,-,....o. _.. ,_i._,_. �,,,,,.,r.. fes. . tiJ.'..,, ts-L.,_. }� - .,L6 �Sr�. _ :wit` :��nR,' These are some but not all of the highlights from the past year. As we embrace the enormous challenges and opportunities ahead, we remain committed to conserve and manage water, the life blood to our economy, communities and environment. We l wish you a happy,safe and healthy new year. a r 3ax�-1 f 'L hii 3, a� SGMA Update 7-r By Paul Gosselin Public outreach, collaboration with other agencies and building upon the County's water resource technical foundation drove activities in 2017. The Center for Collaborative Policy (CCP) team have been appraising the situation in each subbasin regarding potential governance options as it relates to GSP development and implementation.An initial public meeting for the Vina subbasin was held on December 18th. The meeting was well attended and had good discussion of stakeholder assessment findings and governance options. A subcommittee of Vina GSA managers was formed. The next public meeting for the Vina subbasin will be scheduled soon. r Happy Retirement Vickie!!! By Paul Gosselin ,y ti c. r After an outstanding career of dedicated public service, Vickie Newlin retired at the end of December 2017. We wish Vickie all the best in her new adventures. z f 4� L jni h Cl y ets. "`pkv n i 3 x . 73 t.- 3 s: �•S7K,-sitz:' ` :n i '- ;. .. ,.. ,`: ;' Welcome Christina Buck as Assistant Director By Paul Gosselin On January 1, 2018, Christina Buck will begin her tenure as the Assistant Director of the Department of Water and Resource Conservation. Christina began working for the Department as a student intern and, in 2012, joined the Department as the Water Resource Scientist. Christina holds a B.S. and M.S. in Hydrology and a Ph.D. in Hydrologic Sciences from the University of California at Davis. We are fortunate to y` have Christina's leadership and expertise at this critical stage in water resource Yi management. Please join me in welcoming Christina in her new role as Assistant ' Y f Director. u t- SI f 1 ; j , Zb y ;;d�,� 55..'` M q ,. -...- .:.,ttr..�.-'z•-A° ,..' .,f iSo..<'r, h�! I f¢t<F�$�f �/ , t T _ ti: 3 DWRC phone number change By Autum Thomas Butte County Department of Water & Resource Conservation will be changing the mainline phone number to 530.552.3595 beginning January first. For the time being the 530.538.4343 number will be forwarded to the new number, however,we ask that you please update your contact information. �' `�' �ga- ,ry,. �, � :,v32`ai .4"w,.v. �?� N ""�...;�:,s.,.!5rda`"T,<v �L.se. �aL`�� �t•. �r.'�, „:S,�scn 1z•7 " :'ion,��;:>'-`s,� ::T'`�`'•,�,-.s::. ,,r,f},`,r>^ ,:s` :•� <>�`r'°�`1'.„�.�,`.�,,`.`��,.. ��?..`�t'tx�'�",::a� .y.,s,.�',a -�,.k�, i�s.w .;.:." /�� y�-.. eF S,Y°,.�„�.�`,��v�ti'F'-s -;�; w� ".5. ,..i"jo ��a.�" �-o�. "{,b. �. r�.: �`�.;#�F'• gni, raY'Si.- „�,:-r3:,,a:,sr,.tr .f;,.`"-'a,,s:;�c o.::a';;�70' ra�,¢�%''r-. �%�oc".�-�S„ v,:n;+.,, ur -�:t-'r�`'':;.R? •,c”, e, F;��1_,. �3�,.�. �Y,;v, ti.�. r. <=.:`3,�.,�r ".�k,., ..<s,$, ��, ,�,�- .C�" .� ,:�',...;. H.,.v , 3s.YT,�. Water Year 2018 — Here's the status By Christina Buck With a dry December almost behind us,this winter is starting to make us a little bit nervous. Let's take a look at where things are at so far. The water year got off to a dry start with very little precipitation in October. Then November came with a bang and provided enough rain to make up for the dry October and put precipitation levels just above average as we headed into December. Subsequently,a high pressure ridge off the west coast developed and clear,sunny skies have marked our countdown to Christmas and the New Year. As of December 21st,the Northern Sierra 8 station precipitation index stands at 80%of average for this date. A look at the snow water content in the northern Sierra tells a more severe story. As of December 21st,the snow water content is just 