HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSA_90_Southgate.1BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
SUBDIVISION REVIEW REQUEST
To: _ State Division of Forestry DATE; Feb ,, 69 9 1 80
AP NO.: 40-04-x36 & 38 RETURN BY: as soon -as a _possible
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SOUTHGATE ACRES NO, 2 TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION
MAP
APPLICANT: Malcolm D, Jayred and William S. Towne
ENGINEER: McCain Associates
CONDITIONS:
�.
MEN"V/ /Slid/
1AC to
-bE &-ke-
o w
73
if toe -Now
CONUIIENTS
Advisory Agency
Subdivision Committee
Board of Supervisors
LD 1170
e
COUNT' OF BUTTE
LAND DEVELOPMENT SEG.
By
00
BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
SUBDIVISION REVIEW REQUEST
To: State- Division of ForestryDATE: Feb. 6 1980
AP NO.: 40-04-36 & 38 RETURN BY: as soon -as Dossible
PROJECT DESCRIPTILON:
SOUTHGATE ACRES NO. 2
TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP
APPLICANT:
Malcolm D. JayLred and
BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
SUBDIVISION REVIEW REQUEST
To: State- Division of ForestryDATE: Feb. 6 1980
AP NO.: 40-04-36 & 38 RETURN BY: as soon -as Dossible
PROJECT DESCRIPTILON:
SOUTHGATE ACRES NO. 2
TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP
APPLICANT:
Malcolm D. JayLred and
William S.
Towne
ENGINEER: McCain Associates
CONDITIONS:
COUNTY OF BUTIT
LAND DEVELOPMENT SEC.
N ula
FEB 2 5 1,980
COWHENTS
Advisory Agency
Subdivision Committee
Board of Supervisors
LD 1170
By
6-
)0'/t 6 _7�C 707Z) W
8 CC- 66061-;
IAC ^j
__SF f�o&,"kc.
LSC= `� � �
Z 44 1 2'"" Z
���� %�� �'' L"� �9�,,
Ile t
C-�e�,'��
COUNTY OF BUTIT
LAND DEVELOPMENT SEC.
N ula
FEB 2 5 1,980
COWHENTS
Advisory Agency
Subdivision Committee
Board of Supervisors
LD 1170
By
McCA1N ASSOCIATES
492 RIO LINGO AVE. CHICO,CA.95926 691-1665
CONSULTING ENGINEERS SURVEYORS
August 15, 1980
Butte County Fire Department
2334 Fair Street
Chico, California 92926
Attention: Hector Reed
Re: Southgate Acres Subdivision No. 2
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find 2 copies of Southgate Acres Subdivision
No. 2. We are preparing to record this subdivision.
For fire protection, we are proposing that two Butte County
Standard No. 29 "Swimming Pool Connection for Fire Protection",
be installed in the subject subdivision. One swimming pool
would be installed on Baja Court and one on Laguna Court.
If this meets with your satisfaction, please send a letter
to Butte County Department of Public Works stating this.
If you have any further questions or need any additional
information, please feel free to contact me at (916)891-1865.
Very truly yours,
McCAIN ASSOCIATES
Wesley E. Gilbert
WEG:or
Enc.
cc: Butte County,
Dept. of Public Works 0//(-,
Inter -Departmental Memorandum
T John Mendonsa, Assistant Director, Public Works
FROM: William C. Teie, County Fire Warden
SUBJECT: Fire Protection for Various Subdivisions and Parcel Maps
D rE: September 25, 1980
Re** AP# 40-01-25, etc* -- Butte Creek East PA -C, ER .D Log 79--03-12--03
APS 40-41-13,14 - Spanish Gardens
APS 40-40-31 - Southgate Acres Subdivision # 2
APS 40-02-03 - Butte Creek Industrial Community Unit ,#1 & #2 Subdivisions
Applicant -Baldwin Contracting Company
The items listed on the attached correspondence and exhibits from Baldwin
Contracting Company, for the above four projects, meet the fire protection,
requirements stipulated by the Butte County Fire Department and California
Department of Forestry.
Jc
cc: Hilda Wheeler
Baldwin Contracting
H. Reed
R. Tiller
en
lecw
_Ljrr
.�rr
' �' =1 i 1
.A�..�D�rV I �TCONTRACTING OMP' '. i` i.
I N C.
GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS
GENERAL OFFICES NINTH AND YUBA STREETS - MARYSVILLE, CALIF. 95901 (916) 7,42-5141
POST O•F FI C E BOX 311
September 10, 1980
Department of Forestry
Butte County Fire Department
176 Nelson Avenue
Orov i l le, California 95965
ATTN: BILL TETE
RE: FIRE PROTECTION FOR VARIOUS SUBDIVISIONS AND PARCEL MAPS
Gentlemen:
This will confirm our understanding of determinations made during our
meeting of September 5, 1980 in regard to the above referenced subject
matter. The meeting was attended by: Bill Te i e, Ranger in Charge;
John Thurman, North Division Chief; Hector Reed, State Forest Ranger 1;
Dallas Lewis, Vice President and General Manager of Baldwin Contracting
Company Inc.; and Chris Baldwin with Butte Creek Rock Company. A recap
of the total fire protection requirement package for each development is
listed be1ow:
SOUTHGATE ACRES SUBDIVISION UNIT NO. 2 (P I ea se See Exhibit A)
1. Hydrant locations as per Exhibit A.
2. Fire protection provided by swimming pool connections, Standard S-29
.as per Exhibit A.
3. Pressure will be maintained at the requirement set forth in Section
13.01-2 of the Butte County Improvement Standards for Subdivisions.
4. Mains sha 1 I be of P. V.C. material and designed adequately to produce
the mi n i mum f i re f I ows and pressures requ i red.
5. Fire f low to be actuated by pressure demand system for Hydrants '"c'? and "d".
0. Hydrant installations wi 1 l be as per Exhibit A.
SPANISH GARDENS PARCEL MAP (Please See Exhibit B)
I . Hydrant location as per Exhibit B.
2. Minimum f ire f low of 300 gal Ions per minute w i 1 I be sustained for at least
a two hour period.
. Department of Forest
Butte County F i re Department
Attn: Bi 1 l Teie
September 10, 1980
Page Two
3. Pressure of the water utility shall be maintained in accordance with
Section 13.01-2 of the Butte County Improvement Standards for Sub-
divisions.
4. Main i nsta I l a -r i on .will be of P.V.C. material and of adequate size to
p rov i de the requ i red f i re f I ow a nd p ressu re.
5. Hydrant to be the Wharf type.
6. Fire flow to be actuated by a pressure demand system.
BUTTE CREEK INDUSTRIAL COMMUNITY UNIT NO. I AND UNIT NO. 2 SUBDIVISIONS
(Please See Exhibit C)
1. Hydrant locations are shown schematically on Exhibit C and will be
p Iaced strategical I at a Iate r date.
2. A mi n i mum o f 500 ga 11 ons per m i nute f i re f i ow w i I l be ma i nta i ned for
at least a two hour period in Phase No. 1. Phase No. 2 sha I I prow i de
a minimum of 2,000 gallons per minute for at least two hours.
3. The pressure of the water utility sha l 1 be maintained in a%ccordanc:e with
Section 13.01-2 of the Butte County Improvement Standards for Subdivisions.
4. Mains sha I 1 be of P.V.C. materia I and sha I I have adequate size and provide
the requirements of minimum fire f I ows and pressure, see Exhibit C.
5. Hydrants to be Clow Rich 950 Model or Longbeac:h Iron Works 614 Model or
equa 1 .
6. Fire f low to be actuated by a pressure demand system.
7. The pond indicated on Exhibit C shall provide an adequate supply of water
under the requ i rements I i stud above, and sha l I be the off i c i a l f ire f low
source for both Phase No. I and Phase No. 2 development.
BUTTE CREEK EAST PLANNED AREA CLUSTER (Please See Exhibit D)
I .
Hydrant locations w i 1 1 be as per Exhibit D.
2. Fire f lows w i I I maintain a minimum of 500 gal Ions per minute for a period
of two hours.
3. Pressure of the water- utility will be maintained in accordance with
Section 13.01-2 of the Butte County Improvement Standards for Subdivisions.
4. Ma i ns sha I 1 be of P. V. C. mater i a I and sha I I be of adequate s i le to ma i re t a i n
-f h; -al f i re f I ow s and pre sur^s req!j i re;d.
5. Hydrants to be the Wharf type hydrant.
6. Fire. flows to bE� actuated by a presSUre demand ,i stem.
7. Fire f low purnp i ng station and dra �t inlet w i I I be as per Exhibit D.
• Department of Forest
' Butte County -Fire Department
Attn: gill Teie
September 10, 1980
Page Three
8. Setback requirements from the street curb sha i I be 15 feet.
9. Access provided by the two entrances connecting the project to
Honey Run Road shall be sufficient provided the roadway width be in-
creased over and above the standard subdivision roadway to a paved
width of 30 feet.
Asa resu-It of our meeting, we are moving ahead on the design and develop-
ment
evelop--
ment of these projects based on the requirements as listed above. I n order
that we have a clear understanding regarding such requirements, please send
a response in the form of a letter verifying the various fire protection
packages as outlined.
Very truly yours,
BALOWIN CONTRACTING COMPANY INC.
It
Dallas Lewis
Vice President and General Manager
DL:sc
EXHIBIT A
Fire Hydrants "a" and "b" w i l I be installed with a County
Standard S-29 sw i mmn i ng pool connection and will be connected
to a swimming pool, exact locations pending .
Fire Hydrants "c" and "d" wi 1 l be installed at such a time as
an adequate fire protection system is installed on lands to the
south. However, the pipe and elbows for Hydrants "c" and "d"
wi I I be instal I ed as part of the original subdivision construction.
S-29 "Fleads" sha l I be instal led at such a time as f ire protection
is provided for .lands to the south.
r
K
Inter -Departmental Memorandum
TO: John Mendonsa, Assistant Director, Public Works
FROM: William C. Teie, County Fire Warden
SUBJECT: Fire Protection for Various Subdivisions and Parcel Maps
DATE: September 25, 19$0
Re: AP# 40-01-25, etc. - Butte Creek East PA -C, ERD Log 79-03-12-03
AP# 40-41-13,14 - Spanish Gardens
AP//40-40-31 - Southgate Acres Subdivision # 2
AP# 40-02-03 - Butte Creek Industrial Community Unit #1 & #2 Subdivisions
Applicant - Baldwin Contracting Company
The items listed on the attached correspondence and exhibits from Baldwin
Contracting Company, for the above four projects, meet the fire protection
requirements stipulated by the Butte County Fire Department and California
Department of Forestry.
jc
cc: Hilda Wheeler
Baldwin Contracting
H. Reed
R. Tiller
6 [ -to (— J
7"C4 o w
�Dr,.��.uc�7iLrJt�s ?
4;/bwG6G CnAO-1
WY -220
S�t.0 wG Lo 7S
V � C--) (.02,
r;T,vAM TE
County Fi: e W
�o7s �vcticl.t,
1�v5/bw•-r?cam
6 [ -to (— J
7"C4 o w
�Dr,.��.uc�7iLrJt�s ?
WIN CONTRACTING COMP.
1 N C.
GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS
0
GENERAL OFFICES - NINTH AND YUBA STREETS - MARYSVILLE, CALIF. 95901 (916) 742-5141
POST OFFICE BOX 311
Department of Forestry
Butte County Fire Department
176 Nelson Avenue
Oroville, California 95965
ATTN: BILL TEIE
September 10, 1980
i
C•J'..iii •i
RE: FIRE PROTECTION FOR VARIOUS SUBDIVISIONS AND PARCEL MAPS
Gentlemen:
This will confirm our understanding of determinations made during our
meeting of September 5, 1980 in regard to the above referenced subject
matter. The meeting was attended by: Bill Teie, Ranger in Charge;
John Thurman, North Division Chief; Hector Reed, State Forest Ranger l;
Dallas Lewis, Vice President and General Manager of Baldwin Contracting
Company Inc.; and Chris Baldwin with Butte Creek Rock Company. A recap
of the total fire protection requirement package for each development is
listed below:
SOUTHGATE ACRES SUBDIVISION UNIT NO. 2 (Please See Exhibit A)
I. Hydrant locations as per Exhibit A.
2. Fire protection provided by swimming pool connections, Standard S-29
as per Exhibit A.
3. Pressure will be maintained at the requirement set forth in Section
13.01-2 of the Butte County Improvement Standards for Subdivisions.
4. Mains shall be of P.V.C. material and designed adequately to produce
the minimum fire flows and pressures required.
5. Fire flow to be actuated by pressure demand system for Hydrants "c" and "d".
C. Hydrant installations will be as per Exhibit A.
SP,�NISH- GARDENS PARCEL MAP (Please See Exhibit B)
I. Hydrant location as per Exhibit B.
2. Minimum fire flow of 300 gallons per minute will be sustained for at least
a two hour period.
1 3
Department of Fo resi-�' `
Butte County Fire Department
Attn: Bill Teie
September 10, 1980
Page Two
3. Pressure of the water utility shalt be maintained in accordance with
Section 13.01-2 of the Butte County Improvement Standards for Sub-
divisions.
4. Main installation will be of P.V.C. material and of adequate size to
provide the required fire flow and pressure.
5. Hydrant to be the Wharf type.
6. Fire flow to be actuated by a pressure demand system.
BUTTE CREEK INDUSTRIAL COMMUNITY UNIT N0. I AND UNIT NO. 2 SUBDIVISIONS
(Please See Exhibit C)
I. Hydrant locations are shown schematically on Exhibit C and will be
placed strategically at a later date.
2. A minimum of 500 gallons per minute fire flow will be maintained for
at least a -two hour period in Phase No. I. Phase No. 2 shall provide
a minimum of 2,000 gallons per minute for at least two hours.
3. The. pressure of the water utility shall be maintained in accordance with
Section 13.01-2 of the Butte County Improvement Standards for Subdivisions.
4. Mains shall be of P.V.C. material and shall have adequate size and provide
the requirements of minimum fire flows and pressure, see Exhibit C.
5. Hydrants to be Clow Rich 950 Model or Longbeach Iron Works 614 Model or
equal.
6. Fire flow to be actuated by a pressure demand system.
7. The pond indicated on Exhibit C shall provide an adequate supply of water
under the requirements listed above, and shall be the official fire flow
source for both Phase No. I and Phase No. 2 development.
BUTTE CREEK EAST PLANNED AREA CLUSTER (Please See Exhibit D)
1. Hydrant locations will be as per Exhibit D.
2. Fire flows will maintain a minimum of 500 gallons per minute for a period
of two hours.
3. Pressure of the water- utility will be maintained in accordance with
Section 13.01-2, of the Butte County Improvement Standards for Subdivisions.