28%of average for this date. Other parts of the state have been much drier. Of course, it is much too early to tell how this water year will turn out. The good news is that surface water reservoirs are generally above average (see http://cdec.water.ca.gov/ cgi-progs/products/rescond.pdf)for this time of year,which will help meet water needs j.: throughout the state if the winter turns out to be dry. However,for additional recovery in the groundwater system to occur, another above average or wet year is needed to continue the upward trend in groundwater levels we have seen the last two years. In the meantime, continuing to use water wisely and conserve when passible is good water management regardless of how wet or dry the water year turns out to be. Here's to a wetter,snowier January! North Sierra Precipitation: 8-Station Index, December 21,2017 10 0 -,:� .... rro�n�st sii chy. .. ...... .. ..... _. _....... p . Shads Dem Percent of Average for this Data:80% 95 � �Ylno,*, �Oulncy 94.7 I`� arusn croeR 2015-24117 Daily Precip (wettest) �fsluclue Cany.. -_ canon o3 1982-1983 (2nd wettest) 88.5 � 85 _�Psdtic Rouse 1997-1998 82.4 C \ p a 601 ¢; o V � v IL 55' A n r 60 a C Is ° 451 Y 0 40i: 2014-2015 Daily Preci 37 2 m 35', m 30i a 25- U 20? 1976-1977(2nd driest&driest thru Aug 1910 Current Dally Precip:112.6 15; lob 5 0`-----..__ - Oct i Nov 1 Dec i Jan 1 Feb 1 Mar 1 Apr i May 1 Jun 1 Jul 1 Aug 1 Sep 1 Oct 1 Water Year{October i -September 30) Meeting Schedules Water Commission 1/3/2018,1:30 p.m. Board of Supervisors Chambers . 25 County Center Drive ' Board of Supervisors 1/9/2018,9:00 a.m. Board of 5upervisors Chambers 25 County Center Drive <�n m f.ix? 1/22/2018,9:00 a.m. �` F FE eppm '%.i:.<x=>'.. ro-z-,T gw ra;;:•o s>:-• :.avx:� -i �,, „rte�, s. =a;;i-- -Y .;�.�t?: ,w.''k ...- ,',.� .,�' :;. -5::�: hr -a.,y- 3' „Z'L,'�:?a;�K}'h�'�'-;a;;. � ",ay�, S,.:..�„h -�s•�'f> tic, r Board of Supervisors Chambers 25 County Center Drive TAC Meeting 1/10/2018,10:00 a.m. a i 202 Mira Loma Drive,Orciville, Lake Oroville Storage Klamath Boom Combination Water/CalendarYear 4.0 GPAC Meeting 1/16/2018,8:30 a-m. 3.6 _ --- ------------ 311 Nicola C.Shouten Lane, _ w_ _ ---__�_�.� � ��\ Capacity-354as Chico,RoomA0093.2 � _____ / ` -.,__.__---_ Department of Water& 18 Resource Conservation 24 308 Nelson Avenue a f Oroville,CA 95965 ° 20 C Phone:530.552.3595 Fax:530.538.3807 E-mail:bcwater@buttecounty.netl2 -- - - Website:www.btittecolmty.net/ �2010"2017 waterandresource ` 0.8 —2015-2010 ------- 2614.2015 Water&Resource —2013.2614 Conservation Staff 0A —2e12-2013 ——-aWxable bound—is Updated through 1126!2°17 0.0 • Pau]Gosselin,Director Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec • Christina Buck, Assistant Director 2017-2018 Winter Operations Plan • Autum Thomas, ! Administrative Analyst, 9000 i ! _ _ _ 3538 Associate � — � Water Commission — — — — — — — — — — 1 i I Spring Operations will be outlined In s In Final Gate Closure Plan to be • Kathy Chance 5500 %� I I submitted by April 15,2018 2808 Q • Marlc Grover .......... ....... ....... ....... i • DC]ones,Vice-Chair Elev.=813.6 ft.FCO 5 illwa Sill Elevatiors I ••{ r " + Tod Kjmnielshue , I t € O • Mauny Roethler 8°9.0 - ..... 2192 0 �+ •Enhanced Tload Pool Elevation Targol ''� I y W • Ryan Schohr 8 600 ft,2192 TAF jail wetness indexes! 14 ro — David Skinner,ChairabvvewNahaavUln w anicu== o in • Matthew Tennis + Ernie Washington 7aD.o . E €1678 O Dutflov+Trigger for lkMmben •' 16,009 cfs ti >, O J. IlY Projected Elevations are based 709.0 on Nov Forecast from historical 1255 \ 1 hydrologyand'17-'18 Winter \' Operations Plan 650.D j _� 912 utte County 5 O N D 3 F M A M J j A WATER&RESOURCE CONSERVAT3ON — —E.1sting FCM FCD d y ground x Esting FCM FCD wet ground ......17-'18 Dam Safety Pool Target •••••.Elevation Triggers —Actual Elevation ------ Projected Elev for 501.Hydrology — •ProjectedElevfor90%Hydroloi:y