4. Mains shall be of P.V.C. material and shall be of adequate size to maintain
the f i rc t low,; sand pressures requ i red.
5. Hydrants to be the Wharf type hydrant.
6. Fire flows to be actuated by a pressure demand ,ystem.
7. Fire flow pumping station and draft inlet will be as per Exhibit D.
pepartment of Forest
Butte County Fire Department -
Attn: Bill Teie
September 10, 1980
Page Three
8. Setback requirements from the s-reet curb shall be 15 feed-.
9. Access provided by the two entrances connecting the project to
Honey Run Road shall be sufficient provided the roadway width be in-
creased over and above the standard subdivision roadway to a paved
width of 30 feet.
As a result of our meeting, we are moving ahead on the design and develop-
ment of these projects based on the requirements as listed above. In order
that we have a clear understanding regarding such requirements, please send
a response in -the form of a letter verifying the various fire protection
packages as outlined.
Very truly yours,
BALDWIN CONTRACTING COMPANY INC.
Dallas Lewis
Vice President and General Manager
DL:sc
EXHIBIT A
Fire Hydrants "a" and "b" will be installed with a County
Standard S-2.9 swimming pool connection and will be connected
to a swimming pool, exact locations pending.
Fire Hydrants "c" and "d" will be installed at such a time as
an adequate fire protection system is installed on lands to the
south. However, the pipe and elbows for Hydrants "c" and "d"
will be installed as part of the original subdivision construction.
S-29 "♦•leads" shall be installed at such a time as fire protection
is provided for .bands to the south.
INC.
GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRA,C.TORS
GENERAL OFFICES - NINTH AND YUBA STREETS - MARYSVILLE, CALIF. 95901 (916) 742-5141
POST OFFICE BOX 31i
September 10, 1980
Department of Forestry
Butte County Fire Department
176 Nelson Avenue
Oroville, California 95965
ATTN: BILL TEIE
"y
LSU ! i C. C0UIN! I
RE: FIRE PROTECTION FOR VARIOUS SUBDIVISIONS AND PARCEL MAPS
Gentlemen:
This will confirm our understanding of determinations made during our
meeting of September 5, 1980 in regard to the above referenced subject
matter. The meeting was attended by: Bill Teie, Ranger in Charge;
John Thurman, North Division Chief; Hector Reed, State Forest Ranger I;
Dallas Lewis, Vice President and General Manager of Baldwin Contracting
Company Inc.; and Chris Baldwin with Butte Creek Rock Company. A recap
of the total fire protection requirement package for each development is
listed below:
SOUTHGATE ACRES SUBDIVISION UNIT NO. 2 (Please See Exhibit A)
1. Hydrant locations as per Exhibit A.
2. Fire protection provided by swimming pool connections, Standard S-29
as per Exhibit A.
3. Pressure will be maintained at the requirement set forth in Section
13.01-2 of 'the Butte County Improvement Standards for Subdivisions.
4. Mains shall be of P.V.C. material and designed adequately to produce
the minimum fire flows and pressures required.
5. Fire flow to be actuated by pressure demand system for Hydrants "c" and ''d".
6. Hydrant installations will be as per Exhibit A.
SPANISH GARDENS PARCEL MAP (Please See Exhibit B)
I. Hydrant location as per Exhibit B.
2. Minimum fire flow of 300 gallons per minute will, (be sustained for at least
a two hour period.
--------�--------l_____�__�_
Inter-Departmentol Memorandum
TO: Department of Public Works
FROM: William C. Teie, County Fire Warderf
SUBJECT: Fire Protection Requirements, Tentative Parcel Map
,Baldwin Construction Go., AN/ 4o -4o-02107
DATE:
January 19, 1981
In lieu of the original fire protection requirein'ents of 8 fire hydrants
and 2,000 GPM fire flow requirements, the Butte County Fire Department
will accept the following*
1. At time of development of each parcel, a 10,000_ gallon storage tank
with a drafting connection to be installed. Piping to be minimum of
4 'Inch and the pumper connection to be 411 inlet x 4Y2!1 National Hose
thread male with protection cap, all to S-29 Standards.
2. Provide domestic water line to storage tank to maintain level of
water in storage tank.
.3. Provide all weather access to drafting connections
L Ce TSE
Count ire Warden
jc
.b
!
BUTTE CO NTY DIR PA RIK ? NT OF PUB L: C WORKS
LAID DIVISION REVIEW R,-'Q'JES`r �:�, r';•,: : i,�:� ...
To: Forestry DA`L'- : 4-28-81
AY N 0 .: 40-02-133 ......._ .._ _ ...�..�.. RE TUM BY: 5-18-81
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ,.._. TENTATIVE PARCEL "MAP f-A"N0 IZ:ycf nP'"rt-.T 'ere-
, 1''. IC_4NI': Baldwin Contracting Company ,
Q W11 _� I _J v f
ENGINE ER: McCain Associates
CONDI TIONS AND/OR CO:`iiEN'TS : The following conditions will bA met prior to
occupancy of any building; on the created parcels:
I Water Supply:, A :•rater supply ,system is required. The preferable system is
a h ;rdrant swste[ ca-pab1 e o. Meeting _these requirements. If this is not feasible,
independent pumps, static water storage and dry standpipes
system involving
ma -v be substituted. available eater flaw from sucha System rust meet the
flow recuirements as o.itl i.ned in Attacrhm ant 1.
To meet th(:�se rcquiremerts will require the installation of, 1 fire hydrant" at
location .i n. li.cated by red circle on the attaches; drawinf.. Reauired fire flow
of these hydrants is x.000 fpm at 20-125 psis for a period of at least two hours.
M nimu,m hydrant size is 6" maximum hydrant to !IAL
lvdrant. spacing is 300 fesn't.
Hydrants shall be Clow Rich 950 Model or Long Beach Iron works 614 l"iodelt and
shall be in.-talled according to Butt County Publ.i z; I orks Starida.rd -?? .nrl
local we-AtE:r e ency requirements.
ci
�•'-�� 1 Serr ra Z o*� • Require re all building spacer in ex cess of � , )
square feet to be divided ,by two-hour fire wall sOparations that provide
C
onn n -'.:o its plenem and d.i'kr•ide the b=pi dings into spa—.3 :s o.- S, 0 square- xet_�
cr fess cr install aut oriat i c sprink? e.:�s .
Buildib!- Height: Any building- four or ;yore stories in height must be felly
rU.; !2u W1 ,Vau omatic sprinklers. E n ai. d ng� hopisirla any azax'c..Qus or
La,•rim.�ble processe.-3 sha-11 be equipped wit',h Gaut>>:ttati.o. sprink�.ers. Automatic
s p n . e r s ye M. n sl ; a l l ti i1 S. T. 3 C r C3 :' Cl c�.7] C F' ��I :L n ,�. 1.O na 11�: O leg
�Stand�rd for the Inst•11.ation of •Sr�rinkler ",,rsterns and ?2C :�tar�d?.,rd for
i4mvte S gat ton Pro teCt ivn S3 -,n% s.linr' S -!I 'stE:'rmS.
NORM
i • •�'�.'':loteE' c'�n - __ -He-:-.t �'t ��'i, t or : .1:�il.i�' :C•i1 d..hf'at . d� to.-Ncf-t'-ir S'I�1. b�' instal'ted in
.1 I 01,ellin '.,mit18
•�� titt� iG-''t��'�'...L a. ei? c�s f �Jri�) •
S^� e .� d}.tectorc in e;h bodroom, outside each sleein the vricl:r.%ty of
• t �::
bad ►•oo ;: in any bas f-mi?nt , 1. —indry room , f ! trnac e roam , a.n(i each a�:ldz t i onnl
ory of •! ivin uni+ not eted, �xc�zdi�,c�ai .9pac ao and un.f i. ni...s-_hed
� } x: I C S
r�r7 t <J�L.�vt 1L 7 :1 .11 f,i ti
1r\✓ or oV4rh•.•�iv.l ♦•rGi•:17. ►7'•;c�C�, v•'.�ch kitc',':en :-lncl "✓'}:.�1..hL-4 d.
Sarac" .� tallation shall National 14'ire C:odcs r'r In-stni I ati on atta :dar=:i.
LD 1-170��6-80)
r-+
1,,0-a (D c
S.
3.
•
j s -+,r t��
.�
r r -•i
r-•# r- t
• _ :: �... 7 fel ,
e �' •� lam— ti!
r-4yy
�t C' ;4 ..
1-4
rr 4J r
-t 03 4
4-� J:� 4L
Q.- • r-1 C
r-4
1
Department of Fort. Y '►
Butte County F i re L)epartrnent
Attn : Bi I I Tei e
September 10, 1980
Page Two
N
.a 3. Pressure of the water u i I i ty sha I I be ma i nta i ned •i n accordance with
•p Section 1.3.01--2 of the Butte County Improvement Standards for Sub-
divisions.
4. Main instal l6t i on w i I I be of P.V.C. material and of adequate size to
p rov i de the requ i rod f ire f low and pressure.
5. Hydrant to be the Wharf type.
6. Fire f low to be actuated by a pressure demand system.
/BUTTE CREEK INDUSTRIAL COMMUNITY UNIT T N0. 1 AND UNIT No, 2 SUBDIVISIONS
(Please See Exhibit C)
1. Hydrant locations a r,e shown schematically on -Exhibit C and w i (( be
p I aced st rated i ca I I y at a I ater * date.
2. A minimum •Qf 500 gal Ions per minute f ire f low w i l I be maintained for
at least a two hour period in Phase No. 1. Phase No. 2 shall provide
a minimum of 2,000 gallons per minute for at least two hours.
3. The pressure of the water ut i I i ty sha l I be maintained in accordance with
Section 13.01-2 of the Butte County Improvement Standards for Subdivisions.
4. Mains sha I I be of P.V.C. material and s ha I I have adequate size and provide
the requirements of minimum fire -f-lows and pressure, see - Exhibit C.
5. Hydrants to be Clow Rich 950 Model or Longbeac:h Iron Works 6 { 4 Model or
equal.
b. Fire f low to be actuated by a pressure demand system.
7. The pond indicated on Exhibit C shall prov i de an adequat6 supply of water
under the requirements I is -fed above, and sha l I be the of f i c i a l f ire f low
source for both Phase No. 1 and Phase No. 2 development..
BUTTE CREEK EAST PLANNED AREA CLUSTER (Please See Exhibit D)
1 . Hydrant locations will be as per Exhibit D.
2. Fire f lows w i l l maintain a minimum of 500 gal Ions per minute for a period
of two hours.
3. Pressure of the water ut i I i ty wi I I be ma i ni-a i ned i n accordance with
Section 13.01-2 of the Butte County I m p roverflen t Standards for S u bd i v i .s i on s.
4. Mains shall be of P.V.C. materia( and shall be of adequate size to maintain
the fire flows and pressures required.
5. Hydrants to be the Wharf type hydrant.
b. Fire flows to be actuated by a pressure demand system.
7. Fire f low pumping station and draft inlet will be as per Exhibit D.
i. .
APPENDIX E
Application to the But Le Count
Local Agency Formation Commission
APPLICATION INFORMATION
FAO CO. PJ&wirq COOYM
A;1.341983
oroyme, "twui4
Date riled
A. Applicarc(s) Name `--ilium s .pane, '?a.lcom :ravrE,r} Baldwin Contr,=i^+ n_
Adaress
Sig-naure /
;gll.iam ; . Ti wne /
_ Baldwin Contracting Co. Inc.„y
�Iiiisi1 S M
r. Vicom Fre...
B. Project Site
Address
Assessor's Parcel Number
40-4t.')--9. 11, 12, 13, 15, lo, 24, 27, 26, 33, t C _40-3) , 40-0�-135, 40-02-1. 7
C. flame, address, and telephone number, o person to oe contacted
concerning this project: Pall,;,, T.� ;�, !z -1,a S -wa;r, r -i:-„
D. List and describe any other related o_ermits and other public
approvals required for this project, including ti -nose required
by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
Countv of Butte, Tentative Subdivision 'lap; Dent. of dater Resources.
Storm Drainage.
PROJECT DESCRIPTIC1
A. Statutory provisions
under which
this
application i:-
proposed:
Condition of
approval for
the tentative
r:aps:of
Southgate Acre,
Subd.,
Southgate Acres Sub. Unit 2 and Southgate Industrial Sub. Unit No. 2.
B. Affected city or district N/,
C. Justification
1 , 4vin are i:he reasons for this initiation, of this pro -;oral
LQ provide Eermanent solutionto storm drainage and .—Fire . -Prot ec`n
to the area. `�
4. Taxes and property value
(a) Assessed valuation in subject area
(1) Land see attachment
(2) Improvements see attachment
(b) Present level of ad valorem taxes see attachment
(c) Tax rate after proposed action will not change
(d) Special district or other taxes proposed to be
eliminated, if any n =p
(e) Tax code areas see att hmennt
PROJECT AREA - REGIONAL SETTING
A. Housing
1. Estimated increase in dwelling units, on adjacent
parcels, within next 10 years
Unincorporated 30
Incorporated 10
B. Economic factors
1. Land use of adjacent parcels
agricultural
2 . Zoning of adjacent parcels A-2- M_2
C. Commercial activities
1. Amount of sales tax collected in su:ject area
2. Describe commercial and/or industrial facilities within
the sub j ect area, if any retail lumber yard, light manufacturing ,
wholesale, and storage.
LI]
3. Industrial
If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per
shift, and loading facilities L;zht ?n ustrial - 2D
employees, no loading, similar to existing.
4. Institutional
If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from
the project N/A
5. Agricultural
Type of crop or livestock
o. Other
PROJECT SITE - EXISTING SETTING
A. Physical features
1. Land area
a. Square miles
b. Acres 340 acres
2. General description of topography relatively level site,
consistip- of dred�Pr flailing ravels soils, and loamy soils with
M -Q exi si ij g �mcnd , cottonwood._, enalish walnut and other scattered
trees.
3 of 7
W
3. Describe "natural" boundaries (rivers, mountains,
freeways, etc.) Entler AvF n,;e to the north, Highway 99 to
east, and Butte Creek to the southeast.
4. Describe drainage basins, rivers, flood control channels,
etc. --
5. Describe major highways and streets that serve general
area Entler Avenue, Highway 99.
B. Social factors
1., Population
(a) Population on project site 12
(b) Population density _l
(c) Number of registered voters
2. Housing
(a) Number and type of housing units on project site
CO
4 single family residential
C. Economic factors
Describe present:
1. Land use on project site single family residential, industrial.
2 Zoning on ?roject site SR -1, M-2, L-1, A-2
3. General plan designa� ici'i Low dens10y residential, industrial
(Cit-; and Cou—nity )
j
i
•,t
•
2. What are the alternate courses of action
re
irotPction
"n
for
3. How were the boundaries of the proposal determined and
why this particular area rather than a small or larger
area r
anri
4. If a waiver under the Government Code 554790(g) is
requested, explain why the prohibition of an island
would be detrimental to the orderly development of the
community rriA
D. Type of anticipated land use
1. Residential
a. dumber of additional units 4r}
b. Populaticn increase on subjecter
ro
P P ty 1,
C. Popula--ion increase on adjacent parcels:
(1) Incorporated area
(2) Unincorporated area 1.5*
2. Commercial
If commercial, indicate type, whether neighborhood, cite
or regionally or:_ented, square footage of sales area,
and loading facilities Neighborhoo Cot7rtPr�;,,
Azaa
900-100_ 0 i_Ft . o lOar�ira area
-;nil ar to Py; ��-
n rr
3. Proximity of subject area to major commercial and/or
industrial facilities (civic centers, airports, shopping
centers, sawmills, etc.) _ { miles to L,,o�4pto n chico, 1
7 rt -;1-._ t� ('}:porn Nliini r;n.a1 A-' r- nr- ail tI Ll mi e�•., to north Valle- -...
4. Governmental facilities (structures in subject area)
N/A
D. Governmental Services
1. Indicate
governmental services
b
provided to
P
subject areas:
AGENCY PROVIDING SERVICES
I
Af ed
Now Proposed
Action
(a)
Police
Sheriff
Sheriff
(b)
Health
Butte Co.
Butte Co.
(c)
Fire
Butte Co.
Butte Co.
(d)
Sewage disposal
Butte Co.
Butte Co.
(e)
Refuse collection
Private
Private
(r)
Street maintenance
County
County
(g)
Street lighting
None
None
r
�h)
Library services
Butte co.
Butte Co.
(i)
Parks
N/A
N/A
i(
j )
Playgrounds
N/A
N/A
(k)
Schools
Public Schools
Public Schools
(1)
Land -use planning
Butte Co.
Butte Co.
i
(m)
Building regulation_
Butte County
Butte Co.
(n)
Public transportaL.ion
Butte Co.
Butte Co.
(o)
Water supply
Individual
Individual
(pl
Util-'Lies (gas electric)
P.G. E.
(q)
Other
PT. ET.
2. Describe those governmental services that are not now
provided in subject area, or which should be provided
at an increased level Zi/A -_
3. Describe how your proposal meets the governmental needs
of subject area, including corgezits on proposed new
services andior increases in t`!e level of specific services
4. Zf new services are provided, how will co -`s be met
property taxes, connecci.on fees, special assessment
districts, or other sour'es _LCL'^ECti rnai than a
mai.,rA �n�a ana .
cos _ Col 1 erten at time r�1 nna ty to tac aYP
,a: ; '! - —
5. :has any of the sa=ne territory been included within a
proposal denied by the Commission within the preceeding
year no
b. It is desired that this proposal provide for and be made
subject to the following terms and conditions:
NO
-�-NY OTHER COIA-MENT WHICH YOU WISH 'i0 ' IL%YE:
Person completing this questionnaire
Executive Vice Presiden'-, Baldz7in. Contr.
e- Title Co. Lnc.
i
Address flione
{
i+sERE1�". �...5'F.'.F'RSih^-.C'^'z-.....,.�.n.: :"- " �a s. mow'.:..: , r�i _,. �f:1i8. t'i?u La.:.".'�... _.,'y-,�3G�+:s •rt.. ., ,::- ..'i..'�....,ais�•"_:..'s'1:�d.w�i?�i^}�°5.:..".
i
1NVMOAH 3UTA t#
31:6 io3 O►ad\�iu
Ol
ONOdj 3y:{d '33NI'1` \ \\\\ \
\\\ \ \
`A
\\
1131M 'd dmnd \\�
\7" 7,
w \
.\ZA\.
NVId 31.15
Z 3unoi-j
LWU
\\\\\\\ \ \1\4w\\\.
1 \\\\\\\\\\\.\\\\\ \
C \\\�\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ 0
\ ' �, i
RVISION
BUTTE COU!NTY F 1*RE DEPARTIENT
FIRE PROTECTION STANDARDS REVIEW
DEVELOPMENT NAME William Towne/Baldwin Cont.
LOCATION Ehler Avenue, Chico
his project must meet the requirements in the Uniform
u i l d i ng Code amended to Butte County standards,
n accordance with Secti-on .13.00 (Fire Standards) of the
mprovement Standards, the water requirements for this
arcel /project are: (Applicable standards are checked) .
AP# - 40-40-26
DATE 5 / 14 84
Calif. Department of Forestry
.f Butte County Fire Department
Cooperative Fire Protection
RICHARD D. TILLER
13.01-1 Requirement Class 1 . A water supply for Battalion Chief
fire protection will not be required.
13.01-2 Requirement Class 2. A pressurized water
system with adequatenumbers of hydrants is pre- OFFICE 916 891-2789
i
ferred, but if this s not feasible, the following
option will satisfy the fire department require-
ment f
equire-
men or water. ----- -- - - —
( ) a. Water storage tanks with a capacity of 10,000 gallons or more equipped i '
access and fire department connection (S-29); with direct all weather
( ) b. In ground swimming pools equipped with a drafting connection or drafting acce •
r,
c.
A dry standpipe system plumbed to a reliable water source. Such stand ss, o
exceed 1,000 feet in length* standpipe system will
11 not
There must be at least 10,000 gallons of water available and strategically located for each 10 dwellings,
1 e ,
or portions thereof. (Example: • 11 dwellings would require two separated sources). Provisions must be
made to insure that the water stored is always available and accessible for use under all weather conditions.
".
13.01-3 Requirement Class 3. A pressurized community water system is required. Tentative
locations are indicated on the attached preliminary map. Final locationmust hydrant
recorded on the final maps P s must be exactly indicated and
Number of hydrants required maximum hydrant to hydrant spacing feet hydrant size
ti.a.n name and modet)_
and installed according to Butte County Public Works specification,
ficati
p •n,
S-27 and requirements of local water agency. Requi red .fire flows areal lons per minute.
Mitigation flows listed under other conditions. g
13.01-4 Requirement Class 4. Water for fire protection is required. The preferable system is a hydrant
system capable of .meeting the fire flow requirements. If this is not feasible a system involving
inde-
pendent y olv�ng Ende-
p pumps, static water storage and dry standpipes may be substituted. Such a system is subject to
the approval of the fire department. The available water flow from such a system must flow 2,000
gallons per minute. The minimum volume of water in storage must be 10,000 gallons. Provisions must
be made to insure the system - •'
. y provided 1s maintained to its design capacity.
13.01-5 Requirement Class 5. - Pressurized water for fire protection is available within 1,000 feet of the
created parcels. In lieu of bearing the cost of installing a fire hydrant(s) the developer may pay into
the fire department hydrant fund. Pay in -lieu fee into hydrant fund based
wateJr. agency
on $1.25 per frontagePP
P foot. Frontage is indicated by the red line on the attached map. Approximate fee
is $ IRFinal frontage calculation to be made by surveyor and recorded on final map. Frontage
calculation will include both sides of the street on included streets.
P g
Required water system for fire protection must be installed and operating prior to building construction.
Other Conditions:
Installation must be approved by BCFD.
I) Response times for the f rst 3 f re engi nes is as fol lows : CDF/BCFD
1. Station #
2. Station #
3. Station
minutes
minutes
= minutes
In the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan, this project area is classified as a
fire hazard area.
WILLIAM C. THE
County Fire arden
By:
Battalion Chief
1/ Local water agency requirements for hydrants may be more restrictive.
1 /QA
BUTTE COUNTY FIRE HPARTI L IT
FIRE PROTECTION STANDARDS REVIEW
DEVELOPMENT NAME AP #
LOCATION -
This project must meet the requirements in the Uniform
Building Code amended to Butte County standards.
In accordance with Section 13.00 (Fire Standards) of the (ATTACH BUSINESS CARD HERE)
Improvement Standards, the water requirements for this
parcel/project are: (Applicable standards are checked).
( ) 13.01-1 Requirement Class 1. A water supply for fire
protection will not be required. However, if the
domestic water storage system has a capacity of 1,000
gallons or more, a fire department connection to
Butte County Public Works Standard S-29 shall be
installed. The fire department must be notified of any such connection. Such connection point must be located
so that it is readily accessible to fire department equipment.
( ) 13.01-2 Requirement Class 2. A pressurized water system with adequate numbers of hydrants is preferred, but if
this is not feasible, the following option will satisfy the fire department requirement for water.
( ) a. Water storage tanks with a capacity of 10,000 gallons or more, equipped with direct all weather access
and fire department connection (S-29);
( ) b. In ground swimming pools equipped with a drafting connection or drafting access; or,
( ) c. A dry standpipe system plumbed to a reliable water source. Such standpipe system will not exceed
1,000 feet in length.
There must be at least 10,000 gallons of water available and strategically located for each 10 dwellings, or
portions thereof. (Example: 11 dwellings would require two separated sources). Provisions must be made to
insure that the water stored is always available and accessible for use under all weather conditions.
( ) 13.01-3 Requirement Class 3. A pressurized community water system is required. Tentative hydrant locations are
indicated on the attached preliminary map. Final locations must be exactly indicated and recorded on the final
mapl/
Number of hydrants required maximum hydrant to hydrant spacing feet, hydrant size
and installed according to Butte Cnunty public Works Specification
(brand ncurie acid nwde4'I -
S-27 and requirements of local water agency.
( ) 13.01-4 Requirement Class 4. Water for fire protection is required. The preferable system is a hydrant system
capable of meeting the fire flow requirements. If this is not feasible, a system involving independent pumps,
static water storage and dry standpipes may be substituted. Such a system is subject to the approval of the fire
department. The available water flow from such a system must flow , gallons per minute. The minimum
volume of water in storage must be 40 ,0(jt_)_ _gallons. Provisions must be made to insure the system provided
is maintained to its design capacity.
( ) 13.01-5 Requirement Class 5. Pressurized water for fire protection is available within 1,000 feet of the created
parcels. In lieu of bearing the cost of installing a fire hydrant(s) the developer may pay into the fire depart-
ment hydrant fund. Pay in -lieu fee into_ hydrant fund based on $1.25 per frontage
(ruatc a agency)
foot. Frontage is indicated by the red line on the attached map. Approximate fee is $ Final
frontage calculation to be made by surveyor and recorded on final map. Frontage calculation will include both
sides of the street on included streets.
(' ) Other Conditions:
( ) Response times for the first 3 fire engines is as follows:
CDF/BCFD
1. Station # = minutes
2. Station # = minutes
3. Station # = minutes
( ) In the Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan, this project area is classified as a
fire hazard area.
WILLIAM C. TEIE
County Fire_Warden
cc: BCFD File
Battalion Chief
By:
Battalion Chief
l/ Local water agency requirements for hydrants may be more restrictive.
inter-Departmentaal Memora odum
ro: Board of Supervisors
i
FROM. Bill Turpin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT! COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO., 90 AND COUNTY SERVICE AREA NO. 93
DATE: March 20, 1985
County Service Area No. 90
The proposed formation of County Service Area No. 90 was init-
iated by a resolution of the Board of Supervisors in August of
1983. Because this project was proposed in conjunction with a
subdivision to create Southgate Industrial Paris Unit No. 2, an
EIR was proposed which considered t;,e impacts of both projects
(copy enclosed). This EIR was certified by the Advisory Agency,
and one of the conditions of the Tentative Subdivision Map was
the formation of a county service area for storm drainage and
fire hydrants. The application contains the signature of
William S. Towne and Baldwin Contracting Company, both of which
are major landowners in the area, according to Assessor's
records. LAFCo considered this proposed formation and approved
it.
It is the Board of Supervisors' responsibility to hold a hearing
to consider protests and, after that hearing, to decide whether
or not to form the proposed county service area. A map of the
proposed county service area is enclosed for the Board's
information.
County Service Area No. 93
In June of 3984, the formation of County Service Area No. 93
was initiated by the signatures of .Jane Dolan and Hilda Wheeler,
as permitted by law. County Service Area No. 93 provides a
permanent solution to drainage as required by the Advisory
Agency in the approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map for the
Pleasant Oak Subdivision. The purpose of this proposed county
service area is to provide storm drainage and street lighting
service to the area (a map of the proposed formation is enclosed).
The Board of Supervisors is required to hold a protest hearing
to hear those opposed to the formation of the county service
area. If a majority are not opposed, the Board, after the
hearing, may decide to either form or not fornt the proposed
county service area.
f
BT/ss
Enclosures
�, ".`�s'r 5... l.p; 1 n"'4toa..woc.;. ". ..m i x ,�, .;. 'i .;:� a:.'.� sr '"':'Y .:�'7; "°4 ,•,n.,.$ ' :", ,;a ,�"A'.;ay .,W,.
wlt
:11111END 11 B
DESCRIPTION
COUNTY OF BtiTTE SERVICE ARIE'A ii�
.all thzt certain real property situate in the County of Eutte, State
of California, described as follows:
Being all of Lot 15 and a portion of Lot 20 as shown, on that certain
`tap entitled, "Map of the Cussick Tract", which Map was recorded Nov-
ember 27, 1895, in Book 1 of Maps, at page 48, in the office of the
Recorder, County of Butte, State of California, and being more par-
ticularly described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of Parcel 2 as shown on that cer-
tain parcel map recorded November 9, 1979 in Book 1:3 of Parcel Maps,
at pages 83 and 84, in the office of the Recorder, County of Butte,
State of California; Thence North 37011.'00" Fest ra distance of
490.60 feet to the centerline of East Avenue; Thence South 52°44'38"
.:est a distance of 804.86 feet to the centerline point of East
Avenue and Alamo Avenue; Thence South 37°34'06" East a distance of
682.06 feet to the beginning of a 200.00 foot radius curve to the
left; Thence along the arc of said curve through a central angle of
54°59'54" an arc distance of 191.98 feet; Thence North 87926'00"
East a distance of 72.03 feet to the beginning of a 96.15 foot radius
curve to the left; Thence along the are of ss -aid curve through a
central angle of 43908'50" an arc distance of 72.41 feet; Thence North
60916'34" East a distance of 60.00 feet to the southeast corner of
Parcel 3 as shown on said Parcel Map; Thence North 37911'00" West,
along the northeasterly lire of said Parcel 3, a distat:ce of 4.19.72
feet to the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2; Thence NorLh 52°
:4'38" Ecst, along said southeasterly line of Parcel 2, a distance
U£ 526.24 feet to the point of beginning, containing 11.24 acres,
more or less.
APPENDIX A
BY /1CCAIN ASSOC ATI= -S
1105 FORTRESS 9T. CHCCO,CA.9392U 091-0030
DATE: JNX. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SURVEYORS
COUNTY SERVICE. ARFA
DrSCRIPTION
PAGE OF
JOB r4o.
k3 y
All that certain real propexty situate in the ('ounty of Butte,
State of California, described as follows:
Being a portion of Sections ;,►),? �. R, Townsh io 21 "forth, Range
2 East, I`i. D. B. & M., and Fiore particularly described as follows:
Co7unencincT at the most Easterly corner of the :second Subdivision
of the J. F. Entler Ranch, according to the Revised I'lar) thereof
recorded in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Butte,
State of Califarnia, which point is the intersection of the
Southerly line of said Subdivision with the Southerly line of
the right-of-way of the Stirling City Branch of the Southern
Pacific Railroad; thence from said point South 16155' Hest alone;
the Southerly line of said Second Subdivision of the J. F. Entler
Ranch 375.2 feet to a point on the Southwesterly line of State
Highway 99 and the True Point of Beginning for the Parcel herein
described; thence from said Point of Reoinninti ',<()rLh 40°41' test
along the Southwesterly line of said State I!icjjw,-jy d90.R feet to
a point on the Southerlv line of the Stirling Cit•, Branch of
the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of_ -way! thenco North 75114'45"
I.'est along the Southerly line of said railroad ri(itit-of-wav 234.0
feet to a point on the Northwesterly line of Fritler ;~venue, said
point also being the beginning of a 350.00 foot radius curve to the
left; thence along the arc or said ,:urge, through a central angle
of 47°45'52°' an arc length of 291.78 feet; thence continuing alonrr
the Northwesterly line of said Entler avenue South 56043107" !-'est
2754.3 feet: thence leaving said line South 33°17'45" Fast 774.2
feet to a point on the Southerly line of said Second Subdivision
of the J. F. Entler Ranch; thence North 5642'42" East along said
Subdivision line 2193.5 feet; thence South 01025'55" !-Test 2027.4
feet to a point on the Southerly line of said Section 6; thence
Easterly alone: said line 67.2 feet; thence Southerly 2025.6 feet:
thence South 89031' East 3615.0 feet; thence North 02°29' Fast
687.4 feet; thence South 8936' Fast 427.4 feet to a coint in the
centerline of Butte Creek; thence along the centerline of said
Butte Creels the following courses and distances, North 08058" *Fest
108.8 feet, *forth 28031' Fast 196.9 feet and North 58122' Fast
70 feet more or less to a point on the Southerly line of said
Stats Highway 99: thence North 40°41' -est along said State High-
way 482a.0feet; thence .forth 56°55' East 71.5 feet to the point of
beginning.
SUPPLEMENTAL
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPtACT REPORT
for
SOUTHGATE INDUSTRIAL PAPK UNIT m2
AP 40-40-26, 44
Proposed by:
Butte Creek Construction Company
1764 Skyway
Chico, CA 951)26
Prepared by:
ECO -ANALYSTS
114 West Seventh Avenue
Chico, CA 95926
(916) 342-5991
August 1984
September 1984
October 1984
Log #-- a3-08-23-02
SCH # 84082811
1:1to' the two 7:)nds shl own on rano '. , i �.e`.'
.` s- des igxipeed for storage of waterfor fire stip_
pression. A well- and sm4ll Dump wil:i b-.. used t., keep this pont
filled with water. This pond, as iteslgned, cZ-.r hold approx maty..1%
300,000 gallons of water.
The second pond is designed specific, ,.�, po.r starmivat.er
retention and will require on.(.y :niaor modifications to the existin.-�
pond. This pond will 3ontain approximately five acre feet of
wate- it should be noted that in wet years, the very shallow
watertable rigs into the E,xi: ting mond up to a depth of !-fur feet,
reducing the .15 foot maximum depth foo -t stcrmwater'' storage.
These ponds should be designed so that sto.rmwater f:Low,i first
into the deterition pond and then to the pond for storage of water
for Aire suppress, ton. This' will reduce parti,.ulatez in the latter,
preventing possible damage to fire truck pumpz .
The Parcel A pond systern will be sig, i to handle runoff from
Units 1 and 2 ;,z both the residential and industrial subdivisions.
The complete drainage system for the CSA will :include an additional
detention basin along the southern; boundary of the CSA. A shallow,
open ditch will carry stormwater from the initial detention pond
to the southern: detention pond on Pares l B. This detention pord
will be d6signed when additional development begins to occur in
the CSA. In he event of an extremely inte:;se storm, o-Terflow
from this pond will be pumped into Butte Creek. Figure 5 shows
the master drainage plan.
1ar{"l-n
use -.:... .. _ .. .. r .,. '
.i
I -
Z
a
W
cc
a
I
-
�o a
v
z
a
�
O
O
cc
}
� f
a
CCLL
(L
�s
m
uj
O
FGtc?iT^i ii IIT act>
?development of the proposes', industrial park will cause
an increase in the rate and volume of stormwat.t r rune) i f . if
Unit #2 is designed and b1iilt like Unit #1, lot coverage by
impervious surfacing would be about AO percent or 28 acres.
Current runoff from the site .in an average annz.al storm event
(.b inches in 30 minutes) is about l cfs. Runoff from the
site of t ei development would be about 11 cis car an 11 -fold
increase. Stormwaters will be pumped and channelled toward
the.five acre retention pond on Parcel A through a series of
drains.
The final drainage system sand detention ponds will be
sized to handle drainage from an average annual storm event for
the 355 acres. The pumpin- of any excess stormwater into Butte
Creek may necessitate physical alterations of the streambank.
If this is the case, a. streambed alteration permit from the
Department of Fish and Game will be reuuired..
The drainage ponds proposed could create a. favorable envi-
ronment for regular mosquito production, creating a nuisance
for the residential areas.
Required Mitigations
I. The developer shall provide the Butte County Depart-
ment of Public Works with acceptable drainage plans
demonstrating that the proposed detention pond will
adequately handle stormwater runoff.
2. Drainage plans and the design of the fire and storm--
County Mosquito Abatement District to insure that the
proposal will not create a public nuisance.
3. The amount of impervious surface on each parcel shall
be limited •to that necessary for building, parking
and storage areas. Aggregate surfaces and landscaping
should be provided on each lot to allow for some per-
colation of stormwaters.
. Funding for the County Service Area shall be provided
by occupants of the service area• The developer shall
be responsi ire for fees for any unoccupied parcels in
the industrial park.`' f;
.. ��q�.9?4'!;+M .wr n �; tics a.�,,,�x _ "�T�?'•�
a
r�� ix
FIRE PROTECTION
Fire protection for the project sitewii l be provided
by the Butte County Fire Department/California Department of
Forestry. Their closest station is on Fair Street, approxl-
mately 3J miles northwest of the site. Response times would
exceed -Live minutes.
The proposed project includes a CSA. :for -Ci-cc protection..
The fire protection system wili consist of a water supply, main -
twined in a 300,000 gallon lined pond, connected to a series o:
hydrants located throughout the residential and industri�.l areae
(see Figure 2). A new, shallow we l will be drilled adjacent
to the lined pond to insure an adegi�s.te cvater levee., The pump
connected to the well will be regulated by a Sloa`, in the lined
}gond, supplying makeup water to : ,,I pen=ate for evaporation ant'
other losses. Maintenance and operation of th,: f ire 1,rotectiori
system will be turned over to county staff as part -J.F the CSA.
Recommended !Ijti-at ions
s No additional high fire risk businesses shouse', be
Gl owed in Southgate Industrial Parlc.
• Emergency access to al -1 storage areas should be ,.rcvided
by Knox Boxes.
C
t
i
V
ri
��R
y
� F '� � 4
ev� � 1 •4 "
j, Y r��{s� y � � - 1[ J . � J
�' d :i'
"'
k:
S'# .s+.'k.
APPENDIX 6 s
inter-Depnrtmenrul. Memorandum
Advisory .kgency
s last{1 i;� i;epartr;ent.
Env.ir amental Analysis for Tentative Subdivision Allap of
Southgate Industrial Pari: Unit on AP 40-40-26 f 44
Sep,Lenber 22, 1983
I'he proposed Southgate industrial Park Unit #2 represents an
incremental increase in the total Southgate Acres resideritial-Industria'
subdivision being developed by Jayred & Toone of San Francisco.
The current project is approximately 36 acres on two parcels
0-40-26 and 44, zoned ?•1-2, L-1, A-2.
In October of 1980 Jayred & Towne applied for and was granted a
rezone from A-2 to MI -2 on AP 40-40-26 (13,S ac.).At the time of the
rezone an initial study was undertaken. The initial study addressed
impacts associated with industrial development allowed by the
rezoning. For purposes of this project, the previous initial study
will be utilized.
SCOTT TANDY
Interim. Chief Administrative Officer
April 15, 2010
<<NAME>>
<<ADDRESS>>
<<CSZ>>
BUTTE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3380
Telephone: (530) 538-7631 Fax: (530) 538-7120
RE: CSA 90 (Southgate) - March 2010 Pond Inspection Results
Dear <<NAME>>:
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD
BILL CONNELLY
JANE DOLAN
MAUREEN KIRK
STEVE LAMBERT
KIM K. YAMAGUCHI
In follow-up to my letter dated February 12, 2010 to all property owners within Zones 2 and 3 of County
Service Area 90 (Southgate), I provide the following information from the pond inspection completed
by the Fire Department and Durham Pump on March 23, 2010.
What we know:
• The sump pump was surrounded by silt so Durham Pump was unable to start up the pump.
There is concern that starting the pump might force mud, muck, and other contaminants into the
sprinkler systems currently attached to the water supply, unless the system is completely
disconnected.
• The water level in the pond at the time of the inspection was 15' below the deck where the sump
pump is located.
• The bottom of the pond was 24' below that same deck, which means the pond was 9' deep at that
point.
• The pond is only 24.5' deep within arm's reach from the deck indicating that he pond was 9.5'
deep at that point.
• There was only 8' - 9' feet of water above the sump to draw from, if the pump was clear for
activation.
• Due to the low level of the pond over the past couple of years, a large amount of vegetation has
grown where water used to be making it difficult to determine how much water the pond
currently holds. The vegetation will need to be cleared out.
-.EPA
'GREEN _ ---�� �-_�
ADVANTAGE
POWER
PARTNER Butte County
www.AdvantageButteCounty.com
What we think:
• The pond will most likely drop significantly as the summer progresses.
• It is unknown what the recharge rate will be, if at all, due to the drop in the water level in that
area.
• It is unlikely that there is sufficient water in the pond for even one large fire event.
• It may be that the spring that originally fed the pond is no longer producing as much water as it
used to.
• The development in that area has changed the drainage pattern of surface water, which may be
affecting the recharge of the spring.
• It is hard to tell if the pump would start up and keep running, even if the mud is cleared out.
• It appears that even if the mud is pumped out, there is no barrier to keep it from building back up
around the sump pump.
• It does not appear that the pond level has changed much if any in the last couple of months.
Options:
Option #1
• Hire someone. to pump the mud out - estimate to clean out the mud around the sump pump is
$5,000 initially, but it may require on-going pumping.
• Once the pump is cleared, the estimated cost to get the system up and running is $30,000 -
$40,000. The pond may or may not contain enough water to meet fire flow requirements for one
large fire event. It is difficult to estimate the volume of water in the pond due to the unknown
depth of the pond in all areas.
Option #2
• Consider an alternate water source, per previous discussions.
Option #3
• Consider eliminating the fire hydrant function of the CSA and hook fire suppression sprinkler
systems in individual buildings to another water source.
Option #4 — what else?
CONFIDENTIAL
Fire Protection Systems funded through County Service Areas
Meeting to Discuss Legal/Risk Issues
August 27, 2009
Participants: Fire Department, Administration Department, County Counsel, Public Works
Department, Development Services Department
Topics for Discussion
1. CSA 90 — Entler Avenue
a. Water source (pond) has gone dry
b. Discuss options for providing new water source
c. Discuss the impact on current development within CSA
d. What else?
2. CSA 163 — Thorntree Industrial Park
a. System is not working
b. System appears to have been altered
c. Whose responsibility is it to remedy?
d. Discuss the impact on current development within CSA
e. Discuss options for providing required fire hydrant system
BUTTE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
Gregory G. Iturria
Interim Chief Administrative Officer
September 22, 2009
Mr. Ted Harford
DBI Beverage
71 Loren Ave
Chico, CA 95928
Mr. Harford,
25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 200
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3380
BILL CONNELLY
Telephone: (530) 538-7631 Fax: (530) 538-7120
JANE DOLAN
MAUREEN KIRK
STEVE LAMBERT
KIM K. YAMAGUCHI
This letter is sent in response to your calls to Fire Captain Matt Damon of the Butte County Fire
Department regarding the water source for the fire sprinkler system in your building located at
71 Loren Avenue in Chico. As you are aware, your property is part of County Service Area 90
(CSA 90), which provides drainage and fire hydrant maintenance services for properties within
its boundaries. The fire hydrant system that the CSA maintains has been fed by a pond that
relies on groundwater, since the system's installation in the 1980's. Based on aerial photos, it
appears the pond has been dry since approximately 2008 and the fire hydrants have been
designated as non-operative. Though it is ultimately the property owners' financial
responsibility to fund the solution for water provision to the fire hydrant system, County staff are
working on identifying options for alternate water sources to present to the property owners in
the CSA.
According to your discussion with Fire Captain Damon, the sprinkler system for your building
located at 71 Loren Avenue is connected directly to the CSA's water supply, though current
County staff were not aware of this connection previously and records reviewed to -date do not
indicate the CSA water supply as the source of water for private fire sprinkler systems. We will
continue to review our files and records to determine what private sprinkler systems are
connected directly to the CSA's water supply, and whether they may continue to be connected
directly to the CSA's water supply under the existing authority of the CSA. If the current
authority does not allow for the private sprinkler systems, staff will discuss what options are
available to property owners including amending the CSA's authority.
We anticipate completing our file review within the next few weeks and then scheduling a
meeting with all property owners to discuss options and a course of action for an alternate water
&EPA
'GREEN
POWER •
PARTNER
source for the fire hydrant system, m addition to determining the appropriateness of private
build'
s rinkler systems connected directly to the CSA fire hydrant system's water supply. If
Ing
p
y
you would like to further discuss this issue, please feel free to contact either Fire Captain Damon
or me directly. You can reach me at 538-2863.
Sincerely,
Shari McCracken
Deputy Chief Administrative Officer
cc: Supervisor Steve Lambert
Mike Crump, Director, Public Works Department
Tim Snellings, Director, Department of Development Services
Henri Brachais, Fire Chief
✓Matt Damon, Fire Captain
Scott Miller, NVB S
2